Civil
Engineering and Development Department
Land Works Division
2/F, Civil Engineering and
Homantin,
Demolition of Kwai Chung Incineration Plant
Environmental Permit No.
EP-121/2002
Monthly EM&A Report for August 2008 Rev A
Report No.: 203204/KCIP/EM&A/9/A
September 08
Mott Connell Limited
7/F,
Tsim Sha Tsui,
Tel: 2828 5757
Fax: 2827 1823
This document has
been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be
relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being
carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott Connell
being obtained. Mott Connell accepts no
responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for
a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document
for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to
confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott Connell for all loss or damage
resulting therefrom. Mott Connell
accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other
than the person by whom it was commissioned.
To the extent that
this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott Connell
accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether
contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied
by parties other than Mott Connell and used by Mott Connell in preparing this
report.
Pursuant to Condition 2.3 and 3.5 of the Environmental Permit
EP-121/2002
This Monthly EM&A Report (Aug 2008) has
been reviewed, certified and verified by the following EM&A members as
Conforming to the Information and Recommendations contained in the EIA Report
Certified
by:
Joseph Chan
Environmental Team (ET)
Leader
Mott Connell Ltd.
Date 12
September 2008
Verified
by:
Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC)
Hyder Consulting
Limited
Date 12
September 2008
List of Contents Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 Background to the Project............................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Coverage of this EM&A Report...................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Project Management Organisation................................................................... 1-1
1.4 Project Program............................................................................................. 1-1
1.5 Works Undertaken in the Reporting Month....................................................... 1-2
2. EM&A Requirements 2-1
2.1 Summary of EM&A Requirements.................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits....................................................... 2-1
2.3 Event and Action Plans................................................................................... 2-1
2.4 Implementation of Environmental Mitigation
Measures...................................... 2-1
3. Monitoring Results 3-1
3.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule............................................................................ 3-1
3.2 Monitoring Methodology.................................................................................. 3-1
3.3 Monitoring Equipment..................................................................................... 3-3
3.4 Equipment Calibration..................................................................................... 3-3
3.5 Results of Impact Monitoring........................................................................... 3-3
4. Project Environmental Status 4-1
4.1 Environmental Meetings.................................................................................. 4-1
4.2 Status of Environmental Submissions, Permits
and Licenses.............................. 4-1
4.3 Waste Management Status.............................................................................. 4-2
4.4 Review of Environmental Monitoring Procedures.............................................. 4-3
4.5 Implementation Status of Environmental
Mitigation Measures............................ 4-3
5. AUDIT FINDINGS 5-1
5.1 Site Environmental Audit................................................................................. 5-1
5.2 Site Effluent Discharge/WPCO Effluent Discharge.......................................... 5-2
6. Environmental COMPLAINTS AND NON-COMPLIANCE 6-1
6.1 Summary of Environmental Complaints,
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions 6-1
6.2 Environmental Enquires................................................................................... 6-1
6.3 Environmental Events..................................................................................... 6-1
6.4 Environmental Exceedance/ Non-compliance................................................... 6-1
7. future key issues 7-1
7.1 Key Issues and Recommendations for Coming Month....................................... 7-1
8. conclusion and recommendation 8-1
8.1 Conclusions.................................................................................................... 8-1
8.2 Recommendations.......................................................................................... 8-1
List of Appendices
Appendix A.......... Environmental
Quality Performance Limits
Appendix
B.......... Event and Action Plans
Appendix
D.......... EM&A Schedule
Appendix
E.......... Air Quality Monitoring
Results and Graphical Presentation
Appendix
F.......... Calibration
Certificates
Appendix
G.......... Works Programme
List of Tables
Table 2‑1............ Summary of Impact EM&A
Requirements.................................................. 2-1
Table 3‑1............ TSP Monitoring Equipment.......................................................................... 3-3
Table 3‑2............ Equipment
Calibration Frequencies............................................................ 3-3
Table 3‑3............ Results of 1-Hour
TSP Impact Monitoring................................................... 3-3
Table 3‑4............ Results of 24-Hour
TSP Impact Monitoring................................................. 3-4
Table 4‑1............ Status of
Environmental Submissions, Permits and Licenses.................. 4-1
Table 4‑2............ Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table for 2008........................................... 4-2
Table 5‑1............ Summary of
Environmental Site Inspections.............................................. 5-1
Table 6‑1............ Summary of Environmental
Complaints and Prosecutions........................ 6-1
Table 6‑2............ Summary of
Exceedances.......................................................................... 6-1
Table B‑1............ Event and Action Plan for
Air Quality........................................................... B1
Table C‑2........... Implementation Schedule of
Recommended Mitigation Measures From the EIA C1
Table C‑3........... Event Contingency Plan for
Environmental Complaints.............................. C5
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Layout
Plan of Work Site and the Environs
Figure 1.2 Project
Organisation Chart
Figure 2.1 Location
of Air Quality (Dust) Monitoring Station
The EM&A programme for this Project commenced on 1 Dec 2007. This
report presents a summary of the environmental monitoring and audit works, list
of activities, and mitigation measures implemented during the reporting month
of August 2008.
