5.1
Introduction
This Section
assesses the potential noise impacts to the identified Noise Sensitive Receivers
(NSRs) associated with the construction and operation
of the Project in accordance with the requirements stated in Sections 3.4.3 and
3.4.7 of the EIA Study Brief. Mitigation measures are recommended where
potential noise impacts are identified.
5.2
Baseline
Conditions
The Project Site is located in an urban area in
Central. The Site is located in an urban area in Central and covered by the Sai
Ying Pun & Sheung Wan Outline Zoning Plan No. S/H3/24. It has been zoned
as “OU” annotated “Historical Site Preserved for Cultural, Recreational and
Commercial Uses”. The surrounding area
of the Site has been zoned as Residential (Group A) (R(A)),
Commercial (C) and Open Space (O).
Background noise l
To investigate the prevailing noise l
Table 5.1 Measured
Prevailing Background Noise L
Measurement
Location |
Time Periods |
Measured Noise
L |
Barrack Block of the |
Day-time: 07:00 to 11:00 hrs |
59 – 63 |
19:00 to 23:00 hrs |
59 – 61 |
|
|
Night-time: 23:00 to 07:00 hrs |
54 – 59 |
Chancery House |
Day-time: 07:00 to 11:00 hrs |
54 – 58 |
|
19:00 to 23:00 hrs |
55 – 57 |
|
Night-time: 23:00 to 07:00 hrs |
49 – 55 |
5.3
Legislative
Framework
5.3.1
Construction Noise
The principal legislation relating to the cont
The Noise Cont
·
Technical Memorandum on Noise from
Construction Work other than Percussive Piling (GW-TM); and
·
Technical
Memorandum on Noise from Construction Work in Designated Areas (DA-TM).
General Construction Works
Under the EIAO,
potential noise impact arising from general construction works during normal
working hours (ie 07:00 to 19:00 hrs on any day not being
a Sunday or public holiday) at 1m from the external façade of the uses, which
rely on opened windows for ventilation, is to be assessed in accordance with
the noise criteria specified in the EIAO-TM. The EIAO-TM
noise standards are presented in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2 EIAO-TM
Day-time Construction Noise Standards (Leq,
30 min dB(A))
Use |
Noise Standard (dB(A)) |
Domestic Premises |
75 |
Educational Institutions (normal
periods) Educational Institutions (during
examination periods) |
70 65 |
Notes: (a)
The
above standards apply to uses which reply on opened windows for ventilation. (b)
The
above standards shall be viewed as the maximum permissible noise l |
When assessing a Construction Noise Permit
(CNP) application for the use of Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) during the
restricted hours, the Noise Cont
Table 5.3 Area Sensitivity Ratings
Types of Area Containing NSR |
Degree to which
NSR is affected by Influencing Factor (IF) |
||
Not
Affected |
Indirectly Affected |
Directly Affected |
|
Rural
area, including |
A |
B |
B |
Low density residential area consisting of
low-rise or isolated high-rise d |
A |
B |
C |
Urban
area |
B |
C |
C |
Area
other than those above |
B |
B |
C |
Notes: The
following definitions apply: (a)
" (b)
"directly
affected" means that the NSR is at such a location that noise generated
by the IF is readily noticeable at the NSR and is a dominant feature of the
noise climate of the NSR; (c)
"indirectly affected"
means that the NSR is at such a location that noise generated by the IF,
whilst noticeable at the NSR, is not a dominant feature of the noise climate
of the NSR; (d)
"not affected" means that
the NSR is at such a location that noise generated by the IF is not
noticeable at the NSR; and (e)
"urban
area" means an area of high density, diverse d |
The relevant BNLs
are shown in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4 Basic Noise L
Time period |
Area Sensitivity Rating
(dB(A)) |
||
A |
B |
C |
|
All days during the |
60 |
65 |
70 |
All days during the
night-time (ie 23:00-07:00 hrs) |
45 |
50 |
55 |
The Noise Cont
5.3.2
Operational Noise
The EIAO-TM
and IND-TM specifies the applicable ANLs for the fixed plant noise impacts from a d
The ANLs are dependent on
the ASR and the time of the day and are presented in Table 5.5.
