13. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
13.1.1 This chapter outlines the landscape and visual impacts associated with the Shenzhen Western Corridor (SWC) in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance which became law in Hong Kong on 1st April 1998. Both construction and operation impacts are assessed. This assessment is based upon the current SWC alignment and design illustrated in Figures 13.1 - 13.8
13.1.2 The assessment includes:
· A listing of the relevant environmental legislation and
guidelines;
· a description of the scope and contents of the study, including a description
of the assessment methodology;
· a review of the relevant planning and development control framework;
· a baseline study providing a comprehensive and accurate description of the
baseline landscape and visual character;
· recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures; and
· identification of the potential landscape and visual impacts and prediction
of their magnitude and potential significance, before and after the mitigation
measures.
Alignment Review and Selected Conceptual Design
13.1.3 The assessment of alignment and design options is more fully discussed in other sections of this report. Please see Section 4 for an overview of the alignment options and assessments. The Report on Alignment Review assessed alternative alignment options for the SWC including both tunnel and bridge options. The assessment clearly indicated that the bridge options were preferred over the tunnel options. The Report identified two bridge alignment options based on a landing point on the Shenzhen side at Dongjiaotou reclamation in Shekou and the Hong Kong landing point at Ngau Hom Shek. Both bridge options score similar marks in the comparison appraisal conducted in the Report. The first option comprises a straight alignment between Dongjiaotou and Ngau Hom Shek. The second option has similar landing points as the first option but has a gentle S-shaped horizontal alignment. The S-curve is introduced to improve the angles between the bridge alignment and the navigation channels so as to reduce ship impacts. At the same time, this would offer interesting views to drivers and passengers travelling along the bridge.
13.1.4 Comparison of the straight and curved alignments were presented to the Engineering Working Group during the 2nd Engineering Working Group meeting held on 26 October 2001 and the curved alignment was endorsed by the Engineering Working Group at the meeting, subject to fine-tuning of the alignment in the course of the design. The concept of the curved alignment was also presented to the Mainland authorities at a meeting held on 15 October 2001 and the alignment was accepted by Mainland.
13.1.5 The "Working Paper on Structural Forms and Construction Options over the Navigation Channel and other Sections" assessed various possible structural forms and construction methods for the bridge option of SWC. Possible options were identified, evaluated and compared on the basis of key parameters such as aesthetics, time, cost, maintenance etc. The initial findings of the Working Paper were presented in a meeting held on 15 October 2001 with the Mainland Authorities and their designer. The preferred structural forms from the Mainland Authorities was also presented. Subsequent to the presentation and discussion of the different proposals, three options for the typical spans and four options for the main span was selected for further elaboration and these were presented in the Final Report on Conceptual Design.
13.1.6 The alternative bridge schemes were presented to a Joint Assessment Panel comprising Mainland representatives and the members of ACABAS in 3 December 2001. The panel subsequently decided that typical span Option 1a - 75m Span Box Girder with Double Reverse Curve Streamline Soffit and navigational span Option 1 - Cable-stayed Bridge with Inclined Tower identified in the Draft Report on Conceptual Design should be adopted for implementation for the typical spans and navigation channel spans respectively.
13.1.7 The landscape and visual impact assessment presented in this report will be based on the endorsed S-curve alignment and the selected bridge scheme.
13.2 Environmental Legislation and Guidelines
13.2.1 The following legislation, standards and guidelines are applicable to the evaluation of landscape and visual impacts associated with the construction and operation of the SWC:
· Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap.499.S.16)
and the Technical Memorandum on EIA Process (EIAO TM), particularly Annexes 10
and 18;
· Approved Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan No. S/YL-HT/4.(28 March 2000)
· Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines;
· WBTC No. 17/2000 on Improvement to the Appearance of Slopes
· WBTC No. 7/2002 Tree Planting in Public Works
· WBTC No. 25/93 - Control of Visual Impact of Slopes;
· WBTC No. 14/2002 - Management and Maintenance of both Natural Vegetation and
Landscape Works, and Tree Preservation.
· WBTC No. 19/98: The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and
Associated Structures (ACABAS);
· HyDTC No. 10/2001: Visibility of Directional Signs.
· GEO (1999) - Use of Vegetation as Surface Protection on Slopes;
· GEO (1/2000) - Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment and
Bio-Engineering for Man-Made Slopes and Retaining Walls
· Preliminary Project Feasibility Study (PPFS) Report for Deep Bay Link -
Transport Department (May 1999);
· Feasibility Study for additional Cross Border Links, Stage 2. Deep Bay Link
Preliminary Environmental Review
· Feasibility Study for Additional Cross Border Links
· Stage 2 Deep Bay Link Preliminary Environmental Review
· The EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-081/2001) issued under the EIAO on 5.9.01.
· EIAO Guidance Note No.8/2002 - Preparation of Landscape and Visual Impact
Assessment under EIAO.
13.2.2 In addition, reference has been made to
· Agreement No. CE 109/98: Deep Bay Link - Investigation & Preliminary Design.
13.3 Scope and Content of the Study
Shenzhen Western Corridor - Scope
13.3.1 The nature and extent of the Shenzhen Western Corridor (SWC) is described below. The current design is illustrated in Figures 13.1 - 13.8.
13.3.2 The SWC is a dual - 3 lane carriageway, in the form of an elevated structure with hard shoulders, linking the proposed Deep Bay Link (DBL) to the section of SWC within the boundary of the Mainland. The Hong Kong Section of SWC is a designated project under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO). An environmental permit is required before construction and operation of the project.
13.3.3 The study area envelope for the proposed alignment covers a corridor in Deep Bay and a strip of land along the north-western coast of New Territory of HKSAR. Both elevated structure and tunnel option had been considered in earlier studies and the selected structural form of the highway is assumed to be an elevated structure.
13.3.4 The section of the highway with the HKSAR waters is about 3.2 km in length (refer Figure 2.1 under Chapter 2) and will be connected to the portion of about 2 km in length to be provided by the Shenzhen authority. The proposed landing location of the bridge in Shenzhen will be located at Dongjiaotou. The selected landing point of the SWC, thereby linking with the DBL, is at Ngau Hom Shek. The proposed highway will be connected to Deep Bay Link on the Hong Kong side. All the permanent works for this project will mostly be located offshore with certain activities to be carried out on land in the works areas and along the access roads.
13.3.5 Temporary works areas are required at Ngau Hom Shek just to the west of the alignment and is indicated on Figure 2.6 under Chapter 2. A haulage road linking the temporary works areas is required and it is proposed to modify Fung Kong Tsuen Road (refer Figure 6.6 under Chapter 6) for this purpose. Additionally, a barging point is required and it is proposed to utilise an existing barge point at Lung Kwu Sheung Tan (refer Figure 6.3 under Chapter 6).
Limits of the Study Area
13.3.6 The limit of the landscape impact study is 500m on either side of the limit of the SWC and the tentative demarcation boundary with Deep Bay Link Road. This is illustrated in Fig 13.10. The limits of the visual impact studies are the zones of visual influence (ZVIs) of the Deep Bay Link Road during the construction and operation phases. This is illustrated in Figure 13.11. It should be noted that the demarcation line between the SWC and DBL is now located at the coastal edge. Most of the landscape impacts included in this report are associated more with the DBL than the SWC. They are included within this report because of the study area requirement extending to 500m beyond the bridge alignment (source of impact).
13.3.7 The sources of impacts, though technically caused by the DBL, are assessed and mitigation measures proposed under the SWC. Mitigation measures will be implemented under the SWC construction contract.
13.4.1 Landscape and visual impacts have been assessed separately for the construction, operational (opening day) and residual (Year 10) stages. The assessments take into account existing/planned/approved land uses as baseline conditions, and assess all direct and indirect impacts on existing/planned/approved land uses, and on future outlook of the area. Potential impacts are identified in terms of being beneficial/adverse, direct/indirect, short term/long term, and reversible/irreversible.
13.4.2 Impacts are determined in terms of significance thresholds, which are the product of the magnitude of change to baseline conditions due to the proposed Works and the sensitivity of resource/character/receivers. In general terms, magnitude of change relates to parameters of the proposed Works in the context of baseline conditions, and sensitivity refers to properties of resource/character/receivers:
13.4.3 Where appropriate the cumulative impacts of other development proposals is considered.
Landscape Impacts
13.4.4 The assessment of landscape impacts involves the
following procedures:
¨ Assessment of the degree of sensitivity to change of the landscape resources/character. This is influenced by a number of factors including
u quality and maturity of landscape characters/resources,
u rarity of landscape elements: whether is considered to be of local, regional, national or global importance
u ability of the landscape resource/character to accommodate change,
u
whether
there are any statutory or regulatory limitations/ requirements relating to the
resource
¨
Identification
of potential sources of landscape impacts. These
are the various elements of the construction works and operational procedures
that would generate landscape impacts.
¨
Identification
of the magnitude of landscape impacts.
The magnitude of the impact depends on a number of factors including:
u scale of development, and the physical extent of the impact,
u compatibility of the project with the surrounding landscape,
u duration of impacts i.e. whether it is temporary (short, medium or long term), under construction and operation phases,
u
potentially
reversible, or permanent and irreversible
¨
Identification
of potential landscape mitigation measures.
These may take the form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to
the basic engineering and architectural design to prevent and/or minimise
adverse impacts; remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of
building features; and compensatory measures such as the implementation of
landscape design measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc)
to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate
potentially beneficial long term impacts.
