1. BACKGROUND

1.1 An application (No. ESB-049/2000) for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study brief under section 5(1)(a) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) was submitted by the captioned Applicant on 7.4.2000 with a project profile (No. PP-080/2000).

1.2 The Applicant proposes to develop a strategic tourism and retail centre with residential towers between 8-39 storeys to accommodate a design population of 30,000. The total land take area is about 22.5 ha in size including an approximately 15 ha multi-purpose podium structure with residential towers on top north of Castle Peak Road. A low theme park will be located on an area about 7 ha south of Castle Peak Road. The development will be based on podium structure to be built over San Sham Road and the proposed KCRC Sheung Shui - Lok Ma Chau Spur Line. In addition, the development will require decking over of part of the proposed San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel. The proposed development site is to the immediate south of the Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing Control Point extending to north of San Tin Interchange. The location plan of the project showing the approximate project boundary is attached as Figure 1. (The Figure is provided in the submitted project profile).

1.3 The proposed theme park, retail and residential development will include the following elements:

(i) A three level podium to include theme park, commercial/retail venues, car parking, landscape deck and public transport interchange on various;

(ii) Decking of the existing cross-boundary holding area near Lok Ma Chau Control Point;

(iii) Provision of new container truck holding area within the podium structure to hold 600 waiting China-bound vehicles;

(iv) Residential towers of various height (about 8-39 storeys) over approximately 15 ha of the podium for a design population of 30,000;

(v) A potential new railway station to be added to the KCRC Sheung Shui-Lok Ma Chau Spur Line;

(vi) Road works comprising of:

(a) Decking over approximately 350m of San Sham Road between Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing and Castle Peak Road;

(b) Demolition and reprovision, if required, of an existing slip road connecting the New Territories Circular Road, the Castle Peak Road and the Huanggang - Lok Ma Chau Shuttle Bus Interchange;

(c) Realignment of Lok Ma Chau Road to provide vehicular access to the proposed development.

(d) Construction of a new road connecting the realigned Lok Ma Chau Road to join New Territories Circular Road east of San Tin Interchange; and

(e) Road improvement works near to the existing San Tin Interchange.

(vii) Provision of the railway link to and from Lok Ma Chau Station for the West Rail Phase 2 development ;

(viii) Decking and/or culverting about 300m of the San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel below the proposed development;

(ix) Demolition, relocation and/or reprovision of the grasscrete, marshcrete and other wetland habitates provided by the San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel/Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing projects;

(x) Sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities to handle sewage from the proposed development and the final disposal of treated effluent. These may include sewerage system, sewage pumping stations, sewage treatment and compensatory treatment facilities, sewer connection(s) and pumping mains;

(xi) Essential infrastructure/facilities for the development and operation of the theme park, retail and residential development including:

(a) public car/coach parking for visitors/tour groups;

(b) Public Transport Interchange (PTI) underneath the proposed podium to handle passenger/traffic flow to and from the proposed rail station and Huanggang cross boundary shuttle bus service;

(c) pipelines for fresh, salt water and/or reused effluent supply;

(d) stormwater drainage; and

(e) utilities supplies

(xii) Site formation for the proposed development including possible leveling and pond filling works especially over the north-eastern part of the site; and

(xiii) Relocation of graves during site formation works.

1.4 Pursuant to section 5(7)(a) of the EIAO, the Director of Environmental Protection (the Director) issues this EIA study brief to the Applicant to carry out an EIA study.

1.5 The purpose of this EIA study is to provide information on the nature and extent of environmental impacts arising from the construction and operation of the proposed designated projects and related activities taking place concurrently. This information will contribute to decisions by the Director on:

(i) the overall acceptability of any adverse environmental consequences that are likely to arise as a result of the proposed project;

(ii) the conditions and requirements for the detailed design, construction and operation of the proposed project to mitigate against adverse environmental consequences wherever practicable; and

(iii) the acceptability of residual impacts after the proposed mitigation measures are implemented.

2. OBJECTIVES OF THE EIA STUDY

2.1 The objectives of the EIA study are as follows:

(i) to describe the proposed project and associated works together with the requirements for carrying out the proposed project;

(ii) to identify and describe the elements of the community and environment likely to be affected by the proposed project and/or likely to cause adverse impacts to the proposed project, including both the natural and man-made environment;

(iii) to identify and quantify all environmental sensitive receivers, emission sources and determine the significance of impacts on sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(iv) to identify and quantify any potential losses or damage to flora, fauna and wildlife habitats;

(v) to identify any negative impacts on sites of cultural heritage and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vi) to identify and quantify any potential landscape and visual impacts and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(vii) to propose the provision of infrastructure or mitigation measures so as to minimize pollution, environmental disturbance and nuisance during construction and operation of the project;

(viii) to identify, predict and evaluate the residual (i.e. after practicable mitigation) environmental impacts and the cumulative effects expected to arise during the construction and operation phases of the project in relation to the sensitive receivers and potential affected uses;

(ix) to identify, assess and specify methods, measures and standards, to be included in the detailed design, construction and operation of the project which are necessary to mitigate these environmental impacts and reducing them to acceptable levels;

(x) to investigate the extent of side-effects of proposed mitigation measures that may lead to other forms of impacts;

(xi) to identify constraints associated with the mitigation measures recommended in the EIA study;

(xii) to identify, within the study area, any individual project(s) that fall under Schedule 2 and/or Schedule 3 of the EIA Ordinance; to ascertain whether the findings of this EIA study have adequately addressed the environmental impacts of those projects; and where necessary, to identify the outstanding issues that need to be addressed in any further detailed EIA study; and

(xiii) to design and specify the environmental monitoring and audit requirements, if required, to ensure the implementation and the effectiveness of the environmental protection and pollution control measures adopted.

3. DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OF THE EIA STUDY

3.1 The purpose of this study brief is to scope the key issues of the EIA study. The Applicant has to demonstrate in the EIA report that the criteria in the relevant sections of the Technical Memorandum on the Environmental Impact Assessment Process of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the TM) are fully complied with.

The Scope

3.2 The scope of this EIA study shall cover the proposed projects and associated works mentioned in section 1.2 and 3 above. The EIA study shall cover the combined impacts of all tourism/cross boundary activities, the proposed developments and the cumulative impacts of the existing, committed and planned developments in the vicinity of the proposed project, in accordance with the requirements laid down in section 3.4 of the TM. The environmental impacts of on-site and off-site works and facilities associated with the proposed developments shall be addressed. The EIA study shall address the likely key issues described below, together with any other key issues identified during the course of the EIA study:

(i) noise impacts arising from construction and operation of the development and cross boundary vehicle holding / cross boundary traffic related to the proposed development scheme, in particular the construction phase and operation phase noise impact to the nearby village areas and road traffic noise and railway noise to near noise sensitive receivers to the residential elements on the podium structure when the development is occupied;

(ii) noise impact during the operation of the theme park if open air activities and fireworks shows are anticipated;

(iii) air quality impacts arising from construction and operation of the development including impacts due to emission from the covered San Sham Road, the cross -boundary vehicle holding area, the additional container truck holding area and car/coach;

(iv) pollutants (including odour and pollutants like ozone, dioxin, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and heavy metals, if any) to be released during fireworks show;

(v) landscape and visual impacts during construction and operation of the development;

(vi) glare impacts due to laser and/or fireworks show on nearby receivers including road traffic, railway operation and navigation/aviation on vessels and air crafts;

(vii) water quality impacts during construction and operation, including sewage collection, treatment and disposal systems and land drainage and stormwater system;

(viii) risk on storage and handling of fireworks and risk on highway operation and air traffic due to fireworks show;

(ix) potential impacts on historical buildings/architectures, monuments and archeological sites; and

(x) wetland loss and impacts to the adjacent Recognised Sites of Conservation Importance including Wetland Conservation Area, Wetland Buffer Area due to the construction and operation of the proposed development; and

(xi) fisheries impacts during construction and operation of the development.