Table 5.5 ANLs depending
on the ASR
Time Period |
Leq 30min (dB(A)) |
||
ASR “A” |
ASR “B” |
ASR “C” |
|
Daytime
07:00-19:00 hrs |
60 |
65 |
70 |
Evening
19:00-23:00 hrs |
60 |
65 |
70 |
Night-time
23:00-07:00 hrs |
50 |
55 |
60 |
Fixed plant noise is cont
·
the total fixed source noise level at the facade of the
nearest NSR is at least 5 dB(A) lower than the appropriate ANL (as shown in Table 5.5) as
specified in the IND-TM; or
·
the prevailing
background noise l
The noise criteria stipulated
in the IND-TM are dependent on the
ASR of the NSRs. As the NSRs in the
vicinity of the Site are located in an urban area and are not affected by any
Influencing Factor, the ASR “B” has been assumed for these NSRs. Background noise measurement was conducted to
investigate the prevailing noise level in the Study Area (see Table 5.1). The operational noise criteria are determined
and presented in Table
5.6.
Table 5.6 Operational
Noise Criteria
Representative NSR |
Measurement Point |
Time Periods |
Minimum Measured Background Noise L |
ANL-5, dB(A), [2] |
Operational Noise Criteria in this EIA, Minimum of [1] or [2], dB(A) |
N1-N3 |
Barrack Block of the |
Day-time/Evening
time |
59 |
60 |
59 |
|
|
Night-time |
54 |
50 |
50 |
N4-N6 |
Chancery House |
Day-time/Evening
time |
54 |
60 |
54 |
|
|
Night-time |
49 |
50 |
49 |
In any
5.4
Noise
Sensitive Receivers
In accordance with the requirements stated in Section
3.4.3.1 of the EIA Study Brief, the
Study Area for the noise impact assessment covered an area of 300m from the
Site. Only the first layer of NSRs located along the Site boundary was included in the
assessment as the NSRs behind were located further
away from the road and were screened.
The area considered in the assessment is shown in Figure 5.1.
The selected existing representative
NSRs that may potentially be affected by the
construction of the Project include Amber Lodge, Ho Fook
Building, Old Bailey Street Police Married Quarters, Cambridge Villa, Chancery
House and
As the existing structures within the
The locations of the identified representative NSRs are presented in Figure 5.2.
Descriptions of the representative NSRs are
provided in Table 5.7.
Table 5.7 Representative
Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs)
NSR |
Name |
Type of Usage |
No. of Storeys |
N1 |
Amber Lodge |
Residential |
18 |
N2 |
Ho Fook
Building |
Residential |
5 |
N3 |
Old |
Residential |
24 |
N4 |
|
Residential |
11 |
N5 |
Chancery House |
Residential |
6 |
N6 |
|
Residential |
15 |
5.5
Potential
Sources of Impact
5.5.1
Construction Phase
Potential impacts to the NSRs
during the construction phase of the Project will mainly arise from the use of
PME. The major construction activities
will include:
·
Small-scale demolition of sub-standard ancillary structures and walls;
·
Foundation works for the new buildings, construction of the basements at
the lower courtyard, and construction of tunnels under A Hall and B Hall and
M&E trenches;
·
Construction of new buildings, including the Old Bailey Wing and the
Arbuthnot Wing adjacent to the upper courtyard; and
·
Modification/refurbishment works of the existing
building.
The normal working hours of
the construction works will be between 07:00 and 19:00 hrs from Monday to
Saturday (except general holidays). Should
5.5.2
Operation Phase
Fixed Plant Noise
As described in Section 2.5.3, the E&M facilities will be centralised under the
lower courtyard, at the Arbuthnot Wing and the Ablution Block.
Potential sources of noise impacts
are identified as the mechanical equipment associated with the operation of the
revitalised
Since detailed design of the equipment to be
installed within the plant rooms is not yet available, the maximum allowable
sound power l
Noise Emissions from Public Address (PA) System
During the operation phase of
the Project, outdoor
The PA system at the Site
will be temporary and demountable based on the nature of the outdoor
Noise Emissions from Indoor Musical Performance
Musical
performance at some of the multipurpose spaces may be held occasionally. During
the detailed design stage, an acoustic consultant will be appointed to provide
recommendations on the acoustic design such that the corresponding design
criteria of specific space type would be met.
As the musical performance will be held within fully enclosed area and
appropriate acoustic treatment, such as absorptive wall finishing, upgraded
window insulation, etc. will be provided as necessary, adverse noise impact
from the indoor musical performance is not anticipated. Annex B3 shows the locations of fixed plant items.
