8b.1.1.1
This section presents the potential
fisheries impacts generated from the construction and operation of the IWMF at
an artificial island near SKC, including the submarine cable laying works.
8b.1.1.2
Baseline condition for
fisheries resources in the study area would be obtained from the latest
relevant literature. Potential direct, indirect, residual and
cumulative impacts on fisheries resources during the construction and operation
phases of the Project would be identified and evaluated. Mitigation measures would be recommended
where necessary.
8b.2
Environmental Legislation, Policies, Plans, Standards and Guidelines
8b.2.1.1
This
fisheries impact assessment is conducted according to the criteria and
guidelines set out in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact
Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) Annex 9 and Annex 17, in order to provide
objective identification, prediction and evaluation of potential fisheries
impacts arising from the Project. EIAO-TM
Annex 17 sets out the methodology for assessment of fisheries impacts; and
Annex 9 provides the evaluation criteria.
8b.2.1.2
Other
local legislation that applies to fisheries and is relevant to this fisheries impact assessment includes the following:
·
Fisheries Protection Ordinance
(Cap. 171) – aims to promote the conservation of fish and other forms of
aquatic life within the
· Marine Fish Culture Ordinance (Cap. 353) – regulates and protects marine fish culture by designating areas of fish culture zone, granting license, prohibiting unauthorized vessels and any deposition of chemicals or other substance which are likely to cause injury to fish in a fish culture zone. The list of designated fish culture zones was last revised in January 2000.
·
The Water Pollution Control
Ordinance (Cap.358) – aims to protect and control water quality in
8b.3.1.1
According
to the Study Brief Section 3.7.6.2, the study area shall cover the Southern,
Southern Supplementary, Second Southern Supplementary, North Western, North
Western Supplementary, and Western Buffer Water control Zones, as designated
under the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 358, WPCO).
8b.3.1.2
After
referring to the water quality impact assessment, potential adverse impact on
water quality is predicted to be localized.
Fisheries impact assessment for this study will therefore only cover the
Southern Water Control Zone where the Project Site is located.
8b.4
Assessment Methodology
8b.4.1.1
Based
on review of the findings of relevant studies and available information, sufficient
baseline data on capture and culture fisheries are available from the latest Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) Port Survey 2006, AFCD Annual
Report 2001-2010, as well as other relevant information available in other
reports and publications. No field surveys are therefore considered to be
necessary.
8b.4.1.2
The
impact assessment was prepared in accordance with the criteria and guidelines
in Annexes 9 and 17 of the EIAO-TM. Results of water quality modelling (Section 5b) were adopted to assess the
extent and severity of indirect impacts during the marine works. The water quality model was also used to
formulate mitigation measures, if required.
8b.5
Description of the Environment
8b.5.1 Sites of Fisheries Importance
8b.5.1.1
The
study area for this fisheries impact assessment is the same as that for the water
quality impact assessment for this Project.
Four FCZs and no oyster culture are present within
the study area (Figure 8b.1).
A potential important spawning and nursery grounds
for commercial fisheries are also identified with the study area. Table 8b.1 presents the distance of FCZs from
the Project Site:
Table 8b.1 Fisheries
Sensitive Receivers within the Study Area
Fish Culture Zone |
Approximate Distance from the Project Site
(km) |
Cheung Sha
Wan |
6 |
Lo
Tik Wan |
18 |
Sok
Kwu Wan |
22 |
Po Toi |
27.5 |
8b.5.2.1
In 2010, the capture fishing
industry landed approximately 168,000 tonnes of fisheries product valued at
$2,100 million (AFCD, 2011a). The
industry consists of about 3,900 fishing vessels and 8,200 fishermen. Fishing activities are mainly conducted in
the waters of the continental shelf in
Table 8b.2 Recent Figures for Capture Fisheries in
Parameter |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|
Fishing fleet size
(No. of vessels) |
3,900 |
3,700 |
3,800 |
4,000 |
3,950 |
4,150 |
4,300 |
4,600 |
4,470 |
5,100 |
|
Local fishermen
engaged in capture fisheries |
8.200 |
7,600 |
7,900 |
8,500 |
8,500 |
9,170 |
9,700 |
10,100 |
10,860 |
11,560 |
|
Production
(thousand tonnes) |
168 |
159 |
158.0 |
154.0 |
155.0 |
162.0 |
167.5 |
157.4 |
169.8 |
174.0 |
|
Value of produce
(HK$ million) |
2,100 |
2,000 |
1,780 |
1,530 |
1,600 |
1,600 |
1,600 |
1,500 |
1,600 |
1,700 |
|
Source: AFCD 2002,
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011a
8b.5.2.2
The
latest AFCD Port Survey 2006 (AFCD, 2011a) provides the most updated and
detailed information on capture fisheries in
8b.5.2.3
The
fishing operation within the study area was supported by vessels of varying length.
