Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) Report for Establishment of Fish Culture Zone at Outer
Tap Mun November
2022 |
|
EIA
REPORT (HTML) |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
1.
INTRODUCTION 5.
FISHERIES 7.
VISUAL 8.
AIR QUALITY 10.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT 11.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES 12.
CONCLUSION |
|
|
|
LIST OF FIGURES |
|
Figure
1.1 Location Plan for the
Establishment of Fish Culture Zone (FCZ) at Outer Tap Mun Figure 2.1 Potential Areas for Development of
Fish Culture Zones based on Constraint Mapping Figure 2.2 Proposed Locations for the
Establishment of Fish Culture Zones Figure
2.3 Example of the Traditional
Fish Farms Figure
2.4 Example of the Floating
Gravity Cage Figure 2.5 Example of Newer Type of Mariculture Figure
2.6 Example of Submersible Cage
for Fish Culture Figure 2.7 Sample Layout of IMTA Figure
2.8 Example of Deep Cage for
Echinoderm Culture Figure
2.9 Examples of (a) Lantern Nets
and (b) Longlines for Bivalve Culture Figure 2.10 Example
of Semi-submersible Steel Truss Cage Figure 4.1 Representative Photos of Coral Survey
at Outer Tap Mun Figure
4.2a Representative Photos of Drop
Camera Survey at Outer Tap Mun Figure
4.2b Representative Photos of Drop
Camera Survey at Outer Tap Mun Figure
5.1 Fisheries Sensitive Receivers
in the Assessment Area Figure 7.1 VIA Assessment Area and Locations of
Proposed Vantage Points (VPs) for Outer Tap Mun FCZ Figure 7.2 Planning & Development Context
near Proposed Outer Tap Mun FCZ Figure 7.5a&b Outer Tap Mun Viewpoint 1 – View to Project
Site from Kau Lau Wan Figure 7.6a&b Outer Tap Mun Viewpoint 2 – View to Project
Site from Tap Mun pier Figure 7.7a&b Outer Tap Mun Viewpoint 3 – View to Project
Site from Marine Traffic in Long Harbour Figure 7.8a&b Outer Tap Mun Viewpoint 4 – View to Project
Site from Tai Tan Country Trail Figure 7.9a&b Outer Tap Mun Viewpoint 5 – View to Project
Site from Tai Tan Country Trail Figure 8.1 Locations of Representative Air
Sensitive Recievers Figure 9.1 Locations of Sonar Contacts at the
Proposed FCZ at Outer Tap Mun Figure
9.3 SSS Rectified Image showing
Sonar Contacts and Various Types of Seabed Features Figure
9.4 SSS Rectified Image showing
Sonar Contacts B-SC001 Figure
9.5 SSS Rectified Image showing
Sonar Contacts B-SC005, B-SC006, B-SC008 to B-SC011 |
|
|
|
LIST OF APPENDICES |
|
Appendix
1A Stakeholder Engagement Activities Appendix 2A Operation
Measures and Practices Appendix 3A Water
Quality Modelling Plan for Outer Tap Mun Fish
Culture Zone Appendix 3B Assessment
of Carrying Capacity of the Project Site Appendix 3C Contour
Plots of Water Quality Parameter Appendix 4A Literature
Review – Marine Ecology Appendix 4B Approved
Method Statement on Marine Ecological Impact Assessment for Outer Tap Mun FCZ Appendix 4C Survey
Data of Subtidal and Benthic Assemblages Appendix 5A Approved
Method Statement on Fisheries Impact Assessment of Outer Tap Mun FCZ Appendix 9A Survey
Track Plots Appendix 9B Side
Scan Sonar Images of Sonar Contacts |
|
LIST OF TABLES |
|
Table
2.1 Summary of the Key
Considerations of Site Selection Criteria Table
2.2 Summary of Site Evaluation Table
2.3 Proposed Organisms and
Example Species for IMTA Table
2.4 Summary of Environmental
Benefits and Dis-benefits of the Development Options and Alternative
Mitigation Measures Considered for the Project Table
3.1 Summary of Water Quality
Objectives for Mirs Bay WCZ and Tolo
Harbour and Channel WCZ Table
3.2 Summary of EPD Routine
Water Quality Monitoring Data from Selected Stations of the Tolo Harbour and Channel WCZ and
Mirs Bay WCZ (1986 – 2020) Table
3.3 Summary of EPD Routine
Sediment Monitoring Data from Selected Stations of the Tolo
Harbour and Channel WCZ and Mirs
Bay WCZ (1986 – 2020) Table
3.4 Water Sensitive Receivers
(WSRs) in the Vicinity of the Proposed FCZ Site at Outer Tap Mun Table
3.5 Summary of Assessment WQO
Criteria Table
3.6 Summary of Applicable
Assessment Criterion for Identified WSRs Table
3.7 Pollution Loading
Contribution from Wasted Feed and Fish Faeces for
