3.1 Legislation, Standards and Guidelines
3.4 Construction Dust Assessment
3.5 Operational Air Quality Assessment
Figure 3.1 Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 1 of 6)
Figure 3.1a Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 2 of 6)
Figure 3.1b Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 3 of 6)
Figure 3.1c Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 4 of 6)
Figure 3.1d Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 5 of 6)
Figure 3.1e Locations of Air Sensitive Receivers (Sheet 6 of 6)
Figure 3.2 Locations of Concerned
PATH Grids
Figure 3.3 Construction Dust Impact Assessment Area
Figure 3.4a Unmitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.4b Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.4c Unmitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.4d Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.4e Unmitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.5a Unmitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.5b Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.5c Unmitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.5d Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.5e Unmitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.6a Unmitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.6b Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.6c Unmitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.6d Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.6e Unmitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.7a Unmitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.7b Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.7c Unmitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.7d Unmitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.7e Unmitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.8a Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.8b Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.8c Mitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.8d Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.8e Mitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.9a Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.9b Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.9c Mitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.9d Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.9e Mitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.10a Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.10b Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.10c Mitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.10d Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.10e Mitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.11a Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.11b Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.11c Mitigated Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.11d Mitigated Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.11e Mitigated Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations (Tier 1) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.12a Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 2) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2021)
Figure 3.12b Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 2) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2024)
Figure 3.12c Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 2) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2025)
Figure 3.12d Mitigated Cumulative Maximum 1-hour TSP Concentrations (Tier 2) at 1.5m above Ground (Year 2027)
Figure 3.13 Operational Air Quality Impact Assessment Area
Figure 3.14 Locations of Open Road, Tunnel Portals, Ventilation Buildings and Idling Emission Source
Figure 3.15 Locations of Chimney, Proposed Marina and Existing Local Vessel
Figure 3.16 Locations of Sewage Pumping Stations (Sheet 1 of 3)
Figure 3.16a Locations of Sewage Pumping Stations (Sheet 2 of 3)
Figure 3.16b Locations of Sewage Pumping Stations (Sheet 3 of 3)
Figure 3.17 Contours
of Cumulative 19th highest 1-hour NO2 Concentrations at
1.5m above Ground
Figure 3.18 Contours
of Cumulative Annual NO2 Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground
Figure 3.19 Contours
of Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above
Ground
Figure 3.20 Contours
of Cumulative Annual RSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground
Figure 3.21 Contours
of Cumulative 10th highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above
Ground
Figure 3.22 Contours
of Cumulative Annual FSP Concentrations at 1.5m above Ground
Appendix 3.1 Detailed Existing Air Quality Conditions in Year 2010
Appendix
3.2 Dust Emission
Source Locations
Appendix 3.3 Calculations of Dust Emission
Appendix 3.4 Hourly Composite Vehicular Emission Factor (for Construction Dust Assessment)
Appendix 3.5 Calculations of Idling Emission and Tunnel Portal / Ventilation Building (for Construction Dust Assessment)
Appendix 3.6 Detailed Construction Dust Assessment Results (Unmitigated)
Appendix 3.7 Justification of Dust Suppression Efficiency
Appendix 3.8 Detailed Construction Dust Assessment Results (Mitigated)
Appendix 3.9 Traffic Forecast
Appendix 3.10 EMFAC-HK Key Model Assumptions
Appendix 3.11 Hourly Composite Vehicular Emission Factor (for Operational Air Quality Assessment)
Appendix 3.12 Calculations of Emission from Tunnel Portal and Ventilation Building
Appendix 3.13 Calculation of Idling Emission (for Operation Air Quality Assessment)
Appendix 3.14 Details of Emission from OWTF Phase 1
Appendix 3.15 Details of Emission from Marine Vessels
Appendix 3.16 Detailed Operational Air Quality Assessment Results
3.1
Legislation, Standards and Guidelines
3.1.1
General
3.1.1.1
The relevant legislations, standards and guidelines
applicable to the present study for the assessment of air quality impacts
include:
·
Air Pollution Control Ordinance (APCO) (Cap 311);
·
Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation;
·
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines
(HKPSG); and
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO)
(Cap. 499), Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process
(TM-EIAO), Annex 4 and Annex 12.
3.1.2
Air Quality Objectives
3.1.2.1
The principal legislation for controlling air
pollutants is the APCO (Cap 311) and its subsidiary regulations, which defines
statutory Air Quality Objectives (AQOs).
3.1.2.2
The APCO (Cap.311) provides the power for
controlling air pollutants from a variety of stationary and mobile sources and
encompasses a number of Air Quality Objectives (AQOs). In addition to the APCO,
the following overall policy objectives are laid down in Chapter 9 of the Hong
Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG) as follows:
·
Limit the contamination of the air in Hong Kong,
through land use planning and through the enforcement of the APCO to safeguard
the health and well-being of the community; and
·
Ensure that the AQOs for 7 common air pollutants
are met as soon as possible.
3.1.2.3 The principal legislation for controlling air pollutants is the Air Pollution Control Ordinance (APCO) (Cap 311) which provides a statutory framework for establishing the AQOs and stipulating the anti-pollution requirements for air pollution sources. Current AQOs are set out in the table below.
Table 3.1 Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives (HKAQOs)
Pollutant |
Limits on Concentration, µg/m3 [1] (Number
of Exceedance per year allowed in brackets) |
||||
10-min |
1-hour |
8-hour |
24-hour [2] |
Annual [2] |
|
Sulphur
Dioxide |
500 (3) |
|
|
125 (3) |
|
Respirable
Suspended Particulates (RSP) [3] |
|
|
|
100 (9) |
50 (0) |
Fine Suspended
Particulates (FSP) [4] |
|
|
|
75 (9) |
35 (0) |
Carbon Monoxide |
|
30,000 (0) |
10,000 (0) |
|
|
Nitrogen Dioxide |
|
200 (18) |
|
|
40 (0) |
Ozone |
|
|
160 (9) |
|
|
Lead |
|
|
|
|
0.5 (0) |
Notes:
[1] Measured
at 293K and 101.325kPa.
[2] Arithmetic
mean.
[3] Respirable
suspended particulates means suspended particulates in air with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometres or smaller.
[4] Fine
suspended particulates means suspended particulates in air with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometres or smaller.
3.1.3
Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation
3.1.3.1
The Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation specifies processes that require special dust control. The
Contractors are required to inform the EPD and adopt proper dust suppression
measures while carrying out “Notifiable Works” (which requires prior
notification by the regulation) and “Regulatory Works” to meet the requirements
as defined under the regulation.
3.1.4
Total Suspended Particulate Criterion
3.1.4.1
There is no criterion on TSP under the AQOs. In
accordance with Annex 4 of TM-EIAO, a limit of 500μg/m3 for
1-hour TSP concentration at any sensitive receivers should be adopted for
evaluating air quality impacts.
3.1.5
Odour Criterion
3.1.5.1
In accordance with Annex 4 of TM-EIAO, a limit of 5
odour units based on a time-averaging period of 5 seconds should not be exceeded
at any sensitive receivers.
3.2.1
In
accordance with Annex 12 of the TM-EIAO, Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs) include
domestic premises, hotel, hostel, hospital, clinic, nursery, temporary housing
accommodation, school, educational institution, office, factory, shop, shopping
centre, place of public worship, library, court of law, sports stadium or
performing arts centre. Any other
premises or places with which, in terms of duration or number of people
affected, has a similar sensitivity to the air pollutants as the aforelisted
premises and places would also be considered as a sensitive receiver.
3.2.2
Representative
ASRs within the Project Site and a distance of 500m from the boundary of the Potential
Development Areas (PDAs) and the works of the Project within the Study Area
have been identified. These ASRs include both the existing and planned
developments. Existing ASRs are identified by means of reviewing topographic
maps, aerial photos, land status plans, supplemented by site inspections. They
include scattered village houses generally in 1 to 3-storeys high, as well as
residential/commercial developments in Tung Chung/North Lantau.
3.2.3
Planned/committed
ASRs are identified by making reference to relevant Outline Zoning Plans (OZP),
Layout Plans and other published plans in relation to the development on North
Lantau, including:
·
Tung Chung Town Centre Area OZP (No. S/I-TCTC/19);
·
Tung Chung Town Centre Area Layout Plan - Lantau
Island (No. L/I-TCTC/1G);
·
North Lantau New Town Phase IIB Area (Part) Layout
Plan (No. L/I-TCIIB/1D).
3.2.4
The
locations of representative ASRs for air quality impact assessment are
summarized in Table 3.2 and their locations are shown
in Figure 3.1.
Table 3.2 Representative air sensitive receivers
ASR ID |
Description |
No. of Storey (approx.) |
Land use [1] |
Separation distance from project
boundary (approx.) (m) |
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One Citygate |
5 |
Com |
360 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
3 |
Gov |
410 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon
Primary School |
7 |
Edu |
400 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial
Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
7 |
Edu |
350 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam
Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
7 |
Edu |
330 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary
School |
7 |
Edu |
420 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
33 |
Res |
240 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung
Shing House |
30 |
Res |
90 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block
9 |
43 |
Res |
60 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat
House |
35 |
Res |
20 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat
House |
35 |
Res |
270 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1 |
Rec |
360 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital
Phase 1 |
10 |
Hos |
70 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
47 |
Res |
310 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
51 |
Res |
470 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
7 |
Edu |
280 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
7 |
Edu |
300 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
50 |
Res |
620 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
56 |
Res |
660 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1-3 |
Res |
580 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
15 |
Res |
570 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
49 |
Res |
600 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun
Secondary School |
7 |
Edu |
570 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak
Primary School |
7 |
Edu |
630 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
30 |
Com |
500 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1 |
Rec |
490 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1-3 |
Res |
400 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s
Kindergarden |
1 |
Edu |
450 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1-3 |
Res |
290 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1 |
Edu |
260 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1-3 |
Res |
160 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1-3 |
Res |
50 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong
Christian College |
8 |
Edu |
50 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1 |
Wor |
Within project boundary |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1-3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon
Monastery |
1-3 |
Wor |
130 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
4 |
Gov |
520 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1 |
Rec |
680 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1-3 |
Res |
440 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
32 |
Res |
210 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
38 |
Res |
100 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
28 |
Res |
60 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
33 |
Res |
190 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
7 |
|
100 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
49 |
Res |
400 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
52 |
Res |
530 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
51 |
Res |
600 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1 |
Res |
410 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1 |
Res |
540 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1 |
Res |
460 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
15 |
Res |
470 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
50 |
Res |
620 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
4 |
Gov |
<10 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
8 |
Gov |
<10 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
3 |
Res |
180 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
7 |
Edu |
50 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
37 |
Res |
<10 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
37 |
Res |
10 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
37 |
Res |
20 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
37 |
Res |
20 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
3 |
Res |
<10 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
3 |
Res |
<10 |
Planned ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
13 [2] |
Com |
190 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential Development |
30 [2] |
Res |
40 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential Development |
26 |
Res |
180 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary School |
7 |
Edu |
100 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing Development |
40 |
Res |
90 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development |
39 |
Res |
30 |
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
34 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
5 |
Gov |
Within project boundary |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
35 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
35 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
36 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
39 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
38 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
30 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
25 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
31 |
CDA |
Within project boundary |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
25 |
CDA |
Within project boundary |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
31 |
CDA |
Within project boundary |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
30 |
CDA |
Within project boundary |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
32 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
29 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
32 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
29 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
34 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
28 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
16 |
Gov |
Within project boundary |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
9 |
Gov |
Within project boundary |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
21 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
11 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
32 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
32 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
36 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
36 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
11 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
31 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
25 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
25 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
31 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
6 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
13 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
10 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
8 |
Edu |
Within project boundary |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
5 |
Rec |
Within project boundary |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
5 |
Rec |
Within project boundary |
Planned ASRs (TCW under this Project) |
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
18 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
38 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
38 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
32 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
17 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
17 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
4 |
Gov |
Within project boundary |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
5 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
3 |
Com |
Within project boundary |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
6 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
3 |
Res |
Within project boundary |
Note:
[1] Res – Residential; Com – Commercial; CDA – Comprehensive
Development Area; Gov – Government use; Edu –Education; Wor –
Worship; Hos – Hospital/ Clinic; Rec – Park/ Recreational.
[2] Only maximum building heights are
available for these ASRs. Number of storey is therefore estimated by assuming
the floor height as 3m.
[3] No such information is available during
the preparation of this report.
3.3.1
Description of the Existing Environment
3.3.1.1
Historical air quality monitoring data from the
nearest Tung Chung Air Quality Monitoring Station (AQMS) operated by the EPD has
been examined. This AQMS is located at the roof top of Tung Chung Health Centre
(approx. 27.5m above ground), which is about 70m away from the North Lantau
Highway (NLH). Vehicular emissions from the NLH is therefore considered as one
of the key contributors to the air quality monitored at Tung Chung AQMS.
3.3.1.2
The latest 5 published years of air quality
monitoring data, i.e. 2010 to 2014 are described in the sections below.
Meteorological data for the same period measured at the Hong Kong International
Airport (HKIA) by Hong Kong Observatory (HKO) have also been presented to
indicate the prevailing wind direction that contributes the highest recorded
1-hour concentration beyond the allowed exceedance (if applicable).
3.3.1.3 In addition, the average percentage time distribution of short-term pollutant concentrations range over the past 5 years have also be summarised in the sections below in order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the past background air quality conditions. Only the short-term pollutant concentrations (i.e. 1-hour NO2/ SO2/ CO, 24-hour RSP/FSP, and 8-hour O3) are summarised. Air quality data from other general Air Quality Monitoring Station (AQMS) operated by EPD in Hong Kong have also be summarised for comparison.
Nitrogen
Dioxide (NO2)
3.3.1.4 General monitoring records of 1-hour NO2 concentrations for the latest 5 years in various AQMSs in Hong Kong are presented in Table 3.3a, and the detailed records of NO2 concentrations at Tung Chung AQMS are tabulated in Table 3.3b.
Table 3.3a Percentage
time distribution of 1-hour NO2 concentration (2010 – 2014)
Category |
AQMS |
Percentage Time Distribution in various Concentration Range |
|||
0 – 50% of AQOs |
50 – 75% of AQOs |
75 – 100% of AQOs |
>100% of AQOs |
||
1-hour NO2 |
(0 – 100 µg/m3) |
(100 – 150 µg/m3) |
(150 – 200 µg/m3) |
(>200 µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
93.1% |
5.9% |
0.9% |
0.1% |
Yuen Long |
94.5% |
4.8% |
0.6% |
0.1% |
|
Sha Tin |
94.7% |
4.5% |
0.7% |
0.1% |
|
Tai Po |
96.3% |
3.5% |
0.2% |
0.0% |
|
Tuen Mun [1] |
92.5% |
6.4% |
0.9% |
0.1% |
|
Average |
94.2% |
5.0% |
0.7% |
0.1% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
92.6% |
6.4% |
0.9% |
0.1% |
Eastern |
94.4% |
4.9% |
0.6% |
0.1% |
|
Kwai Chung |
87.6% |
9.9% |
2.1% |
0.4% |
|
Kwun Tong |
92.2% |
6.1% |
1.2% |
0.5% |
|
Sham Shui Po |
84.8% |
13.4% |
1.5% |
0.3% |
|
Tsuen Wan |
90.2% |
8.5% |
1.0% |
0.2% |
|
Average |
90.3% |
8.2% |
1.2% |
0.3% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Note:
[1] Tuen
Mun AQMS commenced operation in Year 2014, hence only 1 year air quality
monitoring data is available.
Table 3.3b Air quality monitoring data – NO2 (Tung
Chung Station, 2010 – 2014)
Pollutant |
Year |
19th highest 1-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Max. 24-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Annual Conc. (μg/m3) |
NO2 |
2010 |
203 {160o} |
149 |
44 |
2011 |
184 {270o} |
137 |
51 |
|
2012 |
166 {330o} |
124 |
43 |
|
2013 |
177 {60o} |
140 |
49 |
|
2014 |
198 {280o} |
141 |
45 |
|
5-year mean |
186 [93%] |
138 |
46 [116%] |
|
AQOs |
200 (18) |
N/A |
40 |
Notes:
N/A - Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
[1] Number
of exceedance allowed under the AQOs is shown in ( ), % of the AQOs is shown
in [ ], and wind direction measured at HKIA is given in { }. The 5-year
mean is the average of the yearly maximum.
[2] Monitoring results exceeding the AQOs are underlined.
3.3.1.5 It can be seen in Table 3.3a that the majority of the time of a year (i.e. >90%) that the 1-hour NO2 concentrations in Tung Chung are at a very low concentrations (below 50% of its AQOs i.e. 100μg/m3), which is similar to those of other New Towns and slightly better than the average in Urban area. And there is only 0.1% time of a year that the 1-hour NO2 concentrations would exceed its criteria, which is however also found similar to those in Urban area. From Table 3.3b, it shows that the 19th highest 1-hour NO2 complied with the AQOs of 200μg/m3 in the past 5 years except for Year 2010. There was no obvious trend for the 19th highest 1-hour NO2 concentration and the range was from 166μg/m3 in 2012 to 203μg/m3 in 2010. By correlating the 19th highest 1-hour NO2 concentrations with the wind directions measured at HKIA, the NO2 episodes were corresponding to the wind direction from northwest, northeast, southeast and west, which indicated that these NO2 episodes were likely contributed by various sources adjacent to the TC AQMS.
3.3.1.6 Similarly, there was no pattern observed for the 24-hour NO2 concentration, which had its maximum at 149μg/m3 in 2010 and minimum at 124μg/m3 in 2012. The annual NO2 remained relatively steady in the range of 43 - 51μg/m3, all exceeding the AQOs of 40μg/m3.
Particulates
(including RSP and FSP)
3.3.1.7
General
monitoring records of 24-hour RSP/ FSP concentrations for the latest 5 years in
various AQMSs in Hong Kong are presented in Table 3.3c, and the detailed records of RSP/ FSP concentrations at
Tung Chung AQMS are tabulated in Table
3.3d.
Table 3.3c Percentage
time distribution of 24-hour RSP/FSP concentration (2010 – 2014)
Category |
AQMS |
Percentage Time Distribution in various Concentration Range |
|||
0 – 50% of AQOs |
50 – 75% of AQOs |
75 – 100% of AQOs |
>100% of AQOs |
||
24-hour RSP |
(0 – 50 µg/m3) |
(50 – 75 µg/m3) |
(75 – 100 µg/m3) |
(>100 µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
64.4% |
20.9% |
10.3% |
4.4% |
Yuen Long |
56.3% |
24.1% |
13.2% |
6.4% |
|
Sha Tin |
67.3% |
22.2% |
8.5% |
2.0% |
|
Tai Po |
66.3% |
22.4% |
9.1% |
2.1% |
|
Tuen Mun [1] |
61.3% |
23.5% |
9.6% |
5.6% |
|
Average |
63.1% |
22.6% |
10.1% |
4.1% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
59.1% |
25.7% |
11.6% |
3.6% |
Eastern |
69.3% |
22.2% |
7.2% |
1.3% |
|
Kwai Chung |
65.2% |
23.6% |
8.7% |
2.4% |
|
Kwun Tong |
59.4% |
26.6% |
10.4% |
3.5% |
|
Sham Shui Po |
62.6% |
26.0% |
9.0% |
2.4% |
|
Tsuen Wan |
64.9% |
23.9% |
9.2% |
2.0% |
|
Average |
63.4% |
24.7% |
9.4% |
2.5% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
65.0% |
23.1% |
8.9% |
3.0% |
Average |
65.0% |
23.1% |
8.9% |
3.0% |
|
24-hour FSP |
(0 – 37.5 µg/m3) |
(37.5 - 56.3µg/m3) |
(56.3 – 75 µg/m3) |
(>75 µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
73.1% |
17.2% |
7.2% |
2.5% |
Yuen Long |
62.9% |
23.4% |
9.8% |
3.9% |
|
Sha Tin |
71.9% |
19.6% |
6.5% |
1.9% |
|
Tai Po |
71.5% |
19.5% |
7.3% |
1.6% |
|
Tuen Mun [1] |
66.2% |
23.2% |
6.6% |
4.0% |
|
Average |
69.1% |
20.6% |
7.5% |
2.8% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
67.7% |
21.7% |
7.9% |
2.7% |
Eastern |
75.4% |
20.3% |
3.7% |
0.7% |
|
Kwai Chung |
68.9% |
20.9% |
7.3% |
2.8% |
|
Kwun Tong |
70.4% |
21.8% |
5.5% |
2.2% |
|
Sham Shui Po |
66.3% |
26.4% |
5.7% |
1.6% |
|
Tsuen Wan |
70.3% |
22.2% |
6.3% |
1.2% |
|
Average |
69.8% |
22.2% |
6.1% |
1.9% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
75.1% |
18.4% |
5.0% |
1.5% |
Average |
75.1% |
18.4% |
5.0% |
1.5% |
Table 3.3d Air quality monitoring data – RSP/FSP (Tung Chung
Station, 2010 – 2014)
Pollutant |
Year |
Max. 1-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
10th highest 24-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Annual Conc. (μg/m3) |
RSP |
2010 |
640 [3] {90o} |
111 |
45 |
2011 |
250 {260o} |
109 |
47 |
|
2012 |
274 {280o} |
106 |
45 |
|
2013 |
234 {310o} |
108 |
42 |
|
2014 |
247 {320o} |
101 |
39 |
|
5-year mean |
329 |
107 [107%] |
44 [88%] |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
100 (9) |
45 |
|
FSP |
2010 |
209 {320o} |
79 |
29 |
2011 |
174 {270o} |
78 |
32 |
|
2012 |
210 {280o} |
74 |
28 |
|
2013 |
158 {310o} |
76 |
26 |
|
2014 |
169 {320o} |
65 |
24 |
|
5-year mean |
184 |
74 [99%] |
28 [80%] |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
75 (9) |
35 |
Notes:
N/A - Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
[1] Number
of exceedance allowed under the AQOs is shown in ( ), % of the AQOs is shown
in [ ], and wind direction measured at HKIA is given in { }. The 5-year
mean is the average of the yearly maximum.
[2] Monitoring results exceeding the AQOs are underlined.
[3] The
value was recorded during a dust plume originated from the northern part of
China in March 2010, which was an abnormal event, and hence has not been used
in the calculation of the 5-year mean.
3.3.1.8 It can be seen in Table 3.3c that the majority of the time of a year (i.e. ~65%) the 24-hour RSP concentrations in Tung Chung are at a very low concentrations (below 50% of its AQOs i.e. 50μg/m3), which is similar to those of other New Towns and Urban areas. And there is about 4% time of a year that the 24-hour RSP concentrations would exceed its criteria and is however also similar to those in Urban area and Rural area. Similarly, there is about 75% time of a year the 24-hour FSP concentrations in Tung Chung are below 50% of the criteria, and only 2.5% time the criteria is exceeded, which are similar to those in Urban and Rural areas. From Table 3.3d, it showed that the 10th highest 24-hour RSP exceeded with the AQOs of 100μg/m3 in the past 5 years. The 10th highest 24-hour RSP concentration is gradually decreasing from the value of 111μg/m3 in 2010 to 101μg/m3 in 2014. In addition, a dust plume that originated from northern part of Mainland China in March 2010 resulted in an abnormal hourly RSP concentration.
3.3.1.9 The 10th highest daily FSP concentrations is gradually decreasing from the value of 79μg/m3 in 2010 to 65μg/m3 in 2014 and complied with the AQOs limit for years 2012 and 2014. By correlating the highest 1-hour RSP/FSP concentrations with the wind directions, the majority highest RSP /FSP episodes were corresponding to the wind direction from northwest to west. According to the “2010 Airport Operational Air Quality Study” prepared by the Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (hereinafter called “the HKUST Study”), the impact of HKIA emissions on local RSP levels was concluded negligible and the RSP/FSP concentrations would likely influenced by marine shipping, road transport and regional emission source located northwest from the TC AQMS.
3.3.1.10 Annual RSP concentrations also showed a general decreasing trend, from 45μg/m3 in 2010 to 39μg/m3 in Year 2014, and all complied with the AQOs limit. And the annual FSP concentrations in past 5 years remained steady, ranging from 24 to 32μg/m3, all complying with the AQOs of 35μg/m3.
3.3.1.11 As presented above, exceedances of 24-hour RSP/FSP concentrations were generally observed in Tung Chung over the past 5 years. In order to understand if there is a pattern of high concentration episode over the year, the total exceedance record over the past 5 years in each month have been investigated and are illustrated in the Diagrams 3.1 – 3.2 below. Exceedance records in other general AQMS operated by EPD in Hong Kong have also be presented for comparison.
Diagram 3.1 Number of Exceedance of 24-hour RSP (2010-2014)
Diagram 3.2 Number of Exceedance of 24-hour FSP (2010-2014)
3.3.1.12 As
indicated in Diagrams 3.1 and 3.2,
it is found that exceedance of 24-hour RSP/FSP concentrations generally
occurred in January and December (and in October for some stations as well)
when the prevailing winds were from north and northeasterly, accounting for
about 60% and 70% of the recorded RSP and FSP exceedances in the past 5 years
from 2010 to 2014 respectively. The patterns were found very similar to all
stations, indicating that the episodes were affecting air quality throughout
the whole territory during winter season, which are likely originated from
regional sources, particularly from the northwest. Anthropogenic primary
sources (coal combustion, vehicular exhaust, and residue oil combustion) showed
the highest contributions associated with northwesterly wind, indicating the
strong influence of the more urbanized areas to the northwest of Hong Kong in
the Pearl River Delta region [Ref-[1]]. It was also found
that non-local contributions exhibited relatively higher contributions in
winter (77%) compared to summer (48%) [Ref-[2]].
Ozone (O3)
3.3.1.13 General monitoring records of 8-hour O3
concentrations for the latest 5 years in various AQMSs in Hong Kong are
presented in Table 3.3e, and the
detailed records of O3 concentrations at Tung Chung AQMS are
tabulated in Table 3.3f.
Table 3.3e Percentage
time distribution of 8-hour O3 concentration (2010 – 2014)
Category |
AQMS |
Percentage Time Distribution in various
Concentration Range |
|||
0 – 50% of AQOs |
50 – 75% of AQOs |
75 – 100% of AQOs |
>100% of AQOs |
||
8-hour O3 |
(0 – 80
µg/m3) |
(80 – 120
µg/m3) |
(120 – 160
µg/m3) |
(>160
µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
66.6% |
22.1% |
6.9% |
4.4% |
Yuen Long |
71.9% |
19.4% |
5.6% |
3.1% |
|
Sha Tin |
57.7% |
29.1% |
10.5% |
2.7% |
|
Tai Po |
64.9% |
27.2% |
6.5% |
1.4% |
|
Tuen Mun [1] |
76.4% |
14.2% |
6.0% |
3.3% |
|
Average |
67.5% |
22.4% |
7.1% |
3.0% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
76.9% |
17.7% |
3.9% |
1.4% |
Eastern |
79.9% |
16.6% |
2.7% |
0.7% |
|
Kwai Chung |
86.9% |
11.6% |
1.3% |
0.3% |
|
Kwun Tong |
74.9% |
22.5% |
2.4% |
0.2% |
|
Sham Shui Po |
87.1% |
10.5% |
2.0% |
0.4% |
|
Tsuen Wan |
83.0% |
14.2% |
2.2% |
0.7% |
|
Average |
81.4% |
15.5% |
2.4% |
0.6% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
37.4% |
33.2% |
22.7% |
6.7% |
Average |
37.4% |
33.2% |
22.7% |
6.7% |
Note:
[1] Tuen
Mun AQMS commenced operation in Year 2014, hence only 1 year air quality
monitoring data is available.
