CONTENTS
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Objectives of this EM&A Programme 1
1.3 Content of this EM&A Manual 1
2 Project Description 2
2.1 The Subject Site and its Environs 2
2.2 Project Design 2
2.3 Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements 2
2.4 Environmental Management Plans 2
3 Project Organisation 3
3.2 Environmental Team 3
3.3 Independent Checker (Environmental) 4
3.4 The Contractor 4
3.5 Civil Engineering & Development Department 4
3.6 Environmental Protection Department 4
3.7 Engineer/Engineer’s Representative 4
4 Air Quality 6
4.1 Introduction 6
4.2 Environmental Audit 6
5 Noise 7
5.1 Introduction 7
5.2 Noise Monitoring Parameters 7
5.3 Monitoring Equipment 7
5.4 Monitoring Procedure 7
5.5 Proposed Monitoring Location 8
5.6 Baseline Monitoring 8
5.7 Impact Monitoring 8
5.8 Event and Action Plan 8
5.9 Noise Mitigation Measures 8
6 Waste Management 10
6.1 Introduction 10
6.2 Environmental Audit 10
7 Water Quality 11
7.1 Introduction 11
7.2 Environmental Audit 11
8 Ecology & fisheries 12
8.1 Introduction 12
8.2 Environmental Audit 12
9 Site Environmental Audit 13
9.1 Site Surveillance 13
9.2 Compliance with Legal and Contractual Requirements 13
9.3 Environmental Complaints 13
9.4 Documentation 14
10 Reporting 15
10.1 General 15
10.2 Baseline Monitoring Report 15
10.3 Monthly EM&A Reports 15
10.4 First Monthly EM&A Report 15
10.5 Subsequent Monthly EM&A Reports 17
10.6 Quarterly EM&A Summary Reports 18
10.7 Final EM&A Summary Report 19
10.8 Forms to be Adopted 20
10.9 Data Keeping 20
10.10 Interim Notifications of Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances 20
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Site
Location Plan
Figure 3.1 Organisation Chart of Different Stakeholders under the EM&A
Framework.
Figure 5.1 Proposed
Noise Monitoring Location
Figure 9.1 Preliminary
Site Inspection, Deficiency and Action Reporting System Flow Chart
Figure 9.2 Complaint
Investigation Flow Chart
LIST
OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Summary of Peng Chau Helipad Construction Programme
Table 5.1 Action Limit Levels for Construction Noise
APPENDICES
Appendix 1.1 Implementation
Schedule
Appendix 2.1 Construction
Schedule
Appendix 5.1 Event/Action
Plan
Appendix 10.1 Record Forms
1.1.1
In August 2002 BMT Asia Pacific
Limited (BMT) was awarded the contract for Agreement No. CE 18/2002: Environmental Impact Assessment Study for
Construction of Helipads at Peng Chau and Lamma Island / Investigation by
the Civil Engineering Office, Civil Engineering & Development Department
(CEDD). Two separate Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies have been
carried out for the proposed helipads at Peng Chau and Yung Shue Wan, Lamma
Island.
1.1.2
In accordance with the EIA Study
Brief, this Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual has been
prepared by the EIA Study Team to specify the recommended environmental
monitoring and audit requirements, where considered necessary for the concerned
environmental aspects, to ensure effective implementation of the environmental
protection and pollution control measures.
1.1.3
This Manual provides systematic procedures
for carrying out recommended monitoring and audit works for checking potential
environmental impacts that may arise from the construction of the helipad at
Peng Chau. Mitigation measures
recommended in the EIA report for each key environmental aspect are also
summarized and presented in this Manual.
1.1.4
The EM&A Manual has been developed
as a means to verify the effectiveness and adequacy of the mitigation measures
recommended in the EIA such that additional mitigation measures or remedial
action, if deemed necessary, can be formulated during the construction of the
project. The recommended EM&A
Programme is to be carried out by an Environmental Team (ET) formed before the
commencement of the works.
1.1.5
Environmental regulations currently
enforced in Hong Kong pertaining to air quality, noise, waste management, water
quality, and etc. and the recommendations given in the EIA Report have been
referenced to in the preparation of this EM&A Manual.
1.2.1
The main objectives of this EM&A
programme are:
·
To provide a database of baseline
environmental quality for subsequent checking during the construction phase of
the works;
·
To provide information at an early
stage for identification of potential problem areas and formulation of additional
environmental mitigation measures where necessary should any of the
environmental control measures or practices fail to achieve the target
standards;
·
To verify the environmental impacts
predicted in the EIA Study for the project;
·
To determine project compliance with
relevant regulatory standards, requirements and guidelines;
·
To outline remedial measures to be
undertaken if unexpected problems or unacceptable impacts arise; and
·
To provide data against which
environmental audits may be undertaken effectively.
1.3.1
The recommended EM&A programme in
this Manual contains the following information:
·
Duties of the various project staff
and their respective responsibilities with regards to the EM&A requirements
during construction;
·
Information on project organisation,
work schedule and activities;
·
Requirements with respect to the work
schedule and the necessary EM&A programme to detect the various possible
environmental impacts;
·
Definition of Action Limit Levels and
the establishment of Event/Action Plans;
·
Requirements for reviewing potential
sources of pollution and assessing working procedures in the event of
non-compliance with the environmental criteria;
·
Requirements for the presentation of
EM&A data and appropriate reporting procedures; and
·
Proposed field data forms to be
adopted during the various phases of the works.
1.3.2
An Implementation Schedule (IS) of the
environmental mitigation measures has been developed in accordance with the
requirements of Clause 4.3 of the EIA
Study Brief [Appendix 1.1 refers].
1.3.3
This EM&A Manual shall be regarded
as an evolving document that should be updated when necessary to reflect the
activities on site (e.g. when alternative monitoring locations are proposed).
The updated EM&A Manual shall be prepared by the Contractor’s ET and
submitted to the Engineer’s Representative (ER) and EPD for agreement.
2.1.1
The Project involves the construction
of a helipad by dredge and reclaim along the coastal waters at Pak
Wan, northwest Peng Chau. The Project
will be constructed off a natural, predominantly rocky, coastline.
2.1.2
The helipad deck will be located approximately 10
metres from the back of the Pak Wan shore (i.e., existing land). An access road will be constructed along the
natural shoreline to link the proposed helipad with the existing Emergency
Vehicular Access (EVA) located adjacent to Sea Crest Villa at northwest Peng
Chau [Figure 2.1 refers].
2.1.3
The site location was selected after due consideration of the operational
requirements and environmental impact potential of constructing and operating
the Peng Chau helipad at each of 13 site options / alternatives [Section 2.2 of the Peng Chau Helipad EIA Report refers].
2.1.4
Peng Chau has been developed mainly
with low-rise developments that are located in the central portion of the
island. Northwest of Peng Chau and close to the proposed helipad site, there
are low-rise (3 storeys) apartment type residential buildings and a medium-rise
(7 storeys) public housing estate that are considered key air and noise
sensitive receivers (SRs). Given the natural hilly topography at northwest Peng
Chau there is no direct line of sight between these SRs and the proposed
helipad site (i.e., there will be some shielding of helicopter noise from the
SRs). However, Sea Crest Villa Blocks C and D, which are located approximately
160m southwest of the proposed helipad, have a direct line of site to the EVA
works area.