Technical Requirements

3.3 The Applicant shall conduct the EIA study to address all environmental aspects of the works and activities as described in the scope set out above.

Use of the Relevant Findings of Previously Approved EIA Reports and Relevant Studies

3.4 The Applicant shall review all on-going and previously approved studies/EIA studies relevant to the proposed development and extract relevant information for the purpose of this EIA study. The on-going and previously approved studies/EIA studies relevant to the proposed development include, but not limited to:

(i) Territory Development Strategy Review - Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Preferred Options, Plan D (1995)

(ii) Territory Development Strategy Review - Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Medium-term Options, Plan D (1996)

(iii) Planning and Development Study on North West New Territories - Environmental Assessment, Plan D & TDD (1999)

(iv) Planning and Development Study on North West New Territories - Environmental Impact Assessment, Plan D & TDD (on-going)

(v) Planning and Development Study on North East New Territories - Environmental Assessment, Plan D & TDD (1999)

(vi) Main Drainage Channels and Poldered Village Protection Scheme for San Tin, NWNT - EIA, TDD (1999);

(vii) Lok Ma Chau Spur Line, KCRC (on going).

(viii) Study on the Ecological Value of Fish Ponds in Deep Bay Area, Plan D (1998)

(ix) Shanzhen River Regulation EIA (1997)

(x) Expansion of Kiosks and Other Facilities at Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing - Environmental Studies, ASD (1999)

(xi) NWNT Refuse Transfer Station EIA, EPD (1994)

(xii) Review of Yuen Long & Kam Tin Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Requirements - Summary Report, EPD (1999)

(xiii) Improvement to San Tin Interchange, TD (to be commenced soon)

Consideration of Different Options and Transport Modes

3.5 The EIA study shall take into consideration with clear and objective comparison of the environmental benefits and dis-benefits of different land uses, site layouts, drainage arrangements and rail/road alignments options, with or without the proposed developments. This is particularly relevant to the location, size, shape, form and coverage of the podium structure as well as the proposed design of incorporating road sections, railway alignments, vehicle parking/holding and interchange and drainage regime and designs within the proposed development. In formulating the preferred options, the Applicant shall seek to avoid adverse environmental effects to the maximum practicable extent.

Territory-wide and Sub-regional Environmental Implications of the Additional Cross Boundary Traffic and Tourists

3.6 The Applicant shall assess the territory-wide and sub-regional environmental implications of additional cross boundary traffic and tourists attracted by the theme park development. There should be a chapter in the EIA report to address the cross boundary environmental implications in broad terms.

Cumulative Environmental Impacts

3.7 The Applicant shall assess and evaluate the cumulative environmental impacts arising from the theme park, retail cum residential development and other planned developments in its vicinity. Findings of all relevant environmental/ecological studies, in particular the studies highlighted in section 3.4 above shall be reviewed and incorporated into the EIA report. Particular attention shall be paid on the assessment of conflicts among various projects and on the cumulative impacts due to:

(a) adverse impacts and loss of fish pond and other wetland habitates in the territory especially in the North West New Territories and North East New Territories;

(b) concurrent works in the Lok Ma Chau and San Tin area;

(c) the cross boundary traffic associated with the Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing Check Point and the transport load associated with the KCRC - Lok Ma Chau Spur Line;

(d) transport load and associated air and noise pollution during the construction and operation of the proposed theme park, retail-cum-residential development;

(e) effluent discharge into the Deep Bay catchment; and

(f) alteration of sewerage/sewage treatment system(s), drainage channel alignment(s) and land drainage regime due to the proposed development.

3.8 The EIA study shall include the following technical requirements on specific impacts.

3.8.1 Air Quality Impact

3.8.1.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing air quality impact as stated in Annexes 4 and 12 of the TM, respectively.

3.8.1.2 The "Assessment Area" for air quality impact shall be normally defined by a distance of 500m from the boundary of the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above, yet it may be extended depending on the circumstances.

3.8.1.3 For construction impacts, the Applicant shall ensure the construction works will follow the requirements of the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation in dust control and, subject to section 3.8.14 below, the Applicant shall initiate an audit and monitoring program during the constructional stage to ensure construction dust impacts are controlled within the relevant standard as stipulated in Annex 4 of the TM.

3.8.1.4 The construction and operation air quality assessment shall include the following:

(i) presentation of background air quality (including zone) in the study area for the purpose of identifying the key issues which may have implications on the proposed project's development and, evaluating the cumulative air quality impacts of the proposed project;

(ii) addressing the significance, if any, of the likely increase in air pollutants due to the proposed project by estimating the additional air pollutant emissions in HKSAR caused by internal traffic and cross-boundary traffic to and from the proposed theme park, retail cum residential development;

(iii) description of the topographical and man-made features (including features of the proposed project) which may affect the dispersion characteristics of air pollutants (including emissions from the covered and decked over vehicle holding areas and San Sham Road) within the study area;

(iv) identification of representative air sensitive receivers and/or potential affected uses;

(v) identification of emission characteristics and provision of an emission inventory of the existing, committed and planned air pollution sources including nearby open air/ to be covered highway alignments, open air/decked vehicle holding area, the proposed public transport interchange and those from the theme park construction and operation. The inventory shall include vehicular emissions, odour and pollutants like dioxins, VOC and particulates and any other substances to be emitted from the theme park if fireworks show are proposed;

(vi) description of assessment method (whether analytical or numerical, etc.) and associated assumptions, validity of the method and limits of application. The methodology used shall be agreed with the Director before commencement of the relevant assessment in the EIA study;

(vii) analysis of operational activities identified in (v) above including but not limited to:

(a) vehicle emissions from nearby highways;

(b) vehicle emissions from the open air/to be decked vehicles holding area;

(c) pollutants (including odour and pollutants such as ozone, dioxins, VOC and heavy metal, if any) to be released from the proposed fireworks shows, if anticipated;

(d) vehicle emissions from local roads (whether existing or planned);

(e) vehicle emissions from the public car/coach parking areas and the proposed public transport interchange; and

(f) off-site and territory-wide impacts caused by traffic to and from the proposed theme park, retail and residential development.

(g) odour, if any, from the sewage pumping station(s) and/or sewage treatment facilities associated with the proposed development.