¨ Prediction of the significance of landscape impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures. This achieved by synthesis of the above information leading to an evaluation of the degree of significance of the landscape impacts into thresholds of substantial, moderate, slight, or negligible. Impacts are classified depending on whether the impacts are adverse/beneficial, and irreversible/reversible. By synthesising the magnitude of the various impacts and the sensitivity of the various landscape resources it is possible to identify a series of thresholds to be used as a basis for the categorisation of the degree of significance of the impacts in a logical, well reasoned and consistent fashion.
13.4.5 The rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely substantial, moderate, slight and negligible depending on the combination of large-intermediate-small-negligible magnitude of change, and high-medium-low degree of sensitivity is presented in Table 13.1.
13.4.6 The inclusion of a 'negligible' magnitude of impact is necessary because a negligible impact is different from a 'small' magnitude of impact. A 'small' magnitude impact will cause a varying degree of resultant impact significance depending on whether the landscape resource's sensitivity is low, medium or high. However, a negligible magnitude of impact will always result in negligible significance, irrespective of the sensitivity of the resource.
Table 13.1 Relationship between Receptor Sensitivity and Impact Magnitude in Defining Significance
Impact
Significance |
Receptor
Sensitivity (Landscape Resource or VSR) |
|||
Low |
Medium |
High |
||
Magnitude
of to baseline conditions due to the Works |
Large |
Slight/Moderate |
Moderate/
Substantial |
Substantial |
Intermediate |
Slight |
Moderate |
Moderate/
Substantial |
|
Small |
Negligible/Slight |
Slight |
Slight/Moderate |
|
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visual Impacts
13.4.7 The assessment of visual impacts involves the following procedures.
¨ Identification
of the ZVI’s during the construction and operational Stages of the improvement
works. This
is achieved by site visit and desk-top study of topographic maps and
photographs, and preparation of cross-sections to determine visibility of the
improvement works from various locations.
¨ Identification
of the Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSR's) within the ZVI’s at construction
and operational Stages. These are the people who would reside within, work within,
play within, or travel through, the ZVI’s.
¨ Assessment of the degree of sensitivity to change of the VSR’s. Factors affecting the sensitivity of receivers for evaluation of visual impacts:
u value and quality of existing views,
u availability and amenity alternative views,
u type and estimated number of receiver population,
u duration or frequency of view, and
u degree of visibility.
Those who view the impact from their homes are considered to be highly sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook from their home will have a substantial effect on their perception of the quality and acceptability of their home environment and their general quality of life. Those who view the impact from their workplace are considered to be only moderately sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook will have a less important, although still material, effect on their perception of their quality of life. The degree to which this applies depends on whether the workplace is industrial, retail or commercial. Those who view the impact whilst taking part in an outdoor leisure activity may display varying sensitivity depending on the type of leisure activity. Those who view the impact whilst travelling on a public thoroughfare will also display varying sensitivity depending on the speed of travel and whether the view is continuous or occasionally glimpsed.
¨ Identification
of potential sources of visual impacts. These are
the various elements of the construction works and operational procedures that
would generate visual impacts.
¨ Assessment
of potential magnitude of visual impacts. This
depends on a number of factors including
u scale of development;
u compatibility of the project with the visual context;
u duration of impacts under construction and operation phases;
u reversibility of change;
u distance of the source of impact from the viewer; and
u
potential
obstruction of view.
¨ Identification
of potential visual mitigation measures. These may
take the form of revisions/refinements to the engineering and architectural
design to minimise potential impacts, and/or the implementation of landscape
design measures (e.g. screen tree planting, colour design of hard landscape
features etc) to alleviate adverse visual impacts and generate potentially
beneficial long term visual impacts.
¨ Prediction of the significance of visual impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures. This achieved by synthesis of the above information leading to an evaluation of the degree of significance of the visual impacts into thresholds of substantial, moderate, slight, or negligible. Impacts are classified depending on whether the impacts are adverse/beneficial, and irreversible/reversible. By synthesising the magnitude of the various visual impacts and the sensitivity of the various VSR’s it is possible to identify a series of thresholds to be used as a basis for the categorisation of the degree of significance of the impacts in a logical, well reasoned and consistent fashion.
13.4.8 The rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely substantial, moderate, slight and negligible depending on the combination of large-intermediate-small-negligible magnitude of change, and high-medium-low degree of sensitivity of the VSR's is presented in Table 13.1. The inclusion of a 'negligible' magnitude of impact is necessary because a negligible impact is different from a 'small' magnitude of impact. A 'small' magnitude impact will cause a varying degree of resultant impact significance, depending on whether the receptor's sensitivity is low, medium or high. However, a negligible magnitude of impact will always result in negligible impact significance, irrespective of the sensitivity of the VSR.
13.4.9 In addition, the following have been considered in the preparation of this assessment:
· All mitigation proposals in this report are practical and
achievable within the known parameters of funding, implementation, management
and maintenance. The suggested agents for the implementation (and subsequent
management and maintenance, if applicable) are indicated in Tables 13.5 and
13.6. All works shall be implemented, managed and maintained by Highways
Department unless otherwise stated in WBTC No. 14/2002.
· The DBL is a committed development.
13.4.10 Photomontages and computer generated 3D images are provided to further explain the impacts and the mitigation measures proposed. These are provided in Figures 13.19 to 13.29.
DBL Study Interface
13.4.11 The study area for this project has changed from that indicated in the Final Working paper on LVIA. The interface with the DBL is now located along the coastline (i.e. MHW). Previously, it was located 300m inland from the coastline. It is necessary to consider the impacts assessed in both projects on a collective or cumulative basis. It is envisaged that as both studies proceed further detailed references will be incorporated within each respective report.
13.5 Planning and Development Control Framework
13.5.1 A review has been undertaken of the current planning goals and objectives, statutory land-use and landscape planning designations for the Study Area.
Study Area
13.5.2 The terrestrial study area is covered by the Approved Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan No. S/YL-HT/4. (28 March 2000). The area is zoned currently for Agricultural (AGR), Green Belt (GB) and Coastal Protection (CPA). The water area is recognised as of significant marine conservation: an area of high landscape value suitable for conservation under the Territory Development Strategy Review.
Existing Use and Potential Impacts
13.5.3 The existing use of the study area is Green Belt, small village areas and agricultural uses. The strip along the coast containing mangroves and mudflats is protected under the Coastal Protection Area. The imposition of the SWC will have significant impacts on the planning intention and existing uses of the area. The SWC will result in a major built structure traversing the coastal area, and reducing the natural quality that is currently enjoyed. Impacts through the other areas will be less given the degree of modification that has already occurred. The impact will still be moderate through these areas.
Existing Character of Adjacent Areas
13.5.4 To the north and east of the study area, the existing character is characterised by low coastal foothills covered in a mix of grasslands and small pockets of woodlands. Land uses include container storage yards, small coastal villages and the high-rise residential area of Tin Shui Wai. The quality and character of this area varies as a direct result of land use practices. This is particularly notable with the container storage yards lowering the overall visual quality of the landscape.
13.5.5 Greenbelt and foothills consist of grassland, shrub and woodland areas. These areas have been heavily disturbed and are interspersed with grave sites. As such they are subject to frequent burning
13.5.6 To the south, the area is characterised by small villages located on a narrow coastal strip between Deep Bay and the Castle Peak Range. Vegetation varies from woodland to open grassland-shrub mosaic. The natural quality of this area is high with natural landscape features tending to be visually dominant over human developments. The strip on the coastal side of Deep Bay Road is zoned Coastal Protection Area (CPA).
13.5.7 The development of the Shenzhen Western Corridor is likely to affect the existing and adjacent natural setting and alter the landscape character area due to its scale and elevation.
Planned and Committed Development
13.5.8 With the exception of Deep Bay Link, there are no committed developments within the vicinity of the project area.
Landscape Planning Destination
Inshore Water Protection Area (Coastal Protection Area)
13.5.9 The Deep Bay Coastal area has been identified as a potential inshore water protection / recreation area due to its valuable natural coastal features and other ecological features such as mangroves. The SWC will traverse through this Planning Designation.
Outline Zoning Plans
13.5.10 The current statutory designations for the Study Area
are shown on the following Outline Zoning Plans:
· Approved Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan No. S/YL-HT/4. (28 March 2000)
13.5.11 Under the current OZP the proposed SWC alignment study area passes or
affects land designated for the following uses: 'Coastal Protection Area (CPA)'
and 'Agriculture (AGR) and 'Green Belt (GB)'. Upon the authorisation of the SWC
by the Chief Executive in Council under the Roads (Works, Use and Compensation)
Ordinance, the SWC shall be deemed to be approved under the Town Planning
Ordinance, and the alignment will be shown on the OZP for public information in
the next gazettal of the plan.
13.5.12 The planning intentions of this designated OZP are described below in terms of landscape and visual impact assessment of the proposed SWC. Only the planning intentions of relevant designated areas discussed.
Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan
13.5.13 'Green Belt' (GB): the planning intention of this zone is to define urban and sub-urban limits, contain urban sprawl and to act as a buffer area between developments and more sensitive areas. The Green Belt zones in this area include the ranges of vegetated knolls and hills and permitted burial grounds to the east and south east of Ngau Hom Shek and Ngau Hom Sha respectively. Since much of the area is designated permitted burial grounds, these areas are not frequently used as recreation resources. The SWC dissects the Green Belt Area located to the south of Ngau Hom Shek. It follows a narrow, steep sided valley which runs north south linking the north of Ha Tsuen with Ngau Hom Shek.
