EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

1. This is the 45^th Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report prepared by Cinotech Consultants Limited for the “Agreement No. CE 59/2015 (EP) Environmental Team for Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Design and Construction” (hereinafter called “the Project”). This report documents the findings of EM&A Works conducted in July 2020.

2. During the reporting month, the following works contracts were undertaken:

· Contract No. NE/2015/01 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works;

· Contract No. NE/2015/02 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works;

· Contract No. NE/2015/03 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge;

· Contract No. NE/2017/01 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel –Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works

· Contract No. NE/2017/02 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and Associated Works.

· Contract No. NE/2017/06 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works

· Contract No. NE/2017/07 – Cross Bay Link, Tseung Kwan O – Main Bridge and Associated Works.

Environmental Monitoring Works

3. Environmental monitoring for the Project was performed in accordance with the EM&A Manual and the monitoring results were checked and reviewed. Site Inspections/Audits were conducted once per week. The implementation of the environmental mitigation measures, Event Action Plans and environmental complaint handling procedures were also checked.

4. Summary of the non-compliance (exceedance) in the reporting month for the Project is tabulated in Table I.

Table I Non-compliance (exceedance) Record for the Project in the Reporting Month

Environmental Monitoring	No. of Non-compliance (Exceedance)		No. of Non-compliance (Exceedance) due to Construction Activities of this Project		Action Taken
Environmental Monitoring	Action Level	Limit Level	Action Level	Limit Level	Action Taken
Air Quality	0	0	0	0	N/A
Noise	4	0	4	0	Refer to Appendix K & O
Marine Water Quality	54	193	0	0	Refer to Appendix K
Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring)	0	N/A¹	0	N/A¹	N/A
Ecological	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cultural Heritage	0	0	0	0	N/A
Landfill Gas	0	0	0	0	N/A

Note:(1) No Limit Level for Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring).

Air Quality Monitoring

5. No Action/Limit Level exceedance for 1-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.

6. No Action/Limit Level exceedance for 24-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.

Construction Noise Monitoring

7. Four (4) Action Level exceedances were recorded due to the documented complaints received in this reporting month. The Summary of Documented Complaints in Reporting Month is tabulated in Table III.

8. No Limit Level exceedance for day time and no limit level exceedance for night time construction noise monitoring were recorded in the reporting month.

Water Quality Monitoring

9. Groundwater quality monitoring had been suspended since October 2019 upon the agreement by EPD. Further details should be founded at Section 5.1.

10. All marine water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the reporting month. There were fifty- four (54) Action Level and one hundred and ninety-three (193) Limit Level exceedances in Monitoring Stations (M) during marine water quality monitoring. During this reporting month, no sand plume was observed during the water quality monitoring and site audits, therefore there is no direct evidence that the recent exceedances were due to the construction works of the Project. Details of this investigation are presented in Section 5. Daily silt curtain inspection and weekly diving inspection have been carried out by contractor, the record, as reviewed by the site auditors, indicated that silt curtains were found in good conditions.

11. Construction phase daily piezometer monitoring by the Contractor commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.

Ecological Monitoring

12. Post-translation coral monitoring survey shall be conducted once every 3 months for a period of 12 months after completion of coral translocation. The post-translocation coral monitoring surveys were completed in November 2017.

Monitoring on Cultural Heritage

13. Monitoring of impacts on Cultural Heritage at Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple commenced in May 2017. No Alert, Alarm and Action (AAA) Level exceedance was recorded in the reporting month.

Landscape and Visual Monitoring and Audit

14. The implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures was checked during the environmental site inspections. Recommended follow-up actions have been discharged by the Contractor. Details of the audit findings and implementation status are presented in Section 10.

Landfill Gas Monitoring

15. Monitoring of landfill gases commenced in December 2016 and were carried out by the Contractor at excavation location, Portion III. No Limit Level exceedance was recorded.

Environmental Site Inspection

16. Joint weekly site inspections were conducted by representatives of the Contractor, Engineer and Environmental Team. The representative of the IEC joined the site inspection for NE/2015/01, NE/2015/02, NE/2017/01 and NE/2017/02 on 29, 16, 16 and 16 July 2020 respectively. Details of the audit findings and implementation status are presented in Section 10.

Waste Management

17. Wastes generated from this Project include inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials, non-inert C&D materials and marine sediment. Details of waste management data is presented in Section 11 and Appendix P.

Key Information in the Reporting Month

18. Summary of key information in the reporting month is tabulated in Table II

Table II Key Information in the Reporting Month

Monthly Complaints	Event Details		Action Taken	Status
Monthly Complaints	Number	Nature	Action Taken	Status
July 2020	5	Air / Noise	Details refer to App O	Draft CIRs submitted/ On-going
June 2020	5³	Air / Noise / Water/ Odour	Details refer to App O	Draft CIRs submitted
May 2020	5³	Air / Noise	Details refer to App O	Draft CIRs submitted/ Closed
April 2020	4²	Air / Noise / Light / Odour	Details refer to App O	Draft CIRs submitted/ Closed
March 2020	11	Noise / Odour / Water	Details refer to App O	Closed
February 2020	4	Noise	Details refer to App O	Closed
January 2020	6¹	Noise	Details refer to App O	Closed
Notifications of any summons & prosecutions received	0	---	N/A	N/A
1. One new complaint was received after the submission of the EMA Report (Jan 2020) 2. One of the complaint in April 2020 was missed out and discovered at mid-May 2020. 3. One complaint was moved from June 2020 to May 2020 after investigation.

19. Summary of complaints received in the reporting month is tabulated in Table III.

Table III Summary of Complaints Details in Reporting Month

Complaint	Investigation Findings	Follow-up Action / Mitigation Measure
Tseung Kwan O Side
Dark smoke emission from barge	The dark smoke was originated from the barge. It is common for the barge to release certain amount of dark smoke when the engine is starting. The details shall be referred to CIR-A18.	NIL
Noise nuisance on weekdays & Breaking at early morning	Investigation undergoing
Noise nuisance on weekdays	Investigation undergoing
Squeaky noise during nighttime	The suspected muddy water was due to the strong tidal movement under typhoon influence. The silt curtain was not deployed properly when the typhoon was landed. Details shall be referred to CIR-W15	The Contractor had deployed silt curtain properly after the typhoon.
Lam Tin Side
Noise Nuisance Suspected from Tunnel (C1)	Breaking work was conducted at the underground of Hong Oak Court. No non-conformance was identified.	The Contractor is reminded to strictly follow the requirement of CNP(s).

Key Construction Work in the reporting month & the next reporting month

20. Summary of key construction work in the reporting month is tabulated in Table IV.

Table IV Summary Table for Key Construction Work in the Reporting Month

Contract No.	Project Title	Site Activities (July 2020)
NE/2015/01	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works	Lam Tin Interchange	1) EHC2 U-Trough 2) Site Formation – Area 1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2, Area 3, Area 4 & Area 5 3) Administration Building
		Main Tunnel	4) Main Tunnel Excavation 5) Main Tunnel Lining Works
		TKO Interchange	6) Haul Road Construction and Site Formation & Slope Works 7) Bridge Construction 8) East Ventilation Building
NE/2015/02	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works	1) Site formation works, road and drainage for Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 2) R.C. Structure works for U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 3) Construction of utility trough and pre-cast concrete barrier at P2 U-trough CH411 – CH500 and SR2 CH170 – CH250 4) Installation of socketed H-pile at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 5) Pre-boring for sheetpile at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 6) Pre-boring for sheetpile at storm water manhole 9101 – 9103 7) Sloping seawall construction 8) Removal of temporary cofferdam 9) Backfilling the directional sign footing DS25, ADS22 10) Sheetpile installation at S200 CH821-P2 CH105 11) Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 – CH336 12) TAM grouting works at CH105-CH318 cofferdam 13) Excavation for abutment 14) Construction of abutment 15) Construction of barrier at CH500 – CH650 16) Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 17) Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 18) Excavation of 3^rd layer of ELS at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 19) Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 20) Construction of storm water drain system for SHH 9101 – 9103
NE/2015/03	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge	The construction works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. The EM&A works were terminated in late April 2020.
NE/2017/01	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works	1) Construction of Pier 2) Construction of Pier Head Works 3) Bored Piling Works 4) Segment Erection Works 5) Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms
NE/2017/02	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and Associated Works	1) Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion works 2) Construction of drainage and watermain 3) Pile cap 4) Asphalt Paving 5) Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 6) Road Works 7) Pre-bored Socket-H Pile
NE/2017/06	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works	Nil

Future Key Issues

21. The future key environmental issues in the coming month include:

Table V Summary Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period

Contract No. and Project Title	Site Activities (August 2020)		Key Environmental Issues *
NE/2015/01 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works	Lam Tin Interchange	1) EHC2 U-Trough 2) Site Formation – Area 1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2, Area 3, Area 4 & Area 5 3) Administration Building	(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G)
	Main Tunnel	4) Main Tunnel Excavation 5) Main Tunnel Lining Works	(B)
	TKO Interchange	6) Haul Road Construction and Site Formation & Slope Works 7) Bridge Construction 8) East Ventilation Building	(A) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (F) / (I)
NE/2015/02 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works	1) Construction of pillar box and ducting system at Portion IV adjacent to Ocean Shores EVA 2) Construction of utility trough and road barriers at road P2 CH411 – 500 and SR2 CH110 – CH170 (land section) 3) Site formation at Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 4) Road and drainage works at Road P2 CH500 – 650, slip road SR1 footpath and cycle track, slip road SR2 CH250 – CH350 5) R.C. structure works for U-trough CH318-CH363 6) ELS at underpass P2 CH105 – CH318 7) Modification of dewatering system (P2 CH105 – CH318) 8) 3rd of excavation at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 9) Sheetpile installation at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 10) Installation of de-watering system at S200 CH821 – CH105 11) Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 – CH336 12) Construction of abutment 13) Reposition of Tong Yin Street 14) Drainage works from SMH9101 – SMH9103 15) Installation of de-watering system at CH821 – CH105 16) Excavation & ELS installation works at CH821 – CH105 17) Construction of sloping seawall 18) Removal of temporary cofferdam 19) Construction of seawall coping 20) Installation of profile barrier at P2 CH500-CH650 21) Construction of barrier at CH500 – CH650 22) Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 23) Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 24) Excavation of 3rd layer of ELS at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 25) Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 26) Construction of storm water drain system for SHH 9101 – 9103		(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G) / (I)
NE/2015/03 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge	The construction works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. Materials are being removed from works area.		N/A
NE/2017/01 – Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works	1) Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms 2) Bored Piling Works 3) Installation of Precast Pile Cap Shell 4) Construction of Pile Cap 5) Construction of Pier 6) Construction of Pier Head works 7) Segment erection works 8) Construction of Bridge Decks		(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G)
NE/2017/02 –Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel - Road P2/D4 and Associated Works	1) Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion works 2) Construction of drainage and watermain 3) Pile cap 4) Pre-bored Socket-H Pile 5) Asphalt Paving 6) Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 7) Road Works		(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G)
NE/2017/06 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works	Nil		N/A

