WEST
KOWLOON RECLAMATION
CONTRACT
NO. WK30
REMAINING
ROADWORK STAGE 4
-
LINK
ROADS G & L
FINAL
EM&A MANUAL
40th Floor Hopewell Centre
183 Queen’s Road East
Wanchai
Hong Kong
Telephone (852) 2828 5757
Fax (852) 2827 1823
CONTENTS
Page No.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
- 1
1.1 Purpose of the Manual 1
- 1
1.2 Background 1
- 1
1.3 Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Requirements 1
- 2
1.4 Project Organisation 1
- 3
1.5 Construction Programme 1
- 4
2. AIR QUALITY 2
- 1
2.1 Introduction 2
- 1
2.2 Air Quality Parameters 2
- 1
2.3 Monitoring Equipment 2
- 1
2.4 Laboratory Measurement / Analysis 2
- 2
2.5 Monitoring Locations 2
- 3
2.6 Baseline Monitoring 2
- 4
2.7 Impact Monitoring 2
- 5
2.8 Event and Action Plan for Air Quality 2
- 5
2.9 Dust Mitigation Measures 2
- 8
3. NOISE 3
- 1
3.1 Introduction 3
- 1
3.2 Noise Parameters 3
- 1
3.3 Monitoring Equipment 3
- 1
3.4 Monitoring Locations 3
- 1
3.5 Baseline Monitoring 3
- 2
3.6 Impact Monitoring 3
- 2
3.7 Event and Action Plan for Noise 3
- 3
3.8 Noise Mitigation Measures 3
- 5
4. WASTE
MANAGEMENT 4
- 1
4.1 Introduction 4
- 1
4.2 Waste Mitigation Measures 4
- 1
5. SITE ENVIRONMENTAL
AUDIT 5
- 1
5.1 Site Inspections 5
- 1
5.2 Compliance with Legal and Contractual
Requirements 5
- 2
5.3 Environmental Complaints 5
- 2
6. REPORTING 6
- 1
6.1 General 6
- 1
6.2 Baseline Monitoring Report 6
- 1
6.3 EM&A Reports 6
- 2
6.4 Data Keeping 6
- 7
6.5 Interim Notifications of Environmental
Quality Limit Exceedances 6
- 7
7. OPERATION
PHASE EM&A 7
- 1
7.1 Introduction 7
- 1
7.2 Operational Phase Noise Monitoring 7
- 1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Sensitive
Receivers
Table 1.2 Cut
and Fill Balance for Construction
Table 2.1 Dust Monitoring Stations
Table 2.2 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Table
2.3 Event/Action Plan for Air
Quality
Table
3.1 Noise Monitoring Stations
Table 3.2 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table
3.3 Event/Action Plan for
Construction Noise
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.2 Sensitive
Receivers Locations
Figure 1.3 Project
Organisation and Lines of Communication
Figure 5.1 Complaint
Response Procedures
ANNEX
Annex A Implementation
Schedule
Annex B Implementation
Status Proforma
The purpose of this
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual, hereafter referred to as
the Manual, is to guide the setup of an EM&A programme to ensure compliance
with the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study recommendations, to assess
the effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures and to identify any
further need for additional mitigation measures or remedial action. This Manual outlines the monitoring and audit
programme proposed for the West Kowloon Reclamation Contract WK30 Link Roads
G&L.
This Manual contains the
following:
a)
responsibilities
of the Contractor, the Engineer or Engineer's Representative (ER) Independent
Checker (Environmental) and Environmental Team (ET) with respect to the environmental
monitoring and audit requirements during the course of the project;
b)
information
on project organisation and programming of construction activities for the
project;
c)
the
hypotheses of potential impacts, the basis for and description of the broad approach
underlying the environmental monitoring and audit programme;
d)
requirements
with respect to the construction schedule and the necessary environmental
monitoring and audit programme to track the varying environmental impacts;
e)
the
specific questions and testable hypotheses that the monitoring programme is
designed to answer;
f)
details
of the methodologies to be adopted, including all field, laboratory and
analytical procedures, and details on quality assurance and quality control
programme;
g)
the
rationale on which the environmental monitoring data will be evaluated and
interpreted and the details of the
statistical procedures that will be used to interpret the data;
h)
definition
of Action and Limit levels (AL Levels);
i)
establishment
of Event and Action Plans;
j)
requirements
for reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of
non-compliance of the environmental criteria and complaints;
k)
requirements
for presentation of environmental monitoring and audit data and appropriate
reporting procedures; and
l)
requirements
for review of EIA predictions and effectiveness of the environmental monitoring
and audit programme.
For the purpose of this
Manual, the "Engineer" shall refer to the Engineer as defined in the
Contract and the Engineer's Representative (ER), in cases where the Engineer's
powers have been delegated to the ER, in accordance with the Contract. The ET leader, who shall be responsible for
and in charge of the ET, shall refer to the person delegated the role of
executing the environmental monitoring and audit requirements.
The Territory Development
Department has commissioned Mott MacDonald to undertake the Environmental
Impact Assessment for Link Roads G&L.
The project site and boundary is shown in Figure 1.1.
The objectives of the EIA
Study are as follows:
(i)
to
describe the proposed project and associated works together with the
requirements for carrying out the proposed project;
(ii)
to
identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to
be affected by the proposed project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to
the proposed project, including both the natural and man-made environment;
(iii)
to
identify and quantify emission sources and determine the significance of
impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;
(iv)
to
propose the provision of infrastructure or mitigation measures so as to
minimize pollution, environment disturbance and nuisance during construction
and operation of the project;
(v)
to
identify, predict and evaluate the residual (i.e. after practicable mitigation)
environmental impacts and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the
construction and operation phases of the project in relation to the sensitive
receivers and potential affected uses;
(vi)
to
identify, assesses and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included
in the detailed design, construction and operation of the project which are
necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and to reduce them to
acceptable levels;
(vii)
to
investigate the extent of side-effects of proposed mitigation measures that may
lead to other forms of impacts;
(viii)
to
identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the
EIA study;
(ix)
to
design and specify the environmental monitoring and audit requirements, if
required, to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the
environmental protection and pollution control measures adopted; and
(x)
to
identify, within the study area, any individual project(s) that fall under
Schedule 2 of the EIA Ordinance; to ascertain whether the findings of this EIA
study have adequately addressed the environmental impacts of those projects;
and where necessary, to identify the outstanding issues that need to be
addressed in any further detailed EIA studies.
In this Section, a summary
of the EIA findings is presented, and the requirements and scope of the
EM&A are discussed below. Details
of the recommended mitigation measures as implementation schedule are described
in Annex A.
Air Quality
The construction work will
inevitably lead to dust emissions, mainly from excavation, truck haulage and
material handling. It is predicted
that the dust generated will exceed the hourly and daily criteria of 500 µgm-3
and 260 µgm-3
respectively at the some ASRs. Dust
control measures have therefore been recommended to minimise dust nuisance from
the works.
Noise
Monitoring is required to
ensure compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) in
providing feedback to the Contractors for the management of their
operations. It was recommended that
noise monitoring be carried out as part of the EM&A programme during the
construction period of Link roads G&L and for one year following the
completion of construction in order to monitor road traffic noise levels.
Sensitive
Receivers
Representative air and noise
sensitive receivers, as defined in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental
Impact Assessment have been identified in the EIA Assessment Report and are
listed in Table
1.1. Both the existing and
planned receivers are included in the list.
The locations of these noise and sensitive receivers (NSR and ASR) are
shown in Figure
1.2.