(viii) assessment and evaluation of the net and cumulative construction dust and operational air quality impacts;

(ix) presentation of the assessment results in the form of summary table and pollution contours, whenever practicable, for comparison with relevant air quality standards and the examination of the land use implications of these impacts;

(x) proposals of effective mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative air pollution impacts to established standards;

(xi) the air quality implications of any proposed decking over of road section(s) and vehicles/container truck holding areas should be assessed. If the proposed podium structure and decking will affect dispersion of air pollutants, then the Applicant shall assess the implications of such mitigation measures on air quality impact. If podium or decking will result in the form of total enclosure over road section(s) and vehicles holding/waiting area, then both "tunnel" portal emissions and air quality inside the covered shall also be addressed; and

(xii) the Applicant shall submit all input and output files of the model run(s) in electronic format to the Director; and

3.8.2 Noise and Vibration Impacts

3.8.2.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing noise impact as stated in Annexes 5 and 13 of the TM, respectively.

3.8.2.2 The noise impact assessment shall include the following:

(i) Determination of Assessment Area

The "Assessment Area" for the noise impact assessment shall include all areas within 300m from the boundary of the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above. Subject to the agreement of the Director, the assessment area could be reduced accordingly if the first layer of noise sensitive receivers, closer than 300m from the boundary of the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above, provides acoustic shielding to those receivers at further distance behind. Subject to the agreement of the Director, the area shall be expanded to include NSRs at larger distance, which would be affected by the construction and operation of the proposed project.

(ii) Provision of Background Information and Existing Noise Levels

The Applicant shall provide all background information relevant to the project, e.g. relevant previous or current studies. Unless involved in the planning standards, e.g. those for planning of fixed noise sources, no existing noise levels are particularly r-equired.

(iii) Identification of Noise Sensitive Receivers

(a) The Applicant shall refer to Annex 13 of the TM when identifying the noise sensitive receivers (NSRs). The NSRs shall include all existing NSRs and all planned/committed noise sensitive developments and uses earmarked on the relevant Outline Zoning Plans (OZP), Outline Development Plans and Layout Plans. The Applicant shall review and take into account of the latest progress of the planned land-uses to be recommended in the ongoing Planning and Development Study on North West New Territories.

(b) The Applicant shall select assessment points to represent all identified NSRs for carrying out quantitative noise assessment described below. The assessment points shall be agreed with the Director prior to the quantitative noise assessment. A map showing the location and description such as name of building, use, and floors of each and every selected assessment point shall be given. For planned noise sensitive land uses without committed site layouts, the Applicant should use the relevant planning parameters to work out site layouts for operational noise assessment purpose.

(iv) Provision of an Emission Inventory of the Noise Sources

The Applicant shall provide an inventory of all noise sources during construction and operation of the proposed development. For traffic noise assessment, the inventory shall include road traffic and railway noise data. Confirmation of the validity of the inventory shall be obtained from the relevant government departments/ authorities.

(v) Construction Noise Assessment

(a) The Applicant shall carry out assessment of noise impact from all construction (excluding percussive piling) works of all the concurrent projects in the area during day time, i.e. 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on weekdays other than general holidays in accordance with the methodology stipulated in paragraphs 5.3. and 5.4 of Annex 13 of the TM. The criteria in Table 1B of Annex 5 of the TM shall be adopted in the assessment.

(b) To minimise the construction noise impact, alternative construction methods to replace percussive piling shall be proposed as far as practicable.

(c) If the unmitigated construction noise levels are found exceeding the relevant criteria, the Applicant shall propose practicable direct mitigation measures (including movable barriers, enclosures, quieter alternative methods, re-scheduling and restricting hours of operation of noisy task) to minimise the impact. If the mitigated noise levels still exceed the relevant criteria, the duration of the noise exceedance shall be given.

(d) In case the Applicant would like to evaluate whether construction works in restricted hours as defined under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO) are feasible or not in the context of programming construction works, reference should be made to the relevant technical memoranda issued under the NCO. Regardless of the results of the construction noise impact assessment for restricted hours, the Noise Control Authority will process the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) application, if necessary, based on the NCO, the relevant technical memoranda issued under the NCO, and the contemporary conditions/situations. This aspect should be explicitly stated in the noise chapter and the conclusions and recommendations chapter in the EIA report.

(vi) Operational Noise and Vibration Assessment

(a) Rail Noise and Vibration

(a1) The Applicant shall assess railway noise and vibration impacts due to the operation of the proposed Sheung Shui - Lok Ma Chau Spur Line and West Rail Phase 2 at the interface of the railway lines and the proposed development with respect to the acceptable levels contained in Table 1A in Annex 5 in the TM. The assessment methodology including the railway/train design noise level shall be agreed with the Director prior to the commencement of the assessment.

(a2) The Applicant shall present the noise levels in Leq(30min) and Leq(24hr), Lmax during the day and at night at the NSRs at various representative floor levels (in m P.D.) on tables and plans of suitable scale.

(a3) The Applicant shall propose direct/indirect mitigation measures where the predicted noise level exceeds the criteria set out in Table 1A of Annex 5 of the TM to protect the affected NSRs.

(b) Fixed Noise Sources

(b1) The Applicant shall identify any fixed noise sources within the "Assessment Area", including all activities within the theme park, retail cum residential development, any sewage collection, sewage treatment plant, pumping stations, any pump houses, electricity sub-station, bus depot/terminus, public transport interchange, opening of car/coach/container parking and holding areas etc. The Applicant shall calculate the expected noise using standard acoustics principles. Calculations for the expected noise shall be based on assumed plant inventories and utilization schedule for the worst case scenario. The Applicant shall calculate the noise levels taking into account of correction of tonality, impulsiveness and intermittence in accordance with the Technical Memorandum for the Assessment of Noise from Places other than Domestic Premises, Public Places or Construction Sites.

(b2) The Applicant shall present the noise levels in Leq(30min) or other unit(s) as agreed by the Director, at the NSRs at various representative floor levels (in m P.D.) on tables and plans of suitable scale.

(b3) A quantitative assessment at the NSRs for the fixed noise source(s) shall be carried out and compared against the criteria set out in Table 1A of Annex 5 of the TM.

(b4) The Applicant shall propose direct mitigation measures within the project limits in all situations where the predicted noise level exceeds the criteria set out in Table 1A of Annex 5 of the TM to protect the affected NSRs.

(c) Fireworks

(c1) If fireworks shows are anticipated, the Applicant shall propose criteria, noise metric and methodology in assessing the noise impact arising from fireworks, and, such criteria, noise metric, and methodology shall be approved by the Director prior to the commencement of the assessment. The Applicant shall evaluate the assumed worst case scenarios of fireworks inventories and the display schedule.

(c2) The Applicant shall propose direct mitigation measures within the project limits in all situations if the predicted noise level exceeds the criteria.

(d) Road Traffic Noise

(d1) Calculation of Noise Levels

The Applicant shall analyse the scope of the existing and proposed road improvement/new alignment(s) to identify appropriate new and existing road sections for the purpose of traffic noise impact assessment. When an existing road section undergoes major modification which will directly result in 25% increase in lanes or substantial changes in alignment or characters (e.g. change to a high speed road) of the existing road, it shall be regarded as a new road for the purpose of this noise impact assessment.

