8.1.2
The location of the proposed development is illustrated
in Figures 1.1a and 1.1b, while the project
description is given in Chapter 3 of the report. There are two boundaries indicating
the proposed development, viz. Proposed Development Area Boundary and Project
Site Boundary (Figure 8.1). The Proposed Development Area (PDA) Boundary
indicates the extent of the core public housing development area, which
includes five main components: Hong Po Road (HPR) Site, San Hing Road (SHR)
Site, San Hing Road Site Extension, the proposed Road L7 and the realigned Hong
Po Road; while the Project Site Boundary covers not only the PDA but also the
proposed works area for the associated supporting infrastructure which includes
the traffic improvement works and laying of fresh and salt water mains and
sewerage pipes etc. The whole area within the Project Site Boundary is termed
as “Project Site” in this Chapter.
8.2.1
The ordinances, regulations and guidelines relevant
to ecological impact assessment, and protection of species and habitats of
ecological interest include the following:
·
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance ("the
EIAO", Cap. 499) and the associated Technical Memorandum (EIAO-TM)
·
EIAO Guidance Note No. 7/2010
·
EIAO Guidance Note No. 10/2010
·
Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96) and its
subsidiary legislation (sub. leg.), the Forestry Regulations
·
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170)
·
Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and
Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586)
·
Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208) and its
subsidiary legislation
·
Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131)
·
Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong (http://www.herbarium.gov.hk/PublicationsPreface.aspx?BookNameId=1)
·
China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals
·
China Plant Red Data Book
·
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria
(https://www.iucnredlist.org/)
8.3.1
In accordance with Clause 3.4.9.2 of the EIA Study
Brief No. ESB-299/2017, the assessment area for the terrestrial ecological
impact assessment included areas within 500m distance from the boundary of the Project
Site and all other areas likely to be impacted by the Project and associated
works. The ecological assessment area is indicated in Figure 8.1.
8.3.2
Apart from literature review, ecological surveys
were conducted to fill information gaps, verify the information collated, and
to fulfil the requirements of the EIA Study stipulated in Appendix H of the EIA
Study Brief No. ESB-299/2017. Ecological survey methodology is presented in Appendix 8.1 of this report.
·
EIA for Planning
and Development Study of Potential Housing Site in Area 54, Tuen
Mun (Agreement No. CE21/97) (EIAO Register No.: AEIAR-015/1999) (TM54 EIA);
·
EIA Review Report for Formation, Roads and Drains in Area 54, Tuen
Mun – Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Traffic and Drainage Impact Assessment Review
- Investigation (Agreement No. CE21/2005) (TM54 EIAR-2005);
·
EIA Review Report for Formation, Roads and Drains in Area 54, Tuen
Mun – Phase 1 and 2 Review of Traffic Environmental Drainage and Sewerage
Impact Assessment - Investigation (Agreement No. CE38/2011) (TM54
EIAR-2012);
·
PER for Engineering
Study Review for Site Formation and Infrastructure Works at San Hing Road, Tuen Mun – Investigation (Agreement No. CE56/2013) (SHR
PER);
·
PER for Engineering
Study for Site Formation and Infrastructure Works at Hong Po Road – Feasibility
Study (Agreement No. CE60/2013) (HPR PER);
·
EIA for Widening
of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange (EIAO
Register No.: AEIAR-116/2008);
·
EIA for Hung
Shui Kiu New Development Area (EIAO Register No.:
AEIAR-203/2016);
·
Hong Kong
Biodiversity – Newsletter of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD);
·
Annual reports and other publications of The Hong
Kong Bird Watching Society;
·
Memoirs of Hong Kong Natural History Society;
·
Porcupine! Newsletter of Ecology & Biodiversity, The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong;
·
Lam Tei and Yick Yuen Outline Zoning Plan No. S/TM-LTYY/10;
·
Tuen Mun Outline Zoning Plan No. S/TM/35.
Sites of Conservation Interest
8.4.2
Part
of a Conservation Area (CA) zoning designated on Lam Tei
and Yick Yuen Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No.
S/TM-LTYY/10 is located at the northeast of the assessment area at Chung Shan (Figure
8.2). According to the notes of the OZP, the
zoning is intended to protect and retain the existing natural landscape, ecological
or topographical features of the area for conservation, educational and
research purposes and to separate sensitive natural environment from the
adverse effects of development. According to the latest project layout, the
proposed project site will have no direct encroachment in this CA zone (Figure
8.1).
8.4.3
Apart
from the CA zone at Chung Shan, no Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI),
Ecologically Important Streams (EIS), Country Parks (CP), Special Area nor
nature conservation related Restricted Area were found within the assessment
area.
8.4.4
According
to the ecological evaluation conducted in the approved TM54 EIA, a woodland W2 was rated as habitat of “high” overall
ecological value for the presence of floral species of conservation interest. Same rating (i.e. high) was given in the
following TM54 EIAR-2005. However, the rating had then been lowered to
“moderate to high” since the second EIA Review Report TM54 EIAR-2012, while the
two recently completed PERs (SHR PER and HPR PER) maintained this lowered rating.
The justification for the downgrading of the habitat value from “high” to
“moderate to high” was the reporting of absence of all the previous recorded
floral species of conservation interest in this woodland during their field verifications,
though TM54 EIAR-2005 also cannot find all these species in W2 but still
maintained the “high” rating in its review. (Literature review of floral
species of conservation interest is to be given in next section – Species of Conservation Interest).
Species of Conservation Interest
8.4.5
In terms of floral species, a total of 5 species of
conservation interest were identified from literatures and summarised in the
following table:
Table 8.1 - Summary of
Floral Species of Conservation Interest identified from Previous Ecological
Studies
Species \ Year of Survey
|
TM54 EIA
|
AFCD
Field Survey*
|
TM54 EIAR-2005
|
TM54 EIAR-2012
|
SHR PER
|
HPR PER
|
1997-1998
|
1999 & 2012
|
2005-2006
|
2012-2013
|
2014-2016
|
2014-2016
|
Aquilaria sinensis
|
ü
|
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
Camellia crapnelliana
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
Camellia sinensis
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pyrenaria spectabilis
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
ü
|
ü
|
Rhodoleia championii
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
* supporting survey
information from AFCD reported in TM54 EIA and TM54 EIAR-2012.
^ Michelia macclurei was mentioned in TM54 EIA as a
species of conservation interest for its protection status under Cap 96 sub.
leg. However, it is an exotic plant introduced for ornamental purpose and the
conservation status is considered similar to Michelia x alba and Michelia figo, in
the same family Magnoliaceae, and therefore not
regarded as a species of conservation interest in this EIA. For the same
reason, the planted individuals of Pinus morrisonicola and Fokienia hodginsii mentioned in TM54 EIA are
also not regarded as species of conservation interest in this EIA.
8.4.6
Majority of these five species reported by TM54 EIA
and AFCD survey were found in woodland W2, with few individuals of Pyrenaria spectabilis
at woodland W3 near a stream. In contrast, all the following up related studies
undertaken more recently (i.e TM54 EIAR-2005, TM54
EIAR-2012, SHR PER and HPR PER) cannot find most of these plants in their surveys,
especially no species of conservation interest were observed in W2. Aquilaria sinensis were found in all these studies, but with
very different recorded locations among their findings. In TM54 EIA and two of
its review reports, this species was found only in woodland W2. In the two
PERs, this species was found in woodland W1 and W3 but no records in woodland
W2.
8.4.7
None of these previous records of the species of
conservation interest however, were identified within the Project Site (i.e. no
onsite records) of this EIA.
8.4.8
For
faunal species communities, a total 9 species (including 7 bird species, 1
damselfly species and 1 crab species) were identified from literature review. A
summary is given below:
Table 8.2 - Summary of Faunal Species of Conservation Interest identified from
Previous Ecological Studies
|
TM54 EIA
|
TM54 EIAR-2005
|
TM54 EIAR-2012
|
SHR PER
|
HPR PER
|
AFCD Record *
|
Species /Year of Survey
|
1997-1998
|
2005-2006
|
2012-2013
|
2014-2016
|
2014-2016
|
2020
|
Birds
|
Chinese Pond Heron
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
Little Egret
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
Crested Goshawk
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
Greater Coucal
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
Chinese Hwamei
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
Black Kite
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
Common Buzzard
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
Odonate
|
Ischnura rufostigma
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
Aquatic Fauna
|
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
|
|
|
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
Note: * “AFCD record”
refers to a damselfly record reported to AFCD by a member of the public and
identified by AFCD
8.4.9
According to those previous studies, the bird
species Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Greater Coucal
and the crab species Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon had onsite record (i.e. with recorded locations within Project Site
of this EIA).
8.4.10
An individual (a male adult) of Ischnura
rufostigma was reported by a member of the public
and identified by AFCD at a barren field near Tsing Lun Road (within the 500m
assessment area of this EIA) on 20 March 2020. The location of the record is
next to a grassy and muddy nullah, which is not a typical habitat for this
species. In Hong Kong, this species was once observed in Fanling,
Ho Chung and Kam Tin in the 1960s, however, since then there had been no
further records.
Ecological
Findings of Other Literatures
8.4.11
Two EIA studies (EIA for Widening
of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange and EIA for Hung Shui Kiu New Development Area) were
conducted in area north-east of the assessment area of this EIA and had some
overlapping area in their ecological impact assessment. Apart from the CA zoning identified
from the OZP No. S/TM-LTYY/10 at Chung Shan
mentioned above, no other sites, habitats nor species of conservation interest
were identified in the overlapping area with this EIA.
8.5
Ecological
Baseline – Field Survey
8.5.1
As per the requirements of the EIA
Study Brief (ESB-299/2017), the ecological field surveys with a
duration of at least four months covering the wet
season are required.
8.5.2
Ecological
field surveys were conducted in June-November 2018 and March-April 2020 covering
both wet and dry seasons, which aimed to verify the findings from literature
review and update the ecological baseline. The methodology of ecological field
surveys is given in Appendix
8.1. The
assessment area is illustrated in Figure 8.1.
8.5.3
The
ecological survey schedule is summarised below:
|
2018
|
2020
*
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
Habitat and Vegetation
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Day
Survey
|
Mammal
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
ü
|
|
ü
|
|
|
Bird
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Herpetofauna
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Butterfly
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Dragonfly
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
Aquatic
fauna
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
Night
Survey
|
Mammal
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
ü
|
|
ü
|
|
|
Birds
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Herpetofauna
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
Aquatic
fauna
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
ü
|
|
|
|
Note: * surveys in 2020 for odonates were conducted which aimed to provide additional
survey effort for this specific faunal group in view of the new findings about
the rediscovery of Ischnura rufostigma mentioned in Section 8.4.10.
Habitats
and Vegetation
8.5.4
A
total of eleven types of habitat were identified within the assessment area,
viz. woodland, shrub-grassland, landscape plantation, agricultural land, natural
stream, semi-natural stream, drainage channel, pond, village/orchard, village
area and urban area. Ecological habitats (constituted by woodland,
shrub-grassland and stream) were found mainly located in the north-western
portion of the assessment area while the central, eastern, and southern portions
were dominated by artificial or highly modified habitats such as village area,
drainage channel and urban area. This general pattern of habitat distribution is
basically consistent with the previous TM54 EIA in the same coverage of area to
the northwest of the assessment area.
8.5.5
The
Habitat Map is illustrated in Figure 8.1. A summary of size and proportion of different
habitats is given in Table:
Table 8.3 - Summary of Habitats
in the Assessment Area
Habitat
|
Assessment
Area
|
Project
Site *
|
Size (ha)
|
Percentage (%)
|
Size (ha)
|
Percentage (%)
|
Woodland
|
70.6
|
13.4
|
1.2
|
3.2
|
Shrub-grassland
|
62.3
|
11.8
|
-
|
0.0
|
Landscape Plantation
|
7.5
|
1.4
|
-
|
0.0
|
Agricultural Land
|
3.6
|
0.7
|
1.1
|
2.9
|
Natural Stream
|
1.1
(4,550m in length)
|
0.2
|
0.0
(104m in length)
|
0.0
|
Semi-natural Stream
|
0.7
(2,236m in length)
|
0.1
|
0.1
(356m in length)
|
0.3
|
Drainage Channel
|
3.9
(4,540m in length)
|
0.8
|
0.4
(1,160m in length)
|
1.1
|
Pond
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
-
|
0.0
|
Village / Orchard
|
28.2
|
5.4
|
8.0
|
21.2
|
Village Area
|
90.0
|
17.1
|
17.8
|
47.2
|
Urban Area
|
258.8
|
49.1
|
9.1
|
24.1
|
Total
|
526.9
|
100.0
|
37.7
|
100.0
|
* note:
Project Site refers to all areas fall within the proposed project footprint as
well as temporary works area
|
8.5.6
Indicative
photographic records of habitats are illustrated in Appendix 8.2 (Table A).
8.5.7
As the
coverage of woodland habitats at northwest of the assessment area is largely
consistent with TM54 EIA and the two PERs, same numbering of woodland is
adopted in this EIA for consistency and ease of reference, but some minor
amendments to their boundary were made according to updated baseline survey
findings. The grouping of the woodland is illustrated in Figure 8.2.
8.5.8
The
numbering and grouping of watercourses are indicated in Figure 8.2.
8.5.9
According
to the vegetation survey results, a total of 512 floral species were identified
(Appendix 8.3), of which 8 are species of conservation
interest, including Aquilaria sinensis, Camellia crapnelliana,
Diospyros vaccinioides, Geodorum
densiflorum, Gleditsia australis,
Nepenthes mirabilis, Pyrenaria spectabilis
and Rhodoleia championii. The summary of the floral species of
conservation interest is given in the following table:
Table 8.4 - Floral Species of
Conservation Interest
Species
|
Quantity
(Offsite Record)
|
Quantity
(Onsite Record)
|
Total
Quantity
|
Remarks (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
Aquilaria sinensis
|
56
(48 in woodland, 4 in shrub-grassland and 4 in village/orchard)
-
|
3
(in woodland)
|
59
|
-
Common
in Hong Kong;
-
Listed
in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong
Kong, of Near Threatened (NT) status in mainland China;
-
Scheduled
under Protection of Endangered Species
of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);
-
Recorded
in China Plant Red Data Book and
Illustration of Rare & Endangered Plant
in Guangdong Province;
-
Ranked
as Vulnerable (VU) under IUCN Red List
|
Camellia crapnelliana
|
14
(in woodland)
|
0
|
14
|
-
Very
rare in Hong Kong;
-
Listed
in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong
Kong, of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China;
-
Recorded
in China Plant Red Data Book;
-
Scheduled under
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Ranked
as Vulnerable (VU) under IUCN Red List
|
Diospyros vaccinioides
|
6
(2 in woodland and 4 in shrub-grassland)
|
0
|
6
|
-
Very
common in Hong Kong;
-
Listed
as Critically Endangered (CR) in IUCN Red List
|
Geodorum densiflorum
|
5
(in woodland)
|
0
|
5
|
-
Scheduled under
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Scheduled
under Protection of Endangered Species
of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);
-
Ranked
as Vulnerable (VU) in The Wild Orchards
of Hong Kong
|
Gleditsia australis
|
1
(in woodland)
|
0
|
1
|
-
Rare
native species in Hong Kong
|
Nepenthes mirabilis
|
28
(along stream)
|
0
|
28
|
-
Common
in Hong Kong;
-
Scheduled under
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Scheduled
under Protection of Endangered Species
of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);
-
Listed
in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong
Kong, of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China
|
Pyrenaria spectabilis
|
26
(24 in woodland; 2 in urban area)
|
0
|
26
|
-
Scheduled under
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.)
|
Rhodoleia
championii
|
1
(in woodland)
|
0
|
1
|
-
Very
rare in Hong Kong;
-
Scheduled under
Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Listed
in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong
Kong, of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China
|
Reference
source:
(1) Hong
Kong Plant Database of AFCD Herbarium (Online version at http://www.herbarium.gov.hk/Search_Form.aspx) (accessed in April 2019)
(2) Rare
and Precious Plants of Hong Kong (Online version at http://www.herbarium.gov.hk/PublicationsPreface.aspx?BookNameId=1&ContentId=48&SectionId=3)
(accessed in April 2019)
(3)
IUCN Red List (Online version at http://www.iucnredlist.org/) (accessed
in April 2019)
(4)
Hong Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status (Corlett et al, 2000)
(5) The Wild Orchards of Hong Kong (Barretto et al,
2011)
|
8.5.10
Locations
of the floral species of conservation interest are indicated in Figure 8.1 with close-up plans in Figure 8.1a-b. Representative photographic records of each recorded
species of conservation interest are illustrated in Appendix 8.2 (Table B).
8.5.11
Except
Camellia sinensis,
all the other four floral species of conservation interest identified in TM54
EIA (Table 8.1) were rediscovered in the same woodland at
W2. Three individuals of Pyrenaria spectabilis
were also found in woodland W3 near a stream, which matched the description of
AFCD findings reported in TM54 EIA.
8.5.12
Majority
of the floral species of conservation interest and their individuals were
identified offsite (Table 8.4) except three Aquilaria sinensis were found within the
Project Site in woodland W3 near Po Tong Ha (Figure 8.1a). A total of 319 floral species were identified
within the Project Site and Aquilaria sinensis is the only one floral species of conservation
interest (Appendix 8.3).
Woodland
8.5.13
All
the woodlands W1-5 were termed as secondary woodland throughout TM54 EIA, its
EIA Review Reports and the two related PERs. However,
findings from current ecological surveys suggested that these woodlands can be further
categorised into three woodland types for their different vegetation
composition and origination. With the additional W6 and W7 covered by this
assessment area, a total of 4 types of woodland were classified:
- Mature Secondary woodland
(W2);
- Mixed Woodland
(mixture of plantation woodland and secondary woodland) (W1, W3 and W4);
- Secondary woodland
(W5);
- Plantation Woodland
(W6 and W7)
Mature
Secondary Woodland (W2)
8.5.14
W2 is
a small woodland area of about 2.7ha. The most dominant tree species in this
woodland is Endospermum chinense,
while other common tree species in the habitat include Aporusa dioica, Cratoxylum
cochinchinense, Mallotus paniculatus, Microcos nervosa, Schima superba, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. Common plants in the understorey include Ardisia crenata, Ardisia quinquegona, Mallotus repandus and Psychotria asiatica.
