8.      Ecology.. 1

8.1    Introduction. 1

8.2    Relevant Legislation and Guidelines. 1

8.3    Literature Review.. 2

8.4    Ecological Baseline Survey Methodology. 6

8.5    Ecological Baseline Survey Results. 8

8.6    Evaluation of Habitats and Species of Conservation Importance. 15

8.7    Impact Assessment 30

8.8    Mitigation Measures. 40

8.9    Summary of Mitigation Measures. 42

8.10  Evaluation of Residual Ecological Impacts. 44

8.11  Environmental Monitoring and Audit Programme. 44

8.12  Conclusion. 45

8.13  Reference. 45

 

 

 

Figures

 

Figure 8.1

Study Area

 

Figure 8.2

Locations of the species of conservation importance recorded within the Study Area and Proposed Works Limit from reviewed literature

 

Figure 8.3

Survey Transect and Terrestrial Sampling Point within the Study Area

 

Figure 8.4

Sampling Point for Freshwater Aquatic Assemblage within the Study Area

 

Figure 8.5

Habitat Map and Species of Conservation Importance

 

Figure 8.6

Indicative Locations and Conceptual Design of Animal Corridor

 

 

 

 

Tables

 

 

Table 8.1

Nesting Populations of Ardeid in Ping Che Egretry since 2009

 

Table 8.2

Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area from the Reviewed Literature

 

Table 8.3

Ecological Survey Programme

 

Table 8.4

Habitats within the Study Area

 

Table 8.5

Ping Che Egretry Activity from March to August 2020

 

Table 8.6

Evaluation of Habitats within the Proposed Works Limit

 

Table 8.7

Evaluation of Abandoned Agricultural Land within the Study

 

Table 8.8

Evaluation of Agricultural Land within the Study Area

 

Table 8.9

Evaluation of Channel within the Study Area

 

Table 8.10

Evaluation of Developed Area within the Study Area

 

Table 8.11

Evaluation of Fung Shui Wood within the Study Area

 

Table 8.12

Evaluation of Plantation within the Study Area

 

Table 8.13

Evaluation of Pond within the Study Area

 

Table 8.14

Evaluation of Shrubland/Grassland within the Study Area

 

Table 8.15

Evaluation of Wasteland within the Study Area

 

Table 8.16

Evaluation of Watercourse within the Study Area

 

Table 8.17

Evaluation of Woodland within the Study Area

 

Table 8.18

Evaluation of Flora Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area

 

Table 8.19

Evaluation of Fauna Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area

 

Table 8.20

Potential Direct Habitat Loss in Proposed Works Limit

 

Table 8.21

Potential Direct Ecological Impacts on Species of Conservation Importance

 

Table 8.22

Potential Disturbance on Habitats in Study Area

 

Table 8.23

Potential Indirect Disturbance to Ping Che Egretry

 

Table 8.24

Summary of Potential Ecological Impacts

 

 

 

Appendices

 

Appendix 8.1

Habitat Photos

 

Appendix 8.2

Photos of Selected Species of Conservation Importance

 

Appendix 8.3

Plant Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.4

Bird Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.5

Butterfly Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.6

Odonate Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.7

Reptile Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.8

Amphibian Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.9

Mammal Species Recorded within the Study Area

 

Appendix 8.10

Aquatic Species Recorded across All Aquatic Sampling Points within the Study Area

 

 

 


8.                   Ecology

8.1                Introduction

8.1.1            This Section presents the ecological impact assessment (EcoIA) associated with the construction and operation of the proposed project in accordance with Clause 3.4.5 and Appendix 8.3 of the EIA Study Brief No. ESB-322/2019.  Baseline conditions for ecological components of the terrestrial and associated aquatic environment were evaluated based on information from available literature and recent ecological field surveys conducted during both dry and wet seasons for the purposes of this ecological impact assessment.  Measures required to mitigate any identified ecological impacts have been recommended, where appropriate.  The Study Area extends a distance of 500 m from the Project Site boundary (Figure 8.1).   This area is rural in character, comprising mostly abandoned agricultural lands and village/developed areas.

8.2                Relevant Legislation and Guidelines

8.2.1            Reference has been made to the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) issued under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) in the evaluation of potential ecological impacts, particularly Annex 8 Criteria for Evaluating Ecological Impact and Annex 16 Guidelines for Ecological Assessment.   The following Guidance Notes have also been taken to account:

·       GN 6/2010 Some Observations on Ecological Assessment from the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Perspective;

·       GN 7/2010 Ecological Baseline Survey for Ecological Assessment; and

·       GN 10/2010 Methodologies for Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecological Baseline Surveys.

8.2.2            In addition, the following legislation and guidelines provide the framework for conducting ecological surveys and the protection of species and habitats of ecological importance for ecological impact assessment in Hong Kong:

·       Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap 96);

·       Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap 170);

·       Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208)

·       Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap 586);

·       Development Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No. 4/2020, Tree Preservation

·       Development Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No. 6/2015, Maintenance of Vegetation and Hard Landscape Features

·       Hong Kong Plant Database of Hong Kong Herbarium, Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department

(https://www.herbarium.gov.hk/en/hk-plant-database/index.html)

·       Hong Kong Biodiversity Database of Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department

(https://bih.gov.hk/en/species-database/index.html)

8.2.3            Other international conventions and guidelines that are relevant to this ecological baseline study include the followings:

·       Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora ("CITES").  This Convention regulates international trade in animal and plant species considered to be at risk from such trade.  The main categories of species relevant to Hong Kong are Appendices I and II.  Species listed in Appendix I are species threatened with extinction that are or may be affected by trade; species listed in Appendix II are those that, while not necessarily under current threat of extinction, may become threatened unless trade is subject to strict regulation.  Hong Kong's obligations under this Convention are enforced via the Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance.

·       International Union for Conservation of Nature (“IUCN”): the World Conservation Union maintains, through its Species Survival Commission, a Red List of globally threatened species of wild plants and animals (see http//www.redlist.org).  The Red List is considered the authoritative publication to classify species as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, or lower-risk.

8.3                Literature Review

8.3.1            Through desktop review of publicly available and relevant literature, the existing ecological baseline condition can be established and all available information will be collated and evaluated to identify any information gap relating to the establishment of the ecological profile of the Study Area, and to determine the ecological surveys needed.

8.3.2            The following previous studies were reviewed:

·       AEIAR-035/2000 Shenzhen River Regulation Project Stage III - Environmental Impact Assessment

·       AEIAR-136/2009 Construction of a Secondary Boundary Fence and new sections of Primary Boundary Fence and Boundary Patrol Road

·       AEIAR-160/2011 Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV

·       AEIAR-161/2011 Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works

·       AEIAR-198/2016 Site Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery

·       The Biodiversity Survey conducted by the Drainage Services Department (DSD) in Ping Yuen River

·       Agreement No. CE 6/2002 (DS) Drainage Improvement in Northern New Territories - Package C Investigation, Design and Construction (Drainage Channel TKL05) (Unpublished)

·       Agreement No. CE 60/2005 (TP) Land Use Planning for the Closed Area – Feasibility Study

 

8.3.3            Recognized sites of conservation importance identified within the Study Area included the following:

·       Kan Tau Wai Fung Shui Wood;

·       Ping Che Egretry.

 

8.3.4            Kan Tau Wai Fung Shui Wood to the east and the south of Kan Tau Wai Village is within the Study Area. It was reported to cover an area of 4043m2.  11 species of vascular plants are recorded, with reference to the Committee Paper NCSC 9/06 of Advisory Council on the Environment Nature Conservation Subcommittee. The Proposed Works Limit does not encroach into the boundary of Kan Tau Wai Fung Shui Wood.

8.3.5            Ping Che Egretry is the nearest egretry, which is in the southeast of the 500m Study Area, approximately 20m northeast from the Ping Che Mini-soccer Pitch and adjacent to the Ng Chow Road.  This egretry was first reported in 2009. Ping Che Egretry is located at a group of bamboo in Ping Che. One ardeid species was recorded nesting in this egretry since 2009 (Table 8.1), which is Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus. Ping Che Egretry is about 200m to the east of the Proposed Works Limit, as shown in Figure 8.3.

8.3.6            With reference to the EIA Study Brief, aquatic habitats, including mudflats, marshes, mangroves and streams outside 500m Study Area that are possibly impacted were reviewed.

8.3.7            The nesting population of ardeids in Ping Che Egretry is summarised in Table 8.1.

Table 8.1 Nesting Populations of Ardeid in Ping Che Egretry since 2009

(data from 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020)

Year

Chinese Pond Heron

Total nests

(% of total in Hong Kong)

2009

5

5 (0.6)

2010

16

16 (2.2)

2011

7

7 (0.9)

2012

13

13 (1.5)

2013

11

11 (1.5)

2014

10

10 (1.0)

2015

6

6 (0.4)

2016

7

7 (0.6)

2017

13

13 (1.0)

2018

9

9 (0.8)

2019

11

11 (0.7)

2020

9

9 (0.5)

8.3.8            For the fauna and flora communities, across the reviewed studies, a total of 38 species of conservation importance were recorded within the Study Area of this study and their locations were accurately pinpointed on map. Four vascular plant species, two mammal species, 29 bird species and three herpetofauna species of conservation importance were recorded (Table 8.2). The locations of the species of conservation importance recorded within the Study Area and Proposed Works Limit from the reviewed literature are shown in Figure 8.2.

Table 8.2 Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area from the Reviewed Literature

Species name

Rarity in Hong Kong 8,9,10

Habitat/Distribution in Hong Kong 8,9,10

Protection/Conservation status 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21

Flora

Aquilaria sinensis

Common

-

Cap. 586,

China Red Data Book: (Vulnerable),

State protection (category II), Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants: (Vulnerable)

Cephalanthus tetrandrus

Very rare

-

-

Neottopteris nidus

Restricted

-

Cap. 96

Pavetta hongkongensis

Common

-

Cap. 96

Mammals

Small Asian Mongoose

Herpestes javanicus

Uncommon

-

Cap. 170

Common Bent-winged

Bat Miniopterus

Schreibersii

Common

-

Cap. 170, China Red Data Book: (Endangered), Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Avifauna

Eurasian Teal Anas crecca

Common winter visitor

Found in Deep Bay area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria Harbour, Urban Park

Fellowes et al. (2002): Regional Concern

Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax

Common resident and winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus

Common resident

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern, (Regional Concern)

Grey Heron Ardea cinerea

Common winter visitor

Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park, Cape D'Aguilar

Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern

Great Egret Ardea alba

Common resident and winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern, (Regional Concern)

Little Egret Egretta garzetta

Common resident

Widely distributed in coastal area throughout Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern, (Regional Concern)

Eastern Cattle Egret

Bubulcus coromandus

Resident and common passage migrant

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Striated Heron

Butorides striatus

Present all year, locally uncommon in summer and scarce in winter

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Great Cormorant

Phalacrocorax carbo

Common winter visitor

Widely distributed in coastal areas throughout Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern

Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis

Passage migrant and winter visitor

Found in Ha Tsuen, Lok Ma Chau, Kam Tin, Long Valley, Hong Kong Wetland Park.

Fellowes et al. (2002): Local Concern

Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela

Uncommon resident

Widely distributed in shrublands on hillsides throughout Hong Kong

Cap. 586, China Red Data Book: (Vulnerable), Appendix 2 of CITES, Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Greater Spotted Eagle

Aquila clanga

Scarce winter visitor

Found in Deep Bay area

Cap. 586, China Red Data Book: (Rare), Appendix 2 of CITES, Fellowes et al. (2002): Global Concern, IUCN: (Vulnerable)

Bonelli’s Eagle Aquila fasciata

Scarce resident

Found in Deep Bay area, Hong Kong Island, Lamma Island, Lantau Island, Castle Peak, Sha Lo Tung.

