5.1.1.1
The EIA
Study Brief for the KTE project requires a landscape and visual impact
assessment (LVIA) of the proposed project to be undertaken. This assessment
considers any potential conflicts with landscape planning policy, likely
impacts to landscape character and resources and identifies visual impacts in
the areas surrounding the project during both the construction and operation
stages.
5.1.1.2
The
assessment area for the landscape impact assessment is 100m from the works
limit of the Project boundary as is shown in Figures 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3
along with the works sites and works areas including a barging point and a
temporary explosives storage magazine. (Works sites are areas where
construction activities will be undertaken and works areas are used for
construction stage project offices, material storage and the barging point and
temporary magazine site.) The assessment area for the visual impact assessment
is defined by the visual envelope of the Project shown in Figure 5.4. Recent aerial views are shown in Figure 5.5.
5.2
Relevant Environmental Legislation
5.2.1.1
The
following legislation, standards and guidelines are applicable to the
evaluation of landscape and visual impacts associated with the construction and
operation of the Project:
·
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499) Section 16 and Technical
Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM), particularly
Annexes 3, 10, 11, 18, 20 and 21;
·
EIAO
Guidance Note 8/2002;
·
·
Town
Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);
·
Approved Yau Ma Tei Outline Zoning Plan. S/K2/20;
·
Approved
Ho Man Tin Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K7/20);
·
Draft
Hung Hom OZP (No. S/K9/23);
·
Draft
Tsim Sha Tsui (KPA 1) Outline Zoning Plan. S/K1/25
(Amendment to approved Plan No. S/K1/22);
·
Draft
Tseung Kwan O Outline Zoning Plan No. S/TKO/18;
·
K.P.A.
No. 6 & 7 - Ho Man Tin Outline Development Plan. D/K7/2;
·
K.P.A.
No. 9 Hung Hom Outline Development Plan. D/K9/1E;
·
The
Hung Hom District Study;
·
Protection
of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586);
·
Planning
Department “Study on Landscape Value Mapping of
·
SILTech
Publication (1991) – Tree Planting and Maintenance in
·
WBTC
No. 25/93 – Control of Visual Impact of Slopes;
·
WBTC
No. 17/2000 – Improvement to the Appearance of slopes in connection with WBTC
25/93;
·
WBTC
No. 7/2002 – Tree Planting in Public Works;
·
WBTC
No. 19/02 – Mass Transit Railway Protection;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 2/2004 – Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 11/2004 – Cyber Manual for Greening;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 13/2003A – Guidelines and Procedures for Environmental Impact
Assessment of Government Projects and Proposals Planning for Provision of Noise
Barriers;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 29/2004 – Registration of Old and Valuable Trees, and Guidelines for
their Preservation;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 36/2004 – The Advisory Committee on the Appearance of Bridges and
Associated Structures (ACABAS);
·
ETWB
TCW No. 10/2005 – Planting on Footbridges and Flyovers;
·
ETWB
TCW No. 3/2006 – Tree Preservation;
·
HyDTC
No. 5/2000 – Control in the Use of Shotcrete (Sprayed Concrete) in Slope Works;
·
HyDTC
No. 7/2006 – Independent Vetting of Tree Works under the Maintenance of
Highways Department;
·
GEO
Publication (1999) – Use of Vegetation as Surface Protection on Slopes; and
·
GEO
1/2000 – Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment and Bio-engineering of
Man-made Slopes and Retaining Walls.
5.3.1.1
Landscape
and visual impacts are assessed against four criteria, namely:
·
Conflicts
with published Landscape Planning Policy;
·
Impacts
on Landscape Resources (the physical components of the landscape);
·
Impacts
on Landscape Character (the aggregate impression created by a combination of
resources); and
·
Impacts
on Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) (those people who will see the project).
5.3.1.2
The
Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment in this EIA Study follows the following
methodology:
·
Baseline
identification of Landscape Planning Policy and Identification of conflicts
with the Project;
·
Baseline
identification of Project Sensitive Receivers including Landscape Resources,
Landscape Character and the Zones of Visual Influence as well as their
“Sensitivity to Change”;
·
Identification
of probable sources of landscape and visual impact resulting from the Project
and their “Magnitude”;
·
Assessment
of resulting Impact Significance Threshold of landscape and visual impacts;
·
Identification
of landscape and visual mitigation measures; and
·
Final
assessment of the significance of residual landscape and visual impacts.
5.4
Review of Planning and Development Control
Framework
5.4.1
Planning Review
5.4.1.1
The
existing and planned development framework for the proposed works and for the
surrounding areas has been reviewed to identify potential conflicts with existing
resources and sensitive receivers as well as neighbouring planned land uses, as
well as to ensure a high compatibility between the proposed works and the
surroundings. Surrounding planning and development control of the
proposed work is shown on Figure 5.1.
5.4.1.2
It
should be noted that S13A of Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131) states “any scheme authorized under the Railways
Ordinance (Cap 519) shall be deemed to be approved under this Ordinance,
whether or not those works or that use or that scheme form part of a plan
approved by the Chief Executive in Council under section 9.”
5.4.1.3
The
following plans have been examined:
Outline
Zoning Plans
·
Approved Yau Ma Tei Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K2/20;
·
Approved
Ho Man Tin Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K7/20,
·
Hung
Hom (KPA 9) Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K9/21 (Amendment to approved Plan No.
S/K9/20);
·
Draft
Tsim Sha Tsui (KPA 1) Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K1/25 (Amendment to approved
Plan No. S/K1/22); and
·
Draft
Tseung Kwan O Outline Zoning Plan No. S/TKO/18.
Outline
Development Plans / Studies
·
K.P.A.
No. 6 & 7 - Ho Man Tin Outline Development Plan No. D/K7/2;
·
K.P.A.
No. 9 Hung Hom Outline Development Plan No. D/K9/1E; and
·
The
Hung Hom District Study.
5.4.2
Existing Planning Framework
5.4.2.1
The landscape
areas found within the 100m landscape study area for the project are typically
zoned “O” (Open Space). This includes
5.4.2.2
Street
planting within Amenity Areas and street planting within the Whampoa Estate are
zoned under “CDA” (Comprehensive Development Area). Street tree planting in
other project areas remains under areas shown as ‘Road’.
5.4.2.3
The
Works Sites and Works Areas are located within various zonings as per the OZP
and listed in Table 5.1 below.
Table 5.1 Statutory Designations for Works Sites and
Works Areas
No. |
Works
Item |
Location |
Zoning |
1. YMT Interface |
|||
1A |
Cable reprovisioning at YMT refuge siding tunnels |
WS1 ( |
Open
Space - O |
2. Running Tunnel from YMT Station
to HOM Station |
|||
2A |
Slope stabilisation and upgrading works |
WS2 (Gascoigne road near WS4a, WS45, WS6a ( |
Government,
Institution or Community - G/IC Other
Specified Uses - OU |
2C |
Wylie Road Ancillary Building (WAB) and tunnel spoil
mucking out |
WS7a1 (Tennis Courts at Club de Recreio) |
Other
Specified Uses - OU |
3. HOM Station |
|||
3A |
HOM
Station, with station entrance, ventilation shaft, cooling tower. Temporary
rock crushing equipment |
WS15a
(former Valley Road Estate) |
Residential (Group A) - R(A), Open
Space - O |
3H |
Site
office |
WA2a
( WA15
( |
Green
Belt - GB Open
Space - O |
3I |
Slope
stabilisation and upgrading works |
WS27 ( |
Open
Space - O |
3J |
KTE tunnel
mucking out |
WS26a ( |
Open
Space - O |
3K |
HOM
Station construction and TTM |
WS19 ( |
Open
Space - O |
5. WHA Station |
|||
5A |
WHA
Station with mucking out, station entrance, and ventilation shaft |
WS30, WS33 |
Road ,
Comprehensive Development Area - (CDA) |
5C |
WHA
D&B platform with temporary mucking out |
WS31 |
Comprehensive
Development Area - (CDA) |
5D |
Escape
staircase and pressurisation fan room |
WS37a |
Comprehensive
Development Area - (CDA) |
5E |
Refuge
siding tunnel and ventilation shaft |
WS36a |
Residential
Group A – R(A) |
5F |
Site
office |
WA6, |
Open Space
- O |
6. Barging Point at Hung Hom
Finger Pier |
|||
6a |
Hung
Hom Finger Pier Two
Temporary rock crushing facilities |
WA14 |
Other
Specified Uses - OU |
7. Temporary Magazine Site at TKO
Area 137 |
|||
7a |
TKO
Area 137 |
WA12a,
WA13 |
Other
Specified Uses (Deep Waterfront Industry) -OU(DWI) |
5.4.3
Potential Conflicts with Planning Framework
5.4.3.1
Temporary
uses (expected to be 5 years or less) are always permitted under the OZPs,
however the duration of occupation of the project may over-run this. As such
the uses should strive to conform to the zoned use. MTR Corporation station
entrances and MTR Corporation station structures below ground level are always
permitted except where specified.
WS1
– Open Space - O
5.4.3.2
WS4a,
WS45, WS6a, WS7a1 – Other Specified Uses - OU (Sports and Recreation Club)
5.4.3.3
The
Yau Ma Tei (KPA 2) Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K2/20 zones the area as “OU”
(Other Specified Uses). Primarily intended to provide land for sports and
recreational facilities, MTR Corporation
Vent shafts and other above-ground structures other than entrances are not permitted under Column 2
of the Plan and are specifically intended for other “OU” sites. Some of the
tennis courts at Club de Recreio will be replaced by the new Wylie Road
Ancillary Building (WAB) and ventilation building at WS7a1 and this is in
conflict with the stated planning policy / OZP. However as stated in section
5.4.1 it is deemed to be approved under S13A of the Town Planning Ordinance
(TPO).
WS15a,
– Residential (Group A) - R(A) / Open Space - O
5.4.3.4
WA2a
– Green Belt - GB
5.4.3.5
Area
opposite
WS15,
WS26a, WS27 - Open Space - O
5.4.3.6
Fat
WS19
– Open Space -O
5.4.3.7
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden. - Ho Man Tin Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K7/20 zones the
area as “O” (Open Space). Both MTR
Corporation Vent shafts and other above-ground structures other than entrances as well as Public Transport Terminus or Station are both permitted subject to
approval under Column 2 of the Plan. The site is primarily used for TTM during
the works as well as the construction area for the HOM Station. The garden will
not be able to be utilised by the public during the works but it is considered
that such works are acceptable subject to planning approval.
WA6
– Open Space O
5.4.3.8
Works
Areas at
WA14
– Other Specified Uses - OU
5.4.3.9
MTR
Corporation Freight Terminal – Both the Draft Tsim Sha Tsui Outline Zoning Plan
No. S/K1/25 and the Hung Hom Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K9/21 zone the areas as “OU”
(Other Specified Uses). The area is primarily zoned for railway terminus, bus
terminus, multi-storey car park, indoor stadium, commercial facilities and the
railway pier on the Draft Tsim Sha Tsui Outline Zoning Plan. The site will be
used for a temporary barging point. It is considered that there is no conflict
with planning policy.
WA12a,
WA13 – Other Specified Uses (Deep Waterfront Industry) – OU(DWI)
5.4.3.10
Temporary
Magazine Site - Falling within an area zoned “Other Specified Uses” annotated
“Deep Waterfront Industry” (“OU(DWI)”) on the draft Tseung Kwan O Outline
Zoning Plan No. S/TKO/18. Dangerous Goods
Godown is a Column 2 use with the (OU(DWI) on the Plan. The area is
primarily zoned for special industries which require marine access.
5.4.4
Project Conflicts with Development Planning Framework
5.4.4.1
It is
considered that the Project would be in accordance with the planning goals and
objectives for the study areas with the exception of Works Site WS7a1 as set
out in the OZPs.
5.5
Landscape Resources Baseline
5.5.1
Physical Components
5.5.1.1
Landscape
resources are the physical components of the landscape and include geology,
topography, soils, vegetation and hydrological features. Each landscape
resource possesses a varying sensitivity to development:
5.5.1.2
The study
area is predominantly underlain by Kowloon Granite, a Cretaceous intrusive rock
with an approximate age of 140 million years. This rock dominates the central
belt of
5.5.1.3
The
hillsides in the area are particularly starved of soil cover of any nature on the
predominantly granite based steep slopes and the resultant lack of organic
matter to retain water hinders the development of large sized vegetation. Soils
that can form locally are typically Red Yellow Podzols formed from the granitic
substrate. These soils have acidity and thin organic layers and are prone to
drying quickly. Sheet and gulley erosion further depletes the soil profile.
5.5.1.4
The
topography of the study area rises gently from the low lying area of
reclamation at the south east end of Whampoa (10mpd) to about 18mpd at
5.5.1.5
Within
the dense urban environment any vegetation is a precious resource. The HOM
Station project area covers two contrasting vegetation character types north
and south of the East Kowloon Corridor (
5.5.1.6
Surrounding
the WHA project area the city grid is centred on the streets surrounding
·
Urban
roadside tree planting species including, Aleurities,
Bauhinia, Delonix, Cocos, Livistonia, Michelia, Peltophorum, Spathodea,
Roystonia;
·
Park
and planters with varied exotics including, Callistemon,
Erythrina, Podocarpos, Ravenala; and
·
Structure planting
species including, Acacia confusa, Acacia
auriculiformis, and Melaleuca leucadendron.
5.5.1.7
There
are no “Old and Valuable Trees” (OVTs) within the project Study Area. Fifteen large
trees with trunk diameters of more than 1.0m are found, meeting one of the
criteria for an Old and Valuable Tree as set out in ETWB TCW no. 29/2004 and in
“Registration of Old and Valuable Trees and Guidelines for their Preservation”,
Ref: ETWB(W) 517/83/04. Further
details of their species, size and location are set out in the following
section.
5.5.1.8
Seasonal
runoff from slopes and roads in the area is quickly collected via storm water
discharge systems and feeds into the main sewer systems passing out to sea
through the reclamation areas. No natural inland water resources were
identified.
5.5.2
Assessment of Sensitivity of Landscape Resources
5.5.2.1
The factors
affecting the sensitivity for evaluation of landscape impact include the
following:
·
Quality
of the landscape resource;
·
Importance
and rarity of the landscape element;
·
Maturity
of the resource;
·
Ability
of the resource to accommodate change;
·
Context
of the resource in terms of local, regional, national or global Significance;
and
·
Whether
there are any statutory or regulatory limitations protecting the resource.
5.5.2.2
The ratings are
classified as below:
High: |
Important LDR of particularly distinctive characteristics or high importance, and is sensitive to relatively small changes |
Medium: |
LDR of moderate landscape characteristics and value, and is reasonably tolerant to change |
Low: |
LDR with low landscape characteristics and value, and is largely tolerant to change |
5.5.3
Identified Landscape Resources
5.5.3.1
Landscape
resources (LDRs) identified within the project area have been grouped into 9
differing groups as follows:-
·
LDR-1
- Public Amenity Area;
·
LDR-2
- Open Recreation Space;
·
LDR-3
- Stabilised Slopes with Tree Planting;
·
LDR-4
- Roadside Amenity Planting;
·
LDR-5
- Private Development Landscape Buffer;
·
LDR-6
- Stabilised Slopes Without Greening;
·
LDR-7
- Undeveloped Site Formation;
·
LDR-8
- Man Made Shoreline;
·
LDR-9
– Water Bodies; and
·
LDR-10
-
5.5.3.2
The
identified landscape resources in each group are discussed in more detail below
and their sensitivity assessed in accordance with the criteria in Section 5.5.2
above. In accordance with the Study Brief, resources have been assessed within a
100m distance limit from the works area boundaries. Photos of the Key Landscape
Resources are shown on Figure 5.6.
LDR-1:
Maintained Public Access Amenity Area
LDR-1.1:
5.5.3.3
This small public garden contains paths and benches and is
ringed by a belt of trees of medium to large size and fair to good health and
condition which form an important green space within this dense urban area. The
park provides a good topsoil resource for the planting with depths of 300mm
minimum anticipated in the shrub areas and deeper for the tree planting areas. Forty five trees
were surveyed within the site boundary including seven large size Ailanthus fordii which
are listed under Cap 96 of the
LDR-1.2:
5.5.3.4
A small raised sitting
out space of 2,000m2 consisting of approximately 30 well formed
mature trees. The trees themselves are not particularly special or of rare species
however the compact and collective maturity of the group in this urban setting
means that the area is a particularly valuable landscape resource and
demonstrates a High sensitivity.
LDR-1.3:
5.5.3.5
This Public Open Space of
over 7,000m2 is fully covered with an informally laid out series of
planters containing a mix of native and exotic trees and shrubs between typical
hard surfaced areas with seating. The park is in good condition with healthy
vegetation and is well established. The park provides a good topsoil resource for the planting with depths
of 300mm minimum anticipated in the shrub areas and deeper for the tree
planting areas. The layout of tree planting is proscriptive
of change of use and the park forms an important local green space of
reasonable size with close proximity to local residents. Sensitivity is
considered High.
LDR-1.4:
5.5.3.6
Loosely connected to the
Fat Kwong Street Playground this small sitting out area of 1,500m2 utilises the
space between local distributor roads and contains a hard surfaced central
area. Sensitivity is considered to be Medium.
LDR-1.5:
5.5.3.7
A small sitting out area
of almost 2,000m2 adjacent to the Hung Hong Fire Station. It
contains a number of medium sized trees of common species. Sensitivity is
considered to be Medium.
LDR-1.6:
5.5.3.8
Hillside Local Open
Space of 32,000m2 primarily serving the To Kwa Wan area around
LDR-1.7:
5.5.3.9
This Public Open Space
includes a wide and eclectic collection of varieties of local and exotic trees,
varying in size and condition and well established. The park is the largest
green space in the District and forms a valuable local resource. Sensitivity is
considered High.
LDR-1.8: The
5.5.3.10
The centrepiece of Whampoa
Estate this pocket landmark public space of about 4,000m2 contains the ship
‘Whampoa’ within an artificial pond and surrounded by small planting beds and
containing varied exotic plants and cocoa palms. A single 2m high specimen of
the Sphaeropteris lepifera tree fern is protected under both Cap 96 of
the
LDR-1.9: Whampoa Estate Podium Amenity Areas
5.5.3.11
A number of typical
podium style landscape developments between residential blocks over commercial
and parking areas in the Whampoa Estate. Trees are restricted to occasional
raised planters and valuable resources are at a premium. Sensitivity is deemed Low.
LDR-2.1: Sports Pitches in the vicinity of
5.5.3.12
A congregation of sports
and members clubs in the area including Club de Recreio, The India Club, The
Little Flower Club, YMCA King’s Park Centenary Centre, King’s Park Hockey
Ground, Hong Kong Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club, Philipino Club and
United Services Recreation Club. The area is dominated by open areas of tennis
courts, lawn bowling greens and hockey fields, both grass and synthetic. Within
maintained grounds surrounded by landscape buffer planting (LDR-5.1).
Sensitivity is considered Low.
LDR-2.2:
5.5.3.13
A temporary hardstanding
of 1,200m2 used as a basketball court and providing access for
pedestrians to the
LDR-2.3:
5.5.3.14
An area of approximately
5,000m2
hardball court surrounded by high ball fencing and
access from Fat Kwong Street. Surrounding the playground the slopes are densely
planted with trees (LDR-3.6). The sensitivity for the area inside the fencing
is considered to be Low.
LDR-2.4: King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir Playground
5.5.3.15
Artificial surfaced
soccer and basketball pitches of about 15,000m2 on top of the service reservoir. Sensitivity
is rated as Low.
LDR-2.5: Ho
5.5.3.16
Large complex including
soccer pitch, basketball, tennis courts and outdoor swimming pools, much of it
on car park roof with some buffer tree planting surrounding buildings.
Landscape sensitivity is considered Low.
LDR-2.6: Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir
Playground
5.5.3.17
40,000m2 of grass sports
pitch on top of the service reservoir, forming the highest point on the
LDR-2.7:
5.5.3.18
A number of sports and
games facilities located on typical podium developments between residential
blocks over commercial and parking areas in the
LDR-2.8: Primary School Play Areas on Tak
On Street
5.5.3.19
Four primary schools
grouped together contain open play areas for children around their buildings.
All areas are hard surfaced. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-2.9: Tai Wan Shan Swimming Pool
5.5.3.20
An important local
resource consisting of a series of open air swimming pools within a boundary
wall and fully paved surfaces. Sensitivity is considered Low.
LDR-3:
Stabilised Slopes with Tree Planting
LDR-3.1: Slopes in the area of
5.5.3.21
The large wall above
LDR-3.2: Slopes adjacent to
5.5.3.22
The steep slopes have
been formed with the construction of
LDR-3.3: Slopes surrounding King’s Park
High Level Service Reservoir
5.5.3.23
Well covered with trees,
the slopes form the highest point in the vicinity and are visually prominent
from many directions. A mixture of plantation and invasive species the trees
individually have limited value however on mass form an important landscape
resource, linking other local green habitats and providing visual relief from
the surrounding urban development of the city. Sensitivity is High.
LDR-3.4: Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East
Service Reservoir
5.5.3.24
This area is similar in nature
to LDR 3.3, the south facing slopes contain large belts of vegetation and trees
in shotcrete slopes. The lower slopes are visually contained behind the
government buildings on
LDR-3.5: Slopes surrounding
5.5.3.25
More than 100 medium
sizes trees of reasonable condition can be found surrounding the playground,
exhibiting 15 species types with a mixture of native and exotic common
LDR-4
– Roadside Amenity Planting
LDR-4.1: Street Planting at
5.5.3.26
A row of small Camphor
trees are planted in the pavement next to Eaton Hotel. Sensitivity is Medium.
LDR-4.2: Street planting in the vicinity of
5.5.3.27
LDR-4.3: Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets
5.5.3.28
Three medium sized Ailanthus
fordii are located on the west side of
LDR-4.4: Street planting in the vicinity of
5.5.3.29
Young roadside and
central divider tree planting within the newly developed reclamation areas.
Sensitivity is Medium.
LDR-4.5: Roadside planting in the Princess
Margaret Road Interchange
5.5.3.30
Banks of mixed species
tree planting of medium size and condition within the highway reservations.
Access to public spaces within the areas is catered to. Sensitivity is considered as Medium.
LDR-5
– Private Development Landscape Buffer
LDR-5.1: Planting at Recreation Clubs
around Gascoigne / Wylie Roads
5.5.3.31
Mature roadside trees
are found in the grounds of the private clubs along Wylie and Gascoigne Roads.
They have had many years to put down wide roots and the surrounding area has
not been heavily developed allowing them to reach important size in
contributing to city greening. Two very large Ficus microcarpa trees of 10m and 12m
height (T158 / T165) are found. Trunk diameters are 1.59m and 2.23m. Sensitivity is High.
LDR-5.2: Edge landscape at Harbourfront
Landmark
5.5.3.32
Predominantly shrub
planting within edge planters to the development and the promenade walkway.
Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-5.3:
5.5.3.33
As for LDR-5.2 this
consists predominantly of shrub planting in raised planters fronting the
development. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-6
– Stabilised Slopes without Greening
LDR-6.1: Slopes adjacent to
5.5.3.34
Steep shotcrete slopes
bordering
LDR-6.2: Slopes surrounding
5.5.3.35
Steep shotcrete slopes
bordering
LDR-6.3: Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin West
Service Reservoir
5.5.3.36
Steep shotcrete slopes
forming the formation platform for the Reservoir. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-6.4: Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East
Service Reservoir
5.5.3.37
Steep shotcrete slopes
principally bordering
LDR-7
– Undeveloped Site Formation
LDR-7.1: Site formation levels for use by
HOM Station
5.5.3.38
Eroded shotcrete slopes form
terraces for the formation platforms of the former Valley Road Estate. A large
band of trees at the north of the development site formed on the embankment of
the formation layers between 36.8mpd and 44.5mpd make a strong contribution to
local greening in an area significantly short of local trees. A considerable
number of these trees are self seeded and have grown large together with the
remnants of tree planting from the Housing Authority Valley Estate. Sensitivity
is Low.
LDR-7.2: Planned Dormitory of the
5.5.3.39
This area is leased for
short term works area the site is terraced and surrounded with steep shotcrete
slopes with isolated invasive trees. The site is allocated to PolyU for
development as a student dormitory. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-7.3:
5.5.3.40
Shotcrete slopes form
terraces for the formation platforms of the former Valley Road Estate. Very few
invasive trees are found and the site is visually very open. The terraces are used
for temporary parking. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-7.4: Formation levels at King’s Park
High Level Service Reservoir
5.5.3.41
Unutilized section of
roof of the Service Reservoir. Some local gardening is undertaken and invasive
trees have spread from the surrounding slopes onto the deck, particularly on
the north and east sides. Panoramic views can be obtained from the platform.
Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-7.5: Open Space sites at
5.5.3.42
Irregular shaped developed
pockets residual from the recently formed local distributor road network
principally of
LDR-7.6: Reclaimed land at TKO (Works Areas)
5.5.3.43
A large, flat, coastal
reclamation area newly created
at TKO Area 137 approximately +6mpd with little cover
vegetation. 3 tree species
were identified within site boundary, the most abundant being Leucaena leucocephala (16 nos.), which
is a weed tree species. One native species, Sterculia
lanceolata (1 no.) was found within the site boundary. One exotic species, Acacia confusa (2 nos.), was also
identified. The trunk diameter of the surveyed trees ranges from 0.10m to 0.14m
with height ranging from 6.5m to 9.5m and crown spread from 2m to 4m. Sensitivity is Low.
