Agreement
No. CE31/2014 (CE)
Engineering
Study for Police
Facilities
in Kong Nga Po –
Feasibility
Study
Environmental
Impact Assessment Report
July 2016
Civil
Engineering and Development Department
Contents |
Chapter Title Page
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Designated Projects under the EIA Ordinance 1-1
1.3 Purpose of the EIA Study 1-1
1.4 Objectives of the EIA Study 1-2
1.5 Scope of the EIA Study 1-3
1.6 Structure of the EIA Report 1-4
2.1 Introduction 2-1
2.2 Project Location and History 2-1
2.2.1 Project Location 2-1
2.2.2 Site History 2-1
2.3 Project Scope 2-2
2.4 Need of the Project 2-2
2.4.1 Police Facilities 2-2
2.4.2 Access Road to be Constructed or Improved 2-3
2.4.3 Benefits of the Project 2-3
2.5 Consideration of “Without Project” Alternative 2-4
2.6 Consideration of Alternative Siting and Layout 2-4
2.6.1 Development Siting 2-4
2.6.2 Development Layout Options 2-5
2.6.3 Access Options 2-8
2.7 Consideration of Alternative Construction Methods 2-10
2.7.1 Site Formation and Road Works 2-10
2.7.2 Retaining Walls and Slope Works 2-11
2.7.3 Building Works 2-11
2.8 Programme and Sequence of Works 2-12
2.9 Concurrent Projects 2-12
3.1 Introduction 3-1
3.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines 3-1
3.3 Project Site 3-3
3.4 Study Area and Air Sensitive Receivers 3-10
3.5 Identification of Pollution Sources and Key Pollutants 3-18
3.6 Air Quality Modelling Methodology 3-22
3.7 Odour Impact Assessment Methodology 3-39
3.8 Evaluation and Assessment of Air Quality Impacts 3-41
3.9 Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impact 3-47
3.10 Evaluation of Residual Impact 3-49
3.11 Environmental Monitoring and Audit 3-50
3.11 Conclusion 3-51
4.1 Introduction 4-1
4.2 Relevant Legislation and Guidelines 4-1
4.3 Description of the Noise Environment 4-5
4.4 Construction Noise Impact Assessment 4-6
4.5 Road Traffic Noise Impact Assessment 4-15
4.6 Fixed Plant Noise Impact Assessment 4-19
4.7 Helicopter Noise Impact Assessment 4-28
4.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit 4-38
4.9 Conclusion 4-39
5.1 Introduction_ 5-1
5.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines 5-1
5.3 Assessment Area, Water Sensitive Receivers and Background Conditions 5-4
5.4 Assessment Methodology 5-7
5.5 Identification and Evaluation of Water Quality Impacts 5-7
5.6 Mitigation of Adverse Water Quality Impacts 5-11
5.7 Evaluation of Cumulative and Residual Impact 5-15
5.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit 5-15
5.9 Conclusion 5-15
6 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications 6-1
6.1 Introduction 6-1
6.2 Environmental Standards and Guidelines 6-1
6.3 Assessment Methodology 6-1
6.4 Existing Sewerage Conditions 6-1
6.5 Estimation of Project-related Sewage Flows 6-2
6.6 Evaluation of Sewerage Impacts 6-4
6.7 Mitigation Measures to Minimise Adverse Sewerage Impacts 6-5
6.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit 6-6
6.9 Conclusion 6-6
7 Waste Management Implications 7-1
7.1 Introduction 7-1
7.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines 7-1
7.3 Assessment Methodology 7-2
7.4 Identification, Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impact 7-3
7.5 Mitigation of Adverse Environmental Impact 7-10
7.6 Evaluation of Residual Impact 7-12
7.7 Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements 7-12
7.8 Conclusion 7-13
8.1 Introduction 8-1
8.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines 8-1
8.3 Assessment Methodology 8-1
8.4 Identification of Potential Environmental Impacts 8-2
8.5 Prediction and Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 8-3
8.6 Recommendation of Mitigation Measures 8-4
8.7 Evaluation of Residual Environmental Impacts 8-5
8.8 Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements 8-6
8.9 Conclusion 8-6
9 Ecological Impact (Terrestrial and Aquatic) 9-1
9.1 Introduction 9-1
9.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines 9-1
9.3 Study Area and Methodology 9-2
9.4 Baseline Condition and Ecological Sensitive Receivers 9-6
9.5 Evaluation of Ecological Importance of Habitats and Species 9-31
