4.1 Legislation, Standards and Guidelines
4.2 Description of the Environment
4.3 Assessment Area and Noise Sensitive Receivers
4.4 Construction Noise Impact Assessment
4.5 Operational Noise Impact Assessment
Figures
Figure 4.1 Locations of
Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers
Appendices
Appendix 4.1 Photos
of the Representative NSRs
Appendix 4.3 Detailed
Plant Inventory
Appendix 4.4 Locations
of Workfronts
Appendix 4.5 Unmitigated
Construction Noise Impacts at Selected NSRs
4.1 Legislation, Standards and Guidelines
4.1.1 General
4.1.1.1
The relevant legislation and
associated guidance applicable to this Study for the assessment of noise impact
include:
·
Environmental
Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap. 499), including Technical
Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (TM-EIAO), Annex 5 and Annex 13;
·
Noise
Control Ordinance (NCO) (Cap. 400);
·
Technical
Memorandum (TM) on Noise from Construction Work other than Percussive Piling
(TM-GW);
·
TM on
Noise from Percussive Piling (TM-PP);
·
TM on
Noise on Construction Work in Designated Areas (TM-DA); and
·
TM on
Noise from Places other than Domestic Premises, Public Places or Construction
Sites (TM-Places).
4.1.2 Construction Noise
Construction Noise during Normal Hours
4.1.2.1
NCO provides the statutory
framework for noise control in Hong Kong. Assessment procedures and standards
are set out in the respective TM promulgated under NCO.
4.1.2.2 To ensure a better environment, the TM-EIAO promulgated under the EIA Ordinance has imposed more stringent criteria. For construction, there is no statutory limit on daytime construction noise under NCO and related TMs. There is statutory control on construction noise during daytime on general holidays (including Sundays). Nevertheless, the TM-EIAO stipulates criteria of 65-75dB(A) for daytime construction activities, as shown in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 Noise standards
for daytime construction activities
Uses |
Noise Standards[1], [2], Leq (30 mins) dB(A) |
0700 – 1900
hours on any day not being a Sunday or general holiday |
|
All domestic premises including temporary housing
accommodation |
75 |
Hotel and hostels |
75 |
Educational institutions including
kindergartens, nurseries and all others where unaided voice communication is
required |
70 65 (During examination) |
Notes:
[1] The
above standards apply to uses that rely on opened windows for ventilation.
[2] The above standards should be viewed as the maximum
permissible noise levels assessed at 1m from the external facade.
Construction Noise during Restricted Hours
4.1.2.3 NCO also provides statutory control on general construction works during restricted hours (i.e. 1900 to 0700 hours (of the next day) from Monday to Saturday and at any time on Sundays or public holidays). The use of Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) for construction works during restricted hours would require a Construction Noise Permit (CNP). The TM-GW details the procedures adopted by Environmental Protection Department (EPD) for assessing such application. The granting of a CNP is subject to conditions stated in the CNP and it may be revoked at any time for failure to comply with the permit conditions.
4.1.2.4
In addition to the general
controls on the use of PME during restricted hours, the use of Specified
Powered Mechanical Equipment (SPME) and the undertaking of Prescribed
Construction Work (PCW) during the restricted hours in a designated area are
controlled by the TM-DA. Construction plant or equipment classified as SPME
under the TM-DA includes hand-held breakers, bulldozers, concrete lorry mixers,
dump trucks and vibratory pokers. The PCW includes the erection or dismantling
of formwork or scaffolding, hammering, loading, unloading or handling of
rubble, wooden boards, steel bars, wood or scaffolding material, and the
disposal of rubble through plastic chutes.
4.1.2.5
The TM-DA details the
procedures that should generally be adopted by the Noise Control Authority for
assessing the use of SPME during restricted hours and for determining whether a
CNP would be issued.