Table 3.3f Air quality monitoring data –O3 (Tung Chung
Station, 2010 – 2014)
Pollutant |
Year |
Max. 1-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
10th highest 8-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Max. 24-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Annual Conc. (μg/m3) |
O3 |
2010 |
341 {290o} |
164 |
115 |
44 |
2011 |
312 {260o} |
189 |
144 |
44 |
|
2012 |
383 {260o} |
197 |
158 |
47 |
|
2013 |
314 {270o} |
171 |
129 |
44 |
|
2014 |
355 {290o} |
175 |
152 |
46 |
|
5-year mean |
341 |
179 [112%] |
140 |
45 |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
160 (9) |
N/A |
N/A |
Note:
N/A - Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
[1] Number
of exceedance allowed under the AQOs is shown in ( ), % of the AQOs is shown
in [ ], and wind direction measured at HKIA is given in { }. The 5-year
mean is the average of the yearly maximum.
[2] Monitoring results exceeding the AQOs are underlined.
3.3.1.14 It can be seen from Table 3.3e that more than 60% time of a year that the 8-hour O3 concentrations in Tung Chung are relatively low (<50% of its AQOs), the time percentage is similar to that of other new towns but less than that in Urban area. And there is only 5% time of a year the 8-hour O3 concentrations would exceed its criteria, which is higher than those in Urban area. As NOx emission from motor vehicles and other sources can react with and remove O3 in the air, regions with heavier traffic normally have lower O3 levels than areas with lighter traffic. Hence, in Tap Mun (i.e. Rural area) where air pollution sources are far less than those in New Towns and Urban areas, there are only about 36% time a year the 8-hour O3 concentrations are less 50% of its criteria and about 7% time a year the criteria is exceeded. And the O3 concentrations in Urban area is generally lower that those in New Towns and Rural area.
3.3.1.15 From Table 3.3f, the O3 concentrations were found consistently high in Tung Chung from Years 2010 to 2014. The 10th highest 8-hour O3 concentration in Tung Chung was in the range of 164 – 197µg/m3, all in excess of the AQOs. By correlating the highest 1-hour O3 concentrations with the wind directions, the majority highest O3 episodes were corresponding to the wind direction from northwest to southwest. According to the HKUST Study, O3 is not an emitted pollutant but is formed by reactions between primary pollutant and/or atmospheric components. It is also identified that part of the O3 contribution is carried from the Pearl River Delta (PRD) to Tung Chung by land / sea breeze. Hence, O3 is a regional air pollutant.
3.3.1.16 Since exceedances of 8-hour concentrations were consistently observed in Tung Chung over the past 5 years, the total exceedance record over the past 5 years in each month have been investigated and are illustrated in the Diagram 3.3 below to understand if there is a pattern of high concentration episode over the year. Exceedance records in other general AQMS operated by EPD in Hong Kong have also be presented for comparison.
Diagram 3.3 Number of exceedance of 8-hour O3
(2010-2014)
3.3.1.17 High O3
days were mainly found in hot season from July to October (Diagram 3.3), accounting for about 70% of the recorded exceedances
in the past 5 years from 2010 to 2014. During this season, meteorological
conditions such as high temperature, intense solar radiation, low wind speed
and low relative humidity were favorable for the formation of O3. Transboundary
transport induced by tropical cyclones would bring air mass of O3 as
well as its precursors from polluted areas and it plays a critical role in
these episodes.
Sulphur Dioxide
(SO2)
3.3.1.18 General monitoring records of 24-hour SO2
concentrations for the latest 5 years in various AQMSs in Hong Kong are
presented in Table 3.3g, and the
detailed records of SO2 concentrations at Tung Chung AQMS are
tabulated in Table 3.3f.
Table 3.3g Percentage
time distribution of 24-hour SO2 concentration (2010 – 2014)
Category |
AQMS |
Percentage Time Distribution in various
Concentration Range |
|||
0 – 50% of AQOs |
50 – 75% of AQOs |
75 – 100% of AQOs |
>100% of AQOs |
||
24-hour SO2 |
(0 – 62.5
µg/m3) |
(62.5–93.8µg/m3) |
(93.8 –
125µg/m3) |
(>125
µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Yuen Long |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Sha Tin |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Tai Po |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Tuen Mun [1] |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Eastern |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Kwai Chung |
98.1% |
1.8% |
0.2% |
0.0% |
|
Kwun Tong |
99.9% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Sham Shui Po |
99.0% |
1.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Tsuen Wan |
99.9% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Average |
99.5% |
0.5% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Note:
[1] Tuen
Mun AQMS commenced operation in Year 2014, hence only 1 year air quality
monitoring data is available.
Table 3.3h Air quality monitoring data – SO2 (Tung
Chung Station, 2010 – 2014)
Pollutant |
Year |
Max. 1-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
4th highest 24-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Annual Conc. (μg/m3) |
SO2 [3] |
2010 |
113 {290o} |
46 |
12 |
2011 |
90 {280o} |
38 |
13 |
|
2012 |
91 {270o} |
33 |
13 |
|
2013 |
96 {310o} |
39 |
14 |
|
2014 |
82 {320o} |
35 |
13 |
|
5-year mean |
94 |
38 [31%] |
13 |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
125 (3) |
N/A |
Notes:
N/A - Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
[1] Number
of exceedance allowed under the AQOs is shown in ( ), % of the AQOs is shown
in [ ], and wind direction measured at HKIA is given in { }. The 5-year
mean is the average of the yearly maximum.
[2] Monitoring results exceeding the AQOs are underlined.
[3] Monitoring
data based on the AQOs of 10-min SO2 is currently not publicly
available.
3.3.1.19 According to the monitoring records presented in Table 3.3g and Table 3.3h, it can be seen that the SO2 concentrations in Tung Chung, as well as in other areas in Hong Kong, were in very low level, whereas 100% time of a year the 24-hour SO2 concentrations were under 50% of the respective criteria (i.e. 62.5μg/m3). By correlating the highest 1-hour SO2 concentrations with the wind directions, the majority highest SO2 episodes were corresponding to the wind direction from northwest to west. According to the HKUST Study, SO2 and CO would be due to the heavily industrialised areas to the north and around PRD.
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
3.3.1.20 General monitoring records of 1-hour CO
concentrations for the latest 5 years in various AQMSs in Hong Kong are
presented in Table 3.3i, and the
detailed records of CO concentrations at Tung Chung AQMS are tabulated in Table 3.3j.
Table 3.3i Percentage
time distribution of 1-hour CO concentration (2010 – 2014)
Category |
AQMS |
Percentage Time Distribution in various
Concentration Range |
|||
0 – 50% of AQOs |
50 – 75% of AQOs |
75 – 100% of AQOs |
>100% of AQOs |
||
1-hour CO |
(0 – 15,000
µg/m3) |
(15,000–22,500µg/m3) |
(22,500 –
30,000µg/m3) |
(>30,000
µg/m3) |
|
New Town |
Tung Chung |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Yuen Long |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Sha Tin |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Tai Po |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Tuen Mun [1] |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Urban |
Central / Western |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
|||
Eastern |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Kwai Chung |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Kwun Tong |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Sham Shui Po |
CO is not measured at this AQMS. |
||||
Tsuen Wan |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
Rural |
Tap Mun |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Average |
100.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
Note:
[1] Tuen
Mun AQMS commenced operation in Year 2014, hence only 1 year air quality monitoring
data is available.
Table 3.3j Air quality monitoring data – CO (Tung Chung Station,
2010 – 2014)
Pollutant |
Year |
Max. 1-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Max. 8-hour Conc. (μg/m3) |
Annual Conc. (μg/m3) |
CO |
2010 |
2910 {320o} |
2469 |
737 |
2011 |
2290 {10o} |
2188 |
660 |
|
2012 |
2660 {300o} |
2461 |
671 |
|
2013 |
1810 {330o} |
1640 |
665 |
|
2014 |
2230 {320o} |
1692 |
546 |
|
5-year mean |
2380 [8%] |
2090 [21%] |
656 |
|
AQOs |
2910 {320o} |
10,000 (0) |
N/A |
Notes:
N/A - Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
[1] Number
of exceedance allowed under the AQOs is shown in ( ), % of the AQOs is shown
in [ ], and wind direction measured at HKIA is given in { }. The 5-year
mean is the average of the yearly maximum.
[2] Monitoring
results exceeding the AQOs are underlined.
3.3.1.21 According to the monitoring records presented in Table 3.3i and Table 3.3j, it can be seen that the CO concentrations in Tung
Chung, as well as in other areas in Hong Kong, were in very low level, whereas
100% time of a year that the 1-hour CO concentrations were under 50% of the
respective criteria (i.e. 15,000μg/m3). By correlating the highest 1-hour
CO concentrations with the wind directions, the majority highest CO episodes
were corresponding to the wind direction from northwest to west. According to
the HKUST Study, CO would be due to the heavily industrialised areas to the
north and around PRD.
3.3.2
Existing Air Quality Conditions at Air Sensitive
Receivers
3.3.2.1
According to
Appendix B, Clause 1 (iii) of the EIA Study Brief for the Project, the
cumulative air quality impact during construction and operation stage of the
Project shall be compared with the existing baseline conditions and quantify
any change in air quality levels. To this end, existing air quality conditions
in Year 2010 at each identified existing ASRs as given in Table 3.2 are predicted based on the methodologies as mentioned in Section 3.5.4 and the emission
inventories for Year 2011 as presented in the approved EIA Study “Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport
into a Three-Runway System” (AEIAR-185/2014) (hereinafter called the “3RS
EIA”) are referenced. As discussed in Section
3.5.4, since the hourly meteorological data for Year 2010 extracted from
EPD’s PATH model are adopted, establishing the existing air quality conditions
in Year 2010 using this set of meteorological data is therefore considered
reasonable. Key air pollutants of concern in this air quality assessment include NO2,
RSP and FSP, as discussed in Section
3.5.3.
3.3.2.2
In general, for
near-field sources, CALINE4 is adopted to assess the vehicular emission impact.
Airport emission from the Hong Kong International Airport (under two-runway
system) for Year 2011 as presented in the approved 3RS EIA has been directly
adopted and are modelled by AERMOD for the prediction of existing air quality
conditions. Marine emission from existing local vessel connecting Tuen Mun,
Tung Chung, Sha Lo Wan and Tai O are also modelled by AERMOD.
3.3.2.3
For far-field
sources contributions, including those from marine vessels, power plants,
industries etc., PATH model for Year 2010 has been obtained from EPD and the
model results are adopted as the background air quality level in Year 2010.
3.3.2.4
The predicted 19th
highest 1-hour and annual NO2 concentrations, and 10th
highest 24-hour and annual RSP/ FSP concentrations in Year 2010 are presented
in Table 3.4a. Detailed results are
presented in Appendix 3.1. Moreover, the
contributions to annual NO2 / RSP / FSP at each identified ASRs from
airport related emission, vehicular emission, other proximity (including marine
emission), and ambient background are presented in Tables 3.4b-d. It should be noted that the predictions at 1.5m
above ground are presented, which is identified as the worst affected level. These
predictions are subsequently compared with the cumulative air quality impacts
during construction and operational phase and the change in air quality levels
are quantified in Section 3.4.8 and Section 3.5.6 respectively.
Table 3.4a Cumulative
NO2, RSP and FSP concentrations in Year 2010
ASR
ID |
Location |
Worst
affected Height above ground |
NO2 Conc. (µg/m3) |
RSP Conc. (µg/m3) |
FSP Conc. (µg/m3) |
|||
1-hour (19th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
|||
A1 |
One Citygate |
1.5m |
218 |
63 |
86 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre [1] |
1.5m |
203 |
51 |
85 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
197 |
50 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
30 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
1.5m |
190 |
49 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
29 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
1.5m |
190 |
51 |
84 |
41 |
64 |
29 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
196 |
52 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
30 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
189 |
49 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
206 |
53 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
223 |
60 |
85 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
173 |
42 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
172 |
43 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
221 |
67 |
86 |
44 |
65 |
31 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1.5m |
173 |
42 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
187 |
49 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
215 |
59 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
216 |
60 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
1.5m |
214 |
53 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
214 |
54 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
216 |
60 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
1.5m |
221 |
64 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
30 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1.5m |
219 |
59 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
30 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
1.5m |
220 |
60 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
30 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
222 |
64 |
85 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
229 |
72 |
86 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
228 |
72 |
86 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
230 |
71 |
86 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
235 |
71 |
87 |
44 |
65 |
31 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
173 |
39 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
172 |
40 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
29 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
170 |
39 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1.5m |
168 |
39 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1.5m |
172 |
40 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
154 |
34 |
81 |
39 |
60 |
28 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
157 |
35 |
82 |
40 |
61 |
28 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1.5m |
161 |
40 |
85 |
40 |
64 |
29 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
171 |
39 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1.5m |
157 |
35 |
81 |
40 |
61 |
28 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1.5m |
156 |
34 |
81 |
40 |
61 |
28 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1.5m |
149 |
33 |
81 |
40 |
61 |
28 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1.5m |
149 |
33 |
81 |
40 |
60 |
28 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
149 |
33 |
81 |
40 |
60 |
28 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
228 |
72 |
86 |
43 |
65 |
31 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1.5m |
220 |
69 |
86 |
43 |
64 |
31 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
191 |
42 |
83 |
41 |
62 |
29 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
197 |
51 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
196 |
55 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
203 |
63 |
84 |
42 |
63 |
30 |
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
195 |
52 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
209 |
66 |
85 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
1.5m |
215 |
59 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
1.5m |
216 |
60 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
1.5m |
217 |
59 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
214 |
53 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
218 |
58 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
30 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
212 |
53 |
86 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
1.5m |
215 |
57 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
30 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
1.5m |
223 |
65 |
85 |
43 |
64 |
31 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
206 |
58 |
85 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
204 |
60 |
85 |
42 |
64 |
30 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
168 |
38 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
172 |
42 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
171 |
41 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
177 |
47 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
29 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
171 |
42 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
172 |
41 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
172 |
40 |
85 |
41 |
64 |
29 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
171 |
40 |
84 |
41 |
63 |
29 |
Note: Bolded value means exceedance of its
respective AQOs.
[1] Predicted
pollutant concentrations at the Tung Chung AQMS in Year 2010 are in general
comparable to the actual monitored concentrations presented in Section 3.3.1.
Table 3.4b 19th
highest 1-hour NO2, and annual NO2 concentrations breakdown
(for Year 2010)
ASR
ID |
Location |
Worst affected
Height above ground |
19th highest 1-hour NO2
Contribution (µg/m3) |
Annual NO2 Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
A1 |
One Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
29 |
<1 |
189 |
218 |
2 |
20 |
<1 |
42 |
63 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
18 |
101 |
<1 |
84 |
203 |
1 |
17 |
<1 |
33 |
51 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
11 |
<1 |
186 |
197 |
1 |
16 |
<1 |
33 |
50 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
186 |
190 |
1 |
15 |
<1 |
33 |
49 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
1.5m |
10 |
37 |
<1 |
143 |
190 |
1 |
17 |
<1 |
33 |
51 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
15 |
94 |
<1 |
87 |
196 |
1 |
18 |
<1 |
33 |
52 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
55 |
<1 |
133 |
189 |
1 |
15 |
<1 |
33 |
49 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
19 |
114 |
<1 |
72 |
206 |
1 |
19 |
<1 |
33 |
53 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
14 |
124 |
<1 |
85 |
223 |
1 |
26 |
<1 |
33 |
60 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
18 |
25 |
<1 |
129 |
173 |
1 |
8 |
<1 |
33 |
42 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
42 |
<1 |
130 |
172 |
1 |
9 |
<1 |
33 |
43 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
18 |
2 |
202 |
221 |
2 |
23 |
<1 |
42 |
67 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1.5m |
16 |
17 |
<1 |
139 |
173 |
1 |
7 |
<1 |
33 |
42 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
20 |
52 |
<1 |
115 |
187 |
1 |
14 |
<1 |
33 |
49 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
54 |
<1 |
160 |
215 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
38 |
59 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
37 |
8 |
2 |
168 |
216 |
1 |
21 |
<1 |
38 |
60 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
35 |
<1 |
178 |
214 |
1 |
13 |
<1 |
38 |
53 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
13 |
<1 |
201 |
214 |
1 |
15 |
<1 |
38 |
54 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
35 |
<1 |
181 |
216 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
38 |
60 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
18 |
<1 |
202 |
221 |
2 |
20 |
<1 |
42 |
64 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
9 |
<1 |
210 |
219 |
2 |
16 |
<1 |
42 |
59 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
15 |
1 |
203 |
220 |
2 |
16 |
<1 |
42 |
60 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
12 |
<1 |
210 |
222 |
2 |
20 |
<1 |
42 |
64 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
19 |
<1 |
210 |
229 |
1 |
29 |
<1 |
42 |
72 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
23 |
<1 |
204 |
228 |
1 |
28 |
<1 |
42 |
72 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
136 |
80 |
<1 |
14 |
230 |
2 |
28 |
<1 |
42 |
71 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
17 |
1 |
216 |
235 |
2 |
27 |
<1 |
42 |
71 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
7 |
58 |
<1 |
108 |
173 |
1 |
5 |
<1 |
33 |
39 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
171 |
172 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
33 |
40 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
24 |
26 |
<1 |
121 |
170 |
1 |
5 |
<1 |
33 |
39 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1.5m |
16 |
13 |
<1 |
139 |
168 |
1 |
4 |
<1 |
33 |
39 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1.5m |
17 |
26 |
<1 |
129 |
172 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
33 |
40 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
153 |
154 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
27 |
34 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
157 |
157 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
28 |
35 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
160 |
161 |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
32 |
40 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
167 |
171 |
1 |
5 |
<1 |
33 |
39 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
157 |
157 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
28 |
35 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
156 |
156 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
28 |
34 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
149 |
149 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
28 |
33 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
149 |
149 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
28 |
33 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
148 |
149 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
28 |
33 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
19 |
<1 |
209 |
228 |
2 |
28 |
<1 |
42 |
72 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
18 |
<1 |
201 |
220 |
1 |
30 |
<1 |
38 |
69 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
190 |
191 |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
36 |
42 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
15 |
67 |
<1 |
115 |
197 |
1 |
16 |
<1 |
33 |
51 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
28 |
<1 |
168 |
196 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
33 |
55 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
68 |
<1 |
134 |
203 |
1 |
28 |
<1 |
33 |
63 |
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
18 |
70 |
<1 |
108 |
195 |
1 |
18 |
<1 |
33 |
52 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
126 |
1 |
82 |
209 |
1 |
31 |
<1 |
33 |
66 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
54 |
<1 |
160 |
215 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
38 |
59 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
37 |
<1 |
178 |
216 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
38 |
60 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
15 |
<1 |
201 |
217 |
1 |
20 |
<1 |
38 |
59 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
44 |
<1 |
170 |
214 |
1 |
13 |
<1 |
38 |
53 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
15 |
<1 |
202 |
218 |
2 |
15 |
<1 |
42 |
58 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
55 |
<1 |
157 |
212 |
1 |
14 |
<1 |
38 |
53 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
215 |
215 |
2 |
14 |
<1 |
42 |
57 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
1.5m |
5 |
91 |
<1 |
126 |
223 |
2 |
21 |
<1 |
42 |
65 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
19 |
48 |
<1 |
139 |
206 |
1 |
23 |
<1 |
33 |
58 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
82 |
<1 |
121 |
204 |
1 |
25 |
<1 |
33 |
60 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
168 |
168 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
33 |
38 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
167 |
172 |
1 |
7 |
<1 |
33 |
42 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
167 |
171 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
33 |
41 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
171 |
177 |
1 |
12 |
<1 |
33 |
47 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
41 |
<1 |
130 |
171 |
1 |
7 |
<1 |
33 |
42 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
18 |
24 |
<1 |
129 |
172 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
33 |
41 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
15 |
28 |
<1 |
129 |
172 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
33 |
40 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
11 |
<1 |
160 |
171 |
1 |
5 |
<1 |
33 |
40 |
Notes:
Bolded value means exceedance of its
respective AQOs.
[1] “Other
Proximity” includes contributions from marine emission.
Table 3.4c 10th
highest 24-hour RSP, and annual RSP concentrations breakdown (for Year 2010)
ASR
ID |
Location |
Worst affected
Height above ground |
10th highest 24-hour RSP Contribution
(µg/m3) |
Annual RSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
A1 |
One Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
84 |
86 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
84 |
86 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
42 |
44 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
82 |
86 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
82 |
86 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
82 |
86 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
87 |
87 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
42 |
44 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
80 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
82 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
85 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
40 |
40 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
82 |
86 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
41 |
43 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
79 |
83 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
86 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
82 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
42 |
43 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
41 |
42 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
83 |
85 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
83 |
84 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
41 |
Notes:
Bolded value means exceedance of its
respective AQOs.
[1] “Other
Proximity” includes contributions from marine emission.
Table 3.4d 10th
highest 24-hour FSP, and annual FSP concentrations breakdown (for Year 2010)
ASR
ID |
Location |
Worst affected
Height above ground |
10th highest 24-hour FSP Contribution
(µg/m3) |
Annual FSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
A1 |
One Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
63 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
63 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
30 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
30 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
30 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
65 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
62 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
62 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
65 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
65 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
61 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
61 |
61 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
61 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
61 |
61 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
62 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
64 |
64 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
29 |
31 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
62 |
62 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
64 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
30 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
61 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
30 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
62 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
30 |
31 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
30 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
63 |
64 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
29 |
29 |
Notes:
Bolded value means exceedance of its
respective AQOs.
[1] “Other
Proximity” includes contributions from marine emission.
3.3.2.5
It
can be seen from Table 3.4a that
exceedances of both 1-hour and annual NO2 criteria are predicted at
most existing ASRs in Year 2010. In particular, annual NO2
concentrations of more than 70µg/m3 at 1.5m above ground are
predicted at ASRs located near the North Lantau Highway (NLH), such as A24
(Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School), A25 (Ling Liang Church Sau Tak
Primary School), A26 (Novotel Citygate Hong Kong ), A27 (Man Tung Road Park),
and A42 (Tung Chung Public Library). However, for some existing ASRs located in
a relatively remote area near Tung Chung West which is far away from the NLH,
such as A30 (Sheung Ling Pei), A32 (Ha Ling Pei), A36 (Sha Tsui Tau), A37 (Ngan
Au), A38 (Shek Lau Po), A39 (Mo Ka), and A40 (Shek Mun Kap) etc., compliances
with AQOs could be achieved as there are no major air pollution sources in
these area and the air quality impacts from sources located far away become
less significant due to distance attenuation.
3.3.2.6
According
to Tables 3.4b-d, it is observed that
ambient background contributed the most of the cumulative air quality levels,
while vehicular emission is the second largest contributor.
3.3.2.7
As
discussed in above section, the pollutant concentrations presented in Tables 3.4a-d are predicted at 1.5m
above ground, which is identified as the worst affected level to the air
sensitive uses. In general, cumulative air quality impact gradually decreases
as the receivers’ height increase. For example, cumulative annual NO2
concentration at ASR A26 (Novotel Citygate Hong Kong), the predicted
concentrations from 1.5m to 80m above ground decreased from 71µg/m3
to 46µg/m3. It further indicated that there is relatively
significant impact from vehicular emission at ground level.
3.3.3
Future Air Quality
3.3.3.1
It should be noted that the general ambient air
quality conditions described in Section
3.3.1 are the historical data in the past. During the 12th Hong
Kong-Guangdong Joint Working Group Meeting on Sustainable Development and
Environmental Protection (Nov 2012), the Hong Kong and Guangdong Governments
jointly endorsed a Major Air Pollutant Emission Reduction Plan for the Pearl
River Delta Region up to year 2020. Key emission reduction measures to be
implemented by Hong Kong and PRDEZ include:
Hong Kong Government
·
tightening of vehicle emission standards;
·
phasing out highly polluting commercial diesel
vehicles;
·
retrofitting Euro II and Euro III franchised buses
with selective catalytic reduction devices;
·
strengthening inspection and maintenance of petrol
and liquefied petroleum gas vehicles;
·
requiring ocean-going vessels to switch to using
low sulphur fuel while at berth;
·
tightening the permissible sulphur content level of
locally supplied marine diesel;
·
controlling emissions from off-road vehicles/equipment;
·
further tightening of emission caps on power plants
and increasing use of clean energy for electricity generation; and
·
controlling VOC contents of solvents used in
printing and construction industry.
Pearl River Delta Economic Zone
·
installing desulphurization and denitrification
systems at large-scale coal-fired power generating units;
·
closing down small-scale power
generating units;
·
phasing out heavily polluting cement plants as well
as iron and steel plants;
·
installing vapour recovery systems at petrol
filling stations, oil depots and on tanker trucks;
·
implementing new pollutant emission standards for
boilers as well as specific industries such as cement, furniture
manufacturing, printing, shoe-making and surface coating (automobile manufacturing)
industries;
·
installing denitrification systems at new
dry-type cement kilns;
·
tightening the emission standards for
newly registered petrol vehicles to Guangdong IV standard; and
·
progressively supplying diesel at National IV
standard and petrol at Guangdong IV standard.
3.3.3.2
EPD has developed a regional air quality model,
PATH (Pollutants in the Atmosphere and their Transport over Hongkong), to
simulate air pollution in Hong Kong. To estimate the background concentrations
in future year, EPD has also compiled the emission inventory for Year 2020
taking into account the abovementioned emission reduction measures and adopted
in the PATH model.
3.3.3.3
The project involves 13 grids in the PATH,
including 11_24, 11_25, 12_24, 12_25, 12_26, 13_25, 13_26, 13_27, 14_26, 14_27,
15_26, 15_27 and 16_27. The hourly pollutant concentration data predicted by
PATH for Year 2020 are provided by EPD and are summarised in the following
table. Figure 3.2 illustrates the locations of concerned
PATH grids.
