Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Volume 2 of 3 - FIGURES
FIGURES
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Figure 1.1 Site Plan and SWC Alignment
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
Figure 2.1 Plan and Elevation of SWC
Figure 2.2 Main Spans - General Arrangement
Figure 2.3 Main Spans - Tower and Foundation
Figure 2.4 Typical Spans - General Arrangement
Figure 2.5 Typical Spans - Piers and Foundations
Figure 2.6 Land Requirement Plan Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Chapter 370) - Sheet 2 of 6
Figure 2.7 Land Requirement Plan Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Chapter 370) - Sheet 3 of 6
Figure 2.8 Land Requirement Plan Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Chapter 370) - Sheet 4 of 6
Figure 2.9 Land Requirement Plan Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Chapter 370) - Sheet 5 of 6
Figure 2.10 Construction Sequence of SWC
Figure 2.11 Typical Spans Construction Method - Precast Segmental Balanced Cantilever
Figure 2.12 Main Spans - Construction Method
Figure 2.13 Alternative Construction Method - Insitu Balanced Cantilever
Figure 2.14 Alternative Construction Method - Incremental Launching
Figure 2.15 Alternative Construction Method - Insitu Span by Span
Figure 2.16 Works Programme
SECTION 3 REVIEW OF RELATED EIA STUDIES
Figure 3.1 Crosslinks Study Alignment Options and Landing Points
SECTION 4 CONSIDERATION OF DIFFERENT ALIGNMENT OPTIONS
Figure 4.1 Possible Alignment Options
Figure 4.2 Straight Bridge (Option A) Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Figure 4.3 Straight Bridge (Option A) Plan and Elevation
Figure 4.4 Main Spans - General Arrangement (Options A&B)
Figure 4.5 Straight and Curved Bridge (Option A&B) Geological Profile
Figure 4.6 Curved Bridge (Option B) Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Figure 4.7 Curved Bridge (Option B) Plan and Elevation
Figure 4.8 Immersed Tube Tunnel (Option C) Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Figure 4.9 Immersed Tube Tunnel - Typical Cross Section (Option C)
Figure 4.10 Immersed Tube Tunnel (Option C) Geological Profile
Figure 4.11 Drill and Blast Tunnel - Typical Cross Section (Option D)
Figure 4.12 Drill and Blast Tunnel (Option D) Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Figure 4.13 Drill and Blast Tunnel (Option D) Geological Profile
Figure 4.14 Existing Utilities
Figure 4.15 Bridge Form (Options A & B) Interface with Deep Bay Link
Figure 4.16 Immersed Tube Tunnel (Option C) - Interface with Deep Bay Link
Figure 4.17 Drill and Blast Tunnel (Option D) Interface with Deep Bay Link - Sheet 1
Figure 4.18 Drill and Blast Tunnel (Option D) Interface with Deep Bay Link - Sheet 2
SECTION 5 AIR QUALITY IMPACT
Figure 5.1 Preferred Alignment Option and Study Area of Air Quality Impact Assessment
Figure 5.2 Existing and Planned Major Air Pollution Sources Further Away from the Study Area
Figure 5.3 Representative Air Sensitive Receivers in the Proximity of the SWC Landing Point at Hong Kong side
Figure 5.4 Proposed Construction Works Areas and Access Roads for SWC
Figure 5.5 Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Total Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground for Unmitigated Case
Figure 5.6 Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Total Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground for Unmitigated Case
Figure 5.7 Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Total Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground for Mitigated Case
Figure 5.8 Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Total Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground for Mitigated Case
Figure 5.9A Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground
Figure 5.9B Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.9C Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 5.10A Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground
Figure 5.10B Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.10C Predicted Worst-case 1-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 5.11A Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground
Figure 5.11B Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.11C Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 5.12A Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground
Figure 5.12B Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.12C Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 5.13A Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground
Figure 5.13B Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.13C Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 1.5m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
Figure 5.14A Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground
Figure 5.14B Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 1 of 2)
Figure 5.14C Predicted Worst-case 24-hour Average Respirable Suspended Particulates Concentration Contours at 10m above Ground (Sheet 2 of 2)
SECTION 6 NOISE IMPACT