5.5.3.44
Waterfront hardstanding
with berthing and handling for barges and containers. Sensitivity is Low.
LDR-8.2: Future Promenade at Hung Hom
Reclamation Areas
5.5.3.45
Long strip of man-made
water frontage on
LDR-8.3: Promenade at Whampoa Harbourfront
5.5.3.46
Long strip of man-made
water frontage on
LDR-9.1:
5.5.3.47
With its deep waters and
spectacular surrounding views the Harbour is
LDR-9.2:
5.5.3.48
A relatively untouched
coastal water next to the
LDR-10 –
LDR-10.1:
5.5.3.49
With southern promontory
of the country park is formed by a long high ridgeline with steep vegetated
slopes giving way to a rocky shoreline where it meets the sea. The area is
relatively inaccessible and untouched but does receive occasional hikers to the
top of the ridge. Sensitivity is High.
5.5.4
Summary Schedule of Landscape Resources
5.5.4.1
The Landscape
Resources identified within the area of the alignment, as described above, and
their sensitivity to change are summarised in Table 5.2 below.
Unsurprisingly for a central city location there is a dearth of such
resources and specific groups are shown on Figure
5.2. Photos of the Key Landscape
Resources can be seen on Figure 5.7.
Table 5.2: Assessment of
Sensitivity of Landscape Resources
Ref |
Landscape Resource |
Quality and Maturity (high / medium / low) |
Rarity (high /medium / low) |
Local / District /
Regional Importance |
Statutory Limitations /
Requirements |
Ability to Accommodate
Change (high / medium / low) |
Sensitivity (high / medium / low) |
LDR-1 –Public Amenity Area |
|||||||
LDR-1.1 |
|
high |
medium |
local |
Protected tree species |
medium |
Medium |
LDR-1.2 |
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden |
high |
low |
local |
no |
low |
High |
LDR-1.3 |
|
high |
low |
local |
no |
low |
High |
LDR-1.4 |
|
medium |
low |
local |
no |
medium |
Medium |
LDR-1.5 |
|
medium |
low |
local |
no |
medium |
Medium |
LDR-1.6 |
Ko |
high |
low |
local |
no |
low |
High |
LDR-1.7 |
|
high |
medium |
local |
Protected tree species |
low |
High |
LDR-1.8 |
The |
medium |
medium |
local |
Protected tree |
medium |
Medium |
LDR-1.9 |
|
medium |
low |
local |
no |
high |
Low |
LDR-2 – Open Recreation
Space |
|||||||
LDR-2.1 |
Sports Pitches in the vicinity of |
medium |
low |
local |
no |
high |
Low |
LDR-2.2 |
|
low |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.3 |
Fat |
medium |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.4 |
King’s Park High Level Service Reservoir
Playground |
medium |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.5 |
Ho |
high |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.6 |
Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
medium |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.7 |
|
medium |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.8 |
Primary School Play Areas on Tak On Street |
low |
Low |
||||
LDR-2.9 |
Tai Wan Shan Swimming Pool |
medium |
Low |
||||
LDR-3 – Stabilised Slopes
with Tree Planting |
|||||||
LDR-3.1 |
Slopes in the area of |
high |
low |
local |
no |
low |
High |
LDR-3.2 |
Slopes adjacent to |
high |
Contains tree with diameter over 1m |
low |
High |
||
LDR-3.3 |
Slopes surrounding King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir |
high |
no |
low |
High |
||
LDR-3.4 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir |
medium |
Green Belt |
low |
Medium |
||
LDR-3.5 |
Slopes surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground |
high |
Contains 12 trees with diameter over 1m |
low |
High |
||
LDR-4 – Roadside Amenity
Planting |
|||||||
LDR-4.1 |
Street Planting at |
medium |
low |
local |
no |
medium |
Medium |
LDR-4.2 |
Street planting in the vicinity of |
medium |
low |
no |
medium |
Medium |
|
LDR-4.3 |
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets |
medium |
medium |
Protected tree species |
medium |
Medium |
|
LDR-4.4 |
Street planting in the vicinity of |
medium |
low |
no |
medium |
Medium |
|
LDR-4.5 |
Roadside planting in
the Princess Margaret Road Interchange |
medium |
low |
no |
medium |
Medium |
|
LDR-5 – Private Development
Landscape Buffer |
|||||||
LDR-5.1 |
Planting at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne /
Wylie Roads |
high |
low |
local |
Contains 2 trees with diameter over 1m |
low |
High |
LDR-5.2 |
Edge landscape at Harbour Front Landmark |
medium |
no |
high |
Low |
||
LDR-5.3 |
|
medium |
no |
high |
Low |
||
LDR-6 – Stabilised Slopes
Without Greening |
|||||||
LDR-6.1 |
Slopes adjacent to |
low |
low |
local |
no |
high |
Low |
LDR-6.2 |
Slopes surrounding |
Low |
|||||
LDR-6.3 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man West Service Reservoir |
Low |
|||||
LDR-6.4 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir |
Low |
|||||
LDR-7 – Undeveloped Site
formation |
|||||||
LDR-7.1 |
Site formation levels for use by HOM Station |
low |
low |
local |
no |
high |
Low |
LDR-7.2 |
Future Poly U site formation area |
Low |
|||||
LDR-7.3 |
Residual Valley Road Estate site formations |
Low |
|||||
LDR-7.4 |
Formation levels at King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir |
Low |
|||||
LDR-7.5 |
Open Space sites at |
Low |
|||||
LDR-7.6 |
Reclaimed land at TKO |
Low |
|||||
LDR-8 – Man Made Shoreline |
|||||||
LDR-8.1 |
Hung Hom Finger Pier |
low |
low |
local |
no |
high |
Low |
LDR-8.2 |
Future Promenade at Hung Hom Reclamation Areas |
Low |
|||||
LDR-8.3 |
Promenade at Whampoa Harbourfront |
Low |
|||||
LDR-9 – Harbour Waters |
|||||||
LDR-9.1 |
|
high |
high |
regional |
Protection of the Harbour Ordinance |
low |
High |
LDR-9.2 |
|
high |
high |
regional |
no |
low |
High |
LDR-10 – |
|||||||
LDR-10.1 |
|
high |
high |
regional |
|
|
High |
5.6
Landscape Character
Baseline
5.6.1
Background
5.6.1.1
In general
a landscape is composed of and given its character by a number of natural and
man made features. These differing Landscape Character Types (LCTs) can all be
described as exhibiting a particular and consistent character or combination of
physical features such as land use, terrain, resources or development pattern
and as a result exhibit a varied degree of sensitivity to change as brought
about by the alignment options. The LCTs have been standardised and mapped for
the whole of
5.6.2
Overview
5.6.2.1
The
area of Kowloon under study is particularly inconsistent in its character type
and despite the small land area the proposed works sites and works areas impact
11 different LCTs in 14 different Landscape Character Areas (LCA). the majority
of Character Areas exhibit Urban or Urban Fringe type Landscape
Characteristics. Figure 5.3
indicates the LCAs surrounding the study area. Photos of the Landscape Character Areas are shown on Figure 5.7
5.6.3
Landscape Character Areas (Character Type)
LCA-1
: Area Surrounding
5.6.3.1
This
area is an Institutional type
landscape and includes both low-lying / flat and hillside sites. It is characterised
predominantly by its institutional land uses and features and includes
hospitals, colleges and universities, barracks and youth facilities. Though
covering a variety of different types of institution, the combination of
features and components and their distribution in this landscape tends to be
very similar. It comprises extensive complexes of buildings (usually low or
medium rise) separated by open areas used for circulation or parking, with a
high coverage of semi-formal landscape and vegetation. The whole landscape is
typically surrounded by a perimeter fence. This results in a landscape which is
extensive, reasonably open and semi-formal. The type of landscape can be found
north and south of
LCA-2
: Reclamation Areas at Hung Hom Waterfront (Reclamation/Ongoing Major Development)
5.6.3.2
This
area is a transitional landscape which is currently awaiting or undergoing
large scale construction or re-development. This type of landscape is found on
the coastal land reclaimed for development surrounding Hung Hom Star Ferry. It
consists of both land undergoing development and vacated sites which are
awaiting re-development. It is characterised by a flat, low-lying topography,
lack of significant vegetation or significant built structures and includes
temporary uses such as car and bus parking areas and construction works areas.
As a result of its indeterminate status the landscape has an incoherent,
desolate and transient character.
LCA-3:
King’s Park (Residential
Urban Fringe)
5.6.3.3
This
area is found to the north of
LCA-4:
West of
5.6.3.4
At the
periphery of the dense development of To Kwa Wan the hillside west of
LCA-5: Hung Hom - Cross Harbour Links (Transportation Corridor)
5.6.3.5
The
area surrounding the Hung Hom Rail Terminal and Cross Harbour Tunnel
demonstrates the character of Transportation Corridor Landscape, where two
major highways interchange and the railway is constructed parallel to major
distributor roads and in close proximity. This is a linear landscape, whose
major features are the highway and railway that defines it, but which also
includes flyovers, signage gantries, a clover-leaf interchange, traffic
islands, footbridges and a toll plaza as well as associated miscellaneous
roadside land uses. Between the roads and railway are landscaped embankments
and islands, generally with a semi-mature amenity vegetation of trees and
shrubs. The outcome is a particularly linear landscape of rather diverse
features. The variety of features of different types, scale, materials and
colour, results in a landscape which as well as being diverse, tend also to be
slightly incoherent.
LCA-6:
Ho Man Tin -
5.6.3.6
The
former Valley Road Estate dominates the landscape character of this area
despite the removal of the development itself. This is a residual landscape,
characteristic of a landscape in transition out of Residential Urban Fringe.
The hillside in this area is less easily developed and is characterised by the
roads, highways structures, temporary land uses, slope works with mostly
stabilised or vegetated hillsides, scattered development including GIC development
of the service reservoirs and kerosene store. The area has low density, a
diverse range of features, notable vegetation cover and incoherent structure
with features having little formal relationship to each other.
LCA-7:
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan (City
Grid Mixed Urban)
5.6.3.7
An
older reclamation of
LCA-8: Hung Hom around
5.6.3.8
On the
south side of
LCA-9
: Whampoa and Hung Hom Reclamations (Late 20c / Early 21c Commercial /Residential Complex)
5.6.3.9
This
type of landscape can be found in the new development clusters east of Hung Hom
Station and as far as
LCA-10
: Ho Man Tin Estate (Residential
Urban Landscape)
5.6.3.10
This
is an urban landscape given over predominantly to residential land use.
Developed comprehensively on terraced land the area is characterized by medium
and high-rise residential estates, set amongst open space, together with
associated highways, footbridges, schools, community facilities and retail
facilities. Vegetation includes roadside trees and shrub planting and planting
in open spaces around residential estates. The result is a fairly homogenous,
ordered landscape comprising largely built elements softened to a certain
extent by the effects of surrounding planting and greenery.
LCA-11:
5.6.3.11
LCA-12: Reclamation at TKO
(Reclamation/Ongoing Major Development)
This area is predominantly a
newly formed, uniform, sand plain, reclaimed from the sea and yet to undergo
development. It is characterised by the lack of surface cover and the temporary
nature of the activities being undertaken there. Much resembling a construction
site, it lacks shade elements or focus points and being exposed fill material
demonstrates a lack of vegetation other than occasional pioneer trees. Most
distinctive is the contrast in scale and form from the surrounding natural
vegetated hillside landscape. Due to its desolate nature the landscape lacks
reference objects by which to determine scale, as a result it has a character
of ongoing desolation.
LCA-13:
This is a large-scale upland
and hillside landscape lying between around 40 and 300mPD which abuts the sea.
It includes the small, rocky,
LCA-14:
5.6.3.12
This
is an area of coastal water lying close to the shore and enclosed to a certain
degree by Tung Lung Chau and
5.6.4
Assessment of Sensitivity for Landscape Character Areas
5.6.4.1
Factors
affecting the sensitivity for evaluation of landscape impact include:
·
Quality
of the landscape character;
·
Importance
and rarity of special landscape elements;
·
Maturity
of the landscape;
·
Ability
of the landscape to accommodate change;
·
Context
of the area in terms of local, regional, national or global Significance; and
·
Whether
there are any statutory or regulatory limitations protecting the area.
5.6.4.2
Ratings
are classified as below:
High: |
Important LCA of particularly distinctive characteristics or high importance, and is sensitive to relatively small changes |
Medium: |
LCA of moderate landscape characteristics and value, and is reasonably tolerant to change |
Low: |
LCA with low landscape characteristics and value, and is largely tolerant to change |
5.6.5
Schedule of Landscape Character Areas
5.6.5.1
The
LCAs within the project area are listed below and the specific groups are shown
on Figure 5.3 with the sensitivity
to change summarised in Table 5.3 below. Photos of the Character
Areas can be seen on Figure 5.7. In
accordance with the Study Brief, resources have been assessed within a 100m
distance limit from the works area boundaries.
Table
5.3: Assessment of Sensitivity of Landscape Character Areas
Ref |
Landscape Character Type |
Location |
Quality and Maturity (high / medium / low) |
Rarity (high / medium / low) |
Local / District / Regional
Importance |
Statutory Limitations /
Requirements |
Ability to Accommodate
Change (high / medium
/ low) |
Sensitivity (high / medium
/ Low) |
LCA-01 |
Institutional |
Area surrounding |
medium |
low |
local |
no |
medium |
Medium |
LCA-02 |
Reclamation / Ongoing Major Development |
Reclamation Areas at Hung Hom Waterfront |
low |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-03 |
Residential Urban Fringe |
King’s Park |
medium |
medium |
Medium |
|||
LCA-04 |
Residential Urban Fringe |
West of |
low |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-05 |
Transportation Corridor |
Hung Hom - Cross Harbour Links |
low |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-06 |
Miscellaneous Urban Fringe |
Ho Man Tin - |
low |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-07 |
City Grid Mixed Urban |
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan |
medium |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-08 |
City Grid Mixed Urban |
Hung Hom around |
medium |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-09 |
Late 20c / Early 21c Commercial / Residential
Complex |
Whampoa and Hung Hom Reclamations |
medium |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-10 |
Residential
Urban |
Ho Man
Tin Estate |
medium |
high |
Low |
|||
LCA-11 |
Strait |
|
high |
high |
regional |
low |
High |
|
LCA-12 |
Reclamation
/ Ongoing Major Development |
Reclamation
at TKO |
low |
low |
local |
high |
Low |
|
LCA-13 |
Coastal
|
|
high |
medium |
regional |
low |
High |
|
LCA-14 |
Inshore
Water |
|
high |
medium |
regional |
low |
High |
5.7
Visually Sensitive
Receivers Baseline
5.7.1
Background
5.7.1.1
Visually
Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) are those people who will potentially view the construction
of the project and/or its operation.
5.7.1.2
The
Zone of Visual Influence (Visual Envelope) is that area from which any part of
the proposed Project can be seen. VSRs are identified within the Visual
Envelope at a distance not more than 3km from the Project. Beyond this, the effects of distance and the
extensive visual context tend to render impacts insignificant.
5.7.1.3
Receivers
are identified through the definition of the development’s visual envelope
(i.e. the area within which views of the development are possible). For the
purposes of this study, receivers have been grouped into the following
categories:
Residential: |
Those people who would view the scheme from their home |
Occupational: |
Those people who would view the scheme from their work/study place |
Leisure: |
Those people who would view the scheme whilst engaging in leisure, culture or recreation activities including shopping, walking, hiking, worship or sports |
Transportation: |
Those people who would view the scheme from vehicles |
5.7.1.4
Those
who view the scheme from their homes (Residential VSRs) are typically
considered to be more highly sensitive to any visual intrusion. This is because
the attractiveness, or otherwise, of the view will have a notable effect on a
residents’ general quality of life and acceptability of their home environment.
5.7.1.5
Those
people who view the scheme from their workplace (Occupational VSRs) are
generally considered relatively less sensitive to visual intrusion. This is
because they are normally employed in activities where visual outlook plays a
less important role in the perception of the quality of the working
environment. They are on the whole classified as a medium or low sensitivity
group unless their environmental outlook forms a significant element of their
work.
5.7.1.6
For
those who view the scheme whilst engaging in outdoor leisure pursuits
(Recreational VSRs), visual sensitivity varies considerably depending on the
type of cultural activity. Those taking a stroll in a park, for example, would
be classified as a high sensitivity group compared to football players who
would have a low sensitivity rating.
5.7.1.7
For
those people who view the scheme from public thoroughfares (Transportation
VSRs), the degree of visual intrusion experienced depends on the speed of
travel and whether views are continuous or only occasional. Generally, the
slower the speed of travel and the more continuous the viewing experience, then
the greater the degree of sensitivity.
5.7.2
Assessment of Sensitivity for VSRs
5.7.2.1
Factors
affecting the sensitivity of visual receivers include:
·
Value
and quality of existing views;
·
Availability
and amenity of alternative views;
·
Type
and estimated number of receiver population;
·
Duration
and frequency of view; and
·
Degree
of visibility.
5.7.3
Description of VSRs
5.7.3.1
Potentially
affected residential, leisure, occupational and transportation VSRs include
those shown in Figure 5.4 and
summarised in Table 5.4 below.
Photos of the Key Visual Receivers can be seen on Figure 5.8.
Residential
R1: Residents of towers on the west of
5.7.3.2
This
VSR includes the mid rise buildings of approximately 18 floors;
R2: Residents of Parc Palais
5.7.3.3
Parc
Palais has 9 towers each of 28 Floors. Residents of Towers 1 and 2 have south views which can overlook works site WS7a1
and the proposed WAB. Lower floor residents are largely obstructed in their
view by the
R3: East facing units of
5.7.3.4
The
residents of
R4: Residents on the south side of
5.7.3.5
The
buildings here vary from 8 to 14 floors in an old urban area. Buildings
affected include
R5: Residents grouped around
5.7.3.6
This
is a large group of receivers within a neighbourhood of about 40,000m2. Older
and lower buildings are generally obscured from much of the works however numbers
of higher level residents will have restricted views and these buildings define
the main zone of visual influence from HOM Station. A number of more recent
constructions in the area are also significantly taller and these receivers can
extensively view works sites WS15a and WS19 at HOM Station to the north.
Receivers include
R6: Residents at Ka Wai Chuen
5.7.3.7
This
receiver group includes Ka Bong Lau block
5, Ka Shing Lau block 7, Ka On Lau block 8, Ka Ting Lau block 9, Ka Wing Lau
block 10. Receivers can view works sites WS15a and WS19 at HOM Station to
the north as well as works sites Ws26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong
Street Playground. The works sites form a significant percentage of their view
and with the close proximity to the works receiver sensitivity is considered High.
R7: Residents at
5.7.3.8
This
receiver group includes the 2 towers of Tsing
Chau Street Customs and Excise Quarters (16 floors), Hung Hom Gardens blocks 1 and 2 Green Land Court, Full Hang Court
and the tall structure of Carlton Court
(29 floors). Receivers can view works sites WS15a and WS19 at HOM Station to
the north as well as works sites Ws26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong
Street Playground. The works sites form a restricted percentage of their view
and with alternative views available receiver sensitivity is considered Medium
R8: Residents at Shun
5.7.3.9
These
VSRs are formed by a group of buildings including
R9: Future residents of Planned Dormitory of the
5.7.3.10
The
structure and outlook of this receiver is unknown although the programme of
construction is planned concurrently with the HOM Station development. Due to
the immediate proximity of the works sites WS15a and WS20 at HOM Station it can
be safely assumed that the receiver sensitivity be considered High.
R10: Residents with surrounding views at
5.7.3.11
These
VSRs are formed by 5 towers of approximately 20 floors; Yee Fu Building, Wei King Building Block A-D and Block E-H, Chuen Fat Building
and Hung Hing Court as well as the older, lower units of 15-21 Valley Road and 277-283 Chatham Road
North. Residents’ oblique views look to works sites WS15a and WS20 at HOM
Station as well as works sites WS26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong
Street Playground to the south. With the works sites immediately adjacent, the
receiver sensitivity is considered High.
R11: Residents at Ho Man Tin Estate South
5.7.3.12
Kwun Hei Court, Sik Man House, Yat Man
House, Yee Man House and Choi Man House are the only units at Ho
Man Tin Estate with sufficient height to allow views of the works sites at HOM
Station. Views are restricted to upper floor units with south views and the
distance of 300metres within an otherwise open view restricts the sensitivity
for the proposed works to Low.
R12: Residents at
5.7.3.13
Receivers
are predominantly restricted to the buildings of Ko Shan Road Customs and Excise Service Married Quarters and Hang Shan Court. Both buildings tower
over the proposed works area WA2a to the
R13: Residents of Whampoa Estate and
5.7.3.14
This
VSR includes units with views onto
R14: Residents at Harbourfront Landmark
5.7.3.15
This super-tall
building includes residents with panoramic views over
R15: Residents at
5.7.3.16
A mid
rise building of approximately 12 floors residents with south views look
directly onto
R16: Residents of
5.7.3.17
All 7
high Towers of Harbour Place have west views towards the proposed works area
WA6. Towers 6 and 7 are immediately
adjacent to the works areas and the most sensitive. The sensitivity is
considered High.
R17: Residents of
5.7.3.18
The 4
connected towers of
R18: Future residents of property development above
HOM Station
5.7.3.19
The
structure and outlook of this receiver is unknown and there is currently no programme
for development of the site. However due to the immediate proximity of the
works sites WS15a and WS20 at HOM Station it can be assumed that the receiver
sensitivity be considered High.
R19: Future residents of
5.7.3.20
The
structure and outlook of this receiver is unknown and there is currently no
programme for development of the site. However due to the immediate proximity
of the works sites WS15a and WS20 at HOM Station it can be assumed that the
receiver sensitivity be considered High.
Leisure
L1: Park Users of
5.7.3.21
These
receivers will be excluded from use of the Garden during the proposed works.
They are within the proposed works site WS1 and acute in their appreciation of surroundings,
however the number of receivers is limited. As such the receiver sensitivity is
considered as Medium.
L2: Pedestrians and Shoppers in the vicinity of
5.7.3.22
A
large number of receivers in this group are extremely close to the works sites
WS1 and WS2. This group includes pedestrians on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads, the garden
at
L3: Members and Visitors of
5.7.3.23
Receivers
in this group can be termed as regular in their patronage and sensitive in their
awareness of their surroundings. Both facilities are fairly inward looking and
unlikely to be affected by the work site WS7a1, however potential works at
WS4a, WS6a and WS45 would affect the entrances to these facilities. Receiver
sensitivity is considered High.
L4: Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio
5.7.3.24
Receivers
in this group can also be thought of as regular in their patronage and
sensitive in their awareness of their surroundings. As well as potential slope
works at WS6a being at the entrance to the facility the proposed works site for
the WAB, WS7a1 is directly within the members recreational facilities and will
be prominent visually. The works site forms a significant percentage of their
view and may affect the overall character of the facility. With the close
proximity to the works receiver sensitivity is considered High.
L5: Visitors of King’s Park Hockey Ground
5.7.3.25
The
grandstand at the facility turns its back on
L6: Visitors of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club
and Philipino Club
5.7.3.26
These
receivers are immediately across
L7: Recreation visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water
Service Reservoir
5.7.3.27
Receivers
in this group are limited in number. Good panoramic views can be obtained from
the south edge of the sports field on top of the reservoir and also from the
pavilion on the hillside above
L8: Recreation users of Ho
5.7.3.28
Views
to the works site WS15a are restricted to users on rooftops within the facility
and to oblique views from the windows and entrance facing east to
L9: Recreation users of Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir Playground
5.7.3.29
Works
site WS15a can be fully viewed to the south from the southern edge of this
facility. Receiver numbers are relatively few, short in duration and occasional
in habit. Alternative views may be had from the surrounding panorama. The
receiver sensitivity is considered Low.
L10: Users of
5.7.3.30
These receivers
will be excluded from use of the Garden during the proposed works. They are
within the intended works site WS19 and acute in their appreciation of
surroundings, however the number of receivers is limited and the current
surrounding environment poor. As such the receiver sensitivity is considered as
Medium.
L11: Pedestrians around
5.7.3.31
This
group includes a number of small sitting areas, back roads, paths common areas as
well as Wuhu Street Temporary playground, all peripheral to
L12: Recreational users of Fat Kwong Street Playground
5.7.3.32
These
receivers will be excluded from use of the Playground during the proposed
works. They are within the intended works site WS26a and works area WA15.
Primarily involved in sports activities they are generally inattentive to the
visual surroundings, occasional is use and short in duration of visit. As such
the receiver sensitivity is considered as Medium.
L13: Pedestrians in and around
5.7.3.33
Recreation
users of the Garden on the western side are able to view works sites at HOM
Station and
L14: Pedestrians and Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and
Garden
5.7.3.34
This
group includes receivers on
L15: Visitors to
5.7.3.35
Pedestrians
on the south parapet of the promenade at Hong Kong Coliseum will be able to
view temporary barging point WA14. the numbers of receivers is very low, visits
infrequent and short in duration and alternative views exist. The sensitivity
is considered Low.
