3.4.5 Hazard to Human Life
3.4.5.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria
for evaluating hazard to human life as stated in section 2 of Annex 4 of the
TM.
3.4.5.2 The hazard to human life assessment
shall follow the detailed technical requirements given in Appendix C.
Appendix C – Requirements for Assessment of
Hazard to Human Life
1.
The Applicant shall carry out hazard assessment to evaluate potential
hazard to life during construction and operation stages of the Project due to
Silvermine Bay Water Treatment Works (SMBWTW). The hazard assessment shall
include the following:
(i)
Identify hazardous
scenarios associated with the transport, storage and use of chlorine at SMBWTW
and then determine a set of relevant scenarios to be included in a Quantitative
Risk Assessment (QRA);
(ii)
Execute a QRA of
the set of hazardous scenarios determined in (i), expressing population risks
in both individual and societal terms;
(iii)
Compare individual
and societal risks with the criteria for evaluating hazard to life stipulated
in Annex 4 of the TM; and
(iv)
Identify and assess
practicable and cost-effective risk mitigation measures.
2.
The methodology to be used in the hazard assessment shall be agreed with
the Director and should be consistent with previous studies having similar
issues (e.g. Integration of Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment
Works)
· Dangerous
Goods Ordinance, Chapter 295; and
· Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), Chapter 499.
-
EIAO Technical
Memorandum (EIAO-TM)
-
Hong Kong
Government Risk Guidelines (HKRG), EIAO TM Annex 4
(i)
Hazard Identification: Identify hazard scenarios associated with the transport, storage and
use of chlorine, and then determine a set of relevant scenarios to be included
in a QRA.
(ii)
Frequency Assessment: Assess the likelihood of occurrence of the identified hazard scenarios.
(iii)
Consequence Assessment: Assess the consequences and impact to the surrounding population.
(iv)
Risk Summation and Assessment: Evaluate the risk level, in terms of individual risk and societal risk.
The risks will be compared with the criteria stipulated in Annex 4 of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance – Technical Memorandum (EIAO-TM)[1] to determine their
acceptability.
(v)
Identification of Mitigation Measures:
Identify and assess practicable and
cost-effective risk mitigation measures. The risks of mitigated cases will then
be reassessed to determine the level of risk reduction.
(i)
An Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) Report for “Integration of Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay
Water Treatment Works” (Register No.: AEIAR-158/2011) (the “Previous Report”)[2] was prepared in 2010 and
approved by EPD in 2011. Hazardous scenario identified and assessed in the Hazard
Assessment of this report will be adopted as a basis for the current HA.
(ii)
In 2009, a feasibility study was carried out for a Potential Housing
Site in Tuen Mun East Area by the Planning Department (PlanD) and Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD)[3]. In that report the Tai Lam
Chung No.2 Chlorination Station (now called Tai Lam Chung Chlorination Store)
was studied in form of a QRA. Since the methodology and modelling approach of
the report is very similar to that used in the Previous Report, that report
will be studied and referenced where applicable.
i. Individual Risk: the maximum level of off-site individual risk should not exceed 1 x 10-5 / year, i.e. 1 in 100,000 per year.
ii. Societal Risk: it can be presented graphically as in Figure 5.2. The Societal Risk Guideline is expressed in terms of lines plotting the frequency (F) of N or more fatalities in the population from accidents at the facility of concern. In the figure, ALARP means As Low As Reasonably Practicable. Risk in this region should be mitigated to As Low As Reasonably Practicable.
