TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

16        SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUTCOMES.. 16-1

16.1.... Overview.. 16-1

16.2.... Environmental Benefits of the Project 16-1

16.3.... Incorporation of Environmentally Friendly Options. 16-1

16.4.... Environmental Designs Recommended. 16-2

16.5.... Key Environmental Problems Avoided and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protected  16-3

16.6.... Environmental Protection Measures Recommended. 16-4

16.7.... Estimation of Population Protected. 16-12

 

 

List of Tables

 

Table 16.1     Summary of Key Environmental Problems Avoided and Sensitive Areas Protected  16-3

Table 16.2     Key Recommended Mitigation Measures / Good Site Practices / Enhancement Measures and their Associated Benefits. 16-4

 

 


16               Summary of Environmental Outcomes

16.1           Overview

16.1.1       Section 2 outlines the details and benefits of the Project together with the consideration of alternatives during the preliminary design stage, in which has taken into account of public concern and findings of various engineering and environmental review.  The technical assessments in Sections 3 to 14 have demonstrated that all the statutory requirements in EIA Study Brief (ESB-346/2021) and EIAO-TM have been compiled with.

16.1.2       This chapter summarises the key environmental outcomes arising from this EIA study, the approaches that have been adopted to either avoid or minimise various environmental impacts throughout the design process, and the associated environmental enhancements and mitigation measures.

16.2           Environmental Benefits of the Project

16.2.1       The Project aspires to extend railway service to the existing and future communities in Northwestern New Territories, which aims to enhance the railway accessibility and unleash the development potential of the region.  The key environmental benefits could be derived by implementing the Project:

·               Reduction of the reliance on road-based vehicles;

·               Promotion in the use of environmentally friendly rail system; and

·               Reduction of road traffic noise and vehicular emissions.

 

16.3           Incorporation of Environmentally Friendly Options

16.3.1       Avoidance of environmental impacts was one of the key considerations in this Project. For those possible impacts that could not be avoided, due consideration was given to minimise them as far as practicable to comply with statutory requirements on environmental protection.  Concerns from the public during the course of EIA Study were mainly related to ecology, construction noise, water quality and air quality.  Potential cumulative environmental impacts to the sensitive receivers arising from the concurrent projects during the construction and operation of the Project would also be minimized as far as practicable.  To address the public concerns and environmental impacts, various mitigation approaches were adopted in the design development of the Project and are summarised as below: 

·               Adoption of underground scheme to avoid/minimise the ecological and fisheries impacts, as well as operational airborne rail noise impact;

·               Appropriate selection of the Project alignment and locations of stations and Ancillary Buildings (ABs) to minimise the aboveground encroachment to ecologically sensitive areas including Egretry and night roost near Kam Po Road, Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site, Sha Po Marsh, WCA, WBA and Country Parks;

·               Minimisation of total number of the ABs to avoid / minimise the potential impacts to sensitive receivers and ecologically sensitive areas;

·               Proper selection of construction methods for minimisation of impact to sensitive receivers where practicable;

·               Adoption of proper acoustic design for fixed plant at stations, NTD and ABs for achievement of noise compliance at sensitive receivers; and

·               Adoption of proper ground treatment according to the ground conditions for minimisation of impact on groundwater system.

 

16.4           Environmental Designs Recommended

16.4.1       Other than initiatives to avoid environmental impacts as summarised in Section 16.3, further efforts were exercised. The need for environmental designs required to mitigate the associated impacts were also identified and will be revisited and further established during detailed design for implementation as appropriate. A summary of these efforts is given below: 

·             Adoption of environmentally friendly construction methods;

·             Adoption of green roof;

·             Incorporation of sustainable building considerations in the station design;

·             Adoption of proactive measures to avoid illegal dumping; and

·             Implementation of environmental monitoring and auditing system.

 

Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Construction Methods

16.4.2       Quieter construction method, i.e. bored pile foundation system other than percussive piling, will be adopted for supporting the construction of stations and ABs.  According to ground conditions along the alignment, most of the tunnel sections will be constructed by TBM to minimise construction duct and noise impacts, while remaining sections will be conducted by mined & drill-and-blast method.  Stations and ABs will be unavoidably constructed by cut-and-cover method, and MiC and DfMA approaches which could enable a clean, dry and tidy working environment will be adopted for the superstructures works of stations and ABs as far as practicable to minimise the potential environmental impacts (e.g. dust, noise, water quality and waste generation) arising from on-site formworks and concreting works.  With the adoption of the abovementioned quiet and clean construction method, in addition to the proper construction management (e.g. control of working hours and adoption of temporary noise barrier), the potential disturbance to the sensitive receivers could be minimized.

