This section presents the
Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) associated with the proposed CKR.
Potential landscape and visual impacts that might occur as a result of the development
of this trunk road and its associated structures, have been assessed in
accordance with the criteria and guidelines as stated in Annexes 10 and 18 of
the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM)
and EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010 on Preparation of Landscape
and Visual Impact Assessment under Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance.
Only surface construction activities and
permanent structures are assessed in this report. All underground activities
and facilities are unlikely to impose landscape and visual impacts, and hence
are not assessed.
10.2
Scope and Content of the Study
According to EIA Study Brief No.
ESB-156/2006, the Study Area for the Landscape Impact Assessment (LIA) shall
include all areas within 100 m of the project boundary of the project. The
assessment of landscape character areas and landscape resources will include
all areas within the Study Area boundary. The assessment area for the visual
impact assessment shall be defined by the visual envelope of the Project and
associated works.
As discussed in Sections 2.3 to 2.5
of the EIA, a number of alignment options have been considered for the
west, east and central portions of the CKR. These options have been evaluated
by considering a number of factors including engineering, public comments,
environmental factors etc. Figure 10.1 shows the location and preferred
alignment of the ~ 4.7 km, dual 3-lane
east-west CKR trunk road as well as the ventilation and administration buildings and the works
area. Figure 10.1.1, Figure 10.1.2 and Figure 10.1.3 provide further details of the three main
Project areas, namely the West, Central and East Portions. Figure 10.2 shows existing aerial views of the CKR, with Figure 10.2.1, Figure 10.2.2 and Figure 10.2.3 providing more detail of the three main
Project areas and Figure 10.3.1, Figure 10.3.2 and Figure 10.3.3 illustrating the context and hierarchy of the
existing landscape and visual conditions on annotated oblique aerial views of
the three main Project areas.
While a summary of the currently
agreed key elements is provided below, Section 3 provides full details of Project elements and
construction methodologies, as well as the temporary works area, including
supporting drawings. Figures
showing key elements of structures, such as plans, elevations and typical
design (e.g. of viaducts) are provided in the Impact Assessment sections of the
report, including illustration of soft landscaping.
Tunnel Sections
The tunnel section between Yau
Ma Tei and Ma Tau Kok is approximately 3.9 km (including a 370 m
long underwater tunnel between Ma Tau Kok and Kai Tak). Drill & blast rock tunnel in the central portion is approximately
2,790 m while the cut-and-cover tunnels proposed at both ends of the tunnel,
are approximately 400 m long at Yau Ma Tei and approximately 135 m long at Ma
Tau Kok.
The underwater tunnel between Ma
Tau Kok and Kai Tak is chosen based on various considerations including
minimizing the disturbance to public/marine facilities, environmental impacts,
extents of temporary reclamation and technical feasibility.
Ventilation Buildings (VB) and
There are three Ventilation Buildings (VBs)
and one
-
VB at Yau Ma Tei Interchange. Approximate footprint of 5,000 m2 with
a building height of approximately 20 m above ground (See Figure 10.10.5, Figure 10.10.6, Figure 10.10.7, Figure 10.10.8, Figure 10.10.9 and Figure 10.10.10 for details).
-
VB at Ho Man Tin. Approximate footprint of 3,300 m2 with a
building height of about 10 m above ground (See Figure 10.11.1 and Figure 10.11.2 for details).
-
Ventilation and
Slip Roads / Connection Roads
West Portion – There are
seven bridges designed for the West Portion connection roads to link CKR with
West Kowloon Interchange and Lin Cheung Road, namely Connection B2, B, C, C2,
D, E and G (See Figure 10.10.16 for some general details). The connections
have been designed to ensure the necessary headroom clearance is achieved on
all roads, considering factors such as avoiding the proposed Police Station
site and minimising traffic disruption.
East Portion – Traffic
from all destinations in particular from and to
-
Slip Road S1
– CKR eastbound to
-
Slip Road S2
–
-
Slip Road S3
– CKR eastbound to
-
Slip Road S4
–
- Slip Road S5 – CKR eastbound to Kai Tak Development (case without Trunk Road T2, as T2 will not be available by the time CKR and its east interchange are in place);
- Slip Road S6 – Kai Tak Development westbound to CKR (case without Trunk Road T2, as T2 will not be available by the time CKR and its east interchange are in place);
- Slip Road S7 – CKR eastbound to Road D2;
- Slip Road S8 – Road D2 to CKR westbound; and
-
Slip Road S9
–
Landscaped Decks
West – One landscaped deck
is provided at the west portal in Yau Ma Tei in accordance with the ‘Yau
Tsim Mong District Aspirations Study Report[1]’
published by YTM District Council in April 2010 which referred to the area of
YMT around Kansu Street being developed as an intersection area for north-south
and east-west movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. For further details of the western
landscape deck, see Figure 10.10.11, Figure 10.10.12, Figure 10.10.13, Figure 10.10.14 and Figure 10.10.15.
East – Two landscaped deck
are provided in the east portion.
One at the Kowloon City Ferry Pier Public Transport Interchange (PTI)
where the existing Kowloon City Ferry Pier PTI requires
re-provisioning for the duration of CKR east portion construction activities to
provide working and construction space. The re-provisioned permanent PTI will
remain in the same vicinity as the existing PTI shifting slightly towards To
Kwa Wan Road. An accessible landscaped deck on top of the re-provisioned PTI has
been proposed for public use. The other landscape deck will be
provided in Kai Tak, between the east tunnel portal of CKR and Kai Tak
Development’s depressed road D3, according to the approved Kai
Tak Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K22/4. According to the latest design, open space
would be provided at the top of the landscaped deck. For further details of the eastern landscape
decks, see Figure 10.12.7 and Figure 10.12.8.
Demolition and / or Re-provisioning Works
The Project will include the following
demolition and / or re-provisioning works which are not designated projects
under Schedule 2 of EIAO.
-
Yau Ma Tei (YMT)
-
-
Jade Hawker Bazaar. The
existing, single storey, Jade Hawker Bazaar at Battery Street will need to be
removed for the construction of the cut and cover tunnel. A temporary building
will be built on the existing Kansu Street Rest Garden on the south side of
multi-storey car park building to house the affected hawkers of the jade market
during construction and after completion of the cut and cover tunnel, the
hawkers will move to the new buildings located at the original Jade Hawker
Bazaar position.
-
-
Re-provisioning of
-
Landing Step for Temporary Relocation of Ma Tau Kok Public Pier - order to
facilitate the construction of underwater tunnel, the existing Ma Tau Kok
Public Pier is required to be demolished and a temporary Ma Tau Kok Public
Pier provided. A landing step is
proposed at LCSD promenade (GLA-TK 618 TGLA) near King Wan Street for temporary
boarding of the public between the bus drop-off area on King Wan Street and
temporary Kowloon City Ferry Pier PTI during CKR construction stage. A small
portion of the waiting area inside To Kwa Wan Vehicle Examination Centre is
required to provide a minimum width of 2m between the temporary relocated Ma
Tau Kok public pier and waiting area (GLA-TK 442 TGLA) of. A temporary covered
walkway which directly connects the landing step and temporary PTI will be
provided for the pedestrians as a safe, convenient and pleasant access. The
public pier will be re-provisioned after the commissioning of CKR works and
consistent with the theme of Kai Tak Development. According to the current
construction methodology, dredging is not required for the temporary relocation
of Ma Tau Kok Public Pier.
Conservation Works
- Yau Ma Tei (YMT) Police Station. The cut and cover tunnel of CKR will be constructed partly beneath the YMT Police Station which will therefore need to be decanted prior to construction but will not be demolished. After the commissioning of CKR, the YMT Police Station will be used for other, to be determined, purposes as discussed in the ‘Report on Revitalisation of Yau Ma Tei Police Station’. Conservation of the YMT Police Station is considered desirable not only due to its neo-classical architecture and it being the oldest police station in an urban context that still survives in Hong Kong, but due to its high contextual value (it gives an indication of the original coast line) and the high social value derived from the apparent bond the community has with the building.
Enhancement Works
-
Ma Tau Kok waterfront area and Kowloon City
Ferry Pier Public Transport Interchange (PTI) with cover. The Ma Tau Kok waterfront area is
planned to be part of a continuous waterfront promenade connecting Kwun Tong,
Kai Tak, Ma Tau Kok and To Kwa Wan waterfronts as a long term planning
proposal, as also highlighted in the approved EIA for Kai Tak Development.
Besides providing pleasant public access to the harbourfront, the waterfront
promenade will also act as a key green connector linking individual open
spaces, residential areas and surrounding areas. Temporary re-provisioning of
the existing Kowloon City Ferry Pier PTI is required to facilitate the
construction of the cut-and-cover tunnel. According to Chapter 9, Section
4.2.14 of Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG), it is
recommended on the planning point-of-view to “locate the
facilities (i.e. the PTI in this case) so that
there is no line-of-sight of the noise sources at the noise sensitive uses”.
A rooftop cover with solid barriers on the sides is proposed to screen the
potential noise source of the re-provisioned PTI and provide landscape
treatment to the decking as far as possible to enhance the urban environment.
Full Enclosures
Based on the noise impact
assessment, noise mitigation measures using a combination of enclosure,
semi-enclosure, cantilever and vertical noise barriers will be provided in the
west (See Figure 10.10.5, Figure 10.10.6, Figure 10.10.7, Figure 10.10.8, Figure 10.10.9 and Figure 10.10.10 for general details of noise barriers). There
are three full enclosures in total
-
West Portal End (approx. 100 m and part of the landscape deck)
-
Re-provisioned of Gascoigne Road Flyover (approx. 200 m)
-
Ferry Street Flyover (approx. 100 m)
Report Content
Following the introduction and
this description of the scope of the Study, the report includes the landscape
impact assessment, visual impact assessment, and discussion of mitigation
measures.
The merits of preservation in
totality, in parts or total destruction of existing landscape and the
establishment of landscape are evaluated and alternative alignments, designs
and construction methods that would avoid or reduce the identified landscape
and visual impacts have been evaluated for comparison before adopting other
mitigation or compensatory measures to alleviate impacts. The report is laid
out as follows:
·
Section 10.3 – A list of the relevant legislation and
standards;
·
Section 10.4 – A description of the general
assessment methodology and principles;
·
Section 10.5 – A review of the relevant planning and
development control framework;
·
Section 10.6 – A review of comments received during
Public Consultation and how these have been addressed in the design;
·
Section 10.7 – A baseline study providing a
comprehensive and accurate description of the baseline Landscape Resources
(LRs) and Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) including their sensitivity;
·
Section 10.8 – A baseline study providing a
comprehensive and accurate description of the Visual Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)
including their sensitivity;
·
Section 10.9 – Landscape impact assessment including
identification of the potential landscape impacts, predication of the magnitude
change caused by those potential landscape impacts and their significance
before and after the mitigation measures;
·
Section 10.10 – Recommendation of appropriate
mitigation measures and associated implementation programmes;
·
Section 10.11 – Visual impact assessment including
identification of the potential visual impacts, predication of the magnitude
change caused by those potential visual impacts and their significance before
and after the mitigation measures; and
·
Section 10.12 – A conclusion as to the acceptability
or otherwise of the Project’s predicted residual impacts according to the
five criteria set out in Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM, namely
‘beneficial’, ‘acceptable’, ‘acceptable with
mitigation measures’, ‘unacceptable’ and
‘undetermined’.
10.3
Legislation and Standards
The following legislation,
standards and guidelines are applicable to the LVIA associated with the
construction and operation of the Project:
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap.499, S.16) and the
Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM),
particularly Annexes 10 and 18;
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Guidance Note No. 8/2010
– Preparation of Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment;
·
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap 131);
·
·
ETWB TCW No. 13/2003 – Guidelines and Procedures for Environmental
Impact Assessment of Government Projects and Proposals;
·
ETWB TCW No. 13/2003A – Guidelines and Procedures for
Environmental Impact Assessment of Government Projects and Proposals Planning
for Provision of Noise Barriers;
·
ETWB TCW No. 2/2004 – Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape
Features;
·
ETWB TCW No. 29/2004 – Registration of Old and Valuable Trees, and
Guidelines for their Preservation;
·
ETWB TCW No. 36/2004 – Advisory Committee on the Appearance of
Bridges and Associated Structures (ACABAS);
·
ETWB TCW No. 8/2005 – Aesthetic Design of Ancillary Buildings in
Engineering Projects;
·
ETWB TCW No. 3/2006 – Tree Preservation;
·
DEVB TCW No. 2/2013 – Greening on Footbridges and Flyovers;
·
WBTC No. 25/92 – Allocation of Space for Urban Street Trees;
·
WBTC No. 25/93 – on Control of Visual Impact of Slopes;
·
WBTC No. 17/2000 – Improvement to the Appearance of Slopes
·
WBTC No. 7/2002 – Tree Planting in Public Works;
·
HyD TC No. 5/2000 – Control in the Use of Shotcrete (Sprayed
Concrete) on Slope Works;
·
HyD – Structures Design Guidelines for Highways and Railways.
Third Edition. Section 17;
·
HQ/GN/13 – Interim Guidelines for Tree Transplanting Works under
Highways Department’s Vegetation Maintenance Ambit;
·
GEO Publication No. 1/2011– Technical Guidelines on Landscape
Treatment for Slopes;
·
Land Administration Office Instruction (LAOI) Section D-12 Tree
Preservation;
·
LCSD Planting Manual - Part I : General Requirements of Roadside
Landscape Areas
·
LCSD Register of Old and Valuable trees;
·
Greening, Landscape and Tree Management Section - Guidelines on Greening
of Noise Barriers (April 2012).
·
Study on Landscape Value Mapping of
·
Transport Planning & Design Manual.
In addition, reference has been
made to the following approved studies and EIA reports:
·
Road Works at
·
Hong Kong Section of
·
·
Kai Tak Development EIA Report (EIA-157/2008);
·
Final Report on Planning, Landscape and Urban Design Study for Kai Tak
Development
·
Comprehensive Feasibility Study for The Revised Scheme of South
·
Feasibility Study for South
·
Preliminary Outline Development Plan (PODP) for Kai Tak Development; and
·
Recommended Outline Development Plan for Kai Tak Development.
Outline Zoning Plans (OZPs) references for
the Study are listed in Section 10.5.
10.4
General Methodology and Principles
Landscape and Visual Impacts
have been assessed separately for the construction and operational phase of the
Project. The impact significances quoted in the landscape and visual impact
assessment are of a negative nature unless otherwise specified.
10.4.1
Landscape Impact Assessment
The assessment of landscape
impacts has involved the following procedures:
·
Baseline survey;
·
Assessment of the degree of sensitivity of the existing landscape;
·
Identification of the potential sources of landscape impacts;
·
Assessment of the potential magnitude change caused by landscape
impacts; and
·
Predication of significance of landscape impacts before mitigation.
Baseline Survey
To conduct the landscape
baseline study that describes the baseline landscape resources (LRs) and
landscape character areas (LCAs) found in the Study Area, a desktop review of
topographical maps and other relevant information and photographs was
undertaken, as well as field surveys. Broad brush tree data were taken from a
Detailed Tree Survey completed in October 2010 (submitted separately at the
inception and planning stage and key results provided in Annex B) to provide a
broad understanding of trees around the Project Site. Landscape elements
surveyed include vegetation, rock features, patterns of settlement, land use
and water bodies.
Assessment of the Degree of Sensitivity of
the Existing Landscape
The individual LCAs and LRs
identified in baseline survey were assessed by following factors that influence
sensitivity:
·
Quality and maturity;
·
Importance or rarity in local, regional, national or global context;
·
Ability to accommodate change;
·
Overall size within the Study Area; and
·
Whether there are any statutory or regulatory limitations / requirements
relating to the LCAs and LRs.
The Sensitivity of each LCA and
LR is classified as follows:
·
High: Important
landscape resource or landscape of particularly distinctive character or high
importance, sensitive to relatively small changes
·
Medium: Landscape
resource or landscape of moderately valued landscape characteristics,
reasonably tolerant to change
·
Low: Landscape
resource or landscape of relatively unimportant landscape characteristics,
largely tolerant to change
Identification of the Potential Sources of
Landscape Impacts
These are the various elements
of the construction works and operational procedures that may generate
landscape impacts. Such landscape impacts are described further in Section 10.9 (Landscape Impact Assessment) of this report.
Assessment of the Potential Magnitude of Change caused by Landscape
Impacts:
The magnitude of change on each
LCA and LR, caused by landscape impacts at both construction and operation
phases, is elevated in this report. Information from the Broad brush Tree
Survey is considered when determining the magnitude of change, and other
factors considered are:
·
The physical extent of the impacts i.e. relative size of affected area
compared to the size of the LCAs and LRs in the whole Study Area;
·
Compatibility of the Project with the surrounding landscape;
·
Duration of impacts under construction and operation phases; and
·
Reversibility of change.
The magnitude of change is
classified as follows:
·
Large: The LCA or LR
would experience a major change
·
Intermediate: The LCA
or LR would experience a moderate change
·
Small: The LCA or LR
would experience a slight or barely perceptible change
·
Negligible: The LCA or
LR would experience no discernible change
Predication of Significance of Landscape Impacts before Mitigation:
The Impact Significance is a
definition of the landscape impacts before mitigation. The landscape impact significance during
construction and operation was assessed by combining the sensitivity of the
sensitive receiver and the magnitude of change caused by the impacts, according
to Table 10.1. Impact significance is taken to be adverse
unless stated otherwise as beneficial.
Table 10.1: Matrix for Impact
Significance
Magnitude of Change caused by the
Project |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate / Substantial |
Substantial |
Intermediate |
Slight / Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate / Substantial |
|
Small |
Slight |
Slight / Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Negligible |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
|
|
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
|
Sensitivity (LCAs, LRs or VSRs) |
The degree of Impact
Significance is divided into four thresholds:
·
Substantial: Adverse /
beneficial impact which will cause significant deterioration or improvement in
existing landscape
·
Moderate: Adverse /
beneficial impact which will cause noticeable deterioration or improvement in
existing landscape
·
Slight: Adverse /
beneficial impact which will cause barely perceptible deterioration or
improvement in existing landscape
·
Insignificant: No
discernible change in the existing landscape
10.4.2
Tree Survey Methodology
To minimize conflicts with
existing vegetation, a Detailed Tree Survey in accordance with ETWB 3/2006 was
undertaken in October 2010 under the Agreement No. CE 58/2006(HY) for the whole
development site. These data were used to facilitate the fine tuning of the
proposed detail design for the landscape and ensure that any significant trees,
where possible, be protected during both the design and construction periods. A
further Detailed Tree Survey will be carried out at a later stage of the
Project (mid 2013) when trees within the final agreed works areas will be
surveyed individually as the existing site conditions allow.
10.4.3
Visual Impact Assessment
The assessment of visual impacts has involved the followings procedures:
·
Identification of the Zones of Visual Influence (ZVIs);
·
Identification of Visual sensitive receivers (VSRs) within the ZVIs;
·
Assessments of the degree of sensitivity of the VSRs;
·
Identification of potential sources of visual impacts;
·
Assessment of the potential magnitude of change caused by visual
impacts; and
·
Predication of significance of visual impacts before mitigation.
Identification of Zone of Visual Influence (ZVIs):
This is achieved by site visit
and desktop study of topographic maps and photographs, and preparation of
cross-section to determine visibility of the Project from various locations.
The ZVIs for both construction and operational phase of the Project are
identified.
Identification of Visual Sensitive Receivers
(VSRs) within the ZVIs:
These are the people who would
reside within, work within, play within, or travel through, the ZVIs.
Assessments of the Degree of Sensitivity of
the VSRs:
Factors for considering the
degree of sensitivity of the VSRs include:
·
The type of VSRs, which is classified as Residential, Occupational,
Recreational or Travelling according to whether the person is at home, at work,
at school, at play, or travelling. Those who view the impact from their homes
are in general considered to be highly sensitive as the character of view from
their home will have a substantial effect on their perception of quality and
acceptability of their home environment and their general quality of life.
Those who view the impact from their workplace are generally considered to be
moderately sensitive as the character of view will have a less important effect
on their perception of quality of life. Those who view the impact while taking
part in an outdoor recreational activity may display varying sensitivity
depending on the type of activity. Those who view the impact while travelling
on a public thoroughfare will display varying sensitivity depending on the mode
and speed of travel;
·
Estimated number of receiver population expressed in terms of whether
there are very few, few, many or very many VSRs in any one category of VSR;
·
Value and quality of existing views;
·
Availability and amenity of alternative views;
·
Duration or frequency of view; and
·
Degree of visibility.
The rating for Sensitivity of
the VSRs is classified as below:
·
High: The VSRs are
highly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience
·
Medium: The VSRs are
moderately sensitive to any change in their viewing experience
·
Low: The VSRs are only
slightly sensitive to any change in their viewing experience
Identification of Potential Sources of Visual
Impacts:
These are the various elements
of the construction works and operational procedures that would generate visual
impacts. Such visual impacts are
described further in Section 10.9 (Visual Impact Assessment) of this report.
Assessment of the Potential Magnitude of
Change caused by Visual Impacts:
Factors for considering the
potential magnitude of visual impacts include:
·
Compatibility with the landscape and character of the surroundings;
·
Duration of impacts during construction and operation phases;
·
Scale of the project when viewed from the VSR;
·
Reversibility of the impact;
·
Viewing distance between the nearest source of impact and VSR; and
·
Potential blockage of views i.e. the extent the impact dominates the
field of vision of the viewer.
The magnitude of change is
classified as below:
·
Large: The VSRs would
suffer a major change in their viewing experience
·
Intermediate: The VSRs
would suffer a moderate changes in their viewing experience
·
Small: The VSRs would
suffer a small change in their viewing experience
·
Negligible: The VSRs
would suffer no discernible changes in their viewing experience
Predication of Significance of Visual Impacts
before Mitigation:
The significance of visual
impacts is determined by combining the magnitude of the various visual impacts
and the sensitivity of the VSRs affected. Impact significance is taken to be
adverse unless stated otherwise as beneficial. Table
10.1 shows
the rationale for dividing the degree of significance into four thresholds,
namely, insignificant, slight, moderate and substantial, depending on the
combination of a negligible-small-intermediate-large magnitude of change and a
low-medium-high degree of sensitivity of VSR.
The Significance rating is
divided into four and defined as below:
·
Substantial: Adverse /
beneficial impact where the Project would cause significant deterioration or
improvement in existing visual quality
·
Moderate: Adverse / beneficial
impact where the Project would cause noticeable deterioration or improvement in
existing visual quality
·
Slight: Adverse /
beneficial impact where the Project would cause barely perceptible
deterioration or improvement in existing visual quality
·
Insignificant: The
impacts would cause no discernible change in the existing visual quality
10.4.4
Acceptability of Landscape & Visual Impacts
Measures to mitigate landscape
and visual impacts and reduce their significance have been suggested for the
Project. Impact significance is
reassessed assuming implementation of appropriate mitigation measures and this
is termed ‘Residual Impact’.
The acceptability of impact is judged upon the residual impacts from the
Project. This is explained in
further detail under the following headings:
·
Identification of Potential Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures;
·
Predication of Residual Impacts after Mitigation;
·
Acceptability of the Impacts.
