1. BACKGROUND

1.1 An application (No.ESB-047/2000) for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief under section 5(1) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) was submitted by the captioned Applicant on 8 March 2000 with a project profile (No.PP-077/2000).

1.2 The applicant proposes to proceed with the Yung Shue Wan Development by reclaiming land along the waterfront of Yung Shue Wan to provide land for meeting the planned need of open spaces, residential and commercial developments. Government uses, essential infrastructure and community facilities on Lamma Island. The site of this project is mainly an existing coastline, and adjacent to an existing indigenous village and seafood restaurants along the seafront. The project comprises about 1.2 hectares reclamation, about 350 m of seawall, 200 m of artificial beach, construction of emergency vehicular access (EVA) and a seafront promenade, drainage and sewerage works, improvement works to existing public piers and landscape works. The project profile covers the following designated project:-

(a) reclamation works (including associated dredging works) more than 1 ha in size and a boundary of which is less than 100 m from an existing residential area.

1.3 Pursuant to section 5(7)(a) of the EIAO, the Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) issues this Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief to the Applicant to carry out an EIA study.

1.4 The purpose of this EIA study is to provide information on the nature and extent of environmental impacts arising from the construction and operation of the proposed designated projects and related activities taking place concurrently. This information will contribute to decisions by the Director on:

(i) the overall acceptability of any adverse environmental consequences that are likely to arise as a result of the proposed project;

(ii) the conditions and requirements for the detailed design, construction and operation of the proposed project to mitigate against adverse environmental consequences wherever practicable; and

(iii) the acceptability of residual impacts after the proposed mitigation measures are implemented.

2. OBJECTIVES OF THE EIA STUDY

2.1 The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:

(i) to describe the proposed project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the proposed project;

(ii) to identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the proposed project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the proposed project, including both the natural and man-made environment;

(iii) to identify and quantify emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(iv) to identify and quantify any potential losses or damage to flora, fauna and natural habitats;

(v) to identify any negative impacts on sites of cultural heritage and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vi) to propose the provision of infrastructure or mitigation measures so as to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and operation of the project;

(vii) to identify, predict and evaluate the residual (i.e. after practicable mitigation) environmental impacts and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(viii) to identify, assesses and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and reducing them to acceptable levels;

(ix) to investigate the extent of side-effects of proposed mitigation measures that may lead to other forms of impacts;

(x) to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study;

(xi) to design and specify the environmental monitoring and audit requirements, if required, to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the environmental protection and pollution control measures adopted.

3. DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF THE EIA STUDY

3.1 The purpose of this study brief is to scope the key issues of the EIA study. The Applicant has to demonstrate in the EIA report that the criteria in the relevant sections of the Technical Memorandum on the Environmental Impact Assessment Process of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the TM), are fully complied with.

The Scope

3.2 The scope of the EIA study shall cover the proposed project mentioned in Section 1.2 above, with the location plans shown in Appendix A. The EIA study shall address, but not limiting, to the following likely key issues:

(i) Water, air and noise impact arising from reclamation works including associated dredging works and construction of seawall and artificial beach;

(ii) Construction and operational impacts arising from the provision of infrastructure (e.g. emergency vehicular access, a seafront promenade, drainage and sewerage works);

(iii) Waste management of dredged materials;

(iv) Potential impact on archeological site as well as historic buildings and structures at Yung Shue Wan.

(v) Potential impacts on the planned landuses.

Technical Requirements

3.3 The Applicant shall conduct the EIA study to address all environmental aspects of the activities as described in the scope as set out above. The EIA shall include assessments of associated environmental impacts (e.g. noise and other nuisances), where applicable. Technical requirements for the EIA study are listed in following Sections 3.4 to 3.10.

3.4 Air Quality Impacts

3.4.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing air quality impact as stated in Annexes 4 and 12 of the Technical Memorandum, respectively.

3.4.2 The assessment area for air quality impact shall generally be defined by a distance of 500 m from the boundary of the project area(s); yet it may be extended depending on the circumstances.

3.4.3 The construction dust impact assessment shall include the following:

(a) Analysis of construction activities and their characteristics.