This is the 9th Monthly EM&A Report for the works carried
out during the reporting month.
The following construction activities have taken place during the
reporting month: -
· Maintaining
cleanliness and tidiness of site
areas;
· Erection of bamboo scaffolding and
removal of ACM weather cladding from building of Incineration Plant;
· Removal of ACM cement pipe besides
Ash Bunker;
· Disposal of ACM;
· Erection of wheel washing bay and concrete pavement for
barging point in Portion B;
· Removal of non-inert C&D
materials such as wooden partition walls and doors and steel window frame in
EMSD site office;
· Pilot test for DCM removal;
· Replacement of temporary corrugated
steel cladding on boundary hoarding with approved noise panel.
Impact monitoring for air quality
(dust) due to the demolition work continued during the reporting month. No
exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels for dust was recorded.
No environmental complaint, notification of summons and prosecution was
received or made against the Project in the reporting month.
Site inspection was carried out on a weekly basis to monitor proper
implementation of environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for
the Project. In this reporting month, site inspections were carried out on 8, 14, 21
& 28 Aug 2008.
No non-compliances with regard to site environmental audits were
recorded in this reporting month.
As per the EM&A Manual, baseline 1-hour and 24-hour Total Suspended
Particulates (TSP monitoring was conducted during the period of 31 October 2007
to 13 November 2007. Results were reported in the Baseline Monitoring Report
submitted in November 2007.)
Future key issues to be considered in the forthcoming month include: -
·
ACM Cladding removal
works;
·
Disposal of ACM;
·
Preparation of DCM
removal works;
·
Barging Point
Erection;
· Demolition of minor structures
1.1.2
This
Contract [No.: CV/2007/06] for the Project was awarded to the Contractor –
China International Water & Electric Corporation and contractually
commenced on 31 October 2007. The main Contract will last for 45 months
excluding 12 months for landscape establishment works. In accordance with
Condition 1.11 of the Environmental Permit EP-121/2002, the Director of
Environmental Protection (DEP) was notified that the tentative commencement
date for the Project is 24 Jan 2008 within the context of the Environmental
Permit.
1.1.3
The
scope of the Project includes demolition and clearance of the existing chimney,
buildings and ancillary structures above the existing concrete ground slab
where the former Kwai Chung Incineration Plant (“KCIP”) is located. It also
includes the removal of asbestos containing materials (“ACM”) and dioxin/ furan
contaminated materials (“DCM”) prior to demolition of structures and subsequent
site remediation.
1.1.4
A
layout plan of the Project site and the environs is given in Figure 1.1.
1.1.5
Mott
Connell Limited (MCL) has been commissioned by the Project Proponent – Civil
Engineering and Development Department (“CEDD”) as the Environmental Team
(“ET”) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme
described in the approved EM&A Manual of the Project.
1.2
Coverage of this EM&A Report
1.2.1
The
EM&A programme for this Project commenced on 1 Dec 2007. This report
presents a summary of the environmental monitoring and audit works, list of
activities, and mitigation measures implemented during the reporting month in
Aug 2008.
1.2.2
This
is the 9th Monthly EM&A Report for the works carried out during
the reporting month.
1.3
Project Management Organisation
1.3.1
The
project organisation chart is presented in Figure 1.2.
1.5
Works Undertaken in the Reporting Month
1.5.1
The
following construction activities have taken place during the reporting month:
-
·
Maintaining
cleanliness and tidiness of site areas;
·
Erection
of bamboo scaffolding and removal of ACM weather cladding from building of
Incineration Plant;
·
Removal
of ACM cement pipe besides Ash Bunker;
·
Disposal
of ACM;
·
Erection
of wheel washing bay and concrete
pavement for barging point in Portion B;
·
Removal
of non-inert C&D materials such as wooden partition walls and doors and
steel window frame in EMSD site office;
·
Pilot
test for DCM removal;
·
Replacement
of temporary corrugated steel cladding on boundary hoarding with approved noise
panel.
2.1
Summary of EM&A Requirements
2.1.1
The
EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality and waste
management as specified in the approved EM&A Manual dated Sep 2001.
2.1.2
1-hour
TSP and 24-hour TSP levels at 1 dust monitoring station are to be taken during
the course of dusty work in every reporting month. This air quality monitoring
stations for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP measurements is shown in Figure 2.1 Location of
Air Quality (Dust) Monitoring Station.
2.1.3
A
summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2‑1 below.
Table 2‑1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
Air Quality |
24-Hour TSP |
1 Location - A1 |
Once every 6 days |
During dust generating construction works |
1-Hour TSP |
1 Location - A1 |
3 times every 6 days |
During dust generating construction works |
|
Waste |
On-Site Waste Audit |
Active Work Sites |
Weekly |
During Construction |
On-Site Waste Inspection |
||||
Wastewater |
On-Site Wastewater Audit |
Active Work Sites |
Weekly |
During Construction |
General Site Conditions |
Environmental Site Inspection |
Works areas and areas affected by works |
Weekly |
During Construction |
N.B.