Vessels of less than 15 m in length were more frequently recorded operating
around
8b.5.2.4
The
capture fisheries data in the study area is summarised in Table 8b.3
Table 8b.3 Summary of Capture Fisheries Data
in the Study Area
Parameter |
Shek Kwu Chau* |
Along the Submarine Cable* |
Cheung Sha |
West Lamma Channel |
|
Cheung Chau |
|
No. of Vessels |
50-400 |
10-100 |
10-50 |
100-400 |
100-400 |
100-400 |
100-700 |
Adult Fish Production in terms of Weight (kg/ha) |
100-200 |
0-100 |
0-50 |
50-400 |
200-600 |
200-600 |
50-600 |
Fish Fry Production in terms of Density (tails/ha) |
None
reported |
None
reported |
None
reported |
None
reported |
None
reported |
None
reported |
0-100 |
Fisheries Production (Adult and Fry) in terms of Value
(HK$ /ha) |
2,000-5,000 |
0-2,000 |
500-1,000 |
1,000-5,000 |
2,000-10,000 |
2,000-10,000 |
2,000-10,000 |
Source: Port Survey
2006 (AFCD, 2011a)
Note: * Works area
Operating Fishing Vessel
8b.5.2.5
The
number of operating fishing vessels was considered to be moderate to high for
Shek Kwu Chau (50-400), and low to moderate for the proposed submarine cable
(0-100). The amount of fishing vessels
at Shek Kwu Chau is generally similar to the rest of the
Fisheries Production - Weight
8b.5.2.6
In
terms of weight, adult fish production was low to moderate at Shek Kwu Chau (100-200
kg/ha), and low for the proposed submarine cable alignment (0-100 kg/ha). In comparison, the rest of the
Composition of Capture Fisheries
8b.5.2.7 The capture fisheries productions of the top 10 families within the study area are presented in Table 8b.4. Overall, the fisheries production at Shek Kwu Chau and the proposed submarine cable alignment is considered to be lower than the rest of the study area.
Table 8b.4 Fisheries Production (kg/ha) of Top Ten
Families in the Study Area
Top Ten Fish
Families |
Shek Kwu Chau* |
Along the Submarine Cable* |
Cheung Sha |
West Lamma Channel |
|
Cheung Chau |
|
Scad (Carangidae) |
5-10 |
≤5 |
≤5 |
5-20 |
>60 |
≤5 to 60 |
≤5 to 40 |
Shrimp |
40-60 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 40 |
20-40 |
10-60 |
≤5 to >60 |
Rabbitfish (Siganidae) |
5-10 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
10-20 |
10-20 |
≤5 to 60 |
Squid |
≤5 |
≤5 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 20 |
10-40 |
≤5 to 40 |
5-40 |
Croaker (Sciaenidae) |
10-20 |
5-20 |
10-20 |
5-40 |
10-40 |
10-40 |
≤5 to 60 |
Crab |
5-10 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
5-20 |
10-40 |
≤5 to 40 |
Mullet (Mugilidae) |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 20 |
20-60 |
5-20 |
≤5 to 20 |
Sardine (Clupeidae) |
≤5 |
≤5 |
None reported |
≤5 to 10 |
10-20 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 to 60 |
Seabream (Sparidae) |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
5-10 |
5-20 |
≤5 to 10 |
Anchovy (Engraulidae) |
≤5 |
None reported |
None reported |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 |
≤5 to 10 |
≤5 to 10 |
Source: Port Survey 2006 (AFCD,
2011a)
Note: *Works area
8b.5.2.8
The
most common capture fisheries in Shek Kwu Chau was shrimp (40-60 kg/ha),
followed by croaker (10-20 kg/ha); in which the proposed submarine cable
alignment had low production (≤5-20 kg/ha).
Other fisheries production in these two works areas was low in general.
8b.5.2.9
Within
the rest of the study area, shrimp was also the most commonly captured
fish. Moderate to high production of
this species (up to 60 kg/ha) was recorded around Cheung Chau,
8b.5.2.10 Low yield (5-10 kg/ha) of high-valued scad was reported at Shek Kwu Chau. Low yield (5-10 kg/ha) of other low and medium-valued species, including rabbitfish, croaker, and crab (5-20 kg/ha); as well as very low yield (≤5 kg/ha) of squid, mullet, sardine, seabream and anchovy were also reported.
Fisheries Production – Economic Value
8b.5.2.11
The
fisheries production in terms of economic value was considered to be moderate
to high at Shek Kwu Chau (HK$2,000-5,000), and low to moderate at
the proposed submarine cable alignment (HK$0-2,000). The rest of the Southern WCZ has higher
fisheries production in terms of economic value (up to 10000), where the highest overall
fisheries value was recorded around Soko Islands, Lamma Island and Cheung Chau.
Fry Collection
8b.5.2.12
Fry
collection in
Spawning and Nursery Ground for Commercial Fisheries Resources
8b.5.2.13
According
to the “Fisheries Resources and Fishing Operations in Hong Kong Waters” (AFD,
1998), nursery ground of commercial fisheries resources was identified at
Northeast Waters, Port Shelter, Lamma Island and South Lantau; whilst spawning
ground of commercial fisheries resources were identified at Northeast Waters,
Eastern Waters, Southeast Hong Kong in Mirs Bay, South Lamma, South Cheung
Chau, Northeast Lantau, and South Lantau.
