|
Date |
Monitoring Location |
Tide Mode |
Measured Value (NTU) |
Action Level* (NTU) |
Limit Level* (NTU) |
Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance |
Action taken/ to be taken |
Remarks |
|
9/2 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
3.00 |
16.70 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (2.47 x 1.2 = 2.96) |
23.12 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (2.47 x 1.3 = 3.21) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
6.72 |
14.55 or 120% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.30 x 1.2 = 6.36) |
28.86 or 130% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.30 x 1.3 = 6.89) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/16 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
6.02 |
16.70 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.97 x 1.2 = 5.96) |
23.12 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.97 x 1.3 = 6.46) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/19 |
MW4 |
Mid-Ebb |
4.03 |
13.29 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.32 x 1.2 = 3.98) |
18.37 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.32
x 1.3 = 4.31) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/21 |
MW5 |
Mid-Ebb |
6.90 |
13.29 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.47 x 1.2 = 6.00) |
18.37 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.47 x 1.3 = 6.50) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/23 |
MW5 |
Mid-Ebb |
3.83 |
13.29 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.18 x 1.2 = 3.81) |
18.37 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.18 x 1.3 = 4.13) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Date |
Monitoring
Location |
Tide Mode |
Measured Value
(mg/L) |
Action Level (mg/L) |
Limit Level (mg/L) |
Possible
Reason(s) for the Exceedance |
Action taken/ to
be taken |
Remarks |
|
9/5 |
MW5 |
Mid-Flood |
4.77 (Bottom) |
5.00 (Bottom) |
4.65 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/9 |
MW3 MW5 MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
5.17 5.04 5.17 (Surface & Middle) |
5.20 (Surface & Middle) |
4.72 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/9 |
MW5 |
Mid-Ebb |
3.81 (Bottom) |
3.90 (Bottom) |
3.35 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/9 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
3.78 (Bottom) |
4.66 (Bottom) |
4.03 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/9 |
MW3 MW4 MW5 MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
4.92 4.84 4.11 4.06 (Bottom) |
5.00 (Bottom) |
4.65 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/9 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Flood |
3.88 (Bottom) |
4.69 (Bottom) |
4.55 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
4.12 (Surface & Middle) |
4.91 (Surface & Middle) |
4.24 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 MW5 MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
4.21 4.26 4.12 4.07 4.17 4.16 (Surface & Middle) |
5.20 (Surface & Middle) |
4.72 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Flood |
4.22 (Surface & Middle) |
5.01 (Surface & Middle) |
5.00 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
3.95 (Bottom) |
4.66 (Bottom) |
4.03 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 MW5 MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
4.14 4.17 3.99 3.91 4.09 4.04 (Bottom) |
5.00 (Bottom) |
4.65 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/12 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Flood |
4.10 (Bottom) |
4.69 (Bottom) |
4.55 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/19 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 |
Mid-Flood |
5.16 4.61 4.45 4.29 (Surface & Middle) |
5.20 (Surface & Middle) |
4.72 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/19 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 |
Mid-Flood |
4.96 4.50 4.26 4.13 (Bottom) |
5.00 (Bottom) |
4.65 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/28 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Flood |
4.80 (Surface & Middle) |
5.01 (Surface & Middle) |
5.00 (Surface & Middle) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/28 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
4.30 (Bottom) |
4.66 (Bottom) |
4.03 (Bottom) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Date |
Monitoring
Location |
Tide Mode |
Measured Value
(mg/L) |
Action Level* (mg/L) |
Limit Level* (mg/L) |
Possible
Reason(s) for the Exceedance |
Action taken/ to
be taken |
Remarks |
|
9/5 |
MW3 |
Mid-Ebb |
5.67 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.67 x 1.2 = 5.60) |
20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.67 x 1.3 = 6.07) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/7 |
MW1 MW2 MW4 |
Mid-Ebb |
7.50 7.75 6.50 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.33 x 1.2 = 6.39) |
20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.33 x 1.3 = 6.92) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/7 |
MW5 |
Mid-Flood |
5.17 |
18.60 or 120% of upstream control stations MR5 (3.50 x 1.2 = 4.20) |
23.40 or 130% of upstream control stations MR5 (3.50 x 1.3 = 4.55) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/7 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW6 |
Mid-Ebb |
9.50 9.25 8.50 8.50 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (6.50 x 1.2 = 7.80) |
20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (6.50 x 1.3 = 8.45) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/16 |
WM2 WM6 |
Mid-Ebb |
5.25 4.00 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.00 x 1.2 = 3.60) |
20.00 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (3.00 x 1.3 = 3.90) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/19 |
MW4 |
Mid-Ebb |
10.00 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (7.83 x 1.2 = 9.39) |
20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (7.83 x 1.3 = 10.17) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/21 |
MW1 MW5 MW6 |
Mid-Ebb |
9.75 11.50 10.83 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.00 x 1.2 = 6.00) |
20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.00 x 1.3 = 6.50) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/21 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
10.17 |
13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.00 x 1.2 = 6.00) |
14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.00 x 1.3 = 6.50) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/23 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
10.00 |
13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (7.33 x 1.2 = 8.79) |
14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (7.33 x 1.3 = 9.52) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/26 |
MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 |
Mid-Ebb |
7.50 7.75 7.17 5.83 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.83 x 1.2 = 5.79) |
20.00 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.83 x 1.3 = 6.27) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances
were considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/26 |
WFCZF1 |
Mid-Ebb |
9.00 |
13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.83 x 1.2 = 5.79) |
14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.83 x 1.3 = 6.27) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/26 |
MW6 |
Mid-Flood |
8.00 |
18.60 or 120% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.67 x 1.2 = 6.80) |
23.40 or 130% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.67 x 1.3 = 7.37) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/28 |
MW5 |
Mid-Ebb |
7.17 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.83 x 1.2 = 6.99) |
20.00 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (5.83 x 1.3 = 7.57) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
|
9/30 |
MW5 |
Mid-Flood |
7.17 |
11.50 or 120% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.67 x 1.2 = 6.80) |
20.00 or 130% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.67 x 1.3 = 7.37) |
As there were no marine activities
conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance
was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: ·
Natural fluctuation of water
body |
Nil |
Nil |
*Traceable to Method Statement (Marine Water Quality
Monitoring and Audit Manual), Rev. 2, Section 3.1 – 3.2