Improvements to
San Tin Interchange (Contract No. HY/2004/09)
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report
Report No. 35
April
2008
Table of Content
1.1 Works undertaken during the Reporting Period
1.2 Environmental Permit and Licences
1.3 Environmental
Document Submissions to EPD
1.4 Environmental
Monitoring Locations
2 Environmental Measures and Implementation Status
3.3 Landscape and
Visual Resources
3.4 Ad-hoc Air
Quality Monitoring
4.3 Environmental
Non-compliance
4.4 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution
5.1 Key Issues for the Coming Months
5.2 Monitoring Schedules for the Next Month
List of Annexes
Annex A Contractor’s Works Programme
Annex B Mitigation Measures Checklist
Annex C Calibration Certificates
Annex D Noise Monitoring Results
Annex E Water Quality Visual Inspection Reports
Annex F Landscape & Visual Resources Inspection Reports
Annex G Site Inspection Reports
Annex H Action and Limit Levels
Annex I Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
List
of Tables
Table 1.1 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in April 2008
Table 1.2 Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 3.1 Summary
of Noise Monitoring Results during
Table 3.2 Summary
of Waste Disposal for April 2008
Table 5.1 Proposed Noise Monitoring Schedule for May 2008
List
of Figures
Figure 1 Site Plan & Locations of Noise and Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Executive Summary
Atkins
China Limited (ACL) has been appointed by Chun Wo Construction & Engineering
Co., Ltd. to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A)
programme for the construction works under Contract No. HY/2004/09 Improvements
to San Tin Interchange (hereinafter, the Project).
The
construction of the Project commenced since
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
The
monthly EM&A programme was undertaken in accordance with the EM&A Manual. A summary of the monitoring activities
in this reporting period is listed below:
·
Site
inspections were undertaken jointly with the Contractor and Engineer’s
Representative (ER) on 10th and
·
Noise
monitoring at the designated monitoring stations was undertaken on 15th
and
·
Visual
site surveillance for water quality was undertaken on 10th, 15th,
23rd and 28th April 2008.
·
Site
inspection for landscape and visual resources was undertaken on
Breaches of Action and Limit
Levels
There was no environmental
exceedance recorded during this reporting period.
Environmental Non-Compliance
No environmental non-compliances were received during this reporting period.
Complaint Log
No
environmental complaints were received during this reporting period.
Notifications of Summons and
Prosecutions
No
notifications of summons or prosecutions were received during this reporting
period.
Reporting Changes
This
report has been developed in compliance with the reporting requirements for the
subsequent monthly EM&A reports as required by the Project EM&A Manual.
Future Key Issues
The key issues with respect to the works in the forthcoming 2 months include landscaping works, road paving and road widening works.
1.1
Works undertaken
during the Reporting Period
The
major construction activities undertaken during this reporting period are summarised
below:
· Road widening works;
· Landscaping works;
· Road paving; and
· Installation of railings.
The
site plan of the Project is shown in Figure 1. The Contractor’s works programme is provided
in Annex A.
1.2
Environmental
Permit and Licences
There were no changes or clarification to the Environmental Permit (EP-190/2004) during the reporting period.
There was no Construction Noise Permits (CNP) issued to the
Contractor in April 2008.
1.3
Environmental Document Submissions to EPD
Table 1.1 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in April 2008
Item No. |
Document
Title |
Date of Submission |
1 |
Monthly
EM&A Report No. 34 for March 2008 |
|
2 |
Quarterly
EM&A Summary Report No. 11 |
|
1.4
Environmental Monitoring Locations
Noise monitoring was undertaken at three monitoring stations CM1, CM2 and CM3. The locations are shown on Figure 1. Description of these monitoring stations is provided in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station ID |
Description |
Easting |
Northing |
CM1 |
Village house near |
826133 |
839839 |
CM2 |
Village house near |
826291 |
839918 |
CM3 |
Village house near |
826605 |
840076 |
The
mitigation measures listed in the Project EIA Report, EM&A Manual and
Environmental Permit and the implementation status are provided in Annex B.
In this reporting period, the trees planting were progressing at the area in South Division (M6 and M2 works area). Landscape works were almost complete at the N1 Division (near the site office) and South Division (M6 and M2 works area).
Based on site inspection findings, the Contractor has implemented the
required mitigation measures during construction works to date in general.
3.1.1 Noise Monitoring Equipment
Details
of the noise monitoring equipment are listed below and the calibration
certificates are presented in Annex C:
· Sound level meter ONO-SOKKI LA-5110
· Acoustical calibrator ONO-SOKKI SC-2110
· Hand-held anemometer
3.1.2 Noise Monitoring Methodology
The
sound level meter was calibrated with an acoustical calibrator prior to each
measurement. It was set on a tripod
at 1.2 m above local ground level at the monitoring station. Measurement of the A-weighted Leq(30
minutes) noise level for normal daytime hours was undertaken. Three consecutive A-weighted Leq(5
minutes) noise levels were measured for restricted hours monitoring. Wind speed was checked during the
monitoring period using the hand-held anemometer to ensure steady wind speed
did not exceed 5 m/s, or gusts did not exceed 10 m/s. After the noise measurement the sound
level meter was re-calibrated using the acoustical calibrator.
