2.1 This section presents the requirements, methodology, equipment, monitoring locations, criteria and protocols for the monitoring and audit of air quality impact during the construction and operation phase of the Project.
2.2 The objectives of the air quality monitoring include the following:
·
to identify the extent of
construction dust impact on sensitive receivers;
·
to determine the effectiveness of
mitigation measures in controlling fugitive dust emission from activities
during the construction phase;
·
to audit the compliance of the
Contractor with regard to dust control, contract conditions and the relevant
dust impact criteria;
·
to recommend further mitigation
measures if found to be necessary; and
·
to comply with Action and Limit (A/L)
Levels for air quality as defined in this Manual.
2.3 During construction phase of the Project, dust impacts would be the major air quality impacts. While during operation phase of the Project, stack emissions would be the key environmental issue.
Construction Phase
2.4 The ambient air quality criteria to be monitored and assessed are:
·
The Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives
(AQOs) for Total Suspended Particulates (TSP), 24-hour TSP levels of
·
1-hour TSP limit of 500 mgm-3
2.5 These levels are not to be exceeded at Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs). Monitoring of the TSP levels shall be conducted by the ET to detect any deteriorating air quality and to take timely action to rectify such situation.
Operation Phase
2.6 During operation of the new crematorium, the air pollutants of concern include nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, respirable suspended particulate, total organic carbon, hydrogen chloride, carbon monoxide, mercury and dioxins. The predicted air quality at the nearby ASRs would comply with the AQOs and relevant air quality guidelines with the implementation of recommended mitigation measures. No odour nuisance from the new crematorium is anticipated. By incorporating flue gas treatment system in joss paper burners and limiting joss paper burning activities through administration procedures, nuisance arising from joss paper burning is anticipated to be negligible.
2.7 In order to ensure compliance with the legislation requirements, the conditions and the continuous monitoring stipulated in the BPM12/2(06) – A Guidance Note on the Best Practicable Means for Incinerators (Crematoria), published by EPD, shall be conducted. The monitoring of the air pollutants shall comply with the requirements of BPM and future Specified Process License of new crematorium, to be issued by EPD under the APCO.
Monitoring
during Construction Phase
Monitoring Equipment
2.8 High volume samples (HVSs) in compliance with the following specifications shall be used for carrying out the 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring:
·
0.6 -
·
equipped with a timing / control
device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
·
installed with elapsed-time meter
with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
·
capable of providing a minimum
exposed area of
·
flow control accuracy: +/- 2.5%
deviation over 24-hour sampling period;
·
equipped with a shelter to protect
the filter and sampler;
·
incorporated with an electronic mass
flow rate controller or other equivalent devices;
·
equipped with a flow recorder for
continuous monitoring;
·
provided with a peaked roof inlet;
·
incorporated with a manometer;
·
able to hold and seal the filter
paper to the sampler housing at horizontal position;
·
easily changeable filter; and
· capable
of operating continuously for a 24-hour period.
2.9 The ET is responsible for provision of the monitoring equipment. They shall ensure that sufficient number of HVSs with an appropriate calibration kit are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring. The HVSs shall be equipped with an electronic mass flow controller and be calibrated against a traceable standard at regular intervals. All the equipment, calibration kit, filter papers, etc., shall be clearly labeled.
2.10 Initial calibration of dust monitoring equipment shall be controlled upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The transfer standard shall be traceable to the internationally recognized primary standard and be calibrated annually. The concern parties such as IEC shall properly document the calibration data for future reference. All the data should be converted into standard temperature and pressure condition.
2.11 The flow-rate of the sampler before and after the sampling exercise with the filter in position shall be verified to be constant and be recorded in the data sheet as mentioned in Appendix B.
2.12
If
the ET proposes to use a direct reading dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP
levels, he shall submit sufficient information to the IEC to prove that the
instrument is capable of achieving a comparable result to the HVS. The instrument should also be calibrated
regularly, and the 1-hour sampling shall be determined periodically by the HVS
to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading
method.
2.13
Wind
data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging wind
speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location
shall be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
· The
wind sensors should be installed
·
The wind data should be captured by
a data logger. The data shall be
downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
·
The wind data monitoring equipment
should be re-calibrated at least once every six months.
· Wind
direction should be divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
2.14
In
exceptional situations, the ET may propose alternative methods to obtain
representative wind data upon approval from the ER and agreement from the IEC.
Laboratory Measurement / Analysis
2.15
A
clean laboratory with constant temperature and humidity control, and equipped
with necessary measuring and conditioning instruments to handle the dust
samples collected, shall be available for sample analysis, and equipment
calibration and maintenance. The
laboratory should be HOKLAS accredited.
2.16
If
a site laboratory is set up or a non-HOKLAS accredited laboratory is hired for
carrying out the laboratory analysis, the laboratory equipment shall be
approved by the ER and the measurement procedures shall be witnessed by the
IEC. Any measurement performed by
the laboratory shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the ER and
IEC. IEC shall regularly audit to
the measurement performed by the laboratory to ensure the accuracy of
measurement results. The ET Leader shall
provide the ER with one copy of the Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B for his reference.