Baseline without proposed Project (year 2020)
Construction Stage (year 2019)
Table 5.1 Statistics
of Frequencies of Different Weather Categories (Day Time - SMBWTW)
Sector |
Degree from North |
B |
D |
D |
D |
E |
F |
Total |
1 |
0o |
0.0025 |
0.00125 |
0.02574 |
0.0085 |
0 |
0 |
0.03798 |
2 |
22.5o |
0.00545 |
0.0019 |
0.01519 |
0.00265 |
0 |
0 |
0.02519 |
3 |
45o |
0.0062 |
0.00265 |
0.01854 |
0.01035 |
0 |
0 |
0.03773 |
4 |
67.5o |
0.0034 |
0.00215 |
0.04223 |
0.06362 |
0 |
0 |
0.11141 |
5 |
90o |
0.00165 |
0.00105 |
0.03264 |
0.04323 |
0 |
0 |
0.07857 |
6 |
112.5o |
0.00085 |
0.0007 |
0.00805 |
0.00755 |
0 |
0 |
0.01714 |
7 |
135o |
0.0009 |
0.00055 |
0.0039 |
0.003 |
0 |
0 |
0.00835 |
8 |
157.5o |
0.00065 |
0.0008 |
0.01364 |
0.0039 |
0 |
0 |
0.01899 |
9 |
180o |
0.0007 |
0.00085 |
0.01529 |
0.0025 |
0 |
0 |
0.01934 |
10 |
202.5o |
0.0007 |
0.0006 |
0.0071 |
0.002 |
0 |
0 |
0.01040 |
11 |
225o |
0.00115 |
0.00115 |
0.007 |
0.00165 |
0 |
0 |
0.01095 |
12 |
247.5o |
0.00305 |
0.00155 |
0.01614 |
0.00065 |
0 |
0 |
0.02139 |
13 |
270o |
0.0067 |
0.0017 |
0.02064 |
0.00125 |
0 |
0 |
0.03029 |
14 |
292.5o |
0.00675 |
0.0009 |
0.01574 |
0.00445 |
0 |
0 |
0.02784 |
15 |
315o |
0.0039 |
0.0009 |
0.00875 |
0.0041 |
0 |
0 |
0.01765 |
16 |
337.5o |
0.0036 |
0.001 |
0.01619 |
0.006 |
0 |
0 |
0.02679 |
Total |
0.04813 |
0.01969 |
0.26679 |
0.16538 |
0 |
0 |
0.5 |
|
Wind Speed (m/s) |
15 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
|
Table 5.2 Statistics of Frequencies of Different Weather Categories (Night Time - SMBWTW)
Sector |
Degree
from North |
B |
D |
D |
D |
E |
F |
Total |
1 |
0o |
0 |
0.00066 |
0.0099 |
0.00413 |
0.00388 |
0.00434 |
0.02291 |
2 |
22.5o |
0 |
0.00087 |
0.01668 |
0.00582 |
0.01056 |
0.0077 |
0.04163 |
3 |
45o |
0 |
0.00133 |
0.00949 |
0.00184 |
0.00832 |
0.01031 |
0.03129 |
4 |
67.5o |
0 |
0.00179 |
0.01143 |
0.00709 |
0.01 |
0.01454 |
0.04485 |
5 |
90o |
0 |
0.00148 |
0.02683 |
0.04357 |
0.01643 |
0.01888 |
0.10719 |
6 |
112.5o |
0 |
0.00071 |
0.02112 |
0.01939 |
0.01602 |
0.01454 |
0.07178 |
7 |
135o |
0 |
0.00046 |
0.005 |
0.00515 |
0.00403 |
0.00826 |
0.0229 |
8 |
157.5o |
0 |
0.00036 |
0.00224 |
0.00204 |
0.00189 |
0.00668 |
0.01321 |
9 |
180o |
0 |
0.00056 |
0.00826 |
0.0027 |
0.00679 |
0.00944 |
0.02775 |
10 |
202.5o |
0 |
0.00061 |
0.00959 |
0.00173 |
0.00832 |
0.00867 |
0.02892 |
11 |
225o |
0 |
0.00041 |
0.00423 |
0.00138 |
0.00413 |
0.00525 |
0.0154 |
12 |
247.5o |
0 |
0.00077 |
0.00393 |
0.00112 |
0.00301 |
0.00622 |
0.01505 |
13 |
270o |
0 |
0.00107 |
0.00571 |
0.00046 |
0.00138 |
0.00531 |
0.01393 |
14 |
292.5o |
0 |
0.00117 |
0.00668 |
0.00082 |
0.00128 |
0.00454 |
0.01449 |
15 |
315o |
0 |
0.00061 |
0.00724 |
0.00301 |
0.00173 |
0.00275 |
0.01534 |
16 |
337.5o |
0 |
0.00061 |
0.0051 |
0.00281 |
0.00209 |
0.00275 |
0.01336 |
Total |
0 |
0.01347 |
0.15345 |
0.10305 |
0.09984 |
0.13019 |
0.5 |
|
Wind
Speed (m/s) |
15 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
|
Table 5.3 Average Wind Statistics for Daytime (Peng Chau 2006-2015)
Sector |
Degree from North |
B |
D |
D |
D |
E |
F |
Total |
1 |
0o |
0.01631 |
0.00463 |
0.01573 |
0.01442 |
0.00485 |
0.00633 |
0.06227 |
2 |
22.5o |
0.00716 |
0.00217 |
0.00236 |
0.00179 |
0.00088 |
0.00227 |
0.01664 |
3 |
45o |
0.00805 |
0.00208 |
0.00501 |
0.00136 |
0.00155 |
0.00198 |
0.02003 |
4 |
67.5o |
0.01824 |
0.00246 |
0.01509 |