Cap. 586, China Red Data Book: (Rare), Appendix 2 of CITES, Fellowes et al. (2002): Global Concern

Besra Accipiter virgatus

Scarce resident

Found in Tai Po Kau, Deep Bay area, Chek Lap Kok, Cheung Chau, Soko Islands

Cap. 586, Class 2 Protected Animal of China, Appendix 2 of CITES

Black Kite Milvus migrans

Common resident and winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Appendix 2 of CITES, Fellowes et al. (2002): (Regional Concern)

Eastern Buzzard Buteo japonicas

Common winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Appendix 2 of CITES

Common Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica

Scarce but widespread resident

Widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong

China Red Data Book: (Vulnerable)

Common Kestrel

Falco tinnunculus

Common autumn migrant and winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Class 2 Protected Animal of China, Appendix 2 of CITES

Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis

Common resident

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

China Red Data Book: (Vulnerable), Class 2 Protected Animal of China

Lesser Coucal

Centropus bengalensis

Common resident

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

China Red Data Book: (Vulnerable), Class 2 Protected Animal of China

Chinese Hwamei

Garrulax canorus

Common resident

Widely distributed in hillside shrubland througthout Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Appendix 2 of CITES

Collared Crow Corvus

Torquatus

Uncommon resident

Found in Inner Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk, Pok Fu Lam, Chek lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen

Fellowes et al. (2002): Local Concern, IUCN: (Vulnerable)

Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides

Uncommon resident

Widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Appendix 2 of CITES, Class 2 Protected Animal of China

Collared Scops Owl

Otus lempii

Common resident

Widely distributed in shrubland throughout Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Class 2 Protected Animal of China, Appendix 2 of CITES

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

Scarce resident and winter visitor

Widely distributed in Hong Kong

Cap. 586, Appendix 2 of CITES, Class 2 Protected Animal of China, Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

White-throated Kingfisher Halcyon smyrnensis

Common resident

Widely distributed in coastal areas throughout Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Golden-headed Cisticola Cisticola exilis

Scarce winter visitor

Widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong

Fellowes et al. (2002): Local Concern

Zitting Cisticola

Cisticola juncidis

Common passage migrant and winter visitor

Widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong.

Fellowes et al. (2002): Local Concern

White-shouldered Starling Sturnia sinensis

Common passage migrant

Found in Kam Tin, Deep Bay area, Po Toi Island, Long Valley, Victoria Park, Ho Chung, Ma Tso Lung, Mui Wo, Lam Tsuen Valley

Fellowes et al. (2002): (Local Concern)

Herpetofauna

Common Rat Snake       Ptyas mucosus

-

Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong

Cap. 586, China Red Data Book: (Endangered), Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern, Appendix 2 of CITES

Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis

-

 

Widely distributed in Lantau Island and New Territories.

 

Class 2 Protected Animal of China, Fellowes et al. (2002): (Potential Regional Concern)

Burmese Python

Python bivittatus

-

Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Cap. 170, Cap. 586, Class 1 Protected Animal of China, China Red Data Book: (Critically Endangered), Fellowes et al. (2002): Potential Regional Concern, IUCN: (Vulnerable), Appendix 2 of CITES

Notes:

1.       AEIAR-035/2000 Shenzhen River Regulation Project Stage III – Environmental Impact Assessment

2.       AEIAR-136/2009 Construction of a Secondary Boundary Fence and new sections of Primary Boundary Fence and Boundary Patrol Road

3.       AEIAR-160/2011 Regulation of Shenzhen River Stage IV

4.       AEIAR-161/2011 Liantang / Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Associated Works

5.       AEIAR-198/2016 Site Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery

6.       Agreement No. CE 6/2002 (DS) Drainage Improvement in Northern New Territories – Package C Investigation, Design and Construction (Drainage Channel TKL05)

7.       Agreement No. CE 60/2005 (TP) Land Use Planning for the Closed Area – Feasibility Study

8.       Corlett et al. (2000). Hong Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status.

9.       Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance

10.     AFCD (2019). Hong Kong Biodiversity Database.

11.     Chan et al. (2005). A Field Guide to the Amphibians of Hong Kong.

12.     Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (2019). Appendices I, II and III.

13.     Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance

14.     State Forestry Administration & Ministry of Agriculture (1999). List of Wild Plants under State Protection (Part 1).

15.     Li-Kuo, F., & Jiang-ming, J. (1992). China plant red data book: rare and endangered plants: Vol. 1.

16.     Qin, H. N., Yang, Y., Dong, S. Y., He, Q., Jia, Y., Zhao, L. N., … & Xiang, J. Y. (2017). Threatened species list of China’s higher plants. Biodiversity science, 25(7), 696-744.

17.     Cap. 170 Wild Animals Protection Ordinance

18.     Fellowes et al. (2002). Wild animals to watch: Terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong. (For conservation status listed by Fellowes et al. (2002), letters in parentheses indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in breeding and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence)

19.     Wang & Zhao (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Amphibia and Reptilia

20.     Zheng and Wang (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves.

21.     IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

8.4                Ecological Baseline Survey Methodology

8.4.1            Ecological surveys were carried out, aiming at filling the information gap identified from literature review.

8.4.2            The Study Area for the purpose of ecological baseline surveys includes all areas within 500m distance from the boundary of the Proposed Works Limit (Figure 8.3).

8.4.3            Surveys on habitat and vegetation, terrestrial mammals, avifauna, herpetofauna, butterflies, odonates and freshwater fauna are proposed to be conducted between February 2020 and July 2020, in addition to November 2020 and December 2020, covering both dry and wet seasons. Survey on Ping Che Egretry were carried out between March 2020 and August 2020. Ecological survey programme is shown in Table 8.3.

 

Table 8.3 Ecological Survey Programme

Surveys

2020

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Nov

Dec

 

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

DT

NT

 

Habitat and Vegetation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrestrial Mammals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avifauna

 

 

 

Egretry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Herpetofauna

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butterflies and Odonates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Freshwater Aquatic Assemblage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

1.       DT = Daytime; NT = Nighttime

 

8.4.4            The ecological surveys followed the requirements listed in Annexes 8 and 16 of the Technical Memorandum as well as Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance Guidance Notes No. 7/2010 “Ecological Baseline Survey for Ecological Assessment” and No. 10/2010 “Methodologies for Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecological Baseline Survey. The survey methodology for each item is described in the following sections.

8.4.5            Habitat and Vegetation – Field surveys focusing on habitat (including fish ponds) and vegetation (including trees) within the Study Area was performed during the dry and wet seasons to establish the general terrestrial ecological profile of the Study Area. Habitats were mapped based on recent aerial photos and field ground-truthing. Representative areas of each habitat type and the Proposed Works Limit was surveyed on foot. Special attention was paid to any habitat type shown seasonal patterns. Plant species of each habitat type encountered, and their relative abundance were recorded with special attention to rare or protected species (e.g. Mucuna championii). Nomenclature and conservation status of plant species will follows Corlett et al. (2000), Hu et al. (2003) and Hong Kong Herbarium (2012). Habitats were characterized and defined with reference to size, vegetation type, flora species present, dominant species, species diversity and abundance, community structure and seasonality, as well as the presence of any feature of ecological importance. Representative colour photos were taken for each habitat type and any important ecological features identified. Habitat maps of suitable scale (i.e. 1:1000 to 1:5000) was prepared.

8.4.6            Terrestrial Mammals – Mammal surveys (including day and night-time surveys, covering the dry and wet seasons) were carried out, with a frequency of at least twice in the dry season and twice in the wet season. As most mammals often occur at low densities, all sightings, tracks, and signs of mammals (including droppings) were actively searched along the tentative survey transects (Figure 8.3). Nomenclature for mammals follows Shek (2006). Quantification of abundance of mammals in the Study Area is difficult due to translating sights and tracks (e.g. burrows) to actual abundance. Dusk surveys were conducted for bats by direct observations and using a bat detector. All calls recorded were analysed to permit, as far as possible, identification of species from call structure (Shek and Lau 2006)

8.4.7            Avifauna – Bird surveys (including day and night-time surveys, covering the dry and wet seasons) were carried out, on a monthly basis. Daytime avifauna surveys were carried out in the early morning at the period of peak bird activity. Night surveys were be conducted after dusk to record nocturnal avifauna. The bird communities of each habitat type within the Study Area were surveyed along the tentative survey transects (Figure 8.3). All birds seen or heard within 30 m along the tentative survey transects were counted and identified to species wherever possible. Location of major foraging and roosting sites of waterbirds were marked on map. Signs of breeding (e.g. nests and/ or recently fledged juveniles) within the Study Area, especially in the Proposed Works Limit, were also recorded, if any. Observations were made using binoculars (at least 8x) and photographic records were taken, if possible. Ornithological nomenclature in this report followed the latest List of Hong Kong Birds by Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.

8.4.8            Egretry Survey – Within the 6-month baseline ecological survey, the breeding ardeid population of Ping Che egretry was surveyed monthly by direct observation using binoculars in the breeding season of 2020 (usually between March and August). The numbers of abandoned nests and nests with incubating adults or chicks of each breeding ardeid species in the egretry were recorded during each survey. The extent of the egretry was mapped and physical environment was noted. Particular attention was also paid to any other egretry, foraging ground and/or roosting habitat used by breeding ardeids within the Study Area.

8.4.9            Herpetofauna – Herpetofauna surveys (including day and night-time surveys, covering the dry and wet seasons) were carried out, at least twice in the dry season and twice in the wet season. Herpetofauna surveys were conducted through direct observation and active searching in all habitat types along the tentative survey transects (Figure 8.3) and in potential hiding places such as among leaf litter, inside holes, under stones and logs within the Study Area. Particular attention was given to streams and watercourses. Auditory detection of species-specific calls was used to survey frogs and toads. During the surveys, all reptiles and amphibians sighted and heard were recorded. Nomenclature and conservation status of reptiles has followed Karsen et al. (1998) and Chan et al. (2006), while those of amphibians follows Chan et al. (2005).

8.4.10         Butterflies and Odonates – Butterfly and odonate surveys were carried out, at least twice in the dry season and twice in the wet season. Butterflies and odonates of different habitats within the Study Area were surveyed using a transect method (Figure 8.3). Butterflies and odonates along the tentative survey transects were identified and counted for each type of habitat. Butterflies and odonates encountered outside the transects but within the Study Area were also recorded in order to produce a complete species list. Nomenclature of butterflies and odonates follows Chan et al. (2011) and Tam et al. (2011).

8.4.11         Freshwater Aquatic Assemblage – Streams and watercourse (both perennial and seasonal) within the Study Area were visited, and aquatic fauna, including fish and arthropods, were studied by direct observation and active searching by hand nets and standard field sampling techniques (e.g. kick sampling), at least twice in the dry season and twice in the wet season. Active sampling was carried out at the tentative aquatic sampling locations shown in Figure 8.4. Organisms, expected to be mostly fish and aquatic macro-invertebrates (e.g. freshwater crabs & shrimps, freshwater molluscs and aquatic insect larvae) were recorded and identified. During each survey, all of the sampling points were covered. Nomenclature of fish followed Lee et al. (2004), while that of the macro-invertebrates followed Dudgeon (1999).

8.4.12         The survey transects for terrestrial mammals, avifauna, herpetofauna, butterflies and odonates are shown for indicative purpose in Figure 8.3. The sampling points for freshwater aquatic assemblage are illustrated in Figure 8.4.