Adoption of Green Roof

16.4.3       Adoption of green roof would be carefully considered in order to maximise amenity value, while minimising long-term maintenance. The advantages of adoption of green roof systems are discussed in Section 2.

Adoption of underground scheme and proper design of NTD

16.4.4       Adoption of underground scheme and proper design (i.e. decking at NTD and noise canopies at the trough area) to avoid/minimise the operational airborne rail noise impact.

Incorporation of Sustainable Building Considerations in the Station Design

16.4.5       In addition to the adoption of MiC and DfMA approaches in the design of the stations and ABs as mentioned in Section 2, a number of sustainable building considerations are considered to be practicable at this stage, such as maximisation of natural ventilation to reduce demand for air-conditioning, appropriate glazing and/or shading in the façade design to reduce solar heat gain, allowance for natural daylight penetration to minimise artificial lighting dependency, onsite renewable energy generation in the form of photovoltaic panels or micro wind turbines, rainwater harvesting for landscape planting irrigation and/or toilet flushing, high efficiency potable water fixtures and dual flush systems to reduce water consumption.  These initiatives and the extent of their applications as well as other details have to be revisited and further established during detailed design stage when the engineering design is further developed.

Adoption of Proactive Measures to Avoid Illegal Dumping

16.4.6       Global positioning system (GPS) or equivalent system for tracking and monitoring of all dump trucks will be engaged for the Project in order to record their travel routings and parking locations to prohibit illegal dumping and landfilling of C&D materials generated from the Project.        

Implementation of Environmental Monitoring and Auditing System

16.4.7       In addition to the mitigation measures as described above (with details in the Project Implementation Schedule as given in Appendix 15.1), a comprehensive environmental monitoring and auditing programme would be implemented to cover various aspects of concern.  An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) would also be employed to ensure that all the necessary mitigation measures are implemented in a timely and orderly manner.

16.5           Key Environmental Problems Avoided and Environmentally Sensitive Areas Protected

16.5.1       Sections 16.3 and 16.4 summarise the key approaches adopted in the current design to avoid, minimise and mitigate environmental impacts. Some of these approaches have contributed to avoid a number of environmental problems and to protect a number of environmentally sensitive areas. Table 16.1 presents the key environmental problems that have been avoided and any sensitive areas protected by these approaches.

Table 16.1    Summary of Key Environmental Problems Avoided and Sensitive Areas Protected

Design Approach

Environmental Problems Avoided and Sensitive Areas Protected

Adoption of underground scheme, proper selection of the Project alignment, and locations of stations and ABs (Section 16.3.1)

·         Minimisation of aboveground works sites, so as to avoid / minimise the potential direct impact and to minimise disturbance to sensitive ecological areas, including wetland, sites of conservation importance (including Country Parks, Mai Po Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site, Sha Po Marsh, WCA and WBA) and species of conservation interest.

·         Minimisation of airborne noise impact associated with the train movements.

·         Minimisation of landscape and visual impact associated with the above-ground structures.

·         Minimisation of impact on any significant landscape resources.

·         Avoidance of encroachment of Sha Po Marsh through proper selection of the locations of station and ABs.

Minimisation of total number of the ABs (Section 16.3.1)

·         Reduction of the potential impact to West Rail Compensatory Wetland.

·         Reduction of the potential construction dust, construction noise, fixed plant noise, landscape and visual impact to sensitive receivers.

Adoption of proper acoustic design for fixed plant at stations, NTD and ABs (Section 16.3.1)

·         Protection of the noise sensitive receivers in the vicinity of stations, NTD and ABs from adverse fixed plant noise impact.

Adoption of proper ground treatment according to the ground conditions (Section 16.3.1)

·         Minimisation of impact on groundwater system.

Adoption of environmentally friendly construction method

(Section 16.4.2)

·         Minimisation of construction dust and noise impacts at sensitive receivers and ecological impact in the vicinity of the Project.

Adoption of Green Roof (Section 16.4.3)

 

·         Reduction heat island effect by absorbing some of the heat in evapotranspiration to cool the surrounding and interior temperature

·         Retaining rainwater and help decreasing surface runoff

·         Creating habitat for flora and fauna

·         Use of native and naturalised species to promote biodiversity.

Incorporation of Sustainable Building Considerations in the Station Design

(Section 16.4.5)

·         Maximisation of natural ventilation to reduce demand for air-conditioning.

