2.1
In
this section, the requirements, methodology, equipment, monitoring locations,
criteria and protocols for the monitoring and audit of noise impacts during the
construction and operational phases of the Project are presented.
2.2
The
construction noise level shall be measured in terms of the A-weighted
equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq). Leq (30 minutes) shall be used as
the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours on
normal weekdays. For all other time
periods, Leq (15 minutes) shall be employed for comparison with the
Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) criteria.
2.3
Supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as L10 and L90
shall also be obtained for reference. A
sample data record sheet is shown in Appendix C
for reference.
2.4
Whilst the
Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) does not provide for the statutory control of
construction activities occurring on weekdays during normal working hours (i.e.
Monday to Saturday inclusive 0700-1900 hours), a daytime standard of Leq(30
minute) 75dB stipulated in Annex 5 of the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process
(EIAO-TM) shall be used as the appropriate criterion for all residential
dwellings; while a daytime standard of Leq(30 minute) 70dB will be
adopted for all educational institutions during normal school days and Leq
(30 minute) 65dB during examination periods.
2.5
The NCO
provides statutory controls on general construction works during restricted
hours (i.e. 1900-0700 hours Monday to Saturday and at any time on Sundays and
public holidays). The ANLs for evenings and holidays and for night-time are
dependent on the Area Sensitivity Rating at the NSR. The relevant ANLs are
provided in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Acceptable Noise Levels (ANLs)
Time Period |
Area Sensitivity Rating |
||
A |
B |
C |
|
All
days during the evening (1900-2300 hours) and general holidays (including
Sundays) during the day and evening (0700-2300 hours) |
60 |
65 |
70 |
All
days during the night-time (2300-0700) |
45 |
50 |
55 |
2.6
The
locations of noise sensitive receivers (NSRs) within and adjacent to the
project area are shown in Figure 2.1.
2.7
As
referred to the Technical Memorandum (TM) issued under the NCO, sound level meters
in compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications
651: 1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for
carrying out the noise monitoring.
Immediately prior to and following each noise measurement the accuracy
of the sound level meter shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator
generating a known sound pressure level at a known frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only
if the calibration levels from before and after the noise measurement agree to
within 1.0 dB.
2.8
Noise
measurements should not be made in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a
steady speed exceeding 5ms-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10ms-1.
The wind speed shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of
measuring the wind speed in m/s.
2.9
The ET is
responsible for the provision of the monitoring equipment. He shall ensure that sufficient noise
measuring equipment and associated instrumentation are available for carrying
out the baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc
monitoring. All the equipment and
associated instrumentation shall be clearly labelled.
2.10
Based on
the EIA Report, locations designated for construction noise monitoring are
listed in Table 2.2 and illustrated
in Figure 2.2.
Table 2.2 Noise Monitoring Stations during Construction Phase
Identification No. |
NSR ID in EIA Report |
Noise Monitoring Location |
CN1 |
PTS |
Old Teaching
Block, Police Training School |
CN2 |
CV2 |
Country Villa,
28 Shouson Hill Road |
CN3 |
IV1 |
Island View |
CN4 |
MV |
Manly Villa |
2.11
During operational phase, potential fixed
noise source impact would arise from the fixed plant within the Park and the
proposed lagoon night show at the Aqua City. Monitoring of fixed noise source
impact shall be conducted at the locations as listed in
Table 2.3 and illustrated in Figure 2.3.
