1.1 Purpose of the
Manual
1.2 Project Description
1.3 Objective of the
EM&A
1.4 Scope of the
EM&A Programme
1.5 Organisation
& Structure of the EM&A
1.6 Structure of the
EM&A Manual
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Construction Phase EM&A
3.1 Introduction
3.2.2 Archaeological
Resources
3.4 Operation
Phase
3.4.1 Regular
Audit
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Construction
Phase
4.3 Operation
Phase
5 NOISE
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Methodology and
Criteria
5.3 Monitoring
Equipment
5.4 Monitoring
Locations
5.5 Baseline
Monitoring
5.6 Construction
Impact Monitoring
5.7 Environmental
Quality Performance Limits
5.8 Event and Action
Plan
5.9 Audit
Requirements
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Construction
Phase
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Construction
Phases
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Waste Management
Practices
8.3 Waste Management
EM&A
8.4 Mitigation
Measures
9 Environmental
Site Inspection
9.1 Site Inspections
9.2 Compliance with
Legal & Contractual Requirements
9.3 Environmental
Complaints
9.4 Log-Book
10 Reporting
10.1 General
10.2 Baseline
Monitoring Report
10.3 Monthly EM&A Reports
10.4 Quarterly
EM&A Summary Reports
10.5 Annual/ Final
EM&A Review Reports
10.6 Data Keeping
10.7 Electronic
Reporting of EM&A Information
10.8 Interim
Notifications of Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances
Annexes
Annex A Implementation Schedule
Annex B Construction Phase Noise Monitoring Data Record Sheet
Annex C Complaint
Log
List of Table
Table
1.2 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table
1.3 Contact Information
(to be completed prior to commencement of construction)
Table 5.1 Noise Monitoring Stations for Construction
Noise
Table
5.2 Action and Limit Level for Construction
Noise Monitoring
Table 5.3 Event and Action Plan for Construction
Noise
Table 8.1 Waste Management Checklist
List of Table
Figure
1.1 Project Location
Figure
1.2 Site Plan
Figure
1.3 Tentative Construction Programme
Figure
1.4 EM&A Organisation Chart
Figure
3.1 Areas (In Yellow) Involve Soil Excavation
Works
Figure
5.1 Location of Noise Monitoring Stations
ERM-Hong
Kong Ltd was commissioned by the Jockey Club
The Manual has been prepared in accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-205/2009) and the Technical Memorandum of
the Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM). The purpose of the Manual is to
provide information, guidance and instruction to personnel charged with
environmental duties and those responsible for undertaking EM&A work during
construction and operation of the Project.
It provides systematic procedures for monitoring and auditing the
environmental performance of the Project.
This Manual contains the following information:
·
Responsibilities
of the Contractor(s), Environmental Team (ET), and the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) with respect to the EM&A requirements during
the implementation of the Project;
·
Project
organisation;
·
Requirements
with respect to the construction and operational programme schedule and the
necessary EM&A programme to track the varying environmental impact;
·
Details
of the methodologies to be adopted including field, laboratory and analytical
procedures, and details on quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)
programme;
·
Preliminary
definition of Action and Limit (A/L) levels;
·
Establishment
of Event and Action Plans (EAPs);
·
Requirements
for reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of
exceedances of applicable environmental criteria
and/or receipt of complaints;
·
Requirements
for presentation of EM&A data and appropriate reporting procedures; and
·
Requirements
for review of EIA predictions and the effectiveness of the mitigation measures
and the EM&A programme.
An ET shall be appointed to conduct the monitoring
works and to provide specialist advice on the undertaking and implementation of
environmental responsibilities. The ET
will be led and managed by the ET Leader.
The ET Leader will have relevant education, training, knowledge,
experience and professional qualifications and the appointment will be subject
to the approval of the Director of Environmental Protection. Suitably qualified staff will be included in
the ET, and ET should not be in any way an associated body of the
Contractor(s). For the purpose of this
manual, the ET Leader, who will be responsible for, and in charge of, the ET,
is referred to as the person delegated the role of executing the EM&A
requirements for the Project.
To maintain strict control of the EM&A process,
an IEC will be engaged to verify and validate/ audit the environmental
performance of the Contractor(s).
Sufficient and suitably qualified professional and technical staff will
be employed by the IEC, as required under the EM&A programme for the
duration of the Project.
The vision of the Project embraces three major
principles:
1. Heritage:
·
to
set the
·
to be the focal attraction in the Government’s Conserving Central project.
2. Visual
Arts:
·
to
establish an international reputation for organising art exhibitions;
·
to
attract a high quality cluster of arts organisations;
·
to create
a programme and arts facility that will appeal to a wide cross section of the
people of
·
to
complement the visual arts with a lively and varied performing arts schedule;
·
to
provide an international platform for
·
to
attract international talent to
·
to provide a practical training base for Hong Kong and
3. History:
·
to provide
a unique and informative interpretative experience;
·
to
relay the history and stories of the Site to students, local visitors and
tourists; and
·
to explain the role of law and order in the context of
The Project
aims to transform a cluster of Declared Monuments into a thriving cultural and
historic centre which is financially supported by suitably compatible
commercial activities.
The location of the Project Site and Site Plan are
shown in Figures 1.1 and 1.2.
The Project will repair and conserve the historic
buildings with alterations that are necessary to bring them back into beneficial
use and to extend their useful lives.
The Project will, through beneficial adaptive re-use and the insertion
of new buildings, revitalise the CPS by providing much needed venues for
cultural use and open spaces for the general public to enjoy.
1.2.2
Construction Works
The construction and modification/refurbishment works
are designed to match the requirements of the proposed uses and enhance the
spaces and connections between the buildings and improve circulation throughout
the Site. The key modification/refurbishment
works will include repairs to internal finishes and necessary alterations,
repair of facades, electrical and mechanical upgrading, improve the paving and
site circulation between buildings and opening up part of the existing boundary
wall to facilitate access to the Site.
The construction of the new buildings (the Old Bailey
Wing and the Arbuthnot Wing) will involve typical activities including
excavation, foundation and construction of basement and superstructure.
The construction works are tentatively scheduled to
commence in early 2012 and complete during 2014. The modification works at the existing
buildings are divided into four phases.
The major demolition and excavation works will be conducted in Phase 1
while Phases 2 to 4 will involve renovation work carried out mainly by the use
of handheld/light equipment. The
construction work for the new building will be undertaken in parallel to the
modification works at the existing buildings.
The tentative construction programme is presented in Figure 1.3.
The broad objective of this EM&A Manual is to
define the procedures of the EM&A programme for monitoring the environmental
performance of the Project during design, construction and operation. The construction and operational impacts
arising from the implementation of the Project are described in the EIA Report. The EIA Report also specifies mitigation
measures and good construction site practices that will be needed to comply with the
environmental criteria or further minimise the potential impacts. These mitigation measures and their
implementation requirements are presented in the Implementation Schedule of Mitigation
Measures (see Annex A).
The main objectives of the EM&A programme are to:
·
provide
a database of environmental parameters against which to determine any short
term or long term environmental impacts;
·
provide
an early indication should any of the environmental control measures or
practices fail to achieve the acceptable standards;
·
confirm
that the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA Report are properly
incorporated into the design of the Project;
·
confirm
that the design complies with the recommendations of EIA Report and the
conditions of Environmental Permit (EP);
·
clarify
and identify potential sources of pollution, impact and nuisance arising from
the works for the responsible parties;
·
confirm
compliance with regulatory requirements, contract specifications and EIA study
recommendations;
·
monitor
performance of the mitigation measures and to assess their effectiveness;
·
take
remedial actions if unexpected issues or unacceptable impacts arise;
·
verify
the environmental impacts predicted in the EIA; and
·
audit environmental performance.
The EIA Study indicates that an EM&A programme
will be required for the construction and operation phases of this
Project. A summary of the requirements for
each of the environmental parameters is detailed in Table
1.2.