A1 –
Boundary of the site adjacent to the Kwai Chung Primary Treatment Plant
2.2
Environmental Quality Performance Limits
2.2.1
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality are shown in Appendix A.
2.3.1
The
Event and Action Plans for air quality are shown in Appendix B.
2.4
Implementation of Environmental Mitigation Measures
2.4.1
The
Contractor is required to implement mitigation measures listed in the latest
EP, EIA Report and EM&A Manual. During routine site inspections, the
Contractor's implementation of mitigation measures, if any, are to be inspected
and reviewed. A schedule of the implementation of mitigation measures
identified at the EIA stage is given in Appendix C.
Figure 2.1 Location of Air
Quality (Dust) Monitoring Station
3.1
Impact Monitoring Schedule
3.1.1
Regular
site inspections were carried out on 8, 14, 21
& 28 Aug 2008 in the reporting month to assess the compliance with environmental
requirements. The EM&A schedule is given in Appendix D.
3.1.2
Impact
monitoring for air quality (dust) due to the demolition
work continued during the reporting month.
24-hour
TSP Monitoring
Installation
3.2.1
The
HVS has been installed close to representative air sensitive receivers. The following criteria have been considered
in the installation of the HVS.
·
A
horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against
gusty wind was provided.
·
The
distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least
twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.
·
A
minimum of 2m separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop
sampler.
·
No
furnace or incinerator flues were nearby.
·
Airflow
around the sampler was unrestricted.
·
Permission
was obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring
stations.
·
A
secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the samplers.
Preparation of Filter Papers
·
Glass
fibre filters, G810 are to be labelled with sufficient filters that are clean
and without pinholes.
·
All
filters are to be equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours
before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature is to be around 25 °C
and not variable by more than ±3°C, the relative humidity (RH) is to be <
50% and not variable by more than ±5 %.
A convenient working RH is 40%.
Field Monitoring
·
The
power supply is to be secured to ensure the HVS works properly.
·
The
filter holder and the area surrounding the filter are to be cleaned.
·
The
filter holder is to be removed by loosening the 4 bolts and a new filter, with
stamped number upward, on a supporting screen to be aligned carefully.
·
The
filter is to be properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket forms an
airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
·
The
swing bolts are to be fastened to hold the filter holder down to the
frame. The pressure applied is to
sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
·
The
shelter lid is then closed and is secured with the aluminium strip.
·
The
HVS shall be warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature
conditions.
·
A
new flow rate record sheet is to be set into the flow recorder.
·
The
flow rate of the HVS is to be checked and adjusted at around 1.1 m3/min. The range specified in the updated EM&A
Manual is between 0.6-1.7 m3/min.
·
The
programmable timer is set for a sampling period of 24 hrs + 1 hr, and the
starting time, weather condition and the filter number are to be recorded.
·
The
initial elapsed time is to be recorded.
·
At
the end of sampling, the sampled filter is to be removed carefully and folded
in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter are in
contact.
·
It
was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.
·
All
monitoring information is to be recorded on a standard data sheet.
·
Filters
are to be sent to a HOKLAS accredited laboratory for analysis.
Maintenance and Calibration
·
The
HVS and its accessories are to be maintained in good working condition, such as
replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a
continuous power supply.
·
HVSs
are to be calibrated at a bi-monthly intervals using GMW-25 Calibration Kit
throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
1-hour
TSP Monitoring
Field Monitoring
3.2.2
The
measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are to be in accordance with the
Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
·
Set
POWER to “ON”, push
·
Push
the knob at MEASURE position.
·
Push
“O-ADJ” button. (Then meter’s indication is 0).
·
Push
the knob at SENSI ADJ position and set the meter’s indication to S value
described on the Test Report using the trimmer for SENSI ADJ.
·
Pull
out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.
·
Push
“START” button.
Maintenance and Calibration
·
The
1-hour TSP meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year
intervals throughout all stages of the air quality baseline monitoring.
3.2.3
As
per the approved EM&A Manual, dust monitoring stations are located as shown
in Figure
2.1 Location
of Air Quality (Dust) Monitoring Station.
3.3.1
The
equipment used for air quality (dust) monitoring is listed in Table 3‑1.
Table 3‑1 TSP
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
HVS Sampler |
Greasby GMWS 2310 Accu-vol system |
Calibrator |
Tisch TE-5025A |
1-hour TSP Dust Meter |
TSI Model 8520 Dust
Trak Aerosol Monitor |
3.4.1
The
calibration frequencies of the monitoring equipment are provided in Table 3‑2.
Table 3‑2 Equipment Calibration
Frequencies
Equipment |
Calibration Frequency |
Latest Calibration Date |
High Volume Sampler Greasby GMWS 2310 Accu-vol system |
Every two months |
5 Jul 2008 |
1-hour TSP Dust Meter TSI Model 8520 Dust Trak Aerosol Monitor |
Every six months |
14 Mar 2008 |
3.4.2
The
calibration certificates are included in Appendix F.