2.2.1
The proposed construction programme
can be broadly summarised as presented by Table
2.1. The detailed construction
schedule is presented in Appendix 2.1.
Table 2.1 Summary
of Peng Chau Helipad Construction Programme
Construction Activity
|
Construction Period
|
Site Clearance
|
Dec 2005 – Jan 2006
|
Reclamation
|
Feb 2006 – Sep 2006
|
Construction of Helipad
|
Jan 2006 – Nov 2006
|
Construction of EVA
|
Jul 2006 – Nov 2006
|
The EM&A programme for this Study, as recommended in the EIA, covers
construction noise monitoring. This EM&A Manual also gives recommendations
on protective measures to be undertaken by the Contractor to protect the
surrounding natural and built environment from air and water quality, waste,
ecological impacts which may be generated by the works.
2.4.1
Upon the commencement of the Project,
the Contractor shall prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that shall
form the framework within which the implementation of mitigation measures and
good site practices are to be managed.
2.4.2
The EMP shall provide details of the
means by which the Contractor (and their sub-contractors) shall implement the
recommended mitigation measures and achieve the environmental performance
standards defied in the relevant Hong Kong environmental legislation, the
Contract and in the EIA. Provision
shall be made in the Contract’s Particular Specifications for the Contractor to
prepare and submit the EMP to the IC(E) for verification and for the approval
of the ER.
2.4.3
An environmental performance review
programme, including a regular assessment of the effectiveness of the EMP, site
practices and procedures shall be established prior to the commencement of
construction works. The ET Leader shall
prepare review protocols that shall include inspection and auditing
requirements [Section 3.2.3 refers].
3.1.1
Involvement of relevant parties in a
collaborative and interactive manner is essential for the implementation of the
recommended EM&A programme. The key
parties in an EM&A programme include:
·
Civil Engineering and Development
Department (CEDD) (Project Proponent);
·
Environmental Protection Department
(EPD) (Environmental Regulations Enforcer);
·
The Engineer of the Engineer’s
Representative (ER) (e.g. Engineers from CEDD);
·
The Contractor;
·
The Environmental Team (ET); and
·
The Independent Checker (Environment)
(IC(E)).
3.2.1
An Environmental Team (ET) shall be
appointed to carry out the recommended EM&A works for the helipad project. The ET shall not be an associated company of
the Contractor. The ET Leader shall plan, organise and
manage the implementation of the EM&A programme, and ensure that the
EM&A works are undertaken to the required standards. The ET Leader shall have relevant
professional qualifications in Environmental Sciences or Environmental
Engineering, and possess at least 7 years experience in EM&A and/or
environmental management. An
organisation chart which shows the relationships of different stakeholders
under the EM&A framework is presented by Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1 Organisation
Chart of Different Stakeholders under the EM&A Framework.
3.2.2
The ET Leader shall be responsible for
the implementation of the EM&A programme in accordance with the EM&A
requirements specified in this Manual.
The ET Leader shall keep a contemporaneous log-book of each and every
instance or circumstance or change of circumstances which may affect the EIA
and each and every non-compliance with the Environmental Permit or the
recommendations in the EIA report. This
log-book shall be kept readily available for inspection by the IC(E), and
Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) or his authorized officers. The ET shall not be an associated body of
the IC(E) in the project.
1.
Sampling, analysis and statistical
evaluation of monitoring parameters with reference to the EIA study
recommendations and requirements;
2.
Environmental site surveillance (Section 9 refers);
3.
Inspection and audit of compliance with
environmental protection, and pollution prevention and control regulations;
4.
Inspection and audit of compliance
with procedures established to enable an effective response to environmental
incidents, exceedances or non-compliance;
5.
Assess the effectiveness of the
environmental mitigation measures implemented;
6.
Monitor the implementation of
environmental mitigation measures;
7.
Monitor compliance with the
environmental protection clauses/specifications in the Contract;
8.
Review the construction schedule and
provide comments as necessary;
9.
Review work methodologies which may
affect the extent of environmental impact during the construction phase and
comment as necessary;
10. Complaint investigation, evaluation and identification of corrective
measures;
11. Liaison with the Project IC(E) on all environmental performance
matters, and timely submission of all relevant EM&A proforma for IC(E)’s
approval;
12. Advice to the Contractor on environmental improvement, awareness,
enhancement matters, etc., on site; and
13. Timely submission of the EM&A report to the Project Proponent
and the DEP.
3.2.4
In the event of any exceedance in
Action/Limit levels, the ET shall inform the IC(E), ER and the Contractor
within one working day of the occurrence of each and every occurrence, change
of circumstances or non-compliances with the EIA Report or the Environmental
Permit (EP) so that appropriate remedial action can be undertaken by the
Contractor promptly.
3.2.5
The ET is also responsible for the
preparation of the monthly EM&A reports for submission to IC(E), the
Contractor and the ER, and through the ER, to EPD. The ET shall assist the Contractor and the ER in formulating any
necessary corrective actions and/or additional mitigation measures, and liasing
with relevant Government Departments where necessary.
3.3.1
The Independent Checker (Environment)
(IC(E)) shall advise the ER on environmental issues related to the
Project. The IC(E) shall not be in any
way an associated body of the Contractor or the ET for the Project. IC(E) shall be empowered to audit from an
independent viewpoint the environmental performance during the construction of
the helipad. The IC(E) shall be a
person who has at least 7 years experience in EM&A or environmental
management.
3.3.2
The IC(E) shall be responsible for the
duties defined in the Environmental Permit (EP) and this EM&A Manual, and
shall audit the overall EM&A programme, including the implementation of all
environmental mitigation measures, submissions required in this EM&A
Manual, and any other submissions required under the Environmental Permit. The IC(E) shall be responsible for verifying
the environmental acceptability of permanent and temporary works, relevant
design plans and submissions under the Environmental Permits. The IC(E) shall verify the log-book prepared
and kept by the ET Leader. The IC(E)
shall notify DEP by fax, within 24 hours of receipt of notification from the ET
Leader of any such instance or circumstance or change of circumstances or
non-compliance with the EIA Report or the EP, which might affect the monitoring
or control of adverse environmental impact.
3.3.3
The main duty of the IC(E) is to carry
out independent environmental audit of the project. This shall include, inter alias, the following:
1.
Review and audit in an independent,
objective and professional manner in all aspects of the EM&A programme;
2.
Validate and confirm the accuracy of
monitoring results, appropriateness of monitoring equipment, monitoring
locations with reference to the locations of the nearby sensitive receivers,
and monitoring procedures;
3.
Carry out random sample check and
audit on monitoring data and sampling procedures, etc;
4.
Conduct random site inspection;
5.
Audit the EIA recommendations and
requirements against the status of implementation of environmental protection
measures on site;
6.