Table 2.3 Noise Monitoring Stations during Operational Phase
Identification No. |
NSR ID in EIA Report |
Noise Monitoring Location |
ON1 |
PTS |
Old Teaching
Block, Police Training School |
ON2 |
HA |
The Hazelton |
ON3 |
OR |
Orchid Valley |
ON4 |
MV |
Manly Villa |
ON5 |
HY |
Hau Yuen |
2.12
The status
and location of noise sensitive receivers may change after issuing this
manual. If such cases exist, the ET
Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations and seek approval from the ER and agreement from the IEC on the proposal. The ET leader shall
also inform EPD on the proposal. When alternative monitoring locations are
proposed, the monitoring locations shall be chosen based on the following
criteria:
· Monitoring at sensitive receivers close to the major site activities which are likely to have noise impacts
· Monitoring at the noise sensitive receivers as defined in the Technical Memorandum
· Assurance of minimal disturbance to the occupants during monitoring
2.13
The
monitoring station shall normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the
noise sensitive facade and be at a position 1.2m above ground. If there is a problem with access to the
normal monitoring position, an alternative position should be chosen, and a
correction to the measurements shall be made.
For reference, a correction of +3dB(A) shall be made to the free field
measurements. The ET shall agree with
the IEC and EPD on the monitoring position and the corrections adopted. Once the positions for the monitoring
stations are chosen, the baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring shall be
carried out at the same positions.
2.14
The ET
shall carry out baseline noise monitoring prior to the commencement of the
construction works. The baseline
monitoring shall be measured for a continuous period of at least 14 consecutive
days at a minimum logging interval of 30 minutes for daytime (between 0700 and
1900 hours of normal weekdays) and 15 minutes (as three consecutive Leq,
(5 minutes) readings) for evening time (between 1900 and 2300 hours of
normal weekdays), general holidays including Sundays (between 0700 and 2300
hours) and night-time (between 2300 and 0700 of all days). The Leq,
L10 and L90 shall be recorded at the specified
interval. A schedule on the baseline
monitoring shall be submitted to the IEC for approval and EPD for information
before the monitoring starts. The baseline noise monitoring period shall
cover the proposed operation hours of the
Project i.e. 1000 - 2200hours.
2.15
There
shall not be any construction activities in the vicinity of the stations during
the baseline monitoring. Any
non-project related construction activities in the vicinity of the stations
during the baseline monitoring shall be noted and the source and location
recorded.
2.16
In
exceptional cases, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable
results are obtained, the ET shall liaise with the IEC to agree on an
appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to EPD
for information.
Construction Noise
2.17
Noise
monitoring shall be carried out at all the designated monitoring stations. The monitoring frequency shall depend on the
scale of the construction activities.
An initial guide on the monitoring is to obtain one set of 30-minute
measurement at each station between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays at a
frequency of once a week when construction activities are underway.
2.18
If
construction works are extended to include works during the hours of 1900 –
0700, or general holidays and Sundays, impact monitoring in terms of 3
consecutive Leq (5 minutes) shall be carried out at a minimum
frequency of once a week during evening, general holiday or night-time
works. Applicable construction noise
permits (CNP) under NCO shall be obtained by the Contractor.
2.19
In case of
non-compliance with the construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring,
as specified in Event / Action Plan in Table
2.6 shall be carried out. This
additional monitoring shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are
rectified or proved to be irrelevant to the construction activities.
2.20
Monitoring of fixed noise source impact
shall be conducted:
(a) During
the lagoon night show (hereinafter referred to as “lagoon night show noise
monitoring”)
(b) Not
during the lagoon night show (hereinafter referred to as “daily operational
noise monitoring”)
2.21
Lagoon night show noise monitoring shall be carried out at all the designated monitoring stations
during the performance of lagoon night shows at a logging interval of 30 minutes. The monitoring frequency shall depend on the
schedule of the lagoon night shows, and an initial impact monitoring should be
conducted at least two times per week, with
once on normal weekdays and once on general holidays during the first month of
the lagoon night shows.
2.22
The need
for noise
monitoring during the lagoon night show should be reviewed
monthly based on the previous monitoring results, any adjustment to the
loudspeaker system, and any change to the show schedule or rundown. For the same loudspeaker system and show
rundown, if the noise levels of the month comply with the noise criteria
as stipulated in Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process
(EIAO-TM), or are
consistent with the baseline noise levels, ET may consider not to include this
parameter in the subsequent monitoring programme. Agreement from the IEC and approval from EPD must be obtained
prior to suspension of noise monitoring. Impact monitoring shall re-commence if there is any change to the
power, orientation, and volume of the loudspeaker system, or to the show
rundown, or an increase of show frequency.