The maximum allowable SWLs of the mechanical equipments and the PA system
presented in Annex B3 should be
included in the tender specification to ensure that the assumptions for the
operational noise impact assessment will be implemented. The suppliers of equipment should guarantee
the specified SWLs, with the characteristics of
tonality, impulsiveness and intermittency accounted for, by providing
certificate of measurement and verify the SWL during
testing and commissioning in accordance with international standard
procedures. If necessary, the suppliers
should apply attenuation measures (eg use of
silencers) to achi
5.6
Assessment
Methodology
5.6.1
Construction Phase
The construction noise impact assessment
was undertaken in accordance with the procedures outlined in the GW-TM, which is issued under the NCO and the EIAO-TM. The assessment
methodology is summarised as follows:
·
Identify
the representative NSRs that may be affected by the
construction of the Project;
·
Determine
the plant teams for corresponding construction activities, based on the agreed
plant inventory;
·
Assign
SWLs to the PME proposed based on the GW-TM, British Standard BS 5228 ([1])
and list of SWLs of other commonly used PME ([2]);
·
Calculate
the correction factors based on the distance between the NSRs
and the notional noise source position of the work areas;
·
Apply
corrections in the calculations, such as potential screening effects and
acoustic reflection, if any; and
·
Predict
the construction noise l
The construction noise assessment was undertaken based
on the proposed construction
works programme and plant inventory, and appropriate
utilisation rates of the PME items (see Annexes B1 and B2). The
CPS Ltd and its engineering consultants has reviewed
the programme and plant inventory, and have confirmed that they are reasonable and practicable
for completing the Project within the scheduled timeframe. The
proposed methods for the construction of the Project are common in Hong Kong
and the PMEs proposed are available in the
The Project Site is shown in Figure 5.2. The total SWL associated with each
construction activity was established. The potential noise impacts at NSRs were evaluated by comparing the predicted noise l
5.6.2
Operation Phase
Fixed Noise Sources
The methodology for the fixed plant noise impact
assessment follows the procedures outlined in the IND-TM. The methodology is
summarised as follows:
·
Identify
types of equipment and the number of equipment (if available);
·
Calculate
the maximum SWL for each type of equipment;
·
Identify
representative NSRs that may be affected by the fixed
plant;
·
Calculate
the correction factor, using a conservative approach, based on the horizontal
distance between the NSRs and the fixed plant
sources;
·
Calculate
the maximum allowable SWLs of the plant room louvers
by adopting standard acoustics principles; and
·
Present
the results in terms of Leq, 30min
dB(A), as specified in the IND-TM.
All equipment will be
operated during the day-time and evening time periods (ie
within 07:00 to 23:00 hrs), while some of the equipments, as presented in Annex B3, will be operated during the night-time period
(ie within 23:00 to 07:00 hrs).
The assessment has also taken into account the facade
correction of +3 dB(A). The predicted noise l
5.7
Construction
Phase Impact
The predicted construction noise levels during
day-time period for the construction of the Project are presented in Table 5.8.
Summaries of the predicted noise levels and details of the noise
calculations are presented in Annex B2.
Table 5.8 Predicted Construction Noise L
NSR |
Description |
Predicted Construction Noise L |
N1 |
Amber Lodge |
79 - 86 |
N2 |
Ho Fook Building |
80 - 87 |
N3 |
Old |
81 - 86 |
N4 |
|
84 - 87 |
N5 |
Chancery House |
86 - 89 |
N6 |
|
86 - 89 |
Notes: (a) All
predicted noise l (b) Bold value indicates exceedance of
noise criteria of 75 dB(A) for residential premises. |
5.8
Operation Phase
Impact
Based on the calculated
maximum allowable SWLs
for the plant rooms and the exhaust fans, the predicted fixed plant noise levels at the representative NSRs are summarised in Tables 5.9 and 5.10 for day-time and evening time period, and
night-time period, respectively. Details
of calculation are presented in Annex B3. The predicted noise l
Table 5.9 Predicted Operational Noise L
NSR |
Description |
Predicted Operational
Noise L |
Operational Noise Criterion, dB(A) |
N1 |
Amber Lodge |
53 |
59 |
N2 |
Ho Fook
Building |
52 |
59 |
N3 |
Old |
56 |
59 |
N4 |
|
53 |
54 |
N5 |
Chancery House |
54 |
54 |
N6 |
|
54 |
54 |
Table 5.10 Predicted Operational Noise L
NSR |
Description |
Predicted Operational
Noise L |
Operational Noise
Criterion, dB(A) |
N1 |
Amber Lodge |
42 |
50 |
N2 |
Ho Fook
Building |
48 |
50 |
N3 |
Old |
48 |
50 |
N4 |
|
43 |
49 |
N5 |
Chancery House |
48 |
49 |
N6 |
|
49 |
49 |
It should be noted that the
operational noise assessment presented above is based on a worst-case scenario in
which the equipment are assumed to be operated simultaneously, which is
unlikely to occur in real situation.