Table 1.2 Summary of EM&A Requirements
Parameters |
Construction Phase (a) |
Operation Phase (a) |
Cultural
Heritage |
M + SA |
SA |
Landscape and
Visual |
M + SA |
M |
Noise |
M + SA |
M(b) |
Air Quality |
SA |
- |
Water Quality |
SA |
- |
Waste |
SA |
- |
Note: (a)
M = monitoring, SA = site audit (b)
Monitoring will be required for outdoor events only
and will be implemented through contract requirement for the event organisers. |
1.4
Scope of the
EM&A Programme
The scope of this EM&A programme is to:
·
establish
baseline noise levels at specified locations and implement monitoring
requirements for noise monitoring programme during construction;
·
implement
inspection and audit requirements for cultural heritage, landscape and visual,
air quality, noise, water quality and waste management and;
·
liaise
with, and provide environmental advice (as requested or when otherwise
necessary) to construction site staff on the significance and implications of
the environmental monitoring data;
·
identify
and resolve environmental issues and other functions as they may arise from the
works;
·
check
and quantify the Contractor(s)’s overall environmental performance,
implementation of EAPs, and remedial actions taken to
mitigate adverse environmental effects as they may arise from the works;
·
conduct
monthly reviews of monitored impact data as the basis for assessing compliance
with the defined criteria and to verify that necessary mitigation measures are
identified and implemented, and to undertake additional ad hoc monitoring and auditing as required by special
circumstances;
·
evaluate
and interpret environmental monitoring data to provide an early indication should
any of the environmental control measures or practices fail to achieve the
acceptable standards, and to verify the environmental impacts predicted in the
EIA;
·
manage
and liaise with other individuals or parties concerning other environmental
issues deemed to be relevant to the construction process;
·
conduct
regular site inspections and audits of a formal or informal nature to assess:
-
the
level of the Contractor(s)’s general environmental awareness;
-
the Contractor(s)’s
implementation of the recommendations in the EIA and their contractual
obligations;
-
the
Contractor(s)’s performance as measured by the EM&A;
-
the
need for specific mitigation measures to be implemented or the continued usage
of those previously agreed; and
-
to
advise the site staff of any identified potential environmental issues;
·
produce monthly EM&A reports which summarise EM&A
data, with full interpretation illustrating the acceptability or otherwise of
any environmental impacts and identification or assessment of the
implementation status of agreed mitigation measures.
1.5
Organisation
& Structure of the EM&A
The EM&A will require the involvement of the
1.5.1
Project Organisation
The
The
The ET will have previous relevant experience with
managing similarly sized EM&A programmes and shall include an experience
building conservation expert and the ET Leader will be a recognised
environmental professional, with a minimum of seven years relevant experience
in impact assessments and EM&A programmes.
The ET Leader will be responsible for, and in charge of, the ET; and
will be the person responsible for executing the EM&A requirements, and to
provide advice (if required) on environmental clauses for Contract
Specifications of the Project.
To maintain strict control of the EM&A process, the
The
·
employ
an ET to undertake monitoring and reporting of environmental monitoring data,
and site inspection of construction works;
·
employ
an IEC to audit and verify the overall environmental performance of the works
and to assess the effectiveness of the ET in their duties;
·
supervise
the Contractor(s)’ activities and confirm that the requirements in the Manual
and the Contract Documents are fully complied with;
·
develop
appropriate contract clauses to confirm that the Contractor(s) will have
qualified professionals to interface with the
·
inform
the Contractor(s) when action is required to reduce impacts in accordance with
the EAPs;
·
adhere
to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation; and
·
participate in joint site inspections undertaken by
the ET and IEC.
The AP will:
·
ensure
that the EM&A programme is fully implemented in accordance with the EP
issued upon approval of the EIA Report and the Manual;
·
ensure
that the Contractor is implementing environmental controls and mitigation as
set out in the contract specifications, EP issued upon approval of the EIA
Report and the Manual as well as any additional measures necessary for
compliance with the environmental control standards;
·
ensure
that the Contractor is implementing and enforcing EAPs
when exceedances of A/L Levels or complaints occur;
·
provide
assistance to the ET as necessary in the implementation of the EM&A
programme; and
·
implementing a `stop work' action if necessary when repeated exceedance of target levels justifies this action.
The Contractor(s) will:
·
work
within the scope of the construction contract and other regulatory
requirements;
·
provide
assistance to the ET in carrying out environmental monitoring and site
inspections;
·
submit
proposals on mitigation measures in case of exceedances
of the A/L levels in accordance with the EAPs;
·
implement
measures to reduce impact where A/L levels are exceeded;
·
implement
the corrective actions instructed by the
·
participate
in the site inspections undertaken by the ET and the IEC, as required, and
undertake any corrective actions instructed by the
·
adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint
investigation.
The ET will:
·
monitor
various environmental parameters as required in the Manual;
·
assess
the EM&A data and review the success of the EM&A programme determining
the adequacy of the mitigation measures implemented and the validity of the EIA
predictions as well as identify any adverse environmental impacts before they
arise;
·
carry
out regular site inspection to investigate the Contractor(s)’s site practice,
equipment and work methodologies with respect to pollution control and
environmental mitigation, and effect proactive action to pre-empt issues;
·
review
the Contractor(s)’s working programme and methodology, and comment as
necessary;
·
assisted
by an experience building conservation expert to review the compl
·
review
and prepare reports on the environmental monitoring data and site environmental
conditions;
·
report
on the environmental monitoring results and conditions to the IEC,
Contractor(s), AP, the
·
recommend
suitable mitigation measures to the Contractor(s) in the case of exceedance of A/L levels in accordance with the EAPs; and
·
adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint
investigation.
The IEC will:
·
review
and audit the implementation of the EM&A programme and the overall level of
environmental performance being achieved;
·
assisted
by an experience building conservation expert to check the compl
·
arrange
and conduct monthly independent site audits of the works;
·
validate
and confirm the accuracy of monitoring results, monitoring equipment,
monitoring stations, monitoring procedures and locations of sensitive
receivers;
·
audit
the EIA recommendations and requirements against the status of implementation
of environmental protection measures on site;
·
on an
as needed basis, audit the Contractor(s)’s construction methodology and agree
the appropriate, reduced impact alternative in consultation with the
·
adhere
to the procedures for carrying out complaint investigation;
·
review
the effectiveness of environmental mitigation measures and project
environmental performance including the proposed corrective measures;
·
review
EM&A report submitted by the ET leader and feedback audit results to ET by
signing off relevant EM&A proformas; and
·
report the findings of site audits and other environmental
performance reviews to the
1.5.2
Key Contact Information
Key contact information will be provided in a similar
format as in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3 Contact
Information (to be completed prior to commencement of construction)
Name |
Position |
Telephone |
Facsimile |
E-mail |
The |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
AP |
|
|
|
|
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
Contractor(s) |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
ET |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
IEC |
||||
To be confirmed |
|
|
|
|
The
updated EM&A Organisation Chart with name and contact information of each member;
and a checklist indicating the role and duties of each member responosible for heritage conservation in different
stages shall be submitted to the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) prior
to construction stage commencement.
1.6
Structure of the
EM&A Manual
The
remainder of the Manual is set out as follows:
·
Section 2 sets out the EM&A general requirements;
·
Section 3 sets out the EM&A requirements for cultural heritage;
·
Section 4 sets out the EM&A requirements for landscape and
visual;
·
Section 5 sets out the audit requirements for noise;
·
Section 6 sets out the audit requirements for air quality;
·
Section 7 sets out the audit requirements for water quality;
·
Section 8 sets out the audit requirements for waste management;
·
Section 9 describes the scope and frequency of site
environmental inspection; and
·
Section 10 details the reporting requirements for the EM&A
programme.
In this section, the general requirements of the
EM&A programme for the Project are presented. The scope of the programme is developed with
reference to the findings and recommendations of the EIA Report.
Potential environmental impacts, which were
identified during the EIA process and are associated with the construction
phase of the Project, will be addressed through the monitoring and controls
specified in the Manual and in the construction contracts.
During the construction phases of the Project,
cultural heritage, landscape and visual, air quality, noise, water quality, and
waste will be subject to EM&A, with environmental monitoring being
undertaken for cultural heritage, landscape and visual and noise as determined
in the EIA. Monitoring of the
effectiveness of the mitigation measures will be achieved through the
environmental monitoring programme as well as through site inspections. The inspections will include within their
scope, mechanisms to review and assess the Contractor(s)’s environmental
performance, ensuring that the recommended mitigation measures have been
properly implemented, and that the timely resolution of received complaints are
managed and controlled in a manner consistent with the recommendations of the
EIA Report.
