This
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual (“the Manual”) has been
prepared by ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) on behalf of The Castle Peak Power
Company Limited (CAPCO), a joint venture between CLP Power Hong Kong Limited
(CLP) and ExxonMobil Energy Limited (EMEL).
The Manual is a supplementary document of the EIA Study of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Receiving Terminal and Associated Facilities at Black Point (hereafter referred
to as the Project).
The
Manual has been prepared in accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-126/2005) and the Technical Memorandum of the Environmental
Impact Assessment Process (EIAO TM). The purpose of the Manual is to provide
information, guidance and instruction to personnel charged with environmental
duties and those responsible for undertaking EM&A work during construction
and operation. It provides systematic
procedures for monitoring and auditing of potential environmental impacts that
may arise from the works.
This
Manual contains the following information:
·
Responsibilities
of the Contractor(s), Environmental Team (ET), and the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) with respect to the environmental monitoring and
audit requirements during the course of the project;
·
Project
organisation;
·
The
basis for, and description of, the broad approach underlying the EM&A
programme;
·
Requirements
with respect to the construction and operational programme schedule and the necessary
environmental monitoring and audit programme to track the varying environmental
impact;
·
Details
of the methodologies to be adopted including field, laboratory and analytical
procedures, and details on quality assurance and quality control programme;
·
The
rationale by which the environmental monitoring data will be evaluated and
interpreted;
·
Preliminary
definition of Action and Limit levels;
·
Establishment
of Event and Action plans;
·
Requirements
for reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of
exceedances of applicable criteria and/or receive of
complaints;
·
Requirements
for presentation of environmental monitoring and audit data and appropriate
reporting procedures; and
·
Requirements
for review of EIA predictions and the effectiveness of the mitigation
measures/environmental management systems and the EM&A programme.
For
the purpose of this manual, the ET Leader (ETL), who will be responsible for
and in charge of the ET, will refer to the person delegated the role of executing
the EM&A requirements.
1.2.1
Background to the Study
CAPCO
is proposing the development of a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving
Terminal in the Hong Kong SAR for a sustainable supply of natural gas,
primarily to fuel CAPCO’s power plant at Black
Point. CAPCO has conducted a series of
studies examining the optimum approach to provide a long-term secure supply of
natural gas to
At
the same time CAPCO commenced a dialogue with other key stakeholders including
Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs) to seek feedback on their proposals and
factor some of the issues raised into the design plans prior to commencing the
formal EIAO process.
The
outcome of the discussions with Government and other stakeholders was that
1.2.2
The Proposed Black Point Project
The
The
broad objective of this EM&A Manual is to define the procedures of the
EM&A programme for monitoring the environmental performance of the LNG
project during design, construction and operation. The construction and operational impacts
arising from the implementation of the Project are specified in the EIA Report. The EIA Report also specifies mitigation
measures
and construction practices that may be needed to ensure compliance
with the environmental criteria. These
mitigation measures and their implementation requirements are presented in the
Implementation Schedule of Mitigation Measures (Annex A).
The
main objectives of the EM&A programme are to:
·
provide
a database of environmental parameters against which to determine any short
term or long term environmental impacts, such as through detailed baseline
monitoring;
·
provide
an early indication should any of the environmental control measures or
practices fail to achieve the acceptable standards;
·
ensure
the mitigation recommendations of the EIA are included in the design of the
project;
·
clarify
and identify potential sources of pollution, impact and nuisance arising from
the works for the
responsible parties;
·
confirm
compliance with regulatory requirements, contract specifications and EIA study
recommendations;
·
confirm
compliance of environmental designs during the design phase of the Project with
the specifications stated in the EIA Report and the EP;
·
monitor
performance of the mitigation measures and to assess their effectiveness;
·
take
remedial action if unexpected issues or unacceptable impacts arise;
·
verify
the environmental impacts predicted in the EIA; and
·
audit
environmental performance.
EM&A
procedures are required during the design, construction, post-construction and
operational phases of the project implementation and a summary of the requirements
for each of the environmental parameters is detailed in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Parameter |
EM&A Phase |
|||
Design Phase(2)
|
Construction
Phase |
Post-Construction
Phase |
Operation
Phase |
|
Air Quality |
- |
Yes |
- |
- |
Noise |
- |
Yes |
- |
- |
Water Quality |
- |
Yes |
Yes |
- |
Waste |
- |
Yes |
- |
- |
Terrestrial Ecology |
- (1) |
- |
- |
- |
Marine Ecology |
- (1) |
Yes |
Yes |
- |
Fisheries |
- (1) |
- |
- |
- |
Landscape and Visual |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
- |
Cultural Heritage |
Yes |
- |
- |
- |
Quantitative Risk |
Yes |
- |
- |
- |
Land Contamination Prevention |
Yes |
- |
- |
- |
Note:
(1) Although
pre- construction monitoring may overlap the design phase, the focus of this
monitoring will be to provide additional information on which to assess
potential impacts through construction. (2) EM&A requirements in the design
phase shall include confirmation on the compliance for environmental designs
which were specified in the EIA Report and the EP for all parameters. |
1.4
The Scope of the
EM&A Programme
The
scope of this EM&A programme is to:
·
establish
baseline water quality levels at specified locations;
·
implement
monitoring and inspection requirements for water quality monitoring programme;
·
implement
inspection and audit requirements for marine ecology (marine mammals)
monitoring programme;
·
liaise
with, and provide environmental advice (as requested or when otherwise
necessary) to construction site staff on the significance and implications of
the environmental monitoring data;
·
identify
and resolve environmental issues and other functions as they may arise from the
works;
·
check
and quantify the Contractor(s)’s overall environmental performance,
implementation of Event and Action Plans (EAPs), and
remedial actions taken to mitigate adverse environmental effects as they may
arise from the works;
·
conduct
monthly reviews of monitored impact data as the basis for assessing compliance
with the defined criteria and to ensure that necessary mitigation measures are
identified and implemented, and to undertake additional ad hoc monitoring and auditing as required by special
circumstances;
·
evaluate
and interpret environmental monitoring data to provide an early indication
should any of the environmental control measures or practices fail to achieve
the acceptable standards, and to verify the environmental impacts predicted in
the EIA;
·
manage
and liaise with other individuals or parties concerning other environmental
issues deemed to be relevant to the construction process;
·
conduct
regular site inspections of a formal or informal nature to assess:
-
the level
of the Contractor(s)’s general environmental awareness;
-
the
Contractor(s)’s implementation of the recommendations in the EIA and their
contractual obligations;
-
the
Contractor(s)’s performance as a measured by the EM&A;
-
the
need for specific mitigation measures to be implemented or the continued usage
of those previously agreed;
-
to
advise the site staff of any identified potential environmental issues;
-
submit
monthly EM&A reports which summarise project monitoring and auditing data,
with full interpretation illustrating the acceptability or otherwise of any
environmental impacts and identification or assessment of the implementation
status of agreed mitigation measures; and
·
develop
environmental contract clauses for contractor contract.
1.5
Works Programme
and Works Locations
The
construction works are anticipated to commence in 2007. The preliminary construction programme is
given in Annex B.
The locations of works are shown in Figure
1.1. The Sensitive
Receivers in the vicinity of the proposed LNG terminal at Black Point is shown
in Figure 1.3.
1.6
Organisation and
Structure of the EM&A
1.6.1
General
CAPCO
will appoint an Environmental Team (ET) to conduct the monitoring and auditing
works and to provide specialist advice on undertaking and implementation of
environmental responsibilities.
The
ET will have previous relevant experience with managing similarly sized
EM&A programmes and the Environmental Team Leader (ET Leader) will be a
recognised environmental professional, preferably with a minimum of seven years
relevant experience in impact assessments and impact monitoring programmes.
To
maintain strict control of the EM&A process, CAPCO will appoint independent
environmental consultants to act as an Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
to verify and validate the environmental performance of the Contractor(s) and
his Environmental Team. The IEC will have
previous relevant experience with checking and auditing similarly sized
EM&A programmes and the IEC will be a recognised environmental
professional, preferably with a minimum of seven years relevant experience in
impact assessments and impact monitoring programmes.
1.6.2
Project Organisation
The
roles and responsibilities of the various parties involved in the EM&A
process are further expanded in the following sections and in Figure
1.2. The ET Leader will be responsible for, and in
charge of, the Environmental Team; and will be the person responsible for
executing the EM&A requirements, and to develop environmental Contract
Clauses for Contractor Contract.
CAPCO
CAPCO
will:
·
retain
an Environmental Team (ET) to undertake monitoring, laboratory analysis and
reporting of environmental monitoring and audit data;
·
retain
an Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) to audit and verify the overall environmental
performance of the works and to assess the effectiveness of the ET in their
duties;
·
supervise
the Contractor(s)’ activities and ensure that the requirements in the EM&A
Manual and the Contract Document are fully complied with;
·
develop
appropriate contract clauses to ensure that the Contractor(s) will have
qualified professionals to interface with the ETL/CAPCO/IEC to fulfil the
EIA/EP requirements;
·
inform
the Contractor(s) when action is required to reduce impacts in accordance with
the Event and Action Plans;
·
adhere
to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation; and
·
participate
in joint site inspections undertaken by the ET and IEC.
The Contractor(s)
The
Contractor(s) will:
·
work
within the scope of the construction contract and other tender conditions;
·
provide
assistance to the ET in carrying out monitoring;
·
submit
proposals on mitigation measures in case of exceedances
of Action and Limit levels in accordance with the Event and Action Plans;
·
implement
measures to reduce impact where Action and Limit levels are exceeded;
·
implement
the corrective actions instructed by CAPCO/ET/IEC;
·
participate
in the site inspections undertaken by the ET and the IEC, as required, and
undertake any corrective actions instructed by CAPCO/ETL/IEC; and
·
adhere
to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation.
The
Environmental Team (ET) will:
·
monitor
various environmental parameters as required in this EM&A Manual;
·
assess
the EM&A data and review the success of the EM&A programme determining
the adequacy of the mitigation measures implemented and the validity of the EIA
predictions as well as identify any adverse environmental impacts before they
arise;
·
carry
out regular site inspection to investigate and audit the Contractor(s)’s site
practice, equipment and work methodologies with respect to pollution control
and environmental mitigation, and effect proactive action to pre-empt issues;
·
review
the Contractor(s)’s working programme and methodology, and comment as
necessary;
·
develop
environmental contract clauses for contractor contract;
·
review
and prepare reports on the environmental monitoring data, site environmental
conditions and audits;
·
report
on the environmental monitoring and audit results and conditions to the IEC,
Contractor(s), EPD and CAPCO ;
·
recommend
suitable mitigation measures to the Contractor(s) in the case of exceedance of Action and Limit levels in accordance with
the Event and Action Plans;
·
adhere
to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation; and
·
the
ET Leader will keep a contemporaneous log-book and record each and every
instance or circumstance or change of circumstances which may affect the
environmental impact assessment and every non-conformance with the
recommendations of the EIA Reports or the EPs.
The
ET will be led and managed by the ET Leader.
The ET leader will have relevant education, training, knowledge,
experience and professional qualifications and the appointment will be subject
to the approval of the Director of Environmental Protection. Suitably qualified staff will be included in
the ET, and ET should not be in any way an associated body of the
Contractor(s).
Independent Environmental Checker
The
IEC will:
·
review
and monitor the implementation of the EM&A programme and the overall level
of environmental performance being achieved;
·
arrange
and conduct monthly independent site inspections/audits of the works;
·
validate
and confirm the accuracy of monitoring results, monitoring equipment,
monitoring stations, monitoring procedures and locations of sensitive
receivers;
·
carry
out random sample check and audit on monitoring data and sampling procedures,
etc;
·
audit
the EIA recommendations and requirements against the status of implementation
of environmental protection measures on site;
·
on a
need basis, audit the Contractor(s)’s construction methodology and agree the
appropriate, reduced impact alternative in consultation with CAPCO, the ET and
the Contractor(s);
·
provide
specialist advice to CAPCO and the Contractor(s)
on environmental matters;
·
check
complaint cases and the effectiveness of corrective measures;
·
check
that the necessary mitigation measures recommended in the EIA, EP and Contract documents,
or as subsequently required, are effectively implemented;
·
review
EM&A report submitted by the ET leader and feedback audit results to ET by
signing off relevant EM&A proformas;
·
report
the findings of site inspections/ audits and other environmental performance
reviews to CAPCO, ET, EPD and the Contractor(s); and
·
Sufficient
and suitably qualified professional and technical staff will be employed by the
respective parties to ensure full compliance with their duties and
responsibilities, as required under the EM&A programme for the duration of
the Project.
