|
|
Contract No. HY/2009/18 Central – Wan Chai Bypass –
Central Interchange Noise Management Plan |
Reviewed by: |
|
|
Anfernee Chow Environmental
Officer |
|
|
Approved by: |
|
|
Brian Gillon Site Agent |
This
Noise Management Plan shows the layout plans, details and explanatory
statements for the noise mitigation measures to include the use of movable /
temporary noise barriers, the use of quiet powered mechanical equipments and
the adoption of multiple-phase construction schedules, where appropriate, to be
implemented to mitigate the noise impact arising from the construction of the
Central-Wan Chai Bypass – Central Interchange Project (hereafter as
“the Project”) to the vicinity of the site. Layout plans showing the site boundary
are attached in Appendix
A.
1 Identification
of Noise Sensitive Receivers
With reference to
Tables 4.5, 4.6 & 4.7 and Figures 4.1.1 & 4.1.2 of the Environmental
Impact Assessment Report for Central – Wan Chai Bypass and Island Eastern
Corridor Link (EIA-057/2001) (hereafter as “the EIA Report”), three
noise sensitive receivers have been identified for the Project. The areas, locations and uses of these
noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) are listed in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Noise Sensitive
Receivers
NSR |
Area |
Location |
Use |
N1 |
Sheung Wan |
|
Residential |
N2 |
Central |
City Hall |
Performing Arts
Centre |
N3 |
Central |
PLA Headquarters |
Others (Militray) |
The layout plan (extracted from the EIA Report)
showing the location of noise sensitive receivers is attached in Appendix B.
2 Noise Impact on NSRs
2.1 Noise
Impact on Korea Centre (N1)
In accordance with
the findings in the EIA report, there would be potential construction noise
impact on N1. The adverse noise
impact generated from the course of construction would likely to be partially
screened by the existing noise tolerant structures (
2.2
Noise Impact on City Hall (N2) and PLA
Headquarters (N3)
With reference to
the findings in the EIA report, the noise impact on N3 would be dominantly due
to CRIII project. In addition, N2
is provided with central air conditioning and noise insulated facilities and
the shielding from the noise tolerant structures (General Post Office and Two
International Finance Centre) located between the project site and N2. Hence, the noise impact on N2 and N3 is
anticipated to be minimal.
3 Mitigation
of Noise from
Construction Works
In order to
minimise the construction noise impacts at the affected NSRs, the following
mitigation measures would be implemented during construction stage.
3.1 Adoption
of Quieter PMEs
Quieter PMEs would
be adopted with reference to the recommendation in the EIA report to reduce the
noise generated from construction works, and would be reviewed with the
on-going EM&A results. In addition, detailed plant schedule would be
proposed in corresponding method statement and submitted to the Engineer.
3.2 Adoption of Good Site
Practices
In addition to the
mitigation measures mentioned above, the following good site practices would be
adopted during the entire construction period:
Ø
Only
well-maintained plant would be operated on-site and plant would be serviced
regularly during the construction programme.
Ø
Silencers
or mufflers on construction equipment would be utilised whenever necessary and
would be properly maintained during the construction programme.
Ø
Mobile
plant, if any, would be sited as far away from NSRs as possible.
Ø
Machines
and plant (such as trucks) that may be in intermittent use would be shut down
between work periods or would be throttled down to a minimum.
Ø
Plant known
to emit noise strongly in one direction would, where possible, be orientated so
that the noise is directed away from the nearby NSRs.
Ø
Material
stockpiles and other structures would be effectively utilised, where
practicable, in screening noise from on-site construction activities.
3.3 Liaison through Community
Liaison Group
In accordance with
the permit condition 2.4 of the Further Environmental Permit (Permit no.:
FEP-05/364/2009/A), a Community Liaison Group (CLG) comprising representatives
from the relevant concerned and affected parties, including owners’
corporations, management offices, local committees and schools of affected
areas, was set up, to facilitate communication, enquiries and complaints
handling on all environmental issues, including the follow up on the
implementation of remedial mitigation measures. A designated complaint hotline was also
set up for the Project to address such concerns and complaints in an efficient
manner.
4 Conclusion
The noise impacts
to the affected NSRs were predicted to be lower than limit level. However, the adjacent CRIII project
would also contribute noise impacts to the NSRs. In order to reduce the
cumulative noise impacts to the NSRs, mitigation measures were recommended to
be implemented during the construction of this Project.