Identification of Potential Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
The identification of the
landscape and visual impacts highlight those sources of conflict requiring
design solutions or modifications to reduce the impacts, and, if possible,
blend the development and associated activities in with the surrounding
landscape. Mitigation measures have
considered factors including:
·
Avoiding impact on existing sensitive receivers during construction by
carefully designed construction methods;
·
Adopting alternative design or revisions to the basic engineering or the
architectural design to prevent and / or minimize adverse impacts;
·
Remedial measures such as colour and textural treatment of physical,
engineering and building features;
·
Compensatory measures such as the implementation of landscape design
measures (e.g. tree planting, creation of new open space etc.) to compensate
for unavoidable adverse impacts and to attempt to generate potentially
beneficial long-term impacts; and
·
Screening measures such as through tree and/or shrub planting to screen
roads and associated structures.
These measures will alleviate
the previously identified landscape and visual impacts as far as possible, both
during construction and operation phases, and ensure that the residual impacts
are acceptable. The agencies responsible for the funding implementation,
management and maintenance of the mitigation measures are identified.
Predication of Residual Impacts after
Mitigation
The residual impacts are those
which remain after the proposed mitigation measures have been successfully
implemented. Residual impacts are
assessed both during the construction period, at the commissioning of the Project on day one and during the Design
Year, which is taken to be 10 years after the Project has been opened to normal
operation. During the Design Year
the soft landscape mitigation measures are deemed to have reached a level of
maturity, which allows them to perform their full original mitigation
objectives.
Prediction of Acceptability of Impacts
The criteria and matrices used
to determine the degree of impact described in the above sections. Both landscape and visual impacts are
products of magnitude of change and the relative sensitivity of the sensitive
receiver. Ultimately, the
acceptability of the Project is dependent upon the significance of the residual
impacts in accordance with the five criteria set out in Annex 10 of the
EIAO-TM, namely ‘beneficial’, ‘acceptable’,
‘acceptable with mitigation measures’, ‘unacceptable’
and ‘undetermined’.
10.5
Review of Planning and Development Control Framework
In this study, relevant Outline
Development Plans, Outline Zoning Plans, Layout Plans, Preliminary/ Recommended
Outline Development Plan for Kai Tak and any other relevant statutory and
development plans are reviewed.
This may identify areas of high landscape value as well as the existing
and planned development context and will also have implications on the visual
environment and the location, type and numbers of VSRs to be affected. Any
guidelines on landscape strategies, landscape framework, urban design concept,
building height profiles, designated view corridors, special design areas,
landmarks, open space network and landscape links that may affect the
appreciation of the Project are also reviewed. Any conflict with published land
use plan(s) are highlighted and appropriate follow-up action recommended.
The
Central Kowloon Route traverses the central part of the Kowloon Peninsula, and
the landscape Study Area falls within Kowloon Planning Areas KPA No. 2 (Yau Ma
Tei), KPA No. 6&7 (Ho Man Tin), KPA No. 10 (Ma Tau Kok),
KPA No. 13&17 (Ngau
Tau Kok and Kowloon Bay), KPA
No. 20 (South West Kowloon), and KPA No. 22 (Kai Tak). A review of the existing
and planned development framework for the proposed works in the Study Area has
been considered. It aims to identify issues for the neighbouring planned land
uses, and to ensure a high compatibility between the Project and its
surroundings. Figure 10.4 illustrates the OZPs affected by the whole
Project, which include:
·
Draft South
·
Draft Yau Ma Tei Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K2/21) gazetted on 29/10/2010;
·
Approved Ho Man Tin Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K7/22) gazetted on
13/07/2012;
·
Approved Ma Tau Kok Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K10/20) gazetted on
14/11/2008
·
Draft Ngau Tau Kok and Kowloon Bay Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K13/27)
gazetted on 14/10/2011; and
·
Approved Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K22/4), gazetted on
14/09/2012.
The
‘Yung Shu Tau Urban Design Conceptual Study’ was carried out in
2009 to study the land use planning and urban design in the West Portion taking
into account of some initial ideas collected from the public during
consultations in 2008. The Yung Shu
Tau area in Yau Ma Tei was selected as being where cultural and historical
heritage are most significant along the
For
the East Portion particular attention has been made to reports from the
‘Agreement No. CE 35/2006(CE) Kai Tak Development Engineering Study cum
Design and Construction of Advance Works – Investigation, Design and
Construction’, regarding land use and development and key information is
included below.
Outline Zoning Plan (OZPs)
The
Project Works Area of the West Portion is located within the Draft South West
Kowloon OZP (No. S/K20/27) and Draft Yau Ma Tei OZP (No. S/K2/21) as
illustrated in Figure 10.4.1. OZP No. S/K2/21 sets out various building
height restrictions as well as building set-back, non-build area and building
gap stipulations all of which the Project adheres to.
The
Project Works Area/ surface construction activities are predominantly located
within Open Space (O) and Government / Institution / Community (G/IC) zoned
areas of the affected OZPs and it also a small overlap with Open Space (1) (O1)
where it borders this area which is part of the XRL Project.
Much
of the CKR road alignment and the CKR ventilation building fall on road/
un-zoned areas and will retain the same use so there is no conflict. Where the
connection road passes near
With
the construction of CKR, some cleared land will have been created by the
demolition of certain buildings in the Yau Ma Tei area including the
Conservation of Yau Ma Tei Police Station
Yau
Ma Tei Police Station was gazetted as a Grade 3 historic building
in 1998 and is currently recommended for re-classification as a Grade 2 historic building by the Antiquities and
Monuments Board. The police station
is to be re-provided independently of the CKR project and the existing building
will be converted into a public museum. The existing police station contains a
reporting centre with floor area of around 166m² and an equivalent
reporting centre is desired by the Police Service to be re-provided in the
vicinity of the existing station.
Greening at Ground Level
Since
some of the public facilities along Kansu Street will have to be reprovisioned
for the construction of CKR, space will be available on the original sites of
some of these facilities for greening. This includes the original site of the
Yau Ma Tei Specialist Clinic Extension.
During
the construction of CKR, the sitting out area on the southern side of Henry G.
Leong Yau Ma Tei Community Centre will be occupied for the temporary
reprovisioning of the Yau Ma Tei Public Library and Jade Hawker Bazaar.
Furthermore, the basketball court to the south of the resting area will be
occupied for the construction of the access shaft for construction of the
tunnel. Upon the completion of the works, the basketball court and the greening
and sitting out facilities will be reprovided in accordance with the existing
layouts.
The
sitting out area and open area adjacent to the existing Yau Ma Tei Police
Station will be used as work sites during the construction of CKR. The existing
facilities will be reprovisioned after the completion of the works. Greening
will also be provided in the open area on the west of the junction between
Ferry Street and Yan Cheung Road.
Yau Ma Tei Multi-storey Carpark Building (YMTCPB)
YMTCPB
will be demolished about one year after the commencement of the project. The
offices of Social Welfare Department, Lands Department and Transport Department
inside the building will be temporarily moved to other buildings. The detailed
arrangements are being finalised. For the long-term, these facilities will be
re-provisioned within the proposed West Kowloon Government Offices. The
existing office of Immigration Department inside YMTCPB will be moved to Tsim
Sha Tsui before the project starts and hence will not be affected by the works.
The
public library within YMTCPB will be relocated to the sitting out area south of
Henry G. Leong Yau Ma Tei Community Centre. The Library and Jade Hawker Bazaar
will be accommodated in the same temporary building. The Jade Hawker Bazaar
will be on the ground floor. The library will be at 1/F to 3/F. Upon the
completion of the works, the public library will be relocated to a new building
to be constructed on the original site of the YMTCPB.
Outline Zoning Plans (OZPs)
The
Project Works Area of the Central Portion is located within the Approved Ho Man
Tin Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K7/22) as illustrated in Figure 10.4.2.
The
Project Works Area/ surface construction activities are all located within
Government / Institution / Community (G/IC). The ventilation building of the
proposed works will be located on G/IC zoned land. Zones classified as G/IC here are
intended primarily for the provision of GIC facilities serving the needs of the
local residents as well as the general public. According to the Notes of the
OZP, the proposed ventilation building is neither a Column 1 nor 2 use of the
“G/IC” zone. If this
building is included as part of the gazetted road scheme of this Project
authorized under the Road (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap 370), it
would be deemed to be approved under the Town Planning Ordinance. If this building is included as part of the gazetted road scheme of this
Project authorized under the Road (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance
(Cap370), it is deemed acceptable under the Town Planning Ordinance. Assuming
this to be the case, no potential conflicts are found between the Project
around the Central Portion and with the existing Planning and Development
Control framework. If not, an amendment to the OZP under Section 12A of the TPO
would be required.
Outline Zoning Plans (OZPs)
The
Project Works Area in the East Portion is located mainly in the Approved Kai
Tak Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K22/4). It also borders and has small overlaps
with the Approved Ma Tau Kok Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K10/20) and Draft Ngau
Tau Kok and Kowloon Bay Outline Zoning Plan (No. S/K13/27), as illustrated in Figure 10.4.3.
The
Project Works Area / surface construction activities are located within
Government / Institution / Community (G/IC), Open Space (O), Open Space (1) (O
(1)), Open Space (2) (O (2)), Other Specific Uses (OU), Other Specific Uses
–Amenity Area (OU (A)), and Residential (Group A) (R(A)) of OZP No.
S/K22/4).
The
proposed CKR Project was considered and is incorporated into this OZP for the
Kai Tak Development (KTD) by PlanD (OZP No. S/K22/4). Therefore, areas for
tunnel portal, depressed road, connection road and ventilation/administration
buildings of the CKR Project have been reserved within OZP No. S/K22/4 and
comply with the planning intention. The small overlaps into OZPs S/K10/20 and S/K13/27
are all into areas shown as ‘Road’ and will therefore not conflict with
the planning intention in these areas. Therefore overall there are no potential
conflicts between the Project in the east and with the existing Planning and
Development Control framework.
Kai Tak Development (KTD)
The
KTD has been designed considering a number of objectives to ensure the creation
of a successful urban environment, responsive to its unique context and site
conditions. Figure 10.4.4 shows the approved Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan and the design considerations are set out as below. CKR design follows
these considerations to ensure its integration with KTD.
Connectivity with Surrounding Neighbourhoods
Pedestrian
linkage and continuity of movement patterns are critical to the success and
usability of the area. This will help to revitalize the older areas and ensure
high levels of interface and visitation to the new area, with district urban
quarters that are responsive to their context. At the same time, transport
connections are integrated to support operations within the area, and with
other areas.
Creation of Physical and Activity Nodes
The
plan is formulated around the creation of district and sub-regional nodes which
must function, in urban design terms, as vibrant destinations whether they act
as sports hub, commercial centre or tourism-leisure hub. In turn their success
is dependent on strong connectivity and transit strategy. Figure 10.4.5 illustrates the proposed sub-districts and
their potential connections.
Establishment of an Active Waterfront
The
waterfront is regarded as an enormous natural asset for public accessibility,
perambulation and enjoyment. Pedestrian movement shall be continuous, and link
together a range of diverse programmes and activities which offer a sequence of
promenades, parklands, commercial and retail oriented areas. This consideration is particularly
relevant to CKR along the Ma Tau Kok Waterfront (See following Section on
‘Urban Design Study for Enhancement of Ma Tau Kok Waterfront
Area’).
Establishment of a Continuous Open Space System
The
KTD open space framework allows for ‘green’ continuity, informal
pedestrian circulation, and connects together leisure, recreational, cultural
and commercial areas. It is considered to largely determine the identity of Kai
Tak.
Creation of a Pedestrian Friendly Environment
Apart
from a continuous and connective pedestrian system, the pedestrian experience
shall be user friendly in terms of comfortable walking radii from public
transport, visually contrasting experiences, and environmentally convenient and
safe connections, both horizontally and vertically.
Creating Dynamic and Visually Interesting Urban Places
The
various planning areas should present a mix of architectural and spatial
compositions at various scales as appropriate. While height limitations have
been set in various areas, there is a need for an interesting mix of building
forms, scales and skyline profile to establish the image and identity of the
Kai Tak area.
Integrate Urban Gateways
Gateways
must express the various transitions that occur within the Kai Tak area, and
between the new development district and the surround area. These can take on a
variety of different forms and types, and normally signal points of arrival,
changes of pedestrian or vehicular condition, specific types of street function
and expressive visual markers.
Legibility, Orientation and Views
It
is necessary to provide visual cues that assist the process of orientation.
Within the overall spatial framework, this entails the integration of visual
corridors and important view sheds to regional or city-wide features, the use
of prominent landmark elements, and the serial ‘framing’ of
sequential visual experiences throughout the overall movement framework. Figure 10.4.6 illustrates the visual connections and
breezeways identified within KTD.
Creation of Streetscape
Whenever
possible the creation of coherent and continuous streetscape should form a key
consideration of avenue design through ‘joined together’ elements
to provide consistent built edge, consistency of height profiles, architectural
identity, signage channels, and landscape.
Urban Design Study for Enhancement of Ma Tau Kok Waterfront Area
With a view to enhancing connectivity and accessibility of the Ma Tau
Kok waterfront area and responding
to community needs, initial urban design concepts were proposed in the Urban Design Study for Enhancement of Ma Tau Kok
Waterfront Area, which aimed at providing leisure and recreation
uses (e.g. waterfront promenade, multi-purpose activities centre, cultural
amenity etc.) and revitalising
existing spaces by adopting new uses (e.g., restaurant at the Kowloon City
Ferry Pier etc.). These
initial ideas on land use planning were not
finalized, and have been
subject to further consultations
with Government departments, stakeholders and other planning, design and
construction considerations.
Re-provisioning of the Public Transport Interchange (PTI)
The existing Public Transport Interchange will
be re-provisioned after the construction of CKR. It is proposed to maintain similar number of spaces for bus terminus, car
and coach parking in the re-provisioned PTI. The PTI will be landscaped to enhance amenity and mixed use was encouraged to enhance vibrancy in the area.
Re-provisioning of Ma Tau Kok public pier
It
was proposed that Ma Tau Kok public pier be demolished during construction of CKR and
re-provisioned after the commissioning of the Project to provide a viewing deck above the future public
pier.
Adaptive Reuse of the
decommissioned Vehicular Ferry Pier
It
was proposed that the decommissioned vehicular ferry pier be retained with adaptive re-use to
provide an Interpretive Centre to exhibit the history of the vehicle
ferry services in the harbour context.
Alternative use of the Vehicle Examination Centre
It was suggested in the public forums that
the To Kwa Wan Vehicle Examination
Centre be relocated to open up the waterfront and provide community facilities
for Ma Tau Kok area. An open pavilion/café
and possibly an activity centre could be provided at the existing site upon the relocation of the public facility.
Enhance Vitality of
The structure of Kowloon City Ferry
Pier will not be affected by the construction of CKR. It is proposed to provide restaurant use on top level of
the ferry pier to enhance vitality. There is an opportunity to provide
an elevated waterfront walkway
connecting the
second level of the proposed Kowloon City Ferry Pier, with the Interpretive Centre, the viewing deck above the re-provisioned public pier and PTI to
enhance connectivity to the waterfront promenade.
A 20m-wide Promenade along Ma Tau
Kok Waterfront
With the proposed relocation of To Kwa Wan Vehicle Examination Centre,
there is an opportunity to provide a 20m-wide promenade along Ma Tau Kok Waterfront. Closure of
Provision of Multi-purpose Activity Centre for the
Community
In the public forums, it was suggested that Ma Tau Kok area was lacking community facilities and a multi-purpose activity centre should be built to serve the local community. There
were two proposed locations for the
centre, one near the primary
schools on Kwei Chow Street and other one at the vehicle examination centre site.
Overall,
it is considered that the Project would be in accordance with the planning
goals and objectives for the study areas, as set out in all relevant OZPs and
detailed in planning studies and investigations.
10.6
Comments on Landscape and Visual Issues
Received During Public Forum
A series of public engagement
activities are held in parallel with the investigation study initiated by the
MMHJV and HyD for the purpose of enhancing public participation in the
development of
The main events are a series of
public forums, supplemented by outreach events and monthly newsletters. Yau Ma
Tei local culture and the social and land impacts of the projects also studied
by on-street surveys and in depth interviews with stakeholders.
Views of the public and concerned parties
were obtained at the following presentations and forums:
·
Stage 1 Public Forum on 10 November 2007;
·
Stage 2 Public Forum on 19 January 2008; and
·
Stage 3 Public Forum on 15 March 2008.
·
Public Forum: Specific Issues – Yau Ma Tei Urban Design and the
Conservation of Yau Man Tei Police Station on 10 January 2009.
·
Public Forum: Specific Issues – The construction of the Central
Kowloon Route section at Kowloon Bay, re-provisioning facilities and
enhancement opportunities on 7 Feb 2009.
Issues raised were commonly
focused on increasing greening area and providing quality open space. These
comments will be addressed by providing landscaped decks on tunnel portals.
Landscape baseline review
comprises the identification of all existing Landscape Resources (LR) and
Landscape Character Area (LCA) within 100m of the Project works area. LRs are
mapped in Figure 10.5 (key plan) and in further detail in Figure 10.5.1, Figure 10.5.2 and Figure 10.5.3 with illustrative photographs presented in Figure 10.6.1, Figure 10.6.2, Figure 10.6.3, Figure 10.6.4, Figure 10.6.5 and Figure 10.6.6. LCAs are mapped in Figure 10.7 (key plan) and specifically Figure 10.7.1, Figure 10.7.2 and Figure 10.7.3 and illustrative photographs are presented in Figure 10.8.1, Figure 10.8.2 and Figure 10.8.3.
The tree numbers quoted in this
report have been estimated based on the tree survey report completed in October
2010 under the CKR and Widening of Gascoigne Road Flyover Investigation under
Agreement No. CE 58/2006(HY) and Figure 10.9.1, Figure 10.9.2 and Figure 10.9.3 show trees survey plans based on this
survey. It is noted that an updated
tree survey will be conducted for this Project (targeting to be commenced in
mid 2013).
In terms of the visual aspects,
baseline information is detailed in Section
10.8.
For ease of reference, each LR,
LCA and VSR is given an identity number, which is used in all relevant tables
and figures in this report.
The
1. Public
Open Space
This
broad LR refers to public open spaces containing planting managed by LCSD. The
species consist of a wide variety of exotic and native ornamental species, such
as Bauhinia spp., Lagerstroemia
speciosa, Michelia x alba and Cassia surattensis.
The trees are generally mature, with fair to good health condition and fair to
high amenity value. The trees generally have fair to good form, are well maintained
and act as valuable greening relief for the urban district.
In
the West Portion public open space falling outside the Works Area but within
the Study Area, is the Tin Hau Temple Complex in the West Portion made up of
the Yau Ma Tei Community Centre Rest Garden and the Public Square Street
Children’s Playground and Rest Garden on either side of the temples. There are approximately 45 trees in this
LR, mostly within the Yau Ma Tei Community Centre Rest Garden. Trees are
dominated by Ficus microcarpa, including one
which is 15 m high with a crown spread of 16 m and DBH of
1500 mm which is registered as OVT number LCSD YTM/99. Other common species include mature Aleurites moluccana and Podocarpus macrophyllus
and none of these trees will be affected by the Project since the Works Area
does not fall on this LR.
In
the East Portion three areas of open space of note fall outside the Works Area
but within the Study Area. The Kowloon Bay Recreation Ground and Sports Ground
and Kin Bay Playground near the Auxiliary Police Headquarters at Kai Cheung
Road consists of a number of grass pitches, an outdoor running track and
outdoor hard courts with some peripheral planting. Any peripheral planting within the Works
Area is included in LR 3.3e for the impact assessment. Overall, however, this open space will
not be affected by the Project as all the facilities are outside the Works
Area. Two other areas of open space in the East Portion outside the Works Area
are parks. Hoi Sham Park is east of Yuk Yak Street and south of Sun Fung
Street. It contains outdoor hard court recreational facilities, toilets and a
landscaped park area with over 30 trees both planted and in planters, including
mature Ficus microcarpa, Aleurites
moluccana and younger Juniperus chinensis. It is also well known for the Fish Tail
Rock which is a key feature of the park, now being attached to it via reclaimed
land, where once the rocks were surrounded by water. King Wan Street Playground lies north of
Sun Fung Street and west of King Wan Street. It also has some outdoor hard
court recreational facilities as well as approximiately 15 trees including Aleurites moluccana, Delonix regia and
Bombax ceiba among the hard paved areas.
These parks are rich, green areas and since they lie outside the Works Area,
are not expected to be affected by the Project.
Figure 10.5.1, Figure 10.5.2 and Figure 10.5.3 illustrate the location of these public open
spaces in the West and East Portions respectively. No impact is expected on these specific
LRs since they fall outside the Works Area.
2. Urban
Residential / Institutional Open Space
This
broad LR refers to open space within private residential developments and
institutions, which is not open to the general public. The areas include podium
gardens and entrance plazas for residential developments. The planting consists
of a wide variety of exotic, ornamental species including Bauhinia
spp., Lagerstroemia speciosa and Ficus benjamina. The plants generally have fair to good
form, are well maintained and provide favourable greening for residents and
facility users.
3. Roadside
Planting
This
broad LR refers to amenity planting along roads, central dividers or
roundabouts, which provide greening for the extensive hard-paved urban area.
Exotic ornamental tree species, such as Aleurites moluccana,
Bauhinia spp., Lagerstroemia speciosa and Grevillea robusta, are commonly found along the roadsides
of
In
the West Portion various areas of roadside planting fall outside the Works Area
but within the Study Area. The
roadside planting along Hoi Fai Road, Hoi Po Road, and Lin Cheung Road; the
roadside tree planting along Hoi Ting Road and the junction of Hoi Ting Road/
Hoi Wang Road; Tree planting around the car part at the junction of Waterloo
road and Ferry Street, all include the main tree species Bauhinia spp., Aleurites moluccana, and Lagerstroemia speciosa. There is
some planting in the vicinity of the bus depot area near the Fire services
Department’s West Kowloon Training Centre but this is mainly grasses and
young shrubs as the depot is relatively new. There is also some planting along
Kwai Yue Lane up near Kwai Chung barging point, including approximately 10
trees of poor quality including Ficus spp.
trees and the weedy Leucaena
leucocephala.
Figure 10.5.1 illustrates the location of these roadside
planting areas in the West Portions and since these specific LRs fall outside
the Works Area, none of the trees are expected to be affected by the
Project.
4. Vegetation
on Man-made Slope
This
broad LR refers to the vegetation on man-made slopes formed during site formation
works for hillside developments (not site formation for the CKR Project) and
slope improvement works. Trees are generally medium size and mainly exotic
woodland species such as Acacia confusa, Casuarina
equisetifolia and Eucalyptus spp..
This LR can provide a greening connection from flat areas with development /
open space to semi-natural hillside vegetation.
5. Disturbed
Area with Wild Grass / Small Shrubs
This
broad LR refers to vacant land, overgrown with wild grasses and/or small shrubs
and principally refers to small areas at Yau Ma Tei and the large area within
the former
6. Lawn
Area
This
broad LR refers to the grassy surface of the football field at Ho Man Tin East
Service Reservoir Playground and the grassy surface of the Ho Man Tin West
Fresh Water Service Reservoir. Common lawn grass species such as Axonopus compressus and Cynodon dactylon are found planted on the
football field.
(7. Not Used)
8. Man-made
Shoreline
This
broad LR refers to the man-made shoreline of Kowloon Bay along Ma Tau Kok and
former Kai Tak Airport area which have little if any landscaping. It also
includes a small area of the Yau Ma Tei Typhoon Shelter that lies within the
Study Area in the West Portion but is not with the Works Area and is considered
to remain unaffected by the Project.