1.6.3
Key Contact Information
Key
contact information will be provided in a similar format as in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2 Contact
Information - to be completed prior to commencement of construction
Name |
Position |
Telephone |
Facsimile |
E-mail |
CAPCO – Environmental Permit Holder |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
Contractor(s) |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Team |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
Independent Environmental Checker |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
1.7
Structure of the
EM&A Manual
The
remainder of the Manual is set out as follows:
·
Section 2 sets out the EM&A general
requirements and EIAO Permit Conditions;
·
Section 3 sets
out the EM&A requirement for air quality;
·
Section 4
sets out the EM&A requirement for noise;
·
Section 5
details the requirements for water quality baseline and impact monitoring, and
lists relevant monitoring equipment, compliance and Event and Action Plans (EAPs);
·
Section 6
details the requirements for waste management;
·
Section 7
sets out the EM&A requirement for terrestrial ecology;
·
Section 8
details the requirements for marine ecology (marine mammal);
·
Section 9
sets out the EM&A requirements for landscape and visual;
·
Section 10
sets out the EM&A requirements for cultural heritage;
·
Section 11
sets out the EM&A requirements for land contamination prevention and
quantitative risk;
·
Section 12
describes the scope and frequency of site environmental auditing; and
·
Section 13
details the reporting requirements for the EM&A.
In
this section, the general requirements of the EM&A programme for the Project
are presented with reference to the relevant findings from the EIA Report that
have formed the basis of the scope and content of the programme.
2.2.1
General
The
environmental issues, which were identified during the EIA process and are
associated with the construction phase of the Project will be addressed through
the monitoring and controls specified in this EM&A Manual and in the
construction contracts.
During
the construction phases of the Project, air quality, noise quality, water
quality, ecology, landscape and visual, waste and cultural heritage will be
subject to EM&A, with environmental monitoring being undertaken for water
quality and marine ecology as determined in the EIA. Monitoring of the effectiveness of the
mitigation measures will be achieved through the environmental monitoring
programme as well as through site inspections.
The inspections will include within their scope, mechanisms to review
and assess the Contractor(s)’s environmental performance, ensuring that the
recommended mitigation measures have been properly implemented, and that the
timely resolution of received complaints are managed and controlled in a manner
consistent with the recommendations of the EIA Report.
2.2.2
Environmental Monitoring
The
environmental monitoring work throughout the Project period will be carried out
in accordance with this EM&A and reported by the ET. Monitoring works will comprise of
quantitative assessment of physical parameters such as water quality and marine
ecology impacts which also form an important part of the whole monitoring
programme. The monitoring programme will
be conducted at the chosen representative sensitive receivers in the vicinity
of the construction site.
2.2.3
Action and Limit Levels
Action
and Limit (A/L) Levels are defined levels of impact recorded by the
environmental monitoring activities which represent levels at which a
prescribed response is required. These Levels
are quantitatively defined later in the relevant sections of this manual and
described in principle below:
Action
Levels: beyond which there is a clear indication
of a deteriorating ambient environment for which appropriate remedial actions
are likely to be necessary to prevent environmental quality from falling
outside the Limit Levels, which would be unacceptable; and
Limit
Levels: statutory and/or agreed contract limits
stipulated in the relevant pollution control ordinances, HKPSG or Environmental
Quality Objectives established by the EPD.
If these are exceeded, works will not proceed without appropriate
remedial action, including a critical review of plant and working methods.
2.2.4
Event and Action Plans
The purpose of the Event and Action Plans
(EAPs) is to provide, in association with the
monitoring and audit activities, procedures for ensuring that if any
significant environmental incident (either accidental or through inadequate
implementation of mitigation measures on the part of the Contractor(s)) does
occur, the cause will be quickly identified and remediated,
and the risk of a similar event recurring is reduced. This also applies to the exceedances
of A/L criteria identified in the EM&A programme.
2.2.5
Site Inspections
In addition to monitoring water quality
and marine ecology as a means of assessing the ongoing performance of the
Contractor(s), the ET will undertake site inspections and audits of on-site
practices and procedures twice per month.
The primary objective of the inspection and audit programme will be to
assess the effectiveness of the environmental controls established by the
Contractor(s) and the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures
recommended in the EIA Report. The IEC
will undertake monthly site inspection and audit to assess the performance of
the Contractor(s).
Whilst the audit and inspection programme
will undoubtedly complement the monitoring activity with regard to the
effectiveness of controlling impacts to water quality and marine ecology, the
criteria against which the audits will be undertaken will be derived from the
Clauses within the Contract Documents which seek to enforce the recommendations
of the EIA Report and the established management systems.
The findings of site inspections and
audits will be made known to the Contractor(s) at the time of the inspection to
enable the rapid resolution of identified non-conformities. Non-conformities, and the corrective actions
undertaken, will also be reported in the monthly EM&A Reports.
Section 12 of this Manual presents details of the scope and
frequency of on-site inspections and defines the range of issues that the audit
protocols will be designed to address.
2.2.6
Enquiries, Complaint and Requests for
Information
Enquiries, complaints and requests for
information may occur from a wide range of individuals and organisations
including members of the public, Government departments, the press and
television media and community groups.
Enquiries concerning the environmental
effects of the construction works, irrespective of how they are received, will
be reported to CAPCO and directed to the ET which will set up procedures for
the handling, investigation and storage of such information. The following steps will then be followed:
1) The ET Leader will notify CAPCO of the
nature of the enquiry.
2) An investigation will be initiated to
determine the validity of the complaint and to identify the source of the
issue.
3) The Contractor(s) will undertake the
following steps, as necessary:
i)
Investigate
and identify source of the issue;
ii) If considered necessary by CAPCO following
consultation with the IEC, undertake additional monitoring to verify the
existence and severity of the alleged complaint;
iii) Liaise with EPD to identify remedial
measures;
iv) Liaise with the IEC to identify remedial
measures;
v) Implement the agreed mitigation measures;
vi) Repeat the monitoring to verify
effectiveness of mitigation measures; and
vii) Repeat review procedures to identify
further practical areas of improvement if the repeat monitoring results
continue to substantiate the complaint.
4) The outcome of the investigation and the
action taken will be documented on a complaint log (Annex C). A formal response to each complaint received
will be prepared by the Contractor(s) within five working days and submitted to
CAPCO, in order to notify the concerned person(s) that action has been taken.
5) Enquires which trigger this process will
be reported in the monthly reports which will include results of inspections
undertaken by the Contractor(s), and details of the measures taken, and
additional monitoring results (if deemed necessary). It should be noted that the receipt of
complaint or enquiry will not be, in itself, a sufficient reason to introduce
additional mitigation measures.
The complainant will be notified of the
findings, and audit procedures will be put in place to ensure that the issue
does not recur.
2.2.7
Reporting
Baseline, construction phase and
post-construction phase monitoring, monthly, quarterly and final reports will
be prepared and certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC. The reports will be submitted to the
Contractor(s), CAPCO and EPD. The monthly
reports will be prepared and submitted within two weeks of the end of each
calendar month.
2.2.8
Cessation of EM&A
The cessation of EM&A programme is
subject to the satisfactory completion of the EM&A Final Review Report, agreement
with the IEC and approval from EPD.
Based on the findings of the EIA no
operation phase EM&A is considered necessary. However, other operational licenses will require
specific monitoring or audit conditions or practices, and a non EIA EM&A
practice will need to be put in place.
The EIA study has concluded that dust
monitoring is recommended at the
Dust levels will be reduced through the
implementation of mitigation measures.
During the operational phase, emissions will be controlled by integrated
measures, regular inspections, relevant emissions licenses and are not
predicted to yield concentrations that would lead to significant air quality
impacts. Therefore, no air quality
monitoring will be required for the phase aside from that required by specific
emissions licenses.
3.2.1
Parameters
Monitoring of the Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) levels shall
be carried out by the ET to ensure that construction works are not generating
dust which exceeds the acceptable level.
Timely action should be taken to rectify the situation if an exceedance is detected.
According to the recommendations in the EIA, 24-hour TSP levels
shall be measured to indicate the impacts of construction dust on air quality
during site formation works. The TSP
levels shall be measured by following the standard high volume sampling method
as set out in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part
50), Appendix B. Upon approval by CAPCO
and the Environmental Protection Department (DEP).
All relevant data including temperature, pressure, weather conditions,
elapsed-time meter reading for the start and stop of the sampler,
identification and weight of the filter paper, any other special phenomena and
work progress of the concerned site shall be recorded in detail by the ET. A sample data log sheet is shown in Annex E.
3.2.2
Monitoring Equipment
A high volume sampler in compliance with the
following specifications shall be used for carrying out the 1-hr and 24-hr TSP
monitoring:
(i) 0.6-1.7 m3/min (20-60 SCFM) adjustable
flow range;
(ii) equipped with a
timing/control device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iii) installed with
elapsed-time meter with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iv) capable of providing a
minimum exposed area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
(v) flow control accuracy:
+/- 2.5% deviation over 24-hr sampling period;
(vi) equipped with a
shelter to protect the filter and sampler;
(vii) incorporated with an
electronic mass flow rate controller or other equivalent devices;
(viii) equipped with a flow
recorder for continuous monitoring;
(ix) provided with a peaked
roof inlet;
(x) equipped with a manometer;
(xi) able to hold and seal
the filter paper to the sampler housing in a horizontal position;
(xii) easy to change the
filter; and
(xiii)
capable of operating continuously for 24-hr period.
The Contractor(s) is
responsible for provision of the monitoring equipment and shall ensure that sufficient
number of high volume samplers with an appropriate calibration kit are
available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, impact monitoring and ad
hoc monitoring. The high volume samplers
shall be equipped with an electronic mass flow controller and be calibrated
against a traceable standard at regular intervals. All the equipment, calibration kit, filter
papers, etc. shall be clearly labelled by the ET.
Calibration of dust monitoring
equipment shall be conducted by the ET upon installation and thereafter at
bi-monthly intervals. The transfer
standard shall be traceable to the internationally recognised
primary standard and be calibrated annually.
The calibration data shall be properly documented for future reference
by concerned parties, such as the IC(E).
All the data shall be converted into standard temperature and pressure
condition.
The flow-rate of the
sampler before and after the sampling exercise with the filter in position
shall be verified to be constant and recorded in the data sheet as described in
Section 3.2.1.
If the ET proposes to use a
direct reading dust meter to measure 1-hr TSP levels on an ad hoc basis, he shall
submit sufficient information to the IC(E) to prove that the instrument is
capable of achieving a comparable result as that the High Volume Sampler (HVS)
and may be used for the 1-hr sampling.
The instrument should also be calibrated regularly and the 1-hr sampling
shall be checked periodically by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of
the results measured by the direct reading method.
Wind data monitoring
equipment shall also be provided and set up at suitable locations for logging
wind speed and wind direction near to the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall be
proposed by the ET and agreed with CAPCO, in consultation with the IC(E).
For installation and
operation of wind data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be
observed:
·
the wind sensors
should be installed on masts at an elevated level 10 m above ground so that
they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by the buildings;
·
the wind data
should be captured by a data logger to be down-loaded for processing at least
once a month;
·
the wind data monitoring
equipment should be re-calibrated at least once every six months; and
·
wind direction should be
divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
In
exceptional situations, the ET may propose alternative methods to obtain
representative wind data upon approval from CAPCO and agreement from the IC(E).
3.2.3
Laboratory Measurement/Analysis
A clean laboratory with
constant temperature and humidity control and equipped with necessary measuring
and conditioning instruments shall be used for sample analysis and equipment
calibration and maintenance. The laboratory shall be HOKLAS accredited.
If a site laboratory is set
up or a non-HOKLAS accredited laboratory is hired for carrying out the laboratory
analysis, the laboratory equipment shall be approved by CAPCO, in consultation
with the IC(E). Measurement performed by the laboratory shall be demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the CAPCO and the IC(E). The IC(E) shall conduct regular
audits of the measurements performed by the laboratory to ensure the accuracy
of the results. The ET shall provide
CAPCO and the IC(E) with one copy each of the Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B for reference.