Nursery Ground
8b.5.2.14
The major
commercial juvenile fish and crustacean species previously recorded in the nursery
ground at
Spawning Ground
8b.5.2.15
The major
spawning fish species recorded in the spawning ground at southern waters (South
Lantau, South Cheung Chau, South Lamma, and Southeast Hong Kong) include Gymnothorax reevesi, Inegocia japonicus,
Caranx kalla, Platycephalus indicus, Mylio macrocephalus, Nibea diacanthus,
Johnius belengeri, Portunus pelagicus, Oratosquilla spp., Solenocera
crassicornis, Metapenaeus joyneri, and Leiognathus brevirostris (AFD, 1998).
8b.5.2.16
The
majority of the commercial fisheries species in
8b.5.2.17
The south
waters of Hong Kong, which covers the proposed Project Site at Shek Kwu Chau
and submarine cable alignment, was previously identified as spawning and
nursery ground. An ichthyoplankton and
post-larvae survey was conducted over this area under EIA-125/2006 Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving Terminal and
Associated Facilities: Part 2 South Soko (CLP, 2006). Two of the sampling stations were located at
the offshore waters at Shek Kwu Chau (SKC1 and SKC2). There were 40 fish families of the fish
larvae recorded. The area was dominated
by Gobiidae and Blenniidae. Marked
differences were found in fish family composition between wet and dry seasons:
Ambassidae, Engraulidae, Gobiidae and Sciaenidae were abundant in wet season; whereas,
Callionymidae, Gobiidae, Scorpaenidae and Syngnathidae in dry season. However, spatial difference in fish family
composition was not apparent.
8b.5.2.18
The survey
results also revealed that the densities for fish larva (0.940 ± 1.067 to 2.498 ± 3.180 larva
m-3)and eggs (0.335 ± 0.650 to 3.224 ± 5.356 egg m-3) at
all sampling stations were generally low; the degree of difference in densities
between stations were small (CLP, 2006). Therefore, it was concluded that there was no observable difference in fish larvae
and egg densities between the identified spawning and
nursery grounds at southern waters of Hong Kong, and the waters at Western
Lantau, which was not identified to be important spawning and nursery grounds (ibid.).
8b.5.2.19
Seasonal variation in fish
larvae density was found in southern
waters as the density decreased significantly after October (CLP, 2006). It also deduced that the
peak spawning season was between July and September (ibid).
Overall Findings on Capture Fisheries
8b.5.2.20
In
terms of fisheries production and operation, the proposed works area is
considered to be of low to moderate value, as the overall production is low to
moderate, and that fisheries production is dominated by high yield of moderate-valued
shrimp. In comparison, the rest of the
study area have low to higher yield of fisheries production (in terms of weight
and value), especially in the waters near
8b.5.3.1
Marine
culture fisheries included marine fish culture and oyster culture. Mariculture areas for marine fish included 26
Fish Culture Zones (FCZs) located in various sheltered coastal areas in Hong
Kong waters, occupying about
8b.5.3.2
Although
no figures are available on the individual production of FCZ, it was estimated
that marine culture fisheries production was about 1,512 tones in 2010, with a
value of $118 million. Such production
catered for about 9% of local demand for live marine fish (AFCD, 2011b). Recent figures on marine fish culture are
presented in Table 8b.5:
Table 8b.5 Recent Figures on
Parameter |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
Licensed operator |
1.035 |
1,050 |
1,060 |
1,070 |
1,078 |
1,092 |
1,125 |
1,155 |
1,240 |
1,370 |
Production (tonnes) |
1,512 |
1,437 |
1,370 |
1,532 |
1,490 |
1,540 |
1,540 |
1,490 |
1,211 |
2,470 |
Value (HK$ million) |
118 |
92 |
82 |
99 |
89 |
76 |
79 |
76 |
57 |
136 |
Source:
AFCD 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011b
8b.5.3.3
The
variety of species cultured depends on the availability of imported fry. Commonly cultured marine species include green grouper, brown-spotted grouper, giant grouper, Russell's snapper,
mangrove snapper,
goldlined seabream,
star snapper, and
red drum (AFCD,
2011b).
8b.5.3.4
The nearest Cheung Sha Wan Fish Culture Zone (FCZ)
is about 6 km to the northeast of Shek Kwu Chau. Lo Tik Wan FCZ, Sok Kwu Wan FCZ and Po Toi FCZ are located from 16 to 27.5 km away (Figure 8b.1).
8b.6
Identification,
Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
8b.6.1.1
The construction of the IWMF at
an artificial island near SKC is scheduled to commence in 2013 and complete in
2018. The proposed marine construction
works would involve reclamation, and construction of breakwater, cofferdam and
berth at Shek Kwu Chau; laying of submarine cable between Shek Kwu Chau and
Cheung Sha; and construction of a landing portal at Cheung Sha (Figure 8b.1). More
details on construction method and programme are presented in Section 2.