During the operation phase of the Project,
environmental monitoring will be undertaken for landscape aspect,while audit of implementation of recommended
mitigation measures for cultural heritage will be undertaken as determined in the EIA. However, should other operational licenses
that require specific monitoring or audit conditions or practices be required,
plans under the respective ordinances/ guidelines will need to be put in place.
2.2.2
Environmental Monitoring
The environmental monitoring work throughout the
Project period will be carried out in accordance with this EM&A and
reported by the ET. Monitoring works
will cover cultural heritage, landscape and visual and noise and will form an
important part of the whole EM&A programme.
2.2.3
Action and Limit (A/L) Levels
A/L Levels are defined levels of impact recorded by
the environmental monitoring activities which represent levels at which a
prescribed response is required. These
levels are quantitatively defined later in the relevant sections of the Manual and
described in principle below:
·
Action
Levels: levels beyond
which there is a clear indication of a deteriorating environmental conditions
for which appropriate remedial actions are likely to be necessary to prevent
environmental quality from falling outside the Limit Levels, which would be
unacceptable; and
·
Limit
Levels: statutory and/or
agreed contract limits stipulated in the relevant pollution control ordinances,
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) or Environmental Quality
Objectives established by the EPD. If
these are exceeded, works will not proceed without appropriate remedial action,
including a critical review of plant and working methods.
2.2.4
Event and Action Plans (EAPs)
The purpose of the EAPs is to
provide, in association with the monitoring and audit activities, procedures
for ensuring that if any significant environmental incident occurs, the cause
will be quickly identified and remediated.
This also applies to the exceedances of A/L
limits identified in the EM&A programme.
2.2.5
Site Inspections & Audits
In addition to cultural heritage, landscape and
visual and noise monitoring as a means of assessing the ongoing performance of
the Contractor(s), the ET will undertake site inspections of on-site practices
and procedures each month. The primary
objective of the inspection programme will be to assess the effectiveness of
the environmental controls established by the Contractor(s) and the
implementation of the environmental mitigation measures recommended in the EIA
Report. The IEC will undertake monthly
site audits to assess the performance of the Contractor(s) and the
effectiveness of the ET.
Whilst the inspection and audit programme will
complement the monitoring activity, the criteria against which the inspection/
audits will be undertaken will be derived from the Clauses within the Contract
Documents which seek to enforce the recommendations of the EIA Report and the
Manual.
The findings of site inspections and audits will be
made known to the Contractor(s) at the time of the inspection to enable the
rapid resolution of identified non-conformities. Non-conformities, and the corrective actions
undertaken, will also be reported in the monthly EM&A Reports.
Section 10 of the Manual presents details of the scope and
frequency of on-site inspections and defines the range of issues that the audit
protocols will be designed to address.
2.2.6
Enquiries, Complaint and Requests for
Information
Enquiries, complaints and requests for information may
occur from a wide range of individuals and organisations including members of
the public, Government departments, the press and television media and
community groups.
Enquiries, complaints and requests for information
concerning the environmental effects of the construction works, irrespective of
how they are received, will be reported to the
1)
The
ET Leader will notify the
2)
An
investigation will be initiated to determine the validity of the complaint and
to identify the source(s) of the issue.
3)
The Contractor(s)
will undertake the following steps, as necessary:
·
investigate
and identify source(s) of the issue;
·
if
considered necessary by the
·
liaise
with EPD to identify remedial measures;
·
liaise
with the IEC to identify remedial measures;
·
implement
the agreed mitigation measures;
·
repeat
the monitoring to verify effectiveness of mitigation measures; and
·
repeat review procedures to identify further practical
areas of improvement if the repeat monitoring results continue to substantiate
the complaint.
4)
The
outcome of the investigation and the action taken will be documented on a
complaint log (see Annex
C). A formal response to each
complaint received will be prepared by the Contractor(s) within five working
days and submitted to the
5)
Enquires
which trigger this process will be reported in the monthly EM&A Reports
which will include results of inspections undertaken by the Contractor(s), and
details of the measures taken, and additional monitoring results (if deemed
necessary). It should be noted that the
receipt of complaint or enquiry will not be, in itself, a sufficient reason to
introduce additional mitigation measures.
The complainant will be notified of the findings, and
audit procedures will be put in place to verify that the issue does not recur.
2.2.7
Reporting
Baseline and impact monitoring, monthly, quarterly
and final reports will be prepared by the ET on behalf of the
2.2.8
Cessation of EM&A
The cessation of EM&A programme is subject to the
satisfactory completion of the Final EM&A Report, agreement with the IEC
and approval from EPD.
In
accordance with the recommendations of the EIA, mitigation measures have been
proposed and are summarised in Annex A - Implementation Schedule.
3.2 Detailed
Design Stage
3.2.1 Comprehensive
Survey, Impact Assessment of Historic Features of the Monuments and
Identification of Character Defining Elements (CDE)
As
not all parts of the buildings are accessible during EIA stage of the Project,
comprehensive survey and impact assessment and appropriate mitigation measures
for all the character defining elements and items of heritage significance of
each building will be conducted in detailed design stage. In order to provide appropriate mitigation
measures for historical features of the monuments, the relevant comprehensive survey and impact
assessment will therefore be conducted during the detailed design stage when
closer access to all parts of the buildings will be made possible and when
further ground investigations will have been carried out. Closer access at all levels inside and
outside the buildings will clarify the condition of the fabric and features and
finishes, and the further ground investigations will clarify any strengthening
work required. The design and coordination of the services requirements and
their integration into each building will be carried during the detailed design
stage. The detailed design development of the historic buildings, with the
required interventions, strengthening and integrated services for new adaptive
uses, will be carried out by the conservation design team and agreed with
AMO. The comprehensive survey and the
impact assessments on the historical features will make reference to AMO’s archival records and the possible mitigation measures
will be tabled in four categories in the protection schedule of the historical
features for AMO’s approval:
·
Historical
features to be preserved and repaired in-situ;
·
Historical
features to be altered/ replaced with new replicas;
·
Historical
features to be temporarily removed for conservation treatment and
reinstatement; and
·
Historical
features to be affected and relocated for reuse, display and/ or preservation
by record.
For
those historical features of significant cultural heritage value will be
defined as the character defining elements of the monuments. All the character defining elements will be
well preserved in-situ and repaired in accordance with the work methodologies
approved by the AMO
3.2.2 Archival
Recording
In
order to provide an archival record of the site and a detailed reference for
future restoration works, a detailed cartographic drawings
and photographic records showing the existing condition of all the buildings
and identified CDE should be conducted and submitted to the AMO before the
construction stage for approval. The
archival recording shall compile of a full inventory list together with the
protection schedule of the historical features of the monuments, and identify
the character defining elements (CDEs) of the
monuments from the surveyed significant historical features. All the CDEs must
be preserved, repair and maintained properly, and the inventory list shall be
updated after the construction and include in the Conservation Management Plan
(CMP).
3.2.3 Repair
and Restoration of Historic Buildings and Structures
A
restoration proposal with detailed work methodologies of the repair and
conservation treatments to different kinds of historic building fabrics and
historical features should be worked out by the Conservation Architect and
submitted to the AMO for approval.
3.2.4 Addition
and Alteration (A&A) Works Proposal
As
the A&A works and repair works in the historic buildings and the Site
including the proposed underground utilities within the Site and major proposed
changes as mentioned in the EIA report is still in conceptual stage, in order
to ensure the full compliance of the
conservation guidelines and approaches as mentioned in the EIA report is
followed, the project proponent shall submit detailed proposal of the A&A works
and repairs by means of plans, drawings, photos, specifications, method
statements and/or other formats of presentation to the AMO for approval.
3.2.5 Detailed
Structural Assessment
The
existing building structures have been assessed by the structural engineer as
being capable of supporting the proposed new uses and alterations without
extensive strengthening work. In order
to ensure that the impact to the historic fabric of the buildings is minimal
due to the floor strengthening proposal, a detailed structural report will be
prepared by the structural engineer during the detailed stage to evaluate if
the strengthening proposal needs to be revised and determine any strengthening
work is required for the floors and foundations resulting from the loadings of
the new uses, or the alterations, or from the condition of the existing
structures. Any structural strengthening
proposals will be assessed for their impacts on the CDEs,
and mitigation measures will be considered.