Table 1.1 Sensitive Receivers
Description |
NSR |
ASR |
Mei
Foo Sun Chuen, Phase 3 (Block 90) Mei
Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8 (Block 104) Mei
Foo Sun Chuen, Phase 8 (Block 112) Mei
Foo Sun Chuen, Phase 8 (Block 132) Mei
Foo Sun Chuen, Phase 8 (Block 128) |
MF1 MF2 MF3 MF4 MF5 |
ASR8 ASR9 ASR10 ASR11 ASR12 ASR13 |
KMB
Bus Depot CDA Site (Tower 1) KMB
Bus Depot CDA Site (Tower 2) KMB
Bus Depot CDA Site (Tower 3) |
KMB1 KMB2 KMB3 |
ASR14 ASR15 ASR16 |
Site
10-Residential Blocks, Phase 1 (Block 3) Site
10-Residential Blocks, Phase 1 (Block 4) Site
10-Residential Blocks, Phase 2 (Block 5) Site
10-Residential Blocks, Phase 2 (Block 6) Site
10-Residential Blocks, Phase 2 (Block 7) Site
10 – School Playground |
10S1 10S2 10S3 10S4 10S5 10S6 |
ASR1 ASR2 ASR3 ASR4 ASR5 ASR6 ASR7 |
The project organisation and
lines of communication with respect to environmental protection works is shown
in Figure 1.3.
The Environmental Team (ET)
shall not be in any way an associated body of the Contractor. The ET leader shall have relevant
professional qualifications, or have sufficient relevant EM&A experience
subject to approval of the Engineer's Representative (ER) and the Environmental
Protection Department (EPD).
Appropriate staff shall be
included in the ET, under the supervision of the ET Leader, to fulfil the
EM&A duties of the ET Leader specified in this manual. Basically, the duties comprise the
following:
a)
To
monitor the various environmental parameters as required in EIA study final
report;
b)
To
investigate and audit the Contractors' equipment and work methodologies with
respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation, and anticipate
environmental issues for proactive action before problems arise;
c)
To
audit and prepare audit reports on the environmental monitoring data and the
site environmental conditions; and
d)
To
report on the environmental monitoring and audit results to the Contractor, the
ER, and the EPD or its delegate.
Appropriate resources shall
also be allocated under the Contractor and the ER to fulfil their duties
specified in this manual.
The Independent Checker
(Environmental), IC(E), shall be an independent person or company with a
minimum of 7 years EIA experience and proven track record in EM&A similar
to the scope proposed in this Manual.
A preliminary project
programme is shown in Figure 1.4
The major construction
activities are excavation, road widening and paving/finishing.
It is expected that
construction works will generally be carried out 12 hours a day (07:00 - 19:00
hrs).
Table 1.2 presents the cut and fill balance for the materials generated from the
construction of the Project.
Table 1.2 Cut and Fill
Balance for Construction
Activity |
Material Type |
Likely time of arising |
Estimated total volumes generated |
Construction Phase |
|||
Ground preparatory works |
Site clearance |
Jul 01 - Aug 01 |
Coverage 58177m2 |
|
Demolition materials |
Aug 01 - Dec 01 |
1000m3 |
Earthworks |
Excavated materials |
Aug 01 - Apr 02 |
1000m3 |
General works |
Construction waste |
Throughout construction
period |
1000m3 |
|
Chemical waste |
Throughout construction
period |
max. 450 litre/month |
|
General refuse
(generated by site staff) |
Throughout construction
period |
660kg/week (assumes max of 100
staff and a 6 day week) |
In this section, the
methodology, equipment, monitoring locations, criteria and protocols for the
monitoring and audit of air quality impacts during the construction phase. The impact of fugitive dust on ambient air
pollution depends on the quantity, as well as the drift potential of the dust
particles injected into the atmosphere.
Large dust particles will settle out near the source and particles that
are 30 - 100 µm in diameter are likely to settle within a distance of 100
m from the source depending on
atmospheric turbulence. The main dust
impact will arise from the fine particles of a diameter less than 30 µm,
measured as TSP, dispersed over great distance from the sources. TSP levels shall, therefore, be monitored to
evaluate the dust impact during the construction. The objectives of TSP monitoring shall be:
· to identify the extent of
construction dust impacts on sensitive receiver;
· to determine the
effectiveness of mitigation measures to control dust from construction
activities;
· to recommend further
mitigation measures if found to be necessary; and
· to comply with AL Levels for
air quality as defined in this Manual.
Monitoring and audit of the
TSP levels shall be carried out by the ET to ensure that any deteriorating air
quality could be readily detected and timely actions taken to rectify the
situation.
1-hour and 24-hour TSP
levels shall be measured to indicate the impacts of construction dust on air
quality. The TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix
B. Upon approval of the ER, 1-hour TSP
levels can be measured by direct reading methods which are capable of producing
comparable results such as the high volume sampling method, to indicate short
event impacts.
All relevant data including
temperature, pressure, weather conditions, elapsed-time meter reading for the
start and stop of the sampler, identification and weight of the filter paper,
and other special phenomena and work progress of the concerned site etc. shall
be recorded down in details. A sample
data sheet is shown in Annex A.
High volume sampler (HVS) in
compliance with the following specifications shall be used for carrying out the
1-hr and 24-hr TSP monitoring:
a)
0.6
– 1.7 m3/min (20-60 SCFM) adjustable flow range;
b)
equipped
with a timing/control device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours
operation;
c)
installed
with elapsed-time meter with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
d)
capable
of providing a minimum exposed area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
e)
flow
control accuracy: +/- 2.5% deviation over 24-hr sampling period;
f)
equipped
with a shelter to protect the filter and sampler;
g)
incorporated
with an electronic mass flow rate controller or other equivalent devices;
h)
equipped
with a flow recorder for continuous monitoring;
i)
provided
with a peaked roof inlet;
j)
incorporated
with a manometer;
k)
able
to hold and seal the filter paper to the sampler housing at horizontal
position;
l)
easy
to change the filter; and capable of operating continuously for 24-hr period.
The ET Leader is responsible
for provision of the monitoring equipment.
He shall ensure that sufficient number of HVSs with an appropriate
calibration kit are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular
impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring.
The HVSs shall be equipped with an electronic mass flow controller and
be calibrated against a traceable standard at regular intervals. All the equipment, calibration kit, filter
papers, etc. shall be clearly labelled.
Initial calibration of dust
monitoring equipment shall be conducted upon installation and thereafter at
bi-monthly intervals. The transfer
standard shall be traceable to the internationally recognised primary standard
and be calibrated annually. The
calibration data shall be properly documented for future reference by the
concerned parties such as the IC(E).
All the data shall be converted into standard temperature and pressure
condition.
The flow-rate of the sampler
before and after the sampling exercise with the filter in position shall be
verified to be constant and be recorded down in the data sheet as mentioned in Annex A.
If the ET Leader proposes to
use a direct reading dust meter to measure 1-hr TSP levels, he shall submit sufficient
information to the IC(E) to prove that the instrument is capable of achieving a
comparable result as that the HVS and may be used for the 1-hr sampling. The instrument shall also be calibrated
regularly, and the 1-hr sampling shall be determined periodically by HVS to
check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading
method.
In exceptional situations,
the ET Leader may propose alternative methods to obtain representative wind
data upon approval from the ER and agreement from IC(E).
