Environmental Permit No. EP-438/2012/F
Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹ EP-438/2012/F
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE
(CHAPTER
499)
SECTIONS 10
and 13
Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô±ø¨Ò
(²Ä499³¹)
²Ä10±ø¤Î13±ø
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE
A DESIGNATED PROJECT
«Ø³y¤ÎÀç¿ì«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥ØªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ
A³¡ (³\¥iÃÒ¥Dn³¡¤À)
Pursuant to
Section 10 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (the Ordinance),
the Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) granted the
environmental permit (No. EP-438/2012) to the MTR Corporation
Limited (hereinafter referred to as the ¡§Permit
Holder¡¨) on 22 March 2012. Pursuant to Section 13 of
the EIAO, the Director amends the environmental permit (No. EP-438/2012/E)
based on the Application No. VEP-444/2014.
The amendments, described below, are incorporated into this environmental
permit (No. EP-438/2012/F). This
environmental permit as amended is for the construction and operation of the
designated project described in Part B subject to
the conditions specified in Part C. The issue of this environmental permit is based on the documents,
approvals or permissions described below:
®Ú¾Ú¡mÀô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô±ø¨Ò¡n(Àôµû±ø¨Ò)²Ä10±øªº³W©w¡AÀô¹Ò«OÅ@¸p¸pªø(¸pªø)©ó2012¦~3¤ë22¤é±NÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ(No. EP-438/2012)§å¤©»´äÅK¸ô¦³¤½¥q(¤UºÙ ¡§³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H¡¨)¡C®Ú¾ÚÀôµû±ø¨Ò²Ä13±øªº³W©w¡A¸pªø¦]À³§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒªº¥Ó½Ð½s¸¹VEP-444/2014×qÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ(No. EP-438/2012/E)¡C¥H¤U×q¤w¥]§t¦b¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¤º(½s¸¹EP-438/2012/F)¡C¥»¸g×qªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ§@¬°«Ø³y¤ÎÀç¿ìB³¡©Ò»¡©úªº«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¡A¦ý¶·¿í¦uC³¡©Ò¦C©úªº±ø¥ó¡C¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¬O¨Ì¾Ú¤U¦C¤å¥ó¡B§åã©Î³\¥i¦Óñµo¡G
Application No. ¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹ |
VEP-444/2014 |
Document in the Register: µn°O¥U¤Wªº¤å¥ó¡G |
1. Shatin to
Central Link (SCL) - Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section (Register No.
AEIAR-167/2012) : -
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (October 2011) [Hereafter
referred to as ¡§the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report¡¨] -
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual (October 2011) [Hereafter referred to as ¡§the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual¡¨] -
Executive Summary (October 2011) 1. ¨F¤¤½u-¤j³ò¦Ü¬õꩬq(µn°O¥UÀɸ¹¡GAEIAR-167/2012): -
Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô³ø§i (2011¦~10¤ë) [¤UºÙ¡§SCL(TAW-HUH)Àôµû³ø§i¡¨] -
Àô¹ÒºÊ¹î¼f®Ö¤â¥U (2011¦~10¤ë) [¤UºÙ¡§SCL(TAW-HUH)ÀôºÊ¤â¥U¡¨] -
¦æ¬FºKn(2011¦~10¤ë) 2.
Shatin to Central Link (SCL) ¡V Stabling Sidings at Hung Hom Freight
Yard (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012) : -
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (October 2011) [Hereafter
referred to as ¡§the SCL(HHS) EIA Report"] -
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual (October 2011) [Hereafter referred to as ¡§the SCL(HHS)EM&A Manual¡¨] - Executive
Summary (October 2011) |
|
2.
¨F¤¤½u-¦ì©ó¬õꩳf¹B¯¸ªº¦C¨®°±©ñ³B (µn°O¥UÀɸ¹¡GAEIAR-164/2012): -
Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô³ø§i (2011¦~10¤ë) [¤UºÙ¡§SCL(HHS)Àôµû³ø§i¡¨] -
Àô¹ÒºÊ¹î¼f®Ö¤â¥U (2011¦~10¤ë) [¤UºÙ¡§SCL(HHS)ÀôºÊ¤â¥U¡¨] -
¦æ¬FºKn(2011¦~10¤ë) 3. The Director¡¦s letter of
approval of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report dated 17 February 2012, (ref. (28) in Ax (2) to EP
2/G/A/124 Pt.7) 3.
¸pªø©ó2012¦~2¤ë17¤éµo¥XSCL(TAW-HUH)Àôµû³ø§iªº§åã«H¡AÀÉ®×½s¸¹: ((28) in Ax (2) to EP 2/G/A/124 Pt.7) 4. The Director¡¦s letter of
approval of the SCL(HHS) EIA Report dated 17 February 2012, (ref. (30) in EP 2/G/A/160
Pt.3) 4. ¸pªø©ó2012¦~2¤ë17¤éµo¥XSCL(HHS)Àôµû³ø§iªº§åã«H¡AÀÉ®×½s¸¹: ((30) in EP 2/G/A/160
Pt.3 ) 5. Application for
Environmental Permit submitted on 23 February 2012 (Application No.
AEP-438/2012) [Hereinafter referred to as the ¡§Application¡¨] 5. ©ó2012¦~2¤ë23¤é ´£¥æªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó (¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s:
AEP-438/2012) [¤U ºÙ ¡u ¥Ó ½Ð ®Ñ ¡v] 6.
Environmental Permit issued on 22 March 2012
(Permit No. EP-438/2012) 6. ©ó2012¦~3¤ë22¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012) 7.
Application for Variation of Environmental Permit including all
attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 28 June 2012 (Application No.
VEP-370/2012) 7. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2012¦~6¤ë28¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-370/2012) 8.
Environmental Permit issued on 12 July 2012 (Permit
No. EP-438/2012/A) 8. ©ó2012¦~7¤ë12¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/A) 9.
Application for Variation of Environmental Permit including all
attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 17 October 2012 (Application
No. VEP-382/2012) 9. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2012¦~10¤ë17¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-382/2012) 10. Environmental Permit issued on 26 October 2012 (Permit No. EP- 438/2012/B) 10. ©ó2012¦~10¤ë26¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/B) 11. Application for Variation of Environmental Permit including all
attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 15 April 2013 (Application No.
VEP-401/2013) 11. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2013¦~4¤ë15¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-401/2013) 12. Environmental Permit issued on 30 April
2013
(Permit No. EP-438/2012/C) 12. ©ó2013¦~4¤ë30¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/C) 13.