Note:

(A) Watering for dust generation from haul road, stockpiles of dusty materials, exposed site area, excavation works and rock breaking activities;

(B) Noisy construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling works;

(D) Wastewater and runoff discharge from site;

(E) Accumulation of silt, mud and sand along U-channels and sedimentation tanks;

(F) Set up and implementation of temporary drainage system for the surface runoff;

(G) Storage of chemicals/fuel and chemical waste/waste oil on site;

(H) Accumulation and storage of general and construction waste on site; and

(I) Marine water quality impact and indirect impact to coral communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation

1. introduction

1.1 Cinotech Consultants Limited (Cinotech) was commissioned by Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake environmental monitoring and auditing services for the Works Contracts involved in the implementation of Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LTT) project to ensure that the environmental performance of the Works Contracts comply with the requirements specified in the Environmental Permit (EP), Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A) Manual, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report of the TKO-LTT project and other relevant statutory requirements. This is the 45^th Monthly EM&A report summarizing the EM&A works for the Project in July 2020.

Purpose of the Report

1.2 This is the 45^th Monthly EM&A Report which summarises the impact monitoring results and audit findings for the EM&A programme during the reporting period in July 2020.

Structure of the Report

1.3 The structure of the report is as follows:

Section 1: Introduction – purpose and structure of the report.

Section 2: Contract Information – summarises background and scope of the Contract, site description, project organization and contact details, construction programme, the construction works undertaken and the status of Environmental Permits/Licenses during the reporting month.

Section 3: Air Quality Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations, Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.

Section 4: Noise Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations, Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.

Section 5: Water Quality Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations, Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.

Section 6: Ecological Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations and Action and Limit Levels, monitoring results and Event / Action Plans.

Section 7: Cultural Heritage –summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations and monitoring results.

Section 8: Landscape and Visual Monitoring Requirements – summarises the requirements of landscape and visual monitoring

Section 9: Landfill Gas Monitoring – summarises the monitoring parameters, monitoring programmes, monitoring methodologies, monitoring frequency, monitoring locations, monitoring results and Limit Levels and Action Plan

Section 10: Environmental Site Inspection – summarises the audit findings of the weekly site inspections undertaken within the reporting month.

Section 11: Waste Management – summarises the waste management data in the reporting month.

Section 12: Environmental Non-conformance – summarises any monitoring exceedance, environmental complaints, environmental summons and successful prosecutions within the reporting month.

Section 13: Future Key Issues – summarises the impact forecast and monitoring schedule for the next three months.

Section 14: Conclusions and Recommendation

2. PROJECT INFORMATION

Background

2.1 In 2002, Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) commissioned an integrated planning and engineering study under Agreement No. CE 87/2001 (CE) “Further Development of Tseung Kwan O – Feasibility Study” (the “TKO Study”) to formulate a comprehensive plan for further development of TKO New Town. It recommended to further develop TKO to house a total population of 450,000 besides the district’s continuous commercial and industrial developments.

2.2 At present, the Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is the main connection between Tseung Kwan O (TKO) and other areas in the territory. To cope with the anticipated transport need, the TKO Study recommended the provision of Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LTT) (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”) and Cross Bay Link (CBL) to meet the long-term traffic demand between TKO and the external areas. The site layout plan for the Project is shown in Figure 1. CBL was also entrusted with part of the marine viaducts near Tseung Kwan O Interchange since the commencement of the CBL project the December 2018.

2.3 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for the TKO-LTT project was approved under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) in July 2013. The corresponding Environmental Permit (EP) was issued in August 2013 (EP no.: EP-458/2013). Variations to the EP was applied and the latest EP (EP no.: EP-458/2013/C) was issued by the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) in January 2017.

2.4 The commencement dates of construction of this Project are:

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2015/01 and Contract No. NE/2015/02: 7 November 2016.

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2015/03: 29 May 2017.

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2017/02: 15 March 2018.

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2017/01: 23 May 2018.

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2017/06: 09 November 2018.

Project Organizations

2.5 Different parties with different levels of involvement in the project organization include:

· Project Proponent – Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)

· The Engineer and the Engineer’s Representative (ER) – AECOM

· Environmental Team (ET) – Cinotech Consultants Limited (Cinotech)

· Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) – AnewR Consulting Limited (AnewR)

2.6 The key contacts of the Project are shown in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Key Project Contacts

Party	Role	Contact Person	Phone No.	Fax No.
CEDD	Project Proponent	Mr. LO Sai Pak, Sunny	2301 1384	2739 0076
AECOM	Engineer’s Representative	Mr. KY Chan	3922 9000	2759 1698
Cinotech	Environmental Team	Dr. HF Chan	2151 2088	3107 1388
Cinotech	Environmental Team	Mr. KS Lee	2151 2091	3107 1388
AnewR	Independent Environmental Checker	Mr. Adi Lee	2618 2836	3007 8648

Construction Activities undertaken during the Reporting Month

2.7 The major site activities undertaken in the reporting month included:

Table 2.2 Summary Table for Major Site Activities in the Reporting Month

Contract No.	Project Title	Site Activities (July 2020)
NE/2015/01	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works	Lam Tin Interchange	1) EHC2 U-Trough 2) Site Formation – Area 1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2, Area 3, Area 4 & Area 5 3) Administration Building
		Main Tunnel	4) Main Tunnel Excavation 5) Main Tunnel Lining Works
		TKO Interchange	6) Haul Road Construction and Site Formation & Slope Works 7) Bridge Construction 8) East Ventilation Building
NE/2015/02	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works	1) formation works, road and drainage for Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 2) R.C. Structure works for U-trough CH318 – CH363.50 3) Construction of utility trough and pre-cast concrete barrier at P2 U-trough CH411 – CH500 and SR2 CH170 – CH250 4) Installation of socketed H-pile at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 5) Pre-boring for sheetpile at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 6) Pre-boring for sheetpile at storm water manhole 9101 – 9103 7) Sloping seawall construction 8) Removal of temporary cofferdam 9) Backfilling the directional sign footing DS25, ADS22 10) Sheetpile installation at S200 CH821-P2 CH105 11) Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 – CH336 12) TAM grouting works at CH105-CH318 cofferdam 13) Excavation for abutment 14) Construction of abutment 15) Construction of barrier at CH500 – CH650 16) Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 17) Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 18) Excavation of 3^rd layer of ELS at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 19) Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 20) Construction of storm water drain system for SHH 9101 – 9103
NE/2015/03	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge	The construction works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. Materials were being removed from works area.
NE/2017/01	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works	1) Construction of Pier 2) Construction of Pier Head Works 3) Bored Piling Works 4) Segment Erection Works 5) Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms
NE/2017/02	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2/D4 and Associated Works	1) Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion works 2) Construction of drainage and watermain 3) Pile cap 4) Asphalt Paving 5) Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 6) Road Works 7) Pre-bored Socket-H Pile
NE/2017/06	Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works	Nil

2.8 The construction programme showing the inter-relationship with environmental protection/mitigation measures are presented in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3 Construction Programme Showing the Inter-Relationship with Environmental Protection/Mitigation Measures

Construction Works

Major Environmental Impact

Control Measures

As mentioned in Table 2.2

Noise, dust impact, water quality and waste generation

Ÿ Sufficient watering of the works site with active dust emitting activities

Ÿ Properly cover the stockpiles

Ÿ On-site waste sorting and implementation of trip ticket system

Ÿ Appropriate desilting/sedimentation devices provided on site for treatment before discharge

Ÿ Use of quiet plant and well-maintained construction plant

Ÿ Provide movable noise barrier

Status of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits

2.9 A summary of the relevant permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project is presented in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4 Summary of the Status of Environmental Licences, Notification and Permits

