2.1
Representative noise sensitive
receivers (NSRs) along the proposed alignment were identified and assessed in
the EIA Report. The locations of the
representative NSRs are shown in Figure 2.1.
It was anticipated that some NSRs would be subjected to construction
noise and traffic noise impacts from the Project.
2.2
This section presents the
requirements, methodology, equipment, monitoring locations, criteria and
protocols for the monitoring and audit of noise impacts during the construction
and operation phases of the Project.
Noise Parameters
2.3
The construction noise level shall be
measured in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level
(Leq). Leq (30
minutes) shall be used as the monitoring parameter for the time period
between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays. For all other time periods, Leq (5 minutes)
shall be employed for comparison with the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO)
criteria.
2.4
As supplementary information for data
auditing, statistical results such as L10 and L90 shall
also be obtained for reference. A
sample data record sheet is shown in Appendix B for reference.
Monitoring Equipment
2.5
As referred to in the Technical
Memorandum (TM) issued under the NCO, sound level meters in compliance with the
International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1) and
804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise
monitoring. Immediately prior to and
following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter shall be
checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at
a known frequency. Measurements may be
accepted as valid only if the calibration level from before and after the noise
measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.
2.6
Noise measurements should not be made
in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a steady speed exceeding 5ms-1
or wind with gusts exceeding 10ms-1. The wind speed shall be checked
with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in m/s.
2.7
The ET is responsible for the
provision of the monitoring equipment.
He shall ensure that sufficient noise measuring equipment and associated
instrumentation are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular
impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring.
All the equipment and associated instrumentation shall be clearly
labelled.
Monitoring Locations
2.8
Based on the EIA Report, three worst
affected locations were designated for construction noise monitoring as listed
in Table 2.1 and illustrated in Figure 2.2. The status and location of noise
sensitive receivers may change after issuing this manual. If such cases exist,
the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations and seek approval from
ER and agreement from the IC(E) and EPD.
Table 2.1 Noise
Monitoring Stations during Construction Phase
Identification No.
|
Noise Monitoring Location
|
CM1
|
Village house
near San Tin Highway
|
CM2
|
Village house
near San Tin Highway
|
CM3
|
Village house
near Kwu Tung Road
|
2.9
If, for example, there are
difficulties obtaining access to the proposed noise monitoring locations,
alternative monitoring locations may be proposed. The selection of these
alternative monitoring locations shall be based on the following criteria:
·
At locations close to the major site
activities which are likely to have noise impacts;
·
Close to the NSRs (any domestic
premises, hotel, hostel, temporary housing accommodation, hospital, medical
clinic, educational institution, place of public worship, library, court of
law, performing arts center shall be considered as a NSR); and
·
For monitoring locations located in
the vicinity of the NSRs, care shall be taken to cause minimal disturbance to
the occupants during monitoring.
2.10
The monitoring station shall normally
be at a point 1 m from the exterior of the sensitive receiver building facade
and be at a position 1.2 m above the ground or at the height that has the least
obstructed view of the construction activity in relation to the receiver. If there is problem with access to the
normal monitoring position, an alternative position may be chosen, and a
correction to the measurements shall be made.
For reference, a correction of +3 dB(A) shall be made to the free field
measurements. The ET shall agree with
the IC(E) and EPD on the monitoring position and the corrections adopted. Once the positions for the monitoring
stations are chosen, the baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring shall be
carried out at the same positions.
Baseline Monitoring
2.11
The ET shall carry out baseline noise
monitoring prior to the commencement of the construction works. The baseline monitoring shall be carried out
daily for a period of at least two weeks.
A schedule on the baseline monitoring shall be submitted to the IC(E)
for approval before the monitoring starts.
2.12
There shall not be any construction
activities in the vicinity of the stations during the baseline monitoring. Any non-project related construction
activities in the vicinity of the stations during the baseline monitoring shall
be noted and the source and location recorded.
2.13
In exceptional cases, when
insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are obtained, the
ET shall liaise with the IC(E) and EPD to agree on an appropriate set of data
to be used as a baseline reference and submit to the ER for approval.
Impact Monitoring
2.14
Noise monitoring shall be carried out
at all the designated monitoring stations. The monitoring frequency shall
depend on the scale of the construction activities. The following is an initial guide on the regular monitoring
frequency for each station on a weekly basis when noise generating activities
are underway:
(a)
one set of measurements
between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays;
(b)
one set of measurements
between 1900-2300 hours (if there is construction work during the restricted
hours, the frequency and scope of monitoring shall be determined by the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) application
and the Noise Control Authority);
(c)
one set of measurements
between 2300-0700 hours of next day (if there is construction work during the
restricted hours, the frequency and scope of monitoring shall be determined by
the CNP application and the Noise Control Authority); and
(d)
one set of measurements
between 0700-1900 hours on holidays (if there is construction work during the
restricted hours, the frequency and scope of monitoring shall be determined by
the CNP application and the Noise Control Authority).
2.15
For the measurements (b), (c) and (d)
above, at least one set of measurements shall include 3 consecutive Leq (5
min) results and shall only be carried out when there are construction
activities scheduled during those periods.
2.16
General construction work carried out
during restricted hours is controlled by CNP system under the Noise Control
Ordinance (NCO). The Contractor shall
obtain a CNP prior to any construction work during restricted hours.
2.17
In case of non-compliance with the
construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring, as specified in the
Action Plan in Table 2.3, shall be carried out. This additional monitoring
shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or proved to
be irrelevant to the construction activities.
Event and Action Plan
2.18
The Action and Limit levels for
construction noise are defined in Table 2.2. Should non-compliance of the
criteria occur, action in accordance with the Action Plan in Table 2.3 shall be
carried out.