A total of 104 floral species were identified in this woodland and six of them
are species of conservation interest, including Aquilaria sinensis, Camellia crapnelliana, Diospyros vaccinioides,
Gleditsia australis, Pyrenaria
spectabilis and Rhodoleia championii,
of which Aquilaria sinensis,
Camellia crapnelliana, Pyrenaria
spectabilis and Rhodoleia championii
were identified previously in TM54 EIA (Table 8.1). Diospyros vaccinioides
and Gleditsia australis
are new records to this woodland. Diospyros
vaccinioides is a small shrub found at the
eastern end of the woodland while Gleditsia
australis identified in the woodland is a mature tree
of the species (Plate B5 in Appendix 8.2). Camellia
crapnelliana, Gleditsia australis
and Rhodoleia championii are rare species in Hong Kong and their
presence indicates the woodland would be of ecological interest.
8.5.15
The
overall high maturity of the dominant fung shui wood (FSW)-restricted species Endospermum chinense and the presence of the floral species of conservation interest
with relatively high abundance in such a small woodland area (2.7ha) suggested
that W2 can be considered as a mature secondary woodland of notable botanical
and ecological interest, different from those ordinary secondary woodland such
as W5 commonly seen in the countryside.
8.5.16
Michelia macclurei, Pinus morrisonicola
and Fokienia hodginsii
previously mentioned in
TM54 EIA were not found in this woodland. Michelia macclurei is an introduced species probably
planted locally by villagers for ornamental use. Pinus morrisonicola and Fokienia hodginsii would be planted for the same reason as Michelia macclurei, as
suggested in TM54 EIA. Two trees of Michelia macclurei (Plate
D1 in Appendix 8.2) however, were identified at roadside
along a road access linking to a graveyard at the edge of the adjacent woodland
W3 but not in woodland W2.
Mixed
Woodland (W1, W3, and W4)
8.5.17
This
type of mixed woodland is co-dominated by plantation woodland species and self-seeded
native species commonly found in secondary woodlands. Woodlands W1, W3 and W4 are
classified as this woodland type. All of these
woodlands are originated from plantation woodland established by active tree planting
and further develop into current state through natural colonisation of those
largely native self-seeded pioneers.
W1
8.5.18
W1 is
a small woodland of about 1.5ha in size and located south of W2 near Tong Hang
Road. Its vegetation is co-dominated by common plantation species including
mainly Castanopsis fissa and Casuarina equisetifolia;
and secondary woodland species including Aporusa dioica, Bridelia tomentosa, Celtis sinensis, Dimocarpus longan, Macaranga tanarius, Microcos nervosa, Schefflera heptaphylla
and Syzygium jambos. The
FSW restricted Endospermum chinense can
also observed here but of abundance lower than that in W2 and believed to be
natural colonisation of the species from the adjacent W2. Aquilaria sinensis was found at southwest
of the woodland, which is a floral species of conservation interest.
8.5.19
A
total of 65 floral species were recorded and one of which (i.e. Aquilaria
sinensis) is a species of conservation interest.
W3
8.5.20
W3 is
the largest woodland (27.2ha) in the assessment area. It situates on the hill
slopes northwest of Po Tong Ha. Almost half of its portion falls within Tsing
Shan Firing Range. Its vegetation is co-dominated by common plantation species
and secondary woodland species. Dominant plantation woodland includes mainly Eucalyptus citriodora,
Eucalyptus exserta, Eucalyptus tereticornis
and Lophostemon confertus; while
common native secondary woodland species includes Acronychia pedunculata, Aporusa dioica,
Celtis sinensis, Macaranga tanarius, Mallotus paniculatus, Microcos nervosa,
Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata.
8.5.21
Quite
numerous graves were observed in this woodland, in particular
in areas north of Po Tong Ha and north of W2. Therefore, major human
disturbance would include burning and vegetation clearance / grass trimming for
grave-sweeping activities or construction of new graves.
8.5.22
A
total of 193 floral species were identified and four of which are species of
conservation interest, including Aquilaria
sinensis, Diospyros vaccinioides,
Pyrenaria spectabilis and Geodorum densiflorum. As indicated in Figure 8.1, Aquilaria
sinensis are widely distributed within the
woodland. According to the field survey findings, most of them are seedlings
with few young trees of trunk diameter 100-180mm. However, one of the recorded
individuals located west of Po Tong Ha is a mature specimen of trunk diameter
about 400mm (Plate D2 in Appendix 8.2).
W4
8.5.23
Vegetation
composition of Woodland W4 is similar to that of W3, but the two habitats are physically
separated by other habitats and land uses (Figure 8.1). It is also a mixed woodland co-dominated
by plantation woodland species and secondary woodland species. Dominant
plantation woodland species in W4 includes mainly Acacia confusa, Eucalyptus citriodora and Lophostemon confertus, while secondary woodland species includes Aporusa dioica, Celtis sinensis, Dimocarpus longan, Macaranga tanarius, Mallotus paniculatus, Microcos nervosa,
Schefflera heptaphylla and Syzygium jambos.
8.5.24
A
total of 59 floral species were identified. No floral species of conservation
interest were identified in W4.
Secondary
Woodland (W5)
8.5.25
W5 is
located at Chung Shan at the northern portion of the assessment area and found
to be fragmented into several patches by a shrub-grassland and some village
areas and road access. The largest two patches situate on the eastern and
western hillslopes of Chung Shan. Most of the woodland falls within the CA
zoning on Lam Tei and Yick
Yuen OZP No. S/TM-LTYY/10 as revealed in Section 8.4.
8.5.26
This
habitat is dominated by native tree species widely seen in lowland secondary
woodland, including Aporusa dioica, Celtis sinensis, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea glutinosa, Litsea monopetala, Macaranga tanarius, Mallotus paniculatus, Microcos nervosa,
Pinus massoniana, Schefflera heptaphylla
and Sterculia lanceolata. Eight
individuals of Aquilaria sinensis were identified in the woodland.
8.5.27
A
total of 117 floral species were recorded and one of which (i.e. Aquilaria
sinensis) is a species of conservation interest.
Plantation
Woodland (W6)
8.5.28
W6 is a
plantation woodland dominated by Acacia confusa with some irregular distribution of orchards
along the edge of the habitat. Apart from the dominant tree species Acacia confusa,
other occasionally common species include Artocarpus heterophyllus, Aporusa dioica, Celtis sinensis, Dimocarpus longan, Litchi chinensis, and
Syzygium jambos.
8.5.29
A
total of 100 floral species were identified. No floral species of conservation
interest were identified in W6.
Plantation
Woodland (W7)
8.5.30
W7 is
located at southeast of the assessment area near Fu Tai Estate. The vegetation
of this woodland is rather simple, which is found almost dominated by Acacia confusa
and Lophostemon confertus.
8.5.31
A
total of 37 floral species were identified and none of them were species of
conservation interest.
Shrub-grassland
8.5.32
This
habitat is located on hillside area at north-western portion of the assessment
area and most of the habitat falls within Tsing Shan Firing Range. The
vegetation is dominated by shrubs and herbs. Common plants include Baeckea frutescens,
Desmos chinensis, Dicranopteris
pedata, Ilex asprella, Imperata cylindrica, Ischaemum barbatum, Litsea rotundifolia, Mallotus apelta, Melastoma sanguineum, Miscanthus sinensis, Neyraudia reynaudiana, Panicum maximum, Phyllanthus cochinchinensis, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Rhus hypoleuca, Sageretia thea and Zanthoxylum avicennae.
8.5.33
A
total of 91 floral species were identified and two of them were species of
conservation interest, which include Aquilaria
sinensis and Diospyros
vaccinioides.
Landscape
Plantation
8.5.34
This
habitat refers to artificially vegetated areas created for landscaping of engineered
slopes along urban fringe. Routine maintenance mainly by grass trimming would
be carried out on the modified terrain surface. Two patches of this habitat
were found along the downslopes of woodlands W4 and W6 at the western edge of
the assessment area. A total of 53 floral species were identified in this
habitat. Common plants include Acacia confusa, Aleurites moluccana, Bauhinia blakeana,
Casuarina equisetifolia, Chukrasia
tabularis, Eucalyptus torelliana,
Macaranga tanarius, Melaleuca cajuputi
and Senna siamea.
8.5.35
No
floral species of conservation interest were identified.
Agricultural
Land
8.5.36
Agricultural
lands were found at fragmented areas near Hong Po Road and a larger one near Fu
Tai Estate south of Yuen Long Highway and cultivated as active dry agricultural
land during surveys in 2018. A total of 60 floral species were recorded and as
expected, common plants are all crop species such as Allium fistulosum, Allium tuberosum,
Amaranthus tricolor, Brassica rapa,
Dioscorea alata, Hibiscus
sabdariffa, Ipomoea batatas, Musa x paradisiaca,
Saccharum officinarum and Solanum melongena.
8.5.37
No
floral species of conservation interest were identified.
Watercourse
(Natural Stream, Semi-natural Stream and Drainage Channel)
8.5.38
There
are three types of watercourses identified within the assessment area, viz. natural
stream, semi-natural stream and drainage channel. Natural stream in this EIA
refers to the natural watercourses without human interference/modification,
while semi-natural stream refers to those with some extent of artificial
modification for either drainage or agricultural purposes, and drainage channel
are wholly engineered structures channelized for drainage function and flood
control of the area.
8.5.39
The
watercourses are grouped into three networks N1-N3 (Figure 8.2) under the study. N1 refers to the watercourse
network around Hong Po Road, which comprises watercourses R1a-R1k. This network
is comparatively complete without major broken sections or physical separations.
This network N1comprises natural streams R1a-R1e and R1k at the most upper
course along ravines on the hill, with semi-natural streams R1f-R1g and R1i at
the mid-section along mainly village areas, and drainage channel R1h and R1j at
the lower course. The waterflow of this water network N1 is finally directed
into Tuen Mun Drainage Channel at section near Lam Tei Interchange. Water network N2 refers to those relatively
shorter R2a-d, R3a-b and R4a-d around Po Tong Ha, R5a at woodland W6 and the
isolated drainage channel R5 and R6. This network is characterised by the large
separation of the watercourse between the upstream and downstream. The waters
of R2a-d, R3a-b and R4a-d are immediately ended in developed area downstream
which covered by habitats of village area and urban area and subsequently directed
into an isolated drainage channel R5 or other underground culverts through the urban
underground drainage systems. N3 refers to mainly the Tuen
Mun Drainage Channel R7 and its associated tributary channels near Yuen Long
Highway.
Natural Streams in N1 (R1a, R1b, R1c, R1d,
R1e and R1k)
8.5.40
Six natural
streams (R1a-e and R1k) are identified in water network N1 (Figure 8.1-8.2). All
of them are rocky streams located at uphill area along ravines. Probably due to
the difficult terrain and restriction in accessibility for their location
within Tsing Shan Firing Range, these watercourses were found well preserved
with high naturalness. Waterflow was observed to be continuous during the wet
season in June to September 2018 and became intermittent during dry season in
October to November 2018. In terms of size within the assessment area, R1a and
R1b are the two largest natural streams. R1a is watercourse of about 520m in
length and 13m in width, while R1b with 430m in length and 6m in width. The
other four natural streams R1c-R1d and R1k are small, of length about 208m,
100m, 370m and 180m, with average width about 4m, 5m, 3.5m and 4m respectively.
8.5.41
Common
riparian plants along the natural streams include Baeckea frutescens, Dicranopteris
pedata, Gahnia tristis, Ischaemum barbatum, Lepidosperma chinense, Litsea rotundifolia, Melastoma sanguineum, Microcos nervosa,
Miscanthus floridulus, Nepenthes mirabilis, Pogonatherum crinitum and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, of
which Nepenthes mirabilis is a
species of conservation interest. As indicated in Figure 8.1, majority (24 individuals) of the Nepenthes mirabilis was identified at natural
stream in R1a, and few (4 individuals) at natural stream in R1b. No floral
species of conservation interest were identified in other natural streams of N1
(i.e. R1c-e and R1k).
Natural Stream in N2 (R2a, R2b, R2d, R3a,
R3b, R4a and R5a)
8.5.42
Natural
streams in N2 include R2a, R2b, R2d, R3a, R3b and R4a. R2-a-b were not
identified in TM54 EIA but added later in SHR PER and HPR PER. Both are short
watercourses of small size (of about 88m and 87m in length respectively for R2a
and R2b; and 2.5m in width). R2a and R2d were found as dry channels without any
waterflow even nor stagnant pool (Plate A17 and A19 of Appendix 8.2) during both wet and dry seasons from June to November 2018. Small
water pools were observed at some locations of natural streams R2b and R3a-b (Plate
A18, 20-21 of Appendix
8.2) but no notable
waterflow was observed throughout both wet and dry seasons from June to
November 2018. R3a comprises two stream sections and merges together at area
near the proposed Road L7 at downstream. R3a is comparatively
larger than R2a and R2b, of about 628m in total length with average
width 3.5m. R3b of 240m in length is located near R3a with similar hydrological
condition to R3a. No water flow was observed in both wet and dry seasons and
most of its channel was observed to be dried out (Plate A21 of Appendix 8.2) during both wet and dry seasons in 2018.
8.5.43
In
contrast, natural stream in R4a is the only one with continuous water flow in
wet season and intermittent flow in dry season. It is a watercourse of about 420m
in length with average width of about 5.5m.
8.5.44
R5a
are an isolated group of small and short stream sections located within
woodland W6. Their length ranges from 120m to 180m with average width about 1.8-3m.
8.5.45
A
total of 80 floral species were identified but none of them were species of
conservation interest. Common riparian plants include Alocasia macrorrhizos, Aporusa
dioica, Blechnum orientale, Desmos chinensis, Ficus hispida, Mallotus paniculatus, Microcos nervosa, Microstegium ciliatum, Psychotria asiatica, Rhaphiolepis indica and Schefflera
heptaphylla.
Semi-natural Stream in N1 (R1f, R1g and
R1i)
8.5.46
All
the three semi-natural streams R1f, R1g and R1i in N1 are located at immediate
lower course of the natural streams in R1a-b, R1c-d and R1e respectively and
runs through areas of rural villages and some industrial undertakings. Major
human modification would be the strengthening of the bank to stabilise the
adjacent farmland, village houses or other artificial structures, while their
natural alignments are largely maintained. Apart from structural modifications,
significant human disturbance to these watercourses was the direct domestic
discharge from village area and chemical effluents or run-off from industrial
undertakings. Milky water and unpleasant odour were frequently noted during the
survey period in 2018. Amongst the three semi-natural streams in N1, R1f is the
largest one, of about 812m in total length with about 6m in width. R1f
comprises two short tributaries at downstream of R1a and R1b before converging
into its main watercourse near HPR Site, and its water finally discharges into
the drainage channel R1h. Part of its middle section of about 264m will be
located within the Project Site under the latest layout. R1g is second largest
in N1, of about 716m in total length with average width about 3.5m. Its flowing
pattern is similar to R1f, comprises two upstream
tributaries with feeding waters from R1c and R1d before converging into its
main watercourse near SHR Site and finally joins the downstream drainage
channel of R1h. Whole R1g will be located outside the proposed Project Site.
R1i is a very short watercourse located within the Project Site of about 92m in
length and 2m in width.
8.5.47
A
total of 66 floral species were identified along these watercourses. Common
riparian plants include Alocasia macrorrhizos,
Alternanthera philoxeroides, Bidens
alba, Commelina diffusa, Microstegium ciliatum, Mikania micrantha, Panicum maximum, Panicum repens,
Paspalum conjugatum
and Pennisetum purpureum. No species of conservation
interest were identified.
Semi-natural Stream in N2 (R2c, R4b, R4c
and R4d)
8.5.48
R2c
and R4b are two short sections of semi-natural streams identified at lower
course of R2b and R4a. R4c-d are longer semi-natural streams in this network
which were not identified in previous TM54 EIA nor the PERs.
Most of their riparian areas had been modified for fruit tree planting, other
agricultural use or flood control. Similar to those
found in N1, these watercourses were subject to water pollution from domestic
discharge indicated by the unpleasant odour.
8.5.49
A
total of 46 floral species were identified. Common riparian plants include Alocasia macrorrhizos, Bidens alba, Ipomoea cairica,
Macaranga tanarius, Microstegium
ciliatum, Mikania micrantha
and Panicum maximum. No species of
conservation interest were identified.
Drainage Channel
(R1h, R1j, R5, R6 and R7)
8.5.50
The
major habitat of this type within the assessment area is Tuen
Mun River Channel (TMRC) running almost in parallel to Tuen
Mun Road (Figure 8.1-8.2) which is labelled as R7 in water network
N3. R1h is channelized sections of watercourses at downstream of R1g and R1f,
while R1j is a very short section currently used as village drainage. R5 and R6
are isolated channel sections located at Tsz Tin Road, which receives water
from R2a-c, R3a-b, and R4b-d through some underground drainage systems. Apart from R7 located in N3, all other
identified drainage channels are located downstream of water network N1-2. No
major vegetation coverage was found except some weeds or self-seed pioneers
growing from cracks or climbing on the concrete banks such as Bidens alba, Brachiaria
mutica, Leucaena leucocephala,
Mikania micrantha, Paspalum conjugatum, Panicum
maximum and Sporobolus fertilis.
8.5.51
A
total of 38 floral species were identified but none of them were species of
conservation interest.
Pond
8.5.52
Totally
four pond areas were identified within the assessment area. Three small ponds
were identified near Tsing Chuen Wai, which comprise
two irrigation ponds and one abandoned fishpond. One tiny fung
shui pond probably maintained for religious
belief was identified within a grave area enclosed by village houses near Tsz
Tin Road. A total of 11 floral species
were found along the pond bunds and none of them were species of conservation
interest. Common species include Alternanthera
philoxeroides, Brachiaria mutica, Gnaphalium pensylvanicum,
Ipomoea aquatica and Panicum maximum.