Application for Variation of Environmental
Permit including all attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 30 August 2013 (Application No. VEP-412/2013) 13. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2013¦~8¤ë30¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-412/2013) 14. Environmental Permit issued on 13
September 2013 (Permit No. EP-438/2012/D) 14.
©ó2013¦~9¤ë13¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/D) 15.
Application for Variation of Environmental
Permit including all attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 19 March 2014 (Application No. VEP-432/2014) 15. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2014¦~3¤ë19¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-432/2014) 16. Environmental Permit issued on 4
April 2014 (Permit No. EP-438/2012/E) 16.
©ó2014¦~4¤ë4¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/E) 17. Application for Variation of Environmental Permit including all
attachments submitted by the Permit Holder on 20
June 2014 (Application No. VEP-444/2014) 17. ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2014¦~6¤ë20¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽХ]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹VEP-444/2014) |
Application
No. ¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹ |
Date
of Application ¥Ó½Ð¤é´Á |
List
of Amendments Incorporated into Environmental Permit ¤w¥]§t¦bÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¤ºªº×q¶µ¥Ø |
Date
of Amendment ×q¤é´Á |
VEP-370/2012 |
28 June 2012 2012¦~6¤ë28¤é |
Vary Figures 1,3,4,5 and 11 of Environmental Permit No. EP-438/2012 |
12 July 2012 2012¦~7¤ë12¤é |
VEP-382/2012 |
17 October 2012 2012¦~10¤ë17¤é |
Vary Conditions 2.21 and 2.22 in Part C of Environmental
Permit No. EP-438/2012/A §ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/A
C³¡±ø¥ó²Ä 2.21 ¤Î 2.22¶µ |
26 October 2012 2012¦~10¤ë26¤é |
VEP-401/2013 |
15 April 2013 2013¦~4¤ë15¤é |
Vary Figures 3 and 4 of Environmental Permit No. EP-438/2012/B |
30 April 2013 2013¦~4¤ë30¤é |
VEP-412/2013 |
30 August
2013 2013¦~8¤ë30¤é |
Vary Figures 3 and 4 of Environmental Permit No. EP-438/2012/C |
13
September 2013 2013¦~9¤ë13¤é |
VEP-432/2014 |
19 March 2014 2014¦~3¤ë14¤é |
Vary
Figures 3,
4
and 6 of Environmental Permit
No. EP-438/2012/D |
4 April 2014 2014¦~4¤ë4¤é |
|||||
VEP-444/2014 |
20 June 2014 2014¦~6¤ë20¤é |
Vary
Figures 3
and 4
of
Environmental Permit No. EP-438/2012/E §ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹
EP-438/2012/Eªº¹Ï 3¤Î4 |
15 July 2014 2014¦~7¤ë15¤é |
|||||
15 July 2014 2014 ¦~ 7 ¤ë 15 ¤é |
|
|||||||
Date ¤é´Á |
|
(Maurice K.L. YEUNG) Principal Environmental Protection Officer (Assessment and Noise) for Director of Environmental Protection Àô¹Ò«OÅ@¸p¸pªø (º®uÀô¹Ò«OÅ@¥D¥ô(µû¦ô¤Î¾¸µ) ·¨°ê¨}¥N¦æ |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PART B
(DESCRIPTIONS OF DESIGNATED PROJECT)
B³¡ («ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº»¡©ú)
Hereunder is the
description of the designated project mentioned in Part A
of this environmental permit:
¤U¦C¬°¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒA³¡ ©Ò´£¤Îªº«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº»¡©ú:
Title
of Designated Project «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¦WºÙ |
Shatin to Central Link (SCL) - Tai Wai to
Hung Hom Section [The project is
hereinafter referred to as ¡§the Project¡¨.] ¨F¤¤½u - ¤j³ò¦Ü¬õꩬq [¤Wz¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¤UºÙ ¡§¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¡¨ ] |
Nature of Designated Project |
The Project covers
the following Designated Project elements under Part I, Schedule 2
of the EIAO : -
A railway and its associated stations (Item A.2 of Part 1 of
Schedule 2 of the EIAO); -
A railway siding (Item A.4 of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the EIAO); -
A railway tunnel more than 800 m in length between portals (Item A.7 of
Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the EIAO); -
A railway bridge more than 100m in length between abutments (Item A.8 of
Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the EIAO); and -
An explosive depot in a stand-alone, purpose built building (Item K.10 of
Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the EIAO). ®Ú¾ÚÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡A¥»¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¥]§t¤F¤U¦CÄÝ©ó«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¤¸¯À¡G -
ÅK¸ô¤Î¨ä¬ÛÁp¨®¯¸ (¡uÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡vªþªí2²Ä1³¡A.2¶µ)¡F -
ÅK¸ô°¼½u (¡uÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡vªþªí2²Ä1³¡A.4¶µ)¡F -
¤J¤f¤§¶¡ªºªø«×¶W¹L800¦ÌªºÅK¸ôÀG¹D(¡uÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡vªþªí2²Ä1³¡A.7¶µ)¡F -
¾ô ¥x ¤§ ¶¡ ªº ªø «× ¶W ¹L 100¦Ì ªº ÅK ¸ô ¾ô ¼Ù (¡uÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡vªþªí2²Ä1³¡A.8¶µ)¡F -
¦b¬Y¤@³æ¿W¡B¯S«Øªº«Ø¿vª«¤ºªºÃz¬µ«~Ü®w (¡uÀôµû±ø¨Ò¡vªþªí2²Ä1³¡K.10¶µ) |
Location
of Designated Project «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¦aÂI |
General layout of the railway alignment and
location of the railway stations and the works sites of the Project are shown
in Figures 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 attached to this Permit. ¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¤Î¨ä¤u¦aªº¦ì¸m¨£¸ü©ó¥»³\¥iÃÒ§¨ªþªº¹Ï1,2,3,4¤Î5¡C |
Scale and Scope of Designated Project «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº³W¼Ò©M½d³ò |
Construction and operation of the following
key elements: (i)
a railway of
approximately 11km long from Tai Wai to Hung Hom; (ii)
seven railway
stations at Hin Keng, Diamond Hill, Kai Tak, To Kwa Wan, Ma Tau Wai, Ho Man
Tin and Hung Hom; (iii)
stabling sidings at
the former Hung Hom Freight Yard and associated launching/retrieval tracks; (iv)
associated ventilation
building, ventilation shafts, emergency access, emergency escape access and
emergency egress point; and (v)
supporting works areas, access roads, barging facilities and temporary
explosive magazine during the construction of the Project. «Ø³y©MÀç¿ì¥H¤Uªº¥Dn³¡¥÷¡G (i)
ªø¬ù11¤½¨½ªºÅK¸ô¡A¸ô½u¥Ñ¤j³ò¦Ü¬õê©¡F (ii)
7Ó¦ì©óÅã®|¡BÆp¥Û¤s¡B啓¼w¡B¤g¥ÊÆW¡B°¨ÀY³ò¡B¦ó¤å¥Ð¤Î¬õꩪº¨®¯¸¡F (iii)
¦ì©ó«e¬õꩳf¹B¯¸ªº¦C¨®°±©ñ³B©M¬ÛÃöªº¶i¥X¯¸¸ôy; (iv)
»PÅK¸ô¬ÛÃöªº³q·¤j¼Ó¡B³q·ºÞ¹D¤Îºò«æ±Ï´©³q¹D;¤Î (v)
©ó¬I¤u´Á¶¡ªº«á¶Ô¬I¤u°Ï¡B·F¹D¤ä¸ô¡BÄ»²îÂà¹B³]¬I¡BÁ{®ÉÃz¬µ«~Ü®w¡C Remarks : For Ho Man Tin (HOM) Station and Hung Hom (HUH)