8.5                Ecological Baseline Survey Results

Habitat

8.5.1            Eleven habitat types were identified within the 500m Study Area, namely abandoned agricultural land, agricultural land, channel, developed area, fung shui wood, plantation, pond, shrubland/grassland, wasteland, watercourse and woodland. The Proposed Works Limit only covers seven habitat types, including abandoned agricultural land, agricultural land, pond, channel, developed area, watercourse and woodland, as detailed in Table 8.4. The representative photos of identified habitats are shown in Appendix 8.1, where photo record of species of conservation importance are shown in Appendix 8.2.  The full flora species list is shown in Appendix 8.3 and fauna species list is shown in Appendix 8.4 to Appendix 8.10.

Table 8.4 Habitats within the Study Area

Habitat

Project Site

Study Area

Size (ha)

Size (ha)

Abandoned Agricultural Land

8.64

160.92

Agricultural Land

2.70

42.12

Channel

0.89 (257m)

7.85 (2849m)

Developed Area

4.24

147.03

Fung Shui Woodland

-

0.68

Plantation

-

1.94

Pond

0.13

0.49

Shrubland/Grassland

-

28.53

Wasteland

-

2.27

Watercourse

2.45 (4181m)

5.32 (11059m)

Woodland

1.05

47.68

Total

20.10

444.83

 

Abandoned Agricultural Land

8.5.2            Abandoned agricultural land accounts for the largest area within the 500m Study Area and were mostly in close vicinity to villages nearby. Agricultural land left abandoned by villagers underwent succession and was extensively colonized by invasive climber species Ipomoea cairica and Mikania micrantha, as well as thickets of herb species Bidens alba, Brachiaria mutica, Panicum maximum and Pennisetum purpureum. Fruit tree remnants and a few naturally dispersed tree species were also recorded. No flora species of conservation importance was recorded.

Agricultural Land

8.5.3            Adjacent to villages nearby, agricultural land within the 500m Study Area was cultivated with crop species Fragaria x ananassa, Lactuca sativa, Lycium chinense, Lycopersicon esculentum and fruit tree species Artocarpus heterophyllus, Dimocarpus longan and Litchi chinensis. Large amount of cultivated Aquilaria sinensis was also found in farms within this habitat.

Pond

8.5.4            Ponds within the 500m Study Area scattered and were most isolated from each other.  The two ponds within Wun Chuen Sin Kwoon and next to Ping Che Kat Tin Children’s Playground respectively were constructed with pavements and pavilions surrounding, they are considered constructed for landscaping purpose. The margin and sloping banks of these ponds were made of concrete and had limited growth space for vegetation.  The rest of the ponds were of muddy banks and beds, weedy and/or hydrophilic species such as Alternanthera sessilis, Bidens alba and Mikania micrantha were found colonizing the banks of these ponds.

Channel

8.5.5            Channel within the 500m Study Area only encompasses part of the channelized section of Ping Yuen River, discharging water to Shenzhen River to the north and the section to the east of Ping Che Road. Ping Yuen River was channelized in 2006. Lined with gabion and grassed cellular concrete lining. Some sections of the channel bed were heavily covered by grass and wetland herbs, such as Brachiaria mutica and Commelina diffusa. Both sides of the river bank of a tributary running through Lei Uk area are lined with gabions. Vegetation growing on these gabions is limited.

Developed Area

8.5.6            Developed area within the 500m Study Area was composed of bridges, elderly home, fire station, playgrounds, police station, public schools, pumping station, roads, Taoist Temple and villages and was concrete-paved with limited space for the growth of plants. Landscaping and ornamental species were cultivated and exotic and weedy species was frequently recorded.

Fung Shui Wood

8.5.7            Fung Shui Wood within the 500m Study Area only includes Kan Tau Wai Fung Shui Wood adjacent to Kan Tau Wai outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the 500m Study Area. The canopy is very sparse and interspersed with light gaps. Some saplings of native tree species (e.g. Aporusa dioica) and fruit tree species (e.g. Carica papaya and Dimocarpus longan). Agave americana, an ornamental plant species, was also grown at the edge of the Fung Shui Wood, reflecting the disturbed nature of Kan Tau Wai Fung Shui Wood.

Plantation

8.5.8            A patch of plantation situated immediately to the north of Ping Yeung Public School and across Ping Yuen Road was planted with exotic and fast-growing tree species Acacia confusa, Eucalyptus robusta and Lophostemon confertus as tall as 15m. Regeneration of native tree species in its understorey, however, was lacking. Light gaps were prominent. The understorey of this plantation was rather disturbed and was composed of a mix of native and exotic plant species, including Bidens alba and Ligustrum sinense.

Shrubland/ Grassland

8.5.9            Except the northeast one in the hillslope of the Study Area, shrubland/grassland mostly occurred as fragmented stands within the 500m Study Area and was dominated by native species common in other shrubland/grassland in Hong Kong, such as Baeckea frutescens, Blechnum orientale, Cratoxylum cochinchinense, Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia Miscanthus sinensis, Rhaphiolepis indica, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Rhus succedanea and Smilax china. Ficus microcarpa was occasionally observed.

Wasteland

8.5.10         Subject to intensive anthropogenic disturbance, wasteland patches scattered within the 500m Study Area and the original vegetation were mostly recently cleared, leaving exposed soil and the bare ground was rapidly colonized by invasive species, such as Bidens alba, Ipomoea cairica, Panicum maximum and Wedelia trilobata.

Watercourse

8.5.11         Watercourses within the 500m Study Area include agricultural ditches for crop irrigation, narrow nullahs with vertical and concrete banks and bed for drainage and semi-natural meanders as the tributaries of the pre-channelized Ping Yuen River.

8.5.12         Water level and quality were generally low in the man-made sections of the watercourses within the 500m Study Area. The bed and banks of agricultural ditches were mostly muddy, while that of nullahs were made of concrete. They were also subject to frequent disturbance and effluent discharge from villagers nearby.

8.5.13         The natural section of the watercourses within the 500m Study Area has variable water depth along its reach and their banks are mostly natural and vegetated with hydrophilic herb species Boehmeria nivea var. tenacissima, Brachiaria mutica, Callipteris esculenta, Colocasia esculenta, Commelina diffusa and Persicaria barbata.

Woodland

8.5.14         Occurred as isolated stands with closed canopy reaching as high as 12m within the 500m Study Area, woodland was mostly composed of native plant species. The canopy of these woodland stands was dominated by Aporusa dioica, Cinnamomum camphora, Daphniphyllum calycinum, Dimocarpus longan, Ficus hispida, Litsea glutinosa, Microcos nervosa, Macaranga tanarius var. tomentosa, Machilus chekiangensis, Schefflera heptaphylla and Sterculia lanceolata. The understorey was regenerated with native tree species and native shrub species Litsea rotundifolia var. oblongifolia and Psychotria asiatica, and climber species Cansjera rheedii, Dalbergia benthamii, Desmos chinensis, Strophanthus divaricatus and Zanthoxylum nitidum.

Vegetation

8.5.15         A total of 446 plant species were recorded within the 500m Study Area from February to August 2020, among which 223 are native to Hong Kong and 215 of them are exotic to Hong Kong and the rest are of uncertain origin. Among the 446 plant species recorded, six of them are considered of conservation importance, namely Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus, Mucuna championii, Neottopteris nidus, Pavetta hongkongensis and Xylosma longifolium (Figure 8.2). 

8.5.16         Wild individuals of Aquilaria sinensis were recorded in the watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit, agricultural land and woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Clusters of cultivated Aquilaria sinensis (>700 individuals) were found in agricultural land within the Proposed Works Limit and outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Aquilaria sinensis is common in the lowland forests and fung shui woods of Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) and was included in the book “Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong” (Hu et al. 2003). In south China, particularly Hong Kong, it is threatened by illegal felling and over-exploitation and is listed in Appendix II of CITES (CITES 2020) and is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance in Hong Kong. Moreover, it is included in China Plant Red Data Book (Fu and Chin 1992) and Illustration of Rare & Endangered plant in Guangdong Province (Wu and Hu 1988), and wild individuals are listed in Category II of the List of Wild Plants under State Protection (State Forestry Administration & Ministry of Agriculture 1999). It is also categorized as vulnerable in China Red Data Book (Fu and Chin 1992), the Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants (Qin et al. 2017) and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN 2020).

8.5.17         Several individuals and one individual of Cephalanthus tetrandrus were recorded in the abandoned agricultural land opposite to a pond at Ping Che Kat Tin and in the watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit respectively. This species is a very rare native tree found in thickets by streams in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000).

8.5.18         Dense thickets of Mucuna championii were recorded in the eastern woodland within the Proposed Works Limit, as well as the woodland near Ping Yeung Village outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the 500m Study Area. Generally found in lowland forests, Mucuna championii is a rare native climber species in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) included in the book “Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong” and was assessed as endangered in China (Hu et al. 2003).

8.5.19         Eight Neottopteris nidus individuals were recorded in developed area within the Proposed Works Limit. Neottopteris nidus is a native epiphytic and epilithic herb that is restricted in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) and is listed under Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance in Hong Kong.

8.5.20         Pavetta hongkongensis was recorded in the woodland near Nga Yiu Ha outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the 500m Study Area. It is a common native shrub in fung shui woods and lowland forests in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) and is listed under Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance in Hong Kong.

8.5.21         An individual of Xylosma longifolium was found in the developed area outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the 500m Study Area. This species is a rare native tree usually found in forest in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000).

8.5.22         Although Arundina graminifolia, Arundo donax, Persicaria jucunda, Podocarpus macrophyllus and Pycreus sanguinolentus appear to fall into the criteria of being listed as species of conservation importance, they are eliminated from the list of species of conservation importance, due to their cultivated/naturalized nature, or unconfirmed commonness. While Casuarina equisetifolia, Epipremnum pinnatum, Ficus altissima, Humulus scandens, Lagerstroemia indica, Lagerstroemia speciosa, Ocimum basilicum and Talinum paniculatum are all exotic to Hong Kong and not considered of conservation importance, despite being considered rare or very rare by Corlett et al. (2000) or listed under Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance.

Fauna

Mammals

8.5.23         One mammal species was recorded within the Study Area, which is Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus.  This species is considered of conservation importance.  Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land and Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Pond and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area (Figure 8.2).  It is protected under Cap. 170 Wild Animals Protection Ordinance. It is widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Birds

8.5.24         74 species of bird were recorded within the Study Area. 42 species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit, while 71 species were recorded outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Most of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. Among all the 74 species recorded, 23 species are of conservation importance, including Eurasian Teal Anas crecca, Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Eastern Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Great Egret Ardea alba, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata, Black Kite Milvus migrans, Eastern Buzzard Buteo japonicus, Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius, Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis, Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola, Common Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis, Collared Scops Owl Otus lettia, Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Collared Crow Corvus torquatus, Zitting Cisticola Cisticola juncidis, Rufous-capped Babbler Stachyridopsis ruficeps and Common Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus.  The recorded locations are shown in (Figure 8.2)

8.5.25         Eurasian Teal Anas crecca was recorded in Channel outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common winter visitor found in Deep Bay area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria Harbour, Urban Park.

8.5.26         Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax was recorded in Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common resident and winter visitor widely distributed in Hong Kong. 

8.5.27         Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus was recorded in Agricultural land, Channel and Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Pond and Watercourse outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern and (Regional Concern) by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common resident widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.28         Eastern Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus was recorded in Agricultural land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a resident and common passage migrant widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.29         Grey Heron Ardea cinereal was recorded in Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common winter visitor found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park, Cape D'Aguilar.

