Agreement No. CE 1/2008 (WS) EM&A Manual Improvement of Fresh Water Supply to Cheung Chau Final - Investigation 2831/B&V/020/Issue 3
Table 2.6 Event and Action Plan for Water Quality
| Event | ET Leader | IEC | ER | Contractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action Level being exceededby onesampling day | 1. Repeat in-site measurement to confirm findings. 2. Identify source(s) of impact. 3. Inform IEC and Contractor. 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods. 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor. 6. Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance. | 1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures. 2. Review proposals onmitigation measures. submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly. 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Discuss with IEC on the proposed mitigation measures. 2. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented. 3. Assess effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing. 2. Rectify unacceptable practice. 3. Check all plant and equipment. 4. Consider changes of working methods. 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER. 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures. |
| Action Level being exceededby more than one consecutive sampling days | 1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm findings; 2. Identify source(s) of impact. 3. Inform IEC and Contractor. 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods. 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor. 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented. 7. Prepare to increase the monitoring frequency to daily.8. Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance. | 1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures. 2. Review proposals onmitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly. 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Discuss with IEC on the proposed mitigation measures. 2. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented. 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing. 2. Rectify unacceptable practice. 3. Check all plant and equipment. 4. Consider changes of working methods. 5. Discuss with ET and IEC and propose mitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days. 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures. |
| Limit Level being exceededby onesampling day | 1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm findings. 2. Identify source(s) of impact. 3. Inform IEC, contractor, AFCD and EPD. 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods. 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor. 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented; 7. Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit Level. | 1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures. 2. Review proposals onmitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly. 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation measures. 2. Request Contract to critically review the working methods. 3. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented. 4. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing. 2. Rectify unacceptable practice. 3. Check all plant and equipment. 4. Consider changes of working methods. 5. Discuss with ET, IEC and ER and proposemitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days. 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures. |
January 2010 [2831_EM&A_chap2_v3_jan10.doc] 2-10 B&V
Agreement No. CE 1/2008 (WS) EM&A Manual Improvement of Fresh Water Supply to Cheung Chau Final - Investigation 2831/B&V/020/Issue 3
| Event | ET Leader | IEC | ER | Contractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Limit Level being exceededby more than one consecutive sampling days | 1. Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm findings. 2. Identify source(s) of impact. 3. Inform IEC, contractor, AFCD and EPD. 4. Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods. 5. Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor. 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented. 7. Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Limit Level for two consecutive days. | 1. Discuss with ET and Contractor on the mitigation measures. 2. Review proposals onmitigation measures submitted by Contractor and advise the ER accordingly. 3. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. | 1. Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation measures. 2. Request Contractor to critically review theworking methods. 3. Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented. 4. Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. 5. Consider and instruct, if necessary, the Contractor to slow down or to stop all or part of the work until no exceedance of Limit Level. | 1. Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing. 2. Rectify unacceptable practice. 3. Check all plant and equipment. 4. Consider changes of working methods. 5. Discuss with ET, IEC and ER and proposemitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days. 6. Implement the agreed mitigation measures. 7. As directed by the ER, to slow down or to stop all or part of the work or construction activities. |
January 2010 [2831_EM&A_chap2_v3_jan10.doc] 2-11 B&V
Agreement No. CE 1/2008 (WS) EM&A Manual Improvement of Fresh Water Supply to Cheung Chau Final - Investigation 2831/B&V/020/Issue 3
Table 6.3 Event/Action Plan for Construction Noise Monitoring
| EVENT | ACTION | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET Leader | IEC | ER | Contractor | |
| Action Level | 1. Notify IEC, Contractor and ER 2. Carry out investigation and identify source 3. Report the results of investigation to the IEC, Contractor and ER 4. Discuss with the Contractor and formulate remedial measures 5. Increase monitoring frequency 6. Check compliance to Action/Limit Levels after application of mitigation measures | 1. Review the analysed results submitted by the ET Leader 2. Review the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise the ER & ET accordingly 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures | 1. Confirm receipt of notification of complaint in writing 2. Notify Contractor 3. Check monitoring data submitted by the ET 4. Require Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem 5. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented | 1. Submit noise mitigation proposals to ER and IEC within three working days of notification 2. Liaise with the ER to ensure the effectiveness of the agreed mitigation 3. Amend proposal if required 4. Implement noise mitigation proposals |
| Limit Level | 1. Notify IEC, ER, EPD and Contractor 2. Identify Source 3. Repeat measurement to confirm findings 4. Increase monitoring frequency 5. Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented 6. Inform IEC, ER and EPD the causes & actions taken for the exceedances 7. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring | 1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Discuss amongst ER, ET Leader and Contractor on the potential remedial actions 3. Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness and advise the ER & ET accordingly 4. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures | 1. Confirm receipt of notification of exceedance 2. Notify Contractor 3. Check monitoring data submitted by the ET 4. Require Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem 5. Discuss with ET, IEC and Contractor on proposed remedial actions to be implemented 6. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented 7. Assess the effectiveness of the remedial actions and keep the Contractor informed 8. If exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is abated | 1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to ER within 3 working days of notification 3. Liaise with the ER to ensure the effectiveness of the agreed mitigation 4. Amend proposal if required 5. Implement the agreed proposals 6. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control 7. Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated |
January 2010 [2831_EM&A_chap6_v3_jan10.doc] 6-5 B&V