Station, the civil construction works will be carried out under the Kwun Tong
Line Extension (KTE) Project and the SCL (Mong Kong East to Hung Hom Section)
Project respectively. The construction works to be carried out under this
Project will mainly include internal fitting-out works, track laying works
and provision of other station facilities. «Ø³y¦ó¤å¥Ð¯¸¤Î¬õꩯ¸ªº¤g¤ì¤uµ{¥Dn¤À§O¯Ç¤J¦b¡uÆ[¶í½u©µ½u¡v©M¡u¨F¤¤½u(©ô¨¤ªF¦Ü¬õꩬq)¡vªº¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¤º¡A¦Ó¥»¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø·|¦b¦ó¤å¥Ð¯¸¤Î¬õꩯ¸¶i¦æ¤º³¡¸ËסBçE³]¸ôy¤Î´£¨Ñ¨ä¥L¨®¯¸³]¬I¡C |
1. General
Conditions
1.1 The Permit Holder and any person working on the
Project shall comply with all conditions set out in this Permit. Any
non-compliance by any person may constitute a contravention of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) and may become the subject
of appropriate action being taken under the Ordinance.
1.2 The
Permit Holder shall ensure full compliance with all legislation from time to
time in force including, without limitation to, the Noise Control Ordinance
(Cap. 400), Air Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 311), Water Pollution Control
Ordinance (Cap. 358), Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap. 466) and Waste Disposal
Ordinance (Cap. 354). This Permit does not of itself constitute any ground of
defence against any proceedings instituted under any legislation or imply any
approval under any legislation.
1.3 The
Permit Holder shall make copies of this Permit together with all documents
referred to in this Permit or the documents referred to in Part
A of the Permit readily available at all times for inspection by the
Director or his authorised officers at all sites/offices covered by this
Permit. Any reference to the Permit shall include all documents referred to in
the Permit and also the relevant documents in the Register.
1.4 The Permit Holder shall give a copy of this Permit
to the person(s) in charge of the site(s) and ensure that such person(s) fully
understands all conditions and all requirements incorporated by the Permit. The
site(s) refers to site(s) of construction and operation of the Project and
shall mean the same hereafter.
1.5 The Permit Holder shall display
conspicuously a copy of this Permit on the construction site(s) at all
vehicular site entrances/exists or at a convenient location for public¡¦s
information at all times. The Permit Holder shall ensure that the most
updated information about the Permit, including any amended permit, is
displayed at such location. If the Permit Holder surrenders a part or the
whole of the Permit, the notice he sends to the Director shall also be
displayed at the same location as the original Permit. The suspended, varied
or cancelled Permit shall be removed from display at the construction site(s).
1.6 The Permit Holder shall construct and operate the
Project in accordance with the project descriptions in Part
B of this Permit.
1.7 The Permit Holder shall
ensure that the Project is designed, constructed and operated in accordance
with the information and all recommendations described in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012); the SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012); the application document (Application No. AEP-438/2012);
other relevant documents in the Register; and the information or mitigation measures described in this Permit,
mitigation measures to be recommended in submissions that shall be deposited with
or approved by the Director as a result of permit conditions contained in this
Permit, and mitigation measures to be recommended under ongoing surveillance
and monitoring activities during all stages of the Project. Where
recommendations referred to in the documents of the Register are not expressly
referred to in this Permit, such recommendations are nevertheless to be
implemented unless expressly excluded or impliedly amended in this Permit.
1.8 All
deposited submissions, as required under this Permit, shall be rectified and
resubmitted in accordance with the comments, if any made by the Director within
one month of the receipt of the Director¡¦s comments or otherwise specified by
the Director.
1.9 All submissions approved by the Director, all submissions
deposited without comments by the Director, or all submissions rectified in
accordance with comments by the Director under this Permit shall be construed
as part of the permit conditions described in Part C of
this Permit. Any variations of the submissions shall be approved by the
Director in writing or as prescribed in the relevant permit conditions. Any
non-compliance with the submissions may constitute a contravention of the EIA
Ordinance (Cap. 499). All submissions or any variation of the submissions shall
be certified by the Environmental Team (ET) Leader and verified by the
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) referred to in Conditions 2.1 and 2.2
below, before submitting to the Director under the Permit.
1.10 The
Permit Holder shall release all finalized submissions, as required under this
Permit, to the public by depositing copies in the EIA Ordinance Register
Office, or in any other places, or any internet websites as specified by the
Director, or by any other means as specified by the Director for public
inspection. For this purpose, the Permit Holder shall provide sufficient
copies of the submissions.
1.11 All submissions to the Director required under this Permit shall be
delivered either in person or by registered mail to the EIA Ordinance Register
Office (currently at 27/F, Southorn Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong). Electronic copies of all
finalized submissions required under this Permit shall be prepared in Hyper
Text Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document
Format (PDF version 1.3 or later), unless otherwise agreed by the Director and
shall be submitted at the same time as the hard copies.
1.12 The
Permit Holder shall notify the Director in writing the commencement date of
construction of the Project no later than one month prior to the commencement
of construction of the Project. The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing immediately if there is any change of the commencement date of the
construction.
1.13 For the purpose
of this Permit, ¡§commencement of construction¡¨ does not include works related
to site clearance and preparation, or other works as agreed by the Director.