The Applicant shall calculate the expected road traffic noise using methods described in the U.K. Department of Transport's "Calculation of Road Traffic Noise" (1988). Calculations of future road traffic noise shall be based on the peak hour traffic flow in respect of the maximum traffic projection within a 15 years period upon commencement of operation of the proposed roadwork. The Applicant shall calculate traffic noise levels in respect of each road section and the overall noise levels from combined road sections (both new and existing) at NSRs.

(d2) Presentation of Noise Levels

The Applicant shall present the prevailing and future traffic noise levels in L10(1hr) at the NSRs at various representative floor levels (in m P.D.) on tables and plans of suitable scale.

Quantitative assessment at the NSRs for proposed road alignment(s) shall be carried out and compared against the criteria set out in Table 1A of Annex 5 in the TM. The potential noise impact of proposed road alignment(s) shall be quantified by estimating the total number of dwellings, classrooms and other noise sensitive elements that will be exposed to noise levels exceeding the criteria set in Table 1A of Annex 5 in the TM.

(d3) Proposals for Noise Mitigation Measures After rounding of the predicted noise levels according to the U.K. Department of Transport's "Calculation of Road Traffic Noise" (1988), the Applicant shall propose direct technical remedies in all situations where the predicted traffic noise level exceeds the criteria set in Table 1A of Annex 5 in the TM by 1 dB(A) or more. Specific reasons for not adopting certain direct technical remedies in the design to reduce the traffic noise to a level meeting the criteria in the TM or to maximize the protection for the NSRs as far as possible should be clearly quantified and laid down. The total number of dwellings, classrooms and other noise sensitive element that will be benefited by the provision of direct technical remedies should be provided.

The total number of dwellings, classrooms and other noise sensitive elements that will still be exposed to noise above the criteria with the implementation of all recommended direct technical remedies shall be quantified.

In case where a number of the NSRs cannot all be protected by the recommended direct technical remedies, the Applicant shall identify and estimate the total number of existing dwellings, classrooms and other noise sensitive elements which may qualify for indirect technical remedies under the Executive Council directive "Equitable Redress for Persons Exposed to Increased Noise Resulting from the Use of New Roads", the associated costs and any implications for such implementation. For the purpose of determining the eligibility of the affected premises for indirect technical remedies, reference shall be made to the following set of three criteria:

(1) the predicted overall noise level from the new road together with other traffic noise in the vicinity must be above a specified noise level (e.g. 70 dB(A) for domestic premises and 65 dB(A) for education institutions, all in L10(1hr));

(2) the predicted overall noise level is at least 1.0 dB(A) more than the prevailing traffic noise level, i.e. the total traffic noise level existing before the works to construct the road were commenced; and

(3) the contribution to the increase in the predicted overall noise level from the new road must be at least 1.0dB(A).

(e) Helicopter Noise

The Applicant shall predict the long-term and short-term noise impacts arising from the operation of the helicopter landing pad at the nearby Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing Control Point with respect to the criteria set in Table 1A of Annex 5 in the TM. The assessment methodology shall be agreed with EPD prior to commencement of the assessment. The Applicant shall propose noise control or mitigation measures to minimise impacts to an acceptable level.

(vii) Assessment of Side Effects and Constraints

The Applicant shall identify, assess and propose means to minimize any side effects and to resolve any potential constraints due to the inclusion of any recommended direct technical remedies.

(viii) Evaluation of Constraints on Planned Noise Sensitive Developments/Land Uses

For planned noise sensitive uses which will still be affected even with all practicable direct technical remedies in place, the Applicant shall propose, evaluate and confirm the practicality of additional measures within the planned noise sensitive uses and shall make recommendations on how these noise sensitive uses will be designed for the information of relevant parties.

The Applicant shall take into account agreed environmental requirements / constraints identified by the study to assess the development potential of concerned sites which shall be made known to the relevant parties.

3.8.3 Water Quality Impact

3.8.3.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing water quality impact during the construction and operation phases as stated in Annexes 6 and 14 of the TM respectively.

3.8.3.2 The Applicant shall conduct the following detailed water quality assessment.

Water Quality Impact Assessment

3.8.3.3 The "Assessment Area" for the purpose of water quality impact assessment shall cover all relevant sensitive receivers in San Tin area and in the larger Deep Bay Catchment Area of the Deep Bay Water Control Zone (WCZ).

3.8.3.4 The Applicant shall identify and analyze all physical, chemical and biological disruptions of water system(s) arising during the construction and operation of the project (including the impacts arising from emergency discharge from sewage pumping stations and sewer bursting discharge). The Applicant shall address the following:

General

(i) collection and review of background information on the existing water system(s) and the respective catchment(s);

(ii) characterization of water and sediment quality based on existing information or site surveys/ tests as appropriate;

(iii) identification and analysis of all existing and planned future activities and beneficial uses related to the water system(s) and identification of all water sensitive receivers including inshore water protection/recreation areas;

(iv) identification of pertinent water quality objectives and establishment of other appropriate water quality and sediment criteria or standards for the water system(s) and all sensitive receivers affected by the project;

(v) identification of any alteration of water course/drainage channel, natural stream/ponds, wetland, change of water holding/flow regimes; change of ground water levels, change of catchment types or areas;

(vi) identification, analysis and quantification of all existing and likely future water and sediment pollution sources, including point discharges and non-point sources to surface water runoff. Field investigation and laboratory tests shall be conducted as appropriate;

(vii) establishment and provision of an emission inventory on the quantities and characteristics of all these pollution sources; Impact Predictions

(viii) prediction and quantification by mathematical modelling or other technique approved by the Director, of the impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers due to those alterations and changes identified in (v) and the pollution sources identified in (vi) above. Possible impacts include changes in hydrology, flow regime, sediment erosion or deposition, water and sediment quality and the effects on the aquatic organism due to such changes. The prediction shall take into account and include likely different construction stages or sequences, different operation stages. Cumulative impacts due to other projects, activities or pollution sources within a boundary around the Study Area to be agreed by the Director shall also be predicted and quantified;

(ix) assessment and evaluation of water quality impacts on the sensitive receivers due to the operation of the proposed theme park, retail cum residential development. Among other receivers, the impact on the operation of the wetland habitats on or near the San Tim Main Drainage Channel, the man-made wetland of the Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing and the Deep Bay Wetland Conservation Area/Buffer Area shall be included. Waste Water Pollution

(x) analysis on the adequacy of existing and planned future sewerage infrastructure to receive point discharges of waste water identified in (vi) above;

(xi) analysis on the provision and adequacy of existing and planned future facilities to reduce pollution arising from the non-point sources identified in (vi) above;

(xii) identification and quantification of the residual pollution load from the proposed treatment facilities for treating all point/non-point sources of waste water;

(xiii) identification of the alignment, volume and possible pollutants contained in storm water discharge;

(xiv) analysis on the characteristics of sewage nature;

(xv) identification and quantification of the stormwater, proposed interim treated effluent discharge and other point/non-point sources pollution loads to the San Tin Main Drainage Channel and the other surrounding water courses/bodies;

(xvi) evaluation and quantification of residual impacts on the water system(s) and the sensitive receivers with regard to the appropriate water and sediment quality criteria, standards and guidelines; and

(xvii) analysis and assessment of the impacts due to additional sewage discharge from the project to the Yuen Long, Kam Tin Sewerage Master Plan system and treatment facilities;

(xviii) assessment on the impacts of using ozone or chlorine as disinfectants in the proposed development, in particular on the potential of generation of carcinogenic and toxic organic chlorides; and

(xix) identification and assessment of the residual impacts of any fertilizer, pesticides and/or herbicides (if applied) on the drainage channel, groundwater, or other inland water courses/bodies.

