Chapter 8 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
CONTENTS
8. Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
8.2 Environmental Legislation and Guidelines
8.3 Planning and Development Control Framework
8.6 Landscape
Impact Assessment
8.11 Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
List of Tables
Table 8‑1 Significant
Threshold of Landscape Impact
Table 8‑2 Significant
Threshold of Visual Impact
Table 8‑4 Changes
of Landscape Resources with Planned Development
Table 8‑6 Changes
of Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) with Planned Development
Table 8‑7 Tree
Species Composition within the Site
Table 8‑8 Identified
VSRs and Their Sensitivity (Existed and Planned)
Table 8‑9 Summary
of Proposed Action for Surveyed Trees in the Site
Table 8‑12 Magnitude
of Change for VSRs during Construction and Operational Phases
Table 8‑13 Significance
Visual Impacts during Construction and Operational Phases
List of Figures
Figure 8-1 Existing
Landscape Resources (LRs)
Figure 8-2 Landscape
Resources (LRs) with Planned Development
Figure 8-3 Existing
Landscape Character Area (LCAs)
Figure 8-4 Landscape
Character Area (LCAs) with Planned Development
Figure 8-5 Trees
Recommendation Plan
Figure 8-6 Existing
Visual Envelope (VE)
Figure 8-7 Existing
Visual Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)
Figure 8-8 Visual
Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) with Planned Development
Figure 8-9 Existing
Views and Photomontages from Block 1 of Metro Harbour (Viewpoint 2)
Figure 8-10 Existing Views
and Photomontages from Block 1 of Hampton Place (Viewpoint 3)
Figure 8-11 Existing
Views and Photomontages from Nam Cheong Station Exit on Yen Chow Street West
(Viewpoint 1)
Figure 8-12 Examples
of Temporary Landscape Treatment for Construction Phase
Appendix 8-1 Aerial
Photograph of Landscape Resources
Appendix 8-2 Photographs
of Key Landscape Resources
Appendix 8-3 Aerial
Photograph of Landscape Character Areas
Appendix 8-4 Trees
Species Composition within the Survey Area and Assessment Schedule
Appendix 8-5 Recommended
Tree and Shrub Species for Landscape Design
Appendix 8-6 Examples
of Landscape Finishes
Appendix 8-7 Conceptual
Master Landscape Design
8.1.1 This section presents the landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) for the construction and operation of the Project to outline and examine the landscape baseline conditions of existing landscape resources (LRs) and the landscape character areas (LCAs), the visual amenity, visually sensitive receivers (VSRs), and the planning and development control frameworks within the assessment area where Chapter 3 shows the project details. The assessment area includes all areas within 500m from the Project boundary, while the study area for the visual impact assessment is defined by the Visual Envelope of the Project (i.e. a zone of visual influence which should include all areas from which the proposed scheme of the Project can be seen). The assessment includes:
·
A definition of the scope and contents of the
proposed works;
·
A review of relevant planning and development
control framework;
·
A baseline study providing a comprehensive and accurate
description of the baseline landscape resources, landscape character areas and
visual sensitive receivers (VSRs);
·
Identification of the potential landscape and
visual impacts and prediction of their magnitude and potential significance,
before and after the mitigation measures;
·
Recommendations for appropriate mitigation
measures; and
·
An assessment of the acceptability or the predicted
residual impacts, according to Annex 10 of the Technical Memorandum on
Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM).
8.1.2 The landscape and visual impact assessment follows the criteria and guidelines as stated in Annexes 10 and 18 of the EIAO-TM. Illustrative materials supporting conclusions are provided and the locations of all key viewpoints have been clearly mapped. Photomontages at representative locations provide a comparison between existing views, proposals on day 1 after completion without and with mitigation measures, and in year 10 after completion with mitigation measures in accordance with EIAO Guidance Note No. 8/2010.
8.2
Environmental Legislation and
Guidelines
8.2.1 The assessment has been conducted in accordance with the following:
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO)
(Cap. 499);
·
EIAO-TM, particularly Annex 10 “Criteria for Evaluating
Visual and Landscape Impact” and Annex 18 “Guidelines for Landscape and Visual
Impact Assessment”;
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Guidance
Note No. 8/2010 “Preparation of Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment under
the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance”;
·
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131);
·
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines
Chapters 4 Recreation, Open Space and Greening, and Chapters 11 Urban Design
Guidelines;
·
WBTC No. 7/2002 Tree Planting in Public Works;
·
WBTC No. 3/2006 Tree Preservation;
·
WBTC No. 29/2004 Registration of Old And Valuable
Trees and the guidelines for Preservation;
·
WBTC No. 2/2004 Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard
Landscape Features;
·
WBTC No. 25/92 Allocation of Space for Urban Street
Trees;
·
Study on Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong;
·
Southwest Kowloon Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No.
S/K20/28;
·
Animals and Plants (Protection of Endangered
Species) Ordinance (Cap. 187); and
·
WBTC No. 14/2002 Management and Maintenance of
Natural Vegetation and Landscape Works and Tree Preservation.
8.3
Planning and Development Control Framework
8.3.1
The Site is situated in urban area in Cheung Sha Wan. The
Site falls within an area zoned as “Government, Institution or Community (GIC)”
on the latest South West Kowloon Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/K20/28
and designated as “Government” and “Cable / Drainage / WSD / MTRC Reserve” on
the draft South West Kowloon (Central Section) Outline Development Plan (ODP)
No. D/K20B/D.
According to the Notes of the OZP, the planning intention of the zone is
intended to “provide Government, institution and community facilities serving
the needs of the local residents and/or a wider district, region or the
territory. It is also intended to provide
land for users directly related to or in support of the work of the Government,
organizations providing social services to meet community needs, and other
institutional establishments”. The current proposed Depot is
fulfilling the planning intention.
8.3.2
While there is no building height or plot ratio restrictions stipulated
on the OZP for the subject site, the West Kowloon Reclamation Review Study
recommended building height and plot ratio restrictions of 30 metres above Hong
Kong Principal Datum (mPD) and 2.5 respectively. In
order to address site constraints and operational needs, these restrictions
would be slightly relaxed to 35.4 mPD and 3.75
accordingly.
Landscape Baseline Review and
Impact Assessment
8.4.1
The study area for the landscape impact assessment shall include all
areas within 500 metres distance from the boundary of the Site. The study area for the visual impact
assessment shall be defined by the visual envelope of the Site, i.e. zone of visual
inference of the proposed
Depot.
Identification of Landscape
Resources and Landscape Character Areas
8.4.2
The Baseline Study was conducted based on desktop study and field
surveys to identify and examine existing Landscape Resources / Characters Types
within the Landscape Assessment Study Area and Visual Resources within the Visual
Assessment Study Area.
8.4.3
Landscape Resources (LRs) refer to the basic landscape elements such as
topography, natural landscape form and patterns of settlement of built
features, land use, streetscapes, and any cultural, historical and/or religious
identity. A tree survey has been
conducted within the Project site and its immediately adjacent areas, in order
to identify the landscape resources and quality with respect to the tree
species characters, ecological/conservation value, health and structural conditions
of the existing trees of the Site.
8.4.4
Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) refer to a broad homogenous units
derived from the presence and combination of similar landscape characters
within the study area have been mapped and annotated on a plan.
Methodology of Landscape Impact
Assessment
8.4.5
Potential impacts arisen by the proposed Depot were assessed for both
construction and operation stages.
The impact assessments allow predictions to be made about the likely
levels and significance of landscape impacts. The assessment of landscape impacts will
result from:
·
the landscape character and its quality;
·
the sensitivity of the landscape in accommodating
change;
·
source, nature and magnitude of impacts;
·
the degree of change caused by the impacts to the existing
landscape;
·
significance of the change in consideration of the
local and regional areas and other developments;
·
cumulative effects with other proposals; and
·
identification of vegetation of significant
value which should be conserved.
8.4.6
The sensitivity/quality for landscape characters/resources would
normally be based on:
·
quality of landscape characters/resources;
·
ability of the landscape to accommodate change;
·
importance and rarity of special landscape
elements;
·
significance of the change in local and regional
context; and
·
maturity of the landscape.
8.4.7
The sensitivity/quality of the landscape character/resources will be
assessed as follows:
·
High: important
components or landscape of particularly distinctive character susceptible to
small changes;
·
Medium: a
landscape of moderately valued characteristics reasonably tolerant to change;
and
·
Low: a
relatively unimportant landscape, which is able to accommodate extensive
change.
8.4.8
The magnitude of change to landscape characters/resources would normally
be assessed by considering:
·
compatibility of the proposed project with the
surrounding landscape;
·
duration of impacts in construction and operation phase;
·
scale of development, and
·
reversibility of change.
8.4.9
The magnitude of change to landscape character/resources would be
classified as follows:
·
Large: notable change in the landscape characteristics
over an extensive area ranging to very intensive change over a more limited
area;
·
Intermediate: moderate
changes to a local area;
·
Small: changes to components; and
·
Negligible: no
perceptible changes.
8.4.10
The system for the assessment of the overall landscape impact is
summarized in Table 8‑1 below.
The significant threshold of landscape impact is derived from the
combined analysis of the magnitude of change and the landscape’s quality and
sensitivity. The matrix in Table 8‑1 indicates how the impact is derived.
Table 8‑1 Significant Threshold of
Landscape Impact
Magnitude of Change |
|
Sensitivity / Quality |
||
Low |
Medium |
High |
||
Large |
Moderate
Impact |
Moderate /
Significant Impact |
Significant
Impact |
|
Intermediate |
Slight
/Moderate Impact |
Moderate
Impact |
Moderate /
Significant Impact |
|
Small |
Slight Impact |
Slight /
Moderate Impact |
Moderate
Impact |
|
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Notes:
Significant: Adverse / beneficial impact where
the proposed depot-cum-office building would cause
significant degradation or improvement in existing landscape baseline
conditions.
Moderate: Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposed depot-cum-office building would cause noticeable
degradation or improvement in existing landscape baseline conditions.
Slight: Adverse /
beneficial impact where the proposed depot-cum-office building would cause a barely
noticeable degradation or improvement in existing landscape conditions
or where the changes brought about by the proposed depot would not be apparent in visual terms.
Negligible: The proposed depot-cum-office building does not perceptibly affect
the existing landscape baseline conditions.
Methodology of Visual Impact Assessment
·
visual compatibility with the surroundings;
·
their imposition of possible visual obstruction to neighbouring visual amenity; and
·
possible improvement of visual
quality.
8.4.12
The assessment of potential visual impacts will result from:
·
the sensitivity of the viewer groups at VSR
locations to change and visual intrusion; and
·
the magnitude of change to the visual baseline
condition.