(b) Presentation of background air quality in the study area for the purpose of evaluating the cumulative air quality impacts of the construction activities.

(c) Identification and description of representative existing air sensitive receivers (ASRs) and planned/committed air sensitive uses that would likely be affected by the air emissions of the construction activities.

(d) Identification of emission characteristics and provision of emission inventory of the air pollution sources.

(e) Description of the assessment method and the associated assumptions, validity of the method and limits of application. The methodology used shall be agreed with Air Policy Group of EPD before commencement of study.

(f) Assessment and evaluation of the net and cumulative air quality impacts of the air emissions at the identified ASRs.

(g) Presentation of the predicted residual air quality impacts (both unmitigated and mitigated) in the form of summary tables and pollution contours, for comparison with relevant air quality standards and the examination of the land use implications of these impacts.

(h) Proposals of appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative air pollution impacts to established standards.

(i) Submission of all input and output file(s) of the model run(s) in electronic format to Air Policy Group of EPD.

3.4.4 The Applicant shall note the requirements of the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation in dust control and shall initiate an audit and monitoring programme during constructural stage to ensure construction dust impacts are controlled within the relevant standards as stipulated in Annex 4 of the TM.

3.5 Hazard to Life

3.5.1 The Applicant shall ensure and demostrate that :-

(i) The ventilation openings of the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) installation located on the Yung Shue Wan Reclmation Phase 1 should not be obstructed by the construction works and future development.

(ii) Fixed source of ignition should not be introduced in the vicinity of 3 m from the LPG installation.

(iii) The construction works and future development should not affect the safe transportation of LPG cylinders from the jetty to the LPG installation.

3.6 Noise Impact

3.6.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessment noise impacts as stated in Annexes 5 and 13 of the TM, respectively.

3.6.2 The noise impact assessment shall include the following:

(i) Determination of Assessment Area
The area for the noise impact assessment shall include all areas within 300 m from the project boundary. Subject to the agreement of the Director, the assessment area could be reduced accordingly if the first layer of noise sensitive receivers, closer than 300 m from the project boundary, provides acoustic shielding to those receivers at further distance behind.

(ii) Provision of Background Information and Existing Noise Levels
The Applicant shall provide all background information relevant to the project, e.g. relevant previous or current studies. Unless involved in the planning standards, e.g. those for planning of fixed noise sources, no existing noise levels are particularly required.

(iii) Identification of Noise Sensitive Receivers

(a) The Applicant shall refer to Annex 13 of the TM when identifying the noise sensitive receivers (NSRs). The NSRs shall include all existing NSRs and all planned/committed noise sensitive developments and uses earmarked on the relevant Outline Zoning Plans, Outline Development Plans and Layout Plans.

(b) The Applicant shall select assessment points to represent all identified NSRs for carrying out quantitative noise assessment described below. The assessment points shall be agreed with the Director prior to the quantitative noise assessment. A map showing the location and description such as name of building, topography, use and floors of each and every selected assessment point shall be given.

(iv) Provision of an Emission Inventory of the Noise Sources

The Applicant shall provide an inventory of noise sources (e.g. construction equipment for construction noise assessment).

(v) Construction Noise Assessment

(a) The applicant shall carry out assessment of noise impact from construction (excluding percussive piling) of the project during day time. i.e. 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on weekdays other than general holidays in accordance with the methodology stipulated in paragraphs 5.3 and 5.4 of Annex 13 of the TM. The criteria in Table 1B of Annex 5 of the TM shall be adopted in the assessment.

(b) To minimise the construction noise impact, alternative construction methods to replace percussive piling shall be proposed as far as practicable.

(c) If the unmitigated construction noise levels are found exceeding the relevant criteria, the Applicant shall propose practicable direct mitigation measures (including movable barriers, enclosures, quieter alternative methods, re-scheduling and restricting hours of operation of noisy task) to minimise the impact. If the mitigated noise levels still exceed the relevant criteria, any residual impact shall be evaluated according to Section 4.4.3 of the TM.