8b.6.1.2
The
following table summarizes the habitats to be directly affected under the Project:
Table 8b.6 Sizes of Works Areas for the IWMF an
Shek Kwu Chau |
||
Reclamation |
7.9
ha |
|
Cofferdam |
2 ha |
|
Breakwater |
4.1 ha |
|
Berth |
1.9 ha |
|
Embayment |
15.1 ha |
|
Anti-scouring layer |
1.5 ha |
|
Cheung Sha |
||
Landing portal |
20 m2 |
|
Along submarine cable alignment |
||
Submarine cable trench |
5.8 km long,
17,400 m2 |
|
|
||
Fisheries
Resources to be Directly Affected |
Size |
Duration |
Shek Kwu Chau |
||
Fishing ground |
31 ha |
Permanent |
Fish spawning and nursery ground |
15.9 ha |
Permanent |
Along submarine cable alignment |
||
Fishing ground |
5.8 km long, 17,400 m2 |
Temporary |
Direct Impact
Permanent Loss of Fishing Ground
8b.6.1.3
Assuming
that the total area enclosed within the breakwater would become permanently
inaccessible for fishermen during and after the construction phase (Figure 1.2), no capture
fishing activities could be carried out in these areas. The total area of fishing ground to be lost
would therefore be about 31 ha, including the reclamation area and the
embayment enclosed within the breakwater.
8b.6.1.4
Based
on the Port Survey 2006 (AFCD, 2011a), the potentially affected area supported low
to moderate fisheries production (100-200 kg/ha). The proposed works area constitutes an
insignificant portion of the total fishing areas in
8b.6.1.5
Overall,
in view of the small size of the affected area, and insignificant loss of fisheries
production, the potential impacts on capture fisheries production are considered
to be acceptable under the Project.
Permanent Loss of Spawning and Nursery Ground
8b.6.1.6
The
Project would permanently occupy a total area of 15.9 ha for reclamation, and cofferdam,
breakwater and berth construction. While
the footprint of works overlaps with the previously identified potential
important fish spawning and nursery ground, a permanent loss of the 15.9 ha of Fish Spawning and Nursery Ground would be
resulted.
8b.6.1.7
Considering
that the 15.9 ha of loss would only account for an insignificant amount of area
of the previously identified important fish spawning and nursery ground in the
southern waters, the predicted loss of 15.9 ha is considered to be
insignificant.
8b.6.1.8
In
addition, the fisheries baseline surveys (ichthyoplankton and post-larvae)
conducted under EIA-125/2006 Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving Terminal and Associated Facilities: Part 2 South
Soko (CLP, 2006) concluded that, the densities for fish larvae and eggs
at all sampling stations, including two sampling stations around Shek Kwu Chau
(SKC1 and SKC2), at south and west Lantau waters were generally low; and the
degree of difference in densities between stations were small. Therefore,
it was suggested that there was no observable difference in fish larvae and egg
densities between the identified spawning and nursery
grounds at southern waters of Hong Kong, and the waters at
Temporary Loss of Fishing Ground
8b.6.1.9 During the submarine cable laying process (for details please refer to Section 2), the subsea burying machine would create a trench of about 5.8 km long (17,400 m2) by performing water jetting. The cable would be laid into the trench spontaneously. As a result, temporary occupation of fishing ground in the works area during the cable laying process is expected. Considering that the submarine cable laying operation would only last for about 20 working days, the temporary loss of fishing ground due to submarine cable laying works is considered to be insignificant.
Indirect Impact
Changes in Water Quality
8b.6.1.10
Potential
indirect impacts on fisheries resources would include changes in water quality
due to marine construction works, including filling for reclamation area,
dredging for anti-scouring protection layer, and submarine cable laying
process.
Elevation of Suspended Sediments (SS)
8b.6.1.11
The
proposed marine works would temporarily elevate the SS level and create
sediment plumes. Effects on fisheries
resources could be lethal or sublethal through reduction in survivorship,
growth rate, and reproductive potential due to stress incurred by the need to
flush out deposited material constantly.
High SS level may clog the gill structure of fish and cause physical
damage and hinder transfer of oxygen.
Fish egg and larval fish (fry) are more susceptible to deleterious
impacts from sedimentation through smothering and clogging of their respiratory
systems. Adult fish are generally less
sensitive to effects from SS.
8b.6.1.12
SS
plume occurs naturally in the marine environment by wave action and vertical
flux of water current. Fish has evolved
behavioural adaptation to fluctuation in turbidity, such as clearing their
gills by flushing water, or simply moving to less turbid waters.
Filling for reclamation area
8b.6.1.13 According to the water quality impact assessment (Section 5b.7.3.12 – 5b.7.3.21), unacceptable level of SS elevation was predicted during unmitigated scenario of filling works for reclamation area. Other than silt curtain, control on use of fill material for filling works are proposed to minimise SS elevation, as presented in Table 5b.10 under Section 5b. With the implementation of the proposed measures to minimise SS elevation, compliance with the SS criterion of elevation from 30% of the ambient SS would be achieved. No significant adverse impact from SS elevation due to filling for reclamation area is therefore anticipated.