Contract No.	Permit / License No.	Valid Period		Status
Contract No.	Permit / License No.	From	To	Status
Environmental Permit (EP)
N/A	EP-458/2013/C	20/1/2017	N/A	Valid
Notification pursuant to Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
NE/2015/01	EPD Ref no.: 405305	21/07/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/01	EPD Ref no.: 405582	28/07/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/02	EPD Ref no.: 406100	12/08/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/03	EPD Ref no.: 416072	26/04/2017	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/02	EPD Ref no.: 429867	19/01/2018	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/01	EPD Ref no.: 430070	25/01/2018	N/A	Valid
Billing Account for Construction Waste Disposal
NE/2015/01	Account No. 7025431	11/07/2016	30/09/2020	Valid
NE/2015/02	Account No. 7025654	16/08/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/03	Account No. 7026805	30/12/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/02	Account No. 7029651	22/12/2017	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/01	Account No. 7029994	01/02/2018	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/06	Account No. 7032520	22/11/2018	N/A	Valid
Registration of Chemical Waste Producer
NE/2015/01	Waste Producer No. 5218-290-L2881-02	22/08/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/01	Waste Producer No. 5213-833-L2532-03	22/08/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/02	Waste Producer No. 5213-838-C4094-01	23/08/2016	N/A	Valid
NE/2015/03	Waste Producer No. 5213-265-W3435-04	19/07/2017	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/02	Waste Producer No. 5213-833-Z4004-04	01/02/2018	N/A	Valid
NE/2017/01	Waste Producer No. 5213-833-C4262-01	12/02/2018	N/A	Valid
Effluent Discharge License under Water Pollution Control Ordinance
NE/2015/01	WT00025806-2016	18/07/2018	30/11/2021	Valid
	WT00026212-2016	16/05/2017	30/11/2021	Valid
	WT00027354-2017	22/03/2017	31/03/2022	Valid
	WT00027405-2017	22/03/2017	31/03/2022	Valid
	WT00028495-2017	11/08/2017	31/08/2022	Valid
NE/2015/02	WT00026386-2016	15/12/2016	31/12/2021	Valid
	WT00027226-2017	23/02/2017	28/02/2022	Valid
	WT00030654-2018	16/04/2018	30/04/2023	Valid
NE/2015/03	WT00027295-2017	20/03/2017	31/03/2022	Valid
NE/2017/01	WT00030711-2018	11/04/2018	30/04/2023	Valid
NE/2017/01	WT00030716-2018	23/05/2018	31/05/2023	Valid
NE/2017/02	WT00030654-2018	16/04/2018	30/04/2023	Valid
Construction Noise Permit (CNP)
NE/2015/01	GW-RE0110-20	05/03/2020	04/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0149-20	23/03/2020	22/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0323-20	15/05/2020	29/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0362-20	21/05/2020	12/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0366-20	21/05/2020	20/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0486-20	23/06/2020	21/12/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0572-20	08/07/2020	07/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0580-20	08/07/2020	07/10/2020	Valid
NE/2015/02	GW-RE0034-20	17/01/2020	13/07/2020	Expired on 13 Jul 2020
	GW-RE0114-20	06/03/2020	05/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0181-20	20/03/2020	10/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0291-20	06/05/2020	15/10/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0302-20	07/05/2020	10/10/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0429-20	14/06/2020	13/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0433-20	01/06/2020	25/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0477-20	11/06/2020	13/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0503-20	12/06/2020	04/12/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0584-20	08/07/2020	07/10/2020	Valid
NE/2017/01	GW-RE0250-20	09/04/2020	30/09/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0290-20	04/05/2020	03/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0331-20	07/05/2020	03/11/2020	Valid
	GW-RE0549-20	30/06/2020	28/12/2020	Valid
NE/2017/02	GW-RE0509-20	02/07/2020	30/09/2020	Valid
Marine Dumping Permit
NE/2017/01	EP/MD/21-011	N/A	N/A	N/A
NE/2015/01	CEDD01062	N/A	10/11/2020	Valid
Specified Process (SP) License
NE/2015/01	L-11-053	09/03/2018	08/03/2021	Valid

Summary of EM&A Requirements

2.10 The EM&A programme requires construction noise monitoring, air quality monitoring, water quality monitoring, environmental site audit, etc. The EM&A requirements for each parameter are described in the following sections, including:

· All monitoring parameters;

· Action and Limit levels for all environmental parameters;

· Event Action Plans;

· Environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the Project EIA Report.

2.11 The advice on the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures is summarized in Section 10 of this report.

2.12 This report presents the monitoring results, observations, locations, equipment, period, methodology and QA/QC procedures of the monitoring parameters of the required environmental monitoring works and audit works for the Project in July 2020.

3. AIR QUALITY

Monitoring Requirements

3.1 According to EM&A Manual of the Project, 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring are required to monitor the air quality. For regular impact monitoring, a sampling frequency of at least once in every six days shall be undertaken at all of the monitoring stations for 24-hour TSP monitoring. For 1-hour TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least three times in every six days shall be undertaken when the highest dust impact occurs. Appendix A shows the established Action/Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.

Monitoring Locations

3.2 Six designated monitoring stations were selected for air quality monitoring programme. Table 3.1 describes the air quality monitoring locations, which are also depicted in Figure 2.

Table 3.1 Locations for Air Quality Monitoring

Monitoring Stations	Location	Location of Measurement
AM1	Tin Hau Temple	Ground Level
AM2	Sai Tso Wan Recreation Ground	Ground Level
AM3	Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House	Rooftop (41/F)
AM4⁽¹⁾	Sitting-out Area at Cha Kwo Ling Village	Ground Level
AM4(A)^{(2) (*)}	Cha Kwo Ling Public Cargo Working Area Administrative Office	Rooftop (3/F)
AM5(A)^(*)	Tseung Kwan O DSD Desilting Compound	Ground Level
AM6(A)^(*)	Park Central, L1/F Open Space Area	1/F

Remarks: (1) For 1-hour TSP monitoring; (2) For 24-hour TSP monitoring

^(*)Air quality monitoring at designated station AM4(24-hr TSP), AM5 and AM6 was rejected by the premise owners. Therefore, baseline and impact air quality monitoring works were carried out at alternative air quality monitoring stations AM4(A) (24-hr TSP only), AM5(A) and AM6(A) respectively.

Monitoring Equipment

3.3 High Volume Samplers (HVS) were used to carry out 24-hour TSP monitoring. Direct reading dust meter were also used to measure 1-hour average TSP levels. The 1-hour sampling was determined periodically by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.

3.4 Wind data monitoring equipment was set at rooftop (about 41/F) of Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House for logging wind speed and wind direction such that the wind sensors are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by building. The wind data monitoring equipment is re-calibrated at least once every six months and the wind directions are divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each. The location is shown in Figure 2.

3.5 Table 3.2 summarizes the equipment to be used in the air quality monitoring. Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix B.

Table 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model and Make	Quantity
Calibrator	TISCH Model: TE-5025A	1
1-hour TSP Dust Meter	Sibata Model No.: LD-3B / LD-5R	3
	Met One Instruments Model No.: AEROCET-831	0
	Handheld Particle Counter Hal-HPC300 / Hal-HPC301	0
HVS Sampler	TISCH Model: TE-5170	1
HVS Sampler	GMW Model: GS2310	5
Wind Anemometer	Davis Weather Monitor II, Model no. 7440	1
Wind Anemometer	Davis Weather Stations, Vantage Pro 2, Model No. 6152CUK	0

Monitoring Parameters and Frequency

3.6 Table 3.3 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring period and frequencies of air quality monitoring.

Table 3.3 Frequency and Parameters of Air Quality Monitoring

Monitoring Stations	Parameter	Frequency
AM1, AM2, AM3, AM4, AM5(A) and AM6(A)	1-hour TSP	3 times per 6 days
AM1, AM2, AM3, AM4(A), AM5(A) and AM6(A)	24-hour TSP	Once per 6 days

Monitoring Methodology

1-hour TSP Monitoring

Measuring Procedures

3.7 The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

(Model LD3 / LD3B / LD5R)

Ÿ The 1-hour dust meter is placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.

Ÿ Set POWER to “ON” and make sure that the battery level was not flash or in low level.

Ÿ Allow the instrument to stand for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been released.

Ÿ Push the knob at MEASURE position.

Ÿ Set time/mode setting to [BG] by pushing the time setting switch. Then, start the background measurement by pushing the start/stop switch once. It will take 6 sec. to complete the background measurement.

Ÿ Push the time setting switch to change the time setting display to [MANUAL] at the bottom left of the liquid crystal display. Finally, push the start/stop switch to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.

Ÿ Information such as sampling date, time, count value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring period.

(AEROCET-531)

Ÿ The 1-hour dust meter is placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.

Ÿ Remove the red rubber cap from the AEROCET-531 inlet nozzle.

Ÿ Turn on the power switch that is located on the right side of the AEROCET-531.

Ÿ On power up the product intro screen is displayed for 3 seconds. The intro screen displays the product name and firmware version.

Ÿ Then the main counter screen will be displayed.

Ÿ Press the START button. Internal vacuum pump start running. After 1 minute the pump will stop and the 0.5µm and 5µm channels will show the cumulative counts of particles larger than 0.5µm and 5µm per cubic foot.

Ÿ The AEROCET-531 is now checked out and ready for use.

Ÿ To switch off the AEROCET-531 power to stop the measuring after 1 hour sampling.

Ÿ Information such as sampling date, time, and display value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring period.

(Equipment: Hal Technology; Model no. Hal-HPC300 / Hal-HPC301)

Ÿ The 1-hour dust meter is placed at least 1.3 meters above ground.

Ÿ Set POWER to “ON” and make sure that the battery level was not flash or in low level.

Ÿ Allow the instrument to stand for about 3 minutes and then the cap of the air sampling inlet has been released.

Ÿ Push the knob at MEASURE position.

Ÿ Information such as sampling date, time, count value and site condition were recorded during the monitoring period.

Maintenance/Calibration

3.8 The following maintenance/calibration is required for the direct dust meters:

Ÿ Check and calibrate the meter by HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method at 2-month intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

24-hour TSP Monitoring

Instrumentation

3.9 High volume samplers (HVS) (TISCH Model: TE-5170 and GMW Model: GS2310) completed with appropriate sampling inlets were employed for 24-hour TSP monitoring. The sampler is composed of a motor, a filter holder, a flow controller and a sampling inlet and its performance specification complied with that required by USEPA Standard Title 40, Code of Federation Regulations Chapter 1 (Part 50).

3.10 The positioning of the HVS samplers are as follows:

· a horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the samplers against gusty wind shall be provided;

· no two samplers shall be placed less than 2 meter apart

· the distance between the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, must be at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler;

· a minimum of 2 metres of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is required for rooftop samplers;

· a minimum of 2 metres of separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required;

· no furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;

· airflow around the sampler is unrestricted;

· the sampler is more than 20 metres from the dripline;

· any wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler, shall not cause any obstruction during monitoring;

· permission must be obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and

· a secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the samplers.