0.01533 |
0.00306 |
0.00222 |
0.05640 |
5 |
90o |
0.08947 |
0.00487 |
0.04634 |
0.11857 |
0.00559 |
0.00489 |
0.26973 |
6 |
112.5o |
0.03522 |
0.00320 |
0.00595 |
0.00702 |
0.00179 |
0.00339 |
0.05656 |
7 |
135o |
0.04350 |
0.00401 |
0.00599 |
0.00148 |
0.00177 |
0.00435 |
0.06110 |
8 |
157.5o |
0.04377 |
0.00456 |
0.00776 |
0.00086 |
0.00205 |
0.00442 |
0.06342 |
9 |
180o |
0.05188 |
0.00929 |
0.00941 |
0.00062 |
0.00246 |
0.00707 |
0.08073 |
10 |
202.5o |
0.05515 |
0.00795 |
0.00766 |
0.00014 |
0.00196 |
0.00602 |
0.07889 |
11 |
225o |
0.02075 |
0.00346 |
0.00489 |
0.00043 |
0.00141 |
0.00399 |
0.03493 |
12 |
247.5o |
0.00122 |
0.00081 |
0.00050 |
0.00007 |
0.00029 |
0.00122 |
0.00411 |
13 |
270o |
0.00267 |
0.00107 |
0.00050 |
0.00010 |
0.00029 |
0.00186 |
0.00649 |
14 |
292.5o |
0.02225 |
0.00131 |
0.00568 |
0.00296 |
0.00153 |
0.00420 |
0.03794 |
15 |
315o |
0.02414 |
0.00239 |
0.01382 |
0.01263 |
0.00313 |
0.00544 |
0.06155 |
16 |
337.5o |
0.02125 |
0.00363 |
0.02731 |
0.02509 |
0.00614 |
0.00578 |
0.08920 |
Total |
0.46103 |
0.05790 |
0.17404 |
0.20288 |
0.03873 |
0.06542 |
1.00000 |
|
Wind Speed (m/s) |
15 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
|
Table 5.4 Average Wind Statistics for Night-time (Peng Chau 2006-2015)
Sector |
Degree from North |
B |
D |
D |
D |
E |
F |
Total |
1 |
0o |
0.00000 |
0.00007 |
0.02584 |
0.01628 |
0.01495 |
0.02478 |
0.08192 |
2 |
22.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00012 |
0.00284 |
0.00125 |
0.00217 |
0.00698 |
0.01336 |
3 |
45o |
0.00000 |
0.00010 |
0.00864 |
0.00147 |
0.00578 |
0.00708 |
0.02307 |
4 |
67.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00010 |
0.02904 |
0.02018 |
0.00987 |
0.00867 |
0.06786 |
5 |
90o |
0.00000 |
0.00012 |
0.09186 |
0.13521 |
0.02290 |
0.01705 |
0.26714 |
6 |
112.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00012 |
0.01471 |
0.00660 |
0.00946 |
0.01864 |
0.04953 |
7 |
135o |
0.00000 |
0.00005 |
0.01026 |
0.00154 |
0.00867 |
0.02155 |
0.04207 |
8 |
157.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00007 |
0.01081 |
0.00065 |
0.01074 |
0.02463 |
0.04691 |
9 |
180o |
0.00000 |
0.00010 |
0.01731 |
0.00075 |
0.02032 |
0.04801 |
0.08649 |
10 |
202.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00005 |
0.00809 |
0.00034 |
0.01382 |
0.04226 |
0.06456 |
11 |
225o |
0.00000 |
0.00007 |
0.00602 |
0.00084 |
0.00778 |
0.02463 |
0.03935 |
12 |
247.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00005 |
0.00082 |
0.00010 |
0.00089 |
0.01009 |
0.01194 |
13 |
270o |
0.00000 |
0.00005 |
0.00017 |
0.00014 |
0.00031 |
0.01233 |
0.01300 |
14 |
292.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00002 |
0.00320 |
0.00205 |
0.00178 |
0.02023 |
0.02728 |
15 |
315o |
0.00000 |
0.00012 |
0.01700 |
0.01043 |
0.00848 |
0.02374 |
0.05977 |
16 |
337.5o |
0.00000 |
0.00024 |
0.03942 |
0.02601 |
0.01842 |
0.02167 |
0.10576 |
Total |
0.00000 |
0.00144 |
0.28604 |
0.22382 |
0.15635 |
0.33235 |
1.00000 |
|
Wind Speed
(m/s) |
15 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
|
Table 5.5 Design Parameters of SMBWTW
Parameter |
Value |
Design treatment capacity |
159,000 m3/day |
Form of chlorine storage |
1-tonne drum |
Chlorine inventory |
Max. 17 tonnes |
Number of evaporators |
2 |
Number of Chlorinators |
3 |
Chlorine dosage rate |
2-5ppm |
Number of chlorine drums delivered per truck |
6 |
i.