Dredging works for anti-scouring layer
8b.6.1.14 According to the sediment plume quantitative assessment in water quality impact assessment (Section 5b.7.3.22 – 5b.7.3.30), if unmitigated, the influence zone of SS elevation is relatively large during the dredging and filling activities for the IWMF. As shown in Table 7b.44, the level of SS elevation due to the dredging operation would reach 697 mg/L under unmitigated scenario, which is far above the assessment criteria of elevation of 30% of the ambient SS level.
8b.6.1.15 In order to mitigate the potential impacts from SS elevation, it is proposed to reduce the dredging rate for anti-scouring protection to the suggested level of 380 m3/day, with no more than 15 grabs per hour using grab size of approximately 2 m3 for anti-scouring protection layer construction (Table 5b.12-5b.13). The extent of dredging area has also been limited, as shown in Figure 5b.4.
8b.6.1.16 After the adoption of silt curtain, reduction of dredging rate, and limitation on extent of dredging works, compliance with the SS criterion of 30% elevation from the ambient SS (i.e. 10.7 mg/L during dry season and 8.4 mg/L during wet season) would be achieved. It is therefore considered that adverse impact due to SS elevation from the dredging operation would not be anticipated.
Submarine cable laying
8b.6.1.17 According to the water quality impact assessment (Section 5b.7.4.1 – 5b.7.4.7), no significant water quality impact is predicted for the submarine cable laying process.
Culture Fisheries
8b.6.1.18 As discussed, adverse water quality impacts due to SS elevation would not be anticipated. No adverse impacts on the nearest Fish Culture Zone, Cheung Sha Wan FCZ (~6 km away from works), due to SS elevation would be expected.
Capture Fisheries
8b.6.1.19 As discussed, adverse water quality impacts due to SS elevation would not be anticipated. No adverse impacts on capture fisheries due to SS elevation would be expected.
Spawning and Nursery Ground of Commercial Fisheries
8b.6.1.20
As
discussed, adverse water quality impacts due to SS elevation would not be
anticipated. No adverse impact on the
potential important spawning and nursery ground of commercial fisheries due to
SS elevation from the dredging operation would be anticipated.
Contaminant Release during Dredging Activities
8b.6.1.21
Dredging
activities can cause the release of contaminants from marine sediments. Potential impacts on fisheries resources
include the accumulation of contaminants in fish tissues, resulting in sub-lethal
effects which may alter behaviour, reproduction and increase susceptibility to
disease. Eggs, larvae and juveniles are
particularly susceptible to the sub-lethal effects of contaminants, and
elevated levels may lead to increased mortality. Bioaccumulation in commercially important fish
species may ultimately impact human health. The potential impacts on marine fauna would
depend on several factors including species tolerance, contaminant levels,
water flow rate, etc.
8b.6.1.22 According to the sediment quality monitoring survey conducted by EPD in 2008 (EPD, 2009), the monitoring station closest to the Project Site, SS6, reflected no sediment contamination. Based on the sediment testing results collected under this study, the assessment indicated that unacceptable elevation of contaminant levels due to the proposed marine works would be unlikely. Significant impact regarding bioaccumulation of heavy metals and organochlorines in adult fish, as well as fish egg, larvae and juveniles are therefore not expected.
Decrease of Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
8b.6.1.23
When
the increased SS concentration in water column combined with other factors, the
DO in the water column will reduce.
Elevated SS reduces light penetration and lowers the photosynthetic rate
of phytoplankton, resulting in lowered oxygen production. Moreover, dredging activities disturb bottom
sediments and cause the release of inorganic substances from the seabed into
water column. The sudden release of
inorganic substances may cause eutrophication and algal bloom. Oxidation of dead algae during decomposition
may lead to further oxygen depletion within the water column. If the concentration of oxygen becomes too
low, fish, especially those in early life stages, may be unable to tolerate
such condition and suffer from hypoxia-induced mortality and stress, including
reduced feeding and growth rate, as higher metabolic demand for oxygen are
required for the growth at these developmental stages.
8b.6.1.24 According to the Water Quality Impact Assessment (Section 5b), no significant DO depletion was predicted under this Project even under unmitigated scenario. The dredging activities would cause a maximum DO depletion of less than 0.1 mg/L at the nearest sensitive receiver (located 15 m away from works). Full compliance with the WQO for depth-averaged DO was predicted. Hence, no adverse impacts on fisheries, including the potential important spawning and nursery ground for commercial fisheries, due to changes in DO level would be expected.
Impact on Livelihood of Fisheries Operators
Culture Fisheries Operators
8b.6.1.25
While
the nearest Cheung Sha Wan FCZ is not expected to receive adverse impact from
water quality, the livelihood of mariculture fish operators would not be
affected by the Project.
Capture Fisheries Operators
8b.6.1.26
Considering
that the fishing area to be permanently lost (31 ha) is small in comparison
with the rest of the fishing area in Hong Kong, and that the fisheries
production was considered to be low to moderate, potential impacts on capture
fisheries operators due to the permanent lost is considered to be acceptable.
8b.6.1.27
The loss of fishing ground during
construction phase would affect the local fishermen who habitually fish there.