9. Water
Bodies
This
LR refers to the two major water bodies within LIA Study Area, namely Kowloon
Bay and Kai Tak Nullah and the Kai Tak River that feeds into it. It also includes a small water body near Kwai
Chung barging point which will not be affected by the Project.
The
baseline LRs within the works area, together with their sensitivity, are
described below, as summarised in Table 10.2 following. All LRs in the West Portion are
labelled LR 1.x, all LRs around the Central Portion are labelled LR 2.x and all
LRs in the East Portion are labelled LR 3.x, where ‘x’ refers to
the broad LR type described above.
LR1.1a
– Public Square Street Playground
This
playground is a small paved open area enclosed by planters. There are
approximately 15 trees within this LR, with a majority of the exotic palm Livistona chinensis. There are also a number of native Ficus microcarpa as well as specimens
of Albizia lebbeck, Aleurites moluccana,
Bauhinia blakeana, Cassia surattensis, Crateva unilocularis and Ficus
elastica and trees range in height from 3 – 20 m with 2
-22 m crown spread. This small open space is dominated by three mature Albizia lebbeck, Aleurites moluccana and Crateva unilocularis trees at the entrance
facing Public Square Street, whose condition is generally fair. The trees in
this LR add medium landscape value and overall the LR sensitivity is medium.
LR1.1b
– Shanghai Street / Market Street Playground
This
playground has two basketball courts, one at either end, with some trees and
shrubs planted at the border. The remaining area is covered with hard paving
and has limited planting areas. There are about 10 trees within the playground,
including Bauhinia spp., Ficus benjamina, Ficus virens and Lagerstroemia speciosa. There is one very good specimen of Ficus virens at the edge of the basketball
court facing
LR1.1c
– Bazaar
This
LR refers to the concrete paved small bazaar at the junction of
LR1.1d
– Temple Street / Kansu Street Temporary Rest Garden Garden
This
is a small paved open area next to the Yau Ma Tei Carpark Building with childrens’
play equipment. Any plants in this area are young and planted in pots. Species
include Michelia x alba and Chrysalidocarpus lutescens. Their general
condition is fair. The plants in this LR are portable and provide limited
landscape value and overall the LR sensitivity is low.
LR1.1e
–Yau Ma Tei Jade Market/ Jade Hawker Bazaar
This Jade Hawker Bazaar near Kansu Street is also called the ‘Yau
Ma Tei Jade Market’ and is a major tourist attraction in Hong Kong. It comprises two single-storey bazaars housed
in a single-storey steel shed located on two sites to the north of Kansu
Street. The market sheds and
surrounding area contain 10 live trees.
Species are dominated by Morus alba, on
average 8 m tall and 5 m crown spread and 300 mm DBH. Their general condition is fair. One large Ficus
microcarpa grows through the market roof and is approximately
12 m tall, with a DBH of about 500 mm and crown spread of 20 m
and another tree growing through the roof is an Aleurites
molucanna tree of approximately 12 m height, 480 mm DBH
and 10 m crown spread. The
trees in this LR provide landscape value and overall the LR sensitivity is high.
LR1.3a
– Roadside Planting along West Kowloon Highway and Tunnel Area
This
LR refers to the roadside trees along
LR1.3b
– Roadside Planting along Hoi Wang Road, Yan Cheung Road and Ferry Street
Area
Approximately
125 trees are planted at the central dividers and roadside along Hoi Wang Road,
Yan Cheung Road and around Ferry Street. The species planted at the central
dividers include the exotic palms Roystonea
regia and Archontophoenix
alexandrae. The species planted along the roadside also include
exotic Crateva trifoliata, Melaleuca
quinquenervia and Livistona chinensis. The trees in
this LR range in height from 2 – 10 m with some Roystonea
regia palms reaching up to 5 m spread. These are all exotic, planted
trees and are located in a number of discrete areas rather than one large area,
such that they add medium
landscape value. Overall the LR sensitivity is medium.
LR1.3c
– Roadside Planting between Lai Cheung Road and Ngo Cheung Road
This
LR refers to the viewing garden and roadside planters between
LR1.3d
– Roadside Planting along Canton Road and Public Square Street)
There
only about ten trees within the works area along
LR1.5a
– Disturbed Area at Hau Cheung Street
This
LR refers to the vacant land located at
LR1.5b
– Disturbed Area next to Construction Site at Yau Cheung Road
There
are approximately 60 trees in this disturbed area, mainly at the periphery
where it borders Hoi Wang Road or Yau Cheung Road. Trees are generally fairly
immature and are dominated by the exotic species Acacia confusa, and the weed species Leucaena leucocephala. Around the trees,
the area is approximately 90 % covered with wild grasses and weeds. The
condition of the trees is poor and they add low landscape value. Overall the LR
sensitivity is low.
LR1.5c – Disturbed Area at Kwai Chung
This
LR is currently being used by XRL project as a barging point at Kwai Chung
underneath Cheung Tsing Bridge. The area is predominantly hard paved and
disturbed and is surrounded by an MTR security fence but with some patches of
weedy vegetation including approximately 10 trees. These trees are of low value and include
the weed tree species Leucaena leucocephala,
Casuarina equisetifolia and Macaranga tanarius.
This area is undergoing development and is therefore changing in
appearance. Overall its sensitivity
is considered low.
LR1.8a – Man-made Shoreline around Kwai Chung
This
LR refers to the man-made shoreline around Kwai Chung, particularly the barging
point being used by XRL Project currently. It includes long stretches of
concrete seawall as well as rubble breakwaters. It has no landscape treatment
and its sensitivity is considered to be low.
LR2.3a
– Roadside Planting around Housing Authority Mock-up Centre
Approximately
30 trees are planted around the Housing Authority Mock-up Centre including
along the roadside. The species planted include Ficus microcarpa, Melaleuca quinquenervia and Elaeocarpus
hainanensis and they range in height from 5 – 6 m with
crown spread between 3 – 4 m. These trees are not of high value but do
add some greening to the site and overall the LR sensitivity is medium.
LR2.4a
– Vegetation on Man-made Slopes along Chung Hau Street and Fat
Approximately
155 trees are located on the man-made slopes along Chung Hau Street and Fat
Kwong Street which have been planted there. The dominant species is the woody
invasive species Leucaena leucocephala.
There are other exotic species such as Albizia
lebbeck and Casuarina
equisetifolia as well as some native woodland species such as Celtis sinensis, Ficus spp., Macaranga tanarius
and Schefflera heptaphylla. The
condition of these trees is generally poor due to the crowded growing
environment.
There
are four mature Ficus spp. growing along the edge of works
area. Since these tree have wide and dense crowns with outstanding forms, their
landscape value is relatively higher than other trees. Although this LR is
artificially made, it does provide a significant greening aspect in the urban
area and the LR sensitivity is considered to be high.
LR3.3a
– Roadside Planting along San Ma Tau Street and Bus Terminus
This
LR refers to the roadside trees planted along
LR3.3b
– Roadside Planting along Long Yuet Street
There
are approximately 50 trees in this LR along Long Yuet Street and behind the
Motor Vehicle Inspection Centre, adjacent to vacant land. The species include exotic Melaleuca quinquenervia species as well as some native
species such as Bischofia javanica
and Ficus religiosa. Although one
tree is deemed to be of high value, the general condition of the other trees is
poor due to the limited growing space and many of them have exposed roots,
which crack the concrete paving and their trunks are damaged by the chain-link
fence. These tree reach heights of between 3 -10 m and have crown spread
between 2 – 8 m. They add medium landscape value and overall the
LR sensitivity is medium.
LR3.3c
– Roadside Planting along Kai Cheung Road and Interchange
Approximately
415 trees are located on both sides of Kai Cheung Road within the works area.
Almost all of them are planted, exotic species including Albizia lebbeck, Casuarina equisetifolia and Melaleuca
quinquenervia; and the weedy, invasive species Leucaena leucocephala. They are
generally medium in size and have fair form.
Some
young exotic ornamental trees are planted at the junction of
LR3.3d
– Roadside Planting along Kai Fuk Road
There
are approximately 85 trees in this LR (although the majority fall outside the
works area). The trees are made up
of a wide range of species including exotic Melaleuca
quinquenervia,
LR3.3e
– Roadside Planting along Kai Cheung Road, Wan Kwong Road and Wan Chiu
Road
There
are approximately 50 trees planted along the roadside along Kai Cheung Road,
Wan Kwong Road and Wan Chiu road. The species include mainly exotic species
such as Albizia lebbeck, Casuarina equisetifolia and
Melaleuca quinquenervia. These tree reach heights of between
5 -10 m and have crown spread between 3 – 8 m. They add medium landscape value to the roadside and overall the LR
sensitivity is medium.
LR3.5a
– Disturbed Area within former Kai Tak Airport
This
area is mainly covered by weedy shrubs and herbs such as Lantana camara, Bidens pilosa and some Poaceae spp. which cover approximately 30 % of the area in amongst the
old hard surfaces. Under ten trees
are reportedly found in this LR including native species Ficus
microcarpa and exotic species Melia azedarach and Terminalia catappa. Most of them are undersized and
although they are generally in fair form they add little landscape value, not
least due to their low number. Overall this LR has low
sensitivity.
LR3.8a
– Man-made Shoreline of West Kowloon Bay
This
LR refers to the man-made shoreline along Ma Tau Kok Public Pier. It is a
rectilinear concrete paved area with limited pot planters around Ma Tau Kok
Pier and otherwise no landscape treatment. However, it is an important open
area in the surrounding built-up area and may be developed further as a
waterfront promenade (Open Space) under OZP No. S/K22/4 (Approved Kai Tak OZP).
Overall sensitivity of the LR is considered to be medium.
LR3.8b
– Man-made Shoreline around Former Kai Tak Airport
This
LR refers to the man-made shoreline around the former
LR3.9a
– Kowloon Bay
This
LR refers to inshore part of
LR3.9b
– Kai Tak Nullah
Kai
Tak Nullah is the major storm water channel in South-East Kowloon, collecting
storm water and effluent from San Po Kong, Diamond Hill, Tsz Wan Shan, Wong Tai
Sin, Wang Tau Hom, Lok Fu and
Table 10.2: List of the
Landscape Resources and their Sensitivity
LR Code |
Name |
LR Sensitivity (High/ Medium/ Low) |
|
West Portion |
|
LR1.1a |
Public
Square Street Playground |
Medium |
LR1.1b |
|
Medium |
LR1.1c |
Bazaar |
High |
LR1.1d |
|
Low |
LR1.1d |
Yau Ma Tei
Jade Market/ Jade Hawkers Bazaar |
High |
LR1.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
High |
LR1.3b |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
LR1.3c |
Roadside
Planting between |
Medium |
LR1.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
LR1.5a |
Disturbed
Area at |
Low |
LR1.5b |
Disturbed
Area next to Construction Site at |
Low |
LR1.5c |
Disturbed
Area at Kwai Chung |
Low |
LR1.8a |
Man-made
shoreline around Kwai Chung |
Low |
|
Central Portion |
|
LR2.3a |
Roadside
Planting around Housing Authority Mock-up Centre |
Medium |
LR2.4a |
Vegetation
on Man-made Slopes along |
High |
|
East Portion |
|
LR3.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
LR3.3b |
Roadside
Planting along Long |
Medium |
LR3.3c |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
LR3.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
LR3.3e |
Roadside
Planting along Kai Cheung road, Wang Kwong Road and Wan Chiu Road |
Medium |
LR3.5a |
Disturbed
Area within former |
Low |
LR3.8a |
Man-made
Shoreline of |
Medium |
LR3.8b |
Man-made
Shoreline around former |
Low |
LR3.9a |
|
Medium |
LR3.9b |
Kai Tak
Nullah |
Medium |
10.7.3
Landscape Character Areas
The urban landscapes of
The
The
Kowloon City District in central
The
former
The
baseline LCAs within the LIA study area, together with their sensitivity, are
described below. A total of eight different LCAs are identified within the
whole Study Area, as bulleted below, although no more than five different LCAs
are found in any one section of the Project.
·
City Grid Mixed Urban Landscape
·
Industrial Urban Landscape
·
Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape
·
Ongoing Major Development Landscape
·
Residential Complex Landscape
·
Residential Urban Landscape
·
Transportation Corridor Landscape
·
Typhoon Shelter Landscape
The baseline LCAs together with
their sensitivity, are described below, as summarised in Table 10.3 following. All LCAs in the West Portion are labelled LCA 1.x, all LCAs
around the Central Portion are labelled LCA 2.x and all LCAs in the East
Portion are labelled LCA 3.x, where ‘x’ refers to the specific LCA.
LCA 1.1 – Transportation Corridor Landscape (West Portion)
This
LCA refers to the
LCA 1.2 – Ongoing Major Development Landscape (West Portion & Barging
Point)
This
LCA refers to the construction site of Express Rail Link and its associated
structures (the XRL project). This is a transitional landscape, which is
undergoing large-scale development. Some areas consist of land undergoing
development whilst others are vacated sites, which are awaiting re-development.
They are typically characterised by a flat, low-lying topography, lack of
significant vegetation or significant built structures and may include major
earthworks, partially completed structures, as well as features such as cranes
and earth moving machinery. This LCA is mainly on land reclaimed from the sea
and is close to the coast. There are an estimated 570 trees in this LCA nearest
the main works area with the dominant species being the the invasive weed
species, Leucaena leucocephala and exotic Acacia spp., Casuarina equisetifolia,
Archontophoenix alexandrae, Bauhinia blakeana, and Bombax ceiba are example of other species commonly recorded
her but in far fewer numbers.
In
addition, this LCA contains the land at Kwai Chung currently being used by the
XRL Project as a barging point. As well as the barging point, the landscape
nearby is developed, with man-made shoreline where many barges can alight as
well as the DSD Kwai Chung PreliminaryTreatment Works building and a site
undergoing development currently near the elevated. It has very limited greenery but does
include approximately 20 trees in the area, predominantly weed tree species Leucaena leucocephala, as well as Ficus spp.,
Casuarina equisetifolia and Macaranga tanarius. This area is undergoing development and
is therefore changing in appearance.
As
a result of its indeterminate status or the disturbance caused by ongoing
construction work, this landscape currently has an incoherent, desolate and
transient character and would have low sensitivity. Due to part of this LCA
being made up of the XRL site where landscaping will be carried out, the
overall sensitivity of the LCA is
conservatively considered to be medium.
LCA 1.3 – City Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (West Portion)
This
LCA is found on the older reclamations of Yau Ma Tei. It is some of
Part of
In
total there are an estimated 60 trees in this LCA, mainly Alstonia
scholaris and including others such as Aleurites
molluccana, Bauhinia blakeana, Casis surattensis up to 20 m
high and with varying maturity. The landscape amenity, significance and
quality of this LCA are moderate with reasonable tolerance to change and
therefore, the sensitivity is medium.
LCA 1.4 – Residential Complex Landscape
This
LCA is found on the periphery of the major urban area of Yau Ma Tei. It is
generally on reclaimed areas of West Kowloon comprising some of Hong
Kong’s most recent urban landscapes which consist of extensive
comprehensive developments, typically with a large podium containing retail
uses, parking or a PTI, with commercial or residential towers above. This LCA
is also characterised by its new building stock (often using modern building materials
such as glass and steel). Streets in these landscapes are often wide with
significant roadside landscape provision and tree planting, with footbridges
connecting developments at first floor or podium level. The result is an
intensely urban landscape which is often enclosed, angular and colourful and
defined to a significant extent by its built form and the spaces they create.
LCA 1.4 contains Park Avenue complex, part of
LCA 1.5 – Residential Urban Landscape (West Portion)
This
LCA refers to an urban landscape largely residential in use with some
government/ institutional buildings also, all developed on flat land. LCA1.5
includes the high rise Prosperous Garden residential complex and medium rise
Man Cheong Street Residential buildings, as well the community facilities of
Yau Ma Tei Police Station and Yau Ma Tei Electric Substation and a number of
schools. This LCA takes in the open space of Saigon Street Playground and
Skating area and also includes associated roads, footbridges, and retail
facilities. Vegetation includes planting in open spaces and within the
Prosperous Garden residential complex, with minimal roadside trees and shrub planting
(estimated 60 trees in total, including species such as Melaleuca quinquenervia, Albizia lebbeck, and Casuarina equisetifolia). LCA1.5 is a
fairly ordered landscape comprising largely built elements softened to a
certain extent by the effects of surrounding planting and greenery and overall
its sensitivity is medium.
LCA 1.6 – Typhoon Shelter Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point)
This
LCA refers to the Ya Ma Tei Typhoon shelter at the periphery of the main West
Portion study area and the sea water surrounding the proposed Kwai Chung
barging point, in the West Portion. These bodies of water are used by many
barges and low quality. Overall the
sensitivity of this LCA is low.
LCA 2.1 – Residential Urban Landscape (Middle)
This
LCA refers to the area around Ho Man Tin Estate. It is an urban landscape which
is wholly or largely given over to residential land use. Developed
comprehensively on flat or terraced land, mainly on the edges of urban areas,
residential urban landscape is generally characterized by its medium or
high-rise residential estates, set amongst open space, together with associated
highways, footbridges, school or community facilities and retail facilities.
Vegetation includes roadside trees and shrub planting and planting in open
spaces and around the residential estates. The result is a fairly homogeneous,
ordered landscape comprising largely built elements softened to a certain
extent by the effects of surrounding planting and greenery. LCA 2.1 includes Ho
Man Tin (South) Estate, Fat Kwong Street Sports Centre and overall its
sensitivity is medium.
LCA 2.2 – Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape
This
LCA is found on the periphery of Ho Man Tin around Ho Man Tin West Fresh Water
Service Reservoir and Ho Man Tin Park and also includes part of Ho Man Tin
Service Reservoir Playground south of
LCA 3.1 – City Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (East Portion)
This
LCA refers to the area around Ma Tau Kok, which is the most common and
extensive urban landscape in this district. Developed on a largely orthogonal
or regular city grid, the LCA consists of mainly retail land uses at street
level with high/medium-rise commercial or residential developments above.
Streets are often fairly wide and busy with traffic and the large numbers of
people using these areas but the streetscape is utilitarian with little soft
landscape treatments. Building stock is of mixed age and character, and
vegetation is generally limited to street tree planting and shrub planting in
occasional public open spaces. The result is a landscape which is vibrant,
colourful and diverse in terms of its street life and land use, but which
possesses only limited variety in terms of its urban spaces. LCA 3.1 includes
LCA 3.2 – Ongoing Major Development Landscape (East Portion)
This
LCA refer to the former Kai Tak airport area, which is the site for the
proposed KTD. These are transitional landscapes currently awaiting large-scale
construction. Most of the areas are vacated sites, which are awaiting
construction, whilst some of them are undergoing decommissioning. They are
typically characterised by a flat, low-lying topography, lack of significant
vegetation or significant built structures and may include major earthworks,
partially completed structures, as well as features such as cranes and earth
moving machinery. This LCA is reclaimed from the sea and largely coastal. In total there are an estimated 280
trees in this LCA, dominated by such species as the invasive weed species, Leucaena leucocephala and Albizia
lebbeck and including other species in lesser numbers such as Aleurites moluccana, Bauhinia spp., Delonix regia, Ficus spp. etc, ranging in height between 4-12 m on
average and being moderately mature on average. The KTD site will be developed into a
number of different areas, such as the Ma Tau Kok Waterfront, a Sports Hub,
LCA 3.3 – Industrial Urban Landscape
This
LCA is found on the fringe of
LCA 3.4 – Typhoon Shelter Landscape (East Portion)
This
LCA is found on the coastal edges of Ma Tau Kok and
LCA 3.5
- Transportation
Corridor Landscape (East Portion)
This area comprises the Kwun Tong Bypass (elevated
bypass expressway),
Table 10.3: List of the
Landscape Character Area and their Sensitivity
LCA Code |
Name |
LCA
Sensitivity (High/ Medium/ Low) |
|
West Portion |
|
LCA1.1 |
Transportation Corridor Landscape (West Portion) |
Medium |
LCA1.2 |
Ongoing Major Development Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
Medium |
LCA1.3 |
City Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
Medium |
LCA1.4 |
Residential Complex Landscape |
Medium |
LCA1.5 |
Residential Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
Medium |
LCA1.6 |
Typhoon
Shelter Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
Low |
|
Central Portion |
|
LCA2.1 |
Residential Urban Landscape (Middle) |
Medium |
LCA2.2 |
Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape |
Medium |
|
East Portion |
|
LCA3.1 |
City Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
LCA3.2 |
Ongoing Major Development Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
LCA3.3 |
Industrial Urban Landscape |
Low |
LCA3.4 |
Typhoon Shelter Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
LCA3.5 |
Transportation Corridor Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
The
works area of
The
Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI) is shown in Figure 10.13 (West Portion), Figure 10.14 (Central Portion) and Figure 10.15 (East Portion) and key Visual
Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) within the ZVIs are mapped in Figure 10.13.1 (West Portion), Figure 10.14.1 (Central Portion) and Figure 10.15.1 and Figure 10.15.2 (East Portion).
VSRs
identified within each of the ZVI around the West Portion, Central Portion and
East Portion are detailed below and illustrative photographs of VSRs are
presented in Figure 10.16.1, Figure 10.16.2, Figure 10.16.3, Figure 10.16.4, Figure 10.16.5, Figure 10.16.6, Figure 10.17.1, Figure 10.17.2, Figure 10.17.3, Figure 10.18.1, Figure 10.18.2, Figure 10.18.3, Figure 10.18.4, Figure 10.18.5, Figure 10.18.6 and Figure 10.18.7.
Thirteen
Vantage/ View Points (VPs) are
selected from which to create photomontages. These have been selected to represent
various views towards the Project from different angles, illustrate key Project
features, such as the Landscape Deck in the West Portion and endeavour to represent
key VSR views in each location. VPs
are chosen to try and represent the impact on a number of VSRs, where impacts
are considered to be similar.
Overall the combination of photomontages for the Project aim to support
the assessment of visual impact in the text and provide an idea of the Project
outlook.
Five
VPs have been selected in the West Portion. These are:
·
VP1 –
·
VP2 – CAS HQ;
·
VP3 – Man Cheong Buildings;
·
VP4 –
·
VP5 – Yau Ma Ti Catholic Primary School,
Three
VPs have been selected in the Middle Ventilation Area. These are:
·
VP6 – Sheng Kung Hui Tsoi Kung
·
VP7 – Sik Man House, Ho Man Tin Estate;
·
VP13 – Oi Man Estate
Five
VPs have been selected in the East Portion including one futuristic one within
KTD and one aerial one which does not represent any VSRs but gives a good
indication of the outlook of the Project in the East Portion. These VPs are:
·
VP8 – Grand Waterfront;
·
VP9 – Megabox;
·
VP10 - Aerial photograph above Kai Tak Runway;
·
VP11 – HK International Trade & Exhibition Centre; and
·
VP12 – Within KTD.
A
key map of all the VPs used to develop photomontages is shown in Figure 10.19 although Figure 10.13, Figure 10.14 and Figure 10.15 also show closer detail of the VP locations in
the West, Central Portion and East areas respectively. The photomontages from these VPs are
discussed in the Visual Impact Assessment in Section
10.11.