Village
/ Orchard
8.5.53
This
refers to habitat constituted by mixture of rural village areas and orchards in
mosaic pattern, with some scattered agricultural lands. Therefore, vegetation includes
mainly fruit trees and self-seeded native pioneers, such as Artocarpus heterophyllus, Averrhoa carambola,
Bridelia tomentosa, Carica papaya, Celtis sinensis, Clausena lansium, Dimocarpus longan, Eriobotrya japonica, Litchi
chinensis, Manilkara zapota, Musa x paradisiaca,
Psidium guajava, Sterculia nobilis and Syzygium jambos.
8.5.54
Totally
179 floral species were recorded in this habitat, in which Aquilaria sinensis was one species of
conservation interest. Four individuals of Aquilaria
sinensis were found at area north of the private
residential estate Villa Pinada.
Village Area
8.5.55
This
refers to rural residential areas with much higher building density than
village / orchard and most of the ground areas have been paved without major
vegetation cover. It also included some paved open storage area.
8.5.56
Totally
112 floral species were recorded in this habitat but none of them were species
of conservation interest. Common plants include Alocasia macrorrhizos, Bidens
alba, Carica papaya, Ipomoea cairica,
Leucaena leucocephala, Macaranga tanarius,
Mikania micrantha, Paederia
scandens, Panicum maximum and Wedelia trilobata.
Urban
Area
8.5.57
This
is the largest (258.8ha) habitat type dominating almost the south-eastern half
of the assessment area, which comprises mainly residential built-up areas and
associated infrastructures as well as some active construction sites and
wastelands. Vegetation in this habitat therefore are mainly roadside amenity
planting, isolated landscape planting within built-up areas and self-seeded
weeds.
8.5.58
A
total of 115 floral species were identified. Some common recorded plants
include Aglaia odorata,
Aleurites moluccana, Archontophoenix alexandrae,
Bauhinia blakeana, Bidens
alba, Calliandra haematocephala,
Duranta erecta, Fagraea ceilanica, Ficus microcarpa, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Imperata cylindrica, Ipomoea cairica,
Ixora stricta, Leucaena leucocephala, Melaleuca cajuputi, Mikania micrantha,
Panicum maximum, Peltophorum tonkinense,
Plumeria rubra, Roystonea regia, Schefflera arboricola and Wedelia trilobata. Two
trees of Pyrenaria spectabilis
were identified in a fenced off tree protection area in CEDD’s site formation
works area for Site 1 & 1A (Agreement No. CV/2015/03) southwest of Po Tong
Ha near woodland W2 and tagged as A2487 and A2488 respectively. These two
individuals were the records of this species found in SHR PER and HPR PER.
Fauna
Community
Mammals
8.5.60
A
total of three mammals were recorded during ecological baseline surveys (Appendix
8.4). Except Eurasian Wild Pig ( Sus scrofa), the other two are species of conservation
interest, despite they are very common in Hong Kong.
8.5.61
A
total of 3 insectivorous bats of Microchiroptera were found flying in village/
orchard area, near a section of semi-natural stream at R1f within Project Site.
8.5.62
A scat
of East Asian Porcupine ( Hystrix brachyura)
was detected in woodland W3 near natural stream R1e outside the Project Site.
8.5.63
Photographic
records of mammal species of conservation interest are captured in Appendix
8.2.
Birds
8.5.64
A
total of 29 bird species were recorded (Appendix
8.4). All are common and abundant species in
Hong Kong. They are dominated by urban birds including Chinese Bulbul (Pycnonotus sinensis), Crested
Myna (Acridotheres cristatellus), Domestic Pigeon (Columba livia), Eurasian Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus), House Swift (Apus nipalensis), Red-whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) and Spotted Dove (Spilopelia chinensis).
8.5.65
Little
Egret (Egretta garzetta) is
the only bird species of conservation interest observed. Two individuals were
standing in the northern section of Tuen Mun Drainage
Channel R7, which is surrounded by village area/ orchard rather than by urbanized
area as the southern section.
8.5.66
Other
6 bird species of conservation interest recorded by previous studies, i.e.
Chinese Pond Heron, Crested Goshawk, Greater Coucal,
Chinese Hwamei, Black Kite and Common Buzzard were not detected by current
surveys.
8.5.67
Photographic
records of bird species of conservation interest are captured in Appendix
8.2.
Herpetofauna
8.5.68
A
total of 5 herpetofauna species were recorded (Appendix
8.4). Asian Common Toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus), Brown Tree Frog (Polypedates megacephalus),
Changeable Lizard (Calotes versicolor) and Chinese Gecko (Gekko chinensis)
are widely distributed, while Chinese Forest Skink (Ateuchosaurus chinensis) is
locally uncommon.
8.5.69
There
was no herpetofauna species of conservation importance detected.
Butterflies & Odonates
8.5.70
A
total of 12 butterfly species were recorded (Appendix
8.4). All of them are either common or very
common species. They are Common Grass Yellow (Eurema hecabe), Common Mormon (Papilio polytes), Common
Sailer (Neptis hylas), Dark-brand Bush Brown (Mycalesis mineus), Formosan Swift (Borbo cinnara), Indian
Cabbage White (Pieris canidia),
Large Faun (Faunis eumeus), Lemon
Emigrant (Catopsilia pomona), Pale
Grass Blue (Pseudozizeeria maha), Punchinello
(Zemeros flegyas), Red-base
Jezebel (Delias pasithoe) and
Spangle (Papilio protenor).
8.5.71
There
was no butterfly species of conservation importance detected.
8.5.72
A
total of 8 odonate species were recorded (Appendix
8.4). All are common or abundant in Hong Kong.
They are Blue Percher (Diplacodes trivialis), Common Blue Skimmer (Orthetrum glaucum), Common
Bluetail ( Ischnura senegalensis), Orange-tailed Midget (Agriocnemis
femina), Orange-tailed Sprite (Ceriagrion auranticum), Variegated
Flutterer (Rhyothemis variegata), Wandering
Glider (Pantala flavescens)
and Yellow Featherlegs (Copera marginipes).
8.5.73
No
species of conservation interest was identified.
8.5.74
The damselfly species Ischnura
rufostigma was not detected within the assessment
area during our field surveys, despite extra efforts have been paid around the recorded
location at Tsing Lun Road.
Aquatic
Fauna
8.5.75
A
total of 2 fish and 7 aquatic invertebrate species were identified (Appendix
8.4) during the ecological baseline surveys. Most
of them are common in Hong Kong.
8.5.76
Two
endemic freshwater crab species are considered with conservation interest. Three
localities with total 5 individuals of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon were detected in semi-natural stream R1f. Four out of 5 individuals
from two localities were observed outside the Project Site;
while the most downstream one was located within the Project Site. Among the three localities, mating
behaviour was observed at the most upstream one (Appendix
8.2).
8.5.77
A
total of 12 Somanniathelphusa zanklon from
four localities were observed outside the Project Site. Four of them were
detected at the recorded locality at the natural stream R1a; 5 were detected from two localities in
semi-natural stream R1f; while another 3 were observed from one locality at semi-natural
stream R1g near Villa Pinada.
8.5.78
The
exotic Mosquito Fish (Gambusia affinis),
Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Apple Snail (Pomacea canaliculata)
are highly invasive to local aquatic community.
Table 8.5 - Faunal Species of Conservation Interest
Species
|
Quantity
(Offsite
Record)
|
Quantity
(Onsite
Record)
|
Total
Quantity
|
Remarks
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
(a) Mammal
|
Insectivorous Bat
of Microchiroptera
|
0
|
3
-
3 flying in village/orchard
|
3
|
-
Scheduled under Cap 170;
-
Flying over and no roosting site detected
|
East Asian Porcupine
(Hystrix brachyura)
|
1
-
1 in woodland (W3)
|
0
|
1
|
-
Scheduled under Cap 170
|
Bird
|
Little Egret
(Egretta
garzetta)
|
2
- 2 in drainage channel
|
0
|
2
|
-
Scheduled under Cap 170;
-
Locally
common;
-
Regional
Concern
|
Aquatic Fauna
|
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
|
4
4 in semi-natural stream of N1
(from 2 localities)
|
1
- 1 in semi-natural stream of N1
(from 1 localities)
|
5
|
-
Ranked
as Vulnerable (VU) species under IUCN Red List
-
Endemic;
-
Potential
Global Concern
|
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
12
-
8
in semi-natural stream of N1;
4 in natural stream of N1
(from 4 localities)
|
0
|
12
|
-
Ranked
as Endangered (EN) species under IUCN Red List
-
Endemic;
-
Global
Concern
|
Reference
source:
(1) Wild Animals
Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
(2)
Wild animals to watch: terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation
concern in Hong Kong (Fellowes et al, 2002)
(3) The IUCN Red List
of Threatened Species (http://www.iucnredlist.org/)
(4) Distribution,
habitat utilisation and conservation status of the freshwater crab, Somanniathelphusa
zanklon , endemic to Hong
Kong (Stanton and Leven, 2016)
(5) Distribution of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon, a
freshwater crab endemic to Hong Kong (Stanton et al., 2017)
|
8.6.1
Evaluation
of the identified habitats and species of conservation interest are given in
the tables below:
Table 8.6 - Habitat
Evaluation – Woodland (Mixed Woodland)
Criteria
|
Woodland (Mixed
Woodland)
(W1)
|
Woodland (Mixed
Woodland)
(W3)
|
Woodland (Mixed
Woodland)
(W4)
|
Naturalness
|
Mixed
woodland (mixture of plantation woodland and secondary woodland).
Semi-natural habitat, originated from artificial
plantation woodland.
|
Size
|
Small
(1.5ha)
|
Large
(27.2ha)
|
Medium
(9.6ha)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Medium-low in flora species and low in fauna
species diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Habitat type is fairly common
in Hong Kong.
The recorded Aquilaria sinensis is a
plant species of conservation interest, which is a common species in Hong
Kong.
No rare faunal species were identified.
Chinese Hwamei (Garrulax canorus) was identified from
literature review and it is a common bird species in Hong Kong.
|
Habitat type is fairly common
in Hong Kong.
Aquilaria sinensis, Diospyros vaccinioides,
Pyrenaria spectabilis and
Geodorum densiflorum were the four recorded floral species of
conservation interest, of which Aquilaria
sinensis, Diospyros vaccinioides
are common in Hong Kong, while Pyrenaria spectabilis and Geodorum densiflorum are restricted species in the territory.
East Asian Porcupine
is mammal species of conservation interest, but it is very common in Hong
Kong.
Greater Coucal (Centropus sinensis) was identified from
literature review, which is a common bird species in Hong Kong.
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Re-creatable from artificial origin of plantation
woodland if time is given for natural colonization of secondary woodland
species
|
Fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecologically linked with adjacent woodland W2
|
Ecologically linked with adjacent woodland W2, natural
streams and shrub-grasslands
|
Ecologically linked with adjacent shrub-grasslands
|
Potential Value
|
The habitat value is limited by its small size
and the surrounding developed areas
|
Certain
areas of W3 was observed under constant human disturbance such as burning and
vegetation clearance / grass trimming for grave-sweeping activities and
construction of new graves;
The habitat value could be enhanced with higher
maturity of the native secondary woodland plant species
|
The habitat value could be enhanced with higher
maturity of the native secondary woodland plant species
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
Moderate;
Over 30 years
|
Moderate;
Over 30 years
|
Moderate;
Over 30 years
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Low
|
Medium
|
Medium-Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.7 - Habitat
Evaluation – Woodland (Mature Secondary Wood)
Criteria
|
Woodland (Mature Secondary Wood)
(W2)
|
Naturalness
|
Largely
natural with sign of early human modification indicated by the presence of
fruit trees and ornamentals
|
Size
|
Small
(2.7ha)
|
Diversity
|
Medium-low in flora diversity and low in fauna species
diversity
|
Rarity
|
Mature secondary woodland with high abundance of Fung
Shui wood-restricted species is uncommon in Hong Kong;
Six floral species of conservation interest were
identified, including Aquilaria sinensis, Camellia crapnelliana,
Diospyros vaccinioides, Gleditsia australis, Pyrenaria spectabilis and Rhodoleia championii. Of which Aquilaria sinensis,
Diospyros vaccinioides are common species in
Hong Kong, while Pyrenaria spectabilis
is a restricted species. Gleditsia australis is rare species while Camellia crapnelliana and Rhodoleia championii
are very rare in Hong Kong.
No rare faunal species were identified.
Greater Coucal (Centropus sinensis)
was identified from literature review and it is a common bird species in Hong
Kong.
|
Re-creativity
|
Difficult to be re-created.
|
Fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecologically linked with adjacent woodlands W1 and
W3
|
Potential Value
|
High
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
Mature;
Over 60 years
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
High
|
Note: the ranking order of overall ecological value
of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low, Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.8 -
Habitat Evaluation – Secondary Woodland and Plantation Woodland
Criteria
|
Woodland
(Secondary Woodland)
(W5)
|
Woodland (Plantation
Woodland)
(W6)
|
Woodland
(Plantation Woodland)
(W7)
|
Naturalness
|
Largely
natural, with sign of human modification indicated by the presence of fruit
trees and ornamentals
|
Modified
habitat originated from abandoned orchard
|
Artificial
habitat for landscaping of natural terrains
|
Size
|
Medium
(10.2ha)
|
Medium
(19.2ha)
|
Small
(0.3ha)
|
Diversity
|
Medium-low in flora diversity and low in fauna
species diversity
|
Medium-low in flora diversity and low in fauna
species diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Habitat type is common in Hong Kong.
The recorded Aquilaria sinensis is a
plant species of conservation interest, which is a common species in Hong
Kong.
No rare faunal species were identified.
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Requires long time to be re-created by woodland restoration
|
Requires long time to be re-created by woodland restoration
|
Re-created by afforestation
|
Fragmentation
|
Moderately
fragmented by roads, and shrub-grassland maintained by frequent hill fires.
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation (but presence as isolated small woodland patches within
assessment area)
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecologically linked with adjacent shrub-grassland
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
Potential Value
|
The habitat value could be enhanced with higher
maturity
|
The habitat value could be enhanced with higher
maturity
|
Current potential value is low due to monoculture
of exotic plantation species
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
Moderate;
Over 30 years
|
Moderate;
Around 40 years
|
Young;
Around 20-30 years
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.9 - Habitat Evaluation – Shrub-grassland, Landscape
Plantation and Agricultural Land
Criteria
|
Shrub-grassland
|
Landscape
Plantation
|
Agricultural
Land
|
Naturalness
|
Semi-natural,
some of its area is maintained by human induced hill fires.
|
Artificial
habitat for urban amenity and landscaping of built-up areas
|
Artificial
habitat for crop production
|
Size
|
Large
(62.3ha)
|
Medium
(7.5ha)
|
Medium
(3.6ha)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Habitat type is very common in Hong Kong.
Aquilaria sinensis and Diospyros vaccinioides,
were floral species of conservation interest, but both are common species
in Hong Kong.
No rare faunal species were identified.
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Re-creatable by active planting of suitable species
|
Readily re-creatable
|
Readily re-creatable
|
Fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation, but distribution scattered
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecological
linked with adjacent woodlands and natural streams
|
No
significant ecological linkage was identified
|
No
significant ecological linkage was identified
|
Potential Value
|
Potential value could be enhanced with natural
habitat succession and cease of hill fires
|
Low
due to prominent human disturbance
|
Low
due to prominent human disturbance
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
Moderate;
Over 30 years
|
Young;
Around 15 years
|
Young;
Around 10-20 years
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Low
|
Low
|
Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.10 - Habitat Evaluation – Natural Streams
Criteria
|
Natural Streams
(R1a-e, R1k in Water
Network N1)
|
Natural Streams
(R2a-b, R2d, R3a-b,
R4a and R5a in Water Network N2)
|
Naturalness
|
Natural
rocky streams, with continuous waterflow during wet season
|
Natural
rocky streams;
without
waterflow (R2a-b, R2d, R3a-b, R5a) during both wet and dry season in 2018,
except stream R4a in which waterflow was observed at wet season in 2018
|
Size
|
Small
area with medium length (0.7ha; of total length 1,812m)
|
Small
area with medium length (0.4ha; of total length 2,568m)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Habitat type is common in Hong Kong.
The recorded floral species of conservation
interest, Nepenthes mirabilis is a common
species in Hong Kong.
An endemic crab species Somanniathelphusa
zanklon was recorded.
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Upland rocky streams are difficult to be re-created
|
Upland rocky streams are difficult to be re-created
|
Fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
Low
fragmentation
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecological
linked with adjacent woodlands and shrub-grasslands
|
Ecological
linked with adjacent woodlands
|
Potential Value
|
Potential value is high, particularily
stream R1a where a large quantity of Nepenthes
mirabilis a floral species of conservation interest and a locality of Somanniathelphusa zanklon an endemic crab species were
identified.
|
Low,
indicated by the poor hydrological condition of these streams (except R4a
which had waterflow during wet season, all other streams in this network had
no waterflow throughout both wet and dry season of the year 2018.)
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
Potential breeding site for the endemic crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
No
information
|
No
information
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Medium-low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.11 - Habitat Evaluation – Semi-natural Stream
Criteria
|
Semi-natural Stream
(R1f, R1g and R1i Water Network N1)
|
Semi-natural Stream
(R2c, R4b,
R4c and R4d in Water Network N2)
|
Naturalness
|
Semi-natural lowland watercourse, with slight to moderate human
modifications for drainage, agricultural or geotechnical stability purposes
|
Semi-natural lowland watercourse, with slight to moderate human
modifications for drainage, agricultural or geotechnical stability purposes
|
Size
|
Small area with medium length (0.5ha; of total length 1,620m):
-
R1f: 0.4ha (812m in length)
-
R1g: 0.1ha (716m in length)
-
R1i: 0.0ha (130m²; 92m in length)
|
Small area and short in length (0.2ha; of total length 616m)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species
diversity
|
Low in both floral and faunal species
diversity
|
Rarity
|
Moderately common habitat, but declining due to
continuous channelization works for drainage and flood control of the
territory.
Little
Egret (Egretta garzetta) identified
from literature review is a common bird species in Hong Kong.
