8. ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
8.1 Relevant Legislation, Guidelines and International Conventions
8.1.1 Government legislation and guidelines relevant to the consideration of
terrestrial and aquatic ecology under this study include the following:
Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96) and its subsidiary legislation the Forestry Regulations; | |
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131); | |
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170); | |
Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208) and associated subsidiary legislation; | |
Marine Parks Ordinance (Cap. 476) and associated subsidiary legislation; and | |
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) and associated Technical Memorandum on
Environmental Impact Assessment Process (the "TMEIAP"). |
8.1.2 The assessment
was conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided in the TMEIAP,
particularly Annexes 8 and 16.
8.1.3 This study also
took note of the following Guidelines:
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Chapter 10 "Conservation"; | |
Guidelines for
Implementing the Policy on Off-Site Ecological Mitigation Measures (PELB
Technical Circular 1/97, Works Branch Technical Circular 4/97, dated 17 February
1997); |
8.1.4 International
agreements relevant to this Study include:
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the "Ramsar Convention"); | |
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the "Bonn Convention"); | |
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna ("CITES"); and | |
The Convention on
Biological Diversity. |
8.2.1 A literature
review of the terrestrial ecological conditions within the Study Area was
conducted. The review included Government and private sector reports, as well as
unpublished information, including the following:
Results of biodiversity surveys of Hong Kong flora carried out by University of Hong Kong (Xing et al. 2000, Siu 2000); | |
Porcupine! (Newsletters of Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, University of Hong Kong) for sightings of flora and fauna; | |
Ecological surveys performed for the Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage EIA (Scott Wilson, 2000); and | |
Ecological surveys performed for Study on Revitalisation of Tai O (ERM, 2000) | |
Agreement CE 33/98 Outlying Islands Sewerage Master Plan Stage 2 Review | |
Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey 1993-1996, in Avifauna of Hong Kong (Carey et al. 2001) | |
Egretry Counts in
Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site -
Summer 2001 Report (Wong and Kwok 2000) |
8.2.2 Due to the tight
programme schedule, ecological surveys at Tai O and Ngong Ping were carried out
under the PPFS for the study entitled "Outlying Islands Sewerage Master
Plan Stage 2 Review" (namely the "PPFS surveys") to document
presence and abundance of terrestrial, freshwater aquatic, and marine/coastal
biota. Those surveys covered the Study Area of the current project, covering the
period from July 2001 through mid January 2002, thereby covering the wet and
early dry seasons. Results of these surveys were reviewed and used for impact
assessment of the current project.
8.2.3 According to the study brief, ecological surveys should cover at least nine months and cover the wet and dry seasons. The PPFS surveys covered six months of wet and early dry seasons. Three more months of surveys (from mid-January to mid-April 2002) would be required to fulfil the requirement of the study brief. The same field survey methods specified for the PPFS surveys were employed during the mid-January to mid-April 2002 survey period. Survey results from mid-January to mid-April 2002 were not included and assessed in the Draft Final EIA Report due to the schedule of issuing. Survey results from mid-January to mid-April 2002 were included and assessed in the Final EIA Report. The sampling locations are shown in Drawing No. 23400/EN/062 while the survey schedule is shown inAppendix 8A. The proposed survey methodologies are summarised in the following paragraphs.
Terrestrial Ecological Surveys
8.2.4 Terrestrial
ecological surveys were carried out from July 2001 to mid-April 2002, covering
both dry and wet seasons, extending some 500m either side of proposed alignment
and facilities, in accordance with the EIA Study Brief ESB-074/2001. Results of
field surveys performed up to the end of March 2002 were incorporated in this
report for impact assessment, while the results of remaining surveys performed
in April 2002 (herpetofauna, invertebrates, night surveys, egretry count) are
attached in Appendix 8P as supplementary information. Terrestrial Ecological
Surveys include:
Habitat and vegetation
survey
8.2.5 Habitat maps and
the plant species list of the Study Area obtained from the on-going surveys were
updated based on ground truthing. Surveys were undertaken on 31 July, 6 and 8
August, 19 October 2001, and 16 January, 25 February, 8 and 20 March 2002. Each
representative habitat type was surveyed on foot. Plant species of each habitat
type encountered and their relative abundance, with special attention to rare or
protected species, were recorded. Photographs of each habitat type were taken.
Nomenclature of plant species and their conservation status follows Xing et al.
(2000). Habitat maps were digitised using ArcView GIS software.
Mammal survey
8.2.6 The survey area was searched for evidence of mammal activity, in the
form of scats, burrows, footprints and other traces. These were plotted onto the
habitat plans and investigated in further detail where required. Burrows were
examined closely to determine whether they were in current use. Identification
of mammal nomenclature follows Reels (1996) and Wilson and Reeder (1992).
Surveys were undertaken during the wet seasons on 26 August, 26 and 28 September
2001 and dry seasons on 21 and 25 January, 7 February and 22 March 2002.
Bird survey
8.2.7 The bird surveys
were undertaken in all major habitat types using quantitative methods (point
counts) and qualitative methods. For the point count method, a total of twenty
minutes were spent counting birds at each point. All birds seen or heard within
30 m of each point count location were counted and identified to species where
possible. Ornithological nomenclature followed Viney et al. (1996). All bird
species seen or heard outside sampling points but within the Study Area were
also recorded. Evidence of breeding such as nests, recently fledged juveniles
and habitat utilization was recorded. Surveys were undertaken during the wet
season on 19, 25 August and 9 September 2001, and during the dry season on 25
November, 1 and 3 December 2001, 19 February, 13 and 22 March 2002.
8.2.8 Due to the tight
programme schedule, the combined nine-month ecological surveys (PPFS ecological
surveys and the proposed late dry season ecological surveys) from July 2001 to
mid-April 2002 will not cover the entire spring bird migration season which are
April and May, and breeding season of egrets and herons (April to June). To
cover this data gap literature including "Hong Kong Breeding Bird
Survey" and "Egretry Counts in Hong Kong" by the Hong Kong Bird
Watching Society were reviewed for further information.
Amphibian and
reptiles survey
8.2.9 Reptiles and
amphibians were recorded by direct observation and active searching in potential
concealed locations such as in leaf litter, under stones and logs. Dip-netting
was used to survey tadpoles in aquatic habitats such as streams, pools and
marshes. Auditory detection of species-specific advertisement calls was used to
survey frogs and toads, particularly Romer’s Tree Frog. Surveys were
undertaken in the wet season on 26 August, 26 and 28 September 2001 and dry
season on 28 February, 7 and 22 March 2002.
Insects
(dragonflies, damselflies and butterflies) survey
8.2.10 Dragonflies and
damselflies (Odonata) and butterflies (Lepidoptera) were selected as indicator
groups, to provide a general assessment of the diversity of invertebrate life
associated with the habitats along the survey area.
8.2.11 The abundance
of adult butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly fauna was investigated
quantitatively (using the point count method) and qualitatively (direct
observation/active searching) in all major habitat types within the Study Area.
Any butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly seen within 20 m from the points was
identified and counted. A total of five minutes was spent counting butterflies,
dragonflies and damselflies at each point. Identification of Odonates follows
Wilson (1997) and identification of butterflies follows Walthew (1997). Surveys
of butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly were undertaken in the wet season on 31
July, 1 and 8 August 2001 and in the dry season on 22 February, 12 and 25 March
2002.
Aquatic Fauna
8.2.12 Freshwater
aquatic fauna were investigated through direct observation and active searching,
as well as kick sampling and sweep netting. Captured or observed aquatic
invertebrates were identified to species or the lowest practicable taxonomic
level and counted. During the freshwater fish survey, hook and line and
hand-nets were used. Freshwater aquatic fauna surveys were undertaken in wet
season on 17 August, 14 and 28 September, 1, 6 and 17 October 2001 and in the
dry season on 12 December 2001, 8 and 21 January) and again in 26 February, 25
& 29 March, and 17 April 2002.
8.2.13 Aquatic fauna
in Tai O Creek and Tai O Reedbed was sampled by using fine-mesh cast nets and a
three-layer gill net in wet (17 October 2001) and dry (25 March 2002) seasons (Drawing No.
23400/EN/062). Ten replicates of cast netting were undertaken at
three locations in Tai O Creek. Three-layer gill nets were deployed in Tai O
Creek (four locations) and Tai O Reedbed (two replicates, collected during the
time with tidal flow). Captured organisms were identified to species or lowest
practicable taxonomic level and their sizes were measured.
8.2.14 Animals
collected by these methods were identified on site as far as possible and
released afterward to minimize disturbance to the natural habitats. Only those
that required more detailed examination to confirm their identity were
transferred to the laboratory for processing. This involved sorting and
identification to the lowest practicable taxonomic level. Each taxon was then
counted and diversity indices were calculated.
Night Survey
8.2.15 Night surveys (wet season: 26 August, 26 and 28 September 2001; dry
season: 28 February, 7 and 22 March 2002) were undertaken in Ngong Ping, Keung
Shan and Tai O, mainly focusing on nocturnal wildlife including mammals and
amphibians, as well as Romer's Tree Frog Philautus romeri.
Marine /Coastal
Ecological Surveys
8.2.16 Marine /Coastal
Ecological Surveys were carried out from July 2001 to mid-April 2002, covering
both dry and wet seasons. Results of field surveys, except dry season bentho
survey, performed up to the end of March 2002 were incorporated in this report
for impact assessment, while the results of remaining surveys performed in April
2002 (dolphins) and dry season bentho survey are summarised in Appendix 8P.
Sublittoral benthos surveys
8.2.17 Grab-samples from 9 locations were taken in Tai O Creek and coastal
areas. The 9 locations for benthic ecological sampling are shown on the map in Drawing No.
23400/EN/062. Site H was intended to represent the main
inflow/outflow to/from the western channel. Site G is approximately 200 m west
of Site H. Site A was approximately 200 m from Site H. Site I was within the
proposed sheltered boat anchorage, approximately 350 m further south from Site H
and approximately 100m from the seawall.
8.2.18 Three
replicates of grab-samples at each of the 9 locations were collected in wet (23
August 2001) and dry (26 February 2002) seasons. Samples were sieved using a
0.5mm sieve. Collected organisms were preserved for identification to the lowest
practicable taxonomic level using a binocular dissecting microscope. At least
10% of the sorted and identified samples were re-processed by another specialist
for QA/QC.
8.2.19 The species
diversity (Shannon-Wiener index H') and evenness values (J') were calculated
using the following formula (k is the number of categories and pi is the
proportion of the observations found in category i):
k
H' = - å pi log pi
i=1
J' = H'/ H'max, in which H'max = log k
Natural shore and littoral survey
8.2.20 The coastal habitat types within the Study Area were identified
during the surveys. Most of the shoreline within the Study Area was disturbed
and modified. The intertidal artificial boulder shore (which was identified as
semi-natural shore) located outside the saltpan was surveyed at three
tidal-levels, low, mid and high on 1 August, 17 October for wet season and on 12
December 2001, 26 February and 25 March 2002 for dry season. At each tidal
level, 5 quadrats (25 x 25 cm) were placed randomly to assess the abundance and
distribution of flora and fauna. All animals found in each quadrate were
identified and recorded to species level so that density (No./m2) could be
determined. The species diversity and evenness (J') were calculated using the
above formulae.
8.2.21 All suitable
shores were surveyed for horseshoe crabs on 1 August, 17 October for wet season
and on 12 December 2001, 26 February and 25 March 2002 for dry season. Surveys
attempted to locate both adults and juveniles and were conducted by walking
along the shoreline. Surveys covered all of the muddy and sandy shores and
focussed on areas where local fisherman have observed horseshoe crabs. Any
horseshoe crabs encountered were identified to species, counted and their
location recorded.
8.2.22 Tai O Creek and estuary support extensive stands of mangroves of at least 5 species. Mangrove surveys were conducted on 1 August and 17 October 2001. Further mangrove surveys have been undertaken to identify the location and condition of mangrove stands. The density, average height and community structure, as well as the dominance, of the mangrove recorded within the Study Area was measured. Each patch was photographed and described qualitatively.
Dolphin Survey
8.2.23 Land-based visual surveys were conducted to estimate dolphin use of Tai O
Bay and nearby offshore waters. Eight surveys were scheduled, four in the
morning and four in the afternoon in wet and dry seasons; each survey covered at
least 4 hours. The observation point is located at the ferry pier near Shek Tsai
Po. Dolphin surveys were conducted on 7 September, 28 October, 15 November 2001,
16 January, 28 February, 7 and 25 March 2002. The last survey was conducted
before mid-April 2002.
8.2.24 The locations of dolphin sightings were recorded on topographic maps.
Number of dolphins, age class, distance from observers, and direction of travel
were recorded on data sheets, together with remarks on behaviour. Sea state
(measured on the Beaufort Scale), weather and visibility were recorded.
8.3
Baseline Ecological Conditions
Site of Conservation Importance
Lantau North and
South Country Parks
8.3.1 Lantau North and South Country Parks were designated in 1978. They occupy a total area of about 7800 ha and cover most of Lantau Island. Ngong Ping Road within the Study Area lies on the southern boundary of Lantau North Country Park, while Kwun Yam Shan, Tai Fung Ngau and Muk Yue Shan on the southern part of the Study Area fall into Lantau South Country Park (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Lantau North and South Country Park encompasses a wide range of terrestrial habitats, from grassland to some of the finest forest in Hong Kong supporting a wide range of fauna such as insects, reptiles and a variety of birds.
Lantau Peak Site of
Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Area
8.3.2 Lantau Peak SSSI
and Special Area overlap in area and are located within Lantau South Country
Park (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Lantau Peak Special Area, designated in 1980,
has an area of 116 ha. Lantau Peak SSSI, with an area of about 227.5 ha, was
also designated in 1980 due to the high species richness of the
"scrub-forest" and the presence of rare plant species including
Exbucklandia spp., Magnolia spp., Manglietia spp. and Illicium spp.