A clean laboratory with
constant temperature and humidity control, and equipped with necessary
measuring and conditioning instruments, to handle the dust samples collected,
shall be available for sample analysis, and equipment calibration and
maintenance. The laboratory shall be
HOKLAS accredited or other internationally accredited laboratory.
If a site laboratory is set
up or a non-HOKLAS accredited laboratory is hired for carrying out the
laboratory analysis, the laboratory equipment shall be approved by the ER in
consultation with the IC(E).
Measurement performed by the laboratory shall be demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the ER and the IC(E). IC(E) shall conduct regular audit to the
measurement performed by the laboratory to ensure the accuracy of measurement
results. The ET Leader shall be provide the ER with one copy of the Title 40 of
the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B for his
reference.
Filter paper of size
8"x 10" shall be labelled before sampling. It shall be a clean filter paper with no pin holes, and shall be
conditioned in a humidity controlled chamber for over 24-hr and be pre-weighed
before use for the sampling.
After sampling, the filter
paper loaded with dust shall be kept in a clean and tightly sealed plastic
bag. The filter paper is then returned
to the laboratory for reconditioning in the humidity controlled chamber
followed by accurate weighing by an electronic balance with a readout down to
0.1 mg. The balance shall be regularly
calibrated against a traceable standard.
All the collected samples
shall be kept in a good condition for 6 months before disposal.
The dust monitoring
locations are summarised in Table 2.1. The status and locations of dust sensitive
receivers may change after issuing this manual. If such cases exist, the ET Leader shall propose updated
monitoring locations and seek approval from ER and agreement from the IC(E).
Table 2.1 Dust Monitoring
Stations
Location |
Monitoring
Station |
Description |
Mei Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8 (Block 112) |
ASR 10 |
Residential |
Mei Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8 (Block 128) |
ASR 12 |
Residential |
When alternative monitoring
locations are proposed, the following criteria, as far as practicable, shall be
followed:
a)
at
the site boundary or such locations close to the major dust emission source;
b)
close
to the sensitive receptors; and
c)
take
into account the prevailing meteorological conditions.
The ET Leader shall agree
with the ER in consultation with the IC(E) the position of the HVS for
installation of the monitoring equipment.
When positioning the samplers, the following points shall be noted:
a)
a
horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the samplers against
gusty wind shall be provided;
b)
no
two samplers shall be placed less than 2 meter apart;
c)
the
distance between the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, must be at
least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
d)
a
minimum of 2 metres of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is
required for rooftop samplers;
e)
a
minimum of 2 metre separation from any supporting structure, measured
horizontally is required;
f)
no
furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
g)
airflow
around the sampler is unrestricted;
h)
the
sampler is more than 20 metres from the dripline;
i)
any
wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler, shall not cause any obstruction
during monitoring;
j)
permission
must be obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring
stations; and
k)
a
secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the samplers.
The ET Leader shall carry
out baseline monitoring at all of the designated monitoring locations for at
least 14 consecutive days prior to the commissioning of the construction works
to obtain daily 24-hr TSP samples. 1-hr
sampling shall also be carried out at least 3 times per day while the highest
dust impact is expected. Before commencing the baseline monitoring, the ET
leader shall inform the IC(E) of the baseline monitoring programme such that
the IC(E) can conduct on-site audit to ensure accuracy of the baseline
monitoring results.
During the baseline
monitoring, there shall not be any construction or dust generation activities
in the vicinity of the monitoring stations.
In case the baseline
monitoring cannot be carried out at the designated monitoring locations during
the baseline monitoring period, the ET Leader shall carry out the monitoring at
alternative locations which can effectively represent the baseline conditions
at the impact monitoring locations. The
alternative baseline monitoring locations shall be approved by the ER and
agreed with the IC(E).
In exceptional case, when
insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are obtained, the
ET Leader shall liaise with the IC(E) and EPD to agree on an appropriate set of
data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to ER for approval.
Ambient
conditions may vary seasonally and shall be reviewed at three monthly
intervals. If the ET Leader considers
that the ambient conditions have been changed and a repeat of the baseline
monitoring is required to be carried out for obtaining the updated baseline
levels, the monitoring shall be at times when the contractor's activities are not
generating dust, at least in the proximity of the monitoring stations. Should change in ambient conditions be
determined, the baseline levels and, in turn, the air quality criteria, shall
be revised. The revised baseline levels
and air quality criteria shall be agreed with the IC(E) and EPD.
The ET Leader shall carry
out impact monitoring during the course of the Works. For regular impact monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least
once in every six-days, shall be strictly observed at all the monitoring
stations for 24-hr TSP monitoring. For
1-hr TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least three times in every
six-days shall be undertaken when the highest dust impact occurs. Before
commencing the baseline monitoring, the ET leader shall inform the IC(E) of the
impact monitoring programme such that the IC(E) can conduct on-site audit to
ensure accuracy of the impact monitoring results.
The specific time to start
and stop the 24-hr TSP monitoring shall be clearly defined for each location
and be strictly followed by the operator.
In case of non-compliance
with the air quality criteria, more frequent monitoring exercise, as specified
in the Action Plan in Section 2.8,
shall be conducted within 24 hours after the result is obtained. This additional monitoring shall be
continued until the excessive dust emission or the deterioration in air quality
is rectified.
The baseline monitoring
results form the basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact
monitoring. The ET Leader shall compare
the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up for 24-hour TSP
and 1-hour TSP. Table 2.2 shows the air quality criteria, namely Action and Limit
(AL) Levels to be used. Should
non-compliance of the air quality criteria occurs, actions in accordance with
the Action Plan in Table 2.3 shall be
carried out.
Table 2.2 Action and Limit
Levels for Air Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit (µg/m³) |
24 Hour TSP Level in µg/m³ |
For baseline level £ 200 µg/m³, Action level = (Baseline level * 1.3 + Limit
level)/2; For baseline level > 200 µg/m³, Action level = Limit Level |
260 |
1 Hour TSP Level in µg/m³ |
For baseline level £ 384 µg/m³, Action level = (Baseline level *1.3 + Limit level)/2 For baseline level > 384 µg/m³, Action level = Limit Level |
500 |
Table 2.3 Event/Action Plan
for Air Quality
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ET Leader |
IC(E) |
ER |
CONTRACTOR |
ACTION LEVEL |
|
|||
1. Exceedance
for one sample |
1. Identify
source 2. Inform
IC(E) and ER 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding 4.
Increase monitoring
frequency to daily |
1. Check monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check
Contractor's working method |
1. Notify
Contractor |
1. Rectify
any unacceptable practice 2. Amend
working methods if appropriate |
2. Exceedance
for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Identify
source 2. Inform
IC(E) and ER 3. Repeat
measurements to confirm findings 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily 5. Discuss
with IC(E) and Contractor on remedial actions
required 6. If
exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IC(E) and ER 7. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1. Checking
monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check
Contractor's working method 3. Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures 4. Advise
the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures 5. Supervisor
implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing 2. Notify
Contractor 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented |
1. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of notification 2. Implement
the agreed proposals 3. Amend
proposal if appropriate |
|
|
|||
|
|
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ET Leader |
IC(E) |
ER |
CONTRACTOR |
LIMIT LEVEL |
|
|||
1. Exceedance
for one sample |
1. Identify
source 2. Inform ER and EPD 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily 5. Assess effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep
IC(E), EPD and ER informed of the results |
1. Checking
monitoring data submitted by ET 2. Check
Contractor's working method 3. Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures 4. Advise
the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures 5. Supervisor
implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing 2. Notify
Contractor 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of notification 3. Implement
the agreed proposals 4. Amend
proposal if appropriate |
2.Exceedance for two or more
consecutive samples |
1. Notify
IC(E), ER, Contractor and EPD 2. Identify
source 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm findings 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily 5. Carry
out analysis of Contractor's working procedures to determine possible
mitigation to be implemented 6. Arrange
meeting with IC(E) and ER to discuss the remedial actions to be taken 7. Assess
effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep IC(E), EPD and ER
informed of the results 8. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1. Discuss
amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions 2. Review
Contractor's remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly 3. Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing 2. Notify
Contractor 3. In consultation with the IC(E), agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures to be implemented 4. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented 5. If
exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and
instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is
abated |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of notification 3. Implement
the agreed proposals 4. Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control 5. Stop
the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is
abated |
The EIA report has
recommended dust control and mitigation measures. The Contractor shall be responsible for the design and
implementation of these measures.