2.23
For daily operational noise monitoring,
30-minute noise measurement at each designated station during the operational
hours of the Park but not during the lagoon night show shall be conducted. Lmax,
L10 and L90 shall be recorded at the specified interval
for reference. The monitoring frequency should
be the same as that for the noise monitoring during the lagoon night show. Agreement from the
IEC and approval from EPD must be obtained prior to suspension of noise
monitoring.
Construction Noise
2.24
The action
and limit levels for construction noise are defined in Table 2.4. Should
non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the Event /
Action Plan in Table 2.6 shall be
carried out. If exceedances are resulted from cumulative impacts, all steps
stipulated in the Event / Action Plan shall be carried out.
Table 2.4 Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Time Period |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
0700 – 1900 hours on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received from any one of the
sensitive receivers |
75 dB(A)* |
1900-2300 on all days and 0700-2300 on general holidays (including
Sundays) |
60/65/70 dB(A)** |
|
2300-0700 on all days |
45/50/55 dB(A)** |
* Reduced
to 70dB(A) for schools or institution and 65dB(A) during school examination
periods
** To be selected based on the
Area Sensitivity Rating of A/B/C, and the conditions of the applicable CNP(s) must be followed.
Fixed Noise Sources
2.25
The action
and limit levels for the fixed noise sources
for every 30 minutes (i.e. Leq (30 minutes)) are defined in Table 2.5. Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance
with the Event / Action Plan in Table
2.7 shall be undertaken. If exceedances are resulted from cumulative
impacts, all steps stipulated in the Event / Action Plan shall be carried out.
Table 2.5 Action and Limit Levels for Entertainment Noise
Identification No. |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
ON1 |
When one documented complaint is received from any one of the
sensitive receivers |
60dB(A) |
ON2 |
60dB(A) |
|
ON3 |
55dB(A) |
|
ON4 |
55dB(A) |
|
ON5 |
55dB(A) |
Table 2.6 Event / Action Plan for Construction Noise
Event |
Action |
|||
|
ET |
Contractor |
ER |
IEC |
Action Level |
1.
Identify
source. 2.
Notify
IEC, ER and Contractor. 3.
Conduct
additional noise monitoring to investigate the causes. 4. Report the investigation
results to the IEC, ER and Contractor. 5. Discuss with Contractor for
their formulation of remedial measures if the exceedance is related to
construction works. 6.
Conduct
additional monitoring to check mitigation effectiveness. |
1.
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2.
Submit
noise mitigation proposals to ET, ER and IEC. 3.
Implement
noise mitigation proposals. |
1.
Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2.
Notify
Contractor. 3.
Require
Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem. 4.
Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented. |
1.
Review
the analysed results submitted by the ET. 2.
Review
the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise the ER
accordingly. 3.
Supervise
and confirm in writing the implementation of remedial measures |
Limit Level |
1.
Identify
source. 2.
Notify
EPD, IEC, ER and Contractor. 3.
Conduct
additional noise monitoring and analyse Contractor’s working procedures to
determine possible cause of exceedance. 4.
Provide
interim report to EPD, IEC and ER on the causes and proposed actions to be
taken for the exceedances if exceedance is related to construction works 5.
Assess
effectiveness by additional monitoring and report to EPD, IEC, ER and
Contractor the results. 6.
If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2.
Submit
proposals for remedial actions to ET, ER and IEC within 3 working days of
notification. 3.
Implement
the agreed proposals. 4.
Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control. 5.
Stop
the relevant portion of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is
abated. |
1.
Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2.
Notify
Contractor. 3.
Require
Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem. 4.
Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented. 5.