Ngong Ping Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
8.3.3 Ngong Ping SSSI (Drawing No.
23400/EN/063) was designated in 1999 and
has an area of approximately 14 ha, including part of Ngong Ping Stream and
forested areas. It was a former tea plantation area and is of special scientific
interest due to the presence and the confirmed breeding of the locally rare
Romer's Tree Frog (Philautus romeri). The Ngong Ping valley was confirmed to
support the largest population of the endemic Romer's Tree Frog.
Man Cheung Po Site
of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
8.3.4 Man Cheung Po SSSI consists of the riverine habitat below Man Cheung Po including the Ng Yuen Garden of approximately 29.2 ha (Drawing No. 23400/EN/063). Man Cheung Po SSSI was designated in 1980 mainly due to the presence of the orchids and Ternstroemia pseudoverticillata. Man Cheung Po SSSI is located beside the boundary of the Study Area.
Terrestrial
Habitat/Vegetation
Literature Review
8.3.5 Reviewing the results of biodiversity surveys of Hong Kong flora (Xing
et al. 2000), there were 33 rare or very rare plant species recorded at "Lantau
Peak" (mostly at montane forest or streamside habitat, Appendix
8B), which
presumably is within or near the Lantau Peak SSSI. A total of 5 and 3 rare plant
species were also recorded at "Tai O" and Ngong Ping"
respectively (ibid.).
Survey Results
8.3.6 The field surveys identified that the Study Area is covered by a
variety of terrestrial habitats including plantation, woodland, grass-shrubland,
cultivated land, mangrove/marsh, fish pond, stream and urbanized areas.
Plantation, woodland and grass-shrubland were the dominant habitat type recorded
within the Study Area. Table 8.1 lists the area of each habitat type recorded
within the Study Area.
Habitat type |
Area (ha) |
No. of plant species recorded |
Plantation |
188.0 |
174 |
Woodland |
132.2 |
161 |
Grass-Shrubland |
338.9 |
140 |
Cultivated Land |
15.5 |
83 |
Mangrove/Marsh |
16.2 |
55 |
Fish Pond |
16.7 |
29 |
Stream |
15.2 |
Not applicable (refer to Section 8.3.20) |
Urbanised Area |
68.8 |
94 |
Coastline |
About 400m in length |
Not applicable |
8.3.7 The Study Area
and the locations of various habitat types are shown on Drawing No. 23400/EN/064
and photographic records of representative habitat types are shown on Drawing
No. 23400/EN/065a&b. Species list of flora is given in Appendix
8C.
Plantation
8.3.8 A substantial
portion of the Study Area was covered by plantation including Ngong Ping SSSI,
the Buddha, along roads and hillside of Tai O and within Lantau South Country
Park.
8.3.9 Ngong Ping SSSI
was a former tea plantation area. Camellia sinensis as well as other planted
trees including Acacia confusa were commonly found in this area during the
surveys (Drawing No. 23400/EN/066). Understorey developed after abandonment of
the tea plantation and was fairly high in species richness. Various native
species including Symplocos lancifolia, Schefflera octophylla and Ilex asprella
were found in the undergrowth. The genus Camellia is protected under Forestry
Regulations. The presence of abundant fruiting and seedlings of Camellia
sinensis suggests that this species has adapted to the local site conditions and
is capable of colonising the area. In addition to Camellia sinensis, one tree
species of restricted distribution in Hong Kong (Xing et al. 2000), Celtis
timorensis, was also recorded.
8.3.10 Plantations in the remaining areas mainly comprise exotic species. The most common trees planted were Acacia confusa, Lophostemon conferta and Casuarina equisetifolia. Plantation on hillslopes and roadside mostly formed a pure, dense stand with little undergrowth. Plantation surrounding the Buddha at Ngong Ping included a variety of landscaping species and fruit trees.
Woodland
8.3.11 Young secondary
woodland was mainly found at Tai O and Keung Shan. The open canopy had a height
of 8 - 10 m and was dominated by Machilus chekiangensis, Pinus massoniana,
Mallotus paniculatus, Rhus succedanea, and Sapium discolor. The understorey was
densely vegetated and was composed of a variety of tree, shrub and herb species,
including Acronychia pedunculata, Alangium chinense, Psychotria rubra, and
Litsea rotundifolia.
8.3.12 Woodland was
recorded mainly in ravines and adjacent to grassy or shrubby hillsides in the
presence of shelter and water. The woodland had similar composition to the
surrounding shrubland but with proportionally more tree species including
Schefflera octophylla, Sterculia lanceolata, and Ficus hispida. The woodland
could be considered as young and had moderate diversity. One tree species,
Aquilaria sinensis, commonly found locally but is listed as a Category III
nationally protected species in China and listed as vulnerable in the China
Plant Red Data Book, was also recorded in the plantation and woodland habitats
within the study area. Other than that, rare or protected plants were not
recorded in the woodland habitat during the survey.
Grass-Shrubland
8.3.13 Grass-shrubland
was mainly located on hillsides of higher elevation. Grass-shrublands were of
various heights, ranging from 0.5m to 2m, dominated by Blechnum orientale,
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Baeckea frutescens, Lepidosperma chinense, and
Dicranopteris linearis. Grasses including Ischaemum spp., Eulalia speciosa,
Cymbopogon sp., and Eragrostis sp. were also abundant in grass-shrubland of
younger age at lower elevations. Grass-shrubland was considered to have moderate
diversity, and was subject to fire disturbance. Some grass patches were also
planted with exotic species including Acacia confusa and Lophostemon conferta
along trails and paths.
8.3.14 Two orchid
species, Arundina graminifolia and Spathoglottis pubescens, were recorded on
grassy cut slopes of Ngong Ping Road (Drawing No.
23400/EN/066), with
approximately 10 and 6 individuals of Arundina graminifolia and Spathoglottis
pubescens recorded respectively. The orchid family (Orchidaceae) is protected
under Forestry Regulations. These two species however are commonly found in
grassland in Hong Kong (Siu 2000). The Chinese New Year Flower Enkianthus
quinqueflorus and Farrer's Azalea Rhododendron farrerae were recorded on the
hillside in the vicinity of the proposed pumping station (Drawing No.
23400/EN/066). Both shrub species are protected under Forestry Regulations
although they are commonly found in shrubland habitats in Hong Kong (Xing et al.
2000).
Cultivated Land
8.3.15 All the
formerly cultivated lands recorded within the Study Area had been abandoned. The
plant species of the cultivated lands consisted of pioneer trees including
Mallotus paniculatus, Sapium sebiferum, remnants of crops and fruit trees
including Musa paradisiaca, Citrus maxima, Psidium guajava, and weedy species
including Mikania micrantha, Lantana camara and Bidens pilosa. Some abandoned
cultivated lands were flooded by streams during the wet season survey, and
marshy vegetation had colonised those areas. The marshy vegetation included
Isachne globosa, Wedelia chinensis, Eriocaulon sp., Cyclosorus interruptus and
Impatiens chinensis. Neither rare nor protected plants were recorded during the
survey.
Mangroves/Marsh
8.3.16 Mangroves/Marsh
occurred mainly at abandoned fish ponds, disused saltpans and riparian zones of
Tai O Creek, all of which were subject to tidal influence. Scott Wilson (2000)
undertook a detailed study of distribution and composition of mangroves at Tai
O. Comparison of habitat map and field surveys showed that this habitat has
changed little since 1999. Therefore, their results were combined with the
current findings for discussion here. Since mangroves and reeds were
intermingled, the two habitats are collectively classified and described as
Mangroves/Marsh in this study. Major mangrove stands, however, have been shown
separately on the habitat map.
8.3.17 Six out of
eight mangrove species occurring in Hong Kong were found in this habitat. These
included Kandelia candel, Bruguiera gymnorhiza, Avicennia
marina, Aegiceras
corniculatum, Excoecaria agallocha, and Acanthus ilicifolius. Mangrove
associates including Acrostichum aureum, Hibiscus tiliaceus and
Clerodendrum
inerme as well as the reed Phragmites australis were commonly found in the
mangrove stands. The absence of a real intertidal zone and the steep gradients
of saltpan bunds and fish pond bunds probably result in the dominance of pioneer
mangrove species (Kandelia candel and Avicennia marina) and backshore mangrove
associates, and poor representation of middle zone mangrove species (e.g.
Bruguiera gymnorhiza) (Scott Wilson 2000).
8.3.18 The Tai O
reedbed identified in Dudgeon and Chan (1996) is also included in this habitat.
This is one of the largest Phragmites australis beds in Hong Kong (ibid.).
Mangrove and mangrove associate species were commonly found in the reedbed.
Fish Pond
8.3.19 Fish ponds were
found only at Tai O. All of them were abandoned or had not been recently
managed, although fish nets were seen in some of these ponds and were presumably
used for fish harvest. Grassy pond bunds were planted with trees including
Dimocarpus longan and Melia azedarach. Due to the proximity to the coast and
connection with tidal water, pond bunds were colonised by mangroves, mangrove
associates and reeds, including Kandelia candel, Acrostichum aureum and
Phragmites australis. Given time, and in the absence of management, the pond
bunds will gradually degenerate and the water levels will drop. More mangroves
and reeds will occupy the pond surface and the fish ponds will then be naturally
restored to mangrove/marsh habitats.
Stream
8.3.20 Perennial streams were mainly located at Tai O (Tai O Creek), Keung
Shan, and Ngong Ping. There are two major natural drainage systems in the Study
Area, Sham Wat and Tai O catchment. The streams in Ngong Ping and near Sze Tse
Tau Shan belong to the Sham Wat catchment. They eventually join and flow into
the sea at the outlet in Sham Wat Wan. Tai O main stream collects all the flows
from streams in Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin and then drains into the sea through
Tai O Creek. The upper reaches of most of these streams were natural and
surrounded by woodland habitat, while the middle and lower reaches near villages
or roads were subject to a certain degree of channelisation or bank
reinforcement. The lower reach of the stream (upper reach of Tai O Creek) was
subject to tidal influence and mangroves and mangrove associates had colonized
the earthen bank. As a result, there is no real riparian zone for these streams.
The plant species recorded along the stream habitat can be referenced to the
plant lists for woodland and mangrove/marsh habitats (Appendix
8C).
Urbanised Area
8.3.21 This habitat includes all the roads, houses, temples and wastelands.
The proposed pumping station at Ngong Ping is located on wasteland, which is
also identified as urbanised area. Species recorded included some plantation
species, mainly Acacia confusa, and weeds such as Lantana camara and
Mikania
micrantha. Neither rare nor protected plants were recorded during the survey.
This habitat is of limited ecological value.
Coastline
8.3.22 Most of the shoreline within the Study Area was considered to be
disturbed and modified. It was largely composed of boulders and was void of
vegetation.
Animal Wildlife
Avifauna
Literature Review
8.3.23 A total of 48 bird species (Appendix 8D) were recorded at and near the
Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey between 1993 and 1996
(Carey et al. 2001). Surveys were carried out between March and August in each
year, and covered spring migration and breeding seasons. Twelve species were
identified as breeding species and most are common in Hong Kong (e.g.,
White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus, Chinese Bulbul Pycnonotus
sinensis). Nine of the 12 breeding species were recorded at or near Tai O and
the other three usually nest in shrublands and forests.
8.3.24 Bird species of
interest recorded at and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding Bird
Survey included some raptor species listed in Appendix II of CITES and Class 2
protected wildlife of national importance in China (Black-eared Kite Milvus
lineatus, White-bellied Sea Eagle Haliaeetus leucogaster, Crested Goshawk
Accipiter trivirgatus, Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus and Peregrine Falcon
Falco peregrinus) (Xu 1995, Zheng and Wang 1998). The White-bellied Sea Eagle is
primarily maritime (Viney et al. 1996) and is only recorded in Hong Kong and
nowhere else in China since the 1950's (Zheng and Wang 1998). The Black-eared
Kite and Peregrine Falcon can be found in many types of habitats (Viney et al.
1996). The Crested Goshawk and Bonelli's Eagle are inhabitants of forest (ibid.). These two species together with the Peregrine Falcon are listed as
"rare" in the China Red Data Book (Zheng
and Wang 1998).
8.3.25 Bird species of
interest recorded within and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong Breeding
Bird Survey included some species listed in Class 2 protected wildlife of
national importance in China (Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Lesser Coucal
Centropus bengalensis and Hwamei Garrulax canorus) (Zheng and Wang 1998). The
Greater Coucal and Lesser Coucal are listed as "vulnerable" in the
China Red Data Book (Zheng and Wang 1998).
8.3.26 Other bird
species of interest recorded at and near the Study Area during the Hong Kong
Breeding Bird Survey included the rare/uncommon resident species the Emerald
Dove Chalcophaps indica, Oriental Skylark Alauda gulgula, Upland Pipit
Anthus sylvanus, Black-throated Laughingthrush Garrulax chinensis and Red-billed
Leiothrix Leiothrix lutea, and two rare/uncommon migrant species, the Red-winged
Crested Cuckoo Clamator coromandus and Hainan Blue Flycatcher Cyornis
hainana.
The Oriental Skylark is mainly found in open areas with short grass and Upland
Pipit mainly in grassy upland habitats (Carey et al. 2001). The others are
mainly found in tall shrubland and forests (ibid.).
8.3.27 In addition to
the Hong Kong Breeding Bird Survey, there were some records of avifauna at Tai O
and Ngong Ping. Bird species of interest at Tai O included the rare/uncommon
mangroves/marsh associated species (Reef Egret Egretta sacra, Purple Heron
Ardea purpurea, Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus sinensis, Chestnut Bittern
Ixobrychus cinnamomeus, Schrenck's Bittern Ixobrychus eurhythmus, Banded Rail
Rallus striatus, Pheasant-tailed Jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus) and rare/uncommon
migrant species (Brambling Fringilla montifringilla, Black-browed Reed Warbler
Acrocephalus bistrigiceps, Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus, Yellow-breasted
Bunting Emberiza aureola) (Carey 1996, 1998, Green Lantau Association et al.
