Quality Index |
|||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared
By |
Approved
By |
16 January 2020 |
TCS00684/13/600/R0089v5 |
|
|
Ben Tam (Environmental
Consultant) |
Tam Tak Wing (Environmental
Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Description |
1 |
29 August 2019 |
First
submission |
2 |
4 September 2019 |
Amended against
the IEC¡¦s comments on 3 September 2019 |
3 |
24 September 2019 |
Amended against
the EPD¡¦s comments on 19 September 2019 |
4 |
21 October 2019 |
Amended against
the IEC¡¦s comments on 21 October 2019 |
5 |
16 January
2020 |
Amended against
the EPD¡¦s comments on 18 December 2019 |
This report has been prepared by
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting with all reasonable
skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Agreement with the client,
incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account
of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any
responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the
scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept
no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report,
or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at
their own risk. |
Executive Summary
ES.01. The existing Tai Lam Explosives Magazine (TLEM) has been licensed and was
in used by the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRC) for the construction of the Hong
Kong Section of Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link (XRL) until end of
February 2016, under Environmental Permit No. EP-349/2009/L, being used by the
MTR XRL 824 Contractor.
ES.02. The TLEM was handed over to Dragages Hong Kong
Limited (hereinafter referred as Dragages or ¡§permit
holder¡¨) in early March 2016 and start operating for storage the explosives for
tunnel works of CEDD Contract CV/2012/08 - Liantang/Heung
Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works Contract 2 (hereinafter
referred as ¡§the Project¡¨). Operation of TLEM is a Designated Project to be
implemented under Environmental Permit number EP-502/2015/A (hereinafter
referred as ¡§the EP-502/2015/A¡¨ or ¡§the EP¡¨).
ES.03. Dragages Hong Kong Limited (DHK)
has appointed Action-United Environmental Services and
Consulting (AUES) as the independent Environmental Team (ET) to implement the
relevant EM&A program.
ES.04. There are three phases in this project, operation,
decommissioning and
completion of project phase. During the operation
phase no noise, air quality, water quality and ecological monitoring is
required according to the EP requirement.
ES.05. The
TLEM was started operate by DHK on March 2016 and the blasting work for Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point Project ¡V Contract 2 was completed on 15 August 2017.
The Tai Shu Ha Magazine was closed after 17 August 2017. Decommissioning phase
was commenced in mid of November 2017. But due to the construction programme arrangement, the decommission works was idled
until 21 January 2018 and completed at the end of March 2018.
ES.06. After the decommission works of TLEM was
completed, reinstatement planting works was commenced on 23 April 2018 according to the XRL EIA Vegetation Survey
Report for Tai Shu Ha Road West and the Tree Planting and Landscape Plan
TLP-10: Works in Yuen Long District (Tai Shu Ha) (Completion of Project
Phase). All reinstatement planting works was completed in July 2019 and the Tai
Shu Ha Magazine had been
handover to Land¡¦s Department on 24 July 2019.
ES.07. This is the Final EM&A Summary Report for the Operation
of Existing TLEM under EP-502/2015/A which presents
the EM&A works throughout the three phases of
the project between 1st March
2016 and 31st July 2019.
ES.08. The EM&A Programme was undertaken in accordance with the relevant
EM&A Manual. A summary of the monitoring activities in all phases is listed in the following
table:
Table ES-1 Environmental
Monitoring Activities throughout the Construction Phase
Issues |
Environmental Monitoring Parameters /
Inspection |
Occasions |
Inspection / Audit |
ET
Regular Environmental Site Inspection |
48 Events |
IEC
Monthly Environmental Site Audit |
41 Events |
ES.09. Throughout the operation, decommissioning and
completion of project phase, no environmental complaint was
received. Also, there were no documented notifications of summons and
successful prosecutions received during three phases. Thus, no associated
mitigation action was needed.
ES.10. In general, audit results indicated that the
implemented environmental mitigation measures were effective to alleviate
adverse environmental impacts generated from the Project, confirming that the
EIA predictions on the environmental impacts and the associated recommendations
on the environmental mitigation measures were precise.
ES.11. According to the approved EIA Report, operation of the existing facility will remain similar to the existing
operation as described in the XRL EIA and the
decommissioning works will only affect the existing TLEM which classified as developed areas of negligible
ecological value, and therefore is not considered to
cause any direct ecological impacts to habitats including streams or to species.
