9.1
Potential air quality impact
arising from the construction works would mainly be related to construction
dust from excavation, materials handling, spoil removal and wind erosion, as
well as operation of concrete batching plant, temporary stockpiles and barging
facilities. Construction dust
monitoring and site audit is recommended to confirm that the recommended
mitigation measures are properly implemented.
9.2
There would be no adverse air quality impact anticipated from
the operation of the Project. With
the provision of mechanical air ventilation system fulfilling with EPD Public
Transport Interchange (PTI) guideline, no adverse air quality impact would be
expected. Therefore, no specific
environmental monitoring and audit requirements are required during operation
phase.
9.3
The objectives of the dust monitoring should be:
(i) To identify the
extent of construction dust impacts on sensitive receivers;
(ii) To determine the
effectiveness of mitigation measures to control fugitive dust emission from
activities during construction phase;
(iii) To audit the compliance
of the Contractor with regard to dust control, contract conditions and the
relevant dust impact criteria;
(iv) To recommend further
mitigation measures if found to be necessary; and
(v) To comply with
Action and Limit (A/L) Levels for air quality as defined in this Manual.
Monitoring Parameters
and Equipment
9.4
The total suspended particulate (TSP) levels should be measured
by following the standard method as set out in High Volume Method for Total
Suspended Particulates, Part 50 Chapter 1 Appendix B, Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations of the USEPA (hereinafter referred to as “HVS method”).
9.5
Dust laden with air should be drawn through a high volume
sampler (HVS) fitted with a conditioned, pre-weighed filter paper, at a
controlled rate. After sampling for
24-hours, the filter paper with retained particles is collected and returned to
the laboratory for drying in a desiccator followed by accurate weighing. 24-hour average TSP levels are
calculated from the ratio of the mass of particulates retained on the filter
paper to the total volume of air sampled.
9.6
All relevant data including temperature, pressure, weather
conditions, elapsed-time meter reading for the start and stop of sampler,
identification and weight of the filter paper, and other special phenomena and
work progress of the concerned site, etc, should be recorded down in
detail. A sample data sheet is shown
in Appendix B.
9.7
HVS in compliance with the following specifications should
be used for carrying out the 1-hour and 24-hour monitoring:
(i)
0.6 - 1.7 m3 per minute (20 -
60 standard cubic feet per minute) adjustable flow range;
(ii)
equipped with a timing / control device
with ± 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iii)
installed with elapsed-time meter with ±
2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iv)
capable of providing a minimum exposed
area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
(v)
flow control accuracy: ± 2.5% deviation over 24-hour sampling
period;
(vi)
incorporated with an electronic mass flow
rate controller or other equivalent devices;
(vii)
equipped with a flow recorder for
continuous monitoring;
(viii) provided
with a peaked roof inlet;
(ix)
incorporated with a manometer;
(x)
able to hold and seal the filter paper to
the sampler housing at horizontal position;
(xi)
easy to change the filter; and
(xii)
capable of operating continuously for
24-hour period.
9.8
The ET should be responsible for the provision of the
monitoring equipment. He should ensure that sufficient number of HVSs with
appropriate calibration kit is available for carrying out the baseline
monitoring, regular impacts monitoring and ad-hoc monitoring. The HVSs should be equipped with an
electronic mass flow controller and be calibrated against a traceable standard
at regular intervals, in accordance with requirements stated in the
manufacturers operating manual and as described below. All the equipment, calibration kit,
filter papers, etc, should be clearly labelled.
9.9
Initial calibration of HVSs with mass flow controller should
be conducted upon installation and thereafter every six months. Calibration
should be done using an orifice calibrator. The calibration data should be
properly documented for future reference by the IEC.
9.10
The flow-rate of the sampler before and after the sampling
exercise with the filter in position should be verified to be constant and be
recorded on the data sheet as shown in Appendix
B.