1.14 The Permit Holder notify the Director in writing the commencement date
of operation of the Project no later than two months prior to the commencement
of operation of the Project. The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing immediately if there is any change of the commencement date of the operation.
2. Special Conditions
Submissions and
Measures before Commencement of Construction of the Project
Employment
of Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Personnel
2.1 An
Environmental Team (ET) shall be established by the Permit Holder no later than
one month before the commencement of construction of the Project. The ET shall
not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor or the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) for the Project. The ET shall be headed by an ET
Leader. The ET Leader shall be a person who has at least 7 years of experience
in environmental monitoring and auditing (EM&A) or environmental
management. The ET and the ET Leader shall be responsible for the
implementation of the EM&A programme in accordance with the EM&A
requirements as contained in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual and SCL(HHS) EM&A
Manual. The ET Leader shall keep a contemporaneous log-book of each and every
instance or circumstance or change of circumstances, which may affect the compliance
with the recommendations of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012) and this Permit. The ET Leader shall notify the IEC
within one working day of the occurrence of any such instance or circumstance
or change of circumstances. The ET Leader¡¦s log-book shall be kept readily
available for inspection by all persons assisting in supervision of the
implementation of the recommendations of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012) and
this Permit or by the Director or his authorized officers. Failure to maintain
records in the log-book, failure to discharge the duties of the ET Leader as
defined in the EM&A Manual or failure to comply with this Condition would
entitle the Director to require the Permit Holder by notice in writing to
replace the ET Leader. Failure by the Permit Holder to make replacement, or
further failure to keep contemporaneous records in the log-book despite the
employment of a new ET Leader may render the Permit liable to suspension,
cancellation or variation.
2.2 An
IEC shall be employed by the Permit Holder no later than one month before
commencement of construction of the Project. The IEC shall not be in any way an
associated body of the Contractor or the ET for the Project. The IEC shall be a
person who has at least 7 years of experience in EM&A or environmental
management. The IEC shall be responsible for duties defined in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A
Manual and SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual and shall audit the
overall EM&A performance, including the implementation of all environmental
mitigation measures, submissions required in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual
and SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual, and any other submissions
required under this Permit. In addition, the IEC shall be responsible for
verifying the environmental acceptability of permanent and temporary works,
relevant design plans and submissions under this Permit. The IEC shall verify
the log-book(s) mentioned in Condition 2.1 of this Permit. The IEC shall notify
the Director by fax, within one working day of receipt of notification from the
ET Leader of each and every occurrence, change of circumstances or
non-compliance with the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012) and
this Permit, which might affect the monitoring or control of adverse
environmental impacts from the Project. In the case where the IEC fails to so
notify the Director of the same, fails to discharge the duties of the IEC as
defined in the EM&A Manual or fails to comply with this Condition, the
Director may require the Permit Holder by notice in writing to replace the IEC.
Failure to replace the IEC as directed or further failure to so notify the
Director despite employment of a new IEC may render the Permit liable to
suspension, cancellation or variation. Notification by the Permit Holder is the
same as notification by the IEC for the purpose of this Condition.
Community Liaison Groups
2.3 Before
the commencement of construction of the Project, the Permit Holder shall set up
Community Liaison Groups comprising representatives of concerned and affected parties,
including owners¡¦ corporations, management offices, local committees, residents
and schools in the affected areas along the railway alignment, to facilitate
communications, enquiries and complaint handlings on environmental issues
related to the Project and maintain the Community Liaison Groups throughout
the entire construction period of the Project. The Permit
Holder shall follow up with the Community Liaison Groups on the implementation
of mitigation measures and other initiatives proposed by the Permit Holder such
as Indirect Technical Remedies in the form of upgraded glazing and
air-conditioning for eligible dwellings affected by air-borne construction
noise impact, as well as arrangement of continuous construction noise
monitoring. The Permit Holder
shall notify the Director the date of setting up the Community Liaison Groups,
the membership, the terms of reference and the contact details at least one
month before the commencement of construction of the Project.
2.4 The Permit Holder
shall set up a designated complaint hotline for the Project to address the
environmental concerns and complaints in an efficient manner before the
commencement of construction of the Project and maintain the designated
complaint hotline throughout the entire construction period of the Project.
Employment
of Certified Arborist
2.5 The
Permit Holder shall appoint a Certified Arborist for the Project to advise
on, monitor and ensure proper implementation of measures for protecting trees
affected by the Project as well as trees to be transplanted, and to prepare
submissions as required under Condition 2.13 of this Permit.
Employment
of Qualified Archaeologist
2.6 The
Permit Holder shall
appoint a qualified archaeologist to conduct further archaeological
investigation at former Tai Hom Village site and the Sacred Hill (North) study
area and to conduct rescue excavation to preserve any archaeological remains as
required under Condition 2.16 of this Permit.
Management
Organization of Main Construction Companies
2.7 The Permit
Holder shall, no later than two weeks before the commencement of construction
of the Project, inform the Director in writing the management organization of
the main construction companies and/or any form of joint ventures associated
with the construction of the Project.
The submitted information shall include at least an organization chart,
names of responsible persons and their contact details.
Submission
of Construction Programme and Environmental Permit (EP) Submission Schedule
2.8 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than two weeks before the commencement of the
construction of the Project, deposit with the Director four hard copies and one
electronic copy of the construction programme showing the commencement and
completion dates of major items of construction works; together with the
anticipated schedule of submissions for fulfilling the submission requirements
as contained in this Permit. The
Permit Holder shall inform the Director accordingly in writing in case of any
subsequent changes of items contained in this submitted construction programme
and EP Submission Schedule.
Submission of
Construction Noise Mitigation Measures Plan (CNMMP)
2.9 To
further reduce the air-borne construction noise impacts on the 19 noise sensitive
receivers (NSRs) shown in Table 1 of this Permit with exceedance after
mitigation as predicted in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012), the Permit Holder shall, no later than
one month before the commencement of the construction of the Project, submit to
the Director for approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of an
updated Construction Noise Mitigation Measures Plan (CNMMP) and other
initiatives proposed by the Permit Holder. The Plan shall include:-
(a)
a schedule of
construction works to be carried out at the works areas of the Project within
300m from the NSRs;
(b)
an updated
construction methodology of the construction works;
(c)
an updated
powered mechanical equipment (PME) list for the construction works;
(d)
an updated
proposal of air-borne noise mitigation measures for the 19 NSRs as shown in Table
1 of this Permit, including the provision of noise barriers, enclosures and
Indirect Technical Remedies;
(e)
an updated
prediction of noise levels in accordance with the above updated information and
mitigation proposals in place.