Two endemic crab species Somanniathelphusa zanklon
and Cryptopotamon anacoluthon were recorded in R1f and R1g.
|
Moderately common habitat, but declining due to
continuous channelization works for drainage and flood control of the
territory;
and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Lowland watercourse
could be re-created by habitat restoration or re-creation
|
Lowland watercourse
could be re-created by habitat restoration or re-creation
|
Fragmentation
|
No fragmentation
|
Low fragmentation
|
Ecological Linkage
|
Ecological linked with natural stream at their upper courses
|
Ecological linked with natural stream at their upper courses
|
Potential Value
|
Potential value is limited by the prominent human disturbance, in particular water pollution by direct domestic discharge
and/or chemical discharge.
|
Low, due to prominent human disturbance, in
particular water pollution by direct domestic discharge and/or
chemical discharge and small size of the habitat
|
Nursery / Breeding
Ground
|
R1f and R1g are potential breeding site
for the endemic crab Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
No information
|
No information
|
Abundance/ Richness
of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological
Value
|
Medium-low (for R1f and R1g); Low (for R1i)
|
Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.12 - Habitat Evaluation – Drainage Channel and Pond
Criteria
|
Drainage Channel (R1h, R1j, R5, R6 and R7)
|
Pond
|
Naturalness
|
Wholly
artificial habitat for drainage and flood control
|
Artificial
habitat for agricultural/irrigation uses or fung
shui purpose
|
Size
|
Medium
area with long length
(3.9ha;
4,540m in total length)
|
Small
(0.2ha)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded;
Little
Egret (Egretta garzetta) was recorded and it is a common species in Hong Kong.
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus) identified from literature review is a
very common species in Hong Kong.
|
Common habitat; and no rare species recorded
|
Re-creativity
|
Readily re-creatable
|
Readily re-creatable
|
Fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
Ecological Linkage
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
Potential Value
|
The habitat value is limited due to completely
artificial structure and prominent water pollution
|
Low
due to small size and human disturbance
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
TMRC
was established in 1970s and is around 50 years; while others are recently
constructed in around 10-20 years
|
No
relevant information
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Low
|
Low
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.13 - Habitat Evaluation – Village/Orchard, Village
Area and Urban Area
Criteria
|
Village/Orchard
|
Village Area
|
Urban Area
|
Naturalness
|
Artificial
habitat, with scattered village houses, orchards and some small agricultural
lands
|
Artificial
habitat, comprising mainly rural residential areas
|
Wholly
artificial habitat, dominating by highly urbanized land uses
|
Size
|
Large
(28.2ha)
|
Large
(90.0ha)
|
Large
(258.8ha)
|
Diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Low in both flora and fauna species diversity
|
Rarity
|
Common habitat and no rare species recorded.
The recorded Aquilaria sinensis is a
plant species of conservation interest, which is a common species in Hong Kong.
Insectivorous bat was recorded but the species is unknown.
Chinese Pond Heron (Ardeola bacchus),
Crested Goshawk (Accipiter trivirgatus), Greater Coucal
(Centropus sinensis)
and Chinese Hwamei (Garrulax canorus) were identified from
literature review. Except Crested Goshawk is uncommon, all the others are common species in Hong
Kong.
|
Common habitat and no rare species recorded.
|
Common habitat and no rare species recorded;
The recorded Pyrenaria spectabilis is a floral species of
conservation interest with restricted distribution in Hong Kong. The species
was identified in a tree protection area in a construction site;
The single individual of Ischnura
rufostigma collected at a road junction is a
rare damselfly species.
|
Re-creativity
|
Re-creatable
|
Re-creatable
|
Readily re-creatable
|
Fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
No
fragmentation
|
N/A
|
Ecological Linkage
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
No significant ecological linkage was identified
|
No significant ecological linkage
|
Potential Value
|
Low, due to human disturbance and anticipated
further village development
|
Low, due to much higher human disturbance than
village / orchard
|
Low,
due to heavy urbanization
|
Nursery / Breeding Ground
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
No recorded nursery / breeding sites
|
Age
|
Over
60 years
|
Range
from 10-40 years
|
Over
50 years
|
Abundance/ Richness of wildlife
|
Low
|
Low
|
Low
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Low
|
Negligible
|
Negligible
|
Note: the ranking order of
overall ecological value of habitat: High, Medium-High, Medium, Medium-Low,
Low, Negligible
|
Table 8.14 -
Evaluation of Floral Species of Conservation Interest
Species
|
Location
|
Conservation / Protection Status (1) (4) (5)
|
Distribution (1) (2) (3)
|
Rarity (3)
|
Aquilaria sinensis
|
- Onsite Record: 3
(in woodland)
- Offsite Record: 56 (48 in woodland; 4 in shrub-grassland and 4 in village/orchard)
|
-
Listed in AFCD’s
Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong,
of Near Threatened (NT) status in mainland China;
-
Scheduled under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);
-
Recorded
in China Plant Red Data Book and
Illustration of Rare & Endangered
Plant in Guangdong Province;
-
Ranked as
Vulnerable (VU) under IUCN Red List
|
Common in Hong Kong
|
Common
|
Camellia crapnelliana
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 14 (in woodland)
|
-
Listed in AFCD’s
Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong,
of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China;
-
Scheduled under Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Recorded
in China Plant Red Data Book;
-
Ranked as
Vulnerable (VU) under IUCN Red List
|
Mount Parker, Mau Ping
|
Very
Rare
|
Diospyros vaccinioides
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 6
(2 in woodland and 4 in shrub-grassland)
|
-
No protection
status in Hong Kong;
-
Ranked as
Critically Endangered (CR) under IUCN
Red List
|
Common in Hong Kong
|
Very
Common
|
Geodorum densiflorum
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 5
(in woodland)
|
-
Scheduled under Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub. leg.);
-
Scheduled under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586);
-
Ranked as
Vulnerable (VU) in The Wild Orchards of
Hong Kong
|
Wong Nai Chung,
Aberdeen, Sai Kung
|
Restricted
|
Gleditsia australis
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 1
(in woodland)
|
-
No protection
status in Hong Kong
|
Tai Hang, Wong Nai
Chung, Tai Wai, Tai Po
|
Rare
|
Nepenthes mirabilis
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 28
(in stream)
|
-
Listed in AFCD’s
Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong,
of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China;
-
Scheduled under Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Scheduled under Protection of Endangered Species of
Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586)
|
Tai Lam Chung, So Kwun Wat, Castle Peak, Lantau
Island;
Common in Hong Kong
|
Common
|
Pyrenaria spectabilis
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 26
(24 in woodland; and 2 in urban area)
|
-
Scheduled under Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.)
|
Hong Kong Island, Ma On
Shan, Tao Po, Kwai Tau Leng,
Wu Kau Tang, Lantau Island
|
Restricted
|
Rhodoleia championii
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 1
(in woodland)
|
-
Listed in AFCD’s
Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong,
of Vulnerable (VU) status in mainland China;
-
Scheduled under Forestry Regulations (Cap. 96 sub.
leg.);
-
Listed as Lower
Risk/Least Concern (LC) in IUCN Red List
|
Mount Nicholson, Mount Cameron, Aberdeen
|
Very
Rare
|
Reference source:
(1) Rare
and Precious Plants of Hong Kong (Online version at http://www.herbarium.gov.hk/PublicationsPreface.aspx?BookNameId=1&ContentId=48&SectionId=3)
(2) Flora of Hong Kong Vol 1-4 (AFCD, 2007-2011);
(3) Hong Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status (Corlett
et al, 2000)
(4) The
Wild Orchards of Hong Kong (Barretto et al, 2011)
(5) IUCN Red List
(Online version at http://www.iucnredlist.org/)
|
Table 8.15 - Evaluation of Faunal Species (Mammal) of
Conservation Interest
Species
|
Location
|
Conservation / Protection Status (1)
|
Distribution (1) (2)
|
Rarity (1) (2) (3)
|
East Asian Porcupine
(Hystrix brachyura)
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 1
(in woodland)
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Very
widely distributed in countryside areas throughout Hong Kong, except for
Lantau Island
|
Very common;
Potential Global Concern
|
Insectivorous Bat of Microchiroptera
|
Onsite Record: 3
-(in village/ orchard)
- Offsite record: none
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
|
Species
identification is unable to be made by direct observation at present surveys.
|
N/A
|
Reference
source:
(1)
Hong Kong Biodiversity Database (AFCD, 2020)
(2) A
Field Guide to the Terrestrial Mammals of Hong Kong (Shek,
2006)
(3) Wild animals to
watch: terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong
(Fellowes et al, 2002)
|
Table 8.16 - Evaluation
of Faunal Species (Bird) of Conservation Interest
Species
|
Location
|
Conservation / Protection Status (1) (2)
|
Distribution (2)
|
Rarity (2) (3)
|
|
Chinese Pond Heron
(Ardeola
bacchus)
|
This species was
identified in previous studies, but not observed in current surveys.
- Onsite Record: 1
(in drainage channel
recorded from literature review)
- Offsite record: 1
(in village/orchard
recorded from literature review)
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed
|
Common;
Potential Regional Concern
|
|
Crested Goshawk (Accipiter
trivirgatus)
|
This species was
identified in previous studies, but not observed in current surveys.
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite
record: 1
(in village/orchard)
|
-
Scheduled under Wild Animals Protection
Ordinance (Cap. 170)
-
Scheduled under Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants
Ordinance (Cap. 586)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed in
woodlands and shrublands throughout Hong Kong
|
Uncommon;
Rare in China
Red Data Book
|
|
Greater Coucal (Centropus sinensis)
|
This species was
identified in previous studies, but not observed in current surveys.
- Onsite Record: 1
(in woodland)
- Offsite record: 4
(2 in woodland; 1 in
village/orchard; and 1 in village area)
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed
|
Common;
Vulnerable (VU) in
China Red Data Book
|
|
Little Egret
(Egretta
garzetta)
|
- Onsite Record: 1
(recorded in semi-natural
stream from previous studies)
- Offsite record: 3
(3 in drainage channel, of which 2 records
from current surveys; and another one from previous studies)
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed in
coastal area throughout Hong Kong
|
Common;
Potential Regional Concern
|
|
Chinese Hwamei
(Garrulax
canorus)
|
This species was
identified in previous studies, but not observed in current surveys.
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 2
(1 in woodland; 1 in village/orchard)
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Scheduled under
Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed in
hillside shrubland throughout Hong Kong.
|
Common
resident
|
|
Black Kite
(Milvus migrans)
|
There were
observations of this species reported from literature review, but no exact
locations were indicated
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Scheduled under
the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap
586)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed in
Hong Kong;
Natural range includes
Palearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental and Australasian zoogeographical regions
|
Common;
Regional Concern
|
|
Eastern Buzzard
(Buteo japonicas)
|
There were
observations of this species reported from literature review, but no exact
locations were indicated
|
-
Scheduled under
Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170)
-
Scheduled under
the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap
586)
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Widely distributed in
Hong Kong
|
Common
|
|
Reference source:
(1) All wild birds are protected under Wild Animals
Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170)
(2) Hong Kong Biodiversity Database (AFCD, 2020)
(3) Wild animals to
watch: terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong
(Fellowes et al, 2002)
|
Table 8.17 -
Evaluation of Odonate Species of Conservation
Interest
Species
|
Location
|
Conservation / Protection Status (1)
|
Distribution (2) (3)
|
Rarity (2)
|
Ischnura rufostigma
|
This species was
identified from literature review, but not observed in current surveys.
- Onsite Record: 1 (in urban area
recorded from literature review)
- Offsite record: none
|
-
Ranked as Least Concern (LC) species under IUCN Red List
|
Recorded in Fanling, Ho Chung and Kam Tin;
Burma, China, Nepal,
Thailand and Vietnam
|
Rare
|
Reference
source:
(1) The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (http://www.iucnredlist.org/)
(2) Field
Guide to the Dragonflies of Hong Kong (Wilson et al., 2004)
(3) The
Dragonflies of Hong Kong (Tam et al., 2011)
|
Table 8.18 -
Evaluation of Faunal Species (Aquatic Fauna) of Conservation Interest
Species
|
Location
|
Conservation /Protection Status (1)
|
Distribution (2) (3)
|
Rarity (2) (3) (4)
|
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
(Cryptopotamon anacoluthon)
|
- Onsite Record: 1 (from 1 locality) in semi-natural stream
- Offsite record: 4 (from 2 localities) in semi-natural
stream
|
-
Ranked as Vulnerable (VU) species under IUCN Red List
|
Recorded on Hong Kong
Island, Lantau and the New Territories
|
Endemic;
Potential
Global Concern
|
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
(Somanniathelphusa
zanklon)
|
- Onsite Record: none
- Offsite record: 12 (4 in natural stream and 8 in semi-natural
stream) (totally 4 localities)
|
-
Ranked as Endangered (EN) species under IUCN Red List
|
Mainly in the New Territories
and sporadically on Lantau
|
Endemic;
Global
Concern
|
Reference source:
(1)
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/)
(2)
Distribution, habitat utilisation and conservation
status of the freshwater crab, Somanniathelphusa zanklon , endemic to Hong Kong (Stanton and Leven,
2016)
(3)
Distribution of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon, a freshwater crab endemic to Hong Kong (Stanton et al., 2017)
(4)
Wild animals to watch: terrestrial and
freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong (Fellowes et al, 2002)
|
8.7.1
The
potential ecological impacts arising from the construction and operation of the
proposed Project were assessed in accordance with Annexes 8 and 16 of the EIAO-TM.
8.7.2
The
proposed Project aims to carry out site formation for subsequent public housing
development and construct associated infrastructures to support the proposed
public housing development at existing rural residential areas at Hong Po Road
and San Hing Road (Details of project description is provided in Chapter 1 and
general layout is illustrated in Figures 1.3a-b). The Project Site therefore will cover mainly
developed or modified lands, such as village area and village/orchard. In order
to support the proposed public housing development, the proposed Road L7 is required
at area north Po Tong Ha, which would affect some woodland areas and a few
short sections of natural streams in water network N2 (Figure 8.1).
8.7.3
Anticipated
ecological impacts arising from the proposed project would include:
·
Habitat
Loss
·
Impact
on Floral and Faunal Species of Conservation Interest
·
Habitat
Fragmentation
·
Construction
disturbance to sensitive ecological resources
·
Operational
disturbance to sensitive ecological resources
Habitats
Loss
8.7.4
Site
clearance and site formation works would cause habitat loss within the PDA. Majority
of the habitat loss will occur at area inside the PDA where all the site
clearance and formation works are proposed. Those habitats within the Project Site
but outside the PDA would only be affected temporarily without any alternation
of existing land use or destruction of habitat. The permanent habitat loss area
and temporary affected area are illustrated in Figure 8.3. The
anticipated extent of habitat loss is summarised in the table below:
Table 8.19 - Summary of Habitat Loss
Habitat
|
Overall Ecological Value
|
Permanent Loss
(ha)
|
Temporarily affected (ha)
|
Woodland
(W3)
|
Medium
|
1.2
|
-
|
Agricultural Land
|
Low
|
1.1
|
-
|
Natural Stream (in
N2)
|
Low
|
0.0
(193m2; 104m in length)
|
-
|
Semi-natural Stream
(in N1)
|
Medium-low (R1f) to Low (R1i)
|
0.1
(1,355 m2; 356m in length)
|
0.0
(8m2;7m in length)
|
Drainage Channel
|
Low
|
0.4 (1,160m in length)
|
0.0
(220m2;20m in length)
|
Village / Orchard
|
Low
|
8.0
|
0.0 (127m2)
|
Village Area
|
Negligible
|
17.4
|
0.4
|
Urban Area
|
Negligible
|
0.4
|
8.7
|
8.7.5
The
ecological value of the affected habitats ranges from medium to negligible (Table 8.19). No habitats of high ecological value are
involved.
8.7.6
The
affected woodland patch is a portion in W3 located northwest of Po Tong Ha
where the proposed Road L7 is to be built. It is also one of the two major
grave areas in W3 (another one is located at area north of W2). Grave-sweeping activities
such as burning, vegetation clearance and grass trimming, particularly during
Ching Ming and Chung Yeung Festivals around this affected portion are the major
human disturbance. The affected portion
was also a typical low-quality woodland type indicated by the dominance of
exotics such as Eucalyptus species, Lophostemon
confertus and Melaleuca cajuputi. As indicated in Figure 8.1, the Project Site for road alignment of Road L7 is
largely proposed at the edge of the woodland to reduce the affected size of the
habitat, and avoid direct conflict with the localities of floral species of
conservation interest Pyrenaria spectabilis
and majority (over 10 individuals) of Aquilaria
sinensis around Po Tong Ha, including the mature
specimen of the species mentioned in Section
8.5. Under the current alignment, only three individuals of Aquilaria sinensis would require removal due to unavoidable
direct conflict with the proposed works (for the proposed road L7). All are
young individuals (Appendix 8.2, Plates D3-6) and one of
them was found in poor health condition due to the topping of the main trunk and
loss of its whole canopy (Appendix 8.2, Plates D5-6). No mature
trees of the species will be affected. The wildlife utilisation of this woodland patch was found to be low. A
Greater Coucal observed at the edge of the affected
woodland portion in previous studies is a highly mobile bird species which can
utilise various habitats in the immediate vicinity, and it was not observed
again in current surveys. Taking into account the
limited affected size (1.2ha) which is only a tiny proportion of the woodland,
the affected location at woodland fringe, the presence of human disturbance and
the low habitat quality of the affected area, the impact significance of loss
of this woodland patch is anticipated to be minor.
8.7.7
Two
sections of semi-natural streams (i.e. R1i and part of R1f) are located within
the proposed HPR Site. R1i is a very short and small watercourse located at upstream
of the concrete drainage channel R1j. R1i is considered to be
of low ecological importance due to its limited size (0.01ha) and absence of
species of conservation interest. R1f is one of the two major semi-natural
streams (another one is R1g north of SHR Site) found in water network N1 (Plate
D7-12 of Appendix 8.2). Part of R1f (about 264m) falls within
the Project Site Boundary at HPR Site, with sections of about 380m and 176m
outside the Project Site Boundary at its upper section and lower section,
respectively. Little egret was observed at the semi-natural stream R1f in
previous studies but not observed in current surveys (Little Egret was
identified in current surveys, but the recorded location is at an offsite
drainage channel R7). This species is common in Hong Kong and highly mobile and
anticipated able to utilise other readily available alternative habitats within
the vicinity, such as other offsite semi-natural streams at R1g; as well as
drainage channel TMRC and those ponds near Ng Lau Road.