9.11
If the ET Leader proposes alternative dust monitoring
equipment / methodology (e.g. direct reading methods) after this manual is
issued, the ET should seek agreement from the IEC on the alternative dust
monitoring equipment / methodology.
Proposed Dust Monitoring
Stations
9.12
The worst affected locations in the vicinity of the
construction activities of the Project identified for dust monitoring are listed
in Table 9.1 and shown in Figure
Nos. NOL/ERL/
Table 9.1 Proposed Dust Monitoring Locations
Construction Work Site |
Identification No. |
Air Monitoring Location |
|
AM1 |
House 5,
Phase A, Royal Palms |
|
AM2 |
|
Tai Kong Po Emergency Access Point
(TPP) |
AM3 |
|
Shek Kong Stabling Sidings (SSS)
and Emergency Rescue Station (ERS) |
AM4 |
DD110 |
|
AM5 |
Leung |
|
AM6 |
630 Sheung
Tsuen |
Tse |
AM7 |
Tse |
|
AM8 |
No. 305,
Sheung Tsuen San Tsuen Village House |
|
AM9 |
Sau Shan
House, Cheung Shan Estate |
Shek Yam Works Area (SYW) |
AM10 |
No. 168,
Yau Ma |
|
AM11 |
|
|
AM12 |
Po |
|
AM13 |
|
|
AM14 |
|
|
AM15 |
|
|
AM16 |
The |
|
AM17 |
Tsim Sha
Tsui Fire Station |
9.13
The status and locations of air quality sensitive receivers
may change after this manual is issued. In such cases exist, the ET Leader should
propose updated monitoring locations and seek approval from ER and agreement
from the IEC and EPD.
9.14
When alternative monitoring locations are proposed, the
monitoring locations should be chosen based on the following criteria:
(i)
Monitoring at sensitive receivers close
to the major site activities which are likely to have air quality impacts;
(ii)
Monitoring at the air sensitive receivers
as defined in the EIAO-TM; and
(iii)
Assurance of minimal disturbance to the
occupants during monitoring.
9.15
When positioning the HVSs, the following points should be
noted:
(i)
A horizontal platform with appropriate
support to secure the samplers against gusty wind should be provided;
(ii)
no two samplers should be placed less
than 2m apart;
(iii)
the distance between the sampler and an
obstacle, such as buildings, must be at least twice the height that the
obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
(iv)
a minimum of 2m separation from walls,
parapets and penthouses is required for rooftops samplers;
(v)
a minimum of 2m separation from any
supporting structure, measures horizontally is required;
(vi)
no furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
(vii) airflow
around the sampler is unrestricted;
(viii) the
sampler is more than
(ix)
any wire fence and gate to protect the
sampler, should not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
(x)
permission must be obtained to set up the
samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and
(xi)
a secured supply of electricity is needed
to operate the samplers.
9.16
Baseline monitoring should be carried out to determine the
ambient 1-hour and 24‑hour TSP levels at the monitoring locations prior to the
commencement of the Project works. Before commencing the baseline monitoring, the
ET leader should inform the IEC of the baseline monitoring programme such that
the IEC can conduct on-site audit to ensure accuracy of the baseline monitoring
results.
9.17
TSP baseline monitoring should be carried out for a
continuous period of at least two weeks with the 24-hour and three sets of 1-hour
ambient measurements taken daily at each monitoring location. During the baseline monitoring, there should
not be any construction or dust generating activities in the vicinity of the
monitoring stations. General meteorological conditions (wind speed, direction
and precipitation) and notes regarding any significant adjacent dust producing
sources should also be recorded throughout the baseline monitoring period. A summary of baseline monitoring is
presented in Table 9.2.
9.18
The baseline monitoring will provide data for the
determination of the appropriate Action levels with the Limit levels set against
statutory or otherwise agreed limits.
9.19
If the ET Leader considers that significant changes in the
ambient conditions have arisen, a repeat of the baseline monitoring may be
carried out to update the baseline levels and air quality criteria, after consultation
and agreement with the ER, the IEC and the EPD.