(vi) Evaluation of Constraints on Planned Noise Sensitive Developments/Land Uses

For planned noise sensitive uses which will still be affected even with all practicable direct technical remedies in place, the Applicant shall propose, evaluate and confirm the practicality of additional measures within the planned noise sensitive uses and shall make recommendations on how these noise sensitive uses will be designed for the information of relevant parties.

The Applicant shall take into account the agreed environmental requirements/constraints identified by the study to assess the development potential of the concerned sites which shall be made known to the relevant parties.

3.7 Water Pollution

3.7.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing water pollution as stated in Annexes 6 and 14 of the TM, respectively.

3.7.2 The Applicant shall identify and analyze in the assessment all physical, chemical and biological disruptions of marine, estuarine, fresh water or ground water system(s) arising from construction and operation of the project.

3.7.3 The Applicant shall include the following in the water quality impact assessment:

General

(i) Collection and review of background information on the existing water system(s) and the respective catchment(s);

(ii) Characterization of water and sediment quality based on existing information or site surveys/tests as appropriate;

(iii) Identification and analysis of all existing and future activities and beneficial uses related to the water system(s) and identification of all water sensitive receivers;

(iv) Identification of pertinent water and sediment quality objectives, criteria and standards for the water system(s) and identification of all water sensitive receivers;

(v) Identification and quantification of all activities which may lead to alteration of shoreline, change of flow regimes, change of ground water levels, increase sediment loading to downstream water course, change of catchment types or areas;

(vi) Identification, analysis and quantification of all existing and future water and sediment pollution sources, including point discharge and non-point sources to surface water runoff (e.g. used lubricating oil), and pollution loading in existing storm drains. Field investigation and laboratory tests, as appropriate, shall be conducted as appropriate;

(vii) An emission inventory on the quantities and characteristics of all these existing and future pollution sources in the assessment area shall also be provided;

Impact Predictions

(viii) Prediction and quantification of impacts on the water system(s) and sensitive receivers due to those changes identified in (v) above and the pollution sources identified in (vi) above. Possible impacts include changes in hydrology, flow regime, sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality and the effects on aquatic organism due to such changes. The prediction shall include possible different construction stages or sequences, and different operation stages. Cumulative impacts due to Phase I work and other projects, activities or pollution sources within Yung Shue Wan Bay shall also be predicted and quantified;

Waste Water and Non-point Sources Pollution

(ix) Analysis on the adequacy of existing and planned future sewerage system to receive discharges of waste water identified in (vi) above;

(x) Analysis on the provision and adequacy of existing and planned future facilities to reduce pollution arising from the non-point sources identified in (vi) above;

(xi) Assessment and quantification of the non-point source pollutants input into the Yung Shue Wan Bay during operation phase and to confirm that the water quality of Inner Yung Shue Wan would be suitable for bathing and other contact recreational activities.

Dredging, Filling and Dumping

(xii) Identification and quantification of all dredging, fill extraction, filling, reclamation, sediment/mud transportation and disposal activities and requirements. Potential fill source and dumping ground to be involved shall also be identified. Field investigation, sampling and laboratory tests to characterize the sediment/mud concerned shall be conducted as appropriate. The ranges of parameters to be analyzed; the number, type and methods of sampling/sampling preservation/laboratory tests; and the laboratory to be used shall be approved by Director. Particular attention shall be given to the requirement of WBTC No.22/92 on "Marine Disposal of Dredged Material" (or any current WBTC issued for this subject);

(xiii) Prediction and assessment of impacts on water and sediment quality of the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers due to the activities identified above;

(xiv) Identification and evaluation of the best practicable dredging and reclamation methods to minimise dredging and dumping requirements and demand for fill source based on the criterion that exciting marine mud shall be left in place and not be disturbed as far as possible;

(xv) Evaluation of impacts due to release of the interstitial water and associated contaminants to the water column ground water if wick drain installation is used to speed up consolidation of mud;

(xvi) Cumulative impacts due to other projects, activities or pollution sources within a boundary around the assessment area, subject to the agreement of the Director shall also be predicted and quantified;

(xvii) Assessment and quantification of waste water generated from on-site construction workforce and any effluent generated that would require appropriate treatment and disposal;

(xviii) Assessment and quantification of all existing and future waste water generation activities and analysis on the adequacy of existing and future sewerage infrastructure;

(xix) Proposal for upgrading or providing any effective infrastructure, water pollution prevention and mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction, operation stages so as to reduce the water and sediment quality impacts to within standards. Requirements to be incorporated in the project contract document shall also be proposed. The impact of existing and future waste water generation activities on the proposed artificial beach should also be evaluated.