4.1.2.6
Maximum noise levels from
construction activities during restricted hours at affected Noise Sensitive
Receivers (NSRs) are controlled under the TMs and shall not exceed the
specified Acceptable Noise Levels (ANLs). These ANLs are stipulated in
accordance with the Area Sensitivity Ratings (ASRs) established for the NSRs.
The ANLs for construction works in Designated Areas are more stringent than
those given in the TM-GW and summarised in Table
4.2.
Table 4.2 ANLs for
construction during restricted hours
Time Period |
ANL, dB(A) |
||
ASR A |
ASR B |
ASR C |
|
All weekdays during the evening (1900 to 2300
hours), and general holidays (including Sundays) during the day-time and evening (0700 to 2300 hours) |
60 (45) |
65 (50) |
70
(55) |
All days during the night-time (2300 to 0700 hours) |
45 (30) |
50 (35) |
55
(40) |
Note:
[1] Figures in brackets are
ANLs for SPME construction work in designated areas.
4.1.2.7
As defined in Noise Control
Designated Area Plan, the assessment area of the Project is not within the
Designated Area.
4.1.2.8
Despite any description made in
this EIA, there is no guarantee that a CNP will be issued for the project
construction. The Noise Control Authority will consider a well-justified CNP
application, once filed, for construction works within restricted hours as
guided by the relevant TMs issued under the NCO. The Noise Control Authority
will take into account contemporary conditions /
situations of adjoining land uses and any previous complaints against
construction activities at the Project site before making a decision in
granting a CNP. Nothing in this EIA report shall bind the Noise Control
Authority in making a decision. If a CNP is to be
issued, the Noise Control Authority shall include in it any conditions demand.
Failure to comply with any such conditions will lead to cancellation of the CNP
and prosecution under the NCO. According to the proposed construction
methodology for the Project, construction during
night-time period and other time periods under restricted hours are not
anticipated.
Percussive Piling
4.1.2.9
Under the TM-PP, CNPs are
required for carrying out of percussive piling during 0700 - 1900 hours of the
next day on normal weekdays, and carrying out of percussive piling is generally prohibited during
general holidays including Sundays. This TM specifies the permitted hours and
other conditions for percussive piling. Table
4.3 lists the acceptable percussive piling noise levels for various types
of NSR.
Table 4.3 ANLs for
percussive piling
NSR Window Type or Means
of Ventilation |
ANL, dB(A) |
(i) NSR (or
part of NSR) with no window or other opening |
100 |
(ii) NSR with central air conditioning system |
90 |
(iii) NSR with windows or other openings but
without central air conditioning system |
85 |
4.1.2.10
Depending on the numbers and
types of piling machines and pile types, and the separation from NSRs,
percussive piling would be restricted to 12, 5 or 3 hours respectively during
07:00 - 1900 hours on normal weekdays. For NSRs
that are particularly sensitive to noise, such as hospitals, medical clinics,
educational institutions and courts of law, a further reduction of 10dB(A)
shall be applied to the above ANLs. According to the proposed construction
methodology for the Project, percussive piling is not anticipated.
4.1.3 Operational Noise
4.1.3.1
The TM-EIAO (Annex 5 of TM) has
stipulated the noise standards for various noise sources as shown in Table 4.4. It should, however, be
noted that the following noise criteria are only applicable to uses that rely
on opened windows for ventilation.
