Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/F
Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹ EP-136/2002/F
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE
(CHAPTER 499)
Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô±ø¨Ò
(²Ä499³¹)
²Ä10¤Î13±ø
ENVIRONMENTAL
PERMIT TO DECOMMISSION
A
DESIGNATED PROJECT
¸Ñ°£¹B§@«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥ØªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ
PART A (MAIN PERMIT)
A³¡ (³\¥iÃÒ¥Dn³¡¤À)
Pursuant to
Section 10 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (the EIAO), the
Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) grants the environmental
permit (EP-136/2002) to the Civil Engineering and Development Department
(formerly known as the Civil Engineering Department and hereinafter referred to
as the ¡§Permit Holder¡¨) on 22 May 2002.
Pursuant to Section 13 of the EIAO, the Director amends the
Environmental Permit based on the Application No. VEP-608/2021. The amendments, described below, are
incorporated into this Environmental Permit (EP-136/2002/F). This Environmental Permit as amended is
for the decommission of the designated project described in Part
B subject to the conditions specified in Part C.
The issue
of this environmental permit is based on the documents, approvals or
permissions described below:
®Ú¾Ú¡mÀô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô±ø¨Ò¡n(Àôµû±ø¨Ò)²Ä10±øªº³W©w¡AÀô¹Ò«OÅ@¸p¸pªø(¸pªø)©ó2002¦~5¤ë22¤é±NÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ(½s¸¹EP-136/2002)§å¤©¤g¤ì¤uµ{©Ý®i¸p («eºÙ¤g¤ì¤uµ{¸p¡A¤UºÙ¡§³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H¡¨)¡C®Ú¾ÚÀôµû±ø¨Ò²Ä13±øªº³W©w¡A¸pªø¦]À³§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒªº¥Ó½Ð½s¸¹VEP-608/2021 ×qÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¡C¥H¤U×q¤w¥]§t¦b¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¤º(½s¸¹EP-136/2002/F)¡C¥»¸g×qªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ§@¬°¸Ñ°£¹B§@¥»³\¥iÃÒB³¡©Ò»¡©úªº«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¡A¦ý¶·¿í¦uC³¡©Ò¦C©úªº±ø¥ó¡C
¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒªºµo¥X¡A¤D¥H¤Uªí©Ò¦Cªº¤å¥ó¡B§åã©Î³\¥i§@¬°®Ú¾Ú¡G
Application No. ¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹ |
VEP-608/2021 |
Document in
the Register: µn°O¥U¤Wªº¤å¥ó¡G |
(1) Environmental Impact Assessment ¡V
Demolition of Buildings and Structures in the Proposed Kennedy Town
Comprehensive Development Area Site : Final EIA
Report, EM&A Manual and Executive Summary (Register No.: AEIAR-058/2002)
[Hereinafter referred to as ¡§the EIA Report (Register No.: AEIAR-058/2002)¡¨] (1) °í¥§¦a«°ºî¦Xµo®i°Ï©î¨ø¤uµ{ Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô : ³Ì²×Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô³ø§i, Àô¹ÒºÊ¹î¤Î¼f®Ö¤â¥U ¤Î ¦æ¬FºKn (µn°O¥U½s¸¹¡GAEIAR-058/2002) [¤UºÙ¡§Àôµû³ø§i(µn°O¥U½s¸¹¡GAEIAR-058/2002)¡¨] (2)
The
Director¡¦s letter of approval of the EIA Report dated 16 April 2002, ref:
EP2/H1/KT/PT2/85 Ax 1 (2) Àô¹Ò«OÅ@¸p¸pªø©ó2002¦~4¤ë16¤éµo¥X§åãÀôµû³ø§iªº«H¥ó (ÀÉ®×½s¸¹: EP2/H1/KT/PT2/85 Ax 1) |
|
(3) Application for an Environmental Permit
No. AEP-136/2002 received on 24 April 2002 (3) ©ó2002¦~4¤ë24¤é¦¬¨ìªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó½s¸¹AEP-136/2002 (4) Environmental Permit issued on 22 May
2002 (Permit No. EP-136/2002) (4) ©ó2002¦~5¤ë22¤éñµoªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ (³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002) (5) Application documents for Variation of
Environmental Permit including all attachments submitted by the Permit Holder
on 4 April 2007 (Application No. VEP-234/2007) (5)
³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2007¦~4¤ë4¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡GVEP-234/2007) (6)
Application
documents for Variation of Environmental Permit including all attachments
submitted by the Permit Holder on 27 September 2007 (Application No.
VEP-239/2007) (6)
³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2007¦~9¤ë27¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡GVEP-239/2007) (7)
Application
documents for Variation of Environmental Permit including all attachments
submitted by the Permit Holder on 4 June 2009 (Application No. VEP-287/2009) (7)
³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2009¦~6¤ë4¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡GVEP-287/2009) (8) Application documents for Variation of
Environmental Permit including all attachments submitted by the Permit Holder
on 20 October 2011 (Application No. VEP-337/2011) (8)
³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2011¦~10¤ë20¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡GVEP-337/2011) (9)
Environmental
Impact Assessment ¡VAlternative Ground Decontamination Works at the Proposed
Kennedy Town Comprehensive Development Area Site: Final EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Executive Summary (Register No.: AEIAR-188/2015) [Hereinafter
referred to as ¡§the EIA Report (Register No.:AEIAR-188/2015)¡¨] (9)
°í¥§¦a«°ºî¦Xµo®i°Ï´À¥N¤g¦a°£¦Ã¤uµ{ - Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô : ³Ì²×Àô¹Ò¼vÅTµû¦ô³ø§i, Àô¹ÒºÊ¹î¤Î¼f®Ö¤â¥U ¤Î ¦æ¬FºKn (µn°O¥U½s¸¹¡GAEIAR-188/2015)
[¤UºÙ¡§Àôµû³ø§i (µn°O¥U½s¸¹¡GAEIAR-188/2015)¡¨] (10) Application documents for Variation of
Environmental Permit including all attachments submitted by the Permit Holder
on 27 May 2015 (Application No. VEP-475/2015) (10) ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2015¦~5¤ë27¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡GVEP-475/2015) (11) Application
documents for Variation of Environmental Permit including all attachments
submitted by the Permit Holder on 3 December 2021 (Application No.
VEP-608/2021) (11) ³\¥iÃÒ«ù¦³¤H©ó2021¦~12¤ë3¤é´£¥æªº§ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃҥӽФå¥ó¥]¬A©Ò¦³ªþ¥ó(¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹¡RVEP-608/2021) |
Application No. ¥Ó½Ð®Ñ½s¸¹ |
Date of Application ¥Ó½Ð¤é´Á |
List of Amendments Incorporated into this
Environmental Permit ¤w¥]§t¦b¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¤ºªº×q¶µ¥Ø |
Date of Amendment ×q¤é´Á |
VEP-234/2007 |
4 April 2007 2007¦~4¤ë4¤é |
Add a new condition before each of the following conditions in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002: Conditions 1.8, 1.12, 1.13 and 2.5. ¦bÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002 C³¡²Ä1.8, 1.12, 1.13 ©M2.5 ¶µ±ø¥ó«e¦U¥[¤J¤@¶µ·sªº±ø¥ó¡C Vary Conditions 1.7, 1.11, 1.14, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.7 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002. §ó§ïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002 C³¡²Ä1.7, 1.11, 1.14, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 ©M 2.7 ¶µ±ø¥ó¡C Renumber the permit conditions in Part C of the Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/A where appropriate. §âÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/A C³¡ªº±ø¥ó¾A·í¦a«·s½s¸¹¡C Renumber Figure 2 and Figure 3 to Figure 7 and Figure 6 respectively. §â¹Ï2©M¹Ï3¨Ì§Ç«·s½s¸¹¬°¹Ï7©M¹Ï6¡C Add 4 new figures and numbered as Figures 2 to 5. ¥[¤J4±i·sªº¹Ï¨Ã½s¸¹¬°¹Ï2¦Ü¹Ï5¡C |
30 April 2007 2007¦~4¤ë30¤é |
VEP-239/2007 |
27 Sep 2007 2007¦~9¤ë27¤é |
Amend Phase 1 Part 1 Project Boundary to align with curb line at northern end of Sai See Street. Amend Figures 2 and 3 accordingly. ªu¦è¥«µó¥_ºÝ¸ôÃä§ó§ï²Ä¤@¶¥¬q¤uµ{½d³ò¡C ¬ÛÀ³¦a§ó§ï¹Ï2©M¹Ï3¡C |
18 Oct 2007 2007¦~10¤ë18¤é |
VEP-287/2009 |
4 Jun 2009 2009¦~6¤ë4¤é |
Vary Conditions 1.1, 1.12 to 1.15, 2.5(g) to (p), 2.7 and 3.1 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/B to include reference to the temporary use of Phase 1 site by the holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 to carry out Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/B