8.5.30         Great Egret Ardea alba was recorded in Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern and (Regional Concern) by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common resident and winter visitor widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.31         Little Egret Egretta garzetta was recorded Channel within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land and Channel outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern and (Regional Concern) by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common resident widely distributed in coastal area throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.32         Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata was seen soaring above Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES, and considered as Rare in China Red Data Book, as Vulnerable in Red List of China’s Vertebrates, and as (Regional Concern) by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is a scarce resident found in Deep Bay area, Hong Kong Island, Lamma Island, Lantau Island, Castle Peak, Sha Lo Tung.

8.5.33         Black Kite Milvus migrans was seen soaring above Abandoned Agricultural Land and Developed Area within Proposed Works Limit, and above Abandoned Agricultural Land, Developed Area, Shrubland/Grassland and Wasteland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and considered as Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is a common resident and winter visitor widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.34         Eastern Buzzard Buteo japonicas was seen soaring above Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is a common winter visitor widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.35         Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius was recorded in Channel within the Proposed Works Limit. It is considered as (Local Concern) by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common winter visitor and passage migrant widely distributed in freshwater areas throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.36         Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis was recorded in Channel outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a passage migrant and winter visitor found in Ha Tsuen, Lok Ma Chau, Kam Tin, Long Valley, Hong Kong Wetland Park.

8.5.37         Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola was recorded in Channel outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common passage migrant and winter visitor widely distributed in wetland area throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.38         Common Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Vulnerable in China Red Data Book. It is a scarce but widespread resident widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.39         Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land and Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Fung Shui Wood and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Class 2 Protected Animal of China and considered as Vulnerable in China Red Data Book. It is a common resident widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.40         Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land and Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Class 2 Protected Animal of China and considered as Vulnerable in China Red Data Book. It is a common resident widely distributed in Hong Kong.

8.5.41         Collared Scops Owl Otus lettia was recorded in Developed Area and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and in Class 2 Protected Animal of China. It is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is a common resident widely distributed in shrubland throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.42         Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Developed Area and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and in Class 2 Protected Animal of China. It is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is an uncommon resident widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.43         Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land and Developed Area within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Developed Area, Watercourse and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is a rare resident found in Kowloon Park.

8.5.44         Collared Crow Corvus torquatus was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land and Channel outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed as Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List and is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is an uncommon resident found in Inner Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk, Pok Fu Lam, Chek lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen.

8.5.45         Zitting Cisticola Cisticola juncidis was recorded in Developed Area outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a common passage migrant and winter visitor widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.46         Rufous-capped Babbler Stachyridopsis ruficeps was recorded in Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is an uncommon resident found in Shing Mun, Tai Po Kau, Tai Mek Tuk, Ng Tung Chai, Fo Tan, Tai Mo Shan, The Peak and Kadoorie Agricultural Research Centre.

8.5.47         Common Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a rare winter visitor widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Ping Che Egretry

8.5.48         Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus were recorded nesting. The maximum number of active nests recorded was five. They were recorded on 27th May 2020. Records of nesting activities at the egretry are presented in Table 8.5.  The Ping Che Egretry location is shown in (Figure 8.3).

Table 8.5 Ping Che Egretry Activity from March to August 2020

Date

Number of Chinese Pond Heron Nests

23/3/2020

0

22/4/2020

0

27/5/2020

5

15/6/2020

3

23/7/2020

1

20/8/2020

0

Herpetofauna

8.5.49         Eight reptile species were recorded within the Study Area. Four species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit, while six species were recorded outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Most of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. Among all the eight species recorded, three species are of conservation importance, including Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata, Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus and Four-clawed Gecko Gehyra mutilate (Figure 8.2).

8.5.50         Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land within the Proposed Works Limit. It is considered as Endangered in China Red Data Book and in Red list of China’s Vertebrates. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.51         Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus was recorded in Developed Area outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Endangered in China Red Data Book and in Red list of China’s Vertebrates. It is listed in Appendix 2 of CITES and is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.52         Four-clawed Gecko Gehyra mutilata was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is listed as Vulnerable in Red List of China’s Vertebrates. It is widely but thinly distributed throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.53         10 amphibian species were recorded within the Study Area. All species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit, while eight species were recorded outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Most of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. Among all the 10 species recorded, one species is of conservation importance, which is Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis.

8.5.54         Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land and Agricultural Land within the Proposed Works Limit. It is listed in Class 2 Protected Animal of China and considered as Endangered in Red List of China’s Vertebrates. It is considered as Potential Regional Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is widely distributed in Lantau Island and New Territories.

Butterflies

8.5.55         64 species of butterfly were recorded within the Study Area. 23 species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit, while 60 species were recorded outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. Most of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. Among all the 64 species recorded, five species are of conservation importance, including Grass Demon Udaspes folus, Cornelian Deudorix epijarbas, Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus, Swallowtail Papilio xuthus, Red-breast Jezebel Delias acalis (Figure 8.2).

8.5.56         Grass Demon Udaspes folus was recorded in Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit. It is a rare species widely distributed in agricultural field throughout Hong Kong.

8.5.57         Cornelian Deudorix epijarbas was recorded in Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is a rare species found in Lam Tsuen, Shan Liu, Wu Kau Tang, Pak Sha O, Fung Yuen.

8.5.58         Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus was recorded in Woodland within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is an uncommon species found in Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy Hill, Lin Ma Hang.

8.5.59         Swallowtail Papilio xuthus was recorded in Developed Area within the Proposed Works Limit, and in Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Shrubland/Grassland and Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is a rare species found in Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau Tang, Lung Kwu Chau.

8.5.60         Red-breast Jezebel Delias acalis was recorded in Agricultural Land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. It is considered as Local Concern by Fellowes et al. (2002). It is a rare species found in Tai Tam, Tai Mo Shan, Ngau Ngak Shan, Pat Sin Leng, Tai Pond Kau, Wu Kau Tang, Wong Nai Chung, Fung Yuen, Plover Cove.

Odonate

8.5.61         27 species of odonate were recorded within the Study Area. 18 species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit, while 25 species were recorded outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area. All of the recorded species are common and widespread in Hong Kong. None of the recorded odonate species is considered of conservation importance.

Freshwater Fauna

8.5.62         A total of eight fish species and four aquatic invertebrate species were recorded within the Study Area, where seven fish species and all aquatic invertebrate species were recorded within the Proposed Works Limit.  The recorded species are not considered as species of conservation importance.

8.5.63         The recorded fish and aquatic invertebrates are considered as common and a number of recorded species are exotic species, such as Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus, Mosquito Fish Gambusia affinis, Dwarf Snakehead Channa gachua and Apple Snail Pomacea canaliculata.  In particular, Nile Tilapia were observed as abundant in channel and watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit and Study Area.

8.6                Evaluation of Habitats and Species of Conservation Importance.

8.6.1            In accordance with Table 3, Annex 8 of the EIAO-TM, the ecological value of species was assessed in terms of protection status (e.g. fauna protected under WAPO (except birds), and flora and fauna protected under regional/global legislation/conventions), species distribution (e.g. endemic), and rarity (e.g. rare or restricted).  The evaluation of habitats within the Proposed Works Limit is detailed in Table 8.6, where habitats in Study Area are detailed in Table 8.7 to Table 8.17. The list and evaluation of flora species of conservation interest recorded within the Study Area, according to the EIAO-TM, are given in Table 8.18.  The list and evaluation of fauna species of conservation interest recorded within the Study Area, according to the EIAO-TM, are given in Table 8.19. The habitat map and species of conservation importance is illustrated in Figure 8.5.


Table 8.6 Evaluation of Habitats within the Proposed Works Limit

Criteria

Habitats within the Proposed Works Limit

Abandoned Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

Pond

Channel

Developed Area

Watercourse

Woodland

Naturalness

Man-made but colonized naturally and largely by weeds

Man-made

Man-made

Man-made

Man-made

Both man-made and natural sections found

Largely natural

Size (ha)

8.64

2.7

0.13

0.89 (257m)

4.24

2.45 (4181m)

1.05

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna

Low to moderate diversity of flora

 

Low diversity of terrestrial and freshwater fauna

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna

Low to moderate diversity of flora

 

Low diversity of terrestrial and freshwater fauna

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis

No flora and fauna species of conservation importance

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius

Flora species of conservation importance: Neottopteris nidus

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Swallowtail Papilio xuthus

Flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Grass Demon Udaspes folus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Flora species of conservation importance: Mucuna championii

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Easy to re-create

Easy to re-create

Easy to re-create

Easy to re-create

Easy to re-create for man-made section; difficult to re-create for semi-natural section

Can be re-created

Fragmentation

Occurs extensively within the Proposed Works Limit

Occurs as patches adjacent to villages

Scattered and were most isolated from each other

None

None

Semi-natural section fragmented by man-made section

Occurred as isolated stands

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Ditches and puddles are formed by diversion of water from watercourses nearby for irrigating crops by villagers

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Linked to Watercourse

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Partly linked to Shrubland/Grassland and Woodland; receive nutrient input from surrounding habitats in general

Structurally and functionally linked to Watercourse

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

No significant record

No significant record

No significant record

No significant record

No significant record

No significant record

Age

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

At least 20 years

Abundance/ richness of wildlife

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

Low abundance of terrestrial fauna

Overall ecological value of the Proposed Works Limit

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low to Moderate

Low


Table 8.7 Evaluation of Abandoned Agricultural Land within the Study Area

Criterion

Abandoned Agricultural Land

Naturalness

Man-made habitat but colonized naturally and largely by weeds

Size (ha)

160.92

Diversity

Low to moderate diversity of flora

Low to moderate diversity of bird and butterfly; low diversity of odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Rarity

One flora species of conservation importance: Cephalanthus tetrandrus

19 fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata, Black Kite Milvus migrans, Eastern Buzzard Buteo japonicus, Common Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis, Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Collared Crow Corvus torquatus, Common Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus, Cornelian Deudorix epijarbas, Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus, Swallowtail Papilio Xuthus, Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus, Four-clawed Gecko Gehyra mutilata

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

Occurs extensively within the Study Area

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record, possibly due to significant disturbance

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low to moderate abundance of bird and butterfly; low abundance of odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Overall ecological value

Low

 

 

Table 8.8 Evaluation of Agricultural Land within the Study Area

Criterion

Agricultural Land

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

42.12

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

One flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis

10 fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Eastern Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Swallowtail Papilio Xuthus, Red-breast Jezebel Delias acalis, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

Occurs as patches adjacent to villages

Ecological linkage

Ditches and puddles are formed by diversion of water from watercourses nearby for irrigating crops by villagers

Potential value

Low to moderate

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record, possibly due to significant disturbance

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low to moderate abundance of bird; low abundance of butterfly, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Overall ecological value

Low to moderate

 

              Table 8.9 Evaluation of Channel within the Study Area

Criterion

Channel

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

7.85 (2849m)

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

Nine fauna species of conservation importance: Eurasian Teal Anas crecca, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius, Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis, Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Collared Crow Corvus torquatus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

None

Ecological linkage

Linked to Watercourse

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of all groups of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

Overall ecological value

Low

 

              Table 8.10 Evaluation of Developed Area within the Study Area

Criterion

Developed Area

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

147.03

Diversity

Moderate diversity of flora; low diversity of fauna

Rarity

Two flora species conservation importance: Neottopteris nidus, Xylosma longifolium

10 fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Black Kite Milvus migrans, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Collared Scops Owl Otus lettia, Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Zitting Cisticola Cisticola juncidis, Swallowtail Papilio Xuthus, Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

None

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record, possibly due to significant disturbance

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low to moderate abundance of bird; low abundance of butterfly, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Overall ecological value

Low

 

Table 8.11 Evaluation of Fung Shui Wood within the Study Area

Criterion

Fung Shui Wood

Naturalness

Semi-natural habitat

Size (ha)

0.68

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

One fauna species of conservation importance: Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis

Re-creatability

Not readily re-creatable

Fragmentation

Fragmented and isolated

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Moderate, given time for secondary succession

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

At least 30 years

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of bird and butterfly; odonate, herpetofauna and mammal were not recorded in this habitat.