Before submission to the Director, the CNMMP shall be certified
by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the relevant
information and recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the approved CNMMP shall be fully and properly
implemented.
2.10 Submission of Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan
The Permit Holder
shall, no later than one month before the commencement of construction of the
Project, submit to the Director for approval four hard copies and one
electronic copy of a Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan for the Project.
The Plan shall include:
(a)
updated environmental
monitoring and audit requirements relating to continuous noise monitoring at
the NSRs shown in Table 1 of this Permit with exceedance after mitigation in
air-borne construction noise impact as predicted in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012) and as updated in the CNMMP approved under Condition 2.9;
(b)
drawings in
the scale of 1:5,000 or other appropriate scale as agreed by the Director
showing the proposed locations for conducting continuous noise monitoring;
(c)
monitoring
methodology and measurement parameters;
(d)
a system to
report the continuous noise monitoring results on a website within a period of
2 working days after the relevant noise monitoring data are collected or become
available; and
(e)
an Event and
Action Plan giving details of the immediate active remedial measures in the
event that the measured noise levels exceed the worst-case scenario predicted
in the approved
SCL(TAW-HUH)
EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012) or the levels as updated by the CNMMP approved under Condition
2.9.
Before submission to
the Director, the Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan shall be certified by the ET
and verified by the IEC as conforming to the relevant information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012) or the updated prediction of noise levels
as contained in the CNMMP approved under Condition 2.9. All measures recommended
in the Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan approved under this Condition shall be
fully and properly implemented.
Submission of Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (C&DMMP)
2.11 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month before commencement of
construction of the Project, submit to the Director for approval four hard
copies and one electronic copy of a construction and demolition (C&D)
materials management plan (C&DMMP). The
C&DMMP shall describe the arrangements for avoidance, reuse, recovery and
recycling, storage, collection, treatment and disposal of C&D materials to
be generated from the construction of the Project. The C&DMMP shall indicate the disposal location(s) of all surplus excavated spoil
and other wastes. A trip ticket system shall be included in the C&DMMP.
Surplus excavated spoil and other wastes shall only be disposed of at
designated disposal locations unless otherwise approved by the Director.
Before submission to the Director, the C&DMMP
shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to
the relevant information and recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the approved C&DMMP shall be fully and properly
implemented.
Submission of Sediment Management Plan
2.12 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month before the commencement of
construction works which involves dredging / excavating sediments, submit to
the Director for approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of a
sediment management plan. The
sediment management plan shall include, but not limited to, details of proper treatment
and handling of sediments to be generated from the construction of the Project
before disposal.
Before submission to the Director, the sediment
management plan shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as
conforming to the relevant information and recommendations contained in the approved
SCL(TAW-HUH)
EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the approved sediment management plan shall be fully and
properly implemented.
Submission of Visual, Landscape, Tree Planting &
Tree Protection Plan
2.13 The Permit Holder shall, no later than one
month before the commencement of construction of the Project, submit six hard
copies and one electronic copy of the visual, landscape, tree planting &
tree protection plan to the Director for approval. The plan, with drawings in the scale of 1:1000 or other
appropriate scales as agreed by the Director shall show the visual, landscape,
tree planting & tree protection measures of the Project, and shall include
at least the following information:
(a)
aesthetic landscape and architectural treatment for above ground
structures including stabling sidings at the former Hung Hom Freight Yard, stations, entrances,
ventilation building, ventilation shafts, portals, noise barriers/enclosures
and viaduct section at Hin Heng;
(b)
tree protection proposal showing locations, size, number and plant species of trees to
be retained; and detailed working method statement for protection of retained trees;
(c)
transplantation
proposal showing locations, size, number and tree species to be transplanted and the
final locations for transplantation;
(d)
tree felling proposal showing locations, size, number and plant species
to be felled;
(e)
tree compensation proposal showing locations, size, number and plant species
to be provided or compensated;
(f)
post-planting care proposal showing the proposed establishment period
and associated maintenance care requirements and frequency of transplanted
trees and trees planted as compensation under this Condition; and
(g)
implementation programme, maintenance and management schedules for
measures proposed in (a) to (f) above.
The
proposals under Condition 2.13(b) to (f) shall be prepared by the Certified
Arborist appointed under Condition 2.5. The Plan shall be certified by the ET Leader
and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and recommendations
contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012).
All measures recommended in the approved Plan shall be
fully and properly implemented and maintained for the Project.
2.14 To
mitigate the ecological impact due to the loss of plant species of conservation
importance, Aquilaria sinensis, the affected plants within the works
area shall be transplanted before the commencement of construction. A detailed pre-transplantation survey
shall be carried out to ascertain the presence and the locations of plant species,
Aquilaria sinensis wthin the works area. The Permit Holder shall, no later than two months before
commencement of transplanting works, deposit with the Director four hard copies
and one electronic copy of transplantation proposal. The detailed transplantation
proposal shall include the following information:
(a)
qualification of the specialist(s) to carry out the transplantation
works;
(b)
number, locations and photographs of plants to be transplanted;
(c)
locations of the receptor sites for transplantation;
(d)
methodology and implementation programme; and
(e)
detailed schedule for post-transplantation maintenance and monitoring
of plants.
Before submission to the Director, the transplantation proposal shall
be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the
information and recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012).
Submission
of Conservation Plan
2.15 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than two months before the commencement of
construction works affecting the two historic buildings, namely Former Royal
Air Force Hangar and the Old Pillbox at the former Tai Hom Village site, submit four hard copies and one electronic
copy of the conservation plan for the said two historic buildings to the
Director for approval. The
conservation plan shall include at least the following information:
(a)
a detailed plan for dismantling and reinstating the two said historic
buildings; and
(b)
implementation programme, maintenance and management schedules for
actions recommended in the plan.
Before
submission to the Director, the conservation plan shall be certified by the ET
Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the approved conservation
plan shall be fully and properly implemented for the Project.
Submission
of Archaeological Action Plan(s) (AAP(s))
2.16 The Permit Holder
shall, no later than two months before the commencement of the further
archaeological investigation at the former Tai Hom
Village site or the Sacred Hill (North) study area, deposit with the Director four
hard copies and one electronic
copy
of Archaeological Action Plan(s) for the sites. The Archaeological Action Plan(s)
shall include:
(a)
a detailed plan for further archaeological investigation and rescue
excavation at the former Tai Hom Village site and the Sacred Hill (North) study
area;
(b)
a contingency plan to address possible arrangement when significant archaeological
findings are unearthed during the further archeological investigation and rescue
excavation.
