Improvements to
San Tin Interchange (Contract No. HY/2004/09)
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Report
Report No. 42
November 2008
Table
of Content
1.1 Works undertaken during the Reporting Period
1.2 Environmental Permit and Licences
1.3 Environmental
Document Submissions to EPD
1.4 Environmental
Monitoring Locations
2 Environmental Measures and Implementation Status
3.3 Landscape and
Visual Resources
3.4 Ad-hoc Air
Quality Monitoring
4.3 Environmental
Non-compliance
4.4 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution
5.1 Key Issues for the Coming Months
5.2 Monitoring Schedules for the Next Month
List of Annexes
Annex A Contractor’s Works Programme
Annex B Mitigation Measures Checklist
Annex C Calibration Certificates
Annex D Noise Monitoring Results
Annex E Water Quality Visual Inspection Reports
Annex F Landscape & Visual Resources Inspection Reports
Annex G Site Inspection Reports
Annex H Action and Limit Levels
Annex I Annex I Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
List
of Tables
Table 1.1 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in November 2008
Table 1.2 Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 3.1 Summary
of Noise Monitoring Results during
Table 3.2 Summary
of Waste Disposal for November 2008
List
of Figures
Figure 1 Site Plan & Locations of Noise and Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Executive Summary
Atkins
China Limited (ACL) has been appointed by Chun Wo Construction &
Engineering Co., Ltd. to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A) programme for the construction works under Contract No. HY/2004/09
Improvements to San Tin Interchange (hereinafter, the Project).
The
construction of the Project commenced since
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
The
monthly EM&A programme was undertaken in accordance with the EM&A
Manual. A summary of the monitoring
activities in this reporting period is listed below:
·
Site
inspections were undertaken jointly with the Contractor and Engineer’s
Representative (ER) on 12th and
·
Noise
monitoring at the designated monitoring stations was undertaken on 4th
and
·
Visual
site surveillance for water quality was undertaken on 4th, 12th,
18th and 24th November 2008.
·
Site
inspection for landscape and visual resources was undertaken on
Breaches of Action and Limit
Levels
There was no environmental
exceedance during the reporting period.
Environmental Non-Compliance
No environmental non-compliances were received during this reporting period.
Complaint Log
No
environmental complaints were received during this reporting period.
Notifications of Summons and
Prosecutions
No
notifications of summons or prosecutions were recorded during this reporting
period.
Reporting Changes
This
report has been developed in compliance with the reporting requirements for the
subsequent monthly EM&A reports as required by the Project EM&A Manual.
Future Key Issues
The RE (MCAL) informed EPD of the proposed cessation
of the construction phase EM&A works in November 2008. The EM&A works for the operational
phase of the Project are expected to commence from
.
1.1
Works undertaken
during the Reporting Period
The
major construction activities undertaken during this reporting period are Landscaping works.
The
site plan of the Project is shown in Figure 1. The Contractor’s works programme is
provided in Annex A.
1.2
Environmental
Permit and Licences
There were no changes or clarification to the Environmental Permit (EP-190/2004) during the reporting period.
No Construction Noise Permit (CNP) was issued in November 2008.
1.3
Environmental Document Submissions to EPD
Table 1.1 Summary of Environmental Submissions to EPD in November 2008
Item No. |
Document
Title |
Date of Submission |
1 |
Monthly
EM&A Report No. 41 for October 2008 |
|
1.4
Environmental Monitoring Locations
Noise monitoring was undertaken at three monitoring stations CM1, CM2 and CM3. The locations are shown on Figure 1. Details of these monitoring stations are provided in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Noise Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station ID |
Description |
Easting |
Northing |
CM1 |
Village house near |
826133 |
839839 |
CM2 |
Village house near |
826291 |
839918 |
CM3 |
Village house near |
826605 |
840076 |
The
mitigation measures listed in the Project EIA Report, EM&A Manual and Environmental
Permit and the implementation status are provided in Annex B.
During this reporting period, the landscape works were progressing in the open in North Division.
Based on site inspection findings, the Contractor has implemented the
required mitigation measures during construction works to date in general.