Table 3.5 Future ambient air quality for concerned PATH grids
(Year 2020)
Pollutant |
PATH Grids |
Highest 1-hour Conc. beyond the allowed exceedance (μg/m3) |
Highest 24-hour Conc. beyond the allowed exceedance (μg/m3) |
Highest 8-hour Conc. beyond the allowed exceedance (μg/m3) |
Annual
Conc. (μg/m3) |
SO2 [3] |
11_24 |
163 [1] |
33 |
- |
- |
11_25 |
170 [1] |
38 |
- |
- |
|
12_24 |
136 [1] |
32 |
- |
- |
|
12_25 |
160 [1] |
36 |
- |
- |
|
12_26 |
177 [1] |
38 |
- |
- |
|
13_25 |
155 [1] |
34 |
- |
- |
|
13_26 |
160 [1] |
35 |
- |
- |
|
13_27 |
133 [1] |
36 |
- |
- |
|
14_26 |
156 [1] |
34 |
- |
- |
|
14_27 |
127 [1] |
33 |
- |
- |
|
15_26 |
120 [1] |
31 |
- |
- |
|
15_27 |
126 [1] |
31 |
- |
- |
|
16_27 |
126 [1] |
31 |
- |
- |
|
AQOs |
500 (3) |
125 (3) |
N/A |
N/A |
|
NO2 [3] |
11_24 |
121 |
- |
- |
22 |
11_25 |
131 |
- |
- |
25 |
|
12_24 |
111 |
- |
- |
21 |
|
12_25 |
125 |
- |
- |
24 |
|
12_26 |
159 |
- |
- |
29 |
|
13_25 |
119 |
- |
- |
22 |
|
13_26 |
141 |
- |
- |
27 |
|
13_27 |
146 |
- |
- |
27 |
|
14_26 |
133 |
- |
- |
26 |
|
14_27 |
143 |
- |
- |
26 |
|
15_26 |
130 |
- |
- |
25 |
|
15_27 |
130 |
- |
- |
26 |
|
16_27 |
135 |
- |
- |
26 |
|
AQOs |
200 (18) |
N/A |
N/A |
40 |
|
CO |
11_24 |
1274 |
- |
1128 |
- |
11_25 |
1318 |
- |
1137 |
- |
|
12_24 |
1260 |
- |
1107 |
- |
|
12_25 |
1265 |
- |
1127 |
- |
|
12_26 |
1449 |
- |
1124 |
- |
|
13_25 |
1277 |
- |
1106 |
- |
|
13_26 |
1419 |
- |
1094 |
- |
|
13_27 |
1349 |
- |
1068 |
- |
|
14_26 |
1413 |
- |
1080 |
- |
|
14_27 |
1310 |
- |
1069 |
- |
|
15_26 |
1428 |
- |
1063 |
- |
|
15_27 |
1287 |
- |
1056 |
- |
|
16_27 |
1314 |
- |
1074 |
- |
|
AQOs |
30,000 (0) |
N/A |
10,000 (0) |
N/A |
|
O3 [3] |
11_24 |
- |
- |
116 |
- |
11_25 |
- |
- |
110 |
- |
|
12_24 |
- |
- |
121 |
- |
|
12_25 |
- |
- |
115 |
- |
|
12_26 |
- |
- |
105 |
- |
|
13_25 |
- |
- |
122 |
- |
|
13_26 |
- |
- |
109 |
- |
|
13_27 |
- |
- |
112 |
- |
|
14_26 |
- |
- |
114 |
- |
|
14_27 |
- |
- |
116 |
- |
|
15_26 |
- |
- |
114 |
- |
|
15_27 |
- |
- |
118 |
- |
|
16_27 |
- |
- |
115 |
- |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
N/A |
160 (9) |
N/A |
|
RSP [3] |
11_24 |
- |
78 |
- |
39 |
11_25 |
- |
78 |
- |
39 |
|
12_24 |
- |
76 |
- |
38 |
|
12_25 |
- |
78 |
- |
39 |
|
12_26 |
- |
79 |
- |
40 |
|
13_25 |
- |
76 |
- |
39 |
|
13_26 |
- |
78 |
- |
40 |
|
13_27 |
- |
79 |
- |
40 |
|
14_26 |
- |
77 |
- |
39 |
|
14_27 |
- |
79 |
- |
40 |
|
15_26 |
- |
77 |
- |
39 |
|
15_27 |
- |
78 |
- |
40 |
|
16_27 |
- |
78 |
- |
39 |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
100 (9) |
N/A |
50 |
|
FSP [3] [4] |
11_24 |
- |
59 |
- |
27 |
11_25 |
- |
59 |
- |
27 |
|
12_24 |
- |
57 |
- |
27 |
|
12_25 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
12_26 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
13_25 |
- |
57 |
- |
27 |
|
13_26 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
13_27 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
14_26 |
- |
58 |
- |
28 |
|
14_27 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
15_26 |
- |
58 |
- |
28 |
|
15_27 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
16_27 |
- |
59 |
- |
28 |
|
AQOs |
N/A |
75 (9) |
N/A |
35 |
Notes:
N/A – Not applicable since there are no AQOs
for this parameter.
“-“ – Since there are no AQOs for this
parameter, no value is presented in this table.
[1] Values
are given as highest 10-minute SO2 concentrations, which are
estimated in accordance with EPD’s “Guidelines on the Estimation of 10-minute
Average SO2 Concentration for Air Quality Assessment in Hong Kong”.
[2] Values
in ( ) indicate number of exceedance allowed under the AQOs.
[3] In
consideration of the number of exceedance allowance of the AQOs, the values
presented indicate the concentration levels beyond the AQOs allowance limit,
details as below:
·
4th highest concentration for
24-hour SO2;
·
19th highest concentration for
1-hour NO2; and
·
10th highest concentration for 8-hour
O3, 24-hour RSP and 24-hour FSP.
[4] FSP
concentrations are estimated in accordance with EPD’s “Guidelines on the
Estimation of PM2.5 for Air Quality Assessment in Hong Kong”.
3.3.3.4
It can be seen from the above tables that, with the
implementation of the emission reduction measures by both the Hong Kong and
Guangdong Governments, future air quality in Year 2020 would be significantly
improved from recent existing conditions and would fully comply with the AQOs. In
particular, the highest ambient background contribution to annual NO2
concentration in Tung Chung would be reduced from 42µg/m3 in 2010
(see Table 3.4b) to 29µg/m3
in Year 2020.
3.4
Construction Dust Assessment
3.4.1
Assessment Area
3.4.1.1
With reference to Clause 3.4.1.2 of the EIA Study
brief, the study area for air quality impact assessment should be defined by a
distance of 500m from the boundary of the PDAs and the works of the Project
within the Study Area. Figure 3.3 illustrates the extent of the study area for
construction dust assessment.
3.4.2
Identification of Pollution Sources and Emission
Inventory
3.4.2.1
The key air pollution sources in the
vicinity of the Project that may bear upon the air quality during construction
phase include dust emission associated with the construction activities due to
the Project, the
vehicular emission from the neighbouring roads such as North Lantau Highway
(NLH), airport emission from the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) and due
to the concurrent projects (e.g. HKLR, HKBCF, TMCLKL etc.).
3.4.2.2 Other far-field emission sources further beyond which would also have certain influence on the background air quality level include territory wide vehicular emission, power plants, marine emission, as well as regional emission from PRD.
3.4.2.3 Specifically, the existing and potential near-field sources are described in the following sections:
Dust Emission associated with the Project
3.4.2.4
A review on the construction methodology and
tentative implementation programme has been conducted. In general, construction dust as the
representative pollutants will be generated mainly from the at-grade
construction works (as presented in Appendix 3.2) including the following activities:
·
Reclamation;
·
Site clearance;
·
Soil excavation;
·
Backfilling;
·
Site formation; and
·
Wind erosion of open sites.
3.4.2.5
Since reclamation, excavation and backfilling
activities will involve large quantities of earthworks and silty material
handling, it is anticipated that there may be dust impact as a result of these
activities if mitigation measures are not implemented. It should be noted that
there are construction of new rising main in TCE connecting to the Siu Ho Wan
Sewage Treatment Works (SHWSTW) and upgrading of existing rising main in TCW.
However, it is anticipated that there will only be very small scale of work for
the construction / upgrading of rising main as compared with the construction
works in TCE and TCW, adverse cumulative construction dust impact from such
work is therefore not anticipated.
3.4.2.6
In addition, during the reclamation works in TCE,
barges will be used to carry out the underwater filling activities between
Years 2017 and 2022. Fugitive dust emission from these barges might therefore
cause cumulative dust impact. According to the current marine traffic
estimation, the number of barges will be ranged from 6 trips per day to 56 trips
per day (which is equivalent to maximum 1 trips per hour to 5 trips per hour) throughout
the construction period, whereas the usage of barge will peak during the period
between July 2018 and December 2019 while all Phases 1 to 4 of TCE are being
constructed. However, as compared with the construction dust emission due to dusty
above water construction activities which will be peaked during Year 2021 and
2022 in TCE (see Table 3.8 for
details), there will be no overlapping of peak marine traffic and the peak
at-grade construction works. Moreover, barges will not concentrate at the one
place but spanning all over the TCE reclamation site, of which the separate
distance between nearby ASRs and barges ranges from about 70m to 1,350m. Hence,
it is anticipated that there will no adverse dust impact from the construction
barges.
3.4.2.7
Fugitive dust impact assessments have been carried
out based on conservative assumptions of general construction activities which
include the following:
·
Heavy construction activities including site
clearance, ground excavation, construction of the associated facilities, haul
road, etc.;
·
Wind erosion of all active open sites;
·
Construction programme as provided by the Engineer
is adopted in order to assess the reasonable situation;
·
Construction working periods of 26 days a month and
12 hours a day from 7:00am to 7:00pm, except Sundays and public holidays.
Dust Emission associated with the
Construction of Concurrent Projects
3.4.2.8
The tentative commencement year for the
construction of this Project is 2017 with target full completion in Year 2030. Concurrent
projects in the vicinity of this Project, which may have cumulative
environmental impacts, have been discussed in Section 1.9. Key concurrent projects of air quality concern during
the construction phase of this Project have been identified and are summarised
in the table below. The implementation programmes of these concurrent projects
are provided by the respective project proponents. Where information is not
available, references have been made to the best available information such as
EIA reports.
Table 3.6 Key concurrent projects for construction dust assessment
Key Concurrent
Projects |
Tentative
Commissioning Year |
Hong Kong – Zhuhai –
Macao Bridge Boundary Cross Facilities (HZMB-HKBCF) |
End-2016 [1] |
Hong Kong –
Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road (HZMB-HKLR) |
End-2016 [1] |
Tuen Mun – Chek
Lap Kok Link (TMCLKL) – Southern Section |
End-2016 [1] |
Organic Waste
Treatment Facilities (OWTF) Phase 1 |
End-2016 |
Proposed Home Ownership Scheme
Development at Tung Chung Area 27 |
2019/2020 |
Proposed Public Housing Development at
Tung Chung Area 39 |
2018 |
Planned Hotel Development at Tung Chung
Area 53a |
No information |
Planned Residential use in Tung Chung
Area 54 |
No information |
Committed Developments in Tung Chung
Areas 55a and 55b |
Under construction [2] |
Committed Public
Housing Development at Tung Chung Area 56 |
2016 |
Construction of Addition Sewage Rising
Main and Rehabilitation of the Existing Sewage Rising Main between Tung Chung
and Siu Ho Wan |
2025 |
Three-runway System (3RS) of Hong Kong
International Airport (HKIA) |
2023 |
Proposed marina at TCE |
2030 |
Proposed sports ground at TCE |
2030 |
Proposed railway stations at Tung Chung East and Tung
Chung West |
2024 (Tung Chung West
Station) 2026 (Tung Chung East
Station) |
Possible Lantau Logistic Park |
No information |
Notes:
[1] Date
for substantial completion of key construction activities.
[2] The committed developments in Tung Chung Area 55a and 55b
would likely commence their flat intakes in end-2015 and end-2016 respectively,
whilst any associated construction activities would have been completed. Hence,
cumulative dust impact during construction phase of the Project is not
anticipated.
3.4.2.9
It can be seen
from the above table that the construction of some of the key concurrent
project would have been completed before the construction phase of this
Project, except the:
1) Proposed Home Ownership Scheme Development
at Tung Chung Area 27;
2) Proposed Public Housing Development at Tung
Chung Area 39;
3) Planned Hotel Development at Tung Chung Area
53a;
4) Planned Residential use in Tung Chung Area
54;
5) Construction of Addition Sewage Rising Main
and Rehabilitation of the Existing Sewage Rising Main between Tung Chung and
Siu Ho Wan;
6) Planned Three-runway System (3RS) of Hong Kong International Airport
(HKIA);
7) Proposed marina at TCE;
8) Proposed sports ground at TCE;
9) Proposed railway stations at TCE and TCW;
and
10) Possible Lantau Logistic Park.
3.4.2.10
There is no
information on the implementation programmes for the possible Lantau Logistic
Park (LLP), planned residential use in Tung Chung Area 54, and the possible hotel
development at Tung Chung Area 53. Potential cumulative air quality impact during
construction stage is therefore not included.
Proposed Home Ownership Scheme Development at Tung
Chung Area 27
3.4.2.11 The
proposed development at Tung Chung Area 27, with an area of only about 0.88 ha,
comprises of 2 residential blocks only. Given the limited scale of the
residential development, it is unlikely to generate significant cumulative dust
impact during its construction stage. In addition, it is understood that its target
population intake year will be Year 2019/2020, whereas the major construction
activities will have been completed before the commencement of construction
works in TCW.
Proposed Public Housing Development at Tung
Chung Area 39
3.4.2.12 For the
proposed public housing development at Tung Chung Area 39, the site formation
has been completed and the remaining works would be the construction of
superstructures based on pre-cast concrete, which is expected less dusty. Hence,
cumulative dust impact during construction phase is not anticipated.
Construction of Addition Sewage Rising Main and
Rehabilitation of the Existing Sewage Rising Main between Tung Chung and Siu Ho
Wan
3.4.2.13 It is
anticipated that there will only be very small scale of work for the
construction / upgrading of sewage rising main as compared with the
construction works in TCE and TCW, adverse cumulative construction dust impact
from such work is therefore not anticipated.
Planned 3RS of HKIA
3.4.2.14 For the
construction of 3RS of HKIA, the construction sites would be located at about
2.6km away from the boundary of the PDAs and the works of the Project. In
addition, according to the approved EIA Study “Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System”
(AEIAR-185/2014), water spraying over all active works area would be
implemented once every two hours for 24-hour working in order to minimise the
potential dust impact. Given the large separation distance between the
construction site of 3RS and the Project, and implementation of sufficient dust
suppression measures, adverse cumulative dust impact from the construction of
3RS during construction phase of the Project is therefore not anticipated.
Proposed Marina at TCE
3.4.2.15 It is
anticipated that the construction of the proposed marina will be carried out by
others at the time of TCE Phase 4 construction. Hence, potential cumulative
construction dust impact from the concurrent construction with the Project is
anticipated and is therefore included in the construction dust assessment.
3.4.2.16 It must be
noted that this marina is a Designated Project under Item O.2 of Schedule 2 of
TM-EIAO. A separate EIA study would be conducted by the future operator to
fulfil all the statutory requirements and procedures under the EIAO.
Proposed Sports Ground at TCE
3.4.2.17 It is
anticipated that the construction of the proposed sports ground will be carried
out by others at the time of TCE Phase 4 construction. Hence, potential
cumulative construction dust impact from the concurrent construction with the
Project is anticipated and is therefore included in the construction dust
assessment.
3.4.2.18 This sports
ground is a Designated Project under Item O.7 of Schedule 2 of TM-EIAO, and a
separate EIA study would be conducted by the future operator to fulfil all the
statutory requirements and procedures under the EIAO.
Proposed Railway Stations at TCE and TCW
3.4.2.19 According to the tentative
implementation programme, the construction periods of TCE and TCW railway
stations are 2023 – 2026 and 2021 – 2024 respectively. Hence,
potential cumulative construction dust impact from the concurrent construction
with the Project is anticipated and is therefore included in the construction
dust assessment.
3.4.2.20 Nevertheless, as these 2 proposed
railway stations and the related rail tunnel extension is a Designated Project
under Item A.2 of Schedule 2 of TM-EIAO, a separate EIA study would be
conducted by the future rail operator to fulfil all the statutory requirements
and procedures under the EIAO.
Dust Emission associated with the
Operation of Concurrent Projects
3.4.2.21 Apart from
the dust emissions generated from the construction of concurrent projects as
listed in Table 3.6 above, dust
emissions would also be generated during their operation, including the open
road network, idling vehicles at HKBCF (including kiosks and loading /
unloading bays) induced traffic, chimneys at the OWTF Phase 1, and airport operation
in 3RS. The operations of concurrent projects have also been considered in the
cumulative dust impact assessment during construction phase of the Project.
Dust Emission associated with Operation of
Concurrent Sources (i.e. Open Roads and Hong Kong International Airport)
3.4.2.22 Particulate
emissions, which are generally RSP and FSP with aerodynamic diameters less than
10μm and 2.5μm, are also generated from road traffic along open road and
airport operations. These concurrent sources have also been considered in the
cumulative dust impact assessment during construction phase of the Project.
3.4.3
Key Representative Pollutants
3.4.3.1 According to Section 13.2.4.3 of USEPA AP-42, among all aerodynamic particle sizes (i.e. TSP), there are 47% of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of <10 μm (i.e. RSP). Hence, TSP and RSP are the most representative pollutants for construction phase assessment. However, upon the effect of the AQO from 1 January 2014, a new criteria pollutant, FSP, has been included in the AQO. As a conservative approach, FSP has also been assessed, notwithstanding that it only constitutes 7% of the total particles in fugitive dust. Hence, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour RSP/ FSP, and annual RSP/ FSP concentrations at each identified ASR have been assessed and compared with the AQO or the requirements of TM-EIAO to determine their compliance.
3.4.3.2
Fuel combustion from the use of Powered Mechanical
Equipment (PME) during construction works could be a source of NO2,
SO2 and CO. To improve air quality and protect public health, EPD
has introduced the Air Pollution Control (Non-road Mobile Machinery) (Emission)
Regulation, which came in operation on 1 June 2105, to regulate emissions from
machines and non-road vehicles. Starting from 1 December 2015, only approved or
exempted non-road mobile machinery are allowed to be used in construction
sites. Hence, with the effect of the Regulation, the emissions from PMEs are
considered relatively small as compared with the tailpipe emissions from
vehicles.
3.4.3.3
In addition, there is no source of Pb and O3
emission during the construction phase. Hence, NO2, SO2,
CO, Pb and O3 are not considered as the key pollutants for
quantitative dust assessment.
3.4.4
Assessment Methodology
Dust Emission associated with the Project
3.4.4.1
The prediction of dust emissions is based on
typical values and emission factors from United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42), 5th
Edition. References of the dust emission factors for different dust generating
activities are listed in Table 3.7 below.
Details are discussed in the following sections. Appendix 3.3 presents the calculation of dust emission
factors.
Table 3.7 Reference of dust emission factors for different activities
Operating Site |
Activities |
Equations and Assumptions |
Reference |
All construction and excavation sites |
Heavy construction activities including land clearance, ground
excavation, cut and fill operations, construction of the facilities, haul
road, etc |
E(TSP) = 1.2
tons/acre/month of activity or = 2.69 Mg/hectare/month of activity E(RSP) = E(TSP)
x 0.47 = 1.26 Mg/hectare/month of activity E(FSP) = E(TSP)
x 0.07 = 0.19 Mg/hectare/month of activity |
USEPA AP42, S.13.2.3.3 |
All construction sites |
Wind Erosion |
E(TSP) = 0.85
Mg/hectare/year E(RSP) = E(TSP)
x 0.47 = 0.40 Mg/hectare/year E(FSP) = E(TSP)
x 0.07 = 0.06 Mg/hectare/year (24-hour emission) |
USEPA AP42, S.11.9, Table 11.9.4 |
3.4.4.2
Dust emission from construction vehicle movement
will generally be limited within the confined worksites and the emission factor
given in AP-42 S.13.2.3.3 has taken this factor into account. Watering facilities will be provided at every
designated vehicular exit point. Since
all vehicles will be washed at exit points and vehicle loaded with the dusty
materials will be covered entirely by clean impervious sheeting before leaving
the construction site, dust nuisance from construction vehicle movement outside
the worksites is unlikely to be significant.
Determination of Worst Assessment Year
3.4.4.3
Based on the current Recommended Outline
Development Plan (RODP), construction sites associated with Tung Chung East
(TCE) PDA and Tung Chung West (TCW) PDA are located about 1.3km from each
other. Potential dust impact from construction of each PDAs would likely be of
local-scale and may not cause significant cumulative impact to each other. Worst
assessment year for constructions of each PDAs is therefore identified to
evaluate their individual worst impact on nearby ASRs.
3.4.4.4
Quantities of dust generation during construction
period associated with the Project for each year have been estimated to
identify the worst assessment year and results are tabulated as in Table 3.8 below. It can be seen that
the highest dust generation would occur in Year 2022. However,
it should also be noted that, given the construction period is spanning more
than 10 years, construction sites would be moving around and potential dust
impact on different existing and planned ASRs would therefore be changing from
time to time. Hence, Years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2027 and 2028 are
selected for construction dust impact assessment to evaluate the potential dust
impact. For planned ASRs to be in place in Years 2029 and 2030, since there
will only be superstructure works in these years, significant dust emission and
adverse construction dust impact are not anticipated.
3.4.4.5
Appendix 3.3 presents the calculations of estimated
dust emission.
Table
3.8 Estimated
dust emissions from TCE and TCW during construction period
Year |
Estimated Dust
Emission from various Construction Activities (ton per year) |
Total Dust
Emission (ton per year) |
|||||
Tung Chung East |
Tung Chung West |
||||||
Heavy
Construction |
Wind Erosion |
Sub-Total |
Heavy
Construction |
Wind Erosion |
Sub-Total |
||
2017 |
Note [1] |
Note [2] |
Notes [1,2] |
||||
2018 |
Note [1] |
107 |
3 |
109 |
109 |
||
2019 |
379 |
11 |
390 |
336 |
9 |
345 |
734 |
2020 |
631 |
32 |
663 |
419 |
11 |
430 |
1093 |
2021 |
1935 |
58 |
1993 |
353 |
9 |
362 |
2355 |
2022 |
2545 |
93 |
2638 |
100 |
3 |
103 |
2740 |
2023 |
473 |
76 |
549 |
202 |
5 |
207 |
756 |
2024 |
671 |
74 |
745 |
236 |
6 |
242 |
987 |
2025 |
1149 |
64 |
1213 |
272 |
7 |
279 |
1493 |
2026 |
1214 |
44 |
1257 |
257 |
7 |
263 |
1521 |
2027 |
915 |
24 |
939 |
280 |
7 |
287 |
1226 |
2028 |
96 |
3 |
98 |
207 |
5 |
213 |
311 |
2029 |
Note [3] |
Note [3] |
Note [3] |
||||
2030 |
Note [3] |
Note [3] |
Note [3] |
Notes:
Values in
bold are the maximum within the construction period.
[1] There
are only under water construction works for Tung Chung East in Years 2017 and
2018. Dust emission is therefore not anticipated.
[2] No
construction works for Tung Chung West are scheduled in Year 2017.
[3] Major
heavy construction works, including reclamation, site formation, slope works
and road works will tentatively be completed in end-2028, while there will only
be superstructure works in 2029 and 2030. Significant dust emission is not
anticipated.
Dust Dispersion Modelling Approach
3.4.4.6
With reference to EPD’s “Guidelines on
Assessing the ‘Total’ Air Quality Impacts”, the chemical transport modelling
system-based approach is adopted. Hourly meteorological data (including wind
direction, wind speed, temperature and mixing height) for Year 2010 extracted
from the PATH model are used. Since there is no stability data available from
PATH, PCRAMMET model has been used to predict the stability classes. In
addition, the mixing heights from the PATH which are lower than the minimum
mixing height recorded by the Hong Kong Observatory (HKO) in Year 2010 (i.e.
121m) are capped at 121m. For the treatment of calm hours, the approach
recommended in the "Guideline on Air Quality Models Version 05" (US
EPA) is followed.
3.4.4.7
Dust impact assessment is undertaken using the EPD
approved Fugitive Dust Model (FDM). It
is a well-known Gaussian Plume model designed for computing air dispersion for
fugitive dust sources. Modelling
parameters including dust emission factors, particles size distributions,
surface roughness, etc. are referred to EPD’s “Guidelines on Choice of Models
and Model Parameters” and USEPA AP-42.
The density of dust is assumed to be 2.5g/m3. Owing to the limitation
of the FDM model, worksites located higher than 20m above ground level are set
to the maximum height of 20m in the model as the worst-case assumption.
3.4.4.8
The surface roughness height is closely related to
the land use characteristics, and the surface roughness is estimated as 10
percent of the average height of physical structures within 1km study area. A
surface roughness of 50cm is assumed for Grids 11_24, 11_25, 12_24, 13_27,
14_26, 14_27, 15_26 and 15_27 to represent the relatively rural characteristic
and low-rise developments in the Lantau areas, while 100cm is assumed for Grids
12_25, 12_26, 13_25 and 13_26 to represent the urbanized and high-rise
developments in Tung Chung Town.
3.4.4.9
Particle size distribution is estimated based on
S13.2.4.3 of USEPA AP-42. Table 3.9 presents the particle size
distribution of TSP, RSP and FSP adopted in the assessment.
Table 3.9 Particle size distribution in FDM
Particle Size (µm) |
Average Particle Size (µm) |
Particle Size
Distribution |
||
TSP |
RSP |
FSP |
||
0 – 2.5 |
1.25 |
7% |
15% |
100% |
2.5 – 5 |
3.75 |
20% |
42% |
- |
5 – 10 |
7.5 |
20% |
43% |
- |
10 – 15 |
12.5 |
18% |
- |
- |
15 - 30 |
22.5 |
35% |
- |
- |
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
3.4.4.10 During
daytime working hours (7am to 7pm), it is assumed that dust emissions would be
generated from all dust generating activities and wind erosion. During
night-time non-working hours (7pm to 7am of the next day), Sunday and public
holidays, dust emission source would include wind erosion only as construction
activities during these hours are ceased.
3.4.4.11 Fugitive
dust impacts are modelled for ASR heights at 1.5m, 5m, 10m, 15m and 20m above
ground. Since all the dust generating sources associated with the Project are located
on ground level, these assessment levels would therefore cover the worst-case
scenario. Both the unmitigated and mitigated scenarios are presented. A
100x100m grid is used to generate the pollution contours in order to
investigate the pollutant dispersion.
