10.0 Summary of Environmental Outcomes
TABLES
Table 10.1 Summary of Key Environmental Outcomes, Impacts and Mitigation Measures
APPENDICES
Appendix 10A Summary of Environmental Impacts
Appendix
10B
Key Assessment
Assumptions and Limitation of Assessment Methodologies
10.1.1
This EIA study predicted that, with the
implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, this Project would be
environmentally acceptable with no adverse residual impacts on the population
and environmentally sensitive resources.
Table 10.1 summarises the
environmental outcomes and impacts that have accrued from the environmental
considerations and analysis during the EIA process and the implementation of
environmental control measures. Requirements
for the EM&A programme have been recommended, where necessary, to check on
project compliance with environmental legislation and standards.
10.1.2
The summary of environmental impacts and the
summary of key assessment assumptions, limitation of assessment methodologies
are presented in Appendix 10A and Appendix
10B respectively.
Table 10.1 Summary
of Key Environmental Outcomes, Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Area/Issue |
Environmental
Outcomes, Impacts and Mitigation Measures |
Environmental/
Social Benefits
of the Project |
The New Acute Hospital (NAH) in the Kai Tak
Development Area (KTDA) will be a new major acute general hospital located in
central Kowloon region, and will provide 24-Hour Accident and Emergency
services and be a designated trauma center. The proposed rooftop helipad on the
Acute Block of the NAH will be constructed tentatively between Q4 2023 to Q4
2024 and is expected to be in operation in 2025. Since the NAH is located in
the heart of Kowloon, with the proposed rooftop helipad, the time required to
transfer trauma patients will be significantly shortened compared to the
existing helipads at Tuen Mun Hospital (TMH), Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern
Hospital (PYNEH) and the planned helipad at Queen Mary Hospital (QMH). The
proposed helipad can be operated in conjunction with GFS Kai Tak Division which
is located at 1.5km away when major disasters occur involving a large number
of patients. It also provides an
alternative when the existing helipads are not available due to adverse
weather conditions or any other possible reasons. The major components of the Project are the construction
of helipad structure, safety walkway, access ramp, staircase and noise
barrier. There will be no additional foundation and superstructure
implications of the Project, the potential environmental impacts arising from
the construction of helipad will be small. |
Air
Quality |
Construction of the proposed helipad is
predicted not to cause significant dust impacts while the helipad structure
will be pre-fabricated off-site outside Hong Kong territories and assembled on-site.
Potential causes of pollution may
arise from the limited amount of equipment. Adverse dust impacts would not be
anticipated with the implementation of good site practices. For operational phase, since the expected
average daily emergency helicopter operations would be less than one per day
based on records for current operations at existing hospital helipads, the
helicopter emissions are expected to be minimal. Based on the short-term and
infrequent nature of the emergency helicopter movements, only the 10-minute
average SO2 concentration AQO would be relevant and would therefore
be assessed. The cumulative SO2 (10-mins) air quality impacts arising
from helicopter and marine emissions have been quantitatively assessed using
AERMOD in accordance with ¡§Guidelines on Choice of Models and Model
Parameters¡¨ issued by EPD. In addition, NOx emission from helicopter will
also be generated but it will be off-settled by the use of electric vehicles
and the environmental paver. The assessment results concluded that the air
quality impacts would be insignificant and no mitigation measure would be
required. |
Hazard
to Life |
The potential hazard to life impacts during
the construction and operation of the proposed helipad associated with the Kerry
Dangerous Goods Warehouse (KDWG) and LPG Filling Station at Cheung Yip Street
have been reviewed. A Quantitative
Risk Assessment (QRA) has been carried out. Both individual risk and societal
risk have been assessed and it has been concluded that, despite the
additional impact due to the proposal helipad, the individual risk associated
with KDGW and the LPG filling station would be acceptable with respect to the
Individual Risk Criterion of off-site individual risk not to exceed 1 ¡Ñ 10-5
/ year. The societal risk is
presented in the form of FN curves for comparison against the societal risk
criteria. The result shows that the FN curves for both the assessed years,
namely 2025 and 2036, lie within the Acceptable Region of the risk criteria.