The
West Portion of the VIA study area is in the Yau Ma Tei and Mong Kok Districts
with many different uses but overall highly developed. To the south and west the
The
West Portion of CKR with its associated structures is constructed on flat and
low-lying reclaimed land with similar level (average +5mPD) to the whole
Residential VSRs
R1.1 |
One SilverSea |
R1.2 |
Island Harbourview |
R1.13 |
The |
R1.14 |
The Hermitage |
Residents in high-rise residential building blocks at the edge of ZVI
and distant (over 400 m from new connecting road alignment and/or 500 m from
proposed ventilation building) from the Project include the VSRs listed above.
Since they are the highest buildings in this district, viewers in mid to upper
levels will have panoramic views facing due south to
R1.3 |
|
R1.4 |
Charming Garden |
R1.6 |
|
R1.10 |
|
R1.11 |
The Coronation |
R1.12 |
Planned Residential
Development above Austin Station |
Residents (and future residents in the case of R1.11 and R1.12) in
high-rise residential building blocks closer to the Project (less than 400 m
from new connecting road alignment and/or less than 500 m from proposed
ventilation building) have similar quality of existing views and degrees of
visibility at different levels to those high-rise residential building blocks
at the edge of ZVI, but being closer, the Project would be more prominent in
their view and their sensitivities are considered high,
despite some (such as R1.12) having their views to site slightly restricted by
other buildings such as Man Cheong Buildings (R1.9).
R1.7 |
Prosperous Garden |
R1.9 |
Man Cheong Buildings |
Other residents in the mid to high rise residential blocks in the inner
part of ZVI such as those listed above have a direct and close view to the
R1.5 |
|
R1.8 |
Kansu Street High Rise
Buildings |
The residents in the older reclamations of Yau Ma Tei like
Commercial VSRs
C1.1 |
Bank of |
C1.2 |
HSBC Centre |
C1.4 |
ICC & Ritz Carlton
Hotel |
C1.5 |
Planned Commercial
Development above XRL Terminus |
Viewers (and planned users in the case of C1.5) in the above listed VSRs
have an open and distant (over 400 m from new connecting road alignment and/or
500 m from proposed ventilation building) views toward the Project. The value
and quality of their existing view is good, however they are deteriorated by
abandoned land and the ongoing development of the Express Rail Link.
Considering the nature of the user group and the distance from the Project
Site, the sensitivity of these VSRs is rated as low.
C1.3 |
Eaton Hotel |
C1.6 |
|
Viewers in Eaton Hotel (C1.3) have a close view to the existing
Gascoigne Road Flyover with some buildings and green woodland as a backdrop.
Gascoigne Road Flyover is a busy traffic corridor and traffic congestion can be
seen from day to day. Viewers in Keybond Commercial Building (C1.6) have a
narrow view through to the Project alignment restricted by other buildings
including the new Coronation development. The value and quality of the existing
views for these VSRs is fair and despite the nature of the user group, given
their proximity to the Project their sensitivity is medium.
Government/ Institution/
Community VSRs
GIC1.1 |
Yau Ma Ti |
GIC1.2 |
|
GIC1.3 |
|
GIC1.4 |
Yau
Ma Tei Division Police Station |
GIC1.5 |
Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club
Polyclinic |
GIC1.6 |
Henry G. Leong Yaumatei
Community Centre |
GIC1.7 |
|
GIC1.8 |
Civil Aid Services
Headquarter |
GIC1.9 |
Planned GIC Site |
Viewers in the VSRs listed above are all reasonably close to (within
120m ), if not under the proposed alignment or works area. These buildings are
low to medium rise and at the higher levels may have partial open views towards
the Project. At lower levels, many of the views are dominated by existing
elevated roads such as that of
GIC1.7 |
|
Some users in Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GIC1.7) higher levels and in
Blocks facing west have an open view to the urban landscape at
Occupational VSRs
O1.1 |
LPG Filling Station at |
Users in LPG Filling Station at Hau Cheung
Street (O1.1) have a close and
direct view to the
Recreational VSRs
RE1.1 |
Olympic Plaza |
RE1.2 |
|
RE1.5 |
|
Users in these VSRs generally have high quality views within their
recreational area but these green spaces that they occupy are mainly enclosed
or screen by mature planting, such that their views of the Project would be
restricted. Users of Saigon Street Playground (RE1.5) are less screened within
their playground but surrounded by fairly low quality views. The sensitivity of
these VSRs is rated as low.
RE1.3 |
|
RE1.4 |
Yau Ma |
RE1.6 |
Planned Public Open
space above future XRL-terminus and surrounding |
RE1.7 |
Planned Public Open
space north of |
These existing VSRS, namely viewers in Public Square Street Rest Garden
(RE1.3) and Yau Ma Tei Community Centre Rest Garden (RE1.4) are enclosed by
dense buildings and elevated roads but mature planting within these open spaces
screen off and soften parts of these restricted views. These VSRs will be are
located very close to the Project alignment or will be re-located due to the
Project. The sensitivity of these
VSRs is medium.
Travel/ Transport Related VSRs
T1.1 |
|
West Kowloon Highway (T1.1) is a section of Route 3 in Hong Kong. This
dual-3 lane highway runs for 4.2 km, connecting Western Harbour Crossing in the south with Tsing Kwai Highway in the north. This VSR refers to travellers on
the section from MTRC Kowloon Station to Olympic Station. One side has a nice
open view to
Table 10.4: List of the VSRs in the West Portion and their
Sensitivity
* Denotes future VSRs that will not be in
existence when construction for the Project starts.
VSR Code |
Type of VSRs |
VSR Name |
Number of Individuals (Very few, Few, Many, Very many) |
Quality of Existing View (Poor/ Fair/ Good) |
Availability of Alternative Views |
Approx. Minimum Distance between VSRs and Impact Sources
(Road/Ventilation Building) (m) |
Degree of Visibility towards Project (Glimpse/ Partial/
Full) |
Duration of View (Short/ Medium/ Long) |
Frequency of View (Rare/ Occasional/ Frequent) |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
West Portion |
||||||||||
R1.1 |
Residential |
One
SilverSea |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
750/
920 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R1.2 |
Residential |
Island
Harbourview |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
620/
800 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R1.3 |
Residential |
|
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
130/
400 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.4 |
Residential |
Charming
Garden |
Very
Many |
Fair |
No |
200/
300 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.5 |
Residential |
|
Few |
Fair |
No |
250/
540 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R1.6 |
Residential |
|
Many |
Good |
Yes |
290/
740 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.7 |
Residential |
Prosperous
Garden |
Very
Many |
Fair |
No |
240/
560 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.8 |
Residential |
Kansu Street
High Rise Buildings |
Many |
Poor |
No |
0/
720 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R1.9 |
Residential |
Man Cheong
Buildings |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
150/450 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.10 |
Residential |
|
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
270/
480 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.11 |
Residential |
The
Coronation |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
30/
320 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R1.12 |
Residential |
Planned
Residential Development above Austin Station |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
360/
680 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High* |
R1.13 |
Residential |
|
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
700/
1120 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R1.14 |
Residential |
The
Hermitage |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
500/
680 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
C1.1 |
Commercial |
Bank of |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
600/
770 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C1.2 |
Commercial |
HSBC Centre |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
560/
750 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C1.3 |
Commercial |
Eaton Hotel |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
170/
1010 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C1.4 |
Commercial |
ICC &
Ritz Carlton Hotel |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
720/
840 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C1.5 |
Commercial |
Planned
Commercial Development above XRL Terminus |
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
240/
570 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low* |
C1.6 |
Commercial |
|
Few |
Fair |
No |
160/
650 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Ti |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
100/
200 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
Many |
Good |
Yes |
50/
280 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
Many |
Poor |
No |
120/
540 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei Division Police Station |
Many |
Poor |
No |
0/
610 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.5 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club Polyclinic |
Many |
Poor |
No |
0/
700 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.6 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Henry G.
Leong Yaumatei Community Centre |
Many |
Poor |
No |
20/
750 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.7 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
240/1050 |
Open |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
GIC1.8 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Civil Aid
Services Headquarter |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
40/
180 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC1.9 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Planned GIC Site |
Few |
Poor |
Yes |
10/
120 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium* |
O1.1 |
Occupational |
LPG Filling
Station at |
Few |
Fair |
No |
10/
310 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
RE1.1 |
Recreational |
Olympic
Plaza |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
130/
340 |
Glimpse |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
RE1.2 |
Recreational |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
80/
340 |
Glimpse |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
RE1.3 |
Recreational |
|
Few |
Fair |
No |
0/
580 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
RE1.4 |
Recreational |
Yau Ma |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
30/
800 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
RE1.5 |
Recreational |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
90/
800 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
RE1.6 |
Recreational |
Planned
Public Open Space above future XRL-terminus and surrounding |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
0/
120 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium* |
RE1.7 |
Recreational |
Planned
Public Open space north of |
Few |
Fair |
No |
0/
440 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium* |
T1.1 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
|
Many |
Good |
Yes |
0/0 |
Full |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
The
Central Portion Area of the VIA study area around Ho Man Tin has two main
characters. Proximal to
The
Central Portion Site is located on high ground on man-made slope (average
+59mPD) currently occupied by Water Supplies Department. The area where the
ventilation building is located is nearly the highest point in this region. In
addition to the blockage of view by the service reservoir at western side
(average +68mPD), the extent of ZVI is greatly reduced due to adjacent tall
buildings. However higher levels of some tall buildings in this district such
as 15 Ho Man Tin Hill, Ellery Terrace, Carmel On The Hill and King Man House
can still have a direct view to the Project Site. The baseline conditions of
VSRs within the Central Portion ZVI, together with their sensitivity, are
described below and a summary provided in Table
10.5
following.
Residential VSRs
R2.1 |
15 Ho Man Tin Hill |
R2.2 |
Ellery Terrace |
R2.4 |
Ho Man Tin Estate ( |
R2.5 |
Ho Man Tin Estate |
R2.6 |
|
R2.7 |
|
R2.8 |
Future Redevelopment of
|
R2.9 |
HK Polytechnic
University Student Hostel Development |
The
above listed VSRs, except R2.5, are high rise structures such that some
residents have/will have an open view towards the proposed Project Site. R2.1,
2.2, 2.8 and 2.9 are quite distant from the Proposed Project Site (>300 m)
whereas R2.4 (including Choi Man House, Yee Man House, Yat Man House, Sik Man
House and Kwun Hei Court), R2.6 and 2.7 are all slightly closer. R2.5 is made
up of the western buildings of Ho Man Tin Estate which are mid rise residential
blocks located close to the proposed Project Site and residents on the upper
levels have a direct and nearby view towards it. Due to the existing topography
and the height of the buildings, mid and upper levels have a panoramic view of
the whole Ho Man Tin District and even to Victoria Harbour and Hong Kong Island
on clear days. These viewers have high quality views of an urban nature,
including the landscaping in the area such as at Sheung Lok Street Garden
(RE2.2) and Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir (RE2.1) which provides some
greening. Although it is likely that the future residential blocks in R2.8 will
mainly face south, some viewers may face north towards the Project Site. The views from lower levels of the above listed
VSRs may have no view to the Project Site with others having a view that
is/will be partially interrupted by adjacent buildings such as Chun Man Court
and Ho Man Tin Government Office (GIC2.1) for R2.1 and R2.2, other buildings of
the Ho Man Tin Estate for R2.4 and the Future Redevelopment of Ex-Valley Estate
for R2.9, and these views are/will be generally of lower quality being more
focused to ground level and contained by structures and planting. Primarily
considering the viewers in the mid and upper levels of these buildings, their
good views to and/or their proximity to the proposed Project Site, the
sensitivity of these VSRs is high.
R2.3 |
Ho Man Tin Estate King
Man House |
Some residents in Ho Man Tin Estate King Man House (R2.3) have a distant
(> 400 m) view towards the proposed Project Site but this is only a glimpse
view as it is largely blocked by the Housing Authority Headquarters (GIC2.3).
Otherwise their existing views are panoramic over the Ho Man Tin District and even
further to the
R2.10 |
Oi Man Estate |
While most residents in Oi Man Estate King (R2.10) are unlikely to be
able to see the project site, residents of the higher levels of Kin Man House,
are about 80 m from the proposed Project Site at its closest point and have a
glimpse view of the site over the Ho Man Tin West Service Reservoir, East
Service Reservoir Playground and the general urban surroundings. Some residents
of the easternmost flats at higher levels of Lia Man, Po Man, Chung Man and
Chiu Man Houses may also have glimpse views towards the Project Site, but most
flats face either north of south rather than east towards the site. The views
from lower levels of this VSR will be blocked by adjacent structures and
vegetation and they will not be able to see the Project Site. Considering the
small number of residents with views towards the Project Site and the glimpse
views, the sensitivity of this VSR is medium.
Government/ Institution/
Community VSRs
GIC2.1 |
Ho Man Tin Government
Offices |
GIC2.2 |
SKH Tsoi Kung |
GIC2.3 |
Housing Authority
Headquarters |
Viewers in the above listed VSRs located near the Ho Man Tin West Fresh
Water Service Reservoir are low to medium high buildings and from the higher
levels, their views to the proposed Project Site take in the vegetated man-made
slope around Ho Man Tin West Service Reservoir ad well as taking in the
greenery of the lawn on the top of reservoir. The value and quality of the
existing view is fair to good but given these are workers or school children
and teachers, their views are occasional and less valued, so the sensitivity of
these VSRs is medium.
GIC2.4 |
Housing Authority
Mock-up Centre |
This VSR is low-rise buildings located on the top of the Ho Man Tin West
Fresh Water Service Reservoir with fairly open views to the lawn on the
Services Reservoir and a backdrop of high-rise buildings. The value and quality
of the existing view is fair. Towards the proposed ventilation building the
view is largely blocked by existing vegetation but this site is currently
included in the Works Area. Therefore despite the number of viewers being low
and them placing less value in their view due to their working nature, the
sensitivity of this VSR is as medium.
Recreational VSRs
RE2.1 |
Ho Man Tin East Service
Reservoir Playground |
Views out from this VSR towards the proposed Project Site are fairly
contained by the surrounding trees and to some extent the fence such that any
views would be partial at best. The existing view focuses on the lawn of the
reservoir playground itself, is slightly above from the main Fat Kwong Street
to the west and on raised ground commanding fairly open view south, currently
dominated by the MTR development area to the south west, and with medium to
high buildings as a backdrop. The value and quality of the existing view is
fair and the sensitivity of this VSR is medium.
RE2.2 |
|
Viewers in this VSR have a limited view from within the park to the
outside surroundings at ground level. In addition any view towards the Project
Site is along
Travel/ Transport Related VSRs
T2.1 |
Fat |
T2.2 |
|
Fat
Table 10.5: List
of the VSRs around the Central Portion and their Sensitivity
* Denotes future VSRs that will not be in
existence when construction for the Project starts.
VSR Code |
Type of VSRs |
VSR Name |
Number of Individuals (Very few, Few, Many, Very many) |
Quality of Existing View (Poor/ Fair/ Good) |
Availability of Alternative Views |
Approx. Minimum Distance between VSRs and Impact Sources ( |
Degree of Visibility towards Project (Glimpse/ Partial/
Full) |
Duration of View (Short/ Medium/ Long) |
Frequency of View (Rare/ Occasional/ Frequent) |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
Central Portion |
||||||||||
R2.1 |
Residential |
15 Ho Man
Tin Hill |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
460 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.2 |
Residential |
Ellery
Terrace |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
330 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.3 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate King Man House |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
420 |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R2.4 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate ( |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
150 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.5 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
60 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.6 |
Residential |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
150 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.7 |
Residential |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
180 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.8 |
Residential |
Future
Redevelopment of |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
300 |
Full |
Long |
Occasional |
High* |
R2.9 |
Residential |
HK
Polytechnic University Student Hostel Development |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
460 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R2.10 |
Residential |
Oi Man
Estate |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
80 |
Glimpse |
Long |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Ho Man Tin
Government Offices |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
60 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
SKH Tsoi
Kung |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
30 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Housing
Authority Headquarters |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
35 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC2.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Housing
Authority Mock-up Centre |
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
60
(but within a separate works area) |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
RE2.1 |
Recreational |
Ho Man Tin
East Service Reservoir Playground |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
260 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
RE2.2 |
Recreational |
|
Many |
Good |
Yes |
40 |
Glimpse |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
T2.1 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
Fat |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
25 |
Partial |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
T2.2 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
Chung hau
Street and |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
15 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
The
East Portion of the VIA study area is in the Kowloon Bay District and dominated
by the former Kai Tak Airport which is undergoing development. Surrounding this
area of ongoing development, there is and industrial urban area to the east of
the Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter, including the Hong Kong International Trade
& Exhibition Centre with some green hills in the background including
Kowloon Hill. To the north of the
Kai Tak Development (KTD) area, across the key transport corridor of
The
East Portion of CKR and its associated structures are constructed by a short
cut-and-cover tunnel at Kowloon City Ferry Pier PTI, underwater tunnel across
Kowloon Bay and depressed road on KTD Area of the former Kai Tak Airport area.
Since the former Kai Tak Airport has been decommissioned and is now an ongoing
major development landscape with all buildings already demolished, the ZVI
extends to the first row of building along Prince Edward Road and Kwun Tong
Bypass. Some high-rise residential or commercial buildings can also have a
direct view to the Project Site. The
future developments in Kai Tak would also have a close view of the Project. The baseline conditions of VSRs within
the East Portion ZVI, together with their sensitivity are described below and a
summary provided in Table 10.6 following.
Residential VSRs
R3.1 |
|
R3.2 |
Grand Waterfront |
These VSRs are medium to high rise buildings and residents in the mid to
upper levels will have a direct view to the Project Site. They are closest to
the cut and cover tunnel area and re-provisioning of the PTI with new landscape
deck, but still at least 350 m from it, while the proposed tunnel portal on Kai
Tak is over 750 m away from each of these VSRs. In the future, views to the development
structures may be partly obscured by developments in Kai Tak, such as the
proposed Multi Purpose Stadium Complex. VSRs in lower levels have their views
interrupted by the surrounding buildings, the Public Transport Interchange and
the little vegetation in the area. Only some of the residents in these
buildings have views towards the Project Site, while others are at too low a level
or face away from the Project Site. At the higher levels the views are more
panoramic and the value and quality of the existing view for R3.2 is good,
while that for R3.1 is fair. Overall the sensitivity of these VSRs is high.
R3.3 |
|
Residents
in this VSR have an open and distant view towards the Project Site. They are
one of the tallest residential building blocks in Ma Tau Kok and residents in
mid and upper levels currently enjoy a high quality panoramic view of the
surroundings. VSRs in lower levels have their views interrupted by the
surrounding buildings. After the completion of Kai Tai Development, the view
towards the development will be partially blocked by the proposed Multi Purpose
Stadium Complex. This VSR is rated as having high sensitivity,
but noting that in the future the proposed CKR development will have less of an
impact on it.
R3.4 |
High Rise Developments
along Prince Edward Road West (Including Padek Palace; New Development on Nga
Tsin Long Road; Prince Ritz; Tung Sing Court) |
R3.5 |
High Rise Developments
along |
R3.6 |
Choi Hung Estate |
The VSRs listed above are located to the north of former
R3.7 |
|
Richland Gardens (R3.7) is currently the largest residential development
in this district adjacent to Kowloon Bay Industrial Area, which consist of 22
high-rise residential building blocks. Depending on the location of different
blocks, their visibility and views of the surroundings are different, some may
even have an open view to
R3.8 |
Planned Residential
Development in Kai Tak |
Residents in the planned residential developments (R3.8) within former
R3.9 |
|
R3.10 |
Laguna Verde Complex
and Harbourfront Landmark |
These
buildings are very far from the Project Site (780 m minimum to the tunnel
portal and over 1200 m minimum to the ventilation building). R3.9 houses many
residents and is slightly closer while R3.10 houses a high number of residents
and both have good quality views towards the Project Site. However given the distance, their
sensitivity is medium.
Commercial/ Residential VSRs
CR3.1 |
Comprehensive
Development Area around |
Viewers in the CR3.1 buildings by the Ma Tau Kok waterfront have a close
and open view towards the proposed tunnel portal and through the currently
vacant land of the former
CR3.2 |
Planned Commercial/
Residential Development in Kai Tak |
Future viewers in the CR3.2 buildings, will mainly face either east
towards the Kowloon Bay Industrial Area or west towards
Commercial VSRs
C3.1 |
Newport Centre (partly
in CDA of OZP) |
Viewers in this VSR have a close view to the vacant land of the former
C3.2 |
|
Users in this VSR currently have a direct, close view to the all
concrete paved bus terminus, ferry pier and
C3.3 |
|
C3.4 |
|
Users
in these VSRs have a similar view to VSRs R3.4, R3.5 and R3.6. They are located
to the north of former
Viewers
in upper levels of these medium rise buildings will have an open view to the
vacant land of former
C3.5 |
|
C3.6 |
|
C3.7 |
|
C3.8 |
|
C3.11 |
|
C3.12 |
Billion Centre |
C3.13 |
|
The VSRs listed above are some of the tallest
commercial buildings in Kowloon Industrial Area. Viewers at medium to high
levels in these buildings have open and panoramic views over the area and even
out to
C3.9 |
Planned Commercial
Development in Kai Tak |
Future viewers in this VSR will have a
limited view towards the CKR Project Site, largely blocked by the planned
residential development in the front (R3.8). Additionally considering the
nature of these VSRs, their sensitivity will be low.
C3.10 |
United Daily News Centre |
Viewers in this VSR will have a limited view
towards the CKR Project Site. Only viewers at the higher levels will be able to
see out over existing buildings to the proposed tunnel portal and roads and the
proposed ventilation building will be over 1100 m away. Existing views are of
poor quality and the sensitivity of this VSR is low.
C3.14 |
Industrial Buildings
along |
Viewers in this VSR are in low rise buildings
looking out over a car park area and the busy Kwun Tong Bypass, so their
existing views are poor. Since they are low rise, they will have limited views
past the Project Site immediately in front of them and at best will have a
glimpse view towards the ventilation building. Overall their sensitivity is low.
Governmental/ Institution/
Community VSRs
GIC3.1 |
EMSD Headquarters |
Viewers in this VSR have a close view to the vacant land
of the former
GIC3.2 |
Planned Government
Buildings in Kai Tak |
Future viewers of this VSR will have a close view of the proposed CKR
connecting roads and ventilation building with the proposed Multi-Purpose
Stadium Complex and regional open space of the KTD in the background.
Considering the nature of this VSR, when they come into existence, their
sensitivity will be medium.
GIC3.3 |
|
There are very few viewers in this VSR and only those in the few classrooms
at higher levels facing north east will have a view of the Project Site, out
over the vehicle inspection centre and vehicles lining the road. Their existing
view is fair quality from higher levels but given the very few viewers and the
nature of this VSR, its sensitivity is low.
GIC3.4 |
EMSD Workshops |
Viewers in this VSR have a close view to the vacant land
of the former
Recreational VSRs
RE3.1 |
Planned Regional Open
Space in Kai Tak |
Viewers in these future VSRs will have a panorama view to
RE3.2 |
Planned Multi Purpose
Stadium Complex in Kai Tak |
Viewers in this future VSRs will mainly be focused inside the stadium
complex and their views to the proposed CKR connecting road and ventilation
building will largely be screened by landscaping or other structures. However
given the high number of viewers in this VSR and that this area borders the CKR
connecting road, their sensitivity is medium.