3.2.6 Archaeological
Investigation
An
archaeological investigation will be conducted to obtain field data for
subsequent detailed impact assessment.
The archaeological investigation will focus on areas with archaeological
potential that may potentially be impacted by the Project (i.e. proposed new
development that involves excavation work in archaeological potential areas)
and the investigation is considered feasible to be carried out in the detailed
design phase. These areas are identified
on Figure
3.1.
Subject to the findings of the archaeological investigation, appropriate
mitigation measures will be recommended and agreed with the AMO.
If
new underground services are proposed at the detailed design stage, subject to
the outcome of the archaeological investigation to be conducted in detailed
design stage for the Project, the need for additional archaeological
investigation and subsequent impact assessment due to the new underground
services should be reviewed.
3.2.7 Heritage
Operational Strategy and Manuals
Detailed
Heritage Operational Strategies and Manuals will be developed by the design
team and CPS Ltd’s advisors for each building and for the management and
circulation of the Site (such as distribution of goods and services into and
across the Site, control of visitors, etc.) for AMO’s
approval. To facilitate the future
maintenance and repair of the built heritage in the Site at the operation
stage, one set of the approved method statement of the repair works to the historic
features together with the contact details of the respective work contractors
engaged in the project shall be included in the Heritage Operational Manual as
part of the heritage maintenance guidelines for the reference of site
management and maintenance agents.
3.3 Construction
Phase
3.3.1 Vibration
Monitoring
Potential
ground-borne vibration onto the historic buildings and structures in CPS, the
granite walls at
If
the evaluated and/or measured vibrations have been found to exceed the
allowable values or if damage to either structural or non-structural elements
of the historic buildings have been identified, the
construction work should be stopped and the construction method and appropriate
mitigation measures should be the reviewed and submitted to the AMO for
approval.
3.3.2 Archaeological
Resources
No
EM&A is required at the archaeological potential area of the Garage
(building 05) and the Married Inspectors’ Quarters and Deputy Superintendent’s
House (building 04).
3.3.3 Compliance
of the Approved Measures and Auditing
Staff
training by an experience building conservation expert or relevant competent
person(s) in the environmental team of the project should be provided to the
on-site staffs, contractors, sub-contractors and workers of the project before
commencement of works to ensure their
full understanding of the approved protection schedule, restoration proposal
and work methodologies related to
cultural heritage, and their respective responsibilities in the implementation
of the environmental protection measures.
Regular
site audit for cultural heritage should be carried out in the construction
phase by an experience building conservation expert in the environmental team
(“the Heritage Checker”) to investigate the site practice of the contractors
and workers and their compliance of the approved work methodologies with
respect of conservation works, mitigations for cultural heritage and any
related works. A detailed proposal of
the regular audit such as methodology (e.g. performance and monitoring
indicators, contrl tools, frequency of the audit,
etc.) and the conservation professionals to be engaged should be agreed with
AMO prior to work commencement.
The
Heritage Checker shall also attend the regular site meetings with AMO and
report the compliance and effectiveness of the mitigation measures for cultural
heritage.
3.3.4 Archival
Recording
An
archival recording should be conducted to provide a detailed reference for the
update of the Conservation Management Plan and inventory of historical features
of the monuments, the preparation of as-built drawings showing the condition of
the historic buildings and structures after the completion of the construction
works. These archival records will be a
reference source for future maintenance of the character defining elements,
conservation of the monuments, interpretation and conservation education of the
Site . The
archival recording shall include but not limit to the video and photographic
recording on the detailed process of the repair trials for different kinds of
historical features, conservation works of character defining elements and historic
fabrics of the monuments, and a written records of any new changes to the
detailed design made in the construction phase illustrate with photos and
drawings. A full set of the archives
records of construction work (including both hard and soft copies) should be
submitted to the AMO after the work completion for record purpose.
Regular
audit is recommended for checking the compliance and effectiveness of the
strategies and mitigation measures mentioned in Sections 3.7.4 and 3.7.5 should
be conducted. The detailed proposal of
the regular audit such as methodology (e.g. performance and monitoring
indicators, control tools, frequency of the audit, etc) and the conservation
professionals to be engaged should be agreed with AMO prior to operation
commencement.
The
management team shall ensure the audit to be carried out by an experience
building conservation expert in order to investigate the site practice and work
methodologies of th work
contractors, the tenants and any other stakeholders of the Site with respect of
conservation works, site interpretation of cultural heritage, and any related
works in the operation phase.
To
facilitate the future maintenance and management of the monuments, one set of
the approved method statement/work methodology of the repair and conservation
works to the historic features of the monuments (particular the CDEs) and contract details of the respective work
contractors engaged in the repair and conservation works of the Project should
be included in the Heritage Operation Manual for the reference of site
management and maintenance agents.
An
updated copy of the Heritage Operation Manual and the associated guidelines
should be submitted to AMO at least one week before the opening of the Site.
At
present no operational phase EM&A for archaeological resources and built
heritage outside the CPS Site is considered necessary.
The
EIA has recommended that checking of implementation of the mitigation measures
for landscape and visual resources shall be undertaken as part of the site
inspections. The implementation and
maintenance of mitigation measures (see Annex A) shall be checked to confirm that they
are fully realised and that potential conflicts between the proposed landscape
measures and any other project works and operational requirements are resolved
at the earliest practical date and without compromise to the intention of the
mitigation measures.
Implementation of the mitigation measures
for landscape and visual resources recommended in the EIA Report will be
monitored through the site inspection and audit programme.
A detailed specifications and methods statement could
be drafted and included in the soft landscape maintenance contract to
circumscribe the scope and to ascertain the quality of the work. Following this, quarterly inspections of
affected and newly planted trees should be undertaken by an experienced and
appropriately trained arborist or horticulturist for a period of 12
months. Hard landscape maintenance will
be covered by the Conservation Management Plan and Operational Phase Manual, as
detailed in Sections 3.7.1 and 3.7.4 of the EIA Report.
.
The
requirements, methodology, equipment, monitoring locations, criteria and
protocols for the monitoring and audit of noise impacts during construction of
the Project are presented in this section.
Weekly noise monitoring is recommended during the construction phase to
ensure compliance with the noise criterion at the NSRs. Monthly site audits will be conducted to
ensure that the recommended mitigation measures are properly implemented during
the construction stage.
The
mitigation measures recommended to control noise impacts are summarised in Annex A.
Noise
measurements should be carried out in accordance with the guidelines given in
Annex – General Calibration and Measurement Procedures of Technical Memorandum
on Noise from Construction Work other than Percussive Piling (GW-TM).
Whilst
the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) does not provide for the statutory control of
construction activities occurring on weekdays during normal working hours (ie Monday to Saturday inclusive 0700-1900 hours), a
day-time standard of Leq(30min) 75dB(A) as stipulated in Annex 5 of the Technical
Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) will be adopted
as the noise criterion for all residential dwellings.
The
construction noise l
Supplementary
information for data auditing, two statistical sound l
Noise
measurements should generally not be made in the presence of fog, rain, wind
with a steady speed exceeding 5m s-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10m s-1. The wind speed should be checked with a
portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in m s-1.
As
referred to the GW-TM, sound l
The
ET should ensure that the equipment is maintained in a good working order in
accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations with sufficient spare
equipment available in the
The
ET is responsible for the provision of the monitoring equipment and will ensure
that sufficient noise measuring equipment and associated instrumentation are
available for carrying out the baseline monitoring and impact monitoring. All the equipment and associated
instrumentation will be clearly labelled.
Representative
locations were selected to monitor the noise l
Table 5.1 Noise
Monitoring Stations for
Construction Noise
Monitoring Station |
Description |
N2 |
Ho Fook
Building |
N5 |
Chancery House |
The
status and locations of noise sensitive receivers (NSRs)
may change after issuing the Manual and the location of the noise monitoring
station may need to be adjusted accordingly.