Before submission to the Director, the AAP(s) shall be certified by the
ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the deposited
AAP(s) shall be fully and properly implemented for the Project.
Submissions or
Measures to be Implemented During Construction of the Project
Measures
for Avoiding Impact on Lung Tsun Stone Bridge and Former Kowloon City Pier
2.17 To
avoid direct impact on the remains of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge and Former Kowloon
City Pier, no at-grade construction works of the Project shall be carried out
inside the ¡§buffer zone¡¨ for the remains of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge and Former
Kowloon City Pier as shown in the Figure
6 of this Permit.
Measures
for Mitigating Construction Dust Impact
2.18 In
order to minimize the construction dust impact, the following dust mitigation
measures shall be implemented:-
(a)
watering once every working hour for active works
areas, exposed areas and paved haul roads in Kowloon area to keep these active
works areas, exposed areas and paved haul roads wet;
(b)
watering once every 1.5 working hours for active works areas, exposed
areas and paved haul roads in Tai Wai area to keep these active works areas,
exposed areas and paved haul roads wet; and
(c)
enclosing the unloading process at any barging point by a 3-sided screen
with top tipping hall, and operating water spraying and flexible dust curtains
at the discharge point.
Measures for Mitigating Aerial
Emissions from Construction Plant
2.19 All diesel fuelled
construction plant, including marine vessels if possible, used by the
contractors within the works areas of the Project shall be powered by ultra low
sulphur diesel fuel.
Measures
for Mitigating Water Quality Impact from Dredging Works
2.20 All
dredging works for the Kai Tak Runway Barging Point shall only be carried out
within the site boundary as shown in Figure
7 of this Permit. No extension of the site boundary shall be permitted without the
written approval of the Director.
2.21 Dredging
shall only be carried out by closed grab dredger or backhoe dredger with closed
bucket. The dredging rate shall not
exceed 500 m3 per day. The dredging rate shall not exceed 41.7m3 per hour
for closed grab dredger or 33.3 m3 per hour for backhoe dredger with
closed bucket. Other than closed grab dredger
or backhoe dredger with closed bucket, the use of other type of dredger and
the dredging rate shall be approved in writing by the Director before use.
2.22 Each
closed grab dredger or backhoe dredger with closed bucket or other type of dredger approved by the Director shall be enclosed
by silt curtain during dredging works.
Submission of Contamination Assessment Report and Remedial Action Plan
(SLCA)
2.23 Supplementary
land contamination assessment (SLCA) for the New Territories South Animal
Centre in Hin Keng as shown in Figure
8 of this Permit for soil sampling and analysis of cyanide (free) shall
be carried out after the site is handed over to the Permit Holder. The Permit Holder shall, no later than
one month after the completion of the land contamination investigation, deposit
with the Director three hard copies and one electronic copy of Contamination
Assessment Report (CAR) to document the SLCA findings. If land contamination is
confirmed, the Permit Holder shall also submit to the Director for approval
three hard copies and one electronic copy of Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to formulate
necessary remedial measures.
Before submission to the Director, the CAR and RAP shall be certified by
the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012).
Measures
for Mitigating Land Contamination and Submission of Remediation Works Report
2.24 If
land contamination is confirmed, all remedial measures described in the RAP
approved under Condition 2.23 of this Permit shall be fully implemented.
2.25 If
remediation is required, the Permit Holder shall deposit three hard copies and
one electronic copy of Remediation Report (RR) to the Director, no later than
one month after the completion of the remediation works. The RR shall provide details on the remediation
works carried out, types and volume of contaminated soil, standards and levels
of treatment, and locations of all on-site and off-site disposal sites
(including record of disposal).
The RR shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC to
demonstrate that Condition 2.24 is fulfilled. No construction works at the New Territories
South Animal Centre in Hin Keng shall be carried out
prior to the EPD's endorsement of the said RR.
Submissions
and Measures Before and During Operation of the Project
Submissions
and Measures for Mitigating Operational Noise Impacts
2.26 The
Permit Holder shall operate 8-car type SP 1900 / SP 1950 train or other train
type with equivalent or better noise performance supported with justifications
by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information,
requirements and recommendations as set out in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012). The maximum train frequency operating on the Project from hours 0700 to
2300 shall not exceed 12 trains per 30 minutes in each direction. The maximum train frequency operating
on the Project from hours 2300 to 0700 of the following day shall not exceed 6
trains per 30 minutes in each direction.
2.27 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month after completion of corresponding
parts of the tunnel excavation of the Project, deposit with the Director four
hardcopies and one electronic copy of an Operational Ground-borne Noise
Mitigation Measures Plan to justify the adequacy of the operational
ground-borne noise mitigation measures for the Project. The Plan shall include the review and verification of the assumptions
adopted in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012),
such as line source response and ground vibration conditions, and shall also
include justifications and recommendations for any contingency noise mitigation
measures found necessary, including but not limited to :
(a)
resilent baseplates (type 1)
(b)
isolated slab track (type 4)
Before submission to the Director, the
Operational Ground-borne Noise Mitigation Measures Plan shall be certified by the
ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012).
2.28 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month after completion of installation
of rail tracks, deposit with the Director four hard copies and one electronic
copy of a set of as-built drawing(s) for the operational ground-borne noise mitigation
measures as recommended in the Operational Ground-borne Noise Mitigation
Measures Plan deposited under Condition 2.27 above. Before submission to
the Director, the set of as-built drawing(s) shall be certified by the
ET Leader and verified by the IEC to demonstrate that measures as set out in
the Plan deposited under Condition 2.27 above has been fully and properly
implemented.
2.29 To
mitigate the operational air-borne noise from the viaduct section between Tai
Wai Station and Hin Keng Station and from the operation of the stabling sidings
at Hung Hom, noise mitigation measures as shown in Table 2 and Figures 9a, 9b, 10 and 11 of this Permit shall be
installed.
2.30 The
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month after the completion of
installation of noise mitigation measures as required under Condition 2.29
above, deposit with the Director four hard copies and one electronic copy of a
set of as-built drawings showing:-
(a)
the operational air-borne noise mitigation measures under Condition
2.29 above; and
(b)
any additional or changes in measures if required.
Before submission to the Director, the as-built drawings for
operational air-borne noise mitigation measures shall be certified by the ET
Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). All measures recommended in the deposited
as-built drawings shall be fully and properly implemented and maintained for
the Project.