Dredging and Pond Draining and Filling

(xx) identification and quantification of all dredging, pond draining and filling, site leveling, sediment/ mud transportation and disposal activities and requirements. Potential fill source, if required and dumping ground to be involved shall also be identified. Field investigation, sampling and laboratory tests to characterize the pond water quality and sediment/mud concerned shall be conducted as appropriate. The ranges of parameters to be analyzed; the number, type and methods of sampling/sampling preservation/ laboratory tests; and the laboratory to be used shall be approved by the Director. Particular attention shall be given to the requirement of WBTC No. 3/2000 on "Management of Dredged/Excavated Sediment";

(xxi) prediction, quantification and assessment of impacts on the physical regime, water and sediment quality of the water systems(s) and the nearby sensitive receivers due to the activities identified in secton (xx) above. The prediction and quantification of impacts caused by sediment re-suspension and contaminants release shall be carried out by mathematical modelling or other techniques approved by the Director;

(xxii) identification and evaluation of the best practicable dredging and pond filling methods to minimize dredging and dumping requirements and demand for fill sources based on the criterion that existing pond mud/stream sediment shall be left in place and not be disturbed as far as possible;

(xxiii) evaluation of the impacts due to release of the interstitial water and associated contaminants to the water column, if wick drain installation is employed to speed up consolidation of mud;

(xxiv) Prediction and quantification of cumulative impacts due to other dredging, filling or dumping activities within a boundary around the Study Area to be agreed by the Director; and

(xxv) Among other sensitive receivers, impact on the habitats and ecological mitigation measures of the nearby wetland Conservation Area/Wetland Buffer Area, the San Tin Main Drainage Channel and the Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing shall be addressed.

Potential Problem of Biogas on Reclamation (Pond Filling)

(xxvi) Investigation of the potential biogas problem arising from leaving pond mud in place, including:

(a) a proposal on collection and analysis of representative samples in various depths for the agreement of the Director;

(b) carrying out the actual sampling and testing as agreed by the Director; and

(c) a proposal, with justifications, on monitoring, mitigation and precautionary measures on proposed developments, if found necessary.

Mitigation

(xxvii) Proposal of effective infrastructure upgrading or provision, water pollution prevention and mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction, operation stages so as to reduce the water and sediment quality impacts to within acceptable levels of standards. Best management practices to reduce storm water, pesticides and herbicides and non-point source pollution shall be investigated and proposed as appropriate; and

(xxviii) formulate the mitigation measures to offset the residual pollution load identified in section (xii) above in order to achieve the requirement of no net increase of pollution load to Deep Bay from the proposed development.

3.8.4 Sewerage and Sewage Treatment Implications

3.8.4.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing impacts on the downstream public sewerage, sewage treatment and disposal facilities as stated in section 6.5 in Annex 14 of the TM.

3.8.4.2 The Applicant shall investigate and determine the need and the feasibility of having central pre-treatment facilities and/or a separate sewage treatment plant within the study area.

3.8.4.3 The Applicant shall study and assess the possibility of discharging sewage discharge to the sewers of the Yuen Long, Kam Tin Sewerage Master Plan. The assessment shall include the following:

(i) investigate and review the adequacy of the existing/planned sewerage and treatment facilities for absorbing part or all of the sewage discharge from the proposed development within the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above. The Applicant shall confirm in the EIA report that whether the proposed Yuen Long, Kam Tin Sewerage System and sewage treatment works in the NWNT will provide adequate capacity for the proposed development. The appropriate treatment level of interim discharge, if required, shall be assessed;

(ii) any additional sewage flows and flow projections from other existing/planned developments to be connected to the Yuen Long, Kam Tin Sewerage Master Plan system shall be assessed. The water quality impacts arising from the interim and ultimate effluent discharge, if any, shall be assessed in accordance with section 3.8.3 above.

(iii) based on the above items (i) and (ii), if the existing/planned sewerage layout or capacities cannot cope with the maximum discharges, the Applicant shall propose an optimal and cost-effective upgrading works to improve the existing/planned sewerage and sewage treatment facilities or to provide new sewerage and sewage treatment facilities to receive and transport the sewage arising during the construction and operation of the proposed development. Any proposed sewerage system should be designed to meet current DSD standards. Computerised analysis techniques such as HYDRO WORKS may be used in the preliminary design.

(iv) identify and quantify the water quality and ecological impacts due to the emergency discharge from sewage pumping stations and sewer bursting discharge, and to propose measures to mitigate these impacts;

(v) identify the alignment of the sewerage to connect to the Yuen Long, Kam Tin Sewerage Master Plan system;

(vi) set out the design, operation and maintenance requirements for any proposed sewage treatment facilities, such as pumping station(s) and central pre-treatment facilities for food catering effluent (if recommended), including electrical and mechanical components to eliminate the problem of septicity incurred in long rising main(s) during low flows and to facilitate maintenance. The design, operation and maintenance requirements for the proposed sewage treatment facilities shall be agreed by DSD and EPD. (Twin rising mains for each pumping station should be provided to make sure that the proposed sewage rising mains are maintainable without shutting down and discharging untreated sewage into the natural stream/drainage channel directly).

3.8.5 Waste Management Implications

3.8.5.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing waste management implications as stated in Annexes 7 and 15 of the TM, respectively.

3.8.5.2 The assessment of waste management implications shall cover the following:

(i) Analysis of Activities and Waste Generation

The Applicant shall identify the quantity, quality and timing of the waste arising as a result of the construction and operational activities, based on the sequence and duration of these activities.

(ii) Proposal for Waste Management

(a) Prior to considering the disposal options for various types of wastes, opportunities for reducing waste generation and on-site or off-site re-use shall be fully evaluated. Measures which can be taken in the planning and design stages e.g. by modifying the design approach and in the construction stage for maximising waste reduction shall be separately considered.

(b) Having taken into account all the opportunities for reducing waste generation and maximising reuse, the types and quantities of the wastes required to be disposed of as a consequence shall be estimated and the disposal options for each type of waste described in detail. The disposal method recommended for each type of wastes shall take into account the result of the assessment in (c) below.

(c) The impact caused by handling (including labelling, packaging & storage), collection, and disposal of wastes shall be addressed in detail and appropriate mitigation measures proposed. This assessment shall cover but not limited to the following areas :

- potential hazard;

- air and odour emission;

- noise;

- wastewater discharge; and

- public transport.

