Appendix
10.1 Desk-based Review and Methodology for the Archaeological Field Survey
1. 0 Review of Cultural Heritage
The main objectives of a
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment are firstly, to identify and record all
known cultural heritage resources as defined in the Criteria for Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments, secondly, to
assess any direct and indirect impacts and finally, to recommend appropriate
mitigation measures. In this review, heritage constraints and issues will be
examined in light of the results of the baseline study.
1.1 Background
to the Project
The
drainage improvement works in Sai Kung involves works in three areas, namely
Sha Ha, Pak Kong and Ho Chung.
Proposed works at Sha Ha River:
(1)
Channel
with grasscrete and masonry bank and natural bed will be constructed on the Sai
Kung River for about 140m upstream of the Sha Ha Diversion culvert. This includes: the widening of the river by
excavation and construction of an access road 10m wide at the top of the
culvert and along one side of the river;
(2)
Construction
of three cell Sha Ha Diversion Culvert, involving site clearance and
excavation.
Proposed works at Pak Kong and Ho Chung Rivers:
(1)
River widening by excavation;
(2)
Left
bank with Ho Chung Road will remain untouched with exception the provision of
the road crossing drains;
(3)
Maintenance
access ramps will be constructed and a maintenance footpath on one side of the
river if there is no access from existing road;
(4)
Temporary
foot and vehicular bridges will be erected during construction;
(5) Existing weirs will be
replaced and the water will be temporarily diverted.
An
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study including a Cultural Heritage
Impact Assessment (CHIA) is required for the study. The CHIA will comprise an
Historical Building and Structures Survey and an Archaeological Field Survey.
1.2 Archaeological Resources
The
following archaeological sites are located within or near the proposed works
and, as a result, field survey will be required to assess the extent of potential
impacts on archaeological resources:
Sha Ha River
·
Sha
Ha Archaeological Site
Pak Kong River
·
Tai
To Tun Archaeological Site
Ho Chung River
·
Ho
Chung Archaeological Site
1.3
Archaeological Background to
the Works Areas
1.3.1
Sha Ha
Area within the archaeological site boundary.
The boundary of the
archaeological site at Sha Ha is partially marked on figure 1. It can be seen that part of the proposed
drainage improvement works fall within the site boundary. It is recommended that an archaeological
investigation including an auger hole testing programme consisting of a minimum
of 30 auger hole tests and a minimum of 10 test pit excavations be carried out
prior to the construction of the proposed works. Subject to the result of the archaeological investigation, a
rescue excavation with the programme agreed by the Antiquities and Monuments
Office may be required. For any field
work related to archaeology, the licensing requirement under the Antiquities
and Monuments Ordinance (Cap.53) should be strictly followed. Further
desk-based study will identify which portions of the project area have remained
undisturbed and should be fully tested.
Figure 2 Sha Ha Study Area within the boundary of the
archaeological site
Area outside the archaeological site boundary.
The area north of the road
has a similar landform to the known archaeological site on the alluvial plain.
The northern upper part of the works include the channeling of the existing
river course and will have minimal impact on soils of archaeological interest
as they impact on the river banks (figure 3).
Figure 3 Channeled river at Sha Ha upper
The turning bay (figure 4),
access road and lower part of the drainage improvement works (figures 5-7) should be investigated as they
are proposed on former agricultural areas which have known minimal
disturbance.
Figure 4 Proposed turning bay area at Sha Ha Figure 5 Straightening of river and access road
Figure 6 Straightening of river and access road Figure 7 Straightening of river and access road
A field survey should be
carried out to investigate the archaeological potential of this area.
The survey should comprise
of the following:
·
Field
scan of the entire surface area and the river bed;
·
Auger
hole testing programme consisting of a minimum of 60 auger hole tests; and
·
A
minimum of 10 test pit excavations.
The entire study area north
of the road is not available for testing.
For example the riverbed, which should be scanned for finds, is not
included in the auger and test excavation programme, additionally there are
concrete paths and smaller areas of disturbances (sheds and temporary
structures).
1.3.2 Pak Kong
Remains belonging to the
Ming and Qing dynasties were recovered in Ta Ho Tun. The finds were found during the Territory-wide Survey in 1998 and
included blue and white sherds and a ruined kiln wall (AMO-files). These findings fall far outside the study
area, but may be indicative of archaeological potential in the area. The proposed drainage improvement works in
Pak Kong will mainly affect the river and its riverbanks alluvial deposits
(figures 8-11).
Figure 8 Pak Kong Study Area.