2.31 At
least one month before commencement of operation of the Project, the Permit
Holder shall carry out noise performance test and deposit with the Director
four hard copies and one electronic copy of a Noise Performance Test Report to
confirm the compliance of the operational air-borne and ground-borne noise levels
in accordance with the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). Before submission to the Director, the Noise Performance
Test Report shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC
as conforming to the information and recommendations contained in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). Any necessary measure(s) as recommended
in the Noise Performance Test Report shall be fully and properly implemented
and maintained for the Project.
2.32 At
least one month before commencement of operation of the Project, the Permit
Holder shall carry out fixed plant noise audit and deposit with the Director
four harcopies and one electronic copy of an audit report showing the design of
the fixed plant noise sources associated with the Project complies with the
maximum sound power levels determined in the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA Report (Register
No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-164/2012). The audit report shall also confirm
that noise emitted from the fixed noise sources shall be free of the
characteristics of tonality, impulsiveness and intermittency. The audit report shall be certified by the
ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming to the information and
recommendations contained in the approved
SCL(TAW-HUH)
EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012).
Submissions of As-Built Drawings of Measures for
Mitigating Landscape and Visual Impacts
2.33 At least one month
before the Project commences operation, four hard copies and one electronic
copy of as-built drawing(s) on landscape and visual mitigation measures with an
explanatory statement showing the final locations, size, number and species of
planting to demonstrate compliance with the approved submissions under
Condition 2.13 of this Permit shall be deposited with the Director. This as-built submission shall be
certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC that the Visual, Landscape
and Tree Planting & Tree Protection Plan approved under Condition 2.13 has
been fully and properly implemented.
Measures for
Mitigating Impacts on Water Quality from Track Run-off
2.34 To
mitigate water quality impact from tunnel run-off from rail track :-
(a)
track drainage discharges shall pass through oil/grit
interceptors/chambers to remove oil, grease and sediment before discharging
into public storm drainage/foul sewerage systems;
(b)
the silt traps and oil interceptors shall be cleaned and maintained regularly;
and
(c)
oily contents of the oil interceptors shall be transferred to an
appropriate disposal facility, or to be collected for reuse, if possible.
3. Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Requirements
3.1 The
EM&A programme shall be implemented in accordance with the procedures and
requirements in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual, SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual and the
Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan approved under Condition 2.10 of this Permit. The Permit Holder shall review the
EM&A requirements or programme based on the submitted construction
programme required under Condition 2.8. Any
changes to the EM&A requirements or programme and termination of the
EM&A programme shall be supported with justifications by the ET leader and
verified by the IEC as conforming to the requirements set out in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A
Manual, SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual and the Continuous Noise Monitoring Plan
approved under Condition 2.10 of this Permit, and prior
approval from the Director shall be sought before their implementation.
3.2 Samples, measurements and necessary remedial actions shall be taken in
accordance with the requirements of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual
and SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual by:
(a)
conducting baseline environmental monitoring;
(b)
conducting impact monitoring;
(c)
carrying out remedial actions described in the
Event/Action Plans of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual and SCL(HHS) EM&A
Manual in accordance with the time frame set out in the
Event/Action Plans, or as agreed by the Director, in case where specified
criteria in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A Manual and SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual are exceeded; and
(d)
logging and keeping records of the details of
(a) to (c) above for all parameters within 3 working days of the collection of
data or completion of remedial action(s), for the purpose of preparing and
submitting the monthly EM&A Reports and to make available the information
for inspection on site.
3.3 Four
hard copies and one electronic copy of the Baseline Monitoring Report shall be
submitted to the Director at least 2 weeks before the commencement of
construction of the Project. The submission shall be certified by the ET
Leader and verified by the IEC. Additional copies of the submission shall
be provided upon request by the Director.
3.4 Four hard copies and one electronic copy of monthly EM&A Report shall be
submitted to the Director within 2 weeks after the end of the reporting month.
The EM&A Reports shall include a summary of all non-compliance
(exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit
Levels). The submissions shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified
by the IEC as complying with the requirements set out in the SCL(TAW-HUH) EM&A
Manual, SCL(HHS) EM&A Manual. Additional copies of
the submission shall be provided to the Director upon request by the Director.
3.5 All EM&A data submitted under this Permit shall be true, valid and
correct.
4. Electronic Reporting of EM&A Information
4.1 To facilitate public inspection of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and monthly EM&A Reports via the EIAO
Internet Website and at the EIAO Register Office, electronic copies of these
Reports shall be prepared in Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or
later) and in Portable Document Format (PDF version 1.3 or later), unless
otherwise agreed by the Director and shall be submitted at the same time as the
hard copies as described in Condition 3.3 and 3.4 above of this Permit.
For the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to
each section and sub-section of these Reports shall be included in the
beginning of the document. Hyperlinks to all figures, drawings and tables in
these Reports shall be provided in the main text from where the respective
references are made. All graphics in these Reports shall be in interlaced
GIF format unless otherwise agreed by the Director. The content of the
electronic copies of these Reports must be the same as the hard copies.
4.2 The Permit Holder shall set up a
dedicated website and notify the Director in writing the internet address where
the environmental monitoring data and project information is to be placed
within 1 month after the commencement of construction of the Project. All
environmental monitoring data described in Condition 4.1 of this Permit and all
submissions required by this Permit shall made available to the public via this
dedicated website to be set up by the Permit Holder in the shortest time practicable,
and in no event later than 2 weeks after the relevant environmental monitoring
data are collected or become available, unless otherwise agreed with the
Director. The Permit Holder shall maintain the dedicated website for
public access of the environmental monitoring data and reports throughout the
entire construction period and during the first 3-year period of operation of
the Project, or otherwise as agreed by the Director.
4.3 The internet website as described in Condition 4.2 of
this Permit shall enable user-friendly public access to the environmental
monitoring data and project information including the approved SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012) and SCL(HHS) EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-164/2012), the environmental permit(s) and Project Profile of the
Project. The internet website shall have features capable of:
(a)
providing access to all
environmental monitoring data of this Project collected since the commencement
of construction;
(b)
providing access to all finalized
submissions as required under this Permit;
(c)
searching by date;
(d)
searching by types of
monitoring data (water quality, noise and air quality); and
(e)
hyperlinking to relevant
monitoring data after searching;
or otherwise as agreed by the Director.
Notes :
1. This Permit consists of
three parts, namely, PART A (Main Permit), PART B (Descriptions of Designated Project) and PART C (Permit Conditions). Any person relying on this Permit
should obtain independent legal advice on the legal implications under the
EIAO, and the following notes are for general information only.