Review the effectiveness of
environmental mitigation measures and project environmental performance;
7. On an as needed basis, verify and certify the environmental
acceptability of the construction methodology (both temporary and permanent
works), relevant design plans and submissions under the environmental
permit. Where necessary, the IC(E)
shall agree in consultation with the ET Leader and the Contractor the least
impact alternative;
8. Verify investigation results of complaint cases and the
effectiveness of corrective measures;
9. Verify EM&A report submitted and certified by the ET Leader; and
10. Feedback audit results to ET/CEDD/ER by signing according to the
Event/Action Plans specified in this EM&A Manual.
3.4.1
Upon the commencement of the Project,
the Contractor shall prepare and submit an EMP for the Engineer’s approval,
further to the IC(E)’s verification [Section
2.4 refers]. The EMP shall comprise of the appropriate
extracts from (and references to) the Project EIA report and EM&A Manual,
and include such elements as the relevant statutory environmental standards,
general environmental control clauses and specific environmental management
clauses as well as an outline of the scope and content of the EMP. Consideration shall be given to the
predictive nature of the EIA process and the consequent need to manage and
accommodate the actual impacts arising form the construction process. Any
changes in the construction method, progress rates and other estimates made in
the preliminary design stage to carry out the EIA and the implications of such
changes shall be identified and controlled under the EMP.
3.4.2
The Contractor is responsible for
providing requested information to the ET in the event of any exceedance in the
environmental criteria (Action/Limit levels) specified in this Manual or other
current environmental standards and to rectify unacceptable practices. The Contractor shall discuss with the ET,
IC(E) and ER on any additional mitigation measures identified to be required by
the ET and implement the agreed measures to alleviate any identified
environmental impact to acceptable levels.
The design and implementation of the control and mitigation measures
shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.
3.4.3
In the event that the ET needs to
undertake complaint investigation work, the Contractor and the Engineer shall
co-operate with the ET Leader in providing all the necessary information and
assistance for completion of the investigation. If mitigation measures are required following the investigation,
the Contractor shall promptly carry out these measures.
3.4.4
The Contractor shall report to the ET
on the action(s) taken targeting at environmental protection for inclusion in
the monthly report to be prepared by the ET.
3.5.1
Civil Engineering & Development
Department (CEDD) is the project proponent in this project and shall hold
ultimate responsibility for the project.
CEDD shall liaise with EPD on environmental issues associated with the
project.
3.6.1
Environmental Protection Department
(EPD) is the statutory enforcement body for environmental protection matters in
Hong Kong. Apart from the provision of
mandatory environmental standards, EPD also forms the consultation board for
environmental issues arising from the project.
3.7.1
The Engineer or the Engineer’s
Representative (ER) shall be responsible for overseeing the operations of the
Contractor and the ET. He shall advise,
co-ordinate and give instruction when appropriate for efficient implementation
of any specific environmental mitigation measures identified to be required by
the contractor, and/or outstanding EM&A works required to be carried out by
ET in consultation with the IC(E). The
ER shall supervise the Contractor’s activities and ensure that the requirements
in the EIA Report and EM&A Manual are fully complied with. He shall inform the Contractor when action
is required to reduce impacts in accordance with the Event/Action Plans. He shall review the EM&A Reports
submitted by the ET and follow up the recommendations. He shall ensure that the Contractor is
implementing the environmental controls and mitigation measures as set out in
the EIA report and EM&A Manual, as well as additional measures necessary
for compliance with the relevant environmental standards.
3.7.2
In the event that the ET needs to
undertake complaint investigation work, the Engineer (and the Contractor) shall
co-operate with the ET Leader in providing all the necessary information and
assistance for completion of the investigation. If mitigation measures are required following the investigation,
the ER shall ensure that the Contractor has carried them out.
3.7.3
CEDD will play the role of the ER
should the detailed design and oversight of the construction of the helipad be
carried out in-house by staff of CEDD.
4.1.1
Based on the air quality impact assessment,
it has been identified that no significant impacts will arise from the
construction and operation of the helipad through the proper implementation of
dust control measures as required under the Air Pollution Control (Construction
Dust) Regulation. While no specific control measures have been recommended,
general air quality control measures are recommended for implementation as good
site practices.
4.1.2
To check for implementation of these
measures, the ET shall check on the implementation of air quality control
measures by the Contractor as part of the regular site environmental audit.
4.2.1
As described in Section 9 of the Manual, the ET Leader is responsible
for formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A
programme.
4.2.2
In order to check that the air quality
control measures have been implemented by the Contractor as good site
practices, the ET shall include the following items as part of their site
inspections:
·
Heights from which materials are
dropped should be restricted as far as practicable to minimise fugitive dust
arising from unloading/loading;
·
All spraying of materials and surfaces
should avoid excessive water usage;
·
The working area for site clearance
adjacent to Sea Crest Villa shall be sprayed with water or a dust suppression
chemical immediately before, during and immediately after the operation so as
to maintain the entire surface wet.
·
For reclamation works, if a stockpile
of dusty materials is more than 1.2 m high and within 50m of Peng Lei Road or
the Pak Wan footpath, the stockpile shall be properly treated and sealed with
latex, vinyl, bitumen or other suitable surface stabilizer.
·
Immediately before leaving a
construction site, every vehicle shall be washed to remove any dusty materials
from its body and wheels.
·
Travelling speeds should be controlled
to reduce traffic induced dust dispersion and re-suspension within the site
from the operating haul trucks
·
Where a vehicle leaving a construction
site is carrying a load of dusty materials, the load shall be covered entirely
by clean impervious sheeting to ensure that the dusty materials do not leak
from the vehicle.
·
Erection of hoarding of not less than 2.4 m high
from ground level along the site boundary.
·
Any stockpile of dusty materials shall
be either: (a) covered entirely by impervious sheeting; (b) placed in an area
sheltered on the top and the 3 sides; or (c) sprayed with water or a dust
suppression chemical so as to maintain the entire surface wet.
·
All dusty materials shall be sprayed
with water or a dust suppression chemical immediately prior to any loading,
unloading or transfer operation so as to maintain the dusty materials wet.
4.2.3
All the dust control measures as
recommended in the Air Pollution Control (Construction
Dust) Regulation, where applicable, should also be
implemented.
5.1.1
During the construction phase of the
helipad, power mechanical equipment (PME) used for the helipad construction
will be the primary noise sources. The
key noise generating activities include:
·
Site
clearance for the erection of site office, hoarding and fencing;
·
Reclamation
for the helipad and the Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA); and
·
Construction
of helipad and EVA.
5.1.2
Noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) have
been identified in accordance with Annex 13 of the EIAO TM. As required under Clause 3.4.5.2 (iii) (b) of the EIA Study Brief, the selection of
representative NSRs has been presented to and agreed by the Authority prior to
commencement of this noise impact assessment.
5.2.1
Monitoring of noise levels at the
proposed sensitive receiver locations shall be undertaken by the ET during the baseline
and construction phases of the project to ensure that any increase in noise
levels as a result of the construction works are readily detected and rectified
in a timely fashion.