Southern end. Figure
9 Pak Kong Study Area. Southern end.
Figure 10 Pak Kong Study
Area. Northern end. Figure
11 Pak Kong Study Area in center.
·
A
field visit to the area showed that the riverbank to the west of the river is
occupied by nurseries (figure 9) and that the river banks are very low-lying
compared to the surroundings (figure 11).
The proposed works will impact on the immediate river banks only and
hence no investigation is proposed for the Pak Kong area.
1.3.3 Ho Chung.
·
The proposed drainage works of the Ho Chung
River fall within the boundary of Ho Chung archaeological site. Both historical and prehistoric material has
been excavated from Ho Chung Valley (press release). The channeling of the river will have little impact on soils of
archaeological interest as it will mean excavating the immediate
riverbanks. The associated works areas
such as the turning bay is similarly located on the alluvial plain. Previous investigation has indicated that
the alluvial plain at Ho Chung contains large boulders and cobbles (Strange and
Shaw 1986) and has little archaeological potential (figures 12-15) (Archaeological
Assessments 1999). A field visit
indicated that the turning bay is proposed on an existing road with retaining
wall to the sides (figure 15). No field investigation is recommended for this
area.
Figure 12 Ho Chung river
banks Figure
13 Ho Chung river banks
Figure 14 Ho Chung River
lower course Figure 15 Ho Chung area of proposed turning bay.
2. Scope of Survey
The
desk-based study has identified the Sha Ha area as requiring archaeological
field testing in advance of works:
2.1 Sha Ha Area within the archaeological site boundary. (figure 1 and 2)
The boundary of the
archaeological site at Sha Ha is partially marked on figure 1. It can be seen that part of the proposed
drainage improvement works fall within the site boundary.
An archaeological
investigation will be carried out prior to the construction of the proposed
works including:
1.
a
field scan of the entire area within the project boundary;
2.
an
auger hole testing programme consisting of a minimum of 60 auger hole tests
placed at regular intervals; and
3.
a
minimum of 10 test pit excavations measuring 2 by 2m.
2.2 Sha Ha Area outside the archaeological site boundary.
The area north of the road
has a similar landform to the known archaeological site on the alluvial
plain.
The turning bay (figure 3),
access road and lower part of the drainage improvement works areas (figures 4-6
and figure 1) should be investigated as they are proposed on former
agricultural areas which have known minimal disturbance.
A field survey will be
carried out to investigate the archaeological potential of this area.
The survey comprises of the
following:
1.
Field
scan of the entire surface area and the river bed within the project area;
2.
Auger
hole testing programme consisting of a minimum of 60 auger hole tests placed at
regular intervals; and
3.
A
minimum of 10 test pit excavations measuring 2 by 2m to verify the soil
stratigraphy and potential for cultural/archaeological deposits.
Concrete paths and smaller areas of disturbances
(sheds and temporary structures) should be excluded from the auger and test
excavation programme.
In each of the above areas the methodology is to be
implemented, according to the requirements of the Antiquities and Monuments
Office (AMO) Criteria for Cultural
Heritage Impact Assessment.
Figure 1 accompanying this tender is
indicative of the proposed works areas.
Maps showing the updated design of improvement works will be provided at
the start of the field survey.
Archaeological field survey must be carried out by a
qualified archaeologist who should observe the statutory requirement under the
Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53) to obtain a Licence from the
Authority before undertaking any field work.
3. Recording Format
On site and post-excavation recording must comply
with AMO standards and include the following essential data recorded on
standardized forms:
·
records of areas scanned and results
·
auger records: depths / soil descriptions
/ colour
·
test pit records: context sheets / depths
/ soil descriptions / colour
·
finds per context/quantities
·
detailed finds records and quantification
The
following graphic data must be included:
·
1:1000 maps showing the areas of surface
scan
·
1:1000 maps showing the locations of
auger holes
·
1:1000 maps showing the locations of test
pits
·
photographs of test pit sections and
contexts as required
·
section drawings and any other drawings
of contexts or details
·
artefact photos/drawings
4. Reporting
Requirements
A report containing the
following elements must be submitted at the end of the field survey:
·
all
the records described above
·
all
the photos, maps and drawings described above
·
summaries
of the results of the surface scan, auger testing and test pit excavations
·
discussion
and analysis of the findings
Up
to 10 copies of the Draft Report must be submitted, in English, within 8 weeks
of completion of the field survey.
Up
to 10 copies of the Final Report in English are to be submitted as soon as all
outstanding issues have been resolved with the Authorities, particularly the
Antiquities and Monuments Office.
Reporting is to include a full electronic copy of the Final Report.