Overall ecological value

Low to Moderate

 

Table 8.12 Evaluation of Plantation within the Study Area

Criterion

Plantation

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

1.94

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora and fauna species of conservation importance

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

None

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of bird and butterfly; odonate, herpetofauna and mammal were not recorded in this habitat.

Overall ecological value

Low

 

Table 8.13 Evaluation of Pond within the Study Area

Criterion

Pond

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

0.49

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

Two fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

Scattered and were most isolated from each other

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of bird, butterfly, odonate and mammal; herpetofauna was not recorded in this habitat.

Overall ecological value

Low

 

Table 8.14 Evaluation of Shrubland/Grassland within the Study Area

Criterion

Shrubland/grassland

Naturalness

Natural

Size (ha)

28.53

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

Two fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans, Swallowtail Papilio xuthus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

Occurred as fragmented stands within the Study Area

Ecological linkage

Ecologically linked with adjacent Woodland

Potential value

Low to moderate

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of bird, butterfly, odonate and herpetofauna; mammal was not recorded in this habitat.

Overall ecological value

Low to moderate

 

Table 8.15  Evaluation of Wasteland within the Study Area

Criterion

Wasteland

Naturalness

Man-made habitat

Size (ha)

2.27

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

No flora species of conservation importance

One fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create

Fragmentation

Occurs as patches adjacent to villages

Ecological linkage

Not functionally linked to habitats of conservation importance

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of bird, butterfly and odonate; herpetofauna and mammal were not recorded in this habitat.

Overall ecological value

Low

 

Table 8.16 Evaluation of Watercourse within the Study Area

Criterion

Watercourse

Naturalness

Both man-made and natural sections found

Size (ha)

5.32 (11059m)

Diversity

Low diversity of flora and fauna

Rarity

Two flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus

Seven fauna species of conservation importance: Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Grass Demon Udaspes folus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Easy to re-create for man-made section; difficult to re-create for semi-natural section

Fragmentation

Semi-natural section fragmented by man-made section

Ecological linkage

Partly linked to Shrubland/Grassland and Woodland; receive nutrient input from surrounding habitats in general

Potential value

Low

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

N/A

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low abundance of all groups of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

Overall ecological value

Low for man-made section; low to moderate for semi-natural section

 

Table 8.17 Evaluation of Woodland within the Study Area

Criterion

Woodland

Naturalness

Largely natural

Size (ha)

47.68

Diversity

Low to moderate diversity of flora; low diversity of fauna

Rarity

Three flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Mucuna championii, Pavetta hongkongensis

Nine fauna species of conservation importance: Great Egret Ardea alba, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Collared Scops Owl Otus lettia, Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Rufous-capped Babbler Stachyridopsis ruficeps, Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus, Swallowtail Papilio xuthus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Re-creatability

Can be re-created

Fragmentation

Occurred as isolated stands

Ecological linkage

Structurally and functionally linked to Watercourse

Potential value

Low to moderate

Nursery/breeding ground

No significant record

Age

At least 20 years

Abundance/richness of wildlife

Low to moderate abundance of butterfly; low abundance of bird, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Overall ecological value

Low to moderate

 

Table 8.18 Evaluation of Flora Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area

Scientific names

Locations

Rarity in Hong Kong 1

Distribution 1

Conservation/Protection status

Aquilaria sinensis

Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit

 

Agricultural land and woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area

Common

Lowland forests and fung shui woods

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2020): Vulnerable 2

Appendix II of CITES 3

Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants: Vulnerable 4

China Plant Red Data Book: Vulnerable 5

Included in Illustrations of Rare & Endangered Plant in Guangdong Province 6

Listed in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong 7

Cap. 586 8

State Protection (Category II) 9

Cephalanthus tetrandrus

Watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit

Abandoned agricultural land outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area

Very rare

-

-

Mucuna championii

Woodland within the Proposed Works Limit

Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area

Rare

Lowland forests.

Fung Yuen, Kuk Po and She Shan

Listed in Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong: Endangered in China7

Neottopteris nidus

Developed area within the Proposed Works Limit

Restricted

Forests

Cap. 96A10

Pavetta hongkongensis

Woodland outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area

Common

Fung shui woods and lowland forests

Cap. 96A10

Xylosma longifolium

Developed area outside the Proposed Works Limit but within the Study Area

Rare

Forests

Mui Tze Lam (Ma On Shan), Sha Tau Kok, Loi Tung and Lam Tsuen

-

Notes:

1.      Corlett et al. (2000). Hong Kong Vascular Plants: Distribution and Status.

2.      IUCN (2020). IUCN Red List Version 2019-3.

3.      Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (2020). Appendices I, II and III.

4.      Qin et al. (2017). Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants.

5.      Fu & Chin (1992). China Plant Red Data Book – Rare and Endangered Plants.

6.      Wu & Hu (1988). Illustration of Rare & endangered plant in Guangdong Province.

7.      Hu et al. (2003). Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong.

8.      Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance

9.      State Forestry Administration & Ministry of Agriculture (1999). List of Wild Plants under State Protection (Part 1).

10.   Cap. 96A Forestry Regulations under Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance

Table 8.19 Evaluation of Fauna Species of Conservation Importance Recorded within the Study Area

Species Name 1

Conservation Status 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

Rarity and Distribution 1

Location

Bird

(Remark: all wild bird species are protected under Cap. 170 Wild Animals Protection Ordinance in Hong Kong 2)

Eurasian Teal Anas crecca

Fellowes et al. (2002): RC

Common winter visitor. Found in Deep Bay area, Shuen Wan, Tai Lam Chung Reservoir, Victoria Harbour, Urban Park.

Study Area (Channel)

Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax

Fellowes et al. (2002): (LC)

Common resident and winter visitor. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Watercourse)

Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus

Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC,(RC)

Common resident. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Agricultural Land, Channel, Watercourse); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Pond, Watercourse)

Eastern Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus

Fellowes et al. (2002): (LC)

Resident and common passage migrant. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Study Area (Agricultural Land)

Grey Heron Ardea cinerea

Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC

Common winter visitor. Found in Deep Bay area, Starling Inlet, Kowloon Park, Cape D'Aguilar.

Proposed Works Limit (Watercourse)

Great Egret Ardea alba

Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC,(RC)

Common resident and winter visitor. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Study Area (Woodland)

Little Egret Egretta garzetta

Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC,(RC)

Common resident. Widely distributed in coastal area throughout Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Channel); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel)

Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata

China Red Data Book Status: (Rare); Fellowes et al. (2002): (RC); Red list of China’s vertebrates: (Vulnerable); Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Scarce resident. Found in Deep Bay area, Hong Kong Island, Lamma Island, Lantau Island, Castle Peak, Sha Lo Tung.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Black Kite Milvus migrans

Fellowes et al. (2002): (RC); Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Common resident and winter visitor. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Developed Area); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Developed Area, Shrubland/Grassland, Wasteland)

Eastern Buzzard Buteo japonicus

Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Common winter visitor. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius

Fellowes et al. (2002): (LC)

Common winter visitor and passage migrant. Widely distributed in freshwater areas throughout Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Channel)

Greater Painted-snipe Rostratula benghalensis

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Passage migrant and winter visitor. Found in Ha Tsuen, Lok Ma Chau, Kam Tin, Long Valley, Hong Kong Wetland Park.

Study Area (Channel)

Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Common passage migrant and winter visitor. Widely distributed in wetland area throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Channel)

Common Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica

China Red Data Book Status: (Vulnerable)

Scarce but widespread resident. Widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis

Class 2 Protected Animal of China; China Red Data Book Status: (Vulnerable)

Common resident. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Watercourse); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Fung Shui Wood, Woodland)

Lesser Coucal Centropus bengalensis

Class 2 Protected Animal of China; China Red Data Book Status: (Vulnerable)

Common resident. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land)

Collared Scops Owl Otus lettia

Class 2 Protected Animal of China; Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Common resident. Widely distributed in shrubland throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Developed Area, Woodland)

Asian Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides

Class 2 Protected Animal of China; Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Uncommon resident. Widely distributed in woodland throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Developed Area, Woodland)

Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria

Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Rare resident. Found in Kowloon Park

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Developed Area); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Developed Area, Watercourse, Woodland)

Collared Crow Corvus torquatus

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC; IUCN Red List Status: Vulnerable

Uncommon resident. Found in Inner Deep Bay area, Nam Chung, Kei Ling Ha, Tai Mei Tuk, Pok Fu Lam, Chek lap Kok, Shuen Wan, Lam Tsuen.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Channel)

Zitting Cisticola Cisticola juncidis

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Common passage migrant and winter visitor. Widely distributed in grassland throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Developed Area)

Rufous-capped Babbler Stachyridopsis ruficeps

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Uncommon resident. Found in Shing Mun, Tai Pond Kau, Tai Mek Tuk, Ng Tung Chai, Fo Tan, Tai Mo Shan, The Peak and Kadoorie Agricultural Research Centre.

Study Area (Woodland)

Common Rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Rare winter visitor. Widely distributed in Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Butterfly

Grass Demon Udaspes folus

-

Rare. Widely distributed in agricultural field throughout Hong Kong

Proposed Works Limit (Watercourse)

Cornelian Deudorix epijarbas

-

Rare. Lam Tsuen, Shan Liu, Wu Kau Tang, Pak Sha O, Fung Yuen

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Uncommon. Ngau Ngak Shan, Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong Wetland Park, Mount Parker, Cloudy Hill, Lin Ma Hang

Proposed Works Limit (Woodland); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Swallowtail Papilio xuthus

-

Rare. Kap Lung, Ma On Shan, Tai Tam, Sha Lo Wan, Kat O, Lung Kwu Tan, Wu Kau Tang, Lung Kwu Chau

Proposed Works Limit (Developed Area); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Shrubland/Grassland, Woodland)

Red-breast Jezebel Delias acalis

Fellowes et al. (2002): LC

Rare. Tai Tam, Tai Mo Shan, Ngau Ngak Shan, Pat Sin Leng, Tai Pond Kau, Wu Kau Tang, Wong Nai Chung, Fung Yuen, Plover Cove

Study Area (Agricultural Land)

Reptile

Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata

China Red Data Book Status: (Endangered); Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC; Red list of China’s vertebrates: (Endangered)

Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Common Rat Snake Ptyas mucosus

China Red Data Book Status: (Endangered); Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC; Red list of China’s vertebrates: (Endangered); Appendix 2 of CITES; Cap. 586

Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Developed Area)

Four-clawed Gecko Gehyra mutilata

Red list of China’s vertebrates: (Vulnerable)

Widely but thinly distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land)

Amphibian

Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis

Class 2 Protected Animal of China; Fellowes et al. (2002): PRC; Red list of China’s vertebrates: (Endangered)

Widely distributed in Lantau Island and New Territories.

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land)

Mammal

Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

(Cap. 170)

Widely distributed throughout Hong Kong.

Proposed Works Limit (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Watercourse); Study Area (Abandoned Agricultural Land, Agricultural Land, Channel, Developed Area, Pond, Woodland)

Notes:

1.      AFCD. Hong Kong Biodiversity Database.

2.      Cap. 170 Wild Animals Protection Ordinance.

3.      Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance.