13.5.14 'Agriculture' (AGR): the planning intention of this zone is to retain and safeguard good agricultural land for agricultural purposes. The agricultural in Ngau Hom Shek is categorised 'good quality' and is under active cultivation. The SWC traverses this zone in the form of an elevated road linking with the northern approach road section of DBL.
13.5.15 'Coastal Protection Area' (CPA): the planning intention of this zone is to preserve the natural coastline with a minimum of built development so as to retain their attractive coastal features. The SWC traverses this zone at Ngau Hom Shek to join with the DBL elevated road.
13.5.16 Amendment to the Ha Tsuen Outline Zoning Plan to indicate the SWC and Deep Bay Link alignments will be incorporated in the next gazettal of the OZP for public information.
Summary
13.5.17 The alignment will cross a Inshore Water Protection Area, a Coastal Protection Area, Agricultural Land and Green Belt. All of these zones are designed to safeguard the landscape either from the loss of agricultural land or from the development of built structures. The intention is to retain the area's natural qualities. While the SWC is elevated reducing its overall physical 'footprint' on the land, its scale and nature are not complementary to the intentions of the underlying zones.
Generally
13.6.1 The baseline landscape characteristics and landscape resources are mapped in Figure 13.10. Photomontages are included in Figures 13.19 to 13.26.
Landform
13.6.2 The topography of the study area consists of a narrow coastal plain bounded by the Yuen Tau Shan foothills to the south and Deep Bay to the north. The topography creates an area of great scenic value particularly when viewed in relation to the narrow coastal plain and the sea.
Wetland
13.6.3 The natural valley to the south of Ngau Hom Shek contains natural wetland. This area will be impacted under the DBL but is included within the study area of SWC.
Vegetation
13.6.4 The vegetation of the subject site consists of the following:
· Grassland associated with Green Belts of Yuen Tau Shan and
Tsing Shan.
· Agricultural vegetation located in small pockets within the study area. These
are associated with the village of Ngau Hom Shek. Many of these agricultural
fields are now abandoned.
· Vegetation (tree stands and shrubs) associated with Deep Bay Road corridor.
· Tree groves and individual trees associated with villages.
· Freshwater marshes at Ngau Hom Shek and the adjacent valley.
· Mangroves located at the coastline at Ngau Hom Shek.
The Sea
13.6.5 Deep Bay provides positive views to adjacent receivers.
From the Hong Kong coastline, valuable views are offered across to Shenzhen.
Human and Cultural Landscape Resources
Buildings and Settlements
13.6.6 Primarily the existing development within the study
area consists of several villages and village type developments at Ngau Hom Shek.
Some buildings associated with agricultural plots also exist.
Major Infrastructure
13.6.7 Major infrastructure is limited to the Deep Bay Road which is a narrow carriageway running parallel to the coastline.
Landscape Resources
13.6.8 Several landscape resources have been identified within the study area. These are described below and indicated on Figure 13.10.
LR1 Grassland/Eroded Slopes associated with the Greenbelt
13.6.9 The Greenbelt within the study area consists primarily of grassland and eroded slopes. Much of the grassland is interspersed with graves and their associated access trails. As a consequence to this, the grassland here tends to be poor in quality. There is also evidence of significant bushfire damage. As a consequence erosion of the slopes has occurred. These factors, combined with the fact that the lower slopes are used for illegal dumping of rubbish results in a landscape of poor quality.
LR2 Agricultural Area
13.6.10 The areas identified as agriculture include orchards, vegetable and paddy fields. These provide an attractive, rural character to the area and are located around Ngau Hom Shek.
LR3 Village Type Development - Ngau Hom Shek Village
13.6.11 Village type development consists of small rustic dwellings and workshops. The character of the village areas is represented by a mixed land use of small-scale dwellings, minor storage areas, small-scale agriculture and other individual dwellings.
LR4 Mangroves
13.6.12 Areas of Mangrove are located on the coastline at Ngau Hom Shek. In addition to their ecological value, these provide an important visual definition to this narrow coastal plain. They also provide a landscape/visual buffer between village development and Hau Hoi Wan.
LR5 Mudflats and Oyster Beds
13.6.13 Mudflats are an inherent part of the coastal landscape in this area. The shallow water of Deep Bay results in an extensive tidal variation. The mudflats, whilst being a valuable ecological resource, provide a unique visual and landscape component within the study area.
LR6 Ponds
13.6.14 Several fish ponds are located within the study area. These are generally abandoned or under-utilised. The proposed road will not interfere with these ponds. However, they may be impacted upon due to construction works and stream diversion up channel.
LR7 Wetlands / Marshes
13.6.15 Two areas of marshes occur in the study area. One is located to the east and is associated with the Ngau Hom Shek East Stream and the other area is located in the narrow valley located adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek where the SWC joins the DBL. Both are formed by abandoned fish ponds and, therefore, semi-natural.
LR8 Stream Channels
13.6.16 Two streams are located within the study area. Both streams (total length 2km) are more or less modified or entirely man-made downstream of Deep Bay Road. The ecological value has been assessed as low and the landscape value is considered low to moderate.
Landscape Character Zones
13.6.17 The study area consists of four distinct landscape
character zones (LC). These are
LC1: Agricultural Coastal Lowland
LC2: Greenbelt Foothills
LC3: Village Coastal Lowland
LC4: Sea Edge
LC1: Agricultural Coastal Lowland
13.6.18 This landscape character zone comprises low-lying land which is used for agricultural purposes, ponds and wetland marsh area. The character of this zone is generally open with few built structures or roads. Trees of any substance are largely limited to around the edges of this Character Area or along watercourses.
LC2: Greenbelt Foothills
13.6.19 The Greenbelt Foothills are characterised by eroded slopes primarily vegetated by grassland species. The natural quality of this character area is mixed with few built structures with the exception of a number of graves and associated trails. This tends to have a detrimental effect on the quality of the grasslands.
13.6.20 However, the zone provides important containment for the coastal strip, providing isolation from nearby urban areas and therefore has a high landscape value.
LC3: Village Coastal Lowland
13.6.21 The Village Coastal Lowland forms a modified strip along the coast containing small rustic dwellings and workshops. The character of the buildings is generally small scale, nestled into the landscape rather than competing or contrasting. The buildings however are of poor quality with many being used for storage.
LC4: Sea Edge
13.6.22 The Sea edge consists of mud flats and mangroves, providing an important transition between the land and Deep Bay. The character is open with expansive views available across Deep Bay. The natural character of this zone is generally high with the exception where rubbish has been dumped.
Baseline Visual Conditions
13.6.22 The isolated character of Ngau Hom Shek and the Deep Bay Coastline, combined with Castle Peak Range and the low-lying agricultural areas, reduce the potential visibility of the SWC and the number of VSRs. However, the elevated nature of the road will increase its visibility, notably for the residents of Tin Shui Wai in the north and the villages along the coastline. To the southeast the visual envelope will be contained by the ridgelines emanating from Castle Peak, and of indefinable length stretching out in the coastal waters to the north and south.
13.6.23 Generally throughout the low-lying coastal areas, visibility is limited by vegetation. By retaining this vegetation, screening of the SWC will be possible due to the area's low-lying nature. With elevation, due either to topography or structures, the visibility of the proposal will increase proportionately.
13.7 Landscape Sensitivity to Change
13.7.1 The landscape resources and landscape character zones that will be affected during the construction phase and operation phase, together with their sensitivity to change, are listed in Table 13.2. For ease of reference and co-ordination between text and tables each landscape resource is given an identity number.
Table
13.2 List of the Landscape Resources and
Character Areas
Ref.
|
Landscape
Resource / Landscape Character Area |
Area
(Ha) |
Sensitivity
to Change (Low,
Medium, High) |
Landscape
Resource |
|
|
|
LR1 |
Grassland/Eroded
Slopes associated with the Greenbelt. |
26 |
High |
LR2 |
Agricultural Area |
11.3 |
Medium |
LR3 |
Village Type Development - Ngau Hom Shek Village |
6.5 |
Medium |
LR4 |
Mangroves |
2.5 |
High |
LR5 |
Mudflats &
Oyster Beds |
17.5 |
High |
LR6 |
Ponds |
5 |
High |
LR7 |
Wetlands/Marshes |
7.5 |
High |
LR8 |
Stream Channels |
2
linear km |
Medium |
|
Total |
76.3 |
|
Landscape
Character Area |
|
|
|
LC1 |
Agricultural
Coastal Lowland |
21.1 |
Medium |
LC2 |
Greenbelt Foothills |
26 |
High |
LC3 |
Village Coastal
Lowland |
9.2 |
Medium |
LC4 |
Sea Edge |
20 |
High |
|
Total |
76.3 |
|
Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI)
13.7.2 The ZVI does not vary between the construction and operational phases. The ZVI for both phases is illustrated in Figure 13.11. Since the source of visual impact is a 5km bridge structure (3.2km within Hong Kong SAR's boundary) located over the waters of Deep Bay, the ZVI is quite extensive. A primary and secondary visual envelope has been defined. The primary visual envelope has been limited to a visual range of 7km whilst the secondary visual envelope is the area beyond 7km.
