Improvements to
San Tin Interchange (Contract No. HY/2004/09)
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report
Report
No. 16
September 2006
Client : Chun Wo Construction &
Engineering Co., Ltd. |
Contract
No.: |
||||
Project Title : Improvements to San Tin Interchange (Contract No. HY/2004/09) |
Project No.:
3878 |
||||
Document No.: 3878-OR024-00/elt16978 |
Controlled Copy No.: |
||||
Document
Title: Monthly Environmental Monitoring
& Audit Report No. 16 |
|||||
Covering
Letter / Transmittal Ref. No.: 3878/elt16979/OG177/SB/hn |
Date of Issue: 09th October 2006 |
||||
Revision,
Review and Approval/Authorization Records |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00 |
Monthly EM&A Report No. 16 –
September 2006 |
Various/ 09th October 2006 |
Henry Ng/ 09th October 2006 |
Susana Bezy/ 09th October 2006 |
|
Revision |
Description |
Prepared by / date |
Reviewed by / date |
App. or Auth. by / date |
|
Distribution (if insufficient space, please use separate paper)
Controlled Copy No. |
Issued to |
01 – 04 |
EPD |
05 – 06 |
Maunsell |
07 |
Chun Wo |
08 |
ERM |
09 |
ACL |
Note: App. and
Auth. mean “Approved” and “Authorized” respectively
1 Environmental
Status................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Works undertaken during the Reporting Period........................................................... 1
1.2 Environmental Permit and Licences............................................................................ 1
1.3 Environmental Document Submissions to EPD.......................................................... 1
1.4 Environmental
Monitoring Locations............................................................................. 1
2 Environmental Measures and Implementation Status.......................................... 2
3 Monitoring
Results.................................................................................................... 2
3.1 Noise
Monitoring........................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Water Quality Monitoring............................................................................................... 3
3.3 Landscape and Visual Resources............................................................................... 4
3.4 Ad-hoc Air Quality Monitoring........................................................................................ 4
3.5 Waste Management...................................................................................................... 4
4 Environmental
Audits................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Site Inspection and Audit............................................................................................... 4
4.2 Environmental
Exceedances........................................................................................ 5
4.3 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution.................................................................. 5
5 Forecast and
Schedule............................................................................................. 5
5.1 Key Issues for the Coming Months.............................................................................. 5
5.2 Monitoring Schedules for the Next Month..................................................................... 5
6 Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 6
List of Annexes
Annex A Contractor’s Works Programme
Annex B Mitigation Measures Checklist
Annex C Calibration Certificates
Annex D Noise Monitoring Results
Annex E Water Quality Visual Inspection Reports
Annex F Landscape & Visual Resources Inspection Reports
Annex G Weekly Site Inspection Reports
Annex H Notification of Environmental Exceedances
Annex I Action and Limit Levels
Annex J Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Details of Permits and Licenses issued in September
2006
Table 1.2 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in
September 2006
Table 1.3 Noise
Monitoring Stations
Table 3.1 Summary
of Noise Monitoring Results during Normal Working Hours
Table 3.3 Summary
of Waste Disposal for September
2006
Table 5.1 Proposed
Noise Monitoring Schedule for October 2006
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Plan & Locations of Noise and Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Executive Summary
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been appointed by Chun Wo Construction & Engineering Co.,
Ltd. to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme
for the construction works under Contract No. HY/2004/09 Improvements to San
Tin Interchange (hereinafter, the Project).
The
construction of the Project commenced since 21st June 2005. This report is the sixteenth monthly
EM&A report for the Project which summarises the monitoring results and
audit findings during the reporting period from 1st to 30th
September 2006.
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
The monthly
EM&A programme was undertaken in accordance with the EM&A Manual. A summary of the monitoring activities
in this reporting period is listed below:
·
Weekly site inspections were undertaken jointly with
the Contractor and Engineer’s Representative (ER) on 7th, 14th,
21st and 28th September 2006. The Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) joined the site inspection on 28th
September 2006.