2.17
Filter
paper of size 8" x 10" shall be labelled before sampling. It shall be a clean filter paper with no
pinholes, and shall be conditioned in a humidity-controlled chamber for over
24-hours and be pre-weighed before use for the sampling.
2.18
After
sampling, the filter paper loaded with dust shall be kept in a clean and
tightly sealed plastic bag. The
filter paper shall then be returned to the laboratory for reconditioning in the
humidity-controlled chamber followed by accurate weighing by an electronic
balance with readout down to 0.1 mg.
The balance shall be regularly calibrated against a traceable standard.
2.19
All
the collected samples shall be kept in a good condition for 6 months before
disposal.
Monitoring Locations
2.20
The
dust monitoring stations for construction phase are shown in Figure 2.1.
Baseline Monitoring
2.21
Baseline
monitoring shall be carried out at all of the designated monitoring locations
for at least 14 consecutive days prior to the commissioning of the construction
works to obtain daily 24-hour TSP samples.
The selected baseline monitoring stations should reflect baseline
conditions at the impact stations.
One-hour sampling should also be done at least 3 times per day while the
highest dust impact is expected.
2.22
During
the baseline monitoring, there should not be any construction or dust
generation activities in the vicinity of the monitoring stations. Before commencing baseline monitoring,
the ET shall inform the IEC of the baseline monitoring programme such that the
ER can conduct on-site audit to ensure accuracy of the baseline monitoring
results.
2.23
In
case the baseline monitoring cannot be carried out at the designated monitoring
locations during the baseline monitoring period, the ET Leader shall carry out
the monitoring at alternative locations that can effectively represent the
baseline conditions at the impact monitoring locations. The alternative baseline monitoring
locations shall be approved by the ER and agreed with the IEC.
2.24
In
exceptional cases, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable
results are obtained, the ET shall liaise with the IEC and EPD to agree on an
appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to ER for
approval.
2.25
Ambient
conditions may vary seasonally and shall be reviewed once every three
months. When the ambient conditions
have changed and a repeat of the baseline monitoring is required to be carried
out for obtaining the updated baseline levels, the monitoring should be at
times when the Contractor's activities are not generating dust, at least in the
proximity of the monitoring stations.
Should change in ambient conditions be determined, the baseline levels
and, in turn, the air quality criteria, should be revised. The revised baseline levels and air
quality criteria should be agreed with the IEC and EPD.
Impact Monitoring
2.26
The
ET shall carry out impact monitoring during the course of the Works. For regular impact monitoring, the
sampling frequency of at least once in every six-days, shall be strictly
observed at all the monitoring stations for 24-hour TSP monitoring. For 1-hour TSP monitoring, the sampling
frequency of at least three times in every six-days should be undertaken when
the highest dust impact occurs.
Before commencing baseline monitoring, the ET shall inform the IEC of
the impact monitoring programme such that the IEC can conduct on-site audit to
ensure accuracy of the impact monitoring results.
2.27
The
specific time to start and stop the 24-hour TSP monitoring shall be clearly
defined for each location and be strictly followed by the operator.
2.28
In
case of non-compliance with the air quality criteria, more frequent monitoring,
as specified in the Action Plan in the following section, shall be conducted
within 24 hours after the result is obtained. This additional monitoring shall be
continued until the excessive dust emission or the deterioration in air quality
is rectified.
Environmental Quality Performance
Limits
2.29
The baseline monitoring
results form the basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact
monitoring. The ET shall compare
the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up for 24-hour TSP
and 1-hour TSP. Table 2.1
shows the air quality criteria, namely Action and Limit levels to be used.
Table 2.1 Action
/ Limit Levels for Air Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
24-hour TSP Level in gm-3 |
For baseline level £ Action level = (baseline
level * 1.3 + Limit level)/2; For baseline level > |
|
1-hour TSP Level in gm-3 |
For baseline level £ Action level = (baseline
level * 1.3 + Limit level)/2; For baseline level > |
|
Event and Action Plan
2.30
Should non-compliance of
the air quality criteria occur, actions in accordance with the Action Plan in Table
2.2 shall be carried out.
Mitigation Measures
2.31
As described in the EIA
Report, all ASRs would comply with AQO and EIAO-TM criteria during construction
phase of the Project. Mitigation
measures for dust control have been recommended in the EIA Report and are
listed below:
·
skip hoist for material transport
should be totally enclosed by impervious sheeting;
·
every vehicle should be washed to
remove any dusty materials from its body and wheels before leaving a
construction site;
·
the area where vehicle washing takes
place and the section of the road between the washing facilities and the exit
point should be paved with concrete, bituminous materials or hardcores;
·
where a site boundary adjoins a
road, streets or other accessible to the public, hoarding of not less than
·
every stack of more than 20 bags of
cement should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting places in an area
sheltered on the top and the 3 sides;
·
all dusty materials should be
sprayed with water prior to any loading, unloading or transfer operation so as
to maintain the dusty materials wet;
·
the excavation area should be
limited to as small in size as possible and backfilled with clean and/or
treated soil shortly after excavation work;
·
the height from which excavated
materials are dropped should be controlled to a minimum practical height to
limit fugitive dust generation from unloading;
·
the load of dusty materials carried
by vehicle leaving a construction site should be covered entirely by clean
impervious sheeting to ensure dust materials do not leak from the vehicle; and
Table 2.2 Event
/ Action Plan for Construction Air Quality
EVENT |
ACTION |
|||
ET |
IEC |
ER |
CONTRACTOR |
|
ACTION LEVEL |
||||
1.