If such changes occur during the construction phase, the ET should
propose an updated monitoring location for the agreement from the
When
alternative monitoring location is proposed, the following criteria, as far as practicable,
should be followed:
·
At
locations close to the major site activities which are likely to have noise
impacts;
·
Close
to the NSRs; and
·
For
monitoring locations located in the vicinity of the NSRs,
care should be taken to minimise disturbance to the occupants during
monitoring.
The
monitoring station will normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the NSR
building façade and at a height of approximately 1.2m above ground or at the
height that has the least obstructed view of the construction activities in
relation to the NSR. If access to the
normal monitoring position cannot be obtained, an alternative position will be
chosen, and a correction to the measurements should be made, if appropriate. For instance, a correction of +3 dB(A) should be made to free-field measurements. The ET should agree with the AP, IEC, EPD and
the owners/occupants of the premises on the monitoring position. Once the positions for the monitoring
stations are chosen, the baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring should
be carried out at the same positions.
The
ET should carry out baseline noise monitoring prior to the commencement of any
construction works. The baseline
monitoring shall be measured for a continuous period of at least 14 consecutive
days at a minimum logging interval of 30 minutes for day-time and 15 minutes
(as three consecutive Leq(5min) readings) for
Before
commencing the baseline monitoring, ET shall inform the Contractor(s), IEC, AP
and the EPD of the baseline monitoring schedule programme such that relevant
parties could conduct on-site audit to ensure accuracy of the baseline
monitoring results.
During
the baseline monitoring, there should not be any construction activities in the
vicinity of the monitoring stations. Any
non-Project related construction activities in the vicinity of the stations
during the baseline monitoring should be noted and the source(s) and
location(s) be recorded.
In
case the baseline monitoring could not be carried out at any of the designated
monitoring locations during the baseline monitoring period, the ET shall carry
out the monitoring at alternative location which could effectively represent
the baseline conditions at the impact monitoring locations. The alternative baseline monitoring locations
shall be agreed with the AP, Contractor(s) and IEC and approved by EPD.
In
exceptional cases, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results
are obtained, the ET shall liaise with the AP, IEC and EPD to agree on an
appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference.
5.6
Construction
Impact Monitoring
Noise
monitoring shall be carried out at all the designated monitoring stations. An initial guide on the monitoring is to
obtain one set of 30-minute measurement at each station between 0700 and 1900
hours on normal weekdays at a frequency of once a week when construction
activities are underway.
If
construction works are extended to include works during the hours between 1900
and 0700 hours of the following day, or on general holidays and Sundays,
applicable Construction Noise Permits (CNPs) will be
obtained by the Contractor(s) under the NCO requirements, and the frequency and
scope of monitoring will be determined by EPD in the capacity of the Noise
Control Authority (NCA).
5.7
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits
A/L
L
Table 5.2 Action
and Limit L
Time Period |
Action L |
Limit L |
0700 – 1900 hours on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is
received from any one of the sensitive receivers |
75 dB(A) (Note) |
Notes: (a)
Acceptable Noise L (b)
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours,
the conditions stipulated in the CNP issued by the NCA have to be followed. |
To
account for cases where ambient noise l
For
compliance checking, after taking into account any adjustments agreed with EPD,
comparison with either the Limit or the Maximum Acceptable Impact L
The
ET should compare the impact monitoring results with the noise criteria as
defined in Table 5.2.
In cases where exceedance of these criteria
occurs, actions should be carried out in accordance with the EAP shown in Table
5.3.
Table 5.3 Event
and Action Plan for Construction Noise
Event |
Action |
|||
|
ET |
IEC |
AP |
Contractor |
Action L |
1. Notify IEC and Contractor; 2. Carry out investigation; 3. Report the results of investigation to the IEC, AP and Contractor; 4. Discuss with the Contractor and formulate remedial measures; 5. Increase monitoring frequency to check mitigation effectiveness. |
1. Review the analysed results submitted by
the ET; 2. Review the proposed remedial measures by the Contractor and advise the
AP accordingly; 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Require Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem; 4. Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented. |
1. Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC; 2. Implement noise mitigation proposals. |
Limit L |
1. Identify source; 2. Inform IEC and AP: 3. Repeat measurements to confirm
findings; 4. Increase monitoring frequency; 5. Carry out analysis of
Contractor's working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be
implemented; 6. Inform IEC, AP and EPD the causes and actions taken for the exceedances; 7. Assess effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep IEC,
EPD and AP informed of the results; 8. If exceedance stops, cease additional
monitoring. |
1. Discuss amongst AP, ET, and
Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 2. Review Contractors remedial actions when 3. Supervise the implementation of remedial measures. |
1. Confirm receipt of
notification of failure in writing; 2. Notify Contractor; 3. Require Contractor to propose remedial measures for the analysed noise problem; 4. Ensure remedial measures properly implemented; 5. If exceedance continues, consider what
portion of the work is responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that
portion of work until the exceedance is abated. |
1. Take immediate action to
avoid further exceedance; 2. Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days
of notification; 3. Implement the agreed proposals; 4. Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control; 5. Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the AP until
the exceedance is abated. |
It
is necessary to undertake regular environmental audits and site inspections to
ensure those recommended mitigation measures were properly implemented. The requirements of the environmental audit
programme were set out in Section 10 of the Manual.
The
audit programme will verify the implementation status and evaluate the
effectiveness and stability of the mitigation measures.
In accordance with the recommendations of the EIA,
mitigation measures have been proposed for controlling air quality impacts
during the construction phase of the Project.
Details of the mitigation measures are presented in Annex A
- Implementation Schedule.
As adverse fugitive dust impacts are not anticipated
during the construction period, dust monitoring is considered not
necessary. However, monthly site audits
throughout the construction period are recommended to ensure that appropriate
dust control measures are properly implemented and good construction site
practices are adopted.
In accordance with the recommendations of the EIA, mitigation
measures have been proposed during the construction and operation phases of the
Project. Details of the mitigation
measures are presented in Annex A - Implementation Schedule.
Monthly site audits will be carried out during the
construction phase to monitor the environmental performance of the Project and
to enable prompt actions to rectify any malpractice which may give rise to
water pollution problem. The site audit
will also ensure that the recommended mitigation measures are properly
implemented during the construction stage.
7.2.1
Methodology and Criteria
The Contractor(s) must confirm that the necessary
disposal permits or licences are obtained from appropriate authorities in
accordance with the various ordinances.
Relevant legislation and guidelines for reference include:
·
Water Pollution Control
Ordinance (WPCO) (Cap. 358);
·
Technical Memorandum
Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems, Inland
and Inshore Waters (TM);
·
Practice Note for
Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage (Prop PECC PN 1/94); and
·
The Project is expected to generate the following
types of waste during the construction phase:
·
Construction
and demolition (C&D) materials;
·
Chemical
waste; and
·
General
refuse.
Mitigation measures, where appropriate, have been
recommended in the EIA Report to avoid or reduce potential adverse
environmental impacts associated with handling, collection and disposal of
waste arising from the construction and operation of the Project.
Waste management will be the Contractor(s)’s
responsibility and wastes produced during the construction phase will be
managed in accordance with appropriate waste management practices and EPD’s regulations and requirements.
It is recommended that monthly site audits of the
waste management practices be carried out during the construction phase to
determine if wastes are being managed in accordance with the recommended good
construction site practices. The audits
will examine all aspects of waste management including waste generation,
storage, recycling, transport and disposal.
In addition, the audit will also carry out visual inspection to check if
signs of contaminated soil are revealed during the construction phase. If contaminated soil is found, the procedure
for assessing and remediating the contamination in accordance with Sections 3.1
of EIAO TM Annex 19 will be undertaken.
The guidelines related to land contamination stated in Section 8.3.1
will be followed.
The Contractor(s) will be responsible for the
implementation of any mitigation measures to reduce waste or redress issues
arising from the waste materials.
8.2
Waste Management
Practices
The Contractor(s) shall incorporate the recommended
mitigation measures into a Waste Management Plan (WMP) for managing the
different types of wastes on site. The
Contractor(s) shall submit the WMP to the
The WMP shall describe the arrangements for
avoidance, re-use, recover and recycling, storage, collection, treatment and
disposal of different categories of waste to be generated from construction
activities and shall include the recommended mitigation measures on waste
management detailed in Annex
A of the Manual.