3.5
Results of Impact Monitoring
3.5.1
Results
of 1-hour TSP level are summarised in Table
3‑3. Detailed
results, including weather conditions, and graphical presentations are included
in Appendix
E.
Table 3‑3 Results of 1-Hour TSP Impact
Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
1-hour |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
A1 |
178-284 |
345 |
500 |
3.5.2
No
exceedance of Action / Limit Levels for 1-hr TSP was recorded in the reporting
month.
Air Quality (24-hr TSP)
3.5.3
Results
of 24-hour TSP level are summarised in Table
3‑4. Detailed
results, including weather conditions, and graphical presentations are included
in Appendix
E.
Table 3‑4 Results
of 24-Hour TSP Impact Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
1-hour |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
A1 |
50-142 |
179 |
260 |
3.5.4
No
exceedance of Action / Limit Levels for 24-hr TSP was recorded in the reporting
month.
4.1.1
One
environmental meeting was held on the day of the monthly site inspection on 21 Aug 2008.
4.2
Status of Environmental Submissions, Permits and Licenses
4.2.1
A
summary of status of all environmental submissions, permits, licenses, and/or
notifications to EPD for this Project during the reporting period is presented
in Table
4‑1 below.
Table 4‑1 Status
of Environmental Submissions, Permits and Licenses
Item |
Description |
Date of Application/
Submission |
Status |
1. |
Environmental Permit (EP No. EP-121/2002) |
4 Feb 2002 |
Valid |
2. |
Billing Account under Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction Waste) Regulation (Ref. No.: 7006285) |
Approved on 16 Nov 2007 |
Valid |
3. |
Waste Management Plan |
v2.3 approved on 25 Jul 2008 v3.0 submitted to EPD on 19 Aug 2008 |
v2.3: valid v3.0: pending approval |
4. |
Registration as a Chemical Waste Producer under Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Ref. No.: WPN-5292-320-C3459-01) |
2 Nov 2007 |
Approved by EPD on 26 Nov 2007 |
5. |
Effluent Discharge Licence (Ref. No.: EP760/320/0128821) |
Variation of License submitted on 25 March 2008 (Approved on 8 July 2008) |
Valid |
6. |
Notification pursuant to Section 3(1) of the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation (Form NA) |
EPD notified on 15 Jan 2008 |
Valid |
7. |
Notification of commencement of asbestos abatement work pursuant to Section 73 of the Air Pollution Control Ordinance |
EPD notified on 4 Feb 2008 |
Valid. Approved by EPD on 5 Mar 2008. |
New submissions |
|||
|
No new submissions |
|
|
4.3.1
No
C&D material, except general refuse, was generated by the Project in the reporting month, as shown in Table 4‑2. A trip ticket system has been implemented for all
off-site waste disposals. (Note that 113.8703m3 of ACM has been generated from the
site but was stored on site in August 2008.)
Table 4‑2 Monthly
Summary Waste Flow Table for 2008
Month |
Actual Quantities of Inert C&D Materials Generated
Monthly |
Actual Quantities of C&D Wastes Generated Monthly |
||||||||||||||||||
Total Quantity Generated |
Broken Concrete |
Reused in the Contract |
Reused in other Projects |
Disposed of at Public Fill |
Metals |
Paper/ Cardboard |
Plastics |
Chemical waste |
Others (e.g. refuse) |
|||||||||||
(In tons) |
(In tons) |
(In tons) |
(In tons) |
(In tons) |
(In ‘000 kg) |
(In ‘000 kg) |
(In ‘000 kg) |
(In ‘000 kg) |
(In ‘000 m3) |
|||||||||||
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
Est. |
Act. |
|
Jan |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.250 |
0.0585 |
Feb |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.250 |
0.063 |
Mar |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.125 |
0.018 |
Apr |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.125 |
0.0045 |
May |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3.2 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.125 |
0 |
June |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0.0225 |
0 |
8.1 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.125 |
0.0135 |
Jul |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.125 |
0.009 |
Aug |
0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
0.018 |
0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
120 |
|
0.125 |
0.009 |
Sep |
0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
120 |
|
0.125 |
|
Oct |
0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
120 |
|
0.125 |
|
Nov |
0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
120 |
|
0.125 |
|
Dec |
0 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
120 |
|
0.125 |
|
Total |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0.0405 |
0 |
11.3 |
1.2 |
0 |
1.2 |
0 |
600 |
0 |
1.750 |
0.1665 |
4.4
Review of Environmental Monitoring Procedures
4.4.1
The
monitoring works conducted by the Environmental Team have been reviewed
regularly. No changes in the environmental monitoring procedures are considered
necessary at this stage.
4.5
Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
4.5.1
An
Implementation Schedule of Mitigation Measures from the EIA/ EM&A Manual
has been given in Appendix C.
5.1.1
Site
inspection is to be carried out on a weekly basis to monitor proper
implementation of environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for
the Project. In this reporting month, one monthly site inspection was carried
out jointly by the ER, Contractor, ETL and IEC on 21 August 2008 and additional weekly site
inspections were carried out by the ER, Contractor and ET on 8, 14, 21
& 28 Aug 2008.
Inspection by EPD was carried out on 21 August 2008. No observation or comment
was made.