C³¡²Ä1.1¶µ, 1.12¶µ¦Ü1.15¶µ, 2.5(g) ¶µ ¦Ü (p) ¶µ, ²Ä2.7¶µ ©M 3.1¶µ, ¥HÅã¥ÜÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒEP-313/2008¸¹ªº«ù¦³¤H±NÁ{®É¨Ï¥Î¥»¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä1¶¥¬qªº¤u¦a½d³ò, ¥H¶i¦æ¥»¤uµ{²Ä1¶¥¬q²Ä2³¡¤À¶µ¥Ø¡C Vary Condition 2.5(b) in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/B to remove from Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project the demolition of the existing piers at the harbourfront at the northern boundary of the site. Amend Figures 2 by removing the notation ¡§existing piers to be demolished¡¨ accordingly. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/B C³¡²Ä2.5(b) ¶µ, ±q¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä1¶¥¬q²Ä1³¡¤À¤¤, §R°£¥_³¡Ãä¬É®ü®Ç²{¦³½XÀYªº©î¨ø¤uµ{¡C ¬ÛÀ³¦a§R°£¹Ï2¤º¤§ª`ÄÀ ¡§existing piers to be demolished¡¨¡C |
29 June 2009 2009¦~6¤ë29¤é |
VEP-337/2011 |
20 Oct 2011 2011¦~10¤ë20¤é |
Vary Conditions 2.5(q) in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D to remove the requirement for demolition of the additional concrete paving at Phase 1 Site during Phase 2. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.5(q) ¶µ, ¥H²¾°£©ó¥»¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬q®É©î¨ø¥»¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä1¶¥¬qªº¤u¦a½d³ò¤º¥[¾Qªº²V¾®¤gÂл\¤§n¨D¡C |
15 November 2011 2011¦~11¤ë15¤é |
VEP-475/2015 |
27 May 2015 2015¦~ 5¤ë 27 ¤é |
Vary Conditions 1.7, 2.1, 2.2, 2.7, 2.20 & 3.1 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D to incorporate the EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR 188/2015). קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä1.7 ¶µ, 2.1 ¶µ, 2.2 ¶µ, 2.7¶µ, 2.20¶µ¤Î3.1¶µ, ¥H¥[¤JÀôµû³ø§i(µn°O¥U½s¸¹¡GAEIAR-188/2015)¡C Delete Condition 2.3 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D. §R°£Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.3¶µ¡C Renumber the items under Condition 2.5 in Part C of the Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D where appropriate for update of the Phase 2 work. ¦]À³¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬q¤uµ{, §âÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡ªº²Ä2.5¶µ¤º²Ó¶µ¾A·í¦a«·s½s¸¹¡C Renumber Condition 2.5(q) as 2.5(v) in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D to add on-site reuse of remediated soil and 7-year Programme. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.5(q)¶µ¦¨¬°2.5(v) ¶µ¥H¥[¤Jì¦a«¥Î³B²z«áªd¤g¤Î7¦~¤uµ{¶µ¥Øp¹º¡C Renumber Conditions 2.11, 2.12, 2.13 and 2.14 as Conditions 2.5(g), 2.5(h), 2.5(i) and 2.5(j) in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.11¶µ, 2.12¶µ, 2.13¶µ¤Î2.14¶µ¦¨¬°2.5(g) ¶µ, 2.5(h) ¶µ, 2.5(i) ¶µ¤Î2.5(j) ¶µ¡C Renumber Condition 2.15 as Condition 2.18 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D and incorporate new remediation methods for Phase 2 works. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.15¶µ¦¨¬°²Ä2.18¶µ¨Ã¥[¤J²Ä2¶¥¬q¤uµ{ªº¤g¦a¦Ã¬V¾ãªv¤èªk¡C Renumber Condition 2.16 as Condition 2.19 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D and update the remediation standards from ¡§Dutch B levels¡¨ to ¡§Risk-Based Remediation Goals¡¨ Standard. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.16¶µ¦¨¬°²Ä2.19¶µ¥H¥[¤J¥H§ó§ï¡u²üÄõB¼Ð·Ç¡v¦Ü¡u«ö·ÀIÂç©wªº¤g¦a¦Ã¬V¾ãªv¼Ð·Ç¡v¡C |
25 June 2015 2015¦~6¤ë25¤é |
|
|
Renumber Condition 2.17 as Condition 2.5(k) in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.17¶µ¦¨¬°²Ä2.5(k)¶µ¡C Renumber Condition 2.18 as Condition 2.20 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D and incorporate new mitigation measures for the Phase 2 remediation works. קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.18 ¶µ¦¨¬°²Ä2.20¶µ, ¥H§ó·s¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬qªº·s½w¸Ñ±¹¬I¡C Renumber Condition 2.19 as Condition 2.23 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.19 ¶µ¦¨¬°²Ä2.23¶µ¡C Add New Conditions 2.5(w) for submission of a detailed updated Project Programme for Phase 2 works. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.5(w)¶µ¥H´£¥æ§ó·sªº²Ä2¶¥¬q¤uµ{¶µ¥Øp¹º¡C Add New Conditions 2.11 and 2.12 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D to incorporate ecological precautionary measures for Phase 2 of the Project. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.11¶µ¤Î2.12¶µ¥H¥[¤J²Ä2¶¥¬q¤uµ{ªº¥ÍºA¹w¨¾±¹¬I¡C Add New Conditions 2.13 and 2.14 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of a Review Report for the area occupied by New World First Bus Depot. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.13¶µ¤Î2.14¶µ¥H°w¹ï·s¥@¬É²Ä¤@¤Ú¤h¼t¦û¥Î¤g¦aªºÀË°Q³ø§i¡C Add New Condition 2.15 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of Updated EM&A Manual for Biopile System Discharge Emissions and Ambient Hydrocarbon Monitoring ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.15 ¶µ¥H´£¥æ§ó·sªºÀôºÊ¤â¥U¥HºÊ¹î¡u¥Íª«°ïªk¡v¨t²Î±Æ©ñ¤Î¤j®ð¤ºªº¬´²B¤Æ¦Xª«¡C Add New Condition 2.16 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of Construction Noise Management Plan. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.16 ¶µ¥H´£¥æ«Ø¿v¾¸µºÞ²zp¹º¡C |
|
|
|
Add New Condition 2.17 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of Construction Site Drainage Management Plan. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.17 ¶µ¥H´£¥æ«Ø¿v¦a½L´ë°ÈºÞ²zp¹º¡C Add New Condition 2.21 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of Landscape Plan. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D C³¡²Ä2.21 ¶µ¥H´£¥æ¶é´º³]pp¹ºÁ`¹Ï¡C Add Condition 2.22 in Part C of Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/D for the submission of Remediation Report for the Phase 2 remediation works. ¥[¤J·sªºÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹EP-136/2002/D
C³¡²Ä2.22¶µ¥H´£¥æ¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬q¤g¦a°£¦Ã¤uµ{ªº¾ãªv³ø§i¡C Add Appendix C to provide a) remediation methods; b) criteria for on-site reuse of treated soil; and c) key mitigation measures for Phase 2 of the Project. ¥[¤Jªþ¥óC¥H´£¨Ña) ¤g¦a°£¦Ã¤èªk; b) ¸g³B²zªºªd¤g²{³õ¦A¥Î¼Ð·Ç; c)¥Dn½w¸Ñ±¹¬I¡C Add Appendix D to show the typical cross section and oblique view of a ¡§Biopile¡¨ for indicative purpose. ¥[¤Jªþ¥óD¥HÅã¥Ü¡u¥Íª«°ïªk¡vªº¤Á±¹Ï¤Î±×¨¤¹Ï¡C Renumber Appendix C as Appendix E to change the remediation standards from ¡§Dutch B levels¡¨ to ¡§Risk-Based Remediation Goals¡¨ Standard. קïªþ¥óC ¦¨¬°ªþ¥óE¥H§ó§ï¡u²üÄõB¼Ð·Ç¡v¦Ü¡u«ö·ÀIÂç©wªº¤g¦a¦Ã¬V¾ãªv¼Ð·Ç¡v¡C Vary Figure 5 to show the phase 2 Project Boundary; location of proposed future waterfront promenade and location of the New World First Bus Depot. קï¹Ï¤¥HÅã¥Ü¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬q¤uµ{½d³ò; «Øij®üÀتø´Y ¤Î·s¥@¬É²Ä¤@¤Ú¤h¼t¦ì¸m¡C Add Figure 8 to show the indicative layout of zones for Phase 2 remediation works. ¥[¤J¹Ï¤K¥HÅã¥Ü¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø²Ä2¶¥¬q¤g¦a°£¦Ã¤uµ{®Éªº°Ï°ì¤À§G¡C |
|
VEP-608/2021 |
3 December 2021 2021¦~ 12¤ë 3¤é |
Vary the site area of the Project in Part B קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒB³¡¥÷¤ºªº¶µ¥Ø¤u¦a±¿n¡C Delete ¡§the existing Cadogan Street Temporary Garden¡¨ in Condition 2.5(v) in Part C ¦bÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒC³¡²Ä2.5(v)¶µ¤¤§R°£ ¡§²{¦³ªº¥[¦hªñµóÁ{®Éªá¶é¡¨¡C Update the proposed mitigation and precautionary measures in Condition 2.20(a) in Part C §ó·sÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒC³¡²Ä2.20(a)¶µ¤Uªº½w¸Ñ¤Î¹w¨¾±¹¬I¡C Vary the project boundary in Figure 1 and Figure 5, and delete Figure 8 קïÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ¹Ï1¤Î ¹Ï5¤¤ªº¶µ¥Ø½d³ò¡A¥H¤Î§R°£¹Ï8¡C Update the typical layout of the project under Graphic C2 in Appendix C §ó·sÀô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒªþ¿ýC¤¤¹ÏC2ªº¨å«¬¤u¦a§G§½¥Ü·N¹Ï¡C |
22 December 2021 2021¦~12¤ë
22¤é |
22 December 2021 2021¦~12¤ë 22¤é |
|
|
|
Date ¤é´Á |
|
(Sunny C. W.