L16: Pedestrians on TST East Promenade
5.7.3.36
Pedestrians
along the promenade have views across the harbour towards temporary barging
point WA14. Occasional receivers may even take the elevated path next to
L17: Hikers at
5.7.3.37
The furthest
southerly point in the park has ridge views over the proposed temporary
magazine site WA12a (site formation) and WA13 (temporary magazine). Receivers
are few in number, occasional in visiting habit and short in duration of visit. Alternative views abound. The
sensitivity is considered Low.
Occupational
O1: Workers in commercial buildings on
5.7.3.38
This
VSR includes the lower floor commercial units of
O2: Staff and Guests of Eaton Hotel
5.7.3.39
Receivers with north views at
Eaton Hotel have dominant
views over
O3: Staff and Students of
5.7.3.40
Views to the proposed works site WS1 are largely
concealed by
O4: Staff of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings
5.7.3.41
Receivers
are restricted to the east viewers from
O5: Staff of
5.7.3.42
Receivers
in this group can be termed as regular in their viewing pattern and influenced
by the intimate nature of their surroundings. Both facilities are fairly inward
looking and unlikely to be affected by the work site WS7a1, however potential
works at WS4a, WS6a and WS45 would affect the entrances to these facilities.
Receiver sensitivity is considered Medium.
O6: Staff of Club de Recreio
5.7.3.43
Receivers
in this group can also be thought of as regular in their viewing pattern and
influenced by the intimate nature of their surroundings. As well as potential
slope works at WS6a being at the entrance to the facility the proposed works
site for the WAB, WS7a1 is directly within the club facilities and will be
prominent visually. The works site forms a significant percentage of their
daily view and with such close proximity to the works receiver sensitivity is
considered as Medium.
O7: Staff of King’s Park Hockey Ground
5.7.3.44
The
staff facilities and entrances are located close to works site WS7a1. Despite
the proximity, the limited number of receivers coupled with their activities
being inwardly focused suggests receiver sensitivity to be considered Low.
O8: Staff of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club
and Philipino Club
5.7.3.45
These
receivers are immediately across
O9: Staff and Students of future Primary School (under
construction) at
5.7.3.46
These
receivers are located across
O10: Staff at Ho
5.7.3.47
Views
to the works site WS15a are restricted to receivers on rooftops within the
facility and to oblique views from the windows and entrance facing east to
O11: Staff of Small Businesses at
5.7.3.48
These
VSRs are formed by the lower floor premises of Yee Fu Building,
O12: Workers at short term tenancy on
5.7.3.49
Workers
on this site are housed in temporary accommodation und undertake short term
construction work. They have direct views to works sites WS15a and WS20 at HOM
Station as well as works sites Ws26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong
Street Playground to the south. However with receiver numbers being few,
duration short and regularity of visit limited, the receiver sensitivity is
considered Low.
O13: Staff at Hung Hom Fire Station
5.7.3.50
Receivers
can view works sites WS15a and WS19 at HOM Station to the north as well as
works sites Ws26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong Street Playground.
However with receiver numbers being low and viewing opportunities to the north
rather limited, the receiver sensitivity is considered Low.
O14: Staff and Students of
5.7.3.51
Upper
floor receivers can view works sites WS15a and WS19 at HOM Station to the north
as well as works sites Ws26a, WS27 and works area WA15 at Fat Kwong Street
Playground adjacent. The works site forms a significant percentage of their
view at arrival and departure as well as from a number of positions within
their facilities. Receiver sensitivity is considered Medium.
O15: Staff at
5.7.3.52
This
group of receivers includes all floors of the Caritas Branch College of Careers as well as the lower floors of
O16: Staff of Businesses in Whampoa Estate and
5.7.3.53
This
VSR includes units with views onto
O17: Staff and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary
Schools
5.7.3.54
Upper
floor receivers at the 6 floor
O18:
5.7.3.55
Receivers
at the 6 floor
O19: Office workers with north view at Two
Harbourfront
5.7.3.56
This
20 floor office development looks onto
O20: Staff and Students at
5.7.3.57
The
development on
O21: Staff and Guests of Harbour View Horizon Hotel
5.7.3.58
The
east wing of the development on
O22: Staff and Guests of Harbour Front Horizon Hotel
5.7.3.59
The
north and west wing of the development on Victoria Harbourfront is immediately
adjacent to works area WA14 with the west facade of the building fully
overlooking the potential works area within the wide extent of view. North and
east receivers are able to view works area WA6 over
O23: Staff and Guests of
5.7.3.60
The
south facing facades of this 15 floor building overlook works area WA14 from a
distance of approximately 50 metres. Some of the site is obscured by the
O24: Office workers with south views at International
Mail Centre
5.7.3.61
The
east facades of this low rise building immediately abut works area WA14. The
general outlook of the area is poor and views restricted. Alternative fine
views over
O25: Office / Hotel workers and guests with east views
at TST East
5.7.3.62
The
buildings on
O26: Office Workers at The
5.7.3.63
The
upper floors of this 18 floor building have distant views to HOM Station works
sites over other city buildings. Receiver sensitivity is considered Low.
O27: Staff and Students at
5.7.3.64
The
north facing aspect of this building looks across the
T1: Circulating Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads
5.7.3.65
The
large number of receivers here are generally moving at slow speeds within the
phased traffic flow. They are also required to stop at the junction outside
Eaton Hotel, immediately adjacent to works site WS1. Traffic on
T2: Fast moving vehicles on
5.7.3.66
The
large number of receivers here are generally moving at fast speeds under and
atop the elevated road. The viewpoint is extremely focused and narrow, with
little time to take in lateral views. Despite the proximity to works sites WS4a
and WS45 the receiver sensitivity in this location is considered Low.
T3: Road users on
5.7.3.67
Vehicle
views are contained within the corridor of
T4: Fast moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road
Interchange
5.7.3.68
The
open nature of the urban form in this area allows for longer duration of
viewing opportunities. However traffic on
T5: Fast moving vehicles on
5.7.3.69
Vehicles
approach the works sites at HOM Station in large numbers, viewing first from a distance
and are then able to close on them within the field of view. Despite the speed
of travel the view is sustained and reinforced by proximity with the road
passing directly adjacent to the sites. The full extent of the works can be
absorbed during the length of passing. Sensitivity in this location is
considered Medium.
T6: Road users on
5.7.3.70
Vehicles
pass adjacent to the works site WS15as at HOM Station. However receiver numbers
are relatively few and expectation of benefit of view is not high. Sensitivity
in this location is considered Low.
T7: Temporary parking users on future development site
5.7.3.71
Receivers
park vehicles in temporary parking sites adjacent to the works site WS15a at
HOM Station. However receiver numbers are relatively few and any expectation or
need of benefit of view is not high. Sensitivity in this location is considered
Low.
T8: Road users on
5.7.3.72
Receivers
pass the works site WS15a at HOM Station and WS26a, Ws27 and WA15 at Fat Kwong
Street Playground. Receiver numbers are relatively few and the poor local
viewing environment contributes to a low expectation of beneficial views.
Sensitivity in this location is considered Low.
T9: Road users on
5.7.3.73
The
road will be closed to vehicles during construction. Receivers immediately pass
the works site WS15a at HOM Station. Receiver numbers are relatively few and
the poor local viewing environment contributes to a low expectation of beneficial
views. Sensitivity in this location is considered Low.
T10: Road users on Tak Man / Tak On Street
5.7.3.74
The
road currently interacts closely with the surrounding intimate environment with
high traffic volumes moving at relatively slow speeds and frequently stopping.
Existing views are closed on both sides and focused ahead. The road will be at
the centre of the proposed works sites WS30, WS31, WS33, WS36a, WS37a and
viewing of these works sites will be unavoidable to receivers. Sensitivity in
this location is considered Medium.
T11: Road users on
5.7.3.75
The
road will be at the centre of the proposed works site WS30. Vehicles are
frequently required to stop at the controlled junction at
T12: Road users on
5.7.3.76
The
receivers include vehicles on
T13: Road users on
5.7.3.77
Vehicles
on these roads are generally from light through traffic and vehicle speeds are relatively
low. The receivers pass immediately adjacent to works area WA6 however the
limited number of receivers, short duration and the occasional nature of
viewing means that sensitivity in this location is considered Low.
T14: Road users on
5.7.3.78
Much of this section is on high speed multi-lane
elevated road passing through works area WA14. The parapet wall limits
receiver’s downward views and coupled with the speed of travel that makes
distant views more observable than close objects the sensitivity in this location is considered Low.
T15: Road users on
5.7.3.79
This is a multi-lane distributor road with heavy
traffic flows. Open views exist to
T16: Travellers in
5.7.3.80
The scale of the view of
T17: Recreational boat traffic in
5.7.3.81
Close passing boats are able to view the potential temporary
magazine site at works areas WA12a and WA13. Tit Cham Chau however restricts
the field of view considerably. The scale of the view in Joss House Bay and the
Tat Hong Channel means that views to the works areas form an extremely small
percentage of the view. Receivers are occasional and the views of short
duration. Sensitivity in this
location is considered Low.
5.8
Sources and Magnitude of
Landscape and Visual Impacts
5.8.1
Background
5.8.1.1
The
assessment of landscape impacts will result from:
·
Identification
of the type and sources of impact and their magnitude that would be generated
during construction and operation of the project; and
·
Identification
of the principal landscape impacts primarily in consideration of the degree of change
to the baseline conditions. The impacts are considered systematically in terms
of landscape elements, the project and its context.
5.8.1.2
The
assessment of potential visual impacts will result from:
·
Identification
of the type and sources of visual impact and their magnitude that would be
generated during construction and operation of the scheme; and
·
Identification
of the principal visual impacts primarily in consideration of the degree of
change to the baseline condition.
5.8.2
Potential Sources of Landscape and Visual Impacts
5.8.2.1
The
proposed KTE will comprise an underground railway system over its full length
and therefore potential residual landscape and visual impacts will be
restricted to above-ground construction works and operational facilities. A
schedule of these structures is given in Table
3.3 in Section 3 including their
locations, dimensions and footprint area.
Table
5.4: Assessment of Sensitivity of Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)
VSR |
Location |
Estimated number of
Receivers (Few / Typical / Many) |
Value and Quality of
Existing view (Good / Fair / Poor) |
Availability and Amenity of
Alternative views |
Duration and Frequency of
Existing view (Stationary / Transitory /
Glimpse Frequent / Regular /
Occasional) |
Degree of Visibility (Wide / Restricted / Narrow Distant / Near / Adjacent) |
Sensitivity (high / medium / low) |
Residential |
|||||||
R1 |
Residents
of towers on the west of |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
High |
R2 |
Residents
of Parc Palais |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
alternatives |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
R3 |
East
facing units of |
Many |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
alternatives |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
R4 |
Residents
on the south side of |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R5 |
Residents
grouped at |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R6 |
Residents
at Ka Wai Chuen |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R7 |
Residents
at |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Other
views are more significant |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Distant |
Medium |
R8 |
Residents
at Shun |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R9 |
Future
residents of HK PolyU planned student dormitory |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R10 |
Residents
with surrounding views at |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
R11 |
Residents
at Ho Man Tin Estate South |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Open
Views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
R12 |
Residents
at |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
High |
R13 |
Residents
of Whampoa Estate and Garden |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
High |
R14 |
Residents
of Harbourfront Landmark |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Alternative Views from most floors |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
High |
R15 |
Residents
at Poly U Student Dormitory |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent
but Limited |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
R16 |
Residents
of |
Many |
Poor |
Yes
/ Improved
oblique south views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
High |
R17 |
Residents
of |
Many |
Good |
Yes
/ Extensive
northerly views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
R18 |
Future
residents of property development above HOM Station |
Many |
N/A |
N/A |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
unknown |
High |
R19 |
Future
residents of Valley Road Estate development site |
Many |
N/A |
N/A |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
unknown |
High |
Leisure |
|||||||
L1 |
Users
of |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Views
to all directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L2 |
Pedestrians
and Shoppers in the vicinity of |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Views
to all directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L3 |
Members
and Visitors of |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
High |
L4 |
Members
and Visitors of Club de Recreio |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views from differing viewpoints |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
L5 |
Visitors
of |
Few |
Fair |
Yes
/ Reasonable
views north and south |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Near |
Low |
L6 |
Visitors
of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views from differing viewpoints |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
High |
L7 |
Recreation
visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water Service Reservoir |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
panoramic views |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
L8 |
Recreation
visitors at Ho Man Tin Park and Leisure Centre |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Varied
alternative views |
Stationary
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Near |
Low |
L9 |
Recreation
users at Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
panoramic views |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
L10 |
Users
of |
Few |
Fair |
None |
Transitory
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L11 |
Pedestrians
around |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Fair
views in several directions |
Transitory
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L12 |
Recreational
users of Fat Kwong Street Playground |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Fair
views in several directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L13 |
Pedestrians
in and around |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Fair
views in several directions |
Transitory
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
L14 |
Pedestrians
and Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and Garden. |
Many |
Poor |
Yes
/ Varied
views to several directions |
Transitory
/ Regular |
Narrow
/ Near |
High |
L15 |
Pedestrians
at |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views to several directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
L16 |
Pedestrians
on TST East Promenade |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views to several directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
L17 |
Hikers at |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
views to several directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
Occupational |
|||||||
O1 |
Workers
in commercial buildings on |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O2 |
Staff
and Guests of Eaton Hotel |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O3 |
Staff
and students of |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O4 |
Staff
of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
views to several directions |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Wide
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O5 |
Staff
of |
Few |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O6 |
Staff
of Club de Recreio |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views from differing viewpoints |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O7 |
Staff
of |
Few |
Fair |
Yes
/ Reasonable
views north and south |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Narrow
/ Near |
Low |
O8 |
Staff
of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views from differing viewpoints |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O9 |
Staff
and Students of future Primary School (under construction) at |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Varied
views from differing viewpoints |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O10 |
Staff
of Ho Man Tin Leisure Centre |
Few |
Fair |
Yes
/ Varied
alternative views |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
Low |
O11 |
Staff
of small businesses at |
Few |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O12 |
Workers
at short term tenancy on |
Few |
Fair |
Yes
/ Varied
alternative views |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
Low |
O13 |
Staff
at Hung Hom Fire Station |
Few |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
Low |
O14 |
Staff
and Students of |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O15 |
Staff
at |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O16 |
Staff of businesses in Whampoa Estate and Garden |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O17 |
Staff
and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary Schools |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O18 |
Staff
and Students of |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O19 |
Office
workers at Two Harbourfront |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Panoramic
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
O20 |
Staff
and Students at HK Poly U – Community College Campus |
Typical |
Poor |
Yes
/ alternative
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O21 |
Staff
and Guests at Harbour View Horizon Hotel |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Good
alternative surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
O22 |
Staff
and Guests at Harbour Front Horizon Hotel |
Typical |
Fair |
Yes
/ Good
alternative surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Restricted
/ Near |
Medium |
O23 |
Staff
and Guests of |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
alternative surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
O24 |
Office
workers at International Mail Centre |
Few |
Poor |
Yes
/ alternative
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Low |
O25 |
Office/Hotel
workers and guests at TST East |
Many |
Good |
Yes
/ Panoramic
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
O26 |
Office
workers at The Metropolis Tower |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ alternative
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Restricted
/ Distant |
Low |
O27 |
Staff
and Students at HK Poly U |
Typical |
Good |
Yes
/ Panoramic
surrounding views |
Stationary
/ Frequent |
Wide
/ Near |
Medium |
Transportation |
|||||||
T1 |
Circulating
Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T2 |
Fast
moving vehicles on |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Glimpse Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T3 |
Road
users on |
Many |
Fair |
None
|
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T4 |
Fast
moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road Interchange |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Transitory
/ Glimpse Occasional |
Wide
/ Near |
Low |
T5 |
Fast
moving vehicles on |
Many |
Fair |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
T6 |
Road
users on |
Typical |
Fair |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T7 |
Temporary
parking users on future development
site |
Few |
Poor |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Stationary
/ Regular |
Wide
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T8 |
Road
users on |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T9 |
Road
users on |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T10 |
Road
users on Tak Man / Tak On Street
|
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Medium |
T11 |
Road
users on |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T12 |
Road
users on Whampoa Estate and Garden side streets |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T13 |
Road
users on |
Typical |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T14 |
Road
users on |
Many |
Poor |
None |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Narrow
/ Adjacent |
Low |
T15 |
Road
users on |
Many |
Fair |
Yes
/ Limited
views in other directions |
Glimpse
/ Occasional |
Restricted
/ Distant |
Low |
T16 |
Travellers in |
Many |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
expansive views in other directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Medium |
T17 |
Recreational
boat traffic at Tai Mui Wan |
Few |
Good |
Yes
/ Good
expansive views in other directions |
Transitory
/ Occasional |
Wide
/ Distant |
Low |
5.8.2.2
During
the construction stage, potential Landscape and Visual Impacts would arise
from:
·
Excavation
and construction works for the station boxes at HOM;
·
Excavation
and construction works at WHA station;
·
Construction
of entrances for HOM and WHA Stations;
·
Construction
of above-ground structures including vent shafts and chillers;
·
Temporary
rock crushing facilities at HOM Station and Hung Hom Finger Pier;
·
Stockpiling
of excavated and building materials, and storage of construction equipment and
plant;
·
Off-site
construction traffic such as haulage of excavated materials;
·
Temporary
traffic / road diversions;
·
Night-time
lighting;
·
Temporary
noise mitigation measures e.g. barriers, enclosures;
·
Contractor’s
temporary works areas, including site accommodation and parking areas;
·
Barging
facility; and
·
Construction
of temporary explosive storage magazine facilities and associated vehicular
access at Tseung Kwan O.
5.8.2.3
During
the operation stage, potential residual Landscape and Visual Impacts would be
related to the permanent loss of landscape resources and visible above-ground
structures:
·
Entrances
and associated facilities;
·
Vent
shafts for railway tunnel and sub-way;
·
Chiller
plants; and
·
Permanent
net loss of recreational facilities, slopes, trees and greening.
5.8.2.4
Detailed
information concerning above ground structures is provided in Section 3. Table 3.3 which schedules their size
and configuration and Figures 3.25 -
3.32 indicate the preliminary plan and elevations.
5.9 Magnitude of Landscape Impacts without Mitigation during Construction and Operation Phases
5.9.1
Background
5.9.1.1
The
factors affecting the magnitude of change for assessing landscape impacts
include:
·
Compatibility
of the project with the surrounding landscape;
·
Duration
of impacts under construction and operation phases;
·
Scale
of development; and
·
Reversibility
of change.
5.9.1.2
The
magnitude of change in the landscape will be classified as follows:
Large: |
Notable change in the landscape characteristics over an extensive area ranging to very intensive change over a more limited area |
Intermediate: |
Moderate changes in a local area |
Small: |
Virtually imperceptible change in any components of the landscape |
Negligible: |
Indiscernible change to landscape characteristics |
5.9.1.3
The
magnitude of predicted impacts on both landscape resources and landscape
character are detailed below.
5.9.2
Impacts to Landscape Resources
5.9.2.1
The estimated
magnitude of impacts, before implementation of mitigation measures, on the
landscape resources that would occur during construction and operation phases
are quantified and tabulated in Table
5.5. Only those resources which will be affected by the works are discussed
in detail below. The precise number of trees to be retained,
transplanted, felled and compensated shall be determined and agreed separately
with government during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWB TC
3/2006.
Table
5.5: Schedule of Landscape Resources
Impacted during Construction and Operation
Ref. Landscape Resource |
Works
Site / Area |
Surveyed
# Trees within Project |
Estimated
# Trees Retained |
Estimated
# Trees Transplanted |
Estimated
# Trees Felled |
Area of Resources affected
(m2) |
Reprovision |
|||
Existing |
Construct- ion |
Operation |
||||||||
LDR-1.1 |
|
Cable
Reprovisioning (WS1) |
45 |
41 |
0 |
4 |
2,500 |
600 (including topsoil resources) |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-1.2 |
|
HOM Station (WS19) |
40 |
33 |
0 |
7 |
2,170 |
500 |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-2.1 |
Sports
Pitches in the vicinity of |
WAB (WS7a1) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
60,000 |
4,200 |
1,400 |
4 tennis courts reinstated (with 2 permanently lost) |
LDR-2.3 |
Fat
|
Site Office / Mucking out Point (WA15, WS26a) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4,750 |
4,750 |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-3.1 |
Slopes
in the area of |
Slope Stabilisation (WA2) |
15 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
1,000 |
500 |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-3.2 |
Slopes
adjacent to |
HOM Station excavation (WS15a) |
1094 |
390 |
0 |
704 (1 no. tree with diameter
over 1m) |
25,000 |
15,000 (including topsoil resources) |
2,000 |
Permanent net loss of landscape resources |
LDR-3.4 |
Slopes
surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir |
Site Office at |
122 |
91 |
0 |
31 |
40,000 |
2,000 |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-3.5 |
Slopes
surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground |
Slope Stabilisation (WS27) |
110 |
106 (12 no. trees
with diameter over 1m) |
0 |
4 |
3,800 |
3,800 |
0 |
Reinstated |
LDR-4.2 |
Street
planting in the vicinity of |
WHA Station, Entrance A1 / A2 (WS30) |
49 |
14 |
20 |
15 |
2000 |
500 (including topsoil resources) |
500 |
Reinstated with compensatory planting of smaller trees. Net loss of
landscape resources |
LDR-4.3 |
Tree
planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets |
(WS31, WS33) |
51 |
41 |
10 |
0 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
Temporary removal of trees with reinstatement |
LDR-5.1 |
Planting
at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne / Wylie Roads |
Slope Stabilisation and WAB Access (WS4a, WS6a, WS44, WS45, WS47) |
134 |
127 (2 no. trees with diameter
over 1m) |
0 |
7 |
6,000 |
2000 |
100 |
Reinstated with compensatory planting. No permanent net loss. |
LDR-6.1 |
Slopes
adjacent to |
HOM Station (WS15a, WS20) |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5,500 |
4,000 |
3,500 |
Area planted with trees and greened. Net gain in quality of resource |
LDR-7.1 |
Site
formation levels for use by HOM Station |
HOM Station (WS15a) |
138 |
0 |
17 |
121 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
Replaced with approximately 17,000m2 of temporary greening around station roof and 6000 m2 of temporary potted roof
planting. Temporary net gain in
quality of resource and the duration will depend on the programme for the
future development above. |
LDR-7.5 |
Open
Space sites at |
Site Office (WA6) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46,000 |
18,000 |
- |
Reinstated |
LDR-7.6 |
Reclaimed
land at TKO |
Temporary Magazine Site at TKO Area 137 (WA12a, WA13) |
27 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
600,000 |
10,000 |
- |
To be used by other projects |
LDR-8.1 |
Hung
Hom Finger Pier |
Hung Hom Barging Point (WA14) |
41 |
13 |
22 |
6 |
40,000 |
13,000 |
- |
Reinstated with compensatory planting. |
LDR-9.1 |
|
Barging activities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
negligible |
- |
- |
TOTAL |
|
|
1871 |
871 |
69 |
931 |
|
|
|
|
LDR-1.1:
5.9.2.2
The proposed Cable Tunnel Diversion Works Area
requires approximately 600m2 in this area. Much or all of the park will
need to be closed to the public during the works. The predominant amount of
this area is topsoiled specifically for large tree and shrub planting and will
be impacted. Most of the larger trees are avoided by the works, however two
large trees Aleurities moluccana and Melaleuca leucadendron will
need to be carefully placed well outside the works area or properly fenced off
and protected. Excavation works in this area may impact their large root
systems and so maximum protection should be afforded during the works. 3 small trees are proposed to be felled. A Tree
Removal Application will be submitted for approval in accordance with ETWB TCW
No. 3/2006. Following completion of the project the park will be reinstated and
no ongoing operation stage impacts are envisaged.
LDR-1.2:
5.9.2.3
The trees located in
LDR-2.1:
Sports Pitches in the vicinity of
5.9.2.4
The temporary site works
will see the loss of 6 tennis courts totalling about 4,200m2. The
final site requirements should not exceed 1,400m2 adjacent to Wylie
Road for building the proposed tunnel ventilation building with emergency
access and escape facility (WAB), with the replacement of 4 of the tennis courts.
The operation of the WAB will see the permanent loss of recreation area during
operation of the project.
LDR-2.3:
5.9.2.5
The use of the site for
tunnelling during the works will see the loss of approximately 5,000m2
of hard sports area from public utilisation. No trees are expected to be
impacted and the facilities are able to be re-provisioned following completion
of the project. Following completion no ongoing
impacts are envisaged from operation of the project.
LDR-3.1:
Slopes in the area of
5.9.2.6
Potential slope
stabilisation measures may affect the trees in these slopes. Any slope
stabilisation works in the area will need to preserve the trees in-situ however
and there is currently no intention to fell any trees in this area. Following
completion no ongoing impacts are envisaged from operation of the project.
LDR-3.2:
Slopes adjacent to
5.9.2.7
Potentially significant adverse landscape
impacts are anticipated as a result of construction of the HOM Station development including ventilation
shafts, works sites and access roads undertaken on the slopes and terraces on
the north side of
5.9.2.8
Affected trees will be transplanted and a Tree
Removal Application will be submitted for approval in accordance with ETWB TCW
No. 3/2006. During operation approximately 2000m2 shall be
permanently utilised for the HOM Station whilst the reinstated slopes shall be
replanted with seedling trees.