1998, Carey and Tai 1999, Scott Wilson 2000). Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite and
Lesser Coucal are listed as Class 2 protected wildlife of national importance in
China (Zheng and Wang 1998). White-shouldered Starling Sturnus sinensis, a rare
resident, was also regularly reported at Tai O (Carey 1996, 1998, Carey and Tai
1999).
8.3.28 Other recorded
avian species of conservation interest at Tai O included the rare Greater
Crested Tern Sterna bergii, Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida, White-winged
Black Tern Chlidonias leucoptera and Common Tern Sterna hirundo. These tern
species are primarily maritime.
8.3.29 A small night
roost of the Black-eared Kite was reported in Tai O in 1995 (Carey 1996). The
maximum count in 1995 was 31 birds (Oct - Dec 1995). The roost was also surveyed
in 1996, with maximum count of 37 birds (Jan 96) (Carey 1998). There was no
report of the roost in Hong Kong of the Black-eared Kite which is listed in
Appendix II of CITES and is a Class 2 protected species of national importance
in China (Xu 1995, Zheng and Wang 1998).
8.3.30 Bird species of
interest at Ngong Ping included some rare/uncommon migrants i.e. the Brown
Thrush Turdus chrysolaus, Mountain bush Warbler Cettia fortipes, Mugimaki
Flycatcher Ficedula mugimaki, Brown Shrike, Tristram's Bunting Emberiza
tristrami and Bonelli's Eagle (Carey 1996, 1998, Carey and Tai 1999). All are
inhabitants of shrublands or forests (Viney et al. 1996). Bonelli's Eagle is
listed in Appendix II of CITES and is a Class 2 protected animal of national
importance in China (Zheng and Wang 1998). This species is mainly found in
lightly wooded hillsides (Carey et al. 2001).
8.3.31 The Tai O
egretry is located on a hillside plantation on the northeast slope of Fu Shan in
Tai O (Drawing No. 23400/EN/060). Nesting pairs were recorded in 1995, 1999, 2000
and 2001 (Young and Cha 1995, Wong et al. 2000, Kwok et al. 2001, Wong and Kwok
2002), and Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax
and Little Egret Egretta garzetta were recorded breeding (Table
8.2). The
nesting population at the Tai O egretry never comprised more than 3% of the
total Hong Kong breeding population. However, this is the only nesting colony
reported on Lantau Island to date. According to the local people, this egretry
has existed since 1988, and before that nests were built on mangroves (mainly
Kandelia candel and Acanthus ilicifolius) to the north of the Tai O egretry.
Nesting ardeids in Tai O egretry on average flew for 440 (high tide) to 480 m
(low tide) to feed, and mainly foraged on abandoned fishponds and
mangroves/marsh on the east of the colony (Kwok and Dahmer, 2002).
Year |
Chinese Pond Heron |
Little Egret |
Night Heron |
Total |
% of total nests in Hong Kong |
1995 |
10 |
20 |
3 |
33 |
2.5 |
1999 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
22 |
2.7 |
2000 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
0.8 |
2001 |
0 |
12 |
7 |
19 |
2.3 |
Survey Results
8.3.32 A total of 60 bird species were recorded within the Study Area, 40
species were recorded at sampling points in the Study Area (Appendix
8E) and 20
additional species were recorded outside sampling points but within the Study
Area (Appendix 8F). Relative abundance and species richness in each type of
surveyed habitat, based on the results of the point count method, are presented
in Table
8.3. Both bird abundance and species richness recorded were highest in
mangroves while lowest in grass-shrubland. Grassland habitats are generally low
in diversity of avifauna (Dudgeon and Corlett 1994, Kwok and Dahmer, in press).
Habitats |
Density (individuals ha-1) |
Species richness (mean no. of species per sampling point) |
Total area surveyed (ha) |
Total no. of species recorded |
Cultivated lands |
7.1 |
1.5 |
0.565 |
7 |
Mangroves/ Marsh |
15.9 |
2.9 |
1.130 |
17 |
Plantation |
9.6 |
1.0 |
1.978 |
15 |
Stream |
4.3 |
1.2 |
0.848 |
7 |
Woodland |
9.4 |
1.9 |
1.130 |
11 |
Grass-shrubland |
3.8 |
0.3 |
1.413 |
5 |
Fish pond |
15.3 |
2.0 |
0.565 |
13 |
Urbanized area |
9.4 |
0.8 |
0.565 |
7 |
8.3.33 The recorded
species are mostly common in Hong Kong (e.g., Common Tailorbird Orthotomus
sutorius, Crested Myna Acridotheres cristatellus and Tree Sparrow Passer
montanus). However, some rare/protected species were also recorded during the
surveys. These included Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite, Crested Serpent Eagle
Spilornis cheela, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Buzzard Buteo buteo, Greater Coucal,
Lesser Coucal, Chestnut Bulbul Hemixos castanonotus, White's Thrush Zoothera
dauma and Hwamei.
8.3.34 Buzzard,
Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Black-eared Kite and Hwamei are widely
distributed in Hong Kong but are regarded as species of ecological interest.
Reef Egrets are mainly found in coastal areas. Crested Serpent Eagle, Buzzard,
White-bellied Sea Eagle, Greater Coucal, Reef Egret, Black-eared Kite and Lesser
Coucal are listed as Class 2 protected animals of national importance in China (Zheng
and Wang 1998). Crested Serpent Eagle, Buzzard, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Black
Kite and Hwamei are listed in Appendix II of CITES (ibid.). Crested Serpent
Eagle, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal and Reef Egret are also listed as
"vulnerable" and "rare" in China Red Data Book.
8.3.35 Two rare
species were recorded in the Study Area during the surveys. These were the
Chestnut Bulbul and White's Thrush. Chestnut Bulbul is mainly found in old
forests while White's Thrush can be found in many types of terrestrial habitats
(Carey et al., 2001).
8.3.36 Ardeids (e.g.,
Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus and Little Egret
Egretta garzetta) are of conservation concern, despite of their commonness in
Hong Kong. Breeding populations of Little Egrets and Chinese Pond Heron have
declined gradually, and this may be due to reduction in wetland habitats in Hong
Kong (Carey et al., 2001, Lansdown et al. 2000).
8.3.37 Five species
were observed breeding within the Study Area (Table
8.4). All five species are
common and widespread in Hong Kong (e.g., Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis, Great
Tit Parus major).
Table 8.4 Bird species showing breeding behaviours within the Study Area
Common names |
Habitat Type Recorded |
Observation |
Crested Myna |
Plantation, abandoned pond, grassland, mangroves and urbanized area |
Carrying nesting materials in mangroves at Tai O |
Black-necked Starling |
Abandoned ponds, mangroves and urbanized area |
Carrying nesting materials in urbanized area at Tai O |
Great Tit |
Mangrove, abandoned cultivated land, woodland and plantation |
Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in plantation at Ngong Ping |
Chinese Bulbul |
Abandoned cultivated land, , mangroves, woodland, plantation, stream, urbanized area and grassland |
Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in mangrove at Tai O |
Magpie Robin |
Abandoned cultivated land, mangroves, grassland, stream, urbanised area, woodland and plantation |
Recently-fledged juvenile has been recorded in mangrove at Tai O |
Amphibian/Reptile
Literature Review
8.3.38 There were two
amphibian species of ecological interest, the Leaf Litter Toad Leptolalax
pelodytoides and Rough-skinned Floating Frog Occidozyga lima, recorded within or
close to the Study Area (Appendix 8G). The Leaf Litter Toad is a fairly
restricted and uncommon species in Hong Kong and has been reported in the hill
streams near Ngong Ping (Lau and Dudgeon 1999). In Hong Kong, the Rough-skinned
Floating Frog has declined drastically in recent years and is now only known in
the marsh and wet cultivated fields at Tai O Leung Uk (ibid.).
8.3.39 A number of
restricted and/or uncommon reptiles have also been recorded in the Study Area (Appendix
8G), including Chinese Forest Skink Ateuchosaurus chinensis, found in
a plantation on Tai O Island; Dark Forest Skink Scincella modesta, reported from
Keung Shan (Lazell 1996); Rufous Burrowing Snake Achalinus rufescens, found in
the plantation, tall shrubland and forest at Ngong Ping; Buff-striped Keelback
Amphiesma stolatum, found in a stream at Ngong Ping and in the Keung Shan
catchwater tunnel; Mangrove Water Snake Enhydris bennettii, found near the
mangrove at Tai O (Karsen et al. 1998); Golden Kukri Snake Oligodon
cinereus,
recorded from the grassland near Nei Lak Shan; and Coral Snake Calliophis
macclellandi, recorded from Keung Shan catchwater. A Natricinae snake that is
probably new to science and might represent an undescribed genus was recently
found in the Keung Shan catchwater (Kolby and Lazell 2001).
8.3.40 There are some
other regionally or globally threatened reptiles including Reeves' Terrapin
Chinemys reevesii, Burmese Python Python molurus, Copperhead Racer Elaphe
radiata and Many-banded Krait Bungarus multicinctus, that have been recorded in
the Study Area (Appendix 8G). Reeves' Terrapin, listed as "endangered"
in the IUCN 2000 Red List, was found in a seasonal stream at Ngong Ping and in
the wet cultivated fields at Tai O Leung Uk. Burmese Python (CITES Appendix II
and China Red Data Book "critically endangered") was recorded in the
Keung Shan catchwater. Copperhead Racer, listed as "endangered" in
China Red Data Book (Zhao 1998), was found in the Keung Shan catchwater and in
grassland at Ngong Ping. Many-banded Krait, listed as "vulnerable" in
the China Red Data Book (ibid.), has been recorded from Tai O (Romer 1961).
These records are summarized in Appendix 8G.
Survey Results
8.3.41 A total of nine species of amphibian were recorded during the surveys
within the Study Area. Their distribution and relative abundance in different
sites are shown in Appendix 8H. Among the recorded species, Romer's Tree Frog is
an endemic species and is protected under the Wild Animals Protected Ordinance (Karsen
et al., 1998) (Drawing No.
23400/EN/066, Drawing No.
23400/EN/067). Many
tadpoles of this species were found in the seasonal streams at Ngong Ping.
Indeed Ngong Ping is known to support the largest population of this endemic
frog (Lau 1998) and has been designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest
(SSSI). Another probable endemic species, Short-legged Toad Megophrys
brachykolos (Zhao and Adler 1993), was heard calling in the streams near Keung
Shan. The other seven species of frog and toad (Asian common Toad Bufo
melanostictus, Gunther's Frog Rana guentheri, Green Cascade Frog Rana
livida,
Three-striped Grass Frog Rana macrodactyla, Brown Tree Frog Polypedates
megacephalus, Asiatic Pained Frog Kaloula pulchra and Ornate Pigmy Frog
Microhyla ornata are common to abundant and are widespread locally (Karsen et
al. 1998).
8.3.42 Six species of
lizard and seven species of snake were recorded (Appendix
8H). Two species,
Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus and Chinese Cobra Naja atra, are listed on CITES
Appendix II and both of them were recorded in Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin
respectively. The Common Rat Snake is regarded as "endangered" while
the Chinese Cobra is classified as "vulnerable" according to the China
Red Data Book of Endangered Animals (Zhao 1998). The Indo-Chinese Rat Snake
Ptyas korros is also listed as "endangered" in the China Red Data Book
of Endangered Animals (ibid.), and it was recorded in the Keung Shan catchwater.
All three species, however, are common and widespread in Hong Kong (Karsen et
al. 1998). All recorded lizards (Chinese Gecko Gekko chinensis, Bowring's Gecko
Hemidactylus bowringii, Changeable Lizard Calotes versicolor, Long-tailed Skink
Mabuya longicaudata, Scincella reevesii and Chinese Waterside Skink
Tropidophorus sinicus) are widespread and common to abundant in Hong Kong (Karsen
et al. 1998). The remaining four snakes (Chinese Water Snake Enhydris
chinensis,
White-spotted Slug Snake Pareas margaritophorus, Red-necked Keelback Rhabdophis
subminiatus and Checkered Keelback Xenochrophis piscator) are locally common and
widespread (Karsen et al. 1998).
Mammals
Literature Review
8.3.43 There were 7 sightings of Chinese White Dolphins Sousa chinensis
(individuals or groups) at Tai O Bay in March and April 1999 (Ecosystems Ltd
1999). Interviewed fishermen in Tai O reported that dolphins seldom enter Tai O
Bay (ibid.). Recreational anglers reported regular sightings of dolphins in
outer Tai O Bay. One resident in Tai O reported that dolphins enter the bay
primarily during the sea-bass season (autumn), and they have been known to
penetrate the bay as far as the 500 m from the saltpans (ibid.).
8.3.44 There are few
records of terrestrial mammals from the Study Area (Table
8.5) (Appendix 8G).
Among the eleven recorded species, some of them are of conservation concern,
including Barking Deer Muntiacus sp., Ryukyus Mouse and a number of bat species.
The Barking Deer, a species protected by the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance,
has been recorded in the grassland near Tai O (Lau 1996). Ryukyus Mouse Mus
caroli, a locally restricted species, has been recorded in the grassland at
Ngong Ping. The Bamboo Bat Tylonycteris pachypus, locally rare and restricted,
is protected under the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance and is classified as
"rare" in the China Red Data Book (Wang 1998). It has recently been
found in bamboo clumps near Keung Shan (William Suen, pers. comm.). The tunnel
in the Keung Shan catchwater is also a roost site for Large Mouse-eared Bat
Myotis chinensis, Common Bent-winged Bat Miniopterus schreibersii, Greater
Bent-winged Bat Miniopterus magnater, Bicoloured Leaf-nosed Bat Hipposideros
pomona, Rufous Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus rouxi and Least Horseshoe Bat
Rhinolophus pusillus (Ades 1999). All bats are protected locally under the Wild
Animals Protection Ordinance.