5.2.2
The construction noise level will be
measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq). Noise measurements
will be carried out with an integrating sound level meter using the ‘fast’
response mode. Leq(30 min)
will be used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between
07:00-19:00 hours on normal weekdays.
For all other time periods, Leq(5 min) will be employed for
comparison with the Noise Control Ordinance criteria.
5.2.3
As supplementary information for data
auditing statistical results such as L10 and L90 will
also be obtained for reference.
5.2.4
In addition to carrying out noise
monitoring, control and mitigation measures are recommended for implementation
by the Contractor. The ET shall check
the implementation of these measures during the regular site environmental
audits. As described in Section 9 of this Manual, the ET Leader is responsible
for formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A
programme.
5.3.1
As referred to in the Technical
Memorandum (TM) issued under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO), sound level
meters in compliance with the International Electrical Commission Publications
651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications will be used for
carrying out the noise monitoring.
5.3.2
Immediately prior to and following
each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter will be checked
using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only if the calibration level
from before and after the noise measurement agrees to within 1.0dB. Calibration equipment to be used should meet
IEC 942, Type 1 specifications, and succeeding standard specifications for sound
level meters applicable in Hong Kong. Annual calibration of the noise
monitoring equipment by an accredited laboratory will be carried out for
compliance with IEC publications 651 and 804 and any other relevant standards.
5.3.3
Noise measurements shall not be made
if the wind speed exceeds 5ms-1 or if gusts exceed 10ms-1. The wind speed shall be checked with a
portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in ms-1. Measurements shall not be made while air temperatures
are outside the manufacturer’s specified range or when other intrusive noise
sources (other than influencing factors) are apparent at the assessment point.
5.3.4
Sufficient noise measuring equipment
and associated instrumentation should be available for carrying out the
baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring. All the equipment and associated
instrumentation will be clearly labelled, stored and maintained according to
the manufacturer’s instructions.
5.4.1
Monitoring will be carried out with
reference to the following documents:
·
Technical Memorandum on the Assessment of Noise
from Construction Work other than Percussive Piling, Hong Kong Government;
·
Technical Memorandum on the Assessment of Noise
from Construction Works in Designated Areas, Hong Kong Government
·
Technical Memorandum for the Assessment of Noise
from places other than Domestic Premises, Public Places or Construction Sites,
Hong Kong Government;
·
or
succeeding standards and guidelines.
5.4.2
The monitoring stations will normally
be at a point 1 m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers building facade
and be at a position 1.2 m above the ground. When a measurement is to be made
of noise being received at a place other than a building, the assessment point
will be at least 1.2 m above ground level, at an appropriate point. The
appropriate measurement positions should be at least 3.5 m from any reflecting
surface other than the ground and have an unobstructed view of the Site. In such instances where free-field
measurements are conducted, a positive correction of 3dB(A) will be applied to
the relevant target limits.
5.4.3
The microphone of the sound level
meter will be so orientated that it is pointing in the direction of the Site
and at the source of noise being monitored such that the microphone is
perpendicular to the plane of the incident sound-waves. It will be protected using an appropriate
windshield. To avoid reflections from
the operator’s body, the microphone will be mounted on a tripod, whether
attached to the sound level meter or not. Noise measurements will be rounded to
the nearest whole dB, with values of 0.5 dB or more being rounded upwards.
5.4.4
Noise will not be monitored in the
presence of mist, fog or rain, when wind is at
a steady speed exceeding 5 m/s, or when gusts exceed 10m/s.
5.4.5
For monitoring locations located in
the vicinity of the sensitive receivers, care shall be taken to cause minimal
disturbance to the occupants during monitoring.
5.4.6
Noise measurements shall be recorded
on a field data sheet together with relevant information including project
name, date and time of sampling, monitoring location and parameters, site
observations and remarks. A sample
field data sheet is attached in Appendix
10.1.
5.5.1
The noise impact assessment presented
in the EIA report indicated that the unmitigated construction noise levels at
all NSRs are found to comply with the daytime noise standards stated in Table
1B, Annex 5 of EIAO TM. Noise
mitigation measures have been recommended in the EIA report and shall be
implemented by the Contractor in accordance with the requirements under the
Noise Control Ordinance. The Contractor
shall be responsible for the design and implementation of the noise mitigation
measures.
5.5.2
Figure
5.1 illustrates the location of the proposed noise
monitoring location (N1) identified at this early planning stage. N1 corresponds to NSR1, a residential
premise located about 160 metres southwest of the helipad site, as identified
in the EIA report. The status and locations of noise sensitive receivers may
change after issuing this Manual. If
such case exists, the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations and
seek approval from ER and agreement from the IC(E) and EPD of the proposal.
5.5.3
When alternative monitoring locations
are proposed, the monitoring locations shall be chosen based on the following
criteria:
·
At locations close to the major site
activities which are likely to have noise impacts;
·
Close to the noise sensitive receivers
(as defined by the EIAO TM); and
·
For monitoring locations located in
the vicinity of the sensitive receivers, care shall be taken to cause minimal
disturbance to occupants during monitoring.
5.6.1
Daily noise monitoring shall be
carried out at all designated monitoring locations for a period of at least two
weeks prior to the commencement of the Work to establish the baseline noise
conditions. The frequency of monitoring
for each station will include at least:
·
One set of measurements between 07:00
- 19:00 hours on normal weekdays;
·
One set of measurements between 19:00
- 23:00 hours on normal weekdays;
·
One set of measurements between 23:00
- 07:00 hours of next day; and
·
One set of measurements between 07:00
- 19:00 hours on holidays.
5.7.1
Noise monitoring shall be carried out
at all the designated monitoring stations.
Noise monitoring shall be conducted on a weekly basis when
noise-generating activities are underway.
One set of measurements shall be taken between 07:00-19:00 hours on
normal working days.
5.7.2
General construction works carried out
during restricted hours are controlled by the Construction Noise Permit System,
under the NCO. The Contractor shall apply for a Noise Permit and abide by the
requirements of the permit should works be necessary in the restricted hours.
5.7.3
In case of non-compliance with the
construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring as specified in the
Event/Action Plans shall be carried out [Appendix
5.1 refers]. This additional
monitoring shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or
proved to be irrelevant to the construction activities.
5.8.1
The Action Limit levels for
construction noise are defined in Table
5.1. Should non-compliance of the noise quality criteria occur, actions
will be carried out in accordance with the Event/Action Plan [Appendix 5.1 refers].
Table 5.1 Action
Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Time Period
|
Action
|
Limit
|
07:00 – 19:00 hours on normal weekdays
|
When one documented complaint is received
|
75 dB(A)
|
5.9.1
The EIA report has found that
cumulative noise exceedances would be recorded at nearby NSRs if no mitigation
measures were implemented. However, with
the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, as detailed in Section 4
of the EIA report, noise impacts of construction can be reduced to acceptable
levels that are in compliance with the requirements of the Noise Control
Ordinance.
5.9.2
As described in Section 9 of the Manual, the ET Leader is responsible
for formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A
programme.