Filter paper of size
8"x10" shall be labelled before sampling.
It shall be a clean filter paper with no pin holes and shall be conditioned in
a humidity controlled chamber for over 24-hr and be pre-weighed before use for
the sampling.
After sampling, the filter
paper loaded with dust shall be kept in a clean and tightly sealed plastic
bag. The filter paper shall then be
returned to the laboratory for reconditioning in the humidity controlled
chamber followed by accurate weighing by an electronic balance with a readout
down to 0.1 mg. The balance shall be
regularly calibrated against a traceable standard.
All the collected samples
shall be kept in a good condition for 6 months before disposal.
3.2.4
Monitoring
Location
The air quality sensitive receivers
as determined by the EIA are shown in Figures 3.1 and the recommended dust
monitoring location is at the
When alternative monitoring
locations are proposed, the following preferred locations and factors shall be
considered:
·
the site boundary or locations close to the
major dust emission source;
·
close to the sensitive receptors; and
·
the prevailing meteorological conditions.
The ET shall agree with CAPCO,
in consultation with the IC(E), the position of the high volume samplers. When positioning the samplers, the following
points shall be noted:
·
a horizontal platform with appropriate
support to secure the samplers against gusty wind shall be provided;
·
the distance between the sampler and an
obstacle, such as buildings, shall be at least twice the height that the
obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
·
a minimum of 2 metres
of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is required for rooftop
samplers;
·
a minimum of 2 metres
separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required;
·
no furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
·
airflow around the sampler is unrestricted;
·
the sampler is more than 20 metres from the dripline;
·
any wire fence and gate, to protect the
sampler, shall not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
·
permission must be obtained to set up the
samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations;
·
a secured supply of electricity is needed to
operate the samplers; and
·
no two samplers should be placed less than 2 metres apart.
Prior to construction, the
dust monitoring schedule shall be developed by the ET based upon the
construction schedule supplied by the Contractor. The ET shall inform the IC(E) of the impact
monitoring programme such that he can conduct on-site
audits to ensure accuracy of the impact monitoring results. The environmental
monitoring schedule shall be approved by CAPCO.
The ET shall carry out
baseline monitoring at the
This location has been
selected as they represent properties which are closest to the works and/or are
particularly sensitive to impacts and are representative of the adjacent
properties. The monitoring at these
locations shall be undertaken for at least 14 consecutive days prior to the
start of the construction works to obtain daily 24-hr TSP samples. 1-hr sampling shall also be carried out at
least 3 times per day during the same period.
Monitoring shall take place within a 3 week period prior to the
commencement of construction works.
During the baseline
monitoring, there should not be any construction or dust generation activities in
the vicinity of the monitoring stations.
In case the baseline
monitoring cannot be carried out at the designated monitoring locations during
the baseline monitoring period, the ET Leader shall carry out the monitoring at
alternative locations which can effectively represent the baseline conditions
at the impact monitoring locations. The alternative baseline monitoring
locations shall be approved by CAPCO, IC(E) and agreed with DEP.
In the event that
insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are obtained, the
ET shall liaise with the DEP to agree on an appropriate set of data to be used
as a baseline reference and submit this data to CAPCO and IC(E) for approval.
Ambient conditions may vary
seasonally and shall be reviewed at three monthly intervals. If the ET considers that the ambient
conditions have changed and a repeat of the baseline monitoring is required to
be carried out for obtaining updated baseline levels, the monitoring should be
at times when the Contractor's activities are not generating dust, at least in
the proximity of the monitoring stations.
Should a change in ambient conditions be determined, the baseline levels
and, in turn, the air quality criteria, shall be revised. The revised baseline levels and air quality
criteria shall be agreed with the DEP and supplied to the IC(E).
3.2.6
Impact Monitoring
The ET shall carry out impact monitoring during the course of the
works. According to the recommendations in
the EIA, 24-hour TSP levels shall be measured to indicate the impacts of
construction dust on air quality during site formation works. For regular impact monitoring, the sampling
frequency of at least once in every six days shall be strictly observed at six of the designated monitoring
stations for 24-hr TSP monitoring. The
station to be monitored should be selected based on the prevailing wind
direction and their proximity to the active construction works.
The specific time to start and stop the 24-hr TSP monitoring shall
be clearly defined for the location and be strictly followed by the operator.
In case of non-compliance with the air quality criteria, more
frequent monitoring, as specified in the Action Plan in Section 3.2.7 shall be conducted within 24 hours after the
non-compliance is detected. This additional monitoring shall be continued until
the excessive dust emission or the deterioration in air quality is rectified.
3.2.7
Event and Action Plan for Air Quality
The baseline monitoring results will form the basis for
determining the air quality criteria for the impact monitoring. The ET shall compare the impact monitoring
results with air quality criteria set up for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP (only
required during exceedances). Table
3.1 shows the air quality criteria, namely Action and Limit levels to be
used. Should non-compliance with the air
quality criteria occur, the ET, the IC(E) and CAPCO and the Contractor(s) shall
undertake their specified actions in accordance with the Action Plan shown in Table 3.2.
Table 3.1 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
24 Hour
TSP Level in g/m3 |
For
baseline level #200 g/m3, Action level = (Baseline * 1.3 + Limit
Level)/2; |
260 |
1 Hour
TSP Level in g/m3 |
For
baseline level #384 g/m3, Action level = (Baseline*1.3 + Limit Level)/2; For
baseline level > 384 g/m3, Action Level = Limit Level |
500 |
In case of non-compliance with
the air quality criteria, more frequent monitoring exercise, shall be conducted
within 24 hours after the result is obtained.
This additional monitoring shall be continued until the excessive dust
emission or the deterioration in air quality is rectified. The Event/Action Plan for air quality is
given in the attached Table 3.2.
The Independent Checker (Environment) (IC(E)) shall be empowered
to audit the environmental performance of construction, all aspects of the
EM&A programme, validate and confirm the accuracy of monitoring results,
monitoring equipment, monitoring locations and procedures. If any exceedance
occur, the IC(E) shall follow the actions stated in the Event and Action Plan
in Table 3.2.
3.3
Air
Quality Mitigation Measures
Regular site inspections should be carried
out during the construction phase in order to ensure that the mitigation
measures are implemented and are working effectively. The Contractor(s) will be responsible for the
design and implementation of the mitigation measures which are presented in Annex A
Table 3.2 Event / Action Plan for Air Quality
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET(1) |
IC(E)(1) |
CAPCO |
Contractor(s) |
|
Action
Level |
|
|
|
|
1. Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify
the source. 2. Inform the
IC(E) and the ER. 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding. 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by the ES. 2. Check Contractor’s
working method. |
1. Notify
Contractor. |
1. Rectify
any unacceptable practice 2. Amend
working methods if appropriate |
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Identify
the source. 2. Inform the
IC(E) and the ER. 3. Repeat measurements
to confirm findings. 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. 5. Discuss
with the IC(E) and the Contractor on
remedial actions required. 6. If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with the IC(E) and
the ER. 7. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by the ES. 2. Check the
Contractor’s working method. 3. Discuss
with the ES and the Contractor on
possible remedial measures. 4. Advise the
ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5. Supervisor
implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2. Notify the
Contractor. 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Submit proposals
for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of notification 2. Implement
the agreed proposals 3. Amend
proposal if appropriate |
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
|
ET |
IC(E) |
CAPCO |
Contractor(s) |
Limit Level |
|
|
|
|
1. Exceedance for one sample |
1. Identify
the source. 2. Inform the
ER and the DEP. 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding. 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. 5. Assess effectiveness
of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep the IC(E), the DEP and the ER
informed of the results. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by the ES. 2. Check
Contractor’s working method. 3. Discuss
with the ES and the Contractor on
possible remedial measures. 4. Advise the
ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures. 5. Supervisor
implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2. Notify the
Contractor. 3. Ensure remedial
measures are properly implemented. |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of notification 3. Implement
the agreed proposals 4. Amend
proposal if appropriate |
2. Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Notify the
IC(E), the ER, the DEP and the Contractor. 2. Identify
the source. 3. Repeat
measurements to confirm findings. 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. 5. Carry out
analysis of the Contractor’s working
procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented. 6. Arrange
meeting with the IC(E) and the ER to discuss the remedial actions to be
taken. 7. Assess
effectiveness of the Contractor’s
remedial actions and keep the IC(E), the DEP and the ER informed of the
results. 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Discuss
amongst the ER, ES and the Contractor on the potential remedial actions. 2. Review the
Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly. 3. Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of failure in writing. 2. Notify the
Contractor. 3. In consultation
with the IC(E), agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures to be
implemented. 4. Ensure
remedial measures are properly implemented. 5. If exceedance continues, consider what activity of the work
is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that activity of work
until the exceedance is abated. |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance. 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IC(E) within 3 working days of
notification. 3. Implement
the agreed proposals. 4. Resubmit proposals
if problem still not under control. 5. Stop the
relevant activity of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated. |
Note: ET – Environmental Team,
IC(E) – Independent Checker (Environmental)
The EIA study of the Project
has concluded that no sensitive receivers will be affected by construction
noise. Based upon this, no noise
monitoring is considered necessary during the construction phase. However, audit of the construction noise is
recommended.
Regular site inspections
should be carried out to audit the compliance of the Contractor(s) with regard to
noise control, contract conditions and the relevant noise impact criteria, and
to recommend further mitigation measures if found to be necessary.
No operational phase noise
impacts were predicted at sensitive receiver locations and hence no operational
phase monitoring is required.
In accordance with the recommendations of
the EIA, water quality EM&A is required during dredging activities. In addition, baseline water quality monitoring
will be required prior to the commencement of construction activities. The following Section provides details of the
water quality monitoring to be undertaken by the ET to verify the distance of
sediment plume dispersion and to identify whether the potential exists for any
indirect impacts to occur to ecological sensitive receivers. The water quality monitoring
programme will be carried out to ensure that any deteriorating water quality is
readily detected and timely action taken to rectify the situation. The status and locations of water quality sensitive receivers and the
marine works location may change after issuing this Manual. If required, the ET in consultation with the
Contractor(s) will propose updated monitoring locations and seek approval from
CAPCO, the IEC and EPD.
5.2.1
Water Quality Parameters
Measurements of Dissolved Oxygen (DO) concentration (mg L-1),
DO saturation (%), Salinity (mg L-1), Temperature (ºC) and Turbidity
(NTU) will be taken in situ by the ET
at monitoring stations identified in Sections
5.2.4 and 5.3 below. Water samples for the measurements of SS (mg
L-1) will also be collected for laboratory analysis.
In addition to the water quality parameters,
other relevant data will also be measured and recorded in Water Quality
Monitoring Logs (Annex D),
including the location of the sampling stations, water depth, time, weather
conditions, sea conditions, tidal stage, current direction and speed, special
phenomena and work activities undertaken around the monitoring and works area
that may influence the monitoring results.
Observations on any special phenomena and work underway at the
construction site at the time of sampling will also be recorded.
5.2.2
Sampling Procedures and Monitoring
Equipment
For water quality monitoring, the
following equipment will be supplied and used by the ET. The use of similar
equipment is subject to prior approval from the IEC:
·
Dissolved
Oxygen and Temperature Measuring Equipment - The instrument will be a portable,
weatherproof dissolved oxygen measuring instrument complete with cable, sensor,
comprehensive operation manuals, and will be operable from a DC power
source. It will be capable of measuring: dissolved oxygen levels in the range of 0 -
20 mg L-1 and 0 - 200% saturation; and a temperature of 0 - 45
degrees Celsius. It will have a membrane
electrode with automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable of not
less than 35 m in length. Sufficient
stocks of spare electrodes and cables will be available for replacement where
necessary (e.g. YSI model 59 metre, YSI 5739 probe, YSI 5795A submersible
stirrer with reel and cable or an approved similar instrument).
·
Turbidity Measurement Equipment - Turbidity within the water will be
measured in situ by the nephelometric method.
The instrument will be a portable, weatherproof turbidity-measuring unit
complete with cable, sensor and comprehensive operation manuals. The equipment will be operated from a DC
power source, it will have a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring
turbidity between 0 - 1000 NTU and will be complete with a cable with at least
35 m in length (for example Hach 2100P or an approved
similar instrument).