(xx) Evaluation and quantification of residual impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers with regard to the appropriate water quality objectives, criteria, standards or guidelines.

(xxi) Investigation of the potential biogas problem arising from leaving marine mud in place, including: - a proposal on collection and analysis of representative samples in various depths for the agreement of the Director; - carrying out the actual sampling and testing as agreed by the Director; and - a proposal, with justifications, on monitoring, mitigation and precautionary measures on proposed developments, if found necessary.

Mitigation

(xxii) Proposal of effective infrastructure upgrading or provision, water pollution prevention and mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction stage so as to reduce the water and sediment quality impacts to within acceptable levels of standards. Requirements to be incorporated in the project contract document shall also be proposed. Best management practices to reduce storm water and non-point source pollution shall be investigated and proposed as appropriate. Attention shall be made to the water quality control and mitigation measures recommended in the ProPECC Paper PN1/94 on construction site drainage; and

(xxiii) Evaluation and quantification of residual impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers with regard to the appropriate water and sediment quality criteria, standards and guidelines.

(xxiv) Proposal for providing interim sewage treatment and disposal facilities for the planned development during the operational period before the public sewer system is available for connection. The applicant shall also propose and assess the suitability of location(s) of discharge point(s) of the interim treatment and disposal facilities in order to minimise potential water quality impacts inside the Yung Shue Wan Bay.

(xxv) Assessment and analysis of the adequacy of future sewerage infrastructure to accommodate sewage arising from the planned development during operational phase.

3.8 Waste Management Implications

3.8.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing waste management implications as stated in Annexes 7 and 15 of the TM, respectively.

3.8.2 The assessment of waste management implications shall cover the following:

(i) Analysis of Activities and Waste Generation

The Applicant shall identify the quantity, quality and timing of the waste arising as a result of the construction and operation activities, based on the sequence and duration of these activities.

(ii) Proposal for Waste Management

(a) Prior to considering the disposal options for various types of wastes, opportunities for reducing waste generation and on-site or off-site re-use shall be fully evaluated. Measures which can be taken in the planning and design stages e.g. by modifying the design approach and in the construction stage for maximizing waste reduction shall be separately considered.

(b) Having been taken into account all the opportunities for reducing waste generation and maximizing reuse, the types and quantities of the wastes required to be disposed of as a consequence shall be estimated and the disposal options for each type of waste described in detail. The disposal method recommended for each type of wastes shall take into account of the result of the assessment set out below.

(c) The impact caused by handling (including labelling, packaging & storage), collection, and disposal of wastes shall be addressed in detail and appropriate mitigation measures proposed. This assessment shall cover the following areas:

(i) potential hazard;

(ii) air and odour emissions;

(iii) noise;

(iv) wastewater discharge; and

(v) public transport

3.9 Ecological Impact

3.9.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing ecological impact as stated in Annexes 8 and 16 of the TM, respectively.

3.9.2 The assessment area for the purpose of this ecological impact assessment shall include all areas within 500m distance from the project area, or area likely to be impacted by the project.

3.9.3 In the ecological impact assessment, the Applicant shall examine the flora, fauna and other components of the ecological habitats within the assessment area. The aim shall be to protect, maintain or rehabilitate the natural environment. In particular, the proposed project shall avoid impacts on recognised sites of conversation importance and other ecological sensitive areas. The assessment shall identify and quantify as far as possible the potential ecological impacts associated with the project.