9.6 Identification and Evaluation of Ecological Impacts 9-49
9.7 Precautionary and Mitigation Measures 9-57
9.8 Evaluation of Residual Ecological Impact 9-59
9.9 Ecological Monitoring and Audit Requirements 9-59
9.10 Summary 9-59
9.11 References 9-60
10 Landscape and Visual Impacts_ 10-1
10.1 Introduction 10-1
10.2 Landscape and Visual Legislation, Standard and Guidelines 10-1
10.3 Assessment Area 10-2
10.4 Methodology for Assessment of Landscape and Visual Impacts 10-2
10.5 Review of Relevant Guidelines on Landscape Strategies and Framework and Land Use Zoning 10-8
10.6 Existing Trees within the Project Boundary 10-9
10.7 Landscape Baseline Study 10-12
10.8 Visual Baseline Study 10-27
10.9 Option Assessment 10-30
10.10 Potential Sources of Landscape and Visual Impact 10-32
10.11 Landscape Impact Assessment 10-33
10.12 Visual Impact Assessment_ 10-39
10.13 Visual Enhancement and Landscape Mitigation Measures 10-45
10.14 Residual Landscape Impact 10-55
10.15 Residual Visual Impact 10-64
10.16 Cumulative Impact 10-71
10.17 Summary and Conclusion 10-71
11 Impact of Hazard to Life 11-1
11.1 Introduction 11-1
11.2 Population Adopted For the Assessment 11-12
11.3 Modelling Approach and Calibration 11-19
11.4 Hazard Identification 11-20
11.5 Frequency Assessment 11-31
11.6 Consequence Assessment 11-40
11.7 Risk Assessment 11-51
11.8 Environmental Monitoring & Auditing 11-56
11.9 Conclusion 11-56
11.10 Reference 11-56
12.1 General 12-1
12.2 Summary of Key Environmental Outcomes 12-1
12.3 Air Quality Impact 12-3
12.4 Noise Impact 12-3
12.5 Water Quality Impact 12-4
12.6 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications 12-5
12.7 Waste Management Implications 12-5
12.8 Land Contamination 12-6
12.9 Ecological Impact 12-7
12.10 Landscape and Visual Impacts 12-7
12.11 Impact of Hazard to Life 12-8
12.12 Summary of Environmental Impacts 12-9
13 Environmental Monitoring and Audit Requirements 13-1
13.1 General 13-1
13.2 Air Quality Impact 13-1
13.3 Noise Impact 13-1
13.4 Water Quality Impact 13-1
13.5 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications 13-1
13.6 Waste Management Implications 13-2
13.7 Land Contamination 13-2
13.8 Ecological Impact 13-2
13.9 Landscape and Visual Impacts 13-3
13.10 Impact of Hazard to Life__ 13-3
14 Project Implementation Schedule 14-1
14.1 General 14-1
List of Tables
Table 2.1:__ Comparison between the Refinement Options and Preliminary Layout 2-6
Table 2.2:__ Summary of Preliminary Development Parameters for Preferred Option 2-8
Table 2.3:__ Summary of Concurrent Project Considered for Cumulative Impacts 2-12
Table 3.1:__ Hong Kong Air Quality Objectives 3-1
Table 3.2:__ Air Quality Monitoring Data at Tai Po Station (Year 2011 – 2015) 3-9
Table 3.3:__ Background concentrations for 1-hour average NO2 and 10-minute average SO2 (Year 2011 – 2015)
at Tai Po Station 3-9
Table 3.4:__ Background concentrations for 24-hour average RSP, FSP and SO2 (Year 2011 – 2015) at Tai Po Station 3-9
Table 3.5:__ Representative ASRs Identified for Air Quality Impact Assessment 3-10
Table 3.6:__ Summary of concurrent projects during construction and operation phase 3-22
Table 3.7:__ Key Dust Emission Factors Adopted in the Assessment 3-25
Table 3.8:__ Vehicle Classification in the EMFAC-HK Model 3-29
Table 3.9:__ Operational Emissions of the OWTF2 CHP 3-35
Table 3.10:_ Operational Emissions of the OWTF2 odour treatment units 3-35
Table 3.11:_ Operational Emission of the OWTF2 flare 3-36
Table 3.12:_ Summary of Years 2015 and 2020 Hong Kong Emission Inventory for the PATH Model 3-37
Table 3.13:_ Locations of air sample collection for odour testing 3-40
Table 3.14:_ Odour patrol and sampling dates and locations 3-41
Table 3.15: Summary of Predicted Cumulative Maximum Hourly Average TSP Concentration and 10th Highest Daily
Average RSP and FSP Concentrations (Tier 1 Unmitigated and Mitigated 3-42
Table 3.16:_ Summary of Predicted Cumulative Annual Average RSP and FSP Concentrations (Unmitigated and Mitigated) 3-42
Table 3.17:_ Summary of Predicted Cumulative Modelling Results during Operation Phase 3-43