8.4.13
The sensitivity of receivers is normally based on:
·
value and quality of existing views;
·
availability and amenity alternative views;
·
type and estimated number of receiver population;
·
duration or frequency of view; and
·
degree of visibility.
8.4.14 Using the criteria above, the
sensitivity of VSRs locations will be classified as follows:
·
High: VSRs are
highly sensitive to changes in their viewing experience
·
Medium: VSRs are
moderately sensitive to change in their viewing experience
·
Low: VSRs are
slightly sensitive to changes in their viewing experience
8.4.15
The assessment of the magnitude of change to VSR is normally based on:
·
compatibility of the proposed depot-cum-office
building with the surrounding landscape;
·
duration of impacts under construction and
operation phases;
·
scale of development;
·
reversibility of change;
·
viewing distance; and
·
potential blockage of view.
8.4.16
Research has shown that an object or development will dominate human
vision mainly depending on the amount of space occupied within the horizontal
field of view of the human eye. In
general, objects which occupy greater than approximately 30 degrees of the
field of view are considered to be visually intrusive. Using this criterion, the magnitude of
change to visual resources would be classified as follows:
·
Large: There would be major changes in view to the VSRs
·
Intermediate: There would be moderate changes in view to VSRs
·
Small: There would be minor changes in view to VSRs
·
Negligible: There would be no discernible changes in view to
VSRs
8.4.17 The significant threshold of visual
impact is rated in a similar fashion to the landscape impact and is illustrated
in Table 8‑2 below.
Table 8‑2 Significant Threshold
of Visual Impact
Magnitude of Change |
|
Sensitivity |
||
|
Low |
Medium |
High |
|
Large |
Moderate Impact |
Moderate / Significant Impact |
Significant Impact |
|
Intermediate |
Slight / Moderate Impact |
Moderate Impact |
Moderate / Significant Impact |
|
Small |
Slight Impact |
Slight / Moderate Impact |
Moderate Impact |
|
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Notes:
Significant: Adverse / beneficial impact where
the proposed depot-cum-office building would cause
significant degradation or improvement in existing visual baseline conditions.
Moderate: Adverse / beneficial impact where the proposed depot-cum-office building
would cause noticeable degradation or improvement in existing visual baseline
conditions.
Slight: Adverse /
beneficial impact where the proposed
depot-cum-office building would cause a barely noticeable degradation or
improvement in existing visual conditions or where the changes brought
about by the proposed depot would
not be apparent in visual terms.
Negligible: The proposed depot-cum-office building does not perceptibly affect the existing visual baseline conditions.
Residual Landscape and Visual Impacts
8.4.18
The final stage of the LVIA study is to assess the significance of the
residual impacts of the study assuming landscape mitigation measures are incorporated
into the design. In conclusion the
landscape and visual impacts are then classified into one of five levels of
significance. (This classification is made with reference to the criteria in
Annex 10 of the EIAO-TM), as summarised below:
·
the impact is beneficial
if the proposed depot-cum-office building will complement the landscape and
visual character of its setting, will follow the relevant planning objectives,
and will improve the overall and visual quality of the Study Area;
·
the impact is acceptable
if the assessment indicates that there will be no significant effects on the
landscape, no significant visual effects caused by the appearance of the
proposed depot-cum-office building, or no interference with key views;
·
the impact is acceptable
with mitigation measures if there will be some adverse effects, but these can
be eliminated, reduced or offset to a large extent by specific measures;
·
the impact is unacceptable
if the adverse effects are
considered too excessive and are unable to be mitigated practically; or
·
the impact is undetermined
if significant adverse effects are likely, but the extent to which they may
occur or may be mitigated cannot be determined from the study. Further detailed study will be required
for the specific effects in question.
Photomontages
8.4.19
The visual impacts and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation
measures as stated in Section 8.8 are demonstrated using
photomontages to illustrate existing views and future views (Day 1 to Year 10)
of the Project operation from key groups of VSRs to illustrate existing
conditions and operational stage conditions in relation to other existing and
planned developments and prominent visual features. Three viewpoints have been selected for preparing
the photomontages, as described below:
·
Viewpoint 1
(VP 1): on Yen Ming Road West immediately outside Nam Cheong Station Exit
facing to the Site, representing a location from which the Site is most visible
to the travelers (refer
to Figure 8-11 and Section 8.5.45). The VSRs may experience glimpse to full views of the
Site when they are travelling along.
·
Viewpoint 2
(VP 2): at various levels of Metro Harbour View,
representing views from the residents located opposite to the Site (refer to Figure 8-9 and Section 8.5.34),
The VSRs may have distant and glimpse to partial view of the Site at medium to
high level, but Nam Cheong Park and the harbor area will feature more
prominently in their views due to the small scale of the Site.
·
Viewpoint 3
(VP 3): at various levels of Hampton Place, representing views from the
residents located closest to the Site (refer
to Figure 8-10 and Section 8.5.39). These VSRs may have
closer partial to full view of the Site at level, while the view of medium
level will be significantly blocked by Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Secondary School (Hoi Fan Road) and CLPP Tai Kok Tsui Substation (TKT S/S).
Baseline Landscape Study
8.5.1
Based on desktop studies and site visits, Landscape
Resources (LRs) and Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) within 500m from the site
boundary have been identified. Figure 8-1 and Appendix 8-1 display the extent of
various types of existing landscape resources within the study area. Photos of some key landscape resources will be shown in Appendix 8-2.
Existing Landscape Resources (LRs)
LR 1 Open Space
8.5.2
LR 1 refers to Open Space covering public parks / public
rest garden, playgrounds, sport grounds and sitting-out areas within the study
area.
·
LR 1-1 Nam Cheong Park: a public park in urban area
of Sham Shui Po, managed by Leisure and Cultural
Services Department (LCSD). It is
about 45,000m2 in size, consisting of play equipment for toddlers
and fitness equipment for children and elderly. The park is well-vegetated and dominated
by the large grass/lawn and massive planting at the northern entrance. Dominant
species include, Bauhinia blakeana (洋紫荊), Archontophoenix alexandrae (假檳榔), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Peltophorum pterocarpum (雙翼豆), Pongamia pinnata (水黃皮), Grevillea robusta (銀樺), Cassia fistula (豬腸豆), Ficus religiosa (菩提樹) and Litsea glutinosa( 潺槁樹). Besides Bauhinia blakeana, Pongamia pinnata, Litsea glutinosa and Ficus microcarpa, all
species are exotic, except Bauhinia blakeana. It is
considered of high public amenity value and high sensitivity.
·
LR 1-2 Tung Chow Street Park: a public park in
urban area of Sham Shui Po, managed by LCSD. It is 38,000m2 in size, consisting
of artificial lake, pavilions and square, soccer pitches, basketball courts,
volleyball courts and tennis courts.
Dominant species include Delonix regia (鳳凰木) and Ficus microcarpa
(細葉榕), Cinnamomum burmannii (陰香), Plumeria rubra L. (雞蛋花), Callistemon viminalis (串錢柳), Lagerstroemia speciosa (大花紫薇), Bischofia polycarpa (重陽木) and Araucaria cunninghamii (南洋杉). Besides Ficus microcarpa and Cinnamomum burmannii, all species
are exotic. The park is well
vegetated and considered of medium amenity value and medium sensitivity.
·
LR 1-3 Chui Yu Road Rest Garden: a vegetated rest
garden nearby Metro Harbour View. It is about 4,000m2 in size.
Dominant species include Ficus benjamina (垂葉榕), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Lagerstroemia speciosa (大花紫薇), Plumeria acutifolia (雞蛋花), Senna surattensis (黃槐) and Bauhinia blakeana (洋紫荊). Besides Ficus microcarpa
and Bauhinia blakeana, all species are exotic.
The garden is considered of medium amenity value and low sensitivity.
·
LR 1-4 Fu Cheong Estate Playground and Basketball
Courts: the playground provides play equipment for children and the basketball
courts provides places basketball game for residents of Fu Cheong Estate. The LR is considered of low amenity
value and low sensitivity.
·
LR 1-5 Olympian City Promenade Park: a vegetated
rest garden nearby Olympian City One. It is about 5,000m2 in size.
Dominant species include Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Plumeria acutifolia (雞蛋花), Acacia confusa (台灣相思), Mascarena lagenicaulis (酒瓶椰子) and Bombax ceiba (木棉). Amongst these species, only Ficus microcarpa
are native species. The LR is considered of medium value and sensitivity.
LR 2 Roadside Planting
8.5.3
LR 2 refers to all the roadside planting areas within the
study area. The
landscape composition and conditions of the subdivisions are similar, where Leucaena leucocephala (銀合歡), Melaleuca leucadendron (白千層), Archontophoenix alexandrae (假檳榔), Peltophorum pterocarpum
(雙翼豆), Melia azedarach (苦楝), Delonix regia (鳳凰木), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕) and Aleurites moluccana (石栗) as well as some shrub species such
as Codiaeum variegatum (L.) A.
Juss (灑金榕), Tradescantia spathacea (蚌花) and Asparagus cochinchinensis (天冬) are
the dominant species, which are all exotic species, except Ficus microcarpa, and Leucaena leucocephala is invasive. The
tree species found are all with young to semi-mature age and in generally fair to good
health conditions due to regular maintenance. The development of proposed Depot will
not cause any disturbance to LR2.
LR 2 includes the followings:
·
LR 2-1 Along Lin Cheong Road;
·
LR 2-2 Not Used
·
LR 2-3 Along Hoi Fan Road;
·
LR 2-4 Along Hoi Fai Road;
·
LR 2-5 Along Sam Mong
Road;
·
LR 2-6 Along Chui Yu Road;
·
LR 2-7 Along Sai Chuen Road;
·
LR 2-8 Along Yen Chow Street West;
·
LR 2-9 Along Tonkin Street West; and
·
LR 2-10 At the T-Junction of Yen Chow Street West
and Lin Cheong Road amid Fu Cheong Estate and Nam Cheong Estate.
8.5.4 These roadside plantings apparently provide greenery to soften the urban environment. This LR is considered of medium amenity value and low sensitivity.
LR 3 Marine Frontage (Water Bodies)
8.5.5
LR 3 refers to sea area annexed to Stonecutters Island and
bounded by reclaimed land adjoining Cheung Sha Wan
Wholesale Fish Market, Yuen Fat Building and cargo area at Yen Chow Street
West, Hong Kong Marine Police Operation Base, Hampton Place and the Long Beach
at Hoi Fan Road. It includes:
·
LR 3-1 Cargo Handling Basin; and
·
LR 3-2 Waterfront Promenade
8.5.6
For LR 3-1, since the coastline
has been straightened to form the cargo handling area. Despite that the basin area belongs to natural resources and cannot be
re-created, it has already utilized and heavily trafficked by container ships,
LR 3-1 is therefore considered to be of low public
amenity
value and low sensitivity.