5.1.2
Major
findings provided by ET and those jointly provided by the ET and IEC on 21 August 2008 from the site
inspection are summarised in Table
5‑1 below.
Table 5‑1 Summary of Environmental
Site Inspections
Date of Inspection |
Major Observations |
Action(s) |
8 Aug 2008 |
The contractor is reminded to repair the
damaged plastic sheet at the chimney before demolition commences inside the
chimney. The chemical waste bottles (approx. 20L)
are found near to the chimney without proper labels. |
The
damaged plastic sheet at the chimney opening has been repair. The
chemical waste (liquid) bottles were removed from the area. |
14 Aug 2008 |
Water ponding was found at the
sedimentation tank at the South boundary. Debris was found on the site. The contractor is reminded to maintain good housekeeping and, in particular to prevent debris from entering the drains. |
The
water ponding found was cleared. The
debris found was cleared. |
21 Aug 2008 |
Washing of truck mixer was observed at
Portion B (gravel ground). A proper location should be assigned for car
washing to prevent the wash-out from entering into watercourse. Construction materials were put in front
of the chemical (asbestos) waste containers. The contractor has removed the
materials and maintained a clear access to the container doors. |
As
concreting work will be limited to road paving in portion B, it is expected
that the number of concrete truck will be small. The contractor has proposed
to use a steel tank to collect washing water in the future. The
materials in front of the chemical (asbestos) waste container were removed. |
28 Aug 2008 |
Construction material (bamboo) was
observed at the edge of building roof which creates potential falling object
hazard. The contractor will relocate the materials to avoid the hazard. An inclined steel tank (large size) next to the chimney is found containing stagnant water (around 0.5 m3). The contractor is reminded to remove the water to prevent breeding of mosquitoes. |
Construction
materials at edge of building roof were removed. Water
in the inclined steel tank was removed. |
5.2
Site Effluent Discharge/WPCO Effluent Discharge
5.2.1
A
WPCO effluent discharge licence was granted by EPD on 10 March 2008 and
subsequently the Contractor has applied for variation of licence conditions on
15 March 2008. EPD has
granted the new discharge licence on 8 July 2008. The foul water from toilets
of Contractor’s & Engineer’s site offices in Portion B would be temporarily
stored in storage tank and then collected and disposed by a sewage collector.
5.2.2
Effluent
discharge sampling was carried out on 13 August 2008. No non-compliance
is recorded.
6.1
Summary of Environmental Complaints, Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions
6.1.1
No
environmental complaints have been received during the reporting month. Appendix C presents the environmental complaint event
contingency plan of the Project and Table 6‑1 below presents a statistics of complaints,
notification of summons and successful prosecution since the commencement of
the Project.
Table 6‑1 Summary of Environmental Complaints
and Prosecutions
Complaints
Logged |
Summons
Served |
Successful
Prosecutions |
|||
Aug
2008 |
Cumulative |
Aug
2008 |
Cumulative |
Aug
2008 |
Cumulative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6.1.2
No
environmental complaint, notification of summons and prosecution has been
received or made against the Project in this reporting month.
6.2.1
No
environmental enquiries were received during the reporting month.
6.3.1
No
unusual events were recorded during the reporting month.
6.4
Environmental Exceedance/ Non-compliance
6.4.1
The
Event and Action Plan for air quality (dust) is presented in Appendix B.
Air
Quality - Dust
6.4.2
No
exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour and 24-hour TSP was
recorded.
Waste
Management
6.4.3
Not
applicable.
Summary
of Exceedances
6.4.4
Table 6‑2 summarises the total number of exceedances for air
quality recorded during the reporting period.
Table 6‑2 Summary of Exceedances
Parameters |
Total no. of
Measurements |
Action Level
Exceedance |
% of Action Level Exceedance |
Limit Level Exceedance |
% of Limit Level Exceedance |
Air Quality |
20 |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
6.4.5
No exceedance was recorded
in the reporting period.
7.1
Key Issues and Recommendations for Coming Month
7.1.1
Key
issues to be considered in the coming month include: -
1.
ACM Cladding
removal works;
2.
Disposal of ACM;
3.
Preparation
of DCM removal works;
4.
Barging Point Erection;
5.
Demolition
of minor structures
7.1.2
Based
on the above key issues, the recommended mitigation measures to be implemented
include the following: -
Air
·
Covers
for dusty stockpiles and control of dust emissions from construction
(demolition) works;
·
Haul
road watering and vehicle wheel wash prior to exit;
·
All
plant to be maintained to prevent any undue air emissions.
Noise
·
All
plant shall be maintained to prevent any undue noise nuisance.
·
Use
quiet plants during demolition whenever possible.
·
Noisy
activities should be avoided during holidays.
Water
·
All
wheel wash water shall be diverted to a sediment pit before discharge;
·
Stagnant water shall be cleared quickly after rain;
·
All
fuel cans, generators shall be placed within a bunded area; and any fuel spills
shall be mopped up or excavated and disposed of as necessary;
·
All
washout from concrete mixer shall be collected properly to avoid direct
discharge.