While fishing ground of similar quality is largely available in the vicinity,
fishermen who habitually fish within and around the Project Site could utilise
the waters in the vicinity of the Project Site, hence the livelihood of the
fishermen is not expected to be significantly affected.
8b.6.1.28
During
construction, marine works may result in deterioration in water quality. The fisheries resources in the vicinity of
Project Site may be affected by deterioration in water quality, hence affecting
the livelihood of the capture fishers operating in the area. Nevertheless, with the proper implementation
of the mitigation measures proposed in Section
5b, no adverse impacts on capture fisheries due to deterioration in water
quality would be expected. Capture
fisheries operators are therefore not expected to receive significant adverse
impact due to deterioration of water quality.
8b.6.2.1 Potential sources of water quality impact associated with the operation of the IWMF include:
Wastewater from Incineration Plant and Mechanical Treatment Plant
8b.6.2.2 The IWMF would have zero discharge of wastewater during operation. A wastewater treatment plant would be provided on-site to treat the wastewater generated from the IWMF (mainly human sewage). The treated effluent would be reused on-site (e.g. landscape irrigation, floor/vehicle washing).
Discharge of Saline Water from Desalination Plant at Seawall Outfall
8b.6.2.3
Approximately
8b.6.2.4 The brine water drained from the desalination plant would be concentrated seawater (about 1.7-1.8 time more concentrated than the raw seawater). There would be no temperature elevation in the brine water discharge as compared to the ambient water temperature. No other biocides / anti-fouling chemicals (such as chlorine and C-treat-6) would be used for the proposed desalination plant. Instead, membrane would be backwashed frequently to prevent fouling problem. The backwash water, which contains chemical for cleansing the membrane filter, would be diverted to the onsite sewage treatment works.
8b.6.2.5
According to the detailed
discussion in the Water Quality Impact Assessment (Section 5b.7.6.8 –
5b.7.6.14), the saline water to be discharged from the desalination plant
would comply with effluent discharge standard (Table 5b.12). With the
adoption of a conservative approach during quantitative assessment, the maximum
predicted downstream influence distance of the saline water discharge is about
Impingement and Entrainment
8b.6.2.6
At
the proposed water intake point for water supply at the
desalination plant, the pulling force at the intake point may damage the local
fisheries resources, due to impingement (physical collision with the screen at intake
point) and entrainment (uptake of fisheries resources along with seawater).
8b.6.2.7
Although
the rate of the water intake is slow (2,460 m3/day),
however, for the adult
and juvenile fish species that could not resist the pulling force at the water
intake point, impingement may occur at the intake screen, due to their larger
body size. For the smaller sized fish,
larvae and eggs, entrainment may occur due to the pulling force from water
intake.
8b.6.2.8
Considering
that the results presented in the fisheries
baseline surveys (ichthyoplankton and post-larvae) (CLP,
2006) concluded that the densities for fish larvae and eggs at all sampling
stations in South and West Lantau waters were generally low; and there was no
observable difference in fish larvae and egg densities between the identified
spawning and nursery grounds at southern waters of Hong Kong, and that at
Western Lantau, which was not identified to be important spawning and nursery
grounds (ibid.), it is therefore
considered that impacts on local fisheries resources due to impingement and
entrainment is acceptable.
Impact on Livelihood of Fisheries Operators
8b.6.2.9
The loss of fishing ground
during operation phase within and around the Project Site would affect the
local fishermen who habitually fish there.
While fishing ground of similar quality is largely available in the
vicinity, fishermen who habitually fish within and around the Project Site
could utilise the waters in the vicinity of the Project Site, hence the
livelihood of the fishermen is not expected to be significantly affected.
Obstruction of Fishing Activities due to Anti-scouring Layer
8b.6.2.10 Upon completion of the installation of anti-scouring layer at the foot of breakwater and cofferdam, the anti*scouring layer would not protrude above the seabed, and therefore no obstruction of fishing activities is predicted.
8b.6.3.1
The
overall evaluation of construction and operation phases impacts associated with
the Project is summarized in Table 8b.7
below.
Table 8b.7 Fisheries Impact Evaluation during
Construction and Operation Phases
Criteria |
Construction Phase Impact |
Operation Phase Impact |
Nature of impact |
Direct loss of 31 ha of fishing ground, and 15.9 ha
of spawning and nursery ground. Considering the works area has low to moderate
fisheries production, and constitutes an insignificant portion of the total
fishing area in Temporary loss of 17,400
m2 of fishing ground
would be resulted from the laying of submarine cable between Shek Kwu Chau
and Cheung Sha. As the cable laying process would
only last for about 20 working days, the temporary loss of fishing ground is
considered to be insignificant. Indirect impact on fisheries resources include
elevation in suspended sediment level, contaminants release during dredging,
and decrease in DO. With the adoption of water quality control measures,
compliance with the SS criterion of elevation from
30% of the ambient SS level would be achieved. As unacceptable elevation of
contaminant levels, and decrease in DO due to the works would be unlikely; full
compliance with the WQO is predicted. Indirect impacts on fisheries resources would be temporary and
reversible in nature. |
Permanent loss of 31 ha of fishing ground, and 15.9 ha
of spawning and nursery ground. Considering the Project Site has low to
moderate fisheries production, and constitutes an insignificant portion of
the total fishing area in Indirect impact due to discharge of saline water
would be diluted by large volume of water.