I.
Discussion on Findings of Semi-natural Stream
at R1f and Engineering Constraints
Loss of the semi-natural stream at R1f would
cause impact on two crab species of conservation interest Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon as localities
of the species were identified at an upper section of R1f. The original
development layout requires destruction of all watercourses within the Project Site
Boundary, including the whole onsite section of R1f of about 472m in length with
the records of the two crab species and modified it into underground culverts. Taking into account the ecological baseline findings about
the crabs, effort on impact avoidance and minimisation was carefully considered
by the project team. As discussed in Section 2.3, the option of avoidance
of the whole R1f within the PDA boundary is found to be infeasible due to the
following three key engineering constraints.
1.
As
indicated in Figure 8.1 and other relevant figures, R1f cuts across the HPR Site. As the Site
will be divided into two separate parts, at least 3 proposed housing blocks and
the PTI would be affected and cannot be relocated to other parts of the Project
Site. These housing blocks and PTI are essential construction items necessary
for the development.
2.
Secondly, retaining the
whole R1f would inevitably cause disconnection of the proposed internal roads
and associated utilities due to the position of R1f running across the Site.
3.
Thirdly,
the proposed
site formation level is below the existing watercourse of R1f. As a result, for
the implementation of the development, completely avoidance of the whole onsite
section of R1f becomes impractical.
II.
Retainment and Enhancement of Ecologically
Sensitive Section of R1f
For achieving a better balance between the proposed housing development
and nature conservation, impact minimisation measure by reducing the habitat
loss of R1f is proposed. In
the updated development layout, the most ecologically sensitive upper section of
the semi-natural stream R1f (of about 208m in length) with direct connection to
the offsite upstream and records of the two crab species is proposed to be
retained by excluding from the Project Site Boundary to avoid the direct disturbance
to the crabs and also habitat loss of upper section of the semi-natural stream.
This retained section will be excluded from the Project Site Boundary (Figure 8.1b and 8.3b). The
remaining onsite section of R1f of about 264m length and other drainage
channels within the Project Site will be unavoidably diverted to
proposed box culvert and connected to TMRC downstream under the latest drainage
scheme due to aforementioned engineering constraints.
Nevertheless, the affected lower section of the semi-natural stream R1f is less
ecologically sensitive owing to the increasing human disturbance. This recommended
measure can avoid all the two identified localities of Somanniathelphusa zanklon and majority of the localities of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon (affected
localities reduced from 3 to 1). The retention of the upper course can also preserve the
direct physical and ecological linkage with the natural streams of R1a and R1b
through the offsite upper section of R1f.
Apart from the
direct preservation of the sensitive upper section, a buffer zone of minimum 6m
alongside the southern bank of this preserved semi-natural
stream
section will be provided for better protection. Taking in account the existence of human
disturbance and avoidance of the sensitive upper section with records of the
crab species, the overall impact significance of loss of these modified semi-natural
streams is anticipated to be minor. A further lower section of R1f of about 176m
length is located south of the HPR Site. As it is located outside the Project Site,
it will be wholly retained.
The R1i and R1j
will be diverted by drainage pipes to convey the upstream water flow from R1e to
downstream portion of R1f (outside the HPR Site) and ultimately discharging to TMRC
through existing R1h and underground box culvert.
Installation of a short section of fresh
water mains to the village house is proposed along the existing footbridge over
a short upstream section (8m2, 7m in length) of R1f north of and
outside of HPR site. The proposed works will be undertaken within the
village/orchard habitat and to be laid along the footbridge without direct
impact to the existing stream of R1f.
8.7.8
All
other affected habitats are of ecological value ranging from low to negligible.
Affected natural stream sections in water network N2 including R2a-b and R3a-b
are of low ecological value, and small in size (Table
8.19) without any records of species of conservation interest. There were
insectivorous bats observed at an area
of village/orchard near the semi-natural stream R1f,
they
were flying over but not
relied on this modified habitat type within the project footprint. The overall
impact significance of loss of these habitats with low ecological value is
anticipated to be minor. The affected onsite section of R2a-b and R3a-b will be
changed to underground culverts for the construction of the proposed Road L7 on
their above. No indirect habitat loss to these watercourses is anticipated.
8.7.9
The
affected agricultural land and drainage channel are limited in size and of low
ecological value. The overall impact significance of loss of these two habitats
is anticipated to be minor. Though a Chinese Pond Heron was identified in a
drainage channel section at downstream of R1g from previous studies, the affected
section is limited in size, and similar to other
ardeids, this bird species is highly mobile and able to utilise other readily alternative
same type of habitats which are readily available in the close vicinity at TMRC
and its tributaries.
8.7.10
Village
area and urban area are completely artificial habitats of negligible ecological
value and the impact significance of their loss is anticipated to be
insubstantial. Though one individual of Ischnura
rufostigma was identified in habitat of developed
and disturbed urban area from literature review, this species was reported to
be found in ponds and agricultural fields, rather than urban area which is not
a typical habitat for this species. In fact, the related urban area at Tsing
Lun Road are located outside the PDA and will only be temporarily affected
without any habitat alternation (Figure
8.3).
8.7.11
The
summary of ecological impact evaluation of habitat loss is given below:
Table 8.20 - Potential
Ecological Impact of Habitat Loss
Criteria
|
|
Woodland (W3)
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of overall medium ecological value; the affected portion
however, is a low-quality habitat patch, and regularly disturbed by grave-sweeping
activities
|
Species
|
1 floral species of conservation interest Aquilaria sinensis was recorded;
Greater Coucal was
identified in previous studies but not observed in current surveys
|
Size
|
Small: 1.2ha
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation
periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Agricultural
Land
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of low ecological value
|
Species
|
No species conservation interest was recorded
|
Size
|
Small: 1.1ha
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Natural Stream
(N2) – R2a, R2b, R3a and R3b
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of low ecological value; no waterflow during both wet
and dry seasons in 2018
|
Species
|
No species of conservation interest
|
Size
|
Small: 0ha (193m²; 104m in length)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Semi-natural Stream
(N1) – R1f and R1i
|
Habitat Quality
|
R1f: Habitat of medium-low ecological value
R1i: Habitat of low ecological value
|
Species
|
Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon was identified
in the affected section of R1f;
Little Egret was identified in R1f from
previous studies but not observed in current surveys
|
Size
|
Permanent Loss: Small: 0.1ha (1225 m²; 264m) of R1f; 0ha (130m²;
92m) of R1i
Temporary Affected: Small: 0.0ha (8m²; 7m) of R1f
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
(8m² temporarily affected section
will only be impacted during construction period)
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor (Permanent
Loss)
Insubstantial
(Temporary Affected)
|
Drainage Channel
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of low ecological value
|
Species
|
Chinese Pond Heron was identified from previous studies but not
observed in current surveys
|
Size
|
Small: 0.4ha (1,160m in length) (permanent loss);
Small: 0.0ha (220m², 20m in length) (temporary affected)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor (Permanent
Loss)
Insubstantial
(Temporary Affected)
|
Village /
Orchard
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of low ecological value
|
Species
|
An insectivorous bat was observed flying over
|
Size
|
Medium: 8.0ha (permanent loss);
Small: 0.0ha (127m²) (temporarily affected)
(127m² temporarily affected areas
will only be impacted during construction period)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor (Permanent
Loss)
Insubstantial
(Temporary Affected)
|
Village Area
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of negligible ecological value
|
Species
|
No species of conservation interest
|
Size
|
Medium: 17.4ha (permanent loss);
Small: 0.4ha (temporarily affected)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
(0.4ha temporarily affected areas
will only be impacted during construction period)
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
(Reversible for the temporarily
affected areas)
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Insubstantial
|
Urban Area
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat of negligible ecological value
|
Species
|
One
single record of Ischnura rufostigma was identified within the temporarily
affected area. Urban area however is not the typical habitat for the species
|
Size
|
Small: 0.4ha (permanent loss);
Medium: 8.7ha (temporarily affected)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
(8.7ha temporarily affected areas
will only be impacted during construction period)
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible due to urbanized land use
in nature
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Insubstantial
|
Note: the rating order of overall ecological impact
severity: Severe, Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and Insubstantial
|
Impact
on Floral Species of Conservation Interest
Aquilaria
sinensis
8.7.12
Most
of the localities of the species were located outside the Project Site boundary
and can be preserved onsite throughout the implementation of the Project, but three
individuals were found falling within the Project Site boundary at woodland W3
near Po Tong Ha. Removal would be required for the necessary site clearance and
formation works for the proposed Road L7.
8.7.13
All are
young individuals, comprising one sapling of about 1.8m in height, one seedling
of 0.3m in height and one young but dying tree of about 1.4m in height (the
tree was topped and leaving a trunk with 1.4m height). Photographic records of
the affected individuals are given in Plate D3-6 of Appendix 8.2.
8.7.14
This
species is locally common in Hong Kong, but the population of the mature
individuals is under threats of illegal felling or cutting for collection of
resin (Chen-Xiang). Young trees and seedlings are still common and not under particular threat at the moment. This condition had been
reported in AFCD’s newsletter Hong Kong
Biodiversity No. 7 and the recently released Incense Tree Species Action
Plan 2018-2022.
8.7.15
Taking into account the small affected quantity (3 individuals), the
young state of the affected plants of the species (with one of them in extreme
poor condition), the removal impact is anticipated to be minor.
Table 8.21 - Potential
Ecological Impact on Floral Species of Conservation Interest
Criteria
|
|
Aquilaria
sinensis
|
Species
|
A
common species but its mature individuals under threat of illegal
felling/cutting.
|
Abundance
|
3 young individuals, comprising 1 sapling, 1 seedling and 1
young tree in poor condition
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and
operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity before
Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Note: the rating order of overall ecological impact
severity: Severe, Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and
Insubstantial
|
Impact
on Faunal Species of Conservation Interest
Insectivorous
Bat
8.7.16
Three
individuals of insectivorous bat were observed at an area of village/orchard
near semi-natural stream at R1f. No roosting site/
aggregated colonies were detected within
the Project Site, despite potential places for roosting
still exist (e.g roofs of old buildings). Unavoidable site clearance works for site
formation and construction would result in irreversible reduction of foraging
area and some (mainly artificial/ under human management)
potential roosting sites.
However, this highly mobile species would fly across large continuous patch of
woodland and natural watercourse surrounding the Project Site for roosting (e.g. at caves, wooded area, tree holes, etc.); while their occurrence in village/ orchard reflected
that they are adaptive to human settlement to some extent for foraging. Therefore,
the overall ecological impact to this species is considered
to be minor.
Little
Egret, Chinese Pond Heron, Greater Coucal
8.7.17
A
single individual of each of the three species was detected from previous
studies within the Project Site but not observed in current surveys (Little
Egret was identified in current surveys, but the recorded location is at an
offsite drainage channel). No nest/ egretry were detected.
All three bird species have a wide distribution in Hong Kong. Little Egret and
Chinese Pond Heron are adaptive to various habitats, from ponds, natural streams,
modified watercourse, drainage channel to coastal area. Greater Coucal inhabits in woodland, shrubland and grassland.
8.7.18
Unavoidable
site clearance works for site formation and construction would result in irreversible
reduction of foraging area. However, this highly mobile species would fly
across other available habitats in vicinity. Greater Coucal
can utilise the large continuous patch of woodland W1-W3; while Little Egret
and Chinese Pond Heron could make use of the whole river networks N1-N3 within
the assessment area. For example, Little Egret was observed at the TMRC during
current surveys. Therefore, the overall ecological impact to these species is considered to be minor.
Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon
8.7.19
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon inhabits rather clear/ unpolluted, fast
flowing hill streams, with rocky substratum, leaf litters, and shaded/ wooded
riparian habitats, ranging from 8m to 827m (Ng and Dudgeon, 1992; Stanton et
al., 2017); despite downstream habitat for this species (as well as many other
lowland aquatic species) in Hong Kong are usually fragmented, channelized,
piped and polluted under urbanization.
8.7.20
Such
situation is also reflected by our observations of its distribution pattern in
current surveys. All 5 individuals were detected at three localities in an
upper section of semi-natural stream R1f near the northern margin of the HPR Site
(with 4 individuals outside
and 1 within Project Site). The connected natural streams R1a and R1b
keep feeding fresh, clear water to this upper section of R1f. The more channelized
and opened section at R1f downstream was already invaded by exotic potential
predator Mosquito Fish and Nile Tilapia; and more polluted by direct domestic
discharge from village area and chemical discharge from industrial undertakings.
Such sub-optimum habitat and predatory pressure would limit Cryptopotamon anacoluthon from the core
HPR Site, while the upper section of R1f, natural stream R1a and R1b and the
associated continuous woodland and shrub-grassland would be refuge for this
population (also possible for upper natural stream/ semi-natural stream network
at Chung Shan, see next section). As stated in the discussion of habitat loss,
the latest layout has excluded the 208m upper section of R1f to reduce the
impact on the crab species localities from 3 to 1 (Figure
8.3b).
The whole structure including the banks and bed of the watercourse (Plate
D9-10 of Appendix
8.2) at this section will be completely
avoided by construction works with ecological
enhancement to be conducted as discussed in Section 8.8.12. A 6m buffer
zone will be provided along the southern bank of the avoided section for better
protection.
8.7.21
With
judgement from field observations, habitat requirement of the species, and the
avoidance effort for the concerned section of watercourse, ecological impact
from development of the Project Site to this species is considered
to be minor.
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
8.7.22
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
inhabits both lotic lentic, slow-flowing and low-gradient streams with various
degrees of stream modification and channelization (Stanton and Leven, 2016). It
prefers lowland watercourses or wetland/marsh, with all distribution records
below 220m. It is reported as fairly tolerant to
organic pollution (Ng and Dudgeon, 1992).
8.7.23
Its
better tolerance to organic pollution from domestic discharge in village/
orchard seems explain the higher abundance and more localities of Somanniathelphusa zanklon
recorded by current studies against Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon; while it is also confined to upper section of semi-natural streams
R1f and R1g, with direct observation up to the natural stream R1a. They were
observed in microhabitat with slower water flow than the section with Cryptopotamon anacoluthon. However,
similar sub-optimum habitat and predatory pressure at the more channelized and
opened section at R1f downstream (at core of HPR Site within PDA) made Somanniathelphusa zanklon
limited to the upper section rather than the proposed Project Site boundary located
downstream. The natural streams R1a and R1b, as well as upper natural stream/ semi-natural
stream network north of SHR Site (i.e. R1c, R1d and R1g) would be refuge for
this population, despite a lack of more favourable wetland/ marsh habitat
available within assessment area (Stanton and Leven, 2016). As stated in the
discussion of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
above, the 208m upper section of R1f with the crab localities will be preserved
by excluding this section from the Project Site with additional 6m buffer zone
along the southern bank to avoid impact on both crab species and the habitat. This adjustment in development layout can avoid the impact on the crab species localities from permanent
habitat loss (Figure 8.3b).
8.7.24
With
judgement from field observations, habitat requirement of the species, and the
avoidance effort for the concerned section of watercourse, ecological impact
from development of PDA to this species is considered to be
insubstantial.
Ischnura rufostigma
8.7.25
Ischnura rufostigma is a medium-sized damselfly inhabits in
slow-flowing stream, marshes and wet fields (Tam et al. 2011). It was
once found in Fanling, Ho Chung and Kam Tin, but had
not been observed in Hong Kong for a long time since its last record in the
1960s. One individual of this species was reported at a barren field near Tsing Lun Road, Tuen Mun in March 2020 and the species identity was
confirmed by AFCD. The collection
location of that single individual was in the habitat type of urban area which
is also not typical to this species.
8.7.26
As
illustrated in Figure 8.1, the road junction at Tsing Lun Road and Tsz Tin Road
is solely covered by habitat of urban area. Wet places in nearby area include the
concrete drainage channel R6, a small fung shui pond and some narrow irrigation ditches in habitat
of village/orchard. However, Ischnura rufostigma was not observed in all these habitats
during the current surveys in 2018 and 2020. In fact, no records of this
species were observed in natural/semi-natural streams (i.e. R1a-R4b) within the
assessment area.
8.7.27
As indicated in Figures 1.4 and 1.5, the road junction
situates outside the PDA without any major development works, but will only
minor axillary engineering works including proposed rising mains, salt water
main and re-alignment of traffic lanes of Tsing Lun Road. All these works are
small in scale and will be completely within the habitat of urban area which is
of low ecological value (Figure 8.1). If there is a chance any
adult of Ischnura rufostigma
occurs again in this road junction during the construction period, its mobility
can avoid those minor works activities. The larvae of this species however,
should rely on wetlands which is not present in the recorded location. The
drainage channel, ditches in village/orchard habitat and the small fung shui pond are
all located outside the Project Site boundary, without any construction activities of the Project. Further taking into account only one single individual was recorded,
the potential impact on Ischnura rufostigma due to the implementation of the project is
anticipated to be insubstantial.
8.7.28
The proposed works will not alter the habitat type (i.e.
urban area) and ecological value of the recorded location and its nearby areas
(Figure 8.3). No operation
impact on this species is anticipated.
Table 8.22 - Potential Ecological Impact on
Faunal Species of Conservation Interest
Criteria
|
|
Insectivorous Bat
|
Species
|
Commonly observed
|
Abundance
|
3 flying over and no roosting site/aggregated
colonies detected
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Little Egret
|
Species
|
Widely
distributed in coastal area throughout Hong Kong
|
Abundance
|
1
was observed at the semi-natural stream R1f in previous studies but not
observed in current surveys.
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Chinese Pond
Heron
|
Species
|
Widely
distributed in Hong Kong
|
Abundance
|
1
was observed at drainage channel
R1i in previous studies but not
observed in current surveys.