The dust control measures
stipulated in the Air Pollution Control
(Construction Dust) Regulation shall be incorporated in the Contract
Specification and implemented to reduce dust impact to within the acceptable
dust criteria of 500µgm-3 arising from the works. Typical control measures are:
· where breaking of
rock/concrete is required, watering shall be implemented to suppress dust
generation, water spray shall be used during the handling of excavated material
at the site and at active cuts, tunnel construction works, excavation and fill
sites where dust is likely to be created;
· the heights from which
excavated materials are dropped shall be controlled to a minimum practical
height to limit fugitive dust generation from unloading;
· all dusty materials shall be
sprayed with water immediately prior to any loading, unloading or transfer
operation so as to maintain the dusty materials wet:
·
any
stockpiles of aggregate or spoil shall be covered and water applied;
·
vehicle
travel on haul road shall reduced the speed to 20 kph,
· every vehicle shall be
washed to remove any dusty materials from its body and wheels before leaving a
construction site;
· the load on the vehicles
shall be covered entirely by clean impervious sheeting to ensure that the dusty
materials do not leak from the vehicle; and
· the working area of any
excavation shall be sprayed with water before, during and immediately after the
operation so as to maintain the entire surface wet.
The working hours for this
Project are expected to be limited to daytime and no restricted hour
construction work is anticipated. The
monitoring programme shall be carried out by the ET to ensure that the noise
level of construction works complies with the criteria of the Noise Control
Ordinance (NCO) and other adopted noise criteria.
The construction noise level
shall be measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound
pressure level (Leq) Leq(30 min) shall be used as the
monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700-1900 hours on normal
weekdays. For all other time periods, Leq(5
min) shall be employed for comparison with the NCO criteria.
As supplementary information
for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and L90
shall also be obtained for reference. A
sample data record sheet is shown in Annex
A for reference.
As referred to in the
Technical Memorandum (TM) issued under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO), sound
level metres in compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission
Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be
used for carrying out the noise monitoring.
Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy
of the sound level metre shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator
generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only
if the calibration level from before and after the noise measurement agree to
within 1.0 dB (A).
Noise measurements shall not
be made in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5 ms-1
or wind with gusts exceeding 10 ms-1. The wind speed
shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind
speed in m/s.
The ET Leader is responsible
for the provision and maintenance of the monitoring equipment. He shall ensure that sufficient noise
measuring equipment and associated instrumentation are available for carrying
out the baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc
monitoring. All the equipment and
associated instrumentation shall be clearly labelled.
The noise monitoring
locations are summarised in Table 3.1. The status and locations of noise sensitive
receivers may change after issuing this manual. If such cases exist, the ET Leader shall propose updated
monitoring locations and seek approval from ER, and agreement from the IC(E)
and EPD of the proposal.
Table 3.1 Noise Monitoring
Stations
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Mei Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8 (Block 112) |
MF3 |
Residential |
Mei Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8 (Block 128) |
MF5 |
Residential |
When alternative monitoring
locations are proposed, the monitoring locations shall be chosen based on the
following criteria:
a)
at
locations close to the major site activities which are likely to have noise
impacts;
b)
close
to the noise sensitive receivers (N.B. For the purposes of this section, any
domestic premises, hotel, hostel, temporary housing accommodation, hospital,
medical clinic, educational institution, place of public worship, library,
court of law, performing art centre shall be considered as a noise sensitive
receiver); and
c)
for
monitoring locations located in the vicinity of the sensitive receivers, care
shall be taken to cause minimal disturbance to the occupants during monitoring.
The monitoring station shall
normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers building
facade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground. If there is a problem with access to the normal monitoring
position, an alternative position may be chosen, and a correction to the
measurements shall be made. For
reference, a correction of +3dB(A) shall be made to the free field
measurements. The ET Leader shall agree
with the IC(E) on the monitoring position and the corrections adopted. Once the positions for the monitoring
stations are chosen, the baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring shall be
carried out at the same positions.
The ET Leader shall carry
out baseline noise monitoring prior to the commencement of the construction
works. The baseline monitoring shall be
carried out daily for a period of at least two weeks. A schedule on the baseline monitoring shall be submitted to the
ER for approval before the monitoring starts.
There shall not be any
construction activities in the vicinity of the stations during the baseline
monitoring. Baseline monitoring
measurements shall be evenly spread throughout the assessment period to be
conducted at the some frequency and duration throughout all periods of the day
for which works are anticipated to be constructed (eg. daytime, evening and
nighttime).
In exceptional cases, when
insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are obtained, the
ET Leader shall liaise with EPD to agree on an appropriate set of data to be
used as a baseline reference and submit to the ER for approval.
Noise monitoring shall be
carried out, by the ET Leader, at all the designated monitoring stations. The monitoring frequency shall depend on the
scale of the construction activities.
The following is an initial guide on the regular monitoring frequency
for each station on a per week basis when noise generating activities are
underway:
a) one set of measurements between 0700-1900
hours on normal weekdays;
b) one set of measurements between 1900-2300
hours;
c) one set of measurements between 2300-0700
hours of next day; and
d) one set of measurements between 0700-1900
hours on holidays.
General construction work
carried out during restricted hours is controlled by CNP system under the NCO.
For the measurements (b),
(c) and (d) above, one set of measurements shall at least include 3 consecutive
Leq(5 min) results.
In case of non-compliance
with the construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring as specified in
the Action Plan in Section 3.7 shall
be carried out. This additional
monitoring shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or
proved to be irrelevant to the construction activities.
The AL Levels for
construction noise are defined in Table
3.2. Should non-compliance of the
criteria occurs, action in accordance with the Action Plan in Table 3.3, shall be carried out.
Table 3.2 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Time Period |
Action |
Limit |
0700-1900 hrs on
normal weekdays |
When one
documented complaint is received |
75* dB(A) |
0700-2300 hrs on
holidays; and 1900-2300 hrs on all other days |
|
60/65/70** dB(A) |
2300-0700 hrs of
next day |
|
45/50/55** dB(A) |
* Reduce to
70 dB(A) for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination periods.