LDR-3.4:
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir
(WA2a)
5.9.2.9
The
use of the site to the rear of the Ko Shan Road Customs and Excise Service Married
Quarters contains approximately 120 trees growing on the site formation and the
slopes around the site. Many are of large size and will be protected and
retained. In order to establish the
proposed site office around 30 trees will need to be felled, predominantly
medium sized pioneer species of Ficus
hispida, Macaranga tanarius and Morus
alba of between 7m and 9m tall.
A Tree Removal Application will be submitted for approval in accordance
with ETWB TCW No. 3/2006. Following
completion, the site shall be vacated for other uses. During operation,
greening of the slopes is proposed.
LDR-3.5:
Slopes surrounding
5.9.2.10
A
works site for potential slope stabilisation and upgrading works, the slopes contain
about 100 well developed trees up to 12m tall of typical
LDR-4.2:
Street planting in the vicinity of
5.9.2.11
Primary
impacts are clearly located at the proposed WHA Station Entrance A1 at
5.9.2.12
A
number of other groups of trees on
LDR-4.3:
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets
(WS31, WS33)
5.9.2.13
Works
at
LDR-5.1: Planting at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne
/ Wylie Roads (WS4a, WS45, WS6a, WS44,
WS47)
5.9.2.14
Large Casuarina trees exist within a plantation
border on the boundary with
LDR-6.1:
Slopes adjacent to
5.9.2.15
A large percentage of the steep shotcrete slopes
will be totally removed by excavation for HOM Station. Several isolated small Celtis
trees on the south side will require to be felled. A Tree Removal
Application will be submitted for approval in accordance with ETWB TCW No.
3/2006. During the operational phase,
both compensatory planting and slope greening will be undertaken.
LDR-7.1: Site formation levels for use by HOM Station
(WS15a)
5.9.2.16
The proposed open cut to the station impacts
relatively few trees. The major impact is from the excavation to exit E
requiring the removal of 27 medium size trees along
5.9.2.17
The large band of more than 100 trees including
stands of Acacia, Albizia Celtis,
Leucaena, Melia and Macaranga with trunk diameters around of 0.5m and
height up to 14m tall are found at the north of the development site formed on
the embankment of the formation layers. They do not conflict with the Station
Box excavation itself, however they are within the HOM Station construction site so that they
will potentially conflict with site activities / facilities. These trees will ultimately need to be
removed however and following completion of the project the area will be
temporarily greened during Operation Phase until such time as any further site
development takes place.
LDR-7.5:
Open Space Site at
5.9.2.18
There is no change of use. The site is currently
utilised as temporary works area and few, if any impacts are envisaged during
Construction Phase. No impacts are envisaged during Operation Phase.
LDR-7.6: Reclaimed Land at
TKO (WA12a, WA13)
5.9.2.19
The site is intended for temporary use as the
explosives storage magazine. There is minimal change to the site condition intended
other than the erection of storage units, blast shields and security fencing.
The 27 self seeded trees located within the works area will need to be removed.
A
Tree Removal Application will be submitted for approval in accordance with ETWB
TCW No. 3/2006. Following completion, the TKO site will be subsequently required for use by
other proposed projects and, therefore, for the KTE project, no mitigation can
be proposed for this site.
LDR-8.1: Hung Hom Finger Pier (WA14)
5.9.2.20
The site will be used as a temporary barging
point for the duration of the construction. 41no. trees were identified in the
works area. Construction and operation of the barging point may impact
approximately 28 trees. A Tree Removal Application will be submitted for
approval in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 3/2006. Following completion, compensatory planting
will be implemented.
LDR-9.:
5.9.2.21
Working practice during the project will need to
ensure that construction waste and run-off do not spill into the Harbour. No impacts
are envisaged from the construction or operation of the project.
5.9.3
Landscape Character Impacts
5.9.3.1
The details of the predicted impacts to the LCAs are
detailed below:
LCA-01: Area Surrounding
5.9.3.2
The construction of the WAB at Club de Recreio
will be well visually contained within the site and will have little impact on
the local land use structure. Negligible change to Landscape Character is
anticipated during Construction or Operation Phases.
LCA-02: Reclamation Areas
at
5.9.3.3
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-03: King’s Park
5.9.3.4
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-04: West of
5.9.3.5
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-05: Hung Hom -
5.9.3.6
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-06: Ho Man Tin -
5.9.3.7
Approximately 25 % of this Landscape Character
Type is contained within the scope of the project area and will be occupied
both during and following the works. A large magnitude of change to Landscape Character
can be anticipated through both Construction and Operation Phases.
LCA-07:
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan
5.9.3.8
Negligible change on Landscape Character is
anticipated by the limited scale of works at
LCA-08: Hung Hom around
5.9.3.9
The construction works at Fat Kwong Street
Playground are fairly contained and at the margin of the LCA. A negligible magnitude
of change is anticipated during the construction. No project operation
activities will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-09: Hung Hom
Reclamation
5.9.3.10
There is no predicted change of use from the
baseline condition. No change on Landscape Character is anticipated.
LCA-10: Ho Man Tin Estate
5.9.3.11
No project construction activities will affect
this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-11:
5.9.3.12
No change on Landscape Character is
anticipated.
LCA-12: Reclamation at TKO
5.9.3.13
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-13:
5.9.3.14
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
LCA-14:
5.9.3.15
No project construction or operation activities
will affect this Landscape Character Area.
5.9.4
Schedule of Impacts to Landscape Resources and Landscape Character
5.9.4.1
The magnitude of the impacts,
before implementation of mitigation measures, on the Landscape Resources and
Landscape Character Areas that would occur in the construction and operation
phases are summarised in Tables 5.6 and 5.7 below. Only those
resources and character areas which are affected by the project are listed. All
impacts are adverse unless otherwise stated.
5.10
Magnitude of Visual
Impact before Mitigation during Construction and Operation Phases
5.10.1
Background
5.10.1.1
The magnitude of visual impact will result from
the following:
·
The
context and proximity of the VSR’s location to the project;
·
Other
views available from the VSR’s location;
·
The
number of people normally present at a VSR location;
·
The
characteristic of the VSR (for example, resident, working, studying, etc);
·
The
frequency and length of the view of the proposed scheme from the VSR’s
location;
·
The
quality of the existing view from the VSR’s location and its ability to absorb
change; and
·
The
magnitude of change brought about by the project in relation to the overall view
from the location of each VSR.
5.10.1.2
Factors affecting the magnitude of change:
·
Compatibility
of the project with the surrounding landscape;
·
Duration
of impacts under construction and operation phases;
·
Scale
of development;
·
Reversibility
of change;
·
Viewing
distance; and
·
Potential
blockage of view.
Table 5.6: Magnitude of
Impacts to Landscape Resources before Mitigation
LDR |
Description |
Source of Impact |
Extent of Impact (Full / Part / Slight) |
Duration of Impact (Short / Med / Long) |
Compatibility of Impact (Good / Fair / Poor) |
Reversibility of Change |
Magnitude of Change |
|||||
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
|
Con |
Op |
||||
LDR-1.1 |
|
YMT Refuge access impacts topsoil, small trees,
planting and restricts public access during the works – WS1 Slope stabilisation measures - WS2 |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Short |
Poor |
Good |
Yes |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
LDR-1.2 |
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden |
Encroachment of development access road into
garden impacts several mature trees – WS19 |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Med |
Poor |
Good |
Yes |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
LDR-1.3 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.4 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.5 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.6 |
Ko |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.7 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.8 |
The |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-1.9 |
Whampoa Estate Podium
Amenity Areas |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.1 |
Sports Pitches in the vicinity of |
WAB is
provisioned in Club de Recreio causing loss of tennis courts - WS7a1 |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Poor |
Fair |
No |
Small |
Negligible |
|
LDR-2.2 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.3 |
Fat |
Total area used
for works during construction - WA15, WS26a |
Full |
Slight |
Long |
Short |
Poor |
Good |
Yes |
Large |
Small |
|
LDR-2.4 |
King’s Park High Level Service Reservoir
Playground |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.5 |
Ho |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.6 |
Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.7 |
Whampoa Estate Podium Recreation Areas |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.8 |
Primary School Play Areas on Tak On Street |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-2.9 |
Tai Wan Shan Swimming Pool |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-3.1 |
Slopes in the area of |
Slope
stabilisation measures required - WS2 |
Full |
Full |
Short |
Short |
Fair |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
|
LDR-3.2 |
Slopes adjacent to |
Excavation of
HOM station construction will require removal of large areas of slope and
terraces including topsoil and tree cover - WS15a |
Part |
Part |
Long |
Long |
Poor |
Poor |
No |
Large |
Large |
|
LDR-3.3 |
Slopes surrounding King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-3.4 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir |
Site office -
WA2a |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Good |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
|
LDR-3.5 |
Slopes surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground |
Slope
stabilisation measures required - WS27 |
Part |
Slight |
Short |
Med |
Fair |
Good |
Yes |
Small |
Small |
|
LDR-4.1 |
Street Planting at |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-4.2 |
Street planting in the vicinity of |
Temporary
Traffic Management requires the removal of topsoil resources in roadside
planters and local street trees including mature trees at proposed WHA
station Entrance at |
Full |
Full |
Long |
Long |
Poor |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
|
LDR-4.3 |
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets |
Temporary
Traffic Management requires removal of street trees including rows of mature coco
palms and Ailanthus trees on |
Full |
Full |
Long |
Long |
Poor |
Poor |
Yes |
Large |
Large |
|
LDR-4.4 |
Street planting in the vicinity of |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-4.5 |
Roadside planting in
the Princess Margaret Road Interchange |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-5.1 |
Planting at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne /
Wylie Roads |
Access point
for WAB will impact large trees next to |
Part |
Slight |
Short |
Short |
Fair |
Good |
Yes |
Small |
Negligible |
|
LDR-5.2 |
Edge landscape at Harbour Front Landmark |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-5.3 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-6.1 |
Slopes adjacent to |
HOM Station excavation
requires removal of slopes - WS15a, WS20 |
Full |
Full |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
|
LDR-6.2 |
Slopes surrounding |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-6.3 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man West Service Reservoir |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-6.4 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-7.1 |
Site formation levels for use by HOM Station |
Area totally
redeveloped by the project - WS15a |
Full |
Full |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Fair |
No |
Large |
Large |
|
LDR-7.2 |
Future PolyU site formation area |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-7.3 |
Residual Valley Road Estate site formations |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-7.4 |
Formation levels at King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-7.5 |
Open Space sites at |
Used as works
areas during construction - WA6, |
Part |
- |
Long |
- |
Good |
- |
Yes |
Negligible |
- |
|
LDR-7.6 |
Reclaimed Land at TKO (Works Area) |
Used as a
temporary magazine site during construction - WA12a, WA13 |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Good |
Good |
No |
Small |
Small |
|
LDR-8.1 |
Hung Hom Finger Pier |
Site office and
used as barging point during construction - WA14 |
Full |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Good |
Good |
Yes |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
LDR-8.2 |
Future Promenade at Hung Hom Reclamation Areas |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-8.3 |
Promenade at Whampoa Harbourfront |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-9.1 |
|
Facilitates barging
of waste during construction |
Slight |
- |
Long |
- |
Good |
- |
Yes |
Negligible |
- |
|
LDR-9.2 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
LDR-10.1 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
|
Table 5.7: Magnitude of Impacts to Landscape Character Areas before Mitigation
LCA |
Description |
Source of Impact |
Extent of Impact (Full / Part / Slight) |
Duration of Impact (Short / Med / Long) |
Compatibility of Change (Good / Fair / Poor) |
Reversibility of Change |
Magnitude of Change |
||||
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
|
Con |
Op |
|||
LCA-01 |
Area
surrounding |
WAB and Works Area provisioned in Club de Recreio
/ Slope Stabilisation measures - WS4a, WS45, WS6a, WS44, WS7a1 |
Slight |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Good |
Good |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-02 |
Reclamation
Areas at Hung Hom Waterfront |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-03 |
King’s
Park |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-04 |
West of |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-05 |
Hung Hom - Cross Harbour Links |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-06 |
Ho Man Tin - |
Area significantly occupied by HOM Station
development - WS15a, |
Part |
Part |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Good |
No |
Large |
Large |
LCA-07 |
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan |
YMT Refuge access impacts small trees, planting
and restricts public access during the works – WS1 Slope stabilisation measures - WS2 |
Slight |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Good |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-08 |
Hung Hom around |
Temporary Works
Area at |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Fair |
Good |
No |
Small |
Negligible |
LCA-09 |
Whampoa
and Hung Hom Reclamations |
Area utilised for
WHA station development – WS30, WS31,WS33, WS36a, WS37a Temporary Works Area
to be utilised on future open space package - WA6 |
Part |
Slight |
Long |
Long |
Poor |
Good |
No |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-10 |
Ho Man
Tin Estate |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-11 |
|
WA14 Temporary
Barging Point at Hung Hom Finger Pier |
Slight |
- |
Long |
- |
Poor |
- |
Yes |
Negligible |
- |
LCA-12 |
Reclamation
at TKO |
WA12a, Wa13 Temporary
Magazine Site |
Slight |
- |
Long |
- |
Good |
- |
Yes |
Negligible |
- |
LCA-13 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
LCA-14 |
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none |
none |
5.10.1.3
The magnitude of change to the receivers will
be classified as follows:
Large: |
e.g. the majority of viewers affected / major change in view |
Intermediate: |
e.g. many viewers affected / moderate change in view |
Small: |
e.g. few viewers affected / minor change in view |
Negligible: |
e.g. very few viewers affected / no discernible change in view |
5.10.2
Visual Impacts
5.10.2.1
The magnitude of the impacts, before implementation of
mitigation measures, on the Visually Sensitive Receivers that would occur in the
construction and operation phases are tabulated in Table 5.8. All impacts are adverse unless otherwise stated and are
discussed below.
Residential
R1: Residents of towers on the west of
5.10.2.2
The
temporary works in
R2: Residents of Parc
Palais
5.10.2.3
The
occupation of the tennis court area at Club de Recreio as a works area as well as
the construction of the small WAB building will present an Intermediate magnitude of impact during construction. A tower crane
on the site is likely to cause the most visual impact. The WAB will remain
permanent through operation of the project causing a Small magnitude of change. No potential cumulative impacts are
envisaged.
R3:
East facing units of
5.10.2.4
Impacts
will be generated principally from the excavation, plant and construction works
at WS15a for HOM Station. These will be extensive and prominent including rock
crushing equipment and tower cranes and the magnitude of impacts during
Construction Phase can be considered Large.
Further cumulative visual impacts may be generated from construction of the SCL
around Princess Margaret Road Interchange. Operation impacts will be generated
from the new HOM Station building and the surrounding slope reinstatement works
and can be considered Intermediate.
R4: Residents on the south side of
5.10.2.5
These residents currently
view north to the Open Space on the slopes above
R5: Residents grouped at
5.10.2.6
These residents also
view north to the Open Space on the slopes above
R6: Residents at Ka Wai Chuen
5.10.2.7
These receivers view
directly over the Temporary Works Area at Fat Kwong Street Playground which
includes tunnel mucking out area, site offices and slope stabilisation works.
Trees around the playground will be predominantly retained and provide visual
amelioration. More distant views to the works at HOM Station can be seen
although partly obscured by other tall buildings. Construction Phase impacts
are considered as Large. Reinstatement of the Temporary Works Area at
project completion means that Operation Phase changes are considered Small
in magnitude.
R7: Residents at
5.10.2.8
Construction
Phase impacts will be generated principally from the Temporary Works Area and
Works Sites at Fat Kwong Street Playground in the near distance. These will
consist of a site office and mucking out areas and no large scale works are
anticipated. Receivers can also view the works at HOM Station at a further
distance, in particular the rock crushing equipment, yet views to the excavated
slopes above
R8: Residents
at Shun
5.10.2.9
Similar to VSR-R6
these receivers view both the HOM Station works and the Temporary Works Area at
Fat Kwong Street Playground. Whilst they are not quite so proximate to the
temporary works site they have more open west views to the large scale
construction works at HOM Station. Construction Phase impacts are expected to
be Large. Reinstatement of the Temporary Works Area at project
completion means that Operation Phase Visual Impacts are considered Intermediate.
R9: Future
Residents of HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory
5.10.2.10
The dormitory is
scheduled to be complete by 2012 and as a result receivers will have immediate
views to the construction of HOM Station to the north and the Fat Kwong Street
Playground Temporary Works Area to the south. Such close proximity means that
Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large during both Construction
and Operation Phases, with the location of the HOM Station cooling tower on
R10: Residents
at
5.10.2.11
As for VSR-R9 these
receivers are immediately adjacent to the HOM Station works and also view the
Fat Kwong Street Playground Temporary Works Area to the south. During both
Construction and Operation the HOM Station development will form the majority
of the view. The scale of construction activities mean that a Magnitude of
Change is anticipated to be Large during both Construction and Operation
Phases.
R11: Residents at Ho Man Tin Estate South
5.10.2.12
Receivers
will have restricted views of the site formation levels at HOM Station and
because of the long distance these will not be clear or extensive. The
magnitude of change to their view will be Small
during construction and Negligible
during operation.
R12: Residents of
5.10.2.13
These receivers view
onto the Temporary Works Area WA2a which will contain the project site
office. West facing receivers on the top floors of Shung Fu
Building and Li Ko building also have restricted, distant, oblique views to the
HOM Station site. Loss of a number of
self seeded trees for site establishment in this green
belt area will deprive receivers of some green visual amenity during
construction and a busy works site will replace their direct view. The
Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large during Construction
Phase. Removal of the works buildings at
project completion will see the site remain empty thereafter and return to its
original state. Resulting Operation
Phase impacts are considered to be assessed due to the loss of the self seeded
trees and their contribution to visual amenity.
Based upon the loss of
trees in this area and the associated loss of some visual amenity, the magnitude of change is considered to be Intermediate.
R13: Residents of Whampoa Estate and Garden
5.10.2.14
The construction of
WHA Station will see large scale excavation of the surrounding street
environment. Many residents will have clear views over the excavation and the
accompanying traffic diversion works. Removal of street trees in the area will
see a loss of visual amenity. The Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large
during Construction Phase with Intermediate Operation Phase impacts
resulting from the permanent loss of greening and the incorporation of new
above ground entrance and ventilation structures.
R14: Residents at Harbourfront Landmark
5.10.2.15
The
predominant number of residents will view well beyond the works due to the
height of the building. However lower
floor residents will have proximate views of the excavation and construction of
WHA Station. Furthermore residents will
be impacted directly by the works upon arrival and departure from their
building where the small Ventilation and Escape Staircase at
R15: Residents at
R16: Residents of
5.10.2.16
The
Temporary Site Office at Works Area WA6 will form a Small change to the view for these residents during construction.
The site is currently being used for similar purposes and shall not be utilised
for the works during Operation Phase.
R17: Residents of
5.10.2.17
The
full scale of the works at WS15a will form significant proportion of the view
for many residents. The loss of green visual amenity caused by the excavation
of the slopes at HOM Station and adverse impact of construction plant and views
into the open cut will be apparent despite the distance. Construction phase
changes are considered Intermediate
whilst Operation Phase changes are Small
following removal of construction activity.
R18: Future residents of
property development above HOM Station / R19: Future residents of
5.10.2.18
Whilst
no construction changes can be considered the outlook for future residents will
have changed considerably following construction of the HOM Station. The loss
of local greening on the slopes above
Leisure
L1: Users of
5.10.2.19
The receivers will
not be able to gain access to the
L2: Pedestrians and Shoppers in the vicinity of
5.10.2.20
Construction Phase
impacts will be Small in scale and should not be highly
prominent, only requiring tunnel access for cabling. Potential cumulative
impacts from Central Kowloon Route (CKR) and the Widening of Gascoigne Road
Flyover are possible. Reinstatement of the area following completion means that
impacts will be Negligible during
Operation Phase.
L3: Members and Visitors of
5.10.2.21
The occupation
of the tennis court area at Club de Recreio as a Works Area as well as the
construction of the small WAB building and potential temporary slope
stabilisation works at the entrances to the properties will present an Intermediate magnitude of impact during
construction. The WAB will remain permanent through operation of the project
however the removal of the temporary works will result in a Negligible magnitude of change.
Potential cumulative impacts from the Widening of Gascoigne Road Flyover are possible.
L4: Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio
5.10.2.22
The WAB will be
constructed in the grounds of Club de Recreio where it
will be clearly visible from both building and field areas. Receivers will be
directly adjacent to the works, particularly those partaking in sports. The Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large during
Construction Phase with Intermediate Operation Phase impacts resulting
from the scale and proximity of the new building.
L5: Visitors of King’s Park Hockey Ground
5.10.2.23
During
both Construction and Operation Phases the WAB will be viewed at close
quarters. However the existing trees on
L6: Visitors of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club
and Philipino Club
5.10.2.24
Immediately opposite
the site of the WAB on
L7: Recreation visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water
Service Reservoir
5.10.2.25
Construction
Phase impacts from the development of HOM Station will be closely felt as the
site is immediately adjacent and will dominate the view to the south. Operation Phase impacts will be
reduced due to the removal of construction plant, yet will remain permanently
changed by the scale of the HOM Station building, with the Cooling Tower and
Entrance B shaft becoming major features. The Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large during
Construction Phase with Intermediate Operation Phase impacts.
L8: Recreation users of Ho
5.10.2.26
Receivers
will have close southerly views of the site formation levels at HOM Station,
usually on arrival and departure. The northern end of the works will be visible
including the site offices and rock crushing equipment. The magnitude of change
to their view will be Large during
construction and Small during
operation. .
L9: Recreation users of Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir Playground
5.10.2.27
Works site
WS15a can be fully viewed to the south from the southern edge of this facility.
The rock crushing equipment will be at the forefront of the view and most of
the other activities of the site, including much of the station box excavation
will be open to view. The magnitude of change will be Large during Construction Phase and Intermediate during Operation Phase.
L10: Users of
5.10.2.28
The receivers will
not be able to gain access to the
L11: Pedestrians around
5.10.2.29
The use
of Fat Kwong Street Playground during the construction works, including
potential slope stabilisation measures on the surrounding slopes will be
immediately adjacent to receivers. The magnitude of change will be Large during Construction Phase but due to
the re-instatement of the Playground and slopes shall be considered Small during Operation Phase.
L12: Recreational users of
5.10.2.30
The receivers will
not be able to gain access to the Playground during Construction Phase.
Operation Phase changes will be Small due to the re-instatement of the Playground and
surrounding slopes. Cumulative
impacts will be particularly noticeable from the proximity of the HK PolyU
Planned Student Dormitory which will have been completed.
L13: Pedestrians in and around
5.10.2.31
The
proximity of both HOM Station and Fat Kwong Street Playground during the
construction works will have considerable visual intrusion to Park Users. The
magnitude of change will be Large
during Construction Phase but due to the re-instatement of the Playground as
well as the resultant restricted views to the new HOM Station it shall be
considered Small during Operation
Phase. Cumulative impacts can be expected from the HK PolyU Planned Student
Dormitory which will have been completed.
L14: Pedestrians and Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and
Garden
5.10.2.32
The construction of
WHA Station will see large scale excavation of the surrounding street
environment. Receivers will have continuous views of the works areas, usually
in the form of surrounding site hoardings and the accompanying traffic
diversion works will be conspicuous and affect pedestrian flows. Removal of
street trees in the area will see a loss of visual amenity. The Magnitude of
Change is anticipated to be Large during Construction Phase with Intermediate
Operation Phase impacts resulting from the permanent loss of greening and the
incorporation of new above ground entrance and ventilation structures.
L15: Visitors to
5.10.2.33
Pedestrians
on the south parapet of the promenade at Hong Kong Coliseum will be able to
view the Temporary Barging Point WA14 during Construction Phase. The works will
be relatively well absorbed into the clutter of surrounding structures and
elevated highways, with the rock crushing equipment concealed within an
enclosure. Construction Phase impacts
are considered Small and no ongoing
Operation Phase impacts will arise.
L16: Pedestrians on TST East Promenade
5.10.2.34
Pedestrians
will be able to view the Temporary Barging Point WA14 during Construction
Phase. The works will be relatively well absorbed into the clutter of
surrounding structures and elevated highways, with the rock crushing equipment
concealed within an enclosure. Construction
Phase impacts are considered Negligible and
no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
L17: Hikers at
5.10.2.35
Hikers
will be able to view the Temporary Magazine Site WA12a/WA13 during Construction
Phase. The works will be very small scale and hard to discern in the wider
disrupted. Construction Phase impacts
are considered Negligible and no
ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
Occupational
O1: Workers in commercial buildings on
O2: Staff and Guests of Eaton Hotel
5.10.2.36
Construction Phase
impacts will be Small in scale and should not be highly
prominent, only requiring tunnel access for cabling. Potential cumulative
impacts from
O3: Staff and Students of
5.10.2.37
Construction Phase
impacts will be Intermediate in scale. The slope
stabilisation works proposed at WS2 are immediately adjacent to the College and
will form a large part of the view even though they are relatively small in
nature. Some of the works at WS1 Gascoigne Road Rest G
O4: Staff of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings
5.10.2.38
The
occupation of the tennis court area at Club de Recreio as a works area as well
as the construction of the small WAB building will present an Intermediate magnitude of impact during
construction. A tower crane on the site is likely to cause the most visual
impact. The WAB will remain permanent through operation of the project causing
a Small magnitude of change. No
potential cumulative impacts are envisaged.