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Greater Coucal
|
Species
|
Widely
distributed in Hong Kong
|
Abundance
|
1
was observed at woodland W3 in
previous studies but not observed in current surveys.
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Ischnura rufostigma
|
Species
|
Rare; last records were made in 1960s (apart from
the rediscovery record in March 2020).
|
Abundance
|
1 male was recorded by a member of the public,
but not observed in current surveys and other literatures/previous studies
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction period
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible
|
Magnitude
|
small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Insubstantial
|
Cryptopotamon anacoluthon
|
Species
|
Endemic; recorded on Hong Kong Island, Lantau and
the New Territories
|
Abundance
|
1 locality observed in the affected section of
semi-natural stream R1f
(2 localities will be avoided by the retaining of
the upper section of R1f)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Intermediate
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
Species
|
Endemic; mainly in the New Territories and sporadically on
Lantau
|
Abundance
|
All the 2 localities in semi-natural stream R1f
will be avoided by the latest project layout;
No locality of the species identified in the
affected section of R1f
|
Duration
|
N/A
|
Reversibility
|
N/A
|
Magnitude
|
N/A
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Insubstantial
|
Note: the rating order of overall ecological impact
severity: Severe, Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and
Insubstantial
|
|
|
|
Habitat
Fragmentation
8.7.29
The
linear alignment of the proposed Road L7 near Po Tong Ha would cause
fragmentation impact on woodland W3 as it would cut through the habitat and
cause the formation of an isolated woodland patch south of the new road.
However, the ecological impact has been largely reduced due to the proposed
location at the edge of the woodland rather than core of the habitat. No
notable wildlife utilization of the woodland area was observed. There were no
nest/ breeding site/ important feeding sites associated with any species of
conservation interest. As the
isolated patch is limited in size (about 0.8ha) compared with the whole
continuous habitat, the integrity of woodland W3 can be maintained (25.4ha of
W3, i.e. 93.4% of the original woodland area will be retained) and the
fragmentation effect is anticipated to be minor.
8.7.30
Semi-natural
streams in network N1 are anticipated to be impacted mainly by direct habitat
loss (i.e. sections of R1f fall within Project Site) discussed above rather
than fragmentation. Their natural (i.e. the natural stream habitat) and
semi-natural (i.e. semi-natural stream) upstream sections (i.e. R1a-g) will be
unaffected and able to retain their integrity, while the downstream drainage
channel TMRC will be regularly maintained for drainage and flood control
function of the area. The overall impact severity for watercourses is anticipated
to be insubstantial. Slight fragmentation would occur at semi-natural stream
R1f due to about 264m middle section would be permanently changed to
underground culvert. However, the 380m (including 172m offsite R1f and that
208m retained section) upper section of the R1f to be retained is the most ecologically
sensitive for their higher habitat quality, recorded localities of the two crab
species of conservation interest and better ecological linkage with natural
streams R1a-b. Further taking into account the lower
ecological importance of the offsite downstream and the smaller proportion of
this section, the adverse impact on R1f due to fragmentation effect is
anticipated to be minor.
8.7.31
No
fragmentation impact on other onsite habitats is anticipated since no major
fragmented habitats would be produced in other part of the Project Site currently
dominated by village areas and village/orchard of low ecological value. The
overall impact severity is anticipated to be insubstantial.
Table 8.23 - Potential
Ecological Impact of Habitat Fragmentation
Criteria
|
|
Woodland
(W3)
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat
of medium ecological value; the affected portion however, is a low-quality
habitat patch, and regularly disturbed by grave-sweeping activities
|
Species
|
No
notable wildlife utilization of the woodland area
|
Size
|
A
small (0.8ha) isolated woodland patch would be formed after the project, but
the integrity of the core habitat at size over 25.4ha (93.4%) will be
maintained. Furthermore, there are burial grounds within this 0.8ha woodland
patch.
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Semi-natural
Stream (R1f)
|
Habitat Quality
|
Habitat
of medium-low ecological value; the affected section is located at the
downstream with lower ecological importance
|
Species
|
2 localities of each species of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon at the retained upper section;
No notable wildlife utilization
identified at the retained downstream section
|
Size
|
380m of the watercourse retained in upstream;
176m of the watercourse retained in downstream
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Other Habitats (Drainage Channel, Agricultural Land, Village/Orchard,
Village Area, Urban Area)
|
Habitat Quality
|
Ecological
value ranging from low to negligible
|
Species
|
No
notable wildlife utilization of the relevant habitats
|
Size
|
No
major isolated habitat of particular ecological
value would be formed
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction and operation periods
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Negligible
as no significant fragmentation is anticipated
|
Impact Severity before
Mitigation
|
Insubstantial
|
Note: the rating order of overall ecological impact
severity: Severe, Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and
Insubstantial
|
Construction Disturbance to Sensitive Ecological
Resources
8.7.32
Construction disturbance would cause impact to
wildlife and their habitats in the close proximity to
the Project Site or in onsite areas proposed to be preserved which are sensitive
to human activities, noise, dust or site runoff during the construction period.
In terms of plant species and habitat, offsite woodland areas at W3 with distribution
of Aquilaria sinensis
and Pyrenaria spectabilis are
located along the two sides of the proposed Road L7 near Po Tong Ha, and the
natural stream (R1a) and semi-natural streams (R1f and R1g) with localities of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon are located
upstream of the Project Site near HPR Site and SHR Site. Woodland W2 and the CA
zone at Chung Shan will have no direct physical bordering to the Project Site
boundary with these habitats and only a very small portion of their boundaries
(eastern end of W2 and southern end of the CA zone) facing the Project Site,
while majority of their boundary is enclosed by other land uses / habitats.
8.7.33
Potential impacts to these ecological resources
would include direct damage to the vegetation, due to uncontrol construction
activities such as illegal dumping or stockpiling of construction materials or
waste; or indirect adverse disturbance by excessive dust deposition. The preliminary
findings from impact assessment on air quality, water quality and waste management
in Chapters 4, 6 and 11 of this
report suggested that construction disturbance to offsite environments could be
properly controlled by recommended good site practices together with clear site
demarcation and no residual adverse impact on air quality, water quality and
waste is anticipated. The overall unmitigated impact is anticipated to be
minor.
8.7.34
In terms of faunal community, the crab species of
conservation interest, two localities of Somanniathelphusa zanklon was observed at the offsite upstream of R1a
and R1g respectively. As revealed in Water Quality impact
Assessment in Chapter 6, water
quality of the offsite environments can be properly controlled
and no significant residual adverse impact is anticipated.
Their upstream locations can further reduce the potential water quality
disturbance due to their high elevation and waterflow direction (i.e. water
flows away from rather than towards the crab localities). Provided that
proper construction activities control on water quality and site demarcation is
strictly implemented through good site practice, no significant adverse impact
to these offsite crab communities is anticipated.
8.7.35
Due to additional avoidance design in the latest
project layout, a section of the semi-natural stream R1f of about 208m in length is proposed to be excluded
from the Project Site with provision of 6m buffer zone along the southern bank for
watercourse preservation. As this retained section is directly connected with
the undisturbed offsite watercourses R1a and R1b, and also
located at upstream position, construction disturbance would be similar to
those offsite watercourses, given that the mentioned good site practice is well
in place. Site runoff, according to standard water quality control measure
detailed in Chapter 6, will be properly treated before discharging into
downstream drainage channels. The retained upper section with crab species of
conservation interest will therefore not be affected by water quality
disturbance. No housing development works are proposed in the excluded stream
section (of about 208m) and its associated 6m buffer zone along the southern
bank. Under the “no-works” scenario, the construction disturbance to this
section of R1f and the crab localities is anticipated to be minor. Other than
the avoidance and minimisation measures, enhancement of R1f has been considered
in the planning and design processes of the project. As discussed in the
ecological baseline in Section 8.5, R1f is semi-natural with some
moderate human modification on their stream banks (Plate D7 and D9
of Appendix 8.2) and their
adjacent areas alongside are occupied by modified habitats, dominated by
village/orchard and village area. Ecological enhancement by reinstatement the
modified parts into natural state is recommended, which include the demolition of
the concrete modified banks to natural sloping banks (i.e. with exposed top
soil) and removal of village buildings or structures (e.g. paved footpaths or
temporary storage structure) within the 6m buffer zone to allow natural
vegetation re-introduction. With the implementation of the recommended
enhancement measure, this stream section will be reinstated to more natural
state and its ecological potential is anticipated to be improved. The proposed demolition
works, however, would cause some disturbance temporarily to the stream and the
two crab species of conservation interest. In order to minimise the disturbance
impact on the habitat and the crab species, temporary partition along the
southern bank to be reinstated will be provided to, on the one hand confine the
works inside the area enclosed by the temporary partition and on the other hand
retain the waterflow of the watercourse to minimise the construction impact on
the ecological and hydrological function of the watercourse. Since the
demolition of modified banks is small scale works which large works area is not
required. The temporary partition will be set at 1.5m from the southern bank.
Demolition works will only be undertaken within the enclosed area. The subject
section of R1f is about 6m in width. Therefore, the temporary working area
demarcated by the partition will only be about 25% of the subject section and
the majority of about 75% of the existing watercourse to be enhanced will not
be affected. Though some disturbance due to demolition activities would
inevitably affect the crabs, the impact is
anticipated to be higher than that under the “no-works” scenario (i.e.
retaining the stream without ecological enhancement works); considering the limited portion of works area and temporary nature of
the disturbance, it is still anticipated within the range of
minor. In fact, the crabs and this watercourse currently receive similar
disturbance irregularly due to the essential maintenance of those modified
stream banks by the villagers.
8.7.36
About 176m lower section of R1f will be located
offsite south of the Project Sites of HPR Site. No works are proposed in this
offsite section. Temporary disturbance would occur during the construction
period as its immediate onsite upper section will undergo some construction
works for diverting the watercourse into proposed underground culvert. As
explained in discussion of habitat loss, both the physical and hydrological
condition of this section will be maintained. Though the feeding water would be
disturbed by the diversion works during construction period, the water quality
control requirement under the Project will ensure no significant adverse impact
on the offsite waterbody by properly treating of all water before discharging. As
also discussed in Section 8.7.29, the preliminary findings from impact
assessment on air quality, water quality and waste management in Chapters 4, 6 and 11 of this report
suggested that construction disturbance to offsite environments could be
properly controlled by recommended good site practices together with clear site
demarcation and no residual adverse impact on air quality, water quality and
waste is anticipated. The temporary construction disturbance to this offsite
section of R1f is anticipated to be minor. In addition, this offsite section is
not considered as sensitive ecological receiver for its lower ecological
importance compared with the upper section particularly the first 208m section
with records of crab species of conservation interest due to the weaker
ecological linkage with habitats of higher ecological value such as woodland and
natural streams for its location further away from these habitats and heavier
water pollution and other human disturbance due to the accumulation effect of
the pollutants at its lower course position at this stream.
Table 8.24 - Potential
Ecological Impact of Construction Disturbance
Criteria
|
|
Woodland W3
|
Species
|
2
floral species of conservation interest, including Aquilaria sinensis and Pyrenaria spectabilis
|
Abundance
|
12
records of Aquilaria sinensis and 3 records of Pyrenaria spectabilis in the close surroundings
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction period
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Somanniathelphusa zanklon localities at offsite natural stream (R1a)
and semi-natural stream (R1g)
|
Species
|
1
crab species of conservation interest Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
Abundance
|
2 localities of Somanniathelphusa zanklon (1 in
natural stream R1a and another 1 in semi-natural stream R1g)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction period
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Somanniathelphusa zanklon and Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon at retained section of semi-natural stream R1f
|
Species
|
2
crab species of conservation interest Somanniathelphusa zanklon and Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon
|
Abundance
|
2 localities of each species of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction period
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor (with
or without ecological enhancement works)
|
Woodland W2 and CA zone at Chung Shan
|
Species
|
6
floral species of conservation interest, including Aquilaria sinensis, Camellia crapnelliana, Diospyros vaccinioides,
Gleditsia australis, Pyrenaria
spectabilis and Rhodoleia championii,
|
Abundance
|
20
records of Aquilaria sinensis;
19
records of Camellia crapnelliana;
1
record of Diospyros vaccinioides;
1
record of Gleditsia australis;
21
records of Pyrenaria spectabilis;
and
1
record of Rhodoleia championii
|
Duration
|
Throughout the construction period
|
Reversibility
|
Reversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small
|
Impact Severity before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Note: the rating order of overall ecological impact
severity: Severe, Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and
Insubstantial
|
Operational Disturbance to Sensitive Ecological
Resources
8.7.37
Existing rural areas of comparatively lower
population will be replaced with modern and highly urbanised residential
development complex. The significant increase in human activities due to the
population intake during the operation of the project would cause additional
disturbance to sensitive habitats and associated wildlife in the surroundings.
8.7.38
Natural habitat of higher ecological value would be
more sensitive to the disturbance than those man-made or modified habitats, as
the latter are already under prominent human disturbance and themselves also a source
of disturbance to the surroundings. Woodland W2 is the only habitat of high
ecological value within the assessment area. It is however located west of the end
of the proposed Road L7 and separated from the main development at Hong Po Road
and San Hing Road by over 500m. The works for proposed Road L7 is comparatively
small in scale. In fact, only a very
small portion (eastern end) of the habitat is facing the Project Site, but most
of its boundary is enclosed by other habitats and land uses. The disturbance arising
from the operation of the Project is therefore anticipated to be minor.
8.7.39
The eastern portion of Woodland W3 and hillside
natural streams (R1a and R1e) in network N1 are habitats of medium ecological
value and will be located almost in immediate vicinity to the core development
area at Hong Po Road. The subject portion of woodland W3 currently is
physically separated by a section of the vehicular access of Hong Po Road and
this road section will be retained to continue to act as a barrier along this
interface. A scat of East Asian Porcupine was recorded at this woodland area.
The increase in noise and artificial lighting from the proposed development
would disturb this mammal. However, the adverse effect is expected to be
insignificant. It is because the
abundance of the species is low at the area and the habitat (i.e. woodland W3)
is densely vegetated is considered able to screen off a certain extent of the
noise and light pollution from the new development area at Hong Po Road. The
woodland W3 itself is subject to human disturbance from both outside the
habitat by village residential areas and inside by the grave-sweeping activities evidenced by the
presence of large number of graves, particularly, in area around Po Tong Ha.
Nevertheless, majority of the woodland is located on steep terrains and covered
with dense vegetation, which could effectively restrict the access and as a
result minimise additional potential disturbance due to the rise of the population
of the area. In addition, a large proportion of the woodland W3 is located
within the Tsing Shan Firing Range which can provide further restriction of
public access to the habitat imposed by the military land use. This restriction
could offer an enhancement of indirect protection to the habitat and at the
same time allow a better preservation of those offsite woodland areas for the
East Asian Porcupine as their alternative habitats or refugee to alleviate the
disturbance to occur at the edge of the woodland with direct interface with the
proposed development. The Greater Coucal identified
from previous studies but not observed in current surveys is highly mobile and
well adapt urban area and anticipated to be able to avoid human activities. The
overall impact on the woodland habitat and its associated wildlife is
anticipated to be minor.
8.7.40
Another habitat of medium ecological value in close proximity are those natural hillside streams northwest
of the Project Site, especially R1a and R1b for their large size and presence
of species of conservation interest. Over 90% of these natural streams are located
within the Tsing Shan Firing Range and the restriction in access allows better
protection to both the floral species of conservation interest (i.e. Nepenthes mirabilis) and faunal species
of conservation interest (i.e. Somanniathelphusa zanklon), which biologically relied
on these natural stream habitats during the operation of the Project. All these
natural streams are upper courses of the water network N1 and their upstream
position can further reduce the risk of water pollution by runoff from the
future development as the water shall run downward by gravity to downstream
rather than upward through the proposed drainage system (i.e. box culverts
according to the latest design) in the Project Site and finally discharged into
the TMRC. Therefore, the overall impact
on the offsite natural streams and its associated wildlife is anticipated to be
minor.
8.7.41
Another locality of the crab species Somanniathelphusa zanklon was
found at the semi-natural stream section
at R1g. Similar to its another locality at natural stream R1a, it is located at
the uppercourse of the affected section with a
separation distance of about 125m. Major source of human disturbance is
anticipated to be come from the existing residential land use occupied by Villa
Pinada and the rural village of Chung Shan, rather
than from the future development area at SHR Site for the immediate interface
with the existing disturbance. Its
upstream location can also prevent potential water quality impact from runoff
of the new proposed development area. Therefore, the overall impact on this
second locality of Somanniathelphusa zanklon is
anticipated to be minor.
8.7.42
An additional 208m section of R1f is proposed to be
retained under the latest development layout, in which covers two localities of
each species of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon and
will be in close proximity to the housing development
at HPR Site. Due to the level difference between the watercourse and proposed site
formation levels of the development, a retaining wall of average height 2-3m will
be constructed along the interface. No
direct access will be provided to the watercourse from the proposed housing
development. The physical separation by the proposed retaining wall and the
lack of access between the development site to the watercourse will largely
discourage human disturbance from the new development during the operational
phase. In additional to the recommended reinstatement of artificial habitats to
natural riparian vegetation in the 6m buffer zone, the watercourse and its non-buffered opposite side (i.e. the northern and eastern side)
of the watercourse will not be affected by the project. No significant
operation impact on the watercourse and the two crab species of conservation
interest is anticipated. In fact, the carrying capability of the enhanced
section is expected to become higher for the two crab species during the
operation phase due to the proposed reinstatement of the banks with its 6m
riparian habitats, and permanent removal of domestic effluents from the
villages along the existing southern side of the watercourse, which is
considered to be an ecological beneficial impact.
8.7.43
The CA zone at Chung Shan is located outside the
Project Site and is subject to prominent disturbance from the surrounding
developed areas of Tsing Chuen Wai village and grave-sweeping activities from the
extensive areas of graves on the hill. Similar to W2,
only a very small portion (southern end) of the area is facing the Project Site,
but most of its boundary is enclosed by other habitats and land uses. The
operation disturbance to this CA zone arising from this Project is therefore anticipated
to be minor.