13.7.3 Given this, the primary ZVI can generally be defined by
the following:
· in the north by the Hong Kong SAR boundary;
· in the south by the ridgeline of Tsing Shan (Castle Peak Mountain). Much of
this perimeter area is within the Firing Range Boundary which will not be
considered as a VSR;
· in the east Tin Shui Wai, Sha Kiu Tsuen and the closed boundary area adjacent
to Mai Po Nature Reserve; and
· in the east by the Mai Po Nature Reserve Area.
Key Views and Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)
13.7.4 Table 13.3 lists the key VSRs found within the ZVI's for the construction phase and operational phase. For ease of reference, each VSR is given an identity number, which is used in the table and also in Figure 13.11. The number of receivers, type and duration of view and approximate distance to site is also provided. Data on key views is provided in Table 13.4.
Interface with Deep Bay Link Road
13.7.5 For the purposes of this study, the SWC/DBL interface is located at the mean high tide water mark on the coastal edge. The study area for the SWC extends 500 metres as required by the EIAO Technical Memorandum. The landscape study area of SWC is also included in the DBL LVIA assessment for consistency purposes.
Table
13.3 Identity and Characteristics of the
Key Visual Receivers (VSRs) during Construction & Operation Phases
Ref |
Location
of Receiver |
Number
of receivers Very
Few/Few/Many/Very Many |
Type
of view Partial/Vista/Panoramic |
Duration
of view Constant /Periodic /Infrequent |
Approximate Distance
to site (metres) |
Residential
Receivers |
|
|
|
|
|
VSR1 |
Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
0 |
|
VSR2 |
Residents
of the coastal villages to the west including Ngau Hom Sha, Sheung Pak Nai,
Ha Pak Nai, Tai Shui Hang, Nim Wan and Tsang Tsui. |
Few |
Partial |
Constant |
1000-7000 |
VSR3 |
Residents of the coastal villages to the east including San Hing Tsuen, Mong Tsen Wai and Sha Kiu Tsuen. |
Very
Few |
Partial |
Constant |
2000-5000 |
VSR4 |
Residents of the
high rise residential development at Tin Shui Wai. |
Many |
Partial |
Constant |
3000 |
VSR13 |
Future CDA adjacent
to Lau Fau Shan Road |
Many |
Partial |
Constant |
1500 |
Recreational
Receivers |
|
|
|
|
|
VSR5 |
Walkers along the
Coastal Protection Area and Agriculture Areas along the Coastline |
Very Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
0 |
VSR6 |
Walkers within the
Greenbelt adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek |
Very Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
0 |
VSR7 |
Walkers on Castle
Peak upland areas hiking trails (when entry to firing range is permitted) |
Very Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
4000-7000 |
Occupational
Receivers |
|
|
|
|
|
VSR8 |
Military personnel
at Castle Peak Firing Range |
Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
4000-7000 |
VSR9 |
Workers at
facilities such as Black Point Power Station and WENT Landfill |
Few |
Panorama |
Constant |
7000 |
Travelling
Receivers |
|
|
|
|
|
VSR10 |
Travellers
within Marine Craft on Deep Bay* |
Few |
Vista |
Constant |
0 |
VSR11 |
Travellers on Deep
Bay Road |
Very
Few |
Panorama |
Periodic |
0 |
VSR12 |
Travellers on
Shenzhen Western Corridor |
Many |
Vista |
Constant |
0 |
* As the Bay is very shallow, marine craft are limited to the Southern Navigation Channel (HKSAR) and the Northern Navigation Channel. Since it is adjacent to the HKSAR / Shenzhen border, traffic is restricted. Only cargo and other commercial vessels are expected to be impacted upon.
View Point No. |
Location |
Type of View |
Approximate
Distance to Works (m) |
Figure No. |
1 |
View from Ngau Hom
Shek / Deep Bay Road looking east to new bridge |
Vista defined by Deep
Bay Road, partial glimpses of agricultural fields and Deep Bay. |
150 |
13.19/ 20 |
2 |
View east of Ngau Hom
Shek from Greenbelt |
Elevated panoramic
view looking NW to SW of Deep Bay, Shenzhen coastal area, Ngau Hom Shek
and west down HK coastline. |
200 |
13.21
/ 22 |
3 |
View from Sheung Pak
Nai Village |
Ground level
panoramic view from sea edge looking NE |
2km |
13.23 |
4 |
View from Deep Bay
(Boat Location) SW of proposed Bridge alignment |
Sea level panoramic
view looking NE to SE |
2km |
13.24 |
5 |
View from Lau Fau
Shan |
Elevated panoramic
view looking NE to SW of Deep Bay, Shenzhen coastal areas and mudflat
areas. |
1.5km |
13.25 |
6 |
View from Tin Shui
Wai Residential Block 39th Floor |
Elevated panoramic
view looking N to W over open storage areas and village areas including
Fung Kong Tsuen and San Hing Tsuen with Deep Bay and Shenzhen in the
background. |
3km |
13.26 |
13.8 Construction Stage Impact Assessment
Potential Sources of Impacts
13.8.1 Given the current information available on the design
of the bridge, certain assumptions must be made regarding the possible potential
sources of impacts. These will vary depending on the final design. Refer to
Figures 13.1 -13.8. The SWC is proposed to link Ngau Hom Shek from the Hong Kong
Dongjiaotou in the Shenzhen side. The total length of the bridge is about 5.2km
in which 3.2km is within the Hong Kong boundary (see Figure 13.1). The proposed
SWC will involve the construction of:
· Typical Spans - The typical span arrangement includes two separate decks
running in parallel with a 6 metre gap. Each deck consists of 3 lanes
carriageway, hard shoulder and marginal strip. The total width of the deck is
16.55 metres and the depth is approximately 4 metres. Supporting columns are
typically 6 metres by 2.5 metres in elliptical shape while the columns with
movement joints are 6 metres by 4.5 metres. The columns are at generally 75
metre spacing with pile caps submerged in the seabed.
· Main Spans - Two cable-stayed bridge sections located at the Southern and
Northern Navigation channels. These cable-stayed bridge sections are similar in
design with a single supported tower of height approximately 159 metres and 125
metres above sea level for the Southern and Northern Navigation Channels
respectively. There are approximately 21 and 17 numbers of stay cables for the
Southern and Northern Navigation Channels. The navigable spans for the Southern
and Northern Navigation Channels are 210m and 180m respectively. The pile caps
for the main spans are designed above sea water level with dolphin ship
protection.
· Night Lighting in the form of street light poles and fittings will be located
along the outer edge of each deck. These shall be approximately 12 metres high
at 15-metre spacing. Associated flood lighting will be located at the two cable
sections.
· A temporary access bridge will be built alongside the SWC alignment for the
construction of the SWC foundation works. The temporary bridge will be built in
two sections, one section will start from Ngau Hom Shek and the other section
will start from the seaside (see Figure 2.10 ). The total length of the
temporary access bridge is about 1.85km, with 8m wide steel deck supported small
diameter pipe-piles.
· The upgrading of WSD Header Tank and associated upgrading of DN300 main for
fire main along FKTR
13.8.2 The proposed development would create varying levels of impact on the physical landscape and on the visual amenity of the surrounding areas during the construction stage. Potential impacts would result from the following:
· site clearance works involving the removal of existing
vegetation;
· construction of site access including access from Deep Bay Road;
· the use and modification of Fung Kong Tsuen Road as a haulage road;
· the extension of an existing barge point at Lung Kwu Sheung Tan;
· possible concrete batching plant and concrete pre-casting yard at the barge
point;
· excavation works for columns and piers;
· haulage off-site of excavated materials;
· storage of existing topsoil for reinstatement works;
· materials stockpiling;
· temporary bridge platform used to locate and join bridge segments together
between piers;
· importation and storage of construction equipment and plant;
· temporary use of construction vessels (barges), plant (gantry cranes) and
equipment within Deep Bay;
· the temporary, part completion of structures including piers, decks, towers,
etc;
· the laying down of utilities, including water, drainage and power (permanent
and temporary);
· construction of temporary parking areas, on site accommodation and working
areas; and
· night lighting.
· WSD Header Tank and associated upgrading of the fire main DN300 along Fung
Kong Tsuen Road.
Nature and Magnitude of Landscape Impacts in Construction Phase (refer to Figure 13.14a)
13.8.3 Some impacts are expected on the form of the topography and grassland on the ridge east of the interface with the DBL alignment. In this area, the road will be cut into a ridge adjacent Ngau Hom Shek. Approximately 10,000 square metres of grassland and associated eroded slopes(LR1) will be directly affected via cutting operations. This impact is a result of the DBL road. The sensitivity of this resource is high with a small magnitude of change.
13.8.4 There will be four pairs of piers located within the land area at Ngau Hom Shek. Construction access, piling, storage of materials and other associated construction works will be undertaken along the length of the road and adjacent areas. Approximately 2,000 square metres of Agricultural Area (LR2) will be affected; approximately 500 square metres of Village Type Development - Ngau Hom Shek Village(LR3) affected. These resources have a medium sensitivity and will experience a large magnitude of change. This impact is expected to be permanent and irreversible. The unmitigated magnitude of the impacts on the area is considered moderate. There is not expected to be any direct affect on the high sensitivity ponds (LR6) within the study area as they have a negligible magnitude of change,
13.8.5 There is expected to be some minor impact upon the Mangroves (LR4) located on the coastline of Ngau Hom Shek. The impact is expected to be negligible and temporary. An area of approximately 2,500 square metres could be affected. The sensitivity of this resource is high with an intermediate magnitude of change. The unmitigated magnitude of the impacts on the mangroves is considered moderate to substantial.