·
Noise monitoring at three designated monitoring
stations was undertaken on 5th, 14th, 21st and
29th September 2006 during normal working hours; and on 3rd,
10th 17th
and 24th September 2006 during the restricted hour periods on
a weekly basis when there were construction activities scheduled during those
periods.
·
Visual site surveillance for water quality was
undertaken three times a week.
·
Site inspections for landscape and visual resources
were undertaken on 15th and 27th September 2006.
Breaches of
Action and Limit Levels
There were totally four environmental
exceedances recorded during restricted hours noise monitoring on 3rd,
10th, 17th and 24th September 2006. However,
all the exceedances
were proved not to have been caused
by the site activities of the Contractor and were attributable to the high
ambient traffic noise from San Tin Highway.
Complaint Log
No
environmental complaints were received during this reporting period.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting period.
Reporting
Changes
This report
has been developed in compliance with the reporting requirements for the
subsequent monthly EM&A reports as required by the Project EM&A Manual.
Future Key
Issues
The key
issues with respect to the works in the forthcoming 2 months include:
· Laying of drainage pipes;
· Road widening works;
· Trench works;
· Storage and preparation of precast viaduct segments; and
· Erection of precast viaduct segments
The Contamination
Assessment Report (CAR) and Remediation Action Plan (RAP) of Site A and Site E was prepared and is currently
being reviewed by ER and IEC.
1.1
Works undertaken during the Reporting
Period
The major
construction activities undertaken during this reporting period are summarised
below:
· Percussive piling;
· Laying of drainage pipes;
· Road widening works;
· Trench works;
· Storage and preparation of precast viaduct segments; and
· Erection of precast viaduct segments.
The site plan
of the Project is shown in Figure
1. The Contractor’s works programme is
provided in Annex
A.
1.2
Environmental Permit and Licences
There were no changes or clarification to the Environmental Permit (EP-190/2004) during the reporting period.
Three Construction Noise Permits (CNPs) were issued in
September 2006. Details of the CNPs are
summarised in Table
1.1.
Table 1.1 Details of Permits and Licenses issued in September
2006
Permit / License |
Reference No. |
Issue Date |
Expiry
Date |
Construction Noise Permit for general construction work |
GW-RN0462-06 |
14th
September 2006 |
9th
March 2007 |
Construction Noise Permit for general construction work |
GW-RN0463-06 |
8th
September 2006 |
13th
September 2006 |
Construction Noise Permit for general construction work |
GW-RN0479-06 |
14th
September 2006 |
30th
September 2006 |
1.3
Environmental Document Submissions to EPD
A summary
of the status of the submissions to EPD as provided during the month of
September 2006 is presented in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in September 2006
Item No. |
Document
Title |
Date of Submission |
1 |
Monthly
EM&A Report No. 15 for August 2006 |
14th September 2006 |
2 |
Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
No. 5 (June 2006 – August 2006) |
26th
September 2006 |
1.4
Environmental
Monitoring Locations
Noise monitoring was undertaken at three monitoring stations CM1, CM2 and CM3. The locations are shown on Figure 1. Description of these monitoring stations is provided in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3 Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station ID |
Description |
Easting |
Northing |
CM1 |
Village house near San Tin Highway |
826133 |
839839 |
CM2 |
Village house near San Tin Highway |
826291 |
839918 |
CM3 |
Village house near Kwu Tung Road |
826605 |
840076 |
The mitigation
measures listed in the Project EIA Report, EM&A Manual and Environmental
Permit and the implementation status are provided in Annex B.
Based on site inspection findings, the Contractor has
implemented the required mitigation measures during construction works to date
in general.