ES.12. The current Project extends the operating time
of the TLEM, it cause the reinstatement planting needed to be postponed by
three years. The reinstatement of the TLEM is principally in order to restore
the habitat back to borrow area reinstatement plantation and relative to the
whole borrow area reinstatement plantation, it is a very small area. With
regard to the impact of postponing the reinstatement planting by three years on
habitat, this time period is relatively small with regards to vegetation succession
and establishment of soils. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected on habitats.
ES.13. Overall,
the environmental protection performance of the operation, decommissioning and reinstatement
planting works under the Project was in general satisfactory.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 5
Project Background 5
2 Project Organization and Construction progress 6
Project Organization and Management Structure 6
Works Undertaken During the Operation
Phase 6
Works Undertaken During the Decommissioning
Phase 6
Works Undertaken During the Completion of Project
Phase 6
Summary of Environmental Submissions 6
3 Summary of Impact Monitoring Requirements 7
General 7
Monitoring Parameters 7
4 Waste Management 9
5 Site Inspections 11
6 Reinstatement Planting Works for the TLEM 13
7 Non-compliance,
Environmental Complaint, Notifications of Summons and Prosecution 14
Non-Compliance 14
Environmental Complaint 14
Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions 14
8 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures 15
General Requirements 15
9 Conclusions 16
List of Tables
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits
Table 3-1 Air
and Noise Sensitive Receiver Identified in the EIA Report
Table 3-2 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 4-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 4-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 5-1 Summary
of the Number of Findings/Deficiencies Observed in the Project
Table 5-2 Details
of findings/deficiencies observed during site inspection
Table 6-1 Summary
of the Number of Reinstatement Planting
Table 7-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 7-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 7-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 8-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List
of Appendices
Appendix A Location
and Site Plan of the TLEM
Appendix B Organization
Structure
Appendix C Identified
Air and Noise Sensitive Receiver in the EIA Report
Appendix D Implementation
Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (ISEMM)
Appendix E Letter
to Mines Division to Return License and Stock Book
Appendix F Letter
from EPD to Approve and Proposal to Change the Species for Reinstatement Plant
Appendix G Layout Plan for
Reinstatement Planting
Appendix H Monthly Summary
Waste Flow Table
Appendix I Checklist
of the Content of the Final EM&A Summary Report
1.01 The existing Tai Lam
Explosives Magazine (TLEM) has been licensed and was in used by the MTR
Corporation Limited (MTRC) for the construction of the Hong Kong Section of
Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link (XRL) until end of February
2016, under Environmental Permit No. EP-349/2009/L, being
used by the MTR XRL 824 Contractor.
1.02
The TLEM was handed over to Dragages Hong Kong Limited
(hereinafter referred as Dragages or ¡§permit holder¡¨) in early March 2016 and
start operating for storage the explosives for tunnel works of CEDD Contract
CV/2012/08 - Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated
Works Contract 2 (hereinafter referred as ¡§the Project¡¨). Operation of TLEM is
a Designated Project to be implemented under Environmental Permit number
EP-502/2015/A issued on 21 September 2016 (hereinafter referred as ¡§the
EP-502/2015/A¡¨ or ¡§the EP¡¨).
1.03
The Project is located at the existing TLEM in Tai Shu Ha (Land
Allocation GLA-TYL 1288), Yuen Long District, New
Territories. The location and site plan of the Project are shown in Appendix A. The existing TLEM is composed
of the following components:
l Two stores
each with a capacity of 400 kg explosives;
l Secure
fence;
l CCTV
system;
l Guard
house; and
l Street
fire hydrant water tank (245 m3) and 2 pumps.
1.04
Action-United
Environmental Services & Consulting (hereinafter
referred as ¡§AUES¡¨) was appointed by Dragages as an
Environmental Team (hereinafter referred as ¡§the ET¡¨) to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.05
According to the EP-502/2015/A. There are three phases in this project, operation, decommissioning and completion of project phase. During the
operation phase no noise, air quality, water quality and ecological monitoring
is required according to the EP requirement.