3.4.4.12 A summary
of FDM modelling parameters that has been adopted in the construction dust
assessment are given in Table 3.10 below:
Table 3.10 Modelling parameters in FDM
Parameters |
Input |
Remarks |
Background
Concentration |
Hourly RSP
concentrations predicted by PATH model |
Provided by EPD |
Modelling mode |
Flatted terrain |
- |
Meteorological
data |
Hourly
meteorological data adopted in PATH |
Provided by EPD |
Anemometer
Height |
10m |
- |
Surface
Roughness |
50cm or 100cm |
- |
Emission period |
General
construction activities during daytime working hours (7 am to 7 pm) Wind erosion
during both day-time (7am to 7pm) and night-time (7pm to 7am of the next day)
|
- |
Assessment
height |
1.5m, 5m,10m,
15m and 20m |
- |
3.4.4.13 It is understood that construction activities will not be taken place on
the entire work sites at the same time, but to be undertaken at moving multiple
work fronts spread across the work sites. Notwithstanding this, a “Two Tiers”
assessment approach has been adopted. An initial screening test, namely, “Tier
1 Screening Test”, which assumed that all the worksites would be active, has
been undertaken. The Tier 1 screening test is conservative and has represented
the worst case situation.
3.4.4.14 The purpose of the Tier 1 screening test is identifying the
potentially affected areas where construction dust may accumulate. The hot
spot areas identified in the Tier 1 assessment have been subsequently assessed
by a more focused Tier 2 test. Under the Tier 2 test, an active construction
site with a size of 100m x 100m (or 10,000m2) is assumed to be
positioned closest to the potentially affected ASRs, while all other
construction sites located relatively further away from the ASRs remain
unchanged as per Tier 1. The active construction site is assumed based on the
advice from Engineer that any active construction at any one time in each phase
would not be more than 100m x 100m.
Dust Emission associated with the
Construction of Concurrent Projects
3.4.4.15 As discussed in Section 3.4.2,
there is potential cumulative construction dust impact from the possible MTR
stations at TCE and TCW. Since there is currently no details of dust emission
as well as the detailed implementation programme available, the dust assessment
methodology adopted in the Project is therefore referenced. In addition, given
the requirement stipulated in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation and good site practices for dust control shall be implemented by the
Contractor, it is assumed that mitigation measures will be provided during the
construction of the possible MTR Stations at TCE and TCW. Appendix 3.3 presents the details of dust emission.
Dust Emission from the Operations of
Concurrent Projects and Concurrent Sources
3.4.4.16 Approach for prediction of vehicular emissions from open road and idling
vehicles at HKBCF are the same as operational phase assessment as described in Section 3.5.4, in which the dispersion
model, CALINE4 is used to assess the vehicular emission impact. Vehicular
emissions from open road are determined using the latest EMFAC-HK based on the
projected traffic data for Years 2030 coupled with emission factors for Year
2022. Traffic data in Year 2030, which is the final year of construction
period, is considered to be conservative as it would be the highest within the
construction phase, while emission factor for Year 2022 is adopted as it is the
year that the dust emission would be highest (refer to Table 3.8). Appendix 3.4 presents the hourly RSP
and FSP emission factors for each road link. It should be noted that using
traffic data in Year 2030 and emission factors in Year 2022 is a very
conservative approach and would not occur in reality.
3.4.4.17 Idling emission at HKBCF are estimated in accordance with Permanent
International Association of Road Congresses (PIARC) based on the projected
traffic data for Years 2030 coupled with emission factors for Year 2022, and
the methodology is described in Section 3.5.4.
In addition, emission from tunnel portal and ventilation buildings associated
with HKLR, TMCLKL and HKBCF are also included in the cumulative assessment. Appendix 3.5 presents the detailed
calculations of idling emissions and tunnel portal/ventilation building.
3.4.4.18 For the emissions from airport operation, the prediction approach is the
same as the operational air quality assessment as described in Section 3.5.4, in which the dispersion
model, AERMOD and CALINE4 are used to assess the airport related emission
impact. As part of the operational air quality assessment, the airport related
emission inventory under the future three-runway system (3RS) in Year 2031 has
been adopted, which made reference to the approved 3RS EIA report, for a
conservative assessment.
3.4.4.19 Marine emission from the existing local vessels and industrial emission
from OWTF Phase 1 are also assessed in accordance with the methodology
described in Section 3.5.4, whereas
the dispersion model AERMOD is used to simulate the emission impact.
Far-field Source Contribution (i.e. Future
Background Air Quality)
3.4.4.20 Details are given in Section 3.5.3.
Hourly pollutant concentration data predicted by PATH for Year 2020, which are
provided by EPD, are directly adopted as the background concentration.
3.4.4.21 Only RSP concentrations are available from PATH model. According to EPD’s
“Guidelines on the Estimation of PM2.5 for Air Quality Assessment in Hong Kong”,
the conservative correction as shown in Table
3.11 are adopted to determine the background FSP concentrations. For hourly
background TSP concentrations, it is considered reasonable to assume the hourly
RSP concentrations from PATH as the ambient TSP background concentrations,
since the particulates of sizes larger than 10μm generated from far-field
dust sources would have been largely settled before reaching the ASRs, and
hence most of the particulates contributed from far-field sources affecting the
ASRs will likely be of less than or equal to 10μm in size (i.e. RSP).
Table 3.11 Conversion factors for RSP/FSP
Annual (µg/m3) |
Daily (µg/m3) |
FSP = 0.71 x RSP |
FSP = 0.75 x RSP |
Prediction of the Cumulative Construction
Dust Impact
3.4.4.22 The cumulative construction dust impact is a combination of the emission
impacts contributed from the near field and far field sources (i.e. at local
scale and background air quality impact from other concurrent and regional
sources) on hourly basis.
3.4.4.23 In consideration of the number of exceedance allowance of the daily AQOs
(refer to Table 3.1), the pollutant
concentrations beyond the AQO’s allowance limits (i.e. the 10th highest 24-hour
RSP/ FSP concentrations) are presented. The annual predicted RSP/ FSP
concentrations are also assessed and all predicted levels are then compared
with the AQOs. Besides, the 1-hour TSP concentration as stipulated under Annex
4 of TM-EIAO is also determined at each ASR.
3.4.5
Assessment Results (Unmitigated)
3.4.5.1 The predicted maximum unmitigated 1-hour TSP concentrations, 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP / FSP concentrations among Years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2027 and 2028 are presented in the Table 3.12 below and detailed in Appendix 3.6. Exceedances of the TSP, RSP and/or FSP criteria are predicted at almost all ASRs. Mitigation measures are therefore required to reduce the potential air quality impact during construction phase. It should be noted that the predicted concentrations are based on very conservative assumptions, such as assuming 100% active area, adopting airport emission in Year 2031 and vehicular emission in Year 2022 (but using traffic data in Year 2030).
3.4.5.2 Based on the detailed results presented in Appendix 3.6, it is observed that the worst construction dust impact would likely occur in Years 2021, 2024, 2025 and 2027, and the worst affected height is identified at 1.5m above ground. To this end, contours for the cumulative unmitigated 1-hour TSP concentrations, and 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP / FSP concentrations at 1.5m above ground in these years, are plotted in Figures 3.4 – 3.7.
Table
3.12 Unmitigated
cumulative TSP, RSP and FSP concentrations
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst
affected Year |
Worst
affected Height above ground |
TSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
RSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
FSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
|||
Max. 1-hour |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
|||||
Existing
ASRs |
|||||||||
A1 |
One Citygate |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1220 |
119 |
51 |
63 |
30 |
|
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1161 |
128 |
51 |
63 |
30 |
|
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1087 |
128 |
50 |
63 |
30 |
|
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1068 |
126 |
50 |
63 |
30 |
|
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
941 |
128 |
49 |
63 |
30 |
|
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
986 |
132 |
50 |
63 |
30 |
|
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
868 |
124 |
49 |
62 |
29 |
|
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
939 |
115 |
50 |
61 |
30 |
|
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
1390 |
112 |
52 |
61 |
30 |
|
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
2020 |
1.5 |
1493 |
141 |
63 |
66 |
31 |
|
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
623 |
104 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1088 |
118 |
51 |
62 |
30 |
|
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1172 |
101 |
50 |
59 |
30 |
|
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
986 |
108 |
51 |
62 |
30 |
|
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2481 |
169 |
60 |
70 |
31 |
|
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2131 |
153 |
54 |
68 |
30 |
|
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2263 |
168 |
58 |
69 |
31 |
|
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2129 |
166 |
58 |
69 |
31 |
|
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1843 |
133 |
51 |
64 |
30 |
|
A20 |
La Rossa B |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2714 |
143 |
52 |
65 |
30 |
|
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
2021/ 2022 |
5 |
2616 |
147 |
53 |
65 |
30 |
|
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1618 |
139 |
53 |
65 |
30 |
|
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1259 |
127 |
52 |
64 |
30 |
|
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2534 |
134 |
51 |
66 |
30 |
|
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2382 |
144 |
51 |
65 |
30 |
|
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1329 |
126 |
51 |
64 |
30 |
|
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1168 |
122 |
51 |
63 |
30 |
|
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
787 |
110 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kindergarden |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
735 |
107 |
53 |
61 |
30 |
|
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
991 |
101 |
54 |
61 |
30 |
|
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1939 |
101 |
55 |
61 |
30 |
|
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1538 |
102 |
55 |
61 |
30 |
|
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
2020 |
1.5 |
4027 |
168 |
81 |
67 |
34 |
|
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
2020/ 2024/ 2025 |
1.5 |
2666 |
178 |
70 |
70 |
32 |
|
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
2022/ 2024 |
1.5 |
3356 |
275 |
104 |
68 |
38 |
|
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
2022 |
1.5 |
1526 |
125 |
61 |
63 |
31 |
|
A37 |
Ngan Au |
2025 |
1.5 |
2881 |
289 |
101 |
83 |
37 |
|
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
2020/ 2021/ 2025 |
1.5 |
3036 |
180 |
68 |
69 |
32 |
|
A39 |
Mo Ka |
2027/ 2028 |
1.5 |
4101 |
267 |
98 |
78 |
36 |
|
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
2021/ 2027 |
1.5 |
3794 |
225 |
87 |
78 |
35 |
|
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
2027/ 2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
2026 |
151 |
50 |
66 |
29 |
|
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2337 |
131 |
51 |
65 |
30 |
|
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1811 |
134 |
50 |
65 |
30 |
|
A44 |
Pak Mong |
2021/ 2022 |
5 |
2379 |
124 |
47 |
62 |
29 |
|
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1089 |
117 |
50 |
61 |
30 |
|
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
842 |
121 |
49 |
62 |
29 |
|
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1075 |
110 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1375 |
111 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1515 |
114 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2277 |
160 |
56 |
69 |
31 |
|
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1929 |
142 |
52 |
67 |
30 |
|
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1830 |
136 |
51 |
65 |
30 |
|
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2269 |
151 |
54 |
67 |
30 |
|
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
2021/ 2022 |
5 |
2956 |
153 |
54 |
66 |
31 |
|
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2304 |
150 |
53 |
66 |
30 |
|
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2625 |
160 |
56 |
66 |
31 |
|
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
1448 |
132 |
52 |
64 |
30 |
|
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
756 |
119 |
49 |
62 |
30 |
|
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
817 |
119 |
49 |
62 |
30 |
|
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
813 |
109 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
930 |
114 |
53 |
61 |
30 |
|
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
2022/ 2024 |
1.5 |
2104 |
163 |
69 |
68 |
32 |
|
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
1222 |
118 |
53 |
63 |
30 |
|
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
764 |
103 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
2024 |
1.5 |
1787 |
142 |
58 |
64 |
31 |
|
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
723 |
105 |
54 |
61 |
30 |
|
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
1148 |
105 |
61 |
61 |
31 |
|
Planned ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|||||||||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area
53a - Planned Hotel |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2743 |
209 |
65 |
71 |
32 |
|
P2 |
Tung Chung Area
54 - Planned Residential Development |
2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
4342 |
256 |
74 |
79 |
33 |
|
P3 |
Tung Chung Area
55a - Planned Residential Development |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2822 |
203 |
63 |
71 |
32 |
|
P4 |
Tung Chung Area
89 - Planned Primary / Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
2583 |
216 |
79 |
74 |
34 |
|
P6 |
Tung Chung Area
39 – Planned Public Housing Development |
2020/ 2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
1625 |
118 |
56 |
62 |
30 |
|
P7 |
Tung Chung Area
56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development |
2021 |
1.5 |
3522 |
316 |
123 |
88 |
41 |
|
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
|||||||||
TCE-1 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2024 |
1.5 |
5608 |
342 |
113 |
90 |
39 |
|
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic
& GIC Complex |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
2254 |
195 |
72 |
71 |
33 |
|
TCE-3 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1086 |
121 |
53 |
63 |
30 |
|
TCE-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1584 |
157 |
64 |
65 |
32 |
|
TCE-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
1786 |
169 |
65 |
66 |
32 |
|
TCE-6 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
2077 |
184 |
72 |
69 |
33 |
|
TCE-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
2024 |
1.5 |
3721 |
290 |
106 |
84 |
38 |
|
TCE-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
2024 |
1.5 |
4855 |
261 |
100 |
75 |
37 |
|
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential
Development (D1-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
974 |
111 |
50 |
60 |
30 |
|
TCE-10 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1393 |
122 |
55 |
62 |
30 |
|
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1004 |
112 |
50 |
61 |
30 |
|
TCE-12 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
2122 |
133 |
58 |
62 |
31 |
|
TCE-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
3292 |
193 |
74 |
69 |
33 |
|
TCE-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-2) |
2025 |
1.5 |
6345 |
303 |
103 |
86 |
38 |
|
TCE-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-3) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
2959 |
158 |
67 |
65 |
32 |
|
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1093 |
114 |
51 |
61 |
30 |
|
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1393 |
122 |
55 |
62 |
30 |
|
TCE-18 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
2070 |
152 |
51 |
66 |
30 |
|
TCE-19 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1862 |
134 |
49 |
63 |
30 |
|
TCE-20 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
2715 |
151 |
58 |
67 |
31 |
|
TCE-21 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1962 |
127 |
52 |
63 |
30 |
|
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential
Development (A2-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
2628 |
172 |
55 |
68 |
30 |
|
TCE-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-2) |
2027 |
1.5 |
5037 |
285 |
66 |
85 |
32 |
|
TCE-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-4) |
2027 |
1.5 |
5917 |
341 |
90 |
91 |
36 |
|
TCE-25 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-3) |
2027 |
1.5 |
4893 |
327 |
74 |
88 |
33 |
|
TCE-26 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1154 |
129 |
52 |
65 |
30 |
|
TCE-27 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-3) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1364 |
144 |
57 |
66 |
31 |
|
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police
Station |
2027 |
1.5 |
3681 |
274 |
89 |
79 |
36 |
|
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire
Station |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police
Married Quarters |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
706 |
82 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
|
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post
Secondary Institution |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCE-32 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
466 |
83 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
|
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential
Development (C1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
806 |
88 |
41 |
60 |
28 |
|
TCE-34 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
615 |
82 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
|
TCE-35 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-2) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
1126 |
85 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCE-36 |
Proposed
International School |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
787 |
82 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
|
TCE-37 |
Proposed
Secondary School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
503 |
85 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
625 |
89 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
706 |
92 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCE-40 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
509 |
88 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCE-41 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-2) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
829 |
98 |
43 |
61 |
29 |
|
TCE-42 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-3) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-43 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-4) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential
Development (E1-5) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-45 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-1) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-46 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-2) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-47 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-4) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-49 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-50 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-51 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-2) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-52 |
Proposed
Residential Development (COM-5) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential
Development (F2-1) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-54 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-55 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-2) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-57 |
Proposed
Secondary School (F) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports
Centre (D) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
917 |
109 |
49 |
60 |
29 |
|
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports
Centre (F) |
Note [1] |
|
||||||
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) |
|||||||||
TCW-1 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
429 |
87 |
43 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-2 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
455 |
85 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-3 |
Village Type
Development |
2020 |
1.5 |
1168 |
123 |
61 |
61 |
31 |
|
TCW-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
2025/ 2027 |
1.5 |
2941 |
137 |
56 |
62 |
30 |
|
TCW-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
2024/ 2025/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1665 |
103 |
46 |
60 |
28 |
|
TCW-6 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-7) |
2025/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1510 |
113 |
44 |
59 |
28 |
|
TCW-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
460 |
84 |
45 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
580 |
85 |
46 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic
and GIC Complex |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
975 |
112 |
55 |
62 |
30 |
|
TCW-10 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
1089 |
94 |
49 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-11 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
973 |
115 |
58 |
62 |
31 |
|
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential
Development (TCV-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
609 |
93 |
47 |
61 |
29 |
|
TCW-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-1) |
2027/ 2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
1138 |
96 |
48 |
60 |
29 |
|
TCW-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1560 |
121 |
55 |
61 |
30 |
|
TCW-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
1219 |
102 |
50 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-16 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-3) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-17 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-4) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-18 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-19 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-20 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-21 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-22 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
Note [1] |
|||||||
TCW-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
563 |
83 |
45 |
59 |
29 |
|
TCW-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
407 |
82 |
43 |
59 |
28 |
|
Notes:
Value in
bold means exceedance of its respective criteria.
[1] The planned ASRs will be in place in
Years 2029 or 2030. Since there will only be superstructure works in these
years, adverse construction dust impact are not anticipated.
3.4.6
Recommended Mitigation Measures
3.4.6.1 In order to reduce the dust emission from the Project and achieve compliances of relevant criteria at ASRs, the following specific mitigation measures are recommended:
·
Regular watering under a good site practice should
be adopted. In accordance with the “Control
of Open Fugitive Dust Sources” (USEPA AP-42) as given in Appendix 3.7, watering once per hour on exposed
worksites and haul road is proposed to achieve dust removal efficiency of
91.7%. These dust suppression efficiencies are derived based on the average
haul road traffic of 35 per hour, average evaporation, etc. (see Appendix 3.7). Any potential dust impact and watering
mitigation would be subject to the actual site conditions. For example,
for a construction activity that produces inherently wet conditions or in cases
under rainy weather, the above water application intensity may not be
unreservedly applied. While the above watering frequencies are to be
followed, the extent of watering may vary depending on actual site conditions.
The dust levels would be monitored and managed under an Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme as specified in the EM&A Manual.
3.4.6.2
In addition, the Contractor is also obliged to
follow the procedures and requirements given in the Air Pollution Control
(Construction Dust) Regulation. It stipulates the construction dust control
requirements for both Notifiable (e.g. site formation) and Regulatory (e.g.
road opening) Works to be carried out by the Contractor. The following dust suppression measures
should be incorporated by the Contractor to control the dust nuisance
throughout the construction phase:
·
Any excavated or stockpile of dusty material should
be covered entirely by impervious sheeting or sprayed with water to maintain
the entire surface wet and then removed or backfilled or reinstated where
practicable within 24 hours of the excavation or unloading;
·
Any dusty materials remaining after a stockpile is
removed should be wetted with water and cleared from the surface of roads;
·
A stockpile of dusty material should not be
extended beyond the pedestrian barriers, fencing or traffic cones;
·
The load of dusty materials on a vehicle leaving a
construction site should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting to ensure
that the dusty materials do not leak from the vehicle;
·
Where practicable, vehicle washing facilities with
high pressure water jet should be provided at every discernible or designated
vehicle exit point. The area where
vehicle washing takes place and the road section between the washing facilities
and the exit point should be paved with concrete, bituminous materials or
hardcores;
·
When there are open excavation and reinstatement
works, hoarding of not less than 2.4m high should be provided as far as practicable
along the site boundary with provision for public crossing. Good site practice
shall also be adopted by the Contractor to ensure the conditions of the
hoardings are properly maintained throughout the construction period;
·
The portion of any road leading only to
construction site that is within 30m of a vehicle entrance or exit should be
kept clear of dusty materials;
·
Surfaces where any pneumatic or power-driven
drilling, cutting, polishing or other mechanical breaking operation takes place
should be sprayed with water or a dust suppression chemical continuously;
·
Any area that involves demolition activities should
be sprayed with water or a dust suppression chemical immediately prior to,
during and immediately after the activities so as to maintain the entire
surface wet;
·
Where a scaffolding is erected around the perimeter
of a building under construction, effective dust screens, sheeting or netting
should be provided to enclose the scaffolding from the ground floor level of
the building, or a canopy should be provided from the first floor level up to
the highest level of the scaffolding;
·
Any skip hoist for material transport should be
totally enclosed by impervious sheeting;
·
Every stock of more than 20 bags of cement or dry
pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should be covered entirely by impervious sheeting or
placed in an area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides;
·
Cement or dry PFA delivered in bulk should be
stored in a closed silo fitted with an audible high level alarm which is
interlocked with the material filling line and no overfilling is allowed;
·
Loading, unloading, transfer, handling or storage
of bulk cement or dry PFA should be carried out in a totally enclosed system or
facility, and any vent or exhaust should be fitted with an effective fabric filter
or equivalent air pollution control system; and
·
Exposed earth should be properly treated by
compaction, turfing, hydroseeding, vegetation planting or sealing with latex,
vinyl, bitumen, shortcrete or other suitable surface stabiliser within six
months after the last construction activity on the construction site or part of
the construction site where the exposed earth lies.
3.4.7
Assessment Results (Mitigated)
Tier 1 Screening Test
3.4.7.1 With implementation of the abovementioned mitigation measures, the maximum mitigated 1-hour TSP concentrations, and 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP / FSP concentrations among Years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025, 2027 and 2028 are calculated and presented in Table 3.13 below and detailed in Appendix 3.8. Results indicate that there are no exceedances of respective criteria predicted at all ASRs, except the exceedance of 1-hour TSP criterion at ASR P7 (Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development) in Year 2021, TCE-1 (Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1)) in Year 2024, TCE-14 (Proposed Residential Development (D2-2)) in Year 2025 and TCE-24 (Proposed Residential Development (A2-4)) in Year 2027. Since the Tier 1 screening test adopted very conservative assumption that all the worksite would be active, which would unlikely occur in practice, a more focused Tier 2 assessment is therefore conducted for these ASRs in order to predict the construction dust impact under more practicable assumption.
3.4.7.2 According to the detailed assessment results presented in Appendix 3.8 and as indicated in Table 3.13, worst construction dust impact on each identified ASRs generally occurs at ground level (i.e. 1.5m above ground), which is closest to the at-grade construction site. ASRs located at higher level would generally less affected by construction dust impact as particulates would likely settled or being settled before reaching the ASRs. For example, at ASR TCE-1 (Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1)), the predicted mitigated 1-hour TSP concentrations at 1.5m above ground in Year 2024 is 517µg/m3, while that significantly dropped to 279µg/m3, 193µg/m3 and 147µg/m3 at 10m, 20m and 50m above ground respectively.
3.4.7.3 Hence, contours of mitigated 1-hour TSP concentrations, and 10th highest and annual RSP / FSP concentrations at 1.5m above ground for Years 2021, 2024, 2025 and 2027 are illustrated in Figures 3.8 – 3.11. Contours also indicate that there are no exceedances at other ASRs except the abovementioned.
Table
3.13 Mitigated
cumulative TSP, RSP and FSP concentrations (Tier 1)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst
affected Year |
Worst
affected Height above ground |
TSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
RSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
FSP Conc. (μg/m3) |
||
Max. 1-hour |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
||||
Existing
ASRs |
||||||||
A1 |
One Citygate |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
153 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
153 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
154 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
148 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
161 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
165 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
155 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
166 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
2020 |
1.5 |
174 |
82 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
150 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
159 |
82 |
42 |
59 |
29 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
164 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
157 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
288 |
86 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
237 |
83 |
41 |
60 |
29 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
245 |
87 |
42 |
60 |
28 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
264 |
85 |
42 |
60 |
28 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
200 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
252 |
83 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
244 |
83 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
184 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
180 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
237 |
83 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
224 |
84 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
160 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
168 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
152 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kindergarden |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
156 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
166 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
189 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
246 |
81 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
404 |
81 |
43 |
57 |
28 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
2020/ 2024/ 2025 |
1.5 |
289 |
84 |
43 |
58 |
28 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
2022/ 2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
349 |
84 |
48 |
60 |
29 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
2022/ 2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
184 |
81 |
43 |
59 |
28 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
2025 |
1.5 |
307 |
91 |
45 |
58 |
28 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
2020/ 2021/ 2025 |
1.5 |
316 |
85 |
42 |
58 |
28 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
2027/ 2028 |
1.5 |
404 |
89 |
45 |
58 |
28 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
2021/ 2027 |
1.5 |
396 |
88 |
44 |
60 |
28 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
2021/ 2027/ 2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
252 |
81 |
40 |
59 |
27 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
221 |
83 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
198 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
29 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
298 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
153 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
153 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent
- Block 5 |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
165 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
177 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
257 |
84 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
210 |
82 |
41 |
60 |
28 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
199 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
236 |
83 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
272 |
84 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
239 |
83 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
244 |
84 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
170 |
82 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
146 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
151 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
156 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
2020/ 2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
175 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
2022/ 2024 |
1.5 |
336 |
88 |
45 |
59 |
29 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
150 |
83 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
164 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
2024 |
1.5 |
316 |
86 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
151 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
2020/ 2021 |
1.5/ 5 |
224 |
82 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
||||||||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area
53a - Planned Hotel |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
292 |
87 |
43 |
60 |
29 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area
54 - Planned Residential Development |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
387 |
89 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area
55a - Planned Residential Development |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
281 |
88 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area
89 - Planned Primary / Secondary School |
2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
382 |
91 |
44 |
60 |
29 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area
39 – Planned Public Housing Development |
2020/ 2022/ 2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
182 |
84 |
43 |
60 |
28 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area
56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development |
2021 |
1.5 |
526 |
97 |
50 |
61 |
30 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
||||||||
TCE-1 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2024 |
1.5 |
517 |
99 |
50 |
60 |
30 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic
& GIC Complex |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
258 |
89 |
45 |
60 |
29 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
81 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
193 |
84 |
43 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
221 |
86 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential
Development (B1-2) |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
228 |
86 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
2024 |
1.5 |
383 |
94 |
48 |
60 |
30 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
2024 |
1.5 |
436 |
89 |
48 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-1) |
2024/ 2025/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
180 |
81 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2024/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
209 |
81 |
43 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-1) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
312 |
85 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-2) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5 |
553 |
94 |
48 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-3) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
280 |
84 |
44 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
80 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
2024/ 2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
180 |
81 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
219 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
174 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
252 |
83 |
42 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
189 |
82 |
41 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
266 |
83 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-2) |
2027 |
1.5 |
466 |
89 |
42 |
60 |
29 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-4) |
2027 |
1.5 |
545 |
92 |
45 |
61 |
29 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-3) |
2027 |
1.5 |
454 |
92 |
43 |
60 |
29 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
150 |
82 |
41 |
58 |
29 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-3) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
165 |
82 |
42 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police
Station |
2027 |
1.5 |
353 |
91 |
45 |
59 |
29 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire
Station |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police
Married Quarters |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
149 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post
Secondary Institution |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-32 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
151 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
150 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
149 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-2) |
2028 |
1.5 |
151 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed
International School |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
149 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed
Secondary School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5 |
148 |
78 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5 |
148 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
2028 |
1.5 |
147 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-1) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
148 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-2) |
2028 |
1.5 |
157 |
81 |
40 |
60 |
28 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-3) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-43 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-4) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-44 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-5) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-45 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-1) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-46 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-2) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-47 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-4) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-49 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential
Development (F1-1) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-51 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-2) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-52 |
Proposed
Residential Development (COM-5) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-53 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-54 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-55 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-2) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-57 |
Proposed
Secondary School (F) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports
Centre (D) |
2024/ 2025/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
79 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports
Centre (F) |
Note [1] |
||||||
Planned
ASRs (Tung Chung West under this Project) |
||||||||
TCW-1 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
2020/ 2024/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
147 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
2024 |
1.5/ 5 |
150 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type
Development |
2020/ 2021/ 2022 |
1.5/ 5 |
164 |
80 |
42 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
2025/ 2027 |
1.5 |
309 |
79 |
40 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
2024/ 2025/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
213 |
78 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-7) |
2024/ 2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
195 |
78 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
149 |
78 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
149 |
78 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic
and GIC Complex |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
164 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
160 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2025 |
1.5/ 5 |
169 |
81 |
41 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
143 |
80 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-1) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
169 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
185 |
80 |
41 |
58 |
28 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
2027 |
1.5/ 5 |
155 |
78 |
40 |
58 |
28 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-3) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-17 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-4) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-18 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-19 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-20 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-21 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-22 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
Note [1] |
||||||
TCW-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
143 |
79 |
40 |
59 |
28 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
2028 |
1.5/ 5 |
143 |
79 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
Note:
Value in
bold means exceedance of its respective criteria.
