12D                                  Tables of Assumptions

This section summarizes the assumptions adopted in the QRA study.  These are broadly categorised as population, meteorological, frequency, consequence and plant data assumptions.

12D.1                            Pipelines

12D.1.1                      Segmentation of Route

Table 12D.1    Pipeline Segmentation

 

Section

Kilometre Post

Length (km)

Typ.  Water depth (m)

Trench type

From

To

4

Boundary Section

0

0.73

0.73

2-20

2

3

Urmston Road

0.73

2.52

1.79

20

3

2

Black Point West

2.52

4.78

2.26

5

2

1

Black Point Approach

4.78

4.89

0.11

2

1

 


Figure 12D.1  Pipeline Alignment and Trench Type

 

 

 


 

12D.1.2                      Marine Vessel Classification

Table 12D.2    Vessel Classes Adopted for Assessment    

 


12D.1.3                      Marine Traffic

Table 12D.3    Traffic Volume across Gate Sections (Daily Average, 2003)

Vessel Class

 

Vessel Speed (m/s)

0-5

5-25

Others

 

Vessel Length Range (m)

0-30

30-75

75+

0-30

30-75

75+

Total

From

Gate

To

Gate

“A1” Fishing Vessels and Small Craft

“B1” Rivertrade Coastal Vessels

“C1” Ocean-going Vessels

“A2” Fast Launches and Fast Ferries

“B2” Fast Ferries

“C2” Fast Ferries & Ocean-going Vessels

0

1

250

265

45

150

110

40

5

865

1

2

40

5

1

50

50

5

10

161

Notes:       Values >5 are rounded to nearest 5

Daily values based on 9 day record.  Some rounding applies

 

Table 12D.4    Traffic Growth Forecast

Vessel Type

20112 compared to 2003

20212 compared to 2003

Ocean-going Vessel*

Rivertrade Coastal Vessel

Fast Ferry

Fishing Vessel/ Small Craft/ Fast launch

Others

-5%

+5%

+10%

+5%

+5%

+10%

+15%

+30%

+15%

+15%

* The traffic growth forecasts for 20112 and 20212 does not take into account the development of the Tonggu Waterway.  This waterway is expected to shift ocean-going vessels away from Urmston Road, resulting in a net decrease in traffic for large vessels.  The analysis therefore retains 2003 traffic volumes for ocean-going vessels.

 

Table 12D.5    Traffic Volume Assumed for Base Case 2011

 

Traffic volume (ships per day)

 

Section

Fishing

River-trade

Ocean-going

Fast Launch

Fast ferry

Other

Total

4

Boundary Section

21

3

0

24

30

8

86

3

Urmston Road

250

265

81

118

150

5

869

2

Black Point West

12

16

0

5

8

2

43

1

Black Point Approach

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

Total

284

284

81

147

188

15

999

 

Table 12D.6    Traffic Volume Assumed for Future Year 2021

 

Traffic volume (ships per day)

 

Section

Fishing

River-trade

Ocean-going

Fast Launch

Fast ferry

Other

Total

4

Boundary Section

22

3

0

26

35

9

95

3

Urmston Road

262

290

81

129

177

6

945

2

Black Point West

12

17

0

6

9

2

46

1

Black Point Approach

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

Total

297

310

81

161

221

17

1087

 

12D.1.4                      Marine Vessel Population

Table 12D.7    Vessel Population

Class

Population

 

Fishing vessels

Rivertrade coastal vessels

Ocean-going vessels

Fast launches

Fast ferries

 

 

 

 

 

Others

5

5

21

5

450 (largest ferries in peak hours, 4 hours a day)

350 (average ferry in peak hours, 4 hours a day)

280 (80% capacity, peak hours, 4 hours a day)

175 (50% capacity, daytime operation, 9 hours a day)

105 (30% capacity, late evening, 4 hours a day)

35 (10% capacity, night time, 7 hours a day)

5

 

 

 

 

3.75% of trips

3.75% of trips

22.5% of trips

52.5% of trips

12.5% of trips

5% of trips

 

12D.1.5                      Frequency Analysis

Table 12D.8    Anchor Damage Frequencies used in this Study

Pipeline section

Frequency
(/km/year)

Comment

Boundary Section

1´10-4

Medium marine traffic

Urmston Road

8.6´10-4

High marine traffic

Black Point West

1´10-4

Medium marine traffic

Black Point Approach

1.37´10-5

Low marine traffic

 

Table 12D.9    Summary of Failure Frequencies used in this Study

Pipeline section

Trench type

Corrosion /defects (/km/year)

Anchor/Impact

Others

/km/year

Total*

/km/year

Frequency (/km/year)

Protection factor (%)

anchor<2

Anchor>2

Boundary Section

2

1.18´10-6

1´10-4

99

50

1.34´10-6

3.5´10-6

Urmston Road

3

1.18´10-6

8.6´10-4

99.9

99

1.34´10-6

4.1´10-6

Black Point West

2

1.18´10-6

1´10-4

99

50

1.34´10-6

3.5´10-6

Black Point Approach

1

1.18´10-6

1.37´10-5

99

50

1.34´10-6

2.7´10-6

* The calculation of total failure frequency takes into account the size distribution of ships (based on 20122011 marine traffic) and the protection factors for anchors

 

12D.1.6                      Scenario Development

Table 12D.10  Hole Size Distribution Adopted for Corrosion and Other Failures

Category

Hole Size

Proportion

Rupture (Half Bore)

22" or 558mm

5%

Puncture

4" or 100mm

15%

Hole

2" or 50mm

30%

Leak

<25mm

50%

 

Table 12D.11  Hole Size Distribution for Anchor Impact

Category

Hole Size

Proportion

Rupture (Full Bore)

Full bore

10%

Major

22" or 558mm (half bore)

20%

Minor

4" or 100mm 

70%

 

Table 12D.12  Ignition Probabilities used in Current Study

Release Case

Ignition Probability

 

Passing Vessels (1)

Vessels in Vicinity (2)

<25mm

0.01

n/a

50mm

0.05

n/a

100mm

0.1

0.15

Half bore

0.2

0.3

Full bore

0.3

0.4

1.       Values applied to passing vessels for all types of incidents, i.e. corrosion, others and anchor impact.

2.       Values applied only to scenarios where the vessel causing pipeline damage due to anchor impact is still in the vicinity.