8.7.44
As discussed in literature review in Section 8.4,
the distribution and abundance of floral species of conservation interest is
basically consistent between the previous TM54 EIA undertaken in 1997-1998 and
this EIA in 2018, under the situation that the surrounding areas were substantially
developed and urbanised, which indicated that no notable adverse impact on the
floral species of conservation interest occurred. The proposed Project is
anticipated not to bring significant ecological impact on these species during
the operation. Attention is paid to Aquilaria
sinensis which would be the target of illegal
agar wood collectors. Fortunately, most of the individuals of the species were
found either seedlings or young trees which are unlikely targets of those
illegal events. Only one mature specimen of about 400mm trunk diameter was
identified at woodland W3 near natural stream R2b (Table D of Appendix 8.2). A Species
Action Plan has been developed to undertake conservation actions on the species
which aims to ensure the long-term viability and sustainability of the local Aquilaria sinensis
populations. Further taking into account most of the individuals of the species
are unlikely the target of the illegal activities, the operation disturbance
impact on most of the floral species of conservation interest located in close
proximity to the Project Site is anticipated to be minor.
Table 8.25 - Potential Ecological
Impact of Operational Disturbance
Criteria
|
|
Receiver(s)
|
CA
zone at Chung Shan;
Woodland
W2-W3;
Natural
streams R1a-b in N1;
Semi-natural
streams R1f-g in N1;
6 floral species of conservation interest,
including Aquilaria sinensis,
Camellia crapnelliana, Diospyros vaccinioides, Gleditsia australis,
Pyrenaria spectabilis
and Rhodoleia championii
3
faunal species of conservation
interest, including East Asian Porcupine, Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
|
Abundance
|
30
records of Aquilaria sinensis;
19
records of Camellia crapnelliana;
1
record of Diospyros vaccinioides;
1
record of Gleditsia australis;
24
records of Pyrenaria spectabilis;
1
record of Rhodoleia championii;
and
4 localities of Somanniathelphusa zanklon (1 in
natural stream R1a; 1 in semi-natural stream R1g and 2 in semi-natural stream
R1f) and 2 localities of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon (in semi-natural
stream R1f)
|
Duration
|
Throughout the operational period
|
Reversibility
|
Irreversible
|
Magnitude
|
Small for ecological
receivers
|
Impact Severity
before Mitigation
|
Minor
|
Note:
the rating order of overall ecological impact severity: Severe,
Severe-Moderate, Moderate, Moderate-Minor, Minor, and Insubstantial
|
8.8.1
According to the guidelines stipulated in
the EIAO-TM Annex 16 on impact mitigation, the policy adopted in the
EIA for mitigating ecological impacts, in order of priority, is:
·
Avoidance: Potential impacts shall be avoided to the maximum
extent practicable by optimising the project design;
·
Minimisation: Unavoidable impacts shall be
minimised by taking appropriate and practicable measures; and
·
Compensation: The loss of important species and habitats may
be provided elsewhere (i.e. onsite or offsite) as a compensation. Enhancement
and other conservation measures shall always be considered, whenever possible.
Mitigation
Measures during Design Phase
Avoidance Measure for Sites of Conservation Interest
8.8.2
Woodland W2 and the CA zone at Chung Shan are two
sites of conservation interest identified from literature review and their ecological
conditions were further confirmed in this EcoIA. Direct
encroachment of PDA for site formation and subsequent housing development, and
the works area for associated supporting infrastructure works, including
traffic improvement works and pipes laying works etc., has been avoided from
these two sites to avoid adverse ecological impact. The implementation of clear
site demarcation of the Project Site during construction could further enhance
the effectiveness of this avoidance measures.
Avoidance / Minimisation Measure for Species of
Conservation Interest
8.8.3
A total of 15 individuals of Aquilaria sinensis and 3 individuals of Pyrenaria spectabilis
were identified in woodland W3 at area around where the proposed Road L7 is located.
With reference to the baseline findings, the initial Project Site is found to
be in direct conflict with three young individuals of Aquilaria sinensis (comprising one
seedling, one sapling and one topped young tree) but able to avoid the
remaining 12 Aquilaria sinensis of which including the mature specimen of
trunk diameter of 400mm and all the three streamside Pyrenaria spectabilis. As the proposed Road L7 is
essential to accommodate the traffic demand arising from proposed public
housing development and release the burden of the existing road linkages within
the area, complete avoidance is considered not feasible for the implementation
of the Project. Adjustment of the alignment to minimise the impact has been
considered. However, as indicated in relevant drawings, shifting northward or
southward would only increase the affected quantity of these species. The
current alignment is found to be the preferred option from ecological
perspective as minimal affected Aquilaria
sinensis could be resulted and at same time
prevent direct impact on the mature Aquilaria
sinensis.
8.8.4
Some slope works are required along the proposed Road
L7 for achieving geotechnical stability alongside. In order to prevent
potential adverse impact to the offsite Aquilaria
sinensis identified in close proximity to the proposed
Road L7, alternative construction method (i.e. vertical retaining walls) is proposed
instead of cut slope in order to minimize the construction works area required
(according to the preliminary estimation, encroachment of an additional 0.9ha of
woodland W3 would be required (if cut slope is adopted). This alternative
construction method can significantly reduce construction works area to
completely avoid all the vegetation including the plants of conservation
interest within the additional 0.9ha of woodland W3.
8.8.5
The crab species Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon were identified in an upper section of a semi-natural
stream at northern portion of the HPR Site. In order to avoid adverse
impact on these crab species, the upper section about 208m, which covering the totally
4 recorded crab species localities, is proposed to be completely retained with
minimum 6m buffer zone under the latest revised layout. Other than the
recommended ecological enhancement, no development works will be undertaken within
the 6m buffer zone throughout the construction period.
Mitigation
Measures for Construction Phase
Avoidance and Minimisation Measures for Habitat Loss
8.8.6
The
habitat loss of W3 has been largely reduced from 2.7ha to 1.9ha identified in approved
TM54 EIA report. Under this EIA study, the area of habitat loss is reduced to 1.2ha.
Further enhancement planting has been recommended.
8.8.7
Though the Project Site of the core development area
at Hong Po Road and San Hing Road cannot be further reduced in order to provide
the required number of public housing units, the proposed works area for
associated infrastructures and traffic improvement works are all located away
from sensitive ecological areas as far
as possible in particular woodland W2 and upland natural streams R1a -b to
avoid impacts on these habitats.
Consideration of
Ecological Enhancement by Provision of Woodland Enhancement Planting
8.8.8
As evaluated in Section
8.7, no significant adverse impact was anticipated due to habitat
loss. The avoidance and minimisation
measures mention in Section 8.8.7
are recommended to ensure the impact will be confined to practical minimal. No
mitigation measure is required.
8.8.9
Nevertheless, ecological enhancement by provision of
woodland planting has been considered during the development of the project to
take the opportunity to enhance the ecological performance to the nearby area.
8.8.10
Since the affected woodland W3 is not a high-quality
habitat due to the constant human disturbance and the dominance of exotic plantation
species, the “like for like” principle stated in the EIAO-TM is considered not
suitable. Ecological enhancement by establishing a woodland habitat by using
native plant species instead of exotics found in the affected area is hence
recommended.
8.8.11
As shown in Figure 8.4, the proposed woodland enhancement
planting area is located on existing village/orchard habitat alongside an
offsite upper section of the semi-natural stream R1f connected to the section to
be retained. The advantage of this location is that the proposed enhancement
planting is going to replace the existing artificial village/orchard habitat by
a woodland, and such replacement can reduce the human disturbance to the
ecologically sensitive section of R1f, and also
provide additional buffer to the natural stream R1b for screening disturbance.
8.8.12
A preliminary woodland enhancement planting plan is
presented in Appendix 8.6.
8.8.13
Since the impact of woodland loss is in minor level,
the recommended ecological enhancement through woodland enhancement planting can
bring some extent of ecological beneficial impact to the area.
Preservation of Floral Species of Conservation
Interest by Transplanting
8.8.14
As revealed in Section 8.7, unavoidable removal of three
young Aquilaria sinensis
would be required due to site clearance works within Project Site. Two of them are
seedling and sapling of 0.3m and 1.8m in height respectively. As both plants
are young in age and small in size, they are
considered suitable to be preserved by transplanting for their good health
observed during the ecological baseline survey and anticipated high survival
rate and recovery ability following the transplanting operation. The third
affected individual is a topped young tree. As illustrated in Plate D5-6
of Appendix 8.2, the tree has
lost its whole canopy and just left a lower trunk of about 1.4m in height. It
is not recommended for transplanting due to its extreme poor condition.
8.8.15
As reported in our ecological baseline study in Section
8.5, seedlings and young trees of the species were common in woodland W3.
No specific compensatory planting measure is required for the removal of the
dying individual.
8.8.16
Potential receptor site for the transplanted Aquilaria sinensis
can be located in the unaffected areas inside woodland
W3. Potential site for the transplanting is indicated in Figure 8.4. With the implementation of the
proposed transplanting measure, the impact on this species could be reduced
from minor to insubstantial.
Minimisation Measure and Preservation of Faunal
Species of Conservation Interest by Habitat Enhancement and Temporary Translocation
8.8.17
Apart from the direct avoidance of 208m semi-natural
stream R1f to preserve the habitat of the crab species of conservation
interest, ecological enhancement is recommended for the retained section
onsite. As the major artificial modification of R1f is stream bank
strengthening works (mainly by concrete lining), and the presence of disturbed habitats
occupied by village structures or paved footpaths at the immediate proximity
alongside the stream, proposed ecological enhancement includes reinstatement of
the disturbed stream bank and the buffer zone by demolition of all artificial
structures, following by planting of native plants:
·
To demolish artificial bank structures and reinstate natural state of southern
stream bank of R1f for reintroduction of riparian vegetation (the demolition
works are only undertaken at sections with modified bank structure. Diagram D1
in Appendix 8.5 indicates the extent of the recommended works);
·
To demolish artificial structures e.g. temporary storage
structures/buildings, and paved grounds inside the buffer zone to allow
planting;
·
To plant the recommended native plant species along the reinstated bank
and 6m buffer zone.
8.8.19
As the heavily modified stream banks and the
artificial structures inside the 6m buffer zone cannot be utilized by wildlife
at present, it is expected that the proposed enhancement by reinstating these
areas are able to improve the ecological carrying capacity of the stream and
its associated riparian habitats.
Species
|
Proposed Coverage (%)
|
Stream Bank
(approx. 2m wide within the 6m buffer zone)
|
Alternanthera sessilis
|
25
|
Commelina diffusa
|
25
|
Isachne globosa
|
10
|
Ludwigia adscendens
|
5
|
Microstegium ciliatum
|
5
|
Persicaria hydropiper
|
5
|
Rotala rotundifolia
|
25
|
Other Area
within 6m buffer (approx. 4m in width)
|
Bridelia tomentosa
|
10
|
Celtis sinensis
|
5
|
Cleistocalyx nervosum
|
20
|
Ficus hispida
|
15
|
Litsea rotundifolia
|
15
|
Mallotus paniculatus
|
5
|
Microcos
nervosa
|
10
|
Schefflera
heptaphylla
|
20
|
8.8.21
As discussed earlier in Section 8.7, the enhancement
works will be confined in areas enclosed by temporary partitions about 1.5m
from the bank. Majority of the original watercourse (about 75% of its area)
will be unaffected. However, during the erection of the temporary partition in
the watercourse, most of the individuals of the two crab species Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon would move away
from the works activities to avoid disturbance but, some individuals would be
accidentally moved into the demolition works area. Translocation of these
affected individuals to the unaffected portion of the watercourse R1f is
therefore recommended. Preliminary translocation proposal is given in Section
8.10.
8.8.22
One locality of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon in R1f is
unavoidably affected by the project due to its relevant section of the
watercourse is unable to be preserved onsite. In order to minimise the impact
on the individuals of this locality, same translocation practice recommended
above is also applicable to this section.
8.8.23
Apart from the retained section of stream R1f with
recorded localities of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
recommended to be the receptor site of the translocated individuals, two more
sections of watercourse at further uppercourse (the
eastern tributary downstream of R1b) of R1f and R1g are considered suitable to
be alternative options for receiving the translocated individuals (Figure 8.4). The western tributary
of R1f at immediately downstream of R1a is also a potential receptor site from
ecologically perspective, however, it was screened out as that section falls
within the Tsing Shan firing Range, in which the translocation operation and
the subsequent necessary monitoring in the area would have some extent of
uncertainty due to unpredictable military activities inside.
8.8.24
With the implementation of the recommended
translocation measure, the ecological impact on the crab species is anticipated
to be minor.
Minimisation of Construction Disturbance
8.8.25
Although no significant adverse ecological impact is
anticipated from construction disturbance as discussed in Section 8.7, general
good site practices related to ecological protection has been considered since
the commencement of the feasibility stage and should be implemented to further
minimise impact arising from air quality, noise, water quality and disturbances
from other construction activities, including:
·
Restricting construction activities within clearly demarcated works
boundary;
·
Erecting hoarding and fencing around works areas, screening
disturbances to adjacent habitats;
·
Use of quiet mechanical plant;
·
Use of movable noise barrier / temporary noise screening structures or
purpose-built temporary noise barriers;
·
Use of well-maintained plant on site, which should be serviced
regularly during the construction programme;
·
Regular spraying to minimise impacts of dust deposition on adjacent
vegetation and habitats during the construction activities;
·
Stockpiling of construction materials and dusty materials should be
covered and located away from any watercourses;
·
Construction debris and spoil should be covered up and/or disposed of
as soon as possible to avoid being washed into the nearby watercourses;
·
Construction activities, which generate large amount of wastewater,
should be carried out in a distance away from the watercourses;
·
Mitigation measures to control site run-off from entering the nearby
water environment should be implemented to minimise water quality impacts. Surface
channels should be provided along the edge of the Project Site with direct
interface with watercourses to intercept the run-off;
·
Site lighting should be carefully designed to prevent light spillage
and glare; and
·
Strictly prohibiting open burning on work sites.
Mitigation
Measures for Operation Phase
8.8.26
No ecological mitigation measure for operation phase
is recommended.
8.9
Residual
Ecological Impact
8.9.1
A summary of potential ecological impacts before and
after adoption of the recommended mitigation measures is given below:
Table 8.26 - Summary of Residual
Impacts
Potential Impact
|
Impact Significance
(Before Mitigation)
|
Mitigation /
Precautionary Measures
|
Impact Significance
(After Mitigation)
|
Habitat Loss (Woodland (W3)
|
Minor
|
No mitigation is required, but
Ecological enhancement by means of woodland planting
is proposed as additional ecologically friendly measure
|
Minor
|
Habitat Loss (Agricultural Land, Natural Stream
(N2), Semi-natural Stream (N1), Drainage Channel, Village/Orchard)
|
Minor
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Minor
|
Habitat Loss (Village Area, Urban Area)
|
Insubstantial
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Insubstantial
|
Habitat Fragmentation (Woodland, Semi-natural Stream)
|
Minor
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Minor
|
Habitat Fragmentation (Drainage Channel, Agricultural Land,
Village/Orchard, Village Area, Urban Area)
|
Insubstantial
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Insubstantial
|
Impact on Floral Species of Conservation (Aquilaria sinensis)
|
Minor
|
Preserving affected individuals by transplanting
|
Insubstantial
|
Impact on Faunal Species of Conservation Interest
(Cryptopotamon anacoluthon)
|
Minor
|
Avoidance of the semi-natural stream section;
Preserving affected individuals by translocation;
Ecological enhancement for the retained watercourse and its 6m buffer
zone with temporary partition during the working period of the enhancement.
|
Minor
|
Impact on Faunal Species of Conservation Interest (Somanniathelphusa zanklon)
|
Insubstantial
|
Avoidance of the semi-natural stream section;
Ecological enhancement for the retained watercourse and its 6m buffer
zone with temporary partition during the working period of the enhancement;
Preserving affected individuals during enhancement works by
translocation
|
Insubstantial
|
Impact on Faunal Species of Conservation Interest (Insectivorous Bat,
Little Egret, Chinese Pond Heron and Chinese Hwamei)
|
Minor
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Minor
|
Impact on Faunal Species of Conservation Interest (Ischnura rufostigma)
|
Insubstantial
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Insubstantial
|
Construction Disturbance to Sensitive Ecological Resources
|
Minor
|
Recommended good site practices;
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Minor
|
Operational Disturbance to Offsite Ecological Resources
|
Minor
|
No specific ecological mitigation is required
|
Minor
|
8.9.2
With
the full implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, potential
ecological impacts arising from Project are anticipated to be minimised /
mitigated to acceptable level.
·
Ecological enhancement by provision of woodland planting;
·
Transplanting directly affected individuals of Aquilaria sinensis;
·
Ecological enhancement for the retained section of stream R1f; and
·
Translocation of crab species of Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
8.10.2
The enhancement planting shall be monitored
throughout the establishment period (i.e. period after the completion of the
planting works of the proposed enhancement planting). According to the
preliminary woodland enhancement planting plan in Appendix 8.6, a 3-years monitoring is proposed and the
parameters to be monitored shall include health condition (good/fair/poor/dead)
and survival (%) of the planted trees. The frequency of the monitoring is
proposed to be bi-monthly during the first year while quarterly for the
following years.
Transplanting
directly affected individuals of Aquilaria sinensis
8.10.3
In
order to confirm and update the condition of directly affected and temporarily
affected plants of Aquilaria sinensis in woodland W3, an update vegetation survey on
the species prior to the commencement of the site clearance works is
recommended. The update vegetation survey shall include the following:
·
Confirm and update the presence, condition and locations of Aquilaria sinensis;
·
Identify suitable receptor site(s) for the plants (according to the
current proposal stated in Section 8.8,
suitable unaffected area in woodland W3 is recommended). Potential receptor
site for the transplanting is indicated in Figure 8.4. Deviation from the proposal shall be fully justified and agreed with
AFCD before commencement); and
·
Propose implementation and monitoring programme
for the transplanting.