[1] The planned ASRs will be in place in
Years 2029 or 2030. Since there will only be superstructure works in these
years, adverse construction dust impact are not anticipated.
Tier 2 Assessment
3.4.7.4 As discussed in previous section, exceedance of 1-hour TSP concentrations are predicted at ASR P7 (Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development) in Year 2021, TCE-1 (Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1)) in Year 2024, TCE-14 (Proposed Residential Development (D2-2)) in Year 2025 and TCE-24 (Proposed Residential Development (A2-4)) in Year 2027 under Tier 1 screening test, in which very conservative assumption has been adopted. Hence, a more focused Tier 2 assessment has been conducted for these ASRs. Tier 2 assessment adopts a more practicable assumption that any active construction site at any one time in each phase would not be more that 100m x 100m (or 10,000m2) in size. This assumption is provided and confirmed by the Engineer as a more practicable assumption. The maximum Tier 2 1-hour TSP concentrations are presented in the following table and details are presented in Appendix 3.8. Results show that the predicted 1-hour TSP concentrations would comply with the criterion of 500μg/m3 and as such, adverse short-term construction dust impact is not anticipated.
Table
3.14 Mitigated
cumulative TSP concentrations (Tier 2)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Year |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
Max. 1-hour TSP Concentration (μg/m3) |
Planned ASRs (under Other Projects) |
||||
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development |
2021 |
1.5m |
372 |
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
||||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2024 |
1.5m |
352 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
2025 |
1.5m |
411 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
2027 |
1.5m |
341 |
3.4.7.5 Worst affected level under Tier 2 assessment at all concerned ASRs is 1.5m above ground as the TSP concentrations decreased with increasing height above ground. For example, the predicted Tier 2 1-hour TSP concentrations at TCE-1 (Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1)) has reduced from 352μg/m3 at 1.5m above ground to 218μg/m3, 179μg/m3 and 147μg/m3 at 10m, 20m and 50m above ground. Contours of Tier 2 1-hour TSP concentrations at 1.5m above ground are therefore plotted and presented in Figure 3.12. Contour plots also indicated that there are no active air sensitive uses located within the area of exceedance, and hence adverse short-term dust impact is not anticipated.
3.4.8
Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Changes in Air Quality Conditions in Future Year
3.4.8.1 The predicted maximum mitigated 1-hour TSP, and 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP / FSP project contributions throughout the construction period are therefore summarised in the Table 3.15a-c below. Breakdown of contributions from various source groups (i.e. Airport operation, vehicular emission and ambient background) have also been presented for comparison.
3.4.8.2 1-hour TSP, 10th 24-hour RSP/FSP project contributions ranged from <1 – 414µg/m3, <1 – 38µg/m3 and <1 – 5µg/m3, while annual RSP/FSP project contributions ranged from <1 – 10µg/m3 and <1 – 2µg/m3 respectively. High project contributions of TSP and RSP in future year are generally found at the ASRs located near or within TCE as there are still on-going heavy construction works (such as reclamation and site formation) at area adjacent to those ASRs when they are occupied.
3.4.8.3 However, it must be noted that the predicted project contributions are based on the very conservative assumption that all the worksites would be active (i.e. Tier 1), which is anticipated unlikely in practice. If taking into account this more practicable assumption under Tier 2, the 1-hour TSP project contributions at P7 (Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development), TCE-1 (Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1)), TCE-14 (Proposed Residential Development (D2-2), and TCE-24 (Proposed Residential Development (A2-4)) have been decreased to 278 / 278 / 385 / 320µg/m3 (Tier 2) respectively. In addition, it must also be noted that the construction activities will not be taken place on the same place throughout the construction period, but to be undertaken at moving work fronts spreading across the work sites. Hence, it is anticipated that high TSP project contribution episodes would be relatively occasional. Once the construction works located immediately adjacent to the affected air sensitive use have been completed and moved on to further away, project contributions would then be reduced.
3.4.8.4
Contributions on 1-hour TSP from other sources are comparatively small
and it is considered that the background contributions is the second highest
contributor to the cumulative construction dust impact. On the other hand,
background contributions from far-field sources are identified as the major
contributor of 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP / FSP
concentrations. In particular, FSP contributions are small at all ASRs, indicating
that construction works are not major source of FSP.
Table
3.15a Breakdown
of mitigated Max. 1-hour TSP concentrations
ASR ID |
Location |
Max. 1-hour
TSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
|||||||
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
97 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
153 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
88 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
61 |
153 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
63 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
154 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
148 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
71 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
161 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
74 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
165 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
65 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
155 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
147 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
111 |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
166 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
121 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
50 |
174 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
15 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
128 |
150 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
89 |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
159 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
142 |
164 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
53 |
<1 |
26 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
157 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
251 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
288 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
201 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
237 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
208 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
245 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
228 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
264 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
149 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
200 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
223 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
252 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
215 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
244 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
130 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
184 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
111 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
180 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
208 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
237 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
195 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
224 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
106 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
160 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
100 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
168 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
152 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
156 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
91 |
166 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
38 |
53 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
97 |
189 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
58 |
90 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
97 |
246 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
328 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
404 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
179 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
105 |
289 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
226 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
86 |
349 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
184 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
234 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
71 |
307 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
246 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
70 |
316 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
335 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
70 |
404 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
299 |
<1 |
30 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
65 |
396 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
161 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
88 |
252 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
192 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
221 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
146 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
198 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
189 |
<1 |
12 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
95 |
298 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
147 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
62 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
153 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
12 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
153 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
110 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
165 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
121 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
177 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
221 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
257 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
174 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
210 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
148 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
199 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
184 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
236 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
243 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
272 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
187 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
239 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
215 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
244 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
116 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
170 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
146 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
151 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
156 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
33 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
175 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
160 |
127 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
49 |
336 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
15 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
128 |
150 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
21 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
128 |
164 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
69 |
159 |
22 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
65 |
316 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
151 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
25 |
152 |
10 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
36 |
224 |
Planned ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
223 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
292 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
358 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
387 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
230 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
281 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
345 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
382 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
17 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
182 |
P7 [2] |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
490 (278) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (4) |
2 (1) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (<1) |
34 (89) |
526 (372) |
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE-1 [2] |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
482 (278) |
<1 (6) |
<1 (<1) |
1 (2) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (<1) |
34 (66) |
517 (352) |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
207 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
258 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
147 |
147 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
115 |
14 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
193 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
153 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
221 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
160 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
228 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
331 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
383 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
403 |
13 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
436 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
147 |
147 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
106 |
10 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
180 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
147 |
147 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
175 |
14 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
209 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
285 |
7 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
312 |
TCE-14 [2] |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
527 (385) |
6 (6) |
<1 (<1) |
2 (2) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (<1) |
18 (18) |
553 (411) |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
245 |
16 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
280 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
145 |
147 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
106 |
10 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
180 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
168 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
219 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
153 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
174 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
223 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
252 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
160 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
189 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
214 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
266 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
414 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
466 |
TCE-24 [2] |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
486 (320) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (<1) |
2 (2) |
<1 (<1) |
<1 (<1) |
56 (20) |
545 (341) |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
402 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
454 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
150 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
109 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
165 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
301 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
49 |
353 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
<1 |
<1 |
17 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
149 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
Noted [3] |
|||||||
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
151 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
150 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
18 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
149 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
150 |
151 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
<1 |
<1 |
17 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
149 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
145 |
148 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
145 |
148 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
145 |
147 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
145 |
148 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
156 |
157 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
147 |
147 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
Planned ASRs (TCW under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
14 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
147 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
6 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
150 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
142 |
164 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
238 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
71 |
309 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
131 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
81 |
213 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
70 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
195 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
149 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
149 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
33 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
164 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
35 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
160 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
131 |
169 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
143 |
143 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
65 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
104 |
169 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
87 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
98 |
185 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
139 |
155 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
Note [3] |
|||||||
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
143 |
143 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
143 |
143 |
Note:
[1] Dust concentrations contribution by
construction of concurrent projects (i.e. possible MTR stations at TCE and TCW)
[2] For ASR P7, TCE-1, TCE-14 and TCE-24, the
1-hour TSP contributions under Tier 2 test are presented in ( ).
[3] The planned ASRs will be in place in
Years 2029 or 2030. Since there will only be superstructure works in these
years, only insignificant project contributions are anticipated.
Table 3.15b Breakdown of mitigated 10th highest 24-hour and annual RSP concentrations
ASR ID |
Location |
10th highest 24-hour RSP
Contribution (µg/m3) |
Annual RSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||||||||
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
82 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
86 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
69 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
26 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
87 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
85 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
80 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
80 |
83 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
80 |
84 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
62 |
81 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
43 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
3 |
5 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
74 |
84 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
43 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
14 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
84 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
48 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
72 |
91 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
45 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
74 |
85 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
42 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
16 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
71 |
89 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
45 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
85 |
88 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
44 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
69 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
40 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
83 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
80 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
82 |
84 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
69 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
72 |
84 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
68 |
84 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
7 |
6 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
88 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
45 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
5 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
72 |
86 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
Planned ASRs (under other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
71 |
87 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
70 |
89 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
82 |
88 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
21 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
70 |
91 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
84 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
91 |
97 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
50 |
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
38 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
99 |
8 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
50 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
82 |
89 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
45 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
84 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
86 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
82 |
86 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
94 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
48 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
82 |
89 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
48 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
3 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
18 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
85 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
94 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
48 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
7 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
84 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
44 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
3 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
81 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
2 |
<1 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
70 |
83 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
64 |
89 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
92 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
45 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
67 |
92 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
43 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
72 |
82 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
7 |
<1 |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
82 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
85 |
91 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
45 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
79 |
81 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
2 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
Planned ASRs (TCW under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
42 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
79 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
40 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
79 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
41 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
78 |
80 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
40 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
63 |
80 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
41 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
40 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
40 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
79 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
Note:
[1] Dust concentrations contribution by
construction of concurrent projects (i.e. possible MTR stations at TCE and TCW)
[2] The planned ASRs will be in place in
Years 2029 or 2030. Since there will only be superstructure works in these
years, only insignificant project contributions are anticipated.
Table 3.15c Breakdown of mitigated 10th highest 24-hour and annual FSP concentrations
ASR ID |
Location |
10th highest 24-hour FSP
Contribution (µg/m3) |
Annual FSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||||||||
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
29 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
53 |
58 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
Planned ASRs (under other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
61 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
30 |
Planned ASRs (TCE under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
60 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
30 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
30 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
61 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
29 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
Planned ASRs (TCW under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
28 |
28 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
Note [2] |
Note [2] |
||||||||||||||
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
Notes:
[1] Dust concentrations contribution by
construction of concurrent projects (i.e. possible MTR stations at TCE and TCW)
[2] The planned ASRs will be in place in
Years 2029 or 2030. Since there will only be superstructure works in these
years, only insignificant project contributions are anticipated.
Changes in Air
Quality Conditions from Existing Year 2010
3.4.8.5
In
accordance with the Appendix B, Section 1 (iii) of the EIA Study Brief, any
change in air quality levels as compared with the existing baseline conditions
shall be quantified. Existing air quality conditions in Year 2010 at existing
ASRs are presented in Section 3.3.2,
and the change in air quality levels under various source groups at these ASRs
during construction phase are presented in the following Table 3.16a-b. It should be noted that there are no information on 1-hour
TSP concentrations in Year 2010. Comparing 1-hour TSP concentrations with
24-hour RSP/FSP concentrations is also considered inappropriate due to their
differences in particle size and averaging time. Hence changes in RSP and FSP
concentrations are only presented.
3.4.8.6
In
summary, changes in annual RSP and FSP concentrations range from -2µg/m3
to 7µg/m3 and from -2µg/m3 to <1µg/m3 as
compared to the concentrations estimated for Year 2010. Reduction in RSP and
FSP concentrations are generally predicted at most of the existing ASRs, except
some locations in the TCW area, including ASR A33 –A40, A62 and A65. Despite
the increase in RSP and FSP concentrations due to construction work, the
predicted cumulative RSP and FSP concentrations comply with the AQOs
requirements.
3.4.8.7
Table 3.16a Changes in cumulative RSP concentrations from existing air quality conditions in Year 2010
ASR ID |
Location |
10th highest 24-hour RSP
Contribution (µg/m3) |
Annual RSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||||||||
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-3 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-26 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-17 |
-3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
26 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-26 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
25 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-26 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
4 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
3 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
2 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
2 |
<1 |
-1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-10 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-7 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
19 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-17 |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
4 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
3 |
5 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
3 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
14 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-17 |
-1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
7 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-3 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
2 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
11 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
5 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
4 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
2 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
16 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
8 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
5 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
4 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-12 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
3 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-17 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
12 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-11 |
-1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
22 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-26 |
-3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
16 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-14 |
-1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
3 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-3 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-7 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
7 |
6 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-11 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
4 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-3 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
5 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-11 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
3 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
1 |
Note:
[1] Predicted 10th
highest 24-hour RSP concentrations during construction phase and during Year
2010 may not occur at the similar meteorological conditions (such as wind
speed, wind direction, etc.), hence, large differences in contributions under
various source groups are anticipated.
Table 3.16b Changes in cumulative FSP concentrations from existing air quality conditions
in Year 2010
ASR ID |
Location |
10th highest 24-hour FSP
Contribution (µg/m3) |
Annual FSP Contribution (µg/m3) |
||||||||||||||
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Project
Contribution |
Dust (Other
Projects) [1] |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
2 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-3 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-3 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
2 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
2 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
Note:
[1] Predicted 10th
highest 24-hour FSP concentrations during construction phase and during Year
2010 may not occur at the similar meteorological conditions (such as wind
speed, wind direction, etc.), hence, large differences in contributions under
various source groups are anticipated.
3.4.9
Residual
Impacts (Construction Phase)
3.4.9.1
With the implementation of the mitigation
measures as stipulated in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation, dust control measures, including watering once per hour on exposed
worksites and haul road, and good site practices, the predicted 1-hour TSP,
24-hour and annual RSP / FSP concentrations on area in the vicinity of the
construction sites would comply with the respective criteria. Hence, no adverse residual air quality impact
during construction phase is anticipated.
3.5
Operational
Air Quality Assessment
3.5.1
Assessment
Area
3.5.1.1
With reference to
Clause 3.4.1.2 of the EIA Study brief, the assessment area for operational air
quality impact assessment should be defined by a distance of 500m from the
boundary of the PDAs and the works of the Project within the Study Area. Figure 3.13 illustrates the extent of the study area for operational air quality
assessment.
3.5.2
Identification
of Pollution Source
3.5.2.1
The
key existing air pollution sources within the assessment area that may bear
upon the air quality during operational phase include the vehicular emission
from the neighbouring roads such as North Lantau Highway. Airport operation
located outside 500m assessment area is also considered as a key air pollution
source. For conservative assessment, this major emission source is also
considered in the near-field dispersion model for assessment the cumulative air
quality impact.
3.5.2.2
Other
far-field emission sources outside the assessment area which would also have
certain influence on the background air quality level include territory wide
vehicular emission, power plants, marine emission, as well as regional emission
from Pearl River Delta (PRD). These sources are included in far-field
modelling.
3.5.2.3
Other
than the existing air pollution sources, it is anticipated that the future
infrastructure developments in the vicinity of the Project would induce
additional traffic and hence incur additional emission burden which may also
cause potential air quality impacts on the ASRs. In particular, vehicular emissions due to
the HKLR, HKBCF and TMCLKL are considered as major emission sources and
therefore are included in the
near-field dispersion model for assessment the cumulative air quality impact.
3.5.2.4
Specifically,
the existing and potential near-field sources are described in the following
sections below:
Vehicular Emission from Open Road
3.5.2.5
Major air pollution source in the vicinity of the
Project during operational phase would be tailpipe emission generated from
traffic along open road. Vehicular emissions from the existing road networks,
and those arising from the concurrent projects, including the HKLR, HKBCF,
TMCLKL, LLP, etc. (see details in Sections
3.5.2.16 to 3.5.2.18) that would have cumulative air quality impact on
nearby ASRs have also been addressed. Figure 3.14 illustrates the road networks considered as
near-field sources in the operational air quality assessment.
Vehicular Emission
from Tunnel Portal and Ventilation Building
3.5.2.6
Other
than vehicular emission along open road, those emitted from the tunnel portals
and ventilation buildings for the HKLR and TMCLKL would also cause cumulative
air quality impact. Figure 3.14 illustrates the locations of tunnel
portals and ventilation buildings (as listed below) to be considered in the
near-field model:
·
HZMB – Eastern tunnel portal and ventilation
building;
·
Scenic Hill Tunnel (SHT) – Eastbound and westbound
tunnel portal and ventilation building;
·
HKBCF to Airport Tunnel (HAT) – Tunnel portal only;
and
·
TMCLKL – Southern tunnel portal and ventilation
building.
Vehicular Emission
from Idling Vehicles at HKBCF
3.5.2.7
Emission
from idling vehicles at kiosks and loading / unloading bays at the HKBCF would
also cause cumulative air quality impact. Figure 3.14 illustrates the locations of idling
vehicles.
Airport Emission
3.5.2.8
Key air emission sources associated with the
operation of Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) include the following:
·
Aircraft Landing Take Off (LTO) cycle;
·
Airport ferry at SkyPier;
·
Auxiliary Power Unit (APU);
·
Airside vehicles (including Ground Service
Equipment (GSE) and Non-GSE); and
·
Engine Run Up Facility (ERUF)
3.5.2.9
According to the approved EIA study “Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport
into a Three-Runway System” (AEIAR-185/2014) (hereinafter called “3RS EIA”),
the full operation of 3RS will commence in Year 2023 which would cause
potential cumulative air quality impact.
Industrial Emission
3.5.2.10 Site survey
revealed that there is no existing chimney found within 500m of the Project
boundary. Based on the latest available information, there is also no
industrial emission from the chimney at the North Lantau Hospital in Area 25.
Hence, no cumulative air quality impact from the North Lantau Hospital is
anticipated.
3.5.2.11 Committed
Organic Waste Treatment Facilities (OWTF) Phase 1 would commence its operation
in Year 2016. Its associated chimney emissions would therefore cause cumulative
air quality impact and hence are included in this assessment. Figure 3.15 illustrates the locations of chimneys associated
with OWTF Phase 1.
Marine Emission from the Proposed Marina at TCE
3.5.2.12 A proposed marina with maximum 95 numbers of berths for pleasure vessels
is located at the north of TCE. Based on the currently best available
information, the marina is designed for a mix of 40 and 45 berths for vessels
of Length Overall (LOA) ≤10m and 10-15m respectively, while the remaining
10 berths will be reserve for other vessels of similar size. Figure 3.15 illustrates the location of the
proposed marina. It must be noted that this marina is a Designated
Project under Item O.2 of Schedule 2 of TM-EIAO. A separate EIA study would be
conducted by the future operator to fulfil all the statutory requirements and
procedures under the EIAO.
3.5.2.13 Since the operation characteristic of this proposed marina would be
similar to that of the existing marina at the Hong Kong Gold Coast with about
200 berths in Tuen Mun, site surveys have therefore been conducted to identify
the typical operation of the existing marina and pleasure vessels in Hong Kong
Gold Coast.
3.5.2.14 According to site observations at the Hong Kong Gold Coast in May / June
2013, and January 2014, there was no regular pleasure vessel movement but a
maximum of 4 pleasure vessels travelling in and out of the marina within an
hour. Each pleasure vessel took less than 5 minutes for manoeuvring before
leaving or entering the marina. And there were only less than 5 minutes
hotelling activities in the marina.
3.5.2.15 Based on the current marine traffic forecast for the proposed marina at
TCE, there will be a maximum of 6 pleasure vessel movements per hour during
summer day time (i.e. 8:00am to 7:00pm). Potential cumulative air quality
impact from the proposed marina is included in this assessment.
Marine
Emission from Existing Local Vessels
3.5.2.16 Apart from
the proposed marina, there is also gaseous emission from the existing local
vessels operating at the Tung Chung Development Pier for the transportation
between Tuen Mun, Tung Chung, Sha Lo Wan and Tai O. Site surveys have been
conducted to identify the typical operation of the local vessels. It is
observed that the vessels will hotel at the pier for less than about 5 minutes
for loading/unloading of passengers and will depart immediately once the
loading/unloading activities completed. According to the current operation timetable,
there was only 12 trips of vessels operating at the pier from 07:30 to 19:30 in
one day (i.e. approximately once per hour). As advised by the Transport
Department, currently there is no change in ferry schedule for the
abovementioned ferry service.
3.5.2.17 Potential
cumulative air quality impact is included in this assessment. Figure 3.15 illustrates the marine route of
the existing local vessel.
Odour
Emission from Proposed Sewage Pumping Stations
3.5.2.18 According
to the current development plan, there are a total of 5 proposed
sewage pumping stations (SPSs) under this Project with the proposed design
capacities ranging from 278 – 45,732m3 per day. Their locations are
given in Figure 3.16. The separation distance between these
SPSs and nearest planned air sensitive uses ranges from less than 10m to about
30m.
3.5.2.19 It is anticipated that with the implementation of appropriate mitigation
measures commonly adopted in other existing SPSs in Hong Kong, such as
enclosing the odourous facilities, maintaining negative pressure to prevent
foul air from escaping the building, and provision of odour removal system
(e.g. activated carbon type deodourisation units) at the ventilation exhaust to
control odour impacts, potential odour impact from these proposed SPSs at
nearby air sensitive uses could be properly controlled.
3.5.2.20 To this end, site visits have been conducted to some typical SPSs in
Hong Kong (including Tsing Lung Tau SPS, Sham Tseng SPS, and Casam Beach SPS
near Sham Tseng area; and Jordan Valley Box Culvert SPS near Kowloon Bay area)
in June / August 2015, of which their design capacities range from about 10,500
– 43,200m3 per day. Each of these SPS are provided with odour
removal system (with odour removal efficiency of at least 95%) and all the
potential odour sources are enclosed within the plant buildings. Vertical exhausts
of the odour removal system are all located at the roof-top of each SPS, with
the shortest horizontal separation distance between their site boundaries less
than 10m. Site observations revealed that odour was not noticed at their site
boundaries, and the similar situation is anticipated on the planned ASRs
located in close proximity with the proposed SPSs under this Project.
3.5.2.21 Adverse odour nuisance exceeding the 5 odour units limit arising from
the operations of the proposed SPSs under this Project is therefore not
anticipated if the following at-source mitigation measures are implemented:
·
Potential odour sources should be enclosed;
·
Negative pressure should be maintained within the
facilities;
·
Installation of deodouriser with an odour removal
efficiency of at least 95% to control odour emission via ventilation exhaust;
·
Exhaust of the deodouriser should be oriented away
from sensitive receivers and vertically upwards to avoid direct facing to any
sensitive receivers; and
·
Maintenance of deodouriser should be regularly
conducted to ensure good condition.
Concurrent
Projects
3.5.2.22 Section 1.9 has identified a number of potential
concurrent projects in the vicinity of the Project. Among them, it is
considered the following projects would cause induced traffic and hence would
likely cause cumulative air quality impact during the operational phase:
·
Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities;
·
Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link
Road;
·
Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link;
·
Possible Lantau Logistic Park;
·
Three-runway System of Hong Kong International
Airport;
·
Planned Developments on Airport Island;
·
Cross Boundary Hub in Siu Ho Wan; and
·
Proposed Leisure and Entertainment Node at Sunny
Bay.
3.5.2.23 The traffic forecast has already taken into account
the induced traffic from these concurrent projects.
Summary of
Projects/ Sources included in the Operational Air Quality Assessment
3.5.2.24 A summary of emissions from concurrent projects and
sources included in the operational air quality assessment and their associated
air quality impact are tabulated below:
Table
3.17 Projects/
sources for operational air quality assessment
Project /
Sources |
Associated Air
Quality Impact |
Sources included in
Near-field Modelling |
|
Existing road
network (including those in Airport Island and Lantau Island) |
Vehicular
emission from all open roads |
Planned road network within the PDAs
under this Project and Road P1 |
Vehicular
emission from the new road network |
Hong Kong –
Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road |
Vehicular
emission from its road network, tunnel portal and ventilation building |
Hong Kong –
Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities |
Vehicular
emission from its road network, tunnel portal, and idling emission from
kiosks and loading/unloading bays |
Tuen Mun Chek Lap Kok Link (Southern
Section) |
Vehicular
emission from its road network, tunnel portal and ventilation building |
Three-runway System of Hong Kong
International Airport |
Airport emission
from its related activities |
Organic Waste
Treatment Facilities (OWTF) Phase 1 |
Industrial
emission from its chimneys |
Proposed Marina
at TCE |
Marine emission
from vessels |
Existing Local
Vessels between Tuen Mun, Tung Chung, Sha Lo Wan and Tai O |
Marine emission
from vessels |
Induced Traffic from Concurrent Projects |
|
Hong Kong –
Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic |
Hong Kong –
Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic |
Tuen Mun Chek Lap Kok Link |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic |
Three-runway System of Hong Kong
International Airport |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic |
North Commercial District (NCD) of Hong
Kong International Airport |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic only |
Topside Development at Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic only |
Possible Lantau Logistic Park |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic only |
Cross Boundary Hub in Siu Ho Wan |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic only |
Proposed Leisure and Entertainment Node
at Sunny Bay |
Vehicular
emission from its induced traffic only |
Sources included in Far-field Modelling |
|
Public
Electricity Generation |
Various emission
from Hong Kong and Pearl River Delta contributing to background air quality |
Road
Transport |
|
Navigation |
|
Other
Fuel Combustion |
|
Non-combustion |
3.5.3
Determination of
Representative Air Pollutants
3.5.3.1
As discussed in Section 3.1, the Air Pollution Control
Ordinance (APCO) (Cap 311) and its subsidiary regulations define statutory AQOs
for 7 common air pollutants including NO2, SO2, RSP, FSP,
CO, O3 and lead. According to Appendix B, Clause 5 (ii) of the EIA
Study Brief, the key / representative air pollutant parameters for the project
shall be identified, including the types of pollutants and the averaging time
concentration.
