6.0
MARINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
6.1 Monitoring Requirements
In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact
marine water quality monitoring was conducted three days per week. Measurements
were taken at both mid-flood and mid-ebb tides at three depths (i.e. 1m below
surface, mid depth and 1m from seabed) at the Control Station, C1 and
Monitoring Station, M4.
6.2 Monitoring Locations
For
the Reclamation Project, there were 4 Designated Monitoring Stations and 2
Designated Control Stations specified in the EM&A Manual. Upon the
completion of the monitoring programme under Stage 2 reclamation works, the ET
started monitoring events at the impact station M4 and the control station C1
from 18 May 2004 onwards. Figure 4.1 shows the location of the marine water
quality monitoring stations. Table 6.1 describes the locations of the
monitoring stations in the reporting month.
Table
6.1 Location of Marine Water
Monitoring Stations
Station Description |
Code |
HK Metric Grid E |
HK Metric Grid N |
Control Station (Ebb tide) |
C1 |
844 740.208 |
815 371.502 |
Monitoring Station, Tung Lung Chau
Fish Culture Zone |
M4 |
847 741.029 |
812 977.878 |
6.3 Monitoring Parameters
Monitoring of the marine water quality parameters are listed
in Table 6.2.
Table 6.2 Marine Water Quality Monitoring Parameters
In-situ measurement |
Laboratory analysis |
Depth (m) |
Suspended solids
(mg/L) |
Temperature (°C) |
|
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/L and % saturation) |
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
|
Salinity (ppt) |
6.4
Monitoring Frequency
The
monitoring frequency of the marine water monitoring is summarized in Table 6.3.
Table 6.3 The monitoring
frequency of the marine water
Parameter |
Frequency |
No. of Location |
No. of
Depths |
Temperate |
3 days/week, 2 tides/day |
2 (C1 and M4) |
3 (Surface, mid-depth &
bottom) |
Salinity |
|||
DO |
|||
Turbidity |
|||
pH value |
|||
Suspended solids |
6.5
Monitoring Methodology and Equipment Used
For
Location of the monitoring stations
Global
Positing System (GPS)
A hand-held digital GPS was used to identify the designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling.
For
Water Depth measurement
Echo Sounder
A portable, battery-operated echo sounder was used for the determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station.
For In-situ Water Quality Measurement
All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme before use, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals or sometimes longer throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and temperature
measuring equipment
A
portable, weatherproof DO-measuring meter with built-in salinity compensation
(YSI model 95) was used in the impact monitoring. It can be capable for
measuring:
·
a dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0-20
mg/L and 0-200 % saturation; and
·
a temperature of 0-45 degree Celsius
This type
of DO-measuring meter has a membrane electrode with automatic temperature
compensation complete with a 50-feet cable. Wet bulb
calibration for a DO meter was carried out before measurement at each
monitoring location
Turbidity
Measurement Instrument
A portable and weatherproof turbidity meter (HACH model 2100P) was used during impact monitoring. It has a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU. Response of the sensor was checked with certified standard Turbidity solutions before the start of measurement.
Salinity
Meter
A
portable salinity meter capable of measuring salinity in the range 0-40 ppt
(YSI Model 30M) was provided for measuring salinity of the water at each
monitoring location. It was checked with standard 30 ppt Salinity solutions
before the start of measurement.
For
Water Sampling and Sample Analysis
In-situ monitoring was carried out at three depths: 1 meter below water surface, at mid-depth and 1 meter above the seabed. If the water depth is less than 6 m, the mid-depth station shall be omitted and if the water depth is below 3 m, only the mid depth station shall be monitored.
Water
Sampler
A water sampler comprising a transparent PVC cylinder, with a capacity of not less than 2 liters, was lowered into the water body at the predetermined depth. The both opening ends of the sampler were then closed accordingly by dead weight and water samples were collected.
Water
Container
The
sample container, made by high-density polythene, was rinsed with a portion of
the water sample. The water sample was then transferred to the container,
labelled with a unique sample ID and sealed with a screw cap. The water samples
were stored in a cool box maintained at 4oC. The water samples were
then delivered to a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory (Environmental
Laboratory, ETS-Testconsult Ltd, HOKLAS Registration No. 022) on the same day
for analysis.
The summary of testing method of testing parameter as recommended by EIA or required by EPD, with the QA/QC results in accordance with the requirement of HOKLAS or international accredited scheme is shown in Table 6.4.
Table 6.4 Summary
of testing procedures
Laboratory Analysis |
Testing Procedure |
Detection Limit |
Total suspended solids |
In house method based on APHA 19th ed 2540D |
1.0 mg/L |
In-situ
measurement
All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme before use. Responses of sensors and electrodes were checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibration for a DO meter was carried out before measurement at each monitoring location.