** To be selected based on Area Sensitivity Rating.
Table 3.3 Event/Action
Plan for Construction Noise
EVENT |
ACTION |
|
|
|
|
ET Leader |
IC(E) |
ER |
Contractor |
Action Level |
1. Notify IC(E) and Contractor 2. Carry out investigation 3. Report the results of investigation to the
IC(E) and Contractor 4. Discuss with the Contractor and formulate
remedial measures 5. Increase monitoring frequency to check
mitigation effectiveness |
1. Review the analysed results submitted by
the ET 2. Review the proposed remedial measures by
the Contractor and advise the ER accordingly 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial
measures |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure
in writing 2. Notify Contractor 3. Require Contractor to propose remedial
measures for the analysed noise problem 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented |
1. Submit noise mitigation proposals to IC(E) 2. Implement noise mitigation proposals |
Limit
Level |
1. Notify
IC(E), ER, EPD and Contractor 2. Identify
source 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm findings 4. Increase
monitoring frequency 5. Carry
out analysis of Contractor's working procedures to determine possible
mitigation to be implemented 6. Inform
IC(E), ER and EPD the causes & actions taken for the exceedances 7. Assess
effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep IC(E), EPD and ER
informed of the results 8. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
1. Discuss amongst ER, ET, and Contractor
on the potential remedial actions 2. Review Contractor's remedial actions
whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness and advise the ER
accordingly 3.
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing 2. Notify
Contractor 3. Require
Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem 4. Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented 5. If
exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and
instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is
abated |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working
days of notification 3. Implement the agreed proposals 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until
the exceedance is abated |
The EIA Report has recommended construction noise
control and mitigation measures. The Contractor shall be responsible for the
design and implementation of these measures.
Noise emissions from construction sites can be
minimised through good site practice and selecting quiet plant. These methods
are discussed in the following paragraphs.
Good Site Practice
Good site practice and noise management can
considerably reduce the impact of construction site activities on nearby
NSRs. The following package of measures
shall be followed during each phase of construction:
·
only
well-maintained plant shall be operated on-site and plant shall be serviced
regularly during the construction works;
·
machines
and plant that may be in intermittent use shall be shut down between work
periods or shall be throttled down to a minimum;
·
plant
known to emit noise strongly in one direction, shall, where possible, be
orientated to direct noise away from nearby NSRs;
·
mobile
plant shall be sited as far away from NSRs as possible; and
·
material
stockpiles and other structures shall be effectively utilised, where
practicable, to screen noise from on-site construction activities.
Selecting Quieter Plant and Working Methods
The Contractor may be able
to obtain particular models of plant that are quieter than standard types given
in the GW-TM. The benefits achievable
for each of the measures proposed will depend on the details of the
Contractors' chosen methods of working, and it is considered too restrictive to
specify items of plant that a Contractor has to use during construction
activities. It is therefore both
preferable and practical to specify an overall plant noise performance
specification to apply to the total SWL of all plant on the site, so that the
Contractor is allowed some flexibility to select plant to suit his needs.
Use of Temporary and Movable Noise Barriers
Movable barriers could be
very effective in providing noise screening from a particular plant. It is anticipated that a 3m high movable
noise barrier with a skid footing and a small cantilevered upper portion can be
located within a few metres of plant.
It is estimated that movable noise barrier of this type, if carefully
located, can produce at least 10 dB(A) screening for stationary plant and 5
dB(A) for mobile plant.
Reducing the Number of Plant Operating On-site Close to NSRs.
It shall be noted that various types of silenced
equipment can be found in Hong Kong.
However, the EPD, when processing a CNP application, will apply the
noise levels contained in the relevant statutory TM, unless the noise emission
of a particular piece of equipment can be validated by certificate or
demonstration.
If the above measures are not sufficient to restore
the construction noise quality to an acceptable levels upon the advice of ET
Leader, the Contractor shall liaise with the ET Leader on some other mitigation
measures, propose to ER for approval, and carry out the mitigation measures.
The Contractor is
responsible for waste control within the construction site, removal of waste material produced by the
site and the implementation of any mitigation measures to minimise waste or
redress problems arising from site waste.
The waste material may include any sewage, waste water or effluent
containing sand, cement, silt or any other suspended or dissolved material
flowing from the site into any storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or any waste matter
or refuse deposited anywhere within the site or onto any adjoining land.
The proposed re-use,
recycling, storage, collection, transport and disposal methods for various
wastes which are recommended to avoid or minimise potential adverse impacts are
detailed below. Specifically, it is
recommended that during the construction phase, the Contractor incorporate the
recommendations into an on-site waste management plan.
The Contractor shall also
pay attention to the Waste Disposal Ordinance and its subsidiary regulations,
the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance and the Water Pollution
Control Ordinance, and carry out the appropriate waste management work. The relevant license/permit, such as the
effluent discharge license, the chemical waste producer registration, etc.
shall be obtained. The Contractor shall
refer to the relevant booklets issued by EPD when applying for the license/permit.
During the site inspections
and the document review procedures as mentioned in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this manual, the ET Leader shall pay
special attention to the issues relating to waste management, and check whether
the Contractor has followed the relevant contract specifications and the
procedures specified under the laws of Hong Kong.
This section sets out recycling, storage,
transportation and disposal measures which are recommended to avoid or minimise
potential adverse impacts associated with waste arising from the construction
of Link Roads G&L. The contractor
shall incorporate these recommendations into a comprehensive on‑site
waste management plan. Such a
management plan shall incorporate site specific factors, such as the
designation of areas for the segregation and temporary storage of reusable and
recyclable materials.
Waste Management Hierarchy
The various waste management options can be
categorised in terms of preference from an environmental viewpoint. The options considered to be more preferable
have the least impacts and are more sustainable in the longer term. Hence, the hierarchy is as follows:
·
avoidance
and minimisation, ie not generating waste through changing or improving
practices and design;
·
reuse
of materials, thus avoiding disposal (generally with only limited
reprocessing);
·
recovery
and recycling, thus avoiding disposal (although reprocessing may be required);
and
·
treatment
and disposal, according to relevant laws, guidelines and good practice.
The Contractor shall consult
the EPD on the final disposal of wastes.
This hierarchy shall be used
to evaluate waste management options, thus allowing maximum waste reduction and
often reducing costs. Waste reduction
measures shall be introduced at the design stage and carried through the
construction activities, wherever possible, by careful purchasing control,
reuse of formworks and good site management.
By reducing or eliminating over‑ordering of construction
materials, waste is avoided and costs are reduced both in terms of purchasing
of raw materials and in disposing of wastes.
Training and instruction of
construction staff shall be given at the site to increase awareness and draw
attention to waste management issues and the need to minimise waste
generation. The training requirement
shall be included in the site waste management plan.
Storage, Collection and Transport of Waste
Permitted waste hauliers
shall be used to collect and transport wastes to the appropriate disposal
points. The following measures to
minimise adverse impacts shall be instigated:
·
handle
and store wastes in a manner which ensures that they are held securely without
loss or leakage, thereby minimising the potential for pollution;
·
use
waste hauliers authorised or licensed to collect specific category of waste;
·
remove
wastes in a timely manner;
·
maintain
and clean waste storage areas regularly;
·
minimise
windblown litter and dust during transportation by either covering trucks or
transporting wastes in enclosed containers;
·
obtain
the necessary waste disposal permits from the appropriate authorities, if they
are required, in accordance with the Waste
Disposal Ordinance (Cap 354), Waste
Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation (Cap 354), the Crown Land Ordinance (Cap 28);
·
Dispose
of waste at licensed waste disposal facilities;
·
Develop
procedures such as a ticketing system to facilitate tracking of loads,
particularly for chemical waste, and to ensure that illegal disposal of wastes
does not occur; and
·
maintain
records of the quantities of wastes generated, recycled and disposed.