Table 3.18:_ Summary of historical odour complaints related to the existing pig farms and firing ranges 3-44
Table 3.19:_ Summary of odour testing results 3-45
Table 4.1:__ Noise Standards for Daytime Construction Activities 4-1
Table 4.2:__ Relevant Road Traffic Noise Standards for Planning Purposes 4-2
Table 4.3:__ Area Sensitivity Rating 4-3
Table 4.4:__ Acceptable Noise Level for Fixed Noise Source 4-4
Table 4.5: __ Measured Background Noise Levels 4-6
Table 4.6:__ Representative Construction Noise Sensitive Receivers Identified for the Assessment 4-6
Table 4.7:__ Summary of Concurrent Projects 4-7
Table 4.8:__ Unmitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact 4-9
Table 4.9:__ Quieter PME Recommended for Adoption during the Construction Phase of the Project 4-11
Table 4.10:_ Noise Mitigation Measures for Certain PME during the Construction Phase of the Project 4-12
Table 4.11:_ Mitigated Construction Airborne Noise Impact 4-13
Table 4.12:_ Mitigated Cumulative Construction Airborne Noise Impact 4-14
Table 4.13:_ Representative Road Traffic Noise Sensitive Receivers Identified for the Assessment 4-15
Table 4.14:_ Unmitigated Road Traffic Noise Impact in Year 2038 4-17
Table 4.15:_ Predicted Noise Impacts quantified by Number of Dwellings (Unmitigated) 4-18
Table 4.16:_ Representative Fixed Noise Sensitive Receivers Identified for the Assessment 4-20
Table 4.17:_ Noise Criteria of Planned Fixed Noise Sources 4-20
Table 4.18:_ Measurement Results for Vehicle Sirens / Simulation Shooting 4-23
Table 4.19:_ Measurement Results for Normal Driving 4-23
Table 4.20:_ Measurement Results on Tyre Noise, Skidding Noise and Braking Noise 4-23
Table 4.21:_ Summary of Fixed Noise Sources 4-25
Table 4.22:_ Maximum Permissible SWLs of the Fixed Plant 4-25
Table 4.23:_ Number of Shots in 30-minute Period during a Training Day 4-27
Table 4.24:_ Predicted Fixed Noise Impact from Planned Noise Sources 4-27
Table 4.25:_ Cumulative Fixed Noise Impact from Existing and Planned Noise Sources 4-27
Table 4.26:_ HKPF Day-time Training 4-28
Table 4.27:_ Frequency of using Lo Wu Range Helicopter Landing Site 4-29
Table 4.28:_ Representative Helicopter Noise Sensitive Receivers Identified for the Assessment 4-29
Table 4.29:_ Helicopter Noise Data (with Lateral Movements) 4-33
Table 4.30:_ Helicopter Noise Data (without Lateral Movements) 4-33
Table 4.31:_ Summary of Different Operation Modes 4-33
Table 4.32:_ Predicted Helicopter Noise Impact at All Representative NSRs 4-35
Table 5.1:__ Water Quality Objectives for Deep Bay WCZ 5-1
Table 5.2:__ Annual Summary of Water Quality Data for EPD Monitoring Stations IN1, IN2 and GR1 (2013) 5-6
Table 5.3:__ Water Quality Data for Nearby Water Sensitive Receivers (from 15 April 2013) 5-7
Table 6.1:__ Peaking Factors Adopted to Estimate Project-related Sewage Flows 6-3
Table 6.2:__ Sewage Flows for the Project 6-3
Table 6.3:__ Summary of Sewage Flows generated by the Project to SWHSTW 6-5
Table 7.1:__ Summary of Waste Arising during Construction Phase 7-7
Table 7.2:__ Estimation of General Refuse Generation during Operation Phase 7-8
Table 8.1:__ Review of Aerial Photographs 8-2
Table 8.2:__ Summary of Potential Land Contamination Impact 8-3
Table 9.1:__ Ecological Field Survey Schedule 9-4
Table 9.2:__ Aquatic habitats of the sampling points 9-6
Table 9.3:__ Habitats Present in the Study Area (excluding the Project Site) 9-8
Table 9.4:__ Habitats Present in the Project Site 9-8
Table 9.5:__ Avifauna species of conservation interest recorded within Study Area 9-20
Table 9.6:__ Nest numbers, species type and plant species used as nesting substrate at Man Kam To Road Egretry
(MKT Egretry) and its satellite (MKT Satellite Egretry) recorded between April and July 2015 9-23
Table 9.7:__ Mammal species of conservation interest recorded within the Study Area 9-25
Table 9.8:__ Herpetofauna species of conservation interest recorded within the Study Area 9-27
Table 9.9:__ Butterfly species of conservation interest recorded within the Study Area 9-29
Table 9.10:_ Ecological Evaluation of Plantation 9-32
Table 9.11:_ Ecological Evaluation of Orchard 9-33