13.8.6 Within the DBL alignment, permanent and irreversible impact to the Wetlands/Marshes (LR7) area in the valley south of Ngau Hom Shek is expected. Most of the marsh will be permanently lost. The unmitigated impact is considered substantial. These impacts are associated more with the DBL. Marsh associated with the Ngau Hom Shek east stream is also expected to be affected. Permanent loss of 1,000 square metres is expected. The sensitivity of this resource is high with a large magnitude of change. However, the marsh can be re-created and a wetland compensatory scheme is included within the DBL project.
13.8.7 Approximately 7,500 square metres of Mudflats and Oyster Beds (LR5) is expected to be affected due to the construction of bridge piers in the inter-tidal zone. The sensitivity of this resource is high with an intermediate magnitude of change Unmitigated impact is expected to be moderate to substantial.
13.8.8 Approximately 1km of stream channels (LR8) is expected to be affected to some extent. The Ngau Hom Shek east stream will be heavily disturbed but there is potential to restore it. The sensitivity of this resource is medium with a large magnitude of change This will be undertaken via the wetland compensation scheme under the DBL project. Unmitigated impact is expected to be moderate to substantial.
13.8.9 Vegetation at the edges to the Agricultural and Green Belt areas will be affected. The vegetation within the alignment is generally of poor quality. The assessment of the area identified 96 trees will be affected by the works of which 17 will be retained. Approximately 45 will be transplanted in the area as part of the tree compensation plan. The unmitigated magnitude of the impacts on this vegetation is considered moderate. (Refer to Figure 13.32)
13.8.10 Landscape impacts along Fung Kong Tsuen Road will be limited to the felling of some existing trees for road widening works. 60 trees will be affected including 9 different species. Generally the trees affected are between 4-6m in height. There are 4-5 significant trees adjacent to the road but on the current alignment these trees should not be affected. These significant trees included Celtis sinensis, Delonix regia, Aleurites moluccana, Eucalyptus citriodora and Litchi chinensis. Refer to Figure 13.31.
13.8.11 There is not expected to be any significant landscape impacts due to the extension of the existing barge point at Lung Kwu Sheung Tan.
Impacts on Landscape Character Zones
13.8.12 The Agricultural Coastal Lowland Zone (LC1) to the south of the alignment will be moderately impacted by the SWC. This will be the result of a substantial loss of marsh and wetland. These impacts are more associated with the DBL. The sensitivity of this character area is medium with an intermediate magnitude of change
13.8.13 The SWC will have a slight to moderate impact on the Greenbelt Foothills (LC2) with the alignment traversing the natural slopes. However, most of the impacts to this character zone will result from the DBL. The sensitivity of this character area is high with a small magnitude of change
13.8.14 The Village Coastal Lowland including Ngau Hom Shek (LC3) as well as rural and natural areas such as the valley south of Ngau Hom Shek, will experience permanent and irreversible moderate to substantial impact with the loss of resources within this character zone. The scale and character of the SWC will be out of context with the surrounding developments. The sensitivity of this character area is medium with a large magnitude of change
13.8.15 The impact on the Sea Edge (LC4) will be notable with the imposition of a major elevated structure located within existing mangroves and mudflats. The existing high sensitivity of the zone will be moderately to substantially changed, permanently and irreversibly as a result of its large magnitude of change.
13.8.16 Overall, the unmitigated magnitude of construction impacts will, collectively, be moderate.
Nature and Magnitude of Visual Impacts in Construction Phase (refer to Figure 13.14b)
13.8.17 The visual envelope of the construction phase is shown on Figure 13.11, and would include all areas within the baseline visual envelope. Key visual receivers are described in Table 13.3.
Residential
13.8.18 Residents of the village of Ngau Hom Shek (VSR1), through which SWC will pass through would have direct short range views of the construction of the elevated road and bridge, the appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes in Deep Bay), loss of vegetation and associated works areas. The sensitivity of this receiver is high with a large magnitude of change. Due to the close nature of the proposal to the residents and its scale, the magnitude of change is considered to be large with a substantial unmitigated impact.
13.8.19 Residents of the coastal villages to the west including Ngau Hom Sha, Sheung Pak Nai, Ha Pak Nai, Tai Shui Hang, Nim Wan and Tsang Tsui (VSR2) will have partial views of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of this receiver is high with a small magnitude of change However given the increased distance and screening available, the magnitude of change is considered to be small with a slight/moderate unmitigated impact.
13.8.20 The residents to the east of the proposal including San Hing Tsuen, Mong Tsen Wai and Sha Kiu Tsuen (VSR3) have partial views available of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of this receiver is high with a small magnitude of change However given the increased distance and screening available, the magnitude of change is considered to be small and an unmitigated impact of slight to moderate.
13.8.21 The residents of Tin Shui Wai (VSR4) have long range panoramic views available of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of this receiver is high with a small magnitude of change However given the increased distance and screening available, the magnitude of change is considered to be small with a slight to moderate unmitigated impact.
13.8.22 Future residents of village areas in the CDA located adjacent to Lau Fau Shan Road (VSR13), including future residents in Area 34 and occupiers of future educational establishments proposed, are not considered within the construction stage as the road is assumed to be built first. They are assessed within the operational stage. At this stage the sensitivity of this receiver will be high.
Recreational Users
13.8.23 Recreational walkers along the coastal protection area and agricultural areas along the coastline (VSR5), within the Greenbelt adjacent to Ngau Hon Shek (VSR6), and with the Castle Peak Upland trails (VSR7) would have direct short range views of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of these receivers is medium with an intermediate magnitude of change. Given the proximity to the view, the magnitude of change is considered to be intermediate with a unmitigated of moderate.
Occupational Users
13.8.24 Military personnel using the Castle Peak Firing Range (VSR8) would have panoramic views of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of this receiver is low with a negligible magnitude of change Given the distance and the openness of the existing views, the magnitude of change and unmitigated impact is considered to be negligible.
13.8.25 Workers at Black Point Power Station and WENT Landfill (VSR9) will have direct views of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. The sensitivity of this receiver is low with a negligible magnitude of change However, given the distance, the magnitude of change and unmitigated impact is considered to be negligible.
Travellers
13.8.26 Travellers within the marine craft on Deep Bay (VSR10) and travellers along Deep Bay Road (VSR11) will have panoramic views of the construction of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns, road platform, cables and cable support structure. Views of vessels and cranes in Deep Bay as well as night lighting will be possible. . The sensitivity of this receiver is low with a large magnitude of change Given their close proximity to the works, the magnitude of change will be large and an unmitigated impact of slight/moderate.
13.8.27 Future travellers on SWC (VSR12) will not be affected by the impacts of construction and therefore the receivers will not have a magnitude of change.
13.8.28 There is not expected to be any significant visual impacts due to the extension of the existing barge point at Lung Kwu Sheung Tan or the modification of Fung Kong Tsuen Road for any of the abovementioned VSRs.
Mitigation Measures in Construction Phase
13.8.29 Recommended landscape and visual mitigation measures
for impacts caused during the construction process are described in Table 13.5
together with the associated implementation agency. These are preliminary
mitigation measures that are typical in the treatment of the types of impacts
envisaged. These are indicated in Figure 13.11. The measures listed below should
be adopted from the commencement of construction and should be in place
throughout the entire construction period. The implementation dates are also
provided.
Table
13.5
Proposed Construction Phase Mitigation Measures
ID
No. |
Mitigation
Measure |
Affected
Resources/Receivers |
Implementation
Agency |
Commence ment
Date |
CM1 |
Conservation
(excavation and stockpiling on site) of topsoil for re-use in landscape
works. This includes the proper storage of topsoil to minimise erosion of
stockpiles. |
LR1,2,3,
7 and LC 1,3 |
HyD |
Construction
Phase |
CM2 |
Control
of night-time lighting |
LR3,
LC 1,2,3,4 and all VSRs |
HyD |
Construction
Phase |
CM3 |
Replanting
of disturbed vegetation should be undertaken and this should use
predominantly native plant species. |
All |
HyD |
2004/05 |
CM4 |
Screen
hoarding, using decorative graphic and chromatic devises should be erected
around the works wherever possible to screen the works from motorists and
other receivers within the road corridor and adjacent areas. |
LR3,
LC3 & VSRs |
HyD |
August
2003 |
CM5 |
Maintaining
and protecting existing vegetation adjacent to Deep Bay Road for a minimum
width of 10 metres on either side. |
LR3,
LC1,3 & VSR11 |
HyD |
Construction
Phase |
CM6 |
Planting
within and at the perimeter of temporary work sites should be undertaken
at the earliest possible stage before and during construction, and
opportunities should be sought for undertaking any advance planting. |
All |
HyD |
Construction
Phase |
CM7 |
Existing
trees to be transplanted as
per the Master Landscape Plan |
All |
HyD |
August
2003 |
Prediction of Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction Phase
13.8.30 The potential significance of the landscape impacts
during the construction phase, before and after mitigation, are provided in
Table 13.7. This assessment follows the methodology outlined in Section 13.4
above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table
13.5 above would be implemented.
Prediction of Significance of Visual Impacts in Construction Phase
13.8.31 The design of the bridge has been outlined previously in paragraphs 13.8.1 and 13.8.2. These will vary depending on the final design of the bridge.
13.8.32 The potential significance of the residual visual impacts during the construction phase, before and after mitigation, provided in detail in Table 13.8. This assessment follows the methodology outlined in Section 13.4 above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table 13.5 above would be implemented. The effect of the mitigation measures will be to reduce the potential visual impacts in varying degrees.