Assumptions made in “Integration of SHW and SMBWTW EIA” report
ii.
Hong Kong Population Census and other population statistics published by
Census and Statistics Department (C&SD)
iii.
Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) by traffic consultant
iv.
Desktop search conducted by consultants
v.
Site surveys undertaken by the consultants
General Population Growth Rate
Table 5.6 Population Projection for TPU 961 and 962
Tertiary Planning Units,
TPU(s) |
Projected Population (1) |
||||||
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
|
961 & 962 |
5 900 |
6 000 |
6 000 |
6 000 |
6 100 |
7 800 |
7 800 |
% change
from past year |
N/A |
2% |
0% |
0% |
2% |
28% |
0% |
Note:
(1) Data extracted from Table 15 of the "Projections
of Population Distribution 2015-2024" Report
Major Population Groups within the Study Area
Mui Wo Facelift (The Improvement Works in Mui Wo)
·
Phase
1 works:
1.
a 230-metre (m) long and 11.5-m wide segregated pedestrian walkway and
cycle track along the waterfront between Mui Wo Cooked Food Market and River
Silver
2.
a 35-m long and 4.8-m wide footbridge across River Silver
3.
a civic square near Mui Wo old town with associated landscaped area,
recreational and leisure facilities and a performance venue
4.
seven amenity areas in villages at Mui Wo
5.
ancillary works including signage, landscaping, drainage and utilities
works
·
Phase 2 Stage 1 works:
1.
realignment of Mui Wo Ferry Pier Road and extension of existing car park
2.
ancillary works including slope works, signage, landscaping, drainage
and utilities works
·
Remaining
phases include:
1.
Re-provisioning of new cooked food market and covered cycle parking area
2.
improvement to south waterfront promenade
3.
re-provisioning of cargo loading and unloading area
4.
enhancement of Entrance Plaza
5.
improvement/provision of cycle tracks and heritage trails in Mui Wo
Facilities for children and elderly
(i)
The Lick Hang Kindergarten
(Leafy Branch) is in Ling Tsui Tau (Location ID: 4G) and in Ma Po Village (as
part of Location ID: 18E).
(ii)
The Little Lamb Education is
next to Lick Hang Kindergarten in Ma Po Village (part of Location ID: 18E).
