Table 5.7b Overall Impact Evaluation of Plantation & Parkland &
Developed Areas
Evaluation
Criteria |
Plantation
& Parkland |
Developed
Area |
Habitat quality |
Low |
Very low |
Species |
Five faunal species (Black Kite, Milvus migrans;
Greater Coucal, Centropus
sinensis; Japanese Pipistrelle,
Pipistrellus abramus;
Dog-faced Fruit Bat, Cynopterus sphinx; and Palla’s Squirrel, Callosciurus erythraeus)
of conservation importance recorded from this habitat type. |
Two faunal species (Pacific Reef
Egret, Egretta sacra; Chinese Pond Heron, Ardeola bacchus) of conservation importance recorded from this habitat. |
Size/Abundance |
Direct impact to approximately |
Direct impact to approximately |
Duration |
Loss of habitat within
footprint of proposed development would be irreversible. Indirect construction
phase disturbance would be temporary and reversible. Minor increase in
disturbance during operational phase will be permanent. |
Loss of habitat within
footprint of proposed development would be irreversible. Indirect construction
phase disturbance would be temporary and reversible. Minor increase in
disturbance during operational phase will be permanent. |
Reversibility |
Loss of habitat within
footprint of proposed development would be irreversible. Indirect construction
phase disturbance would be temporary and reversible. Minor increase in
disturbance during operational phase will be permanent. |
Loss of habitat within
footprint of proposed development would be irreversible. Indirect construction
phase disturbance would be temporary and reversible. Minor increase in
disturbance during operational phase will be permanent. |
Magnitude |
The scale of the impacts is considered
low. |
The scale of the impacts is
considered low. |
Overall
impact conclusion |
Low |
Negligible. |