Cumulative Construction Impacts
13.8.33 The construction impacts of SWC must be considered with those of DBL. To this extent, the study area boundary overlaps with the DBL by a distance of 500m. Impacts within this area have also been included within this assessment. However, an assessment the overall impacts of the project should include a review of the assessment of the entire DBL.
Potential Sources of Impacts in Operational Phase
13.9.1 Given the current information available on the design of the bridge, certain assumptions must be made regarding the possible potential sources of impacts. These will vary depending on the final design of the bridge.
13.9.2 The sources of impacts of the project at the
operational stage would include:
· Typical Spans - The typical span arrangement includes two separate decks
running in parallel with a 6 metre gap. Each deck consists of 3 lanes
carriageway, hard shoulder and marginal strip. The total width of the deck is
16.55 metres and the depth is approximately 4 metres. Supporting columns are
typically 6 metres by 2.5 metres in elliptical shape while the columns with
movement joints are 6 metres by 4.5 metres. The columns are at generally 75
metre spacing with pile caps submerged in the seabed.
· Main Spans - Two cable-stayed bridge sections located at the Southern and
Northern Navigation channels. These cable-stayed bridge sections are similar in
design with a single supported tower of height approximately 159 metres and 125
metres above sea level for the Southern and Northern Navigation Channels
respectively. There are approximately 21 and 17 numbers of stay cables for the
Southern and Northern Navigation Channels. The navigable spans for the Southern
and Northern Navigation Channels are 210m and 180m respectively. The pile caps
for the main spans are designed above sea water level with dolphin ship
protection.
· Night Lighting in the form street light poles and fittings will be located
along the outer edge of each deck. These shall be approximately 12 metres high
at 15 metre spacing. Associated flood lighting will be located at the two cable
sections.
13.9.3 Figures 13.1 - 13.8 illustrate the potential sources of impact in the operation phase.
Nature and Magnitude of Landscape Impacts in the Operational Phase (refer to Figure 13.15a)
13.9.4 The SWC will have a slight to moderate unmitigated landscape impact on the grassland/eroded slopes resource (LR1). This is the result of a cut into a ridge adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek. Approximately 10,000 square metres of grassland will be directly affected. This impact is a result of the DBL.
13.9.5 Agricultural Resources (LR2) will experience a moderate unmitigated landscape impact during the operational phase. This is the result of four pairs of piers located within this resource. The impact is expected to be permanent and irreversible.
13.9.6 The village type development at Ngau Hom Shek will (LR3) experience impacts from the operation of the road with the loss of village land resulting from the location of the road piers. The unmitigated impacts are considered to be moderate to substantial and irreversible.
13.9.7 The operation of the SWC will have a moderate to substantial unmitigated impact on the Landscape Resources of Mangroves (LR4) and Mudflats and Oyster Beds (LR5). The impacts will result from the footprint of the bridge piers crossing this area.
13.9.8 The operation phase will have a negligible unmitigated impact on the pond resource (LR6) as it is not expected that any of the impacts will be direct.
13.9.9 The wetlands (LR7) and stream (LR8) resources will be affected by permanent loss of their natural areas and watercourse. As a result the unmitigated impacts will be substantial for the Wetlands/Marshes and Moderate to Substantial for the Stream Channels during the operational phase. The impacts will be reduced with compensation wetlands and improvements to the stream.
Impacts on Landscape Character Zones
13.9.10 The Agricultural Coastal Lowland Zone (LC1) to the south of the alignment will be moderately impacted by the SWC. This will be the result of a substantial loss of marsh and wetland. These impacts are more associated with the DBL.
13.9.11 The SWC will have a slight to moderate impact on the Greenbelt Foothills (LC2) with the alignment traversing the natural slopes. However, most of the impacts to this character zone will result from the DBL.
13.9.12 The village area of Ngau Hom Shek (LC3) as well as rural and natural areas such as the valley south of Ngau Hom Shek, will experience permanent and irreversible moderate to substantial impact with the loss of resources within this character zone. The scale and character of the SWC will be out of context with the surrounding developments.
13.9.13 The impact on the Sea Edge (LC4) will be notable with the imposition of a major elevated structure slicing through existing mangroves and mudflats. The existing high natural quality of the zone will be substantially changed, permanently and irreversibly.
13.9.14 Overall, the unmitigated magnitude of operational impacts will, collectively, be moderate
Nature and Magnitude of Visual Impacts in the Operational Phase (refer to Figure 13.15b)
Residential
13.9.15 During the operation phase, the magnitude of the unmitigated visual impact for residents of Ngau Hom Shek (VSR1) will be substantial. These will be as a result of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and cable support structure as well as night lighting. The structures will appear as large scale built structures dominating the visual character of the immediate area.
13.9.16 Residents, both to the west (VSR2) and east (VSR3) of the alignment including future residents of the CDA (VSR13) will experience operational unmitigated visual impacts as a result of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and cable support structure as well as night lighting. The resultant magnitude for both these VSRs will be slight / moderate.
13.9.17 Primarily due to distance, Tin Shui Wai (VSR4) will experience a slight / moderate magnitude of the unmitigated impact as a result of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and cable support structure as well as night lighting.
Recreational
13.9.18 Recreational users in the area, (VSR5, 6, 7) will experience an moderate unmitigated impact to the existing visual character as a result of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and cable support structure as well as night lighting. VSR 7 will experience a slightly lesser visual impact of slight/moderate due to its increased viewing distance.
Occupational
13.9.19 Due primarily to distance and the openness of existing views, the unmitigated impact during the operation phase for Military Personnel (VSR8) and Power Station Workers (VSR9) will be negligible.
Travelling
13.9.20 For marine travellers on Deep Bay (VSR10) and motorists on Deep Bay Road (VSR11), the magnitude of unmitigated visual impact will be slight/moderate. This will be the result of the bridge and elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and cable support structure as well as night lighting.
13.9.21 Travellers along the Shenzhen Western Corridor (VSR12) will be provided outstanding views of the New Territories and Shenzhen coastlines and the seascapes of Deep Bay. The bridge itself has been designed to a high standard of aesthetic quality. The unmitigated visual impact during operation will be moderate to substantial.
Cumulative Operation Impacts
13.9.22 The operation impacts of SWC must be considered with those of DBL. To this extent, the study area boundary overlaps with the DBL by a distance of 500m. Impacts within this area have also been included within this assessment. However, in considering the overall impacts, the project should include a review of the assessment of the entire DBL.
Mitigation Measures During the Operation Phase
13.9.23 Recommended landscape and visual mitigation measures for impacts caused during the operation phase are described in Table 13.6 below and illustrated in Figure 13.13. Associated implementation, management and maintenance agencies are identified if applicable. The mitigation measures proposed are consistent with the Master Landscape Plan which was prepared as part of the Tree Felling Report. The Tree Felling Plan and Master Landscape Plan are included in this report as Figures 13.30 to 13.32 for ease of reference. Approximate date of implementation is also provided in Table 13.6.
13.9.24 To ensure the protection of the those areas identified by AMO as being unsurveyed but worthy of protection, it is recommended that the area be landscaped using plants with a shallow rooting habit. Plant types will be identified at the Detailed Design stage. An additional 500mm layer of soil will be placed over the top to further ensure the protection of the potential archaeological sites.
Table
13.6
Proposed Operation Phase Mitigation Measures
ID
No. |
Mitigation
Measure |
Apply
To Resource/Receiver |
Implementation
Agency |
Management
Agency |
Maintenance
Agency |
Implementation
Commencement date |
OM1 |
LR3,
LC1,3 & VSR1 |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD
/ LCSD |
Mid
2005 |
|
OM2 |
Implementation
of bio-engineering techniques to the cut slopes (approx. area 0.1Ha). |
LR1,2 |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
2004/05 |
OM3 |
Non-invasive
climbing plants should be used to soften the appearance of viaduct columns
at ground level. |
LC1,
LC1,2,3 and All VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
LCSD |
Mid
2005 |
OM4 |
Woodland
tree and shrub planting should be undertaken at cut slopes so as to
compensate for vegetation lost during construction. Any
affected slope areas should be hydroseeded and planted with woodland
species, avoid shotcreting (approx. area 0.1Ha). |
LR1
and All VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
Mid
2005 |
OM5 |
Native
shrub planting should be undertaken to screen the proposed works and blend
it into the landscape (approx. area 3.4Ha) |
LC1,2,3
and All VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
Mid
2005 |
OM6 |
Planting
should be incorporated where possible to screen the road and bridge in low
level views from adjacent areas, and to tone down the extent of hard
paving and surfaces and reduce the amount of glare (approx. area 0.2Ha) |
All
Landscape and All VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD
/ LCSD |
Mid
2005 |
OM7 |
Sensitive
architectural design of engineering and other built structures, including
form and finishes, this will include but not limited to: barriers, paved
surfaces, retaining walls, walls, columns, buildings, and other
structures, light standards, etc. The
design of built structures shall be to the satisfaction of the ACABAS. |
LC3
and All VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
Detailed
Design Phase mid 2002 – early 2003 |
OM8 |
Lighting
of road and bridge. Should be designed to minimise glare to all receivers.