2. If there is a breach of
any condition of this Permit, the Director or his authorized officer may, with
the consent of the Secretary for the Environment, order the cessation of associated
work until the remedial action is taken in respect of the resultant
environmental damage, and in that case the Permit Holder shall not carry out
any associated works without the permission of the Director or his authorized
officer.
3. The Permit Holder may
apply under Section 13 of the EIAO to the Director for a variation of the
conditions of this Permit. The Permit Holder shall replace the original permit
displayed on the Project site by the amended permit.
4. A person who assumes
responsibility for the whole or a part of the Project may, before he assumes
responsibility of the Project, apply under Section 12 of the EIAO to the
Director for a further environmental permit.
5. Under Section 14 of the
EIAO, the Director may with the consent of the Secretary for the Environment,
suspend, vary or cancel this Permit. The suspended, varied or cancelled Permit
shall be removed from display at the site.
6. If this Permit is
cancelled or surrendered during construction of the Project, another environmental
permit must be obtained under the EIAO before the Project could be continued.
It is an offence under Section 26(1) of the EIAO to construct or operate a
designated project listed in Part I of Schedule 2 of the EIAO without a valid
environmental permit.
7.
Any person who constructs the Project contrary
to the conditions in the Permit, and is convicted of an offence under the EIAO,
is liable: -
(i) on a first conviction on indictment to a fine of $2 million and to
imprisonment for 6 months;
(ii) on a second or subsequent conviction on indictment to a fine of $5
million and to imprisonment for 2 years;
(iii) on a first summary conviction to a fine at level 6 and to imprisonment
for 6 months;
(iv) on
a second or subsequent summary conviction to a fine of $1 million and to
imprisonment for 1 year; and
(v) in any case where the offence is
of a continuing nature, the court or magistrate may impose a fine of $10,000
for each day on which he is satisfied the offence continued.
8. The Permit Holder may
appeal against any condition of this Permit under Section 17 of the EIAO within
30 days of receipt of this Permit.
9.
The Notes are for general reference only and
that the Permit Holder should refer to the EIAO for details and seek
independent legal advice.
Environmental
Permit No. EP-438/2012/F
Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-438/2012/F
| Figure
1 | Figure
2 |
[ Back
to First Page ] / [ Back to Main Index ]
Table 1 - List of noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) with predicted residual air-borne
construction noise impacts exceeding noise criteria as listed in Table 1B of EIAO-TM (to be read in conjunction
with Condition 2.9 of this Permit)
(Extracted from Table 8.15 of the SCL(TAW-HUH) EIA
Report (Register No. AEIAR-167/2012)
NSR ID |
NSR Description |
Uses[1] |
Criterion [2] dB(A) |
Predicted Maximum Noise
Level dB(A) |
Predicted Residual Noise
Impact dB(A) |
TAW-6-7 |
C.U.H.K.A.A.
Thomas Cheung School |
E |
70 (65)
[2] |
68(67) |
0 (2) [3] |
DIH-9-1 |
Shek On
Building |
E + W |
70 (65)
[2] |
70 (70) |
0(5) [3] |
DIH-13-1 |
Canossa Primary
School |
E |
70 (65)
[2] |
67(66) |
0(1) [3] |
DIH-14-1 |
Rhythm Garden
Block 2 |
R |
75 |
77 |
2 |
DIH-14-4 |
Canossa Primary
School (San Po Kong) |
E |
70 (65)
[2] |
69 (68) |
0 (3) [3] |
DIH-14-5 |
Rhythm Garden
Block 1 |
R |
75 |
78 |
3 |
TKW-1-1 |
Parc 22 |
R |
75 |
80 |
5 |
TKW-2-2 |
Skytower Tower
2 |
R |
75 |
76 |
1 |
TKW-3-2 |
Prosperity
House |
R |
75 |
80 |
5 |
MTW-12-3 |
Lucky Mansion |
R |
75 |
80 |
5 |
MTW-12-4 |
352-354 Ma Tau Wai Rd (East Façade) |
R |
75 |
80 |
5 |
MTW-12-4-1 |
352-354 Ma Tau
Wai Rd (North Facade) |
R |
75 |
84 |
9 |
MTW-12-10 |
Lucky Building
(South Facade) |
R |
75 |
84 |
9 |
MTW-12-10-1 |
Lucky Building
(East Facade) |
R |
75 |
80 |
5 |
MTW-12-11 |
Jing Ming
Building |
R |
75 |
82 |
7 |
MTW-16-1 |
SKH Good
Shepherd Primary School |
E |
70 (65)
[2] |
79 (79) |
9(14) [3] |
MTW-18-2 |
No. 2 Kowloon
City Road |
R |
75 |
81 |
6 |
HOM-2-1-A |
Faerie Court
(East Facade) |
R |
75 |
78 |
3 |
HUH-1-3 |
Wing Fung
Building |
R |
75 |
77 |
2 |
Notes:
[1] R- Residential; E ¡V Educational institution; W-Worship
[2] Values in parentheses
indicate the noise criterion during examination period (typical
examination period in May, June, November and December)
of educational institution.
[3] Residual
impact is only expected during the examination period (typical examination
period in May, June, November and December)
of the educational institution.
Table 2 ¡V Details of requirements on noise
barriers/enclosures (to be read in conjunction with Condition 2.29 and Figures 9a 9b,10 and 11 attached to this Permit)
Location |
Track Direction |
Type of noise
Mitigation Measures |
Length (m) |
Height (m) |
Hin Keng |
||||
P1 as shown on Figures 9a and 9b of this Permit |
Up track |
Noise barrier |
350 |
2 |
P2 as shown on Figures 9a and 9b of this Permit |
Up track |
Noise barrier |
100 |
2 |
P3 as shown on Figures 9a and 9b of this Permit |
Down track |
Noise barrier |
150 |
3 |
P4 as shown on Figures 9a and 9b of this Permit |
Tail track |
Noise barrier |
300 |
7 |
P5 as shown on Figures 9a and 9b of this Permit |
Up track |
Noise barrier |
50 |
3 |
South-west of
TAW near Mei Tin Road as shown on Figure
10 of this Permit |
N/A |
Noise cover |
15 |
N/A |
Hung Hum |
||||
P1 as shown in Figure 11 of this Permit |
N/A |
Semi-enclosure |
N/A |
7 |
P2 as shown in Figure 11 of this Permit |
N/A |
Noise barrier |
35 |
5 |
P3 as shown in Figure 11 of this Permit |
N/A |
Noise barrier |
45 |
5 |