RE3.3 |
Current and Future
Waterfront Promenade at Ma Tau Kok |
Viewers in this VSR will have direct views across to the KTD and the
area of the proposed tunnel portal. Once development in Kai Tak has been
completed the Multi-Purpose Stadium Complex and open space either side of the
connecting CKR road will dominate their view. Overall the sensitivity of this
VSR is medium.
O3.1 |
The |
O3.2 |
Petrol Station at |
Viewers in these VSRs have immediate views of busy traffic at ground
level and cannot get to higher levels to enjoy more open views. The value and
quality of their existing views is poor and the sensitivity of these VSRs is low.
Travel/ Transport Related VSRs
T3.1 |
Kwun Tong Bypass |
T3.2 |
Harbour Traffic |
Kwun Tong Bypass (T3.1) is an elevated bypass
expressway in Kwun Tong, with three lanes in each direction. This VSR refers to
the section indicated in Figure 10.15.1. Travellers in the VSR have a view to the
vacant land of the former
Harbour
Traffic (T3.2) is referring to any ships or ferries travelling the inshore part
of
Table 10.6: List
of the VSRs in East Portion and their Sensitivity
* Denotes future VSRs that will not be in
existence when construction for the Project starts.
VSR Code |
Type of VSRs |
VSR Name |
Number of Individuals (Very few, Few, Many, Very many) |
Quality of Existing View (Poor/ Fair/ Good) |
Availability of Alternative Views |
Approx. Minimum Distance between VSRs and Impact Sources
(Road/Ventilation Building) (m) |
Degree of Visibility towards Project (Glimpse/ Partial/
Full) |
Duration of View (Short/ Medium/ Long) |
Frequency of View (Rare/ Occasional/ Frequent) |
Sensitivity (Low, Medium, High) |
East Portion |
||||||||||
R3.1 |
Residential |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
540/
960 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R3.2 |
Residential |
Grand
Waterfront |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
350/
780 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R3.3 |
Residential |
|
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
740/
980 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
High |
R3.4 |
Residential |
High Rise
Developments along Prince Edward Road West (Including Padek Palace; New
Development on Nga Tsin Long Road; Prince Ritz; Tung Sing Court) |
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
1060/
1100 |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium
|
R3.5 |
Residential |
High Rise
Developments along |
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
1000/
1100 |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R3.6 |
Residential |
Choi Hung
Estate |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
1060/
1350 |
Glimpse |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R3.7 |
Residential |
|
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
640/
900 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R3.8 |
Residential |
Planned
Residential Development in Kai Tak |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
120/
220 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
High* |
R3.9 |
Residential |
|
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
780/
1200 |
Partial |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
R3.10 |
Residential |
Laguna Verde
Complex and Harbourfront Landmark |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
1300/
1800 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
CR3.1 |
Commercial/
Residential |
Comprehensive
Development Area around |
Many |
Fair |
No |
340/
740 |
Full |
Long |
Frequent |
Medium |
CR3.2 |
Commercial/ Residential |
Planned
Commercial/ Residential Development in Kai Tak |
Very
Many |
n/a |
Yes |
740/
880 |
Partial |
Long |
Rare |
Medium |
C3.1 |
Commercial |
Newport
Centre (partly in CDA of OZP) |
Very
Few |
Poor |
No |
300/
640 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C3.2 |
Commercial |
|
Very
Few |
Poor |
No |
520/
960 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C3.3 |
Commercial |
|
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
960/
1060 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C3.4 |
Commercial |
|
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
1000/
1200 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C3.5 |
Commercial |
|
Many |
Fair |
No |
120/
500 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.6 |
Commercial |
|
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
150/
600 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.7 |
Commercial |
|
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
100/
780 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.8 |
Commercial |
|
Very
Many |
Fair |
No |
10/
180 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.9 |
Commercial |
Planned
Commercial Development in Kai Tak |
Very
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
750/
850 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low* |
C3.10 |
Commercial |
United Daily
News Centre |
Very
Few |
Poor |
Yes |
700/
1200 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
C3.11 |
Commercial |
|
Many |
Fair |
400/
740 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
|
C3.12 |
Commercial |
Billion
Centre |
Many |
Fair |
No |
50/
550 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.13 |
Commercial |
|
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
250/
650 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
C3.14 |
Commercial |
Industrial
Buildings along |
Very
Few |
Poor |
No |
80/
460 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
GIC3.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
EMSD
Headquarters |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
10/
260 |
Full |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium |
GIC3.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Planned
Government Buildings in Kai Tak |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
20/
100 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Medium* |
GIC3.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
Very
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
650/
1120 |
Glimpse |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
GIC3.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
EMSD
Workshops |
Few |
Fair |
Yes |
260/
580 |
Partial |
Medium |
Occasional |
Low |
RE3.1 |
Recreational |
Planned
Regional Open Space in Kai Tak |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
0/
120 |
Full
to Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium* |
RE3.2 |
Recreational |
Planned
Multi Purpose Stadium Complex in Kai Tak |
Very
Many |
Good |
Yes |
0/
200 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium* |
RE3.3 |
Recreational |
Current and
Future Waterfront Promenade at Ma Tau Kok |
Many |
Good |
Yes |
240/
580 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Medium |
O3.1 |
Occupational |
The |
Few |
Poor |
No |
500/
850 |
Partial |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
O3.2 |
Occupational |
Petrol
Station at |
Few |
Fair |
No |
10/
400 |
Full |
Short |
Occasional |
Low |
T3.1 |
Transport
Related |
Kwun Tong
Bypass |
Many |
Fair |
Yes |
0/
320 |
Full |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
T3.2 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
Harbour
Traffic |
Few |
Good |
Yes |
150/
540 |
Full |
Short |
Rare |
Low |
10.9
Landscape Impact Assessment
10.9.1
Potential Sources of Impact
The proposed
CKR is a dual 3-lane east-west trunk road about 4.7km long with about 3.9km in
tunnel connecting
From
Construction Works
·
Site clearance and site formation works;
·
Provision of elevated and at-grade slip road connections between the
tunnel, the road network on the West Kowloon Reclamation including
modifications to the YMT Interchange and connection roads at eastern end;
·
Construction of tunnel ramps and a tunnel portal to the west of
·
Cut and cover tunnel between
·
Construction of landscape deck;
·
Construction of underwater tunnel between Kowloon City Ferry Pier and
Kai Tak Runway;
·
Construction of ventilation buildings:
(i)
to the west of
(ii)
at the junction of
(iii)
near the tunnel portal in the proposed Kai Tak Development;
·
Construction of administration building near the tunnel portal in the
proposed Kai Tak Development;
·
Construction of depressed road between Kai Tak Runway and the
Interchange with Kai Cheung Road, Kai Fuk Road and the future Road T2 on the
proposed Kai Tak Development;
·
Replacement of a section of at-grade
·
Construction of noise barriers/enclosures;
·
Demolition and re-provisioning of Government, community and commercial
facilities affected by the CKR, including:
(i)
Demolition of Yau Ma Tei Multi-Storey Car Park Building and
re-provisioning in same location;
(ii)
Demolition of
(iii)
Temporary removal of Jade Hawker Bazaar and re-provisioning in same
location as well as construction of a temporary building on Kansu Street Rest
Garden on the south side of multi-storey car park;
(iv)
Removal of the Hong Kong Automobile Association buildings;
(v)
Re-provisioning of a section of Gascoigne Road Flyover (GRF) between
(vi)
Demolition of the existing Ma Tau Kok Public Pier and provision of a
landing step for its temporary relocation.
From
Construction Site Operation
·
Temporary stockpiling of excavated and building materials and storage of
construction equipment and plant at Ma Tau Kok;
·
Temporary noise mitigation measures e.g. barriers, enclosures;
·
Contractor’s temporary works areas, including site offices and
parking areas;
·
Proposed barging point at Kwai Chung
Sources of impacts in the
operation phase would include from the operation of:
·
Tunnel ramps and tunnel portal;
·
Ventilation shafts, ventilation buildings and administration buildings;
·
Landscape deck;
·
Interchange and connection roads including depressed roads and viaducts;
·
Re-provisioned of Government ,and community facilities including;
(i)
Yau Ma Tei Multi-Storey Car Park Building in same location as
previously;
(ii)
·
Adverse residual impacts from loss of trees during the construction
stage.
10.9.2
Degree of Compatibility of the Project and Associated Works
A major portion of the proposed CKR is tunnel, which is deemed very compatible with the surroundings from a landscape and visual perspective, and where it is underground it is unlikely to impose any landscape or visual impacts. The above ground structures such as noise barriers, tunnel ramps, tunnel portal, interchange, connection roads and depressed roads are in line with the existing and planned transportation corridor character setting in Yau Ma Tei and have good compatibility.
In the East Portion, extensive work has been done to ensure the CKR development integrates with the KTD and details of the general design considerations have been provided in Section 10.5.3. Further details regarding specific design considerations in the East Portion, can be found in Section 10.10.1.
Other above ground structures that could cause landscape and visual impacts, and have varying compatibility with the surroundings, include:
·
Noise Barriers/ Enclosures. These are proposed at some locations on the West Portion viaduct.
Details of the noise barriers/enclosures are illustrated in Figure 10.10.5, Figures 10.10.7, Figure 10.10.8, Figure 10.10.9 and Figure 10.10.10.
These have been designed to be as visually unobtrusive as possible while
still providing the necessary noise mitigation. The landscape deck is also a noise
barrier as listed below.
·
Proposed Landscape
Deck on the West Portion of the
CKR Tunnel beyond Ferry Street. This is undergoing detailed design but will
generally enhance the area by providing green space in an urban area.
Practically, the landscape deck may also act as a noise barrier. Details of the
proposed landscape deck are illustrated in Figure 10.10.11, Figure 10.10.12, Figure 10.10.13, Figure 10.10.14 and Figure 10.10.15 and in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.10.
·
Ventilation Building
at Yau Ma Tei Site. Detailed
design is being finalised but will generally enhance the area making it highly
compatible with the surroundings. Details of the proposed ventilation building
are illustrated in Figure 10.10.1, Figure 10.10.2 and Figure 10.10.3 and in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.10.
·
Ventilation Building
at Ho Man Tin. Detailed design
is being finalised but will generally enhance the area making it highly
compatible with the surroundings. Details of the proposed ventilation building
are illustrated in Figure 10.11.1 and Figure 10.11.2 and in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.11.
·
Ventilation Building
at Kai Tak. Detailed design is
being finalised but will generally enhance the area making it highly compatible
with the surroundings. Details of the proposed ventilation building are
illustrated in Figure 10.12.3, Figure 10.12.4, Figure 10.12.5 and Figure 10.12.6 and in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.12.
·
Proposed Landscape
Deck at Kowloon
City Ferry Pier PTI, Ma Tau Kok. This is undergoing detailed design but will
make the PTI more amenable by adding a greening aspect in this urban area.
Practically, the landscape deck may also act as a noise barrier. The proposed
landscape deck location is illustrated in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.12.
·
Proposed Landscape
Deck above Depressed Road in the East Portion, Kai Tak Area. This is undergoing detailed design but will integrate into the overall
landscape master plan of Kai Tak Development, adding green visual relief to
this area and making the road more compatible with the surroundings. The proposed landscape deck location is
illustrated in the Landscape Mitigation Plan in Figure 10.12.
·
Re-provisioned Government, Community Facilities. These facilities which will be demolished due to the CKR (e.g. Yau Ma
Tei Multi-Storey Car Park Building and Kowloon Government Offices) will be
re-provisioned in adjacent or nearby locations and designed to blend with the
existing environment and meet the needs of public. These buildings will undergo
detailed design at a future stage, but it is considered that the re-provisioned
buildings will be compatible with their proposed landscape setting.
·
Temporary Works Sites/ Areas & Barging Points. There will be temporary works sites / areas in the vicinity of the
interchange structures, tunnel, landscaped decks, depressed roads, ventilation
buildings and administration building to facilitate the construction process,
and these will be within the Works Area Limit. It is recommended that Construction and
Demolition (C&D) material should be transported off-site by barge wherever
possible to reduce impacts from road transport. There is a proposed barging point
(currently being used by XRL project) at Kwai Chung underneath Cheung Tsing
Bridge. DLO/TW&KT has allocated the site until August 2015 to RDO/HyD. CKR construction is due to commence at
the end of 2015 and therefore should this barging point be used, it will
continue its current existing use. Figure 10.2.1 illustrates the location of this proposed
Barging Point and gives an indication of the landscape, although the area is
undergoing development currently and therefore it is a changing landscape. In general the area and its surrounding
is of poor quality and given it is a barging point currently, the Project is
not expected to cause any adverse effect.
As a whole, the proposed CKR and associated
works would not create substantial visual instruction to the existing urban
environment, particularly at operation, and it is considered to be compatible
with the existing and proposed landscape settings, even enhancing it in
places.
When assessing the magnitude of change for LRs
and LCAs, tree data from the 2010 Tree Survey Report has been used to help
understand the treatment of trees i.e. whether trees within an LR will be
retained, transplanted or felled, noting an updated tree survey is targeting to
be conducted in mid 2013 and the final details of tree treatment will be
recommended under Tree Removal Application for this Project. In general, unmitigated impact on
existing trees are moderately adverse as many of the trees are common species
and of moderate amenity value.
(Also there will be a significant number of trees and greenery provided
at all ventilation and administration buildings as detailed further in Section 10.10)
There will be substantial adverse unmitigated
impact on existing public open spaces and amenity areas in the West Portion,
such as Public Square Street Playground, Shanghai Street / Market Street
Playground, Bazaar, Temple Street / Kansu Street Temporary Rest Garden and Jade
Hawker Bazaar, due to the construction of cut and cover tunnel and temporary site
offices and the impact will result in removal of some existing trees within
these open spaces. Care has been taken to conserve public open spaces in so far
as possible (e.g. Yau Ma Tei community Centre Rest Garden) and those public
open spaces that are lost due to the Project will be re-provisioned in nearby
locations with similar area. In addition further open space will also be
provided, such that overall there will be a net gain of public open space due
to the Project. The details of re-provisioning affected public open space will
be reviewed during the detailed design stage and further details of
re-provisioning and provisioning of open space is provided in Section
10.10.
For the LCAs, the unmitigated impact will be
generally adverse due to the loss of existing vegetation and the vacant land
after demolition of existing buildings and completion of cut and cover tunnel.
No change is expected to LRs and LCAs falling
outside the Works Area during construction or operation. Additionally the
proposed barging point at Kwai Chung is currently being used as a barging point
by the XRL project and will continue on the existing use, such that no change
is expected here either.
The magnitudes of change for
each of the LRs and LCAs listed in detail in the Baseline Study (Section 10.7),
are provided in Table 10.7 and Table 10.8 for LRs and LCAs respectively. The tables also
provide brief descriptions of the considerations taken into account when
assessing the magnitude of change, before the implementation of mitigation
measures.
Table 10.7: Magnitude of
Change for LRs
LR Code |
Name |
Approx. Area within Study Area/ Works Area (m2) |
Approx. Area Under Alignment (m2) |
Physical extent of impact (Small/ Medium/ Large) |
Compatibility with Surrounding Landscape |
Duration of Impact |
Reversibility of Change |
Magnitude of Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|
|
|
Description of Impacts during Construction and Operation |
|
|
||||||||
|
West Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LR1.1a |
Public
Square Street Playground |
980/ 980 |
245 |
Small |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary -
four years |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
|
|
All this LR is considered to be open space. It all falls within the works area and
although less than a third is under the alignment, it is due to be cleared
for the location of a temporary site office. Due to the alignment, eight
trees are proposed for removal; one for felling and seven for transplanting.
These transplanted trees are mainly Ficus microcarpa
of around 4 m height and Livistona chinensis of
6 m height. The other trees, which are larger in size are not affected
by the alignment itself, but assuming the site is cleared for the temporarily
site office, will be removed by felling..
|
|
|
||||||||
LR1.1b |
|
1,740/ 1,400 |
1,075 |
Medium |
Poor |
Poor |
Mainly
permanent |
Temporary |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
All this LR is considered public open space and some
open hard court pitches lie outside the Study Area. Approximately half of this LR within
the works area is under the alignment.
|
|
|
||||||||
LR1.1c |
Bazaar |
310/ 310 |
310 |
Medium |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary -
four years |
Permanent |
Irreversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
All this LR is considered public open space. It all lies within the works area
falls under the alignment such that all five trees, including the three
considered of high value, will be removed by felling. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.1d |
|
365/ 365 |
0 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary -
four years |
n/a |
Partly
reversible |
Reversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
All of this LR is considered public open space and
it all falls within the works area although none of it under the alignment. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.1e |
Jade Hawker
Bazaar |
1,395/ 1,395 |
1,120 |
Large |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
All of this
LR is considered public open space.
It all falls within the works area and the majority is under the
alignment. At
operation, prior to mitigation, the magnitude of change will remain large. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
83,800/ 23,980 |
4,225 |
Large |
Poor |
Poor |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
There is approximately 83,800 m2 of
this LR in the Study Area, of which a small proportion (23,980 m2)
falls within the works area and approximately 4,225 m2 is under
the alignment and the proposed ventilation building. Approximately 835 trees
within the LR will be removed due to the Project, the majority of which
(approximately 755) are deemed unsuitable for transplanting and must be
felled, so losing much of the greening within this LR despite approximately
725 trees being retained. The
trees proposed for felling include mainly Acacia confuse, Acacia
auriculiformis, Acacia mangium, Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus spp. and Albizia lebbeck
of average 10 m height and those for transplanting are mainly Syzygium cumini on average 7 m high and Chrysalidocarpus lutescens on average 4 m high. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.3b |
Roadside
Planting along |
8,270/ 7,390 |
1,050 |
Small |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
Approximately 7,390 m2 of this planting
along Hoi Wan Road, Yan Cheung road and Ferry Street Area falls within the
works area but a small proportion (1,050 m2) is under the
alignment. It is estimated that
30 of the existing 125 trees will be removed and the majority of these (25)
such as Roystonea regia trees, Bombax ceiba and Melaleuca quinquenervia are suitable for
transplantation. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.3c |
Roadside
Planting between |
4,620/ 4,555 |
485 |
Intermediate |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
Approximately 4,555 m2 of this LR falls
within the works area but only a small proportion of that falls under the
alignment. It is considered that
15 of the 25 trees would need to be removed due to the Project, mainly Bauhinia blakeana trees. Most of these trees can be
transplanted rather than felled and overall just two Bauhinia
blakeana are recommended for felling, while 13 trees, including Bauhinia blakeana and Michelia x alba
around 4 m high, are recommended for transplantation. Nevertheless, during construction the
Project would be poorly compatible with the remaining softscape planting in
this LR and it will lose much of its greening value during construction of
the connection road and landscape deck. Overall the magnitude of change is intermediate
during construction and at operation magnitude of change will reduce to
small. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
455/ 455 |
0 |
Small |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
All this LR falls with the works area, but none is
under the alignment. Still it is considered
that approximately 5 trees would need to be removed due to the Project at the
border of the works area, but all are considered able to be transplanted
rather than felled. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.5a |
Disturbed
Area at |
3,950/ 3,950 |
1,880 |
Medium |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
All this LR falls within the works area, but only
around half is under the alignment and will be permanently changed by the Project. The remaining area will only be
temporarily required by the Project and while most of the trees would have to
be felled (35 out of an estimated 50 in the LR), they are mainly weedy
species of low value such as Leucaena leucocephala. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.5b |
Disturbed
Area next to Construction Site at |
3,715/ 355 |
45 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
The majority of this LR falls outside the works area
and only 355 m2 lies within it, with just two very small
patches falling under the alignment.
Ten of the existing 60 low value trees are proposed to be felled but
half of these are either dead or the weed species Leucaena
leucocephala and the remainder are exotic Acacia
confusa. Since most of
this space is outside the works area, the Project will hardly affect the
openness of this LR and given the low value of trees, disturbed nature and
general low landscape value the Project is fair compatible during
construction and more so at operation. |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.5c |
Disturbed
Area at Kwai Chung |
10,360 / 10,360 |
0 |
Small |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
n/a |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
All of this LR falls within the works area and it is
the proposed barging point for this Project. The site is being used as a barging
point already for the XRL Project and therefore this Project is highly
compatible and compared with the current use the magnitude of change is
considered small. No loss of the
existing trees is expected but taking the worst case scenario the existing
trees are weedy and common species of low value and number and therefore the
magnitude of change is also small if they were felled. Overall the magnitude
of change at construction is small
Man-made shoreline around Kwai Chung |
|
|
||||||||
LR1.8a |
Man-made
shoreline around Kwai Chung |
4,610 / 224 |
0 |
Small |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
n/a |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
All of this LR falls within the works area and it is
the proposed barging point for this Project. The site is being used as a barging
point already for the XRL Project and therefore this Project is highly compatible
and compared with the current use the magnitude of change is considered
small. No loss of the existing
trees is expected but taking the worst case scenario the existing trees are
weedy and common species of low value and number and therefore the magnitude
of change is also small if they were felled. Overall the magnitude of change
at construction is small
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Central Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LR2.3a |
Roadside
Planting around Housing Authority Mock-up Centre |
130/ 130 |
0 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
Reversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
None of this LR falls under the alignment but the
Housing Authority Mock-up Centre is proposed as a storage area and taking
worst case scenario all the trees (approximately 30 including Ficus microcarpa, Melaleuca quinquenervia and Elaeocarpus hainanensis ranging in height from 5 – 6
m with crown spread between 3 – 4 m) will be affected during
construction of the Project due to the earthworks necessary for the
construction of the ventilation building. It is considered that 20 will be
suitable for transplanting and 10 will have to be felled. |
|
|
||||||||
LR2.4a |
Vegetation
on Man-made Slopes off |
10, 455/ 6,160 |
2,635 |
Small |
Poor |
Poor |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
The majority of this LR within the works area is not
under the proposed location of the ventilation building and route for the
access road and at this location the main CKR route is underground.
|
|
|
||||||||
|
East Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LR3.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
1,620/ 1,620 |
1,040 |
Small |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
This LR within the works area falls largely on land
that is only temporarily required by the Project during construction. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.3b |
Roadside
Planting along Long |
450/ 45 |
0 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
Only approximately 45 m2 of
this LR falls within the works area and none under the alignment. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.3c |
Roadside
Planting along |
10,020/ 9,455 |
5,845 |
Large |
Poor |
Poor |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
Over half of this LR within the works area is under
the alignment and will therefore be permanently affected by the Project while
the rest is on land only temporarily required during construction. Of the estimated 415 trees in this LR
160 would need to be removed (Approximately 155 felled, of which at least
half are exotic Casuarina equisetifolia and
about 35 are weed species Leucaena leucocephala;
and five including Albizia lebbeck,
Aleurites moluccana and Bauhinia spp. transplanted) due to the
Project. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
650/ 70 |
70 |
Small |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Irreversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
All of this LR inside the works area, falls under the alignment. Of the
estimated 85 trees in the LR, it is considered that 10 would be felled
(including Albizia lebbeck, Bauhinia spp.
too large to transplant and one dead tree) and 5 would be transplanted
(including Bischofia javanica, Chrysalidocarpus
lutescens and Spathodea campanulata).