Habitat |
Ngong Ping |
Keung Shan |
Tai O |
|
Miniopterus magnater |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Miniopterus schreibersii |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Myotis chinensis |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Tylonycteris pachypus |
Bamboo |
ü |
||
Rhinolophus rouxi |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Rhinolophus pusillus |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Hipposideros pomona |
Catchwater |
ü |
||
Niviventer fulvescens |
Forest |
ü |
ü |
|
Rattus sikkimensis |
Forest |
ü |
ü |
|
Mus caroli |
Grassland |
ü |
||
Muntiacus sp. |
Grassland |
ü |
Survey Results
8.3.45 Only one bat species was observed during the survey (Table
8.6a). At
least two individuals of the Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus were seen
foraging above the abandoned saltpans at Tai O, and three individuals above
abandoned cultivated lands at Keung Shan. The Japanese Pipistrelle is protected
by the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance but is widespread and common in Hong
Kong (Ades 1999).
Table 8.6a Mammal species recorded within the Study Area during the wet and dry season surveys
Habitat |
Ngong Ping |
Keung Shan |
Tai O |
|
Pipistrellus abramus |
Tidal saltpan |
+ |
||
Cultivated land |
++ |
Relative abundance: + = 1-2, ++ = 3-5, +++ = 6-10, ++++ = over 10
8.3.46 Other mammal
species recorded within the Study Area during the field surveys were of low
conservation importance (Common Rat Rattus norvegicus and Sladen's Rat R.
sladeni).
8.3.47 The only marine
mammal recorded during the surveys in proximity to Tai O Bay was the Chinese
White Dolphin. There were a total of 14 sightings of Chinese White Dolphins in
waters off Tai O during surveys between September 2001 and March 2002. The
results of the dolphin surveys are summarized in Table 8.6b and
Drawing No. 23400/EN/068a, b,
c, and
d. The details of the sightings are presented in the following
sections.
7 Sept 2001 |
28 Oct 2001 |
15 Nov 2001 |
16 Jan 2002 |
28 Feb 2002 |
13 Mar 2002 |
25 Mar 2002 |
|
Survey time |
0853-1225 |
1240-1650 |
1234-1640 |
0832-1240 |
1015-1530 |
0930-1330 |
1205-1605 |
Tide |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Flood |
Flood |
Weather |
Cloudy |
Cloudy and windy |
Sunny and clear |
Sunny and clear |
Cloudy |
Sunny and windy |
Cloudy to sunny |
Beaufort sea state |
0-2 |
4-5 |
3-4 |
0-2 |
1-2 |
2-4 |
3 |
Number of sighting |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
Species recorded |
Sousa chinensis |
- |
- |
Sousa chinensis |
- |
Sousa chinensis |
Sousa chinensis |
Total number of dolphins recorded |
13-15 |
0 |
0 |
14-16 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
8.3.48 Sightings on 7 September 2001: The survey was conducted during the flood
tide from 0853 to 1225 hrs. The weather was mainly cloudy, with Beaufort
conditions between 0-2. A total of three sightings of the Chinese White Dolphin
were observed during the survey (Drawing No.
23400/EN/068a). The first sighting
was recorded at 1041 hrs. One dolphin was sighted very close to the nearby rocky
outcrops under Beaufort 2 conditions, apparently engaged in feeding activities
as the animal was circling and chasing fish on the water surface. The dolphin
was observed for 10 minutes and then disappeared. The second sighting was
recorded at 1057 hrs. Two adult dolphins were observed far away from the
observation site (at least 1.5 km away) under Beaufort 1 conditions, surfacing
frequently and disappearing after several minutes. The third sighting was
recorded at 1129 hrs. A group of approximately ten to twelve dolphins was
sighted following and feeding behind active fishing pair-trawlers under Beaufort
0-1 conditions. The group of dolphins, including adults and juveniles, were
observed porpoising at least 2-3 km away from the observation site, frequently
leaping out of the water. A mother-and-calf pair was observed in the group. The
group was moving northward along with the pair-trawlers, closer to the
observation site at 1210 hrs, and disappeared from view at 1215 hrs.
8.3.49 No sighting of
dolphins were recorded on the 28th October or the survey on the 15th November
2001.
8.3.50 Sightings on 16
January 2002: The survey was conducted during the ebb tide from 0832 to 1240
hrs. The weather was sunny with good visibility, and the Beaufort sea state was
between 0-2. A total of four sightings of Chinese White Dolphin were made during
the survey (Drawing No.
23400/EN/068b). The first sighting was recorded at 0902
hrs. One adult dolphin was spotted 800 m away from the observation site under
Beaufort 1 conditions, surfacing several times and disappearing after a few
minutes. The second sighting was recorded at 0946 hrs. A group of six to eight
dolphins was spotted 1.5 km away under Beaufort 2 conditions. The group was
composed of juveniles and adults and was very active performing frequent aerial
behaviours such as spyhopping, breaching and head-slapping. They were moving in
northeasterly direction, and at a later point the group was split up into 2
smaller subgroups. The first subgroup disappeared at around 0955 hrs and the
second subgroup remained in the area until 1020 hrs. The third sighting was
recorded at 1025 hrs. A group of three dolphins (one juvenile and two adults)
was spotted near the rocky outcrop 500m away from the observation site under
Beaufort 2 conditions. They were very active with a lot of aerial behaviour
(i.e. breaching and spyhopping). The animals stayed very close to the water
surface, presumably feeding at the time. At 1105 hrs, another three individuals
(an adult with two young juveniles) joined the group which stayed nearly 50
minutes in the area before disappearing after 1115 hrs. The fourth sighting was
recorded at 1240 hrs. A group of four large adult dolphins was spotted staying
close to a marine police boat 2 km away from the observation site under Beaufort
1 conditions. The group split into two subgroups (two adults in each subgroup),
and they were resting and moving slowly.
8.3.51 No sightings of
dolphin were made on the 28th February 2001.
8.3.52 Sightings on 13
March 2002: The survey was conducted during the flood tide from 0930 to 1330
hrs. The weather was mainly sunny and windy, with Beaufort conditions 2-4. There
was only one sighting of a Chinese White Dolphin during the survey, recorded at
1140 hrs (Drawing No. 23400/EN/068c). The dolphin was observed far away from the
observation site (at least 2.0 km away) under Beaufort 2 conditions, surfacing
frequently and disappearing after 1 minute.
8.3.53 Sightings on 25
March 2002: The survey was conducted during the flood tide from 1205 to 1605
hrs. The weather changed from cloudy to sunny during the day of the survey.
There were six sightings of dolphins. The first sighting was recorded at 1450
hrs. Two dolphins, through to be a mother-and-calf pair, were seen following a
single-trawler (Drawing No.
23400/EN/068d). The two dolphins were spotted 800 m
away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The second sighting
was recorded at 1520 hrs, with one individual spotted 900 m away under Beaufort
1 conditions. The third sighting was recorded at 1534 hrs. One subadult was seen
spyhopping and breaching at 800 m away from the observation site under Beaufort
3 conditions. The fourth sighting was recorded at 1545 hrs. The observed
subadult was seen spyhopping at 900 m away from the observation site under
Beaufort 3 conditions. The fifth sighting was recorded at 1550 hrs. A subadult
was seen at 1 km away from the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions. The
sixth sighting was recorded at 1600 hrs. An adult was spotted 700 m away from
the observation site under Beaufort 3 conditions.
8.3.54 Based on the
result of the surveys, the Chinese White Dolphins were observed to utilize the
offshore areas more frequently than Tai O Bay itself. The behaviour of chasing
fish, breaching, spyhopping and following fishing boats indicated that the
dolphins use the offshore area as their feeding ground. Feeding activities
appeared to be the predominant activity of the dolphins recorded in the offshore
area. Different age classes were observed in the areas during the survey,
including small calves and juveniles. The offshore area of Tai O Bay is
therefore considered to be important habitat of the Chinese White Dolphin.
Invertebrates
Literature Review
8.3.55 Nine species of
dragonflies, including 3 rare and 2 uncommon species, were reported within the
Study Area (Wilson 1997) (Table
8.7). All were recorded at or near Keung Shan.
Sinosticta ogatai and Melligomphus moluami are endemic to Hong Kong
(ibid.).
Protosticta beaumonti and Stylogomphus chunliuae are only recorded in a few
places in Hong Kong. All these species are inhabitants of mountain streams. A
new genus of Platystictidae (Sinosticta) and a new species of Protosticta were
recorded in a small wooded ravine stream draining the northwest slopes of Keung
Shan (ibid.). A rare species Polycanthagyna erythromelas was reported as present
in high abundance at this site.
Table 8.7 Previous records of dragonfly species within the Study Area (Wilson 1995, 1997)
Species names |
Locations |
Remarks |
Habitats |
Commonness & distribution |
Agriomorpha fusca |
Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan |
– |
Forested streams |
FC |
Coeliccia cyanomelas |
Keung Shan |
– |
Slow flowing streams, marshes |
C, W |
Sinosticta ogatai |
Keung Shan |
Sinosticta is a monotypic genus endemic to Hong Kong and only recorded in 5 localities in Tai Mo Shan, Sunset Peak and Keung Shan. |
Forested mountain streams |
R, E |
Protosticta beaumonti |
Keung Shan |
Only recorded in Keung Shan, Lantau Peak and Big Wave Bay (Hong Kong Island) |
Forested mountain streams |
R, E |
Polycanthagyna erythromelas |
Keung Shan |
– |
Forested mountain streams |
R |
Stylogomphus chunliuae |
Keung Shan |
Only recorded in Fujian outside Hong Kong, recorded in Tai Po Kau, Lam Tsuen Valley, Yuen Tun Ha, Tai Mo Shan, Keung Shan, Ng Tung Chai, Tung Chung and Yeung Ka Tsuen. |
Forested streams |
UC |
Leptogomphus elegans |
Keung Shan |
Subspecies L. elegans hongkongensis only recorded in Hong Kong |
Streams, ponds |
FC, E |
Melligomphus moluami |
Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan |
Not recorded outside Hong Kong, recorded – Tai Po Kau, Mount Butler, Yuen Tun Ha, Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan, Tung Chung and Big Wave Bay. |
Streams |
UC, E |
Pseudothemis zonata |
Keung Shan |
– |
Streams, marshes, ponds |
C |
Commonness and distribution: C = common, E = endemic, FC = fairly common, R = rare, UC = uncommon
8.3.56 Eight species
of butterflies were reported by Bascombe in Ngong Ping in 1976 (Bascombe,
unpublished data) (Table
8.8), of which there was one rare and three uncommon
species, including Large Branded Swift Pelopidas subochraceus, Yellow Band Dart
Potanthus parvus, Spotless Grass Yellow Eurema laeta and Common Tree Brown
Lethe rohria. The habitats of these species are listed in Table
8.8.
Table 8.8 Previous records of dragonfly species within the Study Area (Wilson 1995, 1997)
Species names |
Locations |
Remarks |
Habitats |
Commonness & distribution |
Agriomorpha fusca |
Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan |
– |
Forested streams |
FC |
Coeliccia cyanomelas |
Keung Shan |
– |
Slow flowing streams, marshes |
C, W |
Sinosticta ogatai |
Keung Shan |
Sinosticta is a monotypic genus endemic to Hong Kong and only recorded in 5 localities in Tai Mo Shan, Sunset Peak and Keung Shan. |
Forested mountain streams |
R, E |
Protosticta beaumonti |
Keung Shan |
Only recorded in Keung Shan, Lantau Peak and Big Wave Bay (Hong Kong Island) |
Forested mountain streams |
R, E |
Polycanthagyna erythromelas |
Keung Shan |
– |
Forested mountain streams |
R |
Stylogomphus chunliuae |
Keung Shan |
Only recorded in Fujian outside Hong Kong, recorded in Tai Po Kau, Lam Tsuen Valley, Yuen Tun Ha, Tai Mo Shan, Keung Shan, Ng Tung Chai, Tung Chung and Yeung Ka Tsuen. |
Forested streams |
UC |
Leptogomphus elegans |
Keung Shan |
Subspecies L. elegans hongkongensis only recorded in Hong Kong |
Streams, ponds |
FC, E |
Melligomphus moluami |
Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan |
Not recorded outside Hong Kong, recorded – Tai Po Kau, Mount Butler, Yuen Tun Ha, Ngau Kwo Tin, Keung Shan, Tung Chung and Big Wave Bay. |
Streams |
UC, E |
Pseudothemis zonata |
Keung Shan |
– |
Streams, marshes, ponds |
C |
Commonness: VC = very
common, C = common, UC = uncommon
Habitats follow Wu 1988, Chou 1994, Lau 1997, Bascombe et al. 1999, http://hkls.org
Survey Results
8.3.57 A total of 15 species of dragonfly were recorded at point count
locations, including Pantala flavescens, Neurothemis fulvia and Orthetrum sabina
(Appendix 8I). All recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong, and
none are endemic to Hong Kong (Wilson 1997) or protected in Hong Kong or China.
Relative abundance of dragonflies in each type of habitat in the Study Area is
presented in Table
8.9. The highest abundance and species richness of
dragonflies were recorded in abandoned cultivated lands, however, none of the
dragonflies were recorded in grass-shrubland. No additional species were
recorded outside point count locations within the Study Area.
Habitats |
Density (individuals ha-1) |
Species richness (mean no. of species per sampling point) |
Total area surveyed (ha) |
Total no. of species recorded |
Cultivated lands |
21.8 |
1.4 |
0.756 |
10 |
Mangroves/ Marsh |
8.9 |
0.9 |
0.504 |
4 |
Plantation |
4.0 |
0.3 |
3.024 |
7 |
Stream |
11.9 |
1.0 |
0.756 |
8 |
Woodland |
4.4 |
0.5 |
1.260 |
8 |
Grass-shrubland |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.378 |
0 |
8.3.58 Twenty-two
species of butterfly, including Angled Castor Ariadne ariadne, Dark Veined Tiger
Danaus genutia, Common Mormon Papilio polytes and Common Grass Yellow
Eurema
hecabe were recorded at sampling points during the surveys (Appendix
8J). All
recorded species were common or very common in Hong Kong (Walthew 1997), and
none of the recorded butterfly species are protected in Hong Kong or China. The
relative abundance of butterflies recorded in each type of habitat in the Study
Area is presented in Table
8.10. Both abundance and species richness of
butterflies were highest in woodland, which might be related to the higher plant
diversity in woodland habitat (Preston-Mafham and Preston-Mafham 1988). No
butterflies were recorded in grass-shrubland.
