3.                  NOISE MONITORING

Monitoring Requirements

3.1               In accordance with the EM&A Manual, impact noise levels should be obtained at 2 noise monitoring stations. Impact noise monitoring was conducted for at least once per week during the construction phase of the Project. The Action and Limit level of the noise monitoring is provided in Appendix D.

Monitoring Equipment

3.2               Integrating Sound Level Meter was employed for noise monitoring.  They were Type 1 sound level meters capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1).  Portable electronic wind speed indicator capable of measuring wind speed in m/s was employed to check the wind speed.  Table 3.1 details the noise monitoring equipment used.

 

Table 3.1      Noise Monitoring Equipment

Equipment

Model

Integrating Sound Level Meter

Rion NL-31

Calibrator

Rion NC73

Monitoring Locations

3.3               Two monitoring stations were set up in accordance with EM&A Manual. Table 3.2 describes details of the two monitoring stations. The monitoring locations are shown in Figure 2.1.

 

Table 3.2      Locations of Noise Monitoring Stations

Monitoring Station

Identity / Description

CN1

Block A, Po Shan Mansions

CN2

Block A, Po Shan Mansions

Monitoring Parameters

3.4               One set of 30-mins measurement at each monitoring station between 0700 and 1900 on normal weekdays at a frequency of once per week was required to determine the impact noise level. Leq, L10 and L90 would be recorded.

Monitoring Methodology

Monitoring Procedures

·         The Sound Level Meter was set on a tripod at a height of 1.2 m above the ground.

·         Façade measurements were made at all three monitoring locations.

·         The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

·         Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

-         frequency weighting: A

-         time weighting: Fast

-         time measurement: Leq(30 minutes) during non-restricted hours i.e. between 07:00 and 19:00 on normal weekdays

·         Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1000 Hz.  If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB(A), the measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

·         The wind speed was frequently checked with a portable wind meter.

·         During the monitoring period, the Leq , L10 and L90 were recorded.  In addition, site conditions and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

·         Noise measurement was paused during periods of high intrusive noise (e.g. dog barking, helicopter noise) if possible. Observations were recorded when intrusive noise was unavoidable.

·         Noise monitoring was cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s.

Maintenance and Calibration

·         The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

·         The meter should be checked and calibrated at yearly intervals.

·         Calibration details for the sound level meter and calibrator are provided in Appendix E.

Monitoring Results

3.5               The monitoring results for noise are summarized in Table 3.3 and the monitoring data is provided in Appendix I.

 

Table 3.3      Summary of Noise Monitoring Results in the Reporting Period

 

Average, dB(A), Leq (30 mins)

Range, dB(A), Leq (30 mins)

Limit Level, dB(A), Leq (30 mins)

CN1

61.7

59.4 – 64.5

75.0

CN2

60.5

58.2 – 64.0

75.0

 

3.6               There was no noise complaint received in the reporting month, hence, no action level exceedance was recorded. At both monitoring locations, CN1 and CN2, all the monitoring results (daytime) were below the limit level of 75 dB(A).

 

3.7               All the monitoring results lied within the range of the predicted noise levels in the EIA report.

 

3.8               Major noise sources during the noise monitoring included the construction activities from the Project and another project under the same contract (concurrent project) carried out in the vicinity and nearby traffic noise.