8.5.7
On the contrary, LR 3-2 is a portion of the sea frontage
near the Long Beach. It forms a water front promenade and provides attractive
waterfront for residents. This LR is considered as high amenity value and
sensitivity.
LR 4 Vacant Land
8.5.8
LR 4 refers to the unused vacant lands in the study area,
including:
·
LR 4-1 To the northwest of Wholesale Fish Market
along Lin Cheong Road, bounded by Lin Cheong Road and the marine frontage;
·
LR 4-2 Bounded by Sir Ellis Kadoorie
Secondary School (West Kowloon) and Lin Cheung Road;
·
LR 4-3 Bounded by Sham Mong
Road and Lin Cheung Road, inside Nam Cheong Park, as a current construction
site of MTR Express Rail Line (XRL); and
·
LR 4-4 Adjacent to Nam Cheong MTR Station, which is
currently occupied as MTR Express Rail Line (XRL) construction work site.
8.5.9
LR 4 consists of human created areas without or lacking vegetation, that is not yet occupied or used as temporary
construction work sites. It is
considered of low amenity value and low sensitivity compared to the vegetated
area.
LR 5 Vacant Land / Slope Vegetation
8.5.10
Unlike LR 4, LR 5 refers to the spontaneously or naturally
established vegetation of disturbed area within the unused vacant lands. The plants found here are believed to be
highly tolerant to environmental stresses within the degraded urban
landscape. They can be regenerated easily
under undesirable environment, such as lack of soil and moisture. LR 5 includes:
·
LR 5-1 Immediately in front of the exit of Nam
Cheong Station to the northeast of the Site;
·
LR 5-2 Behind Nam Cheong Station Exit, along
Wholesale Market Street, to the northwest of the Site;
·
LR 5-3 At the northeastern periphery of the site
bounded by the Site itself and CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation;
·
LR 5-4 At the northwestern periphery of Wholesale
Fish Market;
·
LR 5-5 In between the vacant land to the northeast
of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School (West
Kowloon);
·
LR 5-6 Bounded by Hoi Fan Road and Lin Cheong Road,
adjacent to Tai Kok Tsui
Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road);
·
LR 5-7 At the slope next
to bus terminal at Tonkit Street West; and
·
LR 5-8 To the north of
Sewage Screening Plants of Drainage Service Department (DSD).
8.5.11
Some of the LRs, such as LR 5-5, LR 5-6 and LR 5-8 cannot be accessed
during the site visits as the areas were locked. However, as seen from the
outside and upon site observations of LR 5-1, LR 5-2, LR 5-3, LR 5-4 and LR
5-7, much of the vegetation of LR 5 belongs to weedy vegetation, such as Lantana
camara (馬纓丹), Bidens alba (白花鬼針草), Oxalis corniculata L. (酢醬草), Wedelia chinensis (蟛蜞菊), Rhynchelytrum repens (紅毛草), or some common exotic species includes Leucaena leucocephala (銀合歡), Acacia auriculiformis (耳果相思), Brassaia actinophylla (澳洲鴨腳木), Aglaia odorata (米仔蘭), Bombax ceiba (木棉). The vegetation apparently provides some greenery
to the densely-built areas. The development of the proposed Depot
will not cause any disturbance to LR 5, except LR 5-3 where some of the trees
may be felled, which will be discussed in Section
8.6). Considering the exotic nature of the vegetation, the amenity
value and sensitivity of LR 5 are of low amenity value and low sensitivity.
LR 6 Residential / Amenity
Planting
8.5.12
LR 6 refers to the architectural
landscape planting area within residential developments or open area of the
study area. These landscape
plantings are dominated by mainly common exotics tree species of young to
semi-mature age, and generally in fair to good health conditions due to regular
maintenance. LR 6 includes the
following:
·
LR 6-1 At Fu Cheong Estate;
·
LR 6-2 At Nam Cheong Estate;
·
LR 6-3 At Sewage Screening Plants of DSD;
·
LR 6-4 Between Hampton Place and the Long Beach;
·
LR 6-5 At the Long Beach;
·
LR 6-6 At Island Harbourview;
·
LR 6-7 At Olympian City One
·
LR 6-8 At Harbour Green;
·
LR 6-9 Metro Harbour
View;
·
LR 6-10 To the southwest of Sewage
Screening Plant of DSD amid Fu Cheong Estate and Nam Cheong Estate;
·
LR 6-11 Along the Waterfront Promenade
adjacent to the Long Beach; and
·
LR 6-12 Adjacent to Exit C of Nam
Cheong MTR Station.
8.5.13
While some of the LRs are planted at Sewage Screening Plants of DSD (LR 6-3) and in the podium of the residential development, such as
the Long Beach (LR 6-5), Island Harbourview (LR 6-6),
Olympian City One (LR 6-7), Harbour Green (LR 6-8) and Metro Harbour View (LR
6-9), requires security check and merely allow
talents accessing, the species could not be identified during the course of
site visit. Other LRs located at Fu Cheong Estate (LR 6-1), Nam Cheong Estate (LR 6-2), between Hampton Place
and the Long Beach (LR 6-4), to the southwest of
Sewage Screening Plant of DSD amid Fu Cheong Estate (LR 6-10) and Nam Cheong
Estate, along the Waterfront Promenade adjacent to the Long Beach (LR
6-11) and adjacent to Exit C of Nam Cheong MTR Station
(LR 6-12) offer well-vegetated or architectural designed area adjoining the
leisure or recreational ground / facilities of the residential developments,
and help soften the hard and dull densely built-up area such as roads and
residential buildings. Dominant species includes Bauhinia blakeana (洋紫荊), Phoenix roebelenii (日本葵), Garcinia subelliptica (福木), Peltophorum pterocarpum
(雙翼豆), Plumeria acutifolia (雞蛋花), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Delonix regia
(鳳凰木), Kaya senegaensis (Desr.) A.Juss (非洲棟), Bombax ceiba (木棉), Grevillea robusta (銀樺), etc. Only Ficus microcarpa and Bauhinia blakeana are native species. These LRs are considered of high amenity value and high
sensitivity.
8.5.14
Sensitivity of the existing landscape
resources are listed in Table 8-3.
Table 8‑3 Summary of Existing
Landscape Resources and their Amenity Values and Sensitivities in the Study
Area
ID |
Components |
Sensitivity |
LR 1 Open Space |
|
|
LR 1-1 |
Nam Cheong Park |
High |
LR 1-2 |
Tung Chow Street
Park |
Medium |
LR 1-3 |
Chui Yu Road
Rest Garden |
Low |
LR 1-4 |
Fu Cheong Estate
Playground and Basketball Courts |
Low |
LR 1-5 |
Olympian City
Promenade Park |
Medium |
LR 2 Roadside Planting |
|
|
LR 2-1 |
Along Lin Cheong
Road |
Low |
LR 2-2 |
Not Used |
-- |
LR 2-3 |
Along Hoi Fan
Road |
Low |
LR 2-4 |
Along Hoi Fai
Road |
Low |
LR 2-5 |
Along Sam Mong
Road |
Low |
LR 2-6 |
Along Chui Yu
Road |
Low |
LR 2-7 |
Along Sai Chuen Road |
Low |
LR 2-8 |
Along Yen Chow
Street West |
Low |
LR 2-9 |
Along Tonkin
Street West |
Low |
LR 2-10 |
At the
T-Junction of Yen Chow Street West and Lin Cheong Road amid Fu Cheong Estate
and Nam Cheong Estate |
Low |
LR 3 Marine Frontage |
|
|
LR 3-1 |
Cargo Handling
Basin |
Low |
LR 3-2 |
Waterfront Promenade
of the Long Beach |
High |
LR 4 Vacant Lands |
|
|
LR 4-1 |
To the west of Wholesale Fish Market along Lin Cheong Road, bounded by Lin Cheong Road and the marine frontage |
Low |
LR 4-2 |
Bounded by Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School (West Kowloon) and Lin Cheung Road |
Low |
LR 4-3 |
Bounded by Sham Mong Road and Lin Cheung Road, inside Nam Cheong Park, as a current construction site of MTR Express Rail Line (XRL) |
Low |
LR 4-4 |
Adjacent to Nam Cheong MTR Station, which is currently occupied as MTR Express Rail Line (XRL) construction work site |
Low |
LR 5 Vacant Land
Vegetation |
|
|
LR 5-1 |
Immediate in front of the exit of Nam Cheong Station to the north of the Site |
Low |
LR 5-2 |
Behind Nam Cheong Station Exit, along Wholesale Market Street, to the northwest of the Site |
Low |
LR 5-3 |
At the northeastern periphery of the site bounded by the Site itself and CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation |
Low |
LR 5-4 |
At the northwestern periphery of Wholesale Fish Market |
Low |
LR 5-5 |
In between the vacant land to the northeastern of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School (West Kowloon) |
Low |
LR 5-6 |
Bounded by Hoi Fan Road and Lin Cheong Road, adjacent to Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road) |
Low |
LR 5-7 |
At the slope next to bus terminal at Tonkit Street West |
Low |
LR 5-8 |
To the north of Sewage Screening Plants of DSD |
Low |
LR 6 Residential /
Architectural Planting |
|
|
LR 6-1 |
At Fu Cheong Estate |
High |
LR 6-2 |
At Nam Cheong Estate |
High |
LR 6-3 |
At Sewage Screening Plants of DSD |
High |
LR 6-4 |
Between Hampton Place and the Long Beach |
High |
LR 6-5 |
At the Long Beach |
High |
LR 6-6 |
At Island Harbourview |
High |
LR 6-7 |
At Olympian City One |
High |
LR 6-8 |
At Harbour Green |
High |
LR 6-9 |
At Metro Harbour View |
High |
LR 6-10 |
To the southwest of Sewage Screening Plant of DSD amid Fu Cheong
Estate and Nam Cheong Estate |
High |
LR 6-11 |
Along the Waterfront Promenade adjacent to the Long Beach |
High |
LR 6-12 |
Adjacent to Exit C of Nam
Cheong MTR Station |
High |
Landscape Resources (LRs) with Planned
Development
8.5.15
In view of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial
development above Nam Cheong Station, as well as the planned football pitch and
basketball court at adjacent to Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School
(Hoi Fan Road), categories of landscape resources of “Vacant Land Vegetation”
of LR 5-6 and LR 5-7 will be changed to “Open Space” and “Residential / Amenity
Planting” respectively. Figure 8-2 displays the extent of various
types of landscape resources with planned developments within the study area. The changes of LR are summarised in Table 8‑4.