Table 9.12: _ Ecological Evaluation of Shrubland 9-33
Table 9.13:_ Ecological Evaluation of Secondary Woodland 9-34
Table 9.14:_ Ecological Evaluation of Grassland/Shrubland 9-34
Table 9.15:_ Ecological Evaluation of Grassland 9-35
Table 9.16:_ Ecological Evaluation of Seasonally Wet Grassland 9-36
Table 9.17:_ Ecological Evaluation of Agricultural Land 9-36
Table 9.18:_ Ecological Evaluation of Watercourse 9-37
Table 9.19:_ Ecological Evaluation of Channelised Watercourse 9-37
Table 9.20:_ Ecological Evaluation of Pond 9-38
Table 9.21:_ Ecological Evaluation of Developed Area 9-38
Table 9.22:_ Ecological Evaluation of Flora Species of Conservation Interest 9-39
Table 9.23:_ Ecological Evaluation of Fauna Species of Conservation Interest recorded during Field Survey within
the Project Site 9-41
Table 9.24:_ Ecological Evaluation of Fauna Species of Conservation Interest recorded during Field Survey within
the Study Area (excluding the Project Site) 9-42
Table 9.25:_ Ecological Evaluation of Fauna Species of Conservation Interest recorded within
the Study Area from Literature Review 9-44
Table 9.26:_ Summary of Habitat Loss within the Project Site in the worst case scenario 9-49
Table 9.27:_ Evaluation of Habitat Loss 9-50
Table 9.28:_ Direct Impact on Flora Species of Conservation Interest 9-51
Table 9.29:_ Evaluation of Disturbance Impact on Fauna Species of Conservation Interest 9-53
Table 9.30:_ Evaluation of Disturbance Impact on Man Kam To Egretry 9-55
Table 9.31:_ Evaluation of Reduction of Ecological Carrying Capacity 9-55
Table 9.32:_ Evaluation of Indirect Ecological Impacts of Potential Changes in Water Quality as a result of Surface Runoff 9-56
Table 9.33:_ Evaluation of Disturbance Impact during Operation Phase 9-56
Table 10.1: Impact significance – relationship between sensitivity and magnitude of change 10-4
Table 10.2: Impact significance – relationship between sensitivity and magnitude of change 10-7
Table 10.3: Summary of existing trees within the Project Site (in order of decreasing abundance) 10-9
Table 10.4: Summary of existing trees within and adjacent to the Project boundary along Kong Nga Po Road
(in order of decreasing abundance) 10-10
Table 10.5:_ Sensitivity of Identified Landscape Resources 10-20
Table 10.6:_ Sensitivity of Identified Landscape Character Areas 10-26
Table 10.7:_ Sensitivity of Visually Sensitive Receivers 10-29
Table 10.8:_ Potential Landscape Impacts of Individual Refinement Layout Options 10-31
Table 10.9:_ Potential Landscape Impacts of Access Options 10-32
Table 10.10: Magnitude of Change in Views for VSRs_ 10-44
Table 10.11: Proposed Visual Enhancement and Landscape Mitigation Measures – Construction Phase 10-46
Table 10.12: Proposed Visual Enhancement and Landscape Mitigation Measures – Operation Phase 10-49
Table 10.13: Indicative Mitigation Planting 10-53
Table 10.14: Significance of Landscape Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases 10-59
Table 10.15: Significance of Visual Impacts in Construction and Operation Phases 10-70
Table 11 1:_ Meteorological Data (1996) 11-10
Table 11 2:_ Meteorological Data (2011-2014 average data) 11-11
Table 11 3:_ Population within the proposed site 11-13
Table 11 4:_ Latest Schedule of OWTF2 11-14
Table 11 5:_ The change of major population group in consultation zone 11-15
Table 11 6:_ Definition of Time periods 11-16
Table 11 7:_ Traffic Variation at Different Time Periods at Major Traffic Stations (ATC 2014) 11-17
Table 11 8:_ Physical Properties of petrol and diesel 11-26
Table 11 9:_ Properties of kerosene (Jet A1) 11-27
Table 11 10: Event frequencies with Implementation of Previous Identified Risk Mitigation Measures 11-32
Table 11 11: Accident rate summary from IATA report 2014 11-33
Table 11 12: Percentage of accidents related to Takeoff/climb and approach/landing phase of a flight 11-33
Table 11 13: Air Traffic Movements at HKIA 11-34
Table 11 14: Helicopter crash frequencies for different equipments in OWTF2 11-35
Table 11 15: Serious and Fatal Vehicle involvements for Medium /Heavy Goods Vehicles 11-36