(iii)
The Mui Wo OWLS School is
in Mui Wo South (Location ID: 14D)
(iv)
The Little Lantau Montessori
Kindergarten is in Silver View Center (Location ID: 4C_K)
(v)
The Kind Hing Trinity International Kindergarten
is near the Mui Wo Ferry Pier car park (Location ID: 14E)
Area affected by Ching Ming
/ Chung Yeung Festival
Table 5.7 Definition of Time Periods
ID |
Time Period |
Period |
Weighing per day |
% Distribution per year |
TM1 |
Working Day |
Monday to Friday |
12 hours |
33.38% |
TM2 |
Saturday Day |
Saturday |
12 hours |
7.14% |
TM3 |
Holiday Day |
Sunday and public holidays (except Ching Ming and Chung Yeung) |
12 hours |
8.93% |
TM4 |
Night |
Monday to Sunday |
12 hours |
50% |
TM5 |
Ching Ming and Chung Yeung (Day) |
4 days - daytime |
12 hours |
0.55% |
Note:
It is assumed that
there are 52 weeks a year, and 17 public holidays in Hong Kong per year which
are all on weekdays
TM1 = (52 weeks * 5 weekdays per week – 17 public holidays) / 365 * 0.5
= 0.3338
TM2 = (52 weeks * 1 Saturday per week) / 365 * 0.5 = 0.0714
TM3 = (52 weeks * 1 Sunday per week + 17 public holidays – Ching Ming
& Chung Yeung and following Sundays (4 days)) / 365 * 0.5 = 0.08929
TM4 = 12 hours per 24 hours = 0.5
TM5 = 4 days per year / 365 * 0.5 = 0.00548
Table 5.8 Peak hour trip Generation (Person/Hour) for Existing Cemetery and Proposed Development in TIA
Existing (vacant plus occupied coffin burial or
urn burial) |
Existing plus proposed development |
748 |
1713 |
South Lantau Road (Location ID: R1)
The access road to Lai Chi Yuen Tsuen (Location ID: R2)
The footpaths at the junction of South Lantau Road and access road to Lai Chi Yuen Cemetery (Location ID: P1, P2, P3)
Table 5.9 Site Survey for Peak Hour Pedestrian Population (Person/Hour) in Year 2014
Road |
Ching Ming Day |
Sunday |
Weekday |
South Lantau Road (between the bus stops) |
69 |
49 |
10 |
Single track access road |
69 |
49 |
10 |
From junction of single track access road to Lai Chi Yuen Cemetery |
459 |
139 |
10 |
Ngan Kwong Wan Road (Location ID: R3) and Mui Wo Ferry Pier Road (Location ID: R4)
Proposed Risk Modelling Approach
Review of identified Hazards in SMBWTW
1. Hazardous scenario inside the chlorination store
i. Spontaneous tank failure
ii. Dropped container
iii.
Spontaneous
failure of larger bore manifold pipework
iv. Spontaneous failure of pigtail
v. Drive away whilst the truck is still unloading
vi. Failure to identify faulty connection (human error)
vii. Failure to tighten connections (human error)
viii. Isolation error (human error)
ix. Failure to identify faulty valve (human error)
x. Fire (internal or external)
xi. Failure of QA procedure allowing water ingress, or presence of NCl3 causing severe corrosion to the drum / pipework, following pressure low alarm failure
xii. Missile domino effect
2. Hazardous scenario happens on road
i. Road accident leading to load shedding
ii. Road accident leading to roll over
iii. Road accident leading to vehicle fire
iv. Road accident leading to truck being crushed in rear
v. Road accident leading to truck being crushing at the side
vi. Spontaneous failure
viii. Missile domino effect
3. Hazardous scenario happens at the store which can lead to direct release of chlorine to atmosphere
i. Air crash
ii. Earthquake
iii. Subsidence/landslides
iv. Dropped container
v. Spontaneous drum failure
vi. Impact while manoeuvring to enter the chlorine store
vii. Road accident leading to truck being crushed in rear
viii. Road accident leading to truck being crushing at the side
ix. Spontaneous truck fire
x. Missile domino effect
i. Equipment Failure
ii. Human Error
iii. Corrosion
iv. Fire/Overheating
v. Contamination
vi. Road accident
vii. Marine Accident
viii. Rail accident
Review of Existing Chlorine Facilities
Hazard associated with the Construction and Operation of the Project to SMBWTW
Table 5.10 Event Frequency adopted in this Study
Hole Size |
Isolation |
Confinement |
Event Frequency (per
year) |
|
Internal Release |
||||
Leak from single 1
tonne drum |
Small |
No |
Vent On |
3.39x10-7 |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
1.99x10-7 |
|
Rupture |
No |
Vent On |
1.87x10-8 |
|
Leak from single 1
tonne drum |
Small |
No |
Vent Off |
7.42x10-6 |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
4.34x10-6 |
|
Rupture |
No |
Vent Off |
4.09x10-7 |
|
Leak from
pipework, 100% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent On |