CHEUNG) Principal
Environmental Protection Officer for
the Director of Environmental Protection Àô¹Ò«OÅ@¸p¸pªø (º®uÀô¹Ò«OÅ@¥D¥ô ±i®iµØ ¥N¦æ) |
|
PART B
(DESCRIPTIONS OF DESIGNATED PROJECT)
B³¡ («ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº»¡©ú)
Hereunder is the description of the designated project mentioned in Part A of this environmental permit (hereinafter referred to
as the ¡§Permit¡¨):
¤U¦C¬°¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ(¤UºÙ ¡§³\¥iÃÒ¡¨)A³¡©Ò´£zªº«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº»¡©ú:
Title of Designated
Projects «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¦WºÙ |
Demolition of Buildings and Structures in the Proposed Kennedy Town Comprehensive Development Area Site [The above designated
projects are hereinafter referred to as ¡§the Project¡¨] °í¥§¦a«°ºî¦Xµo®i°Ï©î¨ø¤uµ{ [¤W¦C«ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¤UºÙ¡§¤uµ{¶µ¥Ø¡¨] |
Nature
of Designated Projects |
Decommissioning of a municipal incinerator ¸Ñ°£¤@Ó¥«¬FµI¤ÆÄlªº¹B§@ |
Location of Designated
Projects «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¦aÂI |
Kennedy
Town. The location of the Project
is shown on Figure 1 attached
to this Permit. °í¥§¦a«°¡C¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº¦aÂI¦p¥»Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒªº¹Ï1©Ò¥Ü¡C |
Scale and Scope of
Designated Project(s) «ü©w¤uµ{¶µ¥Øªº³W¼Ò©M½d³ò |
Decommissioning of a municipal incinerator, including demolition of
the existing chimneys, buildings and structures in
the proposed Kennedy Town Comprehensive Development Area site of about 2.6
ha. where the existing incinerator locates, remediation of contaminated soil
and wastes within the site, and subsequent disposal of the remediated soil
and wastes. ¸Ñ°£¤@Ó¥«¬FµI¤ÆÄlªº¹B§@¡A¥]¬A©î¨ø¸ÓµI¤ÆÄl©Ò¦b¦a±¿n¬ù2.6¤½³¼ªº ¡u°í¥§¦a«°ºî¦Xµo®i°Ï¡v¤º²{¦³ªº·Ï§w¡B¤j¼Ó¤Î«Ø¿vª«¡A¾ãªv¤Î³B¸m¦Ã¬V¤Fªº¤gÄ[¤Îª«®Æ¡C |
1. General
Conditions
1.1 The
Permit Holder and any person working on the Project shall comply with all
conditions set out in this Permit.
Any non-compliance by any person may constitute a contravention of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap.499) and may become the subject
of appropriate action being taken under the Ordinance. Upon completion of Phase 1
Part 1 of the Project (see Condition 2.5), the holder of Environmental Permit
No. EP-313/2008 will take over the Phase 1 site from the Permit Holder for the
construction of the West Island Line (WIL). The holder of Environmental Permit No.
EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent
variations, to follow up with relevant conditions set
out in this Permit in relation to the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as
"Works Area B" in Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) during his occupation of the Phase 1 site, in particular Conditions 1.12
to 1.15, 2.5(g) to (u), 2.7 and 3.1.
Upon completion of the temporary use of the Phase 1 site for the
construction of the WIL, the holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008
will return the Phase 1 site to the Permit Holder for the implementation of
Phase 2 of the Project.
1.2
The Permit Holder shall ensure full compliance with
all legislation from time to time in force including without limitation the
Noise Control Ordinance (Cap. 400), Air Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 311),
Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 358), Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap.
354), Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance (Cap. 509) and Factories and
Industrial Undertakings Ordinance (Cap. 59). This Permit does not of itself
constitute any ground of defense against any proceedings instituted under any
legislation.
1.3
The Permit Holder shall make copies of this Permit
together with all documents referred to in this Permit or the documents
referred to in Part A of the Permit readily available at
all times for inspection by the Director or his authorized officers at all
sites/offices covered by this Permit.
Any reference to the Permit shall include all documents referred to in
the Permit and also the relevant documents in the
Register.
1.4
The Permit Holder shall give a copy of this Permit
to the person(s) in charge of the site and ensure that such person(s) fully
understands all conditions and all requirements incorporated by the
Permit. The site refers to the site
of the Project and should mean the same hereinafter.
1.5
The Permit Holder shall display conspicuously a copy
of this Permit on the site at all vehicular site entrances/exits
or at a convenient location for public¡¦s information at all times. The Permit Holder shall ensure that the
most updated information about the Permit, including any amended Permit, is
displayed at such locations. If the
Permit Holder surrenders a part or the whole of the Permit, the notice he sends
to the Director shall also be displayed at the same locations as the original
Permit. The suspended, varied or cancelled Permit shall be removed from display at
the site.
1.6
The Permit Holder shall carry out the Project as
described in Part B of this Permit.
1.7
The Permit Holder shall ensure that the Project is
designed and constructed in accordance with the information and all
recommendations described in the EIA Reports (Register No. AEIAR-058/2002 and
Register No. AEIAR-188/2015), the application
documents for environmental permits and relevant documents in the Register
listed in Part A of this Permit; the information or
mitigation measures described in this Permit, mitigation measures to be
recommended in submissions that shall be deposited with or approved by the
Director as a result of permit conditions contained in this Permit, and
mitigation measures to be recommended under on-going surveillance and
monitoring activities during all stages of the Project. Where recommendations
referred to in the documents in the Register are not expressly referred to in
this Permit, such recommendations are nevertheless to be implemented unless
expressly excluded or impliedly amended in this Permit.
1.8
The Project shall be implemented in two Phases, with
Phase 1 containing 2 Parts, as described in detail in Condition 2.5 of this
Permit. A tentative programme for
the Project was set out in the Application No. VEP-234/2007.
1.9
All submissions as required under this Permit, shall
be rectified and resubmitted in accordance with the
comments, if any, made by the Director, within one month of the receipt of the
Director¡¦s comments or otherwise specified by the Director.
1.10
All submissions approved by the Director, all
submissions deposited without comments by the Director, or all submissions
rectified in accordance with comments by the Director under this Permit shall
be construed as part of the permit conditions described in
Part C of this Permit. Any
variation of the submissions shall be approved by the Director in writing or as
prescribed in the relevant permit conditions. All submissions or any variations of the
submissions made after the establishment of an Environmental Team (ET) and
employment of an Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) referred to in
Conditions 2.1 and 2.2 below shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified
by the IEC before submitting to the Director under this Permit.
1.11
The Permit Holder shall release all finalized
submissions, as required under this Permit, to the public by depositing copies
in the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Register Office, or in any
other places, or any internet websites as specified by the Director, or by any
other means as specified by the Director for public inspection. For this purpose, the Permit Holder
shall provide sufficient copies of the submissions.
1.12
The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing the commencement dates of the three different phases of the Project:
(a) Phase 1 Part 1, (b) Phase 1 Part 2 and (c) Phase 2 of the Project at least
one month prior to the commencement of each of the above three different phases
of the Project respectively. The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing immediately if there is any change of any of the commencement dates. Unless specified otherwise, the
commencement of the Project shall be taken to mean the commencement of the
Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project. The holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is
required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to
follow up with this condition with respect to notifying the Director the
commencement date of Phase 1 Part 2, i.e. temporary
use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
1.13
The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing the completion dates of all three different phases of the Project: (a)
Phase 1 Part 1, (b) Phase 1 Part 2 and (c) Phase 2 of the Project within one
month of the completion of each of the above three different phases of the
Project respectively. The holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is
required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to
follow up with this condition with respect to notifying the Director the
completion date of Phase 1 Part 2, i.e. temporary use
of the Phase 1 site (which is named a ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
1.14
The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing the date of handing over the site, or any part of the site, to any
other party for the purpose of redevelopment of the area at least one month
prior to the handing over of the area.
The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in writing immediately if there
is any change of the handing over date. The holder of Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any
subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition with respect to notifying the
Director his exit from or handing over of the Phase 1 site upon completion of
Phase 1 Part 2, i.e. temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as
¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the
construction of the WIL.
1.15
The Permit Holder shall notify the Director in
writing the commencement date for temporarily using the site, or any part of
the site, for the purpose as described in Condition 2.5(m) at least one month
prior to the commencement of temporary use of the area. The Permit Holder shall notify the
Director in writing immediately if there is any change of the commencement date
for such temporary use. The holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008
is required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations,
to follow up with this condition with respect to notifying the Director the
commencement date for temporarily using the Phase 1 site (which is named as
¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the
construction of the WIL under Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project.
1.16
All submissions to the Director required under this
Permit shall be delivered either in person or by registered mail to the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Register Office (currently at 27/F, Southorn Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wanchai,
Hong Kong). Electronic copies of
all finalized submissions required under this Permit shall be prepared in Hyper
Text Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document
Format (PDF) (version 1.3 or later), unless otherwise agreed by the Director
and shall be submitted at the same time as the hard copies.
1.17
For the purpose of this Permit,
¡§commencement of each Phase and/or each Part of a Phase of the Project¡¨ does
not include works related to site investigation, contamination confirmatory
investigation, or other works as agreed by the Director. Any damage to the existing concrete
ground slab caused by site investigation, contamination confirmatory
investigation, or other works as agreed by the Director shall be repaired as
soon as practicable such that the structural integrity of the existing concrete
ground slab is maintained so as to avoid exposing the
soil underneath as far as practicable.
2.
Special Conditions
2.1
An Environmental Team (ET) shall be established by
the Permit Holder no later than one month before the commencement of the
Project. The ET shall be headed by an ET Leader. The ET Leader shall be a
person who has at least 7 years' experience in environmental monitoring and
auditing (EM&A) or environmental management. The ET and the ET Leader shall
be responsible for the duties defined in the EM&A Manuals of the EIA
Reports (Register No. AEIAR-058/2002 and Register No. AEIAR-188/2015). The ET Leader shall be
responsible for the implementation of the EM&A programme in accordance with
the EM&A requirements as contained in the EM&A Manuals. The ET Leader
shall keep a contemporaneous log-book of each and
every instance or circumstance or change of circumstances which may affect the
environmental impact assessment and each and every non-compliance with the
recommendations of the EIA Reports (Register No. AEIAR-058/2002 and Register
No. AEIAR-188/2015) or this Permit.