Table 4.4 Noise
standards for operational phase
Common Uses |
Noise Standards[1], [2] |
||||
Aircraft
Noise (Noise Exposure Forecast: NEF) |
Helicopter Noise Lmax dB(A) 0700-1900 hours |
Road
Traffic Noise L10
(1hour) dB(A) |
Rail Noise |
Fixed Noise Sources |
|
All domestic premises including
temporary housing accommodation |
25 |
85 |
70 |
(a) The
appropriate ANLs shown in Table 2 of the Technical Memorandum for the
Assessment of Noise from Places Other than Domestic Premises, Public Places
or Construction Sites and (b) Lmax (2300-0700 hours) = 85dB(A) |
(a) 5dB(A) below
the appropriate ANLs shown in Table 2 of the Technical Memorandum for the
Assessment of Noise from Places Other than Domestic Premises, Public Places
or Construction Sites, or (b) the
prevailing background noise levels (For quiet areas with level 5 dB(A) below
the ANL) |
Hotel and hostels |
25 |
85 |
70 |
||
Offices |
30 |
90 |
70 |
||
Educational institutions
including kindergartens, nurseries and all others where unaided voice
communication is required |
25 |
85 |
65 |
||
Places of public Worship
and courts of law |
25 |
85 |
65 |
||
Hospitals, clinics,
convalescences and homes for the aged, diagnostic rooms, wards |
25 |
85 |
55 |
Notes:
[1]
The
above standards apply to uses that rely on opened windows for ventilation.
[2]
The
above standards shall be viewed as the maximum permissible noise levels
assessed at 1m from the external facade.
4.1.3.2
As mentioned in Section 2, the main objective of the
Project is to enhance the safety and accessibility of the pubic using the pier.
There is neither planned increase in the existing Kaito services nor alteration of their routing.
Therefore, the Project will not introduce any additional operational noise
sources in Table 4.4.
4.2 Description of the Environment
4.2.1 Existing Environment
4.2.1.1
As discussed in Section 2, the works area of the
Project is located at north-eastern coast of Tung Ping Chau facing towards Ping
Chau Hoi. It overlaps mostly with Tung Ping Chau Marine Park and is adjacent to
the Ping Chau Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Plover Cove
(Extension) Country Park is located at more than 70m to the west of the
Project. Part of the works area is currently occupied by Tung Ping Chau Public
Pier of approximately 97m long and 5.5m wide which would be subject to pier
improvement works under the Project. The adjacent area of the Project is
generally rural in character with Tai Tong, Lei Uk, Chan Uk,
Sha Tau and Lam Uk located to more than 210m away. According to the Draft Ping Chau Outline Zoning Plan (OZP)
No. S/NE-PC/1, the existing Tung Ping Chau Public Pier encroaching
the works area is located within an area zoned as “Other Specified Uses” annotated
“Pier” (“OU(Pier)”). The proposed new pier falls outside the boundary of the
OZP. The areas in proximity
to the existing pier are currently zoned as “Coastal Protection Area” (“CPA”),
“Green Belt” (“GB”) and “Village Type Development” (“V”). The existing environment is relatively tranquil and quiet. No major
noise sources are identified during the site visit.
4.3 Assessment Area and Noise Sensitive Receivers
4.3.1 Assessment Area
4.3.1.1 According to Clause 2.2.1(a) of Appendix C of the EIA Study Brief (ESB-306/2017), the assessment area for noise impact should generally include the area within 300m from the boundary of the Project and the works of the Project. A 300m assessment area from the works area of the Project has been adopted. Figure 4.1 shows the extent of the assessment area and the location of the Project.
4.3.2 Noise Sensitive Receivers
4.3.2.2
All NSRs within 300m in the
assessment area from the boundary of the Project and the works of the Project
have been identified with the representative NSRs selected as assessment points
for assessment. These NSRs should include both the existing and committed and
planned sensitive developments (if any) during both construction and
operational phases.
4.3.2.3 The representative existing NSRs are identified by means of reviewing topographic maps, aerial photos, land status plans, relevant Outline Zoning Plans (OZP) (Draft Ping Chau OZP No. S/NE-PC/1), Development Permission Area Plans, Outline Development Plans, Layout Plans and other relevant published land use plans, including plans and drawings published by Lands Department and any land use and development applications approved by the Town Planning Board, and supplemented by site inspections. No committed/ planned NSR was identified within the 300m assessment area from the boundary of the Project and the works of the Project. Photos of the representative existing NSRs are shown in Appendix 4.1.