3.1.3 Noise Monitoring Results
Noise monitoring was undertaken on a biweekly basis when noise generating activities were underway. The noise monitoring results obtained in April 2008, during the normal working hours are summarised in Table 3.1, respectively. There were no construction activities during restricted hours from 1900 to 2300 hours on normal working days and 0700 to 1900 hours on general holidays within this reporting period.
There were no environmental exceedances of the Action and Limit Levels for noise monitoring recorded during the normal daytime hours within the reporting period. Details of the monitoring time period and weather condition during the monitoring period and the graphical presentation of the noise monitoring results are provided in Annex D.
Table 3.1 Summary of Noise Monitoring Results during
Date
of Monitoring |
Measured Noise Level Leq(30
minutes) dB(A) |
||
CM1 |
CM2 |
CM3 |
|
|
65 |
73 |
55 |
|
64 |
73 |
55 |
Remark:
(1) CM2
is a non-façade measurement location.
A positive correction of 3 dB(A) has been applied to the measured noise
level at CM2 according to EPD’s guideline.
Visual site surveillances for water quality were undertaken on 10th, 15th, 23rd and 28th April 2008. Based on the visual inspection results, the Contractor has followed all necessary site practices for the maintenance of the site drainage system, including:
·
Stagnant water was observed to be accumulated at different area in
the site (U-channel and near the hoarding of site office area, Slip Road A work
areas, Castle Peak Road works area and at the sand trap in San Tin Highway
works area). The Contractor was
reminded to clear the stagnant water promptly after rainstorm events to prevent
the mosquito breeding.
·
Silts and rubbishes were observed to be accumulated in the U-channel in
The details of the water quality visual inspection reports are provided in Annex E.
3.3
Landscape and
Visual Resources
One site inspection on the
landscape and visual resources was undertaken in April 2008.
During the inspections, some transplanted trees at M2 in South Division (trees no.: B15, T807, T787 and T711) and N1 Division near the site office (trees no.: N105, T215, N194, T423, N211 and T176) were seen to be in very poor condition. The Contractor was reminded to properly maintain the transplanted trees so as to ensure their survival. Some newly planted trees in M2 appeared dead. The contractor was reminded to replace the dead trees with new trees of the same species and size as compensatory measures.
The details of the landscape
and visual resources inspection reports are provided in Annex F.
3.4
Ad-hoc Air
Quality Monitoring
No ad-hoc air
quality monitoring was required during the reporting period.
The Contractor has adopted a trip ticket system for the disposal of construction wastes. According to the records provided by the Contractor, the disposal of construction waste within the reporting period is summarised in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 Summary of Waste Disposal for April 2008
Waste Type |
Destination |
No.
of Trips |
Quantity |
C&D Waste |
NENT Landfill |
10 |
50 m3 |
Building debris |
CEDD’s Tuen Mun
Area 38 Fill Bank |
140 |
900 m3 |
Sewage Holding
Tank Waste |
Collected by
Waylung Waste Services Ltd. |
15 |
- |
Chemical Waste |
Collected by
Dunwell Enviro-Tech (Holdings) Ltd. |
1 |
1,100 litre |
Site inspections were undertaken
on 10th and
·
Removing the rubbish in
the U-channel in the
· Clearing the stagnant water pools (at different area within the site: U-channel and near the hoarding of site office area, Slip Road A work areas, Castle Peak Road works area and at the sand trap in San Tin Highway works area) to prevent the mosquito breeding.
· Proper collection and handling of used battery casings.
The
record of the site inspection findings is provided in Annex G.
4.2
Environmental Exceedance
During the reporting period, there was no recorded of exceedance during this reporting period.
The Action and Limit Levels
for impact monitoring are provided in Annex H.
4.3
Environmental
Non-compliance
During
the reporting period, no environmental non-compliance was recorded.
4.4
Environmental
Complaint and Prosecution
During
the reporting period, no environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons were
received. Cumulative statistics on complaints,
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for the Project are
provided in Annex I.
5.1
Key Issues for
the Coming Months
The
key issues with respect to the works in the forthcoming 2 months include:
· Road paving; and
· Road widening works.
5.2
Monitoring
Schedules for the Next Month
The proposed schedule
for noise monitoring in May 2008 is provided in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Proposed Noise Monitoring Schedule for May 2008
Date |
Noise
Monitoring Station |
|
CM1, CM2 and CM3 |
|
CM1, CM2 and
CM3 |
There
was no environmental non-compliance attributable to the Project works during
reporting period.
There were three exceedances of the noise Limit Level during the reporting period. However, it was not attributable to the Project works.
No
environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons was received during the
reporting period.