Therefore, both the individual risk and societal risk meet the criteria of the
Hong Kong Risk Guidelines and no mitigation measures are required. |
Noise |
The estimated construction noise generated
from the Project site is not predicted to be significant, as the construction
duration is short and no heavy construction works, such as foundation or
demolition works, are involved. The cumulative construction noise impacts at
the nearby NSRs have been assessed and are within the construction noise
criteria. Construction noise control measures in accordance with EPD¡¦s
ProPECC PN 2/93 to be implemented are recommended to further minimise the
noise levels. Key potential operational noise impacts
would arise from the helicopter operation. Mitigation measures include setback of the
helipad from the closest NSRs and the provision of a noise barrier and noise
reducers in order to provide screening and noise attenuation. It is found that
all the noise sensitive receivers (NSRs)
with exceedance of daytime helicopter noise criteria in the unmitigated
scenario, i.e. approximate the top 12 floors of NSR P01b for the Kai Tak
Development Site 3E1, could be protected by the direct noise mitigation
measures. Also, the design and selection of
flight paths have been optimised to avoid flying over the noise sensitive
areas and the helipad usage is anticipated to be less than once per day according
to the GFS records from other existing emergency medical service helipads. With all practical mitigation measures
implemented, the helicopter noise impacts are expected to be minimised and
the predicated helicopter noise levels at the representative NSRs would
comply with the relevant noise criteria. |
Waste
Management |
The proposed helipad will be constructed
using a steel/ aluminum structure which will be pre-fabricated off-site outside
Hong Kong territories and no concreting works would be carried out on-site or
off-site. Minimal quantities of non-inert
C&D waste, general refuse and chemical waste from the construction site
would be generated, with all the non-inert C&D waste being recyclable. Insignificant
amount of general refuse would be expected during operational phase as the
usage of the helipad is estimated to be less than once a day. No adverse
impacts in relation to waste management would be anticipated with the
implementation of suitable mitigation measures, such as the requirements as stipulated
in the ETWB TC(W) No.19/2005. |
Visual
|
The Project is situated in center of Kowloon
where the surrounding area is comprised of high rise buildings of hospital, commercial
and residential uses. It is
considered that the visual amenity in the area is low and the presence of the
helipad structure is considered to be compatible with the surroundings. The key issue associated with visual impacts
relates to the lighting of the helipad and lights on the helicopter during nighttime
operations. The potential impacts
to the nearby visual sensitive receivers (VSRs) have been assessed in terms
of helicopter landing lights and the helipad perimeter lights. Both types of lights would only be
switched on during the helicopter approach and landing and the duration is
short (7 minutes) and infrequent. It is concluded that the lighting
during the nighttime would not cause significant impacts. The use of laminated glass as a
material for the noise barrier will have a low reflectance level that can
minimise any glare impact during the daytime. Therefore, it is concluded that
adverse visual impacts during the operational phase are insignificant and
acceptable and, with the implementation of recommended mitigation measures,
no residual impacts are expected. |
Water Quality |
Potential construction
run-off, accidental spillage and sewage effluent would have the potential to cause
water quality impacts to the nearby water bodies in the vicinity. However, as the proposed helipad will
be constructed by prefabricated steel/ aluminum, with no concreting works being
proposed, the amount of wastewater and surface run-off generated is expected
to be very limited. Through implementation of the appropriate measures in
accordance with the guidelines stipulated in The Professional Persons Environmental Consultative Committee Practice Note on Construction
Site Drainage (ProPECC PN1/94), site run-off and accidental spillage will be
properly controlled to minimise water quality impacts and no adverse impacts
during the construction phase are predicted. During the operation
phase, the effluent from the emergency fire-fighting system in the form of
foam will be discharged to, and combined with, the daily sewage from the New
Acute Hospital and ultimately discharge to the sewage treatment plant for
treatment. The foam discharge
would comprise only around 1% of the total discharge per day and be
significantly diluted when combined with the sewage from the NAH. No significant adverse water quality
impacts to the environment are expected during the operational phase. |