When decommissioning phase was commenced, audit of implementation of general
good site practice including for disposal of waste, control of water quality
and noise should be undertaken for the project. After the decommissioning works was completed and the TLEM has been removed, audit of
implementation of recommended mitigation measures for ecology (and landscape)
will be undertaken as determined in the EIA and to meet the re-instatement
planting requirements for this site in XRLs EP- 349/2009/L.
1.06
The TLEM was started operated by Dragages at March 2016 and the blasting work for Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai
Boundary Control Point Project ¡V Contract 2 was completed on 15 August 2017.
The TLEM was closed after 17 August 2017. Decommissioning phase was commenced
in mid of November 2017. But due to the construction programme
arrangement, the decommission works was idled until 21 January 2018 and
completed at the end of March 2018. The letter to Mines Division to
return the license and stock book is shown in Appendix E.
1.07
After the decommission
works of TLEM was completed, reinstatement planting works was commenced on 23 April 2018 according to the XRL EIA
Vegetation Survey Report for Tai Shu Ha Road West and the Tree Planting
and Landscape Plan TLP-10: Works in Yuen Long District (Tai Shu Ha) (Completion
of Project Phase). All reinstatement planting works was completed in July 2019
and the Tai Shu Ha Magazine had been handover to
Land¡¦s Department on 24 July 2019.
1.08
This is the Final EM&A Summary Report for the Operation of
Existing TLEM
under EP-502/2015/A which presents the
EM&A works
throughout the three phases of the project between 1st March
2016 and 31st July 2019.
The checklist of the Finial EM&A Summary Report
according to the requirement of the latest EM&A programme
for Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control point
Project is shown in Appendix I.
2.01
Organization
structure of relevant parties involved in the EM&A process and the
organizational structure of the organizations responsible for implementing the
EM&A program are shown in Appendix B.
2.02
In the
operation
Phase, the major activity conducted under the Contract is summarized in below.
-
Operate the TLEM
-
Implement the
mitigation measures in Hazard to Life under EMIS requirement
2.03
In the
decommissioning
Phase, the major activity conducted under the Contract is summarized in below.
-
Dismantle and
remove E&M, fire services, CCTV and lighting installed for the two
explosive stores;
-
Demolish the earth
bunds and the two explosive stores;
-
Frame cut the
re-bar and remove the concrete debris;
-
Remove all fire
service facilities and all ground services including guard house, road
furniture and lighting;
-
Remove fire
hydrant water tank (245m3);
-
Remove the
container guard house and any temporary steel works; and
-
Demolish the paved
road for reinstatement of planting.
2.04
In the
completion of project Phase, the
major activity conducted under the Contract is summarized in below.
-
Reinstatement planting works
2.05
A
summary of the relevant permits, licences, and/or
notifications on environmental protection for this Project is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits
Item |
Description |
License/Permit Status |
1 |
Environmental permit (EP: EP-502/2015/A) |
Application date: 26/08/2016 Date approved: 21/9/2016 |
2 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref No.: 430503 |
3 |
Discharge License |
Nil |
4 |
Registered chemical waste producer |
Nil |
5 |
Billing Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account No. 7019105 |
2.06
In
accordance with the EP No. EP-502/2015/A Condition 3.1, Project Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual has been submitted to EPD before the
commencement of using the magazine.
3.01
The
Environmental Monitoring and Audit requirements are set out in the EM&A
manual. Environmental issue such as hazard to life, general good site practice, ecological impact, disposal of waste, control of water quality and noise control was identified as the key issues.
3.02
According to the approved EIA report, there is no
adverse air and noise impact to the identified sensitive receiver. Therefore, no air or noise monitoring is required
during the three phases of the Project. The identified air and
noise sensitive receiver are listed in Table 3-1 and illustrated in Appendix C.
Table 3-1 Air
and Noise Sensitive Receiver Identified in the EIA Report
Identified Air Sensitive
Receiver in EIA Report |
||||
ID |
Description |
Type |
Distance from TLEM |
No. of Storey |
TSA1 |
Village
House next to Tai Shu Ha Road West |
Residential |
54 m |
1 |
HKMEC |
Hong
Kong Model Engineering Club |
Recreational |
200 m |
N/A |
NHT1 |
Temple
at Nam Hang Tsuen |
Temple |
338 m |
1 |
NHT2 |
Village
House at Nam Hang Tsuen |
Residential |
332 m |
1 |
Identified Noise Sensitive
Receiver in EIA Report |
||||
ID |
Description |
Type |
Distance from TLEM |
No. of Storey |
TS1 |
Village
House next to Tai Shu Ha Road West |
Residential |
297 m |
1 |
3.03
Moreover, regular site inspection for the whole period
was carried out to ensure the mitigation measure in the ISEMM had been
implemented.