Exceedance for one sample |
1.
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and
propose remedial measures; 2.
Inform IEC and ER; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily. (The above actions should
be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Notify Contractor; (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.Rectify any unacceptable
practice; 2.Amend working methods if
appropriate. (The above actions should
be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
2.
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Identify source; 2.
Inform IEC and ER; 3.
Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed
remedial measures; 4.
Repeat measurements to confirm findings; 5.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 6.
Discuss with IEC and Contractor on remedial actions
required; 7.
If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER; 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial
measures; 4.
Advise the ET on the effectiveness of the proposed
remedial measures; 5.
Supervise implementation of remedial measures. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.Submit proposals for
remedial to ER within 3 working days of notification; 2.Implement the agreed
proposals; 3.Amend proposal if
appropriate. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
LIMITED LEVEL |
||||
1.
Exceedance for one sample |
1.
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and
propose remedial measures; 2.
Inform ER, Contractor and EPD; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and
keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial
measures; 4.
Advise the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed
remedial measures; 5.
Supervise implementation of remedial measures. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.Take immediate action to
avoid further exceedance; 2.Submit proposals for
remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification; 3.Implement the agreed
proposals; 4.Amend proposal if
appropriate. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
2.
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Notify IEC, ER, Contractor and EPD; 2.
Identify source; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm findings; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine
possible mitigation to be implemented; 6.
Arrange meeting with IEC and ER to discuss the remedial
actions to be taken; 7.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and
keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results; 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.
Discuss amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential
remedial actions; 2.
Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to
assure their effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly; 3.
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
In consolidation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on
the remedial measures to be implemented; 4.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented; 5. If exceedance continues,
consider what portion of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor
to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is abated. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
1.Take immediate action to
avoid further exceedance; 2.Submit proposals for
remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification; 3.Implement the agreed
proposals; 4.Resubmit proposals if
problem still not under control; 5.Stop the relevant
portion of works as determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated. (The above actions
should be taken within 2 working days after the exceedance is identified) |
·
instigation of an environmental
monitoring and auditing program to monitor the construction process in order to
enforce controls and modify method of works if dusty conditions arise.
2.32 The implementation schedule for recommended air quality mitigation measures is presented in Appendix A.
Monitoring
during Operation Phase
Stack Monitoring
2.33
Monitoring of air quality
parameters of concern due to stack emissions has to be conducted during operation
phase of the Project in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the “A Guidance Note on the Best Practicable Means for Incinerators
(Crematoria) BPM12/2(06)” and the future Specified Process License of new
crematorium, to be issued by EPD under APCO.
2.34
It should be noted that the
proposed sampling methods below are for reference only and should be subject to
the approval of EPD.
2.35
Necessary monitoring equipment
and techniques should be provided and used to demonstrate that the process is properly
operated and the emissions can be minimized to meet the air pollution control
requirements. The scope, manner and
frequency of the monitoring should be sufficient for this purpose and will be
determined by EPD. Monitoring
results should be recorded in such manner specified by EPD. The record should be retained at the
premises for a minimum of two years, or other period specified by EPD, after
the date of last entry and be made available for examination as and when
required by EPD.
2.36
On-line monitoring, process
continuous monitoring and periodic measurement shall be carried out and the
results shall be properly recorded.
Evidence should be provided to demonstrate quality assurance procedures
are in place to ensure all monitoring results are sufficiently accurate and
reliable. Calibration on the
monitoring equipment has to be done by means of parallel measurements with the
reference methods as agreed by EPD.
The requirements of the on-line monitoring and periodic measurement are
provided in the following sections:
On-line
& Process Continuous Monitoring
2.37
Continuous monitoring of
the in-stack exhaust gas and the process shall be carried out. The air
pollutants and parameters to be continuously monitored shall comply with the
requirements of the BPM 12/2(06) and the future Specified Process License of
new crematorium, to be issued by EPD under APCO. The continuous monitoring data
should be transmitted instantaneously to EPD by telemetry system or the real
time and logged monitoring data shall be accessible by EPD in such manner and
format agreed with EPD.
Periodic Measurement
2.38
To confirm that the
levels of air pollutants being adequately controlled, periodic measurements
shall be made. The air pollutants and parameters to be periodically monitored
and the sampling frequency shall comply with the requirements of the
BPM12/2(06) and the future Specified Process License of new crematorium, to be
issued by EPD under APCO.
2.39
All measurement results
shall be recorded, processed and presented in a summary report as agreed by
EPD. The report shall be submitted
to EPD without delay after the source sampling(s) as required is/are completed.