The effect would be permanent though localised and reversible. No impact from wastewater should arise, as ‘zero
discharge policy’ would be adopted. As the Project Site is located within an important commercial
fisheries’ spawning and nursery ground, uptake and damage of fisheries
resources (including fish larvae and egg) may be resulted at the proposed
intake point due to entrainment and impingement. As previously study
demonstrated limited fish larvae and egg densities in |
Size of affected area |
Small. Loss of 31 ha of fishing ground, and 15.9 ha of spawning and nursery ground. Temporary loss of 17,400 m2 of fishing ground. Elevation of SS would be mitigated by water quality control measures.
Sediment plume is predicted to be localized.
|
Small. Permanent loss of 31 ha of fishing ground, and 15.9 ha of spawning and
nursery ground. The volume of
saline water discharge would be small, and the
influence zone of saline discharge be negligible at 72 m downstream from the
outfall. Potential impact on
fisheries resources due to entrainment and impingement would be localised and
small. |
Loss of fisheries resources / production |
Small. Permanent loss of
an insignificant portion (31 ha) of the total fisheries production in |
Small. Permanent loss of
an insignificant portion (31 ha) of the total fisheries production in Negligible loss of fisheries
resources is expected due to impingement and
entrainment at the water intake point. Provision of a
screen at the water intake point would minimise the loss. |
Destruction and disturbance of nursery and spawning
grounds |
Low impact. Permanent loss of 15.9 ha, and temporary disturbance
on 17,400 m2 of spawning and
nursery grounds in southern Lantau waters. |
Low impact. Permanent loss of 15.9 ha of spawning and nursery
grounds in southern Lantau waters. Potential impact on loss of spawning and nursery
fisheries resources due to impingement and entrainment would be minimised
with the implementation of a screen at intake point. |
Impact on fishing activity |
Low impact. The fishing ground in the vicinity of the
IWMF supported a low to moderate number
of vessels, and low to moderate production of fisheries in terms of weight
and value. The size of fishing ground to be affected is
insignificant in comparison with the total area of fisheries habitat and
fishing ground in The affected vessel could fish in other areas in
nearby waters. |
Low impact. The fishing ground in the vicinity of the
IWMF supported a low to moderate number
of vessels, and low to moderate production of fisheries in terms of weight
and value. The size of fishing ground to be affected is
insignificant in comparison with the total area of fisheries habitat and
fishing ground in The affected vessel could fish in other areas in
nearby waters. |
Impact on aquaculture activity |
No adverse water quality impact on aquaculture
activity is predicted at the nearest Cheung Sha Wan FCZ. |
No impact on aquaculture activity is predicted. |
Overall fisheries Impact |
Low |
Low |
8b.7
Evaluation of Cumulative Environmental Impacts
8b.7.1.1 Two major projects may be carried out concurrently with the IWMF at the artificial island near SKC:
ESB-209/2009 – Outlying
Marine works
8b.7.1.2
The concurrent project would
involve the construction of a Sewage Treatment Works (STW) at San Shek
Wan. Although the STW building would be
located outside the study area of the IWMF at Cheung Sha, nevertheless, its
associated submarine outfall, which is approximately 800 m in length and 300 mm
in diameter, would extend from the
8b.7.1.3 While the tentative construction schedule for the IWMF at an artificial island near SKC is 2013 to 2018, there may be an overlapping period for the 2 projects. As the water quality impacts generated from the proposed reclamation and submarine cable installation works are predicted to be localized in the Water Quality Section, no significant cumulative impact on fisheries resources due to water quality would be anticipated.
ESB-187/2008 – Improvement of Fresh Water Supply to Cheung Chau (2010 – 2013)
Marine works
8b.7.1.4
This concurrent project would
construct a submarine water main across Adamasta Channel, between Northern
Channel of Cheung Chau and
8b.7.1.5 According to the tentative schedule of the concurrent project, which is 2010 to 2013, the submarine water main laying works may overlap with the construction phase for the IWMF at an artificial island near SKC (2013-2018). As the replacement works for submarine water main would be conducted by horizontal directional drilling through the bed rock, in which the seabed would not be disturbed; and that the water quality impacts generated from the IWMF marine works are predicted to be localized in the Water Quality section, no significant cumulative impact on fisheries resources due to water quality would be anticipated.
8b.8
Mitigation of Environmental Impacts
8b.8.1.1
Following
EIAO-TM Annex 17, mitigation measures are discussed in this section to avoid,
minimize, and compensate for
the identified fisheries impacts. As the overall fisheries impact is considered
to be low for construction and operation phases, no mitigation measure specifically
for fisheries resources is recommended.