Figure 6.1 Location of Noise Sensitive Receivers and Assessment Points
Figure 6.2 Study Area of Noise Assessment
Figure 6.3 Potential Barging Points at Lung Kwu Sheung Tan
Figure 6.4 Locations of Notional Noise Source for Construction Noise Assessment at Ngau Hom Shek
Figure 6.5 Bridge Structure for Landing Alignment
Figure 6.6 Construction Traffic Forecasts
Figure 6.7 Proposed Purpose-Built Site Hoarding Location in DBL EIA
Figure 6.8 Construction Noise Purpose-Built Site Hoarding
SECTION 7 HYDRODYNAMIC, WATER QUALITY AND SEDIMENT QUALITY IMPACTS
Figure 7.1 Site Plan and SWC Alignment
Figure 7.2 EPD's Sediment Sampling Stations
Figure 7.3 Marine Water Sampling Stations in Shenzhen
Figure 7.4 Locations of the discharge points in Deep Bay
Figure 7.5 Water Sensitive Receivers
Figure 7.6 Grid Layout of the Deep Bay Model
Figure 7.7 Bathymetry Schematisation of the Deep Bay Model
Figure 7.8 Existing Coastline Configuration
Figure 7.9 Coastline Configuration before Commencement of the SWC Bridge Construction
Figure 7.10 Coastline Configuration After the completion of the SWC project
Figure 7.11 Future Coastline Configuration with inclusion of Unconfirmed Reclamation Programme on the Shenzhen Side
Figure 7.12 Proposed Indicator Points near the SWC Bridge
Figure 7.13 Cross Sections Defined in the Model
Figure 7.14 Main Spans - General Arrangement
Figure 7.15 Main Spans - Tower and Foundation
Figure 7.16 Typical Spans - General Arrangement
Figure 7.17 Typical Spans - Piers and Foundations
Figure 7.18 Vibrocore Sampling Points of Sediments for SI
Figure 7.19 Grab Sampling Points of Sediments for SI
Figure 7.20 Sediment Discharge Points (Worst Case Scenario)
Figure 7.21 SWC Works area at Ngau Hom Shek
Figure 7.22 Zinc Concentrations at Grab Sampling Points
Figure 7.23 Arsenic Concentration at Grab Sampling Points
Figure 7.24 Lead Concentration at Grab Sampling Points
Figure 7.25 Case D1 Modelling Results - Wet Season
Figure 7.26 Case D1 Modelling Results - Dry Season
Figure 7.27 Case D2 Modelling Results - Wet Season
Figure 7.28 Case D2 Modelling Results - Dry Season
Figure 7.29 Case D3 Modelling Results - Wet Season
Figure 7.30 Case D3 Modelling Results - Dry Season
Figure 7.31 Gei Wais at Mai Po
Figure 7.31A Sediment Sampling Points in AFCD's Study
Figure 7.32 Arrangement of Silt Curtain
Figure 7.33 Momentary Flow through Bridge Alignment; Dry Season (Upper) and Wet Season (Lower); Scenario 1 (Dotted Line) and Scenario 3 (Solid Line)
Figure 7.34 Accumulated Flow through Bridge Alignment; Dry Season (Upper) and Wet Season (Lower); Scenario 1 (Dotted Line) and Scenario 3 (Solid Line)
Figure 7.35 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 1 (Upper) and Scenario 2 (Lower); Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid-Ebb
Figure 7.36 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 3 (Upper) and Scenario 4 (Lower); Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid-Ebb
Figure 7.37 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 1 (Upper) and Scenario 2 (Lower); Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid-Flood
Figure 7.38 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 3 (Upper) and Scenario 4 (Lower); Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid-Flood
Figure 7.39 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 1 (Upper) and Scenario 2 (Lower); Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid-Ebb
Figure 7.40 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 3 (Upper) and Scenario 4 (Lower); Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid-Ebb
Figure 7.41 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 1 (Upper) and Scenario 2 (Lower); Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid-Flood
Figure 7.42 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Scenario 3 (Upper) and Scenario 4 (Lower); Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid-Flood
Figure 7.43 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Dry Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 2
Figure 7.44 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Dry Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 3
Figure 7.45 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Dry Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 4
Figure 7.46 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Wet Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 2
Figure 7.47 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Wet Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 3
Figure 7.48 Velocity Field; Surface Layer; Wet Season Spring Tide; Upper: Mid Flood; Lower: Mid Ebb; Scenarios 1 and 4