Dust:
·
wetting
the surface of the stockpiled soil with water to keep the surface wet
especially during the dry season;
·
covering
the stockpiled soil with sheets; and
·
enclosure
of the stockpiling area.
Water Quality:
·
separating
surface water drainage system for the stockpiling area;
·
installation
of silt traps for the surface water drainage system; and
·
covering
stockpiled material with tarpaulin during heavy rainstorm.
C&D Waste
In order to minimise waste
arising and to keep environmental impacts within acceptable levels, the
environmental control measures described below shall be adopted.
Careful design, planning and good site management
can minimise over-ordering and generation of waste materials such as concrete,
mortars and cement grouts. The design of formwork shall maximise the use of
standard wooden panels so that high reuse levels can be achieved. Alternatives such as steel formwork or
plastic facing shall be considered to increase the potential for reuse.
The Contractor shall recycle
the C&D material on‑site.
Proper segregation of wastes on site will increase the feasibility of
certain components of the waste stream by the recycling contractors. For example, concrete and masonry can be
used as general fill and steel reinforcement bar can be used by scrap steel
mills. Different areas of the worksite
shall be designated for such segregation and storage wherever site conditions
permit.
The handling and disposal of
bentonite slurries shall be undertaken in accordance with ProPECC PN 1/94 on
construction site drainage.
Construction and demolition
wastes currently comprise approximately 35% of waste inputs to landfills. To maximise landfill life, Government policy
discourages the disposal of C&D wastes with more than 30% inert material
(by weight) at landfill. Inert C&D
material are directed to reclamation areas, where they have the added benefit
of offsetting the need for removal of materials from borrow areas for reclamation
purposes.
Government has established a
charging scheme for the disposal of waste to landfill. When it is implemented, this will provide
additional incentive to reduce the volume of waste generated and to ensure
proper segregation of wastes to allow free disposal of inert material to public
filling areas.
Chemical Waste
It should be stressed that
the Contractor should be registered as a Chemical Waste producer if chemical
wastes are generated.
Chemical waste that is
produced, as defined by Schedule 1 of
the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste)
(General) Regulation, shall be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Handling
and Storage of Chemical Wastes as follows.
Containers used for the
storage of chemical wastes shall:
·
be
suitable for the substance they are holding, resistant to corrosion, maintained
in a good condition, and securely closed;
·
have
a capacity of less than 450 litres unless the specifications have been approved
by the EPD; and
·
display
a label in English and Chinese in accordance with instructions prescribed in Schedule 2 of the Regulations.
The storage area for chemical wastes shall:
·
be
clearly labelled and used solely for the storage of chemical waste;
·
be
enclosed on at least 3 sides;
·
have
an impermeable floor and bunding, of capacity to accommodate 110% of the volume
of the largest container or 20% by volume of the chemical waste stored in that
area, whichever is the greatest;
·
have
adequate ventilation;
·
be
covered to prevent rainfall entering (water collected within the bund must be
tested and disposed as chemical waste if necessary); and
·
be
arranged so that incompatible materials are adequately separated.
Disposal of chemical waste shall:
·
be
via a licensed waste collector; and
·
be
to a facility licensed to receive chemical waste, such as the Chemical Waste
Treatment Facility which also offers a chemical waste collection service and
can supply the necessary storage containers; or
·
be
to a reuser of the waste, under approval from the EPD.
The Centre for Environmental Technology operates a
Waste Exchange Scheme which can assist in finding receivers or buyers for the
small quantity of chemical waste to be generated from the project.
General Refuse
General refuse shall be
stored in enclosed bins or compaction units separate from C&D and chemical
wastes. A reputable waste collector
shall be employed by the contractor to remove general refuse from the site,
separately from C&D and chemical wastes, on a daily or every second day
basis to minimise odour, pest and litter impacts. Burning of refuse on construction sites is prohibited by law.
General refuse is generated
largely by food service activities on site, so reusable rather than disposable
dishware shall be used if feasible.
Aluminium cans are often recovered from the waste stream by individual
collectors if they are segregated or easily accessible, so separate labelled
bins for their deposit shall be provided if feasible.
Office wastes can be reduced
through recycling of paper if volumes are large enough to warrant
collection. Participation in a local
collection scheme shall be considered if one is available.
Site Inspections provide a direct means to trigger
and enforce the specified environmental protection and pollution control
measures. They shall be undertaken
routinely by the ET Leader to inspect the construction activities in order to
ensure that appropriate environmental protection and pollution control
mitigation measures are properly implemented.
With well defined pollution control and mitigation specifications and a
well established site inspection, deficiency and action reporting system, the
site inspection is one of the most effective tools to enforce the environmental
protection requirements on the construction site.
The ET Leader is responsible for formulation of the
environmental site inspection, deficiency and action reporting system, and for
carrying out the site inspection works.
He shall submit a proposal on the site inspection, deficiency and action
reporting procedures within 21 days of the construction contract commencement
to the Contractor for agreement and to the ER for approval.
Regular site inspections shall be carried out at
least once per week. The areas of inspection
shall not be limited to the pollution control and mitigation measures within
the site; it shall also review the environmental situation outside the site
area which is likely to be affected, directly or indirectly, by the site
activities. A copy of Implementation
Status Proforma is shown in Annex B.
The ET Leader shall make reference to the following information in
conducting the inspection:
a)
the
EIA recommendations on environmental protection and pollution control
mitigation measures;
b)
works
progress and programme;
c)
individual
works methodology proposals (which shall include proposal on associated
pollution control measures);
d)
the
contract specifications on environmental protection;
e)
the
relevant environmental protection and pollution control laws; and
f)
previous
site inspection results.
The Contractor shall update the ET Leader with all
relevant information of the construction contract for him to carry out the site
inspections. The inspection results and
its associated recommendations on improvements to the environmental protection
and pollution control works shall be submitted to the IC(E) and the Contractor
within 24 hours, for reference and for taking immediate action. The Contractor shall follow the procedures
and time-frame as stipulated in the environmental site inspection, deficiency
and action reporting system formulated by the ET Leader to report on any
remedial measures subsequent to the site inspections.
Ad hoc site inspections shall also be carried out if significant
environmental problems are identified.
Inspections may also be required subsequent to receipt of an
environmental complaint, or as part of the investigation work, as specified in
the Action Plan for environmental monitoring and audit.
There are contractual environmental protection and
pollution control requirements as well as environmental protection and
pollution control laws in Hong Kong which the construction activities shall
comply with.
In order that the works are in compliance with the
contractual requirements, all the works method statements submitted by the
Contractor to the ER for approval shall also be sent to the ET Leader for
vetting to see whether sufficient environmental protection and pollution control
measures have been included.
The ET Leader shall also review the progress and
programme of the works to check that relevant environmental laws have not been
violated, and that any foreseeable potential for violating the laws can be
prevented.
The Contractor shall regularly copy relevant
documents to the ET Leader so that the checking work can be carried out. The document shall at least include the
updated Work Progress Reports, the updated Works Programme, the application
letters for different license/permits under the environmental protection laws,
and all the valid license/permit. The
site diary shall also be available for the ET Leader's inspection upon his
request.
After reviewing the document, the ET Leader shall
advise the ER and the Contractor of any non-compliance with the contractual and
legislative requirements on environmental protection and pollution control for
them to take follow-up actions. If the
ET Leader's review concludes that the current status on license/permit
application and any environmental protection and pollution control preparation
works may not cope with the works programme or may result in potential
violation of environmental protection and pollution control requirements by the
works in due course, he shall advise the Contractor and the ER accordingly.