2.53x10-6 |
10 min. |
Vent On |
8.54x10-7 |
||
No |
Vent On |
3.42x10-8 |
||
Leak from
pipework, 100% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent Off |
5.52x10-5 |
10 min. |
Vent Off |
1.87x10-5 |
||
No |
Vent Off |
7.46x10-7 |
||
Leak from
pipework, 25% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent On |
5.13x10-6 |
10 min. |
Vent On |
1.73x10-6 |
||
No |
Vent On |
6.94x10-8 |
||
Leak from
pipework, 25% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent Off |
1.12x10-4 |
10 min. |
Vent Off |
3.79x10-5 |
||
No |
Vent Off |
1.51x10-6 |
||
Leak from 7 drums
in store |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
6.00x10-11 |
Leak from 7 drums
in store |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
1.31x10-9 |
Leak from 6 drums
in store |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
6.00x10-11 |
Leak from 6 drums
in store |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
1.31x10-9 |
Rupture of second
drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
Vent On |
1.87x10-9 |
Rupture of second
drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
Vent Off |
4.09x10-8 |
External Release
at the Store |
||||
Leak from single 1
tonne drum on truck or storage within building |
Small |
No |
External |
7.82x10-5 |
Large |
No |
External |
2.11x10-5 |
|
Rupture |
No |
External |
1.40x10-6 |
|
Leak from 7 drums
in store on storage within building |
Large |
No |
External |
5.00x10-7 |
Rupture |
No |
External |
6.09x10-8 |
|
Leak from 6 drums
in store on storage within building |
Large |
No |
External |
5.00x10-7 |
Rupture |
No |
External |
6.09x10-8 |
|
Leak from three 1
tonne drums on truck stationary at store |
Large |
No |
External |
1.56x10-7 |
Rupture of second
drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
External |
1.55x10-7 |
External Release
from the Road |
||||
Leak from 3
1-tonne drums on road |
Large |
No |
External |
2.65x10-6 |
Leak from single 1
tonne drum on road |
Small |
No |
External |
1.60x10-5 |
Large |
No |
External |
2.89x10-5 |
|
Rupture |
No |
External |
1.68x10-7 |
|
Rupture of second
drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
External |
1.68x10-8 |
Table 5.11 Toxic Effect of Chlorine
Concentration (ppm) |
Effects |
1000 |
May be fatal with brief exposure |
400-300 |
A predicted average lethal concentration
for 50% of active healthy people for 30 minutes |
150-100 |
More vulnerable people might suffer
fatality from 5-10 minute exposure |
20-10 |
Causes immediate irritation of nose, throat
and eyes with coughing and lachrymation for half to 1 hour exposure |
10 |
Causes coughing in less than 1 minutes
exposure |
3-6 |
Causes stinging or burning sensation but
can be tolerated without undue ill effect for up to 1 hour |
i. Internal release in the chlorine store
ii. External release on road during transportation
iii. External release at the store
Internal Releases
i.
Contain and Absorb system functions properly (which results in no
off-site impact)
ii.
Ventilation on, scrubber system on, or failure (forced ventilation)
iii.
Ventilation off, scrubber failed and the chlorine escape from the store
from ineffective door and window seals (release due to expansion)
Where
R is the release rate
in the building
N
is the number of air changes per hour
t
is the time elapsed (in hours)
Ventilation driven by expansion of release
Full for 33.3% of the time
Quarter full for 66.7% of the
time
Store full 50% of the time
Store at minimum stock level
(i.e. 1 truckload less than full capacity of the store) 50% of the time
The average release rates used in the
consequence calculation, is calculated by analytical integration of the above
time-dependent release rates Q(t) over the release duration (T):
Table 5.12 Discharge Rates and Their Duration of Each Internal Release Scenario
Consequence |
Hole Size |
Isolation |
Confinement |
Release Rate to the Atmosphere (kg/s) |
Duration (s) |
Leak from single 1 tonne drum |
Small |
No |
Vent On |
2.5x10-1 |
3443 |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
5.5x10-1 |
1244 |
|
Rupture |
No |
Vent On |
7.1x10-1 |
827 |
|
Leak from single 1 tonne drum |
Small |
No |
Vent Off |
6.1x10-2 |
3600 |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
4.2x10-1 |
1565 |
|
Rupture |
No |
Vent Off |
7.1x10-1 |
827 |
|
Leak from pipework, 100% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent On |
4.3x10-2 |
1006 |
10 min. |