Table 2.2 Action and Limit Levels for
Construction Noise
Time Period
|
Action Level
|
Limit Level
|
0700 - 1900
hours on normal weekdays
|
When one
documented complaint is received
|
75 dB(A)
|
Note : If works are to be carried out during
restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit
issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed.
2.19
Since the NSRs near the proposed slip
roads would experience traffic noise impact during the operation of the
Project, a noise monitoring programme was developed to include noise
measurements at NSRs during the peak traffic hour. The programme shall be carried out by the ET to ensure that the
traffic noise levels are comparable to those predicted in the EIA under the
full provision of the recommended mitigation measures. The Highways Department will be responsible
for the operational phase monitoring.
Noise Parameters
2.20
The traffic noise level should be
measured twice within the first year of the road opening. Measurements should be made in terms of the
A-weighted L10 over 3 half hour periods during the peak traffic
hour, other metrics like Leq may be added as seen fit. A sample data record sheet is shown in
Appendix B for reference.
Monitoring Equipment
2.21
Sound level meters in compliance with
the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1)
and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise
monitoring. Immediately prior to and
following each noise measurement the accuracy of the sound level meter shall be
checked using an acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at
a known frequency. Measurements may be
accepted as valid only if the calibration level from before and after the noise
measurement agree to within 1.0 dB.
2.22
Noise measurements should not be made
in accordance with standard acoustical principles and practices in relation to
weather conditions.
2.23
The ET is responsible for the
provision of the monitoring equipment.
He shall ensure that sufficient noise measuring equipment and associated
instrumentation are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular
impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring.
All the equipment and associated instrumentation shall be clearly
labelled.
Monitoring Locations
2.24
The monitoring locations should be
selected according to the following criteria:
(a)
The monitoring locations should be so
chosen that noise from the slip roads would dominate;
(b)
One high floor and one medium floor
monitoring points should be chosen at each locations as far as possible; and
(c)
Selected monitoring locations should
enable monitoring to be done twice within one year after implementation of the
mitigation measures during the operation of the proposed slip roads.
2.25
Two stations were selected for the
operational noise monitoring as described in Table 2.4. Figure 2.3 shows the locations of the
proposed operational noise monitoring stations.
Table 2.4 Noise Monitoring Stations during
Operational Phase
Identification No.
|
Noise Monitoring Location
|
OM1
|
Village house
near Slip Road A
|
OM2
|
Village house
near Slip Road A
|
2.26
The status and locations of NSRs may
change after issuing the EM&A Manual.
In such cases, the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations
and seek approval from the ER, and agreement from the IC(E) and EPD of the
proposal. The purpose of the monitoring
is to review the different situations predicted in the EIA. Monitoring point/façade should be chosen
such that it is dominated by the traffic noise from the proposed slip roads.
2.27
If alternative monitoring locations
are proposed, the chosen monitoring locations shall be based on the following
criteria:
·
they shall be similarly exposed to
potential noise impacts;
·
they shall be close to the NSRs; and
·
they shall be located so as to cause
minimal disturbance to the occupants during monitoring.
2.28
The operational noise monitoring
station shall normally be at a point 1 m from the openable window and be at a
position 1.2 m above the ground or at the height that has the least obstructed
view of the proposed roads in relation to the receiver. The ET shall agree with the IC(E) and EPD on
the monitoring position and the corrections adopted.
Baseline Monitoring
2.29
No baseline operational noise
monitoring is required.
Impact Monitoring
2.30
Noise monitoring shall be carried out
at all the designated monitoring stations.
The following is an initial guide on the traffic noise monitoring
requirements during the operational phase:
(a)
one set of measurements at the
morning traffic peak hour on normal weekdays;
(b)
one set of measurements at the
evening traffic peak hour on normal weekdays;
(c)
a concurrent census of traffic
flow and percentage heavy vehicle shall be obtained for far-side and near-side
of the road and the existing road network in the vicinity of each measuring
point;
(d)
average vehicle speed
estimated for far-side and near-side of the road and the existing road network
in the vicinity of each measuring point; and
(e)
the two sets of monitoring
data should be obtained within the first year of operation.
2.31
Measured
noise levels should be compared with predicted noise levels by applying
appropriate conversion corrections to allow for the traffic conditions at the
time of measurement. A sample data
record sheet for operational noise monitoring is provided in Appendix B for
reference.
Event and Action Plan
2.32
The measured/monitored noise level
shall be compared with the predicted results and the predicted traffic flow
conditions (calculated noise levels based on concurrent traffic census
obtained). In case discrepancies are
observed, explanation should be given to justify the discrepancies.
Construction Phase
2.33
The mitigation measures recommended in
the EIA report include:
·
Use of quiet powered mechanical
equipment (PME)
·
Adoption of movable noise barriers
·
Implementation of the following good
site practices:
-
All plant operated on-site should be
well maintained and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction
works;
-
Machines and plant that may be in
intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be
throttled down to a minimum;
-
Plant known to emit noise strongly in
one direction should, where possible, be orientated to direct noise away from the
NSRs;
-
Mobile plant should be sited as far
away from NSRs as possible; and
-
Material stockpiles and other
structures should be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise
from on-site construction activities.
2.34
According to the EIA report, the
following noise mitigation measures are proposed.
For existing NSRs
·
A 1.5m high reflective plain barrier
of about 121m long erected along the western edge of Slip Road A.
For Future/Planned NSRs
·
A 2m high reflective plain barrier of
about 303m be erected along Slip Road F.
2.35
The implementation schedule for the
recommended noise mitigation measures is presented in Appendix A.