O5: Staff of
5.10.2.39
The occupation
of the tennis court area at Club de Recreio as a Works Area as well as the
construction of the small WAB building and potential temporary slope
stabilisation works at the entrances to the properties will present an Intermediate magnitude of impact during
construction. The WAB will remain permanent through operation of the project
however the removal of the temporary works will result in a Negligible magnitude of change.
Potential cumulative impacts from the Widening of Gascoigne Road Flyover are possible.
O6: Staff of Club de Recreio
5.10.2.40
The WAB will be
constructed in the grounds of Club
de Recreio where it will be clearly visible from both building and field areas.
Receivers will be directly adjacent to the works, particularly those partaking
in sports. The Magnitude of Change is anticipated to
be Large during Construction Phase with Intermediate Operation
Phase impacts resulting from the scale and proximity of the new building.
O7: Staff of King’s Park Hockey Ground
5.10.2.41
During
both Construction and Operation Phases the WAB will be viewed at close
quarters. However the existing trees on
O8: Staff of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club
and Philipino Club /
O9: Staff and Students of future Primary School (under construction) at
5.10.2.42
Immediately opposite
the site of the WAB on
O10: Staff at Ho
5.10.2.43
Receivers
will have close southerly views of the site formation levels at HOM Station,
usually on arrival and departure. The northern end of the works will be visible
including the site offices and rock crushing equipment. The magnitude of change
to their view will be Large during
construction and Small during
operation.
O11: Staff of Small Businesses at
5.10.2.44
These receivers are
immediately adjacent to the HOM Station works and also view the Fat Kwong
Street Playground Temporary Works Area to the south. During both construction
and operation the HOM Station development will form a large extent of the view
but it is restricted to the end of the street where the new cooling tower will
be dominant, replacing the large shotcrete slopes. The scale of construction
activities mean that the Magnitude of Change is anticipated to be Large
during construction and is reduced to Small in Operation Phase with the
removal of construction activities and reinstatement of Fat Kwong Street Playground.
O12: Workers at short term tenancy on
5.10.2.45
Construction
workers involved in the building of the new Hostel will be immediately next to the
works site at HOM Station with full views. The Magnitude of Change during
Construction Phase is Large.
Programming will mean that no Operational Phase Impacts occur.
O13: Staff at Hung Hom Fire Station /
O14: Staff and Students of
5.10.2.46
These receivers view
directly over the Temporary Works Area at Fat Kwong Street Playground which
includes tunnel mucking out area, site offices and slope stabilisation works.
Trees around the playground will be predominantly retained and provide visual
amelioration. More distant views to the works at HOM Station can be seen
although partly obscured by other tall buildings. Construction Phase impacts
are considered as Large. Reinstatement of the Temporary Works Area at
project completion means that Operation Phase changes are considered Small
in magnitude.
O15: Staff at
5.10.2.47
These receivers view
to the HOM Station works site next to
O16: Staff of Businesses in Whampoa Estate and
5.10.2.48
The construction of
WHA Station will see large scale excavation of the surrounding street
environment. Many receivers will have clear views onto the excavation works, site
hoardings and the accompanying traffic diversion works. Removal of street trees
in the area will see a loss of visual amenity. The Magnitude of Change is
anticipated to be Large during Construction Phase with Intermediate
Operation Phase impacts resulting from the permanent loss of greening and the
incorporation of new above ground entrance and ventilation structures.
O17: Staff and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary
Schools
5.10.2.49
The scale
of works is limited in the area to street excavation and Temporary Traffic
Management (TTM) with construction of the new small vent structure near the
school entrances at
O18:
O19: Office workers with north view at Two Harbourfront
5.10.2.50
The
scale of works is limited in the area to street excavation and TTM with
construction of a new vent and escape stair at
O20: Staff and Students at
5.10.2.51
The
Temporary Site Office at Works Area WA6 will form a Small change to the view for these receivers during construction.
The site is currently being used for similar purposes and shall not be utilised
for the works during Operation Phase.
O21: Staff and Guests of Harbour View Horizon Hotel /
O22: Staff and Guests of Harbour Front Horizon Hotel
5.10.2.52
Both
the Temporary Site Office at Works Area WA6 and the Temporary Barging Point at
WA14 will provide impacts. In both
cases the nature of the impact is small scale without the need for large plant
or disruption. Construction Phase impacts are considered Small and no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise
O23: Staff and Guests of
O24: Office workers with south views at International Mail Centre
5.10.2.53
The
Temporary Barging Point works area WA14 will be visible during Construction
Phase. The works will be relatively well absorbed into the clutter of
surrounding structures and elevated highways, with the rock crushing equipment
concealed within an enclosure. Construction
Phase impacts are considered Small and
no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
O25: Office / Hotel workers and guests with east views
at TST East
5.10.2.54
Receivers
will be able to view the Temporary Barging Point works area WA14 during
Construction Phase. The works will be relatively well absorbed into the clutter
of surrounding structures and elevated highways, with the rock crushing
equipment concealed within an enclosure. Construction
Phase impacts are considered Negligible and
no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
O26: Office Workers at The
5.10.2.55
Distant
views to works site WS15a at HOM Station as well as the Temporary Barging Point
at WS14 will provide some change to view. The full extent of the scale of the
works at WS15a will be apparent due to the high elevation of the receivers
whilst the low key impacts from the barging point will be fairly concealed. Construction Phase impacts can be
considered Intermediate. Operation
impacts will be generated from the new HOM Station building and the surrounding
slope reinstatement works and can be considered Small. Further cumulative visual impacts may be generated from
construction of the SCL including the portals at Hung Hom Station and the works
areas around Princess Margaret Road Interchange.
O27: Staff and Students at
5.10.2.56
Impacts
will be generated principally from the excavation, plant and construction works
at WS15a for HOM Station. These will be extensive and prominent including rock
crushing equipment and tower cranes and the magnitude of impacts during
Construction Phase can be considered Intermediate.
Further cumulative visual impacts may be generated from construction of the SCL
around Princess Margaret Road Interchange. Operation impacts will be generated
from the new HOM Station building and the surrounding slope reinstatement works
and can be considered Small.
Transportation
T1: Circulating Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads
5.10.2.57
Construction Phase
impacts will be Small in scale and should not be highly
prominent, only requiring tunnel access for cabling. Potential cumulative
impacts from
T2: Fast moving vehicles on
5.10.2.58
Potential
temporary slope stabilisation works at the entrances to the India Club and Club
de Recreio will present a Small
magnitude of impact during construction. No Operation Phase impacts are
envisaged. Potential cumulative impacts from the Widening of Gascoigne Road
Flyover are possible.
T3: Road users on
5.10.2.59
Potential
Impacts are derived from the WAB as well as slope stabilisation measures on
Wylie Path. During both Construction and Operation Phases these areas will be
passed at close quarters, however the existing trees on Wylie Road mean that the
WAB shall be well screened both before and after completion and Negligible Operation Phase impacts are
anticipated. However the requirement for site establishment and access at such
proximate distances will make the Construction Phase changes Small.
T4: Fast moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road
Interchange /
T5: Fast moving vehicles on
T6: Road users on
T7: Temporary parking users on future development site /
T8: Road users on
5.10.2.60
During Construction
Phase an area of approximately 15,000m² of the Slopes above
T9: Road users on
5.10.2.61
Receivers will not be
able to gain access to the street during Construction Phase. Operation Phase
changes will be Intermediate as for other surrounding streets noted
above.
T10: Road users on Tak Man / Tak On Street /
T11: Road users on
5.10.2.62
The construction of
WHA Station will see large scale excavation of the surrounding street
environment. Receivers will have continuous views of the works areas, usually
in the form of surrounding site hoardings and the accompanying traffic
diversion works will be conspicuous and affect pedestrian flows. Removal of
street trees in the area will see a loss of visual amenity. The Magnitude of
Change is anticipated to be Large during Construction Phase with Intermediate
Operation Phase impacts resulting from the permanent loss of greening and the
incorporation of new above ground entrance and ventilation structures.
T12: Road users on
5.10.2.63
Potential
impacts will be received from construction of the new vent structures at
T13: Road users on
5.10.2.64
The
Temporary Site Office at Works Area WA6 will form a Small change to the view for these receivers during construction.
The site is currently being used for similar purposes and shall not be utilised
for the works during Operation Phase.
T14: Road users on
5.10.2.65
The
Temporary Barging Point at works area WA14 will be visible during Construction Phase
but well concealed behind barriers. The works will be relatively well absorbed
into the clutter of surrounding structures and elevated highways, with the
temporary rock crushing equipment concealed within an enclosure. Construction Phase impacts are considered Small and no ongoing Operation Phase
impacts will arise.
T15: Road users on
T16: Travellers in
5.10.2.66
Receivers will be able to view the Temporary Barging Point (WA14) during
Construction Phase. The works will be relatively well absorbed into the clutter
of surrounding structures and elevated highways, with the temporary rock
crushing equipment concealed within an enclosure. Construction Phase impacts are considered Negligible and no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
T17: Recreational boat traffic in
5.10.2.67
Impacts will derive from the Temporary Magazine Site
at works areas WA12a and WA13 which consists of a small storage compound and low
structure. Tit Cham Chau and the uneven surrounding bund restrict the potential
impacts considerably.
Construction Phase impacts are considered
Negligible and no ongoing Operation Phase impacts will arise.
5.10.3
Temporary Rock Crushing Equipment
5.10.3.1
Three temporary rock crushing equipment may be required during the construction. One
would be located within the works site at HOM Station (WS15a) (See Figure 3.4) and two would be housed
together within one structure at Hung Hom Finger Pier (WA14) (See Figure 3.8). A typical layout of the
crushing equipment and disposition of
these facilities is described in Section 3.6.3 and can be seen on Figure 3.38.
5.10.3.2
The
facility at HOM Station would be relatively insignificant in terms of the scale
of works being undertaken there and would be unlikely to have any significant
visual impact over and above that being assessed within the site, including
tower cranes, large plant, excavation equipment, site offices and exposed
stabilised slopes. The covering structure would be approximately 10m in height.
The materials and colour of the surfacing shall be low key to ensure that no
unnecessary glare or reflection results. The crusher is scheduled for use for
about 19 months after which it would be removed from the site.
5.10.3.3
At Hung
Hom Finger Pier the crushers are housed together under a single structure of
approximately 70m x 50m with a height of approximately 10m. It is strategically
located within the works area to minimise visual intrusion to the majority of
local visual receivers, being placed close under the overhead expressway of
Table 5.8:
Magnitude of Impacts on Visually Sensitive Receivers before Mitigation
VSR |
Location |
Source of Impact |
Type of Impact |
Dist- ance To Source |
Compatibility
with Surroundings (Good / Fair /
Poor) |
Scale of
Development (Small / Med /
Large) |
Duration of Impacts (Short / Med /
Long) |
Reversibility
of change (Yes / No) |
Potential
blockage of view (Full / Part /
Nil) |
Magnitude of
Change (Large /
Intermediate / Small /
Negligible) |
||||||
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
Con |
Op |
|||||
Residential |
||||||||||||||||
R1 |
Residents
on the west of |
WS1 WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
30m |
Fair |
Fair |
Small |
Small |
Long |
Long |
Yes |
Yes |
Nil |
Nil |
Small |
Negligible |
R2 |
Residents
of Parc Palais |
WS7a1 WS47 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
150m |
Poor |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Small |
R3 |
East
facing units of |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
300m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
R4 |
Residents
on the south side of |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
30m |
Poor |
Fair |
Large |
Large |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Full |
Full |
Large |
Large |
R5 |
Residents
grouped at |
WS15a WS19 WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
15m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Nil |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
R6 |
Residents
at Ka Wai Chuen |
WS15a, WS19, WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
80m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
R7 |
Residents
at |
WS15a, WS19, WS20, WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
90m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
R8 |
Residents
at Shun |
WS15a WS20, WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
60m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
R9 |
Future
residents of HK PolyU planned student dormitory |
WS15a WS20, |
HOM Station construction |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Large |
R10 |
Residents
with surrounding views at |
WS20, WS19, WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Full |
Large |
Large |
R11 |
Residents
at Ho Man Tin Estate South |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
340m |
Good |
Good |
Small |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Small |
Negligible |
R12 |
Residents
at |
WA2a, WS15a |
Temporary Site Office, HOM Station Construction (restricted) |
10m |
Fair |
Fair |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
Yes |
Yes |
Nil |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
R13 |
Residents
of Whampoa Estate and Garden |
WS30, WS31, WS33, WS36a, WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / WHA D&B Platform
Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE
Refuge Siding Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase
and Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
R14 |
Residents
of Harbour Front Landmark |
WS33 WS36a WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE Refuge Siding
Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase and Staircase
Pressurisation Fan Room |
15m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Small |
R15 |
Residents
at Poly U Student Dormitory |
WA6 |
Site Office |
20m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
R16 |
Residents
of |
WA6, |
Site Office |
20m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
R17 |
Residents
of |
WS15a |
HOM Station construction / Potential Slope
Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works |
500m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Small |
R18 |
Future
residents of property development above HOM Station |
WS15a WS20, , WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station construction / Reprovisioned facilities in Fat
Kwong Street Playground |
0m |
- |
Good |
- |
Large |
- |
Long |
- |
No |
- |
Part |
- |
Interm’ |
R19 |
Future
residents of Valley Road Estate development site |
WS15a WS20 |
HOM Station construction |
20m |
- |
Good |
- |
Large |
- |
Long |
- |
No |
- |
Part |
- |
Interm’ |
Leisure |
||||||||||||||||
L1 |
Users
of |
WS1, WS2 |
Reprovisioned Facilities at |
0m |
- |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Short |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
L2 |
Pedestrians
and Shoppers in the vicinity of |
WS1, WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Fair |
Fair |
Small |
Small |
Long |
Long |
Yes |
Yes |
Part |
Nil |
Small |
Negligible |
L3 |
Members
and Visitors of |
WS4A, WS45, WS6a, WS7a1 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
Yes |
No |
Part |
Part |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
L4 |
Members
and Visitors of Club de Recreio |
WS6a, WS45, WS7a1 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Poor |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
L5 |
Visitors
of |
WS7a1 WS44 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
30m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
L6 |
Visitors
of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
WS7a1, WS44, WS47 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Poor |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
L7 |
Recreation
visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water Service Reservoir |
WS15a, |
HOM Station Construction |
60m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
L8 |
Recreation
visitors at Ho Man Tin Park and Leisure Centre |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
100m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Small |
L9 |
Recreation
users at Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
WS15a WS20, WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
40m |
Good |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
L10 |
Users
of |
WS15a WS19 |
HOM Station / Reprovisioned facilities in Yan
Fung Street Playground |
0m |
- |
Good |
- |
Large |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Part |
- |
Interm’ |
L11 |
Pedestrians
around |
WS25, WS26a, WS27, WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
10m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Short |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Small |
L12 |
Recreational
users of Fat Kwong Street Playground |
WS15a WS26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / Reprovisioned facilities in Fat
Kwong Street Playground |
0m |
- |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Short |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
L13 |
Pedestrians
in and around |
WS25, WS26a, WS27, WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
20m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Short |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
L14 |
Pedestrians
and Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and Garden |
WS30, WS31, WS33, WS36a, WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / WHA D&B Platform
Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE
Refuge Siding Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase
and Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
L15 |
Visitors
to |
WA14 |
Site clearance,
establishment, erect temporary housing structures / rock crushing
equipment |
0m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Part |
- |
Small |
- |
L16 |
Pedestrians
on TST East Promenade |
WA14 |
Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
0m
-300m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
L17 |
Hikers at |
WA12a WA13 |
Site clearance and establishment, erect temporary
magazine structures (anticipated) |
200m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
Occupational |
||||||||||||||||
O1 |
Workers
in commercial buildings on |
WS1, WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
30m |
Fair |
Fair
|
Small |
Small |
Long |
Short |
Yes |
Yes |
Nil |
Nil |
Small |
Negligible |
O2 |
Staff
and Guests of Eaton Hotel |
WS1, WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
50m |
Fair |
Fair |
Small |
Small |
Long |
Short |
Yes |
Yes |
Part |
Nil |
Small |
Negligible |
O3 |
Staff
and students of |
WS1, WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Fair |
Fair |
Med |
Small |
Med |
Short |
Yes |
Yes |
Full |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O4 |
Staff
of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings |
WS4a WS7a1 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
10m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Interm’ |
Small |
O5 |
Staff
of |
WS4a, WS6a, WS7a1 WS45, |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
Yes |
No |
Part |
Part |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O6 |
Staff
of Club de Recreio |
WS6a, WS45, WS7a1 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Poor |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
O7 |
Staff
of |
WS7a1 WS44, |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
30m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O8 |
Staff
of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
WS7a1, WS44, WS47 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
0m |
Poor |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
O9 |
Staff
and Students of future Primary School (under construction) at |
WS7a1, WS44 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
10m |
Poor |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
O10 |
Staff
of Ho Man Tin Leisure Centre |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
100m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Small |
O11 |
Staff
of small businesses at |
WS20, WS19, WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Small |
O12 |
Workers
at short term tenancy on |
WS20, WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works / Site Office |
0m |
Fair |
- |
Large |
- |
Long
|
- |
No |
- |
Part |
- |
Large |
- |
O13 |
Staff
at Hung Hom Fire Station |
WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / / Site Office |
140m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Small |
O14 |
Staff
and Students of |
WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
50m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Small |
O15 |
Staff
at |
WS15a Ws26a WS27 WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
15m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Med |
Long
|
Long |
No |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
O16 |
Staff of businesses in Whampoa Estate and Garden |
WS30, WS31, WS33, WS36a, WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / WHA D&B Platform
Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE
Refuge Siding Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase
and Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
O17 |
Staff
and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary Schools |
WS33 WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / Escape Staircase and
Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O18 |
Staff
and Students of |
WS33, WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / Escape Staircase and
Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O19 |
Office
workers at front
|
WS33 WS36a, WS37a, |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE Refuge Siding
Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase and Staircase Pressurisation
Fan Room |
15m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Negligible |
O20 |
Staff
and Students at HK Poly U – Community College Campus |
WA6 |
Site Office |
30m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
O21 |
Staff
and Guests at Harbour View Horizon Hotel |
WA6 WA14, |
Site Office / Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
30m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
O22 |
Staff
and Guests at Harbour Front Horizon Hotel |
WA6 WA14, |
Site Office / Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
15m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
O23 |
Staff
and Guests of |
WA14, |
Site clearance,
establishment, erect temporary housing structures / rock crushing
equipment |
10m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
O24 |
Office
workers at International Mail Centre |
WA14 |
Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
0m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Part |
- |
Small |
- |
O25 |
Office/Hotel
workers and guests at TST East |
WA14 |
Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
350m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
O26 |
Office
workers at The Metropolis Tower |
WS15a WA14 |
HOM Station construction / Potential Slope
Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works |
525m
/ 250m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Nil |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Small |
O27 |
Staff
and Students at HK Poly U |
WS15a |
HOM Station construction / Potential Slope
Stabilisation / Permanent Slope Works |
250m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long
|
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Interm’ |
Small |
Transportation |
||||||||||||||||
T1 |
Circulating
Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads |
WS1, WS2 |
KTL Existing
Cable Tunnel Diversion Works, / Potential Slope Stabilisation |
5m |
Fair |
Fair |
Small |
Small |
Long |
Long |
Yes |
Yes |
Part |
Part |
Small |
Negligible |
T2 |
Fast
moving vehicles on |
WS4a, WS45, WS6a, |
Potential Slope Stabilisation |
5m |
Fair |
Good |
Small |
Small |
Short |
Short |
Yes |
Yes |
Nil |
Nil |
Small |
Negligible |
T3 |
Road
users on |
WS7a1, WS44 WS47 |
WAB Construction and Tunnel Mucking-out /
Potential
Slope Stabilisation |
5m |
Fair |
Good |
Small |
Small |
Short |
Long |
Yes |
No |
Part |
Part |
Small |
Negligible |
T4 |
Fast
moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road Interchange |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
100m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
T5 |
Fast
moving vehicles on |
WS15a, WS19, Ws27 |
HOM Station Construction / Potential Slope Stabilisation
/ Permanent Slope Works |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
T6 |
Road
users on |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
5m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Full |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
T7 |
Temporary
parking users on future development
site |
WS15a |
HOM Station Construction |
25m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Full |
Full |
Large |
Interm’ |
T8 |
Road
users on |
WS15a, WS27, WS26a, WA15 |
HOM Station Construction / KTE Tunnel Mucking-out
/ Potential Slope Stabilisation / Site Office |
5m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Large |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
T9 |
Road
users on |
WS15a WS19 |
HOM Station Construction / Reprovisioned |
0m |
- |
Good |
- |
Large |
- |
Long |
- |
No |
- |
Part |
- |
Interm’ |
T10 |
Road
users on Tak Man / Tak On Street
|
WS30, WS31, WS33, WS36a, WS37a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / WHA D&B Platform
Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE
Refuge Siding Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction / Escape Staircase
and Staircase Pressurisation Fan Room |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Large |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Nil |
Large |
Interm’ |
T11 |
Road
users on |
WS30 |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Med |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Large |
Interm’ |
T12 |
Road
users on Whampoa Estate and Garden side streets |
WS30, WS31, WS33 WS36a |
WHA
C&C Structure Construction and TTM Implementation / WHA D&B Platform
Construction and TTM Implementation / KTE
Refuge Siding Tunnel and Ventilation Shaft Construction |
0m |
Fair |
Good |
Small |
Small |
Long |
Long |
No |
No |
Part |
Part |
Interm’ |
Small |
T13 |
Road
users on |
WA6 |
Site Office |
5m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
T14 |
Road
users on |
WA6 WA14, |
Site Office / Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
0m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Small |
- |
T15 |
Road
users on |
WA14, |
Site clearance, establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
200m |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
T16 |
Travellers in |
WA14, |
Site clearance , establishment, erect temporary
housing structures / rock crushing equipment |
0m-1km |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
T17 |
Recreational
boat traffic at Tai Mui Wan |
WA12a,
WA13 |
Temporary Magazine Site |
0m-3km |
Good |
- |
Small |
- |
Long |
- |
Yes |
- |
Nil |
- |
Negligible |
- |
5.11
Impact Significance Threshold
5.11.1.1
The
analysis of the landscape and visual impacts during construction and operation
are presented in the following form of matrix to ascertain the Significance Threshold.
The impacts may be beneficial or adverse as illustrated in Table 5.9.
Table 5.9: Significance
Threshold
Magnitude
of Change |
Sensitivity
|
|||
|
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
Negligible |
Negligible
Impact |
Negligible
Impact |
Negligible Impact |
|
Small |
Slight Impact |
Slight /
Moderate Impact |
Moderate
Impact |
|
Intermediate |
Slight /
Moderate Impact |
Moderate
Impact |
Moderate /
Significant Impact |
|
Large |
Moderate
Impact |
Moderate /
Significant Impact |
Significant
Impact |
5.11.1.2
The
degree of impact or Significance Threshold is considered as follows:
Significant: |
adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause significant deterioration or improvement in the existing landscape/visual quality |
Moderate: |
adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause a noticeable deterioration or improvement in the existing landscape/visual quality |
Slight: |
adverse / beneficial impact where the proposal would cause barely perceptible deterioration or improvement in the existing landscape/visual quality |
Negligible: |
no discernible change in the existing landscape/visual quality |
5.11.1.3
The
Significance Threshold of those impacts, before implementation of mitigation
measures, on the Landscape Resources, Landscape Character Areas and Visually
Sensitive Receivers that would occur in the construction and operation phases
is summarised in Tables 5.10 - 5.12
below.