This log-book shall be kept readily available for
inspection by all persons assisting in supervision of the implementation of the
EIA Report recommendations and this Permit or by the Director or his authorized
officers. Failure to maintain records in the log-book,
failure to discharge the duties of the ET Leader as defined in the EM&A
Manuals or failure to comply with this Condition would entitle the Director to
require the Permit Holder by notice in writing to replace the ET Leader.
Failure by the Permit Holder to make replacement, or further failure to keep
contemporaneous records in the log-book despite the
employment of a new ET Leader may render the Permit liable to suspension,
cancellation or variation. The ET shall not be in any way an associated body of
the Contractor or the IEC for the Project.
2.2
An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) shall be
employed by the Permit Holder no later than one month before the commencement
of the Project. The IEC shall be a
person who has at least 7 years' experience in environmental monitoring and
audit (EM&A) or environmental management. The IEC shall be responsible for the
duties defined in the EM&A Manuals of the EIA Reports (Register No.
AEIAR-058/2002 and Register No. AEIAR-188/2015), and shall audit the
overall EM&A programme described in the EIA Reports (Register No.
AEIAR-058/2002 and Register No. AEIAR-188/2015), including the
implementation of all environmental mitigation measures, submissions required
in the EM&A Manuals, and any other submissions required under this
Permit. In addition, the IEC shall
be responsible for verifying the environmental acceptability of permanent and
temporary works, relevant design plans and submissions under this Permit. The IEC shall verify the log-book(s) mentioned in Condition 2.1 of this Permit. The IEC shall notify the Director by
fax, within 24 hours of each and every occurrence,
change of circumstances or non-compliance with the EIA Reports (Register No.
AEIAR-058/2002 and Register No. AEIAR-188/2015) or this Permit,
which might affect the monitoring or control of adverse environmental
impact. Where the IEC fails to so
notify the Director of the same, fails to discharge the duties of the IEC as
defined in the EM&A Manuals or fails to comply with this Condition, the Director
may require the Permit Holder by notice in writing to replace the IEC. Failure
to replace the IEC as directed or further failure to so notify the Director
despite employment of a new IEC may render the Permit liable to suspension, cancellation or variation. Notification by the Permit Holder is the
same as notification by the IEC for the purpose of this Condition. The IEC
shall not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor or the
Environmental Team for the Project.
2.3
[Deleted]
2.4
The Permit Holder shall, within one month after the
commencement of each Phase and each Part of a Phase of the Project,
inform the Director in writing of the management organization of the main
companies and/or any form of joint ventures associated with the carrying out of
the Project. The submitted information shall include at least an organization
chart, names of responsible persons including the ET Leader and the IEC, and
their contact details. The
different phases or part of a Phase are defined under Condition 2.5 of this
Permit.
Phased
Approach for Implementing the Project and Implementation Requirements
2.5
The Project shall be implemented in two Phases with
the following conditions.
Phase 1 Part 1
(a)
The Site area for both Part 1 and Part 2 of Phase 1
of the Project is shown in Figure 2
of this Permit. At the time of
notification of commencement of Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project as required under
Condition 1.12, the Permit Holder shall deposit with the Director an updated
Project programme, to be accompanied by layout plans with detailed descriptions
and drawings of mitigation measures in scale of 1:1000 or in other suitable
scale as agreed by the Director, showing clearly the
relevant works in Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project.
(b)
Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project includes demolition
and clearance of all existing chimneys, buildings and
ancillary structures above the existing concrete ground slab in the Phase 1
Site area where the former Kennedy Town Incinerator Plant (KTIP) and the
Kennedy Town Abattoir (KTA) are located.
The Phase 1 Part 1 also includes the removal of asbestos containing
materials and dioxin/furan contaminated wastes within the Phase 1 Site.
(c)
Hoardings shall be erected around the Phase 1 Site
at the commencement of Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project and shall be properly
maintained throughout Phase 1 of the Project to restrict access of the Phase 1
Site to only authorized site staffs and workers.
(d)
Throughout Phase 1 Part 1, the existing concrete
ground slab within the Phase 1 Site shall not be demolished but shall be
retained intact as far as practicable.
Before completion of the Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project, inspection shall
be carried out on the condition of the existing concrete ground slab and
existing drainage system with the view to identify and repair any surface
cracks such that their structural integrity is maintained to avoid exposing the
soil underneath as far as practicable.
Such inspection and repair shall be carried out every month thereafter
until the commencement of Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project. Where the inspection and repair work
fall within the reporting month of the monthly Environmental Monitoring &
Audit (EM&A) report described under Condition 3.5 of this Permit, the
inspection findings and repair work carried out shall be reported in that
monthly EM&A report.
(e)
With the exception of drainage
facilities required for the proper function of the site drainage system, the
existing underground facilities such as refuse bunkers, lift pits, underground
chambers and openings, and sub-sided areas within the Phase 1 Site area shall
be cleaned up and backfilled with clean soil to about 130 mm from the top level
of adjacent ground slab. A layer of
concrete cover of not less than 130 mm thickness shall then be laid on top of
the clean soil to fill up the underground facilities such that the top level of
the concrete cover on top of the clean soil above the underground facilities
matches the top level of adjacent ground slab. Before completion of the Phase 1
Part 1 of the Project, inspection shall be carried out on the condition of the
concrete covers and existing drainage facilities retained for the proper
function of the site drainage system, with the view to identify and repair any
surface cracks such that their structural integrity is maintained to avoid
exposing the soil underneath as far as practicable. Such inspection and repair shall be carried
out every month thereafter until the commencement of Phase 1 Part 2 of the
Project. Where the inspection and
repair work fall within the reporting month of the monthly Environmental
Monitoring & Audit (EM&A) report described under Condition 3.5 of this
Permit, the inspection findings and repair work carried out shall be reported
in that monthly EM&A report.
(f)
Phase 1 Part 1 of the Project shall not involve any
excavation work that may disturb or expose any part of the soil underneath the
existing concrete slab.
Control on Demolition
(g)
Non-blasting methods shall be used for the
demolition of all structures within the project site boundary including
buildings and chimneys.
(h)
All Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) shall be
removed prior to commencement of demolition works except for those ACM removal
works that are constrained by access and have to be
handled while the demolition work progresses.
Remediation and Disposal of Wastes
contaminated by Dioxins and/or Furans
(i)
Treatment and disposal of wastes contaminated with
dioxins and/or furans as identified in Appendix A
of this permit and in the CCI findings shall be carried out in accordance with
the approved WMP and shall include the following steps:
a.
conduct pilot mixing and Toxicity Characteristic
Leachate Procedures (TCLP) tests for the contaminated wastes to verify the
effectiveness of the mix and establish the necessary cement to wastes ratio for
the purpose of compliance with the 1 part per billion
toxicity equivalent (1 ppb TEQ) TCLP criteria;
b.
inform the Director the results of the pilot tests
for confirmation of the disposal site.
If the pilot tests identify that some of the contaminated wastes would
need to be disposed of as Chemical Wastes, the fallback option to be adopted to
dispose of the Chemical Wastes and the associated method statements shall be
provided together with the results of the pilot tests;
c.
treat the contaminated wastes by mixing with cement;
d.
seal the treated wastes into steel drums lined with
plastic sheeting after passing the TCLP test as stated in Appendix B of this Permit. Duplicate samples of the treated wastes
may need to be collected for parallel testing by another qualified laboratory
if requested by the Director; and
e.
dispose of the drummed material in Condition
2.5(i)(d) above to a Government landfill agreed by the
Director under Condition 2.15(i)(b) above.
(j)
Testing shall be conducted on samples taken from any
materials left on the North, South, East, West and
underneath of the removed materials to confirm that all contaminated materials
failing to meet the criteria of 1 ppb TEQ have been removed for treatment. Duplicate samples of the materials may
need to be collected for parallel testing by another qualified laboratory if
requested by the Director.
Submission of Remediation Reports
(k)
Six hard copies and one electronic copy of
Remediation Report(s) shall be deposited with the Director after the completion
of the remediation and disposal of contaminated soil and wastes at specific
site areas. The Remediation
Report(s) shall demonstrate that the remediation and disposal work for the site
area that it covers has been undertaken according to the specified methodology
and has been shown to be adequate. The Remediation Report(s) shall be submitted
at least four weeks before the concerned handed over to other parties for
redevelopment. The Remediation Report for works covered in Phase 1 Part 1 of
the Project shall be submitted at least four weeks before commencement of Phase
1 Part 2 of the Project.¡¨ The Remediation Report for works covered in Phase 1
Part 1 of the Project shall be submitted at least four weeks before
commencement of Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project.
Phase 1 Part 2
(l)
At the time of notification of commencement of Phase
1 Part 2 of the Project as required under Condition 1.12, the Permit Holder
shall deposit with the Director a detailed updated Project programme, to be
accompanied by layout plans with detailed descriptions and drawings of
mitigation measures in scale of 1:1000 or in other suitable scale as agreed by
the Director, showing clearly the relevant works in
Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project. The
Project shall be implemented according to the updated programme. The holder of Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any
subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition during the temporary
use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(m)
Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project includes the temporary
use of the Phase 1 Site as site office and for the storage of common
construction materials, the provision of mitigation measures to avoid any
potential release of additional underground contaminants into the environment
resulting from the above temporary use of the site, and the provision of
mitigation measures to avoid impacts on workers on Phase 1 Site and the general public nearby, including residents and
passers-by. It also includes the
removal of temporary site office and facilities for the storage of common
construction materials before completion of the Phase 1 Part 2. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(n)
Under Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project, the Permit
Holder shall not use or carry out any activity in the Phase 1 Site other than
the site office and storage of common construction materials as proposed. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(o)
At locations within the Phase 1 Site area identified
to be temporarily used as site office and for storage of common construction
materials, an additional concrete paving of not less than 200 mm thickness
shall be provided. The indicative
extent of this additional concrete paving, as extracted from the Application
No. VEP-234/2007, is shown in Figure
3 of this Permit. The holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is
required, through conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to
follow up with this condition during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site
(which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008)
for the construction of the WIL.