Operating/analytical procedures for the operation of HVS

3.11 Prior to the commencement of the dust sampling, the flow rate of the high volume sampler was properly set (between 1.1 m³/min. and 1.4 m³/min.) in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction to within the range recommended in USEPA Standard Title 40, CFR Part 50.

3.12 For TSP sampling, fiberglass filters with a collection efficiency of > 99% for particles of 0.3μm diameter were used.

3.13 The power supply was checked to ensure the sampler worked properly. On sampling, the sampler was operated for 5 minutes to establish thermal equilibrium before placing any filter media at the designated air monitoring station.

3.14 The filter holding frame was then removed by loosening the four nuts and a weighted and conditioned filter was carefully centred with the stamped number upwards, on a supporting screen.

3.15 The filter was aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter. Then the filter holding frame was tightened to the filter holder with swing bolts. The applied pressure should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

3.16 The shelter lid was closed and secured with the aluminium strip.

3.17 The timer was then programmed. Information was recorded on the record sheet, which included the starting time, the weather condition and the filter number (the initial weight of the filter paper can be found out by using the filter number).

3.18 After sampling, the filter was removed and sent to the HOKLAS laboratory (Wellab Ltd.) for weighing. The elapsed time will be also recorded.

3.19 Before weighing, all filters was equilibrated in a conditioning environment for 24 hours. The conditioning environment temperature should be between 25°C and 30°C and not vary by more than ±3°C; the relative humidity (RH) should be < 50% and not vary by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH is 40%.

Maintenance/Calibration

3.20 The following maintenance/calibration is required for the HVS:

Ÿ The high volume motors and their accessories will be properly maintained. Appropriate maintenance such as routine motor brushes replacement and electrical wiring checking will be made to ensure that the equipment and necessary power supply are in good working condition.

Ÿ High volume samplers will be calibrated at bi-monthly intervals using TE-5025A Calibration Kit throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

Results and Observations

3.21 No Action/Limit Level exceedance was recorded for both 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP monitoring respectively.

3.22 The air temperature, precipitation and the relative humidity data was obtained from Hong Kong Observatory where the wind speed and wind direction were recorded by the installed Wind Anemometer at rooftop of Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House (41/F). The location is shown in Figure 2. This weather information for the reporting month is summarized in Appendix C.

3.23 The monitoring data and graphical presentations of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring results are shown in Appendix E and Appendix F respectively.

3.24 According to our field observations, the major dust source identified at the designated air quality monitoring stations are as follows:

Table 3.4 Major Dust Source during Air Quality Monitoring

Station	Major Dust Source
AM1 – Tin Hau Temple	Road Traffic at Cha Kwo Ling Road
AM2 – Sai Tso Wan Recreation Ground	N/A
AM3 – Yau Lai Estate Bik Lai House	Road Traffic near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza
AM4 - Sitting-out Area at Cha Kwo Ling Village	Road Traffic at Cha Kwo Ling Road
AM4(A) - Cha Kwo Ling Public Cargo Working Area Administrative Office	Road Traffic at Cha Kwo Ling Road
AM5(A) - Tseung Kwan O DSD Desilting Compound	Vehicle Movement within the Desilting Compound
AM6(A) - Park Central, L1/F Open Space Area	Road Traffic at Po Yap Road

4. NOISE

Monitoring Requirements

4.1 According to EM&A Manual of the Project, construction noise monitoring was conducted to monitor the construction noise arising from the construction activities. The regular monitoring frequency for each monitoring station shall be on a weekly basis and conduct one set of measurements between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. Appendix A shows the established Action and Limit Levels for the environmental monitoring works.

Monitoring Locations

4.2 Noise monitoring was conducted at 9 designated monitoring stations (CM1, CM2, CM3, CM4, CM5, CM6(A), CM7(A), CM8(A), CM9(A)) in the reporting period. Table 4.1 and Figure 3 show the locations of these stations.

Table 4.1 Noise Monitoring Stations

Monitoring Stations	Locations	Location of Measurement
CM1	Nga Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong	Rooftop (41/F)
CM2	Bik Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong	Rooftop (41/F)
CM3	Block S, Yau Lai Estate Phase 5, Yau Tong	Rooftop (40/F)
CM4	Tin Hau Temple, Cha Kwo Ling	Ground Level
CM5	CCC Kei Faat Primary School, Yau Tong	Rooftop (6/F)
CM6(A)*	Site Boundary of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 1, Ocean Shores	Ground Level
CM7(A)*	Site Boundary of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 7, Ocean Shores	Ground Level
CM8(A)*	Park Central, L1/F Open Space Area	1/F
CM9(A)¹	Rooftop of Capri Tower 10	Rooftop (12/F)

Remarks:

* Noise monitoring at designated station CM6, CM7 & CM8 was rejected by the premise owners. Therefore, baseline and impact noise monitoring works were carried out at alternative noise monitoring stations CM6(A), CM7(A) and CM8(A) respectively.

¹ Ad-hoc noise monitoring at station CM9(A) was commenced in September 2019.

4.3 Since the population intake of Capri had commenced during the construction of the TKOLTT, the noise monitoring work in daytime period was conducted at CM9(A) – Rooftop of Capri Tower 10 on normal weekdays. The background Noise Level was recorded during the Lunch Hour of Construction Site (i.e. 12:00-13:00) and to be used as the referencing value for compliance checking for Noise Action and Limit Level.

Monitoring Equipment

4.4 Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for impact noise monitoring. The meters are Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_eq) and percentile sound pressure level (L_x) that also complied with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications. Table 4.2 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment being used. Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix B.

Table 4.2 Noise Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model and Make	Quantity
Integrating Sound Level Meter	SVAN 957/ 959 / 979	3
Integrating Sound Level Meter	BSWA308 SLM	1
Calibrator	SV30A	1
	Brüel & Kjær 4231	1
	ST-120	2

4.5 Table 4.3 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and total duration of monitoring. The noise monitoring schedule is shown in Appendix D. Additional weekly impact monitoring are carried out for evening time (1900 – 2300 hours) for monitoring stations CM1, CM2, CM3 & CM6(A) and night-time (2300 – 0700 hours) for monitoring stations CM1, CM2 & CM3.

Table 4.3 Frequency and Parameters of Noise Monitoring

Monitoring Stations	Parameter	Period	Frequency	Measurement
CM1	L₁₀(30 min) dB(A) L₉₀(30 min) dB(A) L_eq(30 min) dB(A)	0700-1900 hrs on normal weekdays	Once per week	Façade
CM2				Façade
CM3				Façade
CM4				Façade
CM5				Façade
CM6(A)				Free Field
CM7(A)				Free Field
CM8(A)				Façade
CM9(A)				Façade
CM1	L₁₀(5 min) dB(A) L₉₀(5 min) dB(A) L_eq(5 min) dB(A)	1900 – 0700 hrs on normal weekdays		Façade
CM2				Façade
CM3				Façade
CM6(A)		1900 – 2300 hrs on normal weekdays		Free Field

Monitoring Methodology and QA/QC Procedure

4.6 The monitoring procedures are as follows:

· The monitoring station was normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers building façade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground.

· For free field measurement, the meter was positioned away from any nearby reflective surfaces. All records for free field noise levels was adjusted with a correction of +3 dB(A).

· The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

· Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time was set as follows:

- frequency weighting : A

- time weighting : Fast

- measurement time : 30 minutes

· Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94.0 dB at 1000 Hz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement will be more than 1.0 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and repeat of noise measurement would be required after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

· At the end of the monitoring period, the L_eq, L₉₀ and L₁₀ was recorded. In addition, noise sources was recorded on a standard record sheet.

· Noise monitoring will be cancelled in the presence of fog, rain, and wind with a steady speed exceeding 5 m/s, or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m/s. Supplementary monitoring was provided to ensure sufficient data would be obtained.

Maintenance and Calibration

4.7 The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator was cleaned with a soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

4.8 The sound level meter and calibrator was checked and calibrated at yearly intervals.

4.9 Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter was checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only if the calibration levels from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.

Results and Observations

4.10 Four (4) Action Level exceedances were recorded due to the documented complaints received in this reporting month. No Limit level exceedances for night-time construction noise monitoring were recorded and no Limit Level exceedance for day time was recorded in the reporting month.

4.11 Noise monitoring results and graphical presentations are shown in Appendix G.

4.12 The major noise source identified at the noise monitoring stations are shown in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 Major Noise Source during Noise Monitoring

Monitoring Stations	Locations	Major Noise Source
CM1	Nga Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong	Road Traffic near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza
CM2	Bik Lai House, Yau Lai Estate Phase 1, Yau Tong	Road Traffic near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza
CM3	Block S, Yau Lai Estate Phase 5, Yau Tong	Road Traffic near Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza
CM4	Tin Hau Temple, Cha Kwo Ling	Road Traffic at Cha Kwo Ling Road
CM5	CCC Kei Faat Primary School, Yau Tong	Road Traffic at Yau Tong Road
CM6(A)	Site Boundary of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 1, Ocean Shores	Road Traffic at O King Road near Ocean Shores
CM7(A)	Site Boundary of Contract No. NE/2015/02 near Tower 7, Ocean Shores	Road Traffic at Tong Yin Street
CM8(A)	Park Central, L1/F Open Space Area	Road Traffic at Po Yap Road
CM9(A)	Rooftop of Capri Tower 10	Construction Noise from Portion V/Area A of NE/2015/02 site area

4.13 All the Construction Noise Levels (CNLs) reported in this report were adjusted with the corresponding baseline level (i.e. Measured L_eq – Baseline L_eq = CNL), in order to facilitate the interpretation of the noise exceedance. The baseline noise level and the Noise Limit Level at each designated noise monitoring station are presented in Table 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.