3.5.3.2
The air quality
pollutant source during the operational phase of the project would be the
emission from the vehicles travelling on the new and existing roads. The tailpipe emission would comprise a number
of pollutants, including Nitrogen Oxides (NOX), Respirable Suspended
Particulates (RSP), Fine Suspended Particulates (FSP), Sulphur Dioxides (SO2),
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAP), Lead (Pb) etc. Determination of representative air
pollutants for this Project is discussed in the following:
i)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
3.5.3.3
Nitrogen oxides (NOX)
is known to be one of the pollutants emitted by vehicles. Together with VOC and in the presence of O3
under sunlight, NOx would be transformed to NO2.
According to the 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report published by EPD [3-[1]]
which is the latest available information at the time of preparing this report,
the dominant sources of NOx generated in HK are the public electricity
generation and the navigation which both constitute about 31% of the total in
2013. Road transport is the third largest NOx emission group, accounting for
about 23% of the total while other fuel combustion including for industrial
purposes accounted for 10% of the total (see table below).
Table 3.18 The emission percentage and the amount of NOx in Hong Kong (2013)
Pollutant Source Categories |
NOx Emission (%) [1] |
NOx Emission (tons) [1] |
Public Electricity Generation |
31% |
34,580 |
Road Transport |
23% |
25,740 |
Navigation |
31% |
35,630 |
Civil Aviation |
6% |
6,240 |
Other Fuel Combustion |
10% |
11,040 |
Total |
100% |
113,220 |
Note:
[1] Figures
extracted from 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report
3.5.3.4
Upon population intake of the proposed development,
there would be an increase in the traffic flow and hence the NOx emission and
subsequently the NO2 concentrations near to the roadside.
3.5.3.5
NO2 is one of the key representative
pollutants for the operational air quality assessment of the Project. The
1-hour and annual average concentrations at each identified ASR have been
assessed and compared with the AQOs to determine their compliance.
ii)
Respirable Suspended Particulates
(RSP) and Fine Suspended Particulates (FSP)
3.5.3.6
Respirable
Suspended Particulates (RSP) refers to suspended particulates with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10µm or less. According to the EPD’s data [3-1],
and other research studies (Tian et al., 2011 & Wie-Zhen et al., 2008),
road vehicles, particularly diesel vehicles, are one of the sources of RSP in
Hong Kong.
3.5.3.7
According to the
latest statistics of 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report [3-1],
road transport is the second largest source of RSP and FSP accounting for 18% and
21% of the total emissions respectively.
Table 3.19 The emission percentage and the amount of RSP and FSP in
Hong Kong (2013)
Pollutant Source Categories |
RSP |
FSP |
||
Emission (%) |
Emission (tons) |
Emission (%) |
Emission (tons) |
|
Public Electricity Generation |
16% |
940 |
9% |
430 |
Road Transport |
18% |
1,090 |
21% |
1,000 |
Navigation |
36% |
2,160 |
42% |
2,000 |
Civil Aviation |
<1% |
60 |
1% |
60 |
Other Fuel Combustion |
14% |
850 |
16% |
780 |
Non-combustion |
16% |
950 |
10% |
480 |
Total |
[2] |
6,040 |
100% |
4,740 |
Notes:
[1] Figures
extracted from 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report
[2] Figures
are directly extracted from the report and may not be added to 100% or the
total sum of the emission from all source categories.
3.5.3.8
Upon population intake of the proposed development,
there would an increase in the traffic flow and hence the RSP concentrations
near to the roadside.
3.5.3.9
RSP is also one of the key representative
pollutants for the operational air quality assessment of the Project. The
24-hour and annual average concentrations at each identified ASR would be
assessed and compared with the AQOs to determine their compliance.
3.5.3.10 Fine
Suspended Particulates (FSP) refers to suspended particulates with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 2.5µm or less. Similar to RSP, FSP is sourced from road
vehicles, etc, and is also considered as one of the key representative
pollutants for the operational air quality assessment of the Project. The
24-hour and annual average concentrations at each identified ASR would be
assessed and compared with the AQOs to determine their compliance.
iii)
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
3.5.3.11
According to the
latest statistics of 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report [3-1],
the dominant source of SO2 in Hong Kong is from navigation, which
constitutes about 50% of the total emissions. Only a combined of less than 2%
of the total emissions comes from road transport and other fuel combustions
including for industrial purposes. The
introduction of ultra low sulphur diesel for vehicle fleet has reduced the SO2
emission from road transport in Hong Kong. In addition, with effect from 1st
April 2014, the Air Pollution Control (Marine Light Diesel) Regulation
stipulates that the sulphur content of marine light diesel (MLD) used in marine
vessels shall not exceed 0.05% by weight. This regulation will therefore reduce
90% of SO2 emission by navigation from the previous sulphur content
of about 0.5%.
Table 3.20 The emission percentage and the amount of SO2
in Hong Kong (2013)
Pollutant Source Categories |
SO2 Emission (%) [1] |
SO2 Emission (tons) [1] |
Public Electricity Generation |
47% |
14,680 |
Road Transport |
<1% |
50 |
Navigation |
50% |
15,740 |
Civil Aviation |
2% |
540 |
Other Fuel Combustion |
<1% |
280 |
Total |
[2] |
31,280 |
Note:
[1] Figures
extracted from 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report
[2] Figures
are directly extracted from the report and may not be added to 100% or the
total sum of the emission from all source categories.
3.5.3.12 As
discussed in Section 3.2, the latest
5-year average of 4th highest 24-hour SO2 concentration
in Tung Chung is only 33% of the AQOs, and future predicted 24-hour SO2
background concentrations in the study area would be only about 30% of the AQOs
in Year 2020. This clearly indicates
that the AQOs for SO2 could be well achieved with great margin in
the study area. Given that road
transport is not a major emission source of SO2, the sulphur content
of MLD is regulated to not exceeding 0.05% and there is still a large margin to
the AQOs compared to the other pollutants such as RSP, FSP and NO2,
it is appropriate to consider that SO2 is not the key representative
pollutants for quantitative assessment for the operational phase of the
Project.
iv)
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
3.5.3.13
Carbon Monoxide
(CO) is one of the primary pollutants emitted by road transport. According to
the latest statistics of 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report [3-1]
CO emissions from road transport contributed about 59% of total CO emission in 2013
(see the table below).
Table 3.21 The emission percentage and the amount of CO in Hong
Kong (2013)
Pollutant Source Categories |
CO Emission (%) [1] |
CO Emission (tons) [1] |
Public Electricity Generation |
6% |
3,930 |
Road Transport |
59% |
35,840 |
Navigation |
19% |
11,670 |
Civil Aviation |
5% |
3,320 |
Other Fuel Combustion |
10% |
6,040 |
Total |
100% |
60,790 |
Note:
[1] Figures
extracted from 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report
3.5.3.14 Despite
road transportation is the dominant source of CO emission, the air quality
impact from CO is relatively minor according to the historical data record of
monitoring stations. In Year 2013, the highest 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations
were 4,070µg/m3 and 2,860µg/m3 at the roadside monitoring
station in Causeway Bay [3-4], both of which were far below the AQOs
standard of 30,000 (1-hour) and 10,000 (8-hour), respectively. It is therefore
considered that CO is not a representative key parameter for assessment.
v)
Ozone (O3)
3.5.3.15
Unlike other
pollutants such as NOx, O3 is not a primary pollutant emitted from
man-made sources but is formed by a set of complex chain reactions between
various chemical species, including NOx and VOC, in the presence of
sunlight. According to Sun et al.
[3-[2]]
& [3-[3]]
the rate of formation of O3, also known as Ozone Production
Efficiency, depends not only on NOx and VOC levels, but atmospheric oxidation,
temperature, radiation, and other meteorological factors in the atmosphere of
different regions. The formation of O3 generally takes several hours
to proceed (EPD, 2013) [3-[4]]
and therefore O3 recorded locally could be attributed to emissions
generated from places afar.
3.5.3.16
According to “A
Study to Review Hong Kong’s Air Quality Objectives” [3-[5]],
due to the abundance of its precursors (VOC and NOx) from a great variety of
sources such as motor vehicles, industries, power plants and consumer products,
etc., ozone can be widely formed in the region and can be transported over long
distance. The general rising trend of ozone levels in Hong Kong over the past
years reflects an aggravation in the photochemical smog problem on a regional
scale. All these indicate that local traffic emission is not a dominant
controlling factor in O3 formation.
3.5.3.17
Moreover, as
discussed in Section 3.3.1, NOx
emission from motor vehicles can react with and remove O3 in air. Regions
with heavy traffic (i.e. urban area) normally have lower ozone levels than
areas with light traffic (i.e. rural area). Table 3.22 below summaries the ozone concentrations recorded in
various EPD AQMSs for past 5 years. It can be seen that no exceedance of 10th
highest 8-hour O3 concentrations were recorded in the past 5 years,
while exceedances were generally recorded in New Towns (except Tai Po) and in
Tap Mun (i.e. Rural area). Annual O3 concentrations recoded in Tap
Mun were also the highest (i.e. 75µg/m3 in Year 2013) in Hong Kong,
and Sham Shui Po recorded the lowest (i.e. 27µg/m3 in Year 2012).
Table 3.22 Summary of Ozone concentrations (2010 – 2014)
Monitoring Station |
Ozone Concentrations (µg/m3) |
|||||||||
10th highest 8-hour [1] |
Annual |
|||||||||
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
|
Urban Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central/Western |
127 |
136 |
152 |
144 |
147 |
37 |
36 |
37 |
41 |
43 |
Sham Shui Po |
108 |
115 |
134 |
113 |
132 |
28 |
31 |
27 |
31 |
35 |
Eastern |
119 |
126 |
130 |
115 |
132 |
42 |
46 |
40 |
39 |
43 |
Kwun Tong |
100 |
113 |
120 |
127 |
133 |
33 |
37 |
40 |
44 |
46 |
Kwai Chung |
105 |
105 |
117 |
109 |
115 |
28 |
28 |
30 |
30 |
36 |
Tsuen Wan |
104 |
111 |
125 |
117 |
142 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
39 |
New Town |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tai Po |
119 |
144 |
143 |
156 |
144 |
38 |
48 |
34 |
47 |
52 |
Sha Tin |
142 |
149 |
167 |
167 |
164 |
45 |
43 |
47 |
48 |
51 |
Tung Chung |
164 |
189 |
197 |
171 |
175 |
44 |
44 |
47 |
44 |
46 |
Yuen Long |
136 |
163 |
185 |
163 |
177 |
34 |
39 |
39 |
37 |
41 |
Tuen Mun |
Note [2] |
168 |
Note [2] |
41 |
||||||
Rural Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tap Mun |
166 |
188 |
189 |
180 |
181 |
67 |
71 |
71 |
75 |
72 |
Notes:
[1] Bolded
values mean exceedance of the criterion of 160µg/m3.
[2] Tuen
Mun air quality monitoring station commenced operation in Year 2014, hence
there is no data available for the period between 2010 and 2013.
3.5.3.18
As
discussed in Section 3.3, ozone is not a primary pollutant and high
ozone episodes happened in Tung
Chung area occasionally under the influence of regional pollutants transportation. Moreover, traffic emissions
due the Project may reduce the O3
concentrations in the immediate area along main roads. Ozone is therefore not considered as a key parameter
in this assessment.
vi)
Lead (Pb)
3.5.3.19
As leaded petrol
has been banned in Hong Kong since in 1999, it is no longer considered as a
primary source in Hong Kong. According
to the “Air Quality in Hong Kong 2013” from EPD, the measured 3-month averaged
lead level ranged from 4ng/m3 (Tung Chung) to 100ng/m3
(Yuen Long). The measured concentrations
are much lower than annual AQOs limit of 500ng/m3. Therefore, lead
is not considered as a key representative pollutant for the operational air
quality assessment.
vii)
Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs)
3.5.3.20
There are six
kinds of Toxic Air Pollutants (TAPs) routinely monitored in HK, including
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbonyls, and toxic elemental
species.
3.5.3.21
Dioxins,
carbonyls, PCBs and most toxic elemental species are not considered primary
sources of vehicular emissions (http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/
english/environmentinhk/air/studyrpts/assessment_of_tap_measurements.html &
http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/EMEPCORINAIR5/Sources_of_PCB_emissions.pdf/view),
and hence, these three TAPs are not considered as key / representative air
pollutants for the operational air quality assessment.
3.5.3.22
Vehicular
emissions may be a source of diesel particulate matters, PAHs and VOCs. Elemental carbon, which constitutes a large
portion of diesel particulate matters mass, is commonly used as a surrogate for
diesel particulate matter. According to the data from EPD, the elemental carbon
showed a significant decrease in concentration in Hong Kong by 47.5% from 2001
to 2009, and Tsuen Wan by 51.3% from 1999 to 2009. This is because the implementation of EURO
III vehicle emission standard to goods vehicle and bus in 2001 and EURO IV
standard to all types of vehicle in 2006-2007 (http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/
environmentinhk/air/data/emission_inve.html). It is not considered as a key
air pollutant for the operational air quality assessment.
3.5.3.23
Currently, no
ambient air quality standards have been set for PAHs. However, with reference to US and European
Community air quality guidelines, the European commission has a very stringent
guideline concentration for PAHs.
According to the “Air Quality in Hong Kong 2013” published by EPD, the
concentration of PAHs level (Benzo[a]pyrene, BaP) in Hong Kong were 0.15ng/m3
and 0.12ng/m3 monitored at the Tsuen Wan and Central/Western
stations respectively in 2013 which was still much lower than the guidelines of
European Communities of 1ng/m3.
Table 3.23 Comparison
of TAPs concentration in Hong Kong (2013) and the EU Air Quality Standards
Air Pollutants |
Guidelines / Standards (ng/m3) |
Highest Avg Conc at Tsuen Wan station (ng/m3) |
Highest Avg Conc at Central/Western
station (ng/m3) |
Compliance |
EU |
EU |
|||
PAHs (BaP) |
1 (Annual Average)[1] |
0.15 (Annual Average)[2] |
0.12 (Annual Average)[2] |
Well Achieved |
Notes:
[1] Referenced from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm
[2] Referenced from http://www.aqhi.gov.hk/api_history/english/report/files/AQR2013e_final.pdf
3.5.3.24 There are
different standards for different VOC compounds. According to the “Air Quality in Hong Kong 2013” published by EPD, benzene,
1-3 butadiene, formaldehyde and perchloroethylene are the VOCs that may have
more health concern, and the USEPA also identified benzene and 1-3 butadiene
are carcinogenic.
Table 3.24 Comparison
of VOCs concentration in Hong Kong (2013) and the EU Air Quality Standards
TAP |
Guidelines / Standards (μg/m3) |
Highest Avg Conc at Tsuen Wan station (μg/m3) |
Highest Avg Conc at Central/Western station
(μg/m3) |
Compliance |
Benzene |
5 (Annual
Average) [1] |
1.81 |
1.62 |
Well Achieved |
1-3 butadiene |
2.25 (Running Annual Average) [1] |
0.06 |
0.12 |
Well Achieved |
Formaldehyde |
9 (Annual Average) [3] |
- [2] |
5.21 |
Well Achieved |
Perchloroethylene |
40 (Annual Average) [4] |
0.60 |
0.57 |
Well Achieved |
Notes:
[1] Referenced from
the UK National Air Quality Strategy (NAQS)
[2] The measurement of formaldehyde was affected
by influence from renovation works at Princess Alexandra Community Centre as
well as nearby buildings of Tsuen Wan Station. Hence, only formaldehyde
concentration at the Central/Western station is reported.
[3] Referenced from the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Toxicity Criteria Database, California, USA (http://www.oehha.ca.gov/tcdb/index.asp)
[4] Referenced from the Integrated Risk Information
System (IRIS), USEPA (http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0106.htm)
3.5.3.25 As shown in
the above table, the measured VOCs concentration in Hong Kong urban area is far
below the UK and US standards. Also,
according to 2013 Hong Kong Air Pollutants Emission Inventory, the VOCs level
has dropped by approximately 50% in 2007 since 1990 due to the EPD progressive
improvement of EURO standard vehicles over the past two decades. With reference to the EPD’s 2013 Hong Kong
Emission Inventory Report, vehicular emission is also not the primary source of
VOCs, accounting for about 23% of the total in Hong Kong. Besides, according to
another study - “Seasonal and diurnal variations of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in the atmosphere of Hong Kong”, benzene, and 1-3 butadiene only
contributed about 6-13% of overall vehicular emission VOCs. In other words,
only 1.6-3.5% of the overall VOC emissions in Hong Kong are benzene and 1-3
butadiene contributed by vehicular emission.
3.5.3.26 The historical
monitoring data showed that the concentrations of PAHs and VOCs were only in
small amount. It is also reasonably
believed that the emission of PAHs and VOCs should be significantly decreased
after the implementation of EURO V standard vehicles in 2013 and the phasing
out of the pre-EURO IV diesel commercial vehicles. The TAPs is also not specified under the
current AQOs. Based on above reasons,
TAPs is not considered as a key air pollutant for the operational air quality
assessment.
viii)
Conclusion
3.5.3.27
As discussed in
the above sections, NO2, RSP and FSP are considered the key air
quality pollutant for this project and the concentrations of the other
pollutants are very low and hence are not considered as the key pollutants for
the purposes of this air quality assessment.
3.5.4
Assessment
Methodology
General
3.5.4.1
The area for air
quality impact assessment should be generally defined by a distance of 500m
from the boundary of the PDAs and the works of the Project within the Study
Area.
3.5.4.2
The assessment has
evaluated the impacts arising from three classes of emission sources depending
on their distance from the project site, including:
(1) Project induced
contribution;
(2) Pollutant-emitting
activities in the immediate neighbourhood; and
(3) Other contributions
from pollution not accounted for by (1) and (2).
3.5.4.3
All sources within
500m assessment area (i.e. (1) and (2)) are considered as near-field source
impacts and are predicted using local-scale models. These sources include
vehicular emission from existing road network and proposed roads within the
PDAs. Although the HKIA is located outside 500m assessment area, it has been
included in the near-field assessment in this EIA.
3.5.4.4
Other far-field
pollution source impacts (3) which are beyond 500m from the Project (i.e. background
concentration), are predicted using regional scale model – Pollutant in the
Atmosphere and the Transport over Hong Kong, PATH. In PATH model, all major
emission sources including public electricity generation, civil aviation, road
transport, navigation, industries, other fuel combustion and non-combustion
sources covering both HKSAR and Pearl River Delta Economic Zone (PRDEZ) are
considered.
3.5.4.5
The cumulative
operational air quality impact is then a combination of the contributions from
the near-field and far-field sources.
Determination of
Assessment Year
3.5.4.6
According to
Appendix B, Clause 5 (iv) of the EIA Study Brief for the Project, the air
pollution impacts of future road traffic shall be calculated based on the
highest emission strength from road within the next 15 years upon commencement
of operation of the proposed road. The
selected assessment year should represent the highest emission scenario, given
the combination of emission factors and traffic flow for the selected year.
3.5.4.7
Vehicular tailpipe
emissions from open roads are calculated based on the latest EMFAC-HK model
available at the time of preparing this report.
3.5.4.8
Based on the
current tentative implementation programme as presented in Section 2.9, population intake will be in phases in Years 2023, 2024,
2025, 2027, 2029 and 2030. As advised by the Engineer, proposed road
commencement would be in the same commencement year of each phase. Therefore,
EmFAC-HK models have been carried out for Year 2023 (first commissioning), 2024,
2025, 2027, 2029, 2030 and 2038 (15 years after first commissioning) to
determine the highest emission scenario and the worst assessment year. The traffic forecast data is given Appendix 3.9. The
methodology, key model assumptions and results (including emission factors) are
presented in Appendix 3.10.
3.5.4.9
According to the
existing air quality conditions as presented in Section 3.3, NO2 is considered as the most critical air
pollutant for this Project, given its continuous non-compliance of annual AQO
criterion from Years 2010 to 2014. To this end, the total NOx emission from
nearby road networks predicted by EMFAC-HK based on the traffic forecast are summarized in the table below. Results indicate
that the highest NOx emission scenario would likely occur in Year 2023 and hence is taken as the worst assessment year for
the purpose of this operational
air quality assessment. In addition, it
can also be seen from Table 3.25
that, despite the continuous increase in the Vehicle-Km Travelled (VKT), a
progressive decrease in NOx emission from vehicle tailpipe is observed, which
is anticipated as a result of the implementation of emission reduction measures
over motor vehicles by the Hong Kong Government, e.g. introductions of Euro V vehicle emission
standards in 2012 and Euro VI tentatively in 2016, phasing out pre-Euro IV
diesel commercial vehicles by end 2019, etc. These measures on controlling
vehicular emission would progressively reduce roadside air pollution.
Table 3.25 Summary of total daily pollutant emissions and
vehicle-km travelled
Year |
Total NOx
Emission (gram/day) |
Total Vehicle-km
Travelled (VKT/day) |
2023 |
1,120,653 |
2,708,307 |
2024 |
1,089,154 |
2,795,648 |
2025 |
1,076,949 |
2,976,127 |
2027 |
1,073,913 |
3,139,358 |
2029 |
956,421 |
3,616,030 |
2030 |
879,322 |
3,866,166 |
2038 |
603,735 |
4,333,149 |
Note:
Values in
bold are the maximum among Years 2023, 2024, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2030 and 2038.
Vehicular Emission from Open Road
3.5.4.10 The
EMFAC-HK will calculate the hourly vehicular emission (in tonne) for each road
category. The hourly emission rates for
each vehicle class (in gram per mile per vehicle) are obtained by dividing the
hourly emissions calculated in the EMFAC-HK by the VMT for the respective hour.
The calculation of the NOx, RSP and FSP emission factors for
different road groups are given in Appendix 3.10.
3.5.4.11 However, it
should be noted that some planned ASRs would still be under construction and
there would be no traffic flow in theirs nearby road networks. In order to
conduct a conservative operational air quality impact assessment, it is assumed
that the traffic data and emission factors of the population intake year of
each phase beyond Year 2023 are adopted in the assessment as a
reasonable worst case scenario, notwithstanding that this would overestimate
the air quality at some existing ASRs. The composite vehicle emission factors
for each road link are given in Appendix 3.11.
3.5.4.12 The USEPA
approved near field air dispersion model, CALINE4 developed by the California
Department of Transport is used to assess vehicular emissions impact from all
existing and planned open road network.
3.5.4.13 Grid-specific
meteorological data for Year 2010 extracted from EPD’s PATH model is adopted in
CALINE4 model, including relevant temperature, wind speed, direction and mixing
height. The stability classes are
estimated from PCRAMMET model. The
mixing height is capped to 121m as per the real meteorological data. For the treatment of calm hours, the approach
recommended in the "Guideline on Air Quality on Air Quality Models Version
05" is adopted.
3.5.4.14 The surface
roughness height is closely related to the land use characteristics, and the
surface roughness is estimated as 10 percent of the average height of physical
structures within 1km study area. A surface roughness of 50cm is assumed for
Grids 11_24, 11_25, 12_24, 13_27, 14_26, 14_27, 15_26 and 15_27 to represent
the relatively rural characteristic and low-rise developments in the Lantau
areas, while 100cm is assumed for Grids 12_25, 12_26, 13_25 and 13_26 to
represent the urbanized and high-rise developments in Tung Chung Town. The wind
standard deviation is estimated in accordance with the “Guideline on Air
Quality Models (Revised), 1986”, as summarized in the table below.
Table 3.26 Summary of Wind Standard Deviation
Stability Class |
Wind Standard Deviation (roughness = 50cm) |
Wind Standard Deviation (roughness = 100cm) |
A |
28.6 |
32.9 |
B |
28.6 |
32.9 |
C |
22.3 |
25.6 |
D |
15.9 |
18.3 |
E |
9.5 |
11.0 |
F |
4.8 |
5.6 |
3.5.4.15
Owing to the
limitation of the CALINE4 model, elevated road higher than 10m above local
ground or water surface are set to the maximum height of 10m in the model as
the worst-case assumption. For barriers
along roads or any proposed noise barriers as a noise mitigation measures, the
line source is modelled at the tip of the barrier and the mixing width is
limited to the actual uncovered road width in order to address the associated
secondary environmental impact.
3.5.4.16
Ozone Limiting
Method (OLM) is adopted for conversion of NOx to NO2, using the
predicted O3 and NO2 levels from PATH model. According to EPD’s “Guidelines on Choice of
Models and Model Parameters”, the vehicular tailpipe NO2 emission is
assumed to be 7.5% of NOx.
3.5.4.17
Since
the vehicular emission sources are at local ground level, the impact on ASRs at
1.5m, 5m, 10m, 15m and 20m above ground would therefore cover the worst hit
level. However, assessment heights of 50m and 80m above ground are also
included to confirm the compliance of AQOs at a higher level.