A Trip Ticket system shall be included in the
WMP. Wastes shall not be disposed of at
any other designated disposal locations unless otherwise approved in writing by
EPD, Secretary of Public Fill Committee and/or other authorities, as
appropriate.
The Implementation Schedule (see Annex A) provides
details on the appropriate mitigation measures for avoiding and preventing
adverse environmental impacts associated with management of C&D materials,
chemical waste and general refuse from the workforce. The WMP shall be regularly reviewed, and
updated as appropriate, throughout the course of the construction works to
confirm that it remains current with the latest detailed information and works
practices.
The WMP shall also outline the requirements for a
waste audit programme to verify that the measures outlined in the plan are
effectively implemented and adhered to.
To facilitate monitoring and control over the
Contractors’ performance on waste management, a waste inspection and audit
programme will be implemented throughout the construction phase. The programme shall look at the aspects of
waste management including waste generation, storage, recycling, transport and
disposal. An appropriate audit programme
shall be undertaken with the first audit conducted at the commencement of the
construction works.
The aims of the waste inspection and audit programme
are:
·
To
review the Contractor’s WMP including the quantities and types of C&D
materials generated, reused on-site and disposed of off-site and the quantity
of timber used in temporary works construction for each process/activity;
·
To
confirm that the wastes arising from the works are handled, stored, collected,
transferred and disposed of in an environmentally acceptable manner and comply
with the relevant requirements under the Waste
Disposal Ordinance (WDO) and its regulations;
·
To
confirm that the Contractor(s) properly implements the appropriate
environmental protection and waste pollution control mitigation measures, as
outlined in the Implementation Schedule (see Annex A), to reduce and control the
potential for waste impacts;
·
To
monitor the implementation and achievement of the WMP on-site to assess its
effectiveness; and
·
To
monitor the follow-up action(s) on deficiencies identified.
Joint site inspections and audits by the ET, IEC and
Contractor(s) shall be undertaken each month.
Particular attention will be given to the Contractor(s)’s provision of
sufficient spaces, adequacy of resources and facilities for on-site sorting and
temporary storage of C&D materials.
The C&D materials to be disposed of from the site shall be visually inspected. The public fill for delivery to the
government public fill reception facilities shall contain no observable
non-inert materials (e.g. general refuse, timber, etc). As a good practice, the waste to be disposed
of at landfills should minimise any inert or reusable/recyclable C&D
materials (e.g. soil, broken rock, metal, and paper/cardboard packaging,
etc). Any irregularities observed during
the site audits will be raised promptly to the Contractor(s) for rectification.
The findings of the waste audits will be reported in
the Monthly EM&A Reports.
8.3.1
Methodology and Criteria
The Contractor(s) must confirm that the necessary
disposal permits or licences are obtained from appropriate authorities in
accordance with the various ordinances.
In addition to the monthly joint inspections/ audits, each Contractor(s)
shall designate a member of staff as being responsible for routine inspections
and audits of on-site waste management practices, with reference to the
relevant legislation and guidelines as well as the recommendations given in the
Implementation Schedule contained in Annex A of this Manual, and defined below:
General Legislation
·
Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap 354);
·
Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General)
Regulation (Cap 354);
·
Waste Disposal (Charges for Disposal of
Construction Waste) Regulation;
·
Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance
(Cap 28);
·
Public Health and Municipal Services
Ordinance (Cap 132) – Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulations;
and
·
The
storage, handling and disposal of chemical waste should be audited with
reference to the requirements of the Code
of Practice on the Package, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes published
by the EPD.
Other Relevant Guidelines
·
Waste Disposal Plan for Hong Kong
(December 1989), Planning, Environment and Lands Branch Government Secretariat,
·
Chapter 9 – Environment (1999), Hong Kong
Planning and Standards Guidelines,
·
New Disposal Arrangements for Construction
Waste (1992), Environmental Protection Department & Civil Engineering
Department,
·
Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes (1992), Environmental Protection
Department,
·
Works Branch Technical Circular (WBTC) No.
32/92, The Use of Tropical Hard Wood on Construction Site; Works Branch,
·
WBTC No. 2/93, Public Dumps, Works Branch,
·
WBTC No. 2/93B, Public Filling Facilities,
Works Branch,
·
WBTC No. 16/96, Wet Soil in Public Dumps;
Works Branch,
·
WBTC Nos. 4/98 and 4/98A, Use of Public
Fill in Reclamation and Earth Filling Projects; Works Bureau,
·
Waste Reduction Framework Plan, 1998 to
2007, Planning, Environment and Lands Bureau, Government Secretariat, 5
November 1998;
·
WBTC Nos. 25/99, 25/99A and 25/99C,
Incorporation of Information on Construction and Demolition Material Management
in Public Works Subcommittee Papers; Works Bureau,
·
WBTC No. 12/2000, Fill Management; Works
Bureau,
·
WBTC No. 19/2001, Metallic Site Hoardings
and Signboards, Works Bureau,
·
WBTC Nos. 6/2002 and 6/2002A, Enhanced
Specification for Site Cleanliness and Tidiness, Works Bureau,
·
WBTC No. 11/2002, Control of Site Crusher,
Works Bureau,
·
WBTC No. 12/2002, Specification
Facilitating the Use of Recycled Aggregates. Works Bureau,
·
ETWB TC(W) No. 33/2002, Management of Construction
and Demolition Material Including Rock; Environment, Transport and Works
Bureau,
·
DevB
TC(W) No. 6/2010, Trip Ticket System for Disposal of Construction &
Demolition Materials, Development Bureau,
·
ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005, Environmental
Management of Construction Site, Environment, Transport and Works Bureau,
·
WBTC No. 25/99A and 25/99C, Incorporation
of Information on Construction and Demolition Material Management in Public
Works Sub-committee Papers; Works Bureau,
·
EPD’s
Guidance Manual for Use of Risk-based Remediation Goals (RBRGs)
for
·
EPD’s
Guidance Note for Contaminated Land Assessment and Remediation; and
·
EPD’s
Guidance Notes for Investigation and Remediation of Contaminated Sites of
Petrol Filling Stations, Boatyards, and Car Repair/Dismantling Workshop.
The Contractor(s)’s waste management practices shall
be audited with reference to the checklist detailed in Table
8.1.
Details
of the required mitigation measures are included within the Implementation
Schedule of Annex A
of the Manual.
Table 8.1 Waste
Management Checklist
Activities |
Timing |
Checking Frequency |
If non-compliance noted,
Action Required |
Necessary waste disposal permits or licences have been obtained |
Before the commencement of works |
Once |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Only licensed waste haulier are used for
waste collection. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Records of quantities of wastes generated, recycled and disposed are
properly kept. For demolition material/waste,
the number of loads for each day shall be recorded (quantity of waste can
then be estimated based on average truck load. For landfill charges, the receipts of the
charge could be used for estimating the quantity). |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET will inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Wastes shall be removed from site in a timely manner. General refuse is collected on a daily
basis. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Waste storage areas shall be properly cleaned and do not cause
windblown litter and dust nuisance. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Different types of waste shall be segregated in different containers
or skips to enhance recycling of materials and proper disposal of waste. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Chemical wastes shall be stored, handled and disposed of in accordance
with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Handling and Storage of Chemical
Wastes, published by the EPD. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
C&D materials shall be properly covered before leaving the site. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Wastes shall be disposed at licensed sites. |
Throughout the works |
Each Month |
The ET shall inform the Contractor(s), AP and the |
Site inspections provide a direct means to assess and
confirm that the Contractor(s)’s environmental protection and pollution control
measures are in compliance with the contract specifications. The site inspection shall be undertaken
routinely by the ET to verify that appropriate environmental protection and
pollution control mitigation measures are properly implemented in accordance
with the EIA. In addition, the ET shall
be responsible for defining the scope of the inspections, detailing any
deficiencies that are identified, and reporting any necessary action or
additional mitigation measures that were implemented as a result of the
inspection.