·
Salinity
Measurement Instrument
- A portable salinometer capable of measuring
salinity in the range of 0 - 40 ppt will be provided
for measuring salinity of the water at each monitoring location.
·
Suspended Solid Measurement
Equipment - A water
sampler (eg Kahlsico Water
Sampler), which is a PVC cylinder (capacity not less than 2 litres), which can
be effectively sealed with latex cups at both ends, will be used for
sampling. The sampler will have a
positive latching system to keep it open and prevent premature closure until
released by a messenger when the sampler is at the selected water depth. Water samples for suspended solids
measurement will be collected in high-density polythene bottles, packed in ice
(cooled to 4°C
without being frozen), and delivered to the laboratory in the same day as the
samples were collected.
·
Water
Depth Gauge - A
portable, battery-operated echo sounder (Seafarer 700 or a similar approved
instrument) will be used for the determination of water depth at each
designated monitoring station. This unit
will preferably be affixed to the bottom of the work boat if the same vessel is
to be used throughout the monitoring programme.
The echo sounder should be suitably calibrated.
·
pH
Measuring Equipment -
A portable pH meter capable of measuring a range between 0.0 and 14.0 will be
provided to measure pH under the specified conditions (eg.
Orion Model 250A or an approved similar instrument).
·
Positioning
Device - A hand-held
or boat-fixed type differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) or other
equivalent instrument of similar accuracy will be used during monitoring to
ensure the accurate recording of the position of the monitoring vessel before
taking measurements. The DGPS or
equivalent instrument, should be suitably calibrated at appropriate checkpoint
(e.g. Quarry Bay Survey Nail at Easting 840683.49), Northing 816709.55) to
ensure the monitoring station is at the correct position before the water
quality monitoring commence. Marine
anchors will not be used when sampling the impact stations within or on the
boundaries of the Lung Kwu Chau
and
·
Water
Sampling Equipment -
A water sampler, consisting of a PVC or glass cylinder of not less than two
litres, which can be effectively sealed with cups at both ends, will be used
(e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler 13SWB203 or an approved
similar instrument). The water sampler
will have a positive latching system to keep it open and prevent premature
closure until released by a messenger when the sampler is at the selected water
depth.
In-situ monitoring instruments will be checked, calibrated and certified by a
laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other international accreditation
scheme before use, and subsequently re-calibrated at 3 monthly intervals
throughout the stages of the water quality monitoring. Responses of sensors and electrodes will be
checked with certified standard solutions before each use. Wet bulb calibration for the DO meter will be
carried out before measurement at each monitoring location. The turbidity meter will be calibrated to
establish the relationship between turbidity readings (in NTU) and levels of SS
(in mg L-1) where possible.
For
the on site calibration of field equipment, the BS 1427:1993, "Guide to
Field and on-site test methods for the analysis of waters" will be
observed.
Sufficient stocks of spare parts will be
maintained for replacements when necessary.
Back-up monitoring equipment will also be available so that monitoring
can proceed uninterrupted even when some equipment is under maintenance,
calibration, etc.
5.2.3
Laboratory Measurement and Analysis
Analysis
of suspended solids will be carried out in a HOKLAS or other international
accredited laboratory. Water samples of about
500mL will be collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the
laboratory SS determination. The SS
determination work will start within 24 hours after collection of the water
samples. The analyses will follow the
standard methods as described in APHA Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Edition, unless otherwise specified (APHA 2540D for SS) with a
detection limit of 1 mg L-1 or less.
The submitted information should include
the chain of custody forms, pre-treatment procedures, instrument use, Quality
Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) details (such as blank, spike recovery,
number of duplicate samples per-batch etc), detection limits and accuracy. The QA/QC details will be in accordance with
requirements of HOKLAS or another internationally accredited scheme that HOKLAS
has an agreement with. The limits of
detection for the in-situ and laboratory measurements that will be
obtained are shown in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Detection
Limits and Precision for Water Quality Parameters
Parameter |
Limit of Detection |
Dissolved Oxygen |
0.1 mg L-1 |
Salinity |
0.01 ppt |
Temperature |
0.1 °C |
pH |
0.01 units |
Turbidity (NTU) |
0.1 NTU |
Suspended Solids |
1 mg L-1 |
5.2.4
Monitoring Locations, Frequency and
Actions - Pilot Test
Introduction
In order to verify the modelling
predictions in the EIA Report a pilot test will be established during the
dredging works at a suitable location to be agreed with EPD and AFCD. The pilot test will consist of intensive
water quality monitoring on the first three days of the dredging operation
designed to verify the predictions from the modelling work. Pilot test will also include the testing on
the effectiveness of silt curtains with reference to the reduction factors used
in the water quality models.
The details below are indicative and will
be agreed with AFCD and EPD in advance of conduct of the pilot test.
Stations
Three sets of monitoring stations will be
arranged perpendicularly to the dredging works with respect to the three days
monitoring. Monitoring locations will be
fixed throughout the whole day of monitoring.
Frequency
Monitoring should be conducted hourly of
turbidity and suspended solids (SS) for correlation (the methods for taking and
analysing the samples should be as presented above).
Each station will be sampled and
measurements will be taken at three depths, 1 m below the sea surface, mid
depth and 1 m above the seabed. Where
water depth is less than 6 m the mid-depth station may be omitted. If water depth is less than 3 m, only the
mid-depth station will be monitored.
Duplicate water samples shall be taken and analyzed at all monitoring
stations.
Reporting
The turbidity monitoring results should be
submitted on a daily basis and the SS results should be submitted within 24
hours of collection by the ET Leader to EPD and AFCD for review.
Actions
The results of the pilot test will be
utilised to indicate how the dredging works are performing in comparison to the
modelling predictions presented in the EIA.
The results will act essentially as an early warning tool to advise the
Contractor how the dredging/jetting plant is performing. Should the results indicate that the
modelling predictions are being exceeded then the Contractor will be able to
take remedial action.
It should be noted that the Contractor is
not obliged to reduce the dredging rates based on the results of the pilot test
but is strongly advised to review their working methods and take remedial
measures prior to any exceedances being triggered
during actual construction work.
5.2.5
Monitoring Locations for Dredging and
Backfilling Activities
Water quality monitoring will be conducted
within Hong Kong Waters during dredging and backfilling activities. The monitoring stations for dredging and
backfilling activities are shown in Figure
5.1 and detailed in Table 5.2.
The monitoring locations were determined based
upon the locations of the dredging/backfilling activities which would be
required for the reclamation as well as for the approach channel. As seen in Figure 5.1, Impact Stations are
defined as at a distance of approximately 500 m away from the construction
works area. Depending on the works this
typically represents the maximum extent of the zone of influence resulting from
the dredging activities. At the Impact
locations, impact from the dredging activities should be at minimum.
In addition, Reference Stations have been chosen to facilitate comparison of the
water quality of the Impact Stations with ambient water quality conditions,
Reference Stations are located in areas not expected to be affected by other
projects and which lie within the path of water body movements affecting the
Impact Stations but are well outside the predicted influence of the
construction works. Monitoring data from
these Reference Stations could be used as upstream and downstream controls for the
Impact stations.
Locations of Reference Stations would be subject to
change depending on the location and timing of dredging and other marine works
projects in the Study Area. Any proposal
to change the locations of Control / Impact Stations would be subject to IEC
verification and the EPD’s approval.
Apart from the Impact and Reference
Stations, Control Stations have been proposed to assist in the identification
of the source of any impact. They are approximately
1500 m away from the construction works area and 500 m away from the Impact
Stations. Control Stations are
particularly useful for the identification of the pollution source and pathway
if exceedances are found at Impact Stations but not
at the Reference Stations.
In addition, water quality monitoring will
also be conducted at the Sensitive Receiver Stations including Non-gazetted
beach at Lung Kwu Sheung
Tan (M1), Seawater intake at Black Point Power Station (M2) and Intertidal mudflat/horseshoe crab nursery ground at Pak Nai (M3) when dredging works are located close to these
locations.
Table 5.2 Location
of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations for Dredging Activities
Monitoring Station Identification |
Type |
Location |
Coordinates |
IE1 (ebb) |
Impact |
South of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
IE2 (ebb) |
Impact |
Southwest of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
IF1 (flood) |
Impact |
North of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
IF2 (flood) |
Impact |
Northwest of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
CE1 (ebb) |
Control |
South of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
CE2 (ebb) |
Control |
Southwest of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
CF1 (flood) |
Control |
North of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
CF2 (flood) |
Control |
Northwest of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
R1 |
Reference |
Northeast of |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
R2 |
Reference |
Northwest of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
M1 |
Non-gazetted Beach (Sensitive Receiver) |
South of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
M2 |
Seawater Intake (Sensitive Receiver) |
Northeast of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
M3 |
Intertidal/horseshoe Crab (Sensitive Receiver) |
Pak Nai, Northeast of Black Point |
Please refer to Figure 5.1 |
Water quality monitoring would be
undertaken by suitably qualified members of the ET. Water quality monitoring results from the
Reference, Control and Impact stations would be compared to EPD’s
Water Quality Objectives (WQOs), for the North West
(NWWCZ) and Deep Bay Water Control Zones (DBWCZ), as follows:
·
Suspended
Solids (SS): SS should not be raised
above ambient levels by an excess of 30% nor cause the accumulation of SS which
may adversely affect aquatic communities.
·
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO): DO within 2 m of the bottom
should not be less than 2 mg L-1 for 90% of the samples; depth
averaged DO should not be less than 4 mg L-1 for 90% of the samples
during the whole year.
Prior to the commencement of the EM&A
programme, the ET would seek approval of the proposed changes to the water
monitoring stations from the IEC, EPD and AFCD.
Baseline
monitoring will be conducted to collect representative water quality data from the
areas where marine works will be undertaken.
This baseline monitoring will provide data for comparison with water
quality data collected during impact monitoring works.
Baseline
monitoring will be conducted at Impact (IE1, IF1, IE2 and IF2), Control stations
(CE1, CF1, CF1 and CF2), Reference stations (R1 and R2) as well as Receiver
Stations (M1, M2 and M3) specified in Table
5.2 three times a week at mid-flood and mid-ebb tides for four consecutive
weeks prior to the commencement of any marine works for the Project. The tidal range selected for the baseline
monitoring should be at least 0.5m for both flood and ebb tides. There shall not be any marine construction
activities in the vicinity of the stations during the baseline monitoring. The interval between 2 sets of consecutive
monitoring shall not be less than 36 hours.
Baseline monitoring will commence no earlier than two months before
construction works are due to commence.
Baseline monitoring programme should be passed to EPD at least two weeks
prior to commencement of baseline monitoring.
During baseline monitoring, measurements
will be taken at each station at three depths, 1 m below the sea surface, mid
depth and 1 m above the seabed. Where
water depth is less than 6 m the mid-depth station may be omitted. If water depth is less than 3 m, only the
mid-depth station will be monitored, to avoid natural resuspension
of sediments from confounding the results.
The ET will be responsible for undertaking
the baseline monitoring and submitting the results within 10 working days from
the completion of the baseline monitoring work to the IEC for certification
prior to onward transmission to EPD and AFCD.
During the course of the marine works,
impact monitoring would be undertaken at the relevant Reference, Control and
Impact Stations three times a week as shown in Figure 5.1 and Table 5.2. Monitoring at
each station would be undertaken at both mid-ebb and mid-flood tides on the
same day. The tidal range selected for
the baseline monitoring should be at least 0.5m for both flood and ebb
tides. The interval between two sets of
monitoring would not be less than 36 hours.
The monitoring frequency would be increased in the case of exceedances of Action/Limit Levels if considered necessary
by ET and IEC. Monitoring frequency
would be maintained as far as practicable.
Impact monitoring schedule should be passed to EPD at least two weeks
prior to commencement of impact monitoring.
Two consecutive measurements of DO
concentration (mgL-1), DO saturation (%) and turbidity (NTU) would
be taken in-situ according the stated
sampling method. The monitoring probes
would be retrieved out of water after the first measurement and then redeployed
for the second measurement.
Where the difference in value between the
first and second measurement of DO or turbidity parameters is more than 25% of
the value of the first reading, the reading would be discarded and further
readings would be taken. Water samples
for SS (mgL-1) measurements would be collected at the same depths
and as for the in-situ measurements,
duplicates would be taken at Impact, Control and Reference Stations.
In addition to the above in-situ measurements temperature and
salinity would be determined at the Impact, Control and Reference Stations at
the same depths, as specified above.