Table 4.5 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring Stations

Station	Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) (at 0700 – 1900 hrs on normal weekdays)	Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (at 0700 – 1900 hrs on normal weekdays)
CM1	65.5	75
CM2	63.6
CM3	65.6
CM4	62.0
CM5	68.2	70*
CM6(A)	61.9	75
CM7(A)	58.3
CM8(A)	69.1
CM9(A)	N/A⁽¹⁾
(*) Noise Limit Level is 65 dB(A) during school examination periods. (1) ) The background Noise Level was recorded during the Lunch Hour of Construction Site (i.e. 12:00-13:00) and to be used as the referencing value for compliance checking for Noise Action and Limit Level.

Table 4.6 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring Stations (Evening-time & Daytime (Holiday))

Station	Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) (Evening time on all days (1900-2300 hrs) and Holidays (including Sundays) during daytime (0700-1900 hrs))	Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (Evening time on all days (1900-2300 hrs) and Holidays (including Sundays) during daytime (0700-1900 hrs))
CM1	64.4	70
CM2	62.2
CM3	64.7
CM6(A)	60.2	65¹
1. ASR B was adopted according to the EIA as traffic in the surrounding area has not been changed.

Table 4.7 Baseline Noise Level and Noise Limit Level for Monitoring Stations (Night-time)

Station	Baseline Noise Level, dB (A) (Night-time (2300 – 0700 hrs)	Noise Limit Level, dB (A) (Night-time (2300 – 0700 hrs)
CM1	14-day baseline monitoring results for the time period of impact measurement at each station would be adopted	55
CM2
CM3

Current Tunnel Blasting Arrangement

4.14 The drill and blast method was evaluated as the most appropriate method and the general practice of this method was introduced during the EIA report assessment. The paragraphs 2.9.9 and 2.9.33 of the EIA Report mention that there might be one blast or multiple blasts and the maximum number of blast location per day would be determined by the Contractor to suite his method of working.

4.15 Notwithstanding the information provided by the Engineer at paragraphs 4.6.4 and 6.6.12 of the EIA Report, to minimize blast nuisance to the public and to respond to the community concerns, the tunnel blast should be arranged, where possible, avoiding the blast to be carried out during night time and shortening the blast duration by arranging various work fronts to be blasted at different time slots. Hence, it has become more desirable to split one tunnel blasting operation, which may consist of several blasting work fronts along the tunnels, into a total of two to three tunnel blasts per day. The tunnel blasts, which locate outside the MTR Protection Zone (RPZ) possessing insignificant risk to the MTR's structures would be carried out during day time and before 22:00. For the tunnel blasts within and in close vicinity to RPZ, Contractor's blasting assessment report revealed that those blasts have to be carried out after train service and, generally, at around 01:40.

4.16 Since part of the tunnelling works conducted in this reporting month has encroached on the vicinity of the RPZ, some blasting works were carried out during the mid-night.

5. WATER QUALITY

Monitoring Requirements

Groundwater Quality

5.1 The existing groundwater quality monitoring programme has been suspended as the monitoring results had been deemed non-representative of the impact from the project justified by two major factors: (1) influence on the monitoring results from non-project related factors, such as anthropogenic activities and natural phenomenon; and (2) large separation between the monitoring stations and works area. In addition, as no alternative locations for the groundwater quality monitoring were available, the groundwater quality monitoring has been suspended since October 2019 upon the agreement by EPD.

Marine Water Quality

5.2 Marine water quality monitoring was conducted three times per week at the designated monitoring stations. Monitoring took place two times per monitoring day during mid ebb and mid flood tides at three depths (1 meter from surface, mid depth and 1 meter from the bottom). For Tseung Kwan O Salt Water Intake (i.e. Station M6), water sampling and in-situ measurements was taken at the vertical level where the water abstraction point of the intake is located (i.e. approximately mid-depth level). If the water depth is less than 6m, the mid-depth measurement may be omitted. If the depth is less than 3m, only the mid-depth measurements need to be taken.

5.3 Duplicate in-situ measurements (Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO saturation, turbidity, pH, temperature and salinity) and water samples (suspended solids (SS)) at each depth were monitored in accordance with the requirements in the EM&A Manual. For selection of tides for in-situ measurement and water sampling, tidal range of individual flood and ebb tides were not less than 0.5m.

5.4 According to the Environmental Review Report (ERR) for Variations of Environmental Permit (Ref: C45-03), water quality monitoring and audit programme was implemented for monitoring of oxygen depletion (e.g. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) level) in this embayed waters during the period when the fully enclosed barrier is installed. A “Proposal for Water Quality Monitoring in Temporary Marine Embayment” has been submitted to EPD in July 2017 to propose the monitoring frequency, parameter, location, etc. EPD has no further comment on the Proposal. Since January 2020, the cofferdam has been partially removed and the seawater is no longer enclosed. Therefore, no embayment water quality monitoring is required.

Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring)

5.5 Daily piezometer monitoring at any time of the day shall be carried throughout the whole period when any tunnel construction activities are carried out within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate in plan. The monitoring commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.

Monitoring Locations

Marine Water Quality

5.6 A total of twelve monitoring stations are designated for the water quality monitoring program according to EM&A Manual. One additional monitoring station (W1) is designated for monitoring of oxygen depletion in the embayed waters during the period when the fully enclosed barrier is installed. The locations are also summarized in Table 5.2 and shown on Figure 5.

Table 5.2 Marine Quality Monitoring Stations

Monitoring Stations	Descriptions	Coordinates
Monitoring Stations	Descriptions	Easting	Northing
M1	Junk Bay Coral Site – Junk Bay near Chiu Keng Wan	844255	817565
M2	Junk Bay Coral Site – Junk Bay	844076	817087
M3	Junk Bay Coral Site – Junk Island	844491	817890
M4	Junk Bay Coral Site –Chiu Keng Wan	843209	816416
M5	Junk Bay Coral Site – Fat Tong Chau	845463	815769
M6	Tseung Kwan O Salt Water Intake	845512	817442
C1	Control Station – Southeast	844696	814773
C2	Control Station – Northwest	842873	816014
G1	Gradient Station	844418	817560
G2	Gradient Station	844290	817384
G3	Gradient Station	844488	817735
G4	Gradient Station	844967	817551

Monitoring Equipment

5.7 For in-situ monitoring, a multi-parameter meter (Aquaread AP-2000-D) was used to measure Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO saturation (DO %), pH, temperature and turbidity. A sampler was used to collect water samples for laboratory analysis of SS, BOD₅, TOC, Total Nitrogen, Ammonia-N and Total Phosphate.

Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Temperature Measuring Equipment

5.8 The instrument for measuring dissolved oxygen and temperature was portable and weatherproof complete with cable, sensor, comprehensive operation manuals and use DC power source. It was capable of measuring:

Ÿ a dissolved oxygen level in the range of 0-20 mg/L and 0-200% saturation; and

Ÿ a temperature of 0-45 degree Celsius.

5.9 It has a membrane electrode with automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable.

5.10 Sufficient stocks of spare electrodes and cables were available for replacement where necessary.

5.11 Salinity compensation was built-in in the DO equipment.

Turbidity

5.12 Turbidity was measured in-situ by the nephelometric method. The instrument was portable and weatherproof using a DC power source complete with cable, sensor and comprehensive operation manuals. The equipment was capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU. The probe cable was not be less than 25m in length.

5.13 The instrument was consisting of a potentiometer, a glass electrode, a reference electrode and a temperature-compensating device. It was readable to 0.1pH in a range of 0 to 14. Standard buffer solutions of at least pH 7 and pH 10 were used for calibration of the instrument before and after use.

Water Depth Detector

5.14 A portable, battery-operated echo sounder was used for the determination of water depth at each designated monitoring station.

Water Sampler

5.15 Water samples collected for laboratory analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles sample containers, with appropriate preservatives added. All sampling bottles were labelled (waterproof) with the sampling date and time, sample lot number and sampling location reference number to avoid mishandling.

Sample Container and Storage

5.16 Following collection, water samples for laboratory analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles, with preservative appropriately added where necessary. They will be packed in ice (cooled to 4°C without being frozen), delivered to the laboratory and analysed as soon as possible.

Calibration of In-Situ Instruments

5.17 All in-situ monitoring instruments were checked, calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or other international accreditation scheme before use, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals throughout all stages of the water quality monitoring.

5.18 For the on-site calibration of field equipment, the BS 1427:1993, "Guide to Field and on-site test methods for the analysis of waters" was observed.

5.19 Before each round of monitoring, a zero check in distilled water was performed with the turbidity probe of Aquaread AP-2000-D. The probe was then be calibrated with a solution of known NTU.

5.20 Sufficient stocks of spare parts were maintained for replacements when necessary. Backup monitoring equipment was also made available so that monitoring can proceed uninterrupted even when some equipment is under maintenance, calibration, etc.

5.21 Table 5.3 summarizes the equipment used in the water quality monitoring program. Copies of the calibration certificates of the equipment are shown in Appendix B.

Table 5.3 Water Quality Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model and Make	Qty.
Water Sampler	Kahlsico Water-Bottle Model 135DW 150	1
Multi-parameter Water Quality System	YSI 6820-C-M	0
	Aquaread AP-2000-D	0
	YSI EXO1 Multiparameter Sondes	1
Monitoring Position Equipment	“Magellan” Handheld GPS Model GPS-320	1
Water Depth Detector	Fishfinder 140	1

Monitoring Parameters and Frequency

5.22 Table 5.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring period and frequencies of the water quality monitoring in the reporting period.