3.1.1 Noise Monitoring Equipment
Details
of the noise monitoring equipment are listed below and the calibration
certificates are presented in Annex C:
· Sound level meter ONO-SOKKI LA-5110
· Acoustical calibrator ONO-SOKKI SC-2110
· Hand-held anemometer
3.1.2 Noise Monitoring Methodology
The
sound level meter was calibrated with an acoustical calibrator prior to each
measurement. It was set on a tripod
at 1.2 m above local ground level at the monitoring station. Measurement of the A-weighted Leq(30
minutes) noise level for normal daytime hours was undertaken. Three consecutive A-weighted Leq(5
minutes) noise levels were measured for restricted hours monitoring. Wind speed was checked during the
monitoring period using the hand-held anemometer to ensure steady wind speed
did not exceed 5 m/s, or gusts did not exceed 10 m/s. After the noise measurement the sound
level meter was re-calibrated using the acoustical calibrator.
3.1.3 Noise Monitoring Results
Noise monitoring was undertaken on a biweekly basis when noise generating activities were underway. The noise monitoring results obtained in November 2008, during the normal working are summarised in Table 3.1.
There were no environmental exceedances of the Action and Limit Levels for noise monitoring recorded during the normal daytime hours within the reporting period. Details of the monitoring time period during the monitoring period and the graphical presentation of the noise monitoring results are provided in Annex D.
Table 3.1 Summary of Noise Monitoring Results during
Date
of Monitoring |
Measured Noise Level Leq(30
minutes) dB(A) |
||
CM1 |
CM2 |
CM3 |
|
|
65 |
73 |
56 |
|
65 |
73 |
54 |
Remark:
(1)
CM2 is a non-façade measurement location. A positive correction of 3 dB(A) has been
applied to the measured noise level at CM2 according to EPD’s guideline.
Visual site surveillances for water quality were undertaken on 4th, 12th, 18th and 24th
· Rubbish was accumulated
on the slope and in the U-channel near
· Dead vegetations were observed
to have accumulated in Headwall No.7 works area and Bus Terminal works
area. The contractor was reminded
to collect and dispose of the rubbish properly and regularly.
The details of the water quality visual inspection reports are provided in Annex E.
3.3
Landscape and Visual Resources
One site inspection on the
landscape and visual resources was undertaken on
During the inspection, some
transplant trees at M6 in South Division were seen dead. The contractor was reminded
to replace the dead trees with new trees of the same species and size as
compensatory measures.
The details of the landscape
and visual resources inspection report are provided in Annex F.
3.4
Ad-hoc Air Quality Monitoring
No ad-hoc air
quality monitoring was required during the reporting period.
The Contractor has adopted a trip ticket system for the disposal of construction wastes. According to the records provided by the Contractor, the disposal of construction waste within the reporting period is summarised in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 Summary
of Waste Disposal for November 2008
Waste Type |
Destination |
No. of Trips |
Quantity |
Building debris |
CEDD’s Tuen Mun Area 38 Fill Bank |
20 |
100
m3 |
Sewage Holding Tank Waste |
Collected by Waylung Waste Services Ltd. |
15 |
- |
Chemical Waste |
Collected by Dunwell Enviro-Tech (Holdings) Ltd. |
1 |
1,000 litre |
Site inspections were
undertaken on 12th and
· Removing leaves and rubbish in the U-channel and works area.
The
record of the site inspection findings is provided in Annex G.
4.2
Environmental Exceedance
No exceedance was recorded during the sampling period.
The Action and Limit Levels
for impact monitoring are provided in Annex H.
4.3
Environmental Non-compliance
During
the reporting period, no environmental non-compliance was recorded.
4.4
Environmental
Complaint and Prosecution
During
the reporting period, no environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons were
received. The cumulative statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and
successful prosecutions for the Project are provided in Annex I.
5.1
Key Issues for
the Coming Months
The key works for the coming months include landscaping works and maintenance works.
5.2
Monitoring
Schedules for the Next Month
The RE
(MCAL) informed EPD of the proposed cessation of the construction phase
EM&A works in November 2008.
The EM&A works for the operational phase of the Project are expected
to commence from
There
was no environmental non-compliance attributable to the Project works during
reporting period.
No exceedances were recorded during the reporting period.
No
environmental complaints, prosecutions or summons was received during the
reporting period.