4.      Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna. Appendices I, II and III.

5.      Fellowes et al. (2002). Wild animals to watch: Terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong.

·          For conservation status listed by Fellowes et al. (2002), letters in parentheses indicate that the assessment is on the basis of restrictedness in breeding and/or roosting sites rather than in general occurrence.

6.      International Union of Conservation for Nature. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. 

7.      Jiang, Z. G., Jiang, J. P., Wang, Y. Z., Zhang, E., Zhang, Y. Y., Li, L. L., ... & Dong, L. (2016). Red list of China’s vertebrates

8.      List of State Protected Wild Animals, promulgated by the State Council

9.      Zhao, E. (1998). China red data book of endangered animals: Amphibia and Reptilia.

10.   Zheng and Wang (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves.

Abbreviations:

Conservation Status in Fellowes et al. (2002): LC = Local Concern; PRC = Potential Regional Concern; RC = Regional Concern

8.7                Impact Assessment

8.7.1            The proposed works of the Project include, but are not limited to, the following items:

·       Improvement works to tributary sections TKL04 and TKL05 of Ping Yuen River

§  Construct embankments along the sides of the river with average height from 3m to 3.5m, for most of the sections of TLK04. 

§  For the downstream section of TLK04 located between the Ping Che Road and TLK05, widening and construction of embankments of 3.5m.

§  For TLK05 of Ping Yuen River, construct the embankments along both sides of the river with average height from 3m to 3.5m to provide artificial flood plain with an average width from 10m to 21m for high flow conditions. 

·       Drainage improvement works at Ping Yeung Village

§  Construction 825mm to 1200mm wide u-channels and 1200mm diameter drain pipes.  With the completion of the recommended works, a local sub-catchment covering the northern part of village will be re-distributed and discharged into Ping Yuen River at the north instead of TKL04.

·       Construction of road drainage pipes at Ping Che Road

§  Laying 1200mm pipe along Ping Che Road to collect runoff from the road via gullies which will then be discharged into Ping Yuen River.

·       Re-provision of vehicular crossing and footbridges

§  Vehicular crossing and footbridges construction along TKL04 and TKL05.

Impact Assessment Methodology

8.7.2            The potential ecological impacts associated with the above mentioned works are listed below.

·       Direct loss of habitat resulted from vegetation clearance for construction of embankments, widening and laying of drainage system;

·       Direct impact on flora and fauna species of conservation importance;

·       Indirect impacts on surrounding habitats and associated wildlife due to increased disturbance, esp. disturbance to Ping Che Egretry;

·       Indirect impacts (pollution) on watercourses due to construction run-off; and

·       Fragmentation and cumulative impacts

 

8.7.3            The potential to reduce adverse ecological impacts by design changes following the principle of Avoidance elucidated in EIAO Technical Memorandum Annex 8 was then considered with respect to (a) their technical feasibility and (b) their necessity, given the extent of the predicted impacts.

8.7.4            Additional measures for Minimisation of the remaining ecological impacts are then described.  Finally, predicted unavoidable residual impacts, assuming implementation of all proposed mitigation measures are detailed and quantified wherever necessary.

Impact Evaluation

Potential Direct Habitat Loss

8.7.5            Potentential direct habitat loss will occur in the Proposed Site Limit for improvement works to tributary sections TKL04 and TKL05 of Ping Yuen River in Ta Kwu Ling as illustrated in layout plan of 198799/B&V/PP/001. The existing rivers TKL04 and TKL05 are mainly natural streams, with few sections of engineering channels, located at the east and west of Ping Che Road respectively.   Table 8.20 outlines the assessment criteria and discussion for the habitat to be lost to the proposed drainage improvement works in the absence of mitigation measures. 


 

Table 8.20 Potential Direct Habitat Loss in Proposed Works Limit

Site Code

Abandoned Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

Pond

Channel

Developed Area

Watercourse

Woodland

Habitat Quality

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low to moderate

Low

Species

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Copperhead Racer Elaphe radiata, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Chinese Bullfrog Hoplobatrachus chinensis

No flora and fauna species of conservation importance

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Little Ringed Plover Charadrius dubius

Flora species of conservation importance: Neottopteris nidus

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans, Alexandrine Parakeet Psittacula eupatria, Swallowtail Papilio xuthus

Flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Chinese Pond Heron Ardeola bacchus, Grey Heron Ardea cinerea, Greater Coucal Centropus sinensis, Grass Demon Udaspes folus, Japanese Pipistrelle Pipistrellus abramus

Flora species of conservation importance: Mucuna championii

 

Fauna species of conservation importance: Danaid Eggfly Hypolimnas misippus

Size/Abundance

Approx. 8.64ha, very small in a Hong Kong context. 

Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna.

Approx. 2.70ha, very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna.

Approx. 0.13ha, very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna.

Approx. 0.89ha (257m), very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low to moderate diversity of flora and low diversity of terrestrial and freshwater fauna

Approx. 4.24ha, very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna.

Approx. 2.45ha (4181m), very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low to moderate diversity of flora and low diversity of terrestrial and freshwater fauna

Approx. 1.05ha, very small in a Hong Kong context.  Low diversity of flora and terrestrial fauna.

Duration

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Permanent; associated works area will be reinstated upon works completion.

Reversibility

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Irreversible; reversible for works area

Magnitude

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Habitat in the Proposed Works Limit will be affected.

Overall Impact Severity

Low

Low

Low

Low to Moderate

Low

Low to Moderate

Low to Moderate


Direct Impact on Flora and Fauna Species of Conservation Importance

8.7.6            According to the survey findings, four flora species of conservation importance are located within the Project Site, including Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus, Mucuna championii and Neottopteris nidus. 

8.7.7            Wild individuals of Aquilaria sinensis were recorded in the watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit.  Aquilaria sinensis is common in the lowland forests and fung shui woods of Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) and was included in the book “Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong” (Hu et al. 2003). In south China, particularly Hong Kong, it is threatened by illegal felling and over-exploitation and is listed in Appendix II of CITES (CITES 2020) and is protected under Cap. 586 Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance in Hong Kong. Moreover, it is included in China Plant Red Data Book (Fu and Chin 1992) and Illustration of Rare & Endangered plant in Guangdong Province (Wu and Hu 1988), and wild individuals are listed in Category II of the List of Wild Plants under State Protection (State Forestry Administration & Ministry of Agriculture 1999). It is also categorized as vulnerable in China Red Data Book (Fu and Chin 1992), the Threatened Species List of China's Higher Plants (Qin et al. 2017) and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN 2020).

8.7.8            One individual of Cephalanthus tetrandrus was recorded in the watercourse within the Proposed Works Limit.  This species is a very rare native tree found in thickets by streams in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000).

8.7.9            Dense thickets of Mucuna championii were recorded in the eastern woodland within the Proposed Works Limit. This species is generally found in lowland forests, Mucuna championii is a rare native climber species in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) included in the book “Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong” and was assessed as endangered in China (Hu et al. 2003).

8.7.10         Eight Neottopteris nidus individuals were recorded in developed area within the Proposed Works Limit. Neottopteris nidus is a native epiphytic and epilithic herb that is restricted in Hong Kong (Corlett et al. 2000) and is listed under Cap. 96 Forests and Countryside Ordinance in Hong Kong.

8.7.11         The identified flora species of conservation importance would be avoided as much as possible during the construction and operational phase of the Project.  Where the individuals could not be avoided due to technical constraint, transplantation of the concerned species should be considered. 

8.7.12         In terms of the fauna species of conservation importance, Japanese Pipistrelle, Alexandrine Parakeet, Asian Barred Owlet, Black-crowned Night Heron, Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Scops Owl, Common Buzzard, Great Cormorant, Grey Heron, Greater Coucal, Little Egret, Little Ringed Plover, Copperhead Racer, Chinese Bullfrog, Danaid Eggfly, Grass Demon and Swallowtail were recorded within the Project Site.  Among these species, Asian Barred Owlet, Collared Scops Owl, Common Buzzard and Great Cormorant were recorded to literature review findings where they were not recorded within the Proposed Work Limit during this baseline study.  The identified bat, bird, snake and butterfly species are highly mobile, and therefore unlikely to be significantly affected by the drainage improvement works.  However, Chinese Bullfrog is less mobile; in the absence of mitigation measures, it may be directly affected by the construction works.

8.7.13         The potential direct impacts of the Project on these flora and fauna species of conservation importance, including the species identified from literature review are discussed in Table 8.21.

Table 8.21 Potential Direct Ecological Impacts on Species of Conservation Importance

Criteria

Potential Direct Ecological Impacts on Species of Conservation Importance

Species

Flora: Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus, Mucuna championii and Neottopteris nidus

Mammal: Japanese Pipistrelle

Avifauna: Alexandrine Parakeet, Asian Barred Owlet*, Black-crowned Night Heron, Black Kite, Chinese Pond Heron, Collared Scops Owl*, Common Buzzard*, Great Cormorant*, Grey Heron, Greater Coucal, Little Egret, Little Ringed Plover

Reptile: Copperhead Racer

Amphibian: Chinese Bullfrog

Butterfly: Danaid Eggfly, Grass Demon, Swallowtail

Protection Status

Cap. 586: Aquilaria sinensis, Black Kite

Cap. 96A: Neottopteris nidus

Class 2 Protected Animal of China: Greater Coucal, Chinese Bullfrog

Cap. 170: Japanese Pipistrelle, all wild birds

Distribution

None of the species are considered to be restricted in range.

Rarity

AFCD Assessment – Rare: Grass Demon, Swallowtail

Species listed in Fellowes et al. (2002) – Local Concern: Danaid Eggfly, Black-crowned Night Heron, Little Ringed Plover; Potential Regional Concern: Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Grey Heron, Chinese Bullfrog; Regional Concern: Black Kite

Listed as Near Threatened in Red List of China’s Vertebrate (2016) Endangered: Copperhead Racer, Chinese Bullfrog

Abundance

Abundance of species of conservation importance was low.

Duration

Permanent.

Reversibility

Irreversible in the absence of mitigation.

Magnitude

Magnitude would be low due to the small numbers of fauna individuals recorded, and the availability of similar or higher quality habitats nearby.

Overall Impact Severity

For flora species of conservation importance: Low to moderate during construction and negligible during operational phases.

For fauna species of conservation importance: Low to moderate during construction (to Chinese Bullfrog in particular) and negligible during operational phases.

Note:

* Species were recorded within the Project Boundary according to literature review result.  However, these species were not recorded during current ecological baseline survey.

 Indirect Impacts on Surrounding Habitats in SA and Associated Wildlife

8.7.14         In view of the small-scale and localised nature of current Project, only the habitats and associated wildlife adjacent to the Project Site may be subject to indirect impacts resulting from increased disturbances caused by the Project.  Such impact will be limited to construction phase; disturbance during the operational phase would not be anticipated as the activities will be limited to the disturbance from vehicular crossing. 

8.7.15         Habitats that would potentially receive increased disturbances as a result of the proposed works mainly include the watercourses, channel, adjacent abandoned agricultural land, active agricultural land, ponds, woodland and to a lesser extent, wasteland and developed area. Indirect impact on other habitats, including fung shui wood, plantation and shrubland/ grassland are not anticipated, since the disturbance would be separated/ screened considerably by abandoned agricultural land, active agricultural land and developed area.

8.7.16         Disturbance to the adjacent habitats and associated fauna to the proposed alignment could result from such things as dust generation, waste dumping, water pollution from uncontrolled site runoff, construction noise and increased human activities.