Waste
·
Different
types of waste should be segregated, stored, transported and disposed of in
accordance with the relevant legislative requirements and guidelines;
·
Records
of quantities of wastes generated, recycled and disposal (with locations) shall
be kept.
Asbestos
·
Removal,
handling, transportation and disposal of the ACM in line with relevant
regulations.
Dioxin
·
Removal,
handling, transportation and disposal of the DCM in line with
relevant regulations.
8.1.1
EM&A
was performed in August 2008 during which some site works have continued. All monitoring and
audit results in the reporting month were checked and reviewed.
8.1.2
Airborne
dust monitoring continued due to the demolition work during the reporting month. Also, ACM removal was
carried out. In
general, the Contractor is preparing to implement all required mitigation
measures and has been reasonably responsive to the ET’s recommendations on any
discrepancies observed during the weekly environmental site inspection of this
reporting month.
8.1.3
No
environmental complaints, notification summons or successful prosecutions have
been received or made against this Project in this reporting month.
8.2.1
No
further recommendations made at this stage pending more site progress achieved.
Action
and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg/m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
A1 |
179 |
260 |
Action
and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg/m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
A1 |
345 |
500 |
Appendix
B Event and
Action Plans
Table B‑1 Event and Action Plan for Air Quality
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET |
IEC |
ER |
CONTRACTOR |
|
ACTION LEVEL |
||||
1. Exceedance
for one sample |
1. Identify
source 2. Inform IEC
and ER 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check Contractor’s
working method |
1. Notify Contractor 2. Check monitoring data and Contractor's
working methods |
1. Rectify any
unacceptable practice 2. Amend working
methods if appropriate |
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples |
1. Identify
source 2. Inform IEC
and ER 3. Repeat
measurements to confirm findings 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily 5. Discuss with
Contractor , IEC and ER for remedial actions required 6. If exceedance
continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER 7. If exceedance
stops, cease additional monitoring |
1. Checking
monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check
Contractor’s working method 3. Discuss with
ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures 4. Advise the ER
on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures 5. Supervise
implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in
writing 2. Notify Contractor 3. Check monitoring data and Contractor's
working methods 4. Discuss with IEC and Contractor on potential
remedial actions 5. Ensure remedial actions properly implemented |
1. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to ER within 3 working days of notification 2. Implement the
agreed proposals 3. Amend
proposal if appropriate |
LIMIT LEVEL |
||||
1. Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify source 2. Inform ER and EPD 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily 5. Assess effectiveness of Contractor's remedial
actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results |
1. Checking monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check Contractor’s working method 3. Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible
remedial measures 4. Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the
proposed remedial measures 5. Supervise implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in
writing 2. Notify Contractor 3. Check monitoring data and Contractor's
working methods 4. Discuss with ET Leader and Contractor
potential remedial actions 5. Ensure remedial actions properly implemented |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to ER
within 3 working days of notification 3. Implement the agreed proposals 4. Amend proposal if appropriate |
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples |
1. Identify source 2. Inform IEC, ER and EPD the causes &
actions taken for the exceedances 3. Repeat measurement to confirm findings 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily 5. Investigate the causes of exceedance,
Contractor’s working procedures to identify possible mitigation 6. Arrange meeting with IEC and ER to discuss
the remedial actions to be taken 7. Assess effectiveness of Contractor's remedial
actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional
monitoring |
1. Discuss amongst ER, ET and Contractor as the
potential remedial actions 2. Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever
necessary to ensure their effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly 3 Supervise the implementation of remedial
measures |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in
writing 2. Notify Contractor 3. Carry out analysis of Contractor's working
procedures with IEC to determine possible mitigation to be implemented 4. Discuss amongst Environmental Team Leader and
the Contractor potential remedial actions 5. Review Contractor's remedial actions whenever
necessary to assure their effectiveness 6. If exceedance continues, consider what
portion of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that
portion of work until the exceedance is abated |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to ER
within 3 working days of notification 3. Implement the agreed proposals 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under
control 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated |
Appendix
C Schedule of
Mitigation Measures from the EIA/ EM&A Manual and Event Contingency Plan
for Environmental Compliant
Table C‑2 Implementation
Schedule of Recommended Mitigation Measures From the EIA
No. |
Activity |
Mitigation/EIA
Recommendations |
Responsibility
for Implementation |
Location/Duration
completion of measures |
Implementation
Stage |
Relevant
Guidelines Legislation |
Implementation
Status ^ |
1 |
Ash
Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
Treatment |
Reconfirm extent
of contaminated ash deposits by sampling for dioxins and furans. Handling, transportation and disposal of
the ash waste in line with relevant regulations. Collection, immobilisation and testing of
waste for disposal to landfill shall be carried out according to the relevant
regulations and recommendations of the EIA including immobilisation by
collection and mixing the ash material with cement. Pilot mixing and TCLP tests should
establish the ratio of cement to ash to the satisfaction of EPD. Ash waste to be treated and placed into
steel drums lined with plastic sheeting.