Figure 7.49 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Salinity; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.50 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Salinity; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.51 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.52 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.53 Dry Season-Mean Bottom 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.54 Dry Season-Mean Bottom 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.55 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.56 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.57 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Suspended Solids; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.58 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Suspended Solids; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.59 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged 5-Day BOD; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.60 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged 5-Day BOD; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.61 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged E. Coli; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.62 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged E. Coli; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.63 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Unionised Ammonia; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.64 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Unionised Ammonia; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.65 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Total Inorganic Nitrogen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.66 Dry Season-Mean Depth-averaged Total Inorganic Nitrogen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.67 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Salinity; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.68 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Salinity; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.69 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.70 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.71 Wet Season-Mean Bottom 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.72 Wet Season-Mean Bottom 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.73 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.74 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged 90 percentile Dissolved Oxygen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.75 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Suspended Solids; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.76 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Suspended Solids; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.77 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged 5-day BOD; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.78 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged 5-day BOD; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.79 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged E. Coli; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.80 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged E. Coli; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.81 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Unionised Ammonia; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.82 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Unionised Ammonia; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.83 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Total Inorganic Nitrogen; Upper: Scenario 1; Lower: Scenario 2
Figure 7.84 Wet Season-Mean Depth-averaged Total Inorganic Nitrogen; Upper: Scenario 3; Lower: Scenario 4
Figure 7.85 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Oyster Beds near Lau Fau Shan (DO; SS; BOD5) - Dry Season
Figure 7.86 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Oyster Beds near Lau Fau Shan (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Dry Season
Figure 7.87 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Pak Nai SSSI (DO; SS; BOD5) - Dry Season
Figure 7.88 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Pak Nai SSSI (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Dry Season
Figure 7.89 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at EPD Monitoring Station DM4 (DO;SS;BOD5) - Dry Season
Figure 7.90 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at EPD Monitoring Station DM4 (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Dry Season
Figure 7.91 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Shekou Oyster Beds (DO; SS; BOD5) - Dry Season
Figure 7.92 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Shekou Oyster Beds (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Dry Season
Figure 7.93 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Oyster Beds near Lau Fau Shan (DO; SS; BOD5) - Wet Season
Figure 7.94 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Oyster Beds near Lau Fau Shan (E.Coli; UIA; TIN) - Wet Season
Figure 7.95 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Pak Nai SSSI (DO; SS; BOD5) - Wet Season
Figure 7.96 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Pak Nai SSSI (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Wet Season
Figure 7.97 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at EPD Monitoring Station DM4 (DO; SS; BOD5) - Wet Season