Regular site inspections shall be carried out by the
ET each month. Subject to the progress
of the construction works, the Heritage Checker in the ET will have to conduct
more frequent site inspection and progress meetings with the AMO, the
Contractors and the AP in order to check the implementation of the mitigations
for cultural heritage and keep a contemporaneous conservation log-book of each
and every site inspections and performance record. The IEC shall also undertake monthly site
audit to assess the performance of the Contractor(s). The areas of inspection shall not be limited
to the site area and shall also include the environmental conditions outside
the site which are likely to be affected, directly or indirectly, by the site
activities. The ET shall make reference
to the following information while conducting the inspections:
·
the
EIA and EM&A recommendations on environmental protection and pollution control
mitigation measures;
·
protection
schedule of historic features of the monuments;
·
Restoration
proposal of the historic buildings and structures in the Site;
·
ongoing
results of the EM&A programme;
·
work
progress and programme;
·
individual
works methodology proposals;
·
the
contract specifications on environmental protection;
·
the
relevant environmental protection and pollution control laws;
·
previous
site inspection results; and
·
Records
in the conservation log-book of the Heritage Checker since the last monthly
site inspection of the ET.
The Contractor(s) shall update the ET with relevant
information on the construction works prior to carrying out the site
inspections. The site inspection results
shall be submitted to the IEC, the
Ad hoc site inspections shall also be carried out by
the ET and site audits by the IEC if significant environmental issues are
identified. Inspections and audits may
also be required subsequent to receipt of an environmental complaint or as part
of the investigation work as specified in the EAPs
for EM&A programme.
9.2
Compliance with
Legal & Contractual Requirements
There are contractual environmental protection and
pollution control requirements as well as environmental protection and
pollution control laws in
In order that the works are in compliance with the
contractual requirements, the works method statements submitted by the
Contractor(s) to the
The ET shall also review the progress and programme
of the works to check the regulatory compliance.
The Contractor(s) shall regularly copy relevant
documents to the ET so that the checking and auditing work can be carried
out. The relevant documents are expected
to include at a minimum the updated Work Progress Reports, the updated Works
Programme, the application letters for different licence/ permits under the
environmental protection laws and all valid licences/ permits. The site diary
shall also be available for the ET inspection upon request.
After reviewing the document, the ET shall advise the
IEC, the
Upon receipt of the advice, the Contractor(s) shall
undertake immediate action to remedy the situation. The ET, IEC, AP and the
The ET shall undertake the following procedures upon
receipt of a complaint:
(i) log
complaint and date of receipt into the complaint database and inform the IEC
immediately;
(ii) investigate the complaint and discuss
with the Contractor(s) and the
(iii) if a complaint is
considered valid due to the works , the ET will identify mitigation measures in
consultation with the Contractor(s), the
(iv) if mitigation measures are required, the
ET shall advise the Contractor(s) accordingly;
(v) review the Contractor(s)'s response on
the identified mitigation measures and the updated situation;
(vi) if the complaint is transferred from
EPD, an interim report shall be submitted to EPD on the status of the complaint
investigation and follow-up action within the time frame assigned by EPD;
(vii) undertake
additional monitoring and audit to verify the situation if necessary and
confirm that any valid reason for complaint does not recur;
(viii) report the
investigation results and the subsequent actions on the source of the complaint
for responding to complainant. If the
source of complaint is EPD, the results shall be reported within the time frame
assigned by EPD; and
(ix) record the complaint, investigation, the
subsequent actions and the results in the monthly EM&A Reports.
During the complaint investigation work, the ET,
Contractor(s) and the
The ET Leader shall keep a contemporaneous log-book
of each and every instance or circumstance or change of circumstances which may
affect the environmental impact assessment and every
non-compliance from the recommendations of the EIA Report or the conditions
of the EP. The ET Leader shall notify
the IEC within one working day of the occurrence of any such instance or
circumstance or change of circumstance. The ET Leader’s log-book shall be
kept readily available for inspection by persons assisting in supervision of
the implementation of the EIA Report recommendations (such as the
Reports can be provided in an electronic medium upon
agreeing the format with the
Types of reports that the ET Leader shall prepare and
submit include Baseline Monitoring Report, Monthly EM&A Reports, Quarterly EM&A Summary Reports and Annual EM&A Report and
Final EM&A Review Report. In
accordance with Annex 21 of the EIAO-TM, a copy of the monthly, quarterly
summary and final review EM&A reports shall be made available to the
Director of Environmental Protection.
10.2
Baseline
Monitoring Report
In respect of the construction phase EM&A works,
the ET shall prepare and submit a Baseline Monitoring Report no less than 2
weeks before commencement of the works for the Project for agreement on the A/L
Levels. Copies of the Baseline
Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the following: the Contractor(s), the
IEC, the AP, the
The Baseline Monitoring Report for the construction
phase shall cover the baseline noise levels.
It will include at least the following:
(i) Up to half a page executive summary.
(ii) Brief
project background information.
(iii)
Drawings
showing locations of the baseline monitoring stations.
(iv)
Monitoring
results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following
information:
a.
monitoring
methodology;
b.
name
of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;
c.
parameters
monitored;
d.
monitoring
locations (and depth if applicable);
e.
monitoring
date, time, frequency and duration; and
f.
QA/QC
results and detection limits.
(v) Details
on influencing factors, including:
a.
major
activities, if any, being carried out on the site during the period;
b.
weather
conditions during the period; and
c.
other factors which might affect the results.
(vi) Determination
of the A/L Levels for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the
baseline data, the analysis shall conclude if there is any significant
difference between control and impact stations for the parameters monitored;
(vii) Revisions
for inclusion in the Manual; and
(viii) Comments,
recommendations and conclusions.
The results and findings of the construction phase
EM&A work required in this Manual will be recorded in the Monthly EM&A
Reports prepared by the ET Leader. The EM&A
report shall be prepared and submitted within 2 weeks of the end of each
reporting month, with the first report due the month after construction
commences. Each Monthly EM&A Report
shall be submitted to the following parties: the Contractor(s), the IEC, the
AP, the
The ET Leader shall review the number and location of
monitoring stations and parameters every six months, or on as needed basis, in
order to cater for any changes in the surrounding environment and the nature of
works in progress.
10.3.1
Contents of First Monthly EM&A Report
(i) 1-2
pages executive summary, comprising:
-
breaches
of A/L levels;
-
complaint
Log;
-
notifications
of any summons and successful prosecutions;
-
reporting
changes; and
-
forecast of impact predictions.
(ii) Basic project information
including a synopsis of the Project organisation, programme and management
structure, and a drawing of the Project area showing the environmentally
sensitive receivers and the locations of monitoring and control stations,
programme, management structure and the work undertaken during the month.
(iii) Environmental Status,
comprising:
-
works
undertaken during the month with illustrations (such as location of works,
daily excavation/filling rates, percentage fines in the fill material used);
and
-
drawing showing the project area, any environmental
sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations.
(iv) A brief summary of EM&A requirements
including:
-
monitoring
parameters;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (A/L levels);
-
EAPs;
-
environmental
mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA Report; and
-
environmental requirements in contract documents.
(v) Advice on the
implementation of environmental protection, mitigation and pollution control
measures as recommended in the EIA Report and summarised in the updated
implementation schedule.
(vi) Monitoring results (in both hard and diskette
copies) together with the following information:
-
monitoring
methodology;
-
name of
laboratory and equipment used and calibration details;
-
parameters
monitored;
-
monitoring
locations (and depth); and
-
monitoring
date, time, frequency, and duration;
(vii) Graphical plots of trends
of monitored parameters for representative monitoring stations annotated
against the following:
-
major
activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
(viii)
Advice
on the solid and liquid wastes management.
(ix)
A
summary of the current condition of character defining elements, historic
buildings and structures illustrated with photo records, and location plan of
each items, and any significant issues related to the cultural heritage
protection and conservation during the period.
(ix) A summary of non-compliance (exceedances)
of the environmental quality performance limits (A/L levels).
(x) A review of the reasons for and the implications of
non-compliance including a review of pollution sources and working procedures.
(xi) A description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance
and deficiency reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier
non-compliance.
(xii) A summary record of complaints received
(written or verbal) for each media, including locations and nature of
complaints, liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up
procedures taken and summary of complaints.
(xiii) A summary record of notifications of summons,
successful prosecutions for breaches of environmental protection/pollution
control legislation and actions to rectify such breaches.