Vent On |
1.1x10-1 |
1426 |
||
No |
Vent On |
2.5x10-1 |
3443 |
||
Leak from pipework, 100% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent Off |
5.6x10-3 |
3600 |
10 min. |
Vent Off |
1.8x10-2 |
3600 |
||
No |
Vent Off |
6.1x10-2 |
3600 |
||
Leak from pipework, 25% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent On |
4.3x10-2 |
1006 |
10 min. |
Vent On |
1.1x10-1 |
1426 |
||
No |
Vent On |
1.2x10-1 |
1488 |
||
Leak from pipework, 25% drum level |
Small |
3 min. |
Vent Off |
5.6x10-3 |
3600 |
10 min. |
Vent Off |
1.8x10-2 |
3600 |
||
No |
Vent Off |
2.0x10-2 |
3600 |
||
Leak from 7 drums in store |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
3.3 |
1244 |
Leak from 7 drums in store |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
3.3 |
1244 |
Leak from 6 drums in store |
Large |
No |
Vent On |
3.3 |
1244 |
Leak from 6 drums in store |
Large |
No |
Vent Off |
3.3 |
1244 |
Rupture of second drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
Vent On |
7.1x10-1 |
827 |
Rupture of second drum due to missile |
Rupture |
No |
Vent Off |
1.4 |
827 |
Table 5.13 Summary of External Releases
Consequence |
Hole Size |
Release Rate to the Atmosphere (kg/s) |
Duration (s) |
Leak from single 1 tonne drum on truck or storage within building |
small |
0.38 |
2618 |
large |
2.4 |
419 |
|
rupture |
1000 |
1 |
|
Leak from 7 drums in store within building |
large |
17 |
419 |
rupture |
7000 |
1 |
|
Leak from 6 drums in store within building |
large |
14 |
419 |
rupture |
6000 |
1 |
|
Leak from three 1-tonne drums on truck stationary at store |
large |
7.2 |
419 |
Rupture of second drum due to missile domino effect |
rupture |
2000 |
1 |
Releases during Chlorine Transportation
Table 5.14 Summary of Release Sizes during Chlorine Transportation
Hole Size |
Release Rate (kg/s) |
Mass Released |
Small Leak (single drum) |
0.38 |
1 tonne |
Large Leak (single drum) |
2.4 |
1 tonne |
Catastrophic Failure (single drum) |
1 tonne
instantaneous |
1 tonne |
Missile Domino Effect causing rupture of second drum |
2 tonnes
instantaneous |
2 tonnes |
Large Leak (3 drums on truck) |
7.2 |
3 tonnes |
Dispersion of Chlorine in Atmosphere
(i)
Average concentration levels along the plume axis, for continuous
release, and
(ii) Maximum concentration levels along the down-wind cloud path, for instantaneous releases.
LD90 – 90% of healthy people outdoor will die within this contour
LD50 – 50% of healthy people outdoor will die within this contour
LD03 – 3% of healthy people outdoor will die within this contour
Table 5.15 Fatality Rate for Indoor and Outdoor Population Considering Escape Probability
Chlorine Cloud
Concentration (LD) |
Fatality for
Outdoor Population |
Fatality for
Indoor Population |
90 |
0.9 |
0.09 |
50 |
0.41 |
0.05 |
3 |
0.0084 |
0.003 |
Chlorine Cloud Height
Sensitive Population Consideration
Table 5.16 Fatality Rate for Indoor and Outdoor Population Considering Escape Probability (Vulnerable Population)
Chlorine Cloud
Concentration (LD) |
Fatality for
Outdoor Population |
Fatality for
Indoor Population |
90 |
1 |
0.297 |
50 |
1 |
0.165 |
3 |
0.099 |
0.0099 |
Determination of Risk Acceptability
i. Unacceptable where risks are so high that they should usually be reduced regardless of the cost or else the hazardous activity should not proceed;
ii. ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) where the risks associated with the hazardous activity should be reduced to a level “as low as reasonably practicable”, in which the priority of measures is established on the basis of practicability and cost to implement versus risk reduction achieved; and
iii. Acceptable where risks are so low that no action is necessary.
Table 5.17 Summary of PLLs
Case |
Overall
PLL (/year) |
PLL of
Lai Chi Yuen Cemetery (/year) |
% of PLL
to overall PLL |
Base Case (Population ID: 28) |
1.443x10-4 |
3.034x10-7 |
0.210% |
Construction Case (Population
ID: 28+ 28_C) |
1.426X10-4 |
5.706x10-7 |
0.400% |
Operation Case (Population ID:
28 + 28_O) |
1.445X10-4 |
7.699x10-7 |
0.533% |
1. The cemetery population was assumed conservatively. The number of visitors corresponded to the maximum capacity of the cemetery (with extension) was assumed. In fact, the cemetery now is still far from fully occupied. It was also conservatively assumed that the Sunday following the Ching Ming/Chung Yeung Festival will have the same number of visitors as the Festival Day.