Figure 7.98 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at EPD Monitoring Station DM4 (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Wet Season
Figure 7.99 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Shekou Oyster Beds (DO; SS; BOD5) - Wet Season
Figure 7.100 Depth-averaged Time Series Plot at Shekou Oyster Beds (E. Coli; UIA; TIN) - Wet Season
Figure 7.101A Predicted Water Quality Results at DM1, DM2 and DM3
Figure 7.101B Predicted Water Quality Results at DM1, DM2 and DM3
Figure 7.101C Predicted Water Quality Results at DM1, DM2 and DM3
Figure 7.102 Sedimentation Flux at Mai Po, Pak Nai SSSI and Tsim Bei Tsui SSSI - Dry Season
Figure 7.103 Sedimentation Flux at Mai Po, Pak Nai SSSI and Tsim Bei Tsui SSSI - Wet Season
Figure 7.104 Sedimentation Flux-Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid Ebb; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower: Scenario 3, Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.105 Sedimentation Flux-Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid Ebb; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower: Scenario 3, Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.106 Sedimentation Flux-Dry Season Spring Tide; Mid Flood; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.107 Sedimentation Flow-Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid Flood; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower: Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.108 Resuspension Flux-Dry Season Spring Tide, Mid Ebb; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.109 Resuspension Flux-Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid Ebb; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower: Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.110 Resuspension Flux-Dry Season Spring Tide, Mid flood; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2; Lower Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.111 Resuspension Flux; Wet Season Spring Tide; Mid Flood; Top: Scenario 1; Upper: Scenario 2,; Lower: Scenario 3; Bottom: Scenario 4
Figure 7.112A Predicted Sedimentation Fluxes
Figure 7.112B Predicted Sedimentation Fluxes
Figure 7.112C Predicted Sedimentation Fluxes
Figure 7.113 Monitoring Points for Sedimentation on Both Sides of the Bridge Alignment
Figure 7.114 Typical Gully Installation for Highway Structures
Figure 7.115 Low Flow Diversion Schematic of Operation
Figure 7.116 Vertical Profile Required for Option D - Low Flow Diversion
Figure 7.117 Layout of Overflow Weir Chamber
Figure 7.118 Low Flow Interceptor Pipe and Chamber Arrangement at Overflow
Figure 7.119 Interceptor at Gully
Figure 7.120 Proposed Sedimentation Tank Location Plan
Figure 7.121 Sedimentation Tank Details
Figure 7.122 Standard Drainage System with Energy Dissipater
Figure 7.123 Wastewater Treatment during Bored Pile Construction at Various Locations
Figure 7.123A Precautionary Drainage Measures During Bored Pile Construction - Plan
SECTION 8 WASTE MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Figure 8.1 Grab Sampling Points of Sediments for SI
Figure 8.2 Vibrocore Sampling Points of Sediments for SI
SECTION 9 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT
Figure 9.1 Bridge Alignment (S-curved option)
Figure 9.2 Fauna Sampling Locations
Figure 9.3 Location of Egretries and Vantage Point for Flight Behaviour Study
Figure 9.4 Dolphin Fixed-wing Aircraft Survey Transects
Figure 9.5 Dolphin Helicopters Survey Transects
Figure 9.6 Habitat Map Showing Distribution of Seagrass beds
Figure 9.7 Temporal Trend of January Bird Numbers in the Deep Bay Area, 1979-2001 (Data from Hong Kong Bird Watching Society Reports to AFCD)
Figure 9.8 Seasonal Trend of Bird Numbers in NW/LFS, Nov97-Sep01 (Data from Hong Kong Bird Watching Society Reports to AFCD; missing data were due to shortage of surveyors)
Figure 9.9 Ecological and Fisheries Conservation Areas relevant to the Project
Figure 9.10 Black-faced Spoonbill annual census results for HKSAR + Shenzhen and Macau from 1990 through 2002 (data from Dahmer and Felly (in prep.))
Figure 9.11 Photos of Various Habitats and Species of Conservation Interest within the Study Area
Figure 9.12 Dolphin Sighting Records (Number in brackets represents number of dolphins seen)
Figure 9.13 Lotus Bridge in Macau SAR showing Mudflats and Mangrove Plantations
Figure 9.14 Roosting and Feeding sites used by Herons, Egrets, Spoonbills, and Shore birds near the Lotus Bridge Linking Zhuhai with Cotai reclamation in Macau SAR
Figure 9.15 Results of Computer Modelling of Shading Effect
Figure 9.16 Lotus Bridge in Macau SAR showing 35m Pier Spacing Compared to 70m Pier Spacing
Figure 9.16A Conceptual layout for the Proposed Ecological Compensation at Ngau Hom Shek
Figure 9.17 Extent of existing mangrove stands, seagrass beds and mangroves replanting site
Figure 9.18 Location of habitat loss
SECTION 10 FISHERIES IMPACT
Figure 10.1 Bridge Alignment (S-curved Option)
Figure 10.2 Fishing Areas within the Assessment Area