The fixed plant noise
emission should be cont
The calculated maximum allowable SWLs
for the fixed plant noise sources that have been adopted in the assessment are
summarised in Table
5.11.
Table 5.11 Maximum Allowable Sound Power L
Item |
Location |
Maximum Allowable SWL per unit, dB(A) |
Quantity (a) |
Total SWL, dB(A) (a) |
Chilled Water Pumps |
West louvre of chilled
water pump room on the roof of Arbuthnot Wing |
72 |
3/2 |
77/75 |
Condenser Water Pumps |
West louvre
of condenser water pump room on the roof of Arbuthnot Wing |
72 |
3/2 |
77/75 |
Cooling Tower |
Cooling towers on the roof
of Arbuthnot Wing |
80 |
3/2 |
85/83 |
Chiller |
East louvre
of chiller room on the roof of Arbuthnot Wing |
75 |
3/2 |
80/78 |
Genset (b) |
G/F plant room of Old
Bailey Wing |
84 |
1/- |
84/- |
Transformer |
West louvre
of transformer room of Ablution Block |
75 |
2/2 |
78/78 |
Transformer |
South louvre
of transformer room of Ablution Block |
75 |
4/4 |
81/81 |
Fan |
West
louvre of Police Headquarters at lower courtyard |
85 |
1/1 |
85/85 |
Fan |
East
louvre of Police Headquarters at lower courtyard |
85 |
1/1 |
85/85 |
PA system (b) (c) |
Lower courtyard |
91 |
4/- |
97/- |
PA system (b) (c) |
Upper courtyard |
86 |
2/- |
89/- |
Notes: (a)
3/2
indicates the
quantity of the plant items for day-time and (b)
Genset and PA system will only be operated during the
day-time and (c)
The
design of the PA system may be different for individual |
5.9
Mitigation
Measures
5.9.1
Construction Phase
In view of the predicted noise exceedances
during the construction of the Project, the following mitigation measures have
been considered:
·
Good
construction site practice;
·
Use
of quiet PME;
·
Adoption
of movable noise barriers;
·
Use
of noise insulation sheet; and
·
Scheduling
of PME/construction activities.
Good Construction Site Practices
Good construction site practices and noise management
can considerably reduce the potential noise impact of the construction
activities on nearby NSRs. The noise benefits
of these practices can vary according to specific site conditions and
operations. Since the effect of the good construction site practices
could not be quantified, the mitigated noise l
·
Only
well-maintained plant will be operated on-site and plant will be serviced
regularly during the construction phase;
·
Silencers
or mufflers on construction equipment will be utilised and will be properly
maintained during the construction phase;
·
Mobile
plant, if any, will be sited as far away from NSRs as
possible;
·
Machines
and plant (such as trucks) that may be in intermittent use will be shut down
between work periods or will be throttled down to a minimum;
·
Plant
known to emit noise strongly in one direction will, wher
·
Material
stockpiles and other structures will be effectively utilised, wher
Use of Quiet PME
The use of quiet PME is considered to be a
practicable means to mitigate the construction noise impact. Quiet plant
is defined as a PME having actual SWL lower than the value specified in the GW-TM. Quiet PME that have been
adopted in the assessment are summarised in Table 5.12.
Table 5.12 Sound Power L
PME Item |
BS 5228(a)/ EPD QPME Reference(b)
|
Sound Power L |
Excavator |
BS D3/97 |
105 |
Concrete pump |
BS D6/36 |
106 |
Vibratory poker |
BS D6/40 |
98 |
Mobile crane |
BS D7/114 |
101 |
Breaker |
BS D8/12 |
106 |
Dump truck |
BS D9/39 |
103 |
Lorry |
EPD QPME |
105 |
Drill rig |
EPD QPME |
110 |
Grout mixer |
EPD QPME |
90 |
Grout pump |
EPD QPME |
105 |
Notes: (a)
British
Standard BS 5228:2009, Part 1 - Noise and Vibration Cont (b)
“Sound power l |
Adoption of Movable Noise Barriers
The use of noise barriers will be an effective means
to mitigate the noise impact arising from the construction works, particularly
for low-rise NSRs. Movable noise barriers of 3m
in height with skid footing should be used and located within a few metres
of stationary plant and mobile plant such that the line of sight to the NSR is
blocked by the barriers. The length of the barrier should be at least
five times greater than its height. It
is anticipated that the major noise source of all PMEs,
including movable and large PMEs, will be located at
a l
Use of Noise Insulating Sheet
Noise insulating sheet
would be adopted for PME such as drill rig.
