3.1
Environmental site inspections are required to inspect
the construction activities and operation of the temporary CWSF in order to ensure
that appropriate environmental protection and pollution control mitigation
measures are properly implemented.
3.2
There
were 4 site inspections conducted in July 2006 for the temporary CWSF at TKO
137 on 7, 13, 20 and 27 July 2006.
3.3
Site
inspections were carried out by ET to monitor the implementation of proper
environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Project. After
the site inspection, the Contractor was notified of the ET’s observations and
recommendations. A corrective action plan detailing the environmental
observations had also been prepared by the ET. The Contractor then completed
this plan to propose/report their remedial works. This corrective action plan
submission procedure was adopted for each subsequent ET’s inspection to notify
all the relevant parties of the Contractor’s follow up actions. The site
inspection summaries are attached in Appendix H. Particular observations are
described as follows:
Air Quality
·
Fugitive dust was occasionally observed during
transferring, sorting and dumping of C&D waste. The Contractor was reminded
to provide sufficient water spraying.
·
Dark Smoke was observed emitted from a loader at Area
A. The Contractor was reminded to properly maintain the plants on site.
·
Two automatic wheel washing facilities were installed
at the site egress of the Project.
·
The weather condition was mostly wet in the reporting
month. Water truck for dampening the haul road was deployed during drier days.
However, the dampening frequency was inadequate.
·
Vehicles
were travelling below the speed limit in the temporary CWSF. There were
sufficient speed limit signs on site to advise the drivers.
Noise
·
The
major noise source was vehicle movement in the temporary CWSF. Since the nearby
NSRs were remote from the temporary CWSF, the noise impact was minimal. There
was no specific observation noted regarding noise issue.
·
Excavators and breaker were found operating in Area A
without cover or with cover opened. The Contractor was reminded to close flaps
and covers for all plants during operation.
Water Quality
·
Small amount of rubbish, silty material and stagnant
water was found inside the perimeter channel at Area B2. Overflow was observed
after heavy rains.
·
Water ponding was found in the construction area near
the sorting plant and in the open area at Area A. The Contractor was reminded
to fill the area or remove the stagnant water regularly.
·
Bunding along the trapezoidal channel was in progress.
The Contractor was reminded to provide bunding along the trapezoidal channel to
prevent surface runoff and muddy water released from site.
·
Besides
the afore-said issues, the Contractor was reminded to maintain the drainage
systems regularly. It was recommended to arrange additional maintenance for the
silt traps at the wheel washing bays before and after rainstorms so as to
ensure their maximum treatment capacities.
Chemical and
Waste Management
·
Stockpiles of general refuse / collected waste were
found at Area B1 near the Contractor’s Site Office. The Contractor was reminded
to fence off the waste collection area at Area B1.
·
Waste oil drums and oil buckets were found placed on
bareground near the tipping hall. The Contractor was reminded to remove the
chemical containers or store the chemicals in the chemical store.
·
The
Contractor provided waste skips to collect general refuse and would dispose of
them regularly to the SENT Landfill.
Landscape and
Visual
·
Hoarding
was erected at the site egress and aligned along the site boundary in
connection with the Fill Bank at TKO 137.
Review of Environmental Monitoring
Procedures
3.4
The
monitoring works conducted by the Environmental Team were inspected regularly.
The observations for the monitoring works were recorded and summarised as
follows:
·
The
monitoring team recorded the observations around the monitoring stations within
and outside of the construction site.
·
The
monitoring team recorded the temperature, air pressure and general weather
condition on the monitoring day.
Assessment of Environmental Monitoring
Results
3.5
All
monitoring results were audited against the A/L levels and any exceedances
would be validated.
3.6
The
monitoring results in this reporting period were comparable with the
established action and limit levels.
Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste
Management Status
3.7
As advised by the
Contractor, there was no disposal of inert C&D materials, C&D waste and
chemical waste in the reporting month.
3.8
The
actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of the
Project in the month are shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Actual Amounts of Waste Generated in July 2006
Waste Type |
Actual Amount |
Disposal Locations |
Public fill
collected |
110,205.11 ton |
- |
Sorted waste (inert material) |
26,861.35 ton |
TKO Fill Bank |
Sorted waste (non-inert material) |
75,978.04 ton |
SENT Landfill |
Non-inert
C&D waste |
0 tonne |
SENT Landfill |
Inert C&D
waste |
0 tonne |
TKO Fill Bank |
Chemical waste |
0 Litre |
Chemical Waste Treatment Centre |
3.9
The
Contractor should provide sufficient drip trays for all the oil drums/chemical
containers. Besides, these drip trays should be covered by tarpaulin sheet to minimize
rainfall accumulation.
3.10
The
Contractor should use suitable containers with proper labels to store chemical
wastes inside a designated chemical waste store in accordance with Code of Practice
on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes. The Contractor
should also advise their workers of the proper procedures in handling the
chemical waste. All the trip
tickets for chemical waste disposal were properly kept in the site office. No
chemical waste disposal was undertaken in the reporting month.
3.11
The
Contractor should provide sufficient preventive measures during equipment
maintenance works so as to avoid oil leakage on the ground. In the event of any
oil leakage, the Contractor should clean up the polluted soil and handle all
the materials using for this cleaning works as chemical waste.
Environmental Licences and Permits
3.12
No
new environmental license and permit was obtained in the reporting month.
3.13
The Contractor had submitted the drainage plan for review
and had applied for the effluent discharge license, approval from EPD was
awaited.
3.14
The
status of all permits/licences obtained/in use during the reporting period are
summarised in Table 3.2.
Table
3.2 Summary of Environmental
Licensing and Permit Status
Description |
Permit No. |
Valid Period |
Remarks |
|
From |
To |
|||
Environmental Permit |
EP-134/2002/F |
26/1/06 |
- |
(Valid) · Site clearance · Construction of a temporary storm water
system · Stockpiling of 6 million m3
of public fill · Setting up two barging points for
transporting the stockpiled public fill by barges · Setting up a temporary barging point at
the existing Explosive Off-loading Barging Point for the period of May 2004
to December 2004 for transporting the stockpiled public fill by barge · Construction and operation of a
Construction and Demolition Material Sorting Facility (C&DMSF) · Setting up a Construction and Demolition
Material Crushing Facility at the · Remove the temporary fill bank |
Registration as a
Chemical Waste Producer |
5213-839-P2896-01 |
25/1/06 |
-- |
(Registered) |
Implementation Status of Environmental
Mitigation Measures
3.15
An
updated summary of the Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) is
presented in Appendix I. Most of the necessary mitigation measures were
implemented properly. Any deficiencies were noted in the remarks of the
schedule.
Summary of Exceedances of the Environmental
Quality Performance Limit
3.16
There
was no exceedance on 1-hr and 24-hr TSP recorded in the reporting month.
3.17
The
event action plans is attached in Appendix J.
Summary of Complaints, Notifications of
Summons and Successful Prosecutions
3.18
No complaints,
notifications of summons and prosecutions were received in the reporting month.
A summary of environmental complaints and prosecutions was given in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3 Summary of
Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
Complaints logged |
Summons served |
Successful Prosecution |
|||
July 2006 |
Cumulative |
July 2006 |
Cumulative |
July 2006 |
Cumulative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |