PART 1 – TURBIDITY

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (NTU)

Action Level* (NTU)

Limit Level*    (NTU)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

 

12/16

 

MW5

 

Mid-Flood

 

 

4.15

 

 

14.55 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MR5

(3.35 x 1.2 = 4.02)

 

28.86 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MR5

 (3.35 x 1.3 = 4.36)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

PART 2 – DISSOLVED OXYGEN

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (mg/L)

Action Level

(mg/L)

Limit Level

(mg/L)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

 

12/5

 

MW6

 

 

Mid-Flood

 

 

5.15

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.20

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

4.72

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/5

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid- Flood

 

 

4.95

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.01

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.00

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

4.33

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

4.91

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

4.24

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23

 

MW1

MW3

MW4

MW5

MW6

 

 

Mid-Flood

 

 

5.06

4.95

5.14

4.54

4.71

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.20

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

4.72

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid- Flood

 

 

4.55

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.01

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

5.00

(Surface

&

Middle)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

4.31

(Bottom)

 

 

4.66

(Bottom)

 

 

4.03

(Bottom)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/23

 

MW5

MW6

 

 

Mid-Flood

 

 

4.65

4.86

(Bottom)

 

 

5.00

(Bottom)

 

 

4.65

(Bottom)

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

Nil

 

Nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART 3 – Suspended SoLIDs

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (mg/L)

Action Level*

(mg/L)

Limit Level*

(mg/L)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

 

12/2

 

MW5

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

6.83

 

 

 

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(5.17 x 1.2 = 6.20)

 

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (5.17 x 1.3 = 6.72)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/5

 

MW3

MW4

 

 

Mid-Flood

 

 

11.00

11.83

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

11.5

 

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/12

 

MW5

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

6.00

 

 

 

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(4.83 x 1.2 = 5.79)

 

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (4.83 x 1.3 = 6.27)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/14

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

      10.83

 

 

13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(8.83 x 1.2 = 10.59)

 

14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (8.83 x 1.3 = 11.47)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/16

 

MW1

MW2

MW3

MW4 MW5

MW6

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

5.75

5.50

7.67

7.50

4.83

5.50

 

 

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(4.00 x 1.2 = 4.80)

 

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (4.00 x 1.3 = 5.20)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/16

 

WFCZF1

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

5.00

 

 

13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(4.00 x 1.2 = 4.80)

 

14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (4.00 x 1.3 = 5.20)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedance might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/19

 

MW1

MW2

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

8.75

9.25

 

 

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(5.83 x 1.2 = 6.99)

 

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (5.83 x 1.3 = 7.57)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

 

12/23

 

MW4

MW5

 

 

Mid-Ebb

 

 

9.17

8.33

 

 

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

(5.83 x 1.2 = 6.99)

 

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

 

MC1

 (5.83 x 1.3 = 7.57)

 

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

 

Exceedances might be due to:

·          Natural fluctuation of water body

 

 

Nil

 

 

Nil

 

*Traceable to Method Statement (Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Audit Manual), Rev. 2, Section 3.1 – 3.2