These trees would need to be removed due the construction of a connection
road but most trees will be retained and overall the magnitude of change is
small during construction and operation. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.3e |
Roadside
Planting along Kai Cheung Road, Wang Kwong Road and Wang Chiu Road |
2,490/ 2,135 |
0 |
Small |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Irreversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
This LR is within the works area but none of it
falls under the alignment. Of the
approximately 50 trees in the LR, none would need to be removed during the
construction or operation of the Project. At construction the construction
vehicles on the road may have some minor effect on the roadside trees, but at
operation the Project is not considered to affect this LR. Therefore the magnitude of change is
small during construction and negligible at operation. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.5a |
Disturbed
Area within former |
5,850/ 125 |
20 |
Small |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
The former Kai Tak Airport is approximately 79,490 m2
large but just 5,850 m2 falls within the works area and
almost none under the alignment. The area within the works area is estimated
to have only10 including Ficus microcarpa, Melia
azedarach and Terminalia catappa. Five trees are considered
suitable for transplanting (Melia azedarach)
and the remainder suitable for retention, so no live trees will be felled in
this LR.. During operation temporary impact would have gone
but the site changed in nature and use (as will the surrounding KTD), so the
magnitude of change is considered small.
|
|
|
||||||||
LR3.8a |
Man-made
Shoreline of |
5,785/ 2,400 |
770 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
This LR falls within the works area at a point where
the road alignment is underground and the impact would be temporary during
construction of the cut and cover tunnel and underwater tunnel at this
point. During operation some of
this LR is required for a waterfront promenade. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.8b |
Man-made
Shoreline around former |
9,080/ 3,845 |
0 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
None of this LR falls under the above ground
alignment as the CKR is underground at this point. The impact would therefore be
temporary during construction.
During operation this LR will be affected by the Kai Tak Development
Project (KTD) rather than the CKR Project. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.9a |
|
190,920/ 92,275 |
19,540 |
Medium |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
n/a |
Large |
Negligible |
|
|
This LR will be affected by any marine traffic
associated with the Project and how the underwater tunnel is constructed will
affect the impact during construction.
Assuming temporary reclamation is required, a large magnitude of
change is expected during construction. |
|
|
||||||||
LR3.9b |
Kai Tak
Nullah |
8,965/ 1,790 |
1,430 |
Small |
Poor |
Poor |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
Some of this LR falls under the alignment of the
connection road and will be permanently affected by the Project. However under the KTD, the nullah is
due to be enhanced. |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
x.1 Public Open
Space
x.2 Urban
Residential / Institutional Open Space
x.3 Roadside
Planting
x.4 Vegetation
on Man-made Slope
x.5 Disturbed
Area with Wild Grass / Small Shrubs
x.6 Lawn Area
x.7 NOT USED
x.8 Man-made
Shoreline
x.9 Water
Bodies
Table 10.8: Magnitude of Change for LCAs
LCA Code |
Name |
Approx. Area of LCA (ha) |
Approx. Area within Works Area/ Under Alignment (ha) |
Physical extent of the impact (Small/ Medium/ Large) |
Compatibility with Surrounding Landscape |
Duration of Impact |
Reversibility of Change |
Magnitude of Change |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|
|
Description of Impacts during Construction and Operation |
||||||||||
|
West Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA1.1 |
Transportation
Corridor Landscape |
37.58 |
7.73/ 1.52 |
Large |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the connection
road, tunnel portal, ventilation building and temporary traffic and road
diversions. Roughly half the
trees in this LCA will be affected by the Project (approximately 630 trees
require felling and 70 will be transplanted. The trees to be felled are mainly
exotic, common species such as Acacia spp.
but the loss of greenery will cause a large change on this LCA and the
magnitude of change is considered large.
Due to the loss of trees, magnitude of change at operation will
continue to be large. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA1.2 |
Ongoing
Major Development Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
17.32 |
10.37/ 4.33 |
Large |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the connection
road, tunnel portal including landscape deck, temporary storage area and site
office. Over half the trees in
this LCA will be affected by the Project (approximately 280 of 580). 225 will require felling and 55
transplanting. The trees felled
are mainly exotic, common species such as Acacia spp. and weedy species and
given this landscape is generally compatible with the Project under
construction, the magnitude of change during construction and at operation is
small. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA1.3 |
City
Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
13.18 |
2.67/0.59 |
Large |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of cut and cover
tunnel, tunnel portal including landscape deck, demolition of existing
buildings and community facilities and construction of temporary community
facilities. Approximately half of the trees in this LCA will be affected by
the Project, (45 of 60) with 20 requiring felling and 25 considered suitable
for transplanting. During
construction the Project is poorly compatible with the surrounding landscape
but only a small area is affected and relatively few trees lost, meaning
magnitude of change is considered intermediate. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA1.4 |
Residential
Complex Landscape |
3.86 |
0.02/0.00 |
Medium |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
|
A tiny
corner of this LCA is reportedly in the Project works area, but in effect it
lies outside and the Project will not affect it. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA1.5 |
Residential
Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
7.04 |
1.98/0.38 |
Medium |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of cut and cover
tunnel, tunnel portal including landscape deck and demolition of some
existing buildings and community facilities. Approximately ten trees in this LCA
will be affected by the Project and require felling. During construction the Project is
poorly compatible with the surrounding landscape but only a small area is
affected and relatively few trees lost, meaning magnitude of change is
considered intermediate. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA1.6 |
Typhoon
Shelter Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
6.5 |
0/0 |
Small |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
n/a |
Reversible |
n/a |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by barges transporting materials
to/from the works area. Barge use is normal within this LCA and an existing
use such that at worst the Project will cause a small change during
construction At operation
barges will no longer be used by
the Project and this LCA will not be affected by the Project. |
|
|
||||||||
|
Central Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA2.1 |
Residential
Urban Landscape (Middle) |
2.72 |
0.00 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
|
This
LCA is not affected by the Project. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA2.2 |
Miscellaneous
Urban Fringe Landscape |
7.99 |
1.34/0.32 |
Small |
Poor |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the ventilation
building, access road and temporary works. A large number of the trees in this
LCA would have to be felled (currently estimated at 110) and 5 are considered
suitable for transplanting.
Although the area affected is very small, the loss of greenery will
magnitude of change on this LCA and the magnitude of change is considered
intermediate. Due to the
loss of trees, magnitude of change at operation will continue to be intermediate. |
|
|
||||||||
|
East Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA3.1 |
City
Grid Mixed Urban Landscape (East Portion) |
10.80 |
0.82/ 0.49 |
Small |
Fair |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Reversible |
n/a |
Small |
Negligible |
|
|
This LCA
will be temporarily affected by the works area for this Project, but the
impact to landscape will be reversible and temporary. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA3.2 |
Ongoing
Major Development Landscape (East Portion) |
62.23 |
24.24/ 10.38 |
Large |
Good |
Good |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the cut and
cover tunnel and PTI re-provision at Ma Tau Kok as well as the ventilation
building, depressed road, tunnel portal, other connecting roads and temporary
works in the main Kai Tak area.
An estimated 70 trees in this LCA would have to be felled while 15 are
considered suitable for transplanting.
Despite the Project being compatible with this LCA, mainly due to the
loss of greenery the magnitude of change is considered intermediate. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA3.3 |
Industrial
Urban Landscape |
17.86 |
0.58/ 0.00 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
|
This LCA is
not affected by the Project. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA3.4 |
Typhoon
Shelter Landscape (East Portion) |
22.13 |
10.67/ 1.83 |
Medium |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
n/a |
Partly
Reversible |
n/a |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the underwater
tunnel, temporary barging point and increased marine traffic. How the underwater tunnel is
constructed will affect the impact during construction. For worst case scenario intermediate
magnitude of change is suggested during construction. |
|
|
||||||||
LCA3.5 |
Transportation
Corridor Landscape |
7.97 |
4.14/ 1.35 |
Medium |
Fair |
Fair |
Temporary |
Permanent |
Partly
Reversible |
Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
|
|
During
construction this LCA will be affected by the construction of the connection
road and temporary works. An
estimated 95 trees in this LCA would have to be felled while 5 are considered
suitable for transplanting an therefore during construction there will be
some disturbance of this LCA and the magnitude of change is intermediate, but
during operation the Project is fairly compatible and the magnitude of change
will reduce to small. |
|
|
10.9.4
Significance of Landscape Impacts
Using
the sensitivities of the LRs and LCAs described in the Baseline Study (Section
10.7) and the magnitude of landscape change experienced by each, ascertained in
Table 10.7 and Table 10.8, the matrix shown in Table 10.1 has been used to calculate the significance of
landscape impacts before mitigation as shown in Table
10.9 and Table 10.10, for LRs and LCAs respectively.
Before
mitigation, during construction and operation, substantial impacts are mainly
experienced in the West Portion by public open space resources i.e. Public
Square Street Playground (LR1.1a), Shanghai
Street / Market Street Playground (LR1.1b), Bazaar (LR1.1c), Jade Hawker Bazzar
(LR1.1e) but also by the Roadside Planting along West Kowloon Highway and
Tunnel Area (LR1.3a) where high numbers of trees will be removed. In the
Central Portion area, substantial
impacts are experienced during construction and operation and before mitigation
by Vegetation on Man-made Slopes along Chung Hau Street and Fat Kwong Street
(LR2.4a) and in the East Portion substantial impacts are experienced during
construction and before mitigation by Roadside Planting along Kai Cheung Road
and Interchange (LR3.3c).
Before mitigation, during construction and operation, substantial impacts are only experienced by the Transportation Corridor Landscape in the West Portion (LCA1.1) where high numbers of trees will be removed. All other impacts to LCAs are moderate or less prior to mitigation. At operation prior to mitigation, moderate impacts are experienced one LCA in each or the Project Areas; the Transportation Corridor Landscape in the West Portion (LCA1.1), Miscellaneous Urban Fringe Landscape (LCA2.1) around the Central Portion and Ongoing Major Development Landscape in the East Portion (LCA3.2) i.e. at KTD.
Using
the mitigation measures described in Section
10.10, the
residual impact for construction and operation day 1 and year 10 for LRs and
LCAs are provided in Table 10.9 and Table 10.10 respectively.
For all
the impacts that are classified as substantial for LRs, measures involving the
protection, preservation, transplantation and compensation of trees (MM8, MM9,
MM10) are key to their mitigation. In addition, impacts to public open space
resources are greatly mitigated by their re-provisioning (MM14) as well as
landscape enhancement of these areas (MM15). MM15 is particularly relevant to
mitigate the impact on LR1.3a which largely suffers due to a loss of greening,
and as features such as the Landscape Deck in the West Portion have been
provided to help increase the greening aspect of the Project. Although erosion
control (MM6) is generally considered good practice, it is particularly
relevant in reducing impacts to landscape resources on slopes (e.g. LR2.4a) or
with large areas of planting (LR1.3a). With the implementation of these
mitigation measures, residual impacts on all LRs are considered to be
‘slightly adverse’ at worst by year 10 of operation. They are
‘slightly adverse’ at day 1 of operation for most LRs also, except
areas of public open space where re-provisioning will take time to establish
and where there has been substantial loss of trees and the re-planting will
also take time to establish and confer mitigation (e.g. LR1.3a Roadside Planting
along West Kowloon Highway and Tunnel Area.
A
number of LRs in the East Portion are considered to benefit from the Project
once mitigation measures have been implemented. These include Roadside Planting
along San Ma Tau Street and Bus Terminus (LR3.3a). A new Public Transport
Interchange (PTI) will be developed here, with substantial landscaping,
(including a landscaped covered area).LRs which interface with the KTD and will
also mutually benefit from the integration of the CKR and KTD designs. These LRs
are Disturbed Area within former Kai Tak Airport (LR3.5a), Man-made Shoreline
around former Kai Tak Airport (LR3.8b) as well as the Man-made Shoreline of
West Kowloon Bay (LR3.8a) which has been selected to become part of a
waterfront promenade and will benefit from the Project.
The
same mitigation measures used for LRs are relevant to reducing the significance
of impacts on the LCAs and in addition, assuming landscape character is also
partly influenced by the appearance of the landscape, MM12 (Green Roof) can
help to add greening to an LCA affected by loss of greening. In particular for LCA1.1, the measures
involving the protection, preservation, transplantation and compensation of
trees (MM8, MM9, MM10) as well as landscape enhancement (MM15) (including by
provision of a landscape deck) and green roof (MM12) are key to the mitigation
and compensation of the loss of greenery originally caused by the Project. With these mitigation measures impact on
LCA1.1 is reduced to moderate at construction. At operation day 1 after mitigation, all
impacts on LCAs are ‘slightly adverse’ at worst and by year 10 it
is considered that impacts on all LCAs are insignificant.
Table 10.9: Significance
of Impact on LRs, both before and upon Mitigation
LR Code |
Name |
LR Sensitivity (High/ Medium/ Low) |
Magnitude of Change (Large/ Intermediate/ Small/
Negligible |
Impact Significance BEFORE Mitigation (Substantial/
Moderate/ Slight/ Insignificant) |
Recommended Mitigation Measures (MM) |
Residual Impact Significance UPON Mitigation (Significant/
Moderate/ Slight/ Insignificant) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation Day 1 |
Operation Year 10 |
||||||||
|
West Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
LR1.1a |
Public
Square Street Playground |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
1, 8, 9 ,10, 14 |
1, 14 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.1b |
Shanghai
Street /Market Street Playground |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
1, 8, 9 ,10, 14 |
1, 14 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||||||||
LR1.1c |
Bazaar |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
1, 8, 9 ,10, 14 |
1, 14 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||||||||
LR1.1d |
|
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9 ,10, 14, |
14 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.1e |
Jade Hawker
Bazaar |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
1, 8, 9 ,10, 14, |
1, 14 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||||||||
LR1.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||||||||
LR1.3b |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.3c |
Roadside
Planting between |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.5a |
Disturbed
Area at |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.5b |
Disturbed
Area next to Construction Site at |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.5c |
Disturbed
Area at Kwai Chung |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8,9,10 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR1.8a |
Man-made
shoreline around Kwai Chung |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
|
Central Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
LR2.3a |
Roadside
Planting around Housing Authority Mock-up Centre |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR2.4a |
Vegetation
on Man-made Slopes along |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Slight |
||||||||
|
East Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
LR3.3a |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight beneficial |
Slight beneficial |
||||||||
LR3.3b |
Roadside
Planting along Long |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR3.3c |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13 15 |
1, 15 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR3.3d |
Roadside
Planting along |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR3.3e |
Roadside
Planting along Kai Cheung Road, Wang Kwong Road and Wang Chiu Road |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8, 9, 10, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR3.5a |
Disturbed
Area within former |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight beneficial |
Slight beneficial |
||||||||
LR3.8a |
Man-made
Shoreline of |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 14, 15 |
Slight |
Slight beneficial |
Slight beneficial |
||||||||
LR3.8b |
Man-made
Shoreline around former |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15 |
1, 14, 15 |
Slight |
Slight beneficial |
Slight beneficial |
||||||||
LR3.9a |
|
Medium |
Large |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
LR3.9b |
Kai Tak
Nullah |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
1, 15 |
1 |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
||||||||
Note
– Full details of mitigation measures are provided in Section 10.10 but
summary titles are:
MM1 Detailed Design -
Landscape.
MM2 Detailed Design -
Visual.
MM3 Good Site
Management.
MM4 Screen
Hoarding.
MM5 Lighting Control during
Construction.
MM6 Erosion
Control.
MM7 Not used
MM8 Tree Protection
& Preservation
MM9 Tree
Transplantation –
MM10 Compensatory Planting
MM11 Screen Planting
MM12 Green Roof
MM13 Reinstatement
MM14 Re-provisioning of Public
Open Space
MM15 Landscape enhancement
MM16 Lighting Control during
Operation
Table 10.10: Significance
of Impact on LCAs, both before and upon Mitigation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA Code |
Name |
LCA Sensitivity (High/ Medium/ Low) |
Magnitude of Change (Large/ Intermediate/ Small/ Negligible |
Impact Significance BEFORE Mitigation (Substantial/
Moderate/ Slight/ Insignificant) |
Recommended Mitigation Measures |
Residual Impact Significance UPON Mitigation (Significant/
Moderate/ Slight/ Insignificant) |
|||||
|
|
|
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation Day 1 |
Operation Year 10 |
|
West Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA1.1 |
Transportation
Corridor Landscape (West
Portion) |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
1, 8, 9, 10,
13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
LCA1.2 |
Ongoing
Major Development Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10,
13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA1.3 |
City Grid
Mixed Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9 ,10,
14, 15 |
1, 14, 15 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA1.4 |
Residential
Complex Landscape |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
n/a |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA1.5 |
Residential
Urban Landscape (West Portion) |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9 ,10,
14, 15 |
1, 14, 15 |
Slight |
|
|
LCA1.6 |
Typhoon
Shelter Landscape (West Portion & Barging Point) |
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
n/a |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
|
Central Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA2.1 |
Residential
Urban Landscape (Middle) |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
n/a |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA2.2 |
Miscellaneous
Urban Fringe Landscape |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
1, 8, 9 ,10,
13, 14 ,15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
|
East Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LCA3.1 |
City Grid
Mixed Urban Landscape (East
Portion) |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
1, 8, 9 ,10,
14, 15 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA3.2 |
Ongoing
Major Development Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
1, 8, 9, 10,
13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
LCA3.3 |
Industrial
Urban Landscape |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
n/a |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA3.4 |
Typhoon
Shelter Landscape (East Portion) |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Negligible |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
1 |
n/a |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
LCA3.5 |
Transportation
Corridor Landscape (East
Portion) |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
1, 8, 9, 10,
13, 15 |
1, 15 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Note
– Full details of mitigation measures are provided in Section 10.10 but
summary titles are:
MM1 Detailed Design -
Landscape.
MM2 Detailed Design -
Visual.
MM3 Good Site
Management.
MM4 Screen
Hoarding.
MM5 Lighting Control
during Construction.
MM6 Erosion Control.
MM7 Not used
MM8 Tree Protection
& Preservation
MM9 Tree
Transplantation –
MM10 Compensatory Planting
MM11 Screen Planting
MM12 Green Roof
MM13 Reinstatement
MM14 Re-provisioning of Public
Open Space
MM15 Landscape enhancement
MM16 Lighting Control during
Operation
10.10
Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
During
the current landscape and visual impact assessment, mitigation measures to
avoid, reduce or remedy impacts have all been considered, with highest priority
given to impact avoidance and reduction. The mitigation measures proposed are
not only concerned with damage reduction but also include consideration of
potential enhancement of the existing landscape.
At the
Project design stage, many factors have already been considered to avoid or
reduce potential landscape and visual impacts. The exact route of the CKR and
locations of above ground structures including connection roads and ventilation
and administration buildings, have been carefully considered against key
constraints and opinions, taking into account potential LVIA impacts amongst
other factors. Similarly the necessity for the underwater tunnel between Ma Tau
Kok with KTD and its construction method has also been carefully considered,
against key constraints and opinions, current legislation and taking into
account potential LVIA impacts amongst other factors.
As well
as design mitigation measures, measures to reduce and/or compensate for
particular unavoidable impacts during the construction and/or operation of the
Project are also proposed. Certain measures should be adopted during the
detailed design and be built as part of the construction works so that they are
in place at the date of commissioning of the project and in place during the
operational life of the Project. Other measures should be adopted from the
commencement of construction and remain in place throughout the entire
construction period.
Generally,
mitigation measures should be implemented as early as possible. Mitigation
measures have not been assigned as ‘design’,
‘construction’ or ‘operation’ mitigation measures due
to their often encompassing different phases of the Project. For example
although soft landscape mitigation measures may be implemented during construction,
their full effect will often not be appreciated for 10 years. Equally detailed
design measures may reduce construction impacts but will also reduce operation
impacts.
Specific
design consideration and principles for the Project are outlined below while
the proposed landscape and visual mitigation measures for the detailed design,
construction and operation of the Project are given in Section 10.10.2.
10.10.1
Specific Design Considerations
Compatibility with the Surrounding Environmental and Development
Characters
New
structures must be designed to be compatible with their surroundings e.g. the
western connection bridges must be designed to match the existing flyovers in
Yau Ma Tei Interchange.
In the
East Portion, design considerations have taken into account the Kai Tak
Development (KTD) design to ensure the two projects integrate well together.
Considerations specific to this area are listed in Section 10.5.3.
Creating a Comprehensive Green Network
CEDD’s
‘Greening Master Plan’ (GMP) should be used as a guideline to
creating a comprehensive green network in all three above ground areas. In the
West, the GMP suggests a ‘Coastal Scenery’ theme around Yau Ma Tei
to tie in with the
A
significant number of trees and greenery will be provided around ventilation
and administration buildings. For trees unavoidably affected by the Project
that have to be removed, where practical, transplantation will be chosen as the
top priority method of removal but if this is not possible or practical (e.g.
the tree is too large or has a low survival rate) compensatory planting will be
provided for trees unavoidably felled. While most of this will be on-site
compensation, some off-site compensation will be required from felling in all
sections as detailed further in Table 10.11.
Landscape
decks can be used to beautify the area and provide additional greening
space. One landscape deck is
provided in the West Portion (also serving as a noise barrier) and another in
the East Portion over the depressed road.
Public Open Space
Affected
open space is all in the West Portion and impacts are due to the construction
of cut-and-cover tunnel and connecting road. All areas of public open space
affected by the Project will be re-provisioned either at the same location
following the completion of temporary works, or at a separate site, as agreed
with relevant Government departments as detailed further in Table 10.11.
Preservation of Cultural Heritage
Efforts
must be made to ensure structures of cultural heritage are preserved e.g. the YMT Police Station in the West Portion with its neo-classical
architecture is the oldest police station in an urban context that still
survives in Hong Kong and gives an indication of the original coast line. The
community also apparently feel strong bond to the building. Therefore efforts
have been made to conserve the building, which will be decanted prior to
construction and used for other purposes once CKR is operational.
Duration of Construction
Design
measures must take into account the duration of their construction and should
be kept to a practical minimum to reduce landscape and visual impacts.
Minimising Impact of the Underwater Tunnel Construction
The
length of the temporary reclamation proposed is the minimum because the
alignment of the underwater tunnel follows the shortest path connecting Ma Tau
Kok with KTD taking into the need to avoiding resumption of private properties
and making effective connection with the road network in KTD. The area of the temporary reclamation
will be split into Stage 1 and 2 and will be 1.8 ha and 2.0 ha
respectively and will be the minimum extent of reclamation required for
constructing the underwater tunnel according to experience acquired in
constructing the underwater tunnel of the Central-Wan Chai Bypass in Causeway
Bay Typhoon Shelter.
10.10.2
Proposed Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
Table 10.11 below details the proposed landscape and
visual mitigation measures for the Project during construction and operation
and indicates the Funding, Implementation, Management and Maintenance agencies
for each measure. Landscape Mitigation Plans are shown in Figure 10.11, Figure 10.12 and Figure 10.13.