Figure 10.3 Mudflats, Oyster Beds and Oyster Rafts from Tsim Bei Tsui to Ha Pak Nai
Figure 10.4 Mudflats, Oyster Beds and Oyster Rafts within 500m Boundary
Figure 10.5 Orthophoto (Rectified Aerial Photos taken on 2 & 3 January 2002) showing the Sea and Intertidal Zone within 500m from either side of the Bridge Alignment
Figure 10.6 Photos of Intertidal Mudflat at Ngau Hom Shek
Figure 10.7 Fish Ponds near Lau Fau Shan
Figure 10.8 Other Projects in Deep Bay Area
SECTION 11 HAZARD TO LIFE
No enclosure
SECTION 12 CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT
Figure 12.1 Plan of SWCLP Options, the Ngau Hom Shek Archaeological Site and Archaeological Investigations
Figure 12.2 Archaeological Survey at the Location of SWCLP Option AB
Figure 12.3 Profile of Test Pit T1 - South Wall
Figure 12.4 Proposed Works near NHS Archaeological Beach Site
Figure 12.5 Archaeological Survey in The Ngau Hom Shek Area
Figure 12.6 Location of the Survey Area and Shore Based Equipment
Figure 12.7 Photograph of the Study Area
Figure 12.8 Historic Photograph of Oyster Fishing
Figure 12.9 British Admiralty Chart 1899
Figure 12.10 British Admiralty Chart 1966
Figure 12.11 A 1905 - 1909 War Office Map
Figure 12.12 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Oyster Beds on the Seabed
Figure 12.13 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Deeply Incised Trawl Scars
Figure 12.14 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Unidentified Object Number 1
Figure 12.15 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Unidentified Targets Numbers 2 & 3
Figure 12.16 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Unidentified Target Number 4
Figure 12.17 Side Scan Sonar Data Showing Unidentified Target Number 5
Figure 12.18 Location of the Unidentified Features
Figure 12.19 Location of the Unidentified Feature
Figure 12.20 Marine Archaeological Investigation in Deep Bay
Plate 1 Aerial Photo of SWCLP Works Area
Plate 2 Site Views of Landing Point Option AB
Plate 3 Test Pit T1 Stratigraphy and Remains
Plate 4 Remains Collected at the Ngau Hom shek Beach Site
Plate 5 Geometric Patterns on Bronze Age Pottery
Plate 6 Remains from Augering at the Ngau Hom shek Beach Site
Plate 7 Survey at the Locations of Landing Point Options C and D
SECTION 13 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Figure 13.1 Curved Bridge - Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
Figure 13.2 Main Spans - General Arrangement
Figure 13.3 Main Spans - Tower and Foundation
Figure 13.4 Main Span -Bridge Deck
Figure 13.5 Typical Spans - Bridge Deck
Figure 13.6 Typical Spans - Piers and Foundations
Figure 13.7 Typical Spans - Construction Methodology
Figure 13.8 Main Spans - Construction Methodology
Figure 13.9 Extract From Approved Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan No. S/YL-HT/4 Dated 28 march, 2000
Figure 13.10 Baseline Landscape Characteristics and Landscape Resources
Figure 13.11 Zone of Visual Influence and Sensitive Visual Receivers
Figure 13.12 Mitigation Measures in Construction Phase
Figure 13.13 Mitigation Measures in Operation Phase
Figure 13.14A Construction Impacts on Landscape Resources & Landscape Character Areas
Figure 13.14B Construction Impacts on Sensitive Visual Receivers
Figure 13.15A Operation Impacts on Landscape Resources & Landscape Character Areas
Figure 13.15B Operation Impacts on Sensitive Visual Receivers
Figure 13.16A Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources & Landscape Character Areas
Figure 13.16B Residual Impacts on Sensitive Visual Receivers
Figure 13.17 View Point Location
Figure 13.18 Oblique Aerial Photograph
Figure 13.19 Viewpoint No.1: View from Ngau Hom Shek / Deep Bay Road - Existing and Day 1 without Mitigation
Figure 13.20 Viewpoint No.1: View from Ngau Hom Shek / Deep Bay Road - Day 1 with Mitigation and Year 10
Figure 13.21 Viewpoint No.2: View from Greenbelt - Existing and Day 1 without Mitigation
Figure 13.22 Viewpoint No.2: View from Greenbelt -Day 1 with Mitigation and Year 10
Figure 13.23 Viewpoint No.3: View from Sheung Pak Nai Village - Existing and Day 1 with/without Mitigation
Figure 13.24 Viewpoint No.4: View from Deep Bay (Boat Location) - Existing and Day 1 with/without Mitigation and Year 10
Figure 13.25 Viewpoint No.5: View from Lau Fau Shan - Existing and Day 1 with/without Mitigation and Year 10
Figure 13.26 Viewpoint No.6: View from Tin Shui Wai Residential Block 39th Floor - Existing and Day 1 with/without Mitigation and Year 10
Figure 13.27 Main Spans - 3D Computer Model - Sheet 1
Figure 13.28 Main Spans - 3D Computer Model - Sheet 2
Figure 13.29 Main Spans - 3D Computer Model - Sheet 3
Figure 13.30 Tree Survey Plan
Figure 13.31 Tree Survey Plan - Fung Kong Tsuen Road
Figure 13.32 Master Landscape Plan
SECTION 14 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT
No enclosure
SECTION 15 ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES
No enclosure
SECTION 16 CONCLUSIONS
No enclosure
SECTION 17 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
No enclosure