8.7.17         Dust generated due to drainage improvement works, if not effectively controlled, could affect the health of adjacent vegetation. Excessive dust covering leaves can lead to reduction in their photosynthetic rates, abrasion and blocking of stomata.  Improper dumping of construction materials and waste within and/or near to the works areas may result in environmental degradation of the surrounding habitat, which is more sensitive for the retained flora species of conservation importance.

8.7.18         Potential disturbance by construction noise and increased human activities may cause wildlife to avoid using areas adjacent to the alignment, and thereby reduce wildlife density in the area.  Discussion on the potential disturbances of the construction works to the habitats within the Study Area is given in Table 8.22 below.


Table 8.22 Potential Disturbance on Habitats in Study Area

Criteria

Watercourse

Channel

Abandoned Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

Pond

Woodland

Wasteland

Developed Area

Habitat Quality

Low for man-made section; low to moderate for semi-natural section

Low

Low

Low to moderate

Low

Low to moderate

Low

Low

Species

Two flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus

 

Seven fauna species of conservation importance: Black-crowned Night Heron, Chinese Pond Heron, Grey Heron, Greater Coucal, Alexandrine Parakeet, Grass Demon, Japanese Pipistrelle

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Nine fauna species of conservation importance: Eurasian Teal, Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Little Ringed Plover , Greater Painted-snipe, Wood Sandpiper, Greater Coucal, Collared Crow, Japanese Pipistrelle

One flora species of conservation importance: Cephalanthus tetrandrus

 

Nineteen fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron, Little Egret, Bonelli's Eagle, Black Kite   Eastern Buzzard, Common Emerald Dove, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Asian Barred Owlet, Alexandrine Parakeet , Collared Crow, Common Rosefinch, Cornelian, Danaid Eggfly, Swallowtail, Four-clawed Gecko, Copperhead Racer, Chinese Bullfrog, Japanese Pipistrelle

One flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis

 

Ten fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron, Eastern Cattle Egret, Little Egret, Greater Coucal, Lesser Coucal, Alexandrine Parakeet, Swallowtail , Red-breast Jezebel, Chinese Bullfrog , Japanese Pipistrelle

 

 

No flora species of conservation importance

 

Two fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron, Japanese Pipistrelle

Three flora species of conservation importance: Aquilaria sinensis, Mucuna championii, Pavetta hongkongensis

 

Nine fauna species of conservation importance: Great Egret, Greater Coucal, Collared Scops Owl, Asian Barred Owlet, Alexandrine Parakeet, Rufous-capped Babbler, Danaid Eggfly, Swallowtail, Japanese Pipistrelle

No flora species of conservation importance

 

One fauna species of conservation importance: Black Kite Milvus migrans

Two flora species conservation importance: Neottopteris nidus, Xylosma longifolium

 

Ten fauna species of conservation importance: Chinese Pond Heron, Black Kite, Greater Coucal, Collared Scops Owl, Asian Barred Owlet, Alexandrine Parakeet, Zitting Cisticola, Swallowtail, Common Rat Snake, Japanese Pipistrelle

Size/Abundance

5.32 ha (11059m)

 

Low abundance of all groups of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

7.85 ha (2849m)

 

Low abundance of all groups of terrestrial fauna and freshwater fauna

160.92 ha

 

Low to moderate abundance of bird and butterfly; low abundance of odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

42.12 ha

 

Low to moderate abundance of bird; low abundance of butterfly, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

0.49 ha

 

Low abundance of bird, butterfly, odonate and mammal; herpetofauna was not recorded in this habitat.

47.68 ha

 

Low to moderate abundance of butterfly; low abundance of bird, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

2.27 ha

 

Low abundance of bird, butterfly and odonate; herpetofauna and mammal were not recorded in this habitat.

147.03 ha

 

Low to moderate abundance of bird; low abundance of butterfly, odonate, herpetofauna and mammal

Duration

Last during working hours in construction phase

Reversibility

Reversible, disturbance will be ceased once works stopped/ completed

Magnitude

Low, considering the Study Area generally consist of man-made habitat with disturbance from developed area

Overall Impact Severity

Low significance in construction phase, and Very Low in operational phase.

Low significance in construction phase, and Very Low in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

Low significance, mainly in construction phase, and Negligible in operational phase.

 


Indirect Impact to Ping Che Egretry

8.7.19         Active use of the Ping Che Egretry by Chinese Pond Heron has been recorded since 2009, where a maximum of five Chinese Pond Heron nests were recorded during the survey in May 2020.  The egretry is about 200m to the east of the Proposed Works Limit. 

8.7.20         Although the egretry is not located within the Proposed Works Limit, breeding ardeids could cover a wide foraging range.  Therefore, the potential disturbance impact on the egretry is assessed for precautionary purposes.  Barrier hindering the breeding herons from travelling between their breeding and foraging sites would require them habituating the barrier by adjusting their flight altitude, distance or direction, which would demand higher energy consumption and may indirectly affect the breeding successful rate.  The breeding Chinese Pond Heron will be prone to disturbance arising from construction during the breeding period, i.e. March to August.

Table 8.23 Potential Indirect Disturbance to Ping Che Egretry

Criteria

Potential Indirect Disturbance to Ping Che Egretry

Species

Chinese Pond Heron

Protection Status

Cap. 170 – Wild Animals Protection Ordinance

Abundance

Maximum of five active nests were recorded during the baseline survey in 2020.

Duration

During breeding season (Mar - Aug) throughout construction phase

Reversibility

Disturbance would be ceased after construction period

Magnitude

Low to moderate considering the small number of breeding ardeids 

Overall Impact Severity

Low to moderate significance in the construction phases

Potential Impact (Pollution) on watercourses due to Construction Run-off

8.7.21         During the drainage improvement works, uncontrolled site runoff may be generated. The uncontrolled runoff may involve sediments released during excavation, chemical waste from mechanical equipment, especially oils and lubricants and probably sewerage.  If the polluted water is discharged accidentally/ uncontrolled into nearby watercourses and channels.  Such pollution may deteriorate the watercourse water quality, and negatively impact the freshwater flora and fauna communities inhabiting the streams and the habitats connected with the streams.

8.7.22         Nevertheless, considering the construction method, potential water quality impact through release of sediment during construction is expected to be minimal and highly localised.  It is considered that significance of indirect impact on the watercourses in terms of water pollution would be Low to Moderate, and such impact on watercourse will limit to construction phase only. 

Habitat Fragmentation

8.7.23         As the watercourses are existing habitats, small scale of improvement works such as widening would therefore be of Low significance. Site rehabilitation works will be conducted for temporary affected areas upon completion of the drainage improvement works, habitat fragmentation during the operational phase would be of Very Low significance.

Operational Phase Impact

8.7.24         During the operational phase of the project, the works will primarily be the routine maintenance and operation of the completed drainage channel.  No other major activities (e.g. dredging_ are expected from the proposed drainage channel nor the associated drainage facilities.  Therefore, it is not expected that the Project will cause any significant environmental impacts in the operation phase.  Changes to hydrology and hydraulics of downstream river, watercourses and water bodies, and ground water flow regime, and the associated effects on terrestrial and aquatic ecology and fisheries during operation phase of the Project is not expected.

Cumulative Impacts

8.7.25         Referring to the latest information provided by DSD on the interfacing projects, the major concurrent projects include sewerage system upgrading works nearby Ping Che Road and drainage improvement works in Ping Yuen River. With the implementation of control measures during construction as presented in the Preliminary Environmental Review Reports of these concurrent projects, no adverse impact is anticipated. Considered the scale and nature of the cumulative project, no adverse cumulative impact would be anticipated. To further minimise the potential cumulative impacts during construction phase, it is recommended that the contractor shall plan the works area of the close proximity work sections which will not overlap with the works area of interfacing project as far as practical.

8.8                Mitigation Measures

Mitigation Measures for Woodland Habitat to be Lost

8.8.1            Trees in the Proposed Works Limit (esp. the woodland habitat) will be affected as a result of potential direct habitat loss.  All trees should be preserved as far as possible, especially species of high conservation or amenity value. Where trees are to be preserved in-situ, but are likely to be disturbed by works activities, protective fencing/hoarding should be carefully set up around the affected trees.

8.8.2            Trees that cannot be retain due to unresolvable conflict with the engineering design should be transplanted to appropriate receptor site.   If transplantation is not feasible, compensatory planting for the trees should be carried out in the receptor site as well, with a minimum ratio of 1:1.   Recommendations provided in the Tree Preservation and Removal Proposal TPRP should be fully followed.  

8.8.3            Planting of trees and other vegetation to reinstate the works area will also be conducted upon completion of the drainage improvement works. Such rehabilitation works should use native plants of the same species that occur in the adjacent woodland habitat and have flowers/fruits attractive to wildlife.

Mitigation Measures for Flora Species of Conservation Importance

8.8.4            The four flora species of conservation importance were identified within the Proposed Works Limit, including Aquilaria sinensis, Cephalanthus tetrandrus, Mucuna championii and Neottopteris nidus should be preserved as far as possible. As a precautionary measure, it is recommended to conduct a vegetation survey within the works area prior to the commencement of drainage improvement works. The survey should be conducted by a qualified ecologist/ botanist.  Should any rare/protected plant species be found within the area, the survey will record their conditions, numbers and locations.  The survey will also determine the number and locations of the individuals to be affected and evaluate the suitability and/or practicality of transplantation.

8.8.5            Where avoidance is not possible due to technical feasibility, transplantation to appropriate receptor site should be considered.  A Transplantation Plan should be prepared by a qualified ecologist/ botanist with full details of the findings of the flora survey, locations of the receptor site, transplantation methodology, implementation programme of transplantation, post-transplantation monitoring and maintenance programme.  The Plan should be submitted to and approved by AFCD and other relevant departments prior to the site clearance.  The approved transplantation works should be supervised by a qualified botanist/ horticulturist/ arborist with relevant experience in transplanting floral species of conservation importance.

Mitigation Measures for Fauna Species of Conservation Importance

8.8.6            To avoid the potential direct impact on Chinese Bullfrog, prior to commencement of the construction, an update aquatic survey should be conducted with focus to the presence of Chinese Bullfrog.  The survey should be conducted by a qualified ecologist as part of the Environmental Team (ET) and cover the stretch of the watercourse 5m upstream and downstream of the works area.  Should Chinese Bullfrog be found within the surveyed watercourse sections, a Transloacation Plan should be prepared and capture and translocation should be conducted to move the inidviduals from the Project Site to suitable recipient sites. 

8.8.7            The Translocation Plan shoud be prepared by the qualified ecologist as a part of the ET, certified by the IEC and submitted to AFCD within four months upon completion of the update aquatic survey to agree the detailed translocation procedures including the identified receptor site(s).  Approval from the Authority (e.g. AFCD and EPD) should be sought prior to conducting the translocation work. 

8.8.8            The translocation work should be conducted as close to the commencement of the relevant site works as possible, following the approved Translocation Plan. Upon the completion of the translocation work, post-translocation survey should be conducted at the recipient site to monitor the effectiveness of translocation.

8.8.9            Furthermore, in order to maintain the ecological connectivity among areas in adjacent to Ping Yuen River, provision of animal corridors at the upgraded channels as an enhancement measure would be provided. Access points of the animal corridors would be provided in certain intervals and located away from traffic road as far as practicable. The indicative locations and conceptual design of the animal corridor are shown in Figure 8.6. The proposed design, number, and location of the animal corridor subject to further change in the detailed design stage.