9.20
The monthly schedule of the compliance and impact monitoring
programme should be drawn up by the ET one month prior to the commencement of
the scheduled construction period.
9.21
For regular 24-hour TSP impact monitoring, a sampling
frequency of at least once in every six days should be strictly observed at the
monitoring stations when there
are Project related construction activities being undertaken within a radius of
300m from these monitoring stations. In case of complaints, 1-hour TSP
monitoring should be conducted at least three times in every six days when the
highest dust impacts are likely to occur.
The impact monitoring programme is summarised in Table 9.2.
Table 9.2 Summary of Dust Monitoring Programme
Monitoring Period |
Duration |
Sampling Parameter |
Frequency |
Baseline
Monitoring |
Consecutive
days of at least 2 weeks before commencement of construction works |
1
hour TSP |
·
3 times per day |
Continuous
24-hour TSP |
·
Daily |
||
Impact
Monitoring |
Throughout
the construction phase* |
1
hour TSP |
·
3 times every 6 days (as required
in case of complaints) |
Continuous
24-hour TSP |
·
Once every 6 days |
* Impact monitoring should
be conducted at the monitoring stations for 24-hour TSP monitoring when there are Project related construction activities
being undertaken within a radius of 300m from these monitoring stations.
9.22
Before commencement of the monitoring, the ET should inform
the IEC of the impact monitoring programme such that the IEC can conduct an
on-site audit to ensure the accuracy of the impact monitoring results.
9.23
Action and Limit (A/L) levels that provide an appropriate
framework for the interpretation of monitoring results have to be agreed
between ET, IEC, EPD and the ER before commencement of the air monitoring. The air quality monitoring data should
be checked against the agreed A/L levels.
Recommended A/L levels are listed in Table 9.3.
Table 9.3 Proposed Action and Limit Levels for Impact Monitoring
Parameter |
Action Level (1) |
Limit Level |
TSP (24
hour average) |
·
BL £
200μg m-3, ·
BL > 200μg m-3, |
260 μg m-3 |
TSP (1
hour average) |
·
BL £
384μg m-3, ·
BL
> 384μg m-3,
|
500μg m-3 |
(1) BL =
Baseline level,
9.24
The Event and Action Plan prescribes procedures and actions
associated with the outcome of the comparison of air quality results recorded
by the environmental monitoring process and the agreed A/L levels. In the cases where exceedance of these
A/L levels occurs, the ET, the IEC, the ER and the Contractor should strictly
observe the relevant actions of the respective Event and Action Plan listed in Table 9.4.
Table 9.4 Event and Action Plan for Construction Dust Monitoring
ACTION |
||||
ET |
IEC |
ER |
CONTRACTOR |
|
ACTION
LEVEL |
||||
1. Exceedance
for one sample |
1. Identify
source, investigate the causes of complaint and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform
IEC and ER; 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method. |
1. Notify
Contractor. |
1. Rectify any unacceptable practice; 2. Amend
working methods if appropriate. |
2. Exceedance
for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Identify
source; 2. Inform
IEC and ER; 3. Advise
the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4. Repeat
measurements to confirm findings; 5. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily; 6.