Poles and fittings should be designed to conform with the bridge design. |
All
VSRs |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
Detailed
Design Phase mid 2002 – early 2003 |
OM9 |
Transplanted
Tree Stock (approximately 45 trees) |
LR2,3
& All VSRs |
HyD |
In
accordance with Works Branch Technical Circular No. 14/2002. |
In
accordance with Works Branch Technical Circular No. 14/2002. |
Mid
2003 |
Prediction of Significance of Landscape Impacts in Operation Phase
13.9.25 An assessment of the potential significance of the landscape impacts during the operational phase, before and after mitigation is provided in Table 13.7. This follows the methodology outlined in Section 13.4 above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table 13.6 above would be implemented, and that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures would be realised after ten years. These predictions are based on our knowledge of the current design and shall change subject to the design development of the bridge. The proposed view points for the photomontages are shown in Figure 13.17.
Table
13.7
Significance of Landscape Impacts
Ref |
Landscape
Resource / Landscape Character Area |
Sensitivity
to Change (Low,
Medium, High) |
Extent
of Loss (in
Sq. Metres) |
Construction
Phase |
Operation
Phase |
|||||||||
Magnitude
of Change before Mitigation (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Magnitude
of Change After Mitigation (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Impact
Significance before Mitigation (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Impact
Significance after Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Magnitude
of Change before Mitigation (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Magnitude
of Change After Mitigation Day 1 (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large |
Magnitude
of Change After Mitigation Yr 10 (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Impact
Significance before Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Impact
Significance after Mitigation Measures
Day 1 (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Residual
Impact Year 10 (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
|||||
Landscape
Resource |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LR1 |
Grassland/ Eroded
Slopes associated with the Greenbelt. |
High |
10,000 |
Small |
Small |
Slight/Moderate |
Slight(4) |
Small |
Small |
Small |
Slight
/ Moderate |
Slight(4) |
Slight |
|
LR2 |
Agricultural Area |
Medium |
2,000 |
Large |
Large |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate(4) |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LR3 |
Village Type
Development. Ngau Hom Shek Village |
Medium |
500 |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate |
Large |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate/ Substantial |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LR4 |
Mangrove
|
High |
2500 |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate/ Substantial |
Moderate(5) |
Slight |
|
LR5 |
Mudflats
& Oyster Beds |
High |
7,500 |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate/
Substantial |
Moderate |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate/ Substantial |
Moderate(5) |
Slight
/ moderate |
|
LR6 |
Ponds |
High |
0 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible(5) |
Negligible |
|
LR7 |
Wetlands/Marshes |
High |
1,000 |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial(4) |
Large |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate/
Substantial(4,5) |
Moderate
|
|
LR8 |
Stream
Channel |
Medium |
1km
in length |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate/
Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Large |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate/ Substantial(4,5) |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
|
Landscape
Character Area |
||||||||||||||
LC1 |
Agricultural
Coastal Lowland |
Medium |
|
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LC2 |
Greenbelt Foothills |
High |
|
Small |
Small |
Slight
/ Moderate |
Slight
/ Moderate |
Small |
Small |
Small |
Slight
/ Moderate |
Slight
/ Moderate |
Slight
/ Moderate |
|
LC3 |
Village Coastal
Lowland |
Medium |
|
Large |
Large |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Large |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
|
LC4 |
Sea Edge |
High |
|
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
Large |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Substantial |
Moderate
/ Substantial |
|
Notes : (1)All impacts are negative / adverse unless otherwise stated.
(2)Source
of landscape impact on all resources / character areas would include elevated
road (bridge) including piers, columns, road platform and maintenance access
path.
(3)Extent of loss is equal to the total area of the landscape resource that
would be affected by the temporary and permanent works.
(4)Impacts must be considered collectively with the DBL works.
(5)Impacts mitigated via ecological mitigation
measures (refer Chapter 9).
Prediction of Significance of Visual Impacts in Operation Phase
13.9.26 An assessment of the potential significance of the visual impacts during the operational phase, before and after mitigation is briefly described below and provided in detail in Table 13.8. This follows the methodology outlined in Section 13.4 above and assumes that the appropriate mitigation measures identified in Table 13.6 above would be implemented, and that the full effect of the soft landscape mitigation measures would be realised after ten years.
13.9.27 The views of the proposed SWC bridge must be considered with the high density development of Shenzhen as a backdrop. To this extent the visual impact upon those visual receivers is less than if the backdrop was of a more natural landscape.
13.9.28 Overall, according to Annexe 18, Clause 7.1 of the
Technical Memorandum of the EIAO, the main visual issues relate to visual
compatibility with surroundings. This project involves a large linear, geometric
element being introduced to the natural, organic forms of the North West New
Territories coastal landscape. However, this must be considered in conjunction
with the relatively few numbers of VSRs subjected to the impact.
Ref. |
Key
Visually Sensitive Receiver (VSR) |
Minimum
Distance Between VSR and Source(s) |
Receptor
Sensitivity (Low,
Medium, High) |
Construction
Phase |
Operation
Phase |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source(s)
of Impacts |
Magnitude
of Change before Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Construction
Phase Mitigation Measure |
Magnitude
of Change after Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large |
Impact
Significance before Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Impact
Significance after Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial |
Source(s)
of Impacts |
Magnitude
of Change before Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Operation
Phase Mitigation Measure |
Magnitude
of Change after Mitigation Measures
(Day 1) (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large |
Magnitude
of Change after Mitigation Measures
(Year 10)
(Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large |
Impact
Significance before Mitigation Measures (Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Impact
Significance after Mitigation Measures (Day 1)
(Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial |
Impact
Significance Residual Impact
(Year 10)
(Negligible,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RESIDENTIAL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VSR1 |
Residents
of the village area of Ngau Hom Shek (refer
Figures 13.18 – 13.22) |
0m |
High |
Construction
of bridge & elevated road including piers, columns road platform,
cables and cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels
and cranes in Deep Bay) and
stockpiling of materials and night lighting. |
Large |
CM2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Large |
OM1-9
|
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR2 |
Residents
of the coastal villages to the west including Ngau Hom Sha, Sheung Pak Nai,
Ha Pak Nai, Tai Shui Hang, Nim Wan and Tsang Tsui. (refer
Figure 13.23) |
1-7km |
High |
Construction
of bridge & elevated road including piers, columns road platform,
cables and cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels
and cranes in Deep Bay) and
stockpiling of materials and night lighting. |
Small |
CM2 |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Small |
OM1-9
|
Small |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR3 |
Residents
of the coastal villages to the east including San Hing Tsuen, Mong Tsen
Wai and Sha Kiu Tsuen. (refer
Figure 13.25) |
2-5km |
High |
Construction
of bridge & elevated road including piers, columns road platform,
cables and cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels
and cranes in Deep Bay) and
stockpiling of materials and night lighting. |
Small |
CM2 |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Small |
OM1-9
|
Small |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR4 |
Residents
of the high rise residential development at Tin Shui Wai. (refer
Figure 13.26) |
3km |
High |
Construction
of bridge & elevated road including piers, columns road platform,
cables and cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels
and cranes in Deep Bay) and
night lighting. |
Small |
CM2 |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Small |
OM1-9
|
Small |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR13 |
Future
CDA Located adjacent to Lau Fau Shan Road. (refer
Figure 13.26) |
1.5km |
High |
N/A |
N/A |
CM2 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Small |
OM1-9
|
Small |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
RECREATIONAL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VSR5 |
Walkers
along the Coastal Protection Area and Agriculture Areas along the
Coastline (refer
Figure 13.23) |
0m |
Medium |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
Intermediate |
CM2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Intermediate |
OM1-9
|
Intermediate |
Intermedi-ate |
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR6 |
Walkers
within the Greenbelt adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek (refer
Figures 13.21 & 13.22) |
0m |
Medium |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
Inter-mediate |
CM2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Intermediate |
OM1-9
|
Intermediate |
Intermedi-ate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR7 |
Walkers
on Castle Peak upland areas hiking trails (when entry to firing range is
permitted) |
4-7km |
Medium |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
Inter-mediate |
CM2 |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight
|
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Small |
OM1-9
|
Small |
Small |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight
|
Slight
|
|||||||||||||||||||
OCCUPATIONAL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VSR8 |
Military
personnel at Castle Peak Firing Range |
4-7km |
Low |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
Negligible |
CM2 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Negligible |
OM1-9
|
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR9 |
Workers
at facilities such as Black Point Power Station and WENT Landfill |
7km |
Low |
Bridge
including piers, road platform, cables and cable support structure.
Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes in Deep Bay)
and night lighting. |
Negligible |
CM2 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Negligible |
OM1-9
|
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||||||||||||||||
TRAVELLERS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VSR10 |
Travellers
within Marine Craft on Deep Bay. (refer
Figure 13.24) |
0m |
Low |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. |
Large |
CM2 |
Large |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Large |
OM1-9
|
Large |
Large |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR11 |
Travellers
on Deep Bay Road (refer
Figures 13.19 & 13.20) |
0m |
Low |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
Large |
CM2,3,4,5,6,7 |
Large |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Large |
OM1-9
|
Large |
Large |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
Slight/
Moderate |
|||||||||||||||||||
VSR12 |
Travellers
on Shenzhen Western Corridor |
0m |
N/A
(construction phase) Medium (Operation
phase) |
Bridge
& Elevated Road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Appearance of plant (including vessels and cranes
in Deep Bay) and night lighting. |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Bridge
& elevated road including piers, columns road platform, cables and
cable support structure. Night lighting. |
Large |
OM1-9
|
Small
Positive |
Small
Positive |
Moderate
to Substantial |
Slight
(Positive) |
Slight
(Positive) |
1)
All impacts adverse
unless otherwise noted.