5.9.3
In order to check that the noise
control measures have been implemented by the Contractor as good site
practices, the ET shall include the following items as part of their site
inspections:
·
Noisy
equipment and noisy activities should be located as far away from the NSRs as
is practical;
·
Use
of silence equipment and installation of temporary and movable noise barriers.
Movable barriers shall be positioned as close as possible to powered mechanical
equipment so that they are not visible to sensitive receivers;
·
Unused
equipment should be turned off;
·
Powered
mechanical equipment should be kept to a minimum and the parallel use of noisy
equipment / machinery should be avoided; and
·
Regular
maintenance of all plant and equipment.
5.9.4
The
Contractor shall observe and comply with the relevant statutory requirements
and guidelines.
5.9.5
Operational noise monitoring is
impracticable as there are no scheduled helicopter flights, and so operational
phase noise monitoring is not recommended.
5.9.6
Should the need arise, the local community
may lodge noise complaints with the Islands District Office by the following
means:
- Fax: 2815
2291
- Email: dois@had.gov.hk
- Address: Islands District Office, Harbour
Building, 20th Floor, 38 Pier road, Central.
6.1.1
Based on the initial waste generation
assessment, it has been identified that minimal volumes of C&D materials
(including inert and non-inert materials), dredged sediments, chemical waste
and general refuse will be generated from the construction activities.
6.1.2
Through proper onsite handling and
storage (covered containers), reuse (of inert C&D materials) and off-site
disposal (via approved waste collector and to approved waste facilities and/or
disposal grounds) the generation, handling and disposal of these wastes will
not give rise to any adverse environmental impacts. However, given the potential for environmental impacts to arise
from improper waste management (e.g. visual impact, nuisance, etc.), it is
recommended that control and mitigation measures be implemented as part of
general good site practices.
6.2.1
As described in Section 9 of the Manual, the ET Leader is responsible
for formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A
programme.
6.2.2
In order to check that the waste
control and mitigation measures have been implemented by the Contractor as good
site practices, the ET shall include the following items as part of their site
inspections and audit:
i)
The reuse/recycling of all materials on site shall be
investigated prior to treatment/disposal off site;
ii)
Good site practices shall be adopted from the commencement
of works to avoid the generation of waste, reduce cross contamination of waste
and to promote waste minimization practices;
iii)
All waste materials shall be sorted on site into inert and
non-inert C&D materials, and where the materials will be recycled or
reused, these shall be further segregated. The Contractor shall be responsible
for identifying which materials can be recycled/reused, whether on site or off
site. In the event of the latter, the Contractor shall make arrangements for
the collection of the recyclable materials.
Any remaining non-inert waste shall be collected and disposed of to the
refuse transfer station whilst any inert C&D material shall be re-used on
site as far as possible. Alternatively,
if no use of the inert material can be found on site, the material can be
delivered to a public filling area or public fill bank after obtaining the
appropriate licence;
iv)
With reference to ETWB TCW No. 31/2004, Trip-ticket System for Disposal of Construction and
Demolition Material, a trip ticket system should be established at the outset
of the construction of the helipad to monitor the disposal of C&D and solid
wastes from the site to public filling facilities and landfills;
v)
Dredged sediments shall be handled in accordance with the
ETWB TCW No. 34/2002 on Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment and where the
sediments cannot be reused onsite, arrangements shall be made with the MFC for
allocation of dumping space;
vi)
Stockpiling is not envisaged, however if it becomes
unavoidable, stockpiling in any vegetated areas shall be avoided (as far as
possible) and shall be covered with tarpaulin and/or watered to prevent
windblown dust and/or surface runoff;
vii)
Under the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General)
Regulation, the Contractor shall register with EPD as a Chemical Waste Producer
if there is any use of chemicals on site including lubricants, paints, diesel
fuel, etc. Only licensed chemical waste
collectors shall be employed to collect any chemical waste generated at
site. The handling, storage,
transportation and disposal of chemical wastes shall be conducted in accordance
with the Code of Practice on the
Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes and A Guide to the Chemical Waste Control Scheme
both published by EPD;
viii)
A sufficient number of covered bins shall be provided on
site for the containment of general refuse to prevent visual impacts and
nuisance to sensitive receivers. These
bins shall be cleared daily and the collected waste disposed of to the refuse
transfer station on Tai Lei. Further to
the issue of ETWBTC (Works) No. 6/2002A, Enhanced Specification for Site
Cleanliness and Tidiness, the Contractor is required to maintain a clean and
hygienic site throughout the project works;
ix)
All chemical toilets shall be regularly cleaned and the
nightsoil collected and transported by a licensed contractor to a Government
Sewage Treatment Works facility for disposal;
x)
Tool-box talks should be provided to workers about the
concepts of site cleanliness and appropriate waste management procedures,
including waste reduction, reuse and recycling; and
xi)
A recording system for the amount of wastes generated,
recycled and disposed of (including the disposal sites) shall be proposed by
the Contractor, and the ET Leader shall include a
summary of such information in each monthly EM&A Report.
6.2.3
The
Contractor shall also observe and comply with the relevant statutory
requirements and guidelines and their updated versions.
7.1.1
Given the scale and nature of the
Project the initial water quality assessment conducted under the EIA study
indicates that minimal disturbances will be generated and thus no unacceptable
water quality impacts are foreseen.
7.1.2
Although no significant adverse water
quality impacts are predicted and no specific mitigation is necessary, general
control and mitigation measures are recommended for implementation by the
Contractor as good site practice.
7.2.1
As described in Section 9 of the Manual, the ET Leader is responsible
for formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A
programme.
7.2.2
The
ET shall include the measures outlined below as part of
their site inspections to check that the Contractor has implemented the waste
control and mitigation measures as good site practices.
7.2.3
As a precautionary good site practice
measure, it is recommended that silt curtains be installed around the dredging
locations prior to the commencement of dredging. The silt curtains shall reach seabed level.
·
The daily dredging volume should be
spread as evenly as possible over the working hours whenever practical to avoid
sudden surge of pollution elevation during short spells;
·
Special care should be taken during
lowering and lifting grabs to minimize unnecessary disturbance to the seabed;
·
To ensure vessels used have adequate
clearance of the seabed in order to reduce undue turbidity generated by
turbulence from vessel movement or propeller wash;
·
Barges should be fitted with tight
fitting seals to their bottom openings to prevent leakage of material;
·
The Contractor should ensure that
grabs are tightly closed and the hoist speed is suitably low;
·
Barges should not be filled to a level
which will cause overflow of materials during loading and transportation; and
·
Large objects should be removed from
the grab to avoid losses from partially closed grabs.
·
The dredging shall be monitored and a
daily record shall be kept to ensure the dredging rate would not exceed the
assumed maximum daily rate of 465 cubic metres as recommended in the EIA.
7.2.5
The
Contractor shall also observe and comply with the relevant statutory
requirements and guidelines.
8.1.1
Based on the ecological and fisheries
impact assessments of the EIA report, it was identified that the project will
not result in any significant sub-tidal habitat loss and there is not anticipated
to be any impact on the hard coral community from dredge and reclaim so long as
good working practices are followed.