3.8.6 Land Contamination Impact

3.8.6.1 The Applicant shall follow the guidelines for evaluating and assessing potential land contamination issues as stated in sections 3.1 and 3.2, Annex 19 of the TM.

3.8.6.2 The Applicant shall provide a clear and detailed account of the present land use (including description of the activities, chemicals and hazardous substances handled with clear indication of their storage and location by reference to a site map) and the relevant landuse history in relation to possible land contamination (including accident records, change of land use and the like).

3.8.6.3 During the execution of the EIA study, the Applicant shall submit a contamination assessment plan (CAP) to the DEP for endorsement prior to conducting an actual contamination impact assessment of the land/site. The CAP shall include proposals on sampling and analysis required and shall aim at determining the nature and the extent of the contamination of the land/site.

3.8.6.4 Based on the endorsed CAP, the Applicant shall conduct a land contamination impact assessment. If land contamination is confirmed, a remedial action plan shall be prepared to formulate necessary remedial measures.

3.8.7 Hazard to Life (Storage, use, transport, handling and processing of dangerous goods)

3.8.7.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria for evaluating hazard to life as stated in Annex 4 of the TM.

3.8.7.2 The Applicant shall include the following in the risk assessments:

(i) identification of all hazardous scenarios associated with the storage, use, transport, handling and processing of dangerous goods (including fireworks and sodium hypochlorite/chlorine) during operation stages. Hazard identification should fully take account past incident data, in particular for fireworks;

(ii) execution of a Quantitative Risk Assessment expressing population risks in both individual and societal terms;

(iii) comparison of individual and societal risks with the Criteria for Evaluating Hazard to Life stipulated in Annex 4 of the TM;

(iv) identification and assessment of practicable and cost-effective risk mitigation measures by means of cost-benefit analys is;

(v) determining whether the theme park and its associated facilities will pose acceptable levels of risk to the public off-site and the visiting population after mitigation; and

(vi) Separate risk assessments will be required for visiting population (on-site) and off-site population taking into account hazards from fireworks storage, if required, the holding of Dangerous Goods vehicles in confined space and storage of sodium hypochlorite/chlorine for the sewage treatment process.

3.8.7.3 The Applicant shall approach the Director for detailed requirements for risk assessment for dangerous goods.

3.8.8 Ecological Impact (Terrestrial and Aquatic)

3.8.8.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing ecological impact as stated in Annexes 8 and 16 of the TM respectively during the construction and operational phases. The assessment shall include the ecological survey of the "Assessment Area" as defined in section 3.8.8.2 below

3.8.8.2 The "Assessment Area" for the purpose of terrestrial ecological assessment shall include all areas within 500m distance from the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above, or the area likely to be impacted by the proposed developments. The "Assessment Area" for the purpose of marine ecological assessment shall be the same as the "Assessment Area" for water quality impact assessment.

3.8.8.3 In the ecological impact assessment, the Applicant shall examine the flora, fauna and other components of the ecological habitats within the "Assessment Area". The aim shall be to protect, maintain or rehabilitate the natural environment. In particular, the proposed project shall avoid impacts on recognized sites of conservation importance and other ecological sensitive areas. The assessment shall identify and quantify as far as possible the potential ecological impacts associated with the proposed development.

3.8.8.4 The assessment shall include the following major tasks:

(i) review and incorporate the findings of relevant studies including the San Tin Main Drainage Channel EIA (San Tin MDC EIA), Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing Expansion Environmental Study (LMC ES) and Sheung Shui - Lok Ma Chau Spur Line EIA (LMC Spur Line EIA) and collate all the available information regarding the ecological characters of the "Assessment Area";

(ii) identify any information gap relating to the assessment of potential ecological impacts to the terrestrial and aquatic environment;

(iii) carry out any necessary field surveys, the duration of which shall be at least 6 months and cover the winter migratory bird season, and investigations to fill in the information gap, if any, and to fulfil the objectives of the EIA study;

(iv) establish the general ecological profile and describe the characteristics of each habitat found committed ecological measures within the study boundary including those under the EIA Ordinance or the Town Planning Ordinance (such as reinstatement of fishponds) should be taken into consideration; major information to be provided shall include:

(a) description of the physical environment;

(b) habitat maps of suitable scale (1:1000 to 1:5000) showing the types and locations of habitats in the "Assessment Area";

(c) ecological characteristics of each habitat type such as size, vegetation type, species present, dominant species found, species diversity and abundance, community structure, inter-dependence of the habitats and species, and presence of any features of ecological importance;

(d) representative colour photographs of each habitat type and any important ecological features identified;

(e) species found that are rare, endangered and/or listed under local legislation, international conventions for conservation of wildlife/habitats or red data books;

(v) investigate and describe the existing wildlife uses of various habitats with special attention to:

(a) wetlands including fish ponds, wet agricultural land, marsh, flood storage ponds;

(b) avifauna;

(c) fung shui woodland;

(d) natural steam courses and man made drainage channels; and

(e) any other habitats and wildlife groups identified as having special conservation interests by this study.

(vi) describe all recognized sites of conservation importance in the proposed development site and its vicinity and assess whether these sites will be affected by the proposed developments or not;

(vii) using suitable methodology, identify and quantify as far as possible any direct, indirect, on-site, primary, secondary and cumulative ecological impacts such as destruction of habitats, reduction of species abundance/diversity, loss of feeding grounds, reduction of ecological carrying capacity and habitat fragmentation;

(viii) evaluate the significance and acceptability of the ecological impacts identified using well-defined criteria;

(ix) recommend all possible alternatives (such as modifications of layout and design) and practicable mitigation measures to avoid, minimize and/or compensate for the adverse ecological impacts identified;

(x) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the recommended mitigation measures and define the scope, type, location, implementation arrangement, subsequent management and maintenance of such measures;

(xi) determine and quantify as far as possible the residual ecological impacts after implementation of the proposed mitigation measures;

(xii) evaluate the severity and acceptability of the residual ecological impacts using well-defined criteria. If off-site mitigation measures are considered necessary to mitigate the residual impacts, the guidelines and requirements laid down in the Planning & Lands Bureau Technical Circular (PLB TC) No. 1/97 "Guidelines for Implementing the Policy on Off-site Ecological Mitigation Measures" (or any subsequent technical circular issued to replace PLB TC No. 1/97 on this subject) shall be followed; and

(xiii) review the need for and recommend any ecological monitoring programme required.