4.3.2.4
The representative NSRs
identified are summarised in Table 4.5
and their locations are shown in Figure 4.1.
Table 4.5 Identified representative NSRs
NSR |
Description |
Uses [1] |
No. of Floors |
Approx. Separation Distance |
TPC-N1 |
Tai Tong |
R |
1-3 |
210m |
TPC-N2 |
Plover Cove
(Extension) Country Park |
CP [2] |
Not Applicable |
70m |
Notes:
[1] R – Residential; CP – Country Park
[2] The specific use of the area in Country Park for TPC-N2 is hiking trail.
4.4 Construction Noise Impact Assessment
4.4.1 Construction Noise Impact Assessment Methodology
4.4.1.1 Construction noise assessment was conducted based on the following procedures:
· Determine the assessment area which includes an area within 300m from the site boundary of the Project and associated works;
· Identify and locate all NSRs that may be affected by the works, and select representative NSRs as assessment points;
· Obtain the construction method and work sequence for the construction period;
· Obtain the construction plant inventory for each corresponding construction work sequence;
· Determine the Sound Power Levels (SWLs) of the plant items according to the information stated in the TM-GW or other recognized sources of reference, where appropriate;
· Calculate the correction factors based on the distance between the NSRs and the notional noise source positions of the worksites;
· Apply corrections for façade, distance, barrier attenuation, acoustic reflection where applicable;
· Predict construction noise levels at the NSRs;
· Quantify the level of impact at the NSRs, in accordance with TM-GW;
· Predict the cumulative noise impacts for any concurrent construction works in the vicinity of the proposed work;
· For any exceedance of noise criteria, all practical mitigation measures such as alternative construction methodology, quiet plant, silencer, enclosure, etc, shall be examined to alleviate the predicted noise impacts as much as practicable;
· The feasibility, practicability, programming and effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures will be assessed. Any direct mitigation measures recommended will be documented in the report. Specific reasons for not adopting certain direct mitigation measures to reduce the noise to a level meeting the criteria in the TM or to maximize the protection for the NSRs as far as possible will be clearly substantiated and;
· Upon exhausting all direct mitigation measures and the mitigated noise impact still exceeds the relevant criteria in Annex 5 of the TM, residual construction noise impact will be identified, predicted and evaluated in accordance with section 4.4.3 of the TM; and
· Consideration of noise mitigation measures will follow Annex 13 of TM-EIAO and EIAO Guidance Note “Preparation of Construction Noise Impact Assessment under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance” [GN 9/2010].
4.4.2 Identification of Construction Noise Impact
Identification
of Assessment Area and Noise Sensitive Receivers
4.4.2.1 For construction noise assessment, the assessment area includes those within 300m from the boundary of the Project and the works of the Project. Representative NSR locations that would be affected by the construction activities have been selected from Table 4.5. They are also shown in Figure 4.1.
Inventory of Noise Sources
4.4.2.2 As discussed in Section 1, the major works items for the Project include the following:
· Carrying out site investigation works for detailed design;
· Provision of plants, equipment and materials on working barge(s) for implementation of the Project;
· Removal of temporary pier, modification of the existing pier and installation of piles for the new pier;
· Construction of associated facilities on the new pier.
4.4.2.3
The noise sources during the
construction phase would be the use of Power Mechanical Equipment (PME) in different construction works. The key construction activities which have a bearing on
construction noise impacts include:
·
Site
investigation works for detailed design;
·
Mobilization,
pre-drilling works and construction of the temporary pier;
·
Installation
of piles for the new berth of the pier;
·
Construction
of the new pier structures for provision of the new berth of the pier;
· Installation of remaining piles for the new pier and demolition/modification works of the existing pier and temporary pier;
· Construction of the remaining new pier structures; and
· Construction of associated facilities on the new pier.