Discuss with IEC and ER (together with
the Contractor) on remedial actions required; 7. If
exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and ER; 8. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss
with ET and ER (together with the Contractor) on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise
the ET/ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise
Implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of notification
of exceedance in writing; 2. Notify
Contractor; 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Submit proposals for remedial to ER
within three working days of notification; 2. Implement the agreed proposals; 3. Amend
proposal if appropriate. |
LIMIT
LEVEL |
||||
1. Exceedance
for one sample |
1. Identify source, investigate the causes
of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2. Inform IEC, ER, Contractor and EPD; 3. Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4. Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5. Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s
remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER informed of the results. |
1. Check
monitoring data submitted by ET; 2. Check
Contractor’s working method; 3. Discuss
with ET and ER (together with the Contractor) on possible remedial measures; 4. Advise
the ER on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5. Supervise
implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of exceedance in writing; 2. Notify
Contractor; 3. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented. |
1. Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2. Submit
proposals for remedial actions to ER with a copy to IEC within three working
days of notification; 3. Implement
the agreed proposals; 4. Amend
proposal if appropriate. |
2. Exceedance
for two or more consecutive samples |
1. Notify
IEC, ER, Contractor and EPD; 2. Identify
source; 3. Repeat
measurement to confirm findings; 4. Increase
monitoring frequency to daily; 5. Carry
out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible
mitigation to be implemented; 6. Arrange
meeting with IEC and ER to discuss the remedial actions to be taken; 7. Assess
effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and ER
informed of the results; 8. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1. Discuss
amongst ER, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 2. Review
Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly; 3. Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm
receipt of notification of exceedance in writing; 2. Notify
Contractor; 3. In
consultation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial measures
to be implemented; 4. Ensure
remedial measures properly implemented; 5. If
exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is responsible and
instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until the exceedance is
abated. |
1. Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance; 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions
to ER with a copy to IEC within three working days of notification; 3. Implement the agreed proposals; 4. Revise and resubmit proposals if
problem still not under control; 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by the ER until the exceedance is abated. |
9.25
Dust mitigation measures stipulated in the Air Pollution
Control (Construction Dust) Regulation should be implemented to control dust
emissions from all construction work sites.
·
Use of regular watering, with
complete coverage, to reduce dust emissions from exposed site surfaces and
unpaved roads, particularly during dry weather.
·
Use of frequent watering for
particularly dusty construction areas and areas close to ASRs.
·
Side enclosure and covering of any
aggregate or dusty material storage piles to reduce emissions. Where this is not practicable owing to
frequent usage, watering shall be applied to aggregate fines.
·
Open stockpiles shall be avoided
or covered. Where possible, prevent
placing dusty material storage piles near ASRs.
·
Tarpaulin covering of all dusty
vehicle loads transported to, from and between site locations.
·
Establishment and use of vehicle
wheel and body washing facilities at the exit points of the site.
·
Provision of wind shield and dust
extraction units or similar dust mitigation measures at the loading points, and
use of water sprinklers at the loading area where dust generation is likely
during the loading process of loose material, particularly in dry seasons/
periods.
·
Imposition of speed controls for
vehicles on unpaved site roads. 8
kilometers per hour is the recommended limit.
·
Where possible, routing of
vehicles and positioning of construction plant should be at the maximum
possible distance from ASRs.
·
Every stock of more than 20 bags
of cement or dry pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should be covered entirely by
impervious sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides.
·
Cement or dry PFA delivered in
bulk should be stored in a closed silo fitted with an audible high level alarm
which is interlocked with the material filling line and no overfilling is
allowed.
·
Loading, unloading, transfer,
handling or storage of bulk cement or dry PFA should be carried out in a
totally enclosed system or facility, and any vent or exhaust should be fitted
with an effective fabric filter or equivalent air pollution control system.
9.26
Information on the preliminary engineering design indicates
that a concrete batching plant will likely be required. The operation of the
concrete batching plant is classified as a Specified Process (SP), for which a licence
under Air Pollution Control Ordinance
(APCO) is required. The
requirements and mitigation measures stipulated in the Guidance Note on the Best Practicable Means for Cement Works (Concrete
Batch Plant) BPM 3/2(93) should be followed and implemented. Dust control measures have been
incorporated into the design of the concrete batching plant, stockpile areas
and barging facilities (Figure
Nos. NOL/ERL/300/C/XRL/ENS/M50/004 to 015), as presented in Tables 9.5, 9.6 and 9.7, respectively. Details of the remaining recommended
mitigation measures are presented in Appendix
A.
