•
Layout & geometry
•
Topography
•
Maintenance costs
•
Ease of connection to proposed/existing system
•
Maintenance access
Table 2.1 Comparison
of Alternative Locations – Engineering Considerations and Public Concern
|
Ratings for Location (1) |
Findings |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
||
Layout and geometry |
3 |
2 |
5 |
The three
locations are similar in size but Location 3 has a more regular
geometry. This is more favorable
for accommodating the SPS which is in rectangular format. |
Topography |
4 |
4 |
5 |
Within Site 4A,
the lowest point is located at Location 3 (about +6.0 mPD). |
Maintenance costs |
4 |
3 |
3 |
Location 1 is
situated next to the future widened |
Ease of connection to proposed/ existing system |
4 |
3 |
4 |
Location 1 has priority over Locations 2 & 3 for connection of the
sewers in Site 2 of the development.
However, Location 3 is situated closer to the centre of Area 54 as
well as the local villages in a macro perspective. Location 3 has advantage for
connection to the proposed system in the long run. |
Maintenance access to SPS |
4 |
4 |
4 |
All three locations are accessible for
future maintenance. |
Public concern |
1 |
2 |
5 |
During the public consultation to the Tuen Mun Rural Committee and the
locals held on 8 March 2007, the public had grave concern on the location of
the SPS. Amongst the 3 locations,
they objected to Location 1, did not support Location 2 but supported
Location 3, as Location 3 is much far away from the village houses nearby. |
Total |
20 |
18 |
26 |
|
Note:
(1) Marks
are given according to the following ratings:
Poor/ Unsatisfactory |
- - - - - - - - - - - - |
Acceptable |
- - - - - - - - - - - - |
Highly favorable |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Table 2.2 Comparison of Alternative Locations – Environmental Considerations
Location |
Potential Environmental Impacts |
|||
Noise / Air Quality |
Water Quality |
Landscape and Visual |
Cultural Heritage |
|
1 |
Location 1 is close to the residential dwellings of |
Location 1 is near the drainage culvert adjacent to Locations 2 and 3 are near the nullah / drainage culvert adjacent to
Kei Lun Wai village. Potential water quality impacts associated with the construction and
operation of the SPS would be expected to be similar for the three locations. |
Location 1 is significantly to the
agri-rural visual character of Farmlands and orchards within the site area,
and within close distance to VSR of Tze Tin Tsuen and Traveler on Landscape and
Visual impact on Location 2 and 3 would be similar as they are characterize
as Open storage landscape character; however 1 mature tree of Celtis sinensis will be affected by the
works in Location 2 comparing with no potential landscape impact on Location
3 Location 2 is
close to potential VSRs of Union Garden Location 3 is
close to potential VSRs of Kei Lun Wai |
All three locations fall within the Kei Lun Wai Archaeological Site. All three locations have no impact to built heritage resources. |
2 |
Location 2 is close to the residential dwellings of |
|||
3 |
Location 3 is close to the residential dwellings of Kei Lun Wai
village which represent noise and air sensitive receivers |
Interactions with Other Projects
•
Sewerage upgrading works in Tuen Mun managed by
Drainage Services Department (Agreement No. CE 38/2006 (DS))
•
Formation, Roads and Drains in Tuen Mun Area 54 –
Phases 1 and 2, Private and Public Rental Housing Development in Tuen Mun Area
54 managed by CEDD (Agreement No. CE 21/2005 (CE))