6.0               MARINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING

 

6.1       Monitoring Requirements

 

In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact marine water quality monitoring was conducted three days per week. Measurements were taken at both mid-flood and mid-ebb tides at three depths (i.e. 1m below surface, mid depth and 1m from seabed) at the Control Station, C1 and Monitoring Station, M4.

 

6.2        Monitoring Locations

 

For the Reclamation Project, there were 4 Designated Monitoring Stations and 2 Designated Control Stations specified in the EM&A Manual. Upon the completion of the monitoring programme under Stage 2 reclamation works, the ET started monitoring events at the impact station M4 and the control station C1 from 18 May 2004 onwards. Figure 4.1 shows the location of the marine water quality monitoring stations. Table 6.1 describes the locations of the monitoring stations in the reporting month.

 

Table 6.1           Location of Marine Water Monitoring Stations

Station Description

Code

HK Metric Grid E

HK Metric Grid N

Control Station (Ebb tide)

C1

844 740.208

815 371.502

Monitoring Station, Tung Lung Chau Fish Culture Zone

M4

847 741.029

812 977.878

 

6.3        Monitoring Parameters

 

Monitoring of the marine water quality parameters are listed in Table 6.2.

 

Table 6.2           Marine Water Quality Monitoring Parameters

In-situ measurement

Laboratory analysis

Depth (m)

Suspended solids (mg/L)

Temperature (°C)

Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L and % saturation)

Turbidity (NTU)

Salinity (ppt)

 

6.4               Monitoring Frequency

 

The monitoring frequency of the marine water monitoring is summarized in Table 6.3.

 

Table 6.3           The monitoring frequency of the marine water

Parameter

Frequency

No. of Location

No. of Depths

Temperate

3 days/week,

2 tides/day

2

(C1 and M4)

3

(Surface, mid-depth & bottom)

Salinity

DO

Turbidity

pH value

Suspended solids

 

6.5               Monitoring Methodology and Equipment Used

 

For Location of the monitoring stations

 

Global Positing System (GPS)

A hand-held digital GPS was used to identify the designated monitoring stations prior to water sampling.

 

For Water Depth measurement

 

Echo Sounder

A portable, battery-operated echo sounder was used for the determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station.

 

For In-situ Water Quality Measurement

 

All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme before use, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals or sometimes longer throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring.

 

Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and temperature measuring equipment

A portable, weatherproof DO-measuring meter with built-in salinity compensation (YSI model 95) was used in the impact monitoring. It can be capable for measuring:

·       a dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0-20 mg/L and 0-200 % saturation; and

·       a temperature of 0-45 degree Celsius

 

This type of DO-measuring meter has a membrane electrode with automatic temperature compensation complete with a 50-feet cable. Wet bulb calibration for a DO meter was carried out before measurement at each monitoring location

 

Turbidity Measurement Instrument

A portable and weatherproof turbidity meter (HACH model 2100P) was used during impact monitoring. It has a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU. Response of the sensor was checked with certified standard Turbidity solutions before the start of measurement.

 

Salinity Meter

A portable salinity meter capable of measuring salinity in the range 0-40 ppt (YSI Model 30M) was provided for measuring salinity of the water at each monitoring location. It was checked with standard 30 ppt Salinity solutions before the start of measurement.

 

For Water Sampling and Sample Analysis

 

In-situ monitoring was carried out at three depths: 1 meter below water surface, at mid-depth and 1 meter above the seabed. If the water depth is less than 6 m, the mid-depth station shall be omitted and if the water depth is below 3 m, only the mid depth station shall be monitored.

 

Water Sampler

A water sampler comprising a transparent PVC cylinder, with a capacity of not less than 2 liters, was lowered into the water body at the predetermined depth. The both opening ends of the sampler were then closed accordingly by dead weight and water samples were collected.

 

Water Container

The sample container, made by high-density polythene, was rinsed with a portion of the water sample. The water sample was then transferred to the container, labelled with a unique sample ID and sealed with a screw cap. The water samples were stored in a cool box maintained at 4oC. The water samples were then delivered to a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory (Environmental Laboratory, ETS-Testconsult Ltd, HOKLAS Registration No. 022) on the same day for analysis.

 

The summary of testing method of testing parameter as recommended by EIA or required by EPD, with the QA/QC results in accordance with the requirement of HOKLAS or international accredited scheme is shown in Table 6.4.

 

Table 6.4           Summary of testing procedures

Laboratory Analysis

Testing Procedure

Detection Limit

Total suspended solids

In house method

based on APHA 19th ed 2540D

1.0 mg/L

 

In-situ measurement

 

All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation scheme before use. Responses of sensors and electrodes were checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibration for a DO meter was carried out before measurement at each monitoring location.