Production Level of 1 ton at Proposed FCZs Table
3.8 Predicted Water Quality
under Baseline and Project Scenario Table
4.1 Marine Ecological Baseline
Surveys Table
4.2 Density and Indices of
Richness, Evenness and Diversity of Infaunal
Assemblages at the Sampling Locations for the Soft Bottom Habitat Surveys at
the Assessment Area during the Wet Season Table
4.3 Density and Indices of
Richness, Evenness and Diversity of Infaunal
Assemblages at the Sampling Locations for the Soft Bottom Habitat Surveys at
the Assessment Area during the Dry Season Table
4.4 Description of the Seabed
Recorded along Each Transect during the Qualitative Surveys (Spot Dive Reconnaissance
Check Surveys) Table
4.5 Marine Ecological
Importance of Existing Marine Parks and SSSI within the Assessment Area Table
4.6 Ecological Importance of
Intertidal Habitats within and in the vicinity of the Project site Table
4.7 Ecological Importance of
Subtidal Hard-Bottom Habitats within and in the vicinity of the Project site Table
4.8 Ecological Importance of
Subtidal Soft Benthos Assemblages within the Project site Table
4.9 Ecological Importance of
Marine Waters Table
4.10 Species of Conservation
Importance within the Assessment Area Table
4.11 Approximate Shortest
Distance to Marine Ecological Sensitive Receivers (SRs) around the Project
site Table
4.12 Significance of Marine
Ecological Impacts Associated with the Construction and Operation of the
Project Evaluated in accordance with EIAO-TM Table
5.1 Marine Culture Fisheries
Summary Statistics 2008-2021 (Source: AFCD) Table
5.2 Distances between the FCZs
in the Assessment Area and the Proposed FCZ at Outer Tap Mun Table
5.3 Main Commercial Families
of Fisheries Resources in Northeastern Hong Kong Waters from Fishery Surveys
(Source: AFCD Hong Kong Fisheries Resources Monitoring Report (2010-2015)) Table
5.4 Evaluation of Fisheries
Impacts in accordance with the Criteria described in Annex 9 of the EIAO-TM Table
6.1 Government Waste Disposal
Facilities for Construction Waste Table
6.2 Tentative Transportation
Routings for Waste Disposal of General Refuse during Construction Phase Table
6.3 Tentative Transportation
Routings for Waste Disposal of Various Waste during Operation Phase Table
6.4 Summary of Estimated Waste
Arisings and Recommended Waste Management
Arrangements Table
7.1 Relationship between receptor
sensitivity and magnitude of change in defining impact significance Table
7.2 VSRs within the Predicted
Visual Envelope Table
7.3 Magnitude of Change Table
7.4 Visual Impacts Prior to
Mitigation Table
7.5 Un-mitigated and Mitigated
Impacts at the VSRs Table
8.1 Hong Kong Air Quality
Objectives Table
8.2 Identified Representative
ASRs Table
8.3 Concentrations of Air
Pollutants Measured at EPD’s Tap Mun AQMS in the
Recent Five Years (2016 to 2020) Table
8.4 Background Air Pollutant
Concentrations Predicted by the PATH v2.1 Model in 2024 Table
9.1 Survey Types with
Objectives and Survey Spacing Table
9.2 Equipment List Table
9.3 Sonar Contact Summary
Table Table
11.1 Key Environmental Problems
Avoided, Sensitive Areas Protected and Environmental Outcomes achieved Table
11.2 Key Recommended
Environmental Protection / Mitigation Measures and their Associated Benefits Table
12.1 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Water Quality Table
12.2 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Marine Ecology Table
12.3 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Fisheries Table
12.4 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Waste Table
12.5 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Visual Impact Table
12.6 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Air Quality Table
12.7 Summary of Environmental
Assessment and Outcomes – Cultural Heritage Table
12.8 Key Assessment Assumptions,
Limitation of Assessment Methodologies and related Prior Agreement(s) with
the Relevant Authorities Table
12.9 Summary of Environmental
Benefits and Dis-benefits of the Development Options and Alternative
Mitigation Measures Considered for the Project |