8.10.4
Qualified
ecologist(s) shall be in place to conduct the monitoring recommended in the
update vegetation survey report. The monitoring would be conducted after the
completion of the transplanting. Monthly monitoring for the first year
following transplanting and quarterly for the second year is recommended. The
details will be provided in the update vegetation survey report for AFCD’s
review and prior agreement.
8.10.5
Apart from the direct avoidance of 208m semi-natural
stream R1f to preserve the habitat of the crab species of conservation
interest, ecological enhancement is recommended for the retained section
onsite. Proposed ecological enhancement includes reinstatement of the disturbed
stream bank and the buffer zone to natural condition by demolition of all
artificial structures, following by planting of native plants:
·
To demolish artificial bank structures and reinstate
natural state of stream bank for reintroduction of riparian vegetation (the
demolition works are only undertaken at sections with modified bank structure.
Diagram D1 in Appendix 8.5 indicates the extent of the recommended works);
·
To demolish artificial structures e.g. temporary
storage structures/buildings, and paved grounds inside the buffer zone to allow
planting;
·
To plant the recommended native plant species along
the reinstated bank and 6m buffer zone.
8.10.6
A
12-months establishment period shall be provided after the planting works. Monitoring
of the plants once a month is recommended. Species planted along the bank and
buffer zone shall be checked by a qualified ecologist to ensure correct species
are used in accordance with the recommendation in the EIA. Apart from the
species identity, monitoring parameters shall include the overall survival rate
and general health condition of each species. The monthly monitoring shall be
conducted by a qualified ecologist and provide advice whether necessary
actions, such as replacement of dead plants, removal of invasive species, etc.
are required to ensure the performance of the planting works. The monitoring
findings shall be reported properly in the monthly EM&A report.
Translocation
of affected crab species of conservation interest Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and
Somanniathelphusa zanklon
8.10.7
A
confirmation survey is recommended to be undertaken prior to erection of the
temporary partition for the ecological enhancement works for the retained
section of stream R1f, which aims to update the condition of the crab localities
identified in the EIA stage, and to confirm recommended receptor site(s) (the
unaffected section along the retained section of stream R1f is recommended as
the preferred receptor site in Section 8.8. Other potential
receptor sites for consideration are indicated in Figure 8.4); and to advise the translocation methodology according
to the survey results and post-translocation monitoring requirements to be
agreed with AFCD.
8.10.8
It is
expected that the translocation practice is to be conducted by the qualified
ecologist at the same day of the completion of the erection of the temporary
partitions along the bank to be reinstated. The qualified ecologist shall
inspect whether individuals of the two crab species are trapped in the
enhancement works area defined by the temporary partitions,
and carry out translocation immediately according the agreed methodology
with AFCD.
8.10.9
Collection
permit for target species would be applied from AFCD prior to commencement of
translocation. Direct capture, hand netting, and baited traps would be applied
at the semi-natural stream where the two crab species would be affected by
proposed development. Capture would be carried out in wet season when the crabs
are more active. At least 3 capture days are proposed, depending on the project
programme, site and weather condition, and number of individuals captured. All
captured crabs would be temporarily stored in containers with stream water with
leaves and over-crowding in the containers should be avoided. They would be
translocated to the finalized receptor site(s) within the same day. The
ecological enhancement works for the retained section of stream R1f shall only
be started when the whole translocation is completed.
8.10.10
A
post-translocation monitoring would be carried out by qualified ecologist(s) by
the end of wet season after translocation to assess the recapture rate. The
monitoring is recommended to be conducted once a month. The details will be
provided in the confirmation survey report for AFCD’s review and agreement.
Protection
of Offsite Ecological Resources in Close Vicinity during Construction Period
8.10.11
Clear
demarcation of construction site limit should be made to prevent disturbance to
offsite ecological resources including adjacent habitats, vegetation and in
particularly plant species of conservation interest and natural streams which
provide suitable habitats for crab species of conservation interest. As clear site demarcation as well as good
site practices will be an integral part of the site operation and associated
inspections, no further specific ecological monitoring is recommended.
8.11
Cumulative Ecological Impacts
8.11.1
Totally 11 concurrent projects have been identified in
Section 1.8 of this EIA Report.
(a)
Contract
No. CV/2011/01 – Site Formation and Infrastructure Works near Tsing Lun Road
and Tsz Tin Road in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(b)
Contract
No. CV/2012/02 – Construction of Sewage Pumping Station near Tsz Tin Road and
Associated Sewerage Works in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(c)
Contract
No. CV/2015/03 – Site Formation and Infrastructure Works near Tong Hang
Road and Tsz Tin Road in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(d)
Public
Housing Projects at Site 1 & 1A, Site 2, Site 3 & 4 (East) in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(e)
Private Housing Development Works at Site 3/4
(West) in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(f)
Formation,
Roads and Drains in Area 54, Tuen Mun – Site
Formation at Site 4A (East), Site 4A (South), Site 5 and Associated
Infrastructure Works
(g)
Housing
Projects at Site 4A (South) and Site 5 in Area 54, Tuen
Mun
(h)
Construction
for Community Hall and Sports Centre at Site 4A (West) in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(i)
Construction
for Primary School and Secondary School at Site 4A (East) in Area 54, Tuen Mun
(j)
Public
Housing Development at Tuen Mun Area 29 West
(k)
Tuen Mun Western Bypass
8.11.2
As detailed in Section 1.8, projects (a)-(d),
and (h) will not have cumulative construction impacts with this Project since
there will no overlapping of construction period with these interfacing
projects.
8.11.3
Projects (e)-(g), (i)-(j)
and (k) will have some overlapping of construction period with this Project. Projects
(e) - (g) are located in urban area of low ecological
value southeast of the proposed Road L7. No significant cumulative impacts are
anticipated. Their ecological condition under the corresponding projects has
also been reflected in our baseline study in Section 8.5 (mapped as
urban area in the
habitat map of Figure 8.1). Significant cumulative
impacts from projects (i)-(j) and (k) are not
anticipated as these three projects are located rather far away from this
Project and separated by other existing urban land uses. Site 5 of project (g)
is located south of woodland W1, but will be
completely laid on existing developed area with no conflict with any sensitive
ecological resources such site or species of conservation interest. No
significant adverse cumulative ecological impacts are anticipated. In fact, projects
(e) -(g) and this Project were components of the main study of Planning and Development Study of Potential
Housing Site in Area 54, Tuen Mun. According to
their latest EIA Review Report (TM54 EIAR-2012) under Agreement No. CE38/2011
for ecological impact assessment, and no adverse cumulative construction
impacts were identified.
8.11.4
Cumulative operation impacts are not anticipated
from projects (a)-(b), (c), (e)-(j) as all these projects are built on existing
developed areas and located distant from this Project. Project (k) is a
proposed tunnel for Tuen Mun Western Bypass running
completely underground within the assessment area of this Project, with a long
separation distance of about 500m. No cumulative operation impacts are
anticipated.
8.11.5
Projects (c) and (d) are associated projects at Site
1 & 1A near the proposed Road L7 under this Project and therefore also
components of main study of Planning and Development Study of Potential
Housing Site in Area 54, Tuen Mun. Project (c) is
responsible for the site formation and construction of the infrastructures
while project (d) is for the housing development on top of the site. Major
ecological impact arising from these two projects is the permanent loss of some
area at woodland W1. During the course of planning and
design, the loss of the woodland habitat has been reduced to 0.1ha, from 0.6ha at
early stage in TM54 EIA and 0.2ha in TM54 EIAR-2012. According to TM54
EIAR-2012, a woodland compensation area of about 0.4ha for habitat loss at W1
was proposed at an area bordering W1 and W2. Due to the small size of the
affected area in woodland W1, and the compensation measure, no adverse
cumulative operation impacts were identified from both the TM54 EIAR-2012 and
the later SHR PER and HPR PER. The loss of habitat at W1 has also already been
reflected in the current ecological baseline study and illustrated in the
updated habitat map Figure 8.1.
8.12.1
An ecological impact assessment was conducted for
the proposed site formation and infrastructure works for the housing
development at San Hong Road and Hong Po Road in Tuen
Mun.
8.12.2
A total of 11 types of habitat were identified,
including woodland, shrub-grassland, landscape plantation, agricultural land,
natural stream, semi-natural stream, drainage
channel, pond, village/orchard, village area and urban area.
8.12.3
Sites of conservation interest included a mature
secondary wood (woodland W2) near Tong Hang Road and a CA zone at Chung Shan.
8.12.4
In terms of floral species, a total of 8 species of
conservation interest were identified in the baseline study, including Aquilaria sinensis,
Camellia crapnelliana, Diospyros vaccinioides,
Geodorum densiflorum,
Gleditsia australis, Nepenthes mirabilis, Pyrenaria spectabilis and Rhodoleia championii.
8.12.5
In terms of faunal community, a total of 5 species
of conservation interest were identified, which include 2 mammal species (an insectivorous
bat of Microchiroptera and East Asian Porcupine ),
1 bird species (Little Egret) and 2 aquatic faunal species (Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon). Another
5 bird species (Chinese Pond Heron, Crested Goshawk, Greater Coucal, Chinese Hwamei and Black Kite) and one damselfly
species (Ischnura rufostigma)
were detected by previous studies.
8.12.6
Most of the faunal species of conservation interest
were detected outside the proposed Project Site/associated with offsite
habitat. For terrestrial/ volant mammal and bird species of conservation
interest, they are all either locally common or widely distributed in Hong
Kong, with high mobility. They are able to avoid human
activities and anticipated to utilise other readily available and connected habitats
in the vicinity. No nest/breeding/roosting site was detected during the
surveys.
8.12.7
Potential ecological impacts arising from the
project include habitat loss, removal impact on the crab species of
conservation interest (Cryptopotamon
anacoluthon), and removal impact on the floral species of conservation
interest (Aquilaria sinensis).
None of these impacts, however, are anticipated to be of high ecological
significance, because avoidance and minimisation measures have been carefully
considered as early as in the design of the Project to prevent significant
adverse impacts to habitats or species of high conservation importance. No
potential impact on the damselfly species Ischnura rufostigma was anticipated as proposed works will not cause any alternation to
the habitat of its recorded location where the species was detected nor
destruction of any wetland habitats suitable for this species in the
surrounding.
8.12.8
The two identified sites of conservation interest
including the mature woodland W2 of high ecological value and the CA zone within
the assessment area will be avoided by the Project from ecological impacts. An upper
section of the semi-natural stream R1f at HPR Site is
proposed to be retained by adjusting the project site boundary for the
preservation of the localities of two crab species of conservation interest (Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon).
8.12.9
Consideration of minimising impacts on floral
species of conservation interest Aquilaria
sinensis and Pyrenaria spectabilis has also been taken into account during the design of the alignment and
construction method of the proposed Road L7 at Po Tong Ha. With the
implementation of the minimisation measure, including the careful designation
of the alignment and the construction method for the retaining structures along
the new road, all the Pyrenaria spectabilis
and majority of Aquilaria sinensis, including the large specimen of the species can
be preserved in-situ without any conflicts with the proposed works. Other
recommended minimisation measures include the transplanting of Aquilaria sinensis.
8.12.10
Majority of the recorded localities of the two crab
species of conservation interest Cryptopotamon anacoluthon and Somanniathelphusa zanklon
that detected at the semi-natural stream section marginally located along the project
site boundary can be avoided from direct impact by the proposed avoidance of
the sensitive upper section. Apart from the direct avoidance of the sensitive watercourse
section, a buffer zone of minimum 6m alongside will be provided for further protection to these crab
species and their habitat. One locality of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon,
however, is found unavoidably affected due to the permanent loss of its
habitats for the development. The crabs
of this locality are recommended to be preserved by translocation at suitable
undisturbed stream habitat. With implementation of the recommended
translocation measure, no significant overall ecological impact on the crab
species is anticipated. In addition, ecological enhancement for the retained section
of the semi-natural stream R1f by reinstating its artificial bank structure to
natural riparian habitat is proposed which aims to improve the carrying capability
of the watercourse for the two crab species of conservation interest.
8.12.11
Due to limited affected size and quality of the
affected woodland patch, no significant adverse impact is anticipated from the
habitat loss. However, provision of woodland enhancement planting is
recommended to enhance the ecological performance of the area. According to
current proposal, enhancement woodland of not less than 1.2ha will be
provided.
8.12.12
With the full implementation of the recommended
mitigation measures, no unacceptable residual ecological impacts arising from
the implementation of the proposed Project are anticipated.
AECOM. 2016. Hung Shui Kiu New
Development Area: EIA Report. Civil Engineering and Development Department,
HKSAR.
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department. 2019. Hong Kong
Biodiversity Database. Accessed in April 2020. (http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/hkbiodiversity/database/search.asp?lang=en.)
Agriculture,
Fisheries and Conservation Department. Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong (Online Version). Accessed in April 2020. (http://www.herbarium.gov.hk/PublicationsText.aspx?BookNameId=1&SectionId=3)
Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department. Incense
Tree Species Action Plan 2018-2022 (Online Version). Accessed in April 2020.
(https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/con_flo/con_flo_con/files/Incense_Tree_SAP_2018_2022.pdf)
Black &
Veatch Hong Kong Limited and Environmental Resources Management (ERM). 2017. Engineering Study Review for Site Formation
and Infrastructure works Works at Hong Po Road, Tuen Mun – Investigation: Final Preliminary Environmental
Review Report. Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR.
Black &
Veatch Hong Kong Limited Environmental Resources Management (ERM). 2017. Engineering Study Review for Site Formation
and Infrastructure Works at San Hing Road, Tuen Mun –
Investigation: Final Preliminary Environmental Review Report. Civil
Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR.
Barretto, G., Cribb P.
and Gale S. 2011. The Wild Orchids of
Hong Kong. Natural History Publications (Borneo).
Chan, A., Cheung,
J., Sze, P., Wong, A., Wong, E. & Yau, E. (2011) A Review of the Local
Restrictedness of Hong Kong Butterflies. Hong Kong Biodiversity AFCD
Newsletter, 21. pp 1-12.
Chan, K.F.,
Cheung, K.S., Ho, C.Y., Lam, F.N, Tang, W.S., Lau, W.N. & Bogadek, A. 2005. Field Guide to the Amphibians of Hong
Kong. AFCD, Friends of the Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd. Hong Kong.
Corlett, R.T.,
Wing, F.W., Ng, S.C., Chau, L.K.C., and Wong, LM.Y. 2000. Hong
Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status. Memoirs of
the Hong Kong Natural History Society No 23, pp 1-157.
Environmental
Resources Management (ERM). 1999. Planning
and Development Study of Potential Housing Site in Area 54, Tuen
Mun: EIA Study. Territory Development Department, HKSAR.
Environmental Resources Management (ERM). 2013.
Formation, Roads and Drains in Area 54, Tuen Mun – Phase 1 and 2 Review of Traffic Environmental
Drainage and Sewerage Impact Assessment - Investigation: Final EIA Review
Report. Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR.
Fellowes J.R.,
Lau M.W.N., Dudgeon D., Reels G.T., Ades G.W.J., Carey G.J., Chan B.P.L.,
Kendrick R.C., Lee K.S., Leven M.R., Wilson K.D.P. and Yu Y.T. 2002. Wild
animals to watch: Terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in
Hong Kong. In Hodgkiss, I.J. (ed.). Memoirs of
the Hong Kong Natural History Society, No. 19, Hong Kong. pp 123-159.
IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Accessed in April 2020.
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/)
Karsen, S.J., Lau,
M.W.N. & Bogadek, A. 1998. Hong Kong
Amphibians and Reptiles. Provisional Urban Council. Hong Kong.
Lee V. L. F., Lam
S. K. S., Ng F. K. Y., Chan T. K. T. and Young M. L. C. (2004). Field Guide
to the Freshwater Fish of Hong Kong. AFCD, Friends of the Country Parks and
Cosmos Books Ltd., Hong Kong.
Lo, Y.F. and Hui,
W.L. 2005. Hong Kong Butterflies (Second Edition). AFCD, Friends of the
Country Parks and Cosmos Books Ltd. Hong Kong.
Maunsell Consultants Asia
Limited. 2005. Formation, Roads and
Drains in Area 54, Tuen Mun – Phase 1 and 2
Environmental Traffic and Drainage Impact Assessment Review - Investigation:
EIA Review. Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR.
Maunsell Consultants Asia
Limited. 2007. Widening of Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Tin Interchange – Environmental
Impact Assessment. Highways Department, HKSAR.
Ng, P.K.L. & Dudgeon, D. 1992. The Potamidae
and Parathelphusidae (Crustacea :
Decapoda : Brachyura) of Hong Kong. Invertebrate Taxonomy 6: 741–768.
Stanton D.J & Leven M.R. 2016. Distribution, habitat utilisation and
conservation status of the freshwater crab, Somanniathelphusa zanklon,
endemic to Hong Kong. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(3): 8564–8574.
Stanton D.J., Leven M.R. & Hui T.C.H. 2017. Distribution of Cryptopotamon anacoluthon, a freshwater
crab endemic to Hong Kong. Journal of Threatened Taxa 9(2): 9786–9794.
Tam, T.W., Leung, K.K., Kwan, B.S.P., Wu, K.K.Y., Tang, S.S.H., So,
I.W.Y., Cheng, J.C.Y., Yuen, E.F.M., Tsang, Y.M., and Hui, W.L. 2011. The
Dragonflies of Hong Kong. AFCD, Friends of Country Park and Cosmos Books
Ltd.
Wilson, K.D.P., Tam, T.W., Kwan, B.S.P., Wu, K.K.Y., Wong, B.S.F. and
Wong, J.K. 2004. Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Hong Kong (2nd
Edition). AFCD, Friends of Country Park and Cosmos Books Ltd.
Yip, J. K. L.,
and Lai, P. C. C. 2004. The Nationally Rare and Endangered Plant, Aquilaria sinensis:
Its Status in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Biodiversity AFCD Newsletter No. 7. pp
14-16.
Yip, J. K. L., Ngar, Y.N., Yip, J.Y., Liu, E.K.Y. and Lai, P. C. C. 2004. Venturing Fung Shui Woods. Friends of
the Country Parks, Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department and
Cosmos Books Limited.
END
OF TEXT