Table 5.10:
Significance Threshold of Landscape Resources
Ref (LDR) |
Description |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change |
Significance Threshold WITHOUT Mitigation |
|||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
||||
LDR-1 - Public Amenity Area |
|||||||
LDR-1.1 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
LDR-1.2 |
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden |
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LDR-1.3 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.4 |
|
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.5 |
|
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.6 |
Ko |
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.7 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.8 |
The
|
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-1.9 |
Whampoa Estate Podium Amenity Areas |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2 - Open Recreation
Space |
|||||||
LDR-2.1 |
Sports
Pitches in the vicinity of |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
|
LDR-2.2 |
|
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.3 |
Fat
|
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
LDR-2.4 |
King’s
Park High Level Service Reservoir Playground |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.5 |
Ho |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.6 |
Ho
Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.7 |
Whampoa
Estate Podium Recreation Areas |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.8 |
Primary
School Play Areas on Tak On Street |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-2.9 |
Tai
Wan Shan Swimming Pool |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-3 - Stabilised Slopes
with Tree Planting |
|||||||
LDR-3.1 |
Slopes
in the area of |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LDR-3.2 |
Slopes
adjacent to |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
|
LDR-3.3 |
Slopes
surrounding King’s Park High Level Service Reservoir |
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-3.4 |
Slopes
surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
|
LDR-3.5 |
Slopes
surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
|
LDR-4 -Roadside Amenity
Planting |
|||||||
LDR-4.1 |
Street
Planting at |
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-4.2 |
Street
planting in the vicinity of |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LDR-4.3 |
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LDR-4.4 |
Street
planting in the vicinity of |
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-4.5 |
Roadside planting in the Princess Margaret Road
Interchange |
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-5 – Private Development
Landscape Buffer |
|||||||
LDR-5.1 |
Planting
at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne / Wylie Roads |
High |
Small |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
|
LDR-5.2 |
Edge
landscape at Harbour Front Landmark |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-5.3 |
|
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-6 - Stabilised Slopes
Without Greening |
|||||||
LDR-6.1 |
Slopes
adjacent to |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Slight Beneficial |
|
LDR-6.2 |
Slopes
surrounding |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-6.3 |
Slopes
surrounding Ho Man West Service Reservoir |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-6.4 |
Slopes
surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-7- Undeveloped Site
formation |
|||||||
LDR-7.1 |
Site
formation levels for use by HOM Station |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
LDR-7.2 |
Future
PolyU site formation area |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-7.3 |
Residual
Valley Road Estate site formations |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-7.4 |
Formation
levels at King’s Park High Level Service Reservoir |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-7.5 |
Open
Space sites at |
Low |
Negligible |
none |
Negligible |
- |
|
LDR-7.6 |
Reclaimed
Land at TKO (Works Area) |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
|
LDR-8
- Man Made Shoreline |
|||||||
LDR-8.1 |
Hung
Hom Finger Pier |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
LDR-8.2 |
Future
Promenade at Hung Hom Reclamation Areas |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-8.3 |
Promenade
at Whampoa Harbourfront |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-9
- Harbour Waters |
|||||||
LDR-9.1 |
|
High |
Negligible |
none |
Negligible |
- |
|
LDR-9.2 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
LDR-10
– |
|||||||
LDR-10.1 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
|
Table 5.11:
Significance Threshold of Landscape Character Units
Ref (LCA) |
Description |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change |
Significance Threshold WITHOUT Mitigation |
||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|||
LCA-01 |
Area surrounding |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-02 |
Reclamation Areas at Hung Hom Waterfront |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-03 |
King’s Park |
Medium |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-04 |
West of |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-05 |
Hung Hom - Cross Harbour
Links |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-06 |
Ho
Man Tin - |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
LCA-07 |
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-08 |
Hung
Hom around |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
LCA-09 |
Whampoa
and Hung Hom Reclamations Whampoa
and Hung Hom Reclamations |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-10 |
Ho Man Tin Estate |
Low |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-11 |
|
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-12 |
Reclamation at TKO |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
LCA-13 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
LCA-14 |
|
High |
none |
none |
- |
- |
Table 5.12: Significance Threshold of
Visually Sensitive Receivers
Ref (VSR) |
Description |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change |
Significance Threshold WITHOUT Mitigation |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|||||
Residential VSRs |
||||||||
R1 |
Residents of
towers on the west of |
High |
Small |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
R2 |
Residents of
Parc Palais |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
R3 |
East facing units
of |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
||
R4 |
Residents on
the south side of |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
||
R5 |
Residents
grouped at |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R6 |
Residents at Ka Wai Chuen |
High |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R7 |
Residents at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R8 |
Residents at Shun |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R9 |
Future residents of HK PolyU planned student
dormitory |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R10 |
Residents with surrounding views at |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
||
R11 |
Residents at Ho Man Tin Estate South |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
R12 |
Residents at |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R13 |
Residents of Whampoa Estate and Garden |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
R14 |
Residents of Harbourfront Landmark |
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
R15 |
Residents at Poly U Student Dormitory |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
R16 |
Residents of |
High |
Small |
- |
Moderate |
- |
||
R17 |
Residents of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
R18 |
Future residents of property development above HOM Station
|
High |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
||
R19 |
Future residents of Valley Road Estate development
site |
High |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
||
Leisure VSRs |
||||||||
L1 |
Users of |
Medium |
- |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
||
L2 |
Pedestrians and Shoppers in the vicinity of |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
L3 |
Members and Visitors of |
High |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
L4 |
Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
L5 |
Visitors of |
Low |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
L6 |
Visitors of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club
and Philipino Club |
High |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
L7 |
Recreation visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water
Service Reservoir |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
L8 |
Recreation visitors at Ho Man Tin Park and Leisure
Centre |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
L9 |
Recreation users at Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir Playground |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
L10 |
Users of |
Medium |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
||
L11 |
Pedestrians around |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
||
L12 |
Recreational users of Fat Kwong Street Playground |
Medium |
- |
Small |
- |
Slight |
||
L13 |
Pedestrians in and around |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
||
L14 |
Pedestrians and Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and
Garden. |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
L15 |
Pedestrians at |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
L16 |
Pedestrians on TST East Promenade |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
L17 |
Hikers at |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
Occupational VSRs |
||||||||
O1 |
Workers in commercial buildings on |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
O2 |
Staff and Guests of Eaton Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
O3 |
Staff and students of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
O4 |
Staff of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
O5 |
Staff of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
O6 |
Staff of Club de Recreio |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
O7 |
Staff of |
Low |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
O8 |
Staff of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and
Philipino Club |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
||
O9 |
Staff and Students of future Primary School (under
construction) at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
O10 |
Staff of Ho Man Tin Leisure Centre |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
O11 |
Staff of small businesses at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
||
O12 |
Workers at short term tenancy on |
Low |
Large |
- |
Moderate |
- |
||
O13 |
Staff at Hung Hom Fire Station |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
O14 |
Staff and Students of |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
O15 |
Staff at |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
O16 |
Staff of businesses in
Whampoa Estate and Garden |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
O17 |
Staff and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary
Schools |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
O18 |
Staff and Students of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
O19 |
Office workers at Two Harbourfront |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
||
O20 |
Staff and Students at HK Poly U – Community College
Campus |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
O21 |
Staff and Guests at Harbour View Horizon Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
O22 |
Staff and Guests at Harbour Front Horizon Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
O23 |
Staff and Guests of |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
O24 |
Office workers at International Mail Centre |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
O25 |
Office/Hotel workers and guests at TST East |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
O26 |
Office workers at The Metropolis Tower |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
||
O27 |
Staff and Students at HK Poly U |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
Transportation VSRs |
||||||||
T1 |
Circulating Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
T2 |
Fast moving vehicles on |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
T3 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
||
T4 |
Fast moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road
Interchange |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
T5 |
Fast moving vehicles on |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
T6 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
T7 |
Temporary parking users on future development site |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
T8 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
T9 |
Road users on |
Low |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Slight Beneficial |
||
T10 |
Road users on Tak Man / Tak On Street |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
T11 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
||
T12 |
Road users on Whampoa Estate side streets |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
||
T13 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
T14 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
||
T15 |
Road users on |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
T16 |
Travellers in |
Medium |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
T17 |
Recreational boat traffic at Tai Mui Wan |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
||
5.12.1
Background
5.12.1.1
Potential
landscape and visual impacts have been carefully considered during the
development of the project design to (1) avoid impacts on highly sensitive
landscape resources including the large trees at Yan Fung Street (LDR1.2), Fat
Kwong Street Garden (LDR1.3), and Hutchison Park (LDR1.7), and (2) locate,
design and reduce the physical extent of the works as far as possible, as well
as to identify mitigation measures, so as to minimize impacts on existing trees
and open spaces, and to minimize the degree of visual impact, as proposed
below.
5.12.1.2
There
are a number of mitigation measures which will be employed to lessen the impact
of the various elements of the project upon landscape and visual receivers,
both during the construction and operational phases. The recommended landscape
and visual mitigation measures are scheduled in Tables 5.13, 5.14 and 5.15
and are conceptually illustrated on a series of photomontages in Figures
5.14 - 5.21.
Table
5.13: Recommended Construction Phase Landscape
and Visual Mitigation Measures
ID No. |
Type |
Landscape / Visual
Mitigation Measure |
Funding / Implement -ation |
Management
/ Maintenance |
CM1 |
Site Practice – Landscape |
Reuse of
Existing Topsoil Existing topsoil
shall be re-used for new planting areas within the project. Potential topsoil
resources are located at:- a) Gascoigne Road Rest Garden, b) slopes above
Chatham Road North, c) roadside planters in Whampoa Garden. The construction
program shall consider using the soil removed from one phase for backfilling
another. Suitable storage ground, gathering ground and mixing ground shall be
set up as necessary. |
MTR Corporation |
MTR Corporation / LandsD, LCSD / HyD |
CM2 |
Design /
Planning – Landscape |
Tree Transplantation Transplantation
is proposed for a number of trees generally able to provide high amenity
value and which are likely to survive the transplantation process. All
transplantation will be carried out in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 3/2006
and undertaken under separate submission process. |
MTR Corporation |
MTR Corporation / LandsD / HyD / LCSD /
AFCD |
CM3 |
Site
Practice – Visual |
Control
of night-time lighting glare All security floodlights for
construction sites and temporary works areas shall be equipped with
adjustable shield, frosted diffusers and reflective covers, and be carefully
controlled to minimize light pollution and night-time glare to nearby
receivers. |
MTR Corporation
|
Contractor |
CM4 |
Site Practice – Visual |
Erection of Decorative
Hoardings Temporary decorative
screen hoardings shall be designed and erected to be compatible with the
existing urban context, either brightly and imaginatively or with visually unobtrusive
design and colours where more appropriate. All works sites and works areas
shall be surrounded by such hoardings, which shall be removed at project
completion. |
MTR Corporation
|
Contractor |
Table 5.14: Recommended
Operational Phase Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
ID No. |
Type |
Landscape / Visual Mitigation Measure |
Funding /
Implement-ation |
Management
/ Maintenance |
OM1 |
Design /
Planning – Landscape |
Re-provision of Public
Open Spaces Every
effort should be made to minimise use of public open spaces, however if
affected by the Project they shall be re-provisioned to an equal or improved
standard at completion of the project. Sensitive design and
reinstatement of the affected Public Open Spaces (Gascoigne Road Rest Garden,
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden, Fat Kwong Street Playground) shall be made,
incorporating replacement facilities to those currently provided and using
materials of quality suitable for long term use and acceptable to the relevant
government departments including LCSD and PlanD, who shall be consulted on
the design of the reinstated public open spaces at an early stage of the
design process. |
MTR Corporation |
LCSD |
OM2 |
Design / Planning – Landscape / Visual |
Compensatory Tree Planting Suitable land pockets
within the project area will be used for the implementation of compensatory
mitigation to offset the net loss of key landscape resources and improve
visual amenity. A compensatory tree planting proposal including
locations of tree compensation will be submitted separately to seek relevant
government department’s approval, in accordance with ETWB TCW No. 3/2006. |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation / LandsD/ HyD/ LCSD/ AFCD |
OM3 |
Design /
Planning – Landscape / Visual |
Horizontal and Slope
Greening Shotcreting of cut rock
slopes shall be avoided and greening applications employed throughout the
project. At HOM Station the
backfill slopes shall be hydroseeded and native seedling trees planted. The station
roof shall be temporarily greened should there be no further on-site
development within 1 year of the completion of the KTE, until permanent
measures are undertaken under the proposed property development stage. Parapets at WAB and HOM
Station shall be provided with internal permanent planter boxes. The roof at WAB shall be greened to improve visual amelioration from
surrounding high level viewers Station entrances at HOM and WHA shall utilise shrub planting areas to
provide localised greening |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation
/ LandsD |
OM4 |
Landscape / Visual |
Vertical Greening Vertical greening /
climbers shall be applied to all above ground structures against exposed
walls as far as possible subject to technical operational and maintenance
constraints. Such planting shall be employed at WAB, HOM Station and WHA
Station. |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation
|
OM5 |
Design /
Planning – Visual |
Architectural Design Aesthetics
for the WAB at Club de Recreio The emergency access and
ventilation building shall be designed in a way so as to ensure the form,
material and surface detailing of this structure can fit sympathetically into
the local context. The form shall consider the Cultural Heritage of the Club
de Recreio site as well as other proximate buildings. The structure shall
incorporate vertical greening / climbers where possible subject to technical
operational and maintenance constraints. Detail Design Intent for the
structures can be noted below. |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation
|
OM6 |
Design /
Planning – Visual |
Architectural Design
Aesthetics for Above-Ground Structures at HOM Station All station entrances, vent
shafts, chillers and other above-ground structures shall be designed in
accordance with the standardised MTR architectural theme for the KTE and
other current rail projects. However specific attention shall be undertaken
to ensure the form, material and surface detailing of these structures is
considered to fit into the local context in terms of the architectural
character of the site. Detail Design Intent for the structures can be noted
below. |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation
|
OM7 |
Design / Planning
– Visual |
Architectural Design
Aesthetics for Above-Ground Structures at WHA Station These shall be designed in accordance with the standardised MTR
architectural theme for the KTE and other current rail projects. However
specific attention shall be undertaken to ensure the form, material and
surface detailing of these structures is considered to fit into the local
context in terms of the architectural character of the site. Detail Design
Intent for the structures can be noted below. |
MTR Corporation
|
MTR Corporation
|
(1) Agreement
and approval, including precise delineation of boundaries, etc., of the
implementation, management and maintenance agencies of the project will be sought
from all relevant authorities during the detail design stages of the project.
(2) MTR Corporation would be responsible for maintenance
and management of trees within the permanent site boundary. The maintenance
matrix and responsible parties for trees outside the permanent site boundary
are to be confirmed during detailed design stage. To facilitate with the
confirmation process, MTR Corporation would be responsible for the maintenance
works before any agreement is made.
(3) Reinstatement of the Public Open Spaces and other
disturbed areas is subject to the land status after project completion.
Reinstatement of the land back to the previous state may not be practical and
thus the reinstatement may take in other appropriate form.
5.12.2
Design Intent
Urban Integration
5.12.2.1
Stations
will form an important urban nucleus and will have a significant impact upon
the urban fabric and the communities they serve. Station design will not
attempt to dominate in the context of the existing urban setting. The design will
however, attempt to pose a positive gesture to integrate with the surrounding
urban environs in an elegant manner. All the aboveground elements such as
station entrances and vent shafts will have a “line-wide” consistency in
architectural articulation and material palette so that they are easily
recognizable as part of the MTR Corporation system. Vertical greening /
climbers could be applied on the structures in order to soften the appearance
of the building and help integrate it into its surroundings. Preliminary
landscape designs for the surface areas surrounding the WAB, HOM Station and
WHA Station are provided in Figures 5.22
– 5.31. The actual design including architectural finish and greening
will be subject to the detailed design stage when more opportunities to
minimise any visual impact will be explored.
Station
Entrances
5.12.2.2
Station
entrances are the public portal to the MTR system and need to be easily
recognisable and welcoming. They should also be an architecturally pleasing
element within the cityscape. Traditional station entrances for URL underground
stations were typically constructed out of concrete and finished with external
paint or mosaic tiles. This existing entrance design is to be revitalized in
the design of the KTE stations to achieve the following objectives:
·
Maintain
a visual linkage to the existing KTL station entrances in terms of form and
appearance for the line identity;
·
Be
highly recognisable as part of the MTR system through the use of MTR
Corporation branding elements;
·
Be
highly visible and welcoming in daytime as well as night time.
·
Project
a contemporary and elegant look through quality modern materials and
architectural detailing;
·
Integrate
the provisions for signage and passenger information; and
·
Introduce
daylight as deep into the entrance areas as possible.
Vent Shafts /
5.12.2.3
Vent
shafts and any ancillary buildings will possess a mild and subdued character
along with considered architectural quality such that they do not become
distinguished buildings nor urban blemishes. The vent openings will be
carefully orientated so to minimize potential impact to the nearby residents.
The massing of the vent shafts shall be carefully articulated to minimize
visual effects upon the environment. It is envisaged that the same materials
used on the vent shafts and any ancillary buildings would relate to the station
entrances. Surrounding soft landscape treatments shall be considered where land
is available around the vent shafts.
5.12.3
WAB (
5.12.3.1
The principle
design imperative for this building is to create a building with the smallest
practicable building envelope above ground and finished to make the building as
unobtrusive as possible within the
·
The
form and proportions of this building will be complimentary to the
·
The
types of materials and colours of finishes adopted will be complimentary to the
adjacent buildings along
·
The
comparatively large areas of tunnel ventilation and stair pressurisation
louvers, required as the primary function of this building, will be pre-coated
in a non-reflective durable coating finish, colour to match adjacent finishes
to minimise their visual impact;
·
The
local environs of the WAB site are of recreational usage and comprise sports
grounds and well greened areas. Additionally the site and building are
overlooked from distance by high level visually sensitive receivers. In order
to blend unobtrusively into this environment, areas of soft landscape will be
provided at ground and roof level, Vertical greening / climbers will be
provided to appropriate elevations where practical to help the WAB to blend
into this environment;
·
The
areas available for soft landscape at ground level are limited due to
operational and firemen’s access for fire fighting and rescue constraints.
Trees and high shrubs will be provided that are complimentary to existing trees
around the site. Low planters behind the
·
Where
operationally feasible, roofs will be provided with horizontal greening on a
thin soil base. Roof planting will provide additional benefit of thermal
insulation, helping to reduce the thermal load on the building and as a
consequence reduce the need for air conditioning Areas where this is not
feasible will be provided with either gravel roofing of mixed colours in
simple, subtle pattern or where hard paved areas are required for equipment
access these will be finished with hard paving whose appearance will be
selected to be compatible with recreational usage of the area;
·
Since
ducting and cable runs will be installed on the roof areas, a total green roof
is not possible for this building. To permit flexibility for system operation
and future maintenance, extensive planting provision is proposed along the roof
perimeter of the building to soften the building silhouette;
·
To
couple with the rooftop perimeter planting, trees and shrubs are provided on
ground level all round for screening purpose. The combined effect from planting
at both high and low levels should substantially reduce visual impact of the
building;
·
As a
further enhancement, more planters for supporting vertical greening are
proposed on the main walls without affecting access and regular maintenance of
the plant equipment;
·
In
addition to soft landscaping, careful articulation of building bulk and
sympathetic use of materials in the design of this building will make the
building a pleasant neighbourhood to its surroundings; and
·
Perimeter
fencing to the site will be open metal palisade type fencing with soft
landscape behind, to compliment similar existing fencing at the Club de Recreio
boundary.
5.12.3.2
Vertical
greening / climbers have been provided to suitable elevations as follows:
East Elevation (
5.12.3.3
Fire
services inlets, firemen’s access stair, fire control room, doors and tunnel
ventilation louvers occupy a major portion of this elevation precluding
vertical greening to most of the facade. A planter on the first floor level to
the roof platform will provide planting to overhang the parapet facing towards
South
Elevation (Club De Recreio
5.12.3.4
Access
door and louver requirements to the transformer rooms, access doors to the
water meter room and tunnel ventilation louvers preclude the provision of
vertical greening to this elevation. At main roof level a planter will be
provided to permit trailing plants to soften the parapet line. The length of
the trailing planting is limited by the line of ventilation louvers required
for the operation of the electrical switch rooms at first floor level.
West
Elevation (Club de Recreio Tennis Courts)
5.12.3.5
There
are two major planes to this elevation. The southern portion is very close to
the Club de Recreio site boundary due to the re-provisioning of the
North
Elevation (Club de Recreio Tennis Courts and
5.12.3.6
Vertical
greening to this elevation is not possible due to the location of the tunnel
ventilation louvers and stair pressurization plant room louvers except for a
narrow strip between these two.
5.12.4
HOM
Station Structure
5.12.4.1
The design
approach for the HOM Station has been to meet the study brief in order to
attend to both the needs of the existing local residents whilst meeting the
requirements of the interchange station of the KTE and SCL – Tai Wai to Hung
Hom Section lines. The above-ground structures are designed to maximize the
catchment area of the station, i.e. to serve the Hung Hom neighbourhood as well
as the Ho Man Tin housing estates. The architecture is aimed to be of minimal
bulk and visual impact to the neighbourhood.
5.12.4.2
Materials
selected for the external envelope will be complimentary to the area and
applied at a suitable scale and consistency. Areas of louver opening are
intended to provide articulation and a clear architectural presence.
5.12.4.3
Greening
of the development will be provided by edge plantings on the entrances and roof
tops within practical limits. The new paved area at level of about +10mPD would
be provided with planting areas at the boundaries with
5.12.4.4
The
louvers at the top of the station (at the curved slab) are required for
technical reasons for the ventilation of the station as well as trackway
ventilations. As HOM Station is an interchange station the ventilation and the
louvers serve both the KTE and the SCL requirements. The preliminary design
identified the extent of louvers for operational needs and they are designed to
be located at the top of the station to minimise impact to
the ground. Visual impacts of these louvers have been mitigated by
designing them at the curved slab which provides a changing view to the viewers
due to their changing angles of view. Hence, at most locations the entire
length of the louvers would not be visible due to the curved facade. The visual
scale of these louvers are further broken down by radial vertical fins at the
louvers which would conceal the louvers even more when viewed from an oblique
angle.
5.12.4.5
The
ventilation louvers would be coated with a durable and non-reflective coating
finish with colour to match adjacent finishes to minimize visual impact.
Opportunities to minimise the visual impact of the design will be further
explored in the detailed design stage.
5.12.4.6
The
station has 3 entrances. Entrance A serves the
5.12.4.7
Entrance
B is located at
5.12.4.8
Entrance
C faces
5.12.4.9
A new
station forecourt with public access will be created next to
5.12.4.10
Temporary
greening will be undertaken to the roof above HOM Station to improve the visual
outlook unless further construction on the roof is to be undertaken within 12
months following completion of the project. The greening may consist of
hydroseeding or planting over a thin soil base or importation of temporary pots
or planters. All maintenance, both temporary and permanent, will be undertaken
by MTR Corporation.
5.12.5
WHA
Station
5.12.5.1
WHA Station
is located within the developed area of
Entrance A1
5.12.5.2
Entrance
A1 is the largest aboveground station element of WHA Station which contains entrance,
fireman’s access, and ventilation shafts tightly packed together with the
re-provisioned footbridge access (by others) across Hung Hom Road. It is
intended to be integrated as a cohesive building form in order to create better
visual coherence and has been carefully designed to minimise the vent height.
The ventilation shaft towers are arranged at various levels and with an
architectural style that is consistent with the station entrance, plus
secondary screens of architectural grilles and perforated metal panels are
introduced to provide a more visually acceptable interface with pedestrians. A
large portion of the entrance A1 structure is glazed which allows natural
daylight into the Entrance.
5.12.5.3
Local greening
is to be incorporated. The surrounding area affords an opportunity for hard and
soft landscape treatments to complement the station entrance structure,
planting and the existing urban fabric. The wide pedestrian island at the
corner of
5.12.5.4
However,
rooftop greening is not provided at Entrance A1 because a large portion of the
entrance is glazed and of lightweight material as mentioned above. The
remaining roofs over the entrance will be formed in different levels and
patches in areas of generally less than 20 square meters. The variation in roof
level results from the need to have louvers at different levels to avoid short
circuiting of intake and exhaust vents. Additionally, there are no suitable
access points to the roof for maintenance of the planting, whereby additional
space would be required thus conflicting with the design approach to minimize
land take.
Entrances A2 and B1
5.12.5.5
The
free-standing type generic entrance design is to be adopted for standalone Entrance
A2 and Entrance B1. The building envelope of these entrances is basically
formed by glass panels to enhance the security and visual surveillance.
Vertical greening is therefore not recommended in order to avoid obstruction to
the visual surveillance needs.
5.12.5.6
As the
pavement width is extremely tight around these two entrances resulting in the
minimum clearance between the entrance building and the carriageway (i.e.
500mm) (also considering that the carriageway has been reduced to permit the
location of the entrances), there is no space to provide additional greening
surrounding the entrances or green wall on the two entrances. A planter box is
proposed at the rear of the entrance building as an enhancement.
Air Intake at Tak On Street
combined with Entrance B2
5.12.5.7
Modification
of the free-standing type generic entrance design is made to incorporate the
air intake louver on top of Entrance B2 in order to maintain the level of
transparency. The roof and side walls of the station entrances are mostly
glazed for natural light penetrating into the station, therefore roof top
greening is not proposed.
5.12.5.8
As the
pavement width is extremely tight it is necessary to reduce the carriageway to
permit the location of the entrances to obtain the minimum clearance between the
entrance building and the carriageway (i.e. 500mm). Coupled with the minimized
sidewalk width on the opposite side of the entrances additional greening
surrounding the structure is thus not proposed.
5.12.5.9
Similar
architectural style and materials to those used for Entrance A1 are introduced
for the ventilation shaft at
5.12.5.10
This
structure is located tight against
Vent
Shaft at Tak Ting Street
5.12.5.11
Architectural
style and materials are constant with other vents and entrances at
5.12.5.12
Vent openings
will be provided on the majority of the wall surfaces at high levels,
vegetation overgrown from any green roof would interfere with the station
ventilation system, in turn affecting safe station operations. Regular
maintenance for green roof on this structure is also considered extremely
difficult.
5.12.5.13
Instead
of soft landscape, careful articulation of building bulk and sympathetic use of
materials in the design of this building will help to blend with the
surroundings and to make it look a natural element of its neighbourhood.
Vent Shaft and Escape Stair at Wan
5.12.5.14
The
new ventilation shaft added at
5.12.5.15
Roof
top greening is proposed to the lower portion of the building to avoid clashing
with vent openings above. As the pavement width is tight, resulting in the
minimum clearance between this ancillary building and the carriageway (i.e.
500mm), the alignment of Wan Hoi Street needs to be adjusted to suit and
additional greening at pavement level surrounding this building is thus not
proposed.
5.12.5.16
WHA
Station is situated in a congested district. “Vertical panel” greening requires
a minimum clearance of approximate 400 mm between the structure and the support
trellis for the greening, in order to allow maintenance of the structure and
replacement of plants at regular intervals. Due to site constraints and limited
pavement width available, “vertical panel” greening cannot be provided.