8.1.2
While no specific mitigation measures
are considered necessary, the control and mitigation measures recommended for
water quality are relevant to the mitigation against ecological and fisheries
impacts and as such should be implemented by the Contractor as part of their
day-to-day good site practice. The ET
should check the implementation of these measures during the regular site
environmental audit.
8.2.1
As described in Section 9 of the Manual, the ET Leader is responsible for
formulating an environmental site inspection, deficiency and action reporting
system, and for carrying out site inspections under the EM&A programme.
8.2.2
The
ET shall include the measures outlined in Section
7.2.4 above as part of their site inspections to check
that the Contractor has implemented the waste control and mitigation measures
as good site practices to not only control water quality but also to protect
the sub- and inter-tidal ecology around the helipad site.
8.2.3
As a precautionary good site practice
measure, it has been recommended that silt curtains be installed around all
dredging locations prior to the commencement of dredging. The silt curtain(s) shall reach seabed level.
8.2.4
In addition to the good site practices
recommended to further minimize the potential water quality impacts [refer to Section 7.2.4], particular care should be taken when
decommissioning the silt curtain to avoid sudden dispersion of muddy water
which may cause adverse impact to the nearby marine life.
9.1.1
Site surveillance provides a direct
means to trigger and enforce the specified environmental protection and
pollution control measures are in compliance with the contract
specifications. They shall be
undertaken regularly and routinely by ET to inspect the activities at the fill
bank site in order to ensure that appropriate environmental protection and
pollution control mitigation measures are properly implemented by the
Contractor in accordance with the EM&A recommendations. With well-defined pollution control and
mitigation specifications and a well-established site inspection, deficiency
and action reporting system, the site inspection is one of the most effective tools
to enforce the environmental protection requirements on the site.
9.1.2
The ET Leader is responsible for
formulation of the environmental site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting system, and for carrying out the site inspections under the EM&A
works. He shall prepare and submit a
proposal on the site inspection, deficiency and action reporting procedures
within 21 days of the construction contract commencement to the Contractor for
agreement and to the ER and IC(E) for approval. A preliminary site inspection, deficiency and action reporting
system in the form of a flowchart has been prepared for reference, and is
presented in Figure 9.1 for review
and refinement by the ET at the commencement of the Project.
9.1.3
Regular site inspections shall be
carried out at least once per week during the construction period of the
helipad. The areas of inspection shall
include but not be limited to compliance with environmental legislation,
pollution control and mitigation measures within the site. It should also review
the environmental situation outside the site area that is likely to be
affected, directly or indirectly, by the site activities. The ET Leader shall make reference to the
following information in conducting the inspection:
1.
The EIA recommendations on environmental
protection and pollution control mitigation measures with regard to air
quality, noise, waste management, water quality, and ecological impacts;
2.
On-going results of the EM&A
programme;
3.
Works progress and programme;
4.
Individual works methodology proposals
(which shall include proposals on associated pollution control measures);
5.
The contract specifications on
environmental protection and pollution prevention;
6.
The relevant environmental protection
and pollution control laws, ProPECC Notes; and
7.
Previous site inspection results.
9.1.4
The Contractor shall update with the
ET on all relevant information of the contract for him to carry out the site
inspections. The inspection results and
its associated recommendations on improvements to the environmental protection
and pollution control works shall be submitted to the IC(E) and the Contractor
in a site inspection proforma within 24 hours, for reference and for taking
immediate action. The Contractor shall
follow the procedures and time-frame as stipulated in the environmental site
inspection, deficiency and action reporting system formulated by the ET to
report on any remedial measures subsequent to the site inspections.
9.1.5
The ET shall conduct ad hoc site inspections if significant
environmental problems are identified.
The IC(E) shall also conduct independent site audits. Inspections may also be required subsequent
to receipt of any environmental complaints, or as part of the investigation
work, as specified in the Event/Action Plan for environmental monitoring and
audit.
9.2.1
There are contractual environmental
protection and pollution control requirements as well as environmental
protection and pollution control laws in Hong Kong, with which the activities
associated with the construction of the helipad shall comply.
9.2.2
The ET shall review the progress and
programme of the works to check that relevant environmental laws have not been
violated, and that any foreseeable potential for violating the laws can be
prevented.
9.2.3
The Contractor shall regularly copy
relevant documents to the ET so that the checking work can be carried out. The documents shall at least include the
updated Work Progress Reports, the updated Works Programme, application letters
for different license/permits under the environmental protection laws, and all
valid licence(s)/permit(s). The site
diary shall also be available for the ET’s inspection upon his request.
9.2.4
After reviewing the document, the ET
shall advise the ER and the Contractor of any non-compliance with the
contractual and legislative requirements on environmental protection and
pollution control for them to take follow-up actions. If the ET’s review concludes that the current status on
licence/permit application and any environmental protection and pollution
control preparation works may not cope with the works programme or may result
in potential violation of environmental protection and pollution control
requirements by the works in due course, he shall also advise the Contractor
and the ER accordingly. The review
shall be copied to IC(E) for any follow-up action.
9.2.5
Upon receipt of the advice, the
Contractor shall undertake immediate action to remedy the situation. The ER shall check that the Contractor has
taken appropriate action in order that the environmental protection and
pollution control requirements are fulfilled.
9.3.1
Complaints reviewed on environmental
issues shall be referred to the ET Leader for carrying out complaint
investigation procedures. Upon receipt
of complaints the ET shall undertake the tasks outlined in points 1-9
below. The complaint investigation
procedures are also presented in form of a flow chart in Figure 9.2 for easy reference.
1.
Log complaint and date of receipt onto
the complaint database and inform the IC(E) immediately;
2.
Investigate the complaint to determine
its validity, and to assess whether the source of the problem is due to works
activities;
3.
If a complaint is valid and due to
works, identify mitigation measures in consultations with the IC(E);
4.
If mitigation measures are required,
advise the Contractor accordingly;
5.
Review the Contractor’s implementation
of the identified mitigation measures, and the concurrent situation;
6.
If the complaint is transferred from
EPD, submit interim report to EPD on status of the complaint investigation an
follow-up action within the time frame assigned by EPD;
7.
Undertake additional monitoring and
audit to verify the complaint if necessary, and ensure that any valid reason
for complaint does not recur through proposed amendments to work methods,
procedures, machines and/or equipment, etc;
8.
Report the investigation results and
the subsequent actions to the source of complaint. (If the source of complaint
is identified through EPD, the results should be reported within the time frame
assigned by EPD); and
9.
Log a record on the complaint,
investigation, the subsequent actions and the results in the monthly EM&A
reports.
9.3.2
The ER shall immediately notify the
Contractor, ER, Project Proponent and EPD (Local Control Office) of any
complaints received and keep him well informed of the actions being taken to
settle these complaints.
9.3.3
During the
complaint investigation work, the Contractor and ER shall co-operate with the
ET Leader in providing all the necessary information and assistance for
completion of the investigation. If
mitigation measures are identified to be required in the investigation in
consultation with the IC(E), the Contractor shall promptly carry out the
measures. The ER shall ensure that the
Contractor has implemented the mitigation measures.