At each
measurement/sampling depth, two consecutive measurements of dissolved oxygen
(DO), dissolved oxygen saturation (DOS), turbidity and salinity were taken. For
turbidity measurement, the sample was collected by using sampler and then transferred
to the cell. The reading of turbidity of the sample was directly recorded from
the Turbidimeter (HACH 2100P) after inserting the cell to the Turbidimeter. For
DO, DOS and Salinity, duplicate measurements were performed by dropping the
calibrated probes of the corresponding monitoring equipments to the designated
depths of the water column and taking readings after stabilized. The duplicate
measurements were averaged if the difference was not greater than 25%.
Table 6.5 shows the equipment used for in-situ monitoring of water quality. The calibration certificates are attached in Appendix D1.
Table 6.5 Details
of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Equipment (In-site measurement)
Parameter |
Model |
Date of Calibration |
Due Date |
Equipment No. |
Coordinate of
Monitoring stations |
MLR GPS
Navigator, SP24 |
----- |
----- |
EW/005/01* |
Dissolved
Oxygen (Saturation), Temperature |
YSI Dissolved
Oxygen Meter, YSI 95 |
01-03-2006 |
31-05-2006 |
EW/003/001* |
Turbidity |
HACH Model
2100P Turbid Meter |
27-01-2006 |
26-04-2006 |
ET/0505/002 |
Salinity |
YSI Model 30M |
27-01-2006 |
26-04-2006 |
ET/0527/001 |
Water Depth |
EAGLE Strata
128 Sonar |
----- |
----- |
EW/002/02 |
Remark:(*)
indicates the instrument should be calibrated on use.
6.6 Action
and Limit Level
The water
quality criteria, namely Action and Limit (A/L) levels are
presented in the table below.
Table 6.6 Water
Quality Action and Limit Levels
Parameter |
Action Level * |
Limit Level * |
DO (mg/L) |
Surface & Middle <5.45 mg/L (5%-ile of baseline data) Bottom <4.72 mg/L
(5%-ile of baseline data) |
Surface & Middle <5.10 mg/L (1%-ile of baseline data)
Bottom <2.00 mg/L |
SS (mg/L) (Depth-averaged) |
>6.74 mg/L (95%-ile of baseline
data) or >120% of the upstream control station’s SS at the same tide on
the same day |
>7.67 mg/L (99%-ile of baseline data)
or >130% of the upstream control station’s SS at the same tide on the same
day |
Turbidity (NTU) (Depth-averaged) |
>4.28 NTU
(95%-ile of Impact data) or >120% of the
upstream control station’s turbidity at the same tide on the same day |
>4.58 NTU (99%-ile of Impact data)
or >130% of the upstream control
station’s turbidity at the same tide on the same day |
* Traceable
to Method Statement (Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Audit Manual) of
Contract No.CV/2002/08, Rev. 2, Section 3.1 – 3.21
6.7
Event and Action Plan
Please
refer to the Appendix F for details.
6.8
Monitoring Duration and Period in this reporting
month
Below is the time schedule that water quality
monitoring was conducted in this reporting month:
Table 6.7 Time
Schedule of Water Quality Monitoring
March 2006 |
||||||
Sunday |
Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
Saturday |
|
|
|
1 ▼ |
2 |
3 ▼ |
4 |
5 |
6 ▼ |
7 |
8 ▼ |
9 |
10 ▼ |
11 |
12 |
13 ▼ |
14 |
15 ▼ |
16 |
17 ▼ |
18 |
19 |
20 ▼ |
21 |
22 ▼ |
23 |
24 ▼ |
25 |
26 |
27 ▼ |
28 |
29 ▼ |
30 |
31 ▼ |
|
▼
= Marine water quality monitoring carried out by ET
The
daily marine water quality monitoring duration are detailed in Appendix D2.
6.9
Marine Water Quality Monitoring Results
The impact
water quality measurement results are detailed in Appendix D2. Appendix D3 presents the water quality
monitoring data and graphical presentations of monitoring results respectively.
The summary
of marine water quality exceedances is shown in Table 6.8.
Table 6.8 Summary of Marine Water Quality
Exceedances in this reporting month
Station |
Exceedance Level |
DO |
Turbidity |
SS |
Total |
||||
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
||
C1 |
Action |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Limit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
M4 |
Action |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Limit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
According
to the summary of marine water monitoring results, one exceedance of Turbidity
on Action Level at Monitoring Stations M4 was recorded at 21 March 2006
(mid-ebb). According to the site observation, no abnormal site activities were
observed at the Fill Bank. As there was no sediment plume observed from the
Fill Bank and no wastewater discharge was noted from the Fill Bank and the TKO
Basin, the exceedance was considered not due to the Fill Bank. The exceedance
might be due to natural fluctuation of Turbidity in the water body around the
area. Hence, no further actions were required.