Table 11 16: Spontaneous failure frequencies as adopted from OWTF2 EIA report 11-36
Table 11 17: Assumptions used in FTA 11-37
Table 11 18: Result of Fault Tree Analysis 11-38
Table 11 19: Ignition and Explosion Probabilities for Biogas Releases 11-38
Table 11 20: Ignition Probability of petrol 11-39
Table 11 21: Release scenarios to be included in this HA 11-41
Table 11 22: Chlorine toxicity relationship 11-42
Table 11 23: Cloud Height Adopted for Release Events 11-42
Table 11 24: End Point Criteria for explosion risk 11-44
Table 11 25: Consequence distances adopted from OWTF2 EIA report 11-44
Table 11 26: Maximum pool radius for an un-bunded pool fire in DG store 11-46
Table 11 27: Consequence distances for the hazardous scenarios of kerosene road tanker 11-47
Table 11 28: Consequence distances for the hazardous scenarios of petrol/diesel filling station 11-49
Table 11 29: Summary of uncertainty analysis 11-54
Table 11 30: Summary of uncertainty analysis for OWTF2 11-55
Table 11 31: Summary of uncertainty analysis for proposed police facility 11-55
Table 12.1: Summary of Environmental Impacts of Police Facilities in Kong Nga Po 12-10
Table 14.1: Implementation Schedule of Recommended Mitigation Measures 14-1
List of Figures
Figure 2.1a Indicative Police Facilities Layout Arrangement
Figure 2.2 Existing Police Facilities to be Relocated
Figure 2.4 Refinement Layout – Option 1
Figure 2.5 Refinement Layout – Option 2
Figure 2.6 Refinement Layout – Option 3
Figure
2.8
Location of Concurrent Projects
Figure 3.1 Location of Air Sensitive Receivers Outside Project Site
Figure 3.2 Location of Air Sensitive Receivers Within Project Site
Figure 3.3 Relevant ASRs Located at Relevant PATH Grids
Figure 3.4 Location of Potential Construction Dust Emission Area Sources (Tier 1)
Figure 3.5 Location of Potential Construction Dust Emission Line Sources (Tier 1)
Figure 3.6 Location of Potential Dust Emission Sources from Concurrent Projects
Figure 3.7 (Not used)
Figure 3.8 (Not used)
Figure 3.9 (Not used)
Figure 3.10 Road Links within 500m Assessment Area
Figure 3.11 Location of ISCST3 Emission Sources
Figure 3.12 Location of Air Sampling Points
Figure 3.13 (Not used)
Figure 3.19 (Not used)
Figure 3.20 (Not used)
Figure 3.21 (Not used)
Figure 3.22 (Not used)
Figure 3.23 (Not used)
Figure 3.28 (Not used)
Figure 3.41 Odour Testing Results and Wind Directions on Two Typical Hot Days
Figure 3.42 Topography of Existing Condition and the Project Development
Figure
3.43 Cross-Section
of Topography of Existing Condition and the Project Development
Figure 4.3 Photos of Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs)
Figure 4.4 Schematic Configuration of Movable Noise Barrier for PME
Figure 4.5 Schematic Configuration of Full Noise Enclosure for PME
Figure 4.7 Locations of Proposed Fixed Plant Noise Sources
Figure 5.1 Water Quality Impact Assessment Area and Water Sensitive Receivers
Figure
5.2 Indicative
Drainage Routing during Construction Phase
Figure 6.1 Existing Sewerage System
Figure
6.2 Proposed
Sewerage System
Figure
8.1 Location
of Site Photographs
Figure 9.1 Project Site, Assessment Area, Survey Transect and Sampling Location
Figure 9.2a-d Habitat Map and Species of Conservation Significance
Figure
9.3 Indicative
Extent of Egretry
Figure 10-01 Aerial Photograph
Figure 10-02 Future Planning Context
Figure 10-03 Landscape Resources Plan
Figure 10-04 Landscape Resource Photographs
Figure 10-05 Landscape Resource Photographs
Figure 10-06 Landscape Character Area Plan
Figure 10-07 Landscape Character Area Photographs
Figure 10-08 Landscape Character Area Photographs
Figure 10-09 Landscape Character Area Photographs
Figure 10-10 Landscape Character Area Photographs
Figure 10-11 Visual Envelope and Visually Sensitive Receivers
Figure 10-12 Visual Envelope and Visually Sensitive Receivers
Figure 10-13 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-14 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-15 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-16 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-17 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-18 Existing VSR Views