4.4.2.4 The PME inventories would generally include tug boat, derrick barge, rotary type drill rig, concrete saw/ groover, generator and barge-mounted mobile crane etc. Detailed plant inventory and utilisation rate provided and confirmed by the Project Engineer can be referred to Appendix 4.3.
4.4.2.5 There will be no concurrent projects during the construction phase of the Project. Consideration of construction noise impact from the concurrent projects is not required.
4.4.3 Prediction and Evaluation of Construction Noise Impact
Phase of Construction
4.4.3.1
As discussed in Section
2, site investigation works for detailed design of the Project are
tentatively targeted to commence in Q4 2021 for completion in Q1 2022. The pier
improvement works of the Project is tentatively targeted to commence in Year 2023
for completion in Year 2026. Tai Tong and Plover Cove (Extension) Country Park are
identified as NSRs at approximately 210m and 70m away from the nearest works
area respectively. Tai Tong is identified as a NSR in accordance with Annex 13 of the TM-EIAO, the relevant
legislation and guidelines provide a specific noise limit in terms of Leq(30 min) 75 dB(A) for construction works at domestic premises during normal hours
(i.e. 0700-1900). For Plover Cove (Extension) Country Park, there is no specific
noise limit for Country Parks in the relevant legislation and guidelines
including TM-EIAO and TM-GW.
4.4.3.2
Construction
noise impact was assessed with respect to criteria set in Annex 5 of TM-EIAO
and in accordance with the methodology stipulated in Annex 13 of TM-EIAO. The
construction noise levels at representative NSR are predicted without any
mitigation measures (i.e. the “Unmitigated Scenario”). If noise level
exceedance was identified, further runs would be made assuming different
combinations of mitigation measures to be incorporated. (i.e. “Mitigated
Scenario”).
Prediction of Noise
Impact
4.4.3.3
According
to the latest engineering design, construction would mainly comprise site
investigation works, construction of temporary pier, construction of improved
pier and demolition of temporary pier as discussed in Section 4.4.2.2. The corresponding SWLs of these activities
have been estimated according to the PME’s SWLs and the assessment methodology
in the TM-GW. Appendix 4.2 presents
the SWLs for each PME. Appendix 4.3
gives the plant inventory adopted for the workfront
and Appendix 4.4 shows the location
of the workfront adopted for this construction noise
assessment. The utilisation rates and inventory of
PME, as well as the construction programme, have been
reviewed and confirmed by the project engineer to be practicable.
4.4.3.4
Appendix 4.5 presents the calculated construction noise impacts at selected
representative NSRs under unmitigated scenario. The predicted construction
noise impacts at the NSRs under unmitigated scenario are summaries in Table 4.6.
Table 4.6 Predicted construction noise impact at NSRs
under unmitigated scenario
NSR[1] |
Description |
Uses[2] |
Assessed Floor Level (mPD) |
Leq (30-min), dB(A) |
||
Criterion |
Unmitigated Noise Level |
Exceedance |
||||
TPC-N1 |
Tai Tong |
R |
6.2 |
75 |
66 |
N/A |
Notes:
[1] There is no criterion for Plover Cove (Extension) Country Park (TPC-N2). Thus, determination of construction noise level of TPC-N2 for compliance checking is not applicable.
[2] R – Residential
4.4.3.5 It can be seen from Table 4.6 that the predicted construction noise level arising from the Project at the representative NSR TPC-N1 will comply with the criterion of 75 dB(A) in terms of Leq (30-min) under the unmitigated scenario. Thus, adverse construction noise level is not anticipated.
4.4.3.6 For Plover Cove (Extension) Country Park (TPC-N2) with limited transient hikers, though the NSR is identified in accordance with Annex 13 of the TM-EIAO, the relevant legislation and guidelines including TM-EIAO and TM-GW do not provide a specific noise limit for Country Parks. In view of small scale of the Project, adverse noise impacts are not anticipated. In addition, good site practices are proposed in the following section to further minimise the construction noise impact on the Country Park environment as much as practicable.