3.8.9 Fisheries Impacts

3.8.9.1 Fisheries Impact Assessment shall follow the criteria and guidelines as specified in Annexes 9 and 17 of the TM respectively. The "Assessment Area" for the purpose of the fisheries impact assessment shall include the scope of EIA study as defined in section 3.2 above, and its adjacent area of potential impact. The assessment shall review and collate existing information to provide adequate and accurate data for prediction and evaluation of impacts of the proposed developments on fisheries. The assessment shall include the following:

(i) description of the physical environmental background;

(ii) description and quantification as far as possible of the existing aquaculture activities, with special attention on fishponds in San Tin, Lok Ma Chau and around Mai Po;

(iii) description and quantification as far as possible of the existing fisheries/aqua culture resources;

(iv) identification of parameters (eg. water quality parameters) and area that are important to aquaculture activities;

(v) identification and quantification as far as possible of any direct/indirect and on-site/off-site impacts to aquaculture, including permanent loss and temporary occupation ofishponds and those impacts on aquaculture activities due to sewer bursting and emergency discharge from sewage pumping stations;

(vi) evaluation of impacts on aquaculture activities during construction and operation stages in areas around San Tin, Lok Ma Chau and Mai Po and other affected areas;

(vii) evaluation of cumulative impacts of loss of natural and man made wetland habitats in the North West New Territories.

Fisheries Mitigation / Compensation Measures

(viii) identify practical mitigation measures to avoid/minimize the potential impacts on the aqua-culture activities;

(ix) identify and present an adequate package of measures fully compensate all the losses due to the project with details on justification, description of scope and programme feasibility as well as staff and financial implications including those related to subsequent management and maintenance requirements of the proposals. Among others measures, the need to reinstate affected fishponds and other aquaculture sites; and

(x) determine the need, if necessary, make appropriate recommendation for a monitoring and audit programme.

3.8.10 Impact on Cultural Heritage

3.8.10.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing impacts on cultural heritage as stated in section 2 of both Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM respectively.

3.8.10.2 The heritage impact assessment shall be conducted for the archaeological impacts to known archaeological sites including, but not limited to, those at Man Lun Fung Ancestral Hall, Tai Fu Tai Mansion, Man Ancestral Hall, Ming Yuen Tong Ancestral Hall, Man Shui Yeh Ancestral Hall, Ming Tak Tong Ancestral Hall, Tung Shan Temple, Lok Ma Chau Police Station, Grave of Man Lun Fung, Yan Shau Wai, Fan Tin Tsuen, Shop "Yick Fung Lung", Tung Chan Wai, On Lung Tsuen, Wing Ping Tsuen and Ting Sze Study Hall.

3.8.10.3 The heritage impact assessment shall focus on the evaluation of impacts on archaeological areas, historic buildings and cultural heritage and proposals for any mitigation measures with detailed elaboration on scope of work including:

(i) heritage resources of archaeological areas and historic buildings shall be identified as far as practicable through reference to appropriate records, such as the archives of the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) of the Leisure and Cultural Services Department and, where appropriate, through consultations with relevant village representatives, appropriate academic sources and other Government sources, including the Lands Department and District Offices, etc.;

(ii) in case that the above information sources prove inadequate or if parts of the proposed project area have not been adequately studied before, field surveys and site investigations shall be conducted to assemble the necessary data; and

(iii) the criteria to be adopted to assess the level of direct and indirect impacts to the heritage resources and to develop appropriate mitigation measures, shall be established in close liaison with AMO during the course of the EIA Study.

3.8.10.4 The Applicant shall review and incorporate the findings of previous archaeological investigation (AI) at the project area and carry out additional investigation as necessary to adequately assess the cultural and heritage value of the area. The AI to be conducted shall employ appropriate survey techniques to be agreed with AMO and EPD. A detailed geophysical survey report of the project area shall be prepared and studied by professional archaeologist so that archaeological information can be retrieved from the survey data. Based on the archaeological information retrieved, the archaeologist shall determine whether any cultural remains do exist within the project area. Upon receipt of the AI report, the Applicant shall agree with AMO and EPD to decide whether further archaeological investigation shall be undertaken to identify the cultural remains. Mitigation measures shall be designed and the appropriate archaeological works shall be carried out in order to rescue the cultural remains and if found necessary.

3.8.11 Landscape and Visual Impact

3.8.11.1 The Applicant shall follow the criteria and guidelines for evaluating and assessing landscape and visual impacts as stated in Annexes 10 and 18 of the Technical Memorandum. The assessment shall cover all items classified as Designated Project under Schedule 2 and/or Schedule 3 of the EIAO. Both construction and operation impacts shall be assessed.

3.8.11.2 The assessment area for the landscape impact assessment shall include all areas within a 500m distance from the proposed project. The assessment area for the visual impact assessment shall be defined by the 2-km radius visual envelope or the existing viewshed by natural /man-made features from the proposed project and associated works.

3.8.11.3 The Applicant shall review relevant outline development plans, outline zoning plans, layout plans, planning briefs and studies which may identify areas of high landscape value and recommend green belt and conservation area designations. Any guidelines on urban design concept, landscape framework, designated view corridors that may affect the appreciation of the project should also be reviewed. The aim is to gain an insight to the future outlook of the area so that the project can fit into surrounding setting. Any conflict with statutory town plan(s) should be highlighted and appropriate follow-up action should be recommended.

3.8.11.4 The Applicant shall describe, appraise and analyse the existing landscape resources and character of the assessment area. The sensitivity of the landscape framework and its ability to accommodate change shall be particularly focused on. A system should be derived for judging impact significance. The Applicant shall identify the degree of compatibility of the proposed project with the existing landscape. The assessment shall quantify the potential landscape impacts as far as possible, so as to illustrate the significance of such impacts arising from the proposed project. Clear mapping of the landscape impact is required. A tree survey shall be carried out and the impacts on existing trees shall be addressed.

3.8.11.5 The Applicant shall assess the visual impacts of the proposed project(s). Clear illustrations of visual impact assessment are required. The assessment shall include the following:

(i) identification of the key groups of sensitive receivers within the visual envelope and their views at ground level and elevated vantage points;

(ii) description of the visual compatibility of the project with the surrounding, and the planned setting and its obstruction and interference with the key views of the adjacent areas. Among other receivers, sensitive receivers shall include commuters to and from Lok Ma Chau Boundary Crossing, other residences and with view across to San Tin and Lok Ma Chau; and

(iii) the severity of visual impacts in terms of distance, nature and number of sensitive receivers. Nighttime glare and activities such as fireworks shall be considered in the assessment. The visual impacts of the project with and without mitigation measures shall also be included so as to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures.

To facilitate the visual impact assessment, illustrative materials showing the outline and disposal of building blocks, architectural features, building height, and inter-connection of building structures would be required.

3.8.11.6 The Applicant shall evaluate the merits of preservation in totality, in parts or total destruction of existing landscape and the establishment of a new landscape character of the area. In addition, alternative design that would avoid or reduce the identified landscape and visual impacts shall be evaluated for comparison before adopting other mitigation or compensatory measures to alleviate the impacts. The Applicant shall recommend mitigation measures to minimize the adverse effects identified above, including provision of a landscape design. The mitigation measures shall include preservation of vegetation, transplanting of mature trees, provision of screen planting and road side berms, revegetation of disturbed land, compensatory planting, provisioning of amenity areas and open spaces, provision of finishes to structures, deposition of buildings, colour scheme and texture of material used and any measures to mitigate the impact on existing land use. Parties shall be identified for the on going management and maintenance of the proposed mitigation works to ensure their effectiveness throughout the operation phase of the project. The mitigation measures proposed shall not only be concerned with damage reduction but should also include consideration of potential enhancement of existing landscape. A practical programme and funding proposal for the implementation of the recommended measures shall be provided.