Table 9.5 Concrete Batching Plant – Dust
Emission Design Control Measures
Process |
Description |
Dust
Emission Design Control Measures |
Unloading
of raw materials |
Unloading
of aggregates from the tipper trucks to receiving hopper. |
The
receiving hopper would be equipped with enclosures on 3 sides and top cover,
and water spraying system. |
Unloading
of cement and PFA from tankers into the silo. |
The
cement and PFA would be directly loaded into the silo via a flexible duct. Dust collectors should be
installed at cement/PFA silos. |
|
Transfer
of raw materials |
Storage
of aggregates in overhead storage bins. |
The
aggregates would be stored in fully enclosed overhead storage bins. The top of overhead storage bins would
be covered with cladding. Water
spraying system would be installed at the top of storage bins for watering
the aggregates, and aggregate storage bins would be fully enclosed. |
Batching
of raw materials |
Weighing
and Batching of cementitious materials |
The
whole process of weighing and mixing would be performed in a fully enclosed
environment. The mixers would all equip
with dust collectors. |
Truck
loading |
Loading
of concrete from mixer into
transit mixer of a truck |
The
concrete would be directly loaded from the mixer into the transit mixer of a
truck in “wet” form. |
Trucks |
Tipper
trucks and cement tankers within the site. |
Haul
road within the site is paved.
Wheel washing pit would be installed at the gate of the concrete
batching plant. Water spraying system would be installed along the haul road. |
Table 9.6 Cut
and Cover Areas and Stockpiles – Dust Emission Design Control Measures
Process |
Description |
Dust Emission Design Control Measures |
Cut & Cover Areas and
Stockpiles in the vicinity of adits/shafts |
||
Heavy
construction activities at Cut & Cover Areas, Storage of materials at Stockpiles |
Active
areas for heavy construction activities,
loading & unloading materials at stockpiles |
The
specified requirements for cut & cover areas and stockpiles at (i)
Shek Kong works area – active area minimized to 15% of total area, watering
with complete coverage of active area ten times a day. (ii)
Nam Cheong works area – active area minimized to 30% of total area, watering
with complete coverage of active stockpile area four times a day. (iii)
West Kowloon works area – active area minimized to 15% of total area,
watering with complete coverage of active area eight times a day. For
other sites, the active area would be minimized to 30% of the total area,
water spraying system would be applied on the active area and watering with
complete coverage of active area four times a day would be required. The
remaining inactive area would be well covered with impervious sheeting at all
work sites. |
Trucks |
Transportation
of materials to Barging Point |
Wheel
wash facilities provided at the site exit. The vehicles would be washed
before leaving the stockpiles.
The spoils would also be well covered before leaving the site in order
to minimise generation of dusty materials. The
haul roads within the site would be all paved and water spraying would be
provided to keep the wet condition. For
the Shek Kong works area, watering paved haul roads once per hour would be
provided. |
Temporary stockpiles in the
vicinity of barging points |
||
Loading
point |
Loading
of spoils from trucks onto
stockpile |
Water
spraying would be provided at the loading points. |
Storage
of materials |
Active
area for loading & unloading materials |
Water
spraying system would be applied on the active area and watering with
complete coverage of active area four times a day would be required. |
Table 9.7 Barging
Facilities – Dust Emission Design Control Measures
Process |
Description |
Dust Emission Design Control Measures |
Haul
road within barging facilities |
Transportation
of spoils to the Barging Point |
All
road surfaces within the barging facilities would be paved and water spraying
would be provided to keep the wet condition. For haul roads at |
Unloading
of materials |
Unloading
of spoil materials to the barge |
The
unloading process would be undertaken within enclosed tipping hall. Water spraying and dust curtain would
be provided at the discharge point for dust suppression. |
Trucks |
Vehicles
leaving the barging facility |
Vehicle
wheel washing facilities provided at site exit. |
Transportation
of spoils (only for one of Nam Cheong Barging Point) |
Transportation
of spoils to Nam Cheong Barging Point |
Fully
enclosed conveyor system would be adopted for transportation of spoils from
shaft to the barging point. |