Vehicular Emission from Tunnel Portal and
Ventilation Building
3.5.4.18
The USEPA approved
model, AERMOD, is adopted to model the vehicular emission from tunnel portals and
ventilation buildings. Portal emissions are modeled in accordance with the
Permanent International Association of Road Congress Report (PIARC, 1991),
where it is assumed that the pollutant will be ejected from the portal as a
portal jet such that 2/3 of the total emission will be dispersed within first
50m from the portal, and 1/3 of the total emission within the second 50m. To
take into account the horizontal jet effect, portal emission is modeled as
“Volume” source. On the other hand,
emissions from the ventilation buildings are modeled as “Point” source in AERMOD. The pollution sources that are covered in the
near field dispersion AERMOD model include the following:
i)
Emission from HZMB tunnel portal and
associated ventilation building
3.5.4.19
Assumption on the
emission split between ventilation building and tunnel portal (i.e. 70/30%) has
been made with reference to the approved EIA Study “Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road” (AEIAR-144/2009)
(HKLR EIA) and the emissions are calculated based on the Year 2023’s projected traffic flow and vehicular emission factors. Appendix 3.12 presents the calculations for the emission from HZMB
tunnel portal and its associated ventilation building. Details on the release height, exit
temperature, exit velocity and stack diameter for the ventilation building
assumed in the model are also given in Appendix 3.12.
ii)
Emission from HKLR tunnel portals and
associated ventilation building
3.5.4.20
Assumption on the
emission split between ventilation building and tunnel portal (i.e. 70/30%) has
been made with reference to the approved EIA Study “Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road” (AEIAR-144/2009)
(HKLR EIA) and the emissions are calculated based on the Year 2023’s projected traffic flow and vehicular emission factors. Appendix 3.12 presents the calculations for the emission from HKLR
tunnel portals and its associated ventilation building. Details on the release height, exit
temperature, exit velocity and stack diameter for the ventilation building assumed
in the model are also given in Appendix 3.12.
iii)
Emission from HAT tunnel portal
3.5.4.21
The HAT tunnel is
ventilated only by horizontal jet fans according to the HKLR EIA study and
hence all emission will be discharged from tunnel exit only. Its tunnel
emission are calculated based on the Year
2023’s projected traffic flow and
vehicular emission factors. Appendix 3.12 presents the relevant calculations of the emission
and information.
iv)
Emission from TMCLKL tunnel portal and
associated ventilation building
3.5.4.22
Assumption on the
emission split between ventilation building and tunnel portal (i.e. 90/10%) has
been made with reference to the approved EIA Study “Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link” (AEIAR-146/2009) (TMCLKL EIA) and the
emissions are calculated based on the Year
2023’s projected traffic flow and
vehicular emission factors. Appendix 3.12 presents the relevant calculations of the emission
and information.
3.5.4.23
OLM is adopted for
conversion of NOx to NO2, using the predicted O3 and NO2
levels from PATH model. According to
EPD’s “Guidelines on Choice of Models and Model Parameters”, the vehicular
tailpipe NO2 emission is assumed to be 7.5% of NOx.
Vehicular Emission from Idling Vehicles at HKBCF
3.5.4.24 The USEPA
approved near field air dispersion model, CALINE4 developed by the California
Department of Transport is used to assess vehicular emissions impact from
idling vehicles. Emissions are calculated based on the emission factors for
different EURO engines types as of Year 2023 in accordance with the latest
report “Road Tunnels: Vehicle Emissions and Air Demand for Ventilation”
published by the PIARC in 2012, taking into account the mass factor for HGVs
and air-conditioning loading factor of 1.3 (referenced from the approved EIA
Study “Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works”
(AEIAR-161/2011)). In addition, the processing times of each vehicle type have
been predicted based on the latest traffic forecast by the Traffic Engineer. Appendix 3.13 presents the relevant calculations of
idling emission.
Airport Emission from HKIA
3.5.4.25 In the approved
3RS EIA Study, the worst assessment year was determined based on the highest
aircraft emission scenario, and it was identified to be occurred in Year 2031. Emissions
from airport operation presented in the approved 3RS EIA have been directly
adopted for the cumulative air quality impact in Year 2023 as a conservative
approach.
3.5.4.26 Details on
emissions strengths, emission characteristics and modelling parameters shall be
referred to the approved 3RS EIA Study. CALINE4 (for airside vehicles) and AERMOD
(for sources other than airside vehicles) models have been used to assess the
air quality impact from airport related activities.
3.5.4.27 Grid-specific
meteorological data for Year 2010 extracted from the EPD’s PATH model
is adopted in AERMOD model, including relevant temperature, wind speed,
wind direction, etc. Mixing heights deduced from AERMET that
are lower than the lowest mixing height recorded by the HKO in Year 2010
(i.e. 121 m) are capped at 121 m to align
with the real meteorological data. Similarly, mixing heights deduced
from AERMET that are higher than the highest recorded mixing
height in Year 2010 (i.e. 1667m) are capped at 1667 m as per the highest mixing
height recorded. Surface roughness is separated into 12 zones with
heights corresponding to the land use characteristics.
3.5.4.28 OLM has
also been adopted for conversion of NOx to NO2
concentrations. With reference to the approved 3RS EIA, the following initial
NO2/NOx ratios for various emission sources have been
adopted:
Table
3.27 Summary
of initial NO2/NOx ratios (referenced from the 3RS EIA)
Source |
Initial NO2 / NOx Ratio |
Aircraft LTO
(Take-off) |
5.3% |
Aircraft LTO
(Climb-out) |
5.3% |
Aircraft LTO
(Approach) |
15% |
Aircraft LTO
(Taxi-in and Taxi-out) |
37.5% |
Vehicular
Tailpipe |
7.5% |
Other sources
(e.g. ERUF, etc.) |
10% |
Industrial Emission from OWTF Phase 1
3.5.4.29 Chimney
emissions from the committed OWTF Phase 1 have been referenced to the approved
EIA Study “Organic Waste Treatment
Facilities, Phase I” (AEIAR-149/2010). It is understood that a variation of Environmental Permit has been
approved in February 2013 (Application No. VEP-394/2013) and May 2013
(Application No. VEP-403/2013) due to changes in reference design of OWTF. As
presented in the supporting document, it is found that the stack locations and
stack heights are changed from those in the approved OWTF Phase 1 EIA, while
the chimney emission rates remain unchanged. However, given the committed OWTF
Phase 1 is location at more than 3km away from the nearest existing ASRs in Pak
Mong and planned ASRs in TCE, changes in stack location and height would only
cause negligible change in air quality impact. Hence, the information presented
in the approved OWTF Phase 1 EIA is considered applicable for the purpose of
cumulative air quality impact assessment. Appendix 3.14 presents the details of emission and chimney
information.
3.5.4.30
Emissions from the
chimneys are modeled as “Point” source in AERMOD. OLM is adopted for conversion of NOx to NO2, using the
predicted O3 and NO2 levels from PATH model. According to EPD’s “Guidelines on Choice of
Models and Model Parameters”, the industrial NO2 emission is assumed
to be 10% of NOx.
Marine Emission from the Proposed Marina and
Existing Local Vessel
3.5.4.31 Marine
emissions from the proposed Marina and existing local vessel have been
referenced to the EPD’s “Study on Marine Vessels
Emission Inventory, Final Report” published in February 2012. Appendix 3.15 presents the detailed calculation of emission.
3.5.4.32
Emissions from the
marine vessels are modeled as “Point” sources in AERMOD. OLM is adopted for conversion of NOx to NO2,
using the predicted O3 and NO2 levels from PATH
model. According to EPD’s “Guidelines on
Choice of Models and Model Parameters”, the gaseous NO2 emission is
assumed to be 10% of NOx.
Far-field Source Contribution (i.e. Future Background Air Quality)
3.5.4.33
PATH (Pollutants
in the Atmosphere and their Transport over Hongkong) is a regional air quality
model developed by EPD to simulate air quality over Hong Kong against the Pearl
River Delta (PRD) as background. It simulates wind field, pollutant emissions,
transportation and chemical transformation and outputs pollutant concentrations
over Hong Kong and the PRD region at a fine grid size of 1.5km.
3.5.4.34
As a conservative
approach, the Hong Kong emission inventory for Year 2031 as presented in the
approved 3RS EIA Study has been adopted as the basis, except for emissions from
public electricity generation and road transport. Since the approval of 3RS EIA
Study in 2014, the “Fourth Technical Memorandum
for Allocation of Emission Allowances in Respect of Specified Licences” (4th
TM) has been published to further tighten the emissions from the power
generation section in 2019 and beyond. The emission inventory for this
operational air quality assessment has therefore been referenced to the annual
emission allowances stipulated in the 4th TM.
3.5.4.35 For road transport emission, the latest
EMFAC-HK v2.6 has been adopted to determine the territory wide vehicular
emission based on the 2023 territory wide VKT and associated speed
fraction forecasted by the Traffic Engineer.
3.5.4.36
The following Table 3.28 summaries the Hong Kong
emission inventory for the PATH model for this operational air quality
assessment.
Table 3.28 Summary of Hong Kong Emission Inventory for the PATH
Model (for this operational air quality assessment)
Emission Group |
Annual Emission (Tonnes per year) |
Reference |
|||
SO2 |
NOx |
RSP |
VOC |
||
Public Electricity
Generation |
9,220 |
25,480 |
700 |
393 |
Fourth
Technical Memorandum for Allocation of Emission Allowances in Respect of
Specified Licences |
Road Transport |
127 |
8,847 |
334 |
1,781 |
EMFAC-HK v2.6
for Year 2023 |
Navigation |
3,710 |
33,897 |
933 |
4,323 |
Approved 3RS
EIA |
Civil Aviation [1] |
782 |
9,459 |
220 |
675 |
Approved 3RS
EIA |
Other Fuel Combustion |
309 |
10,993 |
898 |
980 |
Approved 3RS
EIA |
Non-combustion |
N/A |
N/A |
1,037 |
23,673 |
Approved 3RS
EIA |
Note:
[1] Emission
from civil aviation (i.e. airport related emission) has been included in the
PATH model for determination of background O3 concentration.
3.5.4.37 PATH model
is used to quantify the future background air quality. Far-field emission
sources including roads, marine, airports, power plants and industries within
the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone and Hong Kong were considered in the PATH
model.
3.5.4.38 Since the
vehicular emission and airport emission are modelled by the near-field
dispersion models, the respective emissions have been removed from the
concerned grids to avoid overestimation.
3.5.4.39 PATH model
has been re-run based on the abovementioned, and the hourly concentrations of
NO2, RSP and O3 predicted by this updated PATH model have
been directly adopted in the calculation of cumulative air quality impact for Year 2023.
3.5.4.40 It is
understood that only hourly RSP concentrations are available from PATH model.
According to EPD’s “Guidelines on the
Estimation of PM2.5 for Air Quality Assessment in Hong Kong”, the
conservative corrections as shown in the following table are adopted to
determine the background FSP concentrations.
Table 3.29 Conversion factors for RSP/FSP
Annual (µg/m3) |
Daily (µg/m3) |
FSP = 0.71 x RSP |
FSP = 0.75 x RSP |
Prediction of
Cumulative Operational Air Quality Impact
3.5.4.41
The cumulative
operational air quality is a combination of the emission impacts contributed
from the near-field and far-field sources (i.e. at local scale and background
air quality impact from other concurrent and regional sources) on hourly basis.
3.5.4.42
In consideration
of the number of exceedance allowance of the hourly and daily AQOs (refer to Table 3.1), the pollutant concentrations
after the AQOs allowance limits (i.e. the 19th highest 1-hour NO2
concentrations and 10th highest 24-hour RSP/ FSP
concentrations) are determined at each ASR at 1.5m, 5m, 10m, 15m, 20m, 50m and
80m above ground. The annual predicted concentrations are also assessed and all
predicted levels are then compared with the AQOs.
3.5.5
Without
Project Scenario
3.5.5.1
In order to
determine the change in air quality level with this Project in place in the
assessment year 2023, an additional assessment has been conducted for
the without project scenario in the same year. Under this scenario, same
methodologies as mentioned in Section
3.5.4 except the traffic forecast for without project have been adopted. EMFAC-HK
is used to predicted the vehicular emission under the without project scenario
and CALINE4 is adopted to assess the vehicular emission impact. Hourly pollutant concentrations from the PATH
model is adopted as the background for the cumulative air quality impact.
3.5.6
Prediction and
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Assessment Results
3.5.6.1
The 19th
highest 1-hour and annual NO2 concentrations, and 10th
highest 24-hour and annual RSP/ FSP concentrations predicted under “with
Project” scenario are presented in Table
3.30. Detailed results are presented in Appendix 3.16. It can be seen from the table below that all the
predicted NO2/ RSP/ FSP concentrations are within the respective criteria. In addition, it should also be
noted that this operational air quality impact assessment has adopted numbers
of conservative assumptions, such as
using airport emission in Year 2031 while the assessment year of 2023 is identified,
included the vehicular emission in areas that would not be existed in Year 2023
(e.g. road network in Tung Chung East), etc.
Table 3.30 Cumulative
NO2, RSP and FSP concentrations (with project scenario)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above Ground |
Pollutant
Concentration (μg/m3) |
|||||
NO2 |
RSP |
FSP |
||||||
1-hour (19th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
24-hour (10th
highest) |
Annual |
|||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One Citygate |
1.5m |
161 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A2 |
Tung Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
132 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A3 |
Ching Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
131 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A4 |
Po On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary
School |
1.5m |
127 |
27 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A5 |
Po Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien
College |
1.5m |
125 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A6 |
Wong Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
127 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A7 |
Yu Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
123 |
27 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A8 |
Fu Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
130 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A9 |
Tung Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
154 |
33 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A10 |
Yat Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
118 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A11 |
Yat Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
115 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A12 |
Tat Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
161 |
33 |
78 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A13 |
Ma Wan Chung |
1.5m |
118 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A14 |
North Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
118 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A15 |
Caribbean Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
149 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A16 |
Caribbean Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
144 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A17 |
Ho Yu College |
1.5m |
151 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A18 |
Ho Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
148 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A19 |
Coastal Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
145 |
31 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A20 |
La Rossa B |
1.5m |
152 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A21 |
LeBleu No.1 |
1.5m |
150 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A22 |
LeBleu Deux |
1.5m |
155 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A23 |
Seaview Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
158 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A24 |
Ling Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
150 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A25 |
Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
148 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A26 |
Novotel Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
155 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A27 |
Man Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
163 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A28 |
New Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
119 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A29 |
Tung Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
116 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A30 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
113 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A31 |
Tung Chung Public School |
1.5m |
114 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A32 |
Ha Ling Pei |
1.5m |
115 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A33 |
Lung Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
112 |
23 |
73 |
38 |
55 |
27 |
A34 |
YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
127 |
27 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A35 |
Hau Wong Temple |
1.5m |
131 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
A36 |
Sha Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
116 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A37 |
Ngan Au |
1.5m |
131 |
27 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A38 |
Shek Lau Po |
1.5m |
126 |
27 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A39 |
Mo Ka |
1.5m |
126 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A40 |
Shek Mun Kap |
1.5m |
122 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A41 |
Shek Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
124 |
25 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
A42 |
Tung Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
152 |
32 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A43 |
Tung Chung North Park |
1.5m |
150 |
34 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
148 |
25 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate
- Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
125 |
27 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court -
Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
129 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A47 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
133 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A48 |
Tung Chung
Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
130 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A49 |
Tung Chung
Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
143 |
36 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 5 |
1.5m |
144 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 10 |
1.5m |
145 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast
Block 16 |
1.5m |
146 |
31 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
150 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
156 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
147 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux
Block 7 |
1.5m |
151 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent
Block 5 |
1.5m |
153 |
31 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire
Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
136 |
34 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A59 |
Lantau District
Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
131 |
34 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
115 |
23 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A61 |
Tung Chung
Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
117 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
117 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
122 |
27 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
114 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate
- Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
114 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
115 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
115 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
Planned ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
Tung Chung Area
53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
157 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area
54 - Planned Residential Development |
1.5m |
158 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area
55a - Planned Residential Development |
1.5m |
146 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
27 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area
89 - Planned Primary / Secondary School |
1.5m |
148 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area
39 – Planned Public Housing Development |
1.5m |
114 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area
56 – Planned Public Rental Housing Development |
1.5m |
150 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
Planned ASRs (Tung Chung East under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TCE-1 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
143 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic
& GIC Complex |
1.5m |
147 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
152 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
148 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
148 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
151 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
142 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
153 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
151 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
1.5m |
152 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
158 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
153 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
155 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
1.5m |
152 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary
School (D) |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
146 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
142 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
146 |
30 |
77 |
39 |
58 |
28 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed
Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
141 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
157 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
155 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
156 |
29 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed
Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
155 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
152 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
147 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police
Station |
1.5m |
153 |
31 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire
Station |
1.5m |
154 |
31 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police
Married Quarters |
1.5m |
151 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post
Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
151 |
30 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
161 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
155 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed
Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
158 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed
International School |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed
Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
157 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
1.5m |
154 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary
School (E1) |
1.5m |
158 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
156 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
163 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
162 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
162 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
156 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
156 |
28 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed
Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
161 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
161 |
30 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
1.5m |
158 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
158 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
158 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
158 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed
Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
168 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
162 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
159 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed
Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
161 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary
School (F) |
1.5m |
161 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed
Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
160 |
29 |
76 |
39 |
57 |
28 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports
Centre (D) |
1.5m |
153 |
28 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports
Centre (F) |
1.5m |
159 |
29 |
78 |
39 |
59 |
28 |
Planned ASRs (Tung Chung West under this Project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TCW-1 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
118 |
26 |
77 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
122 |
26 |
77 |
39 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type
Development |
1.5m |
118 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
111 |
22 |
73 |
38 |
55 |
27 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
112 |
23 |
73 |
38 |
55 |
27 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
111 |
22 |
73 |
38 |
55 |
27 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
116 |
25 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
116 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic
and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
130 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
115 |
24 |
76 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed
Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
130 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
129 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
129 |
28 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
127 |
28 |
75 |
38 |
57 |
27 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
128 |
27 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
128 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
127 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
126 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
123 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
111 |
22 |
73 |
38 |
55 |
27 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
126 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
125 |
26 |
75 |
38 |
56 |
27 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
130 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed
Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
131 |
27 |
77 |
38 |
58 |
27 |
3.5.6.2
High
pollutant concentrations (e.g. annual NO2) are generally predicted
at existing ASRs located adjacent to the North Lantau Highway, such as ASR A1
(One Citygate), A12 (Tat Tung Road Park), A24 (Ling Liang Church E Wun
Secondary School), A25 (Ling Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School), A26 (Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong), A27 (Man Tung Road Park), A42 (Tung Chung Public Library),
A43 (Tung Chung North Park), A49 (Tung Chung Swimming Pool), A58 (Tung Chung
Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot) and A59 (Lantau District Police Headquarters).
Nevertheless, the predicted annual NO2 concentrations for these
existing ASRs are in the range of 31 to 35μg/m3, still complying
with the criterion of 40μg/m3.
3.5.6.3
For
planned ASRs in Tung Chung East Reclamation Area under this Project, sufficient
setback distance between the North Lantau Highway (i.e. major polluting source)
has already been considered in the layout design, the predicted pollutant
concentrations are generally lower than the existing ASRs, whereas the
predicted annual NO2 concentrations are ranging from 27 to 30μg/m3.
For existing and planned ASRs near Tung Chung West area, such as A40 (Shek Mun
Kap), A60 (Shan Ha (Pa Mei)), A63 (Yat Tung Estate – Kui Yat House), TCW-4
(Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6)), etc., which are all located further
away from the major highways, the predicted pollutant concentrations are
relatively low, only ranging from 22 to 28μg/m3.
3.5.6.4
According
to the assessment results, the worst affected level is identified at 1.5m above
ground, while the pollutant concentrations gradually decrease with increasing
height. For example, the predicted annual NO2 concentration at A63
(Yat Tung Estate – Kui Yat House) reduced from 27µg/m3 at 1.5m above
ground to 25µg/m3, 24µg/m3 and 23µg/m3 at 10m,
20m, and 50m above ground respectively. This indicated that the key
contributing pollution source is located at ground level, which is the tailpipe
emission along open road.
3.5.6.5
Contours
of 19th highest 1-hour and annual NO2 concentrations, 10th
highest 24-hour and annual RSP/FSP concentrations (with Project Scenario) at
the worst affected level (i.e. 1.5m above ground) are therefore plotted in Figures 3.17 – 3.22. It is also found that there are no
exceedances at all air sensitive uses. Hence, no adverse air quality impact on
all air sensitive uses is anticipated during the operational phase of this
Project.
Changes in Air
Quality Conditions in Future Years
3.5.6.6
Pollutant
contributions associated with the Project are generated from its induced
traffic and the planned road network in TCE and TCW. By comparing the
assessment results under “with” and “without” project scenarios, project
contribution in future year (i.e. Year 2023) could then be quantified. Detailed
results under “without” project scenario are presented in Appendix 3.16.
3.5.6.7
According
to the assessment results (for both with and without Project Scenarios) as summarised
in Tables 3.31a-b, 3.32a-b and 3.33a-b, maximum contributions of annual NO2 on existing
and planned ASRs are 2µg/m3 and 3µg/m3 respectively,
while the maximum contributions of annual RSP / FSP concentrations on both
existing and planned ASRs are both 1µg/m3 only, which are considered
relatively small as compared to the AQOs.
3.5.6.8
Maximum
changes in cumulative 19th highest 1-hour NO2 concentration
at existing ASRs, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW are 9µg/m3, 24µg/m3,
and 8µg/m3 respectively, while the maximum changes in 10th
highest 24-hour RSP / FSP concentration are only 1µg/m3. Results
indicated that the Project would only cause relative small air quality impact
on both existing and planned ASRs during its operational phase.
3.5.6.9
Small
project contributions of NO2 / RSP / FSP are generally found at ASRs
located near the newly proposed road network as well as near major existing
road (e.g. North Lantau Highway) where induced traffic would be travelled. For
area with lesser new population allocated (i.e. Tung Chung West), induced
traffic is anticipated lesser and hence the project contributions. In addition,
from the breakdown of annual NO2 / RSP / FSP, it is observed that
ambient background constitutes the largest contribution of the cumulative air
quality impact.
Table 3.31a Breakdown
of 19th highest 1-hour NO2 concentrations (with
and without project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
19th
highest 1-hour NO2 Concentrations (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project [1] |
Change in
Concentration (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
128 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
161 |
128 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
161 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
84 |
42 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
132 |
84 |
42 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
132 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
21 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
131 |
<1 |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
128 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
55 |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
127 |
55 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
127 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
<1 |
74 |
<1 |
1 |
50 |
125 |
<1 |
65 |
<1 |
1 |
50 |
116 |
0 |
9 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
48 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
127 |
48 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
127 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
54 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
123 |
54 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
123 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
52 |
23 |
9 |
<1 |
46 |
130 |
52 |
21 |
4 |
<1 |
46 |
123 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
41 |
48 |
<1 |
<1 |
64 |
154 |
41 |
44 |
<1 |
<1 |
64 |
150 |
0 |
4 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
118 |
<1 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
117 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
115 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
115 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
54 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
161 |
54 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
161 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
97 |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
118 |
97 |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
118 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
114 |
118 |
<1 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
114 |
117 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
99 |
41 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
149 |
99 |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
144 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
50 |
33 |
6 |
<1 |
56 |
144 |
50 |
30 |
2 |
<1 |
56 |
138 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
98 |
45 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
151 |
98 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
145 |
0 |
6 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
98 |
42 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
148 |
98 |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
144 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
65 |
24 |
5 |
<1 |
51 |
145 |
65 |
24 |
2 |
<1 |
51 |
142 |
0 |
<1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
54 |
42 |
6 |
<1 |
50 |
152 |
54 |
41 |
2 |
<1 |
50 |
148 |
0 |
<1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
68 |
39 |
10 |
<1 |
33 |
150 |
68 |
38 |
4 |
<1 |
33 |
144 |
0 |
<1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
59 |
36 |
9 |
<1 |
50 |
155 |
59 |
36 |
4 |
<1 |
50 |
149 |
0 |
<1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
58 |
38 |
12 |
<1 |
50 |
158 |
58 |
38 |
4 |
<1 |
50 |
150 |
0 |
<1 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
114 |
30 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
150 |
114 |
30 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
150 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
64 |
43 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
148 |
64 |
42 |
<1 |
<1 |
41 |
147 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
155 |
<1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
150 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
106 |
44 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
163 |
106 |
44 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
163 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
40 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
119 |
40 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
119 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
94 |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
113 |
94 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
113 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
27 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
114 |
27 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
114 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
114 |
115 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
114 |
115 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
107 |
112 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
107 |
111 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
120 |
127 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
120 |
121 |
0 |
6 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
111 |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
131 |
111 |
18 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
131 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
85 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
131 |
85 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
34 |
131 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
60 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
126 |
60 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
126 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
91 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
126 |
91 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
126 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
63 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
31 |
122 |
63 |
23 |
<1 |
<1 |
31 |
118 |
0 |
4 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
90 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
124 |
90 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
124 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
114 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
152 |
114 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
152 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
102 |
40 |
<1 |
<1 |
8 |
150 |
102 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
8 |
146 |
0 |
4 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
44 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
148 |
44 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
147 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
80 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
125 |
80 |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
124 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
89 |
34 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
129 |
89 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
127 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
89 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
133 |
89 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
131 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
124 |
130 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
124 |
130 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
54 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
143 |
54 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
143 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
58 |
27 |
7 |
<1 |
53 |
144 |
58 |
25 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
139 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
69 |
20 |
6 |
<1 |
51 |
145 |
69 |
18 |
2 |
<1 |
51 |
140 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
58 |
25 |
6 |
<1 |
56 |
146 |
58 |
25 |
2 |
<1 |
56 |
142 |
0 |
<1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
56 |
33 |
8 |
<1 |
53 |
150 |
56 |
30 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
142 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
156 |
<1 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
148 |
0 |
8 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
56 |
30 |
8 |
<1 |
53 |
147 |
56 |
30 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
142 |
0 |
<1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
151 |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
141 |
146 |
0 |
6 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
55 |
41 |
7 |
<1 |
50 |
153 |
55 |
41 |
3 |
<1 |
50 |
149 |
0 |
<1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
88 |
45 |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
136 |
88 |
43 |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
133 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
124 |
131 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
124 |
131 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
115 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
115 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
117 |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
60 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
117 |
60 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
117 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
31 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
122 |
<1 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
90 |
119 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
112 |
114 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
112 |
113 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
28 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
114 |
28 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
114 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
27 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
115 |
27 |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
114 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
115 |
<1 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
115 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
6 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
143 |
157 |
6 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
143 |
157 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
63 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
158 |
63 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
157 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
64 |
22 |
8 |
<1 |
53 |
146 |
64 |
21 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
141 |
0 |
<1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
69 |
19 |
7 |
<1 |
53 |
148 |
69 |
17 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
142 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
37 |
22 |
<1 |
<1 |
53 |
114 |
37 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
53 |
111 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
73 |
17 |
7 |
<1 |
53 |
150 |
73 |
15 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
144 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
30 |
1 |
<1 |
111 |
143 |
<1 |
23 |
1 |
<1 |
111 |
136 |
0 |
7 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
110 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
147 |
110 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
144 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
11 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
11 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
151 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
110 |
30 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
148 |
110 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
147 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
112 |
31 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
148 |
112 |
30 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
147 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
110 |
36 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
151 |
110 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
144 |
0 |
7 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
82 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
142 |
82 |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
140 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
41 |
36 |
17 |
<1 |
60 |
153 |
41 |
25 |
6 |
<1 |
60 |
133 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
56 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
151 |
56 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
151 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
11 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
154 |
11 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
11 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
11 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
150 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
91 |
43 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
154 |
91 |
43 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
154 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
44 |
29 |
25 |
<1 |
60 |
158 |
44 |
29 |
10 |
<1 |
60 |
142 |
0 |
<1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
11 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
153 |
11 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
112 |
34 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
155 |
112 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
9 |
148 |
0 |
7 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
11 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
11 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
150 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
11 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
154 |
11 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
152 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
78 |
47 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
146 |
78 |
35 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
134 |
0 |
12 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
78 |
44 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
142 |
78 |
34 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
133 |
0 |
10 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
1 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
146 |
1 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
135 |
146 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
62 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
141 |
62 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
140 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
42 |
40 |
16 |
<1 |
60 |
157 |
42 |
26 |
6 |
<1 |
60 |
133 |
0 |
14 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
42 |
38 |
15 |
<1 |
60 |
155 |
42 |
25 |
6 |
<1 |
60 |
133 |
0 |
13 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
44 |
39 |
13 |
<1 |
60 |
156 |
44 |
24 |
5 |
<1 |
60 |
132 |
0 |
15 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
43 |
38 |
14 |
<1 |
60 |
155 |
43 |
25 |
5 |
<1 |
60 |
133 |
0 |
14 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
18 |
15 |
15 |
<1 |
104 |
152 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
<1 |
104 |
131 |
0 |
9 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
53 |
39 |
4 |
<1 |
50 |
147 |
53 |
33 |
4 |
<1 |
50 |
141 |
0 |
6 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
50 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
153 |
50 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
153 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
50 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
154 |
50 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
153 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
110 |
37 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
151 |
110 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
146 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
109 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
151 |
109 |
31 |
<1 |
<1 |
4 |
144 |
0 |
7 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
58 |
41 |
5 |
<1 |
50 |
154 |
58 |
32 |
5 |
<1 |
50 |
145 |
0 |
9 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
83 |
20 |
5 |
<1 |
53 |
161 |
83 |
12 |
2 |
<1 |
53 |
151 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
52 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
155 |
52 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
101 |
154 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
115 |
11 |
4 |
<1 |
29 |
158 |
115 |
7 |
1 |
<1 |
29 |
152 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
81 |
16 |
4 |
<1 |
53 |
154 |
81 |
12 |
2 |
<1 |
53 |
148 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
41 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
113 |
157 |
41 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
113 |
157 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
86 |
54 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
154 |
86 |
51 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
152 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
87 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
158 |
87 |
51 |
<1 |
<1 |
14 |
152 |
0 |
5 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
127 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
10 |
156 |
127 |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
10 |
156 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
97 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
163 |
97 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
161 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
96 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
162 |
96 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
160 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
82 |
18 |
9 |
<1 |
53 |
162 |
82 |
12 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
150 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
120 |
30 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
156 |
120 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
154 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
40 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
113 |
156 |
40 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
113 |
156 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
96 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
161 |
96 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
51 |
161 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
80 |
14 |
10 |
<1 |
57 |
161 |
80 |
14 |
4 |
<1 |
57 |
155 |
0 |
<1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
82 |
15 |
8 |
<1 |
53 |
158 |
82 |
12 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
149 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
101 |
33 |
17 |
<1 |
6 |
158 |
101 |
24 |
3 |
<1 |
6 |
135 |
0 |
9 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
113 |
14 |
5 |
<1 |
27 |
158 |
113 |
12 |
5 |
<1 |
27 |
156 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
116 |
8 |
4 |
<1 |
29 |
158 |
116 |
7 |
2 |
<1 |
29 |
154 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
51 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
115 |
168 |
51 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
115 |
168 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
125 |
31 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
162 |
125 |
31 |
<1 |
<1 |
6 |
161 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
84 |
12 |
11 |
<1 |
53 |
159 |
84 |
11 |
3 |
<1 |
53 |
151 |
0 |
<1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
103 |
16 |
15 |
<1 |
27 |
161 |
103 |
15 |
3 |
<1 |
27 |
148 |
0 |
<1 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
118 |
8 |
5 |
<1 |
29 |
161 |
118 |
7 |
2 |
<1 |
29 |
156 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
62 |
24 |
7 |
<1 |
66 |
160 |
62 |
24 |
7 |
<1 |
66 |
159 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
58 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
153 |
58 |
29 |
<1 |
<1 |
66 |
153 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
6 |
2 |
<1 |
151 |
159 |
<1 |
6 |
2 |
<1 |
151 |
159 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
118 |
<1 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
117 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
45 |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
122 |
45 |
19 |
<1 |
<1 |
59 |
122 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
37 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
53 |
118 |
37 |
26 |
<1 |
<1 |
53 |
117 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
50 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
111 |
50 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
110 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
112 |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
112 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
47 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
111 |
47 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
60 |
110 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
59 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
116 |
59 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
52 |
116 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
110 |
116 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
93 |
33 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
130 |
93 |
33 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
130 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
29 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
115 |
29 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
115 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
93 |
33 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
130 |
93 |
32 |
<1 |
<1 |
5 |
130 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
110 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
129 |
110 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
129 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
120 |
129 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
120 |
121 |
0 |
7 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
60 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
127 |
60 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
127 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
61 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
128 |
61 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
128 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
93 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
128 |
93 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
128 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
92 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
127 |
92 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
127 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
95 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
126 |
95 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
125 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
121 |
123 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
121 |
122 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
111 |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
109 |
111 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
126 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
125 |
125 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
95 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
125 |
95 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
124 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
27 |
<1 |
1 |
102 |
130 |
<1 |
26 |
<1 |
1 |
102 |
130 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
27 |
<1 |
1 |
102 |
131 |
<1 |
27 |
<1 |
1 |
102 |
130 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Notes:
[1] Predicted 1-hour NO2
concentrations at the same hour as those under “With Project “scenario is
presented.