(p)
No temporary use, to include site office and storage
of common construction material, at the Phase 1 Site shall be allowed until
Remediation Report(s) has been deposited with the Director in accordance with
Condition 2.5(k) below after the completion of the remediation and disposal
of dioxin/furan contaminated wastes at specific site areas proposed for
temporary use. The holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through
conditions under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with
this condition during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as
¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the
construction of the WIL.
(q)
No temporary use, to include site office and storage
of common construction material, at the Phase 1 Site shall be allowed until the
identified locations for such temporary uses have been provided with the
pre-requisite additional concrete paving as stipulated in Condition 2.5(o)
above. The
holder of Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions
under EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this
condition during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as
¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the
construction of the WIL.
(r)
Throughout the entire period of Phase 1 Part 2, the
additional concrete paving to avoid exposing the contaminated soil underneath
shall remain intact and shall not be demolished. Within 7 days, and every month thereafter,
of the start of use of the Site for temporary site office and/or storage of
common construction materials, inspection shall be carried out on the condition
of the additional concrete paving, the site drainage and the foul sewerage
systems to identify, with the view to repair/remedy any surface cracks such
that the structural integrity of these systems is maintained and the soil
underneath will not be disturbed or exposed as far as practicable. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(s)
To allow natural air dispersion of any entrapped vapour contaminants that might be released from the soil
and groundwater, the site office to be erected in the Phase 1 Site shall be
properly designed and constructed to create and maintain a clear void of at
least 500 mm height between the underside of the site office floor and the top
of the additional concrete paving below.
The indicative design is shown in Figure 4 of this Permit. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(t)
To further safeguard against seepage of any vapour contaminants into site offices from the soil and
groundwater, the site office to be erected in the Phase 1 Site shall be
properly designed and constructed to incorporate gas-resistant membranes flooring. The indicative design is shown in Figure 4 of this Permit. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
(u)
Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project, including any
additional site drainage and/or foul sewerage works, shall not involve any
excavation work that may disturb or expose any part of the soil underneath the
existing concrete slab and the additional concrete paving. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition
during the temporary use of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨
in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008)
for the construction of the WIL.
Phase 2
(v)
The Phase 2 Site area is shown in Figure 5 of this Permit. Phase 2 of the Project shall commence as
soon as practicable after the completion of all Phase 1 Part 2 works and shall
not be delayed. Phase 2 of the
Project shall comprise the demolition of existing concrete ground slab,
demolition of any additional site drainage and/or foul sewerage works, demolition
of the refuse collection point, bus depot and public car park. Phase 2 of the Project shall also
include remediation of contaminated soil below ground level within the Phase 2
Site area and the subsequent on-site reuse of the remediated soil. The 7-year
programme proposed in the approved EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-188/2015) for works in Phase 2 also
involves on-site reprovision of the public car park and refuse collection
point.
(w) At the time of
notification of commencement of Phase 2 of the Project as required under
Condition 1.12, the Permit Holder shall deposit with the Director a detailed
updated Project programme, to be accompanied by layout plans with detailed
descriptions and drawings of mitigation measures in scale of 1:1000 or in other
suitable scale as agreed by the Director, having regard to measures described
in Conditions 2.20, 2.23 and Appendix C,
showing clearly the relevant works in Phase 2 of the Project. The Project shall
be implemented according to the updated programme.
Submissions and Measures before commencement
of Phase 2 works
Contamination Confirmatory Investigation
2.6
To cater for the phased approach for implementing
the Project, a proposal on the contamination confirmatory investigation (CCI)
shall be submitted, before the commencement of the Project, to the Director for
approval. The Permit Holder shall agree with the Director the timing for
submitting the CCI proposal. The
CCI proposal shall provide details of the CCI programme to tie in, in terms of
the timing and location, with each Phase and each Part of a Phase of the
Project. The CCI programme shall state the timing for submission of the CCI
findings, review of the waste treatment and disposal method, and preparation
and submission of the Waste Management Plan taking into
account relevant CCI findings as required under Condition 2.7. The CCI shall provide further information
on the extent of contamination at the Investigation Areas A, B, C and D shown
in Figure 6 of
this Permit in addition to those assessed in the EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-058/2002). Six
hard copies and one electronic copy of the relevant findings of the CCI shall
be deposited with the Director before the commencement of each Phase of the
Project.
Submission of
Waste Management Plan
2.7
Six hard copies and one electronic copy of a Waste
Management Plan (WMP) for each of the three different phases of the Project:
(a) Phase 1 Part 1, (b) Phase 1 Part 2 and (c) Phase 2 of the Project shall be
submitted to the Director for approval within one month after the commencement
of the three different phases of the Project respectively. The WMP shall take into account the relevant findings and recommendations in the
waste management section of the EIA Reports (Register No. AEIAR-058/2002 and
Register No. AEIAR-188/2015), and any relevant findings of the CCI. Before submission to the Director, the
WMP shall be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming
to the information and recommendations contained in the EIA Report, and any
relevant findings of the CCI. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition with
respect to submission of a WMP for Phase 1 Part 2, i.e. temporary use
of the Phase 1 site (which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental
Permit No. EP-313/2008) for the construction of the WIL.
2.8
The WMP shall include, but not limited to, the
following information for each type of the wastes relevant to the
specific Project Phase/Part that it is intended to cover. The types of wastes to be covered should
include asbestos containing materials, dioxin/furan contaminated wastes,
contaminated soil, and construction and demolition materials.
(a)
summary of the locational sources, quantity, level
of contamination (if applicable), remediation required prior to disposal (if
applicable), and on-site and off-site disposal methods for different type of wastes;
(b)
timings for generation, remediation (if applicable),
temporary on-site stockpiling or storage, and final on-site or off-site
disposal of different type of wastes;
(c)
timings for conducting the pilot tests as required
under Conditions 2.5(i)(a) as appropriate;
(d)
method statements on the remediation works to be
carried out on different types of contaminated soil and wastes, and the
confirmatory and parallel independent testing to be conducted;
(e)
on-site waste management measures to control
nuisances during the generation, handling, remediation (if applicable), and
temporary stockpiling of the different types of wastes, in particular for
asbestos containing materials, dioxin/furan contaminated wastes and
contaminated soil;
(f)
possible recycling and reuse of materials;
(g)
location of the disposal site(s) for various types
of wastes;
(h)
confirmation on whether or not barges would be used
for removal of wastes;
(i)
transportation routing(s) of the removal of various
types of wastes from the project site to the disposal site(s);
(j)
measures to control nuisances due to transportation
of different type of wastes, in particular to avoid loss of asbestos containing
materials, dioxin/furan contaminated wastes and contaminated soil; to remove
possible soil left on the first several hundred meters of roads by vehicles
leaving the site, such as the option of using specially design road cleansing
vehicle; and to reduce dust nuisance from trucks carrying wastes, such as the
option of installing mechanical covers to trucks;
(k)
trip-ticket system for waste transfer/disposal
operations, including a certification system to confirm to the disposal site¡¦s
operator that the contaminated wastes have been remediated to meet the specific
disposal criteria; and
(l)
responsibilities for implementation.
2.9
All the measures recommended in the approved WMP
shall be fully implemented in accordance with the requirements and time
schedule(s) set out in the WMP.
2.10
Before obtaining the Director¡¦s approval on the WMP
as required under Condition 2.7, no disposal of waste, spoil, soil, excavation
materials or materials obtained from the Project site shall be allowed at any
locations.
Ecological Precautionary Measures
2.11
Before commencement of site clearance works, the
Project site shall be inspected to confirm that there are no active bird nests
on trees. If any active bird nest is found, a suitably sized buffer area shall
be established around the tree to minimise human or machinery disturbance until
the nest is abandoned.
2.12
Before commencement of site clearance works, daytime
inspection shall be carried out to confirm that there are no Short-nosed Fruit
Bats on trees, particularly Chinese Fan-palms, within the Project site. If any
Short-nosed Fruit Bat is found roosting on a tree, a suitably sized buffer area
shall be established around the tree to minimise human or machinery disturbance
until the bat has left.
Submission
of Review Report for the Area occupied by the New World First Bus Depot
2.13
As the area occupied by the New World First Bus
Depot (Bus Depot) as shown in Figure
5 of this Permit may be subjected to further contamination since
approval of the CAR/RAP in the EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-188/2015), the
Permit Holder shall, no later than two months before commencement of work at
the Bus Depot area, deposit with the Director four hard copies and one
electronic copy of a Review Report to confirm:
(a)
the validity of the approved CAP and CAR/RAP in the
EIA Report (Register No.AEIAR-188/2015);
(b)
whether there is any
potential contaminations due to the continual operation of the Bus Depot; and
(c)
whether further site investigation is required.
2.14
The Review Report shall be prepared based on a site
appraisal conducted in accordance with the ¡§Practice Guide for Investigation
and Remediation of Contaminated Land¡¨ issued by EPD. If the Review Report
confirms that further site investigation is required, the Permit Holder shall:
(a)
submit to the Director for approval four hard copies
and one electronic copy of a Supplementary Contamination Assessment Plan
(SCAP), which shall include details of representative sampling and analysis
required to determine the nature and extent of further contamination; and
(b)
no later than one month after the completion of the
site investigation works in accordance with the approved SCAP, submit to the
Director for approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of Supplementary
Contamination Assessment Report to document the findings of the site
investigation works and assessment on the nature and extent of further
contamination and a Supplementary Remediation Action Plan with necessary
remediation measures.