Table 5.4 Water Quality Monitoring Parameters and Frequency

Monitoring Stations	Parameters, unit	Depth	Frequency
Marine Water Quality
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 C1 C2 G1 G2 G3 G4	In-situ: Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO saturation, turbidity, pH, temperature and salinity Laboratory Testing: Suspended Solids (SS)	M1-M5, C1-C2, G1-G4 · 3 water depths: 1m below water surface, mid-depth and 1m above sea bed. · If the water depth is less than 3m, mid-depth sampling only. · If the water depth is less than 6m, omit mid-depth sampling. M6 · at the vertical level where the water abstraction point of the intake is located(i.e. approximately mid-depth level)	3 days per week / 2 per monitoring day (1 for mid-ebb and 1 for mid-flood)

Monitoring Stations

Parameters, unit

Depth

Frequency

Marine Water Quality

In-situ:

Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, DO saturation, turbidity, pH, temperature and salinity

Laboratory Testing:

Suspended Solids (SS)

M1-M5, C1-C2, G1-G4

· 3 water depths: 1m below water surface, mid-depth and 1m above sea bed.

· If the water depth is less than 3m, mid-depth sampling only.

· If the water depth is less than 6m, omit mid-depth sampling.

· at the vertical level where the water abstraction point of the intake is located(i.e. approximately mid-depth level)

3 days per week

2 per monitoring day

(1 for mid-ebb and 1 for mid-flood)

Monitoring Methodology

Marine Water Quality

5.23 The monitoring stations were accessed using survey boat by the guide of a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS). The depth of the monitoring location was measured using depth meter in order to determine the sampling depths. Afterwards, the probes of the in-situ measurement equipment was lowered to the predetermined depths (1 m below water surface, mid-depth and 1 m above seabed) and the measurements was carried out accordingly. The in-situ measurements at predetermined depths was carried out in duplicate. In case the difference in the duplicate in-situ measurement results was larger than 25%, the third set of in-situ measurement would be carried out for result confirmation purpose.

5.24 Water sampler was lowered into the water to the required depths of sampling. Upon reaching the pre-determined depth, a messenger to activate the sampler was then released to travel down the wire. The water sample was sealed within the sampler before retrieving. At each station, water samples for SS at three depths (1 m below water surface, mid-depth and 1 m above seabed) were collected accordingly. Water samples were stored in a cool box and kept at less than 4°C but without frozen and sent to the laboratory as soon as possible.

Laboratory Analytical Methods

5.25 The testing of all parameters were conducted by Wellab Ltd. (HOKLAS Registration No.083) and comprehensive quality assurance and control procedures in place in order to ensure quality and consistency in results. The testing method and limit of reporting are provided in Table 5.5.

Table 5.5 Methods for Laboratory Analysis for Water Samples

Parameters (Unit)	Proposed Method	Reporting Limit	Detection Limit
SS (mg/L)	APHA 2540 D	0.5 mg/L ⁽¹⁾	0.5 mg/L
BOD₅(mg O₂/L)	APHA 19ed 5210B	2 mg O₂/L	--
TOC (mg-TOC/L)	In-house method SOP020 (Wet Oxidation)	1 mg-TOC/L	--
Total Nitrogen (mg/L)	In-house method SOP063 (FIA)	0.6 mg/L	--
Ammonia-N (mg NH₃-N/L)	In-house method SOP057 (FIA)	0.05 mg NH₃-N/L	--
Total Phosphorus (mg-P/L)⁽²⁾	In-house method SOP055 (FIA)	0.05 mg-P/L	--

Note:

1) Limit of Reporting is reported as Detection Limit for non-HOKLAS report.

2) Parameter Total Phosphorus represents the laboratory testing for total phosphate content in water which is the sum of all three forms of phosphates in water.

QA/QC Requirements

Decontamination Procedures

5.26 Water sampling equipment used during the course of the monitoring programme was decontaminated by manual washing and rinsed clean seawater/distilled water after each sampling event. All disposal equipment was discarded after sampling.

Sampling Management and Supervision

5.27 Water samples were dispatched to the testing laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after the sampling. All samples were stored in a cool box and kept at less than 4°C but without frozen. All water samples were handled under chain of custody protocols and relinquished to the laboratory representatives at locations specified by the laboratory.

5.28 QA/QC procedures as attached in Appendix J are available for the parameters analysed in the HOKLAS-accredited laboratory, WELLAB Ltd.

Results and Observations

Groundwater Quality Monitoring

5.29 Monitoring of groundwater quality had been suspended since October 2019. (Details refer to Section 5.1)

Marine Water Quality Monitoring

5.30 Marine water monitoring results and graphical presentations are shown in Appendix I. Other relevant data was also recorded, such as monitoring location / position, time, sampling depth, weather conditions and any special phenomena or work underway nearby.

5.31 Calculated Action and Limit Levels for Marine Water Quality is presented in Appendix I. Fifty-four (54) Action Level and one-hundred and ninety-three (193) limit level exceedances on Monitoring Stations (M) were recorded in marine water quality monitoring.

5.32 Exceedances of turbidity and suspended solid were recorded on from various monitoring stations non-specifically among all stations including the control stations. Investigations over July 2020 showed that the range of SS levels recorded in July 2020 remained consistent with the records in recent months. All Contractor is reminded to strictly follow the approved drainage plan and clear drainage regularly. In particular, all drainage shall be checked and cleared after heavy rainstorm as sediments may accumulate along pipes and culverts. Further details of the exceedance investigation reports can be found in Appendix K.

5.33 Silt curtain inspections are carried out before the commencement of the construction works every day and diving surveys are also conducted once a week to inspect the silt curtain below the water level. The inspection report are verified by both the RE and the diving specialist and the records are reviewed weekly during the site audits.

Groundwater Level Monitoring (Piezometer Monitoring)

5.34 Daily piezometer monitoring at any time of the day shall be carried throughout the whole period when any tunnel construction activities are carried out within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate in plan.

5.35 Tunnel construction activities are within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate in plan. Construction phase daily piezometer monitoring by the Contractor commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3 October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.

Mitigation Measures Adopted by Contractors for Surface runoff Prevention

5.36 During dry season, the Contractors have maintained the mitigation measures adopted on Site, in order to prevent surface run-off and muddy water from discharging to the public areas. The mitigation measures adopted by each Contract are summarised below:

NE2015/01

5.37 At Lam Tin Side, the Site drainage systems are divided into two parts, namely the site formation and tunnel site drainage which includes:

1. Site formation drainage system collects surface run-off from open excavation areas including slope works and flows naturally to the lowest point in the Site, where they are pumped to the wetseps and sedimentation tank for treatment near LTI site entrance before they are discharged to the designated discharge point.

2. Tunnel drainage system collects surface run-off from the tunnel which are then pumped to the sedimentation tanks near tunnel adit, where three sets of wetseps and sedimentation tanks were set up. The treated water will be discharged to designated discharge point near the Eastern Harbour Crossing (EHC) area.

5.38 At Eastern Harbour Crossing (EHC), two sets of wetseps and sedimentation tanks are set up on site. The wastewater will flow to the lowest catchpit by gravity, which are then pumped to wetseps for wastewater treatment. The sandbags/bunds are also set up at the vehicle entrance to surface run-off from the Site.

5.39 At Tseung Kwan O (TKO), the surface run-off from the slope are directed to the lowest point at cavern via the permanent drainage, which are then pumped to the sedimentation tanks for wastewater treatment via temporary pipes. The treated water will be discharged at designated discharge points. The wetseps and sedimentation tanks are provided under the BMCPC bridge and at the two sides of marine working platform. Water from natural stream will also be diverted to existing drainage to avoid overloading the capacity of the wastewater treatment system. The reservoir on the right side of marine working platform will be enlarged to cater for higher water storage demands. During heavy rainfall, the water stored at the exit of the tunnel shall be pumped into the sedimentation tanks on the right.

NE2015/02

5.40 The exposed sloped area at Portion 9 has been covered with geotextile or tarpaulin to avoid surface run-off. Temporary peripheral open U-channel are also provided along the surcharge area within the rock mount to collect stormwater and surface run-off.

5.41 Soak away pit with a 600mm in diameter were bored into the ground, down to -14mPD, near the piling works area to cater for the surface runoff at Portion IX (Figure 1C). The stormwater and the water generated from the piling works are stored temporary at the pit around the soak away pit, which shall be pumped automatically into the soak away pit where they are soaked into the soil naturally.

5.42 The stormwater received in Portion 9 shall be directed and pumped via the flex tube and sump towards the water treatment system and the approved discharge points. Water generated from Portion VI and V and some water in Portion IX are treated via storage tanks and sedimentation tanks and discharged into approved discharge points (manholes of DN2100 Drain and Area Z).

5.43 The peripheral open U-channel are also provided along the site boundary, which shall be directed to the storage tank and WetSep for treatment in Area A.

5.44 Regular cleaning depending on site conditions are provided for the WetSep at Area A and Z; and the storage tanks and sedimentation tanks at Area A. The water treated by the sedimentation tank and the wetsep shall be discharged towards the designated discharge point. Quality of the effluent are also monitored regularly.

NE2017/02

5.45 Existing manholes are covered with sandbags and geotextiles to avoid surface run-off from entering the channels.

5.46 Stockpiles are covered with tarpaulin to avoid surface run-off.

5.47 Concrete blocks and sandbags are placed along the periphery of the site boundary to avoid surface run-off.

5.48 Stormwater within the site enters the excavated area and flow naturally into the sump due height difference. The stormwater collected in the sump shall be pumped into the sedimentation tank where the run-off are treated before discharging into the designated discharge point.

NE2015/03

5.49 The existing manhole cover are covered with geotextile to prevent muddy water from entering the existing U-channels along the side of Po Shun Road. Manhole inspection are carried out by taking silt measurement regularly in case if silt enters the channel, and silt shall be removed from the manhole if silt were found.

5.50 Sandbags were placed at the periphery of the site along the hoarding to prevent surface runoff from escaping the site.

5.51 Exposed slopes are covered with tarpaulin to prevent surface run-off.

5.52 The surface run-off shall be pumped into the sedimentation tank where they are treated before entering the designated discharge points

NE2017/01

5.53 Temporary peripheral open U-channels and sumps are provided for collecting the stormwater, which are pumped and directed towards the sedimentation tank for treatment. The treated water shall be directed to the designated discharge point.