Upon receipt of the advice, the Contractor shall
undertake immediate action to remedy the situation. The ER shall follow up to ensure that appropriate action has been
taken by the Contractor in order that the environmental protection and
pollution control requirements are fulfilled.
Complaints shall be referred to the ET Leader for
carrying out complaint investigation procedures. The ET Leader shall undertake the following procedures upon receipt
of complaint:
a)
log
complaint and date of receipt onto the complaint database and inform the IC(E)
immediately;
b)
investigate
the complaint to determine its validity, and to assess whether the source of
the problem is due to works activities;
c)
if
a complaint is valid and due to works, identify mitigation measures;
d)
if
mitigation measures are required, advise the Contractor accordingly;
e)
review
the Contractor's response on the identified mitigation measures, and the
updated situation;
f)
if
the complaint is transferred from EPD, submit interim report to EPD on status
of the complaint investigation and follow-up action within the time frame
assigned by EPD;
g)
undertake
additional monitoring and audit to verify the situation if necessary, and
review that any valid reason for complaint does not recur;
h)
report
the investigation results and the subsequent actions to the source of complaint
for responding to complainant (If the source of complaint is EPD, the results
shall be reported within the time frame assigned by EPD); and
i)
record
the complaint, investigation, the subsequent actions and the results in the
monthly EM&A reports.
During the complaint investigation work, the
Contractor and ER shall cooperate with the ET Leader in providing all the
necessary information and assistance for completion of the investigation. If mitigation measures are identified in the
investigation, the Contractor shall promptly carry out the mitigation. The ER shall ensure that the measures have
been carried out by the Contractor. A
copy of compliant log is shown in Annex C.
A flow chart of the complaint response procedures is
shown in Figure 5.1.
The reporting guidelines referred to in this section
are based upon a paper based system, however, the same information can be
provided by an electronic medium upon agreeing the format with the ER and
EPD. All the monitoring data (baseline
and impact) shall also be submitted in diskettes in a format shown in Annex A.
The
ET Leader shall prepare and submit a Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report
within 10 working days of completion of the baseline monitoring. Copies of the Baseline Environmental
Monitoring Report shall be submitted to all parties; the Contractor, the IC(E),
the ER and the EPD. The format and
content of the report, and the representation of the baseline monitoring data
shall be in a format to the satisfaction of EPD and include, but not be limited
to the following:
a)
up
to half a page executive summary;
b)
brief
project background information;
c)
drawings
showing locations of the baseline monitoring stations;
d)
monitoring
results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following
information:
· monitoring methodology;
· name of laboratory and types
of equipment used and calibration details;
· parameters monitored;
· monitoring locations (and
depth);
· monitoring date, time,
frequency and duration;
· QA/QC results and detection
limits;
e)
details
on influencing factors, including
· major activities, if any,
being carried out on the site during the period;
· weather conditions during
the period;
· other factors which might
affect the results.
f) determination of the AL Levels for each
monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline data; the
analysis shall conclude if there is any significant difference between control
and impact stations for the parameters monitored, and the following information
shall be recorded:
·
graphical
plots of monitored parameters in the month annotated against;
·
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
g) revisions for inclusion in the EM&A Manual; and
h) comments and conclusions.
The results and findings of
all EM&A work required in the Manual shall be recorded in the monthly
EM&A reports prepared by the ET Leader.
The EM&A report shall be prepared, endorsed by IC(E) and submitted
within 10 working days of the end of each reporting month, with the first
report due in the month after construction commences. Before submission of the first EM&A report, the ET Leader
shall liaise with the parties on the exact number of copies and format of the
monthly reports in both hard copy and electronic medium requirement. The ET Leader shall review the number and
location of monitoring stations and parameters to monitor every 6 months or on
as needed basis in order to cater for the changes in surrounding environment
and nature of works in progress.
First Monthly EM&A
Report
The First Monthly EM&A
Report shall include at least the following :
(a) 1-2 pages executive summary;
·
Breaches
of AL levels;
·
Complaints
Log;
·
Notifications
of any summons and successful prosecutions;
·
Reporting
Changes;
·
Future
key issues.
(b) Basic Project Information
·
Project
organisations including key personnel contact names and telephone numbers;
·
Programme
·
Management
structure; and
·
Works
undertaken during the month;
(c) Environmental Status
·
Work
undertaken during the month with illustrations (such as location of works daily
dredging/filling rates percentage fines in the fill material used);and
·
Drawing
showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the
locations of the monitoring and control stations.
(d) Summary of EM&A requirements
·
All
monitoring parameters;
·
AL
Levels;
·
Event-Action
Plans;
·
Environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the project EIA Report;
·
Environmental
requirements in contract documents;
(e) Implementation Status
Advice on the implementation
status of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures,
as recommended in the project EIA Report, summarised in the updated
implementation schedule (in Annex A);
(f) Monitoring Results
To provide monitoring
results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following
information:
·
Monitoring
methodology
·
Name
of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details
·
Parameters
monitored
·
Monitoring
locations (and depth)
·
Monitoring
date, time, frequency, and duration;
·
Weather
conditions during the period; and
·
Any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
·
QA/QC
results and detection limits
(g)
Report on Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful
Prosecutions
· Record of all noncompliance
(exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits (AL Levels);
·
Record
of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, including
locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;
·
Record
of all notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the
current environmental protection/pollution control legislations, including
locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken,
results and summary;
·
Review
of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons
and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working procedures;
and
·
Description
of the actions taken in the event of noncompliance and deficiency reporting and
any follow-up procedures related to earlier noncompliance;
(h) Others
·
An
account of the future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and work
method statements; and
·
Advice
on the solid and liquid waste management status.
Subsequent Monthly EM&A
Reports
The subsequent Monthly
EM&A Reports shall include the following :
(a) Executive Summary (1-2 pages)
· Breaches of AL levels
· Complaint Log
· Notifications of any summons
and successful prosecutions;
· Future key issues
(b) Environmental Status
·
Works
undertaken during the month with illustrations including key personnel contact
names and telephone number; and
·
Drawing
showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the
locations of the monitoring and control stations
(c) Implementation Status
Advice on the implementation
status of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures
including measures for ecological and visual impacts, as recommended in the EIA
Report, summarised in the updated implementation schedule (see Annex A).
(d) Monitoring Results
To provide monitoring
results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following
information:
·
Monitoring
methodology
·
Name
of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details
·
Parameters
monitored
·
Monitoring
locations (and depth);
·
Monitoring
date, time, frequency, and duration;
·
Weather
conditions during the period; and
·
Any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
·
QA/QC
results and detection limits
(e) Report on Non-compliance, Complaints, Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions
·
Record
of all noncompliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance
limits (AL Levels);
·
Record
of all complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, including
locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary;
·
Record
of all notifications of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the
current environmental protection/pollution control legislations, including
locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken,
results and summary;
·
Review
of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints, summons
and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working procedures;
and
·
a
description of the actions taken in the event of noncompliance and deficiency
reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier noncompliance;
(f) Others
·
An
account of the future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and work
method statements; and
·
Advice
on the solid and liquid waste management status.