The drums should be adequately sealed and in new or good condition. Prior agreement of the disposal criteria
from EPD and agreement to disposal from the landfill operator must be
obtained. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
KCIP work areas. Duration of the ash removal |
A@ |
1, 10, EIA |
P |
II |
Disposal |
To monitor the disposal of
waste at landfills, a “trip-ticket” system (WBTC No. 5/99) for all solid waste
transfer/disposal operations should be implemented. The system should be included as a
contractual requirement, and monitored by the Environmental Team and audited
by the Independent Checker (Environment). |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
A |
1, 5, 9 |
ü |
III |
Asbestos Removal |
An asbestos abatement
programme should be submitted to EPD for approval prior to the commencement
of the asbestos abatement work. |
CEDD and
Contractor |
As above |
A |
4 |
ü |
2 |
Demolition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
Non-blasting Methodology |
Demolition by Non-Blasting
Methodology Only. All structures and
buildings should be demolished and removed prior to demolition of chimneys |
CEDD |
KCIP work areas. Duration of the demolition |
C# |
8 |
ü |
A2 |
Waste Management Plan. |
A Waste Management Plan
shall be submitted to EPD for approval.
The Waste Management Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
findings of the Waste Management Paper of the EIA, the types, quantities,
disposal methods, timing, and locations of final disposition,
responsibilities for implementation and the possible recycling and reuse of
wastes generated. |
CEDD and
Contractor |
Prior to commencement of the demolition works |
Prior to C# |
1 |
ü |
B |
Material Storage |
Covers for dusty stockpiles
and control of dust emissions from construction (demolition) works requires
appropriate dust control measures to be implemented in accordance with the
requirements in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
KCIP work areas. Duration of the demolition |
C |
4 |
ü |
C |
Vehicle movement |
Haul road watering, vehicle
wheel wash prior to exit. Where practical, access roads should be protected
with crushed gravel. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
4 |
P |
D |
Plant maintenance |
All plant shall be
maintained to prevent any undue air emissions. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
Prior to start of works |
4 |
ü |
E |
Demolition Techniques |
Selection of non-blasting demolition
techniques to minimise noise and vibration.
|
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
8 |
ü |
F |
Plant maintenance |
All plant shall be
maintained to prevent any undue noise nuisance. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
2, 3 |
ü |
G |
Wheel wash |
All wheel wash water shall
be diverted to a sediment pit. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
5 |
P |
H |
Sediment control |
Sediment removal facilities
shall provided and be maintained and excavated as necessary to prevent sedimentation
of channels. Perimeter channels should
be provided. Works should be programmed for the dry season where
feasible. Environmental guidelines for
the handling and disposal of discharges from construction sites, as
stipulated in the Practice Note for Professional Persons, Construction Site
Drainage (ProPECC PN 1/94) to be followed. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
5, 12 |
N/A |
I |
Surface water diversion |
All clean surface water
shall be diverted around the site. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
5, 12 |
X |
J |
Fuel can storage |
All fuel cans shall be
placed within a bunded area. Any fuel spills shall be mopped up as necessary. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
5,6 |
ü |
K |
Material, plant movement
& fuel can filling. |
Any fuel or oil spills
shall be excavated and disposed of. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
6,7 |
ü |
L |
Generators |
All generators shall be
placed within a bunded area. Any fuel spills shall be mopped up as necessary. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
5,6,7 |
ü |
M |
Material containers |
All empty bags and
containers shall be collected for disposal. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
6,7 |
ü |
N |
Worker generated litter and
Waste |
Litter receptacles shall be
placed around the site. Litter shall be taken regularly to the refuse
collection points. Chemical toilets (or suitable equivalent) should be
provided for workers. Any canteens should have grease traps. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
6 |
ü |
O |
Neighbourhood nuisance |
All complaints regarding
construction works shall be relayed to the environmental team. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1, 6 |
ü |
P |
Legal requirements |
Different types of waste should
be segregated, stored, transported and disposed of in accordance with the
relevant legislative requirements and guidelines |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1,6 |
ü |
Q |
On-site separation |
On-site separation of municipal
solid waste and construction/demolition wastes shall be conducted in order to
minimise the amount of solid waste to be disposed to landfill. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1, 11 |
ü |
R |
Temporary storage area |
Separated wastes should be
stored in different containers, skips, or stockpiles to enhance reuse or
recycling of materials and encourage their proper disposal. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1, 11 |
ü |
S |
Record of wastes |
Records of quantities of wastes
generated, recycled and disposed (with locations) shall be kept. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1, 9 |
ü |
T |
Trip-ticket system |
To monitor the disposal of
waste at landfills and control fly-tipping, a “trip-ticket” system under WBTC
N0.5/99 for all solid waste transfer/disposal operations should be
implemented. The system should be
included as a contractual requirement, and monitored by the Environmental
Team and audited by the Independent Checker (Environment). |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
C |
1, 9 |
ü |
3 |
Soil
Remediation Phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
B, C, D, F, G, I, J, K, L,
M, N, O, P, Q, R, S and T as above |
As above (see W for soil
remediation). |
As above |
As above |
R |
As above |
N/A |
V |
De-watering |
Collect and recycle
extracted groundwater and leachate by mixing with cement for soil
remediation. Environmental guidelines
for the handling and disposal of discharges from construction sites, as
stipulated in the Practice Note for Professional Persons, Construction Site
Drainage (ProPECC PN 1/94) to be followed.