8.5.16
Based on the available information, the proposed comprehensive
residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station will be
established in the year of 2017 to 2019 by phase, and there is no construction
programme of the football pitch and basketball court at Hoi Fan Road during the
course of report, while the proposed Depot will be constructed in 2014 and in
operation in 2017. Therefore, the
sensitivity of LR 1-P1 and LR 6-P1 is not applicable and will be remarked as
“NA”.
Table 8‑4 Changes of
Landscape Resources with Planned Development
Existing ID |
Existing Landscape Resources |
New ID with Planned Development |
Description of New Landscape Resources with Planned
Development |
Sensitivity |
LR 5-6 |
Bounded by Hoi Fan Road and Lin Cheong Road, adjacent to Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road) |
LR 1-P1 |
Recreational resources as football pitch and basketball court at Hoi Fan Road |
NA |
LR 4-4 |
Adjacent to Nam Cheong MTR Station, which is currently occupied as MTR Express Rail Line (XRL) construction work site |
LR 6-P1 |
Residential Planting at the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station |
NA |
Existing Landscape Character Areas (LCAs)
8.5.17
A total of six landscape character areas (LCAs) formed by various broadly
homogenous units of similar landscape characters were identified within the
500m study area, as shown in Figure 8-3 and Appendix 8-3. These areas include:
LCA 1 Marine Frontage Landscape
8.5.18
LCA 1 refers to the marine frontage landscape consisting of cargo
handling basin (water bodies), the wharf bound by Yen Ming Road and
the waterfront promenade (water bodies). It is characterised
predominantly by the sea area occupied by container ships and cargos without vegetation found inside. Despite the water bodies of cargo
handling basin belongs to natural resources and cannot be re-created, it is
already mainly utilized and heavily trafficked, which is of low quality and
amenity value, and thus low sensitivity. However, due to the higher quality and high amenity value and thus high sensitivity of the waterfront promenade, the whole LCA is
considered to have medium overall amenity value and medium
sensitivity.
LCA 2 Wholesale Food and Fish Market
Landscape
8.5.19
LCA 2 refers to Wholesale Food and Fish Market Landscape, comprising
Cheung Sha Wan Wholesale Food Market Office and Fish
Market Office operated by Agricultural, Fisheries and Conservation Department
(AFCD), haul road and carpark. Being situated in the
urban area bounded by
Yen Ming Road and Wholesale Market Street with no vegetation
located within the area and mainly utilized as wholesaling activities with low
quality, it is
considered to have low amenity value and low sensitivity.
LCA 3 Park Landscape
8.5.20
LCA 3 is mainly consisted of Nam Cheong Park and Tung Chau Street Park. It is dominated by well-vegetated plants,
including, Bauhinia blakeana (洋紫荊), Archontophoenix alexandrae (假檳榔), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Peltophorum pterocarpum (雙翼豆), Pongamia pinnata (水黃皮), Grevillea robusta (銀樺), Cassia fistula (豬腸豆), Ficus religiosa (菩提樹) and Litsea glutinosa (潺槁樹). Besides Bauhinia blakeana, Pongamia
pinnata, Litsea glutinosa and Ficus microcarpa, all species are exotic, except Bauhinia blakeana, as mentioned in Section 8.5.2, of high amenity value and in fairly good health / physical conditions
due to regular maintenance. They are of high quality and high maturity.
Since they are common species, the importance / rarity of special landscape
elements is low. Although
LCA 3 comprised primarily man-made landscape features, it is considered to have
a high sensitivity.
LCA 4 Open
Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape
8.5.21
LCA 4 refers to vacant land including uncovered car parks along Lin
Cheong Road, vacant land along Yen Ming Road (the Site itself), construction
sites at Nam
Cheong Station and Nam Cheong Park, and vacant lands along Hoi Fan Road and
Tung Chow Street. Due to the fact
that this LCA is situated at urban area, which are
commonly found amongst the territory, and this LCA is lacking vegetation or the
vegetation is weedy, such as Lantana camara (馬纓丹), Bidens alba (白花鬼針草), Oxalis corniculata
L. (酢醬草), Wedelia chinensis (蟛蜞菊), Rhynchelytrum repens (紅毛草), the quality and amenity value is low, it is considered as low
sensitivity.
LCA 5 Community / Residential Urban Landscape
8.5.22
LCA 5 refers to the built up and densely populated area in Cheung Sha Wan District dominated by high-rise residential
buildings, and medium to high rise buildings of community services such as
schools, flyovers and roads trafficked by vehicles, as well as the rest garden
and sitting-out areas. It is
considered as the largest LCA within the study area and is one of the most
common landscape characters within the territory. Dominant
species includes Bauhinia blakeana (洋紫荊), Phoenix roebelenii (日本葵), Garcinia subelliptica (福木), Peltophorum pterocarpum
(雙翼豆), Plumeria acutifolia (雞蛋花), Ficus microcarpa (細葉榕), Delonix regia (鳳凰木), Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A.Juss (非洲棟), Bombax ceiba (木棉), Grevillea robusta (銀樺), etc. Although
the landscape quality is good because of regular maintenance and maturity is
low moderate, the species are common and thus the importance / rarity of
landscape element is low, As a result, it is considered to be of low amenity value and low
sensitivity.
LCA 6 Public Services Landscape
8.5.23
LCA 6 refers to buildings or facilities providing services to the
public, such as Nam Cheong Station operated by MTR Corporations, West Kowloon
Central Sewage Pumping Station and Sewage Treatment Screening Plant operated by
DSD, Hong Kong Marine Police Operation Base operated
by Police Force, and Tai Kok Tsui
Substation and Traction Sub-station operated by CLP Power Ltd. Since they are lacking vegetation and thus of low quality, and this character type is commonly found
amongst the territory, they are considered as low amenity value and low
sensitivity.
8.5.24
The sensitivity of the existing landscape
character areas are listed in Table 8‑5.
Table 8‑5 Summary of
Existing Landscape Character Area and their Amenity Values and Sensitivities in
the Study Area
ID |
Name |
Sensitivity |
LCA 1 |
Marine Frontage Landscape |
Medium |
LCA 2 |
Wholesale Food and Fish Market Landscape |
Low |
LCA 3 |
Park Landscape |
High |
LCA 4 |
Open Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape |
Low |
LCA 5 |
Community / Residential Urban Landscape |
Low |
LCA 6 |
Public Services Landscape |
Low |
Landscape Characters Area (LCAs) with Planned
Development
8.5.25
In view of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial
development above Nam Cheong Station, as well as the planned football pitch and
basketball court at vacant land to the south of Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School
(Hoi Fan Road), part of the “LCA 4 Open Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape”,
including the Site itself will be changed to “LCA 6* Public Services Landscape”
(the proposed depot itself), “LCA 3* Park & Recreation Landscape” and “LCA
5* Community / Residential Landscape” respectively. Figure 8-4 displays the extent of various types of landscape
character area with planned development within the study area. The changes of LCA are summarised in Table 8‑6.
8.5.26
Based on the available information, the proposed comprehensive
residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station will be
established in the year of 2017 to 2019 by phase, and there is no construction
programme of the football pitch and basketball court at Hoi Fan Road during the
course of report, while the proposed Depot will be constructed in 2014 and in
operation in 2017. Therefore, the
sensitivity of LCA 6*, LCA 3* and LCA 5* is not applicable and will marked as
“NA”.
Table 8‑6 Changes of
Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) with Planned Development
Existing ID |
Existing Landscape Character Areas (LCAs) |
Location |
New ID with Planned Development |
Description of New Landscape Resources with Planned Development |
LCA 4 |
Open Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape |
The Site itself |
LCA 6* |
Public Services Landscape (the proposed depot) |
LCA 4 |
Open Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape |
To the south of Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road), |
LCA 3* |
Recreational resources as football pitch and basketball court |
LCA 4 |
Open Car Parks / Vacant Land Landscape |
In front of existing Nam Cheong Station |
LCA 5* |
Planned comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station |
Existing Trees within the Proposed Site
8.5.27
A total of 16 tree specimens were identified within the project site
boundary as included in Appendix 8-4. 15 nos. (93.8%)
of the surveyed trees belong to the invasive exotic species Leucaena leucocephala (銀合歡) while 1 no. (6.2%) of non-native species
is Bombax ceiba (木棉). Out of16 trees, 4 trees (25%) were found
to have poor tree form but generally in fair health condition and 12 trees
(75%) were found in generally fair health and tree form. No registered or
potential Old and Valuable Trees (OVTs) were recorded nor
rare or protected species were encountered. Detailed information of the surveyed
trees is presented in the Tree Assessment Schedule in Appendix 8-4. Table 8‑7 summarises the tree species
composition within the Site.
Table 8‑7 Tree
Species Composition within the Site
Scientific name |
Chinese common name |
Species Origin |
No. of Trees |
% of Trees |
Leucaena leucocephala |
銀合歡 |
Exotic |
15 |
93.8% |
Bombax ceiba |
木棉 |
Non- native |
1 |
6.2% |
|
Total |
16 |
100% |
Existing Visual Context
Visual Envelope
8.5.28 In view of the existing development, the Visual Envelope (VE) of the proposed Depot would be largely confined to the built area along Lin Cheong Road, West Kowloon Highway, Yen Ming Road, Yen Chow Street West, Hoi Fan Road, part of Nam Cheong Park, residents from medium to high level of Fu Cheong Estate (including Fu Yuet House, Fu Ying House and Fu Loy House), Nam Cheong House (including Cheong Yat House and Cheong Chit House), and selected occupants of Hampton Place, The Long Beach, Island Harbourview and Metro Harbour View. The extent of the VE is shown in Figure 8-6.