8.3.59 Two additional
species, Yellow Pansy Junonia hierta and Common Lascar Pantoporia hordonia, were
recorded within the Study Area but outside point count locations. Common Lascar
is common or very common while Yellow Pansy is uncommon in Hong Kong (Walthew
1997). Yellow Pansy was recorded in abandoned cultivated lands and woodland in
Keung Shan (Drawing No. 23400/EN/067). This species is usually found in open
areas, and is recorded from a few scattered localities in Hong Kong (Bascombe et
al. 1999).
Table
8.10 Abundance and species richness of butterflies recorded within the Study
Area during the wet and dry season surveys
Habitats |
Density (individuals ha-1) |
Species richness (mean no. of species per sampling point) |
Total area surveyed (ha) |
Total no. of species recorded |
Cultivated lands |
9.9 |
1.2 |
0.756 |
10 |
Mangroves/ Marsh |
5.0 |
0.6 |
0.504 |
4 |
Plantation |
8.8 |
1.0 |
3.024 |
16 |
Stream |
8.6 |
1.1 |
0.756 |
11 |
Woodland |
18.3 |
1.4 |
1.260 |
14 |
Grass-shrubland |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.378 |
0 |
Aquatic Fauna
Literature Review
8.3.60 There is
limited information on the aquatic fauna within the Study Area. Chong and
Dudgeon (1992) reported that Lantau is an important area for native freshwater
fish due to the abundance of relatively undisturbed waterways and freshwater
marshy habitats. The eel Anguilla marmorata, listed in the China Red Data Book,
was reported to occur in Lantau (Yue and Chen 1998, Chong and Dudgeon 1992).
Survey Results
8.3.61 Abundant
freshwater crabs Somanniathelphusa zanklon were recorded in the middle section
of the stream near the horse riding facility at Ngong Ping (Table
8.11). The
density of freshwater crabs Somanniathelphusa zanklon (adults plus sub-adults)
was estimated to reach 5-6 individual/m2 during the wet season survey. A lower
density of about 4 individual/m2 was recorded in the dry season.
Table 8.11 Aquatic invertebrates recorded within the Study Area.
Common name |
Scientific name |
Location |
Relative Abundance* |
|
Wet season |
Dry season |
|||
Freshwater crab |
Somanniathelphusa zanklon |
Ngong Ping |
+++ |
++ |
Atyid shrimp |
Caridina cantonensis |
Tai O main stream |
+++ |
+++ |
Palaemonid shrimp |
Macrobrachium sp. |
Tai O main stream |
++ |
++ |
Caridean shrimp |
Lender sp. |
Tai O main stream |
++ |
\ |
Local mitten crab |
Eriocheir japonicus |
Tai O main stream |
++ |
\ |
*Relative abundance: +++ abundant; ++ common; + occasional
8.3.62 All the three freshwater crabs, Cryptopotamon anacoluthon, Nanhaipotamon hongkongense and
Somanniathelphusa zanklon, found in
Hong Kong are endemic. Among the three species, Cryptopotamon anacoluthon is
most common, and usually occurs at greater abundance in Hong Kong. The mountain
crab Nanhaipotamon hongkongense is usually found in, or close to, upland streams
with clean water in Hong Kong, and thus could be regarded as an indicator for
degree of naturalness in stream habitats. Somanniathelphusa zanklon belongs to a
different family (Parathelphusidae) to the above two species. This crab is
usually found in lowland habitats such as rice fields, irrigation ditches,
flooded furrows and slow-flowing streams and rivers (Dudgeon and Corlett 1994).
8.3.63 Atyid shrimp
Caridina cantonensis and Palaemonid shrimp Macrobrachium sp. were recorded in
Tai O main stream during both the wet and dry season, while local mitten crab
Eriocheir japonicus and another Caridean shrimp Lender sp. were recorded only in
the wet season (Table
8.11). During the surveys, abundant Caridina cantonensis
were found in the upper course of the Tai O main stream, near the confluence of
the streams from Keung Shan and Ngau Kwo Tin. The density of the Atyid shrimp
might reach over 50 individual/m2 for both the wet and dry seasons.
8.3.64 The genus
Caridina belongs to the Family Atyidae, Infraorder Caridea. The Atyidae has the
first two pairs of pereiopods (walking legs) chelate and is characterized by
well-developed tufts of setae for the collection of food. Caridina spp. are tiny
animals with the body length around 2 cm. They are detritivores feeding mainly
on leaf litter from riparian vegetation. Members of this genus are usually found
in mountain streams with clean water. In Hong Kong at least three species of
this genus have been reported, namely, Caridina cantonensis, Caridina apodosis
and Caridina serrata. Caridina cantonensis is the commonest one, and can be
found in various locations throughout Hong Kong.
8.3.65 During the
survey on 28 September 2001, many dead fish were found in the Tai O main stream,
while the stream from Ngau Kwo Tin was not affected as some sensitive fish
species requiring a higher standard of water quality, i.e. Pseudogastromyzon
myersi were recorded.
8.3.66 A diverse fish
community was recorded within the Study Area with a total of 43 fish species,
including Yaoshanicus arcus, Capoeta semifasciolata, Poecilia
reticulata,
Liniparhomaloptera disparis, and Lutjanus argentimaculatus, recorded in the
freshwater streams from upper Keung Shan to Ngau Kwo Tin to Tai O. Thirty-four
species of fish were recorded within the Study Area during the wet season
surveys, while thirty-five species of fish were recorded during the dry season
surveys (Appendix 8K). Similar number of freshwater fish species were recorded
in the two seasons. No freshwater water fish were recorded at Ngong Ping during
the surveys.
8.3.67 Except Anguilla
marmorata, listed as vulnerable in the China Red Data Book (Yue and Chen, 1998),
and Yaoshanicus arcus, endemic to South China (previously thought to be
restricted to eastern New Territories in Hong Kong (Chong and Dudgeon, 1992), no
recorded species are rare, endangered, or endemic.
8.3.68 Anguilla
marmorata is listed as vulnerable in the China Red Data Book because it is
widely hunted for its meat and is believed to be overfished, but this species
may still be widespread in Hong Kong. Yaoshanicus arcus has recently been found
on Lantau and is restricted to the northwestern portion of this island (Bosco
Chan, unpublished data). It is locally common with restricted distribution in
Hong Kong and is of moderate conservation value. Among the recorded freshwater
species, Clarius fuscus, Gambusia affinis affinis and Poecilia reticulata are
introduced species without any conservation significance.
Table 8.12 Freshwater fish of conservation value recorded within the Study Area
Species |
Location |
Relative Abundance |
|
Wet season |
Dry season |
||
Anguilla marmorata |
Near Ngau Kwo Tin, upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream. |
+ |
|
Yaoshanicus arcus |
Lower Keung Shan (stream from Ling Yan Monastery and stream from Cheung Ting). |
+++ |
++ |
*Relative abundance: + = <10 individuals, ++ = 11-30 individuals, +++ = >30 individuals
Tai O Creek and Reed bed
Literature Review
8.3.69 The aquatic organisms caught by the methods of cast netting and tidal
netting were mainly Leiognathus daura, Tilapia mossambica (renamed as
Oreochromis mossambicus), Mugil affinis, Elops saurus and Scylla serrata (Scott
Wilson, 2000).
Survey Results
8.3.70 A total of eleven species of aquatic organisms were caught in Tai O Creek and Tai O Reedbed by fine-mesh cast netting and three-layer gill netting during the survey period (Table 8.13 and Drawing No. 23400/EN/062). Raw data are presented in Appendix 8L & Appendix 8M. The total abundance of each catch, cast net or gill net, was low in wet season (less than 7 individuals), and higher in dry season (the maximum number of individuals caught in one location was 18). Among the caught organisms, Mugil affinis was the most frequently recorded species in wet season, while Penaeus penicillatus in dry season.
Tai O Creek |
Tai O Reedbed |
||||||
Common Name |
Species Name |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 (1) |
5 (2) |
WET SEASON |
|||||||
Cast Netting |
|||||||
Mojarra |
Gerres lucida |
0 |
1 |
0 |
- |
||
Mullet |
Mugil affinis |
2 |
4 |
1 |
- |
||
Gill Netting |
|||||||
Mud crab |
Scylla serrata |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Prawn |
Penaeus penicillatus |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rabbitfish |
Siganus canaliculatus |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Mullet |
Mugil affinis |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Striped eel |
Plotosus lineatus |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sillago |
Sillago sihama |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Japanese Flathead |
Inegocia japonica |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Mojarra |
Gerres lucida |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Ponyfish |
Leiognathus daura |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
Seabream |
Acanthopagrus australis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Tilapia |
Oreochromis mossambicus |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Total number of species |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
Total number of individuals |
5 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
2 |
6 |
|
DRY SEASON |
|||||||
Common Name |
Species Name |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 (1) |
5 (2) |
Cast Netting |
|||||||
Mojarra |
Gerres lucida |
1 |
2 |
1 |
- |
||
Mullet |
Mugil affinis |
0 |
1 |
0 |
- |
||
Penaeid shrimp |
Penaeus penicillatus |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|||
Ponyfish |
Leiognathus daura |
3 |
|||||
Goby |
Acentrogobius sp. |
2 |
|||||
Rabbitfish |
Siganus canaliculatus |
1 |
|||||
Elops saurus |
4 |
||||||
Gill Netting |
|||||||
Mud crab |
Scylla serrata |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Penaeid shrimp |
Penaeus penicillatus |
0 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Mullet |
Mugil affinis |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Japanese Flathead |
Inegocia japonica |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mojarra |
Gerres lucida |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Ponyfish |
Leiognathus daura |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Tilapia |
Oreochromis mossambicus |
3 |
1 |
||||
Goby |
Glossogobius sp. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Total number of species |
2 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
Total number of individuals |
3 |
18 |
16 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
Intertidal Flora and Fauna
Literature Review
8.3.71 Intertidal fauna recorded in Tai O were mainly periwinkles (including
Nodilittorina millegrana and Littorina scabra), Cerithidea
rhizophorarum,
Monodonta labio and mud skippers Periophthalmus cantonensis (Scott Wilson,
2000). A variety of mangrove and mangrove associates, including Kandelia
candel,
Avicennia marina, Bruguiera gymnorhiza, Clerodendrum inerme,
Hibiscus tiliaceus,
Acanthus ilicifolius, Acrostichum aureum, Excoecaria agallocha and
Aegiceras
corniculatum were recorded in Tai O intertidal areas (Scott Wilson, 2000).
Survey Results
8.3.72 In total, 8 species of animals and 1 species of macroalga were recorded
on the artificial boulder shore in wet season, and 9 species of fauna were
recorded in the dry season (Appendix 8O, Table
8.14, Drawing No.
23400/EN/062).
Animals recorded on the shores at the surveyed sites were largely herbivorous
molluscs, including the nerite Nerita albicilla on the high (2.5 m above CD),
mid (2.0 m above Chart Datum) and low (1.5 m above CD) shore, and periwinkles
Littorina scabra on the high shore (Table
8.14). The species diversity and
evenness are presented in Table
8.14, which indicated that the artificial
boulder shore has low diversity in both wet and dry season, but the H' value is
relatively higher in dry season. The predatory gastropod Thais clavigera (the
common dogwhelk) was also recorded in the low shore region. Sessile
filter-feeding barnacles such as the rock oyster Saccostrea cucullata were also
common on the shores (Table
8.14). The mussel Septifer virgatus and the acorn
barnacle Tetraclita squamosa were also recorded on the shores but in low
abundances during wet and dry season. The macroalgae Ulva lactuca was recorded
in wet season but was not found in the dry season survey.
High-intertidal Zone |
Mid-intertidal Zone |
Low-intertidal Zone |
|
WET SEASON |
|||
Snail (No./m2) |
|||
Littorina scabra |
261.6 ± 175.2 |
0 |
0 |
Thais clavigera |
0 |
4.8 ± 4.4 |
29.6 ± 10.8 |
Monodonta labio |
0.8 ± 1.8 |
0 |
0 |
Nerita albicilla |
31.2 ± 12.1 |
83.2 ± 30.4 |
31.2 ± 23.9 |
Crustaceans (No./m2) |
|||
Hermit Crab |
0 |
0.8 ± 1.8 |
0 |
Barnacle (% cover) |
|||
Tetraclita squamosa |
0 |
3± 2.7 |
0 |
Bivalve (% cover) |
|||
Septifer virgatus |
3.4 ± 6.5 |
5 ± 3.5 |
23 ± 4.5 |
Saccostrea cucullata |
11 ± 6.5 |
39 ± 20 |
19 ± 5.5 |
Algae (% cover) |
|||
Ulva lactuca |
0 |
0 |
1± 2.2 |
Species Diversity (H’)* |
0.18 ± 0.12 |
0.05 ± 0.04 |
0.25 ± 0.04 |
Evenness (J’)* |
0.52 ± 0.28 |
0.23 ± 0.05 |
0.82 ± 0.11 |
|
|||
DRY SEASON |
|||
Snail (No./m2) |
|||
Littorina scabra |
188.4 ± 88.9 |
0 |
0 |
Thais clavigera |
0 |
5.2 ± 3.6 |
18.8 ± 6.8 |
Monodonta labio |
0 |
1.4 ± 2.2 |
2.6 ± 2.6 |
Nerita albicilla |
9.6 ± 6.3 |
23.8 ± 8.3 |
18.6 ± 9.2 |
Crustaceans (No./m2) |
|||
Hermit Crab |
0 |
0 |
7.6 ± 5.9 |
Hemigrapsus sanguinolentus |
0 |
0 |
1 ± 1.4 |
Barnacle (% cover) |
|||
Tetraclita squamosa |
0 |
13 ± 21.1 |
0 |
Bivalve (% cover) |
|||
Septifer virgatus |
1 ± 2.2 |
6 ± 5.5 |
25 ± 10 |
Saccostrea cucullata |
5 ± 3.5 |
26 ± 13.9 |
20 ± 10 |
Algae (% cover) |
|||
Ulva lactuca |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Species Diversity (H’)* |
0.34 ± 0.12 |
1.49 ± 0.04 |
1.67 ± 0.04 |
Evenness (J’)* |
0.24 ± 0.28 |
0.83 ± 0.05 |
0.86 ± 0.11 |
Note: * - The species diversity and evenness excluded the sessile organisms which using percentage cover to represent their abundance.