·         Appropriate glazing and/or shading in the façade design to reduce solar heat gain.

·         Allowance for natural daylight penetration to minimise artificial lighting dependency.

·         Onsite renewable energy generation in the form of photovoltaic panels or micro wind turbines.

·         Rainwater harvesting for landscape planting irrigation.

·         High efficiency potable water fixtures and dual flush systems to reduce water consumption.

Avoidance of illegal dumping (Section 16.4.6)

·         Adoption of preventive measures to avoid/minimise the chance of illegal dumping.

Implementation of Environmental Monitoring and Auditing System
(
Section 16.4.7)

·         Ensure all the recommended measures are properly in place and their effectiveness during the construction and operation of the Project.

 

16.6           Environmental Protection Measures Recommended

16.6.1       Mitigation measures were recommended to further reduce the environmental impacts due to construction and operation of the Project. Key recommended mitigation measures / good site practices / enhancement measures and their associated benefits are summarised in Table 16.2 below.

Table 16.2   Key Recommended Mitigation Measures / Good Site Practices / Enhancement Measures and their Associated Benefits

Environmental Aspect

Key Recommended Mitigation Measures / Good Site Practices / Enhancement Measures

Associated Benefits

Air Quality

·         Implement relevant control measures as required in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation to minimise dust generation.

·         Regular watering on heavy construction works sites / works areas, exposed site surfaces and unpaved haul roads to reduce dust emission, subject to actual site condition.

·         Provision of 2.4m/3m high hoarding from ground level along site boundary where appropriate.

·         Provide regular watering at the unloading point of spoils generated by the TBM excavation for the mucking-out operation at TBM launching shafts.

·         Install and close the blast door during blasting. A filtration system comprising watering and dust collector, etc. with overall dust removal efficiency of at least 80% should be provided at the ventilation exhaust.

·         Connect construction plant and equipment to main electricity supply and avoid use of diesel generators and diesel-powered equipment; avoid the use of exempted Non-road Mobile Machineries (NRMMs) and deploy electrified NRMMs as far as practicable to minimise exhaust emission from NRMMs during construction phase.

·     Protect air sensitive receivers by reducing fugitive dust emissions and exhaust emissions from construction plant and equipment

Airborne Noise

·         Liaise with the representative of the planned education institution predicted with exceedance and/or the Examination Authority to confirm the examination periods and to avoid conducting noisy activities during the examination periods if the school is relied on opened windows for ventilation.

·         Adopt quieter construction methods, quiet Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) including Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment (QPME), temporary movable noise barriers, noise insulating fabric, silencer, soundproof hammer bracket, noise enclosures and good site practices to mitigate the construction noise impact.

·         Provide decking and vertical walls at NTD as well as noise canopy and vertical louvre walls with natural ventilation feature at the trough area to avoid noise nuisance during the operation of the Project.

·         Provide acoustic measures where necessary for the planned fixed plants to ensure noise compliance.

·     Protect noise sensitive receivers by reducing construction and operational noise 

Ground-borne Noise

·         Closely liaise with the education institution with exceedance predicted during examination period and avoid TBM operation in the vicinity during such periods.

·         Review the proposed mitigation measures based on the findings of tunnel impact test to be conducted after the completion of tunnel construction.

·     Protect noise sensitive receivers by reducing construction and operational ground-borne noise 

Water Quality

·         Implement the mitigation measures as detailed in the ProPECC PN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” and
ETWB TC (Works) No. 5/2005 “Protection of natural streams / rivers from adverse impacts arising from construction works”, as well as other good site practices to minimise the potential water quality impacts from the construction activities.

·         Surface runoff from construction sites would be collected by temporary drainage system and treated or desilted on-site before discharging into storm drains via adequately designed sand/silt removal facilities such as sand traps, silt traps and sedimentation basins.  Channels or earth bunds or sand bag barriers would be provided on site during construction works to properly direct stormwater to such silt removal facilities.  Perimeter channels would be provided on site boundaries where necessary to intercept storm runoff from outside the site so that it will not wash across the site. Catchpits and perimeter channels would be constructed in advance of site formation works and earthworks.

·     Protect the neighbouring Water Sensitive Receivers (WSRs) during construction phase

Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications

·         Coordinate with the relevant Government departments for modifications or upgrading works on the existing or planned sewerage system where necessary.

·     Avoid adverse impact on the existing and planned sewerage systems

Waste Management Implications

·         Implement good site practices and waste reduction measures (e.g. reuse of construction and demolition (C&D) materials as far as practicable before off-site disposal or develop a materials recovery and recycling programme during construction and operation).