Key Visually Sensitive Receivers (VSRs)
8.5.29 Within the VE, the key VSRs are grouped according to the settlement of development, travellers, and occupational receivers of similar nature, as follow:
·
Visible area with residential VSRs (VSR-R)
o
VSR R01 Residents of Fu Loy House, Fu Ying House
and Fu Yuet House of Fu Cheong Estate
o
VSR R02 Residents of Cheong Chit House and Cheong Yat House of Nam Cheong Estate
o
VSR R03 Residents of Blocks 1 and 2 of Metro Harbour View
o
VSR R04 Residents of West Kowloon Disciplined
Services Quarters
o
VSR R05 Residents of Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 of Harbour Green
o
VSR R06 Residents of Block 1 of Island Harbourview
o
VSR R07 Residents of Blocks 8 and 9 of The Long
Beach
o
VSR R08 Residents of Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of Hampton
Place
·
Visible area with occupational VSRs (VSR-W)
o
VSR W01 Staff of Wholesale Market Office
o
VSR W02 Staff of Yuen Fat Building and Cargo
Unloading / Loading Area
o
VSR W03 Staff and Students of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School
o
VSR W04 Staff of CLP Tai Kok
Tsui Substation
·
Visible area with travelling VSRs (VSR-T)
o
VSR T01 Travellers of Wholesale Market Street
o
VSR T02 Travellers of Yen Chow Street West
o
VSR T03 Travellers of Yen Ming Road
o
VSR T04 Travellers of Hoi Fan Road
o
VSR T05 Travelling of West Kowloon Highway
o
VSR T06 Travelling of Lin Cheong Road
·
Visible area with Recreational VSRs (VSR-RE)
o
VSR RE01 Visitors of Nam Cheong Park
·
Visible area with both travelling and occupational
VSRs (VSR-P)
o
VSR P01 Users / Travellers of Open Carpark next to
Wholesale Fish Market
o
VSR P02 Users / Visitor of Wholesale Food and Fish
Market
o
VSR P03 Users / Travellers of West Kowloon Cargo Handling Area (including
marine frontage)
8.5.30 The selected VSRs are representative of views available to viewers at each of the above locations.
8.5.31 Figure 8-7 shows the locations of the identified VSRs as described as follows:
VSR R01 Residents of Fu Loy House, Fu Ying
House and Fu Yuet House of Fu Cheong Estate
8.5.32 These VSRs may have a distant view of the Site at medium to high level, while their view of the Site will be significantly blocked by existing Nam Cheong Station and West Kowloon Highway. Due to small scale of the proposed development, views of Nam Cheong Park or more distant view of the harbour area, which are considered to have much higher amenity value compared to that of the Site, will feature much more prominently in the visual envelop for residents within these estates. Therefore, the sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R02 Residents of Cheong Chit House and
Cheong Yat House of Nam Cheong Estate
8.5.33 Similar to VSR R01, these VSRs may have a distant partial view of the Site at high level, while the view at the medium level will be significantly blocked by existing trees of Nam Cheong Park and those along Sam Mong Road, and West Kowloon Highway. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R03 Residents of Blocks 1 and 2 of Metro
Harbour View
VSR R04 Residents of West Kowloon
Disciplined Services Quarters
8.5.35 Sitting next to Metro Harbour View, these VSRs have similar views of VSR R03, which may have a glimpse to partial view of the Site at medium to high level. Due to the small scale of the Site, and Nam Cheong Park and the harbour area, which are considered to have much higher amenity value will feature more prominently in their views. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R05 Residents of Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 of
Harbour Green
8.5.36 These VSRs may have glimpse to partial view of the Site at medium to high level. Also, Nam Cheong Park and other streetscapes in the vicinity, which are considered to have much higher amenity value, will feature more prominently in their views. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R06 Residents of Block 1 of Island Harbourview
8.5.37 These VSRs may have closer glimpse to partial of the Site at high level, while the view of medium level will be significantly blocked by Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Secondary School (Hoi Fan Road). Due to the small scale of the Site, the harbour area and other streetscapes in the vicinity, which are considered to have much higher amenity value, will feature more prominently in their views. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R07 Residents of Blocks 8 and 9 of The Long Beach
8.5.38 The Long Beach is located nearby Island Harbourview. Similar to VSR R06, these VSRs may have closer glimpse to partial view of the Site at high level, while the view of medium level will be significantly blocked by Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Secondary School (Hoi Fan Road) and CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR R08 Residents of Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of
Hampton Place
8.5.39 The Hampton Place is located nearby The Long Beach. Similar to VSR R07, these VSRs may have closer partial to full view of the Site at high level, while the view of medium level will be significantly blocked by Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Secondary School (Hoi Fan Road) and CLPP Tai Kok Tsui Substation (TKT S/S). The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low. Figure 8-10 displays the existing views and the photomontages showing the views of the Site from various levels of Block 1 of Hampton Place (Viewpoint 3).
VSR W01 Staff of Wholesale Market Office
8.5.40 These VSRs are the occupational receivers to the west of the Site. Since the Wholesale Market Office is a low-rise building, the views are blocked by existing fencing of the wholesale market area and settlements. Since the quality of existing view is poor, the number of staff of wholesales market office is few and their frequency of view is intermittent, the sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR W02 Staff of Yuen Fat Building and Cargo
Unloading / Loading Area
8.5.41 Yuen Fat Building and the cargo unloading / loading area are located immediately opposite to the Site. These VSRs are also occupational receivers and may have a close full view of the Site from low (including the unloading / loading area) to high level. However, since the number of staff of Yuen Fat Building and Cargo/ Uploading/ Loading Area is few and their frequency of view is intermittent, the sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR W03 Staff and Students of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School
8.5.42 Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School is situated at the southeast of the Site and staff and students are occupational receivers to the Site. The viewers may have “glimpse to partial view” to the Site where the view of the Site is largely blocked by CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation and cargos of unloading / loading area. The sensitivity of these VSRs is considered to be low.
VSR W04 Staff of CLP Tai Kok
Tsui Substation
8.5.43 CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation (TKT S/S) is located immediately adjacent to the Site. Since there is no opening on the façade facing to the Site, the viewers may have “glimpse view” to the Site when the users in CLP S/S watch directly to the Site. The sensitivity of these VSR is considered to be low.
VSR T01 Travellers of Wholesale Market
Street
8.5.44 These VSRs represent transient passers that comprise frequent travellers including staff of Wholesale Market and travellers using the car parks and occasional travellers from elsewhere. The VSRs may experience glimpsed to full views of the Site when they are travelling along Wholesale Market Street. Considering that the VSRs are transient in nature, the sensitivity to the Site is low.
VSR T02 Travellers of Yen Chow Street West
8.5.45 These VSRs represent transient passers that comprise frequent travellers including staff of Wholesale Market, CLP TKT S/S, Yuen Fat Building and cargo unloading / loading area, staff and students of Sir Ellis Kadooris Secondary School and Tai Kok Tsui Catholic School (Hoi Fan Road) and travellers using the car parks at wholesale market and occasional travellers from elsewhere. The VSRs may experience glimpsed to full views of the Site when they are travelling along the street. Considering that the VSRs are transient in nature, the sensitivity to the Site is low. Figure 8-11 displays the existing views and the photomontages showing the views of the Site from Nam Cheong Station Exit on Yen Chow Street West (Viewpoint 1).
VSR T03 Travellers of Yen Ming Road
8.5.46 These VSRs represent transient passers that comprise frequent travellers including staff of CLP TKT S/S, Marine Police Operation Base, MTR Pump House, Water Supplies Department (WSD) Salt Water Pump Station, staff and students of Sir Ellis Kadooris Secondary School and Tai Kok Tsui Catholic School (Hoi Fan Road), and travellers going into Hoi Fan Road and occasional travellers from elsewhere. The VSRs may experience full views of the Site when they are travelling along Yen Ming Road. Considering that the VSRs are transient in nature and the population is very few, the sensitivity to visual change to the Site is low.
VSR T04 Travellers of Hoi Fan Road
8.5.47 These VSRs represent transient passers that comprise frequent travellers including staff of Marine Police Operation Base, MTR Pump House, Water Supplies Department (WSD) Salt Water Pump Station, staff and students of Sir Ellis Kadooris Secondary School and Tai Kok Tsui Catholic School (Hoi Fan Road), and occasional travellers from elsewhere. The VSRs may experience partial to glimpsed views of the Site where the views will be blocked by existing roadside trees and settlements when they are travelling along Yen Ming Road. The sensitivity to visual change to the Site is low.
VSR T05 Travelling of West Kowloon Highway
8.5.48 These VSRs represent transient passers travelling to and fro Kowloon. The VSRs may experience partial to glimpse views of the Site as the view will be blocked by existing roadside trees. The sensitivity to visual change to the Site is low.
VSR T06 Travelling of Lin Cheong Road
8.5.49 These VSRs represent transient passers travelling along. The VSRs may experience partial to glimpse views of the Site where the views will be blocked by existing roadside trees, West Kowloon Highway and the footbridge across. The sensitivity to the Site is low.
VSR RE01 Visitors of Nam Cheong Park
8.5.50 These VSRs represent occasional visitors to the park. The VSRs may experience partial to
glimpse views of the Site while the views will be blocked by existing
landscaped trees in the park, which have high amenity value, as well as West
Kowloon Highway. The sensitivity to
the Site is low.
VSR P01 Users / Travellers of Open Carpark next to Wholesale Market
8.5.51 The car park is situated next to Wholesale Market which is located immediately to the west of the Site. These VSRs comprise occasional travellers and users of the uncovered car parks who are considered to be transient passers-by in these areas. These VSRs may occasionally view the Project site but their views are often blocked by the existing trees and fences separating the car parks and Wholesale Market. Users of the car parks are considered to be of low sensitivity as they are occupied by parking activities and will not stay for a long time.
VSR P02 Users / Visitors of Wholesale Food
and Fish Markets
8.5.52 The Wholesale Food and Fish Markets is situated to the immediate west of the Site, These VSRs comprise occasional users and visitors of the Markets for buying food and fish in the morning. They are considered to be transient passers-by in these areas. These VSRs may occasionally view the Project site but their views are often blocked by the fences separating the Markets and Yen Chow Street West and other settlements. The viewers are considered to be of low sensitivity as they will only stay for a short period of time for buying food.
VSR P03 Users / Travellers of West Kowloon
Cargo Handling Area (including marine frontage)
8.5.53 These VSRs comprise the users and travellers of the cargo handling area, including the to and fro Stonecutter Island (marine frontage). These VSRs may have limited partial view of the Site are often blocked by the existing cargos of their work area. Also, these VSRs will be easily distracted by the sea view of much higher amenity value than that of the Site. They are therefore considered to be of low sensitivity to the Site.
8.5.54 Table 8‑8 summarises the identified VSRs and their sensitivity.
Visual Sensitive Receivers (VSRs) with
Planned Development
8.5.55
In view of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial
development above Nam Cheong Station, views of residents of Fu Loy House, Fu
Ying House and Fu Yuet House of Fu Cheong Estate (VSR
R01) will be significantly blocked, and residents of
the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam
Cheong Station will become the visual sensitive receiver (VSR RP01) instead. Figure 8-8 displays
the extent of various VSRs with planned development within the study area. Due to
small scale of the proposed development, views of more distant view of the
harbour area, which are considered to have much higher amenity value compared
to that of the Site, will feature much more prominently in the visual envelop
for residents within this planned development. Therefore, the sensitivity of
these VSRs is considered to be low. The sensitivity of VSR RP01 is summarised in Table 8‑8.