Any surplus groundwater and leachate requiring disposal to be disposed
of under the relevant legislation or treated to meet the standards given in
Table 9a of the WPCO TM. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
KCIP work areas. Duration of the soil remediation |
R |
5 |
N/A |
W |
Immobilisation |
Immobilisation and testing
of waste soil shall be carried out according to the relevant regulations and recommendations
of the EIA including immobilisation by collection and mixing the contaminated
soil material with cement. Pilot
mixing and TCLP tests should verify the effectiveness and establish the ratio
of cement to soil to the satisfaction of EPD.
Reassurance confirmatory sampling shall be carried out to confirm the
extent of contamination. Soil waste to
be cast in blocks and replaced in the ground.
Extracted soils and materials and stabilisation/solidification to be
conducted in bunded area to prevent surface run-off. See also item 2(H) above. Final soil decontamination report to be
submitted to EPD. |
CEDD’s Contractor |
As above |
R |
1, 10 |
N/A |
4 |
Monitoring
and Audit |
To be carried out in
accordance with the Schedule in the EM&A Manual. |
CEDD*/ Contractor/ RSS |
KCIP works areas During demolition and at end of demolition
throughout execution of Remediation Action Plan |
C |
1 |
ü |
* Normally undertaken
by a specialist monitoring team employed directly by the proponent and audited
by the Independent Checker (Environment)
@ A = during ash removal (before demolition)
# C = during construction (i.e. demolition phase).
* R = during soil remediation phase (after demolition)
^ Implementation
Status:
ü implemented
Ï not implemented
P partially implemented
X rectified by
Contractor
N/A not applicable
1.
Environmental Impact
Assessment Ordinance Technical Memorandum (EIAO)
2.
Noise Control Ordinance
3.
The ProPECC Note PN2/93
(Construction Noise daytime limits)
4.
Air Pollution Control
Ordinance (APCO)
5.
Water Pollution Control
Ordinance (WPCO)(Cap. 358)
6.
Waste Disposal Ordinance
(Cap 354)
7.
Waste Disposal (Chemical
Waste)(General) Regulation (Cap 354)
8.
Draft Code of Practice on
Demolition of Buildings (BD, 1998)
9.
Works Bureau Technical
Circular No. 5/99, Trip-ticket System for Disposal of Construction and
Demolition Material
10. Guidance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites
11. Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 5/98, On Site Sorting of
Construction Waste on Demolition Sites
12.
ProPECC Note PN 1/94Construction Site Drainage
Table C‑3 Event Contingency Plan for
Environmental Complaints
Step |
Day |
Action |
Contractor |
ER |
ET |
IEC |
1 |
1 |
Party receiving complaint
shall create a new complaint record. If the Contractor receives a complaint,
he shall pass the information to the ER.
|
¨ |
¨ |
¨ |
|
2 |
1 |
ER to ensure details of
complaint provided to Contractor (if complaint not originally received by the
Contractor), ET and IEC |
|
¨ |
|
|
3 |
2 |
Within 1 working day after
the receipt of the Notification of Complaint, provide ER relevant works site
information, e.g. types and locations of construction works. |
¨ |
|
|
à |
4 |
2 |
Investigate the complaint
to determine its validity, and to assess whether the source of the problem is
due to the works activities. Report
the validity of the complaint to ER. |
|
|
|
¨à |
5 |
2 |
If complaint is valid and
due to works, ER shall notify the Contractor.
If complaint is invalid or not due to works, Go to Step 12. |
|
¨ |
|
|
6 |
2 |
Propose mitigation measures
to ER within 1 working day of the receipt of the Notification. |
¨ |
|
|
à |
7 |
2 |
Review and agree with the
proposed mitigation measures and make recommendations where necessary. |
|
¨à |
|
¨à |
8 |
2 |
Implement the mitigation
measures once they have been agreed. |
¨ |
|
|
|
9 |
4 |
Audit the implementation of
the proposed mitigation measures on site within 2 working days after measures
have been agreed. |
|
¨à |
|
¨à |
10 |
- |
Undertake additional
monitoring to verify the situation where necessary. |
|
|
¨ |
|
11 |
4 |
Report the investigation
results and subsequent actions taken to ER within 2 working days after the
implementation of mitigation measures. |
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
12 |
5 |
Respond to the complainant
within 1 working day after receiving the investigation report. |
|
¨ |
|
|
13 |
25 |
If no further comments or
complaints are received from the complainant within 20 working days after
responding to the complainant, close the complaint record. If the complainant has further comments or
complaints on the same issue, notify other parties on the same day and go to
step 2. |
|
¨ |
|
¨à |
¨ Action Party
à Enter comments/ proposals into
appropriate complaint record where applicable
Appendix
D EM&A
Schedule
Appendix
E Air
Quality Monitoring Results and Graphical Presentation