Table 5.15: Recommended
Mitigation Measures to Above-Ground Structures
Structures |
Location |
Constraints |
Mitigation Measures |
CDR
Vent Building / WAB at |
Tennis
Courts at Club de Recreio near |
· Since
duct and cable runs will be installed on the roof areas, a full green roof is
not possible for this building as flexibility for system operation and future
maintenance it required. · Minimisation
of the area required for construction and operation of the facility which is
on private land. |
· Minimised
scale and form of building; · Contextual
use of colours, materials and surfaces; and · Extensive
use of vertical greening / climbers and roof greening. |
HOM
Station (Majority of Station Box) |
Region
bounded by |
· Potential
future development above the Station. Roof treatments need to be flexible for
later use. |
· Minimised
scale and form of building; · Integrated
entrance, vents and cooling tower into the station structure; · Architectural
scale appropriate to the context; · Co-ordinated
and consistent use of colours and materials; · Extensive
use of vertical greening / climbers and roof greening; and · Provision
of new public spaces |
HOM
Station Entrance A |
At
|
· Reinstatement
of · Maintenance
access and EVA in limited space. · Light
penetration at street level and into the station structure · Assimilation
of required Intake and Exhaust Vents |
|
HOM
Station Entrance B |
At
|
· Potential
future development above the Station. · Assimilation
of required Escape Stair and fire services. · Significant
level differences |
|
HOM
Station Entrance C (Connected
to |
At
|
· Maintenance
access and EVA in limited space. · Light
penetration at street level and into the station structure · Assimilation
of required Intake and Exhaust Vents |
· Minimised
scale and form of building; · Integrated
entrance, vents and cooling tower into the station structure; · Architectural
scale appropriate to the context; · Co-ordinated
and consistent use of colours and materials; · Extensive
use of vertical greening / climbers and roof greening; and · Provision
of new public spaces |
Series
of louvers along SW & SE elevation of HOM Station |
HOM
Station on slopes adjacent to |
High level vent
openings. Vegetation growing from any roof may interfere with the station
ventilation system. Planting in close
proximity of vent openings constitutes an operational hazard |
|
HOM
Vent Shafts (2 No) |
Along Adjacent
to Entrance A |
||
HOM
Station Fresh Air Intakes |
HOM
Station adjacent to |
||
HOM
Cooling Towers |
Along
|
||
Integrated
WHA Station Entrance A1 with Ventilation Shafts (Air Intakes
/ Exchanges and Exhausts at East Concourse Area) |
Location
1: At |
The roof and side walls of the station entrances are
mostly glazed for natural light penetrating into the station. The roof is formed at different levels with small
areas to avoid short circuiting of intake and exhaust, thus roof greening is
not considered feasible due to the following considerations:- ·
Little noticeable
effect or improvement to the environment. ·
No suitable access to
the planting at roofs for maintenance. |
· Integrated
entrance, vents and footbridge into single structure; · Co-ordinated
use of colours and materials; · Incorporation
of horizontal and vertical greening. |
Stand-alone
WHA Station Entrance A2 |
Location
2: At |
The building
envelope of these entrances is basically formed by glass panels to enhance
the security and visual surveillance. Vertical greening is therefore not
recommended in order to avoid obstruction to the visual surveillance needs. As
the pavement width is extremely tight around these two entrances resulting in
the minimum clearance between the entrance building and the carriageway (i.e.
500mm) (also considering that the carriageway has been reduced to permit the
location of the entrances), there is no space to provide additional greening
surrounding the entrances or green wall on the two entrances. |
· A
planter box is proposed at the rear of the entrance building as an
enhancement. · Consistent
materials and style. |
Stand-alone
WHA Station Entrance B1 |
Location
3: At |
||
WHA Vent
Shafts / Air Intakes at East Concourse Area |
Location
4: Fresh air
intake shaft at Tak On Street and combined with Entrance B2 |
Need
to incorporate the air intake louver on top of Entrance B2 in order to
maintain the level of transparency. The
roof and side walls of the station entrances are mostly glazed for natural
light penetrating into the station. The
pavement width is extremely tight resulting in the minimum clearance between the
vent shaft and the carriageway (i.e. 500mm) and the vent shaft has been
designed to be very narrow in width to occupy minimum pavement width. |
· Consistent
materials, finishes and styling. |
WHA Vent
Shafts / Air Intakes at East Concourse Area |
Location
5: Ventilation
shaft at |
The roofs is formed at different levels with
small areas, for which roof greening is not considered feasible due to the
following considerations:- ·
Little noticeable
effect or improvement to the environment. ·
No suitable access to
the planting at roofs for maintenance operations. |
· Consistent
materials, finishes and styling. · Low level planter for supporting vertical greening is proposed
to the side wall facing · Vegetation coverage will extend to the side or bottom of vent
openings at high level with sufficient separation between vent openings and
planting (2 metres nominal) as required for safe station operation. |
|
Location
6: Ventilation
shaft at |
The pavement width is extremely tight
resulting in the minimum clearance between the vent shaft and the carriageway
(i.e. 500mm) and the vent shaft has been designed to be very narrow in width
to occupy minimum pavement width. Vent openings will
be provided on the majority of the wall surfaces at high levels. Vegetation
growing from any roof may interfere with the station ventilation system.
Regular maintenance for the roof on this building is also considered
extremely difficult if not impossible. |
· Consistent
materials, finishes and styling. · Careful articulation of building bulk
and sympathetic use of materials in the design to blend with the surroundings
and to make it look a natural element of its neighbourhood. |
Location
7: Ventilation
shafts at |
High level vent openings. Planting in close proximity of vent openings constitutes an
operational hazard The pavement width is tight resulting in the
minimum clearance between this ancillary building and the carriageway (i.e.
500mm). The alignment of |
· Roof
top greening is provided to the lower portion of the building. · Articulated
into 2 smaller massings; and · Consistent
materials and style. |
|
Temporary
Explosive Storage Magazine |
TKO Area
137 |
Temporary nature of development and inhospitable
site conditions. In addition the site needs to be kept clear for security
purposes. |
· Security floodlights shall be equipped with
adjustable shield, frosted diffusers and reflective covers, and be carefully controlled
to minimize light pollution and night-time glare. |
5.12.6
Compensatory Tree Planting and
Greening
5.12.6.1
Approximately 1,800
existing trees were surveyed and around 1,000 existing trees will be affected by
the proposed works, of which 69 nos. are intended to be transplanted and 931
proposed to be felled. Recommendations for tree felling, transplantation
and retention are based on the following criteria :-
·
the rarity value of the
species of trees involved;
·
the health,
condition, quality and maturity of the tree;
·
the site conditions
in terms of suitability for transplantation;
·
the suitability of
the species for successful transplantation; and
·
the environmental
impact and amenity value of the tree
5.12.6.2
None of these are
Registered Old and Valuable Trees and all of the affected trees are of low to
medium amenity value according to the tree assessment. Application and approval
for removal for all trees (except
5.12.6.3
Compensatory
planting shall be made under ETWB TCW No. 3/2006 provided at a ratio of 1:1 in quantity
It should be noted that of the 931 trees proposed to be felled under the works,
178 are undesirable Leucaena species for which the compensatory requirement is
not applicable under ETWB TCW No. 3/2006 Clause 33 and a further 630 are
located on slopes which are exempted from the compensation planting ratio
requirement under ETWB TCW No. 3/2006 Clause 27. For the remaining 123 nos. of
trees proposed to be felled, on-site compensatory planting of approx. 224 new
trees of appropriate size and quality (heavy standard / semi mature) will be
undertaken. A further 1,800 nos. seedling tree planting will be provided on the
reinstated slopes surrounding HOM Station to replace the loss of greening as is
shown in the indicative landscape drawings. It is considered that tree planting
within the site project areas alone provides sufficient opportunity to meet the
compensatory requirements in both qualitative and quantitative terms, which has
also been optimized in consideration of the land constraints in the dense urban
setting.
5.12.6.4
The following
locations will be used for on-site tree planting and greening. Preliminary
design plans for the areas can be seen on Figures
5.22 – 5.34 with proposed tree planting highlighted. The minimum areas of
other greening will be subject to variation due to factors such as plant growth
etc. and are tabulated below in Table
5.16: The precise no. of trees to be retained, transplanted, felled and
compensated shall be determined and agreed separately with government during
the Tree Felling Application process under ETWB TC 3/2006.
Table 5.16: Compensatory Tree Planting and Greening
Location |
Area of Horizontal Greening (m2) (Planter / Roof / Slope) |
Area of Vertical Greening (m2) |
Compensatory Tree Planting |
|
Reinstated as original |
- |
8 |
WAB |
Approx. 100 |
Approx. 20 |
14 |
|
Reinstated as original |
- |
5 |
HOM Station |
Approx. 3,000 (Southern slope of HOM Station) |
Approx. 30 |
150 |
Fat |
Reinstated as original |
- |
4 |
WHA Station |
Approx. 800 (permanent) |
Approx. 5 |
15 |
Hung Hom Finger Pier |
Reinstated as original |
- |
28 |
TOTAL
(Approx) |
4,000 |
55 |
224 |
5.12.7
Photomontages
5.12.7.1
The photomontages are
developed to highlight the key mitigation measures introduced to reduce
residual visual impacts of above-ground structures. The locations of the
viewpoints for the photomontages can be seen on Figure 5.13. The montages
illustrate the project works at four time points:
· Existing View;
·
Day
1 of Operation Without Mitigation;
·
Day
1 of Operation With Mitigation; and
·
Year
10 of Operation With Mitigation.
5.12.7.2
The photomontage
locations have been selected with the following main considerations in mind:
· The potential number and type of viewer and distance from the source of impact; and
·
The
potential to fully display the benefits of the mitigation proposals in the
context of the site.
·
The
potential to show cumulative impacts caused by concurrent and potential projects.
5.12.8
Photomontage 1 – View to WAB from
5.12.8.1
The view from
5.12.9
Photomontage 2 – View to WAB from Club de Recreio (Figure 5.15)
5.12.9.1
This view
demonstrates the contextual fit of the design of the WAB and the greening
mitigation measures employed. It is also representative for selective views
from India Club, and YMCA Recreation Ground, however they are generally
screened off and receivers cannot easily attain such a viewpoint.
5.12.10
Photomontage 3 – View to HOM Station Entrance A from Government Quarters at Shun
5.12.10.1
The montage shows
the street level access of the new Entrance A, the cooling tower above the
station and the roof greening measures. The location of the Planned Dormitory
of the
5.12.11
Photomontage 4 – View to HOM Station Entrance B from
5.12.11.1
The montage shows
the street level view of the new Entrance B, indicating massing, typical
finishes and planting measures. Indicative property development above HOM
Station is also shown.
5.12.12
Photomontage 5 – View West to HOM Station Entrance C from
5.12.12.1
The view shows HOM
Station Entrance C linking
5.12.13
Photomontage 6– View East to HOM Station from
5.12.13.1
This view focuses on
the emergency elevator shaft and ventilation structures above the station at
HOM. The view demonstrates the impact to the existing vegetated slopes, the
scale and massing of the new structures and the potential for redeveloping
green space on the site.
5.12.14
Photomontage 7 – View to WHA Station Entrance A1 (Figure
5.20)
5.12.14.1
This focus site includes
the new WHA Station Entrance A1. The image shows the reprovisioned footbridge
across
5.12.15
Photomontage 8 – View of Vent Shaft at WHA Station at
5.12.15.1
The exact locations
and detailing of all the ventilation structures for WHA Station will be further
developed during detail design. However the indicative size and typical
finishes of a structure is shown in place at
5.13
Significance of Residual Impacts
5.13.1
Background
5.13.1.1
The following
section examines the significance of impacts on Landscape Resources, Landscape Character
and VSRs following both construction and operation stage mitigation measures.
The Significance Threshold of those impacts that would occur in the
construction and operation phases is summarised in Tables 5.17 and 5.18
below and illustrated on Figures 5.9 -
5.12.
5.13.2
Residual Impacts on Landscape
Resources
Construction Phase
5.13.2.1
Construction stage
landscape mitigation measures (CM1-3), aimed at limiting landscape impacts, are
focused in 2 areas: a) project design to reduce the scope of the impacted areas
and b) project programming to limit the duration of such impacts. Unfortunately
many of the impacts to vegetation are irreversible and the length of
construction programming is therefore academic. Significant impacts during
construction, therefore, tend to remain despite mitigation measures.
Significant
Adverse Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.2
Slopes adjacent to
Moderate Adverse Residual
Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.3
5.13.2.4
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden (LDR-1.2) - The impacts to the valuable
trees during construction have been minimised by care at design stage although
a few trees will be permanently lost this should not overly change the value of
the group as a landscape resource. Impacts here will be Irreversible.
5.13.2.5
Fat
5.13.2.6
Slopes in the
area of
5.13.2.7
Slopes
Surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground (LDR-3.5) - Slopes in the area may undergo potential stabilisation measures
with the loss of some vegetation, however most of the trees shall be retained.
Little can be done to mitigate against this excavation work during
construction.
5.13.2.8
Street Planting in the vicinity of Hung Hom
Road (LDR-4.2) - The
Temporary Traffic Management needed on Hung Hom Road for the construction of
Whampoa Station will require the removal of all the large trees in the vicinity
including the 4 large trees at the proposed Entrance A1 at Hung Hom Road in
order to maintain an adequate level of traffic flow in the area during project
construction. Technical constraints make it impossible for the trees to be
transplanted locally to an adjacent area. Topsoil resources can be protected
and re-used. Impacts here will remain Moderate Adverse and will be
Irreversible.
5.13.2.9
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets (LDR-4.3) the double row of mature cocoa
palms and the protected tree species Ailanthus fordii on
5.13.2.10
Slopes adjacent to
5.13.2.11
Site formation levels at HOM Station
(LDR-7.1) will be completely removed by the project with the resulting loss of
most of the key trees and vegetation. Selected trees can be transplanted.
Slight Adverse Residual
Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.12
The
loss of amenity spaces at Sports Pitches
at Wylie Road (LDR-2.1),loss of trees at Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir
(LDR3.4) and Planting at Recreation Clubs
around Gascoigne / Wylie Roads (LDR-5.1) are small in scale and generally
Reversible.
Operational
Phase
At Day 1 of Operation
5.13.2.13
It is
expected that mitigation measures in place at Day 1 of Operation may, to some
extent, reduce the significance of impacts. However, there will most likely
remain adverse residual impacts relating to a number of elements of the project
since a net loss of landscape resources will be unavoidable even if minimised.
Significant Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.14
Slopes adjacent to
Moderate Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.15
Street Planting in the vicinity of
Slight Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.16
New
tree and shrub planting can be introduced to
Moderate Beneficial
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.17
The
new HOM Station forecourt on
At
Year 10 of Operation
5.13.2.18
By
year 10 of operations, mature mitigation tree planting along with greening
techniques to artificial slopes is likely to further offset some residual
adverse impacts to landscape resources.
Significant Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.19
No Significant
Residual impacts are identified at Year 10 of Operation.
Moderate Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.20
Slopes
adjacent to
Slight Adverse
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.21
Street Planting in the vicinity of
Slight Beneficial
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.22
The
new planting associated with the WAB at Club de Recreio (LDR-2.1) should have
matured and provide a more valuable landscape resource than that which it
replaced (tennis courts). Residual impacts at Year 10 are considered
Slight Beneficial.
Moderate Beneficial
Residual Landscape Impacts
5.13.2.23
Further
growth of planting from landscape improvements at (LDR-6.1) Slopes adjacent to
5.13.3
Significance of Impacts on
Landscape Character Areas
Construction
Phase
5.13.3.1
Only one
highly valuable Landscape Character Area is identified within the project
scope, being that of the
Significant Adverse
Residual Character Impacts
5.13.3.2
No
Significant Residual Impacts are identified during construction of the project.
Moderate Adverse
Residual Character Impacts
5.13.3.3
The
large works site at HOM Station will be particularly
visually prominent in the surrounding areas and large enough to modify the
nature of the existing landscape framework (LCA06), low in quality as it is.
Mitigation measures will have little effect and in fact the existing character
of the site is one that is undergoing change. Impacts are considered Moderate
and Reversible.
Operational Phase
At
Day 1 of Operation
Significant Adverse
Residual Character Impacts
5.13.3.4
No
Significant Residual Impacts are recorded at Day 1 of Operation.
Slight Adverse Residual Character Impacts
5.13.3.5
With
completion of the project there are only Slight Adverse Residual Impacts to the
identified Landscape Character Areas at Day 1.
At Year 10 of Operation
Significant Adverse
Residual Character Impacts
5.13.3.6
No
Significant Residual Impacts are recorded at Year 10 of Operation.
Slight Beneficial Residual
Character Impacts
5.13.3.7
LCA-06
is an area currently exhibiting qualities of transition. With the
implementation of the project along with other scheduled redevelopments within
the Character Area the underlying character may be said to have actually
changed and the area may need to be redefined to one showing a more defined and
valued urban characteristic. The project itself will be largely responsible for
this change and the residual impacts of the project on the Character Area can
be considered to be Slight Beneficial by Year 10.
5.13.4
Significance of Impacts on Visually Sensitive Receivers
Construction
Phase
5.13.4.1
Residual
visual impacts are going to be most significant during the construction stage,
generally resulting from the undertaking of large cutting and excavation work,
using tower cranes and hoists, crushing equipment, temporary accommodation and
surfaces as well as the comings and goings of large vehicles with unattractive
loads. Works sites can be particularly conspicuous at night with lighting
potentially causing glare. Construction Stage visual mitigation measures are
very limited, focussing on Control of
nightime lighting glare (CM3) and
Erection of Decorative Hoardings (CM4). These will have little or no
significant impression in mitigating the large sites viewed from many
directions as found within the project at HOM Station and WHA Station.
Significant Adverse Residual
Visual Impacts
5.13.4.2
Sources
of impact from the Works Site 15a at HOM Station cannot be adequately mitigated
against visual impact. Initially there will be the loss of visual amenity with
the removal of trees on the hillside above
·
Residents
on the south side of
·
Residents
grouped at
·
Residents
at Shun
·
Future
Residents of HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory (SVR-R9); and
·
Residents
at
5.13.4.3
The Temporary
Works at Fat Kwong Street Playground will be visually prominent to a number of
surrounding receivers. As the nature of this works is small scale the nature of
the visual impacts will be much less severe. Residents at Ka Wai Chuen (VSR-R6) are located overlooking these
works in the foreground and also have clear but more distant views to the large
works at HOM Station.
5.13.4.4
The
Construction works at WHA Station will require the loss of the local green
visual amenity provided by street trees as well as long term deep excavation of
much of the road on Tak Man and Tak On Streets with the resulting traffic
diversion works including the visual clutter of temporary signs, cones and
barriers. Both Residents of Whampoa
Garden (VSR-R13) and Pedestrians and
Shoppers in Whampoa Garden (VSR-L14) will have significant deterioration to
the visual quality of their environment over the long term course of the works.
5.13.4.5
Construction
of the WAB, whilst a small structure, will occupy a reasonably large construction
space during the works. It is relatively overlooked and close by receivers will
not be suitably mitigated during the construction. Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio (VSR-L4) and Visitors of Chinese Civil Servants
Recreation Club and Philipino Club (VSR-L6) will be affected most
significantly.
Moderate Adverse Residual
Visual Impacts
5.13.4.6
The
above identified impacts generated from the works site at HOM Station affect
other receivers, generally further away, lacking clear views or not as
sensitive to the changes in their view. A noticeable deterioration in the
visual quality of these receivers can be observed however:
·
East
Facing Units of
·
Residents
at
·
Recreation
visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water Service Reservoir (VSR-L7);
·
Recreation
Users at Ho
·
Recreation
Users at Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir (VSR-L9);
·
Staff
of Ho Man Tin Leisure Centre (VSR-O10);
·
Staff
at Hung Hom Fire Station (VSR-O13);
·
Staff
at small businesses on
·
Workers
at short term tenancy on
·
Fast
moving vehicles at Princess Margaret Road Interchange (VSR-T4);
·
Fast
moving vehicles on
·
Road
users on
·
Temporary
parking users on future development site (VSR-T7);
·
Road
users on
·
Staff
and Students of
·
Staff
at
·
Staff
and Students at HK Poly U
·
Residents
of
5.13.4.7
The
Temporary Works at Fat Kwong Street Playground will be visually prominent to a
number of surrounding receivers. As the nature of this works is small scale the
nature of the visual impacts will be much less severe. The following Receivers
are affected primarily by their proximity to these works during construction:-
·
Pedestrians
around
·
Pedestrians
in and around
5.13.4.8
The
above identified impacts generated from the works site at WHA Station affect
other receivers, generally further away, lacking clear views or not as
sensitive to the changes in their view. A noticeable deterioration in the
visual quality of these receivers can be observed however:-
·
Staff
of Businesses in
·
Staff
and Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary Schools (VSR-O17);
·
Staff
and Students of
·
Office
workers at Two Harbourfront (VSR-O19);
·
Road
users on Tak Man / Tak On Street (VSR-T10); and
·
Road
users on
5.13.4.9
The
above identified impacts generated from the works site at the WAB and
surrounding slope improvements affect other receivers, generally further away,
lacking clear views or not as sensitive to the changes in their view. A noticeable
deterioration in the visual quality of these receivers can be observed
however:-
·
Residents
of Park Palais (VSR-R2);
·
Members
and Visitors of
·
Staff
of Queen Elizabeth Hospital Buildings (VSR-O4);
·
Staff
of
·
Staff
of Club de Recreio (VSR-O6);
·
Staff
of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club (VSR-O8); and
·
Staff
and Students of
5.13.4.10
Other
Moderate Significant Impacts can be noted to Staff and Students of Methodist College (VSR-O3); where slope
stabilisation works are immediately adjacent, Residents at Ko Shan Road (VSR-R12) who shall look over the
proposed temporary site offices and Residents
of Harbourfront Landmark (VSR-R14) with outlook over temporary site offices
(WA6) and Temporary Barging point at WA14.
Slight Adverse Residual
Visual Impacts
5.13.4.11
A
barely perceptible deterioration in the existing visual quality will be observed
by other receivers who are typically further away from works sites and works
areas, lacking clear or direct views or are not as sensitive to the changes in
their view. Those Receivers exhibiting Slight Residual Impacts are recorded on Table 5.18 along with a full schedule
of Significance Threshold but are not dealt with in further detail here.
Operational
Phase
At Day 1 of Operation
5.13.4.12
With
the removal of the visual impacts caused by construction works at Day 1 of
operation, the majority of adverse visual impacts from the project are
significantly reduced. However the loss of visual amenity resulting from the
permanent loss of open space and greening at both HOM and WHA Stations (LDR3.2
and LDR4.2) will have long term and irreversible consequences. Mitigation
planting will still be relatively young and the amount of area planted may be
localised and only improve the visual amenity on a small scale. Other
mitigation techniques outlined above could ensure a seamless incorporation of
the project into the surrounding environment however.
Potential residual
adverse impacts could result primarily from the above-ground structures
developed under the project. These include the HOM Station, ventilation
structures at WHA Station, new walls, slopes, and entrances as well as the WAB
at Club de Recreio. The final appearance of these is critical in ensuring
minimal visual impacts in the operation stage. The ability to visually
incorporate new structures into the urban setting at Whampoa is a relatively
simple task and as such no Significant residual impacts are anticipated in this
area. Primary concerns rest with the restoration of the site above the HOM
Station and the construction of the WAB.
Significant Adverse
Residual Visual Impacts
5.13.4.13
No
Significant Residual Impacts are recorded at Day 1 of Operation.
Moderate Adverse
Residual Visual Impacts
5.13.4.14
At Day
1 of Operation a number of receivers will still be experiencing the major
change to their view, primarily from the extensive loss of green visual amenity
from the slopes above Chatham Road North including East Facing Units of Wylie Court (VSR-R3), Residents with north views on the south side of Chatham Road North
(VSR-R4), Residents grouped at Wuhu
Street and Gillies Ave (VSR-R5),
Future Residents of HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory (VSR-R9), Residents at Valley Road (VSR-R10), Future residents of property development
above HOM Station
(VSR-R18) and Future residents of Valley Road Estate
development site (VSR-R19). The mitigation measures including replanting of
the impacted slopes, contextual architectural design and provision of
substantial greening surrounding the new station will have improved the outlook
considerably as will removal of unsightly chunam slopes near
5.13.4.15
The
completion of WHA Station will see visual impacts from the loss of visual amenity
resulting from the loss of the large trees at Entrance A1. Trees on
5.13.4.16
Removal
of the surrounding works area at WAB will remove large areas of visual impact
generated during construction. The building itself will be a source of ongoing
visual impact however mitigation measures including tree planting, contextual
architectural design and provision of vertical and roof greening will screen
the building particularly effectively from high level view. Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio
(VSR-L4) and Visitors of Chinese Civil
Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club (VSR-L6) will see a reduction
in visual impact to Moderate significance.
5.13.4.17
Other
Adverse Residual Impacts - Other VSRs experience some smaller degree of adverse
visual impact at the start of the operation stage. A full schedule of all such
impacts is given in Table 5.18.
At Year 10 of Operation
5.13.4.18
Long
term adverse residual visual impacts, particularly to any localised sensitive receivers,
may potentially be extremely limited considering the scale of the project.