4.4.3.7 In view of the minor scale of the Project and limited transient hikers using the hiking trail, it is anticipated that construction works during the restricted hours (i.e. 19:00 to 07:00 on weekdays or any hours in general holidays including Sunday) can be avoided through a better scheduling of works. In case of construction works carried out during the restricted hours, Constriction Noise Permit (CNP) shall be applied to satisfy the legal requirement under NCO. Moreover, as the site investigation, foundation works and demolition works of the Project are marine-based, only a limited air-borne construction noise would be generated. In addition, the construction works of above-water superstructure will mainly be implemented using prefabrication method as far as practicable. Prefabrication method could reduce the amount of above-water noisy operations on-site, and the number of PME items to be used would be limited. Therefore, no adverse construction noise impact is anticipated.
4.4.4 Enhancement Measures of Construction Noise Impact
4.4.4.1
As no exceedance of
construction noise limit is predicted and adverse construction noise impact is
not anticipated, mitigation measures are not required. Nevertheless, it is
still recommended the following enhancement measures to minimise the
construction noise impact as far as practical:
·
Good site
practices to limit noise emissions at the source;
·
Use of
quality powered mechanical equipment (QPME);
·
Use of
temporary noise barriers to screen noise from relatively static PME; and
·
Alternative
use of plant items within one worksite, wherever practicable.
4.4.4.2
The
above enhancement measures would need to be implemented in worksites as good
practices where appropriate. “Recommended Pollution
Control Clauses for Construction Contracts” promulgated by EPD will be added to
the Contract for future contractors to follow. Detailed descriptions of
these enhancement measures are given in the following sections.
Good Site Management Practices
4.4.4.3
Good site practice and noise
management techniques could considerably reduce the noise impact from
construction site activities on nearby NSRs. The following measures should be
practised during each phase of construction.
·
only
well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and
plant should be serviced regularly during the construction programme;
·
machines
and plant (such as crane and generator) that may be in intermittent use should
be shut down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum;
·
plant
known to emit noise strongly in one direction, where possible, be orientated so
that the noise is directed away from nearby NSRs;
·
silencers
or mufflers on construction equipment should be properly fitted and maintained
during the construction works;
·
mobile
plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible and practicable; and
·
material
stockpiles, site office and other structures should be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site
construction activities.
4.4.4.4 The benefits of these techniques can vary according to specific site conditions and operations. The environmental noise climate would certainly be improved with these control practices, although the improvement can only be quantified during implementation when specific site parameters are known.
Use of Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME)
4.4.4.5 The use of quiet plant associated with the construction works is made reference to the PME listed in the QPME system and other commonly used PME listed in EPD web pages as far as possible. It is generally known (supported by field measurement) that particular models of construction equipment are quieter than standard types given in the TM-GW. Whilst it is generally considered too restrictive to specify that the Contractor has to use specific models or items of plant, it is reasonable and practicable to set plant noise performance specifications for specific PME so that some flexibility in selection of plant is allowed. A pragmatic approach would be to request that the Contractor independently verifies the noise level of the plant proposed to be used and demonstrates through furnishing of these results, that the plant proposed to be used on the Project site meets the requirements.
Use of Temporary Noise Barriers to Screen Noise from Relatively Static PME
4.4.4.6
Movable temporary noise
barriers that can be located close to noisy plant and be moved concurrently
with the plant along a worksite can be very effective for screening noise from
NSRs. A typical design which has been used locally is a wooden framed barrier
with a small-cantilevered upper portion of superficial density no less than
7kg/m2 on a skid footing with 25mm thick internal sound absorptive
lining. This measure is particularly effective for low level zone of NSRs.
4.4.4.7
Movable temporary noise
barriers will be used for some PME items (e.g. generator). It is anticipated
that suitably designed barriers could achieve at least 5dB(A) reduction for
movable plant. Acoustic mat would be used for other plant items such as piling rig
and a 5dB(A) noise reduction is anticipated.