3.1.1 Noise Monitoring Equipment
The details of
the noise monitoring equipment are listed below and the calibration
certificates are presented in Annex
C:
· Sound level meter ONO-SOKKI LA-5110
· Acoustical calibrator ONO-SOKKI SC-2110
· Hand-held anemometer
3.1.2 Noise Monitoring Methodology
The sound level
meter was calibrated with an acoustical calibrator prior to each
measurement. It was set on a
tripod at 1.2 m above local ground level at the monitoring station. Measurement of the A-weighted Leq(30
minutes) noise level for normal daytime hours was undertaken. Three consecutive A-weighted Leq(5
minutes) noise levels were measured for restricted hours monitoring. Wind speed was checked during the
monitoring period using the hand-held anemometer to ensure steady wind speed
did not exceed 5 m/s, or gusts did not exceed 10 m/s. After the noise measurement the sound level meter was re-calibrated
using the acoustical calibrator.
3.1.3 Noise Monitoring Results
Noise monitoring was undertaken on a weekly basis when noise generating activities were underway. The noise monitoring results obtained in September 2006, during the normal working hours, restricted hours from 1900 to 2300 hours on normal working days and from 0700 to 1900 hours on general holidays, are summarised in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2, respectively. Noise monitoring during restricted hours from 2300 to 0700 hours of next day was not carried out as there were no construction activities during this time period.
There were no environmental exceedances of the Action and Limit Levels for noise monitoring recorded during the normal daytime hours within the reporting period but four exceedances were recorded during the restricted hours. Details of the monitoring time period and weather condition during the monitoring period and the graphical presentation of the noise monitoring results are provided in Annex D.
Table 3.1 Summary of Noise Monitoring Results during Normal Working Hours
Date
of Monitoring |
Normal Hours. Noise Monitoring
Results Leq(30 minutes) dB(A) |
||
CM1 |
CM2 |
CM3 |
|
5th September 2006 |
66 |
73 |
65 |
14th September 2006 |
67 |
72 |
60 |
21st September 2006 |
67 |
72 |
62 |
29th September 2006 |
66 |
71 |
62 |
Remarks:
(1) CM2 is a non-façade measurement location. A positive correction of
3dB(A) has been applied to the measured noise level at CM2 according to EPD’s
guideline.
Table 3.2 Summary of Noise Monitoring Results during Restricted Hours – All days during the evening (1900 to 2300 hours), and general holidays (including Sundays) during the day-time and evening (0700-2300 hours)
Restricted Hours Noise Monitoring
Results Leq(15 minutes) dB(A) |
|||
CM1 |
CM2 |
CM3 |
|
3rd September 2006 |
64 |
69 |
59 |
10th September 2006 |
62 |
68 |
59 |
17th September 2006 |
65 |
71 |
60 |
24th September 2006 |
64 |
69 |
60 |
Remark:
(1)
CM2 is a non-façade measurement location. A positive correction of
3dB(A) has been applied to the measured noise level at CM2 according to EPD’s
guideline.
(2)
Underlined figure indicates exceedance of the Limit Level of 65dB(A).
Visual site surveillances for water
quality were undertaken three times a week. Based on the visual inspection results,
the Contractor has followed all necessary site practices for the maintenance of
the site drainage system, including:
·
Removal
of stagnant water pools to prevent mosquito breeding.
·
Sedimentation
basin with larger capacity was provided to ensure sufficient retention time for
sedimentation of wastewater.
·
Replacing
damaged sandbags barrier to better control surface runoff.
The details of the water quality visual inspection
reports are provided in Annex E.
3.3
Landscape and Visual Resources
Two site
inspections on the landscape and visual resources were undertaken in September
2006.
During the first inspection, weeds were found growing inside the two transplantation nurseries in the N1 and N2 Division areas and vines were found inside the N1 Division area. The Contractor was reminded to clear up the weeds regularly as proper maintenance for the nursery. Several trees inside the transplantation nursery in the N2 Division area were observed to have fallen down, which may have been caused by the typhoon event between 12th and 13th September 2006.
