·
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap.499.S.16) and the Technical Memorandum on EIA
Process (EIAO-TM), particularly Annexes 10 and 18;
·
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance Guidance Note 8/2002;
·
Town
Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);
·
·
Land
Administration Office Instruction (LAOI) Section D-12 - Tree Preservation;
·
HyDTC
No. 10/2001 – Visibility of Directional Signs;
·
WBTC
No. 25/92 - Allocation of Space for Urban Street Trees;
·
WBTC
No. 7/2002 - Tree Planting in Public Works;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 2/2004 - Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 29/2004 - Registration of Old and Valuable Trees, and Guidelines for
their Preservation;
·
ETWB
No. 36/2004 - Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and Associated
Structures (ACABAS);
·
ETWB
TCW No. 13/
·
ETWB
TCW No. 3/2006 - Tree
Preservation,
·
·
Study
on Landscape Value Mapping of
·
Identification of the baseline
landscape resources found within the study area. This is achieved by site visit and desktop
study of topographical maps, information databases and photographs.
·
Assessment of the degree of
sensitivity to change of the landscape resources. This is influenced by a number of
factors including:
- quality and maturity of landscape resources/characters,
- rarity of landscape resources/characters,
- whether is considered to be of local, regional, national or global importance,
- whether there are any statutory or regulatory limitations/requirements relating to the landscape resource/characters, and
- ability of the landscape resource/character to accommodate change.
The Sensitivity of each landscape resources and character areas is
classified as follows:
High: |
Important landscape or landscape resources of particularly distinctive
character or high importance, sensitive to relatively small changes. |
Medium: |
Landscape or landscape resources of moderately valued landscape
characteristics reasonably tolerant to change. |
Low: |
Landscape or landscape resources of relatively unimportant landscape
characteristics largely tolerant to change. |
·
Identification
of potential sources of landscape impacts. These are the various elements of the
construction works and operational procedures that would generate landscape
impacts.
·
Identification
of the magnitude of landscape impacts. The
magnitude of the impact (or magnitude of change) depends on a number of factors
including:
- the physical extent of the impact,
- compatibility of the project with the surrounding landscape,
- duration of impacts i.e. whether it is temporary (short, medium or long term), under construction and operation phases, and
- reversibility of change.
The magnitude of landscape impacts is classified as follows:
Large: |
The landscape or landscape resource would suffer a major change. |
Intermediate: |
The landscape or landscape resources would suffer moderate change. |
Small: |
The landscape or landscape resources would suffer slight or barely
perceptible change. |
Negligible: |
The landscape or landscape resources would suffer no discernible
change. |
·
Identification
of potential landscape mitigation measures.
Mitigation measures may take the form of
- adopting alternative design or revisions to the basic engineering the architectural design to prevent and/or minimize adverse impacts,
- remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of physical, engineering and building features,
- compensatory measures such as the implementation of landscape design measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc) to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate potentially beneficial long term impacts.
A programme for the mitigation measures is provided. The agencies
responsible for the funding implementation, management and maintenance of the
mitigation measures are identified.
· Predicted significance of landscape impacts before and after the implementation of the mitigation measures. By synthesising the magnitude of the various impacts and the sensitivity of the various landscape resources it is possible to categorise impacts in a logical, well-reasoned and consistent fashion. Table 10.1 shows the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds, namely insubstantial, slight, moderate, and substantial, depending on the combination of a negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of impact and a low-medium-high degree of sensitivity of landscape resource/character.
Table 10.1 Relationship between
Receptor Sensitivity and Impact Magnitude in Defining Impact Significance
Magnitude
of Impact (Change) |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate /
Substantial |
Substantial |
Intermediate |
Slight /
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate /
Substantial |
|
Small |
Slight |
Slight /
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
|
|
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
Receptor
Sensitivity (of Landscape Resource, Landscape Character
Area or VSRs) |
·
Prediction
of Acceptability of Impacts. An
overall assessment of the acceptability, or otherwise, of the impacts according
to the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of the EIAOTM.
·
Identification
of Zones of Visual Influence (ZVIs) during the construction and operational
phase of the Project. This is
achieved by site visit and desktop study of topographic maps and photographs,
and preparation of cross-section to determine visibility of the project from
various locations.
·
Identification
of Visual sensitive receivers (VSRs) within the Zone of Visual Influence (ZVIs)
at construction and operational stages. These
are the people who would reside within, work within, play within, or travel
through, the ZVIs.