·         Submit an Environmental Management Plan (EMP), which includes the Waste Management Plan (WMP) to the Engineer for approval.

·         Implement a trip-ticket system for each works contract in accordance with DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010 to ensure that the disposal of C&D materials is properly documented and verified.

·         Adopt GPS or equivalent system for tracking and monitoring of all dump trucks engaged for the Project in recording their travel routings and parking locations to prohibit illegal dumping and landfilling of inert and non-inert C&D materials.

·         Handle chemical waste in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes, and disposal of chemical waste at licensed chemical waste recycling / treatment facilities.

·     Minimise waste generation

·     Ensure proper handling of chemical waste

·     Ensure the C&D materials are disposed to the designated outlets

Land Contamination

·         Prior to the commencement of the site investigation (SI) works, review the Contamination Assessment Plan (CAP) provided in Appendix 9.1 and conduct site re-appraisal to confirm whether the proposed SI works (e.g. sampling locations, testing parameters etc.) are still valid, and to confirm the appropriate RBRGs land use scenario for the development. 

·         Should any changes in operation which lead to any new or the relocation of contamination hotspots or occurrence of spillage or accident be found in the review, supplementary CAP(s), presenting the findings of the review, the latest site conditions and updated sampling strategy and testing protocol, should be submitted to EPD for approval.

·         The SI works should be carried out according to EPD’s approved CAP(s).

·         Contamination Assessment Report(s) (CAR(s)) should be prepared to present the findings of the SI works and to discuss the presence, nature and extent of contamination.  If contamination is identified in the CAR(s), Remediation Action Plan(s) (RAP(s)) which provides details of the remedial actions for the identified contaminated soil and/or groundwater should be developed prior to construction works at the concerned areas.  Submission to EPD for approval of the supplementary CAP(s), CAR(s) and, if required, RAP would be carried out in stages according to the programme of NOL.

·         If required, carry out soil/groundwater remediation works according to EPD approved RAP(s) and submit Remediation Report(s) (RR(s)) afterwards for EPD approval. The remediation works should be completed and RR(s) demonstrating the completion of remediation works at the area(s) (if any) confirmed with contamination will be prepared and submitted to EPD for approval prior to the commencement of construction works at the contaminated areas.

·     Land contamination issues could be resolved before commencement of construction works by mean of excavation

Ecology

·         Impacts on ecological resources are largely avoided through the alignment selection process and construction methods for the Project, as discussed in earlier sections.  Through adopting the underground tunnel scheme, the aboveground works of the Project are confined to stations, ABs, depot and their associated works site/area thus minimising different types of direct impacts.

·         Provide bat shelter and wetland compensation area.

·         Adopt noise mitigation measures, glare reduction measures, and dust suppression measures.

·         Erect 3m high screening around the works site and works area of SMA where are adjacent to wetlands before commencement of construction activities.

·         Noisy construction works using Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) within 100 m from Kam Po Road Egretry should be scheduled outside the breeding season through careful phasing of works as far as practicable.

·         No noisy construction works should be undertaken within 100m from Kam Po Road ardeid night roost (ANR) approximately 30 minutes before sunset.

·         Use site hoarding that is opaque and in dull colour, non-transparent panels as the noise enclosure and adopting non-glaring tinted materials, as per Guidelines on Design of Noise Barriers (EPD & HyD, 2003) and Practice Notes No. BSTR/PN/003 (Revision E) Noise Barriers with Transparent Panels (HyD, 2020).

·         Conduct a Detailed Vegetation Survey in the identified affected areas (i.e. SPAUT and SATSWW areas) and, if necessary, prepare a Protection and Transplantation Proposal for the affected plant species of conservation importance.

·     Avoidance of direct impact on Recognised Sites of Conservation Importance and Core Areas of Ecologically Sensitive Areas

·     Minimise disturbance impacts to the surrounding habitats and associated wildlife nearby during construction phase

·     Avoidance of bird collision

·     Avoidance of impact to species of conservation importance

 

Fisheries

·         Implement the mitigation measures as detailed in the ProPECCPN 1/94 “Construction Site Drainage” and
ETWB TC (Works) No. 5/2005 “Protection of natural streams / rivers from adverse impacts arising from construction works”, as well as other good site practices to minimise the potential water quality impacts from the construction activities.