Horseshoe Crab
Literature Review
8.3.73 Horseshoe crabs were reported to be occasionally sold in the Tai O
market (Mott MacDonald et al. 1991). Huang et al. (1998) reported that adult
Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda are "frequently fished from the subtidal
mud" of north-west Lantau, including Tai O. Living adult horseshoe crabs
Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda and Tachypleus tridentatus were reported in Tai O
(Chiu and Morton, 1999). Interviews of local fishers were conducted to
investigate the occurrence of horseshoe crabs in the proposed anchorage site at
Tai O (Scott Wilson 2000). It was found that horseshoe crabs were occasionally
caught inside Tai O Bay, and even in the intertidal portion of Tai O Creek.
However no horseshoe crabs were found in the field surveys for Tai O Sheltered
Boat Anchorage EIA. Only dead horseshoe crabs were seen entangled in abandoned
fishing nets along the saltpan perimeter (ibid).
Survey Results
8.3.74 No signs or tracks of horseshoe crabs were recorded within the Study Area
during the dry-season and wet-season surveys for the present project. Horseshoe
crabs, three species of which occur in the South China Sea, are thought to be at
risk from over-harvesting and in Hong Kong possibly from loss of habitat (Huang
et al. 1998). Local fishermen noted that horseshoe crabs are more often seen on
more sandy shores such as at Yi O, indicating that while Tai O is a suitable
habitat, it is not the most preferred habitat (Scott Wilson 2000).
Benthic Fauna
Literature Review
8.3.75 A total 39 species of benthos, dominated by molluscs and polychaetes, were recorded from grab samples in Tai O Bay (Scott Wilson, 2000).
Survey Results
8.3.76 A total of 43 species and 4234 individual benthic organisms were
recorded at the nine sites (Sites A to I, 3 replicates in each site) at Tai O in
the wet season sampling, and 933 individuals from 34 species were recorded in
the dry season sampling (Table
8.15).
8.3.77 Raw data for the wet season and dry season survey are presented in
Appendix 8N. Six major taxa (Phylum) were recorded. Crustaceans dominated at
Sites C, D, E and F (over 85%), and polychaetes dominated at Sites B and G (over
87%) in wet season. For dry season, crustacean still dominated at Sites C &
F (over 60%) but polychaetes dominated at another 3 sites (Sites A, D & E)
besides Sites B & G. At Site I, the abundance of polychaetes and crustaceans
were similar in dry season (both about 45%). No rare species were recorded in
the samples collected during the wet and dry season surveys. The amphipod
Apseudes mortoni was the dominant species in wet season and comprised over 70%
(2999 individuals) of the total abundance. The total number of individuals and
density were highest at Site F in wet season (total number was 1959), which is
located in the inner Tai O Creek, while lowest were at Site H (no living
organisms recorded in both wet and dry seasons), which is located at the mouth
of the Tai O Creek (Table
8.15). The total number of species recorded was
highest at Sites B (19 species in wet season and 23 species in dry season),
which is located away from the Tai O Creek, while lowest at Site H (No record in
both wet and dry seasons) (Table
8.15).
Abundance (Mean No. of individuals/grab ± SD) |
|||||||||
Phylum |
Site A |
Site B |
Site C |
Site D |
Site E |
Site F |
Site G |
Site H |
Site I |
Wet season |
|||||||||
Polychaeta |
7.7± 4 (29) |
115± 56 (88.2) |
11± 5.7 (3.9) |
3.7± 3.8 (2.9) |
3.3± 2.9 (2.1) |
14± 1 (2.1) |
15± 8 (87) |
0 |
15± 7.8 (58.4) |
Oligochaeta |
2± 2 (7.7) |
1± 1.7 (0.8) |
25± 21 (9.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
33.7± 4 (5.2) |
0 (0) |
0 |
0 (0) |
Bivalvia |
0 (0) |
5± 4.4 (3.8) |
5.3± 6.1 (2) |
0 (0) |
0.7± 1.2 (0.4) |
17.7± 6.8 (2.7) |
0.0± 1 (2) |
0 |
1.7± 0.6 (6.5) |
Gastropoda |
0.3± 0.6 (1.3) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 |
0.3± 0.6 (1.3) |
Crustacea |
16± 9.6 (62) |
9.3± 4.9 (7.2) |
230± 175 (85) |
123± 42 (96.8) |
156± 15 (97.5) |
587± 71 (89.8) |
2± 2 (9) |
0 |
8.3± 0.6 (32.5) |
Osteichthyes |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0.3± 0.6 (0.1) |
0.3± 0.6 (0.3) |
0 (0) |
1± 1 (0.2) |
0.0± 1 (2) |
0 |
0.3± 0.6 (1.3) |
Total no. of species |
11 |
19 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
15 |
12 |
0 |
17 |
Total no. of individuals |
78 |
391 |
814 |
381 |
481 |
1959 |
53 |
0 |
77 |
Dry season |
|||||||||
Polychaeta |
14.7± 5.9 (54) |
88.3± 91.7 (93) |
11.7± 2.5 (27) |
14.7± 6.1 (68) |
12.3± 9.9 (49) |
10.7± 4.2 (19) |
11± 9.5 (54) |
0 |
7.7± 4 (47) |
Oligochaeta |
1 (4) |
1 (1) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (4) |
4 (7) |
0 (0) |
0 |
0 (0) |
Bivalvia |
2.7± 2.5 (10) |
0.7± 1.2 (1) |
2.7± 2.5 (6) |
3± 3.6 (14) |
1.7± 1.5 (7) |
0.3± 0.6 (0.5) |
2.7± 2.5 (13) |
0 |
0.3± 0.6 (1.8) |
Gastropoda |
1.5± 0.7 (5) |
2 (2) |
3 (7) |
1 (4) |
2 (8) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 |
1 (6.2) |
Crustacea |
7.3± 6.6 (27) |
3± 3 (3) |
26.3± 13.2 (60) |
3± 1.7 (14) |
8± 12.2 (32) |
42± 16.5 (73.5) |
6.7± 2.1 (33) |
0 |
7.3± 10.1 (45) |
Total no. of species |
20 |
23 |
16 |
17 |
20 |
18 |
15 |
0 |
16 |
Total no. of individuals |
78 |
339 |
125 |
63 |
56 |
163 |
62 |
0 |
47 |
Note: The percentage of the abundance (pooling the 3 replicates) of each taxa (Phylum) recorded in the site was presented as the number within the bracket.
8.3.78 The overall
benthos species diversity (H') was low, the mean value ranging from 0.10 to 0.86
in wet season and 0.68 to 1.23 in dry season. The lowest H' was recorded at Site
H (no living organisms recorded), which is located at the mouth of the Tai O
Creek, while the highest at Site I in wet season and Site C in dry season, which
are both located away from the mouth of Tai O Creek (Table
8.16a). For the
Shannon-Weiner index (H'), a value of < 1 indicates low diversity, 1-2
indicates moderate diversity and a value of > 2 indicates higher diversity.
The mean value of the evenness (J') recorded in the eight sites ranged from 0.13
to 0.86 in wet season and 0.33 to 0.63 in dry season. The evenness index
reflects how similar the abundance values for each species are within an
assemblage. For example, a value of 1 indicates that all species occur in equal
abundance whereas a value close to zero indicates that one species has very high
abundance and the other species are recorded at very low abundance. The evenness
indices indicate that there were limited number of species of benthic organisms
recorded within the sites and they were patchily distributed.
Site A |
Site B |
Site C |
Site D |
Site E |
Site F |
Site G |
Site H |
Site I |
|
Wet season |
|||||||||
Species Diversity (H’) |
0.52 ± 0.11 |
0.47 ± 0.17 |
0.46 ± 0.16 |
0.10 ± 0.05 |
0.19 ± 0.06 |
0.35 ± 0.03 |
0.52 ± 0.08 |
- |
0.86 ± 0.13 |
Evenness (J’) |
0.73 ± 0.11 |
0.46 ± 0.09 |
0.51 ± 0.22 |
0.13 ± 0.02 |
0.25 ± 0.08 |
0.33 ± 0.05 |
0.74 ± 0.14 |
- |
0.86 ± 0.06 |
Dry season |
|||||||||
Species Diversity (H’) |
0.68 ± 0.03 |
0.77 ± 0.74 |
1.23 ± 0.51 |
0.73 ± 0.26 |
0.75 ± 0.83 |
1.05 ± 0.04 |
0.77 ± 0.28 |
- |
1.01 ± 0.62 |
Evenness (J’) |
0.33 ± 0.01 |
0.34 ± 0.36 |
0.60 ± 0.23 |
0.40 ± 0.21 |
0.34 ± 0.37 |
0.53 ± 0.04 |
0.53 ± 0.40 |
- |
0.63 ± 0.53 |
8.3.79 The
identification of the benthic samples was audited and passed the QA check. The
results of the benthic samples were re-processed (10% of the sorted and
identified samples) by another specialist and matched the list of the species
identified during the first identification work.
Mangrove
8.3.80 Mangrove refers to habitats with woody vegetation dominated by
salt-tolerant species found on inter-tidal areas. Eight mangrove stands were
identified within the Study Area (at Tai O) (Table
8.16b). Major mangrove
species found in the Study Area included Kandelia candel, Avicennia marina and
Aegiceras corniculatum. There were limited number of individuals of mangrove
plants recorded within the mangrove stands A, C, F and H. The largest and most
dense mangrove stands were recorded at site B.
8.3.81 Since the
mangrove stands A, D to G are permanently submerged in water, epifaunal survey
was not undertaken. Findings of the surveys for mangrove stands B, C and H
indicated that the mangrove fauna in was dominated by the cerithid (Cerithidea
rhizophorarum) and fiddler crabs (Uca spp.). Sesarma crabs (Pseudosesarma
patshuni) and mud skippers (Periophthalmus cantonensis) were also common in
mangrove stands B, C and H.
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
|
True Mangrove |
||||||||
Kandelia candel |
+ |
++++ |
+ |
++ |
+++ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
Avicennia marina |
+++ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||
Bruguiera gymnorhiza |
+ |
|||||||
Aegiceras corniculatum |
+ |
++ |
++ |
+ |
||||
Mangrove Associates |
||||||||
Clerodendrum inerme |
+ |
+ |
||||||
Hibiscus tiliaceus |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
||||
Acanthus ilicifolius |
+ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
+ |
|||
Acrostichum aureum |
+ |
+ |
++ |
+++ |
||||
Reed |
||||||||
Phragmites australis |
+ |
+ |
+++ |
++++ |
||||
Epifauna |
||||||||
Cerithidea rhizophorarum |
++++ |
+++ |
||||||
Terebralia sulcata |
++ |
+ |
||||||
Uca lactea |
+++ |
++ |
||||||
Uca chlorophthalmus crassipes |
+++ |
+ |
++ |
|||||
Pseudosesarma patshuni |
++ |
++ |
||||||
Periophthalmus cantonensis |
++ |
+ |
++ |
Relative abundance: ++++ = abundant, +++ = common, ++ = occasional, + = scarce
8.4
Evaluation of Habitats and Species
Habitat Evaluation
The ecological importance of the habitats identified was evaluated against
the criteria in Annex 8 of the EIAO TMEIA. This evaluation is presented in
Tables 8.17 - 8.25.