6. ECOLOGY

Post-Translocation Coral Monitoring

6.1 Post-translocation monitoring survey is recommended in the EM&A Manual to audit the success of coral translocation. Information gathered during each post-translocation monitoring survey should include observations on the presence, survival, health condition and growth of the translocated coral colonies. These parameters should then be compared with the baseline results collected from the pre-translocation survey.

6.2 Under Contract No. NE/2015/01 and NE/2015/02, a total of 14 and 29 coral colonies were tagged and translocated respectively from the Donor Site to the Recipient Site in November 2016. Ten (10) corals at the Recipient Site were also tagged by each Contract as reference for post-translocation monitoring.

6.3 The post-translocation coral monitoring shall be conducted once every 3 months after completion for a period of 12 months. Location of post-translocation coral monitoring is shown in Figure 7. The fourth post-translocation coral monitoring was carried out on 07 November 2017. No further monitoring is required.

7. cultural heritage

Monitoring Requirement

7.1 According to the EP Conditions and EM&A Manual, monitoring of vibration impacts was conducted when the construction works are less than 100m from the Built Heritage in close proximity of the worksite, namely the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau temple. Tilting and settlement monitoring should be applied on the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple. Construction works less than 100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau temple commenced on 8 May 2017.

7.2 As stated in the “Built Heritage Mitigation Plan” for this Project, during the period of the construction works conducted within 100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple, monitoring on settlement and tilting will be conducted once a day for the Cha Kwo Ling. Monitoring of vibration will be conducted during blasting at Cha Kwo Ling area once a day. When there is no blasting to be conducted at the area, vibration monitoring at the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple will be conducted once per day when there are piling works or rock breaking works within the 100m from the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple.

Monitoring Locations

7.3 One vibration monitoring point and three building settlement monitoring points were proposed for monitoring of the cultural heritage. The building settlement markers were placed on the wall on three sides of the Temple, except the front, of the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple and the vibration monitoring point is located within the Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple. Monitoring Location is shown in Figure 8.

Monitoring Equipment

7.4 Building settlement is measured via a settlement marker attached to the wall of Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple by adhesive tape.

7.5 Vibration monitoring was conducted by using vibrographs: Minimate Plus manufactured by Instantel. These vibrographs will be calibrated annually and its performance follows the requirements given in the “Guidance Note on Vibration Monitoring” (GN-VM) issued by the Civil Engineering and Development Department, which is based on the Performance Specification for Blasting Seismographs by International Society of Explosive Engineers (ISEE (2000)).

7.6 Table 7.1 summarizes the equipment employed by the Contractor for cultural heritage monitoring. Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix B.

Table 7.1 Cultural Heritage Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Manufacturer and Model	Quantity
Digital Level for tilting	Leica LS15 Serial No.: 701141	1
Digital Caliper for tilting	Mitutoyo CD-6” ASX Serial No.: A17047921	1
iCivil-1011 Inclinometer for building settlement	iCivil-1011 Inclinometer Serial No.: HK110118 / HK110120	2
Vibrographs for vibration monitoring	MiniMate Plus / MicroMate manufactured by Instantel Model No.: 716A0403 / 721A2501	33

Monitoring Methodology

7.7 Vibrograph (velocity seismograph) was deployed at each monitoring station to measure and record the PPV and amplitude of ground motion in three mutually perpendicular directions. Vibration monitoring equipment fulfils the requirements stated in the Government guidelines and is calibrated to HOKLAS standards. Each monitoring would not be more than 10 minutes. Settlement monitoring should be conducted by surveyors manually.

Alert, Alarm and Action Levels

7.8 The Alert, Alarm and Action (AAA) Levels are given in Table 7.2.

Table 7.2 AAA Levels for Monitoring for Cultural Heritage

Parameter	Alert Level	Alarm Level	Action Level
Vibration	ppv: 4.5 mm/s	ppv: 4.8 mm/s	ppv: 5mm/s Maximum Allowable Vibration Amplitude: 0.1mm
Building Settlement Markers	6mm	8mm	10mm
Building Tilting⁽¹⁾	1:2000	1:1500	1:1000

Remarks:

(1) Building tilting measurement was replaced by building settlement point measurement. The tilting can be calculated by the ratio of the maximum settlement difference between 2 points and the distance between the 2 points.

Results

7.9 In the reporting month, cultural heritage monitoring was carried out by the Contractor at the aforesaid location on 26 occasions. No AAA Level exceedance was recorded in the reporting month. The monitoring results are presented in Appendix T.

Mitigation Measures for Cultural Heritage

7.10 According to Condition 3.6 of the EP (EP No.: EP-458/2013/C), to prevent damage to Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple and its Fung Shui rocks (Child-given rocks) during the construction phase, a temporarily fenced-off buffer zone (Rocks buffer zone is 5 m from the edge of Rocks and 15m from the edge of Rocks alter) with allowance for public access (minimum 1 m) around the temple and the Fung Shui rocks shall be provided. The open yard in front of the temple should be kept as usual for annual Tin Hau festival.

7.11 As there is a large buffer distance from the current works to Cha Kwo Ling Tin Hau Temple and the Fung Shui rocks (Child-given rocks), the temporarily fenced-off rocks buffer zone and from the edge of Rocks alter is not required. The fenced-off rocks buffer zone would be implemented when there is construction activities in vicinity of the cultural heritage.

8. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT REQUIREMENTS

8.1 Landscape and visual mitigation measures during the construction phase shall be checked to ensure that they are fully realized and implemented on site.

8.2 Site audits were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor and audit the timely implementation of landscape and visual mitigation measures listed in “Implementation Schedule and Recommended Mitigation Measures” (shown in Appendix N). The summaries of observations and recommendations related to landscape and visual impacts, if any, are shown in Appendix L.

8.3 No non-compliance of the landscape and visual impact was recorded in the reporting month.

9. LANDFILL GAS MONITORING

Monitoring Requirement

9.1 In accordance with the EM&A Manual, monitoring of landfill gas is required for construction works within the Sai Tso Wan Landfill Consultation Zone during the construction phase. This section presents the results of landfill gas measurements performed by the Contractor. Appendix A shows the Limit Levels for the monitoring works.

9.2 The “Landfill Gas Monitoring Proposal”, including the monitoring programme and detailed actions, is submitted to the EPD for approval. Details of monitoring in this Proposal is in line with the monitoring requirements stipulated in the EM&A Manual.

Monitoring Parameters and Frequency

9.3 Monitoring parameters for Landfill gas monitoring include Methane, Carbon dioxide and Oxygen.

9.4 According to the implementation schedule and recommended mitigation measures of the EM&A Manual, measurements of the following frequencies should be carried out:

Excavations deeper than 1m

Ÿ at the ground surface before excavation commences;

Ÿ immediately before any worker enters the excavation;

Ÿ at the beginning of each working day for the entire period the excavation remains open; and

Ÿ periodically throughout the working day whilst workers are in the excavation.

Excavations between 300mm and 1m deep

Ÿ directly after the excavation has been completed; and

Ÿ periodically whilst the excavation remains open.

For excavations less than 300mm deep

Ÿ monitoring may be omitted, at the discretion of the Safety Officer or other appropriately qualified person

Monitoring Locations

9.5 Monitoring of oxygen, methane and carbon dioxide was performed for excavations at 1m depth or more within the Consultation Zone. In this reporting month, the area required to be monitored for landfill gas are shown below and Figure 6 shows the landfill gas monitoring locations.

Ø Excavation Locations : Portion III

Ø Manholes and Chambers : N/A

Ø Relocation of monitoring wells : N/A

Ø Any other Confined Spaces : N/A

Monitoring Equipment noise mitigation

9.6 Table 9.1 summarizes the equipment employed by the Contractor for the landfill gas monitoring.

Table 9.1 Landfill Gas Monitoring Equipment

Equipment

Model and Make

Quantity

Portable gas detector

ALTAIR 5X

Multigas Detector

(Serial No. 137333)

Results and Observations

9.7 In the reporting month, landfill gas monitoring was carried out by the Contractor at the aforesaid locations on 130 occasions. No Limit Level exceedance for landfill gas monitoring was recorded in the reporting month. The monitoring results are provided in Appendix R. Copies of calibration certificates are attached in Appendix B.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT

Site Audits

10.1 Site audits were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the timely implementation of proper environmental management practices and mitigation measures in the Project site. The summaries of site audits are attached in Appendix L.

10.2 Joint weekly site audits by the representatives of the Engineer, Contractor and the ET were conducted in the reporting month as shown in below:

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2015/01: 08, 15, 22 & 29 July 2020

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2015/02: 02, 09, 16, 23 & 30 July 2020

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2017/01: 02, 09, 16, 23 & 30 July 2020

Ÿ Contract No. NE/2017/02: 02, 09, 16, 23 & 30 July 2020

10.3 Monthly joint site inspection with the representative of IEC was conducted for NE/2015/01, NE/2015/02, NE/2017/01 and NE/2017/02 on 29, 16, 16 and 16 July 2020 respectively.

10.4 The EM&A programme of Contract No. NE/2015/03 had been terminated on 21 April 2020 under the approval of EPD.

Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures

10.5 According to the EIA Study Report, Environmental Permit and the EM&A Manual of the Project, the mitigation measures detailed in the documents are recommended to be implemented during the construction phase. An updated summary of the Implementation Schedule and Recommended Mitigation Measures is provided in Appendix N.

10.6 During site inspections in the reporting month, no non-compliance was recorded on reporting month. The observations and recommendations made during the audit sessions are summarized in Appendix L.

11. WASTE MANAGEMENT

11.1 Waste generated from this Project includes inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials, non-inert C&D materials and marine sediments. Inert C&D waste includes soil, broken rock, broken concrete and building debris, while non-inert C&D materials are made up of C&D waste which cannot be reused or recycled and has to be disposed of at the designated landfill sites. Marine sediment shall be expected from excavation and dredging works of this Project.