During the second inspection, the weeds and vines were
observed to have been removed. The
fallen trees found inside the transplantation nursery in the N2 Division during
the previous inspection were replanted.
The details of the
landscape and visual resources inspection reports are provided in Annex F.
3.4
Ad-hoc Air Quality Monitoring
No ad-hoc
air quality monitoring was required during the reporting period.
The Contractor has adopted a trip ticket system for the disposal of construction wastes. According to the records provided by the Contractor, the disposal of construction waste within the reporting period is summarised in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3
Summary of Waste Disposal for September 2006
Waste Type |
Destination |
No. of Trips |
Quantity |
C&D
Waste |
NENT
Landfill |
26 |
130
m3 |
C&D
Waste |
WENT
Landfill |
3 |
15 m3 |
Building
debris |
CEDD’s
Tuen Mun Area 38 Fill Bank |
479 |
2,395
m3 |
|
CEDD’s
Tuen Mun Area 38 C&D Materials Recycling Facility |
1 |
5 m3 |
Chemical
Waste |
Collected
by Dunwell Enviro-Tech (Holdings) Ltd. |
Nil |
Nil |
Chemical
Toilet Waste |
Collected
by Proenvironmental Services Ltd. |
26 |
- |
Sewage
Holding Tank Waste |
Collected
by Waylung Waste Services Ltd. |
12 |
- |
Site inspections were undertaken on 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th September 2006, and jointly with the IEC on 28th September 2006. Specific locations within the site were identified during the inspection for improvements in proper implementation of the environmental mitigation measures. These include:
· Regular and prompt removal of stagnant water pools to prevent mosquito breeding.
· Provision of sedimentation basin with larger capacity to ensure sufficient retention time for sedimentation of waste water in order to prevent overflow of basin.
· Frequent watering of unpaved haul road in order to avoid dust emission.
· Proper storage of used batteries in the designated chemical waste storage facility.
The
record of the weekly site inspection findings is provided in Annex
G.
During the reporting period, there were totally four exceedances of limit level during restricted hours noise monitoring recorded on 3rd, 10th, 17th, and 24th September 2006.
Further
to investigation and discussion with ER, the project-related works being undertaken
during the measurement period were located at a distance away (at least 150m)
from the monitoring stations. The exceedances were due to the high ambient
background noise caused by road traffic on San Tin Highway. Thus, the noise
exceedances recorded were found not to be attributable to project works.
Records of the
notification of environmental exceedances are provided in Annex H. The Action and Limit Levels for impact
monitoring are provided in Annex I.
4.3
Environmental Complaint and Prosecution
During
the reporting period, no environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons were
received. Cumulative statistics on complaints, notifications of summons
and successful prosecutions for the Project are provided in Annex J.
5.1
Key Issues for the Coming Months
The key
issues with respect to the works in the forthcoming 2 months include:
· Laying of drainage pipes;
· Road widening works;
· Trench works;
· Storage and preparation of precast viaduct segments; and
· Erection of precast viaduct segments.
The CAR and RAP of Site A and Site E was prepared and is currently being reviewed by ER and IEC.
5.2
Monitoring Schedules for the Next
Month
The
proposed schedule for noise monitoring in October 2006 is provided in Table 5.1 below:
Table
5.1 Proposed
Noise
Monitoring Schedule for October 2006
Date |
Noise
Monitoring Station |
3rd
October 2006 (Tuesday) |
CM1, CM2 and CM3 |
11th October 2006
(Wednesday) |
|
19th
October 2006 (Thursday) |
CM1, CM2 and CM3 |
27th
October 2006 (Friday) |
CM1,
CM2 and CM3 |
31st
October 2006 (Tuesday) |
CM1, CM2 and CM3 |
There was no environmental non-compliance attributable
to the Project works during reporting period.
There were four exceedances of the Limit Level recorded during the restricted hours noise monitoring during the reporting period. However, they were found not to be attributable to project works.
No
environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons was received during the
reporting period.