Mitigation Measures for Ping Che Egretry

8.8.10         The Ping Che Egretry has been known to be active since and used by breeding Chinese Pond Heron since 2009.  In order to mitigate for the potential disturbance toward the active Ping Che Egretry, proposed construction works within 100m radius from the Ping Che Egretry should be scheduled outside the ardeids breeding season, i.e. March to August. As a precautionary measure, monthly egretry count during the breeding season within construction phase should be conduct at Ping Che Egretry by qualitied ecologist to monitor for any abnormal changes in nesting ardeids due to indirect impacts from the construction activities.

Mitigation Measures for Operational Phase

8.8.11         As discussed in Section 8.7.24, there will be no major works such as dredging and hydrology and hydraulics would not be affected. Thus, mitigation measures are not required for the operational phase works. However, good site practice should be followed during maintenance work.

Mitigation Measures to Potential Disturbances and Water Pollution

8.8.12         As no significant ecological impacts arising from the operation of the Project are anticipated, the proposed mitigation measures to minimise disturbances focus on the construction phase.  The following construction phase mitigation measures are proposed to reduce predicted disturbance impacts and impact of water pollution to an acceptable level:

·       Tree protection zone should be established practically where necessary to minimise damage to the trees preserved in-situ;

·       Implementing measures to minimise magnitude of construction runoff and to avoid/ minimise the potential impact of spillage events, if any, and

·       Appropriate measures including the provision of temporary movable toilets should be adopted.  Controlled wastewater discharge to the nearby water bodies will be implemented in accordance with the guidelines stipulated in Environmental Protection Department (EPD)’s Practice Note for Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage (ProPECC PN1/94) during the construction works to properly control site run-off and drainage and to minimise the potential water quality impact.

8.8.13         Other mitigation measures to minimise disturbance during construction include good site practice and noise management.  The site practices listed below will be followed throughout the construction phase:

·       Avoid any damage and disturbance, particularly those caused by filling and illegal dumping to the surrounding habitats, especially wetland habitats and any watercourses;

·       Excavated materials will be covered and/or properly disposed of as soon as possible to avoid being washed into nearby water bodies;

·       Regularly check the site boundaries to ensure that they are not breached and that no damage occurs to surrounding ecologically sensitive habitats (e.g. woodlands and streams);

·       Prohibit and prevent open fires within the site boundary during construction and provide temporary firefighting equipment in the work areas;

·       Reinstate temporary work sites/disturbed areas, immediately after completion of the construction works; and

·       Only well-maintained plant to be operated on-site and plant to be serviced regularly during the construction program.

8.9                Summary of Mitigation Measures

8.9.1            With the implementation of the mitigation measures discussed above, it is predicted that the Project will fully mitigate for its potential adverse ecological impacts.  Predicted potential ecological impacts arising from the proposed water mains, mitigation measures required and post-mitigation acceptability of the Project are summarized in Table 8.24.

Table 8.24 Summary of Potential Ecological Impacts

Description of impact

Significance of Impact in the Absence of Mitigation Measures

Proposed Mitigation Measures

Residual Impact

Direct loss of abandoned agricultural land

Low significance.

 No mitigation measure is required.

Negligible significance

Direct loss of agricultural land

Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Low significance.

 

Direct loss of pond

Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Negligible significance

Direct loss of channel

Low to moderate significance.

Mitigation Measures to Potential Disturbances and Water Pollution as detailed under Section 8.8.7 and 8.8.8.

Low significance.

Direct loss of developed area

Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Negligible significance

Direct loss of watercourse

Low to moderate significance.

Mitigation Measures to Potential Disturbances and Water Pollution as detailed under Section 8.8.7 and 8.8.8.

Low significance.

Direct loss of woodland

Low to moderate significance.

Avoidance of tree felling as far as possible. If avoidable, trees should be transplanted to the receptor site or compensated with a minimum ratio of 1:1. 

Tree protection zone should be established practically where necessary to minimise damage to the trees preserved in-situ. 

Recommendations provided in the TPRP should be fully followed.

Site rehabilitation by planting native trees and vegetation that occur in adjacent woodland. 

Low significance.

Direct ecological impact on flora species of conservation importance

Construction Phase:

Low to moderate significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Pre-construction survey to identify species of conservation importance for preservation and evaluate the feasibility of transplantation as needed.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Low significance.

Direct ecological impact on fauna species of conservation importance

Construction Phase:

Low to moderate significance (in particular to Chinese Bullforg),

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Update aquatic survey to be conducted with focus to Chinese Bullfrag and other amphibian/aquatic species of conservation importance and, where necessary, prepare Translocation Plan and conduct translocation work as close to the commentcement of the relevant works as possible, provision of animal corridors at the upgraded channels as an enhancement measure.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Low significance.

Indirect disturbance on watercourse and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

Indirect disturbance on channel and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

Indirect disturbance on abandoned agricultural land and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Indirect disturbance on agricultural land and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Indirect disturbance on pond and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Indirect disturbance on woodland and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Indirect disturbance on developed area and associated wildlife

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Indirect disturbance to Ping Che Egretry

Construction Phase:

Low to moderate significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Avoidance of construction works within 100m radius from the egretry during breeding season.

As a precautionary measure, monthly egretry survey to be conducted during breeding months in construction period.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Impact of water pollution due to  construction run-off

Construction Phase:

Low to Moderate significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Mitigation Measures to Potential Disturbances and Water Pollution as detailed under Section 8.8.7 and 8.8.8.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Negligible significance.

Habitat fragmentation

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

No mitigation measure is required.

Construction Phase:

Low significance.

Operational Phase:

Very Low significance.

Cumulative impacts

Nil.

No mitigation measure is required.

Nil.

8.10            Evaluation of Residual Ecological Impacts

8.10.1         Based on the above assessment as well as with the effective implementation of the suggested mitigation and precautionary measures, adverse residual impacts from the Project on the ecological resources within and in the vicinity of the Project Area would not be anticipated.  Off-site mitigation measures are therefore not considered necessary to mitigate the residual impacts any further.

8.11            Environmental Monitoring and Audit Programme

8.11.1          Implementation of the recommended mitigation measures described in Section 8.8 should be conducted as presented in the standalone Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual.

Egretry

8.11.2         Prior to any construction activities, surveys of the Ping Che egretry should be conducted to confirm its location and status.

8.11.3         During the construction phase, construction works within 100m radius from the egretry will be avoided during breeding months (March – August).  Also, monthly egretry survey during breeding months in construction period will be conducted.

Transplantation of Flora Species of Conservation Importance

8.11.4         As a precautionary measure, it is recommended to conduct a vegetation survey within the works area prior to the commencement of drainage improvement works. The survey should be conducted by a qualified ecologist/ botanist.  Should any rare/protected plant species be found within the area, the survey will record their conditions, numbers and locations.  The survey will also determine the number and locations of the individuals to be affected and evaluate the suitability and/or practicality of transplantation, where identified plants could not be avoided.

Translocation of Amphibian Species of Conservation Importance

8.11.5         Monitoring surveys will be conducted for the translocated amphibians.  The effectiveness of the translocation programme will be assessed through surveys in breeding habitats and determine whether breeding occurs.  Evidence of breeding will include calling males, findings of eggs and tadpoles.  At least three surveys will be conducted in each release site after the translocation.  Surveys will be carried out during the breeding season of Chinese Bullfrog (March to September).  In addition, the monitoring survey should also record presence of aquatic fauna species (if any).

8.12            Conclusion

8.12.1         The ecological impact assessment has been carried out based on literature reviews and the updated ecological survey conducted between February 2020 and December 2020, which covered both wet and dry seasons. According to the Project alignment, the Project will cause potential habitat loss to abandoned agricultural land (8.64ha), agricultural land (2.70ha), channel (0.89ha), developed area (4.24ha), pond (0.13ha), watercourse (2.45ha) and woodland (1.05ha). 

8.12.2         Majority of the identified impacts are considered to be low or negligible in the absence of mitigation measures. However, the potential impact on direct loss of watercourse, direct loss of woodland, direct ecological impact on flora and fauna species of conservation importance, indirect disturbance to Ping Che Egretry and impact of water pollution due to construction run-off are considered as low to moderate.  Necessary mitigation measures were proposed for the above potential impacts.

8.12.3         It is predicted that the impacts will mainly arise during the construction phase, as no major activities would be conducted during the operational phase.  The routine maintenance and the operation of the completed drainage channel would not cause any significant ecological impact.

8.12.4         With the implementation of mitigation measures and precautionary measures, adverse residual impacts from the Project on the ecological resources within and in the vicinity of the Project Area during construction and operation phase would not be anticipated. Off-site mitigation measures are therefore not considered necessary to mitigate the residual impacts any further.

8.13            Reference

Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD). (2019). Hong Kong Biodiversity Database. Retrieved from: https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/hkbiodiversity/database/search.php

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (2020). Appendices I, II and III. Retrieved from: https://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php. Accessed on 6 April 2020.

 

Corlett, R. T., Xing, F. W., Ng, S. C., Chau, L. K. C., & Wong, L. M. Y. (2000). Hong Kong vascular plants: distribution and status. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society 23:1-157.

 

Fellowes, J.R., Lau, M.W.N., Dudgeon, D., Reels, G.T., Ades, G.W.J., Carey, G.J., Chan, B.P.L., Kendrick, R.C., Lee, K.S., Leven, M.R., Wilson, K.D.P. and Yu, Y.T. (2002). Wild animals to watch: Terrestrial and freshwater fauna of conservation concern in Hong Kong. Memoirs of the Hong Kong Natural History Society No. 25, 123-160.

Fu, L. and Chin, C. M. (1992). China Plant Red Data Book. Science Press, Beijing.

 

Hong Kong Herbarium. (2020). HK Plant Database. https://www.herbarium.gov.hk/Search_Form.aspx

 

Hu, Q.M, Wu, T.L., Xia, N.H., Xing F.W., Lai, C.C.P., Yip, K.W. (2003). Rare and Precious Plants of Hong Kong. Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

International Union of Conservation for Nature. (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org.

Jiang, Z. G., Jiang, J. P., Wang, Y. Z., Zhang, E., Zhang, Y. Y., Li, L. L., ... & Dong, L. (2016). Red list of China’s vertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 24(5), 500-551.

 

Qin, H. N., Yang, Y., Dong, S. Y., He, Q., Jia, Y., Zhao, L. N., Yu, S. X., Liu, H. Y., Liu, B., Yan, Y. H., Xiang, J. Y., Xia, N. H., Peng, H., Li, Z. Y., Zhang, Z. X., He, X. J., Yin, L. K., Lin, Y. L., Liu, Q. R., Hou, Y. T., Liu, Y., Liu, Q. X., Cao, W., Li, J. Q., Chen, S. L., Jin, X. H., Gao, T. G., Chen, W. L., Ma, H. Y., Geng, Y. Y., Jin, X. F., Chang, C. Y., Jiang, H., Cai, L., Zang, C. X., Wu, J. Y., Ye, J. F., Lai, Y. J., Liu, B., Lin, Q., W. & Xue, N. X. (2017). Threatened species list of China’s higher plants. Biodiversity science, 25(7), 696-744.

 

State Forestry Administration & Ministry of Agriculture. (1999). List of Wild Plants under State Protection (Part 1). The State Council, Beijing. (promulgated on 9 Sept. 1999).

 

Wang, S. and Zhao, E. M. (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Amphibia and Reptilia. Science Press, Beijing.

 

Wu, D. L. and Hu. C.X. (1988). Illustrations of Rare and Endangered Plants in Guangdong Province. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing.

Yue, P. and Chen, Y. (1998) China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Pisces. Science Press, Beijing.

 

Zheng, G. and Wang, Q. (1998). China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves.  Science Press, Beijing.

 

END OF TEXT