(g) Appendix
·
AL
levels
·
Graphical
plots of trends of monitored parameters at key stations over the past four
reporting periods for representative monitoring stations annotated against the
following:
i) major activities being carried out on site
during the period;
ii) weather conditions during the period; and
iii) any other factors which might affect the
monitoring results
·
Monitoring
schedule for the present and next reporting period
·
Cumulative
statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions
·
Outstanding
issues and deficiencies
Quarterly EM&A Summary
Reports
The Quarterly EM&A
Summary Report which shall generally be around 5 pages (including about 3 of
text and tables and 2 of figures) shall contain at least the following
information.
a)
up
to half a page executive summary;
b)
basic
project information including a synopsis of the project organisation, programme,
contacts of key management, and a synopsis of work undertaken during the
quarter;
c)
a
brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
·
monitoring
parameters;
·
environmental
quality performance limits (AL Levels); and
·
environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA Report;
d) advice on the implementation status of
environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures, as
recommended in the project EIA study report, summarised in the updated
implementation schedule;
e) drawings showing the project area, any
environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and
control stations;
f) graphical plots of the trends of monitored
parameters over the past 4 months (the last month of the previous quarter and
the present quarter) for representative monitoring stations annotated against;
·
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
·
weather
conditions during the period; and
·
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
g) advice on the solid and liquid waste
management status;
h) a summary of noncompliance (exceedances) of the environmental
quality performance limits (AL Levels);
i) an quarterly assessment of constructional impacts on water
quality at the project site including but not limited to comparison of the
difference between the quarterly mean and 1.3 times of the ambientment which is
defined as 30% increase of the baseline data or EPD data of the related
parameters by using appropriate statistical procedures. Suggestion of appropriate mitigation
measures if the quarterly assessment analytical results demonstrate that the
quarterly mean is significantly higher than the liaison water quality times of
the ambient mean (p < 0.05);
j) a brief review of the reasons for and the implications of
non-compliance including review of pollution sources and working procedures;
k) a summary description of the actions taken in the event of
non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance;
l) a summary record of all complaints received (written or verbal)
for each media, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up
procedures taken;
m) comments (e.g. effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation
measures), recommendations (e.g. any improvement in the EM&A programme) and
conclusions for the quarter; and
n) proponents' contacts and any hotline telephone number for the
public to make enquiries.
Annual/Final EM&A Review
Reports
The Annual/Final EM&A
Report shall contain at least the following information:
a) Executive Summary (1-2 pages);
b) drawings showing the project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations:
c) basic project information including a synopsis of the project
organization contacts of key management, and a synopsis of work undertaken
during the course of the project or past twelve months;
d) a brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
(i) environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the
project EIA Report;
(ii) environmental impact hypotheses tested;
(iii) AL Levels;
(iv) all monitoring parameters
(v) Event-Action Plans;
e) a summary of the implementation status of environmental
protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as recommended in the
project EIA study report summarized in the updated implementation schedule;
f) graphical plots and the statistical analysis of the trends of
monitored parameters over the course of the project, including the post project
monitoring (for the past twelve months for annual report) for all monitoring
stations against:
·
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
·
weather
conditions during the period; and
·
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results
g) a summary of noncompliance (exceedances) of the environmental
quality performance limits (AL Levels);
h) a review of the reasons for and the
implications of non-compliance including review of pollution sources and
working procedures as appropriate;
i) a description of the actions taken in the event of
non-compliance;
j) a summary record of all complaints received (written or verbal)
for each media liaison and consultation undertaken, action and follow-up
procedures taken;
k) a summary record of notifications of summons and successful prosecutions
for breaches of the current environmental protection pollution control
legislations locations and nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up
actions taken and results;
l) a review of the validity of EIA Report predictions and
identification of shortcomings in EIA Report recommendations; and
m) a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation
measures;
n) a review of success of the EM&A programme to cost effectively
identify deterioration and to initiate prompt effective mitigatory action when
necessary.
The site document such as the monitoring field records, laboratory
analysis records, site inspection forms, etc. are not required to be included
in the monthly EM&A reports for submission. However, the document shall be well kept by the ET Leader and be
ready for inspection upon request. All
relevant information shall be clearly and systematically recorded in the
document. The monitoring data shall
also be recorded in magnetic media form, and the software copy can be available
upon request. The water quality data
software format shall be agreed with EPD.
All the documents and data shall be kept for at
least one year after completion of the construction contract.
With reference to Event/Action Plans in Tables 2.3 and 3.3, when the environmental quality limits are exceeded, the ET
Leader shall immediately notify the ER and EPD, as appropriate. The notification shall be followed up with
advice to EPD on the results of the investigation, proposed action and success
of the action taken, with any necessary follow-up proposals. A sample template for the interim
notifications is shown in Annex A.
Operational noise is required for EM&A during operational
phase. The methodology, equipment,
monitoring locations, criteria and protocols for the monitoring and audit are
discussed as follows.
Noise monitoring following construction of Link
Roads G&L is recommended to verify the traffic noise prediction contained
within the EIA Report. The Territory Development Department shall be
responsible for the operational phase monitoring. A qualified noise monitoring contractor or laboratory shall be
employed to carried out the proposed monitoring.
7.2.1 Noise Parameter
The operational phase noise monitoring shall focus
on traffic noise. Noise level shall be
measured in terms of L10 for the a.m. and p.m. peak traffic flow on
normal weekdays once Link Roads G&L are operational. In order to capture the actual peak hour
traffic, noise monitoring is recommended to be conducted for a period of 1.5
hour.
7.2.2 Monitoring Equipment
Monitoring equipment to be used shall be the same as
that specified in Section 3.3. That is, sound level meters in
compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications
651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for
carrying out the traf-fic noise monitoring.
Calibration procedures and other measurement conditions shall also be in
the same as stated in Section 3.3.
7.2.3 Monitoring Locations
The noise monitoring locations is recommended at
NSRs as indicated in Table 7.1. However, the exact locations where the noise
monitoring shall be conducted shall be confirmed in agreement with the EPD.
Table 7.1 Noise
Monitoring Stations during Operational Phase
Location |
Monitoring Station |
Description |
Mei Foo Sun Chuen Phase 8
(Block 112) KMB Bus Depot CDA Site,
Tower 1 Site 10, Residential
Blocks, Phase 1, Block 3 |
MF3 – Top Level KMB1 – Low Level 10S1 – Mid Level |
Residential Residential Residential |
7.2.4 Baseline
Monitoring
Although there will be no traffic on Link Roads G & L before its official opening, baseline monitoring is necessary to define the background contribution from the major noise sources (viz West Kowloon Expressway, Route 9 and Lai Wai Interchange).
7.2.5 Impact Monitoring
Traffic noise monitoring shall be carried out at monitoring stations which will be subsequently agreed with EPD prior to Link Roads G & L being fully operational. It is recommended that three noise measurements for 30 minutes each carried out by the ET at each selected representative noise monitoring station during two traffic peak hours (e.g. 08:00 to 09:30 and 17:30 to 18:00) should be obtained during the first year of the operation of Link Roads G & L (i.e. 2003). The following is a guide on the traffic noise monitoring for each station when Link Roads G & L is operational.
· one set of measurements at the morning traffic peak hour on normal weekdays (exact timing to be confirmed with Transport Department and agreed with EPD); and
· one set of measurements at the evening traffic peak hour on normal weekdays (exact timing to be confirmed with Transport Department and agreed with EPD).
During the traffic noise monitoring, traffic counts should also be conducted so as to ensure the traffic noise of the peak periods are covered.
7.2.6 Comparison of Measured and Modelled Results
Measured noise level should be compared with the predicted noise levels using the counted traffic data at the time of measurement.
The IC(E) shall comment on the discrepancies, if any, and report to EPD for reference. There will be no Event and Action Plan applicable to traffic noise monitoring during the operational phase.