3.04
The EM&A programmes of three phases shall cover the following
environmental issues:
•
Hazard to life;
•
General good site practice;
•
Disposal of waste;
•
Control of water quality;
•
Noise control measure; and
•
Ecological impact.
3.05
A
summary of the monitoring parameters is presented in Table 3-1 as below.
Table 3-2 Summary
of EM&A Impact Monitoring Requirements
Environmental Issue |
Parameters |
Hazard
to life and General good site practice |
undertake site inspections of
on-site practices and procedures each month |
Disposal
of waste |
undertake site inspections of
on-site practices and procedures each week |
Control of water quality |
undertake site inspections of
on-site practices and procedures each week to
ensure comply with WPCO requirement |
Noise control measure |
undertake site inspections of
on-site practices and procedures each week to
ensure good site practices are adopted and noise generation minimized during decommissioning |
Ecological impact |
To restore the habitat back
to borrow
area reinstatement plantation, as it was prior to the construction of the TLEM for the MTRC¡¦s use. To ensure the proposed mitigation recommended in the approved XRL EIA for loss of green areas affected by
the XRL
Project, is implemented. |
4.01
Waste management was carried out by an on-site Environmental
Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time. The effective
management of waste arising during the decommissioning phase will be monitored
through the site audit programme. The aims of the
waste audit are:
l To ensure the waste arising
from the works are handled, stored, collected, transferred and disposed of in
an environmentally acceptable manner; and
l To encourage the reuse and
recycling of material.
4.02
In addition to the site inspections, the ET shall review the
documentation procedures prepared by the Waste Coordinator once a month to ensure proper records are being maintained and procedures
undertaken in accordance with the Waste Management Plan.
Records
of Waste Quantities
4.03
All
types of waste arising from the construction work are classified into the
following:
l Construction & Demolition (C&D)
material;
l Chemical waste;
l General refuse; and
l Excavated soil.
4.04
Where possible, construction materials should
be reused on-site as far as practicable to reduce the construction waste, which
should then be sorted or classified on site for proper recycling and disposal
as recommended in the Environmental Management Plan and the associated Waste
Management Plan.
4.05
The quantities of wastes generated under the Contract in this
Reporting Period are summarized in Tables 4-1 and 4-2 and the Monthly Summary Waste
Flow Table is shown in Appendix H. Whenever possible,
materials were reused on-site as far as practicable.
Table 4-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
||||
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
Jul 2019 |
Total |
||
Reused in this Contract
(Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Reused in other Projects
(Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Disposal as Public Fill
(Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
0 |
1.0267 |
0 |
1.0267 |
TM38 |
Table 4-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
||||
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
Jul 2019 |
Total |
||
Metals
(¡¥000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Plastics (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Chemical Wastes (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
General Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
0 |
0.3269 |
0 |
0.3269 |
Landfill Site |
4.06
For the project of
Operation of the Existing TLEM, there only small amount of C&D and general
refuse generated at the decommissioning phase. During the
operation and completion of
project phase, there only very small amount of
domestic general refuse created. The small amount of the general refuse will be
disposed to the nearby public refuse collection point everyday by the site
staff.
5.01
According to the EM&A Manual, the environmental site
inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Monthly environmental site inspections during
operation and completion of project phase and
Weekly environmental site inspections during decommissioning
phase should carry out to confirm the
environmental performance.
5.02
The areas of inspection included the pollution control and
mitigation measures within TLEM. Waste management and landscape and visual aspects were covered.
5.03
During the three phases, total 48 events of environmental site inspections were undertaken by the ET to
evaluate the site environmental performance. No adverse environmental impacts
were registered, indicating that mitigation measures implemented were effective
and sufficient for the construction activities undertaken. Minor deficiencies
found during site inspections and audit was rectified by specified deadlines.