If
exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and
instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is
abated. |
1.
Discuss
amongst ER, ET and Contractor on the potential remedial actions. 2.
Review
Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly. 3.
Supervise
and confirm in writing the implementation of remedial measures. |
Table 2.7 Event / Action Plan for Entertainment Noise
Event |
Action |
||
|
ET |
Ocean Park |
IEC |
Action Level |
1.
Identify
source. 2.
Notify
EPD, IEC and Ocean Park. 3.
Conduct
additional noise monitoring and investigate the causes. 4. Report the investigation
results to the EPD, IEC and Ocean Park. 5.
If
the exceedance is related to the show, conduct additional monitoring for
checking mitigation effectiveness and report the findings and results to EPD,
IEC and Ocean Park. |
1.
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2.
In
consultation with IEC, submit proposal for remedial actions within 3 calendar
days of notification. 3.
Amend
proposal if required by the IEC. 4.
Implement
the agreed remedial actions immediately. |
1.
Review
the monitoring and investigation results submitted by the ET. 2.
Require
Ocean Park to submit proposal for remedial actions. 3.
Review
and endorse the proposed remedial measures by Ocean Park. 4.
Supervise
and confirm in writing the implementation of remedial measures. |
Limit Level |
1.
Identify
source. 2.
Notify
EPD, IEC and Ocean Park. 3.
Analyse
with IEC the programme of the show and the setting of loudspeaker system in
order to investigate the causes of exceedance. 4.
Provide
interim report to EPD, IEC and Ocean Park the causes of the exceedances. 5.
If
the exceedance is related to the show, assess effectiveness by additional
monitoring. 6.
Report
the remedial action implemented and the additional monitoring results to EPD,
IEC and Ocean Park. 7.
If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2.
Assist
ET and IEC to analyse the programme of the show and the setting of
loudspeaker system. 3.
In
consultation with ET and IEC, determine possible mitigation to be implemented
and submit proposal for remedial actions within 3 calendar days of
notification. 4.
Amend
proposal if required by the IEC. 5.
Implement
the agreed remedial actions immediately. 6.
Resubmit
proposal if the problems is still not under control. 7.
Suspend
relevant portion(s) of show as determined by the IEC until the exceedance is
abated. |
1.
Analyse
with ET the programme of the show and the setting of loudspeaker system in
order to investigate the causes of exceedance. 2.
Require
Ocean Park to submit proposal for remedial actions. 3.
Review
and endorse the proposed remedial measures by Ocean Park. 4.
Supervise
and confirm in writing the implementation of remedial measures. 5.
If
exceedance continues, consider what portion(s) of show is responsible and
instruct Ocean Park to suspend the relevant portion(s) until the exceedance
is abated. |
Construction Phase
2.26
Although
the noise mitigation effects are easily quantifiable and the benefits may vary
with site conditions and operating conditions, good site practices are easy to
implement and do not impact upon the works schedule. The site practices listed below should be followed during each
phase of construction:
· Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction programme
· Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment should be utilized and should be properly maintained during the construction programme
· Mobile plant, if any, should be sited as far from NSRs as possible
· Machines and plant (such as trucks) that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum
· Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction should, wherever possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away from the nearby NSRs
· Material stockpiles and other structures should be effectively utilized, wherever practicable, in screening noise from on-site construction activities
2.27
In order
to reduce the excessive noise impacts at the affected NSRs at the Waterfront
during normal daytime working hours, quieter plants are recommended. The Contractors do not have to use specific
items of quiet plant adopted in this assessment. The Contractors may use other type of quiet plant, which have the
same total SWL, to meet their needs.
Use of Movable Noise Barrier
2.28
The use of
movable barrier for certain PME could further alleviate the construction noise
impacts. In general, 5dB(A) reduction
for movable PME and 10dB(A) for stationary PME can be achieved depending on the
actual design of movable noise barrier.