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Low to moderate, human created habitat but with natural recolonisation. |
Size |
The total size of this habitat is approximately 188ha. |
Diversity |
High plant species diversity but partly contributed by exotic/landscaping species, low to moderate diversity for fauna. |
Rarity |
One protected (but mainly planted) tree species, Camellia sinensis and one restricted tree species, Celtis timorensis, recorded in Ngong Ping SSSI. Five protected bird species, Black-eared Kite, Buzzard, Crested Serpent Eagle, Hwamei and Greater Coucal, were recorded. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created, but no guarantee on species composition. |
Fragmentation |
Less fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Partly within and very close to the Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora. |
Potential value |
Hillside plantation can develop into mature woodland upon management including thinning and weeding. Limited potential for roadside and landscaping plantation. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
A recently fledged Great Tit was been recorded in plantation at Ngong Ping. Plantation in the Study Area can provide breeding habitats for birds and butterflies. The Tai O egretry is located on plantation on Fu Shan. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
Moderate. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to moderate in general, moderate for the plantation within Ngong Ping SSSI and Tai O egretry. |
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Fairly natural and dominated by native species. |
Size |
Large stands on some hillsides, some restricted along ravines on grassy hillsides. The total size of this habitat is approximately 132.2ha. |
Diversity |
Moderate to high plant species diversity, low to moderate for the fauna. |
Rarity |
Four rare/protected species, Black-eared Kite, Lesser Coucal, Chestnut Bulbul and White’s Thrush, were recorded. |
Re-creatability |
Difficult to create in terms of species composition. |
Fragmentation |
Not fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Partly within and very close to Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora. |
Potential value |
Moderate with management such as thinning and weeding. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. But could provide breeding habitats for birds, mammals and butterflies. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance and diversity of birds and butterflies recorded were low and moderate respectively. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Moderate. |
Table 8.19 Evaluation of Grass-Shrubland within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Natural, occasionally with planted species. Subject to high level of human disturbance |
Size |
Large continuous patch on upper hillslopes within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 338.9ha. |
Diversity |
Moderate to high plant species diversity, low fauna diversity. |
Rarity |
Two protected orchids, Arundina chinensis and Spathoglottis pubescens, and two protected shrubs, Enkianthus quinqueflorus and Rhododendron farrerae, were recorded next to Sze Tse Tau Shan. Protected species recorded during surveys included Black-eared Kite and Greater Coucal. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be re-created, but some native species are not commercially available. |
Fragmentation |
Less fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Partly within and very close to Lantau Peak SSSI which has rich and rare flora. |
Potential value |
Moderate, become secondary woodland over time, but limited by fire disturbance. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
Low wildlife richness and abundance. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low. |
Table 8.20 Evaluation of Cultivated Lands within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Human-created habitat but abandoned, mostly with remnants of crops or weedy species. |
Size |
Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 15.5ha. |
Diversity |
Moderate plant species diversity, low to moderate for the wildlife. |
Rarity |
Protected species recorded during the surveys included Common Rat Snake and Japanese Pipistrelle. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created, but no guarantee on species composition. |
Fragmentation |
Isolated stands scattered in the Study Area. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential value |
Low, but those fed by streams may become more natural marsh over time. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance and diversity of invertebrates and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low to moderate. |
Table 8.21 Evaluation of Mangroves/Marsh within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Semi-natural, mostly originated from abandoned fields/ ponds/ salt pans. |
Size |
Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 16.2ha. |
Diversity |
Low plant species diversity, moderate for birds, low for the other terrestrial wildlife. |
Rarity |
Rare/protected species recorded during the surveys included Reef Egret and Black-eared Kite. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created provided substrate with proper levels and tidal flux is provided. |
Fragmentation |
Fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
This habitat is subject to tidal influence and linked to fish pond habitat. |
Potential value |
High, may increase in size with time. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
Recently fledged Chinese Bulbul and Oriental Magpie Robin have been recorded in mangrove areas. Crested Myna was recorded carrying nesting materials into mangrove areas. Mangroves are reported as important nursery ground for fisheries. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance of birds and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively. |
Overall Ecological Value |
High. |
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Human-created but abandoned. All the fish ponds are tidally influenced. |
Size |
Small within the Study Area. The total size of this habitat is approximately 16.7ha. |
Diversity |
Low plant species diversity, moderate for birds, low for other terrestrial wildlife diversity. |
Rarity |
Japanese Pipistrelle, Reef Egret, and Black-eared Kite were recorded during the surveys. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created. |
Fragmentation |
Isolated within the Study Area. |
Ecological Linkage |
This habitat is subject to tidal influence and linked to mangroves/marsh habitat. |
Potential value |
It could become mangroves/marsh habitat over time if left unmanaged. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
No record of significant nursery or breeding ground during the surveys. |
Age |
Young. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance of birds and other wildlife recorded were moderate and low respectively. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Moderate. |
Table 8.23 Evaluation of Streams within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Natural at upper reach, modified sections can be found at middle or lower reaches. |
Size |
The total length of the freshwater streams is over 7km. |
Diversity |
Low aquatic invertebrate species and other wildlife diversity, freshwater fish species assemblages was diverse as 43 species were recorded. |
Rarity |
Romer’s Tree Frog and Short-legged Toad were recorded in Ngong Ping and Keung Shan respectively. Anguilla marmorata was recorded in Tai O main stream and Yaoshanicus arcus was recorded in Lower Keung Shan and Tai O main stream. |
Re-creatability |
Difficult to be re-created. |
Fragmentation |
Not applicable. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential value |
Medium, more aquatic species could establish if given time. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
The stream in Ngong Ping was reported to be the breeding ground for Romer's Tree Frog and dragonflies. |
Age |
No information but considered irrelevant. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
Relatively high richness and abundance of freshwater fish. |
Overall Ecological Value |
High except the modified sections. |
Table 8.24 Evaluation of Urbanised Area within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
Naturalness |
Low. Heavily disrupted and disturbed by human activities. |
Size |
The total size of this habitat is approximately 68.8ha. |
Diversity |
Moderate in terms of floristic diversity but low in structural diversity. |
Rarity |
Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys. |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created. |
Fragmentation |
Heavily fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Potential value |
Low. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
Black-necked Starlings was recorded carrying nesting materials in urbanised areas. Limited as breeding ground for wildlife due to high human disturbance. |
Age |
No information but considered irrelevant. |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance and richness of wildlife recorded were low. |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low. |
Table 8.25 Evaluation of Marine Habitats within the Study Area
Criteria |
Discussion |
|
Intertidal |
Benthic |
|
Naturalness |
Low. Most of the intertidal habitats within the Study Area heavily disrupted and disturbed by human activities, except the section of artificial boulder shore located oustside the saltpans was identified as semi-natural. |
Moderate. Disturbed by pollution loadings. |
Size |
The total size of this habitat is about 1000m in length, of which approximately 400 m is semi-natural artificial boulder shore.. |
About 20 hectares in size. |
Diversity |
Low, even on the semi-natural section. |
Low. |
Rarity |
Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys. |
Neither rare nor protected species recorded during the surveys |
Re-creatability |
This habitat can be readily re-created. |
Difficult to be re-created. |
Fragmentation |
Fragmented. |
Not fragmented. |
Ecological Linkage |
Not functionally linked to any highly valued habitat in close proximity. |
Connecting the Tai O Bay and Tai O Creek. |
Potential value |
Low. |
Low if the present pollution loading from Tai O unchanged. |
Nursery/Breeding Ground |
No record of significant nursery or breeding ground was found during the surveys. |
Potentially a nursery and breeding ground for marine organisms. Its function, however, is limited by the present pollution level. |
Age |
No information but considered irrelevant. |
N/A |
Abundance/Richness of Wildlife |
The abundance and richness of wildlife recorded were low. |
The abundance of wildlife was moderate, but the diversity was low |
Overall Ecological Value |
Low. |
Moderate |
Species Evaluation
The list and evaluation of the floral and faunal species of ecological
interest recorded within the Study Area, according to the TMEIAP, are given in
Tables 8.26 and 8.27:
Table 8.26 Evaluation of floral species of ecological interest recorded within the Study Area
Species |
Common Name |
Growth Form |
Location |
Protection Status |
Distribution |
Rarity |
Camellia sinensis |
Tea |
Shrub/ Tree |
Plantation near Ngong Ping |
Protected |
Sunset Peak, Tai Mo Shan |
Rare, also planted |
Celtis timorensis |
- |
Tree |
Plantation near Ngong Ping |
Not protected |
Tung Chung, Aberdeen, Shek O |
Restricted |
Arundina chinense |
Bamboo Orchid |
Herb |
Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan |
Protected |
Ting Kau, Sai Kung, Hong Kong Island |
Very common |
Spathoglottis pubescens |
Buttercup Orchid |
Herb |
Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan |
Protected |
Shing Mun |
Very common |
Aquilaria sinensis |
Incense Tree |
Tree |
Plantation at Ngong Ping SSSI and woodland at Keung Shan |
Category III nationally protected species in China and listed as vulnerable in the China Plant Red Data Book, |
Commonly found in lowland forests and fung shui woods |
Common |
Enkianthus quinqueflorus |
Chinese New Year Flower |
Shrub |
Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan |
Protected |
Pokfulam, Ting Kau, Sai Kung |
Common |
Rhododendron farrerae |
Farrer’s Azalea |
Shrub |
Grass-shrubland near Sze Tsz Tau Shan |
Protected |
Commonly found in shrubland |
Common |
Table 8.27 Evaluation of faunal species of ecological interest recorded within the Study Area
Common Name |
Species |
Location |
Protection Status |
Distribution |
Rarity |
Japanese Pipistrelle |
Pipistrellus abramus |
Salt pans at Tai O Abandoned cultivated land at Keung Shan |
All bats are protected in Hong Kong |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Chinese White Dolphin |
Sousa chinensis |
Outer Tai O Bay |
All cetaceans are protected in Hong Kong Class I Protected Animal in PRC, Appendix I of CITES |
Concentrated in western Hong Kong water |
Not uncommon in western Hong Kong water |
Greater Coucal |
Centropus sinensis |
Plantation in Ngong Ping |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC, "vulnerable" in China Red Data Book |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Lesser Coucal |
Centropus bengalensis |
Woodland in Keung Shan and plantation in Ngong Ping, and near the reed bed in Tai O |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC, "vulnerable" in China Red Data Book |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Reef Egret |
Egretta sacra |
Along the bund of salt pan in Tai O |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and rare in China Red Data Book |
Hong Kong’s coastal areas |
Common |
Black-eared Kite |
Milvus lineatus |
Above reed bed, fish pond and salt pans in Tai O |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Very common |
White-bellied Sea Eagle |
Haliaeetus leucogaster |
Above mangroves and marshes in Tai O |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES |
Hong Kong’s coastal areas, only recorded in Hong Kong and nowhere else in China |
Uncommon/rare |
Crested Serpent Eagle |
Spilornis cheela |
Plantation in Keung Shan; calling for territories |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES "rare" in China Red Data Book |
Localised in distribution in Hong Kong |
Rare |
Buzzard |
Buteo buteo |
Plantation in Tai O |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC and Appendix II of CITES |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Uncommon |
Hwamei |
Garrulax canorus |
Plantation in Keung Shan |
All birds are protected in Hong Kong, Appendix II of CITES |
Widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Romer’s Tree Frog |
Philautus romeri |
Seasonal stream at Ngong Ping |
Protected under the Wild Animals Protected Ordinance |
Lamma Island, Po Toi, Lantau Islands |
Restricted, endemic |
Short-legged Toad |
Megophrys brachykolos |
Stream near Keung Shan |
Not protected |
Hong Kong Island, Lantau Island, Ho Chung |
Rather restricted, possible endemic |
Common Rat Snake |
Ptyas mucosus |
Cultivated land in Keung Shan |
Listed on Appendix II of CITES, "endangered" in China Red Data Book |
Common and widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Chinese Cobra |
Naja atra |
Catchwater near Ngau Kwo Tin |
Listed on Appendix II of CITES and regarded as vulnerable in China Red Data Book |
Common and widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Indo-Chinese Rat Snake |
Ptyas korros |
Catchwater in Keung Shan |
Listed as endangered in the China Red Data Book |
Common and widespread in Hong Kong |
Common |
Marbled Eel |
Anguilla marmorata |
Upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream |
Listed as endangered in the China Red Data Book, Class 2 Protected Animal of PRC |
Widely distributed in Asia including South and Southeast Asia |
Common |
- |
Yaoshanicus arcus |
Lower Keung Shan, upper and lower sections of Tai O main stream. |
Not protected |
North-west Lantau and north-east and east New Territories |
Restricted to South China and northern Vietnam but locally common |
Horseshoe Crab |
Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda; Tachypleus tridentatus |
Tai O Bay |
Not protected |
In Hong Kong, mainly in the western waters. |
Local population declining. |
Summary
8.4.1 Based on the ecological conditions presented in the above sections, it
is considered that the mangrove/marsh and freshwater stream have high ecological
value. The woodland, fish pond and plantation within Ngong Ping SSSI are
regarded to have moderate ecological value, while cultivated lands, grass-shrubland
and urbanised area considered of low ecological value. For the two marine
habitats, intertidal habitat is considered of low ecological value and benthic
habitat is considered as moderate. Most of the recorded species are common and
widespread in Hong Kong. However, some rare/protected/endangered flora and fauna
species were recorded within the Study Area.
8.4.2 Some species of
conservation importance were reported in the literature reviewed.
8.5 Impact Identification and Assessment
8.5.1 Evaluation of ecological impacts is based on the following criteria
described in Annex 8 of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact
Assessment Process:
Habitat quality;
Species;
Size/abundance;
Duration of potential
impact; and
Magnitude of potential
impact
8.5.2 The primary EIA
requirement is for compilation and analysis of data, followed by assessment of
impacts using TM guidelines. Impacts are assessed with reference to Annexes 8
and 16 of the Technical Memorandum of the EIA Ordinance. Discrete project
impacts and cumulative impacts are assessed, mitigation plans developed to
reduce impacts to acceptable levels, and ecological monitoring and audit
programmes specified as needed.
Construction Stage
Site Formation
8.5.3 The construction of the sewage treatment works and sewerage/the effluent pipelines would cause a temporary loss of 0.13 ha of plantation, 0.17 ha of grass-shrubland, 0.94 ha of urbanised/disturbed habitats and a permanent loss of 0.01 ha of plantation, 0.11 ha of grass-shrubland, and 2.01 urbanised/disturbed habitat (Table 8.28). The sewage treatment works will be built on urbanised/disturbed area and the sewerage will follow the existing road. As the proposed discharge point is located at the mouth of Tai O Creek, no dredging or reclamation is required for the proposed project.Drawing No. 23400/EN/086, 87, 88, 89, 90 and 091 shows the land requirements for the Project. Due to the limited area and ecological importance of habitats to be lost, the impact is considered minor. Most of the project components avoid identified sensitive habitats or biota. No habitat of ecological importance would be lost to the project. Species of ecological importance recorded during field surveys or reported in reviewed literature would not be affected. No additional species or habitat of conservation concern were recorded during the supplementary ecological surveys; therefore the results of supplementary ecological surveys does not affect the conclusion of the impact assessment.
Table 8.28 Potential loss of habitat (ha) to the sewage treatment work and sewerage alignment
Habitat Type |
Sewage treatment work + Flow Monitoring Chamber |
Sewerage alignment + Temporary works area |
Temporary loss |
||
Plantation |
- |
0.13 |
Grass-Shrubland |
- |
0.17 |
Urbanised/Disturbed |
- |
0.94 |
Permanent Loss |
||
Plantation |
0.01 |
-* |
Grass-Shrubland |
0.11 |
- |
Urbanised/Disturbed |
2.01 |
-* |
* sewerage pipeline will be underground
Noise and Disturbance
8.5.4 Noise and visual disturbance may be occur during site formation and
construction, potentially affecting the distribution and behaviour of fauna of
the adjacent habitats. Due to the temporary and localised nature of the
disturbance, potential impacts to fauna from this source are ranked as minor.
