Appendix 4.4 Fixed Plant Noise Impact Assessment |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Plant Inventories of Proposed Disinfection Facilities at Stonecutters Island Sewage Treatment Work |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment Units |
No of item |
Reference |
SWL, dB(A) |
Total SWL , dB(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Dechlorination Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Feed Pump |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
(from truck to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank Transfer Pump (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
(from tank to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sampling Pump |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
|
(from chamber 15 to simulation loop) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventilation Fan for Plant Room |
3 |
Ref 3 |
83 |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (2L/s) |
2 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Conditioner Unit for Control Room |
2 |
Ref 4 |
78 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fume Recovery System |
1 |
Ref 6 |
96 |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Chlorination Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (10L/s) |
3 |
Ref 5 |
100 |
105 |
|
(from truck to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (70L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
(installed on the vessel) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank Transfer Pumps (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
(from tank to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer Pump to Day Tank (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (2L/s) |
2 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
95 |
|
(sodium hypochlorite tank farm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effluent Transfer Pump to Mixing Tank |
1 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Dosing Pumps |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (Barge Unloading Area) (2L/s) |
1 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (Day Tank Farm) (2L/s) |
2 |
Ref 5 |
92 |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Conditioner Unit for Control Room |
2 |
Ref 4 |
78 |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing Stonecutter Island Sewage Treatment Plant |
|
Ref 2 |
112 |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref 1: As the flow rate of the pump is subject to dosing plan which is not available at this stage, the maximum SWL of the pumpset in Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC) was used in this assessment for the worst case. |
||||
|
Ref 2: The SWL
for the operation of the exisitng sewage treatment plant was backward calculated
based on the on-site measured |
||||
|
Ref 3: Based on the estimated volume flowrate by DSD, the SWL of the ventilation fan was made reference to Good Practices on Ventilation |
||||
|
System Noise Control. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref 4: Based on on-line searching (http://www.fujitsugeneral.co.nz/includes/heat-pumps/conventional-window-wall.pdf), the SWLs of air |
||||
|
conditioner units range from 69 to 78 dB(A) depending on the cooling capacity. The maximum SWL of the air conditioner unit was used |
||||
|
in this assessment for the worst case. It should be noted that Fujitsu air-conditioner was only taken as an example for the purpose of |
||||
|
this assessment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ref 5: Based on the estimated horsepower and operating speed of pumpset by supplier, the appropriate SWL of the pumps was made |
||||
|
reference to Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC). |
||||
|
Ref 6: The estimated SWL was made reference to EIA Report on San Wai STW and Ha Tsuen Pumping Station. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Operational Noise Levels at Representative Noise Sensitive Receiver (Unmitigated Scenario) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Operational Noise Levels at NSR N1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Treatment Units |
No of item |
Reference |
SWL, dB(A) |
Total SWL , dB(A) |
Distance in m |
Enclosure Reduction, dB(A) |
Screening Reduction, dB(A) |
SPL , dB(A) |
Enclosed |
Remark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Dechlorination Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Feed Pump |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
155 |
20 |
|
43 |
Yes |
2duty+1standby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 3 |
92 |
92 |
140 |
|
|
44 |
No |
1duty+1standby |
|
|
(from truck to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank Transfer Pump (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 3 |
92 |
92 |
150 |
|
|
43 |
No |
1duty+1standby |
|
|
(from tank to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sampling Pump |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
175 |
20 |
|
42 |
Yes |
2duty+2standby |
|
|
(from chamber 15 to simulation loop) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventilation Fan for Control Room and |
2 |
Ref 5 |
83 |
86 |
140 |
|
|
38 |
No |
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump Room |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventilation Fan for Chemical Feed Pump Room |
1 |
Ref 5 |
83 |
83 |
155 |
|
|
34 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (2L/s) |
2 |
Ref 3 |
92 |
95 |
140 |
|
|
47 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Conditioner Unit for Control Room |
2 |
Ref 2 |
78 |
81 |
140 |
|
|
33 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scrubber |
1 |
Ref 4 |
96 |
96 |
130 |
|
|
49 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPL, dB(A) at N1 |