(xiv) A forecast of the works programme, impact
predictions and monitoring schedule for the next one month; and
(xv) Comments, recommendations and conclusions for the monitoring
period.
10.3.2
Contents of the Subsequent Monthly
EM&A Reports
(i) Title page.
(ii) Executive summary (1-2 pages), including:
- breaches of A/L levels;
- complaint log;
- notifications of any summons and successful
prosecutions;
- reporting changes; and
- forecast of impact predictions.
(iii) Contents page.
(iv) Environmental status, comprising:
- drawing showing the Project area, any environmental sensitive
receivers and the locations of the monitoring and control stations;
- summary of non-compliance with the
environmental quality performance limits; and
- summary of complaints.
(v) Environmental issues and actions, comprising:
- review issues carried forward and any
follow-up procedures related to earlier non-compliance (complaints and
deficiencies);
- description of the actions taken in the
event of non-compliance and deficiency reporting;
- recommendations (should be specific and
target the appropriate party for action); and
- implementation status of the mitigation
measures and the corresponding effectiveness of the measures.
(vii) Appendices, including:
- A/L levels;
- graphical plots of trends of monitored parameters at key stations
over the past reporting month for representative monitoring stations annotated
against the following: major activities being carried out on site during the
period; weather conditions during the period; and any other factors which might
affect the monitoring results;
- monitoring schedule for the present and next reporting period;
- cumulative complaints statistics; and
- details of complaints, outstanding
issues and deficiencies.
10.4
Quarterly
EM&A Summary Reports
The ET Leader shall submit Quarterly EM&A Summary Reports for the construction phase EM&A
works only. These reports shall contain
at least the following information:
(i)
Up to half a page
executive summary.
(ii)
Basic project
information including a synopsis of the Project organisation, programme,
contacts of key management, compliance with EP condition (status of submission)
and a synopsis of work undertaken during the quarter.
(iii) A brief
summary of EM&A requirements including:
-
monitoring
parameters;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (A/L levels); and
-
environmental mitigation measures, as recommended in the EIA
Report.
(iv) Advice on the implementation of environmental protection and pollution
control/mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA Report and summarised in
the updated Implementation Schedule.
(v) Drawings showing the Project area, any
environmental sensitive receivers and the locations of the monitoring and
control stations.
(vi) Graphical plots of the trends of monitored parameters over the
past four months (the last month of the previous quarter and the present
quarter) for representative monitoring stations annotated against:
-
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
any other factors which might affect the monitoring results.
(vii) Advice on the solid and liquid wastes
management.
(viii) A summary of the current condition of
character defining elements, historic buildings and structures illustrated with
photo records, and location plan of each items, and any significant issues
related to the cultural heritage protection and conservation during the period.
(viii) A summary of
non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental
quality performance limits (A/L levels).
(ix) An Impact Prediction Review will be prepared
to compare project predictions with actual impacts for the purpose of assessing
the accuracy of predictions on the EIA study.
The review will focus on the comparison between the EIA study prediction with the EM&A monitoring results. If any excessive variation was found, a
summary of investigation and follow up procedure taken shall be addressed
accordingly.
(x) A brief review of the reasons for and the
implications of non-compliance including review of pollution sources and
working procedures.
(xi) A summary description of the actions taken
in the event of non-compliance and any follow-up procedures related to earlier
non-compliance.
(xii) A
summarised record of complaints received (written or verbal) for each media,
liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken.
(xiii) Comments
(eg effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation
measures), recommendations (eg any improvement in the
EM&A programme) and conclusions for the quarter.
(xiv) Proponents'
contacts for the public to make enquiries.
10.5
Annual/ Final
EM&A Review Reports
An Annual EM&A Report shall be prepared by the ET
at the end of each construction year during the course of the Project. A Final EM&A
Review Report shall be prepared by the ET at the end of the construction
phase. The Annual/Final EM&A Review Reports shall contain at least the following
information:
(i) Executive Summary (1-2 pages).
(ii) Drawings
showing the project area any environmental sensitive receivers and the
locations of the monitoring and control stations.
(iii) Basic
project information including a synopsis of the Project organization, contacts
for key management staff and a synopsis of work undertaken during the course of
the Project.
(iv) A brief summary of EM&A requirements
including:
-
environmental
mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA Report;
-
environmental
impact hypotheses tested;
-
environmental
quality performance limits (A/L Levels);
-
monitoring
parameters; and
-
EAPs.
(v) A
summary of the implementation status of environmental protection and pollution
control/mitigation measures as recommended in the EIA Report and summarised in
the updated Implementation Schedule.
(vi) Graphical plots and the statistical analysis of the trends of
monitored parameters over the course of the project including the post-project
monitoring for monitoring stations annotated against the following:
-
the
major activities being carried out on site during the period;
-
weather
conditions during the period; and
-
any
other factors which might affect the monitoring results;
(vii) A
summary of the implementation status of the protection and conservation works
to the character defining elements, historic buildings and structures of the
Site illustrate with photo records, and location plan of each items.
(viiI) A summary of non-compliance (exceedances) of the environmental quality performance
limits (A/L levels).
(ix) A
review of the reasons for and the implications of non-compliance including
review of pollution sources and working procedures as appropriate.
(x) A description of the
actions taken in the event of non-compliance.
(xi) A
summary record of complaints received (written or verbal) for each media,
liaison and consultation undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken.
(xii) A
summary record of notifications of summonses and successful prosecutions for
breaches of the current environmental protection/pollution control
legislations, locations and nature of the breaches investigation, follow-up
actions taken and results.
(xiii) A
comparison of the EM&A data with the EIA predictions with annotations and
explanations for any discrepancies, including a review of the validity of EIA
predictions and identification of shortcomings in the EIA recommendations.
(xiv) A
review of the monitoring methodology adopted and with the benefit of hindsight,
comment on its effectiveness, including cost effectiveness.
(xv) A
review of the success of the EM&A programme,
including a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of the mitigation
measures, and recommendations for any improvements in the EM&A programme.
(xvi) A clear cut statement on the environmental
acceptability of the Project with reference to specific impact hypotheses and a
conclusion to state the return to ambient and/or the predicted scenario as the
EIA findings.
The site documents such as the monitoring field records,
laboratory analysis records, site inspection forms, etc. are not required to be
included in the EM&A Reports for submission. However, the documents shall be kept by the
ET Leader and be ready for inspection upon request. Relevant information shall
be clearly and systematically recorded in the documents. The monitoring data shall also be recorded in
magnetic media, and the software copy shall be available upon request. The documents and data shall be kept for at
least one year after the completion of the construction phase EM&A
works. For those documents and data
related to heritage conservation, the ET Leader shall submit one full set of
these records (both hard and soft copies) to AMO for record and update the
Conservation Management Plan if necessary.
10.7
Electronic
Reporting of EM&A Information
To enable the public inspection of the Baseline
Monitoring Report and Monthly EM&A Reports via the EIAO Internet Website
and at the EIAO Register Office, electronic copies of Monthly EM&A Reports
shall be prepared in Hyper Text Markup Language
(HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document Format (PDF, version 4.0
or later), unless otherwise agreed by EPD and shall be submitted at the same
time as the hard copies. For the HTML
version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section and
sub-section of the EM&A Reports shall be included in the beginning of the
document. Hyperlinks to figures,
drawings and tables in the EM&A Reports shall be provided in the main text
where the respective references are made.
Graphics in the reports shall be in interlaced GIF format unless
otherwise agreed by EPD. The content of
the electronic copies of the Monthly EM&A Reports must be the same as the
hard copies.
The internet address and the environmental monitoring
data shall be made available to the public via the EIAO Internet Website and
the EIAO Register Office.
The internet website as described above will enable
user friendly public access to the monitoring data and with features capable
of:
·
providing
access to environmental monitoring data collected since the commencement of
works;
·
searching
by data;
·
searching
by types of monitoring data;
·
hyperlinks
to relevant monitoring data after searching; and
·
or otherwise as agreed by EPD.
10.8
Interim Notifications
of Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances
With reference to EAPs,
when the environmental quality limits are exceeded, the ET shall notify the
IEC, Contractor(s), the AP, the