8.5.5 The proposed sewage treatment works would be located in the vicinity of Lantau North Country Park, and a few sections of the proposed effluent pipeline would encroach upon Lantau North Country Park and Ngong Ping SSSI (Drawing No. 23400/EN/067a). Construction of these facilities may have negative short-term ecological impacts on these areas. The impact, however, is minor since the affected area would be mainly confined to constructed road and temporary in nature.
8.5.6 Some of the
plant species of conservation interest lie very close to the proposed effluent
alignment. However, due to the localised nature of disturbance of this project,
the potential impacts to these plant species is anticipated to be minor. No
protective measures for the protected plant species are required.
Surface Runoff
8.5.7 Potential
impacts to aquatic ecology during the construction phase would mainly arise from
sedimentation due to surface runoff. Elevated suspended solids levels caused by
site runoff could increase the suspended solids load in the water bodies, and
could decrease dissolved oxygen levels. A lower oxygen level would affect
stationary species, whilst mobile species would tend to temporarily avoid the
area. The result could be a temporary reduction in aquatic life abundance.
8.5.8 Runoff should
not be discharged into streams or marine water. Site runoff should be desilted,
to reduce the potential for suspended sediments, organics and other contaminants
to enter stream and marine environment. Cautions must be taken to avoid runoff
from entering the streams in the crossings of sewer and natural streams. Special
attention should be paid to the stream in which Romer's Tree Frog has been
observed breeding (Drawing No.
23400/EN/067a). It is recommended that earthworks
near this stream should not be carried out during the breeding season of Romer's
Tree Frog (March to September).
Summary of Construction Impacts
8.5.9 Potential impacts of project construction are summarised in Table
8.29.
Activity |
Receiver |
Potential Impacts |
Nature of Impacts |
Severity |
Mitigation Recommended |
Site formation |
Habitats and species associated (urbanised/disturbed/wasteland) |
Total loss of flora and habitats within site formation boundary, Loss of habitats for fauna |
Permanent, irreversible, small scale, limited species affected |
Minor |
No |
Noise and disturbance |
Sensitive wildlife species on adjacent habitats |
Inhibition of vegetation growth Changes in distribution, activity patterns |
Temporary, reversible, small scale, limited species affected |
Minor |
No |
Surface runoff |
Marine and stream fauna |
Changes in distribution, and/or activity patterns of associated fauna |
Reversible, small scale, limited species affected |
Minor to moderate |
Yes Prevention of runoff to streams and marine habitats, desilt runoff |
Operation Stage
8.5.10 Machinery noise and odour of sewage from the sewage treatment work
may cause changes in distribution pattern of some fauna. However, the impact is
minor as the remaining fauna in the Study Area are disturbance tolerant.
8.5.11 Operational
phase impacts would arise from discharge of treated effluent. The pollution
loading of the treated effluent would however be small as compared to the
background pollution loading, and the potential impacts on the water quality
would be localized. No adverse impacts are predicted.
8.5.12 According to
the water quality assessment result (Section 5 of this report), the
operation-phase water quality at the existing mangroves and the location close
the future mangrove planting area would fulfil the WQO. The UIA and TIN level
would be below 0.0074 mg/L and 0.3679 mg/L respectively which fully complied
with the WQO. Relatively higher E. coli concentrations were predicted at the
existing mangroves in Tai O creek with average values of 6729 and 3397
count/100ml for dry and wet season respectively. The high E. coli levels were
however contributed by the pollution input from existing unsewered developments.
As detailed in Section 5, the existing mangroves currently receive a
considerable amount of sewage discharges from unsewered developments. The
natural pollution tolerance displayed by mangroves is well documented. Recent
studies of mangals in Hong Kong and the Futian Nature Reserve in Shenzhen firmly
conclude that mangroves would not be adversely affected by high pollution loads
including concentrated sewage effluent. So it is not anticipated that the
additional input from the Ngong Ping STW would cause any adverse impact on the
existing mangroves at Tai O Creek or on the future mangrove planting site at the
salt pans.
Summary of Operation Impacts
8.5.13 Potential impacts of project operation are summarised in Table
8.30.
Activity |
Receiver |
Potential Impacts |
Nature of Impacts |
Severity |
Mitigation Recommended |
Changes in water quality in North Western WCZ |
Marine ecosystems |
Changes of nutrient levels in sea water |
Long-term |
Minor |
No |
Changes in water quality in North Western Supplementary WCZ |
Marine ecosystems |
Changes of nutrient levels in sea water |
Long-term |
Minor |
No |
Machinery noise and odour |
Terrestrial fauna |
Changes in distribution and activity patterns of fauna |
Permanent, irreversible, small scale, limited species affected |
Minor |
No |
Cumulative Impacts
8.5.14 Currently there is no other major project proposed in the areas along
the sewer alignment. No cumulative impacts on terrestrial ecology would arise.
For marine ecology, the future Tai O Boat Anchorage would involve dredging
during construction. However, no cumulative impacts would result from these two
projects as no intertidal or marine works would be required in the present
project, and the Boat Anchorage project will be commissioned before the
construction of the present project according to the current schedule. The Water
Quality Assessment has taken into account the boat anchorage project, and
indicated that this would not produce significant cumulative impacts.
8.6.1 The TM (Annex 16) and the TC require that mitigation of ecological
impacts be sought in the following order of priority: (1) avoid, (2) minimise,
(3) compensate on-site and (4) compensate off-site. At each stage, residual
impacts should be re-assessed to determine whether there is a need to proceed to
the next stage of mitigation. The following measures are proposed to mitigate
the impacts discussed in the preceding section.
Construction Stage
8.6.2 Measures should be taken to avoid runoff to streams and estuary. Site
runoff should be desilted, to reduce the potential for suspended sediments,
organics and other contaminants to enter the local freshwater or marine
environment.
Operational Stage
8.6.3 No ecological mitigation measures are required. Net loss of a small
area of wasteland and urbanised areas of little ecological importance will be
the only residual impact, this is not predicted to be significant. It is also
anticipated that this project will not impose any impact in addition to those
arising from the Tai O Sheltered Boat Anchorage Project and the proposed cable
car terminal at Ngong Ping.
8.7.1 No residual impacts would be anticipated if the mitigation measures
suggested above are implemented.
8.8.1 Limited impacts on terrestrial and marine ecology were predicted from
the construction of the sewage treatment work, sewer alignment, and the outfall.
Provided that good practice for controlling surface runoff is employed and
enforced, and earthworks can be suspended for the section of sewer close the
stream where the Romer's Tree Frog was found during the breeding season of the
frog (March to September), no residual impacts are anticipated.
8.8.2 During
operational stage, the water quality in the water bodies in Ngong Ping is
expected to improve as the project collects and treats raw sewage. The high
level of treatment would prevent any adverse impacts to the Tai O Bay.
Ades, G.W.J. 1999. The species composition, distribution and population size
of Hong Kong bats. Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History Society 22:183-209.
Bascombe, M.J., Johnston, G. and Bascombe, F.S. 1999. The Butterflies of Hong
Kong. Academic Press, United Kingdom.
Carey, G. 1996. Hong Kong Bird Report 1995. Hong Kong Birdwatching Society, Hong
Kong.
Carey, G. 1998. Hong Kong Bird Report 1996. Hong Kong Birdwatching Society, Hong
Kong.
Carey, G. and Tai, S.L. 1999. Hong Kong Bird Report 1997. Hong Kong Birdwatching
Society, Hong Kong.
Carey, G.J., Chalmers,
M.L., Diskin, D.A., Kennerley, P.R., Leader, P.J., Leven, M.R., Lewthwaite, R.W.,
Melville, D.S., Turnbull, M. and Young, L. 2001. The Avifauna of Hong Kong. Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Chiu, H.M.C and Morton, B. 1999. The Biology, Distribution, and Status of Horseshoe Crabs, Tachypleus tridentatus and Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda (Arthropoda: Chelicerata) in Hong Kong: Recommendations for Conservation and Management. Final report to China Light Power Company Limited.Chong, D. and Dudgeon, D. 1992. Hong Kong stream fishes: an annotated checklist with remarks on conservation status. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 19: 79-112.
Chong, D. and Dudgeon,
D. 1992. Hong Kong stream fishes: an annotated checklist with remarks on
conservation status. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 19:
79-112.
Chou, I. 1997.
Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium. Henan Scientific and Technological
Publishing House.
Dudgeon, D. and Corlett, R. 1994. Hills and Streams: An Ecology of Hong Kong.
Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
Dudgeon, D. and Chan
E.W.C. 1996. Ecological Study of Freshwater Wetland Habitats in Hong Kong.
Prepared for Agriculture and fisheries Department, Hong Kong Government.
Ecosystems Ltd. 1999.
Agreement No. CE 41/98. Environmental and Drainage Impact Assessment for Tai O
Sheltered Boat Anchorage - Ecology and Fisheries Surveys. Prepared for Scott
Wilson (Hong Kong) Ltd.
ERM. 2000. Agreement
Number CE 59/98. Study on Revitalisation of Tai O: Technical Report 7. Prepared
for Planning Department.
Green Lantau
Association, The Conservancy Association, Friends of the Earth, Green Power, HK
Marine Conservation Society, World Fund for Nature HK. 1998. A Conservation
Strategy for Lantau.
Huang, Q., H. Chiu and
B. Morton. 1998. Nursery beaches for horseshoe crabs in Hong Kong. Porcupine! 18
(Dec. 1998): 9-10. (Newsletter of the Department of Ecology & Biodiversity,
University of Hong Kong.)
Karsen, S.J., Lau,
M.W.N. and Bogadek, A. 1998. Hong Kong Amphibians and Reptiles. Second Edition.
Provisional Urban Council, Hong Kong.
Kolby, J. and Lazell,
J. 2001. Amazing snake. Porcupine! 22:9-10.
Kwok, H.K., Wong, L.C.
and Carey, G.J. 2001. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to
the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site - Summer 2000 report. The Hong Kong
Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Kwok, H.K. and Dahmer,
T.D. 2002. Habitat Utilization by Little Egrets Egretta garzetta Breeding
at Tai O Egretry. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 25:
95-104.
Kwok, H. K. and Dahmer,
T. D. (in press). Bird community of a fire-maintained grassland in Hong Kong.
Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society.
Landsdown, R.V.,
Mundkur, T. and Young, L. 2000. Herons in East and South-east Asia. pp 73-98, in
(J. A. Kushlan and H. Hafner). Heron Conservation. Academic Press, San Diego.
Lau, M. 1996. Wildlife
Windows Two. Porcupine! 14:15.
Lau, P. 1997.
Butterflies of Hong Kong. Brilliant Printing Company, Hong Kong.
Lau, M.W.N. 1998. Habitat Use by Hong Kong Amphibians, with Special Reference to the Ecology and
Conservation of
Philautus romeri. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lau, M.W.N. and
Dudgeon, D. 1999. Composition and distribution of Hong Kong amphibian fauna.
Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History Society 22:1-79.
Lazell, J. 1996.
Prizes of plunder ñ Hong Kong herpetological highlights. Porcupine! 15:12.
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Ltd., Shankland Cox, Wilbur Smith Associates and EBC Hong Kong. 1991. North Lantau Developent: Tropic Report TR 10 - Environmental Assessment (Revised). Prepared for Territory
Development
Department, South West NT Development Office.
Preston-Mafham, R. and
Preston-Mafham, K. 1988. Butterflies of the World. Blendford Press, London.
Reels, G. 1996.
Distribution of large mammals in Hong Kong. Porcupine! 15:36-38.
Romer, J.D. 1961.
Annotated checklist with keys to the snakes of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong
Kong Natural History Society 5:1-17.
Romer, J.D. 1975. Annotated checklist with keys to the lizards of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 10:1-13.
Scott Wilson (Hong Kong) Limited. 2000. Agreement No. CE 41/98 Tai O
Sheltered Boat Anchorage Environmental and Drainage Impact Assessment. Final
Assessment Report. Prepared for Civil Engineering Department. May 2000.
Siu, G.L.P. 2000. Orchidaceae of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. 23: 137-148.
Viney, C., Phillipps, K. and Lam, C.Y. 1996. Birds of Hong Kong and South China. Government Printer, Hong Kong.
Walthew, G. 1997. The status and flight periods of Hong Kong butterflies. Porcupine! No. 16: 34-37.
Wang, S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals. Mammalia. Science Press, Beijing.
Wilson, K.D.P. 1995. Hong Kong Dragonflies. Urban Council, Hong Kong.
Wilson, K.D.P. 1997. An annotated checklist of the Hong Kong dragonflies with recommendations for their conservation. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society No. 21: 1-68.
Wilson D.E. and D. M. Reeder. 1992. Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington & London.
Wong, L.C., Kwok, H.K. and Carey, G.J. 2000. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site – Summer 1999 report. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Wong, L.C. and Kwok, H.K. 2002. Egretry counts in Hong Kong, with particular reference to the Mai Po and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site – Summer 2001 report. The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society, Hong Kong.
Wu, X.F. 1988. Butterflies of the Ling-nan Oasis. Academic Periodical Press, Beijing.
Xing, F.W., Ng, S.C., Chau, L.K.C. 2000. Gymnosperms and angiosperms of Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society. 23: 21-136.
Xu, W.S. 1995. Raptors of China. China Forestry Publishing House. Beijing.
Young, L. and Cha, M.W. 1995. The history and status of egretries in Hong Kong with notes on those in the Pearl River delta, Guangdong, China. Hong Kong Bird Report 1994: 196-215.
Yue, P. and Chen, Y. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Pisces. Beijing: Science Press.
Zhao, E.M. and Adler, K. 1993. Herpetology of China. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Oxford, Ohio.
Zhao, E. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals. Amphibia & Reptilia. Science Press, Beijing.
Zheng, G.M. and Wang, Q.S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves. Science Press, Beijing.