11.2 With reference to relevant handling records of this Project, the quantities of different types of waste generated in the reporting month are summarised and presented in Appendix P.

11.3 The Contractors are advised to minimize the wastes generated through the recycling or reusing. All mitigation measures stipulated in the approved EM&A Manual and waste management plans shall be fully implemented. The status of implementation of waste management and reduction measures are summited in Appendix N.

12. ENVIRONMENTAL NON-CONFORMANCE

Summary of Exceedances

12.1 Four (4) Action Level exceedances of noise were recorded due to the documented complaints received in the reporting month. No Limit Level exceedances of construction noise monitoring were recorded for day-time in the reporting month. No Limit Level exceedance of night-time was recorded in the reporting month. The night time Limit Level exceedances were considered due to road traffic near the Eastern Cross Harbour Tunnel Toll Plaza, therefore non-Project related.

12.2 Fifty-four (54) Action Level and one hundred and ninety-three (193) exceedances were recorded in monitoring stations (M) during marine water quality monitoring.

12.3 Actions carried out in accordance with the Event and Action Plans in Appendix M are presented in Appendix K – Summary of Exceedance.

Summary of Environmental Non-Compliance

12.4 No non-compliance was recorded on this reporting month.

Summary of Environmental Complaint

12.5 Five (5) environmental complaints were received in the reporting month. The Cumulative Complaint Log is presented in Appendix O. The investigation status and result is also reported in Appendix O.

Summary of Environmental Summon and Successful Prosecution

12.6 No notification of summon or successful environmental prosecution was received in this reporting period. The Cumulative Log for environmental summon and successful prosecution since the commencement of the Project is presented in Appendix O.

13. FUTURE KEY ISSUES

13.1 Tentative construction programmes for the next three months are provided in Appendix Q.

13.2 Major site activities to be undertaken for the next reporting period are summarized in Table 13.1.

Table 13.1 Summary Table for Site Activities in the next Reporting Period

Contract No. and Project Title	Site Activities (August 2020)		Key Environmental Issues *
NE/2015/01 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Main Tunnel and Associated Works	Lam Tin Interchange	1) EHC2 U-Trough 2) Site Formation – Area 1G1, Area 1G2, Area 2, Area 3, Area 4 & Area 5 3) Administration Building	(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G)
	Main Tunnel	4) Main Tunnel Excavation 5) Main Tunnel Lining Works	(B)
	TKO Interchange	6) Haul Road Construction and Site Formation & Slope Works 7) Bridge Construction 8) East Ventilation Building	(A) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (F) / (I)
NE/2015/02 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Road P2 and Associated Works	1) Construction of pillar box and ducting system at Portion IV adjacent to Ocean Shores EVA 2) Construction of utility trough and road barriers at road P2 CH411 – 500 and SR2 CH110 – CH170 (land section) 3) Site formation at Road P2 CH500-CH650 and SR1 4) Road and drainage works at Road P2 CH500 – 650, slip road SR1 footpath and cycle track, slip road SR2 CH250 – CH350 5) R.C. structure works for U-trough CH318-CH363 6) ELS at underpass P2 CH105 – CH318 7) Modification of dewatering system (P2 CH105 – CH318) 8) 3rd of excavation at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 9) Sheetpile installation at S200 CH821 – P2 CH105 10) Installation of de-watering system at S200 CH821 – CH105 11) Installation of socketed H-pile at CT01 CH117 – CH336 12) Construction of abutment 13) Reposition of Tong Yin Street 14) Drainage works from SMH9101 – SMH9103 15) Installation of de-watering system at CH821 – CH105 16) Excavation & ELS installation works at CH821 – CH105 17) Construction of sloping seawall 18) Removal of temporary cofferdam 19) Construction of seawall coping 20) Installation of profile barrier at P2 CH500-CH650 21) Construction of barrier at CH500 – CH650 22) Drainage works at SR1 footpath / cycle truck 23) Installation of ELS at cofferdam CH105 – CH318 24) Excavation of 3rd layer of ELS at CH105 – CH318 cofferdam 25) Backfilling works for reinstatement of Tong Yin Street 26) Construction of storm water drain system for SHH 9101 – 9103		(A) / (B) / (C) / (D) / (E) / (G) / (I)
NE/2015/03 - Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Northern Footbridge	The construction works under the contract had been completed in December 2019. Materials are being removed from works area.		N/A
NE/2017/01 – Tseung Kwan O Interchange and Associated Works	1) Dismantling of Temporary Working Platforms 2) Bored Piling Works 3) Installation of Precast Pile Cap Shell 4) Construction of Pile Cap 5) Construction of Pier 6) Construction of Pier Head works 7) Segment erection works 8) Construction of Bridge Decks		(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G)
NE/2017/02 –Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel - Road P2/D4 and Associated Works	1) Inspection pit excavation and utility diversion works 2) Construction of drainage and watermain 3) Pile cap 4) Pre-bored Socket-H Pile 5) Asphalt Paving 6) Pier, Staircase and Lift Shalt Construction 7) Road Works		(A) / (B) / (E) / (F) / (G)
NE/2017/06 – Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel – Traffic Control and Surveillance System(TCSS) and Associated Works	Nil		N/A

Note:

(A) Watering for dust generation from haul road, stockpiles of dusty materials, exposed site area, excavation works and rock breaking activities;

(B) Noisy construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling works;

(D) Wastewater and runoff discharge from site;

(E) Accumulation of silt, mud and sand along U-channels and sedimentation tanks;

(F) Set up and implementation of temporary drainage system for the surface runoff;

(G) Storage of chemicals/fuel and chemical waste/waste oil on site;

(H) Accumulation and storage of general and construction waste on site; and

(I) Marine water quality impact and indirect impact to coral communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation.

Key Issues for the Coming Month

13.3 Key environmental issues in the coming month include:

· Watering for dust generation from haul road, stockpiles of dusty materials, exposed site area, excavation works and rock breaking activities;

· Noisy construction activity such as rock-breaking activities and piling works;

· Runoff from exposed slope or site area;

· Wastewater and runoff discharge from site;

· Accumulation of silt, mud and sand along U-channels and sedimentation tanks;

· Set up and implementation of temporary drainage system for the surface runoff;

· Precaution measures in case of heavy rainfall brought along by typhoon;

· Storage of chemicals/fuel and chemical waste/waste oil on site;

· Accumulation and storage of general and construction waste on site; and

· Marine water quality impact and indirect impact to coral communities due to marine construction for TKO-LTT reclamation.

14. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions

14.1 This is the 45^th Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report which presents the EM&A works undertaken during the period in July 2020 in accordance with EM&A Manual and the requirement under EP.

Air Quality Monitoring

14.2 No Action/Limit Level exceedance for 1-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.

14.3 No Action/Limit Level exceedance for 24-hour TSP monitoring was recorded.

Construction Noise Monitoring

14.4 Four (4) Action Level exceedances were recorded due to the documented complaints received in this reporting month.

14.5 No Limit Level exceedances was recorded for daytime construction noise in the reporting month. No limit level exceedances were recorded for night-time.

Water Quality Monitoring

14.6 Groundwater quality monitoring had been suspended since October 2019. Details shall be referred to Section 5.1.

14.7 Fifty-four (54) Action Level and one hundred and ninety-three (193) Limit Level exceedances were recorded in Monitoring Stations (M) during marine water quality monitoring.

14.8 Tunnel construction activities are within +/- 50m of the piezometer gate in plan. Construction phase daily piezometer monitoring by the Contractor commenced in June 2018. It has switched to monthly basis since 3October 2018 as the construction activity was 120m away from the piezometer gate. No monitoring was conducted in the reporting month.

Ecological Monitoring

14.9 The post-translocation coral monitoring surveys were completed in November 2017.

Monitoring on Cultural Heritage

14.10 No Alert Alarm and Action (AAA) Level exceedance of cultural heritage monitoring on cultural heritage was recorded in the reporting month.

Landscape and Visual Monitoring and Audit

14.11 No non-compliance of the landscape and visual impact was recorded in the reporting month.

Landfill Gas Monitoring

14.12 Monitoring of landfill gases in the reporting month was carried out by the Contractor at excavation location, Portion III. No Limit Level exceedance was recorded.

Environmental Site Inspection

14.13 Joint weekly site inspections were conducted by representatives of the Contractor, Engineer and Environmental Team. During site inspections in the reporting month, no non-compliance was identified. The environmental deficiency observed during the reporting month are shown in Appendix K.

Complaint, Prosecution and Notification of Summons

14.14 Five (5) environmental complaints, no successful prosecution and notification of summon were received during the reporting period.

Recommendations

14.15 The following recommendations were made to the Contractor for the reporting month:
Air Quality Impact

· To regularly apply watering on dry surface should be applied to minimize erosion.

· To aim the water spray at the rock breaking point for effective dust suppression.

· To water materials before loading/unloading.

· To turn off idle equipment.

Construction Noise

· To provide sufficient noise barriers for noisy PMEs as practically at LTI according to CNMP.

· To repair the gaps between the noise barriers.

· To place compatible noise barrier close to the breaking point for effective noise screening.

· To erect sound proof canvases on derrick lighter barge

Water Quality Impact

· To clear the oil slick and check for any damage of the silt curtain.

· To repair damaged or missing silt curtain

· To check whether the curtain has been set to the seabed.

· To ensure that the pumping rate of bored pile is sufficient to avoid discharging waste water into the sea.

· To clear floating refuse between the cofferdam and silt curtain.

· To clear oil slick within and outside cofferdam.

· To control the amount of loading materials in the barge to avoiding spillage.

· To cover stockpile near seafront.

· To remove wastewater and oil in drip tray.

· To remove pond/still water.

Waste/Chemical Management

· To bund or lock the chemical storage area.

· To clear dripping oil from bored piling machine.

· To clear oil slick on seawater.

· To clear oil on the floor.

Landscape and Visual

· To avoid placing any construction materials in the tree protection zone.