Table 8‑8 Identified
VSRs and Their Sensitivity (Existed and Planned)
VSRs |
Description |
Quality
of Existing View (Good / Fair / Poor) |
Availability
and Amenity (High, Medium, Low) of Alternative Views |
Degree
of Visibility (Full / Partial / Glimpse) |
Estimated
Populations of Viewers (Large / Intermediate / Few / Very Few) |
Frequency
of View (Frequent / Intermittent / Occasional / Rare) |
Sensitivity
(High / Medium / Low) |
|
Visible Area with Residential VSRs |
||||||||
VSR R01 |
Residents
of Fu Loy House, Fu Ying House and Fu Yuet House of
Fu Cheong Estate |
Fair |
High |
Glimpse |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R02 |
Residents
of Cheong Chit House and Cheong Yat House of Nam
Cheong Estate |
Fair |
High |
Glimpse
to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R03 |
Residents
of Blocks 1 and 2 of Metro Harbour View |
Fair to
Good |
High |
Glimpse to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R04 |
Residents
of West Kowloon Disciplined Services Quarters |
Fair to Good |
High |
Glimpse to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R05 |
Residents
of Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 of Harbour Green |
Fair to
Good |
High |
Glimpse to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R06 |
Residents
of Block 1 of Island Harbourview |
Fair |
High |
Glimpse to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R07 |
Residents
of Blocks 8 and 9 of The Long Beach |
Poor
to Fair |
Medium |
Glimpse to Partial |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
VSR R08 |
Residents
of Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of Hampton Place |
Poor
to Fair |
Medium |
Partial
to Full |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
Visible Area with Occupational VSRs |
||||||||
VSR W01 |
Staff of
Wholesale Market Office |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse |
Few |
Intermittent |
Low |
|
VSR W02 |
Staff of
Yuen Fat Building and Cargo Uploading / Loading Area |
Poor |
Low |
Full |
Few |
Intermittent |
Low |
|
VSR W03 |
Staff and
Students of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse
to Partial |
Intermediate |
Intermittent |
Low |
|
VSR W04 |
Staff of
CLP Tai Kok Tsui
Substation |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse |
Very few |
Rare |
Low |
|
Visible Area with Travelling VSRs |
||||||||
VSR T01 |
Travellers
of Wholesale Market Street |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse
to Full |
Very few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR T02 |
Travellers
of Yen Chow Street West |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse
to Full |
Very few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR T03 |
Travellers
of Yen Ming Road |
Poor |
Low |
Full |
Very few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR T04 |
Travellers
of Hoi Fan Road |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse
to partial |
Very few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR T05 |
Travelling
of West Kowloon Highway |
Fair to
Good |
High |
Glimpse
to partial |
Few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR T06 |
Travelling
of Lin Cheong Road |
Poor to
Fair |
Low |
Glimpse
to partial |
Few |
Rare |
Low |
|
Visible Area with Recreational VSRs |
||||||||
VSR RE01 |
Visitors
of Nam Cheong Park |
Fair to
Good |
Medium |
Glimpse
to partial |
Very few |
Occasional
|
Low |
|
Visible Area with both Travelling and Occupational VSRs |
||||||||
VSR P01 |
Users /
Travellers of Open Carpark next to Wholesale Fish
Market |
Fair |
Low |
Glimpse |
Very Few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR P02 |
Users /
Visitor of Wholesale Food and Fish Market |
Poor |
Low |
Glimpse |
Few |
Rare |
Low |
|
VSR P03 |
Users / Travellers
of West Kowloon Cargo Handling Area (including marine frontage) |
Fair |
High |
Glimpse |
Few |
Rare |
Low |
|
Visual Sensitive Receivers at Planned Development |
||||||||
VSR RP01 |
Residents
of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above
Nam Cheong Station |
Fair to
Good |
High |
Full |
Intermediate |
Frequent |
Low |
|
8.6
Landscape Impact Assessment
Construction Phase
8.6.1 The potential sources of landscape impacts from the proposed Depot during construction phase are mainly arisen from site clearance including removal of existing vegetation.
8.6.2
According to the tree survey, out of the 16 trees surveyed within project boundary,
15 trees are in direct conflict with the proposed car parking spaces and access
road for the vehicle depot. All 15 trees are of the invasive exotic species, Leucaena leucocephala (銀合歡), which is considered as
an undesirable, self-seeded weedy species. All of them are proposed to be
removed during site clearance work.
8.6.3
The remaining tree of Bombax ceiba will be
retained on-site and may require pruning.
8.6.4 Table 8-9 summarises the number of trees for each type of recommendation in the Site. Figure 8-5 and Appendix 8-4 indicates the tree recommendations for all the surveyed trees within the project boundary.
Table 8‑9 Summary of Proposed
Action for Surveyed Trees in the Site
Recommendations |
Number of Trees |
Retain and Prune |
1 |
Transplant |
0 |
Fell |
15 |
Total |
16 |
8.6.5 Despite of the exotic and invasive nature of Leucaena leucocephala, magnitude of change of LR 5-3 during construction phase is large because the trees to be felled are exactly located at LR 5-3 where the local context of the Site would be changed significantly, it will therefore cause direct impact from construction activities. As a result of low sensitivity and large magnitude of change, impact arisen from the proposed Depot during construction phase is considered moderate.
8.6.6 In contrary, magnitude of change of other LRs, including LR 1, LR 2, LR 3, LR 5 (except LR 5-3) and LR 6, as well as the LRs with planned development (LR 1-P1 and LR 6-P1) are considered as negligible since there is no direct change to the regional context due to construction activities of the proposed Depot. Hence, the impacts of the proposed Depot during the construction phase are considered to be negligible.
8.6.7 Table 8‑10 summarises the significant threshold of landscape impact on LRs of the proposed Depot.
8.6.8 Similarly, magnitude of change of LCA 4 during construction phase is large since the proposed Depot would be built on the vacant land landscape where the existing vegetation (15 trees) would be felled. As a result of low sensitivity and large magnitude of change, a moderate impact is anticipated during the construction of the proposed Depot.
8.6.9 Similar to LRs, magnitude of change of other LCAs, i.e. LCA 1, LCA 2, LCA 3, LCA 5 and LCA 6 is considered to be negligible as there is no direct change on them due to construction activities. As a result, the anticipated impacts of all LCAs except LCA 4 during construction phase are considered to be negligible.
8.6.10 Table 8‑11 summarises the significant threshold of landscape impact on LCAs of the proposed Depot.
Operation Phase
8.6.11 During the operation phase, the sources of landscape impact are mainly the presence of the permanent structure of the proposed Depot and its operation.
8.6.12 While there is no direct conflict of the operation of the proposed Depot with other LRs, except LR 5-3, the magnitude of change remains negligible during the operation phase. Due to the fact that the landscape resource of LR 5-3 would be occupied by the permanent structure of the proposed Depot, its magnitude of change remains large and a moderate impact is anticipated.
8.6.13 Similarly, the magnitude of change of all LCAs, except for LCA 4, remains negligible during the operation phase. Since part of the landscape character areas of vacant land would be occupied by the permanent structure of the proposed Depot, its magnitude of change remains large and moderate impact was resulted.
Construction Phase
8.7.1 The potential sources of visual impacts from the proposed Depot during construction phase are mainly arisen from site clearance including temporary establishment of site office and associated work area, operation of site works, presence of numerous machineries and equipment as well as material stockpiling, and the incremental movement of site vehicles around. According to the construction programme as stated in Appendix 3-1, the proposed construction works would tentatively commence in 2013 and last for approximately 24 months.
8.7.2 In view of the limited footprint of the proposed works as discussed in above sections, and the potential blockage of view of all existing VSRs, except VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 is from glimpse to partial, the magnitude of change of the these VSRs, including those residential, occupational, travelling VSRs except VSR T02, VSR T03 as well as both travelling and occupational VSRs except VSR P02, is negligible. Hence their visual impact is considered not significant due to construction activities. However, due to the close proximity of VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 to the Site where these VSRs may have glimpse to full view of the Site, the construction activities may impose some visual impact on the viewers. Nevertheless, in view of their transient nature of use, the magnitude of change of VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 due to the construction activities is considered as small. As a result, with low sensitivity and small magnitude of change, slight visual impacts are anticipated.
8.7.3 It is expected that the construction of the proposed Depot would be commenced before the establishment of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station. Therefore, no magnitude of change or visual impact are anticipated for VSR RP-01 during the construction phase.
8.7.4 On the other hand, the Yuen Fat Building and cargo unloading / loading area is located immediate opposite to the Site, however, due to the daily operation of the building and unloading / loading areas, the staff (VSR W02) may rarely view the Site, magnitude of change of VSR W02 is considered as small. Hence, impact is considered to be slight.
8.7.5 Considering there is no opening on the façade facing the Site of CLP Tai Kok Tsui Substation, the staff (VSR W04) may only have rare views of the proposed Depot and negligible impact is anticipated though the substation is situated immediate adjacent to the Site.
8.7.6 Table 8‑12 and Table 8‑13 summarise the significant threshold of visual impact on VSRs of the proposed Depot.
Operation Phase
8.7.7 During the operation phase, the sources of visual impact are also the presence of the permanent structure of the proposed Depot, and thus its operation and vehicles parking, as well as the incremental numbers of vehicles, e.g. refuse collection vehicles (RCVs), travelling to and fro the Site.
8.7.8 Due to the limited scale of development of the proposed Depot while the potential blockage of view is glimpse to partial, magnitude of change for residential, occupational except VSR W02, travelling except VSR T02 and VSR T03 and both occupational and travelling VSRs except VSR P02, remain negligible and hence the visual impact is considered as negligible. Due to the close proximity of the Site and transient nature of the VSR W02, VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02, magnitude of changes of these VSRs remains small as the construction phase. As a result, slight impacts for VSR W02, VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 respectively are anticipated arising from permanent structure of the proposed Depot.
8.7.9 Regarding the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station (VSR RP01), despite the small scale of the Site, due to the close proximity between VSR RP01 and the proposed depot, the magnitude of change is considered as small, and therefore the visual impact of the viewers is therefore considered slight.
8.8.1
The identification of the landscape and visual impacts highlights the
potential primary sources of impacts and their magnitude of change caused to LRs/LCAs/VSRs.
Corresponding mitigation measures are proposed to avoid and reduce the
identified sources of impacts, and to remedy and compensate unavoidable
impact. The potential landscape and
visual enhancement is also considered in the proposed mitigation measures.