3.9.4 The assessment shall include the following:

(i) review the findings of relevant studies and collate all the available information regarding the ecological characters of the assessment area;

(ii) evaluate the information collected and identify any information gap relating to the assessment of potential ecological impacts to the terrestrial and aquatic environment;

(iii) carry out necessary field surveys which shall cover wet season (the duration of which shall be at least 3 months) and investigations to verify the information collected, fill the information gaps identified and fulfill the objectives of the EIA study;

(iv) establish the general ecological profile and describe the characteristics of each habitat found; major information to be provided shall include:

(a) description of the physical environment;

(b) habitat maps of suitable scale (1:1000 to 1:5000) showing the types and locations of habitats in the assessment area;

(c) ecological characteristics of each habitat type such as size, vegetation type, species present, dominant species found, species diversity and abundance, community structure, inter-dependence of the habitats and species, and presence of any features of ecological importance;

(d) representative color photos of each habitat type and any important ecological features identified;

(e) species found that are rare, endangered and/or listed under local legislation, international conventions for conservation of wildlife/habitats or red data books;

(v) investigate and describe the existing wildlife uses of various habitats with special attention to:

(a) coral;

(b) cetaceans (such as porpoise);

(c) natural stream courses;

(d) and any other habitats and wildlife groups identified as having special conservation interests by the study.

(vi) describe all recognized sites of conservation importance in the proposed development site and its vicinity and assess whether these sites will be affected by the proposed development or not;

(vii) using suitable methodology, identify and quantify as far as possible any direct, indirect, on-site, off-site, primary, secondary and cumulative ecological impacts such as destruction of habitats, reduction of species abundance/diversity, loss of feeding rounds, reduction of ecological carrying capacity, habitat fragmentation; and in particular the habitat loss and disturbance to wildlife during construction stage;

(viii) evaluate the significant and acceptability of the ecological impacts identified using well-defined criteria;

(ix) recommend all possible alternatives (such as modifications of layout and design) and practicable mitigation measures to avoid, minimize and/or compensate for the adverse ecological impacts identified, such as reinstatement of habitats temporarily affected by the proposed development to its original state and if possible with some enhancement features;

(x) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures and define the scope, type, location, implementation arrangement, subsequent management and maintenance of such measures;

(xi) determine and quantify as far as possible the residual ecological impacts after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures;

(xii) evaluate the severity and acceptability of the residual ecological impacts using well-defined criteria. If off-site mitigation measures are considered necessary to mitigate the residual impacts, the guidelines and requirements laid down in the PELB Technical Circular No. 1/97 should be followed; and

(xiii) review the need for and recommend any ecological monitoring programme required.

3.10 Impact on Cultural Heritage

3.10.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing impact on cultural heritage as stated in Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM, respectively.

3.10.2 The historical, archaeological and cultural heritage impact study should take into account the importance of cultural heritage in Hong Kong and address the potential impacts to the historical, archaeological and cultural resources within the assessment area.

3.10.3 The examination of the assessment area should also allow a more general appraisal of archaeology, architectural history and historic landscapes of the areas that the development will take place. The project should be modified and, if necessary, supplemented to accommodate off-site areas of spoil disposal, construction sites and traffic routes which could affect archaeological, historic and cultural resources as there are identified during the evolution of the engineering design.

3.10.4 The historical, archaeological and cultural heritage impact assessment should focus on :

(i) Investigation of archaeological potential of the study area by :

(a) developing a field evaluation programme to identify areas to be investigated;

(b) producing field evaluation protocols to determine the sampling technique, the sample rational to be applied and the site record forms to be used, the evaluation protocols should be compatible with the data capture requirements of the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO); and

(c) undertaking field evaluations.

(d) undertaking marine archaeological investigation (MAI) (Appendix B).

(ii) Evaluation of impacts on cultural heritage including the old houses in Yung Shue Wan in the vicinity as indicated in Appendix C and any other historic buildings as well as their historic environs, and proposals for any mitigation measures with detailed elaboration on scope of work and financial implications.

