Event and Action Plan for
Marine Water Quality
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET
Leader |
IC(E) |
ER |
Contractor |
|
Action Level being exceeded by one sampling day |
1.
Repeat
in‑situ measurement to confirm findings; 2.
Identify
source(s) of impact; 3.
Inform
the IC(E) and the Contractor; 4.
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and the Contractor's working methods; 5.
Discuss
mitigation measures with the IC(E) and the Contractor; 6.
Repeat
measurement on next day of exceedance. |
1.
Discuss
with the ET Leader and the Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2.
Review
proposals on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor and advise the
ER accordingly; 3.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Discuss
with the IC(E) on the proposed mitigation measures; 2.
Make
agreement on the mitigation measures to the implemented. |
1.
Inform
the ER and confirm notification of the non‑compliance in writing 2.
Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3.
Check
all plant and equipment; 4.
Consider
changes of working methods; 5.
Discuss
with the ET Leader and the IC(E) and propose mitigation measures to the IC(E)
and the ER; 6.
Implement
the agreed mitigation measures. |
Action Level being exceeded by more than one
consecutive sampling days |
1.
Repeat
in‑situ measurement to confirm findings; 2.
Identify
source(s) of impact, 3.
Inform
the IC(E) and the Contractor; 4.
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods; 5.
Discuss
mitigation measures with the IC(E) and the Contractor; 6.
Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented; 7.
Prepare
to increase the monitoring frequency to daily; 8.
Repeat
measurement on next day of exceedance. |
1.
Discuss
with the ET Leader and the Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2.
Review
proposals on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor and advise the
ER accordingly; 3.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Discuss
with IC(E) on the proposed mitigation measures; 2.
Make
agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; 3.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Inform
the ER and confirm notification of the non‑compliance in writing 2.
Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3.
Check
all plant and equipment; 4.
Consider
changes of working methods; 5.
Discuss
with the ET Leader and the IC(E)and propose mitigation measures to the IC(E)
and the ER; 6.
Implement
the agreed mitigation measures. |
Event and Action Plan for
Marine Water Quality (Continue)
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET
Leader |
IC(E) |
ER |
Contractor |
|
Limit Level being
exceeded by one consecutive sampling day |
1.
Repeat
in‑situ measurement to confirm findings; 2.
Identify
source(s) of impact; 3.
Inform
the IC(E), the Contractor, the EPD and the AFCD; 4.
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and the Contractor's working methods; 5.
Discuss
mitigation measures with the IC(E), ER and Contractor; 6.
Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented; 7.
Increase
the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit Level. |
1.
Discuss
with the ET Leader and the Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2.
Review
proposals on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor and advise the
ER accordingly; 3.
Access the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Discuss
with the IC(E) on the proposed mitigation measures; 2.
Request
the Contractor to critically review the working methods; 3.
Make
agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; 4.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures |
1.
Inform
the ER and confirm notification of the non‑compliance in writing; 2.
Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3.
Check
all plant and equipment; 4.
Consider
changes of working methods; 5. Discuss with the ET Leader, the IC(E) and the ER and proposed mitigation measures to the IC(E) and the ER within 3 working days; 6.
Implement the agreed mitigation measures. |
Limit Level being exceeded by more than one
consecutive sampling days |
1.
Repeat
in‑situ measurement to confirm findings; 2.
Identify
source(s) of impact, 3.
Inform
the IC(E) and the Contractor; 4.
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods; 5.
Discuss
mitigation measures with the IC(E) and the Contractor; 6.
Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented; 7.
Increase
the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit Level for two
consecutive days. |
1.
Discuss
with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures; 2.
Review
proposals on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor and advise the
ER accordingly; 3.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Discuss
with IC(E) on the ET Leader and the
Contractor on the proposed mitigation measures; 2.
Request
Contractor to critically review the working methods; 3.
Make
agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented; 4.
Access
the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures; 5.
Consider
and instruct, if slow down or to stop all or part of the marine work until no
exceedance of Limit Level. |
1.
Inform
the ER and confirm notification of the non-compliance in writing; 2.
Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3.
Check
all plant and equipment; 4.
Consider
changes of working methods; 5.
Discuss
with the ET Leader, the IC(E) and the
ER and propose mitigation measures to the IC(E) and the ER within 3 working
days; 6.
Implement
the agreed mitigation measures; 7.
As
directed by the ER, slow down or stop all or part of the construction
activities. |