2.29
The
Contractor should be responsible for design of the movable noise barrier with
due consideration given to the size of the PME and the requirement of
intercepting the line of sight between the NSRs and PME. Barrier material of surface mass in excess
of 7kg/m2 is recommended to achieve the predicted screening
effect.
2.30
Exceedance
of up to 5 dB(A) would be predicted at the Police Training School (NSR PTS)
during the examination periods. Early liaison with the principal of this impacted
school is recommended to plan for the construction programme. Noisy construction activities should be
avoided during the examination period as far as
practicable so as to reduce the potential noise impact at the school to comply
with the noise criterion of 65dB(A).
Blasting
2.31
Although
of short duration of blast, the following mitigation measures are recommended
to be implemented to minimise the nuisance from blasting noise:
· The Contractor shall establish a communication channel with the nearest NSRs to liaise on the blasting schedule and inform them of any scheduled blasting in advance
· Sufficient time shall be allowed for alerting all the potential sensitive receivers through established channel of communication prior to each and every blasting activity
· Proper procedures shall be put in place to alert and minimise any startling effect on the staff working in Ocean Park
· Subject to detailed design to be conducted by the Contractor, trial tests could be conducted to evaluate the optimal amount of charge to be used for each blasting
Operational Phase
Fixed Noise Sources
Fixed Plant
2.32 The following noise reduction measures should be considered as far as practicable during detailed design:
· Choose quieter plant such as those which have been effectively silenced.
· Include noise levels specification when ordering new plant (including rides, E/M equipment and PA system).
· Locate fixed plant away from any NSRs as far as practicable.
· Locate fixed plant in walled plant rooms or in specially designed enclosures.
· Locate noisy machines in a basement or a completely separate building.
· Develop and implement a regularly scheduled plant maintenance programme so that equipment is properly operated and serviced in order to maintain controlled level of noise. The programme should be implemented by properly trained personnel.
2.33 Since the assessment was conducted based on conceptual design information, a review of noise impact due to fixed plant (together with that due to the open-air lagoon night show) based on detailed design available at a later stage is recommended.
Entertainment
Noise
2.34
The following factors should be taken into account
in the detailed design of the loudspeaker system as far as practicable.
§
The system should comprise a
cluster of small power loudspeakers instead of a few large-power
loudspeakers.
§
Speakers should be distributed throughout
the spectator area rather than being clustered at one end of the venue or
directly pointing to NSRs, and should be placed closer to the audience.
§
Directional speakers should be
used as far as practicable and oriented to point towards the audience and away
from the nearby NSRs.
§
The sound system should comply
with criteria set out in the EIAO-TM, whilst also providing sufficient direct
sound when considering the intelligibility of a sound system.
2.35
Upon completion of system installation, sound tests
to be witnessed by qualified professionals of IEC should be performed to
demonstrate that the loudspeaker system will satisfy the above-mentioned
acoustic design requirements.
Noise Review Study
2.36
The conceptual design and other assumptions made in
the EIA study would be used as a reference for future detailed design of the
show. When detailed design information
is available, it is considered necessary to conduct a Noise Review Study to
verify the EIA predictions.
Good Management Practices
2.37
Good management practices should be in place,
including noise monitoring, setting up a complaint hotline, and distributing
advance notice to nearby NSRs. It is
recommended that good management practices be implemented during both
rehearsals and shows.
Fall Back Option
2.38
As a fall back option, should non-compliance of
EIAO-TM noise limit at NSRs be identified for the lagoon night show, interim
measures such as turning down/off music volume shall be implemented before
long-term measures such as redesigning show with no music/lower music volume
are in place.
Cumulative Fixed Noise Source Impact
2.39
Since the assessment was conducted based on
conceptual design information, a review of fixed noise source impact (including
fixed plant and entertainment noise) is recommended in detailed design stage to
verify the EIA predictions.
2.40
The
implementation schedule for the recommended noise mitigation measures is
presented in Appendix
B.