3.8.11.7 Coloured perspective drawings, plans and section/elevation diagrams, annotated oblique aerial photographs, photo-retouching and computer-generated photomontage shall be adopted to fully illustrate the landscape and visual impacts of the proposed project(s) to the satisfaction of the Director. All computer graphics shall be compatible with Microstation DGN file format. The Applicant shall record the technical details such as system set-up, software, data files and function in preparing the illustration which may need to be submitted for verification of the accuracy of the illustrations.

3.8.12 Land Use Conflicts

3.8.12.1 As an integral part of the EIA, the Applicant shall assess the interface issues and the environmental impact on land use including those for works areas and temporary uses, land take, relocation/reprovisioning and their compatibility with the existing, committed/approved or planned land uses.

3.8.13 Requirement for the identification of projects falling under Schedule 2 (Designated Projects) of the EIAO

3.8.13.1 The Applicant shall identify clearly in the EIA report all items within the Scope of the EIA study, as defined in section 3.2 above, that are classified as Designated Projects (DPs) under Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

3.8.13.2 For those DPs identified in section 3.8.11.1 above, of which the environmental impacts have been adequately addressed in this EIA study in accordance with the Study Brief and TM requirements, a separate schedule of mitigation measures shall be provided for each DP in this EIA report.

3.8.14 Impacts Summary

To facilitate easy retrieval of important information, an impacts summary in the form of a table, or any other form approved by the Director, showing the assessment points, results of impact predictions, relevant standard or criteria, extent of exceedance predicted, if any, mitigation measures proposed and residual impacts, if any, after mitigation measures are implemented, etc., should be given at the end of each chapter on individual impact in the EIA report as well as the Executive Summary.

3.8.15 Summary of Environmental Outcomes

The EIA report shall contain a summary of the key environmental outcomes arising from the EIA study, including the population and environmentally sensitive areas protected, environmentally friendly designs recommended, key environmental problems avoided, compensation areas included and the environmental benefits of environmental protection measures recommended.

3.8.16 Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Requirements

3.8.16.1 The Applicant shall identify and justify in the EIA study whether there is any need for EM&A and environmental management system (EMS) activities during the construction and operation phases of the proposed developments and, if affirmative:

(i) to define the scope of the EM&A requirements for the proposed developments in the EIA study; and

(ii) to set out the EMS requirements for the construction and operation of the proposed developments to achieve satisfactory environmental performance.

3.8.16.2 Subject to the confirmation of EIA study findings, the Applicant shall comply with the requirements as stipulated in Annex 21 of the TM.

3.8.16.3 The Applicant shall prepare a project implementation schedule (in the form of a checklist as shown in Appendix 3 or as approved by the Director) containing all the EIA study recommendations and mitigation measures with reference to the implementation programme. To facilitate issue of Environmental Permits (EPs) in future, the implementation schedules shall be grouped under individual works packages in separate DPs where applicable.

3.8.17 Monitoring and Audit Requirement of the Proposed Developments

The Applicant should note the monitoring and audit requirement stipulated in paragraph 8.1 of the TM. The Proponent shall proposed an environmental monitoring and audit programme in the EIA report to verify the predictions and the effectiveness of mitigation measures including audit on compliance during the operation phase of the project.

4. DURATION OF VALIDITY

This EIA study brief is valid for 24 months from the date of issue. If the EIA study does not commence within this period, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh before commencement of the EIA study.

5. REPORT REQUIREMENTS

5.1 In preparing the EIA report, the Applicant shall refer to Annex 11 of the TM for the contents of an EIA report. The Applicant shall also refer to Annex 20 of the TM which stipulates the guidelines for the review of an EIA report.

5.2 The Applicant shall supply the Director with the following number of hard copies of the EIA report and the Executive Summary:

(i) 50 hard copies of the EIA report in English and 80 hard copies of the Executive Summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese) as required under section 6(2) of the EIAO to be supplied at the time of application for approval of the EIA report, unless advised otherwise by the Director;

(ii) where necessary, addendum to each copy of the EIA report and the Executive Summary submitted in (i) above, upon advice by the Director.

(iii) for the purpose of the public inspection required under section 7(1) of the EIAO, 50 hard copies of the EIA report and 80 hard copies of the Executive Summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese), including any addendum if required in section 5.2 (ii) above, to be supplied to the locations stipulated in the "Guidance Note on Advertisement and Public Inspection of Documents" issued under the EIAO, unless advised otherwise by the Director;

(iv) 20 hard copies of the EIA report in English and 50 hard copies of the Executive Summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese), including any addendum if required in section 5.2 (ii) above, to be supplied to the Secretary of Advisory Council on the Environment (ACE), upon advice by the Director for consultation with the ACE, as required under section 7(5) of the EIAO.

(v) 5 hard copies of the EIA report in English and 10 hard copies of Executive Summary (each bilingual in both English and Chinese), with any addendum if required in section 5.2 (ii) above, for deposition in the Register, if and when the EIA report is approved by the Director, as required under section 8(5) of the EIAO.

5.3 The Applicant shall make additional hard copies of the above documents available to the public, subject to payment by the interested parties of full costs of printing.

5.4 In addition, to facilitate public inspection of the EIA Report via the EIAO Internet Website, the Applicant shall provide electronic copies of both the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report prepared in HyperText Markup Language (HTML) (version 4.0 or later) and in Portable Document Format (PDF version 4.0 or later), unless otherwise agreed by the Director. For the HTML version, a content page capable of providing hyperlink to each section and sub-section of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary Report shall be included in the beginning of the document. Hyperlinks to all figures, drawings and tables in the EIA Report and Executive Summary shall be provided in the main text from where the respective references are made. All graphics in the report shall be in interlaced GIF format unless otherwise agreed by the Director.

5.5 The electronic copies of the EIA report and the Executive Summary shall be submitted to the Director at the time of application for approval of the EIA Report.

5.6 When the EIA Report and the Executive Summary are made available for public inspection under section 7(1) of the EIA Ordinance, the content of the electronic copies of the EIA Report and the Executive Summary must be the same as the hard copies and the Director shall be provided with the most updated electronic copies.

5.7 To promote environmentally friendly and efficient dissemination of information, both hard copies and electronic copies of future EM&A reports recommended by the EIA study shall be required and their format shall be agreed by the Director.

6. OTHER PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS

6.1 During the EIA study, if there is any change in the name of Applicant for this EIA study brief, the Applicant in this study brief must notify the Director immediately.

6.2 If there is any key change in the scope of the project mentioned in section 1.2 and section 1.3 of this EIA study brief and in Project Profile No. PP-080/2000, the Applicant must seek confirmation from the Director in writing on whether or not the scope of issues covered by this EIA study brief can still cover the key changes, and the additional issues, if any, that the EIA study must also address. If the changes to the project fundamentally alter the key scope of the EIA study brief, the Applicant shall apply to the Director for another EIA study brief afresh.

May 2000
Environmental Assessment and Noise Division,
Environmental Protection Department