PART 1 – TURBIDITY

Date	Monitoring Location	Tide Mode	Measured Value (NTU)	*Action Level (NTU)**	*Limit Level (NTU)**	Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance	Action taken/ to be taken	Remarks
Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (NTU)

Action Level* (NTU)

Limit Level* (NTU)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

Nil

PART 2 – DISSOLVED OXYGEN

Date	Monitoring Location	Tide Mode	Measured Value (mg/L)	Action Level (mg/L)	Limit Level (mg/L)	Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance	Action taken/ to be taken	Remarks
1/25	MW5 MW6	Mid-Flood	5.01 5.18 (Surface & Middle)	5.20 (Surface & Middle)	4.72 (Surface & Middle)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (mg/L)

Action Level

(mg/L)

Limit Level

(mg/L)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

1/25

MW5

MW6

Mid-Flood

5.01

5.18

(Surface

Middle)

5.20

(Surface

Middle)

4.72

(Surface

Middle)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

Exceedances might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

PART 3 – Suspended SoLIDs

Date	Monitoring Location	Tide Mode	Measured Value (mg/L)	Action Level* (mg/L)	Limit Level* (mg/L)	Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance	Action taken/ to be taken	Remarks
1/2	MW5	Mid-Flood	9.83	18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations MR5 (8.17 x 1.2 = 9.80)	23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations MR5 (8.17 x 1.3 = 10.62)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/6	MW3 MW4 MW5	Mid-Ebb	11.67 12.67 11.67	11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (11.33 x 1.2 = 13.59)	20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (11.33 x 1.3 = 14.72)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/6	MW3 MW4	Mid-Flood	10.67 10.67	9.9	11.5	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/11	MW5	Mid-Flood	7.67	18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60)	23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/16	MW5	Mid-Flood	6.83	18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60 )	23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations MR5 (5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/16	MW6	Mid-Flood	6.67	18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60)	23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/20	MW6	Mid-Flood	6.50	18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.17 x 1.2 = 6.20)	23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations MR6 (5.17 x 1.3 = 6.72)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/25	MW3 MW4	Mid-Ebb	7.50 6.50	11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.50 x 1.2 = 5.40)	20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.50 x 1.3 = 5.85)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project. Exceedances might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/25	WFCZF1	Mid-Ebb	5.83	13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.50 x 1.2 = 5.40)	14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.50 x 1.3 = 5.85)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil
1/27	MW3	Mid-Ebb	6.67	11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.33 x 1.2 = 5.19)	20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations MC1 (4.33 x 1.3 = 5.62)	As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances was considered not due to the Project. Exceedance might be due to: · Natural fluctuation of water body	Nil	Nil

Date

Monitoring Location

Tide Mode

Measured Value (mg/L)

Action Level*

(mg/L)

Limit Level*

(mg/L)

Possible Reason(s) for the Exceedance

Action taken/ to be taken

Remarks

1/2

MW5

Mid-Flood

9.83

18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations

MR5

(8.17 x 1.2 = 9.80)

23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations

MR5

(8.17 x 1.3 = 10.62)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/6

MW3

MW4

MW5

Mid-Ebb

11.67

12.67

11.67

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

MC1

(11.33 x 1.2 = 13.59)

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

MC1

(11.33 x 1.3 = 14.72)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

Exceedances might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/6

MW3

MW4

Mid-Flood

10.67

9.9

11.5

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

Exceedances might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/11

MW5

Mid-Flood

7.67

18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations

MR5

(5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60)

23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations

MR5

(5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/16

MW5

Mid-Flood

6.83

18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations

MR5

(5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60 )

23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations

MR5

(5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/16

MW6

Mid-Flood

6.67

18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations

MR6

(5.50 x 1.2 = 6.60)

23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations

MR6

(5.50 x 1.3 = 7.15)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/20

MW6

Mid-Flood

6.50

18.6 or 120% of upstream control stations

MR6

(5.17 x 1.2 = 6.20)

23.4 or 130% of upstream control stations

MR6

(5.17 x 1.3 = 6.72)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/25

MW3

MW4

Mid-Ebb

7.50

6.50

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.50 x 1.2 = 5.40)

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.50 x 1.3 = 5.85)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances were considered not due to the Project.

Exceedances might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/25

WFCZF1

Mid-Ebb

5.83

13.1 or 120% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.50 x 1.2 = 5.40)

14.1 or 130% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.50 x 1.3 = 5.85)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedance was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

1/27

MW3

Mid-Ebb

6.67

11.5 or 120% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.33 x 1.2 = 5.19)

20.0 or 130% of upstream control stations

MC1

(4.33 x 1.3 = 5.62)

As there were no marine activities conducted in the reclamation site on the day of monitoring, the exceedances was considered not due to the Project.

Exceedance might be due to:

· Natural fluctuation of water body

Nil

*Traceable to Method Statement (Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Audit Manual), Rev. 2, Section 3.1 – 3.2