Figure 10-19 Preliminary Landscape Master Plan
Figure 10-20 Preliminary Landscape Master Plan
Figure 10-21 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Plan
Figure 10-22 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Plan
Figure 10-23 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Plan
Figure 10-24 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Oblique Aerial View
Figure 10-25 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-26 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-27 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-28 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-29 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-30 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-31 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-32 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-33 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-34 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Sections
Figure 10-35 Residual Impacts on Landscape Resources during Construction and Operation
Figure 10-36 Residual Impacts on Landscape Character Areas during Construction and Operation
Figure 10-37 Residual Visual Impacts during Construction and Operation
Figure 10-38 Vantage Points for Photomontages
Figure 10-39 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-40 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-41 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-42 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-43 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-44 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-45 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-46 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-47 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-48 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-49 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-50 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-51 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-52 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-53 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-54 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-55 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure 10-56 Landscape and Visual Mitigation Measures – Photomontage
Figure
10-57 Proposed Viaduct Section along
Improved Kong Nga Po Road
Figure 11.1 Detailed location arrangement inside the proposed site
Figure 11.3 Societal Risk Guidelines
Figure
11.4 Road Markings
within SSWTW
Figure 11.5 Barrier in the north-western corner of SSWTW
Figure
11.6 Wind rose
adopted in this study (2011-2014 average)
Figure 11.7 Padding material to prevent bouncing back of ricochet
Figure
11.8 Fuel road
tanker transport route to be assessed
Figure 11.9 Aircraft Crash Coordinate System
Figure
11.10 Distance between proposed
helipad and OWTF2 storage
Figure
11.11 Relative Position of non-fuel
gas facilities within the site
List of Appendices
Appendix
2.1 Tentative Construction Programme
Appendix 3.1 Calculation of Dust Suppression Efficiency
Appendix 3.2 Estimation of Particle Size Distribution
Appendix 3.3 Details of Dust Emission Sources for 1-hour TSP, Daily RSP and Daily FSP (Tier 1)
Appendix 3.4 Estimation of Active Area Percentages for Key Construction Activities (Annual)
Appendix 3.5 (Not used)
Appendix 3.6 Data Input file for Hourly TSP, Daily RSP and Daily FSP (Tier 1)
Appendix 3.7 (Not used)
Appendix 3.8 Details of Dust Emission Sources for Annual RSP and Annual FSP
Appendix 3.9 Data Input file for Annual RSP and Annual FSP
Appendix 3.10 Letter from Transport Department regarding Traffic Forecast Data
Appendix 3.11 24-Hour Traffic Pattern
Appendix 3.12 Vehicle Age Distribution in Base Year 2010
Appendix 3.13 Road Profile of Road Links within 500m Study Area
Appendix 3.16 24-hour Variations of Annual Averages of Temperature and Relative Humidity
Appendix 3.17 24-hour Speed Fractions
Appendix 3.18 Calculation of Emission Factors for Each Model year
Appendix 3.19 Composition Emission Factor in Year 2023