There may be small areas where perhaps cut slopes have not become fully
greened. In fact some impacts could be determined to be beneficial to a number
of receivers due to the poor visual environment endured currently at Ho Man
Tin. The redevelopment of LDR-6.1 Slopes adjacent to Yan Fung Street and LDR7.1 Site Formation levels for use by HOM Station, which were of low
landscape value and poor visual amenity provide the opportunity to upgrade the
quality of the urban environment in these areas. The HOM Station frontage on
Significant Adverse
Residual Visual Impacts
5.13.4.19
No
Significant Residual Impacts are recorded at Year 10 of Operation
Moderate Residual
Impacts
5.13.4.20
At
Year 10 of Operation Residents with north
views on the south side of
5.13.4.21
The
location of the HOM Station cooling tower above Entrance A on
Moderate Beneficial
Residual Visual Impacts
5.13.4.22
The
removal of the unsightly shotcrete slopes on
Table 5.17: Significance of Residual
Landscape Impacts
Ref (LCA) |
Description |
Sensitivity to Change |
Magnitude of Change |
Significance Threshold WITHOUT Mitigation |
Mitigation Measures |
Significance Threshold WITH Mitigation |
|||||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
|||||||
Landscape Resources |
|||||||||||||
LDR-1.1 |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM1,2, OM1,2 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-1.2 |
Yan Fung Street Rest Garden |
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
OM1,2 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
|||
LDR-2.1 |
Sports Pitches in the vicinity of |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
OM2,3,4 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Slight Beneficial
|
|||
LDR-2.3 |
Fat |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
OM1 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-3.1 |
Slopes in the area of |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
OM3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-3.2 |
Slopes adjacent to |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
CM1,2 OM2,3,4 |
Significant |
Significant |
Moderate |
|||
LDR-3.4 |
Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
OM3 |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-3.5 |
Slopes surrounding Fat Kwong Street Playground |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM2 OM2,3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-4.2 |
Street planting in the vicinity of |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM2 OM2,3,4 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
|||
LDR-4.3 |
Tree planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM2 OM2 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-5.1 |
Planting at Recreation Clubs around Gascoigne /
Wylie Roads |
High |
Small |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM2 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-6.1 |
Slopes adjacent to |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Slight Beneficial |
OM2,3,4 |
Moderate |
Moderate Beneficial |
Moderate Beneficial |
|||
LDR-7.1 |
Site formation levels for use by HOM Station |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1,2 OM2,3,4 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-7.5 |
Open Space sites at |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
|||
LDR-7.6 |
Reclaimed Land at TKO (Works Area) |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
- |
Slight |
Slight |
Slight |
|||
LDR-8.1 |
Hung Hom Finger Pier |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
OM2 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LDR-9.1 |
|
High |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
|||
|
|||||||||||||
Landscape Character Areas |
|||||||||||||
LCA-01 |
Area surrounding |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
CM2,3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LCA-06 |
Ho
Man Tin - |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM1,2,3,4 OM1,2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight Beneficial |
|||
LCA-07 |
Yau Ma Tei and Jordan |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
CM1,2,3,4 OM1,2,3 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LCA-08 |
Hung
Hom around |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM2,3,4 OM1,2,3, |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LCA-09 |
Whampoa
and Hung Hom Reclamations |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
CM2,3,4 OM1,2,7 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||
LCA-11 |
|
High |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
Negligible |
- |
- |
|||
LCA-12 |
Reclamation at TKO |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM5 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
|||
Table 5.18: Significance of Residual
Visual Impacts
Ref (VSR) |
Description |
Sensitivity to Change |
Magnitude of Change |
Significance Threshold WITHOUT Mitigation |
Mitigation Measures |
Significance Threshold WITH Mitigation |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
||||
Residential VSRs |
||||||||||
R1 |
Residents of towers on the west of |
High |
Small |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R2 |
Residents of Park Palais |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
R3 |
East Facing units of |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
R4 |
Residents on the south side of |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,,6 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Moderate |
R5 |
Residents grouped at |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Slight |
R6 |
Residents at Ka Wai Chuen |
High |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Significant |
Slight |
Negligible |
R7 |
Residents at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
R8 |
Residents at Shun |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Significant |
Slight |
Negligible |
R9 |
Future Residents
of HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
OM2,3, 4,6 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Moderate |
R10 |
Residents with
surrounding views at |
High |
Large |
Large |
Significant |
Significant |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Moderate |
R11 |
Residents at Ho
Man Tin Estate South |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM3, 4,6 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R12 |
Residents of |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
R13 |
Residents of Whampoa
Estate and Garden |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,4,7 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Slight |
R14 |
Residents of
Harbourfront Landmark |
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,4,7 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
R15 |
Residents at
Poly U Student Dormitory |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
R16 |
Residents of |
High |
Small |
- |
Moderate |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
R17 |
Residents of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
R18 |
Future residents
of property development above HOM Station |
High |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
OM2,3,4,6 |
- |
Moderate |
Slight |
R19 |
Future residents
of Valley Road Estate development site |
High |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
OM2,3,4,6 |
- |
Moderate |
Slight |
Leisure VSRs |
||||||||||
L1 |
Users of |
Medium |
- |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
- |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L2 |
Pedestrians and
Shoppers in the vicinity of |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L3 |
Members and
Visitors of |
High |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L4 |
Members and
Visitors of Club de Recreio |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Slight |
L5 |
Visitors of |
Low |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L6 |
Visitors of
Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
High |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Slight |
L7 |
Recreation
visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water Service Reservoir |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
L8 |
Recreation
visitors at Ho Man Tin Park and Leisure Centre |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM3,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
L9 |
Recreation users
at Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM3,6 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L10 |
Users of |
Medium |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Moderate |
OM2,3,4,6 |
- |
Slight Beneficial |
Moderate Beneficial |
L11 |
Pedestrians
around |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3, |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
L12 |
Recreational
users of Fat Kwong Street Playground |
Medium |
- |
Small |
- |
Slight |
OM2,3 |
- |
Negligible |
Negligible |
L13 |
Pedestrians in
and around |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
L14 |
Pedestrians and
Shoppers in Whampoa Estate and Garden. |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,7 |
Significant |
Moderate |
Slight |
L15 |
Pedestrians at |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
L16 |
Pedestrians on
TST East Promenade |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
L17 |
Hikers
at |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
Occupational VSRs |
||||||||||
O1 |
Workers in
commercial buildings on |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O2 |
Staff and Guests
of Eaton Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O3 |
Staff and
students of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O4 |
Staff of Queen
Elizabeth Hospital Buildings |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O5 |
Staff of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O6 |
Staff of Club de
Recreio |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
O7 |
Staff of |
Low |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,4 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O8 |
Staff of Chinese
Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O9 |
Staff and
Students of future Primary School (under construction) at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O10 |
Staff of Ho Man
Tin Leisure Centre |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM3,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O11 |
Staff of small
businesses at |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Significant |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O12 |
Workers at short
term tenancy on |
Low |
Large |
- |
Moderate |
- |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
- |
- |
O13 |
Staff at Hung
Hom Fire Station |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O14 |
Staff and Students of |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O15 |
Staff at |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
O16 |
Staff of businesses in Whampoa Estate and Garden |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,4,7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
O17 |
Staff and
Students of S.K.H. Fung Kei Primary Schools |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,6 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O18 |
Staff and Students
of |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,7 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O19 |
Office workers
at Two Harbourfront |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,7 |
Moderate |
Negligible |
Negligible |
O20 |
Staff and
Students at HK Poly U – Community College Campus |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
O21 |
Staff and Guests
at Harbour View Horizon Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
O22 |
Staff and Guests
at Harbour Front Horizon Hotel |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
O23 |
Staff and Guests
of |
Medium |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
O24 |
Office workers
at International Mail Centre |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Slight |
- |
- |
O25 |
Office/Hotel
workers and guests at TST East |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
O26 |
Office workers
at The Metropolis Tower |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3, 4,6 |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
O27 |
Staff and
Students at HK Poly U |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
Transportation VSRs |
||||||||||
T1 |
Circulating
Traffic on Nathan and Gascoigne Roads |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3 |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
T2 |
Fast moving
vehicles on |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM3 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
T3 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Negligible |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,5 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
T4 |
Fast moving
vehicles at Princess Margaret Road Interchange |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T5 |
Fast moving
vehicles on |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Slight |
T6 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T7 |
Temporary
parking users on future development
site |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T8 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,3,4,6 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T9 |
Road users on |
Low |
- |
Intermediate |
- |
Slight Beneficial |
OM2,3,4,6 |
- |
Moderate Beneficial |
Moderate Beneficial |
T10 |
Road users on Tak Man / Tak On Street |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,4,7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T11 |
Road users on |
Low |
Large |
Intermediate |
Significant |
Moderate |
CM3,4 OM2,4,7 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Negligible |
T12 |
Road users on Estate and
Garden side streets |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
CM3,4 OM2,7 |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
T13 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
T14 |
Road users on |
Low |
Small |
- |
Slight |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
T15 |
Road users on |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
T16 |
Travellers on |
Medium |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
T17 |
Recreational
boat traffic at Tai Mui Wan |
Low |
Negligible |
- |
Negligible |
- |
CM3,4 |
Negligible |
- |
- |
5.14.1
Relevant Concurrent Projects
5.14.1.1
Four other major
concurrent projects are planned that may result in cumulative impacts from the
works. These are:
·
Central
·
Shatin
to Central Link (SCL) Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section;
·
Planned
Dormitory of Hong Kong Polytechnic University (details not yet available); and
·
Essential
Public Infrastructure Works (EPIW) near HOM Station.
5.14.2
5.14.2.1
According to the HyD (refer to Appendix 3.3), the construction programme
and commissioning time of CKR are under review, and the types of construction
works and the respective construction plant inventories within the construction
period are not available yet.
5.14.2.2
The existing
5.14.2.3
The widening of Gascoigne Road Flyover from
5.14.2.4
The small project works at Gascoigne Road Rest
Garden WS1 and at Chinese Methodist College WS2 may become rather insignificant
in terms of the disruption caused by the ongoing road expansion works in this
area, which has the potential to be highly disruptive. Cumulative visual
impacts are likely to be envisaged here but the KTE works may become less
visually significant in the context of the road works.
5.14.2.5
This project has been covered during the MTR
Corporation/CKR liaison meetings and the HyD have put forward their early
proposals with alternative schemes for supporting the Gascoigne Road Flyover
widened deck. As shown in Table 3.4, there would be no
programming conflict and hence no cumulative impacts at Gascoigne Road Flyover.
5.14.3
Shatin to Central Link Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section
5.14.3.1
Tunnels from SCL Tai
Wai to Hung Hom Section will connect to HOM Station with a works
site near
5.14.3.2
Cumulative adverse landscape impacts during
construction phase can be anticipated to areas surrounding the KTE works,
particularly in the area around the Temporary Works Sites at Princess Margaret Road
Interchange and the new Tunnel Portals at Hung Hom Station. The likely loss of
most of the amenity trees at the Interchange, a further expanse of trees at the
west side of the slopes above
5.14.3.3
Cumulative adverse visual impacts during
construction phase might be expected to Visual Receivers in the vicinity of the
Works Sites at Princess Margaret Road Interchange and at Hung Hom Station where
the construction of New Portals will be undertaken. Identified common visual
receivers include R3-East Facing Units of
Wylie Court, R4- Residents on the south side of Chatham Road North,
R5-residents grouped around Wuhu Street and Gillies Avenue, L15- Pedestrians at
Hung Hong Coliseum, O22-Guests and
Staff at Harbourfront Horizon Hotel, O23-Guests
and Staff at Harbour Plaza Metropolis, O24-Office
Workers at International Mail Centre, O25-Office/Hotel
Guests and Workers at TST East, O26-Office
Workers at Metropolis Tower, O27-Staff
and Students at HK PolyU Lee Shau Kee Building, T4-Fast moving vehicles at
Princess Margaret Road Interchange and T5-Fast moving vehicles on Chatham Road
North.
5.14.4
Planned Dormitory of
5.14.4.1
The site on the junction of
5.14.5
Essential
Public Infrastructure Works
5.14.5.1
Walkway connections from Ho Man Tin Estate to the
north and
5.14.5.2
LDR-3.3 - Slopes surrounding King’s Park High Level Service
Reservoir - An area of LDR 3.3 is likely to be impacted during construction and
operation phases. Some trees and
slopes will need to be cut and stabilised and without extreme care the impacts
could be unnecessarily severe. Preliminary design information available
estimates that approximately 26 medium size trees of about 8m height and
predominantly Leucaena leucocephala species will be impacted by the
work. The number of affected trees is subject to
future design development.
5.14.5.3
LDR-6.3 - Slopes surrounding Ho Man Tin West Service
Reservoir –The EPIW will impact trees and slopes fronting the Housing Authority
Mock Up Centre for the former Valley Road Estate and at the junction of
5.14.5.4
5.14.5.5
A number of VSRs are likely to have compounded visual
impacts resulting from construction of the EPIW, causing a slight increase in
the adversity of visual impact during construction stage. Furthermore
a cumulative loss of visual amenity due to the further removal of existing
greenery / open space can be envisaged. Operational stage impacts are
not considered adverse:
·
R8
- Residents at Shun
·
R9
– Future Residents of HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory
·
R10
- Residents with surrounding views at
·
R11
–Residents at Ho Man Tin Estate South;
·
L7
- Recreation visitors at King’s Park Fresh Water Service Reservoir;
·
L8
– Recreation visitors at Ho Man Tin Park and Leisure Centre;
·
L9
– Recreation users at Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir Playground;
·
O10 - Staff at Ho Man Tin Leisure
Centre;
·
T6 – Road users on
·
T7 - Temporary Parking users on future development
site; and
·
T8 - Road users on
5.14.5.6
Public
Transport Facility – These facilities are
planned to incorporate bus and taxi waiting areas at Chung Hau Street Close to HOM Station Entrance B. Anticipated road widening here will further impact
the
5.14.6
Potential
Property Development above HOM Station
5.14.6.1
There
exists the potential to develop the airspace above the roof of HOM Station at
some future stage. Whilst no details for this are currently available, should
such a project proceed at an early stage it may appear as the ongoing
continuation of construction works for the project construction works on the
HOM Station site into the operation period.
5.14.6.2
Furthermore,
existing visual receivers (including the occupants of the planned dormitory of
5.15
Environmental Monitoring
and Audit
5.15.1
Construction Phase
5.15.1.1
The landscape and visual
mitigation measures proposed should be incorporated in the detailed landscape
and engineering design specifications, drawings and contract documents
including the protection of existing trees, conservation of topsoil, the
practicalities of transplantation of existing trees and the requirements for
successful establishment and growth of new tree planting and shrubs, so as to
ensure the effectiveness of the mitigation measures described above. The designs should be checked to ensure that
further measures are fully incorporated in order that potential conflicts with
civil engineering, geo-technical, structural, lighting, signage, drainage,
underground utility and operational requirements are resolved prior to
construction.
Any changes to the mitigation measures that may be recommended to match the
baseline review result or to match the ongoing EM&A should also be
incorporated in the detailed design.
5.15.1.2
The design,
implementation and maintenance of mitigation measures should be checked
regularly to ensure that they are fully realised and compliant with the
intended aims of the measures. Any potential
conflicts among the proposed mitigation measures, the project works, and
operational requirements should also be identified and resolved early.
5.15.1.3
The
extent of the agreed works areas should be regularly checked during the
construction phase. Any trespass by the
Contractor outside the limit of the works leading to any damages to existing
trees should be reported to the Independent Environmental Checker,
Environmental Team and Engineer’s Representative.
5.15.2
Operational Phase
5.15.2.1
A specialist
landscape sub-contractor should be employed by the works Contractor for the
implementation of further soft landscape works and subsequent maintenance
operations during the establishment period.
The planting should commence during the construction contract and extend
throughout the Contractor’s one-year maintenance period, which will be within
the first operational year of the project.
The intention is to provide at least 24 months establishment period for
the majority of the planting works. The
longer term maintenance responsibilities of buildings and the areas surrounding
above ground structures shall be undertaken by MTR Corporation. This shall
include regular maintenance of planted areas in terms of watering, weeding,
pruning and applications of fertilisers and pesticides as well us the general
upkeep of some hard finished areas surrounding built structures, specifically
surrounding the WAB and HOM Station. Those areas and public spaces used
temporarily during the project works shall be handed back to government once
satisfactory reinstated.
5.16.1
General
5.16.1.1
The project has
unavoidable Adverse Landscape and Visual Impacts resulting primarily from areas
of excavation for stations at Ho Man Tin and Whampoa arising during the
Construction Phase. A full explanation is made in Section 2 of the Report
detailing the possible alternative alignments and construction methods that
were considered at Investigation Stage. Attempts were made to identify
solutions with less adverse potential consequences in landscape and visual
terms however such options have implications on safety and duration of the
construction programme which make them unacceptable. Further potential
construction stage impacts are caused from temporary works sites, the new
·
The project is
generally compatible with the statutory planning framework;
·
Impacts have been
minimised as best as possible through careful consideration of alternatives,
minimisation of works areas, incorporation of aesthetic external design and landscape
treatments of proposed structures including the above-ground vents at HOM and WHA Stations and the WAB at Club de Recreio;
·
The most significant residual
impacts to Landscape Resources after Year 10 are Moderate Adverse for the localised area at LDR-3.2; and
·
No
Significant Adverse Residual Impacts
to Landscape Character or VSRs are generated by the Project at Day 1.
·
The
project is able to generate Beneficial
Impacts to Landscape Character and some Visual Receivers in the Operational
Phase.
5.16.2
Review
of Planning and Development Framework
5.16.2.1 Tennis courts at Club de Recreio will be replaced by the WAB and this is in conflict with the approved OZP where MTR Corporation vent shafts and other above-ground structures other than entrances are not permitted under Column 2 of the Plan. However as stated in section 5.4.1 of this EIA Report this is deemed to be approved under S13A of the TPO.
5.16.3
Potential Landscape and Visual
Impacts
5.16.3.1
The following
permanent net loss of landscape resources are anticipated:
·
Approximately
1,400m2 of tennis courts at Club de Recreio for the WAB;
·
Approximately
6,000m2 of mature mixed and plantation trees in the zoned Open Space
at
·
Approximately
3,500m2 of bare shotcrete slopes at
·
Approximately
20,000m2 of terraced brownfield site above HOM Station.
5.16.3.2
Approximately 1,000
existing trees will be affected by the proposed works, of which none are of
high amenity value according to criteria defined in the tree survey
methodologies in the Appendix. 69 trees (6%) are intended to be transplanted
and 931 proposed to be felled. None of these are Registered Old and Valuable
Trees. Application and approval for removal for all trees shall be obtained in
accordance with Environment Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No,
3/2006.
5.16.3.3
Compensatory tree
planting and greening shall be provided to compensate for felled trees and loss
of visual amenity with reference to the requirement in ETWB TCW No.
3/2006. A minimum of 224 heavy standard trees will be provided within the
site areas of the project and 1,800 seedling trees planted on slopes
surrounding HOM Station. Furthermore an approximate total of 55m2 of vertical greening / climbers shall be provided at the WAB and HOM
Station.
5.16.3.4
Final compensatory
tree planting proposal including exact locations of compensation will be
submitted separately in accordance with Environment Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No, 3/2006.
5.16.3.5
A total
of 47 Landscape Resource Areas are identified within the project. During both
the Construction and Operational Phases Significant
Landscape Impacts are anticipated at Slopes adjacent to
5.16.3.6
A
total of 14 Landscape Character Areas are identified within the project. During
both the Construction and Operational Phases Moderate Impacts to Landscape Character are anticipated at Ho
Man Tin - Valley Road Estate (LCA-6).
5.16.3.7
A total of 77 VSRs are identified within the project. During
the Construction Phase Significant Visual
Impacts are anticipated to 22 of these VSR’s. During Operational Phase Significant Impacts would remain
to Residents on the south side of
5.16.4
Mitigation Measures
5.16.4.1
The following mitigation
measures are proposed to be undertaken:
Construction Phase
·
Reuse
of Existing Topsoil;
·
Tree
Transplantation;
·
No-intrusion
Zone;
·
Decoration
of Hoarding; and
·
Control
of night-time lighting glare, however, currently no night-time working is proposed.
Operation Phase
·
Re-provision
of Public Open Spaces;
·
Compensatory
Tree Planting;
·
Horizontal
and Slope Greening;
·
Vertical
Greening;
·
Architectural
Design Aesthetics for Above-Ground Structures for the WAB at Club de Recreio;
·
Architectural
Design Aesthetics for Above-Ground Structures at HOM Station; and
·
Architectural
Design Aesthetics for Above-Ground Structures at WHA Station.
5.16.5
Residual Landscape and Visual
Impacts
5.16.5.1
At
Construction Phase, despite introduction of the above mitigation measures, it
is not possible to adequately mitigate against the resulting landscape impacts
and Significant Adverse Residual
Impacts to Landscape Resources are anticipated at Slopes adjacent to
5.16.5.2
Moderate Adverse Residual Landscape Impacts are
identified at Gascoigne Road Rest Garden (LDR-1.1); Yan Fung Street
Rest Garden (LDR-1.2); Fat Kwong Street Playground (LDR-2.3); Slopes
in the area of Chinese Methodist College (LDR-3.1); Slopes surrounding
Fat Kwong Street Playground (LDR3.5); Street planting in the vicinity of
Hung Hom Road (LDR-4.2); Tree Planting on Tak Man / Tak On Streets
(LDR-4.3); Slopes adjacent to Yan Fung Street (LDR-6.1) and Site
formation levels for use at HOM Station (LDR-7.1).
5.16.5.3
These adverse
impacts are generally irreversible and the Operation Phase allows for the
opportunity to carry out effective mitigation measures including tree planting
and greening. Based upon this, most of
the adverse impacts are reduced to Slight
or Negligible at Day 1. These Residual
Landscape Impacts are generally Negligible at Year 10 although Slight
Adverse Impacts remain at Yan Fung Street Rest Garden (LDR-1.2)
5.16.5.4
However, at Day 1 of
Operation Significant Adverse
impacts at Slopes adjacent to Chatham
Road North (LDR-3.2) and Moderate Adverse impacts at Street planting in the vicinity of
Hung Hom Road (LDR-4.2) still prevail. The impacts are reduced over time, however, and by Year 10 of Operation have reduced to Moderate Adverse Residual Landscape Impacts for Slopes
adjacent to
5.16.5.5
Notably Slight Beneficial Residual Impacts are
anticipated at Sports Pitches in the vicinity of Wylie Road (LDR-2.1)
and Moderate Beneficial Impacts at Slopes
adjacent to
5.16.5.6
For the Reclaimed
Land at TKO (LDR-7.6), Slight
Adverse Residual Landscape Impacts are identified during construction as a
result of the loss of some trees. Due
to the requirement for this site to be subsequently used by other projects, no
mitigation measures are possible for this site as a result of the KTE project
and, as such, Slight Adverse Residual Landscape Impacts remain at Day 1 and Year 10.
5.16.5.7
Following
introduction of mitigation measures only one LCA demonstrates Impacts. Moderate Adverse Residual Impacts to
Landscape Character at Ho Man Tin - Valley Road Estate (LCA-06) are
anticipated. At Day 1 of Operation Slight impacts prevail at LCA-06 and by Year 10 of Operation Slight Beneficial Residual Landscape
Character impacts will be evidenced. For
the Area Surrounding Gascoigne Road (LCA-01), Yau Ma Tei and Jordan (LCA07), Hung
Hom around
5.16.5.8
Despite
mitigation measures Significant
Adverse Residual Visual Impacts are anticipated during Construction Phase
to Residents on the south side of Chatham
Road North (VSR-R4), Residents
grouped at Wuhu Street and Gillies Avenue (VSR-R5), Residents at Ka Wai Chuen (VSR-R6), Residents at Shun Yung
Street (VSR-R8), Future Residents of
HK PolyU Planned Student Dormitory (VSR-R9), Residents at Valley Road (VSR-R10), Residents of Whampoa Estate and Garden (VSR-R13), Members and Visitors of Club de Recreio (VSR-L4), Visitors of Chinese Civil Servants Recreation Club and Philipino Club (VSR-L6)
and Shoppers in Whampoa Garden
(VSR-L14).
5.16.5.9
Operation Phase
impacts resulting from resulting above-ground structures and loss of visual
amenity can be effectively mitigated and at Day 1 of Operation no Significant
Impacts prevail. By Year 10 of Operation the
most significant visual impacts envisaged are Moderate Adverse at
Residents on the south side of
5.16.6
Cumulative Impacts
5.16.6.1
Further cumulative impacts to identified landscape
resources may occur from other identified works both during and following the
project. The Shatin to Central Link, EPIW and Chung Hau Street PTF specifically
are immediately adjacent and will see further erosion to tree resources in the
greater area, effectively increasing the scope of impacts to resources and the
reach of the project beyond the boundary itself.
5.16.6.2
A number of VSRs are likely to have compounded visual
impacts resulting from construction of other concurrent and future planned
projects, particularly the concurrent development of HK PolyU Student Dormitory
at
5.16.7
Overall Conclusion
5.16.7.1
With reference to
the criteria defined in Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM, it is considered that the Significant
Adverse Residual Landscape and Visual Impacts resulting during Construction
Stage are unavoidable. Operational Impacts from the project are acceptable once
the prescribed mitigation measures are applied at completion and throughout
operation of the project.