Table 10.11: Proposed
Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures
Id No. |
Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measure |
Funding Agency |
Implementation Agency |
Maintenance/ Management Agency |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM1 |
Detailed Design - Landscape. All
works shall be carefully designed to minimize impacts on existing landscape
resources and visually sensitive receivers, particularly those of high value
or high sensitivity. For this
purpose, the extent of the works area will be minimised and existing trees
within the works area shall be avoided were practicable. Designs which ensure the construction time frame is
kept to a practical minimum should also be considered. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM2 |
Detailed Design - Visual. Tunnel portals and all
structures above ground including noise barriers shall be sensitively
designed with colour, texture and tonal quality being compatible with the
existing urban context. The ‘natural terrain’ idea will be
applied to the design of ventilation and administration buildings. For noise barriers/ enclosures, the colour of the
structural frames and the frame of the glazing panels shall give a natural
look and match with the colour of the adjacent buildings in the area. Designs which ensure the construction time frame is
kept to a practical minimum should also be considered. |
HyD |
HyD |
Building proponent/ HyD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM3 |
Good Site Management. Large temporary
stockpiles of excavated material shall be covered with unobtrusive sheeting
to prevent dust and dirt spreading to adjacent landscape areas and
vegetation, and to create a neat and tidy visual appearance. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM4 |
Screen Hoarding. Decorative screen
hoarding should be erected to screen the public from the construction
area. It should be designed to be
compatible with the existing urban context. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM5 |
Lighting Control during Construction. All
lighting in the construction site shall be carefully controlled to minimize
light pollution and night-time glare to nearby residencies and GIC. The
contractor shall consider other security measures, which shall minimize the
visual impacts. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM6 |
Erosion Control. The potential for
soil erosion shall be reduced by minimizing the extent of vegetation
disturbance on site and by providing a protective cover over newly exposed
soil. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM7 |
Not used |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM8 |
Tree Protection & Preservation.
Exiting trees to be retained within the Project Site should be carefully
protected during construction. Note no Registered Old and Valuable Trees are
located within Works Area and none of the affected trees are LCSD champion
Trees or Registered Old and Valuable Trees, neither are they rare or
endangered species, but mainly common exotic trees. Tree protection measures
will be detailed at the Tree Removal Application stage and plans submitted to the relevant Government
Department for approval in due course in accordance with ETWB TC no. 3/2006.
Care should be taken to preserve as many trees as possible by avoidance (also
see MM1). |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM9 |
Tree Transplantation. For trees unavoidably affected by the Project
that have to be removed, where practical transplantation will be chosen as
the top priority method of removal. If this is not possible or practical
(e.g. the tree is too large or has a low survival rate) compensatory planting
will be provided for trees unavoidably felled (See MM10). For trees
unavoidably affected by the Project works that are transplanted,
transplantation must be carried out in accordance with ETWBTC 2/2004 and
3/2006. According to the 2010 Tree Survey, of the 2812 trees surveyed,
approximately 163 trees affected by the Project are suitable for
transplantation and onsite planting sites were identified for these trees.
Due to Project re-alignment, other projects development (e.g. XRL) and the updated Tree Survey due to be carried out in
mid 2013, however, the numbers of
trees affected by the Project has been reduced, particularly in the West
Portion and therefore the number of trees that will require transplanting may
reduce also. Since final numbers have not been confirmed, a worst case
scenario of approximately 160 trees requiring transplantation is estimated. |
HyD |
HyD’s Contractor |
HyD/LCSD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM10 |
Compensatory Planting. For trees
unavoidably affected by the Project that have to be removed, where practical
transplantation will be chosen as the top priority method of removal but if
this is not possible or practical (e.g. the tree is too large or has a low
survival rate) compensatory planting will be provided for trees unavoidably
felled. All felled trees shall be compensated for by planting trees to the
satisfaction of relevant Government departments. Required numbers and
locations of compensatory trees shall be determined and agreed separately
with Government during the Tree Felling Application process under ETWBTC
3/2006. According to the 2010 Tree Survey, 2,401heavy standard trees with 80mm
DBH trees would have been required to compensate for the loss of about 1141
trees with 192,030mm total DBH that would have been felled by the
Project. This allowed for 1:1 DBH
compenstation ratio and 1:2 quantity compensation ratio. If 100mm (rather
than 80mm) DBH heavy standard trees are used for compensatory planting, just
1,921 trees would be required for compensatory planting rather than 2,401. Due to Project re-alignment, other projects development (e.g. XRL) and
the updated Tree Survey due to be
carried out in mid 2013, the
numbers of trees affected by the Project has been reduced, particularly in
the West Portion. Although the final treatment of trees numbers will be
subject to the final Tree Felling Application, it is now estimated that
approximately 300 trees that were previously due to be felled, will no longer
be affected by the Project.. Assuming a 5 m centre to centre
spacing for planting 100mm DBH heavy standard trees, an approximate area of
21 m2 is required for each compensatory tree. It has been
estimated that each area is able to absorb the following number of
compensatory trees and transplanting trees:East Portion - 505 in KTD and 75
in Ma Tau Kok; Central Portion area – 26; West Portion – 765 i.e.
TOTAL 1371. In the worst case scenario (using 2010 Tree Survey Report felling
number) this approximate calculation estimates it will be necessary to agree
additional receptor sites for approximately 550 compensatory trees, but given
the reduction in felled trees in the West Portion, this number is likely to
reduce. |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD/LCSD (LCSD for roadside planting) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM11 |
Screen planting. Tall screen/buffer trees, shrubs and
climbers should be planted, in so far as is possible, to soften and screen
proposed structures such as roads and central strip, vertical edges and
buildings and to enhance streetscape greening effect where appropriate. Indiscriminate selection of tree
species for screening should be avoided and the principle of ‘right
tree for the right place’ followed. This detail will be provided at the
Detailed Design stage. This measure may additionally form part of the compensatory planting
and will improve and create a pleasant pedestrian environment. |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD/LCSD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM12 |
Green Roof. Roof greening will be established on
ventilation and administration buildings to reduce exposure to untreated
concrete surfaces and particularly mitigate visual impact to VSRs at high
levels. |
HyD |
HyD |
Building proponent |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM13 |
Reinstatement. All works areas, excavated areas and
disturbed areas for tunnel construction and temporary road diversion or any
other proposed works shall be reinstated to former conditions or better, with
reasonable landscape treatment and to the satisfaction of the relevant
Government departments. (Specific
mitigation for disturbance to public open space is detailed separately under
MM14). |
HyD |
HyD |
Relevant Government departments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM14 |
Re-provising of Public Open Space. All areas of
public open space affected by the Project will be re-provisioned either at
the same location following the completion of temporary works, or at a
separate site, as agreed with relevant Government departments. Open space should be re-provisioned in
an enhanced manner. Under the proposed development, approximately 980 m2 of
Public Square Street Playground (LR1.1a), 1,400m2 of Shanghai
Street / Market Street Playground (LR1.1b), 310m2 of the Bazaar
(LR1.1c), and 365m2 of Temple Street / Kansu Street Temporary Rest
Garden (LR1.1d) will be temporarily closed and affected during the
construction stage. Following construction, the same areas affected will be
re-provisioned in situ for the Public Square Street Playground (LR1.1a) and
Temple Street / Kansu Street Temporary Rest Garden (LR1.1d). Similarly the same area of the
Shanghai Street / Market Street Playground (LR1.1b) and of the Bazaar
(LR1.1c) will be re-provisioned/ reinstated. The Yau Ma Tei Jade market
(LR1.1e Jade Hawker Bazaar) will be demolished during construction, re-sited
to a temporary location and ultimately reinstated back at its original
location, underneath the alignment. In addition some new open space areas are
proposed; the original Yau Ma Tei Specialist Clinic Extension Site and
Proposed Yau Mau Tei Landscape Deck are both new public open spaces, such
that overall more public open space will be re-provisioned/ reinstated than
is taken during construction. Summary of Public Open Space
Landscape Resource Affected
Summary of Proposed New Open Space
|
HyD |
HyD |
LCSD / ArchSD (Hard landscape works) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM15 |
Landscape Enhancement. Implement a comprehensive landscape
plan to maximize the greening opportunity and create a unique landscape for
the project to blend in with the surrounding, including in re-provisioned
areas. In particular,: -
landscape enhancement of
re-provisioned Public Transport Interchange; -
landscape deck on tunnel
portals; -
viaduct planters for trailer
planting, -
vertical greening of piers
and walls with climbers or trailer planting; -
roadside planting i.e.
planting along central dividers and on road islands e.g. in the middle of
roundabouts. (Roadside planting i.e. at the road edge and not in the central
divider or road island, and vertical greening may be considered part of
Screen Planting) Purpose-built maintenance access without temporary traffic arrangement
must be provided and detailed design of landscape decks and planting,
including details of maintenance access locations, will be sent to
maintenance and management parties for endorsement and ensures these
mitigation measures are feasible.
|
HyD |
HyD |
Contractor/ Other Government Departments. E.g. HyD,
LandsD, LCSD (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MM16 |
Lighting Control during Operation. Roadside lighting
and that at the ventilation and administration buildings should be controlled
so as to minimize the visual impacts at night. For the enclosed noise
barriers, lighting will be provided by two rows of continuous fluorescent
lights mounted along the ceiling of the noise enclosure so drivers see
continuous lines on the ceiling.. |
HyD |
HyD |
HyD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) |
Contractor responsible during the agreed
establishment and maintenance period.
Other designated management & maintenance agents to take up
maintenance and management of landscaping after end of agreed period, as
guided by ETWB TC(W) No. 2/2004 ‘Maintenance of
Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features’ i.e. HyD within the boundary of
expressways; LandsD on unallocated/unleased Government land not maintained by
other departments; LCSD along non-expressway public roads. |
10.10.3
Cumulative Landscape Impact
West
Portion
Part of the works area at the
west of tunnel portal is interfaced with proposed tunnel works and ventilation
building of Express Rail Link (XRL). As the construction methods of XRL are
similarly by cut and cover tunnel, the potential impacts on existing landscape
resources will be the similar. There is also a barging point at Kwai Chung
currently being used by XRL which is proposed to remain as a barging point for
CKR. XRL project construction started in January 2010, prior to CKR and a
number of trees within the works area that is currently XRL but will be handed
over to CKR in January 2015, have already been removed for the XRL project.
Landscape impacts due to the CKR Project in this area are therefore
reduced.
Central Portion
Works area for Central Portion
is not interfaced with nearby major development such as Kwun Tong Line
Extension. Therefore, no cumulative landscape impact is anticipated.
East
Portion
Part of the works area within To
Kwa Wan and former
The KTD project commenced in
2009 with completion of the project beyond 2020 in seven packages. CKR will be
commissioned earlier.
10.11
Visual Impact Assessment
10.11.1
Potential Sources of Visual Impact
Visual
impacts may be caused by various factors during construction and operation and
these are similar to sources of landscape impacts as described in Section 10.9.1. In addition to the
landscape impacts described in Section 10.9.1, additional potential sources of visual impact
are described below:
From
Construction Site & Operation
·
Noise barriers, in the form of noise enclosures, semi-enclosures,
cantilever and vertical barriers;
·
Temporary traffic and road diversions;
·
Temporary construction traffic;
·
Night time lighting;
·
Dust during dry weather.
Some
details regarding the impacts experienced by VSRs in each section are provided
below and the magnitude of change on each of the VSRs that were listed in the
Baseline Study (Section 10.8), are provided in Table
10.12.
Regarding
the compatibility of the Project with the surroundings, this has been discussed
in Section 10.9.2.
The Project is generally thought to be compatible with the surroundings
during operation and less so during the site formation, demolition and
construction works and this is not repeated in the Table
10.12. Largely because of this, visual impacts
are often considered more severe during construction compared to operation and
this is also reflected Table 10.12.
All 13
VPs are mapped in Figure 10.19 and also shown for each section in Figure 10.13 (West Portion), Figure 10.14 (Central Portion) and Figure 10.15 (East Portion).
Photomontages are provided in Figure 10.20, Figure 10.21, Figure 10.22, Figure 10.23, Figure 10.24, Figure 10.25, Figure 10.26, Figure 10.27, Figure 10.28, Figure 10.29, Figure 10.30, Figure 10.31 and Figure 10.32.
West Portion
Prior
to mitigation, visual impacts in this area are primarily because of the
construction of connection road, cut and cover tunnel, ventilation building and
the erecting noise barriers including a landscape deck. During construction this will also
involve impacts from excavation works, stockpiling of excavated materials;
general work sites and works area, traffic diversions, obstruction of views
arising from hoarding as well as the removal of trees, either by felling or
transplanting which will also be an impact felt during operation.
The
re-provisioning of a short section of GRF before widening will be constructed
and commissioned at about the same time as the demolition of Yau Ma Tei Carpark
Building. As the re-provisioned section of GRF is only slightly shifted to the
north of the existing alignment while maintaining the same number of lanes and
height, there would be no additional visual impact to the construction and
operation phase of CKR. The landscape and visual impact assessment of widening
of GRF is subject to another EIA study under EIA study brief (ESB-155/2006).
In
general, the closer the VSRs to the impacts, the larger the magnitude of change
as there will be higher potential that views from these VSRs will be fully or
partially blocked by the construction activities.
Photomontages
for this area are shown in Figure 10.20, Figure 10.21, Figure 10.22, Figure 10.23 and Figure 10.24, taking into consideration other developments
in the area, such as XRL and proposed GIC buildings. They help illustrate the conclusions
reached as to the severity of visual impacts both prior to mitigation, and
following implementation of mitigation measures.
Central Portion
The
impacts in this area are primarily due to the construction of the ventilation
building and access road, as well as the associated removal of trees, either by
felling or transplanting. Temporary works sites and temporary noise mitigation
measures, traffic diversions, and hoarding may also cause some obstruction of
views.
Similarly,
to in the West Portion, the closer the VSRs to the impacts, the more likely
that visual impact will be significant, although this is not necessarily true
with viewers at lower levels whose views to the Project Site are sometimes
blocked by vegetation and/or existing structures whereas viewers at higher
elevations further from the site may have more open views to it.
Photomontages
for this area are shown in Figure 10.25, Figure 10.26 and Figure 10.32 and help illustrate the conclusions reached as
to the severity of visual impacts both prior to mitigation, and following
implementation of mitigation measures.
East Portion
The
impacts in this area are primarily due to the construction of all above ground
structures including the depressed road and other connection roads, landscape
decks, ventilation and administration building, tunnel portals, cut and cover
tunnel, and works associated with building the underwater tunnel. During construction this will also involve
impacts from excavation works, excavated material stockpiles, as well as the
associated removal of trees, either by felling or transplanting. In addition
the temporary works sites, temporary noise mitigation measures, traffic
diversions and hoarding may obstruct views.
As
per the other areas, the closer the VSRs to the impacts, the more likely that
visual impact will be significant, although this is not necessarily true with
viewers at lower levels whose views to the Project Site are sometimes blocked by
vegetation and/or existing structures whereas viewers at higher elevations
further from the site may have more open views to it.
In
addition, in the East Portion some VSRs will lose their views to the CKR site
once KTD has been fully built, so significance of visual impacts may change
over time.
Photomontages
for this area are shown in Figure 10.27, Figure 10.28, Figure 10.29, Figure 10.30 and Figure 10.31 and take into consideration the complex
ongoing development at Kai Tak.
They help illustrate how the CKR integrates with the KTD and support the
conclusions reached as to the severity of visual impacts both prior to mitigation,
and following implementation of mitigation measures.
Table 10.12 Magnitude of Change on VSRs
VSR Code |
Type of VSRs |
VSR Name |
Approx. Min Distance between VSR & Impact Sources
(Road/ Building) (m) |
Scale of the Development (Small, Medium, Large) |
Description of Key Impacts |
Duration of Impacts (Construction/ Operation) |
Potential Blockage of View (Full/Partial/Nil) |
Magnitude of Change |
||
Construction |
Operation |
|||||||||
West
Portion |
||||||||||
R1.1 |
Residential |
One
SilverSea |
750/
920 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.2 |
Residential |
Island
Harbourview |
620/
800 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.3 |
Residential |
|
130/
400 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.4 |
Residential |
Charming
Garden |
200/
300 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
R1.5 |
Residential |
|
250/
540 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and, to a lesser degree, the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.6 |
Residential |
|
290/
740 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and, to a lesser degree, the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.7 |
Residential |
Prosperous
Garden |
240/
560 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and, to a lesser degree, the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
R1.8 |
Residential |
Kansu Street
High Rise Buildings |
0/
720 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and, to a lesser degree, the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Full |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
R1.9 |
Residential |
|
150/450 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and, to a lesser degree, the ventilation building; • The
connection roads and tunnel portal will be visible due to their proximity to
the site and will largely change their view, however the ventilation building
is further away and beyond the Planned Public Open Space above the future
XRL-terminus and this element will not change their view to such an extent. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
R1.10 |
Residential |
|
270/
480 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
R1.11 |
Residential |
The
Coronation |
30/
320 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck, fully enclosed noise barrier over Ferry Street and the
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
R1.12 |
Residential |
Planned
Residential Development above Austin Station |
360/
680 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Small |
R1.13 |
Residential |
|
700/
1120 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R1.14 |
Residential |
The
Hermitage |
500/
680 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C1.1 |
Commercial |
Bank of |
600/
770 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C1.2 |
Commercial |
HSBC Centre |
560/
750 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C1.3 |
Commercial |
Eaton Hotel |
170/
1010 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads and, to
a lesser degree, the landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C1.4 |
Commercial |
ICC &
Ritz Carlton Hotel |
720/
840 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C1.5 |
Commercial |
Planned
Commercial Development above XRL Terminus |
240/
570 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and
ventilation building; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Small |
C1.6 |
Commercial |
|
160/
650 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and, to
a lesser degree, the landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC1.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Ti |
100/
200 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
GIC1.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
50/
280 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, connection roads, landscape deck,
ventilation building and to a lesser degree the tunnel portal; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC1.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
120/
540 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck, fully enclosed noise barrier over Ferry Street and
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC1.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei Division Police Station |
0/
610 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads and
noise barriers; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
GIC1.5 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei
Jockey Club Polyclinic |
0/
700 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal and connection roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
GIC1.6 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Henry G.