[2] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Table 3.31b Breakdown
of Annual NO2 concentrations
(with and without project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
Annual NO2 Concentrations
(µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project |
Change in
Concentration (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
29 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
2 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
33 |
2 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
31 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
2 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
33 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
31 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
30 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
30 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
2 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
2 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
23 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
32 |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
2 |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
34 |
2 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
30 |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
30 |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
28 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
2 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
36 |
2 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
31 |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
2 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
31 |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
30 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
2 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
34 |
2 |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
32 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
2 |
13 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
34 |
2 |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
33 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
1 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
27 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
23 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
2 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
31 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
1 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
31 |
1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
1 |
7 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
30 |
1 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
3 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
5 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
23 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
26 |
2 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
23 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
3 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
2 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
20 |
24 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
3 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
3 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
3 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
28 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
26 |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
22 |
25 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
27 |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
21 |
26 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Notes:
[1] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Table 3.32a Breakdown
of 10th highest 24-hour RSP concentrations (with and without
project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
10th
highest 24-hour RSP Concentrations (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project [1] |
Change in
Concentrations (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
77 |
78 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
76 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
73 |
73 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
75 |
75 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
76 |
77 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Notes:
[1] Predicted 24-hour RSP
concentrations at the same day as those under “With Project “scenario is
presented.
[2] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Table 3.32b Breakdown
of Annual RSP concentrations (with and without project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
Annual RSP Concentrations
(µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project |
Change in
Concentrations (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
39 |
39 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
39 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
37 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
38 |
38 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Note:
[1] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Table 3.33a Breakdown
of 10th highest 24-hour
FSP concentrations (with and without project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
10th
highest 24-hour FSP Concentrations (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project [1] |
Change in
Concentrations (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
59 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
57 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
57 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
55 |
55 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
56 |
56 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
57 |
58 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Note:
[1] Predicted 24-hour FSP
concentrations at the same day as those under “With Project “scenario is
presented.
[2] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Table 3.33b Breakdown
of Annual FSP concentrations (with
and without project scenarios)
ASR ID |
Location |
Worst affected Height
above ground |
Annual FSP Concentrations
(µg/m3) |
|||||||||||||||||
With Project |
Without Project |
Change in
Concentrations (µg/m3) [With – Without] |
||||||||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
|||
Existing
ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
A1 |
One
Citygate |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (under Other Projects) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
P1 |
Tung Chung Area 53a - Planned Hotel |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P2 |
Tung Chung Area 54 - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P3 |
Tung Chung Area 55a - Planned Residential
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P4 |
Tung Chung Area 89 - Planned Primary / Secondary
School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P6 |
Tung Chung Area 39 – Planned Public Housing
Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
P7 |
Tung Chung Area 56 – Planned Public Rental
Housing Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCE under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCE-1 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-2 |
Proposed Clinic & GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-3 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (B1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-9 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-10 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-11 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (D1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (D2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-16 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-17 |
Proposed Primary School (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-18 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-19 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-20 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-21 |
Proposed Comprehensive Development (A1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-25 |
Proposed Residential Development (A2-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-26 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-27 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-28 |
Proposed Police Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-29 |
Proposed Fire Station |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-30 |
Proposed Police Married Quarters |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-31 |
Proposed Post Secondary Institution |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-32 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-33 |
Proposed Residential Development (C1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-34 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-35 |
Proposed Residential Development (C2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-36 |
Proposed International School |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-37 |
Proposed Secondary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-38 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-39 |
Proposed Primary School (E1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-40 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-41 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-42 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-43 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-44 |
Proposed Residential Development (E1-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-45 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-46 |
Proposed Residential Development (E3-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-47 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-48 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-49 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-50 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-51 |
Proposed Residential Development (F1-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-52 |
Proposed Residential Development (COM-5) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-53 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-54 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-55 |
Proposed Residential Development (F2-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-56 |
Proposed Primary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-57 |
Proposed Secondary School (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-58 |
Planned Sports Centre (D) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCE-59 |
Planned Sports Centre (F) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
28 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Planned
ASRs (TCW under this Project) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TCW-1 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-2 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-3 |
Village Type Development |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-4 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-5 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-6) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-6 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-7) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-7 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-8 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCW-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-9 |
Proposed Clinic and GIC Complex |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-10 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-11 |
Proposed Commercial Development (COM-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-12 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-13 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-1) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-14 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-15 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-2) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-16 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-3) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-17 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-4) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-18 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-19 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-20 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-21 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5a) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-22 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-5b) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-23 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
TCW-24 |
Proposed Residential Development (TCV-8) |
1.5m |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
27 |
27 |
0 |
<1 |
<1 |
0 |
0 |
<1 |
Note:
[1] Under without project
scenario, planned ASRs in TCE and TCW under this Project will not be existed.
Assessment results for these planned ASRs are for indication purpose only.
Changes in Air
Quality Conditions from Existing Year 2010
3.5.6.10
In
accordance with the Appendix B, Section 1 (iii) of the EIA Study Brief, any
change in air quality levels as compared with the existing baseline conditions
shall be quantified. Existing air quality conditions in Year 2010 at existing ASRs
are presented in Section 3.3.2, and
the change in air quality levels under various source groups at these ASRs
during operational phase of the Project (i.e. Year 2023) are presented in the
following Table 3.34a-c.
3.5.6.11
It
can be seen that reduction in pollutant concentrations are generally predicted
at all the existing ASRs, whereas improvements in annual NO2, RSP
and FSP concentrations from existing air quality conditions range from 7 – 40
µg/m3, 1 – 5 µg/m3 and 1 – 3 µg/m3 respectively.
3.5.6.12
According
to the breakdown presented in Table 3.34a-c,
the background contribution in future years has been largely decreased from
that in Year 2010, especially the annual NO2 contribution has a
maximum improvement of 21µg/m3. Implementation of emission reduction
measures by Hong Kong and PRDEZ is considered as the one of the factors on the
general improvement in air quality conditions in future years. As discussed in Section 3.3.3, both Hong Kong and PRDEZ
would implement numbers of emission reduction measures, such as tightening of
vehicle emission standards and emissions from power plant etc., and the future
air quality would be significantly improved from recent existing conditions. A
comparison of the NOx emission inventory in Year 2010 and that adopted in this
operational air quality assessment is given in Diagram 3.4 below. It can be seen that there is a significant reduction
(about 70%) in vehicular emission from Year 2010 to Year 2023, and slight
reduction in power generation and navigation. NOx emissions from civil aviation
and other fuel combustion have however increased from Year 2010.
3.5.6.13
Significant
improvements in vehicular emission from existing condition are resulted from
control measures on motor vehicles implemented by Hong Kong Government.
Introductions of Euro V vehicle emission standards in 2012 and Euro VI
tentatively in 2016, phasing out pre-Euro IV diesel commercial vehicles by end
2019, and other measures on controlling vehicular emission would progressively
reduce roadside air pollution.
Diagram 3.4 Comparison
of NOx Emission Inventory
Note:
Referenced from EPD’s “2010 Hong Kong
Emission Inventor Report”
3.5.6.14
Improvement
in background air quality in remote area near TCW are found generally smaller
(only about 7µg/m3 in annual NO2). It is anticipated
there are only less influences from the far-field emission sources (including
power plant, marine vessel and other regional sources) due to very large
separation distance, reduced emissions from these sources could therefore have
only less improvements on the background air quality in these remote area.
3.5.6.15
For
ASRs located relatively near open road, e.g.
A12 (Tat Tung Road Park) and A27 (Man Tung Road Park), significant
improvement in vehicular contributions of about 70% from existing conditions has
been predicted, which is therefore considered as the result of control measures
on motor vehicles. In particular, annual NO2 contributions from
vehicular emission have a maximum decrease of 20µg/m3 from existing
condition in Year 2010. For ASRs located in remote area near TCW, such as A33
(Lung Tseung Tau) and A40 (Shek Mun Kap), as these ASRs are located far away
from major roads and hence is less influenced by vehicular emission, only about
1-4µg/m3 decrease in annual NO2 contribution are
predicted.
3.5.6.16
Airport’s
contributions as well as the contributions from marine vessels, however,
increased slightly (about max. 1µg/m3 of annual NO2) from
the existing conditions in Year 2010 as the numbers of air traffic movement
have been increased and due to the proposed marina. However, they are not major
contributors to the cumulative air quality impact.
Table 3.34a Changes
in NO2 concentrations from existing air quality conditions in Year
2010
ASR ID |
Location |
Changes in Pollutant Concentration under
various Source Group (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||
19th
highest 1-hour NO2 |
Annual NO2 |
||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
128 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-184 |
-57 |
<1 |
-12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-32 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
66 |
-59 |
<1 |
<1 |
-78 |
-71 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-23 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
<1 |
10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-76 |
-66 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-22 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
55 |
14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-132 |
-63 |
<1 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-22 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
-9 |
37 |
<1 |
1 |
-94 |
-66 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-23 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
33 |
-73 |
<1 |
<1 |
-28 |
-69 |
<1 |
-11 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-23 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
54 |
-41 |
<1 |
<1 |
-78 |
-65 |
<1 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-22 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
33 |
-92 |
9 |
<1 |
-26 |
-76 |
<1 |
-12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-25 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
27 |
-76 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-69 |
<1 |
-15 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-28 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
-18 |
-17 |
<1 |
<1 |
-19 |
-55 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-17 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
3 |
-39 |
<1 |
<1 |
-20 |
-57 |
<1 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-18 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
54 |
38 |
-2 |
<1 |
-150 |
-60 |
<1 |
-14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-34 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
81 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-138 |
-55 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-17 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
-20 |
-48 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-69 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-22 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
99 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-152 |
-66 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-29 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
12 |
24 |
4 |
<1 |
-113 |
-72 |
<1 |
-14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-30 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
98 |
9 |
-1 |
<1 |
-169 |
-63 |
<1 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-24 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
98 |
29 |
-1 |
<1 |
-192 |
-66 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-26 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
65 |
-11 |
5 |
<1 |
-130 |
-70 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-29 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
54 |
24 |
5 |
<1 |
-152 |
-69 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-33 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
68 |
30 |
10 |
<1 |
-177 |
-68 |
<1 |
-11 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-31 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
59 |
21 |
8 |
<1 |
-153 |
-65 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-30 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
58 |
26 |
12 |
<1 |
-160 |
-65 |
<1 |
-14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-34 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
114 |
11 |
<1 |
<1 |
-204 |
-80 |
<1 |
-20 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-40 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
63 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
-163 |
-80 |
<1 |
-19 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-39 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
-136 |
-66 |
<1 |
<1 |
127 |
-75 |
<1 |
-19 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-39 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
106 |
27 |
-1 |
<1 |
-203 |
-72 |
<1 |
-19 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-39 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
33 |
-38 |
<1 |
<1 |
-49 |
-54 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-15 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
3 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-62 |
-56 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
71 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
-119 |
-57 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
11 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-62 |
-54 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-15 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
-17 |
-26 |
<1 |
<1 |
-15 |
-58 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
<1 |
4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-47 |
-42 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-11 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
<1 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
-37 |
-30 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
111 |
17 |
<1 |
<1 |
-159 |
-30 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-11 |
-14 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
3 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-57 |
-54 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-15 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
85 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-123 |
-26 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
60 |
8 |
<1 |
<1 |
-98 |
-30 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
91 |
12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-127 |
-23 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
63 |
27 |
<1 |
<1 |
-117 |
-27 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-7 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
90 |
15 |
<1 |
<1 |
-130 |
-25 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-7 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
114 |
13 |
-1 |
<1 |
-203 |
-76 |
<1 |
-20 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-40 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
102 |
22 |
-1 |
<1 |
-193 |
-69 |
<1 |
-19 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-35 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
44 |
3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-89 |
-43 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-15 |
-17 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
65 |
-29 |
<1 |
<1 |
-109 |
-72 |
<1 |
-11 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-24 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
89 |
6 |
<1 |
<1 |
-162 |
-67 |
<1 |
-12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-25 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
89 |
-31 |
<1 |
<1 |
-128 |
-70 |
<1 |
-20 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-33 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
-14 |
-67 |
<1 |
<1 |
17 |
-65 |
<1 |
-12 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-25 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
53 |
-89 |
-1 |
<1 |
-29 |
-66 |
<1 |
-17 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-30 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
58 |
-28 |
7 |
<1 |
-108 |
-70 |
<1 |
-14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-30 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
69 |
-17 |
5 |
<1 |
-127 |
-71 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-29 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
58 |
10 |
6 |
<1 |
-144 |
-71 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-29 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
56 |
-11 |
8 |
<1 |
-117 |
-64 |
<1 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-24 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
-61 |
-62 |
<1 |
-10 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-30 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
55 |
-24 |
7 |
<1 |
-104 |
-66 |
<1 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
-16 |
-24 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
<1 |
9 |
<1 |
<1 |
-73 |
-64 |
<1 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-29 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
50 |
-50 |
7 |
<1 |
-76 |
-69 |
<1 |
-14 |
<1 |
<1 |
-21 |
-34 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
69 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-136 |
-69 |
<1 |
-11 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-24 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
2 |
-77 |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
-73 |
<1 |
-13 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-26 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-58 |
-53 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-15 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-57 |
-55 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
60 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-115 |
-54 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
<1 |
26 |
<1 |
<1 |
-81 |
-55 |
<1 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-20 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
<1 |
-40 |
<1 |
<1 |
-18 |
-57 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-17 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
10 |
-15 |
<1 |
<1 |
-52 |
-57 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
12 |
-15 |
<1 |
<1 |
-54 |
-57 |
<1 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
<1 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
-50 |
-56 |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-13 |
-16 |
Table 3.34b Changes
in RSP concentrations from existing air quality conditions in Year 2010
ASR ID |
Location |
Changes in Pollutant Concentration under
various Source Group (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||
10th
highest 24-hour RSP |
Annual RSP |
||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient
Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-10 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
-1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-10 |
-10 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-5 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
<1 |
-3 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
-2 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-9 |
-9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-3 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
-1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-3 |
-4 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance Depot |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-8 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
Table 3.34c Changes
in FSP concentrations from existing air quality conditions in Year 2010
ASR ID |
Location |
Changes in Pollutant Concentration under
various Source Group (µg/m3) |
|||||||||||
10th highest 24-hour FSP |
Annual FSP |
||||||||||||
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient Background |
Cumulative |
Airport |
Vehicular |
Marine Vessel |
Industrial |
Ambient Background |
Cumulative |
||
Existing ASRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1 |
One
Citygate |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A2 |
Tung
Chung Health Centre |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A3 |
Ching
Chung Hau Po Woon Primary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A4 |
Po
On Commercial Association Wan Ho Kan Primary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A5 |
Po
Leung Kuk Mrs. Ma Kam Min Cheung Fook Sien College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A6 |
Wong
Cho Bau Secondary School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A7 |
Yu
Tung Court - Hei Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A8 |
Fu
Tung Estate - Tung Shing House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A9 |
Tung
Chung Crescent Block 9 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A10 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Shun Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A11 |
Yat
Tung Estate - Hong Yat House |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A12 |
Tat
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A13 |
Ma
Wan Chung |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A14 |
North
Lantau Hospital Phase 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A15 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A16 |
Caribbean
Coast Block 6 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A17 |
Ho
Yu College |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A18 |
Ho
Yu Primary School |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A19 |
Coastal
Skyline Block 1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A20 |
La
Rossa B |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A21 |
LeBleu
No.1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A22 |
LeBleu
Deux |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A23 |
Seaview
Crescent Block 1 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A24 |
Ling
Liang Church E Wun Secondary School |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A25 |
Ling
Liang Church Sau Tak Primary School |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A26 |
Novotel
Citygate Hong Kong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A27 |
Man
Tung Road Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-8 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A28 |
New
Tung Chung Hang |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A29 |
Tung
Chung Our Lady’s Kinder garden |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A30 |
Sheung
Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A31 |
Tung
Chung Public School |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A32 |
Ha
Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A33 |
Lung
Tseung Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A34 |
YMCA
of Hong Kong Christian College |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A35 |
Hau
Wong Temple |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-2 |
A36 |
Sha
Tsui Tau |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A37 |
Ngan
Au |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A38 |
Shek
Lau Po |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A39 |
Mo
Ka |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A40 |
Shek
Mun Kap |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A41 |
Shek
Mun Kap Lo Hon Monastery |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-4 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-1 |
-1 |
A42 |
Tung
Chung Public Library |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A43 |
Tung
Chung North Park |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A44 |
Pak Mong |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-5 |
-5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A45 |
Fung Tung Estate - Tung Ma House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A46 |
Yu Tung Court - Heung Tung House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A47 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A48 |
Tung Chung Crescent - Block 5 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A49 |
Tung Chung Swimming Pool |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A50 |
Caribbean Coast Block 5 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A51 |
Caribbean Coast Block 10 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A52 |
Caribbean Coast Block 16 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-7 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A53 |
La Mer House 1 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A54 |
Le Bleu House 23 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A55 |
Le Bleu House 99 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-7 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A56 |
Le Bleu Deux Block 7 |
-1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A57 |
Seaview Crescent Block 5 |
<1 |
-2 |
<1 |
<1 |
-4 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-3 |
A58 |
Tung Chung Fire Station cum-Ambulance
Depot |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A59 |
Lantau District Police Headquarters |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A60 |
Shan Ha (Pa Mei) |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A61 |
Tung Chung Catholic Secondary School |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A62 |
Yat Tung Estate - Chui Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A63 |
Yat Tung Estate - Kui Yat House |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A64 |
Yat Tung Estate - Ping Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A65 |
Yat Tung Estate - Fuk Yat House |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A66 |
Sheung Ling Pei |
<1 |
-1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
A67 |
Wong Ka Wai |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-6 |
-6 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
-2 |
-2 |
3.5.7
Recommended
Mitigation Measures
3.5.7.1
According to the operational air
quality assessment results, adverse cumulative air quality impact during operational
phase is not anticipated. No mitigation measures are required.
3.5.7.2
For the potential odour impact
from the proposed sewage pumping station, as discussed in Section 3.5.2, the following at-source mitigation measures should
be implemented to control odour emission:
·
Potential odour sources should be enclosed;
·
Negative pressure should be maintained within the
facilities;
·
Installation of deodouriser with an odour removal
efficiency of at least 95% to control odour emission via ventilation exhaust;
·
Exhaust of the deodouriser should be oriented away
from sensitive receivers and vertically upwards to avoid direct facing to any
sensitive receivers; and
·
Maintenance of deodouriser should be regularly
conducted to ensure good condition.
3.5.8
Residual Impacts
(Operational Phase)
3.5.8.1
According to the operational
air quality assessment result, it is indicated that there is no adverse
residual air quality impact during the operational phase of the Project.
3.5.9
Possible Slippage
of Concurrent Projects
3.5.9.1
There are numbers
of key concurrent projects currently under construction or committed to
commence construction in near future, including the 3RS of HKIA, HKLR, HKBCF
and the TMCLKL etc.. The traffic forecast has taken into account all the
induced traffic from these concurrent projects according to their
implementation schedule based on the best available information. In case that
the construction schedules of these concurrent projects were slipped, there
would be less induced traffic from the concurrent projects at the assessment
years compared to the adopted traffic forecast. Thus, the potential impact on
the air quality assessment findings presented in above sections due to possible
slippage of concurrent projects would be insignificant as the current
assessment results are on the conservative side.
3.6.1
Construction Phase
3.6.1.1
Potential
construction dust impact would be generated from reclamation, ground
excavation, site formation, etc. during construction phase. Quantitative
construction dust impact assessment have been conducted. Results have concluded
that there will not be any adverse residual air quality impact during
construction phase given frequent watering on all works area once per hour
during working hours.
3.6.2
Operational Phase
3.6.2.1
Quantitative
operational air quality assessment have been conducted taking into account the
vehicular emission impacts associated with the Project and nearby existing road
network, airport emission associated with the HKIA including its three-runway
system, and potential concurrent projects (including, but not limited to, induced
traffic due to HKLR, HKBCF, TMCLKL, etc.) in the vicinity. Cumulative impact from far-field
source contributions, including territory wide vehicular emission, power
plants, marine emission, as well as regional emission from PRD, have also been
taken into account. It is concluded
that the predicted cumulative air quality impacts on all air sensitive
receivers would comply with the AQOs during the operational phase, and hence no
adverse impacts are anticipated.
Ref-[1] : Huang,
X.F., Yu, J.Z., Yuan, Z., Lau, A.K.H., Louie, P.K.K. (2009) “Source analysis of
high particulate matter days in Hong Kong” Atmospheric Environment, 43 (2009),
p. 1196–1203
Ref-[2]
: Yuan, Z., Yadav, V.,Turner, J.R,
Louie, P.K.K., Lau, A.K.H. (2013) “Long-term trends of ambient particulate
matter emission source contributions and the accountability of control
strategies in Hong Kong over 1998-2008” Atmospheric Environment, 76 (2013) p.
21-31
[3-[1]
] Environmental
Protection Department (2013), 2013 Hong Kong Emission Inventory Report (http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/sites/default/files/epd/2013EIReport_eng_1b.pdf)
[3-[2]
] Sun
Y.,Wang L.L..,Wang Y.S. (2010) “In situ measurements of SO2, NOx,
NOy, and O3 in Beijing, China during August 2008” Science of the
Total Environment 409 (2011), P933-940
[3-[3]
] Sun Y.,Wang L.L..,Wang Y.S. (2010)
“In situ measurements of NO, NO2, NOy, and O3 in Dinghushan (112oE,
23oN), China during autumn 2008”, Atmospheric Environment 44 (2010), P2079-2088