The site inspection checklists can be found in their relevant EM&A monthly
reports. A statistical summary of the frequency of reminders and deficiencies
observed is shown in Table 5-1.
Table 5-1 Summary
of the number of findings/deficiencies observed in the Project
Number of Findings in the Month |
2016 |
||||||||||||||
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
||||
NA |
Operation Phase (OP) |
||||||||||||||
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Number of Findings in the Month |
2017 |
||||||||||||||
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
||||
Operation Phase (OP) |
|||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Number of Findings in the Month |
2018 |
||||||||||||||
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
||||
OP |
DP |
Completion of Project Phase |
|
||||||||||||
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Number of Findings in the Month |
2019 |
||||||||||||||
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
||||
Completion of Project Phase |
NA |
||||||||||||||
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Remark: OP (Operation Phase), DP (Decommissioning Phase), NA (Not Applicable)
Table 5-2 Details of findings/deficiencies
observed during site inspection
Project
Phase |
Inspection
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
Operation Phase |
22 September 2017 |
During the inspection, free standing chemical
containers without drip tray were observed. |
Chemical
containers without drip tray was removed and drip tray had been provided for
future chemical storage on-site. |
Decommissioning Phase |
2 February 2018 |
EP should be displayed properly at the site entrance. |
EP was properly display at the site entrance. |
9 February 2018 |
Construction waste or material should be stored apart from the retaining
tree. |
Construction waste or material storage near the retaining tree was
removed. Also tree protection zone had been set up for the
existing tree area. |
|
2 March 2018 |
Dust mitigation measure should be provided for stockpile storage on-site
to prevent dust generation. |
Stockpile storage on-site was removed. |
|
23 March 2018 |
Dust emitted from excavation works was observed, dust mitigation
measures should be provided to reduce dust generation. |
Dust mitigation had been provided during the
excavation works. All excavation work was completed during
the next inspection and no dust generation was observed. |
|
Completion of Project Phase |
25 April 2018 |
EP should be displayed properly at the site exit. |
EP was displayed properly at the site exit. |
29 June 2018 |
Sand
and mud cumulated inside the existing manhole and u-channel should be
cleared. |
Sand and mud cumulated inside the existing manhole and
u-channel was cleared |
5.05
According to Table 5-1, the average findings/deficiencies observed in the three phases was 0.172 per month. Minor deficiencies found in the site
inspections were in general rectified within the specified deadlines. The environmental performance of the
Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
6.01
After the decommission
works was completed, reinstatement planting works was undertaken according to the XRL EIA Vegetation
Survey Report for Tai Shu Ha Road West and the Tree Planting and Landscape Plan
TLP-10: Works in Yuen Long District (Tai Shu Ha) (Completion of Project
Phase) to restore the habitat back to borrow area reinstatement plantation, as
it was prior to the construction of the TLEM for the MTRC¡¦s use.
6.02
Reinstatement planting works was commenced on 23 April 2018 and one of the particular species for reinstatement plant in the approved Tree
Planting and Landscape Plan TLP-10 C. Parthenoxylon
(¶À¼Ì) is rarely selected for cultivation both in Mainland China and Hong
Kong. Therefore the Independent Tree Specialist (ITS) proposed to substitute it
with other native species C. camphora (¼Ì¾ð).
6.03
The substitute proposal was no commented from EPD
and the reinstatement plant works was
completed in July 2019 and the Tai Shu Ha Magazine site had been handover to Land¡¦s Department on 24 July
2019. The approval
letter from EPD and the substitute proposal to change the species for reinstatement plant is
shown in Appendix F. The layout plan for reinstatement planting and photo record
which taken on-site is
shown in Appendix G. The total no. of reinstatement
planting was summarised in Table
6-1.
Table 6-1 Summary
of the number of reinstatement planting
7.01
No non-compliance was
identified during regular site inspection and environmental audit. No associated remedial actions were
recommended.
7.02
During the three phases, no
environmental complaint was received. Summary of environmental complaint is
presented in Table 7-1 below.
Table 7-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Time Period |
Environmental Complaint
Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
2016 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2017 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2018 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Jul 2019 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
7.03
No
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were recorded during the three phases. No associated remedial actions were recommended. Summary of environmental summons and
prosecutions are presented in Table 7-2 & 7-3 below.