·
Assessment
of the degree of sensitivity to change of the VSRs. Factors
considered include:
- the type of VSRs, which is classified according to whether the person is at home, at work, at school, at play, or travelling. Those who view the impact from their homes are considered to be highly sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook from their home will have a substantial effect on their perception of the quality and acceptability of their home environment and their general quality of life. Those who view the impact from their workplace and at school are considered to be only moderately sensitive as the attractiveness or otherwise of the outlook will have a less important, although still material, effect on their perception of their quality of life. The degree to which this applies depends on whether the workplace is industrial, retail or commercial. Those who view the impact whilst taking part in an outdoor leisure activity may display varying sensitivity depending on the type of leisure activity. Those who view the impact whilst travelling on a public thoroughfare will also display varying sensitivity depending on the speed of travel.
- other factors which are considered (as required in the EIAO GN 8/2002) include the value and quality of existing views, the availability and amenity of alternative views, the duration or frequency of view, and the degree of visibility.
The sensitivity of VSRs is classified as follows:
High: |
The VSR is highly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience. |
Medium: |
The VSR is moderately sensitive to any change in their viewing
experience. |
Low: |
The VSR is only slightly sensitive to any change in their viewing
experience. |
·
Identification
of relative numbers of VSRs. This is
expressed in term of whether there are very few, few, many or very many VSRs in
any one category of VSR.
·
Identification
of potential sources of visual impacts. These
are the various elements of the construction works and operational procedures
that would generate visual impacts.
·
Assessment
of the potential magnitude of visual impacts. Factors considered
include
- the compatibility with the surrounding landscape,
- the duration of the impact,
- the reversibility of the impact,
- the scale of the impact and distance of the source of impact from the viewer, and
- The blockage of view
The magnitude of visual impacts is classified as follows:
Large: |
The VSRs would suffer a major change in their viewing experience. |
Intermediate: |
The VSRs would suffer a moderate in their viewing experience. |
Small: |
The VSRs would suffer a small change in their viewing experience. |
Negligible: |
The VSRs would suffer no discernible change in their viewing
experience. |
·
Identification
of potential visual mitigation measures. These
may take the form of adopting alternative designs or revisions to the basic
engineering and architectural design to prevent and/or minimise adverse
impacts, remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of building
features, and tree planting to screen the roads and associated structures. A
programme for the mitigation measures is provided. The agencies responsible for
the implementation, management and maintenance of the mitigation measures are
identified and their approval-in-principle has been sought.
·
Prediction
of the significance of visual impacts before and after the implementation of
the mitigation measures. By
synthesising the magnitude of the various visual impacts and the sensitivity of
the VSRs, and the numbers of VSRs that are affected, it is possible to
categorise the degree of significance of the impacts in a logical,
well-reasoned and consistent fashion. Table
10.1 shows the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four
thresholds, namely, insubstantial, slight, moderate and substantial, depending
on the combination of a negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of impact
and a low-medium-high degree of sensitivity of VSRs.
The significance of visual impacts is categorised as follows:
Substantial: |
Adverse / beneficial impact
where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in
existing visual quality. |
Moderate: |
Adverse / beneficial impact
where the proposal would cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in
existing visual quality. |
Slight: |
Adverse / beneficial impact
where the proposal would cause a barely perceptible deterioration or
improvement in existing visual quality. |
Insubstantial: |
No discernible change in the
existing visual quality. |
·
Prediction
of Acceptability of Impacts. An
overall assessment of the acceptability, or otherwise, of the impacts according
to the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of the EIAOTM.
· Identification and plotting of visual envelope of the Project and associated works,
· Identification of key groups of sensitive receivers within the visual envelope with regard to views from ground level and elevated vantage points,
· Description of the visual compatibility of the Project and associated works within the surrounding, both existing and planned uses, its obstruction and interference with the key views of the adjacent areas; and
· Description of severity of visual impacts in terms of nature, distance and number of sensitive receivers. The visual impact of the Project and associated works with and without mitigations shall be assessed, and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures shall be demonstrated.