8.8.2 The proposed mitigation measures during construction phase include:
· CMM1: Control of construction activities;
·
CMM2: Temporary landscape treatment during construction phase;
·
CMM3: Tree Preservation
8.8.3 The proposed mitigation measures during operation phase include:
·
OMM1: Proper arrangement of materials during operation phase; and
·
OMM2: Landscape design, consisting of:
o OMM2.1: Ground Floor Planting
o OMM2.2: Vertical Greening
o OMM2.3: Roof Gardens
o OMM2.4: Hard Landscape features
CMM1 – Control of Construction Activities
8.8.4
Proper control of construction activities can effectively minimise the
disturbances to VSRs. The operation
and placement of the construction plant and machinery, as well as the
transportation and storage of material should be cautiously arranged in a way
that the potential adverse impacts can be reduced and confined in certain areas
in the Site. The height of
temporary structures such as hoardings and site offices should be minimised and
the temporary construction sites shall be restored locally to the existing
condition so as to minimise any negative impacts and associated uncomfortable
views. Site boundaries shall be
checked regularly to ensure that the working area does not exceed and causes
further damage to the surrounding area.
Also, in case of nighttime construction is
conducted, control of nighttime lighting on the works
areas to prevent undesired light pollution to the surrounding area, such as viewers
from roads, should be implemented.
CMM2 – Temporary Landscape Treatment
8.8.5
Provision of temporary landscape treatment during construction phase,
such as temporary planting around the site office, applying aesthetic
treatments on site hoardings and/or façade of site office, as well as providing
green roof of site office, would lessen the visual disturbance to the
surroundings arising from construction activities.
8.8.6
Examples of aesthetic treatments on site hoardings and green roof of
site office can be referred to Figure
8-12.
CMM3 – Tree Preservations
8.8.7 There will be 1 nos. of tree to be retained on the site and thus the measures should be implemented during construction phase, such as erection of fencing around the trees, avoidance of placing any construction materials close to the trees, apply mulching beyond root collar and also conduct visual checking / monitoring in regular basis.
OMM1 – Proper Arrangement of Materials
during Operation
8.8.8
The majority of operational activities, including vehicle repair,
maintenance, operation and parking, will be carried out within the
depot-cum-office building. Some vehicles parking will occur in the uncovered
car parks facing Lin Cheong Road.
Given that most of the vehicles at the said uncovered car parks are light
vehicles such as staff shuttle buses, 4-seats cars, instead of RCVs, it will
not cause any significant adverse impacts to the visual quality of the VSRs.
OMM2 – Landscape Design
OMM2.1 – Ground Floor Planting – Pedestrian
Zone
8.8.10
Tree planting with upright columnar form are proposed along the north
fence wall to soften the edges and provide visual interest at the streetscape
level and to maximise the amount of green space accessible to the public. It also enhances the streetscape amenity
for pedestrians passing by from the MTR station, and enables screening of views
from VSRs into vehicle maintenance depot. Similar trees planting will be taken
along the west building façade to soften its edges and to enhance the main
entrance. Feature trees are
proposed at the northwest and southwest corners of the building to provide a
strong vertical visual highlight.
8.8.11
An approximate 630m2 of tree and shrub planting and
groundcovers are proposed for pedestrian zone planting. A mix of native and
ornamental species is proposed in Appendix
8-5.
OMM2.2 – Vertical Greening
8.8.12
Extensive vertical greening with area of about 330 m2 would
be introduced to the Depot to screen views of the parking structure and enhance
the visual amenity of the building facades. Climbing plants, such as Lonicera japonica,
Pyrostegia venusta, Quisqualis indica, Tristellateia australasiae, are recommended to maximize the coverage and screening
of parking levels. Planters located
on each level of parking will provide sufficient space for the climbers to
spread across grills incorporated into the architectural facades.
OMM2.3 – Roof Gardens
8.8.13
A multi-layered landscape is created using varying levels of planting,
paving and landscape features in order to complement the strong architectural
lines. Trees, shrubs and
groundcovers with different textures, colours, and fragrances provide a rich
overlay to the terraces providing year round visual interest for users of the
roof landscape as well as for those viewing the roof garden from their
workspaces. An area of about 1,400m2
of shrub species is proposed to be provided either in built-in planters or
large feature pots. Trees will be
planted either in planters or in ornamental pots. A mix of native and ornamental shrubs
and groundcovers will be planted to articulate the spatial arrangements as well
as to further add to the visual amenity.
A mix of local natural stone materials and recycled products will be
explored for the paving and landscape features for both the pedestrian and roof
areas. Recommended tree and shrub species are listed in Appendix 8-5.
OMM2.4 – Hard Landscape features
8.8.15
A total of 27 trees on-grade
and on 3/F would
serve as compensation to 15 nos. of trees to be felled in accordance with
requirements set in ETWB TC(W) No. 3/2006. All the proposed mitigation
measures would be managed and maintained by FEHD to ensure the effectiveness
throughout the operation phase of the Project.
8.8.16
Appendix 8-7 shows the mitigation measures
and conceptual master landscape design for this Project.
Landscape Impact during Construction Phase
8.9.1
During the construction phase, 15 trees that are in direct conflict with
the proposed car parking spaces and access road for the vehicle depot will be
felled with compensation in compliance with ETWB TC(W)
No. 3/2008, already incorporated in the conceptual landscape master plan. Despite of the limited scale of
development, the construction of the proposed Depot involves removal of
existing 15 trees. There are still slight residual impacts on LCA 4 but
moderate residual impacts on LR 5-3. The impacts on LCA 4 and LR 5-3 are both
acceptable as the impact will be eliminated and the construction phase is
temporary in nature.
Landscape Impact during Operation Phase
8.9.2
As previously discussed, planting of a mix of native and ornamentals
special will be provided. A total
of 27 trees would serve as compensation to 15 nos. of trees to be felled in
accordance with requirements set in ETWB TC(W) No.
3/2006. At Day 1 of
operation, the planting is not mature enough. The magnitude of change is small.
With proper and regular maintenance, the planting will become mature and thus magnitude of change will be reduced to
negligible in Year 10 when the mitigation measures are already established.
Visual Impact during Construction Phase
8.9.3
With the implementation of mitigation measures of CMM1, CMM2 and CMM3 during construction phase, the
magnitude of change of VSR W02, VSR T02, VSR T03 and
VSR P02, would
become negligible since the visual quality and amenity of the Site have been
improved. As a result, the residue visual impacts for all VSRs would become
negligible.
Visual Impact during Operation Phase
8.9.4
Following the completion of construction activities, given
the proposed depot consists of low-rise structures that will have minimal
impacts on visual openness to the environment, the magnitude of change at Day
1 is small. However, the magnitude of change would further reduce as the proposed
landscape mitigation measures would help screen the operational phases and
soften the impact of the building on the surrounding landscape. At Year 10, the trees and shrub planting will
have matured further screening views for the surrounding VSRs to
have more greenery view, magnitude of change become slight.
8.9.5
Summary tables for the residual impact for LRs/LCAs/VSRs after
implementing mitigation measures are shown in Tables Table 8‑10, Table 8‑11, Table 8‑12 and Table 8‑13.
8.9.6
In view of the results discussed above, landscape and visual impact
induced from the construction of the proposed Depot is therefore acceptable,
with the implementation of mitigation measures.
8.10.1 Cumulative landscape and visual impacts during the construction and
operation phase of the Projects and other projects in the vicinity are
assessed. Key projects identified are planned football pitch and basketball
court at vacant land to the south of Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road) and the
proposed comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong
Station to be established in the year of 2017 to 2019 by phase whereas there is
no construction programme of the football pitch and basketball court at Hoi Fan
Road during the course of report, while the proposed Depot will be constructed
in 2014 and in operation in 2017. Therefore, cumulative impact of the proposed
project with the proposed football pitch and basketball court are not assessed in this study, while
cumulative impact of the proposed project with the proposed comprehensive
residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station is not anticipated.
8.11
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit
Construction Phase
8.11.1
Given the limited footprint of the proposed Depot, no significant
impacts on the identified LRs and LCAs will be anticipated except for impacts
on LR 5-3 Vacant Land Vegetation and LCA 4 Vacant Land due to felling of 15
common trees of the Site.
Construction site hoardings should be erected to surround the site to
minimise the landscape and visual impacts on viewers from road level. No monitoring is recommended during the
construction phase.
Operation Phase
8.11.2 The Project will result in the felling of 15 trees within the Site. The landscape design as mentioned in Sections 8.8.9 to 8.8.13 are adopted as mitigation measures to compensate for the trees lost, which is proposed to plant 27 nos. compensatory trees of heavy standard size (100mm DBH) on-grade and on 3/F, exceeding minimum compensatory requirements as per the requirement in accordance with ETWB TC(W) No. 3/2006 i.e. in a compensatory ratio not less than 1:1 in terms of both quality and quantity. Planting of these trees would be completed before the completion of construction work of the Project. Approval on tree felling would be obtained from the relevant government departments including Lands Department. The compensatory plantings would be implemented and any necessary monitoring of the compensatory planting after establishment would be conducted (if required) according to the tree felling approval conditions as required by the approval authorities.
8.12.1
LCAs, LRs and VSRs have been identified and their Sensitivity has been
evaluated. Magnitude of Change to
LCAs, LRs and VSRs during construction and operation phases before and after
implementation of recommended mitigation measures have been compared.
8.12.2 Out of the total 16 trees surveyed within the Site, 15 trees, which are of the invasive exotic species, Leucaena leucocephala (銀合歡), which is considered as an undesirable, self-seeded weedy species, are in direct conflict with the proposed car parking spaces and access road for the vehicle depot and are proposed to be removed during site clearance work. Despite of the exotic and invasive nature of Leucaena leucocephala, magnitude of change of LR 5-3 during construction phase is large because the trees to be felled are exactly located at LR 5-3 where the local context of the Site would be changed significantly, it will therefore cause direct impact from construction activities. Similarly, magnitude of change of LCA 4 during construction phase is large. As a result of low sensitivity and large magnitude of change, a moderate impact for LR 5-3 and LCA 4 is anticipated during the construction of the proposed Depot.
8.12.3 The potential sources of visual impacts from the proposed Depot during construction phase are mainly arisen from site clearance including temporary establishment of site office and associated work area, operation of site works, presence of numerous machineries and equipment as well as material stockpiling, and the incremental movement of site vehicles around. Due to the close proximity of VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 to the Site where these VSRs may have glimpse to full view of the Site, the construction activities may impose some visual impact on the viewers. Nevertheless, in view of their transient nature of use, the magnitude of change of VSR T02, VSR T03 and VSR P02 due to the construction activities is considered as small. As a result, with low sensitivity and small magnitude of change, slight visual impacts are anticipated. Following the completion of construction activities, the magnitude of change would further reduce as the proposed landscape mitigation measures would help screen the operational phases and soften the impact of the building on the surrounding landscape. At Year 10, the trees and shrub planting will have matured further screening views for the surrounding VSRs.
8.12.4
With the implementation of mitigation measures such as control of
construction activities and temporary landscape treatment during construction
phase, the proposed Depot will inevitably result in some landscape impact but
no adverse visual
impact during the construction phase, On the contrary, ground floor planting, vertical greening and roof gardens will be
provided for the proposed Depot during operation phase. Both landscape and
visual impact would become negligible in Year 10 when the mitigation measures
are already established.