The monitoring location/position, time,
water depth, water temperature, salinity, weather conditions, sea conditions,
tidal stage, special phenomena and work underway at the marine works site will
be recorded.
Upon completion of all marine construction
activities, a post-project water quality monitoring exercise would be carried
out for four weeks, in the same manner as the baseline monitoring.
Water
quality monitoring will be evaluated against Action and Limit Levels. The key assessment parameters are dissolved
oxygen and suspended sediment
and thus Action and Limit Levels based on the assessment criteria are
identified for these. However turbidity
can also provide valuable instantaneous information on water quality and thus
an Action Limit is also recommended for this parameter to facilitate quick
responsive action in the event of any apparent unacceptable deterioration
attributable to the works. The proposed
Action and Limit Levels are shown in Table 5.3.
Action and Limit levels are used to
determine whether operational modifications are necessary to mitigate impacts
to water quality. In the event that the levels
are exceeded, appropriate actions in Event and Action Plan (Table 5.4) should be undertaken and a
review of works should be carried out by the Contractor(s).
Any noticeable change to water quality
will be recorded in the survey reports and will be investigated and remedial
actions will be undertaken to reduce impacts.
Particular attention will be paid to the Contractor(s)’s implementation
of the recommended mitigation measures.
Table 5.3 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameters |
Action (mg L-1) |
Limit (mg L-1) |
For all marine construction works |
||
DO in mgL-1
(surface, middle, bottom) |
Data from impact
stations show a depletion of 30% compared with corresponding data from reference
stations |
DO levels are <
5 mgL-1 at the surface and middle depths or are < 2 mg L-1
for the bottom depth. |
Turbidity in NTU in mg L-1 (depth averaged) |
120% of reference station’s mean Turbidity (at the same tide of the
same day) |
130% of reference station’s mean turbidity (at the same tide of the
same day) |
|
|
|
Suspended Solids in mg L-1 (depth averaged), |
120% of reference station’s mean SS (at the same tide of the same
day). |
130% of reference station’s mean SS (at the same tide of the same day) |
|
|
|
Notes: - For DO, exceedance of the water quality limits occurs when
monitoring result is lower than the limits. - For SS, exceedance of the water quality limits occurs when
monitoring result is higher than the limits. -
All the figures
given in the table are for reference only and these may be amended with the
agreement of EPD. -
“Depth
Averaged” is calculated by taking the arithmetic mean of the in-situ parameters readings at all
three depths. For suspended solids
“depth averaged” is calculated by combining all three samples into one mixed
sample which is analysed to produce a physical arithmetic mean. |
It
should be noted that all Action Limit levels presented in Table 5.3 may
be revised based on the baseline data to be collected in advance of
construction works. If deemed necessary,
the ET in consultation with the Contractor(s) will propose revised Action Limit
levels and seek approval from CAPCO, the IEC and EPD.
The IEC will be empowered to audit the
environmental performance of construction, aspects of the EM&A programme,
validate and confirm the accuracy of monitoring results, monitoring equipment,
monitoring locations and procedures. If
any exceedance occurs, the ET, IEC and the
Contractor(s) will follow the actions stated in the Event and Action Plan (Table
5.4).
Table 5.4 Event
and Action Plan for Water Quality Monitoring during Construction Phase
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET(1) |
IEC(1) |
Contractor(s) |
CAPCO |
|
Action Level being exceeded by one sampling day |
1. Repeat in-situ
measurement to confirm findings; 2. Identify
source(s) of impact; 3. Inform the IEC,
the Contractor(s) and CAPCO; 4. Check monitoring
data, plant, equipment and the Contractor(s)’s working methods; 5. Discuss
mitigation measures with the IEC and the Contractor(s); |
1. Discuss with the
ET and the Contractor(s) on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals
on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor(s) and advise CAPCO
accordingly; 3. Assess the
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1. Inform CAPCO and
confirm notification of the exceedance in writing; 2. Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3. Check plant and
equipment; 4. Consider changes
of working methods; 5. Discuss with the
ET and the IEC and propose mitigation measures to the IEC and CAPCO; 6. Implement the agreed
mitigation measures. |
1. Discuss with the
IEC on the proposed mitigation measures; 2. Make agreement on
the mitigation measures to be implemented. |
Action Level being exceeded by more than one consecutive
sampling days |
1. Repeat in-situ
measurement to confirm findings; 2. Identify
source(s) of impact; 3. Inform the IEC,
the Contractor(s) and CAPCO; 4. Check monitoring
data, plant, equipment and Contractor(s)’s working methods; 5. Discuss
mitigation measures with the IEC and the Contractor(s); 6. Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented; |
1. Discuss with the
ET and the Contractor(s) on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals
on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor(s) and advise CAPCO
accordingly; 3. Assess the effectiveness
of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1. Inform CAPCO and
confirm notification of the exceedance in writing; 2. Rectify
unacceptable practice; 3. Check plant and
equipment; 4. Consider changes
of working methods; 5. Discuss with the
ET and the IEC and propose mitigation measures to the IEC and CAPCO within 3
working days; 6. Implement the
agreed mitigation measures. |
1. Discuss with the
IEC on the proposed mitigation measures; 2. Make agreement on
the mitigation measures to be implemented; 3.
Assess
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
Limit Level being exceeded by one consecutive sampling day |
1. Repeat in-situ
measurement to confirm findings; 2. Identify
source(s) of impact; 3. Inform the IEC,
the Contractor(s) and EPD; 4. Check monitoring
data, plant, equipment and the Contractor(s)’s working methods; 5. Discuss
mitigation measures with the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s); 6. Ensure mitigation measures are implemented; |
1. Discuss with the
ET / Contractor(s) on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals
on mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor(s) and advise CAPCO
accordingly; 3. Assess the
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1. Immediate stoppage
of works; 2. Inform CAPCO
and confirm notification of the exceedance in
writing; 3. Rectify
unacceptable practice; 4. Check plant and
equipment; 5. Consider
changes of working methods; 6. Discuss with
the ET, the IEC and CAPCO and propose mitigation measures to the IEC and
CAPCO within 3 working days; 7. Implement the
agreed mitigation measures. |
1. Discuss with the
IEC, the ET and the Contractor(s) on the proposed mitigation measures; 2. Request the Contractor(s)
to critically review the working methods; 3. Make agreement
on the mitigation measures to be implemented; 4. Assess the
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
Limit Level being exceeded by more than
one consecutive sampling days |
1. Repeat in-situ
measurement to confirm findings; 2. Identify
source(s) of impact; 3. Inform the IEC,
the Contractor(s) and DEP; 4. Check monitoring
data, plant, equipment and Contractor(s)’s working methods; 5. Discuss mitigation
measures with the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s); 6. Ensure mitigation
measures are implemented; |
1. Discuss with ET
and Contractor(s) on the mitigation measures; 2. Review proposals on
mitigation measures submitted by the Contractor(s) and advise CAPCO
accordingly; 3. Assess the
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1. Immediate
stoppage of works; 2. Inform CAPCO and
confirm notification of the exceedance in writing; 3. Rectify
unacceptable practice; 4. Check plant and
equipment; 5. Consider changes
of working methods; 6. Discuss with the
ET, the IEC and CAPCO and propose mitigation measures to the IEC and CAPCO
within 3 working days; 7. Implement the agreed
mitigation measures; 8. As directed by
CAPCO, slow down or stop all or part of the construction activities. |
1. Discuss with the
IEC, the ET and the Contractor(s) on the proposed mitigation measures; 2. Request
Contractor(s) to critically review working methods; 3. Make agreement on
the mitigation measures to be implemented; 4. Assess
effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures; 5. Consider and
instruct, if necessary, the Contractor(s) to slow down or to stop all or part
of the marine work until no exceedance of Limit
Level. |
Note: (1) ET – Environmental Team, IEC –
Independent Environmental Checker
5.6
Water Quality
Mitigation Measures
The
EIA report has outlined a variety of recommended water quality mitigation
measures. These are summarised in the
Implementation Schedule of Mitigation Measures (Annex
A).
During the construction phase, waste
management will be the Contractor(s)’s responsibility to ensure that wastes
produced during the construction phase are managed in accordance with
appropriate waste management practices and `EPD’s
regulations and requirements. The
construction Contractor(s) will also follow the Waste Management Plan when
managing the different types of wastes on site.
The Project is expected to generate the
following during the construction phase:
·
Dredged
marine sediment;
·
C
& D Materials;
·
Chemical
waste;
·
Sewage;
and
·
General
refuse.
Auditing of waste management practices
weekly during site inspections will ensure that these solid and liquid wastes
generated during construction are not disposed of into the surrounding storm
drains. The construction Contractor(s)
will be responsible for the implementation of any mitigation measures to reduce
waste or redress issues arising from the waste materials.
6.2
Waste Management
Practices
The
construction Contractor(s) will submit a Waste Management Plan (WMP) for the
construction works to EPD for approval.
The WMP will describe arrangements for avoidance, re-use, recover and
recycling, storage, collection, treatment and disposal of different categories
of waste to be generated from construction activities and will include the
recommended mitigation measures on waste management detailed in Annex A of this EM&A Manual. The WMP will indicate the disposal
location(s) of all surplus excavated spoil and other waste.
Prior to
the commencement of dredging activities, the disposal strategy for the dredged
sediment will be determined in accordance with the ETWBTC No. 34/2002: Management
of Dredged/Excavated Sediment.
A Trip
Ticket system will be included in the WMP. Surplus excavated spoil and other wastes will
not be disposed at any other designated disposal locations unless otherwise
approved in writing by EPD, Secretary of Public Fill Committee and/or other
authorities as appropriate.
The
Implementation Schedule (Annex A) provides details on the
appropriate mitigation measures for avoiding and preventing adverse
environmental impacts associated with dredged marine mud, construction and
demolition (C&D) materials, chemical wastes, general refuse and sewage from
the workforce. The WMP should be refined
and updated as more detailed information is generated on the volume of dredged
marine mud. Similarly, it should be
regularly reviewed, and updated as appropriate, throughout the course of the
construction works to ensure that it remains current with the latest detailed
information and works practices.
The WMP
should also outline the requirements for a waste audit program to ensure the
measures outlined in the plan are effectively implemented and adhered too.
In order
to ensure that the construction Contractor(s) has implemented the
recommendations of the EIA Report, the ET will conduct regular site audits of
the waste streams, to determine if wastes are being managed in accordance with
the procedures in the approved WMP. The
audits should look at the aspects of waste management including waste
generation, storage, recycling, transport and disposal. An appropriate audit programme should be
undertaken with the first audit conducted at the commencement of the
construction works. Routine weekly site
inspections should also include waste management. The scope of the waste management audits is
presented below.
6.3.1
Objectives of Waste Audit
The waste
management audit programme will include, but is not limited to, the following:
·
Ensuring
that the wastes arising from works are handled, stored, collected, transferred
and disposed of an environmentally acceptable manner and comply with the
relevant requirements under the Waste
Disposal Ordinance (WDO) and its regulations;
·
Ensuring
that the construction Contractor(s) properly implements the appropriate
environmental protection and waste pollution control mitigation measures, as
outlined in the Implementation Schedule and presented in Annex A, to reduce and control the
potential for waste impacts;
1)
1) Ensuring the effective implementation of the Contractor(s)’s WMP;
and
·
Encourage
the reuse and recycling of materials.
6.3.2
Methodology and Criteria
The
construction Contractor(s) must ensure that the necessary disposal permits or
licences are obtained from appropriate authorities in accordance with the
various Ordinances. In addition to the
ET audits, each construction Contractor(s) will designate a member of staff as
being responsible for inspecting and auditing the on-site waste management
practices on a monthly basis, with reference to the relevant legislation and
guidelines as well as the recommendations given in the Implementation Schedule
contained in Annex A of this EM&A Manual, and
defined below:
General
Legislation
·
Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap
354);
·
Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General)
Regulation (Cap 354);
·
Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of Construction
Waste) Regulation;
·
Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 28);
·
Public Health and Municipal Services
Ordinance (Cap 132) – Public Cleansing and Prevention of
Nuisances (Urban Council) and (Regional Council) By-laws;
·
Dumping at Sea Ordinance (1995);
and,
·
The
storage, handling and disposal of chemical waste should be audited with
reference to the requirements of the Code
of Practice on the Package, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes
published by the EPD.