Submission of Updated
EM&A Manual for Biopile System Discharge Emissions and Ambient Hydrocarbons
Monitoring
2.15
The Permit Holder shall, no later than one month
before the commencement of Phase 2 of the Project, submit to the Director for
approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of an updated EM&A Manual
for the Project. The updated
EM&A Manual shall include:
(a) updates
on the environmental monitoring and audit requirements relating to Biopile
System Discharge Emissions and Ambient Hydrocarbons (HC) Monitoring as
recommended in Chapter 2 of the EM&A Manual of the EIA Report (Register No.
AEIAR-188/2015);
(b) drawings
in the scale of 1:5,000 or other appropriate scale as agreed by the Director
showing the proposed locations for conducting Biopile System Discharge
Emissions and Ambient HC Monitoring;
(c) proposed
monitoring methodology and measurement parameters; and
(d) an
Event and Action Plan with proposed immediate remedial action(s).
Submission
of Construction Noise Management Plan
2.16
To avoid construction noise impact on S.K.H. Lui
Ming Choi Memorial Primary School, the Permit Holder shall, no later than one
month before the commencement of construction of relevant part of the Project,
submit to the Director for approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of
a Construction Noise Management Plan (CNMP) for construction work during
examination periods of the School. The plan shall include:-
(a) a proposal of construction noise mitigation
measures, including the provision of noise barriers and enclosures for
different types of construction activities to be carried out for the Project
where applicable, and any other initiatives proposed by the Permit Holder; and
(b) administrative measures, including
setting up a manned hotline or a channel of communication with the School, to avoid noisy construction activities during
examination).
Submission of
Construction Site Drainage Management Plan
2.17
Four hard copies and one electronic copy of
Construction Site Drainage Management Plan (CSDMP) with detailed design of the
site drainage system and incorporating the requirements stipulated in S.5.7.1.1
of the EIA Report (Register No.: AEIAR-188/2015), certified by a qualified
civil engineer with suitable drainage system design experience, shall be
submitted to the Director for approval before commencement of the Phase 2 of
the Project. The CSDMP shall include detailed designs of cut-off channels,
earth bunds or similar impervious water barriers for collecting and preventing
site runoff from escaping off-site.
Submissions
and Measures during Phase 2 Works
Remediation
of Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metal and/or Hydrocarbons
2.18
Remediation for contaminated soil identified in the
Contamination Assessment Report / Remediation Action Plan (CAR/RAP) in Appendix
7.2 of the EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-188/2015) and any further site
investigation required in Condition 2.13 shall be carried out according to the
following methods: :
(a)
The remediation methods as stated in Appendix C of this permit shall be adopted for the 3
different types of contaminated soil, i.e. Type A
contaminated soil (Heavy Metals) by cement solidification; Type B contaminated
soil (Hydrocarbons) by biopiling; and Type C
contaminated soil (Heavy Metals and Hydrocarbons) by biopiling
followed by cement solidification. A typical cross section and oblique view of
a biopile is shown in Appendix D.
(b)
Upon proper treatment, Type A soil shall be reused
on site after passing the TCLP test as stated in Table C1 of Appendix C of this permit and meeting the Unconfined
Compressive Strength (UCS) test of not less than 1 MPa. Duplicate samples of
the treated soil may need to be collected for parallel testing by another
qualified laboratory if requested by the Director; and
(c)
Upon proper treatment, Type B soil shall be reused
on site after passing the biopile closure assessment as stated in Table C2 of Appendix C of this permit. Duplicate samples of the
treated soil may need to be collected for parallel testing by another qualified
laboratory if requested by the Director.
(d)
Upon proper treatment, Type C soil shall be reused
on site after passing the TCLP test, UCS test and biopile closure assessment as
required in above Conditions 2.18(b) and (c). Duplicate samples of the treated
soil may need to be collected for parallel testing by another qualified laboratory
if requested by the Director.
2.19
Prior to backfilling the respective excavation zones
with treated soil, confirmatory sampling shall be conducted to confirm that all
contaminated soil has been removed. The confirmatory sampling will be conducted
in accordance with the requirements stipulated in Section 4.3.3. of CAR/RAP in
Appendix 7.2 of the EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-188/2015) to meet the Risk
Based Remediation Goals (¡§RBRG¡¨) Standards as shown in Appendix
E of this Permit. Duplicate samples of the soil may need to be
collected for parallel testing by another qualified laboratory if requested by
the Director.
Mitigation
and Precautionary Measures
2.20
The following measures shall be implemented to
prevent pollution, control nuisances, and reduce risk during the remediation
phases:
(a)
Control on active works area (i.e.
area with concrete paving material removed and without any cover)
The Permit Holder shall, at least one
month before commencement of excavation works, submit to the Director for
approval four hard copies and one electronic copy of an Air Quality Management
Plan (AQMP). The AQMP shall confirm
on the schedule and zonings for active works area and specify the maximum allowable
size of active works area in operation for the respective zone and total active
works area at any one time over the entire Project site for better control on
the potential emission of hydrocarbons, heavy metals
and fugitive dusts. The maximum
allowable sizes of active works areas shall be complied with during the
excavation works;
(b)
Dust suppression measures
All active works areas shall be sprayed with water
frequently at no less than once every 2.5 hours. All stockpiled soil shall be
covered with tarpaulin or other impermeable material to minimise potential
emissions of fugitive dust, heavy metals and hydrocarbons.;
(c)
Control measures during remediation by biopile
method:
i) During biopile operation, the biopiles
shall be enclosed by impervious membrane during bio-degradation process and
activated carbon filters with an installed removal efficiency of at least 99%
of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) shall be fitted to the pipe outlet(s) of
the biopile(s);
ii) Emissions from the biopile
pipe outlet(s) shall be regularly monitored by a Continuous Emission Monitoring
System to check the performance of the activated carbon filter system; and
iii) Spent activated carbon filter shall
be replaced regularly to ensure that the measured total Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC) emission concentration from the system is below 20 ppm; and
iv) The extraction pump and/or blower for
the biopile pipe network shall be switched off to stop system discharge
emission when exceedance of the monitored total VOC limit of 20 mg/m3
is detected and/or unacceptable air quality is monitored at the site boundary.
Resumption of biopile system discharge emission shall only be allowed after
confirmation and implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, e.g. replacement of the activated carbon filter;
(d)
Control measures during remediation by cement
solidification method:
The cement solidification process and the
associated storage bins shall be fully enclosed. Any storage piles shall be covered with
tarpaulin or other impermeable material. Soils that require both hydrocarbons (HC)
and heavy metals (HM) remediation will first go through HC remediation by biopiling and then through HM remediation by cement
solidification; and
(e)
The Key Mitigation Measures as stated in Appendix C of this Permit shall be implemented.
Submission of Landscape Plan
2.21
To reduce the landscape impact due to the Project,
four hard copies and one electronic copy of a Landscape Plan, at least one
month before the commencement of corresponding parts of landscape works of the
Project, shall be deposited with the Director. The Plan shall include the design
details, locations, implementation programme, maintenance and management
schedules, and drawings in the scale of 1:1,000 or other appropriate scale as
agreed by the Director of the landscape mitigation measures of the Project as
recommended in the EIA Report (Register No.: AEIAR ¡V 188/2015). In particular,
the Landscape Plan shall show the design of the waterfront promenade and
details of the tree compensatory proposal. Compensatory tree planting with a
minimum ratio of 1:1 in terms of quantity shall be provided in the proposed
future waterfront promenade.
Submission of Remediation Report(s)
2.22
Six hard copies and one electronic copy of
Remediation Report(s) shall be submitted to the Director for approval after the
completion of the remediation of corresponding areas of the Project. The Remediation Report(s) shall
demonstrate that the remediation for the site area that it covers has been
undertaken according to the specified methodology and has met the treatment
Goals at Appendix E for the intended land use, i.e. Urban Residential, Rural Residential, Industrial or
Public Parks, known at the time of submission. The Remediation Report(s) shall
be submitted at least four weeks before the concerned area(s) of Phase 2 of the
Project is/are handed over to other parties for redevelopment.
Measures for Works in all
Phases
2.23
Mitigation measures shall be implemented to prevent
other demolition related nuisances throughout the demolition and remediation
phases, in accordance with the EIA Report (Register No. AEIAR-058/2002),
including but not limited to the following:
(a)
provide boundary hoarding of height not less than
5.5 meters measured from street level modified to perimeter noise barrier form,
and made of panels with superficial surface density not less than 10 kg/m2;
(b)
provide moveable noise barriers close to powered mechanical
equipment (PME) in cases where, in the opinion of the ET leader, IEC or the
Director, such PME has the potential to cause excessive noise nuisance to
sensitive receivers and where a benefit will result from providing the barriers;
(c)
if necessary, in addition to the Conditions 2.23(a)
and (b) above, modify continuous operational periods for noisy plant or take
other measures to comply with the construction noise criteria;
(d)
use adequately designed and maintained perimeter
channels, sediment traps, temporary channels, temporary diversion and oil
interception facilities to mitigate site run-off impacts;
(e)
divert all clean surface water around the site; and
(f)
provide bunded areas for generators, and for storage
of fuel, oil and chemical wastes.
3.
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) for the Project
3.1
The EM&A programme shall be implemented as set
out in the EM&A Manuals of the EIA Reports (Register AEIAR-058/2002 and
EIAR-188/2015). Any changes to the programme shall be justified by the IEC as
conforming to the requirements set out in the EM&A Manuals and shall be
submitted to the Director for approval.