9.4.1
All documentation is required to be
filed in a traceable and systematically manner and ready for inspection upon
request. All EM&A results and
findings shall be documented in the EM&A report prepared by the ET and
endorsed by IC(E) prior to circulation to the Contractor, ER and EPD.
10.1.1
The following reporting requirements
are based upon a paper-documented approach.
However, the same information shall be provided in an electronic medium
upon agreeing the format with the ER and EPD. All the monitoring data (baseline
and impact) shall also be submitted in an agreed electronic format in
accordance with the requirements under Annex 21 of the EIAO TM. This would enable a transition from a
paper/historic and reactive approach to an electronic/real time proactive
approach.
10.2.1
The ET Leader shall prepare and submit
a Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report within 10 working days of completion
of the baseline monitoring. Copies of
the Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report shall be submitted to each of the
four parties: the Contractor, the IC(E), the ER and EPD. The ET Leader shall liaise with the relevant
parties on the exact number of copies needed.
The format and content of the report and the presentation of the
baseline monitoring data to be submitted to EPD shall be agreed with EPD prior
to submission.
10.2.2
The baseline monitoring report shall
include at least the following:
1.
Up to half a page executive summary;
2.
Brief project background information;
3.
Drawings showing locations of the
baseline monitoring stations;
4.
An updated programme on construction/
of the helipad with milestones of environmental protection/mitigation
activities annotated;
5.
Monitoring results (in both hard and
diskette copies) together with the following information:
·
Monitoring methodology;
·
Types of equipment used and
calibration details;
·
Parameters monitored;
·
Monitoring locations;
·
Monitoring date, time, frequency and
duration; and
·
QA/QC results and detection limits.
6.
Details on influencing factors,
including:
·
Major activities, if any, being
carried out on the site during the period;
·
Weather conditions during the period;
and
·
Other factors which might affect the
results.
7.
Determination of the Action Limit
levels for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline
data, the analysis shall conclude if there is any significant difference
between control and impact actions for the parameters monitored;
8.
Revisions for inclusion in the
EM&A Manual; and
9.
Comments and conclusions.
10.3.1
The results and findings of all
EM&A work required in the Manual shall be presented in a monthly EM&A
report that shall be prepared by the ET Leader. The EM&A report shall be endorsed by IC(E), and then
submitted to EPD within 10 working days of the end of each reporting
month. The first report is due in the
month after the establishment phase commences.
A maximum of 4 copies of each monthly EM&A report shall be submitted
to each of the four parties: the Contractor, the IC(E), the ER and EPD. Before
submission of the first EM&A report, the ET Leader shall liase with the
parties on the exact number of copies and format of the monthly reports in both
hard copy and electronic medium required.
10.3.2
The ET Leader shall review the number
and location of monitoring stations and parameters to be monitored every 6
months or on a needed basis in order to cater for the changes in surrounding
environment and nature works in progress.
10.4.1
The first monthly EM&A report
shall include at least the following:
1. Executive Summary (1-2 pages);
· Breaches of Action Limit levels;
· Complaint Log;
· Notifications of any summons and successful prosecutions;
· Reporting Changes; and
· Future key issues.
2. Basic Project Information
· Project organisation including key personnel contact names and
telephone numbers;
· Programme with fine tuning of activities showing the
inter-relationship with environmental protection/mitigation measures for the
month;
· Management structure; and
· Work undertaken during the month.
3. Environmental Status
· Works undertaken during the month with illustrations (such as
location of works, daily dredging/filling rates, etc.); and
· Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations.
4. Summary of EM&A requirements including:
· All monitoring parameters;
· Environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit levels);
· Event/Action Plans;
· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA
study final report;
· Environmental requirements in contract documents;
5.
Implementation Status
·
Advice on the implementation status of
environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the project EIA study report, summarised in the updated
implementation schedule.
6. Monitoring Results (in both hard and
electronic copies) together with the following information;
·
Monitoring methodology;
·
Types of equipment used and
calibration details;
·
Parameters monitored;
·
Monitoring locations;
·
Monitoring date, time, frequency, and
duration;
·
Weather conditions during the period;
·
Graphical plots of the monitored
parameters in the month annotated against;
§
Major activities being carried out on
site during the period;
§
Weather conditions that may affect the
results; and
§
Any other factors which might affect
the monitoring results;
·
QA/QC results and detection limits;
·
Waste generation and disposal records;
·
All monitoring results should be
tabulated with exceedances highlighted for ease of reference; and
·
Compare/contrast and assess the
EM&A data with the EIA predictions and provide discussion for any
discrepancies.
7. Report on Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
·
Compliance status with the EP under
the EIAO and any EP submissions;
·
Record of all non-compliance
(exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit
levels);
·
Record of all complaints received
(written or verbal) for each media, including locations and nature of
complaints investigation, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and
follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;
·
Record of all notifications of summons
and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental
protection/pollution control legislations, including locations and nature of
the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, result and summary;
·
Review of the reasons for and the
implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons and prosecutions including
review of pollution sources and working procedures; and
·
Description of the actions taken in
the event of non-compliance and deficiency reporting and any follow-up
procedures related to earlier non-compliance.
8. Comments, Recommendations and Conclusions
·
An account of the future key issues
reviewed from the works programme and work method statements;
·
Advice on the solid and liquid waste
management status; and
·
Submission of implementation status proforma,
proactive environmental protection proforma, regulatory compliance proforma,
site inspection proforma, data recovery schedule and complaint log summarizing
the EM&A of the period.
10.5.1
The subsequent monthly EM&A reports
shall including the following:
1. Executive Summary (1-2 pages)
· Breaches of Action Limit levels;
· Complaint log;
· Notifications of any summons and successful prosecutions;
· Reporting changes;
· Future key issues.
2. Environmental Status
· Programme with fine tuning of activities showing the
inter-relationship with environmental protection/mitigation measures for the
month;
· Work undertaken during the month with illustrations included (such
as location of works, daily, dredging/filling rates, etc); and
· Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations.
3. Monitoring Results to provide monitoring results (in both hard
and electronic copies) together with the following information.
·
Monitoring methodology;
·
Types of equipment used and
calibration details;
·
Parameters monitored;
·
Monitoring locations;
·
Monitoring date, time, frequency, and
duration;
·
Weather conditions during the period;
·
Graphical plots of the monitored parameters
in the month annotated against;
§
Major activities being carried out on
site during the period;
§
Weather conditions that may affect the
results; and
§
Any other factors which might affect
the monitoring results;
·
QA/QC results and detection limits;
·
Waste generation and disposal records;
·
All monitoring results should be
tabulated with exceedances highlighted for ease of reference; and
·
Compare/contrast and assess the
EM&A data with the EIA predictions and provide discussion for any
discrepancies.
4. Implementation
Status
·
Advice on the implementation status of
environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the project EIA study report, summarised in the updated
implementation schedule.