(a) heritage resources within the Study Areas should be identified through reference to appropriate records, such as the archives of the AMO, and through consultations with relevant village representatives, appropriate academic sources and other Government sources, including the Lands Department, District Offices, etc.;

(b) if the consultants identifies any additional buildings and structures within the study area which are of potential historic or cultural importance and not recorded by AMO, the office should be reported as soon as possible. The historic and cultural value of the items will be further assessed by the AMO;

(c) the criteria to be adopted to assess the level of direct and indirect impacts to the heritage resources and to develop appropriate mitigation measures, should be established in close liaison with the relevant specialists within the EIA Study Team and should be agreed by the AMO prior to application; and

(d) conceptual photomontage is required to facilitate the assessment of visual impact on the cultural heritage affected.

3.11 Summary of Environmental Outcomes

3.11.1 The EIA Report shall contain a summary of the key environmental outcomes arising from the EIA study, including the population and environmentally sensitive areas protected, environmentally friendly designs recommended, key environmental problems avoided, compensation areas included, the environmental benefits of environmental protection measures recommended and residual impacts.

4. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & AUDIT (EM&A) REQUIREMENTS

4.1 The Applicant shall identify in the EIA study whether there is any need for EM&A activities during the construction and operation phases of the project and, if affirmative, to define the scope of the EM&A requirements for the project in the EIA study and a website for electronic EM&A shall be implemented with a view to proactively abating the environmental impacts. The relevant monitoring and audit data shall be make available to the public via internet access to this website.

4.2 Subject to the confirmation of the EIA study findings, the Applicant shall comply with the requirements as stipulated in Annex 21 of the TM.

4.3 The Applicant shall prepare a project implementation schedule (in the form of a checklist) containing all the EIA study recommendations and mitigation measures with reference to the implementation programme.

5. DURATION OF VALIDITY

5.1 This EIA study brief is valid for 24 months after the date of issue. If the EIA study does not commence within this period, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh before commencement of the EIA study.

6. REPORT REQUIREMENTS

6.1 In preparing the EIA report, the Applicant shall refer to Annex 11 of the TM for the contents of an EIA report. The Applicant shall also refer to Annex 20 of the TM, which stipulates the guidelines for the review of an EIA report.

6.2 The Applicant shall supply the Director with the following number of copies of the EIA report and the executive summary:

(i) 40 copies of the EIA report in English and 50 copies of the executive summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese) as required under section 6(2) of the EIAO to be supplied at the time of application for approval of the EIA report.

(ii) when necessary, addendum to the EIA report and the executive summary submitted in (i) above as required under section 7(1) of the EIAO, to be supplied upon advice by the Director for public inspection.

(iii) 20 copies of the EIA report in English and 50 copies of the executive summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese) with or without Addendum as required under section 7(5) of the EIAO, to be supplied upon advice by the Director for consultation with the Advisory Council on the Environment.

6.3 In addition, to facilitate the public inspection of the EIA Report via the EIAO Internet Website, the applicant shall provide electronic copies of both the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report prepared in HyperText Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in DynaDoc Format (version 3.0 or later) [for Chinese documents] and in Portable Document Format (PDF version 3.0 or later) [for English documents], unless otherwise agreed by the Director. For the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section and sub-section of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report shall be included in the beginning of the document, and all graphics in the report shall be in interlaced GIF format.

6.4 The electronic copies of the EIA report and the Executive Summary shall be submitted to the Director at the time of application for approval of the EIA Report.

6.5 When the EIA Report and the Executive Summary are made available for public inspection under s.7(1) of the EIA Ordinance, the content of the electronic copies of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary must be the same as the hard copies and the Director shall be provided with the most updated electronic copies.

7. OTHER PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

7.1 During the EIA study, if there is any change in the name of the Applicant for this EIA study brief, the Applicant mentioned in this study brief must notify the Director immediately.

7.2 If there is any key change in the scope of the project mentioned in section 1.2 of this EIA study brief and in Project Profile (No.PP-077/2000), the Applicant must seek confirmation from the Director in writing on whether or not the scope of issues covered by this EIA study brief can still cover the key changes, and the additional issues, if any, that the EIA study must also address. If the changes to the project fundamentally alter the key scope of the EIA study brief, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh.

April 2000
Environmental Protection Department