The noise
insulating sheet should be deployed such
that there would be no opening or gaps on the joints. With reference to the approved EIA Report for West Island
Line (WIL) (Register No.: AEIAR-126/2008 approved on 23 Dec 2008) and MTRC Contract C4420 Tsim
Sha Tsui Modification Noise
Assessment Report for Variation of Environmental Permit (July 2003) and the
technical data from the manufacturer of the noise insulating sheet, a reduction of over
10 dB(A) could be achi
Scheduling of PME/Construction Activities
To further
alleviate the construction noise impacts, some construction activities will be
operated in sequence rather than simultaneously within the respective works
areas, ie only Group A, Group B, Group C or Group D of PMEs
should be operated at any time (see Annex B4).
The above
mitigation measures have been vetted and confirmed by the CPS Ltd and its
Engineering Consultants as being practicable in completing the works within the
scheduled timeframe. It is considered
practical to specify the quiet PME and noise mitigation measures described in Section 5.9.1 in the contract document
to mitigate the construction noise impact.
With the implementation of the good construction site
practices, use of quiet PME and movable noise barriers and scheduling of
PME/construction activities (as shown in Annex B4), the mitigated
noise levels due to the construction of the Project and concurrent projects
were calculated at the representative NSRs with
results summarised in Tables
5.13. Summaries of predicted
mitigated noise levels and detailed calculations are presented in Annex B4.
Table 5.13 Predicted Construction Noise L
NSR |
Description |
Predicted Construction
Noise L |
N1 |
Amber Lodge |
67 - 71 |
N2 |
Ho Fook
Building |
67 - 72 |
N3 |
Old |
69 - 72 |
N4 |
|
71 - 73 |
N5 |
Chancery House |
73 – 75 |
N6 |
|
73 - 75 |
Note: (a) All predicted noise l |
The results indicate that with the adoption of the
recommended mitigation measures, no exceedance of the
EIAO-TM noise criteria during the
construction phase is anticipated at NSRs. No
further mitigation will therefore be required.
5.9.2
Operation Phase
Although no adverse noise impact is expected due to
the operation of fixed plant items, it is still recommended that the following
measures be implemented as far as practicable to minimise the potential impact:
·
Choose
quieter equipment;
·
Include
noise l
·
Locate
fixed plant items or noise emission points away from the NSRs
as far as practicable;
·
Locate
noisy machines in completely enclosed plant rooms or buildings with suitable
and practicable noise remedies; and
·
D
Noise Emissions from Events at the Courtyards and the Use of Public
Address (PA) System
·
good management practices shall be in place, including noise monitoring,
setting up a complaint hotline, and distributing advance notice to nearby NSRs. It is
recommended that good management practices be implemented during both
rehearsals and shows;
·
in any
·
as a
fallback option, should non-compliance of the relevant noise criteria at the NSRs be identified for the
·
The requirements of not exceeding the total sound power l
5.10
Cumulative Impact
One potential concurrent construction work is identified within the Study Area. The former Police Married Quarters on
5.11
Residual Impact
With the implementation of the recommended noise
mitigation measures, the predicted noise l
The assessment results indicated that residual fixed
plant noise impacts due to the operation of the Project would not be expected.
5.12
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
Noise monitoring is recommended during the
construction phase to ensure compliance with the noise criterion at the NSRs. Weekly noise
monitoring will be undertaken at the representative NSRs
N2 Ho Fook Building and N5 Chancery
House. Monthly site audits will be conducted to
ensure that the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented during
the construction stage.
With the implementation of
the recommended mitigation measures, no adverse impact is expected due to the
operation of the fixed plant items. Monitoring
will be required for outdoor events only and will be specified in the contract
document for the event organisers for implementation..
5.13
Conclusions
Owing to the close proximity of some of the NSRs to the works area of the Project Site, mitigation
measures are required to be implemented to mitigate the construction noise
impacts. Practicable mitigation
measures, including good construction site practices, use of quiet PME, movable
noise barriers and scheduling of PME/construction activities, are
recommended. With the implementation of
the recommended mitigation measures, the mitigated construction noise l
The predicted operational noise l