 

At each measurement/sampling depth, two consecutive measurements of dissolved oxygen (DO), dissolved oxygen saturation (DOS), turbidity and salinity were taken. For turbidity measurement, the sample was collected by using sampler and then transferred to the cell. The reading of turbidity of the sample was directly recorded from the Turbidimeter (HACH 2100P) after inserting the cell to the Turbidimeter. For DO, DOS and Salinity, duplicate measurements were performed by dropping the calibrated probes of the corresponding monitoring equipments to the designated depths of the water column and taking readings after stabilized. The duplicate measurements were averaged if the difference was not greater than 25%.

 

Table 6.5 shows the equipment used for in-situ monitoring of water quality. The calibration certificates are attached in Appendix D1.

 

Table 6.5           Details of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Equipment (In-site measurement)

Parameter

Model

Date of Calibration

Due Date

Equipment No.

Coordinate of Monitoring stations

MLR GPS Navigator, SP24

-----

-----

EW/005/01*

Dissolved Oxygen (Saturation), Temperature

YSI Dissolved Oxygen Meter, YSI 95

01-03-2006

31-05-2006

EW/003/001*

Turbidity

HACH Model 2100P Turbid Meter

27-01-2006

26-04-2006

ET/0505/002

Salinity

YSI Model 30M

27-01-2006

26-04-2006

ET/0527/001

Water Depth

EAGLE Strata 128 Sonar

-----

-----

EW/002/02

Remark:(*) indicates the instrument should be calibrated on use.

 

6.6        Action and Limit Level

 

The water quality criteria, namely Action and Limit (A/L) levels are presented in the table below.

 

Table 6.6           Water Quality Action and Limit Levels

Parameter

Action Level *

Limit Level *

DO (mg/L)

Surface & Middle

<5.45 mg/L (5%-ile of baseline data)

 

Bottom

<4.72 mg/L (5%-ile of baseline data)

Surface & Middle

<5.10 mg/L (1%-ile of baseline data)

 

Bottom

<2.00 mg/L

SS (mg/L)

(Depth-averaged)

>6.74 mg/L (95%-ile of baseline data) or >120% of the upstream control station’s SS at the same tide on the same day

>7.67 mg/L (99%-ile of baseline data) or >130% of the upstream control station’s SS at the same tide on the same day

Turbidity (NTU)

(Depth-averaged)

>4.28 NTU (95%-ile of Impact data) or

>120% of the upstream control station’s turbidity at the same tide on the same day

>4.58 NTU (99%-ile of Impact data) or

>130% of the upstream control station’s turbidity at the same tide on the same day

* Traceable to Method Statement (Marine Water Quality Monitoring and Audit Manual) of Contract No.CV/2002/08, Rev. 2, Section 3.1 – 3.21

 

 

6.7               Event and Action Plan

 

Please refer to the Appendix F for details. 

 

 

6.8               Monitoring Duration and Period in this reporting month

 

Below is the time schedule that water quality monitoring was conducted in this reporting month:

 

Table 6.7        Time Schedule of Water Quality Monitoring

March 2006

Sunday

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

 

 

 

1

2

 

3

4

 

5

 

6

7

 

8

9

 

10

11

 

12

 

13

14

 

15

16

 

17

18

 

19

 

20

21

 

22

23

 

24

25

 

26

 

27

28

 

29

30

 

31

 

▼ = Marine water quality monitoring carried out by ET

 

The daily marine water quality monitoring duration are detailed in Appendix D2.

 

6.9               Marine Water Quality Monitoring Results

 

The impact water quality measurement results are detailed in Appendix D2. Appendix D3 presents the water quality monitoring data and graphical presentations of monitoring results respectively.

 

The summary of marine water quality exceedances is shown in Table 6.8.

 

Table 6.8           Summary of Marine Water Quality Exceedances in this reporting month

Station

Exceedance Level

DO

Turbidity

SS

Total

Flood

Ebb

Flood

Ebb

Flood

Ebb

Flood

Ebb

C1

Action

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Limit

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

M4

Action

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

Limit

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

According to the summary of marine water monitoring results, one exceedance of Turbidity on Action Level at Monitoring Stations M4 was recorded at 21 March 2006 (mid-ebb). According to the site observation, no abnormal site activities were observed at the Fill Bank. As there was no sediment plume observed from the Fill Bank and no wastewater discharge was noted from the Fill Bank and the TKO Basin, the exceedance was considered not due to the Fill Bank. The exceedance might be due to natural fluctuation of Turbidity in the water body around the area. Hence, no further actions were required.