Table
10.2 List
of the Landscape Resources / Landscape Character Areas and Their Sensitivity to
Change
|
Landscape
Resource / Landscape
Character Zone |
Sensitivity to Change (Low,
Medium, High) |
LR1 |
Roadside planting at Tsing Tin Interchange |
High |
LR2 |
|
High |
LCA1 |
Transportation Corridor LCA |
Intermediate |
LCA2 |
Park Urban LCA |
High |
LCA3 |
Tuen Mun Urban LCA |
Medium |
LCA4 |
|
Medium |
Table 10.3 Visual
Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) and Their Sensitivity to Change
|
Key Visual Sensitive
Receivers (VSRs) |
Type of VSRs |
Number of
Individuals (Many/ Medium/ Few/ Very Few) |
Quality of
Existing View (Good/ Fair/ Poor) |
Availability
of Alternative Views (Yes/ No) |
Degree of
Visibility (Full/ Partial/ Glimpse) |
Frequency of
View (Very Frequent/ Frequent/ Occasional/ Rare) |
Sensitivity to
Change (Low, Medium, High) |
R1 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Full |
Frequent |
High |
R |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Full |
Frequent |
High |
R2B |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Frequent |
High |
R3 |
Dorboa
Building, Elite Garden, Tung Wai Court, Wah Hing Mansion, Wah Lee Building,
Sai Po Building, Look Yuen, Cheung Lung Building, On Lai Building and Man
Cheong Building |
Residential |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R4 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R5 |
Tuen Mun
Fire Services (R&F) Married Quarters |
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R6 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Frequent |
High |
R7 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Frequent |
High |
R8 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R9 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R10B |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R11 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R12 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
R13 |
|
Residential |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Frequent |
Medium |
GIC1 |
|
Occupational |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2 |
|
Occupational |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Partial |
Rare |
Medium |
GIC3 |
|
Occupational |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC4 |
Kwong Choi
Market |
Occupational |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC5 |
|
Occupational |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Occasional |
Low |
GIC6 |
|
Occupational |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Glimpse |
Rare |
Low |
O1 |
|
Recreational |
Medium |
Good |
Yes |
Full |
Occasional |
High |
O2 |
|
Recreational |
Medium |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
O3 |
|
Recreational |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
O4 |
San Wo Lane
Playground |
Recreational |
Medium |
Good |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Medium |
T1 |
Traveller
along |
Transportation |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Full |
Occasional |
Low |
T2 |
Users of
Light Rail |
Transportation |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
Partial |
Occasional |
Low |
Table 10.4 Visual
Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) and Their Magnitude of Impacts
Id
No. |
Key Visual Sensitive
Receiver (VSR) |
Blockage of View (Full/
Partial/ Glimpse |
Viewing Distance (M) |
Scale of Development (Large/
Medium/ Small) |
Compatibility (Good/
Fair/ Poor) |
Reversibility of Change (Yes/
No) |
Magnitude
of Impacts (Large/ Intermediate/
Small/ Negligible |
|
Construction |
Operation |
|||||||
R1 |
|
Full |
60 |
Large |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
R |
|
Full |
120 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
R2B |
|
Full |
265 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
R3 |
Dorboa
Building, Elite Garden, Tung Wai Court, Wah Hing Mansion, Wah Lee Building,
Sai Po Building, Look Yuen, Cheung Lung Building, On Lai Building and Man
Cheong Building |
Glimpse |
250 |
Medium |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R4 |
|
Glimpse |
240 |
Medium |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R5 |
Tuen Mun
Fire Services (R&F) Married Quarters |
Glimpse |
400 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R6 |
|
Partial |
175 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
R7 |
|
Partial |
275 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
R8 |
|
Partial |
425 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R9 |
|
Glimpse |
550 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R |
|
Glimpse |
275 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R10B |
|
Glimpse |
375 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R11 |
|
Glimpse |
300 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R12 |
|
Glimpse |
600 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
R13 |
|
Glimpse |
750 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
GIC1 |
|
Partial |
125 |
Large |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
GIC2 |
|
Glimpse |
215 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
GIC3 |
|
Glimpse |
200 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
GIC4 |
Kwong Choi
Market |
Partial |
75 |
Large |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
GIC5 |
|
Glimpse |
450 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
GIC6 |
|
Partial |
475 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
O1 |
|
Full |
0 |
Large |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
O2 |
|
Glimpse |
115 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
O3 |
|
Glimpse |
125 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
O4 |
San Wo Lane
Playground |
Glimpse |
300 |
Small |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
T1 |
Traveller
along |
Full |
0 |
Large |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
T2 |
Users of
Light Rail |
Glimpse |
150 |
Medium |
Fair |
No |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
·
Widening of
· Construction of noise barriers,
· Temporary site access areas, site cabins and heavy machinery,
· Construction site traffic
· Increased road traffic congestion,
· Temporary noise mitigation eg. barriers, enclosures,
· Contractor’s temporary works areas, including site accommodation and parking areas,
· Night time lighting, and
· Dust during dry weather
·
Widening of
·
New noise barriers – 100m long 6m high
barrier with 3.5m cantilever length at 23 degrees to the horizontal at the north of
Table 10.5 Significant
Landscape Impacts of the Proposed Works during Construction Phase
Id
No. |
Landscape Resources/ Landscape Character Areas |
Source of Impact |
Description
of Impacts |
Magnitude
of Impacts |
LR1 |
Roadside
planting at Tsing Tin Interchange |
· Widening of · Construction of noise barrier |
·
Approx. 34
nos. of existing trees would
be affected by the permanently works. |
Large |
LR2 |
|
· Widening of · Construction of noise barrier · Temporary and Permanent alienation of part of |
·
·
·
Approx. 13
nos. of existing trees would
be affected by the permanently works. |
Large |
LCA1 |
Transportation
Corridor LCA |
· Widening of · Construction of noise barrier |
·
Approximate 34
nos. of existing trees would be affected by the permanently works. |
Large |
LCA2 |
Park
Urban LCA |
· Widening of · Construction of noise barrier · Temporary and Permanent alienation of part of |
·
·
·
Approx. 13
nos. of existing trees would
be affected by the permanently works. |
Large |
LCA3 |
Tuen
Mun Urban LCA |
·
Widening of ·
Storage of
Construction equipment and plant |
·
Change of existing car park to a site for
construction activities |
Small |
Table 10.6 Proposed
Construction Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
ID No. |
Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures |
Funding Agency |
Implementation Agency |
CM11 |
Topsoil, where
identified, should be stripped and stored for re-use in the construction of
the soft landscape works, where practical. |
HyD |
HyD |
CM21 |
Existing trees to be
retained on site should be carefully protected during construction. |
HyD |
HyD |
CM3 |
Trees unavoidably
affected by the works should be transplanted where practical. |
HyD |
HyD |
CM4 |
Compensatory tree
planting should be provided to compensate for felled trees. |
HyD |
HyD |
CM51 |
Control of night-time lighting. |
HyD |
HyD |
CM6 |
Erection of decorative
screen hoarding compatible with the surrounding setting. |
HyD |
HyD |
Note: (1) HyD
shall be responsible for the implementation of road works and associated
amenity landscape areas; refer to Good Site Practices.