Alternative Use of Plant Items within One Worksite
4.4.4.8 In practice, some plant items will operate sequentially within the same worksite, and certain reduction of the predicted noise impacts could be achieved. However, any additional control on the sequencing of plant will impose a restrictive constraint to the Contractor on the operation and planning of plant items, and the implementation of the requirement would be difficult to be monitored.
4.4.4.9 The feasibility, practicability, programming and effectiveness of the above enhancement measures have been reviewed by the project engineer and confirmed to be practicable.
4.4.5 Cumulative Impact with Concurrent Project
4.4.5.1
The potential neighbouring
concurrent projects have been identified and evaluated in Section 2.10.
Among these two identified concurrent projects, only “Environmental Association
Ltd’s Desalination Project at Tung Ping Chau” has a
confirmed construction programme. It will be completed in Q4 2020, which will
not overlap with that of this Project. Cumulative construction noise impact is
not anticipated.
4.4.6 Evaluation of Residual Construction Noise Impact
4.4.6.1 Construction noise impact arising from the Project can comply with the prescribed construction noise criterion stipulated in the TM-EIAO under the unmitigated scenario at the representative NSR. Adverse residual construction noise impact is not anticipated.
4.5 Operational Noise Impact Assessment
4.5.1.1 During the operational phase, the improved pier will not have any planned fixed noise sources. In addition, there would be no planned increase in the licensed Kaito services after the pier improvement works. Conversely, the main objectives of the Project are to enhance pier facilities and provide adequate structural integrity for safe pier usage. Renewable energy facilities at the new pier will be limited to non-noise emitting devices, such as solar panels. No loudspeakers, wind turbines or other fixed noise sources are proposed in the improved pier.
4.5.1.2 The representative NSRs, as summarised in Table 4.5, are located to the west of the Project site and are at least 70m away. As the pier length will increase from 97m to approximately 123m with the landing steps shifted seawards, the proposed berthing locations associated with the marine traffic noise sources will be farther away from the coast and the NSRs as compared with the current condition without pier improvement. Therefore, no operational noise impact is anticipated.
4.6.1 Construction Phase
4.6.1.1
Tai Tong and Plover Cove (Extension) Country
Park are identified as NSRs at approximately 210m and 70m
away from the nearest works area respectively. TM-EIAO has specified a noise limit of 75 dB(A)
for domestic premises (e.g. TPC-N1 Tai Tong) during non-restricted hours. However, there is no specific noise limit provided for Country Parks
(e.g. TPC-N2 Plover Cover (Extension) Country Park) from legislation and
relevant guidelines.
4.6.1.2 Construction noise level has been predicted for the domestic representative NSR. The predicted construction noise level would comply with the perspective noise criterion in the TM-EIAO under the unmitigated scenario. For Plover Cove (Extension) Country Park (TPC-N2), in view of small scale of the Project and limited transient hikers using the hiking trail, adverse noise impacts are not anticipated. In addition, good site practices are proposed in Section 4.4.4 to further minimise the construction noise impact on the Country Park environment as much as practicable. Adverse construction noise impact is not anticipated.
4.6.1.3
Furthermore, since no construction
works will be carried out during the restricted hours, and the prefabrication
method for the superstructure construction will be adopted as far as
practicable. In addition, a number of enhancement measures including good site
practices, the use of QPME, and the use of temporary noise barriers, etc. are proposed in Section 4.4.4 to further reduce the construction noise impact. Therefore, no
adverse construction noise impact is anticipated.
4.6.2 Operational Phase
4.6.2.1
During
the operational phase, the improved pier will not have any planned fixed noise
sources. In addition, there would be no planned increase in the licensed Kaito services after the pier improvement
works. Therefore, no operational noise impact is anticipated.