5. Report on Non-compliance, Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
·
Compliance status with the EP under
the EIAO and any EP submissions;
·
Record of all non-compliance
(exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit
levels);
·
Record of all complaints received
(written or verbal) for each media, including locations and nature of
complaints investigation, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and
follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;
·
Record of all notifications of summons
and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental
protection/pollution control legislations, including locations and nature of
the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, result and summary;
·
Review of the reasons for and the implications
of non-compliance, complaints, summons and prosecutions including review of
pollution sources and working procedures; and
·
A description of the actions taken in
the event of non-compliance and deficiency reporting and any follow-up
procedures related to earlier non-compliance.
6. Comments, Recommendations and Conclusions
·
An account of the future key issues
reviewed from the works programme and work method statements;
·
Advice on the solid and liquid waste
management status; and
·
Submission of implementation status
proforma, proactive environmental protection proforma, regulatory compliance
proforma, site inspection proforma, data recovery schedule and complaint log
summarizing the EM&A of the period.
7. Appendix
·
Action Limit Levels;
· Graphical plots of trends of monitored parameters at key stations
over the past four reporting periods for representative monitoring stations
annotated against the following:
§
Major activities being carried out on
Site during the periods;
§
Weather conditions during the period;
and
§
Any other factors which might affect
the monitoring results
·
Monitoring schedule for the present
and next reporting period;
·
Cumulative statistics on complaints,
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions; and
·
Outstanding issues and deficiencies.
10.6.1
The quarterly EM&A summary report,
which should generally be around 5 pages (including about 3 of text and tables
and 2 of figures), should contain at least the following listed
information. Apart from these, the
first quarterly summary report should also confirm that the monitoring work is
proving effective and that it is generating data with the necessary statistical
power to categorically identify or confirm the absence of impact attributable
to the works.
1. Up to half a page executive summary;
2. Basic
project information including a synopsis of the project organisation,
programme, contacts of key management, and a synopsis of work undertaken during
the quarter;
3. A brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
· Monitoring parameters;
· Environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit levels); and
· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA
study final report;
4. Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and
pollution control/mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA study
report, summarised in the updated implementation schedule, including waste
generation and disposal records;
5. Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations;
6. Compliance status with the EP under the EIAO and any EP submissions;
7. Graphical plots of the trends of monitored parameters over the past 4
months (the last month of the previous quarter and the present quarter) for
representative monitoring stations annotated against;
· The major activities being carried out on site during the period;
· Weather conditions during the period; and
· Any other factors which might affect the monitoring results.
8. Compare/contrast and assess the EM&A data with the EIA
predictions and provide discussion for any discrepancies;
9. Comments, Recommendations and Conclusions
· Advice on the solid and liquid waste management status;
· A summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental
quality performance limits (Action Limit levels);
· A brief review of the reasons for an the implications of
non-compliance including review of pollution sources and working procedures;
· A summary description of the action taken in the event of
non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance;
· A summary record of all complaints received (written or verbal) for
each media, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up
procedures taken;
· A summary record of all notifications of summons and successful
prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental protection/pollution
control legislation, locations and nature of the breaches, investigation,
follow-up actions taken and results; and
· Comments (e.g. effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation
measures), recommendations (e.g. any improvement in the EM&A programme) and
conclusions for the quarter.
10.6.2
Apart from the above, the first
quarterly summary report should also confirm that the monitoring works are
proven to be effective, and the monitoring works are generating data with the
necessary statistical power to categorically identify or confirm the absence of
impact attributable to the works.
10.7.1
Timing for completion of the EM&A
Programme shall be confirmed by ER in liaison with the IC(E). Impact monitoring shall continue until the
completion of all construction works as approved by the ER.
10.7.2
The final EM&A summary report
shall include the following:
1. An executive summary;
2. Basic project information including a synopsis of the project
organisation, programme, contacts of key management, and a synopsis of work
undertaken during the entire construction phase, including baseline phase activities,
of the works;
3. A brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
· Monitoring parameters;
· Environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit levels); and
· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA
study final report.
4. Advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and
pollution control/mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA study
report, summarised in the updated implementation status proformas, including
waste generation and disposal records;;
5. Drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations;
6. Compliance status with the EP under the EIAO and any EP submissions;
7. Graphical plots of the trends of monitored parameters over the
period of construction (of the helipad) for representative monitoring stations
annotated against;
·
The major activities being carried out
on site during the period;
·
Weather conditions during the period;
·
Any other factors which might affect the
monitoring results; and
·
The return of ambient environmental
conditions in comparison with baseline data.
8. Compare / contrast and assess the EM&A data with the EIA
predictions and provide discussion for any discrepancies;
9. Provide clear-cut decisions on the environmental acceptability of
the project with reference to the specific impact hypothesis;
10. Advice
on the solid and liquid waste management status;
11. Comments,
Recommendations and Conclusions
·
A summary of non-compliance
(exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action Limit
levels);
·
A brief review of the reasons for and
the implications of non-compliance including review of pollution sources and
working procedures;
·
A summary description of the actions
taken in the event of non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to
earlier non-compliance;
·
A summary record of all complaints
received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken;
·
Review the monitoring methodology
adopted and with the benefit of hindsight, comment on its effectiveness
(including cost effectiveness);
·
A summary record of all notification
of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current
environmental protection/pollution control legislations, locations and nature
of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken and results;
·
Review the practicality and
effectiveness of the EIA process and EM&A programme (e.g. effectiveness and
efficiency of the mitigation measures),
·
Recommend any improvement in the
EM&A programme; and
·
A conclusion to state the return of
ambient and/or the predicted scenario as per EIA findings.
10.8.1
To facilitate the management of the
EM&A programme for the construction of the helipad, the record forms
presented in Appendix 10.1 (including
those presented in the preceding sections) should be adopted where applicable
during the construction phase of the Project.
These forms are listed as follows:
1. Implementation Schedule [Section
10 of the EIA Report for Peng Chau Helipad refers];
2. Implementation Status Performa;
3. Data Recovery Schedule;
4. Site Inspection Corrective Action Proforma;
5. Proactive Environmental Protection Proforma;
6. Regulatory Compliance Proforma;
7. Complaint Log;
8. Sample Template for Interim Notifications of Environmental Quality
Limits Exceedances; and
9. Noise Monitoring Field Record Sheet.
The site document such as the monitoring field records, laboratory
analysis records, site inspection forms, etc. are not required to be included
in the monthly EM&A reports, for submission. However, the document shall be well kept by the ET and be ready
for inspection upon request. All
relevant information shall be clearly and systematically recorded in the
document. The monitoring data shall
also be recorded in magnetic media form, and the software copy can be available
upon request. All the documents and
data shall be kept for at least one year after completion in construction of
the helipad.
With reference to Event/Action Plans in previous sections, when the
environmental quality limits are exceeded, the ET shall immediately notify the
ER & EPD, as appropriate. The
notification shall be followed up with advice to EPD on the results of the
investigation, proposed action and success of the action taken, with any
necessary follow-up proposals. A sample
template for the interim notifications is shown in Appendix 10.1.