Other
Relevant Guidelines
·
Waste Disposal Plan for Hong Kong (December
1989), Planning, Environment and Lands Branch Government Secretariat,
·
Environmental Guidelines for Planning In
Hong Kong (1990), Hong Kong Planning and Standards Guidelines,
·
New Disposal Arrangements for Construction
Waste (1992), Environmental Protection Department &
Civil Engineering Department,
·
Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes (1992),
Environmental Protection Department,
·
Works Branch Technical Circular, 32/92,
The Use of Tropical Hard Wood on Construction Site; Works
Branch,
·
Works Branch Technical Circular No. 2/93
and 2/93B, Public Dumps, Works Branch,
·
Works Branch Technical Circular No. 16/96,
Wet Soil in Public Dumps; Works Branch,
·
Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 4/98
and 4/98A, Use of Public Fill in Reclamation and Earth Filling Projects; Works
Bureau,
·
Waste Reduction Framework Plan, 1998 to
2007, Planning, Environment and Lands Bureau, Government Secretariat, 5
November 1998;
·
Works Bureau Technical Circular No.
12/2000, Fill Management; Works Bureau,
· Environmental
Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular No 31/2004, Trip-ticket System
for Disposal of Construction and Demolition Material; Environmental Transport and Works Bureau,
Hong Kong SAR Government;
·
Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 25/99A
and 25/99C, Incorporation of Information on Construction and Demolition
Material Management in Public Works Sub-committee Papers; Works
Bureau,
·
Works Bureau Technical Circular No.
19/2001, Metallic Site Hoardings and Signboards, Works
Bureau,
·
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No.34/2002, Management of Dredged/Excavated Material,
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau,
·
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No.19 /2005, Construction Management on Construction
Sites, Environment, Transport and Works Bureau,
·
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No.33 /2002, Management of Construction and
Demolition Material including Rock, Environment, Transport and
Works Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government;
·
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No 19/2005, Environmental Management on Construction
Sites, Environment, Transport and Works Bureau; and
·
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No 31/2004, Trip Ticket System for Disposal of
Construction & Demolition Materials,
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau.
The Contractor(s)’s waste management
practices will be audited with reference to the checklist detailed in Table
6.2 below:
Table 6.2 Waste
Management Checklist
Activities |
Timing |
Checking Frequency |
If non-compliance noted, Action Required |
Necessary waste disposal permits or
licences have been obtained |
Before the commencement of works |
Once |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. The Contractor(s)
should apply for the necessary permits/ licences prior to disposal of the
waste. The ET will ensure that
corrective action has been taken. |
Dredged sediments are managed and
disposed in accordance with the ETWBTC
No. 34/2002: Management of
Dredged/Excavated Sediment. |
Throughout the dredging works. Sediment
assessment to be completed prior to dredging |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to manage and dispose the dredged materials properly. The Contractor(s) will immediately suspend
dredging until the dredging materials are properly managed and disposed. |
Only licensed waste haulier are used for
waste collection. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s), CAPCO
and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to use a licensed waste haulier. The Contractor(s) will temporarily suspend
waste collection of that particular waste until a licensed waste haulier is
used. Corrective action will be
undertaken within 48 hours. |
Records of quantities of wastes
generated, recycled and disposed are properly kept. For demolition material/waste, the number
of loads for each day will be recorded (quantity of waste can then be
estimated based on average truck load.
For landfill charges, the receipts of the charge could be used for
estimating the quantity). |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. The Contractor(s) will
estimate the missing data based on previous records and the activities
carried out. The ET will audit the
results and forward to CAPCO and IEC for approval. |
Wastes are removed from site in a timely
manner. General refuse is collected on
a daily basis. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to remove waste accordingly. |
Waste storage areas are properly cleaned
and do not cause windblown litter and dust nuisance. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to clean the storage area and/or cover the waste. |
Different types of waste are segregated in
different containers or skip to enhance recycling of material and proper
disposal of waste. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to provide separate skips/ containers. The Contractor(s) will ensure the workers
place the waste in the appropriate containers. |
Chemical wastes are stored, handled and
disposed of in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Handling and Storage of Chemical Wastes, published by the EPD. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to rectify the issues immediately. Warning will be given to the Contractor(s)
if corrective actions are not taken within 24 hrs. |
Demolition material/waste in dump trucks
are properly covered before leaving the site. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will instruct the
Contractor(s) to comply. The
Contractor(s) will prevent trucks from leaving the site until the waste are
properly covered. |
Wastes are disposal of at licensed
sites. |
Throughout the works |
Twice a Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s),
CAPCO and IEC. CAPCO will warn the
Contractor(s) and instruct the Contractor(s) to ensure the wastes are
disposed of at the licensed sites.
Should it involve chemical waste, the Waste Control Group of EPD will
be notified. |
Note: ET – Environmental Team, IEC – Independent
Environmental Checker
Details of
the required mitigation measures are included within the Implementation
Schedule of Annex A of this EM&A Manual.
The EIA
study has concluded that the impact on the natural habitats is considered to be
low and no adverse residual impact is expected after the implementation of the
mitigation measures. During the
operational phase, adverse impacts are not expected to occur. Therefore, no terrestrial ecology monitoring
will be required for either the construction or operational phase.
Before the
works commence, a detailed
vegetation survey on the Pitcher Plants and Bamboo Orchids would be conducted within the impacted shrubland and Project Area by a suitably qualified botanist/
ecologist to identify and record the affected individuals prior to the
commencement of site clearance works.
Feasibility and suitability of transplanting the affected plant species
of conservation interest would be carefully studied and suitable receptor sites
would be identified. Detailed
transplantation proposal providing information of transplantation methodology,
recipient site, implementation programme, watering requirement,
post-transplanting monitoring and personal involved shall be submitted to and
approved by EPD and AFCD. Transplantation would be undertaken and
supervised by a suitably qualified botanist/ horticulturist. After transplantation,
monitoring will be undertaken to check the performance and health conditions of
the transplanted individuals on a weekly basis in the first month after
transplantation and monthly basis for additional eleven months. Remedial actions will be discussed with AFCD
in the event of unsuccessful transplantation.
7.2
Terrestrial
Ecology Mitigation Measures
Regular site
inspections should be carried out in order to ensure that the mitigation
measures are implemented and are working effectively. The Contractor(s) will be responsible for the
design and implementation of the mitigation measures which are presented in Annex A.
In addition
to the above transplantation, provision of 0.7 ha of compensatory planting of shrubland and 6 ha of enhancement planting will be
conducted.
The constraints on dredging and piling
works defined within the EIA and Environmental Permit will act as appropriate
mitigation measures to control the environmental impacts to marine ecological
resources to within acceptable levels.
In addition to the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin (Sousa chinensis) exclusion zone monitoring, impacts of
construction activities will be monitored through impacts to water quality (see
Section 5 of this EM&A Manual).
8.2
Marine Mammal
Exclusion Zone: Around the Marine Percussive Piling Barge
8.2.1
Visual Monitoring
Marine mammal exclusion zones for the
construction activities is listed in Table
8.1 The marine mammal exclusion zone should be monitored by the qualified
person(s) ([1])
with an unobstructed, elevated view of the area. The viewpoint(s) will be proposed by the ET
to the IEC for approval. Activities
should not begin until the qualified person certifies that the exclusion zone
is continuously clear of marine mammals for a period of 30 minutes. Should marine mammals move into the exclusion
zone during the activities, cessation of the activities will be commenced as
described in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1 Exclusion Zone
Requirement
Activity |
Exclusion Zone |
Requirement |
Marine
Percussive Piling Works Dredging Works for Approaching Channel/Turning
Basin |
500m from
piling barge 250m from
dredger |
30 minutes clear of marine mammals before
percussive piling activities begin. If
cetaceans are observed in the exclusion zone, percussive piling will be
delayed until they have left the area.
When dolphins are spotted within the exclusion zone, percussive piling
works will cease and will not resume until the observer confirms that the
zone has been continuously clear of dolphins for a period of 30 minutes. Piling works
will be restricted to a daily maximum of 12 hours with daylight operations. No piling works will be conducted during the Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin calving period between March and August. 30 minutes clear of marine mammals before dredging
activities begin. If cetaceans are
observed in the exclusion zone, dredging will be delayed until they have left
the area. As per previous
practice in |
|
|
|
The qualified
person for the above visual monitoring must be suitably trained to conduct the
visual monitoring works and may be part of the ET. The IEC will be required to verify the
qualification and experience of the qualified person.
The EIA has highlighted that as part of
the construction procedure for the marine percussive piling works a bubble
jacket will be installed to aid in reducing the levels of underwater sounds
generated by the percussive piling activities.
Mitigation measures for marine mammals are presented in Annex A.
A pilot test will be conducted to verify
the effectiveness of the design of bubble jacket proposed by the Contractor at
reducing underwater sound levels generated from marine percussive pile
driving. The methodology for the test
will be developed once the detailed design and methodology for marine
percussive piling has been developed. It
is envisioned that the pilot test methodology will reference previous similar
tests that have been conducted in
The methodology and protocol for the test
will be agreed with EPD and AFCD in advance and will take place on the first
pile to be percussively piled into the seabed on site at Black Point.
1)
1)
2)
This Section
defines the EM&A requirements that have been recommended to ensure that the
proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures are effectively
implemented.
The EIA has recommended that EM&A for
landscape and visual resources is undertaken during the construction of the
project. The implementation and
maintenance of landscape mitigation measures (Annex A) should be checked to ensure
that they are fully realised and that potential conflicts between the proposed
landscape measures and any other project works and operational requirements are
resolved at the earliest practical date and without compromise to the intention
of the mitigation measures.
Landscape Plans
for the Project should be prepared before the commencement of landscape works
of the Project. The Landscape Plan will
include the locations, design details, implementation schedules, and drawings
in the scale of 1:1000 or other appropriate scale showing the landscape and
visual mitigation measures. The
Landscape Plan will be certified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC as conforming
to the requirements set out in Section
11.11 of the EIA Report before deposit to EPD.
Baseline
monitoring for the landscape will comprise a vegetation survey of the
vegetation and trees on the site.
Representative vegetation types will be identified along with typical
species composition. The landscape and
visual baseline will be determined with reference to the landscape and visual
impact assessments included in the EIA Report.
9.4
Construction and
Post-construction Phase Audit
A
specialist Landscape Sub-Contractor should be employed by the Contractor(s) for
the implementation of landscape construction works and subsequent maintenance
operations during a 24 month establishment period.
Measures
undertaken by both the Contractor(s) and the specialist Landscape
Sub-Contractor during the construction phase and first year post-construction
will be audited by a Landscape Architect of the ET, ensure compliance with the
intended aims of the measures. Site
inspections should be undertaken at least once every two weeks throughout the
first half of the landscaping plants establishment period when planting works
are being undertaken.
Post-construction
phase auditing will be restricted to the last 12 months of the establishment works
of the landscaping proposals and thus only the items in the list below related
to this period are relevant to the post-construction audit the remainder are
for the construction phase site inspections.
The broad scope of the audit/inspections is detailed below but should
also be undertaken with reference to the more specific checklist provided in Table
9.1.
·
the extent of the agreed works areas should be regularly checked during
the construction phase. Any trespass by the
Contractor(s) outside the limit of the works, including any damage to existing
trees will be noted;
·
the progress of the engineering works should be regularly reviewed on
site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for the landscape works to
be undertaken;
·
existing trees and vegetation within the study area which are not
directly affected by the works are retained and protected to the extent safely
practical;
·
the methods of protecting existing vegetation proposed by the Contractor(s)
are acceptable and enforced;
·
preparation, lifting transport and re-planting operations for any
transplanted trees;
·
landscaping works are carried out in accordance with the specifications;
·
the planting of new trees, shrubs, groundcover, climbers, ferns, grasses
and other plants, together with the replanting of any transplanted trees are
carried out properly and within the right season; and
·
necessary horticultural operations and replacement planting are
undertaken throughout the Establishment Period to ensure the healthy
establishment and growth of both transplanted trees and all newly established
plants.