Appendix 3.20 Letter from EPD regarding Chimney
Appendix 3.21 Model Parameters for ISCST3
Appendix 3.22 (Not used)
Appendix 3.23 Detail Odour Patrol and Testing Report
Appendix 3.25 (Not used)
Appendix 3.26 Annual RSP and FSP Results for Unmitigated and Mitigated Scenarios
Appendix 3.27 (Not Used)
Appendix 4.1 Unmitigated Construction Plant Inventory and Noise Impact Assessment
Appendix 4.2 Mitigated Construction Plant Inventory and Noise Impact Assessment
Appendix 4.3 Extent of Proposed Project Road
Appendix 4.4 Letter from Transport Department regarding Traffic Forecast Data
Appendix 4.5 Traffic Forecast Data and Key Plan for Road Traffic Noise Impact Assessment
Appendix 4.6 Predicted Road Traffic Noise Levels for Unmitigated Scenario (Year 2038)
Appendix 4.7 Correspondence between Mott MacDonald and HKPF
Appendix 4.8a Gunshot Noise Measurement Results
Appendix 4.8b Fixed Noise Sources Impact Assessment
Appendix 4.9 Correspondence between Mott MacDonald and GFS
Appendix 4.10 Helicopter Noise Impact Assessment
Appendix 6.1
Proposed Sewer Pipeline Design
Appendix 8.1 Representative Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix 8.2 Responses from Government Departments on Relevant Information
Appendix 9.2 List of Flora recorded within the Study Area
Appendix
9.3 List of Fauna recorded within the
Study Area
Appendix
10.1 Broad-Brush Tree Survey
Appendix 11.1 Some Information Extracted from the Reassessment Study
Appendix 11.2 Kerosene Transport Route
Appendix 11.3 Photos of Kerosene Truck used by GFS
Appendix 11.4 Fault Tree Analysis
Appendix 11.5 Event Tree Analysis in OWTF2
Appendix 11.6 Population Considered in this Assessment
Appendix 11.7 Individual Risk Results
Appendix 11.8 Societal Risk Results
Appendix 11.9 Cumulative Risk Assessment Result
Abbreviations
ADWF |
Average Dry Weather Flows |
AFCD |
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department |
ALARP |
As Low As Reasonably Practicable |
ANLs |
Acceptable Noise Levels |
APCO |
Air Pollution Control Ordinance |
APR |
Approach |
AQOs |
Air Quality Objectives |
AQUALINE |
|
ArchSD |
Architectural Services Department |
ASR |
Air Sensitive Receiver (Air quality) Area Sensitive Rating (Noise) |
ATC |
Annual Traffic Census |
BCP |
Border Crossing Point |
BLEVE |
Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion |
BOD5 |
5-Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand |
C&D |
Construction and Demolition |
CAP |
Contamination Assessment Plan |
CAR |
Contamination Assessment Report |
CBD |
United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity |
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
CFA |
Court of Final Appeal |
CFD |
Computational Fluid Dynamics |
CHP |
Combined Heat and Power |
CIA |
Chemical Industry Association |
CITES |
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora |
CNL |
Corrected Noise Level |
CNP |
Construction Noise Permit |
CO |
Carbon Monoxide |
COD |
Chemical Oxygen Demand |
CPLD |
Committee on Planning and Land Department |
CRTN |
Calculation of Road Traffic Noise |
C&SD |
Census and Statistics Department |
CWPs |
Chemical Waste Producers |
CZ |
Consultation Zone |
DC |
Distance Attenuation |
DG |
Dangerous Goods |
DNV |
Det Norske Veritas |
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
DRIFT |
Dense Releases Involving Flammables or Toxics |
E.coli |
Escherichia coli |
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
EIAO-TM |
Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process |
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
EMSD |
Electrical and Mechanical Services Department |
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
ETA |
Event Tree Analysis |
EU |
European Union |
EV |
Electric Vehicle |
FC |
Façade Correction |
FCA |
Frontier Closed Area |
FDM |
Fugitive Dust Model |
FLN |
Fanling North |
FLN NDA |
Fanling North New Development Area |
FN |
Frequency/Number of Fatality |
FNFSR |
Fanling North Freshwater Service Reservoir |
FRP |
Fire Resistant Rating |
FSD |
Fire Services Department |
FSP |
Fine Suspended Particulates |
FTA |
Fault Tree Analysis |
GB |
Green Belt |
GESF |