53 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GWTM : The assumed SWL of the ventilation fan was made reference to the Techical Memorandum on Noise From Construction Work Other Than Percussive Piling. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Ref 1: As the flow rate of the pump is subject to dosing plan that is not available at this stage, the maximum SWL of the pumpset in Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC) was used in this assessment for the worst case. |
|
||||||||||
|
Ref 2: Based on on-line searching (http://www.fujitsugeneral.co.nz/includes/heat-pumps/conventional-window-wall.pdf), the SWLs of air conditioner units range from 69 to 78 dB(A) |
|
|
|||||||||
|
depending on the cooling capacity. The maximum SWL of the air conditioner unit was used in this assessment for the worst case. It should be noted that Fujitsu air-conditioner was only |
|
|
|||||||||
|
taken as an example for the purpose of this assessment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref 3: Based on the estimated horsepower and operating speed of pumpset by supplier, the SWL of the pumps was made reference to Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC). |
|
||||||||||
|
Ref 4: The estimated SWL was made reference to EIA Report on San Wai STW and Ha Tsuen Pumping Station. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Ref 5: Based on the estimated volume flowrate by DSD, the SWL of the ventilation fan was made reference to Good Practices on Ventilation System Noise Control. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Enclosure Reduction: Reduction of SWL due to the enclosure for the equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Standby item was not inlcuded in the noise assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Operational Noise Levels at Representative Noise Sensitive Receiver (Unmitigated Scenario) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Operational Noise Levels at NSR P1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Treatment Units |
No of item |
Reference |
SWL, dB(A) |
Total SWL , dB(A) |
Distance in m |
Enclosure Reduction, dB(A) |
Screening Reduction, dB(A) |
SPL , dB(A) |
Enclosed |
Remark |
|
Proposed Chlorination Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (10L/s) |
3 |
Ref 4 |
100 |
105 |
330 |
|
10 |
39 |
No |
3duty+3standby |
|
|
(from truck to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Transfer Pump (70L/s) |
1 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
92 |
230 |
|
10 |
30 |
No |
|
|
|
(installed on the vessel) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank Transfer Pumps (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
92 |
315 |
|
10 |
27 |
No |
1duty+1standby |
|
|
(from tank to tank) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer Pump to Day Tank (20L/s) |
1 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
92 |
315 |
|
10 |
27 |
No |
1duty+1standby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump |
2 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
95 |
315 |
|
10 |
30 |
No |
2duty+2standby |
|
|
(sodium hypochlorite tank farm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effluent Transfer Pump to Mixing Tank |
1 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
109 |
520 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
Yes |
1duty+1standby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Dosing Pumps |
2 |
Ref 1 |
109 |
112 |
520 |
20 |
10 |
23 |
Yes |
2duty+1standby |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (Barge Unloading Area) |
1 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
92 |
240 |
|
10 |
29 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sump Pump (Day Tank Farm) |
2 |
Ref 4 |
92 |
95 |
520 |
|
10 |
26 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air Conditioner Unit for Control Room |
1 |
Ref 3 |
78 |
78 |
305 |
|
10 |
13 |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing Stonecutter Island Sewage Treatment Plant |
|
Ref 2 |
112 |
112 |
330 |
|
10 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SPL, dB(A) at P1 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GWTM : The assumed SWL of the ventilation fan and actuator was made reference to the Techical Memorandum on Noise From Construction Work Other Than Percussive Piling. |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Ref 1: As the flow rate of the pump is subject to dosing plan that is not available at this stage, the maximum SWL of the pumpset in Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC) was used in this assessment for the worst case. |
|
||||||||||
|
Ref 2: The SWL for the operation of the exisitng sewage treatment plant was backward calculated based on the on-site measured noise level using the standard acoustical principles. |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Ref 3: Based on on-line searching (http://www.fujitsugeneral.co.nz/includes/heat-pumps/conventional-window-wall.pdf), the SWLs of air conditioner units range from 69 to 78 dB(A) |
|
|
|||||||||
|
depending on the cooling capacity. The maximum SWL of the air conditioner unit was used in this assessment for the worst case. It should be noted that Fujitsu air-conditioner was only |
|
|
|||||||||
|
taken as an example for the purpose of this assessment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref 4: Based on the estimated horsepower and operating speed of pumpset by supplier, the SWL of the pumps was made reference to Good Practice on Pumping System Noise Control (GPPSNC). |
|
||||||||||
|
Enclosure Reduction: Reduction of SWL due to the enclosure for the equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Screening Reduction: Reduction of SWL due to the screening of line of sight by the structure of FSD diving training centre itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Standby item was not inlcuded in the noise assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|