Table
9.1 Construction/Post-Construction
Phase Audit Checklist
Area of Works |
Items to be Checked |
Advance planting |
monitoring of implementation and maintenance of planting, and against potential
incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc. |
Protection of trees to be retained |
identification and demarcation of
trees / vegetation to be retained, erection of physical protection (e.g. fencing),
monitoring against potential incursion, physical damage, fire, pollution,
surface erosion, etc. |
Clearance of existing vegetation |
identification and demarcation of
trees / vegetation to be cleared, checking of extent of works to reduce
damage, monitoring of adjacent areas against potential incursion, physical
damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc. |
Transplanting of trees |
identification and demarcation of
trees / vegetation to be transplanted, monitoring of extent of pruning / lifting
works to reduce damage, timing of operations, implementation of the stages of
preparatory and translocation works, and maintenance of transplanted
vegetation, etc. |
Plant supply |
monitoring of operations relating
to the supply of specialist plant material (including the collecting,
germination and growth of plants from seed) to ensure that plants will be
available in time to be used within the construction works. |
Soiling, planting, etc. |
monitoring of implementation and
maintenance of soiling and planting works and against potential incursion,
physical damage, fire, pollution, surface erosion, etc. |
Decorative treatment of site
hoarding |
implementation and maintenance, to
ensure conformity with agreed designs. |
Architectural design and treatments of structures (where
practicable), retaining walls, elevated road structures and other engineering
works. |
implementation and maintenance of mitigation measures, to
ensure conformity with agreed designs. |
Establishment Works |
monitoring of implementation of maintenance operations
during Establishment Period |
In the event of non-compliance from the Environmental
Permit, EIA Study, EM&A Manual and Landscape Plan, the responsibilities of the
relevant parties is detailed in the Event /Action plan provided on Table 9.2.
Table 9.2 Event and Action
Plan for Landscape and Visual Monitoring during Construction Phase
EVENT |
ACTION |
|
|
|
|
ET(1) |
IEC(1) |
Contractor(s) |
CAPCO |
Non-compliance on one occasion |
1. Identify Source 2. Inform the
Contractor(s), IEC and CAPCO 3. Discuss remedial actions with
the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s) 4. Monitor remedial actions until rectification
has been completed |
1. Check report 2. Check the Contractor(s)'s working method 3. Discuss
with the ET and the Contractor(s) on
practical remedial measures 4. Advise CAPCO on
effectiveness of proposed remedial measures. 5. Check implementation of
remedial measures. |
1. Amend working methods 2. Rectify damage and
undertake any necessary replacement |
1. Notify Contractor(s) 2. Ensure remedial measures
are properly implemented |
Repeated Non-compliance |
1. Identify Source 2. Inform the Contractor(s), IEC
and CAPCO 3. Increase monitoring frequency 4. Discuss remedial actions with
the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s) 5. Monitor remedial actions
until rectification has been completed 6. If nonconformity stops, cease
additional monitoring |
1. Check
monitoring report 2. Check the Contractor(s)'s
working method 3. Discuss with the ET and the
Contractor(s) on practical remedial measures 4. Advise CAPCO on effectiveness
of proposed remedial measures 5. Supervise implementation
of remedial measures. |
1. Amend working methods 2. Rectify damage and
undertake any necessary replacement |
1. Notify the Contractor(s) 2. Ensure remedial measures
are properly implemented |
Note: (1) ET
– Environmental Team, IEC – Independent Environmental Checker
The Landscape and Visual Assessment of the EIA
recommended a series of mitigation measures for the construction and operation phase
to ameliorate the landscape and visual impacts of the project. Details of the recommended mitigation
measures are included within the Implementation Schedule provided in Annex A.
Implementation of the mitigation measures for
landscape and visual resources recommended by the EIA will be monitored through
the site audit programme. Section 12
of this EM&A Manual sets out the requirements of the auditing programme.
This Section defines the
EM&A requirements that have been recommended to ensure that the proposed
cultural heritage mitigation measures are effectively implemented.
The EIA has recommended that mitigation measure for impacted
cultural heritage resources is undertaken prior to construction of the
project.
The
recommended mitigation measure is to undertaken a photographic and cartographic
recording for two building structures at Terrace 1, a WWII cave at Terrace 2
and a stone structure at Terrace 3 due to direct impact of the sites from site
formation works for the development to preserve the sites by record. AMO should
be liaised to ensure their recording requirements are fulfilled. Details of the recommended mitigation measure is included
within the Implementation Schedule provided in Annex A.
This
Section defines the EM&A requirements that have been recommended to ensure
that appropriate measures to reduce land contamination and quantitative risk be
undertaken during the design phase of the project. A design phase audit is recommended to ensure
that the design of the Project, including the spill response plan, comprise the
necessary elements to control, detect, contain, clean up, handle and dispose
any material that could lead to contaminated land or pose a risk to life or the
environment.
A series of
mitigation measures were recommended to be integrated into the design,
concerning considerations of land contamination and quantitative risk. These mitigation measures were developed to
reduce the likelihood of the loss of fuels from the system, hence reduce the
associated contamination and quantitative risk.
These measures are based on the need to specify procedures for detecting
a leak and containing a leak if it occurs, and to define methods for clean up
and disposal of the leak.
These
measures are summarised in the Implementation Programme of Mitigation Measures
(Annex A).
The
measures proposed within the EIA to prevent land contamination and risk to life
and the environment should be embodied into the detailed design drawings and
contract documents. Designs should be
checked to ensure that the measures are incorporated and that potential
conflicts with civil engineering, geo-technical, structural, lighting, signage,
drainage, underground utility and operational requirements are resolved prior
to construction.
The
EM&A requirements for land contamination and quantitative risk to the
environment comprise the audit during design phase. The audit will focus on the integration of
fuel spill control, leakage detection and leakage/spill containment into
detailed engineering design.
The design
items for audit will include:
·
pipeline
leak detection and automatic shut-off system;
·
pipeline
rock armour protection;
·
bunding of fuel/oil/grease storage
areas;
·
tank
leak detection, drainage isolation and containment system;
·
on-site
fire service installations and equipment;
·
jetty
fire protection; and
·
fuel
delivery shut off valves.
CAPCO will
carry out the audit to ensure appropriate measures have been incorporated in
the design and have been specified to the Contractor(s) for implementation.
Site inspections provide a direct means to
assess and ensure the Contractor(s)’s environmental protection and pollution
control measures are in compliance with the contract specifications. The site inspection will be undertaken
routinely by the ET to ensure that appropriate environmental protection and
pollution control mitigation measures are properly implemented in accordance
with the EIA. In addition, the ET will
be responsible for defining the scope of the inspections, detailing any
deficiencies that are identified, and reporting any necessary action or
additional mitigation measures that were implemented as a result of the
inspection.
Regular site inspections will be carried
out twice a month. The areas of inspection will not be limited to the site area
and should also include the environmental conditions outside the site which are
likely to be affected, directly or indirectly, by the site activities. The ET will make reference to the following
information while conducting the inspections:
·
the
EIA and EM&A recommendations on environmental protection and pollution
control mitigation measures;
·
ongoing
results of the EM&A programme;
·
work
progress and programme;
·
individual
works methodology proposals;
·
the
contract specifications on environmental protection;
·
the relevant
environmental protection and pollution control laws; and
·
previous
site inspection results.
A monthly waste management audit will be
carried out as part of the site audit programme.
The Contractor(s) will update the ET with
relevant information on the construction works prior to carrying out the site
inspections. The site inspection results
will be submitted to the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s) within 24 hours. Should actions be necessary, the ET will
follow up with recommendations on improvements to the environmental protection
and pollution control works and will submit these recommendations in a timely
manner to the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s).
They will also be presented, along with the remedial actions taken, in
the monthly EM&A report. The
Contractor(s) will follow the procedures and time frame stipulated in the
environmental site inspection for the implementation of mitigation proposal and
the resolution of deficiencies in the Contractor(s)’ EMS. An action reporting system will be formulated
and implemented to report on any remedial measures implemented subsequent to
the site inspections.
Ad
hoc site inspections will
also be carried out by the ET and IEC if significant environmental issues are
identified. Inspections may also be required
subsequent to receipt of an environmental complaint or as part of the
investigation work as specified in the Action Plan for environmental monitoring
and audit.
12.2
Compliance with
Legal and Contractual Requirements
There are contractual environmental protection
and pollution control requirements as well as environmental protection and
pollution control laws in
In order that the works are in compliance
with the contractual requirements, the works method statements submitted by the
Contractor(s) to CAPCO for approval will be sent to the ET for review.
The ET will also review the progress and
programme of the works to check the regulatory compliance.
The Contractor(s) will regularly copy
relevant documents to the ET so that the checking and auditing work can be
carried out. The relevant documents are
expected to include at a minimum the updated Work Progress Reports, the updated
Works Programme, the application letters for different licence/permits under
the environmental protection laws and all valid licences/permits. The site
diary will also be available for the ET inspection upon request.
After reviewing the document, the ET will
advise the IEC, CAPCO and the Contractor(s) of any non-compliance from the
contractual and legislative requirements on environmental protection and
pollution control for follow-up actions.
The ET will also advise the IEC, the Contractor(s) and CAPCO on the
current status on licence/permit applications and any environmental protection
and pollution control preparation works that may not be suitable for the works
programme or may result in potential nonconformity of environmental protection
and pollution control requirements.
Upon receipt of the advice, the
Contractor(s) will undertake immediate action to remedy the situation. The ET, IEC and CAPCO will follow up to
ensure that appropriate action will be taken by the Contractor(s) in order that
the environmental protection and pollution control requirements are fulfilled.
The
complaints handling procedure will be as follows:
The ET will undertake the following
procedures upon receipt of a complaint:
(i) log complaint
and date of receipt into the complaint database and inform the IEC immediately;
(ii) investigate the complaint and discuss with
the Contractor(s) and CAPCO to determine its validity and to assess whether the
source of the issue is due to works activities;
(iii) if
a complaint is considered valid due to the works , the ET will identify
mitigation measures in consultation with the Contractor(s), CAPCO and IEC;
(iv) if mitigation measures are required, the ET
will advise the Contractor(s) accordingly;
(v) review the Contractor(s)'s response on the
identified mitigation measures and the updated situation;
(vi) if the complaint is transferred from EPD, an
interim report will be submitted to EPD on the status of the complaint
investigation and follow-up action within the time frame assigned by EPD;
(vii) undertake additional monitoring and audit to
verify the situation if necessary and ensure that any valid reason for
complaint does not recur;
(viii) report the investigation results and the
subsequent actions on the source of the complaint for responding to
complainant. If the source of complaint
is EPD, the results should be reported within the time frame assigned by EPD;
and
(ix) record the complaint, investigation, the
subsequent actions and the results in the monthly EM&A reports.
During the complaint investigation work,
the ET, Contractor(s) and CAPCO will cooperate with the IEC in providing the
necessary information and assistance for completion of the investigation. If mitigation measures are identified in the
investigation, the Contractor(s) will promptly carry out the mitigation
measures. CAPCO will approve the
proposed mitigation measures and the ET and IEC will check that the measures
have been carried out by the Contractor(s).
The ET Leader will keep a contemporaneous
log-book of each and every instance or circumstance or change of circumstances
which may affect the environmental impact assessment and every non-compliance
from the recommendations of the EIA Reports or the Environmental Permit. The ET Leader will notify the IEC
within one working day of the occurrence of any such instance or circumstance
or change of circumstance. The ET Leader’s log-book will be kept readily
available for inspection by persons assisting in supervision of the
implementation of the EIA Reports recommendations (such as CAPCO, IEC and
Contractor(s)) and the EPs or by EPD or his authorised officers.
Reports can be provided in an electronic
medium upon agreeing the format with CAPCO and EPD. The monitoring data (baseline and impact)
will also be made available through a dedicated internet website that would be
agreed with relevant authority.
Types of reports that the ET Leader will
prepare and submit include baseline monitoring report, monthly EM&A report,
quarterly EM&A summary report and final EM&A review report. In accordance with Annex 21 of the EIAO-TM,
a copy of the monthly, quarterly summary and final review EM&A reports will
be made available to the Director of Environmental Protection.
13.2
Design Phase
Audit Report
The Design Phase Audit Report will provide
the means for CAPCO to certify that the completed environmental design elements
have been completed in accordance with the EIA requirements. The ET will include in the report a signed
off proforma (see Annex
C) to confirm that there are no outstanding environmental
measures, identified as requiring design phase audit, that require further
action. The IEC will confirm that the
report meets these requirements.