An updated EM&A Manual with details covering the two different
phases of the Project: (a) Phase1 Part 1 and (b) Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project,
making reference to the documents submitted with the Application for Variation of Environmental Permit
(Application No. VEP-234/2007), shall be submitted to the Director for approval
at least 1 month before commencement of each of the specific phases of the
Project: that is (a) Phase 1 Part 1 and (b) Phase 1 Part 2 of the Project. The holder of
Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008 is required, through conditions under
EP-313/2008 or any subsequent variations, to follow up with this condition with
respect to submission of an EM&A Manual and implementation of an EM&A
programme for Phase 1 Part 2, i.e. temporary use of the Phase 1 site
(which is named as ¡§Works Area B¡¨ in the Environmental Permit No. EP-313/2008)
for the construction of the WIL.
3.2
A complaint investigation procedure shall be set up
at least two weeks before the commencement of the Project. The complaint investigation procedure
shall follow the requirements set out in the EM&A programme.
3.3
All environmental monitoring and audit data
submitted under this Permit shall be true, valid and
correct.
3.4
Four hard copies and one electronic copy of the
Baseline Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the Director at least two
weeks before the commencement of the Project. Additional copies of the
submission shall be provided to the Director upon request from the Director.
3.5
Four hard copies and one electronic copy of monthly
EM&A Report shall be submitted to the Director within two weeks after the
end of the reporting month. Additional copies of the submission shall be
provided to the Director upon request from the Director.
3.6
The actions described in the Event/Action Plans of
the EM&A Manual shall be fully and properly carried out, in accordance with
the time frame(s) set out in the Event/Action Plan, or as agreed by the
Director.
4.
Electronic Reporting of
EM&A Information
4.1
To facilitate public inspection of the Baseline
Monitoring Report and monthly EM&A Reports via the EIAO Internet Website
and at the EIAO Register Office, electronic copies of these Reports shall be
prepared in Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in
Portable Document Format (PDF version 1.3 or later), unless otherwise agreed by
the Director and shall be submitted at the same time as the hard copies as
described in Conditions 3.4 and 3.5 of this Permit. For the HTML version, a
content page capable of providing hyperlinks to each section and sub-section of
these Reports shall be included at the beginning of the document. Hyperlinks to
all figures, drawings and tables in these Reports shall be provided in the main
text where the respective references are made. All graphics in these Reports
shall be in interlaced GIF format unless otherwise agreed by the Director. The
content of the electronic copies of these Reports shall be the same as the hard
copies.
4.2
All environmental monitoring data described in
Condition 4.1 above shall be made available to the public via internet access
in the shortest possible time and in no event later than two weeks after the
relevant environmental monitoring data are collected or become available,
unless otherwise agreed with the Director. The Permit Holder shall notify the
Director in writing, within six weeks after the commencement of the Project, the
internet address where the environmental monitoring data are to be placed. The
internet address and the relevant environmental monitoring data shall be made
available to the public via the EIAO Internet Website and the EIAO Register
Office.
4.3
The internet website as described in Condition 4.2
above shall enable user-friendly public access to the monitoring data with
features capable of:
(a)
providing access to all environmental monitoring
data collected since the commencement of the Project;
(b)
searching by date;
(c)
searching by types of monitoring data; and
(d)
hyperlinking to relevant monitoring data after searching;
or otherwise as
agreed by the Director.
Notes
:
1.
This Permit
consists of three parts, namely, PART A (Main Permit), PART B (Description of Designated Project) and PART C (Permit Conditions). Any person relying on this permit
should obtain independent legal advice on the legal implications under the Ordinance,
and the following notes are for general information only.
2.
If there is a breach of any conditions of this Permit, the Director or
his authorized officer may, with the consent of the Secretary for the
Environment, order the cessation of associated work until the remedial action
is taken in respect of the resultant environmental damage, and in that case the
Permit Holder shall not carry out any associated works without the permission
of the Director or his authorized officer.
3.
The Permit
Holder may apply under Section 13 of the Ordinance to the Director for a
variation of the conditions of this Permit. The Permit Holder shall replace the
original permit displayed on the Project site by the amended permit.
4.
A person
who assumes the responsibility for the whole or a part of the designated
project may, before he assumes responsibility of the designated project, apply
under Section 12 of the Ordinance to the Director for a further environmental
permit.
5.
Under Section 14
of the Ordinance, the Director may with the consent of the Secretary for the
Environment, suspend, vary or cancel this Permit. The
suspended, varied or cancelled Permit shall be removed
from display at the Project site.
6.
If this Permit
is cancelled or surrendered during the Project, another environmental permit
must be obtained under the Ordinance before the Project could be continued. It
is an offence under Section 26(1) of the Ordinance to decommission a designated
project listed in Part II of Schedule 2 of the Ordinance without a valid environmental
permit.
7.
Any person who
carries out the Project contrary to the conditions in the Permit, and is
convicted of an offence under the Ordinance, is liable: -
(i)
on a first
conviction on indictment to a fine of $ 2 million and to imprisonment for 6 months;
(ii)
on a second or
subsequent conviction on indictment to a fine of $ 5 million and to
imprisonment for 2 years;
(iii)
on a first
summary conviction to a fine at level 6 and to imprisonment for 6 months;
(iv)
on a second or
subsequent summary conviction to a fine of $1 million and to imprisonment for 1
year; and
(v)
in any case
where the offence is of a continuing nature, the court or magistrate may impose
a fine of $ 10,000 for each day on which he is satisfied the offence continued.
8.
The Permit
Holder may appeal against any condition of this Permit under Section 17 of the
Ordinance within 30 days of receipt of this Permit.
9.
The Notes are
for general reference only and that the Permit Holder should refer to the EIA
Ordinance for details and seek independent legal advice.
10. Occupational
safety and health issues are governed by the Occupational Safety and Health
Ordinance (Cap. 509), and Factories and Industrial Undertakings Ordinance
(Cap.59). The Permit Holder is advised to contact the Labour
Department for requirements relating to occupational safety and health issues.
Environmental Permit No. EP-136/2002/F
Àô¹Ò³\¥iÃÒ½s¸¹ EP-136/2002/F
| Figure 1 | Figure 2 | Figure 3 | Figure 4 | Figure 5 | Figure 6 | Figure 7 |
[ Back to
First Page ] / [ Back to Main Index ]
Locations Identified in the EIA Report
(AEIAR-058/2002) Requiring
Remediation and the Actions Recommended
(Extracted from table 4.3 of the EIA Report,
Register No. AEIAR-058/2002))
Table A Soil/Rubbles/Ash
Wastes Remediation Actions Required
Borehole# |
Action Required |
Remove concrete surface and clear
uncontaminated surface material and stockpile |
Proposed depth of Material for Removal
or Treatment |
Remedial Action |
Reassurance / Confirmatory Sampling |
TB1 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.3m depth |
Immediately below concrete 0.3m to 4.0m |
Immobilisation for 0.3m to 2.0m and 3.0m to 4.0m* TCLP test followed by removal of 2.0m to 3.0m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg) and TPH
contamination at edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB2 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m depth |
Immediately below concrete 0.5m to 1.5m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cu, Pb and Zn) contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB3 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 2.5m depth |
2.5m to 3.5m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg) contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB4 |
Yes |
Down to 2.2m depth |
2.2m to 4.2m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cu, Pb and Zn) contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB5 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 1.8m.
Down to 2.5m depth |
2.5m to 4.0m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB8 |
Yes |
Concrete
down to 1m. Down to 2.5m |
2.5m to 3.5m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 2.5m to
3.5m to landfill. Immobilisation if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, determine extent of PAH contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB9 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 1.0m depth |
1.0m to 2.0m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB10 |
Yes |
Surface rubble/ash and brick material (not soil) about 1.5m depth. |
1.5 m |
Clear Waste to landfill. Waste to be treated and tested to meet
EPD disposal criteria. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn) TPH and PCDD/PCDF
contamination under surface contaminated materials.* |
TB11 |
Yes |
Down to 1.5m depth |
1.5 m |
Clear Waste to landfill. Waste to be treated and tested to meet
EPD disposal criteria. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and PCDD/PCDF
contamination under surface contaminated materials.* |
TB11 |
Yes |
Below hardstanding surface (soil materials)
|
1.5 to 4.0m |
Immobilisation*
|
Yes, to determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole. |
TB12 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m |
0.5 to 1.5m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB13 |
Yes |
Down to 2.5m |
2.5m to 3.5m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb, Zn, Hg) contamination at edge and
base of excavated hole.* |
TB15 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.4m |
0.4 to 2.4m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 0.4m to 2.4m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cu, Pb, Hg and Zn) and PAH
contamination at edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB16 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.8m |
0.8 to 4.3m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu, Pb and Zn) contamination at edge and
base of excavated hole.* |
TB17 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.4m |
0.4 to 2.4m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb and Hg) contamination at edge and
base of excavated hole.* |
TB18 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 1.0m |
1.0m to 2.0m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB19 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.6m |
0.6m to 4.0m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb and Hg) contamination at edge and
base of excavated hole.* |
TB20 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.3m |
0.3m to 2.3m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 0.3m to 2.3m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cu, Pb, Hg, Cd and Zn) PAH and TPH
contamination at edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB21 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m |
0.5m to 5.0m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 0.5m to 3.5m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. Remaining depth to be immobilised to 5m * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu, Pb, Hg and Zn) and TPH contamination
at edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB22 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m |
0.5 to 1.5m |
Immobilisation * |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB23 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m |
0.5 to 4m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
TB24 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 1.2m |
1.2 to 4.2m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu, Pb and Hg) contamination at
edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB25 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.9m.