 

12D.2                            Gas Receiving Stations

12D.2.1                      Population

Land Population

There is no land based population within 500m of the proposed GRSs.

The security entrance to BPPS is more than 600m from the GRS facilities. The nearest industrial facilities in Lung Kwu Sheung Tan are about 1.4km away and Lung Kwu Tan Road is more than 700m away. None of these populations will be impacted by any release from the GRSs.

Marine Population

The marine study was based on 2003 data, extrapolated to years 2011 and 2021.

Table 12D.13  Population at Risk

Marine Vessel Type

Population

Fatality Probability

Population at Risk

Ocean-Going Vessel

Rivertrade Coastal Vessel

Fast Ferries

 

 

 

 

 

Tug and Tow

Others

21

5

450

350

280

175

105

35

5

5

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.9

0.9

2

2

135

105

84

53

32

11

5

5

 

 

Figure 12D.2  Marine Population at Risk by Grid, Year 20112

 

Figure 12D.3  Marine Population at Risk by Grid, Year 20212

 

Table 12D.14  Fast Ferry Population Distribution for Day and Night Time Periods

Population

Population at Risk

% of Day Trips

% of Night Trips

% of All Trips

(= 0.75 × day + 0.25 × night)

450

350

280

175

105

35

135

105

84

53

32

11

5

5

30

60

-

-

-

-

-

30

50

20

3.75

3.75

22.5

52.5

12.5

5.0

 

Stationary Marine Population

Other stationary marine population such as that for the Urmston Road Anchorage area are more than 500m from the proposed GRSs and were therefore neglected in the analysis.

12D.2.2                      Meteorological Data

Table 12D.15  Data from Sha Chau Weather Station (2004-2008)

 

Day

Night

Wind Speed (m/s)

2.5

3

7

2

2.5

3

7

2

Atmospheric Stability

B

D

D

F

B

D

D

F

Wind Direction

Fraction of Occurrence

0°

0.052

0.006

0.140

0.005

0.000

0.005

0.114

0.010

30°

0.009

0.005

0.050

0.003

0.000

0.004

0.092

0.008

60°

0.005

0.004

0.009

0.002

0.000

0.006

0.021

0.010

90°

0.040

0.012

0.064

0.007

0.000

0.016

0.139

0.029

120°

0.053

0.007

0.136

0.005

0.000

0.009

0.228

0.023

150°

0.014

0.003

0.023

0.003

0.000

0.003

0.039

0.015

180°

0.029

0.004

0.032

0.004

0.000

0.003

0.048

0.012

210°

0.074

0.007

0.083

0.004

0.000

0.004

0.100

0.014

240°

0.000

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

270°

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

300°

0.008

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.003

330°

0.043

0.004

0.040

0.003

0.000

0.004

0.027

0.007

 

12D.2.3                      Frequency Analysis

Table 12D.16  Gas Release Event Frequencies

Section Code

Piping Diameter (mm)

Hole Size (mm)

Initiating Event Frequency

Unit

Reference

G01

7501067

10

25

50

100

FB

1.00E-07

1.00E-07

7.00E-08

7.00E-08

3.00E-08

per metre per year

Hawksley

G02

700

10

25

50

100

FB

1.00E-07

1.00E-07

7.00E-08

7.00E-08

3.00E-08

per metre per year

Hawksley

G03

400

10

25

50

100

FB

3.00E-07

3.00E-07

1.00E-07

1.00E-07

5.00E-08

per metre per year

Hawksley

G04

700

10

1.00E-07

per metre per year

Hawksley

 

25

1.00E-07

 

50

7.00E-08

 

100

7.00E-08

 

FB

3.00E-08

G05

700

10

1.00E-07

per metre per year

Hawksley

25

1.00E-07

50

7.00E-08

100

7.00E-08

FB

3.00E-08

G06

350

10

3.00E-07

per metre per year

Hawksley

25

3.00E-07

50

1.00E-07

100

1.00E-07

FB

5.00E-08

G07

700

10

1.00E-07

per metre per year

Hawksley

25

1.00E-07

50

7.00E-08

100

7.00E-08

FB

3.00E-08

G08

700

10

1.00E-07

per metre per year

Hawksley

25

1.00E-07

50

7.00E-08

100

7.00E-08

FB

3.00E-08

 

12D.2.4                      Scenario Development

Table 12D.17  Ignition Probabilities Assumed

 

Immediate Ignition

Delayed Ignition 1

Delayed Ignition 2

Delayed Ignition Probability

Total Ignition Probability

Small leak

0.02

0.045

 

0.005

0.05

0.07

Large leak/rupture

0.1

0.2

 

0.02

0.22

0.32

* Small leak = 10 and 25mm. Large leak = 50 and 100mm holes