13.3
Baseline
Monitoring Report
In respect of the construction phase
EM&A works, the ET will prepare and submit a Baseline Environmental
Monitoring Report at least 2 weeks before commencement of the works for the
Project. Copies of the Baseline
Environmental Monitoring Report will be submitted to the following: the
Contractor(s), the IEC, CAPCO, the EPD, the AFCD, and the PlanD/LPU,
as appropriate. The ET will liaise with
the relevant parties on the exact number of copies required.
The baseline monitoring reports for the
construction phase will include at least the following:
(i) up to half a
page executive summary.
(ii) brief project background information.
(iii)
drawings
showing locations of the baseline monitoring stations.
(iv)
monitoring
results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following
information:
-
monitoring
methodology;
-
name
of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;
-
parameters
monitored;
-
monitoring
locations (and depth);
-
monitoring
date, time, frequency and duration; and
-
quality
assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) results and detection limits.
(v) details on influencing factors, including:
-
major
activities, if any, being carried out on the site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
other
factors which might affect the results.
(vi) determination of the Action and Limit Levels
for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline data,
the analysis will conclude if there is any significant difference between
control and impact stations for the parameters monitored;
(vii) revisions for inclusion in the EM&A
Manual; and
(viii) comments, recommendations and conclusions.
Construction
Phase
The results and findings of the
construction phase EM&A work required in this Manual will be recorded in
the monthly EM&A reports prepared by the ET Leader. The EM&A report will be prepared and submitted
within 2 weeks of the end of each reporting month, with the first report due
the month after construction commences.
Each monthly EM&A report will be submitted to the following parties:
the Contractor(s), the IEC, CAPCO and the EPD, as well as to other relevant
departments as required. Before
submission of the first EM&A Report, the ET will liaise with the parties on
the exact number of copies and format of the reports in both hard copy and
electronic medium.
The ET Leader will review the number and
location of monitoring stations and parameters every six months, or on as
needed basis, in order to cater for any changes in the surrounding environment
and the nature of works in progress.
Post-Construction Phase
The post-construction phase EM&A (landscape
and marine mammals) will be reported on a bi-monthly basis for a period of one
year after the commission of the project.
The ET will prepare operational phase EM&A Reports on a bi-monthly
(once every two months) basis to be submitted within two weeks of the end of
the reporting period. The reports will
be submitted to the Contractor(s), the IEC, CAPCO, EPD and PlanD/LPU,
as appropriate.
13.4.2
Contents of First Monthly EM&A Report
(i) 1-2 pages
executive summary, comprising:
-
breaches
of
-
complaint
Log;
-
notifications
of any summons and successful prosecutions;
-
reporting
changes; and
-
forecast
of impact predictions.
(ii) basic
project information including a synopsis of the project organisation, programme
and management structure, and a drawing of the Project area showing the
environmentally sensitive receivers and the locations of monitoring and control
stations, programme, management structure and the work undertaken during the
month.
(iii) Environmental
Status, comprising:
-
works
undertaken during the month with illustrations (such as location of works,
daily dredging/filling rates, percentage fines in the fill material used); and
-
drawing
showing the project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the
locations of the monitoring and control stations.
(iv) A
brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
-
monitoring
parameters;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (Action and Limit levels);
-
Event-Action
Plans;
-
environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the Project EIA study final report; and
-
environmental
requirements in contract documents.
(v) Advice
on the implementation of environmental protection, mitigation and pollution
control measures as recommended in the Project EIA study report and summarised
in the updated implementation schedule.
(vi) monitoring results (in both hard and
diskette copies) together with the following information:
-
monitoring
methodology;
-
name of
laboratory and equipment used and calibration details;
-
parameters
monitored;
-
monitoring
locations (and depth);
-
monitoring
date, time, frequency, and duration; and
(vii) graphical
plots of trends of monitored parameters over the past four reporting periods
for representative monitoring stations annotated against the following:
-
major
activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
(viii) Advice on the solid and liquid waste
management.
(ix) a
summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the
environmental quality performance limits (Action and Limit levels).
(x) a
review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance including a review
of pollution sources and working procedures.
(xi) a
description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance and deficiency
reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance.
(xii) a
summary record of complaints received (written or verbal) for each media,
including locations and nature of complaints, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken and summary of complaints.
(xiii) a
summary record of notifications of summons, successful prosecutions for
breaches of environmental protection/pollution control legislation and actions
to rectify such breaches.
(xiv) a
forecast of the works programme, impact predictions and monitoring schedule for
the next one month; and
(xv) Comments,
recommendations and conclusions for the monitoring period.
13.4.3
Contents of the Subsequent Monthly
EM&A Reports
(i) Title page.
(ii) Executive
summary (1-2 pages), including:
- breaches of Action and Limit levels;
- complaint log;
- notifications of any summons and
successful prosecutions;
- reporting changes; and
- forecast of impact predictions.
(iii) Contents
page.
(iv) Environmental
status, comprising:
- drawing showing the Project area, any
environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and
control stations;
- summary of non-compliance with the
environmental quality performance limits; and
- summary of complaints.
(v) Environmental
issues and actions, comprising:
- review issues carried forward and any follow-up
procedures related to earlier non-compliance (complaints and deficiencies);
- description of the actions taken in the
event of noncompliance and deficiency reporting;
- recommendations (should be specific and
target the appropriate party for action); and
- implementation status of the mitigatory measures and the corresponding effectiveness of
the measures.
(vii) Appendices,
including:
- action and limit levels;
- graphical plots of trends of monitored
parameters at key stations over the past four reporting periods for
representative monitoring stations annotated against the following: major
activities being carried out on site during the period; weather conditions
during the period; and any other factors which might affect the monitoring
results;
- monitoring schedule for the present and next
reporting period;
- cumulative complaints statistics; and
- details of complaints, outstanding issues
and deficiencies.
13.4.4
Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
The
ET Leader will submit Quarterly EM&A Summary Reports for the construction
phase EM&A works only. These reports
should contain at least the following information:
(i)
Up to half a page
executive summary.
(ii)
basic project
information including a synopsis of the Project organisation, programme, contacts
of key management, compliance with EP condition (status of submission) and a
synopsis of work undertaken during the quarter.
(iii) a brief summary of EM&A requirements
including:
-
monitoring
parameters;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (Action and Limit levels); and
-
environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the Project EIA study final report.
(iv) advice on the
implementation of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation
measures as recommended in the Project EIA study report and summarised in the
updated implementation schedule.
(v) drawings
showing the Project area, any environmental sensitive receivers and the
locations of the monitoring and control stations.
(vi) graphical plots of the trends of monitored
parameters over the past four months (the last month of the previous quarter
and the present quarter) for representative monitoring stations annotated
against:
-
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results.
(vii) advice on the solid and liquid waste
management.
(viii) a summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance
limits (Action and Limit levels).
(ix) An Impact Prediction Review will be prepared
to compare project predictions with actual impacts for the purpose of assessing
the accuracy of predictions on the EIA study.
The review will focus on the comparison between the EIA study prediction
with the EM&A monitoring result. If
any excessive variation was found, a summary of investigation and follow up
procedure taken will be addressed accordingly.
(x) a
brief review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance
including review of pollution sources and working procedures.
(xi) An
assessment of the construction impacts on suspended solids, including but not
limited to, a comparison of the difference between the quarterly mean and the
1.3 times the ambient mean value, the latter being defined as a 30% increase of
the baseline data or EPD data, using appropriate statistical procedures. Suggestions of appropriate mitigation
measures will be made if the quarterly assessment analytical results
demonstrate that the quarterly mean is significantly higher than the 1.3
ambient mean value (p <0.05).
(xii) a summary description of the actions taken in
the event of non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier
non-compliance.
(xiii) a summarised record of complaints received
(written or verbal) for each media, liaison and consultation undertaken,
actions and follow-up procedures taken.
(xiv) Comments (eg
effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation measures), recommendations (eg any improvement in the EM&A programme) and
conclusions for the quarter.
(xv) Proponents' contacts for the public to make
enquiries.
13.5
Annual/Final
EM&A Review Reports
An
annual EM&A report will be prepared by the ET at the end of each
construction year during the course of the project. A final EM&A report will be prepared by
the ET at the end of each of the construction and operational phases. The annual/final EM&A reports will contain
at least the following information:
(i) Executive
Summary (1-2 pages).
(ii) drawings showing the project area any
environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and
control stations.
(iii) basic project information including a synopsis
of the project organization, contacts for key management staff and a synopsis
of work undertaken during the course of the project or past twelve months.
(iv) a
brief summary of EM&A requirements including:
-
environmental
mitigation measures as recommended in the project EIA study final report;
-
environmental
impact hypotheses tested;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (Action and Limit Levels);
-
monitoring
parameters; and
-
Event-Action
Plans.
(v) a summary of the implementation status of
environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the project EIA study report and summarised in the updated
implementation schedule.
(vi) graphical plots and the statistical analysis
of the trends of monitored parameters over the course of the projects including
the post-project monitoring (or the past twelve months for annual reports) for
monitoring stations annotated against the following:
-
the major
activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period;
-
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results; and
(vii) a summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance limits
(Action and Limit levels).
(viii) a review of the reasons for and the
implications of non-compliance including review of pollution sources and
working procedures as appropriate.
(ix) a description of the actions taken in the
event of non-compliance.
(x) a summary record of complaints received
(written or verbal) for each media, liaison and consultation undertaken,
actions and follow-up procedures taken.
(xi) a summary record of notifications of
summonses and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental
protection/pollution control legislations, locations and nature of the breaches
investigation, follow-up actions taken and results.
(xii) a comparison of the EM&A data with the
EIA predictions with annotations and explanations for any discrepancies,
including a review of the validity of EIA predictions and identification of
shortcomings in the EIA recommendations.
(xiii) A review of the monitoring methodology
adopted and with the benefit of hindsight, comment on its effectiveness, including
cost effectiveness;
(xiv) A review of the success of the EM&A
programme, including a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of the
mitigation measures, and recommendations for any improvements in the EM&A
programme.
(xv)
A clear
cut statement on the environmental acceptability of the project with reference
to specific impact hypotheses and a conclusion to state the return to ambient
and/or the predicted scenario as the EIA findings.
The
site documents such as the monitoring field records, laboratory analysis
records, site inspection forms, etc. are not required to be included in the
EM&A Reports for submission.
However, the documents will be kept by the ET Leader and be ready for
inspection upon request. Relevant information will be clearly and
systematically recorded in the documents.
The monitoring data will also be recorded in magnetic media, and the
software copy will be available upon request.
The documents and data will be kept for at least one year after the
completion of the operational phase EM&A works.
13.7
Electronic
Reporting of EM&A Information
To enable the public inspection of the
Baseline Monitoring Report and monthly EM&A Reports via the EIAO Internet
Website and at the EIAO Register Office, electronic copies of monthly EM&A
Reports will be prepared in Hyper Text Markup
Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document Format (PDF,
version 4.0 or later), unless otherwise agreed by EPD and will be submitted at
the same time as the hard copies. For
the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section
and sub-section of the EM&A Reports will be included in the beginning of
the document. Hyperlinks to figures,
drawings and tables in the EM&A Reports will be provided in the main text
where the respective references are made.
Graphics in the reports will be in interlaced GIF format unless
otherwise agreed by EPD. The content of
the electronic copies of the monthly EM&A Reports must be the same as the
hard copies.
Environmental monitoring data will be made
available to the public via the internet access in the form of a website, in
the shortest practical time and in no event later 2 weeks after the relevant environmental
monitoring data are analysed and validated.
The internet address and the environmental monitoring data will be made
available to the public via the EIAO Internet Website and the EIAO Register
Office.
The internet website as described above will
enable user friendly public access to the monitoring data and with features
capable of:
·
providing
access to environmental monitoring data collected since the commencement of
works;
·
searching
by data;
·
searching
by types of monitoring data (water quality);
·
hyperlinks
to relevant monitoring data after searching; and
·
or
otherwise as agreed by EPD.
13.8
Interim
Notifications of Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances
With reference to Event/Action Plans, when
the environmental quality limits are exceeded, the ET will notify the
Contractor(s), CAPCO, EPD and the AFCD as appropriate within 24 hours of the
identification of the exceedance. The notification will be followed up with
each party on the results of the investigation, proposed action and success of
the action taken, with any necessary follow-up proposals. A sample template for the interim
notifications is shown in Annex C.