Table
10.7 Proposed
Operation Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
ID No. |
Landscape and Visual
Mitigation Measures |
Funding Agency |
Implementation Agency |
Maintenance/ Management
Agency |
OM1 |
Aesthetic design of road-related structures,
including noise barriers and enclosure. |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
OM2 |
Shrub planting to soften and screen
proposed roads and associated structures. |
HyD |
HyD |
LCSD/HyD |
OM3 |
Tree and Shrub Planting in the central strip |
HyD |
HyD |
LCSD/HyD |
OM5 |
Area reinstated to match former condition |
HyD |
HyD |
LCSD |
Note: (1) HyD
shall be responsible for the maintenance and management for hard streetscape
works and LCSD shall be responsible for the maintenance and management of soft
landscape works.
Table 10.8 Significance
of Landscape Impacts in the Construction and Operation Phases
|
Landscape
Resource / Landscape Character |
Sensitivity to Change (Low, Medium, High) |
Magnitude of Change (Negligible, Small,
Intermediate, Large) |
Impact Significance before Mitigation (Insubstantial,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Recommended Mitigation Measures |
Impact Significance Day 1 after Mitigation |
Impact Significance 10 years after Mitigation |
||||
(Insubstantial, Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
|||||||||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Operation |
|||
Part
1 –Landscape Resources |
|||||||||||
LR1 |
Roadside
planting at Tsing Tin Interchange |
High |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
CM1 to CM6; OM1 to OM5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
LR2 |
|
High |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM1 to CM6; OM1 to OM5 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
Part
1 –Landscape Character Areas |
|||||||||||
LCA1 |
Transportation
Corridor LCA |
Intermediate |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1 to CM6; OM1 to OM5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
LCA2 |
Park
Urban LCA |
High |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
CM1 to CM6; OM1 to OM5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
LCA3 |
Tuen
Mun Urban LCA |
Medium |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
CM5, CM6, OM5 |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
LCA4 |
|
Medium |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Not required |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Table 10.9 Significance of Visual Impacts in the
Construction and Operation Phases (Note: All impacts adverse unless otherwise
noted.)
Id No |
Key Visual Sensitive Receiver (VSR) |
Receptor Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
Magnitude of Impact (Negligible,
Small, Intermediate, Large) |
Impact Significance without Mitigation
Measures (Insubstantial,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Recommended
Mitigation Measures |
Residual Impact Significance with Mitigations (Insubstantial,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Day 1 Operation |
10 year after operation |
||||
R1 |
|
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
CM1 to CM6 OM1 to OM5 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
R2A |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R2B |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R3 |
Dorboa
Building, Elite Garden, Tung Wai Court, Wah Hing Mansion, Wah Lee Building,
Sai Po Building, Look Yuen, Cheung Lung Building, On Lai Building and Man
Cheong Building |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R4 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R5 |
Tuen Mun
Fire Services (R&F) Married Quarters |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R6 |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R7 |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R8 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R9 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R10A |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R10B |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R11 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R12 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
R13 |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
GIC1 |
|
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
GIC2 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
GIC3 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
GIC4 |
Kwong Choi
Market |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
GIC5 |
|
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
|
GIC6 |
|
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
|
O1 |
|
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
O2 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
O3 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
O4 |
San Wo Lane
Playground |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
T1 |
Traveller
along |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
|
T2 |
Users of
Light Rail |
Low |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Slight |
Slight |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
Insubstantial |
*Note: A:
Road widening and associated slope works
B:
Noise Barrier
C:
Temporary Works Area