8b.8.1.2 In order to minimise environmental impacts during construction phase, alteration to the phasing of works, construction method, and layout plan of the IWMF at the artificial island near SKC have been made (Section 2 for details). The total fishing ground to be permanently lost due to the project has been significantly reduced from ~50 ha to ~31 ha. By adopting the cellular cofferdam construction method, instead of the conventional seawall and breakwater construction method, SS elevation would be greatly reduced, minimising adverse impact on the health of fisheries resources. A more detailed construction programme is presented in Table 2.5.
8b.8.1.3 In order to minimise the risk of impingement and entrainment of fisheries resources (including fish, larvae and egg) through the intake point, provision of a screen at the water intake point for desalination plant would be essential.
8b.8.1.4 In order to minimize and control the water quality, no wastewater effluent, anti-fouling agent, heavy metals and other contaminants would be released during operation phase of the Project. Mitigation measures recommended in the water quality impact assessment during construction and operation would serve to protect fisheries resources from indirect impacts resulted from the Project.
8b.8.1.5
Some of the recommended mitigation measures include
the following:
·
Dredging rate of no greater
than
· Dredging should be carried out by closed grab dredger (no more than 15 grabs per hour using grab size of approximately 2 m3) to minimize release of sediment and other contaminants during dredging;
· Silt curtains should be deployed around works area to minimize the potential impact of elevated SS level and sedimentation from dredging;
· Temporary sanitary facilities should be employed on-site to handle sewage from the workforce;
· Barges should be loaded carefully to avoid splashing of material; and
· All barges should be fitted with tight bottom seals to prevent leakage of material during loading and transporting.
8b.8.1.6
More
description on measures to mitigate water quality impact is presented in Section 5b.8.
8b.8.1.7 Artificial Reefs (ARs) are proposed to be deployed within the proposed marine park under this Project as an enhancement measure for the marine habitats. The creation of hard surfaces increases the complexity of marine habitats by offering various micro-habitats, and provides opportunities for marine organisms to develop within the AR, including fish. This enhancement feature would bring positive impacts to the previously identified important spawning and nursery ground for fisheries resources. More details are discussed in Section 7b.7.
8b.8.1.8 Release of fish fry has been proposed under this Project. The proposed deployment of ARs with various micro-habitats within the proposed marine park would provide shelter and nursery ground for the released fish fry. The frequency and quantity of fry to be released should be agreed by AFCD.
8b.9
Evaluation of
Residual Environmental Impacts
8b.9.1.1
Residual
impacts arised from the Project include the permanent loss of 31 ha of fishing
ground, and 15.9 ha of spawning and nursery grounds of commercial
fisheries resources. The areas
of fishing, and spawning and nursery grounds to be lost are considered to be small,
in comparison with the total area of fisheries habitat and fishing ground in
8b.10
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
8b.10.1.1 With the implementation of the mitigation measures for water quality, as recommended in the water quality impact assessment (Section 5b.8), no unacceptable fisheries impacts would be resulted from the Project. No monitoring programme for fisheries is recommended.
8b.11.1.1
Permanent
loss of 31 ha of fishing ground, and 15.9 ha of previously identified fisheries
spawning and nursery ground is expected to arise due to the IWMF footprint. Temporary loss of 17,400
m2 of fishing
ground would be resulted from the laying process of submarine cable. Potential impact from
impingement and entrainment of fisheries resources would be minimized by provision
of screen at the seawater intake, in order to minimise the
uptake of fisheries resources. Indirect impact on fisheries due to elevation in SS level would be
temporary and localized. Mitigation
measures such as adoption of silt curtain, reduced dredging rate, and phasing
of marine works have been recommended, in order to minimise adverse impact on
water quality, hence protecting fisheries resources.
8b.11.1.2
With the
proper implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, potential impact on
fisheries due to the proposed Project is considered to be acceptable.
AFCD(2011a). Fisheries: Capture Fisheries. http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/fisheries/fish_cap/fish_cap_latest/fish_cap_latest.html (Last revision date: 14 March 2011).
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department,
AFCD (2011b). Fisheries: Aquaculture. http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/fisheries/fish_aqu/fish_aqu_mpo/fish_aqu_mpo.html
(Last revision date: 14 March 2011). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation
Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2010). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2009-2010. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2009). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report 2008-2009.
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2008). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2007-2008. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2007). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2006-2007. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2006). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2005-2006.
AFCD (2005). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2004-2005. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2004). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2003-2004. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2003). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2002-2003. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2002). Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department Annual Report
2001-2002. Agriculture, Fisheries
and Conservation Department, Hong Kong.
AFCD (2001). Agreement No. CE62/98, Consultancy
Study on Fisheries and Marine Ecological Criteria for Impact Assessment Final
Report. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong
Kong.
AFD (1998). Fisheries
Resources and Fishing Operations in Hong Kong Waters. Agriculture and Fisheries Department, Hong Kong.
CLP (2006). Liquefied
Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving Terminal and Associated Facilities EIA Study EIA
Report. CLP Power Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong.
EPD(2009). Marine Water Quality in Hong Kong in 2008. Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong.
FMO (2008). Wholesale Price of Fresh Marine
Fish / Live Marine Product on
Fishbase (2008). Fish: Search Fishbase. http://www.fishbase.org/