2)
All visual impacts must
be considered collectively with the DBL.
3)
The views of the
proposed SWC bridge must be considered with the high-density development of
Shenzhen as a backdrop. To this extent the visual impact upon those visual
receivers is less than if the backdrop was of a more natural landscape
13.10 EVALUATION OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS
13.10.1 The landscape and visual impacts and mitigation measures for the SWC are based on the current design and information available. The potentially most significant impacts during the construction and operation phases and the expected residual impacts are described below.
Landscape Impacts (refer to Figure 13.16a)
· Landscape impact upon agricultural areas (LR2) and
Greenbelt grassland areas (LR1). This will result in the loss of a large area of
agrarian and grassland landscape. The existing agriculture and vegetation are of
a low quality with many areas being abandoned or burnt out, and the mitigation
measures for these areas will result in establishment of quality planting areas.
The residual impact is expected to be slight for grassland and moderate for
agricultural areas.
· Landscape impact upon the rural village character of Ngau Hom Shek (LR3) is
expected to be moderate. The elevated 6 lane carriageway and columns will divide
the village and be a permanent presence within the area. Landscape impact upon
slope profiles within the small natural valley and adjacent ridgeline
immediately south of Ngau Hom Shek Village.
· Landscape impact upon Mangroves (LR4) will be limited to a small area.
Planting of new mangroves proposed under the ecological impact report will
mitigate these impacts. The residual mitigated impacts to this area are expected
to be slight.
· Impact upon the mudflats (LR5) is expected to be moderate to substantial.
After construction, re-contouring of these area will result in residual
mitigated impact of slight / moderate.
· There will be little likely impact to existing ponds (LR6) in the study area
and residual impact is expected to be negligible.
· Landscape impact upon the wetland/marsh (LR7) areas. The construction of the
road will result in the permanent loss of marsh. The impact upon this area is
expected to be substantial. However, it is expected the wetland compensation
scheme proposed under the DBL will substantially alleviate the loss of this
resource (refer to the ecological impact report). Mitigated impact will be
moderate.
· A significant length of stream channel (LR8) is expected to be impacted upon.
The landscape value of these is low to moderate. After construction, the stream
channels will be re-created (refer to ecological section-). The expected
residual impact is moderate to substantial.
· Areas affected for each Landscape Resource are provided in the table below.
Table 13.9 Area of Landscape Resources Affected
Identity
No. |
Landscape
Resource / Landscape
Character |
Area
(m2) Affected. |
Area
(m²)of Mitigation |
LR1 |
Grassland/Eroded
Slopes associated with the Greenbelt |
10,000 |
9,000 |
LR2 |
Agricultural Area |
2,000 |
2,000 |
LR3 |
Village Type
Development - Ngau Hom Shek Village |
500 |
500 |
LR4 |
Mangroves |
2,500 |
Mitigated
by Ecological Measures |
LR5 |
Mudflats &
Oyster Beds |
7,500 |
Mitigated
by Ecological Measures |
LR6 |
Ponds |
None
expected |
N/A |
LR7 |
Wetlands/Marshes |
1,000 |
Mitigated
by Ecological Measures |
LR8 |
Stream Channels |
1km
in length |
Mitigated
by Ecological Measures |
Landscape Character Impacts
13.10.2 Residual impact to the Agricultural Coastal Lowland Character (LC1) is expected to be moderate. This is mainly due to the large, elevated road structure traversing the area, incongruous to the existing character
13.10.3 Residual impacts to the Greenbelt (LC2) is expected to be slight/ moderate. This impact will be a result of the DBL at the interface with the SWC. The road will result in slope cuts and modification to hillsides and valley forms.
13.10.4 Residual impacts to the village coastal lowlands (LC3) is expected to be moderate / substantial. The large, elevated road structure will permanently change the rural / agrarian landscape character at Ngau Hom Shek.
13.10.5 Residual impact to the sea edge (LC4) is expected to be moderate / substantial. The incongruous road structure will be in direct contrast with the sea edge character.
Visual Impacts (refer to Figure 13.16b)
13.10.6 Significant visual impacts and the expected residual impact are described below.
· Visual impact upon walkers within the Coastal Protection
Area and rural areas of Ngau Hom Shek (VSR5) is expected to be moderate during
both construction and operation phases. Residual impact is expected to be slight
/ moderate.
· The visual impact to Ngau Hom Shek Village (VSR1) is expected to be
substantial during construction and moderate during operation. A sufficient
buffer zone with associated screen planting will significantly alleviate the
impact. Residual impact is expected to be moderate.
· Slight residual visual impacts will be experienced by the villages to the
west of Ngau Hom Shek (VSR2) and Tin Shui Wai (VSR4). This is largely due to
distance and the screening that will be provide by vegetation.
· Villages to the east of the site (VSR3) and the future CDA (VSR13) will
experience slight to moderate visual residual impacts. Given the distance, the
proposed mitigation measures will not greatly influence the residual impact.
· Military personnel (VSR8) and Power Station Workers (VSR9) will experience
negligible visual impacts during the construction phase which will continue
through the operation phase.
· The visual impact to walkers within the Green belt adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek
(VSR6) is expected to be moderate. Observations, however, reveal that this area
is not visited frequently by walkers. It is remote and is dotted with grave
sites and associated tracks. Residual impact is expected to be moderate.
· Travellers on marine craft (VSR10) will expect slight/moderate visual impact
as will travellers within motor cars driving along Deep Bay Road (VSR11).
Residual impact for both these VSRs is also slight/moderate.
· The visual impacts for Walkers on Castle Peak (VSR7) will be Slight after
mitigation and will remain as a residual impact.
· Views from most VSRs (including marine craft) will see the bridge and
associated structures within a backdrop of the development of Shenzhen. When
viewed in this context, negative visual impacts are alleviated.
· Many bridge structures are seen as a positive attribute to visual
environments. There are many world wide examples of these including: Sydney
Harbour Bridge, Sydney, Australia; Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco, USA and
The Alamillo Bridge, Seville, Spain. Well designed bridge structures can be a
valuable contribution to landscapes, particularly within urban contexts. This
must be considered in the on-going visual assessment of the SWC.
· The visual impact upon travellers on the SWC (VSR12) are identified as slight
positive. The route over Deep Bay will offer outstanding views to motorists of
Deep Bay and the coastlines of North West New Territories and Shenzhen. The
bridge design can generally be viewed as a positive aesthetic for these
travellers.
13.10.7 All impacts must be considered in relation to the proposed Deep Bay Link Road. The study area overlaps with the study area for the DBL by 350 metres and many of the potential impacts (particularly landscape impacts) are reflected in both studies.
13.11 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT
13.11.1 It is recommended that EM&A during the design, construction and operational stages is undertaken. The design stage EM&A will consist of auditing the detailed landscape designs. Construction and operational stage EM&A will comprise audit of the EIA recommendations together with planting and planting establishment in the form of site inspection. The operational stage auditing will be undertaken for one year during the Contractor's maintenance period. Further details of the specific EM&A requirements are detailed in Section 16 of this report and in the EM&A Manual.
13.11.2 The extent of the works areas should be regularly checked during the construction phase. Any trespass by the Contractor outside the limit of the works, including any damage to landscape areas should be reported to the Engineer. The progress of the engineering works should be regularly reviewed on site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for implementing landscape and visual mitigation measures.
13.11.3 The Monthly Report shall provide a statement on the general state of the landscape and visual aspects in the study area, and confirm that required mitigation measures are being implemented.
13.11.4 Details of the EM&A programme are provided in the EM&A Manual which is required to be made available for public exhibition under the EIAO.
13.12.1 Landscape impact to the rural village character of Ngau Hom Shek (LR3) will be moderate and permanent. Impacts upon mangroves and mudflats (LR4 and 5) will be mitigated in conjunction with ecological mitigation measures and residual impact is expected to be slight and slight / moderate respectively. Residual impacts to wetlands/marshes (LR7) will be moderate and stream channel (LR8) will be moderate to substantial.
13.12.2 Mitigated impact upon the overall landscape quality (inclusive of character areas LC1-LC4) will vary from slight/moderate to moderate / substantial. Much of the SWC is elevated and physical impacts in the area, whilst being moderate to substantial during construction, are expected to be mitigated for operation. This will involve extensive landscape treatment to the area within Ngau Hom Shek, specifically adjacent to the proposed roadway.
13.12.3 The residual visual impact to Ngau Hom Shek village (VSR1) and Walkers within the Greenbelt adjacent to Ngau Hom Shek (VSR6) are expected to be moderate. Views from most other VSRs will be negligible, slight or slight/moderate. Views from most VSRs will see the bridge and associated structures within a backdrop of the development of Shenzhen. When viewed in this context, negative visual impacts are alleviated. In addition, the perception of the bridge as a 'landmark' structure with positive visual attributes should also be considered.
13.12.4 Given the elevated, linear nature of the SWC combined with its scale, it is unlikely the mitigation measures will ever totally visually mitigate the proposal. Planting and the overall design will have an effect on reducing the overall impact on VSRs in comparison to if no mitigation measures were proposed. These mitigation measures include planting to screen the structures as well as designing the structures to an acceptable quality of aesthetics. After 10 years, it is reasonable to expect the planting to grow and therefore enhance the screening measures but it is also envisaged that mature growth will still not screen all the structures.
13.12.5 Overall, it is considered that, in terms of Annexe 10 of the EIAO TM, the landscape and visual impacts are acceptable with mitigation measures.