Table 7-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Time Period |
Environmental Summons
Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
2016 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2017 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2018 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Jul 2019 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Table 7-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Time Period |
Environmental Prosecution
Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
2016 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2017 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
2018 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
Jul 2019 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
8.01
The environmental mitigation measures that recommended in the
Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (ISEMM) in the EP and
the EM&A Manual covered the issues of document
submission, ecological, noise, water, hazard to life and waste and they are concluded
and summarized presented in Appendix D.
8.02
The Permit Holder under the Project shall be implementing the
required environmental mitigation measures according to the EM&A Manual as
subject to the site condition.
Environmental mitigation measures generally implemented by the Permit
Holder are summarized in Table 8-1.
Table 8-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Hazard to Life |
¡P
Security plan
addresses different alert security levels. ¡P
Followed the
emergency plan ¡P
Magazine kept
locked all the time and provided with proper security measures ¡P
No delivery
vehicles remained within the site secured fence off magazine store area |
Ecological |
¡P
Protect the
existing tree near the magazine site ¡P To restore the habitat back to borrow area
reinstatement plantation, as it was prior to the construction of the TLEM for
the MTRC¡¦s use. ¡P
To ensure the
proposed mitigation recommended in the approved XRL EIA for loss of green
areas affected by the XRL Project, is implemented. |
Noise Impact |
¡P
To ensure good
site practices are adopted ¡P
Noise generation
minimized during decommissioning |
Waste Management |
¡P
Avoid adverse
environmental impacts related
to handling and disposal of
waste |
Water quality |
¡P
Minimize
construction site runoff during decommissioning |
8.03
Based on site inspection, it is considered that the environmental
mitigation measures implemented by the Permit Holder are effective.
9.01
The TLEM was started operated by Dragages at March
2016 and closed after 17 August 2017 due to the blasting work for Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point Project ¡V
Contract 2 was completed. The
decommissioning phase for TLEM was scheduled in Mid of November 2017. However, due to the contractor arrangement,
decommission of the magazine was idled until 21 January 2018. The actual decommission works of TLEM was
commenced on 22 January 2018 and completed on 28 March 2018.
9.02
According to the approved EIA Report, operation of the existing
facility will remain similar to the existing operation as described in the XRL
EIA and the decommissioning works will only affect the existing TLEM which
classified as developed areas of negligible ecological value, and therefore is
not considered to cause any direct ecological impacts to habitats including
streams or to species.
9.03
After the decommission
works was completed, reinstatement planting works was undertaken according to the XRL EIA Vegetation
Survey Report for Tai Shu Ha Road West and the Tree Planting and Landscape Plan
TLP-10: Works in Yuen Long District (Tai Shu Ha) (Completion of Project
Phase) to restore the habitat back to borrow area reinstatement plantation, as
it was prior to the construction of the TLEM for the MTRC¡¦s use.
9.04
Reinstatement planting works was commenced on 23
April 2018 and completed in July 2019 and the TLEM site had been handover to
Land¡¦s Department on 24 July 2019.
9.05
The current Project extends the operating time of
the TLEM, it cause the reinstatement planting needed to be postponed by three
years. The reinstatement of the TLEM is principally in order to restore the
habitat back to borrow area reinstatement plantation and relative to the whole
borrow area reinstatement plantation, it is a very small area. With regard to
the impact of postponing the reinstatement planting by three years on habitat,
this time period is relatively small with regards to vegetation succession and
establishment of soils. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected on habitats.
9.06
During the operation, decommissioning and completion of project phase, 48 events of environmental site inspections were undertaken by the ET to
evaluate the site environmental performance and there were no incidences of
non-compliance recorded .Observations of minor deficiencies were found during
regular site inspections or monthly site audits. The average deficiencies
per month is 0.172. All deficiencies were generally rectified within the specified deadlines.
9.07
During the operation, decommissioning and completion of project phase, there were no notifications of summons and
successful prosecutions and no public concern/environmental
complaint received by the EPD.
9.08
Although the reinstatement
planting works was completed, the EM&A programme will be ongoing. The EM&A programme will be ceased after satisfactory
completion of the Final EM&A Report, agreement with the IEC and approval
from EPD.
END OF TEXT