Guidelines for Estimated Sewage Flow |
GFS |
Government Flying Service |
GMP |
Greening Master Plan |
GMPNET |
Greening Master Plan for Northwest New Territories |
GW-TM |
Technical Memorandum on Noise from Construction Work other than Percussive Piling |
HA |
Hazard Assessment |
HAZOP |
Hazard and Operability Study |
HKBWS |
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society |
HKIA |
Hong Kong International Airport |
HKO |
Hong Kong Observatory |
HKPF |
Hong Kong Police Force |
HKPSG |
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines |
HKSAR |
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
HOKLAS |
Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme |
HQ |
Head Quarter |
HSE |
Health and Safety Executive |
HyD |
Highways Department |
IATA |
International Air Transport Association |
ICAO |
International Civil Aviation Organization |
ICL |
Initial Climb |
IFs |
Influencing Factors |
I/M |
Inspection and Maintenance |
IND-TM |
Technical Memorandum for the Assessment of Noise from Places other than Domestic Premises, Public Places or Construction Sites |
ISCST3 |
Industrial Source Complex – Short Term Version 3 |
JSP |
Joint Service Publication |
KNP |
Kong Nga Po |
KTN |
Kwu Tung North |
LCAs |
Landscape Character Areas |
LD |
Lethal Dose |
LIA |
Landscape Impact Assessment |
LND |
Landing |
LPG |
Liquefied Petroleum Gas |
LRs |
Landscape Resources |
LWFR |
Lo Wu Firing Range |
MHIDAS |
Major Hazard Incident Data Service |
MMIS |
Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale |
MTLFR |
Ma Tso Lung Firing Range |
NCO |
Noise Control Ordnance |
NT North |
New Territories North |
NTNE |
New Territories North East |
NENT NDA |
North East New Territories New Development Area |
NO2 |
Nitrogen Dioxide |
NOx |
Nitrogen Oxides |
NOISE |
National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment |
NRMM |
Non-road mobile machinery |
NSR |
Noise Sensitive Receiver |
O3 |
Ozone |
OLM |
Ozone Limiting Method |
OVT |
Old and Valuable Tree |
OWTF2 |
Organic Waste Treatment Facilities Phase 2 |
OZP |
Outline Zoning Plan |
PATH |
Pollutants in the Atmosphere and their Transport over Hong Kong |
PC |
Private Cars |
Pcif |
Catchment Inflow Factor |
PD&TTF |
Police Driving and Traffic Training Facilities |
PDAs |
Potential Development Areas |
PFC |
Public Fill Committee |
PFRFs |
Public Fill Reception Facilities |
PHI |
Potentially Hazardous Installation |
PME |
Powered Mechanical Equipment |
PNL |
Predicted Noise Level |
PRC |
People’s Republic of China |
PRD |
Pearl River Delta |
PRDEZ |
Pearl River Delta Economic Zone |
PS |
Pumping Station |
PTF |
Proposed Police Training Facility |
PTU |
Police Tactical Unit |
QRA |
Quantitative Risk Assessment |
RAP |
Remediation Action Plan |
RBRGs |
Risk-based Remediation Goals |
RC |
Reinforced Concrete |
RCV |
Refuse Collection Vehicle |
RR |
Remediation Report |
RSP |
Respirable Suspended Particulates |
TD |
Transport Department |
TPDM |
Transport Planning and Design Manual |
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulate |
SE |
South-east |
SBF |
Second Boundary Fence |
SIL(E) |
South Island Line (East) |
SPL |
Sound Pressure Level |
SO2 |
Sulfur Dioxide |
SS |
Suspended Solids |
SSSI |
Site of Special Scientific Interest |
SULFR |
San Uk Ling Firing Range |
SSWTW |
Sheung Shui Water Treatment Works |
SWHSTW |
Shek Wu Hui Sewage Treatment Works |
SWL |
Sound Power Level |
TM-DSS |
Technical Memorandum on Standards for Effluents Discharged into Drainage and Sewerage Systems |
TOF |
Takeoff |
UFF |
Unit Flow Factors |
USEPA |
US Environmental Protection Agency |
US FAA |
US Federal Aviation Agency |
VE |
Visual Envelope |
VOCs |
Volatile Organic Compounds |
VKT |
Vehicle Kilometre Travelled |
VSRs |
Visual Sensitive Receivers |
WCZs |
Water Control Zones |
WDO |
Waste Disposal Ordinance |
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
WPCO |
Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
WQOs |
Water Quality Objectives |
WSD |
Water Supplies Department |
WTF |
Weapons Training Facilities |
VPs |
Vantage Points |
ZVIs |
Zones of Visual Influence |