·         Surface runoff from construction sites would be discharged into storm drains via adequately designed sand/silt removal facilities such as sand traps, silt traps and sedimentation basins.  Channels or earth bunds or sand bag barriers would be provided on site during construction works to properly direct stormwater to such silt removal facilities.  Perimeter channels would be provided on site boundaries where necessary to intercept storm runoff from outside the site so that it will not wash across the site. Catchpits and perimeter channels would be constructed in advance of site formation works and earthworks.

·     Minimise of potential impacts to nearby fisheries resources.

Landscape and Visual

·         CM1 Tree Preservation and Transplantation – Tree without impact from the proposed works should be retained and any existing trees unavoidably affected by the works should be transplanted as far as possible in accordance with LAO Practice Note 6/2023.

·         CM2 Control of Night-time Lighting Glare – Control of night-time lighting glare to prevent light overspill to the nearby VSRs and into the sky. Relevant best practices as suggested in the "Charter on External Lighting" and “Guidelines on Industry Best Practices for External Lighting Installations” promulgated by ENB should be adopted.

·         CM3 Erection of Decorative Screen Hoarding – Erection of decorative screen hoarding or hoarding compatible with the surrounding setting.

·         CM4 Management of Construction Activities and Facilities Construction facilities and activities on work sites and areas should be carefully managed and controlled on the height and disposition /arrangement to minimise any potential adverse landscape and visual impacts. 

·         OM1 Aesthetically Pleasing Design of Aboveground Structures – Aesthetically pleasing design as regard to the form, material and finishes should be incorporated to Stations, Entrance, Ancillary Buildings and other associated engineering facilities so as to blend in the structures to the adjacent landscape and visual context.

·         OM2 Buffer Screen PlantingBuffer screen planting, including shrub to provide screening to ventilation building, engineering structures and associated facilities. 

·         OM3 Roof Greening – Roof greening at the roof area of the proposed structures as far as practical to enhance the landscape quality of the structures and mitigate any potential visual impact on adjacent VSRs at high level.

·         OM4 Compensatory Tree Planting – Compensatory tree planting in accordance with LAO Practice Note 6/2023.

·         OM5 Landscape Treatments on Slope or Retaining StructureLandscape treatments on slope or retaining structure should be made reference to GEO Publication No. 1/2011 – Technical Guidelines on Landscape Treatment for Slopes.

·     Minimise landscape and visual impact during construction and operational phases

 

 

 

 

Cultural Heritage

Built Heritage

·         Monitor ground-borne vibration, tilting and ground settlement for the other identified item (i.e. San Yau Vegetable Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd.) during construction phase.

·         Conduct cartographic and photographic record, and other documentation means (including 3D scanning) at two other identified items including Pok Wai Public School and Fung Kat Vegetable Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd. before commencement of construction works at the respective areas.

Archaeology

·         Conduct archaeological survey-cum-excavation at Long Ha Archaeologically Sensitive Area (ASA) and Ngau Tam Mei ASA, further archaeological investigation at  NTM-TP3, and further archaeological survey at  the south of SAT Station after land resumption and before commencement of site formation and construction works.

·         Conduct archaeological watching brief at the northwest of SAT Station during the course of excavation works.

·         Inform the AMO by the project proponent immediately in case of discovery of antiquities or supposed antiquities  under the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53) during the construction phase, so that appropriate mitigation measures, if needed, can be timely formulated and implemented in agreement with AMO.

·     No impact to cultural heritage resources anticipated

Hazard to Life

·         Implement all the good practices to minimize the hazard-to-life even further and ensure that the services, utilities, slopes, retaining walls, buildings and structures will not be affected through ground vibrations or other effects:

·         Blasting Works: The good practice could make reference to the latest guideline including, but not limited to, Practice Note for Authorized Persons and Registered Structural Engineers (APP-72) by Buildings Department (BD).

·         Overnight Storage of Explosives: The good practice could made reference to the latest guideline including, but not limited to, “Guidance Note No.  GN 8 How to Apply for a Mode A Store Licence for Storage of Blasting Explosives” by CEDD.

·         Transportation of Explosives: The good practice could made reference to the latest guideline including, but not limited to “Guidance Note No.  GN 2 Approval of an Explosives Delivery Vehicle” and “Guidance Note No.  GN 3 Application and Handling of a Removal Permit” by CEDD.

·     Protect nearby sensitive receivers due to transportation, storage and use of explosive.

16.7           Estimation of Population Protected

16.7.1       With careful planning and design of the Project, together with the implementation of mitigation measures recommended in this EIA Report, the population in vicinity of the Project during construction and operational phases have been planned to be protected by mitigation measures from various environmental impacts.