Leong Yaumatei Community Centre |
20/
750 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, and connection road; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC1.7 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
240/1050 |
Medium |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection road and, to
a lesser degree, the ventilation building; •
Demolition of Yau Ma Tei Specialist Clinic Extension and Yau Ma • The
connection road and tunnel portal will be fairly visible from higher levels
of this location and the view will change a little. However this is not a high rise VSR
and views to site are partial. In
addition the ventilation building is distant so this element will not change
the view very much. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
GIC1.8 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Civil Aid
Services Headquarter |
40/
180 |
Large |
•
Construction of connection roads, noise barriers, landscape deck and the
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC1.9 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Planned GIC
Site |
10/
120 |
Large |
•
Construction of connection roads, noise barriers, landscape deck and the
ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
n/a |
Intermediate |
O1.1 |
Occupational |
LPG Filling
Station at |
10/
310 |
Large |
•
Construction of connection roads, noise barriers (including full enclosure at
Ferry Street), landscape deck and the ventilation building and to a lesser
degree the cut and cover tunnel and tunnel portal; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
RE1.1 |
Recreational |
Olympic
Plaza |
130/
340 |
Medium |
•
Construction of connection roads and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
RE1.2 |
Recreational |
|
80/
340 |
Medium |
•
Construction of connection roads and ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
RE1.3 |
Recreational |
|
0/
580 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, connection roads,
landscape deck and to a lesser degree the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
RE1.4 |
Recreational |
Yau Ma |
30/
800 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal, and connection roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
RE1.5 |
Recreational |
|
90/
800 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, tunnel portal and connection road and
possibly the ventilation building to a lesser degree; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
RE1.6 |
Recreational |
Planned
Public Open Space above future XRL-terminus and surrounding |
0/
120 |
Large |
• This
VSR is only due to come into existence after CKR is commissioned. |
n/a /
Permanent |
Partial |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Intermediate |
RE1.7 |
Recreational |
Planned
Public Open space north of |
0/
440 |
Large |
• This
VSR is only due to come into existence after CKR is commissioned. |
n/a /
Permanent |
Partial |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Intermediate |
T1.1 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
|
0/0 |
Large |
•
Construction of connection roads, landscape deck, ventilation building and to
a lesser degree the cut and cover tunnel and portal; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
Central
Portion |
||||||||||
R2.1 |
Residential |
15 Ho Man
Tin Hill |
460 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
R2.2 |
Residential |
Ellery
Terrace |
330 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
R2.3 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate King Man House |
420 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
R2.4 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate ( |
150 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R2.5 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin
Estate |
60 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
R2.6 |
Residential |
|
150 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R2.7 |
Residential |
|
180 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R2.8 |
Residential |
Future
Redevelopment of |
300 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Small |
R2.9 |
Residential |
HK
Polytechnic University Student Hostel Development |
460 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
R2.10 |
Residential |
Oi Man
Estate |
80 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; • The
ventilation building will just be visible over existing vegetation and the
existing reservoir, to residents at higher levels, but will integrate into
the existing view rather than block it. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
GIC2.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Ho Man Tin
Government Offices |
60 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC2.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
SKH Tsoi
Kung |
30 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
large |
Intermediate |
GIC2.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Housing
Authority Headquarters |
35 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; • The
ventilation building will be highly visible due to its proximity. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Intermediate |
GIC2.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Housing
Authority Mock-up Centre |
60
(but within a separate works area) |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
RE2.1 |
Recreational |
Ho Man Tin
East Service Reservoir Playground |
260 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; • Use
of the Housing Authority Mock-up Centre as temporary storage area during construction; • At
operation, the ventilation building will be visible but largely blocked by
vegetation surrounding the reservoir. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
RE2.2 |
Recreational |
|
40 |
Small |
•
Construction of the ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
T2.1 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
Fat |
25 |
Small |
•
Construction ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
T2.2 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
|
15 |
Small |
•
Construction ventilation building; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
East
Portion |
||||||||||
R3.1 |
Residential |
|
540/
960 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation and PTI
reinstatement which these VSRs are right next to. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
R3.2 |
Residential |
Grand
Waterfront |
350/
780 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation and PTI
reinstatement which these VSRs are right next to. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
R3.3 |
Residential |
|
740/
980 |
Medium |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R3.4 |
Residential |
High Rise
Developments along Prince Edward Road West (Including Padek Palace; New
Development on Nga Tsin Long Road; Prince Ritz; Tung Sing Court) |
1060/
1100 |
Small |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
R3.5 |
Residential |
High Rise
Developments along |
1000/
1100 |
Small |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads; • The
views of these elements will integrate with KTD at operation and these VSRs
will have limited, if any, views to the CKR development structures as they
will be blocked by such structures as the planned commercial development
(C3.9) and planned residential developments (R3.8) in Kai Tak. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
R3.6 |
Residential |
Choi Hung
Estate |
1060/
1350 |
Small |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads; • The
views of these elements will integrate with KTD at operation and these VSRs
will have limited, if any, views to the CKR development structures as they
will be blocked by such structures as the planned commercial development
(C3.9) and planned GIC developments (GIC3.2) in Kai Tak. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
R3.7 |
Residential |
|
640/
900 |
Medium |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the
ventilation and administration buildings and connecting roads as well as the
tunnel portal and depressed road to a lesser degree in the distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R3.8 |
Residential |
Planned
Residential Development in Kai Tak |
120/
220 |
Large |
• Once
built, residents at higher levels may have views to the ventilation and
administration buildings and connecting roads in the foreground and possibly
the tunnel portal and depressed road in the distance; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Intermediate |
R3.9 |
Residential |
|
780/
1200 |
Small |
•
Unlike residents in Wyler Gardens, residents at high levels of this VSR have
their view to the cut and cover tunnel works to its north blocked by other
buildings and mainly face towards the KTD south apron |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
R3.10 |
Residential |
Laguna Verde
Complex and Harbourfront Landmark |
1300/
1800 |
Small |
•
Residents of this VSR facing north have their panoramic views to the
construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads in the Kai Tak area; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
CR3.1 |
Commercial/
Residential |
Comprehensive
Development Area around |
340/
740 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the tunnel portal, temporary reclamation, depressed road and
to a lesser degree the ventilation and administration buildings and connecting
roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
CR3.2 |
Commercial/
Residential |
Planned
Commercial/ Residential Development in Kai Tak |
740/
880 |
Small |
• Once
built, views in these developments will be affected by the operation of the
connecting roads; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Small |
C3.1 |
Commercial |
Newport
Centre (partly in CDA of OZP) |
300/
640 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the tunnel portal, temporary reclamation, depressed road
close by across the water and to a lesser degree the ventilation and
administration buildings and connecting roads in the distance; •
Changes to Ma Tau Kok waterfront e.g. Pier changes and extra marine traffic; • At
operation, views of CKR elements will integrate into KTD and may be blocked
or not be prominent. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.2 |
Commercial |
|
520/
960 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation and PTI reinstatement
which these VSRs are right next to. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
C3.3 |
Commercial |
|
960/
1060 |
Small |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel portal,
depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and connecting
roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
C3.4 |
Commercial |
|
1000/
1200 |
Small |
•
Residents at higher levels will have views to the construction of the tunnel
portal, depressed road, ventilation and administration buildings and
connecting roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Negligible |
C3.5 |
Commercial |
|
120/
500 |
Medium |
•
Viewers at higher levels will have views to the construction of the
ventilation and administration buildings and connecting roads and may be able
to see the tunnel portal and depressed road construction to a lesser degree
in the distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.6 |
Commercial |
|
150/
600 |
Small |
• For viewers
at higher levels, main impacts will be from construction of the connecting
roads and the ventilation and administration buildings in the distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.7 |
Commercial |
|
100/
780 |
Small |
• For
viewers at higher levels, main impacts will be from construction of the
connecting roads and the ventilation and administration buildings in the
distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.8 |
Commercial |
|
10/
180 |
Large |
•
Viewers at higher levels will have views to the construction of the
ventilation and administration buildings and connecting roads and the tunnel
portal and depressed road construction to a lesser degree in the distance; • This
VSR is right next to construction of the ventilation and administration
buildings and these elements will party block some of their views; • CKR
elements will integrate with KTD at operation but many connecting roads
directly border this VSR and so the magnitude of change will remain large. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Large |
C3.9 |
Commercial |
Planned Commercial
Development in Kai Tak |
750/
850 |
Small |
• Once
development in KTD area is complete, this VSR's views to the CKR elements
will be largely screened by other buildings and the CKR is being designed to
complement the KTD, so no adverse visual impact is expected. |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a /
Irreversible |
n/a |
Negligible |
C3.10 |
Commercial |
United Daily
News Centre |
700/
1200 |
Medium |
•
Unlike residents in Wyler Gardens, viewers at high levels of this VSR have
their view to the cut and cover tunnel works just to its north blocked by
other buildings and mainly face towards the KTD south apron |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.11 |
Commercial |
|
400/
740 |
Small |
• For
viewers at higher levels, main impacts will be from construction of the
connecting roads and the ventilation and administration buildings in the
distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
C3.12 |
Commercial |
Billion
Centre |
50/
550 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the connecting roads and possibly the ventilation and
administration buildings; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
C3.13 |
Commercial |
|
250/
650 |
Small |
• For
viewers at higher levels, main impacts will be from construction of the
connecting roads and the ventilation and administration buildings in the
distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
C3.14 |
Commercial |
Industrial
Buildings along |
80/
460 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the connecting roads and possibly the ventilation and
administration buildings; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Small |
Small |
GIC3.1 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
EMSD
Headquarters |
10/
260 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the ventilation and administration building and connecting
roads for the existing viewers; • Once
development in KTD area is complete, this VSR is close to the CKR connecting
roads and the ventilation and administration buildings, so these will
partially block the view; • Key
changes of view will also be caused by KTD structures such as the planned
residential buildings (R3.8), Multi Purpose Stadium Complex (RE3.2) and
Regional Open Space (RE3.1) |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
GIC3.2 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
Planned
Government Buildings in Kai Tak |
20/
100 |
Medium |
• Once
development in KTD area is complete, this VSR is close to the CKR connecting roads
and the ventilation and administration buildings, so these will partially
block the view; |
n/a /
Permanent |
Partial |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
n/a |
Small |
GIC3.3 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
|
650/
1120 |
Large |
•
Viewers in this VSR have their view to the cut and cover tunnel works just to
its north blocked by the vehicle inspection centre and any relevant views are
mainly of KTD; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
GIC3.4 |
Government/
Institution/ Community |
EMSD Workshops |
260/
580 |
Medium |
•
Construction of the tunnel portal, temporary reclamation, depressed road
close by across the water and to a lesser degree the ventilation and
administration buildings and connecting roads in the distance; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
RE3.1 |
Recreational |
Planned
Regional Open Space in Kai Tak |
0/
120 |
Small |
• Once
development in KTD area is complete, this VSR's views to the CKR elements
will be largely screened by other buildings and the CKR is being designed to
complement the KTD, so no adverse visual impact is expected. |
n/a /
Permanent |
Nil |
n/a
e/ Irreversible |
n/a |
Negligible |
RE3.2 |
Recreational |
Planned
Multi Purpose Stadium Complex in Kai Tak |
0/
200 |
Small |
• Once
development in KTD area is complete, this VSR's views to the CKR elements
will be largely screened by other buildings and the CKR is being designed to
complement the KTD, so no adverse visual impact is expected. |
n/a
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
n/a |
Negligible |
RE3.3 |
Recreational |
Current and
Future Waterfront Promenade at Ma Tau Kok |
240/
580 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation and PTI
reinstatement which these VSRs are right next to. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
O3.1 |
Occupational |
The |
500/
850 |
Large |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation and PTI
reinstatement which these VSRs are very near to. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Large |
Small |
O3.2 |
Occupational |
Petrol
Station at |
10/
400 |
Large |
•
Construction of the connecting roads and possibly the ventilation and
administration buildings; • The
connecting roads will affect this ground level VSR most, being so close, but
will blend well with the existing view of Kwun Tong Bypass; •
Other elements of the Project are unlikely to be visible as blocked by e.g.
Kwun Tong Bypass; • Key
changes of view will be caused by KTD structures rather than CKR structures
which will have limited impact. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
T3.1 |
Transport
Related |
Kwun Tong
Bypass |
0/
320 |
Small |
•
Construction of ventilation and administration buildings and connecting
road. |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
T3.2 |
Travel/
Transport Related |
Harbour
Traffic |
150/
540 |
Small |
•
Construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation, tunnel portal,
depressed road, ventilation and administration building and connecting roads; |
Temporary/
Permanent |
Nil |
Partly
reversible/ Irreversible |
Intermediate |
Small |
10.11.3
Significance of Visual Impacts
Using
the sensitivities of the VSRs described in the Baseline Study (Section 10.8) and the magnitude of change on each VSR ascertained in Table 10.12, the matrix shown in Table
10.13 has been used to calculate the significance of
visual impacts before mitigation as shown in Table
10.11.
Before
mitigation, during construction, substantial impacts are experienced by a
number of VSR in each area of the Project. In the West Portion high rise
residential buildings with open views of a large extent of the Project,
particularly if close to it, are substantially affected as well as a number of
G/IC buildings again particularly those within the Works Area or very close to
the Project. One recreational VSR
is also substantially impacted during construction; the
Using
the mitigation measures described in Section
10.10, the
residual impact for construction and operation day 1 and year 10 are also
provided in Table 10.13.
Measures to mitigate visual impacts are largely general and although
they can be applied to specific elements of the Project (e.g. Landscape
enhancement – landscape deck), most of them are required in combination
to contribute to the mitigation of visual impacts on a particular VSR.
Generally visual mitigation measures are not considered to reduce visual
impacts to a lower significance level at construction and are most effective at
operation, therefore substantial impacts, as described above, may still be
experienced by a number of VSRs during construction.
For all
the impacts that are classified as substantial at operation prior to
mitigation, measures to consider visual aspects in detailed design (MM 2),
Green Roofs (MM12) and Landscape Enhancement (MM15) are key to their
mitigation. MM15 in particular aims
to maximize greening opportunities, including through provision of landscape
decks in the West and East Portions, including planters on viaducts, providing
roadside planting, on buildings and greening vertical walls and piers which all
enhances the visual aspect of the Project to those looking on. In addition, the protection,
preservation, transplantation and compensation of trees (MM8, MM9, MM10) are
very important in retaining a green aspect and reducing visual impacts. Other
slightly more general measures such as good site management (MM3), screen
hoarding (MM4), controlling lighting during construction and operation (MM5 and
MM16) are also important visual mitigation measures.
With the implementation of these mitigation measures, residual impacts at day 1 of operation are considered to be ‘moderately adverse’ for six VSRs, the Kansu Street High Rise Buildings (R1.8) and The Coronation (R1.11) as well as four GIC VSRs: Yau Ma Tei Division Police Station (GIC1.4), Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club Polyclinic (GIC1.5), and Henry G. Leong Yaumatei Community Centre (GIC1.6). Impacts on all other VSRs are ‘slightly adverse’ or insignificant. By year 10 of operation however, all impacts have reduced to ‘slightly adverse’ at worst and a number of VSRs are considered to benefit from the Project. The viewers along the Current and Future Waterfront Promenade at Ma Tau Kok (RE3.3) are considered to benefit moderately, while four VSRs will slightly benefit. These are the viewers in the Comprehensive Development Area around Ma Tau Kok Road (CR3.1), Newport Centre (C3.1), Kapok Industrial Building (C3.2) and Holy Carpenter Primary School (GIC3.3). These beneficial impacts are due to the enhanced waterfront promenade at Ma Tau Kok.
Table 10.13 Significance
of Visual Impact on VSRs, both before and upon Mitigation
* Denotes future VSRs that will not be in existence
when construction for the Project starts.
† Measures
to mitigate visual impacts are largely general. Although they can be applied to specific
elements of the Project (e.g. Landscape enhancement – landscape deck),
most of them are required in combination to contribute to the mitigation of
visual impacts on a particular VSR.
Id No. |
VSR Type |
VSR Name |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change BEFORE Mitigation (Negligible, Small,
Intermediate, Large) |
Impact Significance BEFORE Mitigation (Insignificant,
Slight, Moderate, Substantial) |
Recommended Mitigation Measures† |
Residual Impact Significance UPON Mitigation |
||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction & Operation |
Construction |
Operation Day 1 |
Operation Year 10 |
||||
West Portion |
|||||||||||
R1.1 |
Residential |
One SilverSea |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.2 |
Residential |
Island Harbourview |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.3 |
Residential |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.4 |
Residential |
Charming Garden |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.5 |
Residential |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.6 |
Residential |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.7 |
Residential |
Prosperous Garden |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.8 |
Residential |
Kansu Street High Rise Buildings |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
R1.9 |
Residential |
|
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.10 |
Residential |
|
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.11 |
Residential |
The Coronation |
High |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
R1.12 |
Residential |
Planned Residential Development above
Austin Station |
High* |
n/a |
Small |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.13 |
Residential |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R1.14 |
Residential |
The Hermitage |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.1 |
Commercial |
Bank of |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.2 |
Commercial |
HSBC Centre |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.3 |
Commercial |
Eaton Hotel |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.4 |
Commercial |
ICC & Ritz Carlton Hotel |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.5 |
Commercial |
Planned Commercial Development above XRL
Terminus |
Low* |
n/a |
Small |
n/a |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C1.6 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC1.1 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Ti |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC1.2 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
|
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC1.3 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
|
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC1.4 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei Division
Police Station |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
GIC1.5 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Yau Ma Tei Jockey Club Polyclinic |
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Substantial |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
GIC1.6 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Henry G. Leong Yaumatei Community Centre |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Moderate |
Slight |
GIC1.7 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
|
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
GIC1.8 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Civil Aid Services Headquarter |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC1.9 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Planned GIC Site |
Medium* |
n/a |
Intermediate |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
O1.1 |
Occupational |
LPG Filling Station at |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE1.1 |
Recreational |
Olympic Plaza |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE1.2 |
Recreational |
|
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE1.3 |
Recreational |
|
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE1.4 |
Recreational |
Yau Ma |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE1.5 |
Recreational |
|
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE1.6 |
Recreational |
Planned Public Open Space above future
XRL-terminus and surrounding |
Medium* |
n/a |
Intermediate |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE1.7 |
Recreational |
Planned Public Open space north of |
Medium* |
n/a |
Intermediate |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
T1.1 |
Travel/ Transport Related |
|
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
Central Portion |
|||||||||||
R2.1 |
Residential |
15 Ho Man Tin Hill |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.2 |
Residential |
Ellery Terrace |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.3 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin Estate King Man House |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.4 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin Estate ( |
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.5 |
Residential |
Ho Man Tin Estate |
High |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.6 |
Residential |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.7 |
Residential |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.8 |
Residential |
Future Redevelopment of |
High* |
n/a |
Small |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.9 |
Residential |
HK Polytechnic University Student Hostel
Development |
High |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R2.10 |
Residential |
Oi Man Estate |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
GIC2.1 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Ho Man Tin Government Offices |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC2.2 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
SKH Tsoi Kung |
Medium |
large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC2.3 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Housing Authority Headquarters |
Medium |
Large |
Intermediate |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC2.4 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Housing Authority Mock-up Centre |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Substantial |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE2.1 |
Recreational |
Ho Man Tin East Service Reservoir
Playground |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
RE2.2 |
Recreational |
|
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
T2.1 |
Travel/ Transport Related |
Fat |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
T2.2 |
Travel/ Transport Related |
Chung hau Street and |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
East Portion |
|||||||||||
R3.1 |
Residential |
|
High |
Large |
Small |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.2 |
Residential |
Grand Waterfront |
High |
Large |
Small |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.3 |
Residential |
|
High |
Intermediate |
Small |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.4 |
Residential |
High Rise Developments along Prince
Edward Road West (Including Padek Palace; New Development on Nga Tsin Long
Road; Prince Ritz; Tung Sing Court) |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
R3.5 |
Residential |
High Rise Developments along |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
R3.6 |
Residential |
Choi Hung Estate |
Medium |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
R3.7 |
Residential |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.8 |
Residential |
Planned Residential Development in Kai
Tak |
High* |
n/a |
Intermediate |
n/a |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.9 |
Residential |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
R3.10 |
Residential |
Laguna Verde Complex and Harbourfront
Landmark |
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
CR3.1 |
Commercial/ Residential |
Comprehensive Development Area around |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Slightly beneficial |
CR3.2 |
Commercial/ Residential |
Planned Commercial/ Residential
Development in Kai Tak |
Medium* |
n/a |
Small |
n/a |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
C3.1 |
Commercial |
Newport Centre (partly in CDA of OZP) |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Slightly beneficial |
C3.2 |
Commercial |
|
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Slightly beneficial |
C3.3 |
Commercial |
|
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
C3.4 |
Commercial |
|
Low |
Small |
Negligible |
Slight |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
C3.5 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.6 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.7 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.8 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Large |
Large |
Substantial |
Moderate |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.9 |
Commercial |
Planned Commercial Development in Kai Tak |
Low* |
n/a |
Negligible |
n/a |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
C3.10 |
Commercial |
United Daily News Centre |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.11 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.12 |
Commercial |
Billion Centre |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.13 |
Commercial |
|
Medium |
Small |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
C3.14 |
Commercial |
Industrial Buildings along |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC3.1 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
EMSD Headquarters |
Medium |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
GIC3.2 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
Planned Government Buildings in Kai Tak |
Medium* |
n/a |
Small |
n/a |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
GIC3.3 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
|
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Slightly beneficial |
GIC3.4 |
Government/ Institution/ Community |
EMSD Workshops |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE3.1 |
Recreational |
Planned Regional Open Space in Kai Tak |
Medium* |
n/a |
Negligible |
n/a |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE3.2 |
Recreational |
Planned Multi Purpose Stadium Complex in
Kai Tak |
Medium* |
n/a |
Negligible |
n/a |
Insignificant |
2, 3,
4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
n/a |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
RE3.3 |
Recreational |
Current and Future Waterfront Promenade
at Ma Tau Kok |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Substantial |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Substantial |
Insignificant |
Moderately beneficial |
O3.1 |
Occupational |
The |
Low |
Large |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
O3.2 |
Occupational |
Petrol Station at |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
T3.1 |
Transport Related |
Kwun Tong Bypass |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Moderate |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Moderate |
Slight |
Insignificant |
T3.2 |
Travel/ Transport Related |
Harbour Traffic |
Low |
Intermediate |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
2, 3,
4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 |
Slight |
Insignificant |
Insignificant |
10.11.4
Cumulative Visual Impact
West
Portion
Since the CKR will use the same
cut-and-cover tunnel construction method as the Kowloon Southern Link, VSRs
within this ZVI will receive similar viewing experience during the construction
phase. The construction works of CKR will commence after the completion of
Kowloon Southern Link, so it will not cause accumulated impacts to the VSRs.
Part of the working areas will
interface with Hong Kong Section of Guangzhou - Shenzhen - Hong Kong Express
Rail Link (XRL), which commenced in January 2010 prior to CKR. Construction
methods are similar, and no addition visual impacts to adjacent VSRs are
expected.
The development of widening options
of Gasgoine Road Flyover (GRF) is divided into two parts: west section and east
section. The west section refers to the west of
In order to facilitate the
construction of CKR, some buildings along the west section such as Yau Ma Tei
Specialist Clinic Extension, Yau Ma Tei Carpark Building and Kowloon Government
Office will be demolished. Moreover, in order to allow the traffic flow in the
existing flyover to not be affected during the construction of CKR, a new deck
must be provided on the north side of the existing flyover before the
demolition of the existing flyover. The re-provisioned deck at the north of
existing GRF will serve as a permanent deck for maintaining the single 2-lane
2-way traffic flow during and after the demolition of the existing GRF. The
piers of the deck will be supported by the CKR tunnel structure. The re-provisioned
deck will be designed to allow future widening on both sides of the deck
without additional piers. Therefore, the widening works at west section will
not require constructing new piers for the widening section.
As the works area of GRF is
enclosed by CKR and the construction period of the west section is almost
parallel to CKR, no additional impacts are expected.
Central Portion
There are two MTR projects that
should be considered for cumulative impacts with CKR around the Central
Portion: the Ho Man Tin Station of the Kwun Tong Line Extension (KTE) from Yau
Ma Tei Station to a new Wampoa station (started and due to complete in 2015);
and the Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section (TAW-HUH) of the Shatin-Central Link (SCL)
(due to start construction in 2012 and complete in 2018). The projects are mainly underground but
both will use a new station at Ho Man Tin.
This station will be located to the south of the Central Portion, at the
ex-Valley Road Estate site which is not visible from the Central Portion site
due to topography, however, one pedestrian lift will be constructed under KTE,
adjacent to the proposed works area for the MVB, near Fat Kwong Street but
given the small nature of the works for this, it is thought unlikely to cause
additional visual impact and overall adjacent and planned VSRs are not expected
to suffer any greater visual impacts due to other projects considered.
East
Portion
The
alignment of CKR passes through the KTD and it has been coordinated and fully
incorporated into the design of KTD. The SCL (TAW-HUH) is also
an integral part of KTD, running across the north of the site and integrating
with CKR.
Therefore, no additional visual impact to adjacent or planned VSRs are
expected.
As
the majority of the CKR is underground, landscape and visual impacts would be
restricted to above ground construction works and operational facilities only.
It is considered there will be no substantial adverse landscape and visual
impacts to the surrounding sensitive receivers during the operation phase.
Based
on the 2010 Tree Survey, about 1304 trees will be
affected by the works and need to be removed by felling or transplanting, while
approximately 2812 will be retained.
The 2010 Tree Survey estimated approximately 163 trees would be suitable
for transplanting and approximately 1141 trees will not be suitable for
transplanting and would therefore require felling. Due to the Project
re-alignment and other projects development (e.g. XRL), the number of trees
affected by the CKR Project has reduced since the 2010 Tree Survey. An updated
Tree Survey will be carried out (due to commence mid 2013) and tree treatments
will only be finalised during the Tree Removal Application.
For
trees unavoidably affected by the Project that have to be removed, where
practical, transplantation will be chosen as the top priority method of removal
but if this is not possible or practical (e.g. the tree is too large or has a
low survival rate), compensatory planting will be provided for trees
unavoidably felled. The felled trees will be compensated for mainly within the
Project Boundary including on the future landscape deck near the western tunnel
portal but it is likely that it will be necessary to agree additional receptor
sites for some compensatory trees (and possibly transplanted trees). Using
worst case scenario numbers, current estimates predict additional receptor
sites will be required for approximately 550 trees but given the reduced
numbers of trees now affected by the Project, particularly in the West Portion,
this number is likely to be reduced.
No
Registered Old and Valuable Trees are located within the Works Area and none of
the affected trees are LCSD champion Trees or Registered Old and Valuable
Trees, neither are they rare or endangered species, but mainly common exotic
trees. All the trees with high amenity values that are unavoidably affected by
the works would be transplanted where possible. Detailed tree preservation,
transplanting and felling including compensatory planting proposals will be
submitted to the relevant Government Department for approval in due course in
accordance with ETWB TC no. 3/2006.
Part
of the public open spaces within the Works Area will be permanently taken by
connection road, tunnel portal, ventilation building or re-provisioned
community facilities, particularly in the West Portion. All areas of public
open space affected by the Project will be re-provisioned either at the same
location following the completion of temporary works, or at a separate site, as
agreed with relevant Government departments and under the proposed
development. Overall more public
open space will be re-provisioned/ reinstated than is taken during construction
providing a net benefit to the regional environment.
A
number of LRs in the East Portion are also considered to benefit from the
Project at operation once mitigation measures have been implemented. These
include Roadside Planting along
Impact
on Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) during construction would be primarily due
to construction activities including associated temporary works for the
construction of cut and cover tunnel, temporary reclamation, ventilation and
administration buildings and connecting roads. After implementation of
mitigation measures, there would be moderate adverse residual impacts on the
Transport Corridor Landscape (LCA1.1) in the West Portion and the Typhoon
Shelter (LCA3.4) and Transportation Corridor Landscape (LCA3.5) in the East
Portion during construction. The rest of the LCAs would experience slight or
insignificant residual impacts at this stage. With the implementation of
mitigation measures, at the design year (operation year 10), impacts from the
Project on all the LCAs would be insignificant.
Visual
impact during the construction phase would be primarily due to construction
activities such as excavation for cut and fill, temporary reclamation, piling
and demolition of existing buildings as well as actual construction of new
structures such as the ventilation and administration buildings, depressed and
connecting roads and tunnel portals including landscape deck. With
implementation of mitigation measures during construction, there would still be
some substantial impacts on VSRs adjacent or close to the CKR especially
residential and GIC VSRs while residual impacts on VSRs further away from the works
would be moderate to slight adverse except for those who will be shielded from
the view by future development in the former Kai Tak Airport area and not be
affected by the Project. After the implementation of mitigation measures in
operation year 10, visual impacts on all VSRs will be insignificant with the
exception of some slight adverse visual impacts on residential and GIC VSRs
that are close to the tunnel portal in the West Portion.
Considerable
effort has been made to integrate the CKR with KTD and overall the former
Overall, it is considered that
the adverse residual landscape and visual impacts of the proposed Project are
considered as acceptable with mitigation measures during construction and
operation phase.