2. The traffic flow was assumed to be the peak hour flow for the whole day during Tsing Ming / Chung Yeung Festival
3. Many population is conservatively assumed to a higher value. For example, the future civic square is assumed to have 2000 people (maximum capacity as provided by CEDD) in every Sunday, and 200 people over the night.
Identification of Risk Mitigation Measures
Table 5.18 Candidate Risk Mitigation Measures
Option |
Measures |
Remarks |
Operation stage |
||
A |
Prepare face masks at every
level of the Cemetery as well as the Extension |
To be assessed in CBA |
B |
Setting up temporary shelter at
the cemetery during the Ching Ming and Chung Yeung Festival |
To be assessed in CBA |
C |
Enhance communication with WSD
and Police and identify emergency response in case of major chlorine incident |
Recommended to implement as a
good practice |
Construction Stage |
||
D |
Prepare 50 face masks for
construction workers |
Since the number of face masks
involved will not be significant, this mitigation measure will be implemented
by contractor without the need of CBA assessment |
E |
Enhance emergency response
arrangements, e.g. provision of visual and audible alarms, training etc. |
Provision of a means of alerting
construction workers in case of chlorine release is considered an effective
mitigation measure. Therefore, it is recommended to implement as a good
practice. |
Table 5.19 Assumptions for Candidate Mitigation Measures
Option |
Detail provisions |
Project Stage |
A |
Chemical, Biological and Radiological (CBR) Gas
Mask can be place at every level of the existing cemetery as well as at the
cemetery extension. 2000 of the gas masks should be prepared to cater for the
maximum capacity of the Cemetery with Extension. Such gas masks cabinets can
also be found in some large metro/subway stations in Seoul. Due to the site
condition, it is expected that only 10% of the visitors can have enough time
to access the gas masks and put them on timely and properly before the chlorine
gas cloud arrives the cemetery. |
Operation stage |
B |
One or two temporary shelters can be set up
during Ching Ming / Chung Yeung Festival so that in case of chlorine release
some visitors can stay in the shelter and wait for evacuation by Fire
Services Department/ Police. The temporary shelter should be able to sustain
a filtered fresh air supply for a certain period of time. Due to the space
available and the site constraints, 10% of visitors during festival days are
assumed to be able to be protected by the shelter. |
Operation stage |
Analysis of Mitigation Measures
Table 5.20 Candidates for Risk Mitigation Measures to be considered in CBA
Option |
Estimated Cost (HK$M) |
PLL Reduction |
Design Life (Years) |
ICAF (HK$M) |
Cost-effective Measures |
A |
1 |
7.70x10-8 |
5 |
2.60x106 |
No |
B |
5 |
5.89x10-9 |
10 |
8.49x107 |
No |
1. The number of workers on site during construction stage should be kept within the level as assessed in this report.
2. FEHD/ArchSD/the responsible personnel of the construction site should keep effective communication with Police or relevant authorities to ensure a proper evacuation/emergency response in case of a gas release incident. FEHD/ArchSD/the responsible personnel of the construction site should ensure all workers on site to be familiar with the route to escape. Diagram showing the escape routes to a safe place should be posted in the site notice boards and at the entrance/exit of site.
3. Specific means of providing a rapid and direct warning (e.g. Siren and Flashing Light) to construction workers in the event of chlorine gas release in the SMBWTW should be determined and made known to the construction workers.
4. The construction site officer should establish a communication channel with the SMBWTW operation personnel during construction stage. Upon receiving the notice of an external gas leak at the SMBWTW, the construction site officer should direct the workers to evacuate by following the instructions of Police or relevant authorities as appropriate.
5. Induction Training should be provided to any staff before working on site.
6. The responsible officer of the construction site should ensure all construction staff are familiar with the evacuation routes and /or location of the protective gears (if available).
[1] Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Chapter 499.
[5] "Tips on driving on Lantau Closed Roads," ed: Hong Kong Transport Department, Feb 2016.