Down to 1.0m |
Depth 1.0m ¡V
4.4m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 1.0m to 2.9m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. Immobilisation for remaining 2.9m to 4.4m* |
Yes, to determine extent of HM (Pb, Hg) and PAH contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB26 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.8m |
Depth 0.8m ¡V
3.0m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 0.8m to 3.0m to landfill. Immobilisation
if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, to determine extent of HM (Pb, Cu, Zn, Hg) and TPH contamination.* |
TB27 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m and clean soil down to 2.0m |
2.0 to 4.0m |
TCLP test followed by removal of 2.0m to
4.0m to landfill. Immobilisation if TCLP tests exceed criteria **. |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu and Pb) and PAH contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB28 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.4m |
0.4 to 4.4m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) contamination at
edge and base of excavated hole.* |
TB29 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.5m |
0.5 to 3.5m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Cu, Pb, Hg and Zn) contamination at edge
and base of excavated hole.* |
TB30 |
Yes |
Concrete down to 0.6m |
0.6 to 1.6m |
Immobilisation* |
Yes, determine extent of HM (Pb) contamination at edge and base of
excavated hole.* |
Refuse
Bunkers |
Yes |
N/A |
N/A |
Landfill disposal * |
Examine bunker refuse prior to demolition. |
# For location of
boreholes, please refer to Figure 7
of the Permit
* If contamination
confirmed by reassurance sampling extract a further 1m into the soil, immobilise and resample.
** TCLP
test for all metals identified in Table E1 in EPD Contaminated Sites
Investigation and Remediation Guidance Notes
--- END OF APPENDIX A ---
Criteria for
Soil Contamination and Landfill Disposal of Contaminated Soil
(Extracted from Appendix B of the EIA Report, Register No.
AEIAR-058/2002)
Disposal Criteria for
Contaminated Soil
Metals (for on-site reuse)
Parameter |
TCLP
Limit (ppm) |
Cadmium |
10 |
Chromium |
50 |
Copper |
250 |
Nickel |
250 |
Lead |
50 |
Zinc |
250 |
Mercury |
1 |
Tin |
250 |
Silver |
50 |
Antimony |
150 |
Arsenic |
50 |
Beryllium |
10 |
Thallium |
50 |
Vanadium |
250 |
Selenium |
1 |
Barium |
1000 |
Source :
Guidance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites (EPD TR1
/ 99).
Metals
Toxicity
Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test for materials contaminated with
heavy metals needs to be carried out in accordance with the testing frequency
and requirements as stipulated in EPD¡¦s Guidance Notes for Investigation and
Remediation of Contaminated Sites.
TPH and PAH
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) tests for TPH, PAH and BTEX
contaminated materials have to be carried out according to the testing
frequency and requirements as stipulated in EPD¡¦s ¡§Guidance Notes for
Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites. Pre-treatment is required to bring
levels of TPH to below the TCLP limit of 2,500ppm PAH/BTEX to below the TCLP
limit 1,000ppm.
Dioxins and Furans (PCDD/PCDF)
Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) tests for PCDD/PCDF contaminated
materials have to be carried out with reference to the
requirements as stipulated in EPD¡¦s Guidance Notes for Investigation and
Remediation of Contaminated Sites.
Pre-treatment is required to bring levels of PCDD/PCDF to below the TCLP
limit of 1ppb PCDD/PCDF (TEQ), subject to TCLP confirmation at a frequency of 1
sample per 100 tonnes of stabilised
materials.
N.B.
TEQ = toxicity
equivalent units.
ppm = mg/kg (miligrams / kilogram)
ppm = mg/g (micrograms
/ gram)
ppb = ng/g (nanograms
/ gram)
ppb = 1000pg/g (picograms / gram)
---
END OF APPENDIX B ---
For Phase 2 of the Project
Remediation Methods[1]
The following remediation methods are recommended for
the 3 different types of contaminated soil:
¡ Type
A contaminated soil (Heavy Metals): Cement solidification, test, on-site
backfilling.
¡ Type
B contaminated soil (Hydrocarbons): Biopiling, test,
on-site backfilling.
¡ Type
C contaminated soil (Heavy Metals and Hydrocarbons): Biopiling
followed by cement solidification, test, on-site backfilling.
The contaminated soil would be excavated and transported
to the corresponding designated areas on-site for appropriate remediation.
Trucks would carry the excavated contaminated soil into the stockpiling areas
or remediation works areas for temporary storage or treatment respectively. Graphic C1
indicates the workflow during remediation works.
Graphic
C1: Flow Chart for Remediation Works
|
Typical Site Layout[2]
A
schematic layout of a typical arrangement for all the works including
excavation, cement solidification plant, biopile and
stockpiling areas for different types of soil is shown in Graphic C2.
Graphic
C2: Schematic Diagram of Typical Site
Layout
|
Table C1: Universal Treatment Standards
for On-site Reuse of Cement Solidification Treated Soil
Parameter |
TCLP
Limit (mg/L) |
Antimony |
1.15 |
Arsenic |
5 |
Barium |
21 |
Cadmium |
0.11 |
Chromium (total) |
0.6 |
Lead |
0.75 |
Mercury (all
others) |
0.025 |
Nickel |
11 |
Zinc |
4.3 |
Note: (1) Universal Treatment Standard: US 40 CFR 268.48.
(2)
For other RBRGs metal contaminants Cobalt,
Copper, Manganese, Molybdenum and Tin, they must be reduced by at least 90
percent in mobility for respective metals through cement solidification
remediation treatment. The reduction of mobility of metal contaminants
(leachable metals contaminants) should be confirmed through TCLP tests (i.e. to carry out TCLP test for the untreated soil and for
the soil after treatment and to compare the concentrations of the metals in the
leachates).
(3)
The TCLP test for the concerned metal(s) will
be tested both for untreated soil and for soil after treatment in order to
confirm that the requirement of Note (2) can be complied with (i.e. reduced by at least 90 percent in mobility for the
respective metal(s) through cement solidification remediation treatment).
Criteria for Treated Soil from Biopile[4]
Table C2: Soil
Clean-up Targets for Biopile Closure Assessment
Parameter |
Soil
RBRGs ¡V Urban Residential / Rural Residential (mg/kg) |
PAH |
|
Benzo(a)anthracene |
11.4 |
Benzo(a)pyrene |
1.14 |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene |
9.88 |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene |
114 |
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene |
1.14 |
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene |
11.4 |
Petroleum
Carbon Ranges |
(PCR/TPH) |
C6 - C8 |
545 |
C9 - C16 |
1,330 |
C17 -
C35 |
10,000 |
Key Mitigation Measures[5]
During excavation, the Contractor shall adopt the following measures:
¡ Properly
design and execute excavation profile;
¡ Fence
off the contaminated area throughout the period of remediation works;
¡ Take
precautions when controlling ground settlement, groundwater and wastewater;
¡ Avoid
temporary stockpiling as far as practical. In case temporary storage is needed,
contaminated soil should be placed in designated area paved with either
concrete or lined with impermeable sheeting, bunded and covered properly with
tarpaulins to prevent cross-contamination of different types of contaminated soil;
¡ Supply
of suitable backfill materials after excavation;
¡ Implement
speed control for vehicles travelling on site;
¡ Properly
decontaminate machineries and vehicles before excavating or taking different
contaminated soil and leaving the excavation zone.
The following mitigation measures shall be followed
during remediation works:
¡ The
loading, unloading, handling and storage of cement should be carried out in an
enclosed environment;
¡ The
loading, unloading, handling, transfer or storage of
materials that may generate airborne dust emissions such as untreated soil and
oversize materials sorted out from screening plant and stabilised
soil stockpiled in designated area should be carried out in such a manner to
prevent or minimise dust emissions.
¡ All
practical measures, including but not limited to speed control for vehicles,
should be taken to minimise dust emissions;
¡ Simultaneous
operation of mixing facilities and other equipment shall be avoided as far as
possible to minimise unnecessary generation of noise nuisance;
¡ Stockpile
of untreated soil shall be covered as far as practicable;
¡ Treated
oversize materials can be used as backfilling material for on-site backfilling.
Sorted materials of size smaller than 5cm will be collected and transferred to
the mixing plant for further remediation;
¡ Treated
soils can be broken down into suitable size for on-site backfilling purpose;
¡ Water
used in installation of pipe piles should as far as practicable be recirculated
after sedimentation. Excess wastewater should go through silt removal
facilities before discharge. The Contractor would be required to obtain a
license from EPD under the WPCO for discharge to the public drainage system.
¡ Housekeeping
should be maintained at all times at the mixing plant as well as among other
remediation facilities;
¡ Visual
inspection and rinsing (if needed) of any contaminated soil adhered on the
broken concrete slab surface are recommended; and
¡ A
clear separation between treated and untreated materials is recommended.
Furthermore, physical separation of the temporary stockpiles of different types
of soils in clearly designated areas with appropriate signage and fencing
should be provided.
---
END OF APPENDIX C ---
Typical Cross Section and Oblique View of a Biopile[6]
Graphic
D1: General Cross-Section and Oblique View
of a Biopile for indicative purpose |
||
Header pipe connecting to blower and system control
|
||
|
---
END OF APPENDIX D ---
¡ (Extracted
from Table 2.1 of
¡§Guidance Manual for Use of
Risk-Based Remediation Goals¡¨ for Contaminated Land Management¡¨ )
--- END OF APPENDIX E ---
[1] This part was prepared based
on Section 7.7 and Graphic 7.1 of the EIA Report (Register No.:
AEIAR-188/2015).
[2] This part was prepared based on the application
for Variation of Environmental Permit submitted on 3 December 2021 (Application
No. VEP-608/2021).
[3] This table was prepared based on Table 4.7 of the Appendix 7.2 of the
EIA Report (Register No.: AEIAR-188/2015).
[4] This table was prepared based on Table 4.6 of the Appendix 7.2 of the
EIA Report (Register No.: AEIAR-188/2015).
[5] This part was prepared based on S.7.8.2 of the EIA Report (Register No.:
AEIAR-188/2015).
[6] This part was prepared based on Graphic 3.1 of the EIA Report (Register
No.: AEIAR-188/2015).