8.12.5
Comparing with the original setting of the Site before the proposed
project where undesirable and weedy species are located at the Site, the
overall landscape character and visual quality of the Site would be improved,
with the provision of landscape design including ground floor planting at
pedestrian zone, vertical greening and roof gardens for the proposed Depot.
According to Annex 10 of EIAO-TM, the landscape and visual character of the
Site have been complemented and therefore landscape and visual impact arising
from the proposed Depot is considered as beneficial.
Table 8‑10 Magnitude
of Change for LRs and Significance of Landscape Impacts during Construction and
Operational Phases
LR |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change |
Significant Threshold |
Magnitude of Change After
Mitigation Measures |
Significant Threshold After
Mitigation Measures |
||||||||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
||||||||
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
||||||||||||
LR
1 Open Space |
|||||||||||||||
LR 1-1 |
Nam Cheong Park |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 1-2 |
Tung Chow Street Park |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 1-3 |
Chui Yu Road Rest Garden |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 1-4 |
Fu Cheong Estate Playground
and Basketball Courts |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 1-5 |
Olympian City Promenade Park |
Medium |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR
2 Roadside Planting |
|||||||||||||||
LR 2-1 |
Along Lin Cheong Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-2 |
Not Used |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|||||
LR 2-3 |
Along Hoi Fan Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-4 |
Along Hoi Fai Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-5 |
Along Sam Mong Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-6 |
Along Chui Yu Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-7 |
Along Sai
Chuen Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-8 |
Along Yen Chow Street West |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-9 |
Along Tonkin Street West |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 2-10 |
At the T-Junction of Yen
Chow Street West and Lin Cheong Road amid Fu Cheong Estate and Nam Cheong Estate |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 3 Marine Frontage |
|||||||||||||||
LR 3-1 |
Cargo Handling Basin |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 3-2 |
Waterfront Promenade |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 4 Vacant Land |
|||||||||||||||
LR 4-1 |
To the west of Wholesale Fish Market along Lin Cheong Road, bounded by
Lin Cheong Road and the marine frontage |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 4-2 |
Bounded by Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary
School (West Kowloon) and Lin Cheung Road |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 4-3 |
Bounded by Sham Mong Road
and Lin Cheung Road, inside Nam Cheong Park, as a current construction site
of MTR Express Rail Line (XRL) |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 4-4 |
Adjacent to Nam Cheong MTR
Station, which is currently occupied as MTR Express Rail Line (XRL)
construction work site |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5 Vacant Land Vegetation |
|||||||||||||||
LR 5-1 |
Immediate in front of the
exit of Nam Cheong Station to the north of the Site |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-2 |
Behind Nam Cheong Station Exit,
along Wholesale Market Street, to the northwest of the Site |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-3 |
At the northeastern
periphery of the site bounded by the Site itself and CLP Sub-station |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Intermediate |
Adver-sely Small |
Negligi-ble |
Moderate |
Adver-sely Slight |
Negligi-ble |
|||
LR 5-4 |
At the northwestern
periphery of Wholesale Fish Market |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-5 |
In between the vacant land
to the northeastern of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School (West Kowloon) |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-6 |
Bounded by Hoi Fan Road and
Lin Cheong Road, adjacent to Tai Kok Tsui Catholic Primary School (Hoi Fan Road) |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-7 |
At the slope next to bus
terminal at Tonkit Street West |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 5-8 |
To the north of Sewage
Screening Plants of DSD |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6 Residential / Architectural Planting |
|||||||||||||||
LR 6-1 |
At Fu Cheong Estate |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-2 |
At Nam Cheong Estate |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-3 |
At Sewage Screening Plants
of DSD |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-4 |
At Hampton Place |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-5 |
At the Long Beach |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-6 |
At Island Harbourview |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-7 |
At Olympian City One |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-8 |
At Harbour Green |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-9 |
At Metro Harbour View |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-10 |
To the southwest of Sewage
Screening Plant of DSD amid Fu Cheong Estate and Nam Cheong Estate |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-11 |
Along the Waterfront
Promenade adjacent to the Long Beach |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-12 |
Adjacent to Exit C of Nam
Cheong MTR Station |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR with Planned Development |
|||||||||||||||
LR 1-P1 |
Recreational resources as
football pitch and basketball court |
NA |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
LR 6-P1 |
Residential Planting at the proposed
comprehensive residential and commercial development above Nam Cheong Station |
NA |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|||||
Remark: Beneficial effect, if any, is specifically
indicated.
Table 8‑11 Magnitude
of Change for LCAs and Significance of Landscape Impacts during Construction
and Operational Phases
LCA |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of
Change |
Significant
Threshold |
Magnitude of
Change After Mitigation Measures |
Significant
Threshold After Mitigation Measures |
|||||||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
|||||||
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
|||||||||||
LCA 1 |
Marine Frontage
Landscape |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
||||
LCA 2 |
Wholesale Food
and Fish Market Landscape |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
||||
LCA 3 |
Park Landscape |
High |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
||||
LCA 4 |
Open Car Parks /
Vacant Land Landscape |
Low |
Large |
Large |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Intermediate |
Adver-sely Small |
Negli-gible |
Slight |
Adver-sely Slight |
Negli- gible |
||
LCA 5 |
Community /
Residential Urban Landscape |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
||||
LCA 6 |
Public Services
Landscapes |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
||||
Remark: Beneficial effect, if any, is specifically
indicated.
Table 8‑12 Magnitude
of Change for VSRs during Construction and Operational Phases
VSRs |
Description |
Compatibility
of the project with the surrounding landscape (Good, Fair, Poor) |
Duration of
Impacts (Frequent, Intermittent, Occasional, Rare) |
Scale of Development |
Reversibility
of Change (Yes/ No) |
Shortest Viewing Distance (approx. m) |
Potential
Blockage of View (Full, Partial,
Glimpse) |
Magnitude of
Change (Large,
Intermediate, Small, Negligible) |
||
Construction |
Operation |
|||||||||
Visible
Area with Residential
VSRs |
||||||||||
VSR R01 |
Residents of Fu Loy House, Fu Ying
House and Fu Yuet House of Fu Cheong Estate |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
340 |
Glimpse |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R02 |
Residents of Cheong Chit House and
Cheong Yat House of Nam Cheong Estate |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
250 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R03 |
Residents of Blocks 1 and 2 of Metro
Harbour View |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
410 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R04 |
Residents of West Kowloon Disciplined
Services Quarters |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
410 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R05 |
Residents of Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 of
Harbour Green |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
430 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R06 |
Residents of Block 1 of Island Harbourview |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
450 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R07 |
Residents of Blocks 8 and 9 of The
Long Beach |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
370 |
Glimpse to Partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR R08 |
Residents of Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of
Hampton Place |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
280 |
Partial
to Full |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
Visible
Area with Occupational
VSRs |
||||||||||
VSR W01 |
Staff of Wholesale Market Office |
Fair |
Intermittent |
Small |
No |
240 |
Glimpse |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR W02 |
Staff of Yuen Fat Building and Cargo
Uploading / Loading Area |
Fair |
Intermittent |
Small |
No |
20 |
Partial
to full |
Small |
Small |
|
VSR W03 |
Staff and Students of Sir Ellis Kadoorie Secondary School |
Fair |
Intermittent |
Small |
No |
65 |
Glimpse |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR W04 |
Staff of CLP Tai Kok
Tsui Substation |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
<1
(Immediate adjacent) |
Full |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
Visible
Area with Travelling
VSRs |
||||||||||
VSR T01 |
Travellers of Wholesale Market Street |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
30 |
Glimpse
to full |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR T02 |
Travellers of Yen Chow Street West |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
1 |
Glimpse
to full |
Small |
Small |
|
VSR T03 |
Travellers of Yen Ming Road |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
1 |
Full |
Small |
Small |
|
VSR T04 |
Travellers of Hoi Fan Road |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
40 |
Glimpse
to partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR
T05 |
Travelling
of West Kowloon Highway |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
35 |
Glimpse to partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR T06 |
Travelling of Lin Cheong Road |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
20 |
Glimpse
to partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
Visible
area with Recreational VSRs |
||||||||||
VSR RE01 |
Visitors of Nam Cheong Park |
Fair |
Occasional |
Small |
No |
140 |
Glimpse
to partial |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
Visible
area with both Travelling and
Occupational VSRs |
||||||||||
VSR P01 |
Users / Travellers of Open Carpark next to Wholesale Fish Market |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
405 |
Glimpse |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
VSR P02 |
Users / Visitor of Wholesale Food and
Fish Market |
Fair |
Occasional |
Small |
No |
30 |
Glimpse |
Small |
Small |
|
VSR P03 |
Users / Travellers of West Kowloon
Cargo Handling Area (including marine frontage) |
Fair |
Rare |
Small |
No |
150 |
Glimpse |
Negligible |
Negligible |
|
Visual
Sensitive Receivers with planned Development |
||||||||||
VSR RP01 |
Residents of the proposed
comprehensive residential and commercial development at Nam Cheong Station |
Fair |
Frequent |
Small |
No |
120 |
Partial |
NA |
Small |
|
Table 8‑13 Significance
Visual Impacts during Construction and Operational Phases
VSRs |
Sensitivity |
Magnitude of Change
Before Mitigation Measures |
Significance
Threshold Before Mitigation Measures |
Magnitude of Change
After |
Significance
Threshold After |
||||||
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
Construction |
Operation |
||||
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
Day 1 |
Year 10 |
||||||||
Visible
area with Residential VSRs |
|||||||||||
VSR R01 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R02 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R03 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R04 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R05 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R06 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R07 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR R08 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visible
area with Occupational VSRs |
|||||||||||
VSR W01 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR W02 |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR W03 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR W04 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visible
area with Travelling VSRs |
|||||||||||
VSR T01 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR T02 |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR T03 |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR T04 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR T05 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR T06 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visible
area with Recreational VSRs |
|||||||||||
VSR RE01 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visible
area with both Travelling and Occupational VSRs |
|||||||||||
VSR P01 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR P02 |
Low |
Small |
Small |
Slight |
Slight |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
VSR P03 |
Low |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Visual
Sensitive Receivers at Planned Development |
|||||||||||
VSR RP01 |
Low
|
NA # |
Small |
NA
# |
Slight |
NA
# |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Remark:
# Construction of the proposed Depot would be commenced before the
establishment of the proposed comprehensive residential and commercial
development above Nam Cheong Station, no magnitude of change or visual impact
are anticipated for VSR RP-01 during the construction phase, and thus was shown
as “NA (Not applicable)”.